US20180016505A1 - Method for producing hydrotreated oil and method for producing catalytic cracked oil - Google Patents
Method for producing hydrotreated oil and method for producing catalytic cracked oil Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180016505A1 US20180016505A1 US15/550,871 US201615550871A US2018016505A1 US 20180016505 A1 US20180016505 A1 US 20180016505A1 US 201615550871 A US201615550871 A US 201615550871A US 2018016505 A1 US2018016505 A1 US 2018016505A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- content
- catalyst
- mass
- ratio
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G45/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
- C10G45/02—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
- C10G45/04—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used
- C10G45/06—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof
- C10G45/08—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof in combination with chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G69/00—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process
- C10G69/02—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process plural serial stages only
- C10G69/04—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one other conversion process plural serial stages only including at least one step of catalytic cracking in the absence of hydrogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/201—Impurities
- C10G2300/202—Heteroatoms content, i.e. S, N, O, P
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a production method for obtaining hydrotreated oil from heavy hydrocarbon oil, and to a production method for obtaining catalytic cracked oil from heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit has been playing a central role in gasoline production for addressing demand for gasoline and promoting conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oil into light oil. Further, in recent years, interest has been high in the FCC unit as a process for producing a light hydrocarbon oil having high added value from heavy hydrocarbon oil, and a stock oil in which oil residue such as an atmospheric residual fraction is mixed in addition to a conventional vacuum gas oil fraction has also been used as a stock oil for FCC, seeking for higher economical efficiency.
- a catalyst is put in a heavy oil direct desulfurization unit serving as a pretreatment unit of an FCC unit, and the atmospheric residual oil is reacted under high-temperature high-pressure conditions to be subjected to demetallization, desulfurization, and denitrification treatment.
- zeolite has been generally used for the FCC catalyst used in an FCC unit, and a reduction in the amount of nitrogen poisoning the zeolite, particularly the amount of basic nitrogen, has been desired in the stock oil for FCC. That is, if it is possible to reduce the amount of nitrogen in the stock oil for FCC, the performance of the FCC catalyst will be sufficiently exhibited, and the efficiency of gasoline production will probably be improved. However, it has been considered until now that the denitrification reaction will also proceed when the desulfurization reaction proceeds in the direct desulfurization unit of heavy hydrocarbon oil, and there has been no particular technology of improving denitrification activity.
- Non Patent Literature 1 there is described that while an improvement in desulfurization activity and denitrification activity is found by impregnating and supporting phosphorus, pore volume of the catalyst tends to be reduced to cause rapid metal poisoning to reduce catalyst life.
- Patent Literatures 1 and 2 there is proposed a hydrotreating method of obtaining a stock oil for FCC by hydrotreating vacuum gas oil, atmospheric residual oil, and the like, the method including a first step of performing desulfurization and denitrification treatment at a relatively high reaction temperature and a second step of performing nuclear hydrogenation of two or more cyclic aromatics at a lower reaction temperature.
- Patent Literature 3 there is proposed a method of improving desulfurization activity and denitrification activity by using a catalyst containing phosphorus.
- a catalyst in which denitrification activity is higher than desulfurization activity so called a catalyst in which denitrification selectivity is high, and a hydrotreating method using the same are desired.
- an object of the present invention is to provide a method for producing hydrotreated oil, the method being able to efficiently obtain a hydrotreated oil suitably desulfurized and denitrified as a stock oil for FCC from heavy hydrocarbon oil. Further, another object of the present invention is to provide a method for producing catalytic cracked oil, the method being able to efficiently obtain the catalytic cracked oil by using the hydrotreated oil obtained in the above production method as a stock oil for FCC.
- one aspect of the present invention relates to a method for producing hydrotreated oil and a method for producing catalytic cracked oil to be described below.
- a method for producing hydrotreated oil comprising: a step of passing heavy hydrocarbon oil through a reactor filled with a hydrotreating catalyst to obtain hydrotreated oil, wherein the hydrotreating catalyst contains phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element; the ratio C 2 /C 1 of the content C 2 of the iron group element to the content C 1 of phosphorus in the hydrotreating catalyst is less than 0.60 in a molar ratio; the average pore diameter of the hydrotreating catalyst is larger than 7.5 nm and smaller than 9.5 nm.
- a method for producing hydrotreated oil the method being able to efficiently obtain hydrotreated oil suitably desulfurized and denitrified as a stock oil for FCC from heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- a method for producing catalytic cracked oil the method being able to efficiently obtain catalytic cracked oil.
- the method for producing hydrotreated oil according to the present embodiment comprises a step of passing heavy hydrocarbon oil through a reactor filled with a hydrotreating catalyst to obtain hydrotreated oil.
- the hydrotreating catalyst contains phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element.
- the iron group element represents metal elements belonging to group 8, group 9, and group 10 elements of the fourth period of the periodic table
- the group 6 element represents metal elements belonging to group 6 elements of the periodic table.
