US20190230866A1 - Cutting tool with a variable pivot system - Google Patents
Cutting tool with a variable pivot system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20190230866A1 US20190230866A1 US16/381,225 US201916381225A US2019230866A1 US 20190230866 A1 US20190230866 A1 US 20190230866A1 US 201916381225 A US201916381225 A US 201916381225A US 2019230866 A1 US2019230866 A1 US 2019230866A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- handle
- cutting tool
- hand operated
- projections
- cutting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G3/00—Cutting implements specially adapted for horticultural purposes; Delimbing standing trees
- A01G3/02—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears
- A01G3/025—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears having elongated or extended handles
- A01G3/0251—Loppers, i.e. branch cutters with two handles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B13/00—Hand shears; Scissors
- B26B13/26—Hand shears; Scissors with intermediate links between the grips and the blades, e.g. for remote actuation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G3/00—Cutting implements specially adapted for horticultural purposes; Delimbing standing trees
- A01G3/02—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G3/00—Cutting implements specially adapted for horticultural purposes; Delimbing standing trees
- A01G3/02—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears
- A01G3/021—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears characterized by the arrangement of pivots
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G3/00—Cutting implements specially adapted for horticultural purposes; Delimbing standing trees
- A01G3/02—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears
- A01G3/025—Secateurs; Flower or fruit shears having elongated or extended handles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B17/00—Hand cutting tools, i.e. with the cutting action actuated by muscle power with two jaws which come into abutting contact
- B26B17/02—Hand cutting tools, i.e. with the cutting action actuated by muscle power with two jaws which come into abutting contact with jaws operated indirectly by the handles, e.g. through cams or toggle levers
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T83/00—Cutting
- Y10T83/04—Processes
Abstract
A hand operated cutting tool includes a first handle coupled to a first cutting member, the first handle having a first set of projections; and, a second handle coupled to a second cutting member and movably coupled to the first handle, the second handle having a second set of projections. The handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein a first region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being at least partly engaged, and wherein a second region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being disengaged.
Description
- The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/490,209, entitled “CUTTING TOOL WITH A VARIABLE PIVOT SYSTEM,” filed Apr. 18, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/131,724, entitled “CUTTING TOOL WITH A VARIABLE PIVOT SYSTEM,” filed Apr. 18, 2016, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/538,130 entitled “CUTTING TOOL WITH A VARIABLE PIVOT SYSTEM,” filed Nov. 11, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/906,754 entitled “CUTTING TOOL WITH A VARIABLE PIVOT SYSTEM,” filed Nov. 20, 2013. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
- The present disclosure relates to hand operated cutting tools. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to hand operated cutting tools with a variable pivot system.
- This section is intended to provide a background or context to the disclosure recited in the claims. The description herein may include concepts that could be pursued, but are not necessarily ones that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated herein, what is described in this section is not prior art to the description and claims in this application and is not admitted to be prior art by inclusion in this section.
- It is generally known to provide a hand operated cutting tool for use in pruning or trimming branches and the like, such as a lopper having a pair of pivoting members such as handles that actuate cutting jaws that cooperate to capture and sever a branch between the jaws. Such known loppers typically include a pair of handles pivotally movable between an open and closed position for actuating the cutting jaws between a full open and closed position. The known loppers may also include devices intended to increase the available leverage provided by the handles, including levers and/or gears that transmit and increase a force from the handles to the jaws.
- As a lopper cuts through an object (e.g. a roughly cylindrical sample of a wood material), the force required to cut increases up to a maximum, at a location approximately sixty percent through the sample, then decreases at a generally similar rate until approximately ninety to ninety-five percent through the sample where the force required to complete the cutting operation rapidly decreases. Typical cutting tools such as a lopper are sized such that with the tool fully opened, the average human holds the handles with arms abducted and elbows facing outward, and move with a transverse flexion of the arms until the tool is fully closed. There is a reduction in the transverse flexion strength as the arms are abducted and elbows straightened, which tends to result in a changing force available from the user where the force required to cut the object is increasing.
- In comparison to a two-hand operated cutting tool such as a lopper, one-hand operated cutting tools are typically controlled via a single hand of an operator. For example, pruners and scissors are typically held in a palm of an operator. However, like the two-hand operated cutting tools, the one-hand operated cutting tools typically include a pair of handles that can be actuated to move a pair of cutting members to cut through an object of the tool.
- One embodiment relates to a hand operated cutting tool. The hand operated cutting tool includes a first handle coupled to a first cutting member, the first handle having a first set of projections. The hand operated cutting tool also includes a second handle coupled to a second cutting member, the second handle having a second set of projections. The handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein during a first region of travel the first and second sets of projections are at least partly engaged, and wherein during a second region of travel the first and second sets of projections are disengaged. According to one embodiment, the first region of travel defines approximately two-thirds of a cutting stroke while the second region of travel defines approximately one-third of the cutting stroke. According to another embodiment, the first and second sets of projections are structured as gear projections such that their engagement/disengagement provides a variable mechanical advantage to an operator of the tool with the engagement corresponding to a relatively greater mechanical advantage than the disengagement.
- Another embodiment relates to a hand operated cutting tool. The hand operated cutting tool includes a first cutting member; a first handle including a second cutting member, wherein the second cutting member includes a first set of projections and is coupled to the first cutting member; and a second handle including a lever, wherein the lever includes a second set of projections and is coupled to the first cutting member. The first and second handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein during a first region of travel proximate the full open position the first and second set of projections are disengaged, and during a second region of travel proximate the full closed position the first and second set of projections are at least partly engaged. Accordingly, in one embodiment, a relatively greater mechanical advantage from the at least partial engagement of the first and second sets of projections is provided in the first region of travel relative to the second region of travel.
- Still another embodiment relates to a hand operated cutting tool. The hand operated cutting tool includes a first cutting member including a first pivot point and a second pivot point; a second cutting member coupled to the first cutting member at the second pivot point, wherein the second cutting member includes a first set of gear projections; and a lever coupled to the first cutting member at the first pivot point, wherein the lever includes a second set of gear projections. The first and second cutting members are movable between a full open position and a full close position that defines a cutting stroke, wherein the first and second set of gear projections are disengaged during a first region of the cutting stroke and at least partly engaged during a second region of the cutting stroke. According to one embodiment, the hand operated cutting tool is structured as a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper.
- Yet another embodiment relates to a method of operating a hand operated cutting tool. The method includes providing a first cutting member including a first pivot point and a second pivot point; providing a second cutting member coupled to the first cutting member at the second pivot point, wherein the second cutting member includes a first set of projections; and providing a lever coupled to the first cutting member at the first pivot point, wherein the lever includes a second set of projections. According to one embodiment, during a cutting stroke, the first and second cutting members are movable between a full open position and a full close position. During a first region of travel proximate the full open position of the cutting stroke, the first and second set of projections are disengaged, and during a second region of travel of the cutting stroke proximate the full closed position, the first and second set of projections are at least partly engaged. The engagement and disengagement of the first and second set of projections provides a variable mechanical advantage to the cutting tool. As a result, an additional mechanical advantage is provided during a region of highest resistance of the object-to-be cut by the tool, which may aid use and appeal to users of the cutting tool.
- Another embodiment relates to a method of minimizing an effort to cut through an object using a hand operated cutting tool. The method includes receiving human force data as a function of handle spacing for a hand operated cutting tool; receiving cut-through force data as a function of handle angle for the hand operated cutting tool; dividing the received human force data by the received cut-through force data to obtain a human ability factor curve; generating a mechanical advantage curve for the hand operated cutting tool; setting the mechanical advantage curve to peak at approximately a peak of the human ability factor curve; and determining a pitch circle based on the set mechanical advantage curve. According to one embodiment, the determined pitch circle is then provided in a geared portion of a variable pivot mechanism for the hand operated cutting tool.
- One embodiment relates to a hand operated cutting tool. The hand operated cutting tool includes a first handle coupled to a first cutting member, wherein the first handle has a first set of projections. The hand operated cutting tool also includes a second handle coupled to a second cutting member, wherein the second handle has a second set of projections. The handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein during a first region of travel proximate the full open position the first and second gear projections are at least partly engaged, and wherein during a second region of travel proximate the full closed position the first and second gear projections are disengaged.
- Another embodiment relates to a hand operated cutting tool. The hand operated cutting tool includes a first handle having a pivot pin, a cam follower, and a first gear projection; a first cutting member having a bore, wherein the bore is structured to receive the pivot pin to couple the first handle to the first cutting member; and a second handle having a second cutting member and an elongated member, wherein the elongated member has a cam surface and a second gear projection. The handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position during a cutting stroke, wherein during a first region of travel proximate the full open position of the cutting stroke the first and second gear projections are at least partly engaged, and wherein during a second region of travel proximate the full closed position of the cutting stroke the cam follower and the cam surface are engaged while the first and second gear projections are disengaged.
- Still another embodiment relates to a method of operating a hand operating cutting tool. The method includes providing a first cutting member; providing a second cutting member coupled to the first cutting member; providing a first handle coupled to the first cutting member, the first handle having a first set of projections; and providing a second handle coupled to the second cutting member, the second handle having a second set of projections. According to one embodiment, during a cutting stroke, the first and second handles are movable between a full open position and a full close position. During a first region of travel proximate the full open position of the cutting stroke, the first and second set of projections are at least partly engaged, and during a second region of travel proximate the full close position of the cutting stroke, the first and second set of projections are disengaged.
- Yet another embodiment a method of minimizing an effort to cut through an object using a one-hand operated cutting tool. The method includes receiving human force data as a function of handle spacing for a hand operated cutting tool; receiving cut-through force data as a function of handle angle for the hand operated cutting tool; dividing the received human force data by the received cut-through force data to obtain a human ability factor curve; generating a mechanical advantage curve for the hand operated cutting tool; setting the mechanical advantage curve to peak at approximately a peak of the human ability factor curve; and determining a pitch circle based on the set mechanical advantage curve. According to one embodiment, the determined pitch circle is then provided in a geared portion of a variable pivot mechanism for the one-hand operated cutting tool, wherein the geared portion corresponds to approximately two-thirds of a cutting stroke for the one-hand operated cutting tool.
