WO1999000054A1 - Adjustable computer tomography device - Google Patents

Adjustable computer tomography device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999000054A1
WO1999000054A1 PCT/IB1998/000802 IB9800802W WO9900054A1 WO 1999000054 A1 WO1999000054 A1 WO 1999000054A1 IB 9800802 W IB9800802 W IB 9800802W WO 9900054 A1 WO9900054 A1 WO 9900054A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ray source
adjustment
ray
patient
computer tomography
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/IB1998/000802
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Jantje Edith Wilting
Jan Timmer
Fransisca Maria Cornelia De Brouwer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koninklijke Philips NV
Philips AB
Philips Svenska AB
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Philips AB
Philips Svenska AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV, Philips AB, Philips Svenska AB filed Critical Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Priority to JP10542107A priority Critical patent/JP2000516834A/ja
Priority to DE69840290T priority patent/DE69840290D1/de
Priority to EP98919417A priority patent/EP0942682B1/en
Publication of WO1999000054A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999000054A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03Computed tomography [CT]
    • A61B6/032Transmission computed tomography [CT]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05GX-RAY TECHNIQUE
    • H05G1/00X-ray apparatus involving X-ray tubes; Circuits therefor
    • H05G1/08Electrical details
    • H05G1/26Measuring, controlling or protecting
    • H05G1/30Controlling
    • H05G1/46Combined control of different quantities, e.g. exposure time as well as voltage or current
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/40Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/4021Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving movement of the focal spot
    • A61B6/4028Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving movement of the focal spot resulting in acquisition of views from substantially different positions, e.g. EBCT