- the iron group element include iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), and nickel (Ni)
- examples of the group 6 element include chromium (Cr), molybdenum (Mo), and tungsten (W).
- the ratio C 2 /C 1 (molar ratio) of the content C 2 of the iron group element to the content C 1 of phosphorus in the hydrotreating catalyst is less than 0.60. Further, the average pore diameter of the hydrotreating catalyst is larger than 7.5 nm and smaller than 9.5 nm.
- a hydrotreated oil suitably desulfurized and denitrified as a stock oil for FCC can be efficiently obtained from heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- the hydrotreating catalyst since the hydrotreating catalyst has specific metal composition and a specific average pore diameter, good catalyst life and excellent denitrification activity are obtained in the hydrotreatment of heavy hydrocarbon. Therefore, according to the production method according to the present embodiment, even in the operation in which the content of sulfur in the production oil is set to a constant level like before, denitrification efficiently proceeds in addition to desulfurization, and a hydrotreated oil in which nitrogen content is sufficiently reduced can be obtained. That is, in the production method according to the present embodiment, a hydrotreated oil suitably denitrified as a stock oil for FCC can be efficiently produced as compared with conventional direct desulfurization methods.
- the stock oil used in the method for producing hydrotreated oil according to the present embodiment may be any oil as long as it is heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- the heavy hydrocarbon oil refers to that containing a fraction whose boiling point under normal pressure is 380° C. or more.
- the heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, atmospheric distillation residual oil and vacuum distillation residual oil, and may be solvent deasphalted oil, visbreaking oil, and the like obtained by using them as a raw material. Further, the heavy hydrocarbon oil may contain vacuum gas oil, a residual oil from a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, and the like.
- FCC fluid catalytic cracking
- the solvent deasphalted oil may be, for example, a heavy hydrocarbon oil in which the content of a fraction whose boiling point is 550° C. or more is 70% by mass or more.
- the method for producing the solvent deasphalted oil is not particularly limited, but it can be obtained, for example, by solvent deasphalting using a chain saturated hydrocarbon having 3 to 6 carbon atoms as a solvent.
- the solvent include propane, normal butane, isobutane, normal pentane, isopentane, and normal hexane.
- the solvent may be used singly or in combination.
- a solvent containing a chain saturated hydrocarbon having 5 or 6 carbon atoms in an amount of 50% by volume or more is suitably used as the solvent in solvent deasphalting, and according to such a solvent, the solvent deasphalted oil tends to be obtained at a high extraction ratio of 60% by volume or more or 70% by volume or more. Note that the residue after extraction is separated as a pitch.
- the content of sulfur be 5.0% by mass or less, and it is more preferable that the content of sulfur be 4.0% by mass or less.
- the content of sulfur in the resulting hydrotreated oil will be sufficiently reduced, and the content of sulfur in the catalytic cracked oil to be obtained later will also be suitably reduced.
- the lower limit of the content of sulfur in the heavy hydrocarbon oil is not particularly limited, the lower limit may be, for example, 0.6% by mass or more, and may be 0.8% by mass or more.
- the heavy hydrocarbon oil even when a heavy hydrocarbon oil having such a content of sulfur is used as a stock oil, the heavy hydrocarbon oil will be sufficiently desulfurized by hydrotreatment, and the content of sulfur in the hydrotreated oil will be sufficiently reduced.
- the content of nitrogen in the heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, 0.05% by mass or more, and may be 0.07% by mass or more.
- the hydrotreating catalyst since the hydrotreating catalyst has excellent denitrification activity, even when a heavy hydrocarbon oil containing nitrogen as described above is used as a stock oil, the heavy hydrocarbon oil will be sufficiently denitrified by hydrotreatment, and the content of nitrogen in the hydrotreated oil will be sufficiently reduced.
- the content of nitrogen in the heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, 0.35% by mass or less, and may be 0.30% by mass or less. When the content of nitrogen is in this range, the nitrogen in the resulting hydrotreated oil tends to be more significantly reduced.
- the content of basic nitrogen may be, for example, 0.02% by mass or more, and may be 0.03% by mass or more.
- the hydrotreating catalyst since the hydrotreating catalyst has excellent denitrification activity, even when a heavy hydrocarbon oil containing basic nitrogen as described above is used as a stock oil, the heavy hydrocarbon oil will be sufficiently denitrified by hydrotreatment, and the content of basic nitrogen in the hydrotreated oil will be sufficiently reduced.
- the content of basic nitrogen in the heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, 0.12% by mass or less, and may be 0.10% by mass or less. When the content of basic nitrogen is in this range, the basic nitrogen in the resulting hydrotreated oil tends to be more significantly reduced.
