Classifications

• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08L—COMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
  • C08L19/00—Compositions of rubbers not provided for in groups C08L7/00 - C08L17/00
  • C08L19/006—Rubber characterised by functional groups, e.g. telechelic diene polymers
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08C—TREATMENT OR CHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF RUBBERS
  • C08C19/00—Chemical modification of rubber
  • C08C19/30—Addition of a reagent which reacts with a hetero atom or a group containing hetero atoms of the macromolecule
  • C08C19/42—Addition of a reagent which reacts with a hetero atom or a group containing hetero atoms of the macromolecule reacting with metals or metal-containing groups
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08C—TREATMENT OR CHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF RUBBERS
  • C08C19/00—Chemical modification of rubber
  • C08C19/30—Addition of a reagent which reacts with a hetero atom or a group containing hetero atoms of the macromolecule
  • C08C19/42—Addition of a reagent which reacts with a hetero atom or a group containing hetero atoms of the macromolecule reacting with metals or metal-containing groups
  • C08C19/44—Addition of a reagent which reacts with a hetero atom or a group containing hetero atoms of the macromolecule reacting with metals or metal-containing groups of polymers containing metal atoms exclusively at one or both ends of the skeleton
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F136/00—Homopolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, at least one having two or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds
  • C08F136/02—Homopolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, at least one having two or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds the radical having only two carbon-to-carbon double bonds
  • C08F136/04—Homopolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, at least one having two or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds the radical having only two carbon-to-carbon double bonds conjugated
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
  • G02C7/00—Optical parts
  • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
  • G02C7/04—Contact lenses for the eyes
  • G02C7/041—Contact lenses for the eyes bifocal; multifocal
  • G02C7/042—Simultaneous type
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
  • G02C7/00—Optical parts
  • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
  • G02C7/04—Contact lenses for the eyes
  • G02C7/047—Contact lens fitting; Contact lenses for orthokeratology; Contact lenses for specially shaped corneae
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
  • G02C2202/00—Generic optical aspects applicable to one or more of the subgroups of G02C7/00
  • G02C2202/24—Myopia progression prevention