-
FIG. 1A is a schematic image of a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper, in a fully open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 1B is a schematic image of a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper, in a further open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 1C is a schematic image of a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper, in a partially open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 1D is a schematic image of a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper, in a fully closed position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 2A is a schematic image of a front view of a lever for a two-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 2B is a schematic image of a back view of a lever for a two-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic image of a back view of a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as a lopper, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 4A is a schematic image of a front view of a second cutting member coupled to a guide member for a two-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 4B is a schematic image of a back view of a second cutting member coupled to a guide member for a two-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 5 is a schematic image of a side view of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a hand pruner, in a fully open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 6 is a schematic image of a side view of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a hand pruner, in a fully closed position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 7A is a schematic image of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, in a fully open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 7B is a schematic image of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, in a further open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 7C is a schematic image of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, in a partially open position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 7D is a schematic image of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, in a fully closed position according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIGS. 8A-8E are schematic images of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, through the cutting stroke from a different viewpoint than that depicted inFIGS. 7A-7D according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 9A is a schematic image of a side view of a first handle of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 9B is a schematic image of a side view opposite to that ofFIG. 9A of a first handle of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 10A is a schematic image of a side view of a second handle of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 10B is a schematic image of an isometric view of a second handle of a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as a pruner, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 11 is a diagram of a method of minimizing effort required to cut through an object using a two-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of force curve data representing human strength capability as a function of handle spacing for a two-hand operated cutting tool and as a function of hand grip spacing for a one-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 13 is a graphical representation of thirty-two inch lopper characteristics as a function of handle angle according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 14 is a graphical representation of a mechanical advantage curve for a thirty-two inch lopper as a function of handle angle according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 15 is a diagram of a method of minimizing effort required to cut through an object using a one-hand operated cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 16 is a graphical representation of hand pruner characteristics as a function of handle angle according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 17 is a graphical representation of a mechanical advantage curve for a hand pruner as a function of handle angle according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 18 is a diagram of a method of operating a two-hand operated cutting tool with a variable pivot mechanism, according to an exemplary embodiment. -
FIG. 19 is a diagram of a method of operating a one-hand operated cutting tool with a variable pivot mechanism, according to an exemplary embodiment. - Referring to
FIGS. 1A-4B generally, a two-hand operated cutting tool, shown for example as a “lopper” having a pair of handles operable to actuate a pair of cutting members, is illustrated having a variable pivot system. A two-hand operated cutting tool is typically characterized with an operator using both hands to grab each of the handles in order to actuate the tool (e.g., a lopper). The variable pivot system is configured to control the opening and closing of one of the cutting members and includes a geared portion and a slide portion that are actuated at different times through the progression of a cutting stroke of the tool. As referred to herein, the cutting stroke refers to a start position of the handles (and, correspondingly, the cutting members) being separable by a maximum distance (e.g., full open, etc.) and an end position with the handles being separated by a minimum distance (e.g., full closed, etc.). Conversely, the opening stroke refers to a full closed start position and a full open end position. Within a first region represented by an approximate one-third of the cutting stroke, the interaction between the handles and cutting members is provided by a slide portion of the variable pivot system. After the first region of the cutting stroke, the variable pivot system transitions to a second region for the remaining approximate two-thirds of the cutting stroke. In the second region, the interaction is provided by a geared portion of the variable pivot system. As such, during approximately the final two-thirds of the cutting stroke (i.e., where the cutting tool severs an object, such as a branch or tree limb), the variable pivot system provides a leverage profile defined by the geared portion. As described more fully herein, the combination of a geared portion and a slide portion in the variable pivot system provides for a variable mechanical advantage with the cutting tool. Particularly, a relatively greater mechanical advantage may be provided by the geared portion relative to the slide portion during the cutting stroke. As also described herein, by providing the geared portion at only a select travel region during the cutting stroke, a human effort to cut objects using the hand operated cutting tool may be minimized at a key location (i.e., where the object is most resistant to being cut) during the cutting stroke. - According to an exemplary embodiment for a two-hand operated cutting tool, a lever (e.g. link, arm, etc.) is pivotally coupled to a first cutting member of the cutting tool and to one of the handles. As the lever travels from a fully open to a fully closed position, the lever experiences an approximately curvilinear line travel from the slide portion to the geared portion and vice versa. From the standpoint of the force required to cut through an object, typically, the object's resistance and, therefore, the force required to cut through the object varies based on the position of the handles (e.g., the angle between the handles). At large angles (i.e., a more fully open handle position), the resistance is minimal. But, at approximately sixty-degrees, a maximum resistance is generally encountered in the cutting stroke through the maximum-sized object for which the tool is designed. In comparison, from the standpoint of human force characteristics, the maximum produced human force typically decreases with increasing distance between the handles of the cutting tool.
- Because the first region of the cutting stroke corresponds to a “least resistance” encountered in cutting the object (e.g., relatively low force required), the slide portion of the variable pivot system is engaged. Accordingly, the slide portion of the variable pivot system has a relatively lower mechanical advantage in comparison to the geared portion because the slide portion has no mechanism for mechanical advantage (i.e., the geared portion utilizes meshable gears to increase mechanical advantage but the slide portion has no such mechanism). Rather, the mechanical advantage in the slide portion is provided by the length of the handles and a single pivot mechanism. However, during the second region (i.e., approximately the final two-thirds) of the cutting stroke, where greater resistance is encountered in cutting the object, the geared portion of the variable pivot system is engaged to provide an increased mechanical advantage. Because the geared portion is not engaged throughout the entire cutting stroke (i.e., only in the second region corresponding to about the final two-thirds of the cutting stroke), the pitch of the gears may be increased (i.e., beyond a pitch commonly associated with a cutting tool having a geared leverage mechanism operating throughout the entire cutting stroke). According to an exemplary embodiment, the gear teeth of the geared portion are at least partially elliptical such that a variable mechanical advantage is provided during the final two-thirds of the cutting stroke. Because of the increased gear pitch available through the use of a combined slide and gear arrangement, a greater amount of mechanical advantage may be provided during the final two-thirds of the cutting stroke where a maximum force is required to cut through an object. As such, the human force required to cut through an object may be overall minimized.
- Although the various features of the disclosure are shown and described above by way of example with reference to a two-hand operated cutting tool (e.g., a lopper), the variable pivot system may be used with a wide variety of cutting devices including, but not limited to a primarily one-hand operated cutting tool. All such variations are intended to be within the scope of this disclosure. Accordingly, referring to
FIGS. 5-10B generally, a one-hand operated cutting tool having a pair of handles operable to actuate a pair of cutting members, is illustrated having a variable pivot system. In comparison to the two-hand operated cutting tool, the one-hand operated cutting tool may be used with a single hand of an operator, such that the one-hand operated cutting tool may include, but is not limited to, pruners, shears, scissors, etc. - Similar to the variable pivot system of the two-hand operated cutting tool, the variable pivot system of a one-hand operated cutting tool substantially controls the opening and closing of one of the cutting members and includes a geared portion and a slide portion that are actuated at different times through the progression of a cutting stroke of the tool. Within a first region of the cutting stroke (approximately two-thirds), the interaction between the handles and cutting members is provided by a geared portion of the variable pivot system. After the first region of the cutting stroke, the variable pivot system transitions to a second region for the remaining approximate one-third of the cutting stroke (i.e., the slide portion). As such, during the final one-third of the cutting stroke, the variable pivot system provides a leverage profile defined by the slide portion.
- As compared to a two-hand operated cutting tool, the configuration of the variable pivot system for a one-hand operated cutting is substantially reversed. Based on empirical data, as hand-grip spacing decreases (e.g., the distance between the handles of a one-hand operated cutting tool while the tool is in the palm/hand of a user) from a maximum distance for the tool to a minimum distance, the available force a user can exert increases. In comparison, as the distance decreases from a maximum distance between the handles of a two-hand operated cutting tool to a minimum distance, the available force a user can exert generally decreases. Because the available force a user can exert is relatively lower at larger hand-grip distances, a mechanism (e.g., geared portion) provides an increased mechanical advantage during the first region of the cutting stroke for a one-hand operated cutting tool. By not providing the geared mechanism throughout the cutting stroke, the pitch circles of the meshable gears may be increased (i.e., beyond a pitch commonly associated with a cutting tool having a geared leverage mechanism operating throughout the entire cutting stroke). Accordingly, the variable pivot system of the one-hand operated cutting tool works to reduce the effort required to cut through an object by providing an additional mechanical advantage to the user when the user is typically at their weakest.
- Thus, an advantage of the present disclosure is that a lower effort requirement is generated by the variable pivot system, while staying within traditional constraints of two-hand (as well as one-hand) operated cutting tools. For example, traditional constraints include human and physical limitations that restrict the maximum handle angle opening, geometric and cut-capacity limitations that restrict the distance the cutting members (e.g., blades) can open, etc. The present disclosure does not merely lengthen the handles, but rather utilizes human force characteristics to substantially stay within traditional constraints to reduce the effort required to cut through an object using a two-hand (and one-hand) operated cutting tool.
- Although specific examples are shown and described throughout this disclosure, the embodiments illustrated in the figures are shown by way of example, and any of a wide variety of other cutting member configurations, lever devices, pivot systems, and cutting device types (e.g. snips, pruners, shears, etc.) will be readily apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art after reviewing this disclosure. All such variations of cutting tools that use the variable leverage system are intended to be within the scope of the disclosure. Moreover, as referred to herein, the object of a cutting tool can include a wide variety of objects, such as branches, twigs, weeds, small trees, etc.
- Referring more particularly now to
FIGS. 1A-1D , a two-hand operated cutting tool is shown, for example as alopper 10, according to an exemplary embodiment. Thelopper 10 is shown to include a pair ofhandles 12, wherein one of thehandles 12 is coupled to alever 16 and theother handle 12 is coupled to asecond cutting member 18. The lopper is further shown to include afirst cutting member 20, which includes afirst aperture 26 a and asecond aperture 28 a (also referred to herein as pivot points). Thefirst cutting member 20 includes afirst cutting device 22, shown for example as a blade. Thesecond cutting member 18 includes a second cutting device 34 (shown for example as a hook, but may be an anvil, blade or other cutting device according to alternative embodiments) that engages with thefirst cutting device 22 in a shearing relationship to cut through an object. - According to an exemplary embodiment, the first cutting
member 20 is pivotally coupled to thesecond cutting member 18 at thesecond aperture 28 a and thesecond aperture 28 b of thesecond cutting member 18. Thefirst cutting member 20 is also pivotally coupled to thelever 16 at thefirst aperture 26 a and thefirst aperture 26 b of thelever 16. First andsecond apertures member 20 to thesecond cutting member 18 at thesecond apertures member 20 to thelever 16 at thefirst apertures second cutting member 18 rotates about thesecond apertures lever 16 rotates about thefirst apertures - As described in greater detail below, rotation of the
lever 16 about thefirst apertures variable pivot mechanism 50 via atravel stop 24 and a locking projection 42 (shown as a cam follower 42) tocam surface 52 interaction (seeFIG. 3 ). As shown, thetravel stop 24 extends from thelever 16 in an opposite direction relative to an extension direction of thecam follower 42 from thelever 16. By constraining the movement of thelever 16, the gearedprojections - The