- Heavy hydrocarbon oil may contain heavy metals such as nickel and vanadium. It is preferable that the content of heavy metals in the heavy hydrocarbon oil be, for example, 200 ppm by mass or less, and it is more preferable that the content of heavy metals be 100 ppm by mass or less. When the content of heavy metals is as described above, a reduction in the catalyst life of a hydrotreating catalyst due to metal poisoning can be sufficiently suppressed.
- the content of heavy metals may be more than 3 ppm by mass, and may be 5 ppm by mass or more. Even when a heavy hydrocarbon oil containing heavy metals is used as a stock oil, a reduction in the catalyst life of a hydrotreating catalyst can be sufficiently suppressed by filling the upstream side of a reactor with a demetallization catalyst. Note that the content of heavy metals in a heavy hydrocarbon oil after demetallization may be, for example, 12 ppm by mass or less, and may be 15 ppm by mass or less.
- Heavy hydrocarbon oil may contain asphaltene.
- the content of asphaltene in heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, 0.05% by mass or more, and may be 2.0% by mass or more. Further, the content of asphaltene in heavy hydrocarbon oil may be, for example, 3.0% by mass or less, and may be 4.0% by mass or less.
- the content of sulfur in heavy hydrocarbon oil represents a value determined according to JIS K2541 “Crude oil and petroleum products—Determination of sulfur content”.
- the content of nitrogen in heavy hydrocarbon oil represents a value determined according to JIS K2541 “Crude oil and petroleum products—Determination of nitrogen content”.
- the content of basic nitrogen in heavy hydrocarbon oil represents a value measured according to UOP testing method No. 269-90.
- the content of heavy metals in heavy hydrocarbon oil represents a value measured by X-ray fluorescence analysis.
- the content of asphaltene in heavy hydrocarbon oil represents a value measured according to IP143 as heptane insolubles.
- a hydrotreating catalyst contains phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element, and the ratio C 2 /C 1 (molar ratio) of the content C 2 of the iron group element to the content C 1 of phosphorus in the hydrotreating catalyst is less than 0.60. Further, the average pore diameter of the hydrotreating catalyst is larger than 7.5 nm and smaller than 9.5 nm.
- the hydrotreating catalyst may be that comprising an inorganic oxide carrier and an active component supported by the inorganic oxide carrier.
- the active component contains phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element.
- a refractory inorganic oxide carrier is suitable as the inorganic oxide carrier, and examples include alumina, silica, titania, magnesia, zirconia, boron oxide, zinc oxide, and zeolite (for example, Y zeolite, ZSM-5 zeolite, and the like), and mixtures thereof.
- the active component supported by the inorganic oxide carrier may contain components other than phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element; and, for example, the active component may contain platinum and the like.
- the hydrotreating catalyst contain cobalt and/or nickel as an iron group element, and it is more preferable that the hydrotreating catalyst contain nickel.
- the hydrotreating catalyst contain molybdenum and/or tungsten as a group 6 metal, and it is more preferable that the hydrotreating catalyst contain molybdenum.
- the content of phosphorus in the hydrotreating catalyst may be, for example, 0.1% by mass or more, and it is preferable that the content of phosphorous be 1.0% by mass or more. Further, the content of phosphorus may be, for example, 4.0% by mass or less, and it is preferable that the content of phosphorus be 3.0% by mass or less.
- the content of an iron group element in the hydrotreating catalyst may be, for example, 1.0% by mass or more, and it is preferable that the content of an iron group element be 1.5% by mass or more. Further, the content of an iron group element may be, for example, 3.5% by mass or less, and it is preferable that the content of an iron group element be 3.0% by mass or less.
- the content of a group 6 element in the hydrotreating catalyst may be, for example, 5.0% by mass or more, and it is preferable that the content of a group 6 element be 6.0% by mass or more. Further, the content of a group 6 element may be, for example, 12.0% by mass or less, and it is preferable that the content of a group 6 element be 11.0% by mass or less.
- the content of phosphorus, an iron group element, and a group 6 element represents a value measured by ICP emission spectroscopy.
- the ratio C 2 /C 1 (molar ratio) of the content C 2 of an iron group element to the content C 1 of phosphorus is less than 0.60; it is preferable that the ratio C 2 /C 1 be less than 0.55; and it is more preferable that the ratio C 2 /C 1 be less than 0.53.
- denitrification activity tends to be further improved.
- the ratio C 2 /C 1 be 0.20 or more, and it is more preferable that the ratio C 2 /C 1 be 0.25 or more. According to the hydrotreating catalyst having such a ratio C 2 /C 1 , desulfurization activity tends to be further improved.
- the ratio C 1 /C 3 (molar ratio) of the content C 1 of phosphorus to the content C 3 of a group 6 element be larger than 0.23; it is more preferable that the ratio C 1 /C 3 be larger than 0.40; and it is further preferable that the ratio C 1 /C 3 be larger than 0.50.