Definitions

• the present invention relates generally to methods and apparatuses for substantially concurrently conditioning central and peripheral vision. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to the methods and apparatuses for conditioning and improving vision substantially beyond the central vision.
• vision is substantially simultaneously controlled from central vision to peripheral vision; in which peripheral vision may include the para-central, or mid-peripheral or far peripheral visual regions.
• peripheral vision may include the para-central, or mid-peripheral or far peripheral visual regions.
• Such vision control leads to improved visual performance by manipulating the positional image foci of an individual, such that the central and peripheral images are intentionally and substantially simultaneously directed to central and peripheral retinal surfaces respectively.
• manipulation of the position of the image foci may be such as to place them directly on the retina, or some other desirable positional relationship.
• FIGURE 1 is an optical diagram showing an eye, which is emmetropic centrally but is myopic in the periphery;
• FIGURE 2 is an optical diagram showing an eye, which is emmetropic centrally but is hyperopic in the periphery;
• FIGURE 3 is an optical diagram showing an eye, which is myopic centrally and with a greater amount of myopia in the periphery;
• FIGURE 4 is an optical diagram showing correction of the eye of FIG. 3 with a conventional device resulting in central correction but the periphery remaining myopic;
• FIGURE 5 is an optical diagram showing correction of the eye of FIG. 3 with an embodiment of the present invention resulting in correction of both central and periphery;
• FIGURE 6 is an optical diagram showing an eye which is hyperopic centrally but is emmetropic in the periphery
• FIGURE 7 is an optical diagram showing correction of the eye of FIG. 6 with a conventional device resulting in central correction with periphery rendered myopic;
• FIGURE 8 is an optical diagram showing correction of the eye of FIG. 6 with an embodiment of the present invention resulting correction of both central and periphery.
• FIGURE 9 is a plot of measured contrast sensitivity (as contrast threshold) against departure of peripheral refractive state from emmetropia (i.e. peripheral defocus) for three subjects. Note that lower contrast thresholds indicate better contrast sensitivity, which is one measure or criterion of visual performance.
• FIGURE 10 is a plot of peripheral refractive state as measured at 30 degree along the horizontal-nasal visual field against central refractive state for the right eye of 1603 subjects.
• FIGURE 11 is a flow-chart describing a protocol for improving and enhancing peripheral visual performance with a device of the present invention.
• corrective vision devices and methods correct only the central (or foveal) vision.
• This practice is based on the knowledge that the fovea (considered the center of vision) is the most acute part of the retina in terms of visual acuity and also image resolution.
• the eye will naturally rotate to "fixate” on the visual object of interest (i.e. changing the direction of gaze of the eye to place the part of the visual image of most interest onto the fovea) to make use of the maximum acuity available at the fovea.
• the central and only concern, when prescribing refractive vision correction is to improve the end- result for central or foveal vision.
• peripheral refraction can be "ametropic" (i.e. a state of being incorrectly focused; which may include being myopic, hyperopic or astigmatic and is the opposite of "emmetropic”; a state of being correctly focused) for individuals.
• the peripheral refractive state does not always precisely match the central refractive state.
• an eye may have a correctly focused central image point (i.e. is emmetropic centrally), but whose mid-peripheral image points may be out of focus (i.e. ametropic peripherally).
• Any other combinations are possible, including (without being exhaustive) centrally hyperopic and peripherally even more hyperopic, centrally myopic and peripherally emmetropic, etc.
• a device such as used conventionally
• peripheral vision may be degraded or suffer.
• inventions for improving peripheral vision by positioning the peripheral image points at a predetermined and precise position relative to the retina to achieve optimal performance according to one or more pre-selected peripheral criteria parameters for optimal peripheral visual performance.
• Embodiments of the present invention contemplate both the process of 'finding' the optimal position and offering prescriptive solutions to effect the peripheral vision improvement.
• the principles and bases of the present invention are described in the following sections with reference to Figures 1 to 11.
• optical diagrams Figures 1 through 8 illustrate the optical principles relating to the present invention. It should be noted that these diagrams are drawn with the eye presented as a "reduced eye" (i.e. without their internal optical components, such as, for example, the crystalline lens, showing).
• the principle of the present invention will be adequately defined with such reduced eye optical diagrams showing only the anterior refracting surface, retina and pupil. Further, the actual antero-posterior (i.e. distance from front of eye - nearer the cornea, to back of eye - nearer the retina) location of image points relative to the retina have been exaggerated in these diagrams in order to present the concepts embodied in the present invention in greater clarity.
• Figures 1 and 2 are optical diagrams illustrating eyes that are centrally emmetropic but peripherally ametropic.
• the eye [101] is peripherally myopic while in Figure 2, the eye [201] is peripherally hyperopic.
• the central emmetropia is seen from the positions of the central focal points [104] and [204] lying on the respective fovea [105] and [205].
• the peripheral image point [102] is located in front of (i.e. in a direction that is towards the cornea from the retina) the peripheral retina [103].
• the peripheral image point [202] is located behind (i.e. in a direction that is away from the cornea from the retina) the peripheral retina [203].
• Figures 1 and 2 are also representative of equivalent optical situations in which central refractive errors have already been corrected using conventional vision correction devices.
• the light rays [106] and [206] entering the eye may be thought of as light rays emerging from a conventional optical device not shown.
• the result is a residual ametropic state for the periphery (peripheral myopia for Figure 1 , peripheral hyperopia for Figure 2).