lopper 10 is shown to further include avariable pivot system 50. Thevariable pivot system 50 includes a first set ofprojections 30 coupled to thesecond cutting member 18 and a second set ofprojections 32 coupled to thelever 16. Theprojections projections gear projections gears 30, 32) that is elliptically shaped. In comparison, a “circular pitch” refers to a line joining two rotating axes (i.e., the line/arc defining the intersection ofgears 30, 32) that is circularly shaped. As such, according to an alternate embodiment, the gear teeth provided asgear projections - Because the
gear projections gear projection variable pivot system 50, the first 20 degrees of the handles closing corresponds to the slide portion (i.e., the first region) that closes theblade 20 degrees (i.e., a ratio of 1:1). However, the handles closing the remaining 140 degrees corresponds to the blade closing the remaining 50 degrees in the second region (i.e., a gear ratio of 14:5; a 23% increase in mechanical advantage over 16:7). The increase in mechanical advantage is because when two gears have ratios greater than 1:1 (as is the case here), they act as two levers of different lengths—an input of more angular motion distance into one gear (more rotations) provides more torque out of the other gear due to it traveling a relatively smaller amount of rotations or angular displacement than it previously had to in order to output that same amount of torque (e.g., the difference between the larger gear ratio of 14:5 to the smaller gear ratio of 16:7). So here, as the gear ratio is increased from increasing the gear pitch due to the structure of thevariable pivot system 50, the result is an increase in mechanical advantage for the two-hand operated cutting tool (and the one-hand operated cutting tool, as described below). As such, the two-hand operated cutting tool withvariable pivot system 50 typically provides an increase in mechanical advantage over traditional variable leverage geared loppers. - Referring collectively now to the two-hand operated cutting tool in
FIGS. 1A-1D , operation of theloppers 10 through the cutting stroke is now described. In the full open position (FIG. 1A ), thehandles 12 are at a maximum distance andangle 70 a from each other. In the full open position, thefirst gear projection 30 and thesecond gear projection 32 are also at a maximum distance away from each other. As a user applies flexion force to thehandles 12 to move them closer together within the first region, thelever 16 slides (i.e., the slide portion of the variable pivot system 50) toward thesecond cutting member 18 along a curvilinear path 56 (seeFIG. 3 ). Thecurvilinear path 56 is defined by the interaction between a cam follower 42 (i.e., locking projection) and acam surface 52 of aguide member 60. During thelever 16 sliding via the interaction of thecam follower 42 and thecam surface 52, thelever 16 rotates about thesecond apertures cam follower 42 and the travel stop 24 (described below and shown inFIGS. 2A-2B ), thelever 16 is substantially restricted from rotating about thefirst apertures variable pivot system 50. After approximately one-third of the cutting stroke, thelever 16 has translated (e.g. “slid”) along thecurvilinear path 56 into a position where thesecond gear projection 32 approaches thefirst gear projection 30 to initiate engagement of the geared projections during travel through the second region of the cutting stroke (seeFIG. 1B ). At this point on the curvilinear path 56 (i.e., approximately at aslide portion endpoint 58 inFIG. 3 ), the slide portion transitions to the geared portion of the cutting stroke and thecam follower 42 disengages from thecam surface 52 thereby permitting the gearedprojections cam follower 42 disengaging from thecam surface 52, thetravel stop 24 disengages from the first cuttingmember 20. As such, during travel through the geared portion of the cutting stroke, thelever 16 rotates about thefirst apertures gear projections gear projections first cutting device 22 rotates about thesecond apertures FIG. 1C ). At the end of the cutting stroke where thehandle angle 70 b is at a minimum, a fully closed position is obtained.FIG. 1D shows an example of the fully closed position where no line-of-sight gap exists between thefirst cutting device 22 andsecond cutting device 34 and thegear projections angle 70 b. - Referring next to
FIG. 2A , a front view of thelever 16 is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. The front view ofFIG. 2A represents the views depicted inFIGS. 1A-1D , where the first cuttingmember 20 is shown overlaying thelever 16. In comparison,FIG. 2B shows the back view of thelever 16 according to an exemplary embodiment. In addition to the second set ofprojections 32, thelever 16 includes atravel stop 24 and acam follower 42. - From the full closed position, as the
handles 12 are pulled apart toward the full open position and the variable pivot system is about to transition from the geared portion to the slide portion (i.e., the opening stroke), thetravel stop 24 engages with the first cuttingmember 20 to substantially prevent the lever 16 (and, in turn, thehandle 12 coupled to the lever 16) from rotating (i.e., counterclockwise) about thefirst apertures travel stop 24 allows the user to pull open and slide or translate the lever away (i.e., the slide portion of the variable pivot system 50) from thesecond cutting member 18 by preventing thelever 16 from rotating about thefirst apertures travel stop 24 prevents the lever from rotating about the first aperture 26 during the slide portion of the opening stroke, thecam follower 42 maintains the path of travel of the cam follower 42 (and, consequently, the lever 16) along a curvilinear path 56 (seeFIG. 3 ). During the cutting stroke, thecam follower 42 travels toward a slideportion end point 58 via translation along thecurvilinear path 56. In comparison, during the transition from the geared portion to the slide portion in the opening stroke, thecam follower 42 travels away from theend point 58 along thecurvilinear path 56 as thelever 16 is translated further away from thesecond cutting member 18. - As the
cam follower 42 travels along the curvilinear path 56 (i.e., during the slide portion of the opening and cutting strokes), thecam follower 42 interacts with acam surface 52 of theguide member 60. This interaction restricts the cam follower 42 (and, lever 16) from straying from thecurvilinear path 56. At or near theend point 58 during the cutting stroke, thecam follower 42 disengages with thecam surface 52 to permit the gearedportions cam follower 42 to thecurvilinear path 56, a consistent engagement and disengagement between the gearedprojections - According to an exemplary embodiment, the
travel stop 24 includes a vertically extended (i.e., perpendicular to the lever 16) member coupled to thelever 16 that contacts the first cuttingmember 20 during the slide portion of the opening stroke to substantially restrict thelever 16 from rotating about thefirst apertures lever 16, a bent piece of metal welded to thelever 16, a roller coupled to thelever 16, a bent piece of metal otherwise coupled to thelever 16, and/or a protruding bolt, lug, pin, etc. In comparison, the cam follower 42 (i.e., locking projection) can include a vertically extended (i.e., perpendicular to the lever 16) member protruding in the opposite direction to that of thetravel stop 24. Thecam follower 42 prevents the gearedprojections variable pivot mechanism 50 because thecam follower 42 travels along a consistentcurvilinear path 56 during the slide portion of thevariable pivot mechanism 50. In some embodiments, thecam follower 42 can include a protruding bolt, roller, lug, pin, bent piece of metal, welded piece of metal, an integral piece of material with the lever, etc. - Referring more particularly to
FIG. 3 , a back view of thelopper 10 is shown according to an exemplary embodiment.FIG. 3 depicts the interaction between thecam follower 42 and thecam surface 52 of theguide member 60. According to an exemplary embodiment, theguide member 60 is stationary (i.e., theguide member 60 remains fixed relative to thesecond cutting member 18, despite the movement of the cuttingmembers guide member 60 includes acam surface 52, which thecam follower 42 interacts with during the slide portion of thevariable pivot mechanism 50. The interaction between thecam surface 52 and thecam follower 42 constrains and guides thecam follower 42 along thecurvilinear path 56. According to an exemplary embodiment, theguide member 60 is coupled to thesecond cutting member 18 atapertures 62 a of theguide member 60 andapertures 62 b of thesecond cutting member 18. The coupling mechanism between theguide member 60 and second cuttingmember 18 can include bolts, pins, screw, set-screws, etc. According to an alternate embodiment, theguide member 60 is coupled to thesecond cutting member 18 at thesecond apertures guide member 60 is integral with the second cutting member 18 (e.g., one cast piece). AlthoughFIG. 3 depicts a generallyU-shaped guide member 60,FIG. 3 is not meant to be limiting as to the shape of theguide member 60. For example, theguide member 60 could be hook-shaped or C-shaped, or other any other shape suitable for constraining and/or guiding motion of thecam follower 42 to allow repeated and consistent interaction between the gearedprojections guide member 60 can be made of metal, but according to alternative embodiments, theguide member 60 can be made out of any suitably rigid and durable material. - Referring to
FIG. 4A , a front view of thesecond cutting member 18 having second cuttingdevice 34 is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. AlthoughFIG. 4A depicts thesecond cutting device 34 as a hook, thesecond cutting device 34 can take a variety of forms (e.g., a blade, a saw-like configuration, etc.) and is configured to apply pressure opposite to thefirst cutting device 22 to cut through an object. Referring toFIG. 4B , a back view of thesecond cutting member 18 coupled to theguide member 60 is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. - Referring to
FIG. 18 , amethod 1800 of operating a two-hand operated cutting tool, is shown according to one embodiment. According to one embodiment,method 1800 may be implemented with the cutting tool ofFIGS. 1A-4B and, as such, may be described in regard to one or more features of that cutting tool. Atstep 1802, a first cutting member of a hand operated cutting tool is provided. According to one embodiment, the first cutting member includes first and second pivot points. Atstep 1804, a second cutting member coupled to the first cutting member is provided. According to one embodiment, the second cutting member is coupled to the first cutting member at the second pivot point. The second cutting member may also include a first set of projections (e.g., projections 30). Atstep 1806, a lever coupled to the first cutting member is provided. In one embodiment, the lever is coupled to the first pivot point of the first cutting member. The lever may include a second set of projections (e.g., projections 32). Atstep 1808, the cutting members are actuated between a full open position to a full close position. In a first region of travel proximate the full open position, a translation (e.g., sliding, etc.) interaction between the lever relative to the second cutting member is provided. In a second region of travel proximate the full close position, a rotation interaction between the lever and the second cutting member is provided. According to one embodiment, the rotation interaction is provided by the at least partial engagement of the first and second set of projections. According to one embodiment, the first and second set of projections are structured as gear projections. The gear projections may have a partial elliptical pitch, a circular pitch, etc. During the first region of travel, the projections are disengaged and become engaged during the second region of travel. In one embodiment, the second region corresponds with approximately two-thirds of a cutting stroke and the first region corresponds with approximately one-third of the cutting stroke. As described,method 1800 largely corresponds with operation of the two-hand operated cutting tool. Accordingly, in one embodiment, features described in regard toFIGS. 1A-4B that are not described in regard tomethod 1800 may be included in other variations ofmethod 1800 and is intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - Referring now to
FIGS. 5-6 , a one-hand operated cutting tool, shown for example as ahand pruner 100 with a variable pivot system, is illustrated according to an exemplary embodiment. Thehand pruner 100 is shown to include a pair ofhandles first handle 110 is coupled to afirst cutting member 120 and thesecond handle 112 is coupled to asecond cutting member 130. According to the embodiment depicted, thesecond handle 112 is integral with thesecond cutting member 130. Thehand pruner 100 is shown to also include anelongated member 190 coupled to thesecond handle 112. Theelongated member 190 may be integral with thesecond handle 112 or a separate component attached by any typical manner (e.g., bolt, weld, etc.). According to an exemplary embodiment, thefirst cutting member 120 includes afirst cutting device 125 and thesecond cutting member 130 includes asecond cutting device 135. First andsecond cutting devices first cutting member 120 is pivotally coupled to thesecond cutting member 130 at aperture 140 (also referred to herein as a pivot point). The first andsecond cutting members aperture 140 as a user squeezes thehandles Aperture 140 is shown to include connections such as bolts, pins, lugs, studs, etc. - Referring more particularly to
FIGS. 7A-7D , a one-hand operated cutting tool is shown, for example as ahand pruner 100 with avariable pivot system 150, according to an exemplary embodiment. Please note that material from thehandle 110 has been removed inFIGS. 7A-7D to illustrate the interaction between the first and second sets ofprojections FIG. 8A , the material has not been removed from thehandle 110, which makes it slightly more difficult to observe the first set ofprojections 160. Accordingly, referring back toFIGS. 7A-7D , as inFIGS. 5-6 , thehand pruner 100 is shown to include a pair ofhandles members first cutting member 120 is coupled to thefirst handle 110 and thesecond cutting member 130 is coupled to the second handle; afirst cutting device 125 coupled to thefirst cutting member 120 and asecond cutting device 135 coupled to thesecond cutting member 130; anelongated member 190 coupled to thesecond handle 112; and, among other features, avariable pivot system 150. - Referring more particularly to the
variable pivot system 150 of thehand pruner 100, thevariable pivot system 150 includes acam surface 175 coupled to thesecond handle 112 and acam follower 165 coupled to thefirst handle 110. Thecam surface 175 is shown to be included as an integral piece on theelongated member 190 of thesecond handle 112. In one embodiment, thecam follower 165 is the top most projection of the first set of projections 160 (i.e., closest to the handle 112). According to another embodiment, thecam follower 165 may be structured as any type of component (e.g., a roller, etc.) that engages with thecam surface 175 during a second region of the cutting stroke (described below). According to an exemplary embodiment, thefirst handle 110 includes a first set ofprojections 160 and thesecond handle 112 includes a second set ofprojections 170. As shown inFIGS. 7A-7D , thecam surface 175 and the second set ofprojections 170 are positioned on an interior surface of theelongated member 190, such that the first set ofprojections 160 are facing both thecam surface 175 and the second set ofprojections 170. In other words, thecam surface 175 and the second set ofprojections 170 are proximate thefirst handle 110. According to one embodiment, theprojections projections gear projections gear projections - The
first handle 110 is shown to also include a pivot pin 250 (FIGS. 9A-9B ). Thepivot pin 250 is received in abore 251 of the first cutting member 120 (FIGS. 5-6 ), which rotatably couples thefirst handle 110 to thefirst cutting member 120. Arotation axis 180 is defined by thepivot pin 250 in the bore 251 (FIG. 8A ). Because thepivot pin 250 is rotatably coupled withinbore 251 of thefirst cutting member 120, the first handle rotates about therotation axis 180. - According to one embodiment, the