- the ratio C 1 /C 3 be less than 1.5, and it is more preferable that the ratio C 1 /C 3 be less than 1.0. In such a hydrotreating catalyst, metal resistance tends to be further improved.
- the ratio C 2 /C 3 (molar ratio) of the content C 2 of an iron group element to the content C 3 of a group 6 element be less than 0.45; it is more preferable that the ratio C 2 /C 3 be less than 0.44; and it is further preferable that the ratio C 2 /C 3 be less than 0.42.
- the ratio (denitrification selectivity) of denitrification activity to desulfurization activity tends to be much higher, and a highly denitrified hydrotreated oil tends to be easily obtained.
- the average pore diameter of the hydrotreating catalyst is larger than 7.5 nm; it is preferable that the average pore diameter be larger than 7.6 nm; and it is more preferable that the average pore diameter be larger than 7.8 nm. In such a hydrotreating catalyst, the catalyst life tends to be significantly improved by the improvement in metal resistance performance.
- the average pore diameter of the hydrotreating catalyst is less than 9.5 nm; it is preferable that the average pore diameter be less than 9.2 nm; and it is more preferable that the average pore diameter be less than 9.0 nm.
- a hydrotreating catalyst denitrification selectivity tends to be further improved, and a highly denitrified hydrotreated oil tends to be easily obtained.
- the average pore diameter of a hydrotreating catalyst represents a value measured by a nitrogen adsorption method.
- the specific surface area of a hydrotreating catalyst be 150 m 2 /g or more; it is more preferable that the specific surface area be 200 m 2 /g or more; it is preferable that the specific surface area be 350 m 2 /g or less; and it is more preferable that the specific surface area be 320 m 2 /g or less.
- a hydrotreating catalyst further excellent denitrification activity tends to be obtained in combination with sufficient desulfurization performance.
- a hydrotreating catalyst As a hydrotreating catalyst, a new catalyst, a regenerated catalyst, and the like may be used without particular limitation.
- a reactor may be further filled with a catalyst other than the above hydrotreating catalyst.
- the reactor may be filled with a demetallization catalyst on the upstream side of the hydrotreating catalyst. That is, the reactor may be filled with a demetallization catalyst in the preceding stage, and may be filled with a hydrotreating catalyst in the subsequent stage.
- the demetallization catalyst is not particularly limited as long as it can remove at least a part of heavy metals in heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- Suitable examples of the demetallization catalyst include that comprising an inorganic oxide carrier and an active component supported by the inorganic oxide carrier.
- a refractory inorganic oxide carrier is preferred as the inorganic oxide carrier, and examples include alumina, silica, alumina-silica, boron oxide, and zinc oxide, and mixtures thereof.
- examples of the active component include group 6 elements such as molybdenum and tungsten and iron group elements such as cobalt and nickel.
- the inorganic oxide carrier may further contain phosphorus.
- the average pore diameter measured by a nitrogen adsorption method be 10 nm or more, and it is more preferable that the average pore diameter be 12 nm or more. In such a demetallization catalyst, more excellent demetallization activity tends to be obtained. Further, it is preferable that the average pore diameter of the demetallization catalyst be 25 nm or less, and it is more preferable that the average pore diameter be 23 nm or less. In such a demetallization catalyst, more excellent hydrotreating activity and catalyst strength tend to be obtained.
- the pore volume of the demetallization catalyst be 0.6 mL/g or more; it is more preferable that the pore volume of the demetallization catalyst be 0.65 mL/g or more; it is preferable that the pore volume of the demetallization catalyst be 1.0 mL/g or less; and it is more preferable that the pore volume of the demetallization catalyst be 0.9 mL/g or less. In such a demetallization catalyst, sufficient catalyst life and catalyst strength tend to be obtained, and more stable operation tends to be achieved.
- a demetallization catalyst As a demetallization catalyst, a new catalyst, a regenerated catalyst, and the like may be used without particular limitation. Further, the filling proportion of the demetallization catalyst in the reactor may be arbitrarily changed depending on the operating conditions and the stock oil composition.
- the reactor may be further filled with a catalyst other than the demetallization catalyst and the hydrotreating catalyst; for example, the reactor may be filled with a middle stage catalyst in which demetallization activity and desulfurization activity are combined.
- a catalyst other than the demetallization catalyst and the hydrotreating catalyst
- the reactor may be filled with a middle stage catalyst in which demetallization activity and desulfurization activity are combined.
- Various well-known catalysts may be used as such a catalyst.
- the hydrotreated oil is obtained by passing heavy hydrocarbon oil through a reactor filled with a hydrotreating catalyst and performing hydrotreatment of the heavy hydrocarbon oil.
- the reaction conditions of the hydrotreatment may be arbitrarily adjusted depending on the target production oil composition (for example, the content of sulfur) and the catalyst activity of the catalyst with which the reactor is filled.
