WO2005090638A2 - Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits - Google Patents

Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005090638A2
WO2005090638A2 PCT/US2005/010693 US2005010693W WO2005090638A2 WO 2005090638 A2 WO2005090638 A2 WO 2005090638A2 US 2005010693 W US2005010693 W US 2005010693W WO 2005090638 A2 WO2005090638 A2 WO 2005090638A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
gas mixture
surface deposits
fluorocarbon
oxygen
silicon
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/010693
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005090638A3 (en
WO2005090638A8 (en
WO2005090638A9 (en
Inventor
Herbert Harold Sawin
Bo Bai
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Massachusetts Institute Of Technology filed Critical Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
Priority to EP05760434A priority Critical patent/EP1737998A2/en
Priority to BRPI0508214-5A priority patent/BRPI0508214A/en
Priority to JP2007505283A priority patent/JP2007531289A/en
Publication of WO2005090638A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005090638A2/en
Publication of WO2005090638A9 publication Critical patent/WO2005090638A9/en
Publication of WO2005090638A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005090638A3/en
Publication of WO2005090638A8 publication Critical patent/WO2005090638A8/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/32Gas-filled discharge tubes
    • H01J37/32431Constructional details of the reactor
    • H01J37/32798Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
    • H01J37/32853Hygiene
    • H01J37/32862In situ cleaning of vessels and/or internal parts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08CLEANING
    • B08BCLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B7/00Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
    • B08B7/0035Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/44Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
    • C23C16/4401Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
    • C23C16/4405Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F4/00Processes for removing metallic material from surfaces, not provided for in group C23F1/00 or C23F3/00
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/30Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of perfluorocarbons [PFC], hydrofluorocarbons [HFC] or sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen, fluorocarbon and nitrogen source. More specifically, this invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits from the interior of a chemical vapor deposition chamber by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen, perfluorocarbon compound and nitrogen source.
  • Remote plasma sources for the production of atomic fluorine are widely used for chamber cleaning in the semiconductor processing industry, particularly in the cleaning of chambers used for Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD).
  • remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber.
  • capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer.
  • the use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior.
  • the present invention relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated gas mixture; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
  • the present invention also relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said surface deposits is selected from a group consists of silicon, doped silicon, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
  • the present invention further relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising nitrogen source, and thereafter (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
  • Surface deposits removed in this invention comprise those materials commonly deposited by chemical vapor deposition or plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition or similar processes. Such materials include silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten , silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, such as FSG (fluorosil icate glass) and SiCOH or PECVD OSG including Black Diamond (Applied Materials), Coral (Novellus Systems) and Aurora (ASM International).
  • FSG fluorosil icate glass
  • PECVD OSG including Black Diamond (Applied Materials), Coral (Novellus Systems) and Aurora (ASM International).
  • One embodiment of this invention is removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices.
  • Such process chamber could be a Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) chamber or a Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) chamber.
  • the process of the present invention invol /es an activating step using sufficient power to form an activated gas mixture. Activation may be accomplished by any means allowing for the achievement of dissociation of a large fraction of the feed gas, such as: RF energ-y, DC energy, laser illumination and microwave energy.
  • the neutral temperature of the resulting plasma depends on the power and the residence time of the gas mixture in the remote chamber. In this invention, it is found that addition of nitrogen gas helps absorption of RF power. Under certain power input and conditions, neutral temperature will be higher with longer residence time. Here, preferred neutral temperature is over about 3,000 K.
  • the activated gas is formed in a remote chamber that is outside of the process chamber, but in close proximity to the process chamber.
  • the remote chamber is connected to the process chamber by any means allowing for transfer of the activated gas from the remote chamber to the process chamber.
  • the remote chamber and means for connecting the remote chamber with the process chamber are constructed of materials known in this field to be capable of containing activated gas mixtures. For instance, aluminum and stainless steel are commonly used for the chamber components.
  • AI 2 O 3 is coated on the interior surface to reduce the surface recombination.
  • the gas mixture that is activated to form the activated gas comprises oxygen, nitrogen source and fluorocarbon.
  • a fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F.
  • Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound.
  • a perfluorocarbon compound in this invention is herein referred to as a compound consisting of C, F and optionally oxygen.
  • Such perfluorocarbon compounds include, but are not limited to tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, octafluoropropane, hexafluorocyclopropane decafluorobutane, octafluorocyclobutane, carbonyl fluoride and octafluorotetrahydrofuran.
  • a preferred gas mixture has oxygen to fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1 :3.
  • a more preferred gas mixture has oxygen to fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from abo ut 2:1 to about 20:1
  • a "nitrogen source" of the invention is herein referred to as a gas which can generate atomic nitrogen under the discharge conditions in this invention.
  • Examples of a nitrogen source here include, but are not limited to N 2 , NF 3 and all kinds of nitrogen oxides such as NO, N 2 O, NO 2 et al.
  • the gas mixture that is activated to form the activated gas may further comprise carrier gases such as argon and helium.
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention is a method for removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, perfluorocarbon compound and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound is at least 1 : 3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated gas mixture; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the interior of said deposition chamber and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. It was found in this invention that nitrogen gas can dramatically increase the etching rate.
  • the perfluorocarbon compound is octafluorocyclobutane (Zyron® 8020) manufactured by DuPont.
  • Zyron® 8020 octafluorocyclobutane manufactured by DuPont.
  • Zyron® 8020 generated low etching rate and high COF 2 emission.
  • the etching rate starts to improve with a small amount of nitrogen and saturates when nitrogen addition exceeds certain amount, (see Figure 2 and 3)
  • the nitrogen addition also increases the power consumption and decreases the COF 2 emission, (see Figure 2 and
  • the etching rate started at a high level.
  • the system can be used to alter surfaces placed in the remote chamber by contact with the fluorine atoms and other constituents coming from the source. The following Examples are meant to illustrate the invention and are not meant to be limiting.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the remote plasma source and apparatus used to measure the etching rates, plasma neutral temperatures, and exhaust emissions.
  • the remote plasma source is a commercial toroidal-type MKS ASTRON®ex reactive gas generator unit made by MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA.
  • the feed gases e.g. oxygen, fluorocarbon, nitrogen source, Argon
  • the oxygen is manufactured by Airgas with 99.999% purity.
  • the fluorocarbon is Zyron® 8020 manufactured by DuPont with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane.
  • Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0.
  • the activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber.
  • the surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber.
  • the neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C 2 and N 2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference.
  • the etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber.
  • N 2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and to reduce the hang-up of products in the pump.
  • FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in
  • Example 1 The feeding gas composed of O 2 , Zyron® 8020 (C 4 F 8 ), Ar, N 2 , wherein O 2 flow rate is 1542 seem, Ar flow rate is 2333 seem, C Fs flow rate is 125 seem, N 2 flow rate is 0, 200, 400, 600 seem respectively. Chamber pressure is 2 torr.
  • the feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz RF power to a neutral temperature of more than 5000 K. The activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO 2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 200° C. The results are showed in Figure 2.
  • Example 2 The feeding gas composed of O 2 , Zyron® 8020 (C F 8 ), Ar, N 2 , wherein 0 2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C 4 F 8 flow rate is 250 seem, N 2 flow rate is 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 seem respectively. Chamber pressure is 2 torr.
  • the feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz RF power to a neutral temperature of 5500 K.
  • the activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO 2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 200° C. The results are showed in Figure 3.
  • the COF 2 concentration in the pump exhaust was monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 4.
  • Example 3 The initial feeding gas composed of O 2 , Zyron® 8020 (C F 8 ), Ar, wherein O 2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C 4 F 8 flow rate is 250 seem.
  • the process chamber pressure is 2 torr.
  • the mounting with SiO 2 surface deposits on it was controlled at 100° C.
  • the emission gases of C 4 F 8 , CO, CO 2 , C 2 F 6 , C 3 F 8 , CF 4 , COF 2 , N 2 O, NF 3 and SiF 4 were monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 5.
  • the plasma was ignited at the time of 250 seconds by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature rose to about 5500 K.
  • Example 4 The pretreatment gas mixture was composed of 100 seem of
  • N 2 and 2000 seem of Ar. It was activated by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature was about 2000 K. Starting at the 100 seconds and continuing for 3 seconds, the activated gas passed through from the remote chamber to the process chamber with the SiO 2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the gas mixture composing of 1750 seem O 2 and 250 seem Zyron® 8020 (C 4 F 8 ) were added in. The cleaning gas mixture was activated by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature was about 5500 K. The process chamber pressure was 2 torr. The mounting with Si ⁇ 2 surface deposits on it was controlled at 100° C.
  • the emission gases of C 4 F 8 , CO, CO 2 , C 2 F 6 , C 3 F 8 , CF 4 , COF 2 , N 2 O, NF 3 and SiF 4 were monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 7a.
  • the etching rate started at a high level, as shown in Figure 7b, and the COF 2 emission was low.
  • cleaning gas mixture containing N 2 With cleaning gas mixture containing N 2 , the system was kept in a high etching rate state. At the time of about 500 seconds, N 2 was removed from the cleaning gas mixture, causing the etching rate to drop slowly and the COF 2 emission to increase slowly. At the time of 1850 seconds, 100 seem N 2 was added back to the cleaning gas mixture. As a result, etching rate jumped up, COF 2 emission dropped and the CO 2 emission increased immediately. The power was turned off at the 3160 seconds.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
  • Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Cleaning In General (AREA)
  • ing And Chemical Polishing (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an improved remote plasma cleaning method for removing surface deposits from a surface, such as the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. The improvement involves addition of a nitrogen source to the feeding gas mixture comprising of oxygen and fluorocarbon. The improvement also involves pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits by activating a pretreatment gas mixture comprising of nitrogen source and passing the activated pretreatment gas through the pathway.