• the aim of the present invention is to control not only the central image position, but also the peripheral image position or positions. This is illustrated in the examples shown from Figures 3 to 8.
• an eye [301] is illustrated that has an amount of central myopia and a greater amount of myopia in the periphery, as can be seen from the positions of the central [304] and peripheral image points [302] relative to the retina [303].
• the eye [301] of Figure 3 has been corrected using a conventional vision correction device [410] that only attempts to correct central/foveal vision.
• the central image point [404] has been relocated to the fovea [405]. Since such devices typically have optical power which is relatively constant (for correction of central vision) across its field of view, approximately the same refractive correction introduced to the central image point would have also been introduced to the peripheral image points.
• the peripheral image point [402] has also been relocated by some amount, but not sufficiently to place it on the peripheral retina [303]. Therefore, this eye remains myopic (albeit by a smaller amount than its original refractive state) peripherally and would not have optimum peripheral vision.
• the eye [301] of Figure 3 has been corrected using a device according to embodiments of the present invention [510].
• the central, on-axis power is selected to correct central myopia while the peripheral power is selected to correct the greater amount of peripheral myopia. This results in the selected positioning of both central [504] and peripheral image points [502] to the correct location relative to the retina [303] and fovea [405] to provide optimal central and peripheral visual performance.
• Figure 6 provides another example.
• the eye [601] is centrally hyperopic while its periphery is emmetropic. This can be seen by the central image point [604] being located behind the fovea [605] and the peripheral image point [602] lying near the peripheral retina [603].
• correction of the eye of Figure 6 with a conventional vision correction device [710], as illustrated in Figure 7, would provide good central vision (the central image point [704] now lying on the fovea [605]) but renders the eye myopic in the periphery (the peripheral image point [702] now lying in front of the peripheral retina [603]).
• the periphery was enjoying optimum or near optimum vision, the introduction of a conventional vision correction device effectively degraded peripheral vision.
• a vision correction device [810] according to embodiments of the present invention provides the appropriate amount of on-axis (central) power to correct the central hyperopia of the eye in Figure 6.
• the peripheral (off-axis) power of this device is selected to not introduce any change in image position in the periphery, thereby maintaining the good peripheral vision of the eye.
• both central [804] and peripheral [802] image points now lie on the fovea [605] and near the peripheral retina [603] respectively.
• one aim is to correct and/or preserve not only central focus, but also peripheral vision. In many individuals, this may be determined by ascertaining the extent to which an eye is out of focus in the periphery.
• Table 1 sets forth the tabular results representing the example of Figures 6 to 8.
• the uncorrected refractive state of the eye is hyperopic by an amount equal to +2.5OD while the periphery is emmetropic (and conventionally denoted as "piano" by practitioners of vision correction).
• a conventional device that corrects only the central refractive state of +2.5OD would render the central refractive state emmetropic (fourth row), but also induce a state of myopia equivalent to -2.5OD in the periphery.
• a device, according to embodiments of the present invention would (as shown in the fifth row) provide the correct power for both the center and periphery. The net result is an emmetropic state for both central and peripheral vision (sixth row).
• the prescription of a device according to embodiments of the present invention may be presented as an augmented form of the conventional vision correction prescription format. While it may also readily be applied to the astigmatic component (i.e. cylinder power and axis) of a prescription as understood by vision correction practitioners, this principle is briefly illustrated by referring only to the spherical power of a prescription.
• this +3.0OD hyperope should this +3.0OD hyperope also have an emmetropic periphery as measured at, e.g. 30 degrees field angle, the prescription may read as:
• the prescription format may be readily augmented as follows. For example, suppose the above eye was further found to be -0.75D myopic at 45 degrees field angle and a device of the present invention is to be prescribed to improve peripheral vision at both 30° and 45° field, the prescription may read as: +3.00D Piano @ 30° -0.75D @ 45°
• any number of peripheral powers may be specified to correct for any number of peripheral image positions.
• the prescription for devices of the present invention may be designated and fabricated as continuous or quazi-continuous mathematical functions (e.g. polynomials, splines, etc).
• peripheral power of the device may also need to be asymmetrical to provide appropriate control of peripheral vision for both nasal and temporal fields.
• peripheral image position control for field angles along vertical and oblique meridians of the eye are also contemplated.
• vision correction was directed to the central foveal region. This was an inference based on the knowledge that retinal cell density is higher in the central region, as is visual acuity.
• the conventional practice is to neutralize the central refractive error and thereby optimize central visual acuity.
• embodiments of the present invention recognize and take advantage of certain other aspects of vision and visual performance found in the peripheral regions, such as, for example, contrast sensitivity, motion detection, light detection, etc., which may be used as criteria parameters
• improvements to peripheral vision in terms of any (or combinations) of the above criteria parameters may return benefits to the individual in terms of more clinically subjective (in vision correction, "subjective refers to assessments that require the patient's observations or preferences as opposed to “objective” which refers to direct measwurements without requiring input from the patient) but equally important considerations such as subjective vision assessment, or subjective preference for the peripheral vision performance, or subjective preference for overall visual performance, clarity, acceptability, etc, for the individual.