- the reaction temperature of hydrotreatment may be 300° C. or more, and may be 350° C. or more. By setting such a reaction temperature, the activity of the hydrotreating catalyst with which the reactor is filled tends to be more significantly exhibited. Further, the reaction temperature of hydrotreatment may be, for example, 500° C. or less, and may be 450° C. or less. By setting such a reaction temperature, the thermal decomposition of heavy hydrocarbon oil does not excessively proceed; the operation of a hydrotreating unit can be smoothly performed; and activity degradation of the hydrotreating catalyst can be suppressed.
- the hydrogen partial pressure in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 3 MPa or more, and may be 5 MPa or more. By setting such hydrogen partial pressure, hydrogenation reaction tends to sufficiently proceed, and a more highly desulfurized and denitrified hydrotreated oil tends to be obtained. Further, the hydrogen partial pressure in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 25 MPa or less, and may be 20 Mpa or less. In such hydrogen partial pressure, an increase in equipment construction cost and operating cost tends to be avoided, and an economical advantage tends to be obtained.
- the hydrogen/oil ratio in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 400 L/L, and may be 500 L/L. By setting such a hydrogen/oil ratio, the hydrogenation activity of a hydrotreating catalyst tends to be more significantly exhibited. Further, the hydrogen/oil ratio in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 3000 L/L, and may be 1800 L/L. By setting such a hydrogen/oil ratio, excellent economical efficiency can be secured.
- the liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 0.1 h ⁇ 1 or more, and may be 0.2 h ⁇ 1 or more. By setting such a liquid hourly space velocity, excellent economical efficiency can be secured. Further, the liquid hourly space velocity in hydrotreatment may be, for example, 3.0 h ⁇ 1 , and may be 2.0 h ⁇ 1 . By setting such a liquid hourly space velocity, a more highly desulfurized and denitrified hydrotreated oil tends to be obtained.
- the hydrotreated oil obtained in the method for producing hydrotreated oil according to the present embodiment is highly desulfurized and denitrified, and can be suitably used as a stock oil for FCC.
- the content of nitrogen in hydrotreated oil be 0.15% by mass or less; and it is more preferable that the content of nitrogen be 0.13% by mass or less. Further, it is preferable that the content of basic nitrogen be 0.05% by mass or less; and it is more preferable that the content of basic nitrogen be 0.04% by mass or less.
- the content of nickel and vanadium in hydrotreated oil be 10 ppm or less, respectively, and it is more preferable that the content of nickel and vanadium be 5 ppm or less, respectively.
- Such a hydrotreated oil can sufficiently suppress metal poisoning of a catalyst used in the FCC process.
- a hydrotreated oil suitable for the FCC process can be efficiently and stably produced by a method excellent in economical efficiency.
- catalytic cracked oil can be efficiently obtained by using the hydrotreated oil obtained in the above production method as a stock oil for FCC. That is, the method for producing catalytic cracked oil according to the present embodiment may comprise a step of obtaining hydrotreated oil by the above method and a step of obtaining catalytic cracked oil by fluid catalytic cracking of the hydrotreated oil.
- the hydrotreated oil obtained in the production method is suitably denitrified as a stock oil for FCC, catalyst degradation in the fluid catalytic cracking is sufficiently suppressed, and the catalytic cracked oil can be efficiently obtained.
- the embodiment of fluid catalytic cracking is not particularly limited, but can be performed by a known method.
- the catalytic cracked oil obtained in the production method according to the present embodiment can be suitably used for the applications of chemical raw materials such as a gasoline fraction, a gas oil fraction, a coke raw material, propylene, and butadiene.
- solvent deasphalted oil obtained by solvent deasphalting the following vacuum residual oil at an extraction ratio of 70% using a hydrocarbon solvent containing 90% or more of a hydrocarbon having 5 and 6 carbon atoms.
- the properties of the solvent deasphalted oil were as follows.
- Example 1 a catalyst (demetallization catalyst X) (average pore diameter: 18 nm, pore volume: 0.87 mL/g) in which 2.7% by mass of molybdenum (in terms of molybdenum elements) was supported by an alumina carrier was used as a demetallization catalyst. Further, a catalyst A having the composition shown in Table 1 was used as a hydrotreating catalyst.
- C 2 /C 3 represents the ratio of the content C 2 of an iron group element to the content C 3 of a group 6 element
- C 1 /C 3 represents the ratio of the content C 1 of phosphorus to the content C 3 of a group 6 element
- C 2 /C 1 represents the ratio of the content C 2 of an iron group element to the content C 1 of phosphorus.
- the reactor inlet side of a hydrotreating unit was filled with the demetallization catalyst X, and the subsequent stage side of the hydrotreating unit was filled with the equal volume of the catalyst A. Hydrotreatment was performed under the following conditions using this hydrotreating unit.