second handle 112 includes alocking device 260. Thelocking device 260 may be structured as a separate component relative to thesecond handle 112. In other embodiments, thelocking device 260 is an integral component of thesecond handle 112. Thelocking device 260 is shown to include a locking projection 262 (FIG. 7A ). Thelocking device 260 is translatable indirections locking device 260 in adirection 264 engages the lockingprojection 262 with a notch 268 (e.g., groove, recess, capture, etc.) in thefirst cutting member 120 when thehandles projection 262 and thenotch 268 locks the handles in the full close position. Moving thelocking device 260 in adirection 266 releases the lockingprojection 262 from thenotch 268 to unlock thehandles handles tool 100 occupies a relatively lesser amount of space for relatively easier storage. In some embodiments of the hand operated cuttingtool 100, thelocking device 260 may not be included. All such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - As shown in
FIG. 7A , thetool 100 may include a biasing member, shown as aspring 270. According to one embodiment, thespring 270 biases thehandles handles members - Referring collectively now to the one-hand operated cutting tool in
FIGS. 7A-7D , operation of thehand pruner 100 through the cutting stroke is now described. In the full open position (FIG. 7A ), thehandles angle 280 from each other. In the full open position, thefirst gear projection 160 and thesecond gear projection 170 are at least partially engaged. As a user applies flexion force to move thehandles handle 110 rotates clockwise about therotation axis 180. As thehandle 110 rotates, thefirst gear projection 160 at least partly engages with thesecond gear projection 170 and thehandle 110 rotates upward toward (i.e., closer) the second handle 112 (FIG. 7B ) thereby decreasing theangle 280. After approximately the first two-thirds of the cutting stroke, theprojections FIG. 7C ). After disengagement of thegear projections handle 110 slides or translates along a path defined by the interaction of thecam follower 165 with thecam surface 175. In the example shown, thecam surface 175 is positioned above the projections 170 (FIG. 10B ). As a result, an interaction of the first andsecond gear projections cam surface 175 andcam follower 165 in the second region of the cutting stroke occurs along acontinuous path 200 defined by theelongated member 190. In the full close position (FIG. 7D ), thegear projections handles projections - The arrangement between the
gear projections handles first handle 110 along a portion of thepath 200 defined by only the cam surface to cam follower interaction (no partial engagement of the projections) provides for a pure rectilinear force (no rotational element other than that relative to the aperture 140). Based on empirical data, for a hand pruner of a given handle length, the average human strength capability increases with decreasing handle angle (i.e., as the handles move closer together, the user is able to exert more force to cut through an object). Accordingly, the average user is weakest when the handles are in the full open position. By implementing a variable pivot system, the human strength characteristics can be accounted for by providing a relatively greater amount of mechanical advantage where it is most beneficial to a typical user (i.e., the beginning of the cutting stroke; the first region). As such, the first region corresponds to the geared portion and the second region corresponds to the slide portion of the variable pivot mechanism. During the slide portion, the mechanical advantage is limited to the length of the handles of the hand pruner. However, during the geared portion, additional mechanical advantage is provided by the interacting gears in the geared portion (hence, a relatively greater mechanical advantage than just from the length of the handles). Moreover, because the geared portion is limited to the first two-thirds of the cutting stroke, the pitch of the gears may be increased without affecting the practicality of the hand pruner. For example, practical considerations relating to the tool can include the size of the tool. If the geared portion was provided throughout the entire cutting stroke and the pitch of the gears increased, then the whole tool would likely need to increase to accommodate the larger gears. However, because the geared portion does not correspond to the entire cutting stroke, the gear pitch can increase (corresponding to greater mechanical advantage) while staying within practical considerations relating to the hand pruner. As described above, increasing the gear pitch increases the gear ratio, which increases the mechanical advantage (i.e., a relatively greater angular displacement ingear 32 via the handle results in more torque output due to a relatively smaller angular displacement of thegear 30 for the two-hand operated cutting tool). - Referring next to
FIGS. 8A-8E , a different viewpoint of the geared portion and slide portion of thevariable pivot mechanism 150 during the cutting stroke is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. Also shown inFIGS. 8A-8E is thecam surface 175 tocam follower 165 interaction along a portion of thepath 200 during the slide portion of the cutting stroke. The engagement between thecam surface 175 and thecam follower 165 guides the movement of thehandle 110 during the slide portion. Furthermore, in the second region (i.e., slide portion), rotation of thefirst handle 110 is substantially constrained via the interaction of thefirst locking projection 205 with thesecond locking projection 210. Rotation of thefirst handle 110 is also substantially constrained in another direction by the interaction between a first rotation stop 220 and asecond rotation stop 225. Accordingly, during the second region, thehandles - Referring to
FIGS. 9A-9B , a front (FIG. 9A ) and back (FIG. 9B ) view of thefirst handle 110 are shown, according to an exemplary. Referring toFIGS. 10A-10B , a front (FIG. 10A ) and isometric (FIG. 10B ) view of thesecond handle 112 are shown, according to an exemplary embodiment. In addition to other features, thefirst handle 110 is shown to include afirst locking projection 205. Similarly, thesecond handle 112 is shown to include asecond locking projection 210. According to an exemplary embodiment, thefirst locking projection 205 is structured an integral extension from thefirst handle 110 while thesecond locking projection 210 is structured as an integral extension from thesecond handle 112. In other embodiments, the first andsecond locking projections first handle 110 andsecond handle 112 in any fashion. According to an exemplary embodiment, thefirst handle 110 is shown to include a first rotation stop 220 and thefirst cutting member 120 is shown to include asecond rotation stop 225. According to an exemplary embodiment, the rotation stops 220 and 225 are integral extensions from thefirst handle 110 and thefirst cutting member 120, respectively. - As mentioned above, from the full close position, the
gear projections first handle 110 rotates about therotation axis 180 while moving upward toward thesecond handle 112. Now, as the first region transitions to the second region of the cutting stroke, thecam surface 175 andcam follower 165 are engaged as are thefirst locking projection 205 and thesecond locking projection 210. In addition, the first and second rotation stops 220 and 225 are also engaged. The interaction between the first and second rotation stops 220 and 225 substantially prevents thehandle 110 from rotating any further clockwise about therotation axis 180. The interaction between thecam surface 175 and thecam follower 165 constrain the movement of thehandle 110 along thepath 200. The interaction between the lockingprojections handle 110 from rotating counterclockwise during the slide portion of the cutting stroke (i.e., the second region) and constrain thehandle 110 to translational movement toward thehandle 112.FIG. 8E depicts this interaction (reference numeral 211) where the lockingprojections cam follower 165 along a portion of thepath 200 during the second region, a consistent engagement and disengagement of the gearedprojections - Referring to
FIG. 19 , amethod 1900 of operating a one-hand operated cutting tool, is shown according to one embodiment. According to one embodiment,method 1900 may be implemented with the cutting tool ofFIGS. 5-10B and, as such, may be described in regard to one or more features of that cutting tool. Atstep 1902, a first cutting member of a hand operated cutting tool is provided. Atstep 1904, a second cutting member coupled to the first cutting member (e.g., at pivot point 140) is provided. Atstep 1906, a first handle coupled to the first cutting member is provided. According to one embodiment, the first handle includes a first set of projections (e.g., projections 160). Atstep 1908, a second handle coupled to the second cutting member is provided. According to one embodiment, the second handle includes a second set of projections (e.g., projections 170). Atstep 1910, the handles are actuated between a full open and a full close position. During a first region of travel proximate a full open position, the first handle rotates relative to the second handle. During a second region of travel proximate a full close position, a translational movement between the handles occurs. In other words, the second region corresponds with substantial zero rotation of the first handle. According to one embodiment, the first region corresponds with two-thirds of a cutting stroke and the second region corresponds with approximately one-third of a cutting stroke. As described,method 1900 largely corresponds with operation of the one-hand operated cutting tool. Accordingly, in one embodiment, features described in regard toFIGS. 5-10B that are not described in regard tomethod 1900 may be included in other variations ofmethod 1900 and is intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - Referring next to
FIG. 11 , amethod 1100 for minimizing the effort required to cut through an object using a hand operated cutting tool is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. According to one embodiment,method 1100 is implemented with a two-hand operated cutting tool, such as that shown and described with reference toFIGS. 1A-4B above. Accordingly,method 1100 may reference one or more features of the two-hand operated cutting tool ofFIGS. 1A-4B to aid explanation ofmethod 1100. - First, human force data as a function of handle spacing is received (1101). The human force data represents an average maximum force a human can deliver comfortably at various handle spacings. According to one embodiment, the human force data is measured data acquired from a plurality of people. For example, a person may squeeze the handles together (an open position to a close position) at a specific handle angle and the force is measured when the person says or otherwise indicates that this is the force they are comfortable applying albeit they may able to be exert a greater force. In other examples, a true maximum force may be used at
step 1101. All such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In still other embodiments, the human force data is simulated, estimated, or any generated using any other type of mechanism (e.g., computer modeling software). Second, the cut through force data as a function of handle angle is received (1102). The cut through force data corresponds to a force required to cut through a maximum sized object for the tool at various handle angles. Like the human force data, the cut-through force data may be measured, estimated, simulated, etc. Third, the received human force data is divided by the received cut through force data for a given handle length (1103). By keeping the handle length constant, the division has the same units. Fourth, a mechanical advantage curve is generated (1104). As described below, the mechanical advantage curve may be generated based on one or more constraints (e.g., maximum slope changes in a geared portion of a variable pivot system) and with any type of generation mechanism (e.g., computer simulation software). Fifth, the mechanical advantage curve is set to peak at approximately the same location as the peak of step 1103 (1105). In one embodiment, approximately corresponds with a plus-or-minus ten degree handle angle (e.g., the peak of the mechanical advantage curve may be set to the peak ofstep 1103 if the peak of the mechanical advantage curve is within a ten degree handle angle of the peak of step 1103). In other embodiments, approximately may correspond with a different handle angle degree than ten degrees (e.g., plus-or-minus five degrees). Based on the set mechanical advantage curve, a pitch circle for the geared portion is determined (1106). According to one embodiment, after determination, the pitch circle is implemented with the two-hand operated cutting tool to reduce the effort required to cut through an object (1107).Method 1100 is more fully described in the following paragraphs with reference toFIGS. 12-14 , withFIGS. 12 and 13 depicting graphical representations ofsteps FIG. 14 depicting graphical representations ofsteps - Referring to
FIG. 12 , a graphical representation of force curve data representing human strength capability as a function of handle spacing (i.e., the “two-arm grip spacing” axis legend) for a two-hand operated cutting tool and as a function of handle spacing (i.e., the “hand grip spacing” axis legend) for a one-hand operated cutting tool is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. As mentioned above,FIG. 12 is a graphical representation ofstep 1101. According to one embodiment, the curves inFIG. 12 represent best-fit lines obtained from measured data. The curves are referred to herein as the Human Capability Force Curves (HCFC) (i.e., a HCFC for a two-hand operated cutting tool (curve 1202) and an HCFC for a one-hand operated cutting tool (curve 1201)). In other embodiments, the data may be simulated or obtained from any other source or type of human force data generating device (e.g., biological simulation software in a computer). As mentioned above and in the embodiment depicted, the HCFCs represent a maximum comfortable exertion force. For example, a person may indicate a maximum comfortable exertion at a specific of hand grip spacing (for one-hand operated cutting tool) and two-arm grip spacing (for two-hand operated cutting tool). When that person indicates they are at their maximum comfortable exertion, the corresponding force may be measured (e.g., via a strain gauge or other force measuring mechanism) and recorded as a data point for that person. This process may be repeated for a plurality of persons over a range of hand grip and two-arm grip spacings for each person. Each data point for each person at each hand grip spacing or two-arm grip spacing may then be averaged (in other embodiments, a median value or other representative value may be used) with a best fit line applied to create the HCFC. In other embodiments, a true maximum force may be used rather than a maximum comfortable exertion force. In still other embodiments, a near minimum force may be used (in that regard, the pitch circles may be optimized for individuals who may be able to exert a relatively lower force). In each case, the same process as described above may be used to create a HCFC. Accordingly, all such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - As shown, in regard to a two-hand operated cutting tool, as the user's hands become closer, the force that a user can deliver to the handles of a two-hand operated cutting tool typically decreases (curve 1201). In comparison, in regard to a one-hand operated cutting tool, as the grip spacing decreases, the force that a user can deliver typically increases (curve 1202). Thus, force delivery characteristics for a one-hand operated cutting tool and a two-hand operated cutting tool are nearly direct opposites of each other. This is shown by the nearly oppositely sloped
curves FIG. 12 . For this reason, the variable pivot mechanism operates opposite for a two-hand operated cutting tool to that of a one-hand operated cutting tool. - Accordingly, each tool utilizes a unique human strength capability curve in order to minimize the effort required to cut through an object.
