US8623576B2 - Time differential reticle inspection - Google Patents

Time differential reticle inspection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8623576B2
US8623576B2 US13/378,811 US201013378811A US8623576B2 US 8623576 B2 US8623576 B2 US 8623576B2 US 201013378811 A US201013378811 A US 201013378811A US 8623576 B2 US8623576 B2 US 8623576B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signature
reticle
contamination
difference
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US13/378,811
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20120171600A1 (en
Inventor
Eric Brian CATEY
Nora-Jean Harned
Yevgeniy Konstantinovich Shmarev
Robert Albert Tharaldsen
Richard David Jacobs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ASML Holding NV
Original Assignee
ASML Holding NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ASML Holding NV filed Critical ASML Holding NV
Priority to US13/378,811 priority Critical patent/US8623576B2/en
Assigned to ASML HOLDING N.V. reassignment ASML HOLDING N.V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HARNED, NORA-JEAN, CATEY, ERIC BRIAN, JACOBS, RICHARD DAVID, SHMAREV, YEVGENIY KONSTANTINOVICH, THARALDSEN, ROBERT ALBERT
Publication of US20120171600A1 publication Critical patent/US20120171600A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8623576B2 publication Critical patent/US8623576B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F1/00—Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
    • G03F1/68—Preparation processes not covered by groups G03F1/20 - G03F1/50
    • G03F1/82—Auxiliary processes, e.g. cleaning or inspecting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F1/00—Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
    • G03F1/68—Preparation processes not covered by groups G03F1/20 - G03F1/50
    • G03F1/82—Auxiliary processes, e.g. cleaning or inspecting
    • G03F1/84—Inspecting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70483—Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
    • G03F7/70605—Workpiece metrology
    • G03F7/70616—Monitoring the printed patterns
    • G03F7/7065—Defects, e.g. optical inspection of patterned layer for defects

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to lithography, and more particularly to patterning device inspection.
  • a lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate.
  • a lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs).
  • a patterning device which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, can be used to create a circuit pattern formed on an individual layer of the IC.
  • the pattern can be transferred onto the target portion (e.g., comprising part of, one, or several dies) of the substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging the pattern onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) on the substrate.
  • a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are patterned.
  • lithographic apparatus include steppers, in which each individual target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning” direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
  • EUV radiation needs the exposure radiation beam path in the apparatus to be evacuated to avoid absorption of the exposure radiation.
  • EUV lithographic apparatus use a patterning device, such as a mask or a reticle, to impart a pattern into a beam of EUV radiation.
  • Such patterning devices are highly susceptible to contamination, such as particulate contamination, which provides image defects in the pattern imparted into the EUV radiation beam.
  • the image defects at least degrade, and in some cases, can destroy the performance of an IC manufactured with a contaminated reticle.
  • the image defects reduce yield of the lithographic apparatus. Therefore, inspecting patterning devices for contamination is important to maintain and improve yield of the lithographic apparatus.
  • Absolute detection measures a scattered signal from a probe beam. Analysis of the scattered signal may indicate a particular type and size of particulate contamination.
  • absolute detection is not able to accurately distinguish between a signal produced by scattering from a reticle pattern and a signal produced by scattering from contamination on the reticle pattern. This problem occurs because contamination can be composed of any material having dimensions down to a molecular level, which unfortunately includes dimensions of a reticle's absorber structures.
  • absolute detection when using absolute detection, a scattered signal from a particle on the reticle's surface is indistinguishable from a signal scattered by the reticle's absorber structures.
  • absolute detection is often relegated to inspecting non-patterned surfaces, such as a back-side of a reticle or a pellicle.
  • Comparison techniques include two common methods for inspecting patterned surfaces of a reticle.
  • the first traditional comparison technique is commonly known as “die-to-die” comparison.
  • This technique contemporaneously compares a first pattern on a substrate to a second pattern, similar to the first pattern, that is also located on the substrate.
  • This technique essentially compares a first optical signal from a first pattern on the reticle with a second optical signal from a second pattern on the same reticle. Problems with this technique include that it cannot be performed when the reticle contains only one pattern or only a collection of unique patterns. Further, variations in absorber structure sizes and variations in critical dimensions between the first and second patterns can complicate the particle detection process and undesirably limit inspection accuracy.