- the reaction temperature was changed to 360° C., 380° C., and 400° C.; the analysis of sulfur, nitrogen, and heavy metals was performed on the hydrotreated oil obtained under each condition; and based on the analysis results, desulfurization activity (kHDS), denitrification activity (kHDN), and demetallization activity (kHDM) were determined. Note that each activity was calculated as an average value of a relative ratio to the reaction rate constant of Comparative Example 4 to be described below by calculating the reaction rate constant at each reaction temperature, assuming that the order of reaction is second order for desulfurization reaction, first order for denitrification reaction, and first order for demetallization reaction.
- the basic nitrogen removal ratio was calculated from the basic nitrogen concentration in a stock oil and the basic nitrogen concentration in a hydrotreated oil at a reaction temperature of 380° C. Further, the proportion (kHDN/kHDS) of denitrification activity to desulfurization activity was defined as HDN selectivity. Further, the time until desulfurization activity decreases to 20% of initial desulfurization activity was measured as an index of catalyst life of hydrotreating catalyst; a relative value to the time in Comparative Example 4 to be described below was determined; and the relative value was defined as a relative metal resistance.
- the desulfurization activity (kHDS), denitrification activity (kHDN), demetallization activity (kHDM), basic nitrogen removal ratio, HDN selectivity, and relative metal resistance determined by the above methods are shown in Table 2.
- Example 4 Example 1 De- De- De- Desulfurization Desulfurization Desulfurization Desulfurization sulfurization sulfurization sulfurization catalyst A catalyst B catalyst C catalyst D catalyst E catalyst F catalyst G catalyst H Mo (wt %) 8 10 8 10 8 12 12 8 Ni (wt %) 2 2.5 1.5 2 0.65 3 2.7 2.2 Co (wt %) 0 0 0 0 1.35 0 0.8 0 P (wt %) 2 2.5 2 2.5 0.6 2.5 1.4 0 C 2 /C 3 (mol/mol) 0.4 0.4 0.31 0.32 0.4 0.4 0.49 0.45 C 1 /C 3 (mol/mol) 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.23 0.65 0.36 0 C 2 /C 1 (mol/mol) 0.52 0.52 0.40 0.41 1.72 0.62 1.35 — Average ( ⁇ ) 82 82 82 82 85 75 60 95 pore diameter
- Example 4 Example 1 Example 2 De- De- Desulfurization Desulfurization Desulfurization Desulfurization Desulfurization sulfurization sulfurization catalyst A catalyst B catalyst C catalyst D catalyst E catalyst F catalyst G catalyst H kHDS % 110 117 87 107 133 116 133 100 kHDN % 167 206 161 203 118 189 223 100 kHDM % 85 78 70 75 88 84 51 100 Basic nitrogen % 23 30 19 32 11 26 28 5 removal ratio HDN % 152 176 185 190 89 163 168 100 selectivity Relative metal % 58 50 58 50 67 33 17 100 resistance
- a hydrotreating system using a plurality of catalysts was performed to obtain production oil. Further, in order to confirm the reactivity of catalytic cracking reaction of the resulting production oil, a MAT (Micro Activity Test) test was performed on the production oil. Details will be described below.
- the above demetallization catalyst X a demetallization catalyst Y (average pore diameter: 18 nm, pore volume: 0.80 mL/g) in which 6% by mass of molybdenum (in terms of molybdenum elements) and 1.5% by mass of nickel (in term of nickel elements) are supported by an alumina carrier, the above desulfurization catalyst E, the above desulfurization catalyst H, and the above desulfurization catalyst A were prepared. Further, a mixture in which the above solvent deasphalted oil was mixed with an atmospheric residual oil B to be shown below were mixed in a ratio of 54:46 (volume ratio) was prepared as a stock oil for hydrotreatment.
- a reactor in which two reaction towers were coupled was prepared; a first tower was filled with the demetallization catalyst X and the demetallization catalyst Y in this order from the inlet side; and a second tower was filled with the desulfurization catalyst E, the desulfurization catalyst H, and the desulfurization catalyst A in this order from the inlet side.
- Outlet temperature of the first tower Inlet temperature of the first tower+8° C.
- Inlet temperature of the second tower Inlet temperature of the first tower ⁇ 2° C.
- Outlet temperature of the second tower Inlet temperature of the second tower+20° C.
- the MAT test was performed in the same manner as in Example 5 except that the catalyst/oil ratio was changed to 9.5 (weight ratio). The test results are shown in Table 4.
- “Density (15° C.)” represents the density at 15° C.
- “LCO fraction” represents the content of a fraction having a boiling point of 221° C. or more and less than 343° C.
- “VR fraction” represents the content of a fraction having a boiling point of 538° C. or more.
- “Carbon residue”, “Nitrogen”, “Basic nitrogen”, “Sulfur”, “Ni”, and “V” represent the content of carbon residue, nitrogen, basic nitrogen, sulfur, nickel, and vanadium, respectively.
- “Average molecular weight” represents the number average molecular weight value of hydrocarbon measured with a GPC unit.