- Referring now to
FIG. 13 , thirty-two inch handle length lopper characteristics as a function of handle angle for a constant handle length is shown, according to an exemplary embodiment.Curve 1301 represents a Material Cut Force Curve (MCFC) for a thirty-two inch lopper, according to an exemplary embodiment. In one embodiment,curve 1302 corresponds withstep 1102 ofmethod 1100. Whereas the HCFC is from the standpoint of the user,curve 1301 is from the standpoint of the object to be cut.Curve 1301 represents the force needed to cut through a maximum sized object for the cutting tool at various handle angles. An example creation ofcurve 1301 may be as follows. A plurality of maximum sized objects may be assembled and cut by the lopper. The force may be measured (e.g., via a strain gauge) and recorded over the cutting stroke (e.g., via from a maximum handle angle to a minimum handle angle). Utilizing the force curve data for a plurality of maximum sized objects, at each handle angle, the corresponding force curve data points may be averaged (or, a maximum value, a minimum value, a standard deviation value, etc.) and plotted. After plotting, a best fit line may be applied to the cut-through force data to create the MCFC. In other embodiments, other curve fitting techniques may be used to create the MCFC, and the other curves described herein. In the example shown, at an approximate sixty-degree handle angle, the force to cut through the object is maximized. Because the fibers in an object are typically compressible, the object compresses from the shearing force by the two cutting members prior to the maximum resistance being encountered to actually cut through the object. - Still referring to
FIG. 13 ,curve 1303 represents an average adult limit of comfortable exertion (e.g., force and/or effort) at various handle angles for a constant handle length. Because the HCFC is a function of handle spacing and the MCFC is a function of handle angle, if the handle length stays constant, dividing HCFC (i.e.,curve 1303, which is generated based on a constant handle length) by the MCFC yields the Human Ability Factor Curve, “HAFC,” (curve 1302) (corresponding to step 1103 of method 1100). Because the HCFC represents the maximum human force at a given grip spacing and the amount of force required to cut through an object may be less than that maximum force, the HAFC represents a percent of strength (i.e., effort) as a function of position that a user needs to exert in order to make the cut through the object. - Referring to
FIG. 14 , a graphical representation of mechanical advantage as a function of blade angle for a two-hand operated cutting tool with a variable pivot system is shown, according to an exemplary embodiment. Themechanical advantage curve 1401 was generated by adherence to the constraints of the variable pivot system and the, in this example, constraints of the thirty-two inch lopper (step 1104). For example, such constraints include human and physical limitations, such as a maximum handle-opening angle, a handle length, and a geometric and cut-capacity limitation of the object to be cut (i.e., a maximum sized object as a cutting subject for the tool). Moreover, there are maximum slope changes that can be used with the geared portion of the variable pivot system. Accordingly, by adhering to these constraints, the depicted mechanical advantage curve was created. Because of the variable pivot system, the flat line section in the mechanical advantage curve represents the single pivot portion whereas the curved section represents the geared portion of the variable pivot system. According to one embodiment, the mechanical advantage curve may be generated based on an iterative process. For example, a mechanical advantage curve is designed and then one associated gear-tooth geometry (using a variation on the involute gear-profile) is constructed. Next, the designed mechanical advantage curve is used to “cut” the mating gear. This process establishes the parameter windows that are mechanically feasible and robust (e.g., the constraints of the system). The pitch circles are a geometric derivative of the mechanical advantage curve (i.e., step 1106). - In this embodiment, the slide portion of the variable pivot mechanism corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 140 degrees to 115 degrees, where approximately refers to plus-or-minus ten degrees. Comparatively, the geared portion corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 115 degrees to 0 degrees. In other embodiments, based on the constraints of the cutting tool, the approximate handle angles for each portion—geared and slide—may vary (e.g., the geared portion may correspond with a handle angle of approximately 115 degrees to 5degrees). For example, a twelve inch lopper may have a full open handle angle of approximately ninety degrees. In this example, the slide portion may correspond with 90 degrees to 60 degrees and the geared portion corresponds with 60 degrees to 0 degrees, where approximately is plus-or-minus 5 degrees. As mentioned above, according to one embodiment, the geared portion may correspond with two-thirds of a cutting stroke while the slide portion corresponds with one-third of the cutting stroke. While the exact handle angle delineations may differ based on the application, it should be understood that
method 1100 with the graphs shown and described herein are still substantially applicable to those applications. In turn, all such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - As shown in
FIG. 14 , the peak of themechanical advantage curve 1401 is set to approximately the peak of the HAFC 1402 (step 1105). As mentioned above, “approximately” may differ based on the cutting tool this method is being utilized with. In one embodiment, approximately corresponds to a plus-or-minus ten degree handle angle. In other embodiments, a different value may be used (e.g., a plus-or-minus five degree handle angle). Note that this location may be different than the peak location of the MCFC and that this is typically an iterative process. A pitch circle is determined using the mechanical advantage curve that peaks at approximately where the HAFC peaks (step 1106). - The determined pitch circles are then implemented in, for example, the lopper of
FIGS. 1A-4B (i.e., step 1107). As mentioned above, in one embodiment, the determined pitch circles are at least partially elliptical. At each blade angle, the geared portion is configured to deliver approximately the mechanical advantage derived and represented inFIG. 14 (for the thirty-two inch lopper). The determined pitch circles are based in part on the HAFC, i.e., the percent of strength (effort) a user is exerting to make the cut through an object. As such, due to the geared portion of the variable pivot system, the resultant effort is lower than the otherwise required human effort to cut through an object without the geared mechanism. The resultant effort curve is represented inFIG. 14 ascurve 1403. In turn, as described, the determined pitch circles for the geared portion are optimized to minimize human effort in operating the hand operated cutting tool. This feature may appeal to customers, which may lead to an increase in sales potential. - Referring next to
FIG. 15 , amethod 1500 for minimizing the effort required to cut through an object using a one-hand operated cutting tool, such as that shown and described with reference toFIGS. 5-10B and 19 above is illustrated according to an exemplary embodiment.Method 1500 is substantially similar tomethod 1100 and, in turn, is briefly described. The difference betweenmethod 1500 andmethod 1100 is thatmethod 1500 is for a one-hand operated cutting tool. More nuanced differences are explained and shown in regard toFIGS. 16-17 . - First, human force data as a function of handle spacing is received (1501). The human force data represents an average maximum force a human can deliver comfortably at various handle spacings. According to one embodiment, the human force data is measured data acquired from a plurality of people. For example, a person may squeeze the handles together (an open position to a close position) at a specific handle angle and the force is measured when the person says or otherwise indicates that this is the force they are comfortable applying albeit they may able to be exert a greater force. In other examples, a true maximum force may be used at
step 1501. All such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In still other embodiments, the human force data is simulated, estimated, or any generated using any other type of mechanism (e.g., computer modeling software). Second, the cut through force data as a function of handle angle is received (1502). The cut through force data corresponds to a force required to cut through a maximum sized object for the tool at various handle angles. Like the human force data, the cut-through force data may be measured, estimated, simulated, etc. Third, the received human force data is divided by the received cut through force data for a given handle length (1503). By keeping the handle length constant, the division has the same units. Fourth, a mechanical advantage curve is generated (1504). As described below, the mechanical advantage curve may be generated based on one or more constraints (e.g., maximum slope changes in a geared portion of a variable pivot system) and with any type of generation mechanism (e.g., computer simulation software). Fifth, the mechanical advantage curve is set to peak at approximately the same location as the peak of step 1503 (1505). In one embodiment, approximately corresponds with a plus-or-minus three degree handle angle (e.g., the peak of the mechanical advantage curve may be set to the peak ofstep 1503 if the peak of the mechanical advantage curve is within a three degree handle angle of the peak of step 1503). Relative to the two-hand operated cutting tool, in general, the one-hand operated cutting tool has a relative smaller full open separating angle between the handle. As such, the “approximate” designation is smaller. In one embodiment, full open corresponds with a handle angle (e.g., angle 280) of approximately 30 degrees. In this embodiment, the first region of travel corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 30 degrees to 5 degrees and the second region of travel corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 5 degrees to a full close position (e.g., 0 degrees). It should be understood, however, in other embodiments, approximately may correspond with a different handle angle degree than 3 degrees (e.g., plus-or-minus one degrees). Based on the set mechanical advantage curve, a pitch circle for the geared portion is determined (1506). According to one embodiment, after determination, the pitch circle is implemented with the one-hand operated cutting tool to reduce the effort required to cut through an object (1507). - As mentioned above in regard to
FIG. 12 , for a one-hand operated cutting tool, as the grip spacing decreases (i.e.,angle 280 between the handles), the force that a user can deliver typically increases. In regard to the paragraphs that follow, this curve is referred to as the HCFC-HP (i.e., human capability force curve-hand pruner). As mentioned before, force delivery characteristics for a one-hand operated cutting tool and a two-hand operated cutting tool are nearly direct opposites of each other. Accordingly, each tool utilizes a unique human strength capability curve in order to minimize the effort required to cut through an object. - Referring to
FIG. 16 , human characteristics of a hand pruner of given handle length are shown, according to an exemplary embodiment.Curve 1601 represents a Material Cut Force Curve (MCFC-HP (hand pruner)) for a hand pruner, according to an exemplary embodiment. In one embodiment,curve 1602 corresponds withstep 1502 ofmethod 1500. Whereas the HCFC-HP is from the standpoint of the user,curve 1601 is from the standpoint of the object to be cut.Curve 1601 represents the force needed to cut through a maximum sized object for the cutting tool at various handle angles. An example creation ofcurve 1601 may be as follows. A plurality of maximum sized objects may be assembled and cut by the pruner. The force may be measured (e.g., via a strain gauge) and recorded over the cutting stroke (e.g., via from a maximum handle angle to a minimum handle angle). Utilizing the force curve data for a plurality of maximum sized objects, at each handle angle, the corresponding force curve data points may be averaged (or, a maximum value, a minimum value, a standard deviation value, etc.) and plotted. After plotting, a best fit line may be applied to the cut-through force data to create the MCFC-HP. In other embodiments, other curve fitting techniques may be used to create the MCFC-HP, and the other curves described herein. - Still referring to