• peripheral performance criteria which are clinically important to the individual patient are familiar to the practitioners of vision correction, and may be chosen as peripheral performance criteria for embodiments of the present invention. According to embodiments of the present invention, it is characteristics such as these and others in the peripheral focus that are sought to be "tuned” by methods and apparatuses of the present invention. Contrary to other attempts at modifying peripheral effects, according to embodiments of the present invention, it is now recognized that aspects or characteristics of peripheral vision, such as, for example, contract sensitivity, motion detection sensitivity, etc. are selectively changed or "tuned” via selective correction of the peripheral vision through precise optical refractive control, and readjusted image positioning on the periphery of the retina.
• the critical spatial frequency to which characteristics, such as, for example, contrast sensitivity, etc., should be tuned are thought to be different from the high spatial frequencies ordinarily associated with central visual acuity.
• the optimal visual performance might not occur when the focus is 'perfect' (i.e. when peripheral refractive error has been neutralized).
• Figure 9 shows the results from the measurement of peripheral contrast sensitivity of three subjects. Along the vertical axis, measured peripheral contrast sensitivity, indicated as contrast threshold, is shown (generally, the lower the contrast threshold, the better the visual performance). For these three subjects, first the peripheral refractive state was measured and then neutralized optically. Then peripheral contrast sensitivity was measured with different amounts of induced peripheral defocus from their best-corrected peripheral refractive state. Thus, along the horizontal axis, the amount of peripheral defocus (i.e. equivalent to an induced peripheral refractive state) is plotted.
• the optimum peripheral refractive power may be one that is slightly "defocused" relative to a correction selected through measurement by objective refraction.
• Many other examples of using other criteria parameters as a guide to optimizing peripheral visual performance may be considered. A few follows by way of illustration of the principle.
• detecting horizontal motion in the horizontal plane is of most importance (e.g. detecting vehicles entering a motorway from a side-street, or perceiving lateral airspace when piloting an aircraft, etc.), motion detection of sharp vertical edges may be of greater importance. Since the eye could have some amount of astigmatism (either refractive or from oblique astigmatism aberration), it might be useful to "tune" the peripheral focus so that the vertical line focus of astigmatism is on the retina.
• the key visual object e.g. football, puck, baseball, skeet, water fowl, etc.
• the key visual object e.g. football, puck, baseball, skeet, water fowl, etc.
• the key visual object might have a characteristic spatial frequency range or band due to, among other things, its shape, size, and critical distance.
• peripheral refractive state is a reasonable first approximation to improving and optimizing peripheral visual performance
• embodiments of the present invention contemplate maintaining the optimal central vision while correcting or modifying peripheral refraction.
• Selecting the proper field angle to begin this process depends on precisely how much peripheral focus change is required, as well as the individual's "tolerance to changes" in vision over the central and paracentral region, pupil size (as well as the influence of the Stiles-Crawford effect), etc.
• a myopic adult patient of -5.00D was wearing conventional soft contact lens.
• Central over-refraction i.e. refractive error measured on top of the contact lens being worn
• contrast sensitivity measurements returning a central contrast sensitivity threshold of 0.175.
• peripheral over-refraction using essentially the same instrumentation as for the measurement of central refraction with the exception that the patient is instructed to fixate on a target point positioned at an appropriate field angle so that the peripheral refraction is measured
• peripheral over-refraction using essentially the same instrumentation as for the measurement of central refraction with the exception that the patient is instructed to fixate on a target point positioned at an appropriate field angle so that the peripheral refraction is measured
• the eye was hyperopic at around +3.08D. This indicates that the conventional contact lens was not correcting the peripheral defocus adequately.
• the wearing of a conventional contact lens that corrected the central -5.00D myopia inappropriately introduced a residual amount of hyperopia to the periphery. This may be particularly visually discomforting for the patient who is more accustomed to visual sensation associated with the uncorrected, myopic periphery.
• Contrast sensitivity measured at this peripheral field angle was found to be at a contrast threshold of 1.615, ( a higher contrast threshold indicates a poorer visual performance), while visual acuity measurement at this peripheral angle was found to be at 1.242 LogMAR units.
• a contact lens according to the principle of embodiments of the current invention was used to correct this eye.
• This contact lens had the same central corrective strength (i.e. -5.00D) as the conventional lens worn by the patient, but the peripheral power of this contact lens, delivered -2.00D to the eye at around 30 degrees field angle.
• Peripheral contrast sensitivity of the eye now wearing the contact lens of the current invention returned a much improved performance (i.e. lower contrast threshold) of 1.04 while peripheral visual acuity was found also to be improved, at 0.975 LogMAR units (a lower LogMAR unit indicates better visual acuity).
• This patient also reports a general subjective preference of the quality of vision when wearing the contact lens of the current invention compared to the conventional contact lens.
• peripheral visual performance of the example eye may be further enhanced by trial testing other contact lenses with slightly differing peripheral refractive strengths.
• an iterative, e.g. stepwise or binary search approach the most suitable peripheral power may be found that delivers optimum visual performance according to the performance criteria parameters; which in this example included peripheral contrast sensitivity, peripheral visual acuity as well as overall subjective preference on the part of the patient.
• the basic concept is illustrated in Clinical Example 2.
• a pre-teen low myope wearing a conventional soft contact lens was found to achieve a peripheral contrast sensitivity threshold of 0.87 and 0.99 respectively for the temporal and nasal field angles of 30 degrees.
• Peripheral refraction suggested the peripheral field was relatively hyperopic.