- Example 5 Stock oil FCC stock FCC stock FCC stock FCC stock oil B oil A oil A Catalyst/stock oil Mass ratio 8.5 9.5 8.5 Dry gas % by mass 3.4 3.6 3.4 H2 % by mass 0.1 0.1 0.1 CH4 % by mass 1.3 1.4 1.2 C2H4 % by mass 1.0 1.1 1.1 C2H6 % by mass 1.0 1.0 1.1 LPG % by mass 12.6 12.9 12.8 C3H6 % by mass 4.5 4.6 4.6 C3H8 % by mass 1.3 1.4 1.3 C4H8 % by mass 3.7 3.8 3.8 C4H10 % by mass 3.0 3.1 3.1 WCCG % by mass 52.5 52.6 52.0 LCO % by mass 16.0 15.5 15.9 CLO % by mass 8.3 7.9 8.4 COKE % by mass 7.2 7.5 7.5 TOTAL % by mass 100.0 100.0 100.0 Decomposition % by mass 68.5 69.1 68.2 ratio
- “Dry gas”, “LPG”, “WCCG”, “LCO”, “CLO”, and “COKE” represent a hydrocarbon having 1 or 2 carbon atoms, a hydrocarbon having 3 or 4 carbon atoms, a hydrocarbon having 5 or more carbon atoms and a boiling point of less than 221° C., a hydrocarbon having a boiling point of 221° C. or more and less than 343° C., a liquid hydrocarbon having a boiling point of 343° C. or more, and a solid product, respectively.
- “Decomposition ratio” represents the proportion of the amount excluding LCO, CLO, and COKE from all the products.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2015109748 | 2015-05-29 | ||
JP2015-109748 | 2015-05-29 | ||
PCT/JP2016/065219 WO2016194686A1 (ja) | 2015-05-29 | 2016-05-23 | 水素化処理油の製造方法及び接触分解油の製造方法 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180016505A1 true US20180016505A1 (en) | 2018-01-18 |
Family
ID=57441336
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/550,871 Abandoned US20180016505A1 (en) | 2015-05-29 | 2016-05-23 | Method for producing hydrotreated oil and method for producing catalytic cracked oil |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20180016505A1 (ko) |
EP (1) | EP3305874A4 (ko) |
JP (1) | JP6770953B2 (ko) |
KR (1) | KR20180013844A (ko) |
CA (1) | CA2986556A1 (ko) |
WO (1) | WO2016194686A1 (ko) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10533141B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-01-14 | Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC | Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit |
US10604709B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-03-31 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials |
US11788017B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2023-10-17 | Magëmã Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil |
US12025435B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2024-07-02 | Magēmã Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2019099611A (ja) * | 2017-11-29 | 2019-06-24 | Jxtgエネルギー株式会社 | 炭化水素油の製造方法 |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4846961A (en) * | 1986-12-05 | 1989-07-11 | Union Oil Company Of California | Hydroprocessing catalyst with a Ni-P-Mo |
US20130306517A1 (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2013-11-21 | Shell Oil Company | Catalyst and process for hydroconversion of a heavy feedstock |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4879265A (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1989-11-07 | Union Oil Company Of California | Hydroprocessing catalyst and phosphorous and citric acid containing impregnating solution |
JPH0661464B2 (ja) * | 1986-02-26 | 1994-08-17 | 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | 重質炭化水素油の水素化脱硫脱窒素用触媒 |
JP3545943B2 (ja) * | 1998-07-28 | 2004-07-21 | 株式会社ジャパンエナジー | 水素化精製触媒 |
CA2501973C (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2010-10-26 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | A silicon-containing alumina support, preparation thereof and a catalyst comprising the alumina support |
JP4658491B2 (ja) * | 2004-02-26 | 2011-03-23 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | 環境対応軽油の製造方法 |
JP4472556B2 (ja) * | 2004-03-26 | 2010-06-02 | コスモ石油株式会社 | 炭化水素油の水素化処理触媒及びその製造方法並びに炭化水素油の水素化処理方法 |
FR2904242B1 (fr) * | 2006-07-28 | 2012-09-28 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | Procede d'hydrodesulfuration de coupes contenant des composes soufres et des olefines en presence d'un catalyseur supporte comprenant des elements des groupes viii et vib |
FR2910352B1 (fr) * | 2006-12-21 | 2010-10-08 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | Procede d'hydroconversion en phase slurry de charges hydrocarbonees lourdes et ou de charbon utilisant un catalyseur supporte |
JP5228221B2 (ja) * | 2007-04-27 | 2013-07-03 | コスモ石油株式会社 | 炭化水素油の水素化処理触媒の製造方法 |
JP5841481B2 (ja) * | 2012-03-30 | 2016-01-13 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | 重質残油の水素化精製方法 |
JP2014173025A (ja) * | 2013-03-11 | 2014-09-22 | Jx Nippon Oil & Energy Corp | 減圧軽油の水素化精製方法 |
-
2016
- 2016-05-23 CA CA2986556A patent/CA2986556A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2016-05-23 KR KR1020177024887A patent/KR20180013844A/ko not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2016-05-23 JP JP2017521827A patent/JP6770953B2/ja active Active
- 2016-05-23 WO PCT/JP2016/065219 patent/WO2016194686A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2016-05-23 US US15/550,871 patent/US20180016505A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2016-05-23 EP EP16803121.9A patent/EP3305874A4/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4846961A (en) * | 1986-12-05 | 1989-07-11 | Union Oil Company Of California | Hydroprocessing catalyst with a Ni-P-Mo |