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a computer tomography device, including an X-ray source, an X-ray detection system for picking up a number of density profiles of an object to be radiologically examined, - a reconstruction unit for deriving an image signal from the density profiles, and
  • control system for adjusting the X-ray source on the basis of a density value of the object.
  • a computer tomography device of this kind is known from United States patent US 5,400,378.
  • the invention also relates to a method of computer tomography.
  • the control system of the known computer tomography device adjusts the tube current of the X-ray source on the basis of relative X-ray absorption values derived from "scout data".
  • the "scout data” represent the attenuation of X-rays in the object relative to a standard value. Such scout data comprises the minimum values of two density profiles picked up by exposing the object to be examined to X-rays from two mutually perpendicular directions.
  • the tube current is adjusted on the basis of the relative X-ray absorption values.
  • the adjustment of the X-ray source is adapted to the relative X-ray absorption in the part of the object to be examined, for example a patient to be radiologically examined.
  • the control system does not suitably take into account the fact that the desired image quality differs for images of different parts of the object to be examined.
  • the density profiles are picked up by irradiating the patient by means of X-rays from a number of directions. An image of, for example a cross-section of the object is reconstructed from the density profiles.
  • the operation of the known computer tomography device is also known from the general article "X-ray computed tomography for medical imaging" by Harish P. Hiriyannaiah in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, March 1997, pp. 42-59.
  • control system is arranged to adjust the X-ray source on the basis of a kind of tissue of a part of the object to be examined.
  • the intensity and/or energy of the X-rays can be accurately adapted to the part of the object to be examined.
  • the intensity and/or energy of the X-rays can notably be adapted very well to the anatomy and the morphology of the patient to be examined, thus ensuring that an image of high diagnostic quality is formed whereas the X-ray dose whereto the patient is exposed remains comparatively low.
  • An image of high diagnostic quality notably has a low noise level, so that small details of low contrast can still be reproduced in a suitably visible manner.
  • the intensity and/or energy of the X-rays is adjusted to be as low as possible, but high enough to ensure that the noise level of the image is acceptably low.
  • the intensity and/or energy of the x-rays is adjusted on the basis of the murphology of the part of the patient's anatomy to be examined.
  • the X-ray source is adjusted so that it yields an image having the quality required for the part imaged.
  • Image quality relates notably to the noise level of the image, the contrast of the image, and their mutual relationship which represents the contrast resolution.
  • the contrast resolution is the smallest brightness difference in the image of a detail of given dimensions which can still be visibly reproduced.
  • the noise level, or rather the contrast resolution is adapted to the part of the anatomy of the patient to be examined.
  • the imaging of lung tissue requires only little contrast resolution, because small deviations can be readily noticed in the image against the background of low X-ray absorption.
  • the contrast resolution is related to the noise level of the image.
  • the contrast resolution is a function of the noise level.
  • the noise level of the image can be readily predicted as a function of the adjustment of the X-ray source; this is because the noise in the image is caused mainly by shot noise of the X-rays, said shot noise having a Poisson distribution.
  • the intensity of the X-rays can be readily adjusted by adjustment of the tube current of the X-ray source.
  • the tube current is the electric current of an electron beam whereby X-rays are generated in an anode of the X-ray source.
  • the energy of the X-rays can be readily adjusted by adjustment of the electric high voltage between the cathode and the anode of the X-ray tube.
  • the period of time during which the X-ray source emits X-rays can also be adjusted.
  • This period of t ' me is the pulse duration of the X-ray pulses produced by the X-ray source.
  • the product of the tube current and the pulse duration is also referred to as the mAs value.
  • This mAs value represents the X-ray dose whereto the patient is exposed.
  • the energy of the X-rays can be adjusted by adaptation of the electric high voltage applied to the X-ray source.
  • the control system preferably takes into account a density value of the object and a reference adjustment.