• a lens according to the principle of the present invention was placed on the eye to test its ability to improve peripheral contrast sensitivity. This lens introduces an additional +1.5 OD to the peripheral refractive power at the field angle of 30 degrees.
• the resultant contrast sensitivity thresholds were improved to 0.59 and 0.91 respectively for the temporal and nasal fields.
• peripheral visual performance in this case, in the form of contrast sensitivity
• peripheral additional power as prescribed by the myopia treatment method in our earlier work
• a young emmetrope was found to have a central contrast sensitivity threshold of 0.31 and a peripheral contrast sensitivity of 0.71 for the temporal field angle of 30 degrees.
• the results from peripheral refraction revealed the peripheral field was relatively myopic.
• a lens that introduced an additional -0.5OD to the peripheral refractive power at the field angle of 30 degrees was placed on the eye to test its ability to improve peripheral contrast sensitivity.
• the resultant contrast sensitivity thresholds were improved to 0.24 and 0.65 for the central and the temporal fields respectively.
• peripheral visual performance in an emmetropic eye in terms of contrast sensitivity
• modulating peripheral refractive power in a device of the present invention demonstrates how peripheral visual performance in an emmetropic eye (in terms of contrast sensitivity) can be either further improved or degraded by modulating peripheral refractive power in a device of the present invention.
• one or more criteria parameters of peripheral visual performance such as objective visual optical parameters including, for example, contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, motion detection, light detection, etc., or subjective, qualitative parameters including, for example, subjective visual quality, apparent vision 'normalcy', peripheral or overall vision preference, visual discomfort, etc, are selected as the indicator(s) for peripheral vision improvement.
• the peripheral refractive state of the eye is then measured. From that result, the change in peripheral refractive effect required to optimize the criteria parameters of peripheral visual performance is estimated. This may be done initially by selecting a device with peripheral refractive effect that approximately neutralizes the peripheral refractive state of the eye while simultaneously provide the appropriate central refractive correction.
• peripheral visual performance may then be achieved iteratively by applying differing, incremental peripheral refractive effects to the eye and measuring the response in the criteria parameters. After such progressively optimizing iterations, the best correction is selected, or the best result can be interpolated/extrapolated from the results obtained during the iterations. Since, these "trial" lenses need not optimize or correct the central vision, the trial lenses could be single vision lenses.
• kits or "trial set" consisting of two or more test devices with differing amounts of peripheral refractive effects for the purpose of changing peripheral refractive effects incrementally on an eye specifically for the purpose of facilitating the rapid, iterative convergence to the optimum peripheral prescription for a patient.
• a prescription for peripheral refractive effect in a device could be selected by establishing a look-up table relating criteria response to refractive state in the periphery, for example, after collecting requisite data from studies directed to the relationship between the two parameters.
• An example of how such data may be obtained and collated for the criterion of contrast sensitivity can be appreciated from Figure 9.
• Figure 9 While individual responses are shown for three subjects, it is possible to summarize the data into a 'typical' response based on the average of all subjects. In this way, and by collecting the data from a greater numbers of subjects, the relationship between peripheral refractive state and contrast sensitivity is built up to establish a population response curve. Similar curves may be obtained in the same way for other criteria parameters.
• the selection for the device may be established by considering, simply, the central refractive state of the eye.
• Our research has shown that there is a population trend relating central refractive state to peripheral refractive state.
• the peripheral refractive state for the nasal visual field at 30 degrees field angle is plotted along the vertical axis against the central refractive state of the same eye. It can be seen that there is a strong trend relating the two refractive states.
• selection of an appropriate device of the present invention to improve peripheral visual performance may be achieved in many patients by consideration of their central refractive error and then referring to the population average relationship between central and peripheral refraction at selected field angles.
• One suggested protocol comprises the steps of:
• step 4 Repeat iterations from step 4 with different peripheral refractive effect, if required, until peripheral performance is adequate or optimized.
• Step 2 of the above procedure may be replaced by referring to normative population relationship between central and peripheral refractive states.
• Step 3 may be facilitated or refined by referring to a population relationship between peripheral refractive state and the peripheral visual performance criteria parameter(s).
• vision correction is generally provided for distance viewing, such as, for example, for corrections for presbyopic individuals
• the method and devices according to embodiments of the present invention may also be used to improve or optimize peripheral visual performance at any viewing distance other than distance viewing as would be understood by practitioners of vision correction.
• this invention also provides for the improvement, enhancement and optimization of peripheral visual performance at different viewing distances for different eyes of an individual. This is particularly useful, for example, for presbyopic individuals, or for individuals with particular vocational needs (e.g. microscopists who, when operating microscopes monocularly, may benefit from one eye optimized 'globally' for distance (through the eyepiece of the microscope) and one eye optimized 'globally' for near (for reading/writing notes), etc.
• the present invention contemplates using any useful means of vision correction to effect the peripheral vision improvement.
• lenses, devices and ocular systems such as, contact lenses, spectacle lenses, onlay/inlays, anterior and posterior chamber intraocular lenses, orthokeratology systems, and refractive corneal surgery (PRK, LASIK, etc.).