  • the second conventional comparison technique compares a pattern on a tangible reticle with a computer-generated theoretical reticle layout design from which the tangible reticle was fabricated.
  • Problems with this technique include that errors in a reticle fabrication process, such as those stemming from critical dimension control, are not represented in the computer-generated theoretical reticle layout design. These errors complicate the comparison technique by indicating differences between the tangible reticle and the computer-generated theoretical reticle layout design that are false positive indications of contamination.
  • this comparison technique inherently produces errors that complicate the particle detection process and undesirably limit inspection accuracy.
  • the present invention includes improved reticle inspection systems and methods. To meet these needs, embodiments of the present invention are directed toward time differential reticle inspection. For example, an embodiment provides a method for detecting contamination on a reticle using a time differential technique.
  • presence of a difference between a first signature of a portion of the reticle and a second signature, produced subsequent to the first signature, of the portion of the reticle is determined.
  • a significant difference between the first and second signatures indicates a presence of contamination on the reticle. If there are no significant differences, then the reticle is considered to be clean.
  • the first signature can be measured when the reticle is in a known clean condition.
  • another embodiment provides a method for detecting contamination on a reticle.
  • a first signature of a portion of the reticle is recorded. Then the portion of the reticle is exposed to form a wafer image. The wafer image is inspected to detect an error. If an error is detected, the first signature is erased and the reticle is rejected as contaminated. If no error is detected in the wafer image, then the portion of the reticle is subsequently inspected to produce a second signature. A difference between the first signature and the second signature is determined, to detect contamination on the reticle. If contamination is detected, the reticle can be cleaned.
  • a method for detecting contamination on a reticle A first signature of a portion of the reticle is recorded at a time when the reticle meets a minimum level of cleanliness necessary to produce a functional integrated circuit layer. After the recording, the portion of the reticle is inspected to produce a second signature. A difference between the first signature and the second signature is determined, to detect contamination on the reticle. If contamination is detected, the reticle can be cleaned.
  • FIGS. 1A and 1B respectively depict reflective and transmissive lithographic apparatuses.
  • FIG. 2 depicts an example EUV lithographic apparatus.
  • FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method of detecting contamination.
  • FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method of detecting contamination using a known clean reticle.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method of detecting contamination including inspecting a reticle to determine the reticle's cleanliness.
  • FIG. 6 depicts a contamination detection system.
  • a machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device).
  • a machine-readable medium may include read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other forms of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.), and others.
  • firmware, software, routines, instructions may be described herein as performing certain actions. However, it should be appreciated that such descriptions are merely for convenience and that such actions in fact result from computing devices, processors, controllers, or other devices executing the firmware, software, routines, instructions, etc.
  • the first signature can be measured when the reticle is in a known clean condition, such as at a time when the reticle meets a minimum level of cleanliness necessary to produce a functional integrated circuit layer.
  • a known clean condition such as at a time when the reticle meets a minimum level of cleanliness necessary to produce a functional integrated circuit layer.
  • FIGS. 1A and 1B schematically depict lithographic apparatus 100 and lithographic apparatus 100 ′, respectively.
  • Lithographic apparatus 100 and lithographic apparatus 100 ′ each include: an illumination system (illuminator) IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g., DUV or EUV radiation) provided by a source SO; a support structure (e.g., a mask table) MT configured to support a patterning device (e.g., a mask, a reticle, or a dynamic patterning device) MA and connected to a first positioner PM configured to accurately position the patterning device MA; and a substrate table (e.g., a wafer table) WT configured to hold a substrate (e.g., a resist coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioner PW configured to accurately position the substrate W.
  • an illumination system illumination system
  • IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g., DUV or EUV radiation) provided by a source SO
  • a support structure
  • Lithographic apparatuses 100 and 100 ′ also have a projection system PS configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MA onto a target portion (e.g., comprising one or more dies) C of the substrate W.
  • a projection system PS configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MA onto a target portion (e.g., comprising one or more dies) C of the substrate W.
  • the patterning device MA and the projection system PS are reflective
  • the patterning device MA and the projection system PS are transmissive.
  • the illumination system IL can include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic, or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling the radiation beam B.
  • optical components such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic, or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling the radiation beam B.
  • the support structure MT holds the patterning device MA in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device MA, the design of the lithographic apparatuses 100 and 100 ′, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device MA is held in a vacuum environment.
  • the support structure MT can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device MA.
  • the support structure MT can be a frame or a table, for example, which can be fixed or movable, as required.
  • the support structure MT can ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system PS.
  • patterning device should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam B with a pattern in its cross-section, such as to create a pattern in the target portion C of the substrate W.
  • the pattern imparted to the radiation beam B can correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion C, such as an integrated circuit.
  • the patterning device MA can be transmissive (as in lithographic apparatus 100 ′ of FIG. 1B ) or reflective (as in lithographic apparatus 100 of FIG. 1A ).
  • Examples of patterning devices MA include reticles, masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels.
  • Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase shift, and attenuated phase shift, as well as various hybrid mask types.
  • An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in the radiation beam B which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
  • projection system PS can encompass any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors, such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum.
  • a vacuum environment can be used for EUV or electron beam radiation since other gases can absorb, respectively, too much radiation or too many electrons.
  • a vacuum environment can therefore be provided to the whole beam path with the aid of a vacuum wall and vacuum pumps.
  • Lithographic apparatus 100 and/or lithographic apparatus 100 ′ can be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables) WT.
  • the additional substrate tables WT can be used in parallel, or preparatory steps can be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other substrate tables WT are being used for exposure.
  • the illuminator IL receives a radiation beam from a radiation source SO.
  • the source SO and the lithographic apparatuses 100 , 100 ′ can be separate entities, for example when the source SO is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source SO is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatuses 100 or 100 ′, and the radiation beam B passes from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD ( FIG. 1B ) comprising, for example, suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander.
  • the source SO can be an integral part of the lithographic apparatuses 100 , 100 ′—for example when the source SO is a mercury lamp.
  • the source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD, if required, can be referred to as a radiation system.
  • the illuminator IL can comprise an adjuster AD ( FIG. 1B ) for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam.
  • AD adjuster
  • the illuminator IL can comprise various other components ( FIG. 1B ), such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO.
  • the illuminator IL can be used to condition the radiation beam B, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross section.
  • the radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA, which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table) MT, and is patterned by the patterning device MA.
  • the radiation beam B is reflected from the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA.
  • the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the radiation beam B onto a target portion C of the substrate W.
  • the second positioner PW and position sensor IF 2 e.g., an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor
  • the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g.
  • the first positioner PM and another position sensor IF 1 can be used to accurately position the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA with respect to the path of the radiation beam B.
  • Patterning device (e.g., mask) MA and substrate W can be aligned using mask alignment marks M 1 , M 2 and substrate alignment marks P 1 , P 2 .
  • the radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask MA), which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table MT), and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the mask MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W.
  • the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B.
  • the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in FIG.
  • the mask table MT can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the radiation beam B, e.g., after mechanical retrieval from a mask library, or during a scan.
  • movement of the mask table MT can be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (coarse positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which form part of the first positioner PM.
  • movement of the substrate table WT can be realized using a long-stroke module and a short-stroke module, which form part of the second positioner PW.
  • the mask table MT can be connected to a short-stroke actuator only, or can be fixed.
  • Mask MA and substrate W can be aligned using mask alignment marks M 1 , M 2 and substrate alignment marks P 1 , P 2 .
  • the substrate alignment marks as illustrated occupy dedicated target portions, they can be located in spaces between target portions (known as scribe-lane alignment marks).
  • the mask alignment marks can be located between the dies.
  • the lithographic apparatuses 100 and 100 ′ can be used in at least one of the following modes:
  • lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs
  • the lithographic apparatus described herein can have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc.
  • LCDs liquid-crystal displays
  • any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein can be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion,” respectively.
  • the substrate referred to herein can be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein can be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate can be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein can also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
  • lithographic apparatus 100 includes an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) source, which is configured to generate a beam of EUV radiation for EUV lithography.
  • EUV extreme ultraviolet
  • the EUV source is configured in a radiation system (see below), and a corresponding illumination system is configured to condition the EUV radiation beam of the EUV source.
  • FIG. 2 schematically depicts an exemplary EUV lithographic apparatus 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • EUV lithographic apparatus 200 includes a radiation system 42 , an illumination optics unit 44 , and a projection system PS.