FIG. 16 ,curve 1603 represents an average adult limit of comfortable exertion (e.g., force and/or effort) at various handle angles for a constant handle length. Because the HCFC-HP is a function of handle spacing and the MCFC-HP is a function of handle angle, if the handle length stays constant, dividing HCFC-HP (i.e.,curve 1603, which is generated based on a constant handle length) by the MCFC-HP yields the Human Ability Factor Curve, “HAFC-HP,” (curve 1602) (corresponding to step 1503 of method 1500). Because the HCFC-HP represents the maximum human force at a given grip spacing and the amount of force required to cut through an object may be less than that maximum force, the HAFC-HP represents a percent of strength (i.e., effort) as a function of position that a user needs to exert in order to make the cut through the object. - Referring next to
FIG. 17 , a graphical representation of mechanical advantage as a function of blade angle for a one-hand operated cutting tool with a variable pivot system is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. Themechanical advantage curve 1701 was generated by adherence to the constraints of the variable pivot system and the, in this example, constraints of the hand pruner (one-hand operated cutting tool) (step 1504). For example, such constraints include human and physical limitations, such as a maximum handle-opening angle, a handle length, and a geometric and cut-capacity limitation of the object to be cut (i.e., a maximum sized object as a cutting subject for the tool). Moreover, there are maximum slope changes that can be used with the geared portion of the variable pivot system. Accordingly, by adhering to these constraints, the depicted mechanical advantage curve was created. Because of the variable pivot system, the flat line section in the mechanical advantage curve represents the single pivot portion whereas the curved section represents the geared portion of the variable pivot system. As shown, the first region (geared portion) corresponds to a relatively greater mechanical advantage than the second region (slide portion) of the cutting stroke. Like the example mentioned above, the first region of travel for the one-hand operated cutting tool with the variable pivot system corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 30 degrees to approximately 5 degrees, and the second region of travel corresponds with a handle angle of approximately 5 degrees to a full close position (e.g., 0 degrees). Accordingly, in this case, the first region (geared portion) is approximately eighty percent of the cutting stroke (30 degree full open angle and 25 degrees corresponds with the first region). In other embodiments, the first region may be two-thirds of the cutting stroke relative to one-third of the second region. In still other embodiments, the delineation may vary (e.g., 50-50, 25-50, etc.). This is also true of the two-hand operated cutting tool despite being primarily described in regard to a 2/3-1/3 split. All such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. - As shown in
FIG. 17 , the peak of themechanical advantage curve 1701 is set to approximately the peak of the HAFC-HP 1702 that represents the HAFC-HP with the variable pivot mechanism (step 1505). As mentioned above, “approximately” may differ based on the cutting tool this method is being utilized with. In one embodiment, approximately corresponds to a plus-or-minus three degree handle angle. In other embodiments, a different value may be used (e.g., a plus-or-minus five degree handle angle). Note that this location may be different than the peak location of the MCFC-HP and that this is typically an iterative process. A pitch circle is determined using the mechanical advantage curve that peaks at approximately where the HAFC-HP peaks (step 1506). - The determined pitch circles are then implemented in, for example, the hand pruner of
FIGS. 5-10B (i.e., step 1507). Therefore, at each blade angle, the geared portion is configured to deliver approximately the mechanical advantage derived and represented inFIG. 17 . The determined pitch circles are based in part on the HAFC-HP, i.e., the percent of strength (effort) a user is exerting to make the cut through an object. As such, due to the geared portion of the variable pivot system, the resultant effort (curve 1703) is lower than the otherwise required human effort to cut through an object without the geared mechanism (curve 1702). Please note that this curve will change and in turn the pitch circles for various hand tools that utilize the described variable pivot system. - It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the elements of the hand operated cutting tool, shown as a lopper and a pruner, with a variable pivot system shown schematically in the embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited.
- Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the preferred and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. For example, the shape and position of the guide member plate may be varied as necessary to accommodate changes in the dimensions, shape and geometry of the other components of the cutting tool. Also, the type and positions of the locking devices (e.g., travel stop and cam follower) may further be varied to accommodate changes in other components of the cutting tool. Furthermore, the handles extending from the first cutting member and the lever may be of any suitable size and shape to correspond to the specific type of cutting devices and type of cutting tool (e.g. loppers, shears, pruners, trimmers, etc.). Moreover, for example, the type and positions of locking projections for the one-hand operated cutting tool may be varied to accommodate changes in other components of the cutting tool.
- The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. In the claims, any means-plus-function clause is intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design, operating configuration and arrangement of the preferred and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure as expressed in the appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. A hand operated cutting tool, comprising:
a first handle having a cam follower and a first set of projections; and
a second handle movably coupled to the first handle, the second handle having an elongated member, wherein the elongated member has a cam surface and a second set of projections;
wherein the handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein a first region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being at least partly engaged, and wherein a second region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being disengaged.
2. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 1 , wherein the elongated member at least partially overlays the first handle throughout a movement of the handles from the full open position to the full closed position, and wherein the second set of projections are positioned on an interior surface proximate the first handle of the elongated member.
3. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 1 , wherein the cam surface is positioned directly above the second set of projections on the elongated member.
4. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 1 , wherein the first region of the movement is also defined by the cam follower and the cam surface being disengaged, and wherein the second region of the movement is also defined by the cam follower and the cam surface being engaged.
5. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 1 , further comprising:
a first locking projection coupled to the first handle; and
a second locking projection coupled to the second handle.
6. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 5 , wherein during the second region of the movement, the first locking projection and the second locking projection are engaged.
7. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 1 , wherein the first and second sets of projections are structured as gear projections.
8. A hand operated cutting tool, comprising:
a first handle having a pin, a cam follower, and a first set of projections;
a first cutting member having a bore, wherein the bore is structured to receive the pin to couple the first handle to the first cutting member; and
a second handle movably coupled to the first handle, the second handle having a second cutting member and an elongated member, wherein the elongated member has a cam surface and a second set of projections;
wherein the handles are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein a first region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being at least partly engaged, and wherein a second region of movement is defined by the first and second sets of projections being disengaged
9. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 8 , wherein the first region of the movement is also defined by the cam follower and cam surface being disengaged, and wherein the second region of the movement is also defined by the cam follower and the cam surface being engaged.
10. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 8 , wherein the cam surface is positioned directly above the second set of projections on the elongated member.
11. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 8 , further comprising:
a first rotation stop coupled to the first handle;
a second rotation stop coupled to a first cutting member;
a first locking projection coupled to the first handle; and
a second locking projection coupled to the second handle.
12. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 11 , wherein during the first region of the movement, the first handle rotates relative to the first cutting member, and wherein during the second region of the movement, the first rotation stop and the second rotation stop are at least partly engaged as are the first locking projection and the second locking projection to substantially prevent rotation of the first handle to the first cutting member during the second region of the movement.
13. A hand operated cutting tool, comprising:
a first cutting member;
a first handle including a second cutting member, wherein the second cutting member is pivotably coupled to the first cutting member, and wherein the second cutting member includes a first set of projections;
a second handle coupled to the first cutting member, wherein the second handle includes a lever coupled to the first cutting member, wherein the lever includes a second set of projections and a cam follower; and
a guide structure coupled to the second cutting member, the guide structure including a cam surface;
wherein the first handle and the second handle are movable between a full open position and a full closed position, wherein in the full open position the first and second sets of projections are disengaged and in the full close position the first and second sets of projections are at least partly engaged.
14. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 13 , wherein the cam follower travels along a continuous curvilinear path defined by an interaction between the cam follower and the cam surface as the first and second handles move from the full open to the full close position.
15. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 13 , wherein the lever includes a travel stop, wherein an interaction between the cam follower and the cam surface and an interaction between the travel stop and the first cutting member substantially prevents rotation of the lever about the first cutting member.
16. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 15 , wherein at the full open position, the cam follower engages the cam surface, the travel stop engages the lever, and the first set of projections and the second set of projections are disengaged.
17. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 13 , wherein a cutting stroke is defined by the first handle and the second handle moving between the full open position to the full closed position, wherein a first region of the cutting stroke is proximate the full open position and a second region of the cutting stroke is proximate the full closed position, wherein the first region of the cutting stroke corresponds with a handle angle between the first handle and the second handle of approximately 140 degrees to 115 degrees, and wherein the second region of the cutting stroke corresponds with a handle angle between the first handle and the second handle of approximately 115 to 5 degrees.
18. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 13 , wherein the guide member projects outward and away from the second cutting member toward the lever.
19. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 18 , wherein the guide member at least partially overlays each of the first cutting member, the second cutting member, and the lever.