Description

TITLE OF INVENTION Remote Chamber Methods for Removing Surface Deposits
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention. The present invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen, fluorocarbon and nitrogen source. More specifically, this invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits from the interior of a chemical vapor deposition chamber by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen, perfluorocarbon compound and nitrogen source. 2. Description of Related Art. Remote plasma sources for the production of atomic fluorine are widely used for chamber cleaning in the semiconductor processing industry, particularly in the cleaning of chambers used for Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD). The use of remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber. While capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer. The use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior. The semiconductor industry has shifted away from mixtures of fluorocarbons with oxygen for chamber cleaning, which initially were the dominant gases used for in situ chamber cleaning for a number of reasons. First, the emissions of global warming gases from such processes was commonly much higher th an that of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) processes. NF3 dissociates more easily in a discharge and is not significantly formed by recombination of t_he product species. Therefore, low levels of global warming emissions can be achieved more easily. In contrast, fluorocarbons are more difficult to breakdown in a discharge and recombine to form species such as tetrafl uoromethane (CF4) which are even more difficult to break down than other fluorocarbons. Secondly, it was commonly found that fluorocarbon discharges produced "polymer" depositions that requ ire more frequent wet cleans to remove these deposits that build up after repetitive dry cleans. The propensity of fluorocarbon cleans to deposit "polymers" occurs to a greater extent in remote cleans in which no ion bombardment occurs during the cleaning. These observations dissuaded the industry from developing industrial processes based on fluorocarbon feed gases. In fact, the PECVD equipment manufacturers tested remote cleans based on fluorocarbon discharges, but to date have been unsuccessful because of polymer deposition in the process chambers. However, if the two drawbacks as described above can be resolved, fluorocarbon gases are desirable for their low cost and low- toxicity. While prior work has been done on perfluorocarbon/oxygen discharges with nitrogen addition to enhance the etching of silicon nitride. The enhancement is regarded as the result of the formation of NO by the discharge which in turn reacts with N on ttie silicon nitride surface, followed by the effective fluorination of Si atoms to form volatile products. CH. Oh et al. Surface and Coatings Technology 171 (2003) 267.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated gas mixture; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. The present invention also relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said surface deposits is selected from a group consists of silicon, doped silicon, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. The present invention further relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising nitrogen source, and thereafter (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGfS) Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an apparatus useful for carrying out the present process. Figure 2. Plot of the effect of N2 addition to 125 seem Zyron® 8020 on (a) etching rate, (b) power consumption. Figure 3. Plot of the effect of N2 addition to 250 seem Zyron®
8020 on (a) etching rate, (b) power consumption. Figure 4. Plot of the effect of N2 addition to 250 seem Zyron® 8020 on the COF2 emission, measured by FTIR. Figure 5. Plot of the effect of N2 addition to 250 seem Zyron® 8020 on the various waste gas emission, measured by FTIR. Figure 6. Plot of etching rate changes wit i intermittent N2 addition. Figure 7a. Plot of the effect of N2 pretreatment on the various waste gas emission, measured by FTIR. Figure 7b. Plot of the effect of N2 pretreatment on the etching rate of Zyron® 8020. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INDENTION Surface deposits removed in this invention comprise those materials commonly deposited by chemical vapor deposition or plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition or similar processes. Such materials include silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten , silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, such as FSG (fluorosil icate glass) and SiCOH or PECVD OSG including Black Diamond (Applied Materials), Coral (Novellus Systems) and Aurora (ASM International). One embodiment of this invention is removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. Such process chamber could be a Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) chamber or a Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) chamber. The process of the present invention invol /es an activating step using sufficient power to form an activated gas mixture. Activation may be accomplished by any means allowing for the achievement of dissociation of a large fraction of the feed gas, such as: RF energ-y, DC energy, laser illumination and microwave energy. The neutral temperature of the resulting plasma depends on the power and the residence time of the gas mixture in the remote chamber. In this invention, it is found that addition of nitrogen gas helps absorption of RF power. Under certain power input and conditions, neutral temperature will be higher with longer residence time. Here, preferred neutral temperature is over about 3,000 K. Under appropriate conditions (considering power, gas compOsition, gas pressure and gas residence time), neutral temperatures of at least about 6000K may be achieved, for example, with octafluorocyclobutane. The activated gas is formed in a remote chamber that is outside of the process chamber, but in close proximity to the process chamber. The remote chamber is connected to the process chamber by any means allowing for transfer of the activated gas from the remote chamber to the process chamber. The remote chamber and means for connecting the remote chamber with the process chamber are constructed of materials known in this field to be capable of containing activated gas mixtures. For instance, aluminum and stainless steel are commonly used for the chamber components. Sometimes AI2O3 is coated on the interior surface to reduce the surface recombination. The gas mixture that is activated to form the activated gas comprises oxygen, nitrogen source and fluorocarbon. A fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F. Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound. A perfluorocarbon compound in this invention is herein referred to as a compound consisting of C, F and optionally oxygen. Such perfluorocarbon compounds include, but are not limited to tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, octafluoropropane, hexafluorocyclopropane decafluorobutane, octafluorocyclobutane, carbonyl fluoride and octafluorotetrahydrofuran. A preferred gas mixture has oxygen to fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1 :3. A more preferred gas mixture has oxygen to fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from abo ut 2:1 to about 20:1 A "nitrogen source" of the invention is herein referred to as a gas which can generate atomic nitrogen under the discharge conditions in this invention. Examples of a nitrogen source here include, but are not limited to N2, NF3 and all kinds of nitrogen oxides such as NO, N2O, NO2 et al. The gas mixture that is activated to form the activated gas may further comprise carrier gases such as argon and helium. A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a method for removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, perfluorocarbon compound and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound is at least 1 : 3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated gas mixture; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the interior of said deposition chamber and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. It was found in this invention that nitrogen gas can dramatically increase the etching rate. In one embodiment of this invention, the perfluorocarbon compound is octafluorocyclobutane (Zyron® 8020) manufactured by DuPont. As demonstrated in the examples shown below, without nitrogen gas, Zyron® 8020 generated low etching rate and high COF2 emission. The etching rate starts to improve with a small amount of nitrogen and saturates when nitrogen addition exceeds certain amount, (see Figure 2 and 3) The nitrogen addition also increases the power consumption and decreases the COF2 emission, (see Figure 2 and
4) It was also found that at the similar conditions of this invention, the drawbacks of the perfluorocarbon compound, i.e. global warming gases emission and polymer deposition, can be overcome. In the experiments of this invention, no significant polymer depositions on the interior surface of chamber was found. The global warming gas emissions were also very low as shown in Figure 5. It was further found that some pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits can increase the etching rate. In this invention, the pretreatment is achieved by activating a pretreatment gas mixture comprising of nitrogen source and passing the activated pretreatment gas through the pathway. In one embodiment as described in Example 4, the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits was pretreated for 3 seconds by an activated nitrogen and argon gas mixture. After the pretreatment, the etching rate started at a high level. Alternatively, the system can be used to alter surfaces placed in the remote chamber by contact with the fluorine atoms and other constituents coming from the source. The following Examples are meant to illustrate the invention and are not meant to be limiting.
EXAMPLES Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the remote plasma source and apparatus used to measure the etching rates, plasma neutral temperatures, and exhaust emissions. The remote plasma source is a commercial toroidal-type MKS ASTRON®ex reactive gas generator unit made by MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA. The feed gases (e.g. oxygen, fluorocarbon, nitrogen source, Argon) were introduced into the remote plasma source from the left, and passed through the toroidal discharge where they were discharged by the 400 KHz radio-frequency power to form an activated gas mixture. The oxygen is manufactured by Airgas with 99.999% purity. The fluorocarbon is Zyron® 8020 manufactured by DuPont with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane. Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0. The activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber. The surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber. The neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C2 and N2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference. The etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber. N2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and to reduce the hang-up of products in the pump. FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in the pump exhaust.
Example 1 The feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® 8020 (C4F8), Ar, N2, wherein O2 flow rate is 1542 seem, Ar flow rate is 2333 seem, C Fs flow rate is 125 seem, N2 flow rate is 0, 200, 400, 600 seem respectively. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz RF power to a neutral temperature of more than 5000 K. The activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 200° C. The results are showed in Figure 2. Example 2 The feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® 8020 (C F8), Ar, N2, wherein 02 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C4F8 flow rate is 250 seem, N2 flow rate is 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 seem respectively. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz RF power to a neutral temperature of 5500 K. The activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 200° C. The results are showed in Figure 3. In this experiment, the COF2 concentration in the pump exhaust was monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 4.
Example 3 The initial feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® 8020 (C F8), Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C4F8 flow rate is 250 seem. The process chamber pressure is 2 torr. The mounting with SiO2 surface deposits on it was controlled at 100° C. The emission gases of C4F8, CO, CO2, C2F6, C3F8, CF4, COF2, N2O, NF3 and SiF4 were monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 5. The plasma was ignited at the time of 250 seconds by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature rose to about 5500 K. There were no N2 addition at the beginning and the etching rate was low (see Figure 6), the COF2 emission was high and the CO2 emission was low. At the 720 seconds, 100 seem N2 was added to the feeding gas. As a result, etching rate jumped up, COF2 emission dropped and the CO2 emission increased immediately. At the 1280 seconds, N2 flow was stopped. The etching rate, COF2 emission and CO2 emission all slowly recovered to the previous level. 200 seem of N2 flow was added starting at the 2100 seconds and was stopped at the 2780 seconds. The same type of changes repeated. At the 3100 seconds, the C4F8 flow was stopped for 5 seconds. After a dip of etching rate, COF2 and CO2 emission, the system recovered and continued the transition. The power was turned off at the 3600 seconds. From Figure 5, it may be expected that the addition of 200 seem of N2 would increase the etching rate to the same level as the addition of 100 seem of N2 did. However, it was observed that the etching rate slightly decreased after the first two micrometer of the surface deposits were etched away, probably due to the change of the roughness of the film.
Example 4 The pretreatment gas mixture was composed of 100 seem of
N2 and 2000 seem of Ar. It was activated by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature was about 2000 K. Starting at the 100 seconds and continuing for 3 seconds, the activated gas passed through from the remote chamber to the process chamber with the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the gas mixture composing of 1750 seem O2 and 250 seem Zyron® 8020 (C4F8) were added in. The cleaning gas mixture was activated by 400 KHz RF power and the neutral temperature was about 5500 K. The process chamber pressure was 2 torr. The mounting with Siθ2 surface deposits on it was controlled at 100° C. The emission gases of C4F8, CO, CO2, C2F6, C3F8, CF4, COF2, N2O, NF3 and SiF4 were monitored by FTIR and shown in Figure 7a. After the pretreatment, the etching rate started at a high level, as shown in Figure 7b, and the COF2 emission was low. With cleaning gas mixture containing N2, the system was kept in a high etching rate state. At the time of about 500 seconds, N2 was removed from the cleaning gas mixture, causing the etching rate to drop slowly and the COF2 emission to increase slowly. At the time of 1850 seconds, 100 seem N2 was added back to the cleaning gas mixture. As a result, etching rate jumped up, COF2 emission dropped and the CO2 emission increased immediately. The power was turned off at the 3160 seconds.

Claims

CLAIMfS) What is claimed is:
1. A method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated gas mixture; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said surface deposits is removed from the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said power is generated by an RF source, a DC source or a microwave source.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said nitrogen source is nitrogen gas, NF3, or nitrogen oxides.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said fluorocarbon is a perfluorocarbon compound.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said perfluorocarbon compound is selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, octafluoropropane, octafluorocyclobutane, carbonyl fluoride, perfluorotetrahydrofuran.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mixture further comprises a carrier gas.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein said carrier gas is at least one gas selected from the group of gases consisting of argon and helium.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pressure in the remote chamber is between 0.01 Torr and 20 Torr.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surface deposit is selected from a group consisting of silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials.
11.The method of claim 1 , wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1.
12. A method for removing surface deposits, said surface deposits is selected from a group consists of silicon, doped silicon, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a gas mixture comprising oxygen, fluorocarbon and a nitrogen source, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said surface deposits is removed from the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein said nitrogen source is nitrogen gas, NF3, or nitrogen oxides.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein said fluorocarbon is a perfluorocarbon compound.
6. A method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising nitrogen source, and thereafter (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
PCT/US2005/010693 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits WO2005090638A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP05760434A EP1737998A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
BRPI0508214-5A BRPI0508214A (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 surface deposit removal methods
JP2007505283A JP2007531289A (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber method for removing surface deposits

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55622704P 2004-03-24 2004-03-24
US60/556,227 2004-03-24
US64044404P 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
US64083304P 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
US60/640,833 2004-12-30
US60/640,444 2004-12-30

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005090638A2 true WO2005090638A2 (en) 2005-09-29
WO2005090638A9 WO2005090638A9 (en) 2006-01-26
WO2005090638A3 WO2005090638A3 (en) 2006-04-13
WO2005090638A8 WO2005090638A8 (en) 2006-11-16

Family

ID=34965582

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/010692 WO2005098086A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
PCT/US2005/010691 WO2005095670A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
PCT/US2005/010693 WO2005090638A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/010692 WO2005098086A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
PCT/US2005/010691 WO2005095670A2 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-03-24 Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (3) EP1733072A2 (en)
JP (3) JP2007530792A (en)
KR (3) KR20070037434A (en)
BR (3) BRPI0508205A (en)
TW (3) TWI284929B (en)
WO (3) WO2005098086A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007070116A2 (en) * 2005-08-02 2007-06-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Remote chamber method using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits from the interior of a cvd /pecvd- plasma chamber
WO2015103003A1 (en) * 2013-12-30 2015-07-09 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Chamber cleaning and semiconductor etching gases
US20220059327A1 (en) * 2018-12-25 2022-02-24 Showa Denko K.K. Adhesion removal method and film-forming method
CN116145106A (en) * 2023-02-21 2023-05-23 苏州鼎芯光电科技有限公司 Cleaning method for semiconductor coating process chamber

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0697467A1 (en) * 1994-07-21 1996-02-21 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for cleaning a deposition chamber
US7581549B2 (en) 2004-07-23 2009-09-01 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method for removing carbon-containing residues from a substrate
US9034199B2 (en) 2012-02-21 2015-05-19 Applied Materials, Inc. Ceramic article with reduced surface defect density and process for producing a ceramic article
US9212099B2 (en) * 2012-02-22 2015-12-15 Applied Materials, Inc. Heat treated ceramic substrate having ceramic coating and heat treatment for coated ceramics
US10240230B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2019-03-26 Seastar Chemicals Inc. Process and method for in-situ dry cleaning of thin film deposition reactors and thin film layers
JP6202423B2 (en) * 2013-03-05 2017-09-27 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Plasma cleaning method and plasma cleaning apparatus
US9850568B2 (en) 2013-06-20 2017-12-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Plasma erosion resistant rare-earth oxide based thin film coatings
US11854773B2 (en) 2020-03-31 2023-12-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Remote plasma cleaning of chambers for electronics manufacturing systems

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1304731A1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2003-04-23 Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth Method of cleaning cvd device and cleaning device therefor

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5158644A (en) * 1986-12-19 1992-10-27 Applied Materials, Inc. Reactor chamber self-cleaning process

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1304731A1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2003-04-23 Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth Method of cleaning cvd device and cleaning device therefor

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ALLGOOD C ET AL: "Evaluation of octafluorocyclobutane as a chamber clean gas in a plasma-enhanced silicon dioxide chemical vapor deposition reactor" JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY. MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, US, vol. 150, no. 2, 2003, pages G122-G126, XP002280013 ISSN: 0013-4651 *
CRUDEN BRETT A ET AL: "Neutral gas temperature estimate in CF4/O2/Ar inductively coupled plasmas" APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, AIP, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, MELVILLE, NY, US, vol. 81, no. 6, 5 August 2002 (2002-08-05), pages 990-992, XP012033207 ISSN: 0003-6951 *
OH C H ET AL: "Effect of N-containing additive gases on global warming gas emission during remote plasma cleaning process of silicon nitride PECVD chamber using C4F8/O2/Ar chemistry" SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY ELSEVIER SWITZERLAND, vol. 171, no. 1-3, 1 July 2003 (2003-07-01), pages 267-272, XP002362634 ISSN: 0257-8972 cited in the application *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007070116A2 (en) * 2005-08-02 2007-06-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Remote chamber method using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits from the interior of a cvd /pecvd- plasma chamber
WO2007070116A3 (en) * 2005-08-02 2007-09-07 Massachusetts Inst Technology Remote chamber method using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits from the interior of a cvd /pecvd- plasma chamber
WO2015103003A1 (en) * 2013-12-30 2015-07-09 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Chamber cleaning and semiconductor etching gases
US10109496B2 (en) 2013-12-30 2018-10-23 The Chemours Company Fc, Llc Chamber cleaning and semiconductor etching gases
US20220059327A1 (en) * 2018-12-25 2022-02-24 Showa Denko K.K. Adhesion removal method and film-forming method
CN116145106A (en) * 2023-02-21 2023-05-23 苏州鼎芯光电科技有限公司 Cleaning method for semiconductor coating process chamber

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005095670A3 (en) 2006-05-04
WO2005090638A3 (en) 2006-04-13
WO2005095670A2 (en) 2005-10-13
BRPI0508204A (en) 2007-07-17
WO2005098086A3 (en) 2006-05-04
KR20070043697A (en) 2007-04-25
JP2007531289A (en) 2007-11-01
WO2005090638A8 (en) 2006-11-16
WO2005098086A2 (en) 2005-10-20
JP2007531288A (en) 2007-11-01
TW200623281A (en) 2006-07-01
TW200623251A (en) 2006-07-01
TWI281715B (en) 2007-05-21
EP1733071A2 (en) 2006-12-20
TWI281714B (en) 2007-05-21
BRPI0508214A (en) 2007-07-17
TWI284929B (en) 2007-08-01
TW200623240A (en) 2006-07-01
JP2007530792A (en) 2007-11-01
BRPI0508205A (en) 2007-07-17
EP1737998A2 (en) 2007-01-03
EP1733072A2 (en) 2006-12-20
KR20070040748A (en) 2007-04-17
KR20070037434A (en) 2007-04-04
WO2005090638A9 (en) 2006-01-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060144820A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
WO2005090638A2 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
US20050258137A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits
US20070107750A1 (en) Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits from the interior of chemical vapor deposition chambers
US20070028944A1 (en) Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits
KR100760891B1 (en) Method for enhancing fluorine utilization
EP2007923B1 (en) Etching process
US20090047447A1 (en) Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor
CN112981369B (en) Chamber Cleaning and Semiconductor Etching Gases
JP2009503905A (en) Method for removing surface deposits and passivating internal surfaces inside chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chambers
US20070028943A1 (en) Method of using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits
KR102275996B1 (en) Hydrofluoroolefin etching gas mixtures
US20060144819A1 (en) Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1/7-7/7, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/10-10/10

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 4859/DELNP/2006

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007505283

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200580009423.9

Country of ref document: CN

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005760434

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020067021947

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2005760434

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020067021947

Country of ref document: KR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: PI0508214

Country of ref document: BR