  • the radiation system 42 includes a radiation source SO, in which a beam of radiation can be formed by a discharge plasma.
  • EUV radiation can be produced by a gas or vapor, for example, from Xe gas, Li vapor, or Sn vapor, in which a very hot plasma is created to emit radiation in the EUV range of the electromagnetic spectrum.
  • the very hot plasma can be created by generating at least partially ionized plasma by, for example, an electrical discharge.
  • Partial pressures of, for example, 10 Pa of Xe, Li, Sn vapor or any other suitable gas or vapor can be required for efficient generation of the radiation.
  • the radiation emitted by radiation source SO is passed from a source chamber 47 into a collector chamber 48 via a gas barrier or contaminant trap 49 positioned in or behind an opening in source chamber 47 .
  • gas barrier 49 can include a channel structure.
  • Collector chamber 48 includes a radiation collector 50 (which can also be called a collector mirror or a collector) that can be formed from a grazing incidence collector.
  • Radiation collector 50 has an upstream radiation collector side 50 a and a downstream radiation collector side 50 b , and radiation passed by collector 50 can be reflected off a grating spectral filter 51 to be focused at a virtual source point 52 at an aperture in the collector chamber 48 .
  • illumination optics unit 44 From collector chamber 48 , a beam of radiation 56 is reflected in illumination optics unit 44 via normal incidence reflectors 53 and 54 onto a reticle or mask (not shown) positioned on reticle or mask table MT. A patterned beam 57 is formed, which is imaged in projection system PS via reflective elements 58 and 59 onto a substrate (not shown) supported on wafer stage or substrate table WT.
  • illumination optics unit 44 and projection system PS can include more (or fewer) elements than depicted in FIG. 2 .
  • grating spectral filter 51 can optionally be present, depending upon the type of lithographic apparatus.
  • illumination optics unit 44 and projection system PS can include more mirrors than those depicted in FIG. 2 .
  • projection system PS can incorporate one to four reflective elements in addition to reflective elements 58 and 59 .
  • reference number 180 indicates a space between two reflectors, e.g., a space between reflectors 142 and 143 .
  • collector mirror 50 can also include a normal incidence collector in place of or in addition to a grazing incidence mirror. Further, collector mirror 50 , although described in reference to a nested collector with reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 , is herein further used as example of a collector.
  • a transmissive optical filter can also be applied.
  • Optical filters transmissive for EUV, as well as optical filters less transmissive for or even substantially absorbing UV radiation, are known to skilled artisans.
  • grating spectral purity filter is herein further indicated interchangeably as a “spectral purity filter,” which includes gratings or transmissive filters.
  • EUV transmissive optical filters can be included as additional optical elements, for example, configured upstream of collector mirror 50 or optical EUV transmissive filters in illumination unit 44 and/or projection system PS.
  • upstream and downstream indicate positions of one or more optical elements “optically upstream” and “optically downstream,” respectively, of one or more additional optical elements.
  • a first optical element closer to source SO than a second optical element is configured upstream of the second optical element; the second optical element is configured downstream of the first optical element.
  • collector mirror 50 is configured upstream of spectral filter 51
  • optical element 53 is configured downstream of spectral filter 51 .
  • All optical elements depicted in FIG. 2 can be vulnerable to deposition of contaminants produced by source SO, for example, Sn. Such can be the case for the radiation collector 50 and, if present, the spectral purity filter 51 .
  • a cleaning device can be employed to clean one or more of these optical elements, as well as a cleaning method can be applied to those optical elements, but also to normal incidence reflectors 53 and 54 and reflective elements 58 and 59 or other optical elements, for example additional mirrors, gratings, etc.
  • Radiation collector 50 can be a grazing incidence collector, and in such an embodiment, collector 50 is aligned along an optical axis O.
  • the source SO, or an image thereof, can also be located along optical axis O.
  • the radiation collector 50 can comprise reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 (also known as a “shell” or a Wolter-type reflector including several Wolter-type reflectors). Reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 can be nested and rotationally symmetric about optical axis O.
  • an inner reflector is indicated by reference number 142
  • an intermediate reflector is indicated by reference number 143
  • an outer reflector is indicated by reference number 146 .
  • the radiation collector 50 encloses a certain volume, i.e., a volume within the outer reflector(s) 146 .
  • the volume within outer reflector(s) 146 is circumferentially closed, although small openings can be present.
  • Reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 respectively can include surfaces of which at least portion represents a reflective layer or a number of reflective layers.
  • reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 are at least partly designed for reflecting and collecting EUV radiation from source SO, and at least part of reflectors 142 , 143 , and 146 can not be designed to reflect and collect EUV radiation.
  • at least part of the back side of the reflectors can not be designed to reflect and collect EUV radiation.
  • On the surface of these reflective layers there can in addition be a cap layer for protection or as optical filter provided on at least part of the surface of the reflective layers.
  • the radiation collector 50 can be placed in the vicinity of the source SO or an image of the source SO.
  • Each reflector 142 , 143 , and 146 can comprise at least two adjacent reflecting surfaces, the reflecting surfaces further from the source SO being placed at smaller angles to the optical axis O than the reflecting surface that is closer to the source SO.
  • a grazing incidence collector 50 is configured to generate a beam of (E)UV radiation propagating along the optical axis O.
  • At least two reflectors can be placed substantially coaxially and extend substantially rotationally symmetric about the optical axis O.
  • radiation collector 50 can have further features on the external surface of outer reflector 146 or further features around outer reflector 146 , for example a protective holder, a heater, etc.
  • the terms “lens” and “lens element,” where the context allows, can refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, comprising refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical components.
  • UV radiation e.g., having a wavelength ⁇ of 365, 248, 193, 157, or 126 nm
  • EUV or soft X-ray radiation e.g., having a wavelength in the range of approximately 5-20 nm, e.g., 13.5 nm
  • particle beams such as ion beams or electron beams.
  • UV radiation refers to radiation with wavelengths of approximately 100-400 nm.
  • Vacuum UV, or VUV refers to radiation having a wavelength of approximately 100-200 nm.
  • Deep UV (DUV) generally refers to radiation having wavelengths ranging from about 126 nm to about 428 nm, and in an embodiment, an excimer laser can generate DUV radiation used within lithographic apparatus. It should be appreciated that radiation having a wavelength in the range of, for example, about 5-20 nm relates to radiation with a certain wavelength band, of which at least a part is in the range of about 5-20 nm.
  • a first and second signature are measured at different times to compare a region of the reticle to itself, at an earlier point in time, and thus identify contamination due to changes in the signatures.
  • the first signature can be measured when the reticle is in a known clean condition, such as at a time when the reticle meets a minimum level of cleanliness necessary to produce a functional integrated circuit layer. Thus, if there is a significant difference between the first and second signatures, this difference indicates a presence of contamination on the reticle. If there are no significant differences between the first and second signatures, the reticle is considered to be clean.
  • the systems and methods described herein do not need to discriminate between contaminates and a reticle absorber structure. Also, unlike comparison methods, there is no need to have knowledge of the reticle pattern, either for purposes of comparison to a computer-generated theoretical reticle layout design from which the tangible reticle was fabricated, or for purposes of locating a similarly-patterned region. Moreover, any type of reticle pattern can be inspected using the methods described herein, so reticle pattern features whose dimensions are similar to those of particles, or whose uniqueness may prevent die-to-die comparison, can be inspected with this technique.
  • This technique distinguishes between signals produced by the reticle's absorber and a signal produced by contaminants and thus, the technique identifies presence of contamination having physical dimensions substantially similar to those of absorber structures. Also, since each region of the reticle is compared with itself, critical dimension variation is not an issue, and this noise source is removed.
  • FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method 300 for detecting contamination on a reticle.
  • a first signature of at least a portion of a reticle, is produced and recorded.
  • a signature results from measuring a physical characteristic of at least a part of the reticle surface.
  • a signature can be produced using an inspection technology such as intensity imaging, interferometry, holography, thermal imaging, or electrostatic measurement. Other inspection technologies can also be used to produce a signature.
  • the reticle is scanned with electromagnetic radiation, from a source, to produce a signature in a form of a digital image.
  • the electromagnetic radiation has a wavelength of substantially 266 nanometers, a deep ultraviolet wavelength, or another practical wavelength. In some instances, the radiation can be polarized. Further, the system magnification can be adjusted to adjust a projected image size.
  • the electromagnetic radiation is subsequently detected by a detector that is coupled to a processor and a storage device.
  • the detector can be a focal plane array, for example, a charge-coupled device (CCD) such as an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD).
  • CCD charge-coupled device
  • ECCD electron-multiplying charge-coupled device
  • the detection process operates in a time delay and integration (TDI) mode.
  • the electromagnetic radiation can be detected with a photomultiplier tube or a CMOS active pixel sensor.
  • a second signature of at least the portion of the reticle.
  • Step 320 starts at a later time than the start of step 310 .
  • Step 320 can be performed at a routine interval, such as after passage of a predetermined period of time, a predetermined period of reticle usage, a predetermined period of storage, or a combination of these factors.
  • Performance of step 320 need not be periodic, and can be started at any time after starting step 310 .
  • the first signature and the second signature need not be of exactly the same region of the reticle, and need only include overlapping regions for comparison in step 330 .
  • the first signature and the second signature are compared to identify a difference between the first signature and the second signature.
  • a difference between the signatures indicates contamination on the reticle.
  • the quantity of contamination is also identified to determine if the quantity of contamination is significant enough to warrant further action.
  • the difference between the signatures indicates a presence of significant contamination if the difference indicates that the contamination will degrade imaging of the reticle pattern sufficiently to impair function of a circuit fabricated with the reticle.
  • the quantity of contamination can also be considered significant if the difference between signatures indicates particles have a surface area greater than a surface area limit.
  • the comparison result can also indicate a size and location of the contamination. If the quantity of contamination is significant, the reticle can be cleaned to reduce the quantity of contamination present.
  • FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method 400 for detecting contamination using a known clean reticle.
  • optional steps are illustrated with a dashed box.
  • the reticle is presented to the inspection system, such as an inspection module in a lithographic tool.
  • the reticle can be a reflective reticle and can lack a protective pellicle.
  • a first signature of at least a portion of the reticle is produced and recorded.
  • the reticle meets a minimum level of cleanliness necessary to produce a functional circuit layer.
  • the first signature is produced by intensity imaging.
  • Steps 320 and 330 are performed subsequent to step 430 .
  • a second signature of at least a portion of the reticle is produced.
  • the second signature can also be produced by intensity imaging.
  • the first signature and the second signature are compared to identify a difference between the first signature and the second signature. A difference between the first and second signatures indicates contamination on the reticle. Additional details about steps 320 and 330 are found elsewhere herein.
  • step 440 the reticle is removed from the inspection system.
  • step 450 if contamination is detected, the reticle is cleaned.
  • step 460 presence of contamination on the reticle is reported.
  • step 470 the exemplary method 400 ends.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart of an exemplary method 500 for detecting contamination including inspecting a reticle to determine the reticle's initial cleanliness.
  • optional steps are illustrated with a dashed box.
  • the reticle is presented to an inspection system.
  • Step 310 is performed subsequent to step 510 .
  • a first signature of at least a portion of the reticle, is produced. Additional details about step 310 are found elsewhere herein.
  • step 515 the first signature is recorded.
  • step 520 at least a portion of the reticle is exposed to form a wafer image.
  • step 525 the wafer image is examined to determine if there are any errors present in the image that suggest the reticle will produce a malfunctioning circuit layer.
  • step 530 is a decision block which determines a flowpath of the exemplary method 500 based upon the results of step 525 .
  • the reticle is stored, for example, in a reticle library.
  • the reticle is used. For example, the reticle is exposed to impart a pattern into the radiation beam B in the lithographic apparatus 100 or the lithographic apparatus 100 ′.
  • step 550 data identifying a location of the contamination is stored.
  • step 555 the first signature is stored.
  • step 560 the reticle is cleaned to remove contamination causing the error.
  • a post-cleaning signature is recorded.
  • the first signature is then compared with the post-cleaning signature to confirm the contamination is removed from the reticle, and no new contamination is present on the reticle. If no new contamination is present, the first signature is overwritten with the post-cleaning signature. Accordingly, the post-cleaning signature becomes the first signature.
  • Steps 320 and 330 are performed subsequent to steps 540 and 570 .
  • a second signature of at least a portion of the reticle is produced.
  • a difference between the first signature and the second signature is determined, to detect contamination on the reticle. Additional details about steps 320 and 330 are found elsewhere herein.
  • step 580 the reticle is removed from the inspection system.
  • step 585 if contamination is detected, the reticle is cleaned.
  • step 590 presence of contamination on the reticle is reported.
  • step 595 the exemplary method 500 ends.
  • FIG. 6 depicts a contamination detection system 600 , which is configured to perform at least a part of the methods detailed herein.
  • the contamination detection system 600 includes a patterning device inspection system 610 , a lithography tool 650 , a controller 620 that is coupled to a memory 630 , and an inspection module 640 .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
  • Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
  • Preparing Plates And Mask In Photomechanical Process (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
US13/378,811 2009-09-24 2010-07-16 Time differential reticle inspection Active 2030-07-28 US8623576B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/378,811 US8623576B2 (en) 2009-09-24 2010-07-16 Time differential reticle inspection

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US24551109P 2009-09-24 2009-09-24
US13/378,811 US8623576B2 (en) 2009-09-24 2010-07-16 Time differential reticle inspection
PCT/EP2010/060354 WO2011035946A1 (en) 2009-09-24 2010-07-16 Time differential reticle inspection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120171600A1 US20120171600A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US8623576B2 true US8623576B2 (en) 2014-01-07

Family

ID=42988390

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/378,811 Active 2030-07-28 US8623576B2 (en) 2009-09-24 2010-07-16 Time differential reticle inspection

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US8623576B2 (ja)
JP (2) JP2013506149A (ja)
KR (1) KR101677522B1 (ja)
CN (1) CN102472961B (ja)
NL (1) NL2005107A (ja)
TW (1) TWI485395B (ja)
WO (1) WO2011035946A1 (ja)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9063097B2 (en) * 2011-02-11 2015-06-23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Systems and methods eliminating false defect detections
US10401305B2 (en) 2012-02-15 2019-09-03 Kla-Tencor Corporation Time-varying intensity map generation for reticles
EP2828646B1 (en) 2012-03-20 2022-05-04 KLA-Tencor Corporation Using reflected and transmission maps to detect reticle degradation
US9390494B2 (en) 2012-12-13 2016-07-12 Kla-Tencor Corporation Delta die intensity map measurement
US9778205B2 (en) 2014-03-25 2017-10-03 Kla-Tencor Corporation Delta die and delta database inspection
EP2952964A1 (en) * 2014-06-03 2015-12-09 Aselta Nanographics Method for determining the parameters of an ic manufacturing process by a differential procedure
EP3627226A1 (en) * 2018-09-20 2020-03-25 ASML Netherlands B.V. Optical system, metrology apparatus and associated method
TWI739528B (zh) * 2020-07-24 2021-09-11 熱映光電股份有限公司 氣體檢測裝置
US11927526B2 (en) * 2021-08-05 2024-03-12 Changxin Memory Technologies, Inc. Method and system for detecting cleanliness in cavity of target device
CN114815206A (zh) * 2022-04-19 2022-07-29 中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心 一种在线x光高分辨探测器

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10246951A (ja) 1997-03-04 1998-09-14 Sony Corp レチクルの欠陥検査方法及びその装置
WO2000070332A1 (en) 1999-05-18 2000-11-23 Applied Materials, Inc. Method of and apparatus for inspection of articles by comparison with a master
US6614520B1 (en) 1997-12-18 2003-09-02 Kla-Tencor Corporation Method for inspecting a reticle
US20050166171A1 (en) 2004-01-28 2005-07-28 Applied Materials Israel Ltd Method and system for controlling the quality of a reticle
CN101452201A (zh) 2007-11-30 2009-06-10 上海华虹Nec电子有限公司 检测掩膜版的方法

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0658527B2 (ja) * 1986-12-04 1994-08-03 松下電子工業株式会社 マスク検査方法
JPH08272077A (ja) * 1995-03-30 1996-10-18 Canon Inc 検査装置およびこれを用いた露光装置やデバイス生産方法
JPH08272078A (ja) * 1995-03-31 1996-10-18 Seiko Epson Corp パターンの検査方法及び検査装置
JPH10267862A (ja) * 1997-03-27 1998-10-09 Nikon Corp 異物検査装置および方法ならびに情報処理装置
JP4021035B2 (ja) * 1998-02-24 2007-12-12 沖電気工業株式会社 マスク及びその管理装置
JP2000305249A (ja) * 1999-04-16 2000-11-02 Canon Inc ペリクルおよびレチクル異物検査装置
US6603873B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2003-08-05 Applied Materials, Inc. Defect detection using gray level signatures
JP2003185592A (ja) * 2001-12-21 2003-07-03 Sony Corp 欠陥判定方法
JP2004063545A (ja) * 2002-07-25 2004-02-26 Nikon Corp マスク検査方法、マスク検査装置、荷電粒子線露光方法及び荷電粒子線露光装置
JP2007170914A (ja) * 2005-12-20 2007-07-05 Fujitsu Ltd フォトマスクの検査方法及び検査装置
JP2008102162A (ja) * 2006-10-17 2008-05-01 Kawasaki Microelectronics Kk レチクル異物の管理方法

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10246951A (ja) 1997-03-04 1998-09-14 Sony Corp レチクルの欠陥検査方法及びその装置
US6614520B1 (en) 1997-12-18 2003-09-02 Kla-Tencor Corporation Method for inspecting a reticle
WO2000070332A1 (en) 1999-05-18 2000-11-23 Applied Materials, Inc. Method of and apparatus for inspection of articles by comparison with a master
US20030048939A1 (en) 1999-05-18 2003-03-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Method of and apparatus for inspection of articles by comparison with a master
US20050166171A1 (en) 2004-01-28 2005-07-28 Applied Materials Israel Ltd Method and system for controlling the quality of a reticle
WO2005073806A1 (en) 2004-01-28 2005-08-11 Applied Materials Israel, Ltd. Method and system for controlling the quality of a reticle
CN101452201A (zh) 2007-11-30 2009-06-10 上海华虹Nec电子有限公司 检测掩膜版的方法

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
English-Language Abstract for Chinese Patent Publication No. 101452201 A, published Jun. 10, 2009; 1 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority directed to related International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/060354, issued Mar. 27, 2012; 7 pages.
International Search Report directed to related International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/060354, mailed Nov. 15, 2010, from the European Patent Office; 4 pages.
Yen, S. M., et al., "Improving COO on KLA-Tencor Wafer Fab Reticle Inspections by Implementing Pixel Migration as New STARlight2+ Capability", Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering-Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology, vol. 7028, pp. 70282O-1 to 70282O-8 (2008).

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011035946A1 (en) 2011-03-31
CN102472961B (zh) 2015-04-22
KR20120086703A (ko) 2012-08-03
CN102472961A (zh) 2012-05-23
JP6009614B2 (ja) 2016-10-19
NL2005107A (en) 2011-03-28
TW201132961A (en) 2011-10-01
TWI485395B (zh) 2015-05-21
US20120171600A1 (en) 2012-07-05
JP2013506149A (ja) 2013-02-21
KR101677522B1 (ko) 2016-11-18
JP2015165324A (ja) 2015-09-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8623576B2 (en) Time differential reticle inspection
US8189203B2 (en) Reticle inspection systems and method
US9046754B2 (en) EUV mask inspection system
US9041903B2 (en) Mask inspection with fourier filtering and image compare
US20120281197A1 (en) Holographic Mask Inspection System with Spatial Filter
US20120086800A1 (en) Surface Inspection System with Advanced Illumination
JP5112385B2 (ja) 任意パターンを有するパターニングデバイス上のパーティクル検出
US20110317136A1 (en) Inspection Apparatus Employing Wide Angle Objective Lens With Optical Window
US20110170083A1 (en) Lithographic Apparatus and Device Manufacturing Method
US8405825B2 (en) Method of detecting a particle and a lithographic apparatus
NL2005001A (en) Holographic mask inspection system with spatial filter.
NL2005489A (en) Inspection apparatus employing wide angle objective lens with optical window.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ASML HOLDING N.V., NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CATEY, ERIC BRIAN;HARNED, NORA-JEAN;SHMAREV, YEVGENIY KONSTANTINOVICH;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20091125 TO 20091203;REEL/FRAME:027397/0861

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8