20. The hand operated cutting tool of claim 13 , wherein the hand operated cutting tool is a lopper.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/381,225 US20190230866A1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2019-04-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201361906754P | 2013-11-20 | 2013-11-20 | |
US14/538,130 US9345200B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2014-11-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/131,724 US9655305B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/490,209 US10321635B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2017-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US16/381,225 US20190230866A1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2019-04-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/490,209 Continuation US10321635B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2017-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20190230866A1 true US20190230866A1 (en) | 2019-08-01 |
Family
ID=53171958
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/538,130 Active US9345200B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2014-11-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/131,724 Active US9655305B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/490,209 Active US10321635B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2017-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US16/381,225 Abandoned US20190230866A1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2019-04-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/538,130 Active US9345200B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2014-11-11 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/131,724 Active US9655305B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US15/490,209 Active US10321635B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2017-04-18 | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US9345200B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP3192352B1 (en) |
CN (2) | CN109258162B (en) |
AU (2) | AU2014353365B2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK3071016T3 (en) |
PL (2) | PL3071016T3 (en) |
RU (2) | RU2617583C1 (en) |
TW (2) | TWI573678B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015077090A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011116790A1 (en) * | 2010-03-25 | 2011-09-29 | Gardena Manufacturing Gmbh | Hand-operated shears |
EP3192352B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2018-11-07 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
US9591808B2 (en) * | 2014-02-26 | 2017-03-14 | Thomas Lin | Gardening shears capable of switching cutting modes |
US9426945B2 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2016-08-30 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | Pruning shears |
US20160120132A1 (en) * | 2014-11-04 | 2016-05-05 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | Pruning shears |
TWM511199U (en) * | 2015-08-19 | 2015-11-01 | Everraise Entpr Co Ltd | Pruning shears with changeable operation modes |
JP6888255B2 (en) * | 2015-09-14 | 2021-06-16 | マックス株式会社 | Electric scissors |
US10843352B2 (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2020-11-24 | Fiskars Finland Oy Ab | Cutting tool with a flat force profile |
US10136583B2 (en) * | 2016-05-23 | 2018-11-27 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Geared hand tool |
US10836028B2 (en) * | 2016-07-10 | 2020-11-17 | Herbavore LLC | Interchangeable toollessly releasable handles for hand tools and methods of using the same |
US10182530B1 (en) * | 2017-07-21 | 2019-01-22 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Handheld gardening gear shears |
CN107466688A (en) * | 2017-08-09 | 2017-12-15 | 犀牛日用制品(中山)有限公司 | A kind of gear type garden shear |
USD890584S1 (en) | 2018-03-06 | 2020-07-21 | Fiskars Finland Oy Ab | Lopper |
USD890582S1 (en) | 2018-03-06 | 2020-07-21 | Fiskars Finland Oy Ab | Tool handle |
USD873632S1 (en) | 2018-03-06 | 2020-01-28 | Fiskars Finland Oy Ab | Shears |
USD892580S1 (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2020-08-11 | Allprofessional Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Embellishing plate for shears |
JP1650795S (en) * | 2019-01-25 | 2020-01-20 | ||
FI20215327A1 (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2022-09-24 | Fiskars Finland Oy Ab | A cutting device |
CN113829000B (en) * | 2021-09-28 | 2022-08-23 | 太原理工大学 | Method and device for shaping cutting tool |
CN116584261B (en) * | 2023-07-13 | 2023-09-15 | 北京林大匠心园林工程有限公司 | Greening maintenance trimming device |
Family Cites Families (173)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US444635A (en) * | 1891-01-13 | Bolt and rivet cutter | ||
US460705A (en) * | 1891-10-06 | Shears | ||
US65745A (en) * | 1867-06-11 | John e | ||
US547101A (en) * | 1895-10-01 | Hugh williams | ||
US351339A (en) * | 1886-10-19 | Bolt-cutter | ||
US328288A (en) * | 1885-10-13 | Seal-press | ||
US1304917A (en) * | 1919-05-27 | Tobacco-clipper | ||
US542435A (en) * | 1895-07-09 | Corrugating and cutting tool | ||
US476459A (en) * | 1892-06-07 | hamxnn | ||
US107577A (en) * | 1870-09-20 | Improvement in pruning-shears | ||
US397698A (en) * | 1889-02-12 | Shears | ||
US512086A (en) * | 1894-01-02 | Pliers | ||
US246399A (en) * | 1881-08-30 | James h | ||
US157610A (en) * | 1874-12-08 | Improvement in bolt-trimmers | ||
US148566A (en) * | 1874-03-17 | De laxcy kennedy | ||
US508022A (en) * | 1893-11-07 | Peter kamphaus | ||
US303067A (en) * | 1884-08-05 | Bolt and rivet clipper | ||
US433914A (en) * | 1890-08-05 | James w | ||
US103873A (en) * | 1870-06-07 | Improvement in fruning-knife | ||
US46960A (en) * | 1865-03-21 | Improved hand shears or nippers | ||
US563458A (en) * | 1896-07-07 | Shears | ||
US573548A (en) * | 1896-12-22 | Nippers | ||
US633588A (en) * | 1898-11-08 | 1899-09-26 | Anna Helwig | Pneumatic stay-bolt clipper. |
US640257A (en) * | 1899-03-16 | 1900-01-02 | Albert J Baer | Hoof-cutter. |
US694829A (en) * | 1901-08-08 | 1902-03-04 | James Candlish | Bolt cutter and trimmer. |
US766298A (en) * | 1903-06-02 | 1904-08-02 | Moriz Eggeman | Shears. |
US767344A (en) * | 1904-02-10 | 1904-08-09 | Joseph A Mccormick | Device for trimming and paring hoofs. |
US823367A (en) * | 1905-02-18 | 1906-06-12 | James Ryan | Wrench. |
US823816A (en) * | 1905-10-03 | 1906-06-19 | William Pertiman Spragg | Shears. |
US863111A (en) * | 1907-05-20 | 1907-08-13 | Henry W Smohl | Bolt-clipper. |
US860815A (en) * | 1907-05-28 | 1907-07-23 | August Loock | Hoof-cutter. |
US883457A (en) * | 1907-12-19 | 1908-03-31 | Charles Geis | Shears. |
US906950A (en) * | 1908-07-15 | 1908-12-15 | William Stephen Smith | Pocket-scissors. |
US1065753A (en) * | 1912-02-17 | 1913-06-24 | Whitney Metal Tool Company | Hand metal-shears. |
US1066675A (en) * | 1912-06-22 | 1913-07-08 | Edward S Stowell | Hoof-trimmer. |
US1105191A (en) * | 1913-09-02 | 1914-07-28 | Seal & Fastener Co | Tool for joining metal-strap ends. |
US1181072A (en) * | 1915-01-08 | 1916-04-25 | Rufus S Gibson | Bolt and rod cutter. |
US1168125A (en) * | 1915-08-31 | 1916-01-11 | Atlas Implement And Tool Company | Hoof-trimmer. |
US1201991A (en) * | 1916-03-20 | 1916-10-17 | Charles H Thurston | Wire-cutter. |
US1502191A (en) * | 1916-03-23 | 1924-07-22 | Helwig John | Metal-pressing tool |
FR486693A (en) * | 1916-08-28 | 1918-04-30 | Dante Mansutti | Wire cutter |
FR488129A (en) * | 1917-12-22 | 1918-09-05 | Renou & Cie Soc | Hinged cutting pliers for cutting piano wire |
US1284351A (en) * | 1918-03-04 | 1918-11-12 | Antoni Jagielo | Wire-cutting scissors. |
US1368077A (en) * | 1919-12-16 | 1921-02-08 | William W Underwood | Metallic snip |
US1395758A (en) * | 1920-03-15 | 1921-11-01 | Maszczyk Alexander | Operating means for hinged tools |
US1430705A (en) * | 1921-06-17 | 1922-10-03 | Wagenbach Anton | Shears especially for rolled iron |
US1469467A (en) * | 1921-06-17 | 1923-10-02 | Wagenbach Anton | Shears for iron and similar materials |
US1429792A (en) * | 1921-08-26 | 1922-09-19 | Stiriss Jacob | Envelope-closure tool |
US1455297A (en) * | 1921-11-21 | 1923-05-15 | Heller Tool Company | Cutting tool |
US1576882A (en) * | 1924-06-19 | 1926-03-16 | Voleske John | Cutter |
US1712800A (en) * | 1925-12-15 | 1929-05-14 | Porter Inc H K | Metal-cutting tool |
US1689648A (en) * | 1926-02-15 | 1928-10-30 | Voleske John | Shears |
US1760627A (en) * | 1926-08-04 | 1930-05-27 | William Schollhorn Co | Hand tool |
US1715898A (en) * | 1927-06-04 | 1929-06-04 | Carri Hermann | Duplex scissors |
GB340872A (en) * | 1929-04-11 | 1931-01-08 | Brev Fort Soc D Expl Des | Improvements in portable shearing tools for shearing metal |
US1836967A (en) * | 1930-06-16 | 1931-12-15 | Helwig Anna | Metal shear and wire cutter |
DE559786C (en) * | 1930-08-17 | 1932-09-24 | Karl Bohm | Hand scissors for cutting open nuts screwed on the bolt in their axial direction |
US1915404A (en) * | 1931-03-27 | 1933-06-27 | Gilbey M Clifton | Pliers |
US1897532A (en) * | 1931-07-11 | 1933-02-14 | Delbert E Pilcher | Emasculator |
GB391553A (en) * | 1932-01-22 | 1933-05-04 | Alexander Leslie Turner | A new or improved hand-operated machine for cutting wood and like materials |
US2084633A (en) * | 1933-04-15 | 1937-06-22 | Erickson Carl Arvid | Adjustable pliers |
GB452010A (en) * | 1935-02-13 | 1936-08-13 | Ronald Harry Baker | Improvements in or relating to scissors, shears and like cutting tools |
FR926212A (en) * | 1946-05-02 | 1947-09-25 | Improvement in hand tools comprising two active elements movable angularly relative to each other | |
US2437432A (en) * | 1946-10-01 | 1948-03-09 | Martines Rene | Tool |
FR943745A (en) * | 1946-12-31 | 1949-03-16 | Mechanical clamping and cutting device applicable to wire cutters, bolt cutters, shears or others | |
US2500461A (en) | 1947-06-25 | 1950-03-14 | Lazzarini Aldo | Claw-lever-and-rack-actuated parallel jaw wrench |
US2500462A (en) | 1947-07-05 | 1950-03-14 | Lazzarini Aldo | Lever and gear-sector operated locking parallel-jaw wrench |
DE804766C (en) * | 1948-10-12 | 1951-04-30 | Paul Borchert | Hand scissors |
US2660783A (en) * | 1953-04-22 | 1953-12-01 | Interstate Drop Forge Company | Peripheral cutter for multilayer cables |
FR1162295A (en) * | 1956-11-06 | 1958-09-10 | Forges Stephanoises Sa Des | Hand shears |
US2939211A (en) * | 1958-09-19 | 1960-06-07 | Kearney James R Corp | High-leverage tool |
US3230756A (en) * | 1961-07-20 | 1966-01-25 | Hatheway Patterson Corp | Crimping tool |
US3210844A (en) * | 1962-10-08 | 1965-10-12 | Tontscheff Todor Kaniov | Cutting pliers |
GB1162492A (en) * | 1966-02-24 | 1969-08-27 | Wilkinson Sword Ltd | Improvements in or relating to Cutting Tools. |
GB1408703A (en) * | 1973-02-19 | 1975-10-01 | Post Office | Cable cutters |
US4130938A (en) * | 1973-10-11 | 1978-12-26 | Rheintechnik Weiland & Kaspar K.G. | Cutter for animal hooves and claws |
CH595194A5 (en) * | 1975-08-25 | 1978-02-15 | Felix Flisch | |
US4178682A (en) * | 1978-08-31 | 1979-12-18 | H. K. Porter, Inc. | Ratchet cable cutter |
US4277887A (en) * | 1979-05-10 | 1981-07-14 | Indian Head Inc. | Conduit cutting apparatus |
US4378636A (en) * | 1980-12-12 | 1983-04-05 | Wick John R | Cutting tool |
US4599795A (en) * | 1983-06-11 | 1986-07-15 | Mcc Corporation | Cutting tool |
JPS62148113A (en) * | 1985-12-20 | 1987-07-02 | Kobayashi Kogu Seisakusho:Kk | Manual cable cutter |
DE8710354U1 (en) * | 1986-08-09 | 1987-12-10 | Kobayashi Tools Mfg. Co. Ltd., Sanjo, Niigata, Jp | |
SU1535456A1 (en) * | 1988-01-11 | 1990-01-15 | Головное Специализированное Конструкторское Бюро По Садово-Огородному Инструменту Научно-Производственного Объединения "Мехинструмент" | Secateur |
US5060381A (en) * | 1990-08-13 | 1991-10-29 | Taberlet Jean Jacques | Pair of scissors, in particular for use in the cutting of hair |
US5168629A (en) * | 1990-08-28 | 1992-12-08 | Frank Willard | Scissor assembly |
US5184404A (en) * | 1992-06-01 | 1993-02-09 | Chen Ching Jen | Wire cutter |
US5426857A (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1995-06-27 | Fiskars Oy Ab | Pivoted hand-held cutting tool |
US5325592A (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1994-07-05 | Fiskars Oy Ab | Pivoted tool having integral pivot member and method of producing same |
US5570510A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1996-11-05 | Fiskars Oy Ab | Lopper |
US5341573A (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1994-08-30 | Fiskars Oy Ab | Pivoted tool having a self-compensating unitary pivot member |
US5544416A (en) * | 1995-03-21 | 1996-08-13 | Lin; Mao-Sen | Shears |
USD368634S (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1996-04-09 | Spencer Frazer | Combination hand tool |
US5511314A (en) * | 1995-06-16 | 1996-04-30 | Huang; Shoei-Shin | Garden shears |
US5628115A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1997-05-13 | Hebert; Paul W. | Cutting tool |