  • the density value differs for each part of the anatomy to be examined; for example, lung tissue absorbs hardly any X-rays whereas the skull and the region of the hips absorb a comparatively large amount of X-rays.
  • the reference adjustment concerns an adjustment which yields, in a rather large number of situations, an image of acceptable image quality while exposing the patient to an acceptable X-ray dose.
  • the reference adjustment is an adjustment of the X-ray source which yields the desired result for a majority of patients undergoing the relevant radiological examination, a group of patients having a diameter in a predetermined range or the reference adjustment is an adjustment which is adequate for a radiological examination of a voluminous patient.
  • the reference adjustment is preferably dependent on the part of the anatomy to be examined, on the expected pathology or on the diagnostic requirements.
  • the reference adjustment is used, or the radiologist is at least offered the possibility of selecting the reference adjustment, when an adjustment derived by the control system does not lead to a substantial reduction of the required X-ray dose.
  • the adjustment which is co-based on the reference adjustment and the density value can also be suitably used without taking into account the part of the patient to be examined for the adjustment.
  • the reference adjustment preferably takes into account the fact that a different image quality is required for the imaging of different parts of the anatomy.
  • the reference adjustment is chosen so that it yields the desired quality when a comparatively voluminous patient is examined.
  • the adjustment of the X-ray source can be readily adapted to the patient to be examined.
  • the reference adjustment can also be derived from a mean or representative volume of the relevant part of the anatomy to be examined, the density or the X-ray absorption of said part and the desired image quality also being taken into account.
  • the control system takes into account a difference between the djustment derived by the control system and the reference adjustment.
  • the adjustment of the X-ray source preferably is changed only if a patient is examined whose build deviates significantly from the build associated with the reference adjustment. It is thus achieved that most radiological examinations are performed on the basis of a standardized protocol. Moreover, the loss of a substantial amount of time for readjustment of the X-ray source is avoided. Furthermore, the adjustment of the X-ray source will not be influenced by inaccuracies occurring during extraction of the adjustment of the X-ray source.
  • the adjustment of the X-ray source is adapted, so as to limit the X-ray dose whereto a patient is exposed, only in the case of particularly large or voluminous patients, particularly small or skinny patients or children.
  • control system changes the adjustment of the X-ray source if the adjustment derived by the control system deviates from the reference adjustment by more than a threshold value.
  • the threshold value can be adjusted in advance. In practice, preferably a threshold value is used which yields a reduction of the X-ray dose by approximately 1/3 relative to the X-ray dose associated with the relevant reference adjustment.
  • the difference between the adjustment derived by the control system and the reference adjustment is displayed. This enables the radiologist to adjust the X-ray source by hand, on the basis of the adjustment advised by the control system, or to use the reference adjustment.
  • the adjustment of the X-ray source concerns the intensity and/or the energy of the X-rays emitted by the X-ray source.
  • the intensity of the X-ray source can be readily adjusted by controlling the tube current of the X-ray source.
  • the energy of the X-ray source can be readily adjusted by controlling the electric high voltage of the X-ray source.
  • the density value of the patient to be examined can be readily measured, notably locally, by irradiating the patient by means of X-rays and by locally detecting to what extent the X-rays are attenuated.
  • the result of such a measurement is referred to as a "scanogram" or "scout data".
  • the X-ray source irradiates the patient by means of X-rays while the X-ray source and the X-ray detector are maintained in a fixed orientation relative to the patient.
  • the X-ray source thus forms an X-ray shadow image which is usually called a "scanogram".
  • the scanogram is usually employed to select a part of the patient of which density two are to be picked up.
  • the local dimension of the patient notably the thickness, can be accurately derived from the scanogram.
  • the X-ray source is adjusted while taking into account the dimensions of the patient.
  • the intensity and/or the energy of the X-rays is chosen to be lower whereas in order to form a scanogram of a heavier or very heavy patient a higher intensity and/or energy of the X-rays is selected.
  • a very low intensity and/or energy of the X-rays is used.
  • the X-ray source in order to form the scanogram the X-ray source can be sufficiently accurately adjusted on the basis of a coarse judgement of the patient. Such a coarse judgement of the patient can be readily made in a glance. It also makes sense to form such a scanogram while taking into account a property of the patient to be examined, for example the stature thereof, independently of the use of the scanogram for adjusting the X-ray source.
  • An embodiment of a computer tomography device is defined in Claim 8.
  • the patient is exposed to a lower X-ray dose by reducing the intensity and/or energy of the X-ray source.
  • the reference adjustment preferably concerns the adjustment which is adequate for a radiological examination of a voluminous patient, so that the X-ray dose whereto a patient is exposed in practice is practically always lower than the X-ray dose that would be applied according to the reference adjustment.
  • the noise index represents the amount of noise to be expected in the image in dependence on the adjustment of the computer tomography device.
  • the radiologist provides an indication as to which noise impression is desired for the image to be generated.
  • the control system derives an adjustment of the X-ray source from the value selected for the noise index so as to achieve the desired image quality.
  • the noise index is defined in such a manner that a strong correlation exists between a more or less subjective evaluation of noise by the radiologist and the objective value of the standard deviation of the brightness values of the image.
  • the standard deviation represents variations of the brightness values in as far as they do not relate to image information.
  • An embodiment of a computer tomography device is defined in Claim 10.
  • the angle at which the patient is irradiated can thus be taken into account. As the angle of incidence of the X-rays is larger, the path traveled by the X-rays through the patient will be longer and the X-rays will be attenuated more. It is also an object of the invention to provide a method of computed tomography for forming an image of high diagnostic quality while limiting the x-ray dose whereto the patient is exposed. The object is achieved by the method defined in Claim 11.
  • the Figure shows diagrammatically a computer device according to the invention.
  • the Figure shows diagrammatically a computer tomography device according to the invention.
  • An X-ray source 1 co-operates with a slit-shaped diaphragm 10 so as to emit a diverging flat (fan-shaped) X-ray beam 3 for irradiating the object 2, for example a patient to be examined.
  • the X-ray detector 5 is arranged opposite the X-ray source 1.
  • the X-ray detector of the present embodiment is a position-sensitive X-ray detector which comprises a row of separate detector cells 11.
  • the detector cells 11 are, for example gas-filled (xenon) detectors or solid-state detectors.
  • the thickness of the fan-shaped X-ray beam generally amounts to from 1 mm to 10 mm, measured halfway between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector.
  • the intensity of the radiation having traversed the patient and incident on the X-ray detector is determined mainly by the absorption within the patient 2 who is arranged on a table 12 between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector.
  • the absorption is measured along a large number of lines from a large number of directions by rotating the X-ray source 1 and the X-ray detector 5 together around the patient by means of a support 13.
  • the combined rotation of the X-ray source and the X-ray detector may be continuous but also intermittent.
  • the patient can be displaced along the axis of rotation during irradiation and rotation, so that the X-ray detector acquires data from a significant three-dimensional volume of the patient.
  • the computer device may also include a detection system which is not rotatable but extends along (substantially) the entire circumference of the patient.
  • the X-ray source and the X-ray detector are fully rotated together, i.e. through 360°, around the patient.
  • annular anode arranged around the patient can also be used as the X-ray source, the point of incidence of an electron beam generating X-rays from the anode material then being displaced along the annular anode around the patient. It suffices in principle, however, to use a fan-shaped beam which rotates around the patient through an angle which amounts to the sum of 180° and the angle of aperture of the fan-shaped beam.
  • the intensity of the X-rays received by the individual detector cells in any position or orientation of the X-ray source and the X-ray detector is digitized and applied to a reconstruction unit 4. In the reconstruction unit 4 this measured data is converted, after correction for known error sources and disturbances, into a density profile of the patient to be examined.
  • high and low density values in the density profile correspond to parts of the patient in which the X-ray absorption is high and low, respectively.
  • the intensity values of the X-rays received by the X-ray detector in individual orientations constitute a respective density profile.
  • an image of a slice along a plane through the patient can be derived from these density profiles by means of the reconstruction unit.
  • An image of this kind may represent, for example, a cross-section of the patient to be examined.
  • Such an image can be displayed on a monitor 14 which is coupled to the reconstruction unit.
  • the image may also be stored as a digital image matrix or be applied to an image processing unit 15 for further processing.
  • the computer tomography device also includes a control unit 20 which serves to adjust the X-ray source.
  • This adjustment concerns notably the adjustment of a high- voltage power supply 21 for the X-ray source, particularly the adjustment of the tube current and the high voltage whereby the intensity and the energy of the X-rays are adjusted.
  • the control unit is connected to a memory unit 22 in which suitable reference adjustments of the X-ray source are stored for the examination of different parts of the anatomy of the patient to be examined. Such reference adjustments can be empirically determined by forming images of various parts of the anatomy of a large number of patients while using a number of adjustments of the X-ray source.
  • the reference adjustments comprise the tube current and the high voltage of the X-ray source, and may also comprise other parameters of the computer tomography device, for example the slice thickness used, the speed of rotation of the X-ray source and the X-ray detector, and filter adjustments of the reconstruction unit.
  • the reference adjustment preferably also comprises a reference thickness of the patient.
  • the reference adjustments have been chosen in such a manner that in the circumstances represented by individual reference adjustments an image of the desired diagnostic quality is produced while using an acceptable X-ray dose.
  • a so-called scanogram of the patient is formed by irradiating the patient by means of X-rays while the X-ray source and the X-ray detector are stationary and the patient table with the patient is displaced in the longitudinal direction of the patient.
  • the reconstruction unit 4 derives from x-ray attenuation values density values of different parts of the patient from the local absorption of X-rays. These density values constitute the scanogram and are stored in the memory unit 22.
  • the control unit 20 calculates the local thickness of the patient from the density values of the patient and compares the calculated thickness with the reference thickness. The control unit applies the calculated thickness of the patient and the reference thickness to a display 23.
  • the control unit 20 also includes one or more selection members 24, such as preset keys, for adjusting the computer tomography device so as to form the scanogram. This adjustment is performed by adjusting the X-ray source on the basis of the thickness of the patient.
  • preset keys are provided for forming a scanogram of a small child, a thin, a normal and a very voluminous patient.
  • is the mean X-ray absorption coefficient along the path traveled by the X-rays through the part of the patient to be examined and d is the path length of the X-rays through the part of the patient to be examined.
  • the standard deviation is an accurate measure of the noise level in the image.
  • p G( ⁇ d, ⁇ )
  • c y / exp( ⁇ tf) v sl ⁇
  • V the electric high voltage
  • s the slice thickness
  • I the tube current
  • the pulse duration of the X-ray source
  • c a proportionality constant.
  • An acceptable noise level ⁇ ref can be empirically determined for adjustments p e.g.
  • an effective patient thickness D eff is derived.
  • I 0 /I is the ratio of the x-ray intensity incident on the part of the patient to be examined to the x-ray intensity passing through the part of the patient to be examined. This ratio is obtained from the scanogram.
  • p G( ⁇ , D, ⁇ ref )
  • the effective patient thickness D eff may be calculated even more accurately by taking into account the mean x-ray absorptivities of the part of the patient to be examined in respective directions. The values of this ratio for different parts of the patient to be examined are taken up in the scanogram.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Pulmonology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
PCT/IB1998/000802 1997-06-26 1998-05-25 Adjustable computer tomography device Ceased WO1999000054A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10542107A JP2000516834A (ja) 1997-06-26 1998-05-25 調整可能なコンピュータ断層撮影装置
DE69840290T DE69840290D1 (de) 1997-06-26 1998-05-25 Einstellbare rechnergestützte tomographie anlage
EP98919417A EP0942682B1 (en) 1997-06-26 1998-05-25 Adjustable computer tomography device

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP97201958.2 1997-06-26
EP97201958 1997-06-26

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999000054A1 true WO1999000054A1 (en) 1999-01-07

Family

ID=8228489

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB1998/000802 Ceased WO1999000054A1 (en) 1997-06-26 1998-05-25 Adjustable computer tomography device

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6094468A (enExample)
EP (1) EP0942682B1 (enExample)
JP (1) JP2000516834A (enExample)
DE (1) DE69840290D1 (enExample)
WO (1) WO1999000054A1 (enExample)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU646487B2 (en) * 1990-05-16 1994-02-24 General Hospital Corporation, The Treatment of male infertility
EP1116475A1 (de) * 2000-01-15 2001-07-18 Philips Corporate Intellectual Property GmbH Computertomographie-Verfahren zur Erzeugung eines Scannogramms
WO2006085247A2 (en) 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Dose rate control in an x-ray system
WO2019157415A1 (en) * 2018-02-09 2019-08-15 General Electric Company Systems and method for x-ray imaging

Families Citing this family (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE60031787T2 (de) * 1999-10-08 2007-02-22 Gendex Corp. Automatische belichtungssteuerung für ein zahnärztliches panorama- und kephalographie-röntgengerät
US6614878B2 (en) 2001-01-23 2003-09-02 Fartech, Inc. X-ray filter system for medical imaging contrast enhancement
US6650730B2 (en) 2001-01-23 2003-11-18 Fartech, Inc. Filter assembly for X-ray filter system for medical imaging contrast enhancement
JP4785265B2 (ja) * 2001-04-12 2011-10-05 ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー X線ctシステムおよびその操作コンソールおよびその制御方法
JP2002355239A (ja) * 2001-06-01 2002-12-10 Hitachi Medical Corp X線ct装置
JP4387638B2 (ja) * 2001-07-04 2009-12-16 株式会社東芝 X線コンピュータ断層診断装置
JP2008221016A (ja) * 2001-07-04 2008-09-25 Toshiba Corp X線コンピュータ断層診断装置
JP4309631B2 (ja) * 2001-10-22 2009-08-05 株式会社東芝 X線コンピュータトモグラフィ装置
US6680995B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-01-20 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co., Llc Method and apparatus of determining and displaying a helical artifact index
US6904127B2 (en) * 2001-11-21 2005-06-07 General Electric Company System and method of medical imaging having default noise index override capability
US7162010B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2007-01-09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Method to measure the entrance dose of a radiology apparatus
US6459755B1 (en) * 2002-02-26 2002-10-01 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co. Llc Method and apparatus for administering low dose CT scans
US7254623B1 (en) * 2002-04-16 2007-08-07 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for reducing x-ray dosage in CT imaging prescription
US6850588B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2005-02-01 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Radiation exposure limiting scheme
US6744846B2 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-06-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for automatic exposure control in CT scanning
JP4154990B2 (ja) * 2002-10-17 2008-09-24 株式会社島津製作所 X線ct装置
WO2004071301A1 (ja) * 2003-02-14 2004-08-26 Hitachi Medical Corporation X線ct装置
US20050238140A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-10-27 Dan Hardesty X-ray imaging system with automatic image resolution enhancement
US6956929B2 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-10-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for controlling modulation of X-ray tube current using a single topogram
US7545912B2 (en) * 2003-10-02 2009-06-09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. X-ray unit
US7453987B1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2008-11-18 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system for high energy, low radiation power X-ray imaging of the contents of a target
JP2006320523A (ja) * 2005-05-19 2006-11-30 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc シャトルモードヘリカルスキャンのスキャンパラメータ設定方法およびx線ct装置
DE102005046784A1 (de) * 2005-09-29 2007-04-05 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung von Parametern
US20070147579A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 De Man Bruno K B Method and system for radiographic imaging with organ-based radiation profile prescription
JP4729519B2 (ja) * 2007-03-09 2011-07-20 ゼネラル・エレクトリック・カンパニイ 器官に基づく放射線プロファイル設定を設けた放射線撮像の方法及びシステム
NL1033544C2 (nl) * 2007-03-15 2008-09-16 Gen Electric Werkwijze en systeem voor radiografische afbeelding met orgaan-gebaseerd stralingsprofielvoorschrift.
US8031831B2 (en) * 2009-05-28 2011-10-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Voltage and or current modulation in dual energy computed tomography
WO2011008967A1 (en) 2009-07-15 2011-01-20 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research System and method for automatic tube potential selection for radiation dose reduction in ct
US8314394B1 (en) 2009-11-04 2012-11-20 Science Applications International Corporation System and method for three-dimensional imaging using scattering from annihilation coincidence photons
JP6257948B2 (ja) * 2012-08-07 2018-01-10 東芝メディカルシステムズ株式会社 X線撮影システム
DE102012018856A1 (de) * 2012-09-25 2014-03-27 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Computertomographen
DE102013219249A1 (de) * 2013-09-25 2015-03-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und System zur automatischen Auswahl eines Scanprotokolls
US9486173B2 (en) 2014-08-05 2016-11-08 General Electric Company Systems and methods for adjustable view frequency computed tomography imaging
JP6342437B2 (ja) * 2016-02-22 2018-06-13 ゼネラル・エレクトリック・カンパニイ 放射線断層撮影システム及びその制御プログラム
US10973489B2 (en) * 2017-09-29 2021-04-13 General Electric Company CT imaging system and method using a task-based image quality metric to achieve a desired image quality
US12064268B2 (en) 2020-03-17 2024-08-20 Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for medical imaging
CN111358479A (zh) * 2020-03-17 2020-07-03 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 一种放射线设备的采集参数确定方法和系统
US12458302B2 (en) * 2021-05-05 2025-11-04 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Systems and methods for processing and visualizing tube current modulations in medical imaging devices

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4158138A (en) * 1977-10-25 1979-06-12 Cgr Medical Corporation Microprocessor controlled X-ray generator
US4260894A (en) * 1978-11-30 1981-04-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Optimum dose tomography scanning system
US5629971A (en) * 1995-05-11 1997-05-13 Adac Laboratories Scan speed for transmission exposure reduction in a nuclear medicine camera

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US35848A (en) * 1862-07-08 Improvement in skeleton skirts
JPH0636793B2 (ja) 1988-05-20 1994-05-18 株式会社東芝 X線ctスキヤナ
US5231651A (en) * 1990-03-30 1993-07-27 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray computerized tomographic method and apparatus with simple programmable anatomical selecting operation
US5400378A (en) * 1993-11-19 1995-03-21 General Electric Company Dynamic dose control in multi-slice CT scan
US5379333A (en) * 1993-11-19 1995-01-03 General Electric Company Variable dose application by modulation of x-ray tube current during CT scanning
US5737386A (en) * 1995-06-08 1998-04-07 Strawder; Glenn G. Computer for an x-ray machine

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4158138A (en) * 1977-10-25 1979-06-12 Cgr Medical Corporation Microprocessor controlled X-ray generator
US4260894A (en) * 1978-11-30 1981-04-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Optimum dose tomography scanning system
US5629971A (en) * 1995-05-11 1997-05-13 Adac Laboratories Scan speed for transmission exposure reduction in a nuclear medicine camera

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU646487B2 (en) * 1990-05-16 1994-02-24 General Hospital Corporation, The Treatment of male infertility
EP1116475A1 (de) * 2000-01-15 2001-07-18 Philips Corporate Intellectual Property GmbH Computertomographie-Verfahren zur Erzeugung eines Scannogramms
JP2001218767A (ja) * 2000-01-15 2001-08-14 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv スキャノグラムを形成するコンピュータ断層撮影方法
WO2006085247A2 (en) 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Dose rate control in an x-ray system
WO2006085247A3 (en) * 2005-02-11 2006-10-19 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv Dose rate control in an x-ray system
US7545915B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2009-06-09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Dose rate control in an X-ray system
WO2019157415A1 (en) * 2018-02-09 2019-08-15 General Electric Company Systems and method for x-ray imaging

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2000516834A (ja) 2000-12-19
US6094468A (en) 2000-07-25
EP0942682B1 (en) 2008-12-03
EP0942682A1 (en) 1999-09-22
DE69840290D1 (de) 2009-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6094468A (en) Adjustable computer tomography device
US5867553A (en) Computed tomography scanner with reduced power x-ray source
US6904118B2 (en) Method and apparatus for generating a density map using dual-energy CT
Ning et al. Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation
US6501828B1 (en) Method and apparatus for influencing X-rays in a beam path
US6507639B1 (en) Method and apparatus for modulating the radiation dose from x-ray tube
JP5371758B2 (ja) X線ct装置
US20020085672A1 (en) Automatic exposure control and optimization in digital x-ray radiography
Catalano et al. Optimizing radiation dose and image quality
US20120155609A1 (en) System and method of low dose exposure aided positioning (leap) for digital radiography
US7409043B2 (en) Method and apparatus to control radiation tube focal spot size
US20030058994A1 (en) Computed tomography method and apparatus for registering data with reduced radiation stress to the patient
JP2004173924A (ja) X線制御方法およびx線画像撮影装置
US9968318B2 (en) Estimating apparatus, X-ray diagnosis apparatus, and estimating method
Inoue Radiation dose modulation of computed tomography component in positron emission tomography/computed tomography
EP1382298A1 (en) X-ray computed tomography apparatus with support system for setting scan conditions
EP0041752A1 (en) Radiography apparatus incorporating image subtraction
Supanich et al. AAPM Task Group Report 238: 3D C‐arms with volumetric imaging capability
US5373543A (en) Computer tomography apparatus having means for producing a shadowgraph
US7391843B2 (en) Systems and methods for adjusting noise in a medical imaging system
US12004284B2 (en) Methods and systems for x-ray imaging
US5008914A (en) Quantitative imaging employing scanning equalization radiography
Molloi et al. Area X‐ray beam equalization for digital angiography
Ross et al. Design and image quality results from volumetric CT with a flat-panel imager
Sassi et al. Moving segments region of interest attenuator for x‐ray fluoroscopy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998919417

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998 542107

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998919417

Country of ref document: EP