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Optics & Photonics (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Eyeglasses (AREA)
• Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
• Prostheses (AREA)
• Image Processing (AREA)

Priority Applications (10)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=40403983

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (13)

Cited By (4)

Families Citing this family (40)

Citations (1)

Family Cites Families (28)

• 2008
  • 2008-10-23 US US12/256,705 patent/US8057034B2/en active Active
  • 2008-10-24 CN CN200880112943.6A patent/CN101990648B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2008-10-24 WO PCT/US2008/081057 patent/WO2009055638A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2008-10-24 MX MX2010004572A patent/MX2010004572A/es active IP Right Grant
  • 2008-10-24 EP EP08841077A patent/EP2208108A1/en not_active Withdrawn
  • 2008-10-24 NZ NZ584831A patent/NZ584831A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2008-10-24 TW TW97140802A patent/TWI466654B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2008-10-24 AU AU2008316726A patent/AU2008316726B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 2008-10-24 CA CA2701101A patent/CA2701101A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2008-10-24 KR KR1020107011458A patent/KR101583096B1/ko not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2008-10-24 BR BRPI0817772A patent/BRPI0817772A2/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2008-10-24 JP JP2010531267A patent/JP5684571B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
• 2010
  • 2010-03-17 ZA ZA2010/01909A patent/ZA201001909B/en unknown
• 2014
  • 2014-06-20 JP JP2014127011A patent/JP2014209256A/ja active Pending

Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events