US5689888A (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 1997-11-25 | Fiskars Consumer Oy Ab | Variable force tool |
US6105257A (en) * | 1998-08-14 | 2000-08-22 | Fiskars Inc. | Remote gripping or cutting apparatus having a rotatable head |
US6161291A (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2000-12-19 | Gilmour, Inc. | Lopping apparatus having handle compartments for stowing blades during periods of non-use and associated method |
GB2344783A (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2000-06-21 | Lin Yu Tang | Gardening shears |
US6422780B2 (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2002-07-23 | Pao-Lu Chen | Structure for connecting a tool with a grip |
RU2168889C2 (en) * | 1999-10-04 | 2001-06-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Мехинструмент" | Cutter |
USD434286S (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2000-11-28 | Thomes Lin | Gardening shears |
USD437751S1 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2001-02-20 | Thomes Lin | Gardening shears |
US6789324B2 (en) | 2000-05-12 | 2004-09-14 | Fiskars Consumer Oy Ob | Double gear hedge shears |
CA2308563A1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-16 | Shoei-Shin Huang | Improvement on gardening shears |
FR2813496B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2003-03-07 | Deville Sa | SHEARS |
WO2003009670A1 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2003-02-06 | Aquapore Moisture Systems, Inc. | Two-handed cutter with rotatable handles |
US6393703B1 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2002-05-28 | Jiin Haur Industrial Co., Ltd. | Structure for confining a rotational angle of a handle of gardening shears |
US20030093906A1 (en) * | 2001-11-20 | 2003-05-22 | Hsin-Te Huang | Metal shears |
FR2837126B1 (en) * | 2002-03-18 | 2004-12-03 | Joseph Sampognaro | ARTICULATED SCISSORS FOR PIZZA CUTTING |
AU2002358825A1 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-10-08 | Sun Chunxiao | Improved scissors |
DE20219648U1 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2003-03-06 | Huang Yao Chung | secateurs |
US6938346B1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2005-09-06 | Hong Chuan Hsian Industries Co., Ltd. | Pair of scissors comprising a gear transmission mechanism to work a movable jaw thereof |
US20040194320A1 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-07 | Jung-Te Hsieh | Apparatus for pruning high branches |
GB2404613A (en) * | 2003-07-14 | 2005-02-09 | David Jarman | A vegetation pruning device |
US6935031B1 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2005-08-30 | Hung Chuan Hsian Industries Co., Ltd. | Gear-driven shears provided with a curved plate on a movable jaw |
US20060026845A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2006-02-09 | Ming-Ling Lin | Garden shear |
DE102004039624A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-23 | Gardena Manufacturing Gmbh | Hand-operated cutting tool, in particular hedge trimmer or pruner |
DE102004060722A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-07-06 | Gardena Manufacturing Gmbh | Scissors, especially hedge trimmers |
DE102004062521A1 (en) * | 2004-12-24 | 2006-07-06 | Gardena Manufacturing Gmbh | Hand-operated cutter, in particular pruning shears |
MD3065G2 (en) * | 2005-05-06 | 2007-03-31 | Иван НЕКИТ | Pruner (variants) |
FI121534B (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2010-12-31 | Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab | Cutting Tools |
US7347125B1 (en) | 2006-09-13 | 2008-03-25 | Daniel Juieng | Automatic adjustable head wrench |
US7716840B2 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2010-05-18 | Emerson Electric Co | Tubing cutter |
US7530172B1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2009-05-12 | Jiin Haur Industrial Co., Ltd. | Labor-saving long-arm gardening shears |
US20090000127A1 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2009-01-01 | Christopher Smith | Multipurpose shears |
US20090047065A1 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2009-02-19 | Ku-Chia Cheng | Expandable and extractable positioning device for use in tubular members |
US7966735B1 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2011-06-28 | Hasbro, Inc. | Scissors assembly with rotatable blades |
US7946039B2 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2011-05-24 | Electroline Corporation | Hand-held ratchet tool for moving a pair of jaw members toward and away from each other |
FI122764B (en) * | 2008-08-19 | 2012-06-29 | Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab | Cutting Tools |
CN201352909Y (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2009-12-02 | 维胜特企业股份有限公司 | Garden shears capable of increasing the shearing area |
US8046924B2 (en) * | 2009-03-03 | 2011-11-01 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Cutting tool with variable mechanical advantage |
TW201038187A (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2010-11-01 | Natura Innovation Ltd | Labor-saving gardening shear |
TW201112942A (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-16 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co Ltd | Labor-saving garden shears |
USD621234S1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2010-08-10 | Gilmour, Inc. | Lopper |
USD620771S1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2010-08-03 | Gilmour, Inc. | Lopper |
US8166659B2 (en) | 2009-11-29 | 2012-05-01 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
CN201630055U (en) | 2009-12-25 | 2010-11-17 | 杭州埃法花园设备有限公司 | Dual-force high branch shears |
US8826545B2 (en) * | 2010-01-07 | 2014-09-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Lopping shears |
US8225513B2 (en) | 2010-03-02 | 2012-07-24 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Gardening shears having energy-saving function |
US8266804B2 (en) * | 2010-07-26 | 2012-09-18 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD634994S1 (en) * | 2010-08-15 | 2011-03-29 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD634995S1 (en) * | 2010-08-15 | 2011-03-29 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD638676S1 (en) * | 2010-09-08 | 2011-05-31 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Gardening shears |
USD638674S1 (en) * | 2010-09-08 | 2011-05-31 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Gardening shears |
USD638675S1 (en) * | 2010-09-08 | 2011-05-31 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Gardening shears |
WO2012033540A2 (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | Panosian Michael H | Enhanced power compact bolt cutter |
US8327549B2 (en) * | 2010-09-15 | 2012-12-11 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD652277S1 (en) * | 2010-10-05 | 2012-01-17 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Cutting device |
US8661691B2 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2014-03-04 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD649420S1 (en) * | 2011-04-07 | 2011-11-29 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Scissors |
TWM414816U (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2011-11-01 | Green Guard Industry Ltd | Labor-saving gardening scissor |
US8584368B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2013-11-19 | Ho Cheng Garden Tool Co. Ltd. | Position restriction structure of scissors |
USD679559S1 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2013-04-09 | Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab | Cutting tool |
USD693192S1 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2013-11-12 | Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab | Cutting tool |
USD684828S1 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2013-06-25 | Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab | Cutting tool |
USD677539S1 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2013-03-12 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Scissor handles |
USD684027S1 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2013-06-11 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Scissor handles |
USD678022S1 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2013-03-19 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Scissor handles |
US20140053413A1 (en) * | 2012-08-23 | 2014-02-27 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
USD700030S1 (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2014-02-25 | Iittala Group Oy Ab | Scissors |
USD700029S1 (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2014-02-25 | Iittala Group Oy Ab | Scissors |
USD700493S1 (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2014-03-04 | Iittala Group Oy Ab | Scissors |
US8978255B2 (en) * | 2012-10-28 | 2015-03-17 | Jiin Haur Industrial Co., Ltd. | Garden shears |
TWM451804U (en) * | 2012-11-23 | 2013-05-01 | Classic Garden Tools Co Ltd | Gardening shear |
US9003667B2 (en) * | 2013-01-18 | 2015-04-14 | Ho Cheng Garden Tools Co., Ltd. | Pair of garden scissors with an adjustable cutting |
FR3004891B1 (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2015-04-24 | Fiskars France Sas | MANUAL CUTTING TOOL |
EP3192352B1 (en) * | 2013-11-20 | 2018-11-07 | Fiskars Brands, Inc. | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system |
JP6257358B2 (en) * | 2014-02-03 | 2018-01-10 | 東邦工機株式会社 | Cutting tool |
DE202014103611U1 (en) * | 2014-08-04 | 2014-11-20 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | cutting tool |
DE202014103612U1 (en) * | 2014-08-04 | 2014-12-19 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | secateurs |
US9426945B2 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2016-08-30 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | Pruning shears |
US20160120132A1 (en) * | 2014-11-04 | 2016-05-05 | Formosa Tools Co., Ltd. | Pruning shears |
-
2014
- 2014-11-11 EP EP17160376.4A patent/EP3192352B1/en active Active
- 2014-11-11 RU RU2016123366A patent/RU2617583C1/en active
- 2014-11-11 DK DK14805744.1T patent/DK3071016T3/en active
- 2014-11-11 WO PCT/US2014/065077 patent/WO2015077090A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-11-11 PL PL14805744T patent/PL3071016T3/en unknown
- 2014-11-11 PL PL17160376T patent/PL3192352T3/en unknown
- 2014-11-11 CN CN201810992617.4A patent/CN109258162B/en active Active
- 2014-11-11 RU RU2017107969A patent/RU2648815C1/en active
- 2014-11-11 AU AU2014353365A patent/AU2014353365B2/en active Active
- 2014-11-11 CN CN201480072997.XA patent/CN105916369B/en active Active
- 2014-11-11 EP EP14805744.1A patent/EP3071016B1/en active Active
- 2014-11-11 US US14/538,130 patent/US9345200B2/en active Active
- 2014-11-19 TW TW103140108A patent/TWI573678B/en active
- 2014-11-19 TW TW105143753A patent/TWI687293B/en active
-
2016
- 2016-04-18 US US15/131,724 patent/US9655305B2/en active Active
- 2016-09-08 AU AU2016225858A patent/AU2016225858B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-04-18 US US15/490,209 patent/US10321635B2/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-04-11 US US16/381,225 patent/US20190230866A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW201713477A (en) | 2017-04-16 |
US20160227709A1 (en) | 2016-08-11 |
EP3071016B1 (en) | 2017-10-04 |
WO2015077090A1 (en) | 2015-05-28 |
EP3192352B1 (en) | 2018-11-07 |
TW201532765A (en) | 2015-09-01 |
DK3071016T3 (en) | 2017-11-20 |
PL3192352T3 (en) | 2019-06-28 |
CN105916369B (en) | 2018-10-02 |
TWI573678B (en) | 2017-03-11 |
US20170215347A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 |
US9345200B2 (en) | 2016-05-24 |
RU2648815C1 (en) | 2018-03-28 |
US10321635B2 (en) | 2019-06-18 |
PL3071016T3 (en) | 2018-01-31 |
EP3071016A1 (en) | 2016-09-28 |
AU2014353365B2 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
CN109258162A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
AU2014353365A1 (en) | 2016-06-23 |
AU2016225858B2 (en) | 2016-11-10 |
EP3192352A1 (en) | 2017-07-19 |
US9655305B2 (en) | 2017-05-23 |
RU2617583C1 (en) | 2017-04-25 |
AU2016225858A1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
US20150135914A1 (en) | 2015-05-21 |
CN109258162B (en) | 2019-11-08 |
CN105916369A (en) | 2016-08-31 |
TWI687293B (en) | 2020-03-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10321635B2 (en) | Cutting tool with a variable pivot system | |
USRE45488E1 (en) | Cutting tool with variable mechanic advantage | |
EP0895712B1 (en) | Lopper | |
US8220164B2 (en) | Cutting tool | |
US8458912B2 (en) | Cutting tool | |
JP5908489B2 (en) | Dual mode ratchet pruning shears | |
EP1219165B1 (en) | Power-lever cutting device | |
US7346991B1 (en) | Hand tool providing double compound leverage to the jaws | |
TW201725970A (en) | Electric scissors | |
US20080295341A1 (en) | Hand operated cutting tool | |
CN108367443B (en) | Cutting tool with gentle force curve | |
GB2389812A (en) | Cutting implement | |
GB2471775A (en) | Gardening shears |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |