WO2007017325A2 - Procede de selection d'informations d'apres le contexte et procede de representation de ces informations - Google Patents

Procede de selection d'informations d'apres le contexte et procede de representation de ces informations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007017325A2
WO2007017325A2 PCT/EP2006/063961 EP2006063961W WO2007017325A2 WO 2007017325 A2 WO2007017325 A2 WO 2007017325A2 EP 2006063961 W EP2006063961 W EP 2006063961W WO 2007017325 A2 WO2007017325 A2 WO 2007017325A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
information
relevance
fact
value
comparison
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2006/063961
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
WO2007017325A3 (fr
Inventor
Martin Dienelt
Oliver MÄCKEL
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Publication of WO2007017325A2 publication Critical patent/WO2007017325A2/fr
Publication of WO2007017325A3 publication Critical patent/WO2007017325A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
    • B60K35/20—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor
    • B60K35/28—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor characterised by the type of the output information, e.g. video entertainment or vehicle dynamics information; characterised by the purpose of the output information, e.g. for attracting the attention of the driver
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K35/00—Instruments specially adapted for vehicles; Arrangement of instruments in or on vehicles
    • B60K35/20—Output arrangements, i.e. from vehicle to user, associated with vehicle functions or specially adapted therefor
    • B60K35/29—Instruments characterised by the way in which information is handled, e.g. showing information on plural displays or prioritising information according to driving conditions
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00—Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units
    • B60W30/14—Adaptive cruise control
    • B60W30/16—Control of distance between vehicles, e.g. keeping a distance to preceding vehicle
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00—Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/08—Interaction between the driver and the control system
    • B60W50/14—Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K2360/00—Indexing scheme associated with groups B60K35/00 or B60K37/00 relating to details of instruments or dashboards
    • B60K2360/16—Type of output information
    • B60K2360/179—Distances to obstacles or vehicles
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K2360/00—Indexing scheme associated with groups B60K35/00 or B60K37/00 relating to details of instruments or dashboards
    • B60K2360/18—Information management
    • B60K2360/186—Displaying information according to relevancy
    • B60K2360/1868—Displaying information according to relevancy according to driving situations
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K31/00—Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator
    • B60K31/0008—Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator including means for detecting potential obstacles in vehicle path
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00—Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/08—Interaction between the driver and the control system
    • B60W50/14—Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
    • B60W2050/143—Alarm means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for context-based selection of information.
  • the invention relates to a method for presenting information, in particular for the optical representation of information, on a display such as a head-up display.
  • the representation or representation of information is predominantly acoustic or optical via the conventional display instruments in the cockpit.
  • a disadvantage of the display of driving information in the instrument cluster of the cockpit is the fact that the driver has to avert the view from the traffic to read the necessary driving information. Depending on the amount of information in the display instruments, valuable time elapses until the driver has the desired information. recorded and looked back at the traffic situation.
  • Head-Up Displays One way to avoid the eye-drops from the traffic, so-called Head-Up Displays (HUDs) is. With this technology, it is possible to show the driver certain driving information directly into the windshield. The driver therefore no longer has to avert his gaze from the traffic situation if he wants to ascertain driving information such as the current speed.
  • a head-up display essentially comprises a semitransparent glass pane, which is mounted in the driver's direct sea field, and a projector for generating the information to be displayed, which can be realized for example by a TFT screen with a particularly high luminosity.
  • the concept of the head-up display originated in aviation, where it serves to display the primary display instruments.
  • automotive head-up displays are not counted among the primary gauges.
  • the picture does not appear in the driver's direct sea field, but for example directly above the hood at an optical distance of about 2m to 4m from the viewer.
  • Forms of presentation enrich the environment perceived by the driver by superimposing an artificially created scene.
  • Aerospace examples include runway markings or artificial horizons in the head-up display.
  • non-contact analog presentation forms information without direct reference to the environment, for example the course or the current speed in the field of aviation.
  • Another way to avoid attention fixing is to use the head-up display merely as a temporary display element. This has been proposed, for example, by DM Zaidel in "Specification of methology for investigating the human factor of advanced driver information systems", Toronto University, 1999.
  • DM Zaidel in "Specification of methology for investigating the human factor of advanced driver information systems", Toronto University, 1999.
  • the object of the present invention is therefore to provide a method and a device with which information, in particular visual information to be displayed on a head-up display, can be selected and displayed context-based.
  • the first object is achieved by a method for context-based selection of information according to claim 1, the second object by an apparatus according to claim 13.
  • the method according to the invention for context-based presentation of information, in particular for display on a display, in which the context-dependent representation takes place as a function of a quantity of input facts representing the driving situation, comprises the steps:
  • the first subset may in particular also be the entire input fact quantity.
  • the information itself may also be considered as a fact, namely as an output fact.
  • the target fact can hereby be represented by one or more facts of the set of input facts. If it is represented by several input facts, the target fact can be determined by arithmetic or logical operations from these input facts.
  • the relevance variable can be regarded as an intermediate factor of the method, which represents neither an input factor nor an output factor.
  • a condition may be that the value of the relevance variable must be the largest value of all relevance variables assigned to a piece of information so that the associated information is displayed.
  • a condition for presentation it is possible to make the exceeding of a relevance threshold by the value of the relevance variable a condition for presentation.
  • a combination of the size of a relevance value in comparison to the sizes of the other relevance values and a relevance threshold is also possible.
  • At least one target fact can be re-determined if at least one input variable of the first subset has changed, and a new comparison can take place if at least the target fact and / or the actual fact changes has or have.
  • a new comparison of the actual fact with the target fact if at least one specific input factor has changed.
  • the proposed method makes it possible to contextually select information from an information pool according to its relevance, which can then be displayed as temporary information, for example in a head-up display. This makes it possible to reduce the number of information to be displayed to the information most relevant in the current driving situation, which has the advantage that the driver has to spend less time looking for the desired information in the display.
  • the value of a relevance variable newly determined for an information is added to the current value, ie to the previous value of the reference variable.
  • the added relevance value can have both positive and negative values. If the target fact is about the safety-relevant minimum distance to the vehicle ahead indicates and the actual fact represents the actual distance, so for example, falling below the safety distance can lead to an increase in relevance value. If, in the next comparison, it is determined that the safe distance is still below the distance and the distance to the vehicle in front has possibly even decreased, then a positive relevance value is added to the previous relevance value, so that the relevance value increases further and eventually fulfills the presentation condition.
  • the distance to the vehicle in front increases and in particular the safety distance is exceeded, then a negative value can be added to the relevance value, so that the sum of the old relevance value and newly added value becomes smaller and thus the relevance falls. If necessary, however, the relevance value can also be reset to 0, which may be the case, for example, if the safety distance is no longer undershot.
  • the value of the relevance variable is greater the more the actual fact deviates from the target fact in an undesired manner.
  • the assignment of the relevance variable to the information associated with the target fact occurs in that a comparison variable is formed on the basis of the comparison result and the comparison variable is classified into one of at least two relevance classes which represent different comparison results.
  • the relevance classes can be formed differently for different target facts.
  • the relevance classes can include additional facts in addition to the target facts.
  • the at least two relevance classes are assigned different values of relevance size.
  • the information is then assigned the value of the relevance variable which corresponds to the relevance class into which the comparison variable has been classified.
  • a relevance class for falling below the safety distance and one for maintaining or exceeding the safety distance can be present.
  • the relevance class for falling below corresponds to a positive relevance value that is negative for exceeding.
  • this class it is also possible for this class to result in a reset of the relevance value to 0.
  • the predetermined condition that must be fulfilled for the presentation of the information can be made dependent on at least one further fact.
  • the comparison results of actual facts with desired facts, which are not assigned to the information to be displayed serve. This makes it possible, for example, to suppress information of the navigation system, which is in fact of high relevance, at the same time as there is a distance warning as a further fact, which has a lower relevance but requires immediate action.
  • several conditions are checked before information is displayed as an output factor.
  • the priorities can be set by selecting the additional facts to be taken into account and their preconditions for taking them into account.
  • An alternative way of setting priorities in presenting information is to modify the relevance size associated with the information associated with the desired fact, taking into account certain additional facts. For example, the determined value of the relevance variable for a navigation display can be reduced or even set to 0 if there is a distance warning at the same time. In this way, relevance values of others Information in the presence of a distance warning are modified so that the distance warning is preferably displayed. Again, prioritization can be done by choosing the additional facts to consider.
  • the information to be displayed is selected according to the context-based selection of information according to the invention.
  • the presentation may in particular include visual presentation on a display, for example on a head-up display.
  • fading in the peripheral visual field can be created by fading in, giving the driver additional reaction time in critical driving situations.
  • the single FIGURE shows a device for carrying out the method according to the invention in the form of a block diagram. Priority of information to be displayed.
  • the device 1 comprises a number of inputs 3a to 3n for receiving signals from sensors of the vehicle. For example, speed sensors, acceleration sensors, radar sensors for automatic distance control or for adaptive cruise control, speed sensors, steering angle sensors, etc. can be used as sensors.
  • the device 1 further comprises at least one input 5 for connecting information or communication devices, for example a navigation system or a system for transmitting traffic warnings.
  • Vehicle data can be changed.
  • the signals and information arriving via inputs 3, 5 and 7 form a set of input facts representing the driving situation.
  • the inputs 3, 5 and 7 are connected to a latch 9, in which the input facts remain stored until new inputs are supplied via the inputs 3, 5 and 7.
  • the input facts stored in the buffer 9 are then overwritten by the new input facts.
  • a desired fact determination unit 11 Connected to the buffer 9 are a desired fact determination unit 11 and an actual fact determination unit 13. These are used to determine from the input facts at least one target fact and one actual fact. Both determination units 11, 13 may comprise arithmetic and / or logical operation units for determining the desired fact or the actual fact.
  • the device 1 further comprises a comparison unit 15, which is used to receive the target fact with the target fact determination unit 11 and to receive the actual fact with the Actual fact determination unit 13 is in communication.
  • the comparison unit 15 is also connected to the latch 9 for the optional reception of at least one input factor.
  • the comparison unit 15 for comparing the determined target fact with the determined actual fact, possibly taking into account an input factor.
  • the information is stored in an information memory 19 connected to the relevance allocation unit 17.
  • the prioritization unit 21 is connected to the buffer 9 for receiving input facts and to the comparison unit 15 for receiving comparison results in order to enable prioritization taking into account the current driving situation.
  • the prioritization unit 21 may also be integrated into the relevance allocation unit 17, so that the priority rules are already taken into account when determining the relevance values.
  • the device 1 comprises an output connected to the prioritization unit 21, via which the information output by the prioritization unit 21 is forwarded to a display 23, for example a head-up display, provided it has corresponding relevance values and is not suppressed due to a priority control ,
  • a display 23 for example a head-up display, provided it has corresponding relevance values and is not suppressed due to a priority control .
  • the data and information entering via the inputs 3, 5, 7 form a set of input facts, which form the basis for the context-based selection of information to be displayed on the head-up display.
  • the information to be displayed on the head-up display 23 depends, on the one hand, on its relevance and priority and, on the other hand, on the space available on the display. The relevance and / or the priority may arise in particular from the traffic situation.
  • the data on the traffic situation are read into the buffer 9 via the inputs 3, 5, 7.
  • New incoming data and information overwrite the previously stored data and information.
  • the context of the journey ie the driving situation, is u. a. from the streets, the traffic signs and traffic lights as well as other road users.
  • the driver must primarily follow the road, taking into account the dynamic aspects of the environment, such as the other road users, as well as static aspects, such as traffic signs, signs, etc.
  • Weather conditions also play a role, as well as the condition of the driver, personal preferences, such as sporting or economic driving style, and possibly existing other inmates, such as children. All these factors can be detected by means of suitable sensors or entered into suitable memories and fed via the inputs 3, 5, 7 to the buffer 9. All these factors, which are stored as input facts in the buffer 9, can be summarized in the context of the driving situation.
  • the driving situation is observed, based on certain characteristics conclusions are drawn, and it is detected a potential hazard and then carried out an action. For example, if the driver is on a motorway and is following another vehicle at a safe distance, there is a risk of a rear-end collision. If the safety distance is exceeded for a long time, an interval warning should therefore be displayed on the head-up display as an action.
  • This example also shows that certain aspects of the environment are, under certain conditions, to be rated higher than under other conditions. The distance to the vehicle ahead wins only when it is too low.
  • the method according to the invention is capable of deciding in a particular situation which information is available to the person
  • the driving situation here can be regarded as a set of facts describing the current driving state.
  • further information that can not be directly derived from the environment of the vehicle, such as the destination.
  • the appropriate action is triggered in the form of the representation of a specific driving information.
  • the system thus works in a similar way to a driving expert who assesses the driving situation and intervenes in case of a potential hazard according to his knowledge.
  • the inventive method selects the information to be displayed on the basis of the input facts and a control system.
  • a control system in the form of the "Java Expert System Shell (JESS)" can be used as the control system JESS is implemented in Java and has been developed since 1995. disgusted and already used many times.
  • this control system provides a comprehensive interface for using JESS in Java programs and high performance of the interference engine.
  • the various signals and information of the vehicle represent a set of input facts on the basis of which the information to be displayed in the head-up display is selected. This information is the starting point of the procedure.
  • Another type of fact in the rule system namely the intermediate facts necessary to execute the rules.
  • the modeling of the time course of the driving information takes place via an indirect approach. With this approach, it is determined at any time how relevant the individual driving information is for the driver. Instead of tracking the time profile of the incoming driving data and using this route to show or hide driving information, relevance values are calculated for each driving information that is to be displayed on the head-up display and, if necessary, priorities taken into account.
  • the speed as well as the weather and temperature conditions are important in addition to the actual distance to the vehicle in front.
  • the calculation of the safety distance according to the formula speed divided by 2.
  • the safety distance On other factors with respect to the safety distance, such as the reaction time of the driver, the braking distance of the vehicle, the friction between the tire and the road at this point for simplicity be waived.
  • the following driving information is considered for the display of a distance warning: speed, distance to the vehicle ahead, weather conditions and temperature. In the present example, this information forms the input facts of the control system read into the buffer 9.
  • the weather and temperature conditions have a direct influence on the safety distance. Temperatures below 0 C and precipitation extend the braking distance, dry weather reduces it. To model this influence, the quotient is modified accordingly. If the temperature is lower than 0 ° C and there is precipitation, the speed is divided by 1,2 instead of 2. At temperatures above 0 ° C and precipitation by 1.6 and in all other cases by 2. These values were chosen to roughly describe the different influences.
  • the speed and the distance should be assumed as continuous, the temperature and weather conditions as discrete values. At the temperature and in the weather conditions, instead of the discrete but also a continuous subdivision could be met, as it is e.g. In case of heavy precipitation and high speed, aquaplaning can occur.
  • the mentioned driving information is assigned as a tuple of the class trapping facts.
  • the input facts are modeled as disordered facts with two slots. The first slot represents the name of the driving information, the second the associated value.
  • the JESS syntax for this structure of disordered facts is:
  • a desired behavior of the driver is defined in the different driving situations in order to be able to recognize deviations from this behavior.
  • the target behavior is represented by at least one target factum which is determined in the target fact determination unit 11 based on arithmetic and / or logical operations from a subset of the input facts stored in the latch 9.
  • the subset may include only a single fact or all input facts in the extreme cases.
  • the actual behavior of the driver is represented in the form of an actual fact which is determined by the actual fact determination unit 13 on the basis of the input facts stored in the latch 9.
  • a subset of the input facts is used, which in extreme cases can only be a single input factor, but may also include the entire set of input facts.
  • the subset of input facts that is used to determine the safety margin as a target factum is the input fact set, which consists of the following input facts: speed, weather conditions, and temperature.
  • the input factor, which is used to determine the actual fact, ie the actual distance to the vehicle in front, is given only by an input factor, namely by the actual distance to the vehicle in front.
  • the speed factor, the weather conditions and the temperature are taken into account to determine the setpoint factor in order to determine the optimum safety distance.
  • other influencing factors such as the road condition, can be included in the determination of the target fact.
  • the input facts in the present concrete example are limited to the three input facts mentioned.
  • the resulting rules can then have the following form, for example:
  • the weather conditions were interpreted as simple discrete values (rain or sun). The temperature is only included in the calculation if it is below 0 ° C and at the same time there is precipitation in the form of rain. All three rules modify the quotient when calculating the minimum distance (dcquot). The calculation of the optimal safety distance then takes place in the following form:
  • this rule fires and causes the target fact determination unit 11 to recalculate the setpoint fact, ie the safety distance (dcmet), with the aid of the function f_calcDist.
  • the function f calcDist divides the current speed by the value in the fact "dcquot”.
  • the degree of deviation of the actual fact from the target fact in the present example the degree of deviation of the distance to the vehicle ahead to the safety distance, can represent the level of hazard potential in this driving situation, namely when the actual distance is less than that safety distance.
  • the smaller the actual distance the faster information should be displayed in the form of a warning message in the head-up display.
  • the warning is then issued by a reference to the triggering potential hazard.
  • the hint would appear in the form of a distance warning.
  • the comparison of the actual fact with the target fact takes place in the comparison unit 15.
  • This receives from the target fact determination unit 11, the target fact, in the present example, the safety margin, and from the actual fact determination unit 13, the actual distance as actual Fact.
  • the comparison may be based on the following rule:
  • the current speed, the current distance and the calculated safety distance are entered in this rule.
  • the speed can be transmitted as an input factor directly from the latch 9 in the comparison unit 15.
  • the comparison is performed each time at least one of the facts entering the rule changes.
  • the comparison is carried out in the concrete example on the basis of the following function funcdist 10, whereby a relevance value for the distance warning is determined on the basis of the comparison:
  • the relevance allocation unit 17 integrated in the comparison unit 15 assigns a relevance value that depends on the comparison result. If the actual fact, that is to say the actual distance, is greater than the setpoint fact, that is to say the safety distance, then the friction mapping unit 17 gives a relevance variable with the
  • the relevance allocation unit 17 If the actual fact is equal to the target fact, so the actual distance equal to the safety distance is, the relevance allocation unit 17 outputs a relevance variable with the value 0 and if the actual fact is smaller than the target fact, ie the safety distance is below, the relevance allocation unit 17 outputs a positive value for the relevance size whose Amount of the quotient of the actual distance as an actual fact and an input factor, namely the speed, depends. The smaller the actual distance and the higher the speed, the greater the amount. This ensures that the distance warning is faster, the higher the speed and the shorter the distance to the vehicle in front.
  • the relevance allocation unit 17 adds the newly determined value of the relevance variable to the previous value of the relevance variable. This means that the relevance decreases if the safety distance is exceeded, the relevance increases, if the safety distance is further undercut and the relevance remains the same, if the safety distance is exactly maintained.
  • the addition of the relevance size value can be based on the following rule:
  • the information "distance warning” is represented here by the fact “dist”.
  • the facts dist, relevance (rlvc) and color (color) can be read by an external program and have the following structure:
  • the Color fact is usually set to black, but can be switched to red if there are particularly urgent warnings.
  • the values of the relevance variables of all the information to be displayed are in the range between 0 and 100. Since relevance values of more than 100 or less than 0 can occur in the procedure described, the method according to the invention comprises two further rules which ensure that the relevance values are in the intended range stay between 0 and 100.
  • the values of the relevance variables in the prioritization unit 21 are modified.
  • modification rules can also be taken into account immediately when calculating the values of the relevance variables.
  • the former approach has the advantage that the rule creation can be simplified and a higher modality is possible, since not intervene in the already created rules.
  • the last-mentioned method offers the advantage that the runtime of the control system can be reduced since not all relevance values are first calculated in order to be subsequently modified.
  • different information to be displayed on the head-up display is assigned different priorities, which may depend, inter alia, on the current driving situation. If, for example, there is a navigation instruction at the same time as the distance warning, the relevance value of the distance warning can be reset to 0 if it is to be expected that the driver will reduce the vehicle speed due to the navigation instruction, for example to turn it off. After a short break Blend phase of the navigation instruction, for example, after about 2 to 3 seconds, this is hidden and the relevance values of the distance warning can rise again. The driver then does not immediately receive a previously existing distance warning immediately after the appearance of a navigation instruction. This allows the driver to adapt to the traffic situation without paternalism through the head-up display.
  • the method is equally applicable to all other information to be displayed on the head-up display, provided that they are selected on the basis of the driving context.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
  • Instrument Panels (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de représentation d'informations en fonction du contexte, en particulier sur un dispositif d'affichage, les informations étant représentées en fonction d'un ensemble de faits de départ représentant une situation, en particulier une situation de conduite. Le procédé selon l'invention comprend les étapes suivantes : détermination d'au moins un fait théorique associé à une information pouvant être représentée, d'après une première partie de l'ensemble de faits de départ ; contrôle d'au moins un fait réel associé au fait théorique ; comparaison du fait réel et du fait théorique ; attribution d'une grandeur de pertinence, présentant une valeur déterminée, à l'information associée au facteur théorique d'après le résultat de la comparaison ; représentation de l'information lorsque la valeur de cette grandeur de pertinence remplit une condition prédéterminée.
PCT/EP2006/063961 2005-08-08 2006-07-06 Procede de selection d'informations d'apres le contexte et procede de representation de ces informations WO2007017325A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005037288.0 2005-08-08
DE102005037288A DE102005037288A1 (de) 2005-08-08 2005-08-08 Verfahren zur kontextbasierten Auswahl von Informationen sowie Verfahren zu deren Darstellung

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007017325A2 true WO2007017325A2 (fr) 2007-02-15
WO2007017325A3 WO2007017325A3 (fr) 2007-04-26

Family

ID=37633620

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2006/063961 WO2007017325A2 (fr) 2005-08-08 2006-07-06 Procede de selection d'informations d'apres le contexte et procede de representation de ces informations

Country Status (2)

Country Link
DE (1) DE102005037288A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2007017325A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007024395A1 (de) 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh Darstellungsverfahren zur Unterstützung eines Fahrzeugführers
DE102009059140A1 (de) * 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur Integration einer Komponente in ein Informationssystem eines Fahrzeugs
FR3001559B1 (fr) * 2013-01-31 2016-05-27 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa Dispositif et procede de gestion pour l'affichage priorise d'informations relatives a des fonctions d'un vehicule
DE102014220373A1 (de) * 2014-10-08 2016-04-14 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Freiprogrammierbares Display
DE102018203748A1 (de) * 2018-03-13 2019-09-19 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren, eine Vorrichtung sowie ein korrespondierendes Computerprogramm zum Variieren oder Unterdrücken zumindest einer Fahrerinformation
US11373527B2 (en) * 2019-03-25 2022-06-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Driver assistance for non-autonomous vehicle in an autonomous environment
DE102019217346B4 (de) 2019-11-11 2023-12-07 Psa Automobiles Sa Verfahren zur Darstellung von Informationen auf einer Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Computerprogrammprodukt, Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle sowie Kraftfahrzeug

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3222263A1 (de) * 1982-06-09 1983-02-03 Günter 1000 Berlin Mehnert Abstands-warnsystem fuer kraftfahrzeuge
US5181038A (en) * 1991-05-06 1993-01-19 Ivhs Technologies, Inc. Target persistence filter for multi-frequency automotive radar system
US5471214A (en) * 1991-11-27 1995-11-28 State Of Israel Ministry Of Defense, Armament Developmental Authority, Rafael Collision avoidance and warning system
US5880710A (en) * 1990-09-07 1999-03-09 Caterpillar Inc. Adaptive vehicle display
US6057754A (en) * 1997-08-11 2000-05-02 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Drive assist system for motor vehicle
US6429845B1 (en) * 1995-03-07 2002-08-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Process for displaying several sets of information
US20020120371A1 (en) * 2000-10-14 2002-08-29 Leivian Robert H. Method of response synthesis in a driver assistance system
US20030034883A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-02-20 Yoshihisa Sato Obstacle detecting apparatus and related communication apparatus
US20040073367A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-15 Altan Osman D. Threat assessment algorithm for forward collision warning

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09123848A (ja) * 1995-11-06 1997-05-13 Toyota Motor Corp 車両用情報表示装置
FR2768839B1 (fr) * 1997-09-19 2000-06-16 Peugeot Systeme d'affichage d'informations pour vehicule automobile
FR2789884B1 (fr) * 1999-02-19 2001-06-15 Renault Procede et dispositif de commande de la presentation d'informations a un conducteur de vehicule automobile
DE10052654B4 (de) * 2000-10-24 2019-03-14 Volkswagen Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von optischen und/oder akustischen Informationen in einem Kraftfahrzeug
DE10117410B4 (de) * 2001-04-06 2004-11-18 Daimlerchrysler Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ausgabe von Daten über eine Information eines Kraftfahrzeugs
US6580984B2 (en) * 2001-09-07 2003-06-17 Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. Method and device for supplying information to a driver of a vehicle
DE10144752A1 (de) * 2001-09-11 2003-03-27 Volkswagen Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Übertragung von Information in ein Kraftfahrzeug
DE10340870A1 (de) * 2003-09-04 2005-04-28 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Steuerung der Ausgabe von Meldungen
DE10343683A1 (de) * 2003-09-20 2005-04-21 Daimler Chrysler Ag Informationssystem für Kraftfahrzeuge

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3222263A1 (de) * 1982-06-09 1983-02-03 Günter 1000 Berlin Mehnert Abstands-warnsystem fuer kraftfahrzeuge
US5880710A (en) * 1990-09-07 1999-03-09 Caterpillar Inc. Adaptive vehicle display
US5181038A (en) * 1991-05-06 1993-01-19 Ivhs Technologies, Inc. Target persistence filter for multi-frequency automotive radar system
US5471214A (en) * 1991-11-27 1995-11-28 State Of Israel Ministry Of Defense, Armament Developmental Authority, Rafael Collision avoidance and warning system
US6429845B1 (en) * 1995-03-07 2002-08-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Process for displaying several sets of information
US6057754A (en) * 1997-08-11 2000-05-02 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Drive assist system for motor vehicle
US20020120371A1 (en) * 2000-10-14 2002-08-29 Leivian Robert H. Method of response synthesis in a driver assistance system
US20030034883A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-02-20 Yoshihisa Sato Obstacle detecting apparatus and related communication apparatus
US20040073367A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-15 Altan Osman D. Threat assessment algorithm for forward collision warning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007017325A3 (fr) 2007-04-26
DE102005037288A1 (de) 2007-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3365741B1 (fr) Procédé de conduite de véhicules entièrement automatisée et véhicule automobile correspondant
DE102017221191B4 (de) Verfahren zur Anzeige des Verlaufs einer Sicherheitszone vor einem Fahrzeug oder einem Objekt mit einer Anzeigeeinheit, Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens sowie Kraftfahrzeug und Computerprogramm
DE112017005406T5 (de) Informationsverabeitungssystem, Informationsverarbeitungsverfahren und lesbares Medium
DE102007058437B4 (de) Verfahren zur Informationsvermittlung an den Fahrer eines Kraftfahrzeugs
EP3425442B1 (fr) Procédé d'enrichissement d'un champ de vision d'un conducteur d'un véhicule avec des informations additionnelles, dispositif d'utilisation dans un véhicule observateur, ainsi que véhicule automobile
EP3543059A1 (fr) Procédé de calcul d'une surimpression des informations supplémentaires pour un affichage sur une unité d'affichage, dispositif de mise en uvre du procédé, ainsi que véhicule automobile et programme informatique
DE102018202146A1 (de) Verfahren zum Auswählen eines Fahrprofils eines Kraftwagens, Fahrassistenzsystem und Kraftwagen
EP3717954B1 (fr) Procédé d'affichage du déroulement d'une trajectoire devant un véhicule ou un objet pourvu d'une unité d'affichage, dispositif de mise en oeuvre du procédé
DE102018203121B4 (de) Verfahren zur Berechnung einer AR-Einblendung von Zusatzinformationen für eine Anzeige auf einer Anzeigeeinheit, Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens sowie Kraftfahrzeug und Computerprogramm
EP2149132A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'identification d'informations importantes pour le trafic
DE102018001375A1 (de) Fahrzeugfahrassistenzsystem, Fahrzeugfahrassistenzverfahren und Computerprogrammprodukt
DE102018208703A1 (de) Verfahren zur Berechnung einer "augmented reality"-Einblendung für die Darstellung einer Navigationsroute auf einer AR-Anzeigeeinheit, Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens sowie Kraftfahrzeug und Computerprogramm
WO2007017325A2 (fr) Procede de selection d'informations d'apres le contexte et procede de representation de ces informations
DE102020104032A1 (de) Vorrichtung zum überwachen eines fahrers, system mit derselben und verfahren davon
DE102014206117A1 (de) Systemarchitektur für kontextabhängige hmi-detektoren
EP3922501A1 (fr) Commande d'un affichage d'un dispositif d'affichage tête haute de réalité augmentée pour un moyen de déplacement
DE102015115163A1 (de) Verfahren zur situationsabhängigen Auswahl von Trajektorien für Fahrerassistenzsysteme von Fahrzeugen
DE102013021641A1 (de) Fahrerassistenzsystem für ein Kraftfahrzeug
DE102012220100A1 (de) Verfahren und Informationsgerät zum Darstellen von einer Fahrerinformation auf einer Blickfeldanzeige für ein Fahrzeug
DE102018209753A1 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtung, mobiles Anwendergerät und Computerprogramm zum Bereitstellen einer Information zur Nutzung in einem Fahrzeug
DE102012201156B4 (de) Verfahren, Datenverarbeitungsvorrichtung und Computerprogramm zum Bereitstellen von einer Geschwindigkeitswarnungsinformation für ein Navigationsgerät
DE102010030257A1 (de) Fahrerassistenzverfahren sowie Fahrerassistenzeinrichtung
DE102020112899A1 (de) Verfahren und System zur vollständig automatischen Führung eines Kraftfahrzeugs und Kraftfahrzeug
DE102021122074A1 (de) Fahrzeuganzeigesteuervorrichtung, fahrzeuganzeigesteuerverfahren, computerlesbares speichermedium und fahrzeuganzeigesystem
DE102020206256A1 (de) Verfahren zum Anzeigen und/oder Ausgeben einer Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung für ein Fahrzeug und Verfahren zum Ausgeben einer Information über eine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung an ein Fahrzeug

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06777610

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2