US20130306517A1 (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2013-11-21 | Shell Oil Company | Catalyst and process for hydroconversion of a heavy feedstock |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10533141B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-01-14 | Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC | Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit |
US10563133B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-02-18 | Magëmä Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
US10563132B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-02-18 | Magēmā Technology, LLC | Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization |
US10584287B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-03-10 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Heavy marine fuel oil composition |
US10604709B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-03-31 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials |
US10655074B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-05-19 | Mag{hacek over (e)}m{hacek over (a)} Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil |
US10836966B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2020-11-17 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device utilizing structured catalyst beds and reactive distillation for the production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
US11136513B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2021-10-05 | Magëmä Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials |
US11203722B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2021-12-21 | Magëmä Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization |
US11345863B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2022-05-31 | Magema Technology, Llc | Heavy marine fuel oil composition |
US11441084B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2022-09-13 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
US11447706B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2022-09-20 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Heavy marine fuel compositions |
US11492559B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2022-11-08 | Magema Technology, Llc | Process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil |
US11530360B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2022-12-20 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit |
US11560520B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2023-01-24 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition and the removal of detrimental solids |
US11788017B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2023-10-17 | Magëmã Technology LLC | Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil |
US11795406B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2023-10-24 | Magemä Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials |
US11884883B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2024-01-30 | MagêmãTechnology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
US11912945B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2024-02-27 | Magēmā Technology LLC | Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit |
US12025435B2 (en) | 2017-02-12 | 2024-07-02 | Magēmã Technology LLC | Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3305874A4 (en) | 2019-01-23 |
KR20180013844A (ko) | 2018-02-07 |
CA2986556A1 (en) | 2016-12-08 |
JPWO2016194686A1 (ja) | 2018-03-15 |
EP3305874A1 (en) | 2018-04-11 |
JP6770953B2 (ja) | 2020-10-21 |
WO2016194686A1 (ja) | 2016-12-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20180016505A1 (en) | Method for producing hydrotreated oil and method for producing catalytic cracked oil | |
US7981828B2 (en) | Process for hydrodesulphurizing gasoline cuts containing sulphur and olefins in the presence of a catalyst comprising at least one support, one group VIII and one group VIB element | |
KR102517485B1 (ko) | 중유를 석유 화학 생성물로 전환하는 시스템 및 방법 | |
CN102311795B (zh) | 一种由柴油原料生产高辛烷值汽油组分的加氢方法 | |
CN112143522A (zh) | 一种生产化工料的加氢方法和系统 | |
US7993513B2 (en) | Two-step process for desulphurizing olefinic gasolines comprising arsenic | |
JPS5850636B2 (ja) | 重質炭化水素油の脱硫処理方法 | |
CN101040032B (zh) | 重质烃油加氢处理的方法 | |
US20060157386A1 (en) | Hydrocracking catalysts for vacuum gas oil & de-metalized oil blend | |
EP0090437B1 (en) | Process for the production of hydrocarbon oil distillates | |
JP2019099611A (ja) | 炭化水素油の製造方法 | |
EP2751227A2 (en) | Integrated crude refining with reduced coke formation | |
WO2020123374A1 (en) | Upgrading polynucleararomatic hydrocarbon-rich feeds | |
US10344222B2 (en) | Upgrading hydrocarbon pyrolysis products | |
CN110249033A (zh) | 用于优化加氢裂化工艺的催化剂负载的方法 | |
JP4644484B2 (ja) | ナフサ脱硫を増大するためのcoの低減 | |
JP6038708B2 (ja) | 石油製品の製造方法 | |
Hancsók et al. | Selective desulphurization and denitrogenation of hydrocarbon mixtures rich in olefins | |
US20220372385A1 (en) | Process and system for hydrotreating deoiled asphalt | |
JP5457808B2 (ja) | 1環芳香族炭化水素の製造方法 | |
JP6548223B2 (ja) | 燃料油基材の製造方法 | |
CN109694732B (zh) | 加工重质柴油的方法 | |
JP5419672B2 (ja) | 炭化水素油の水素化精製方法 | |
JP5371327B2 (ja) | 炭化水素油の製造方法 | |
RU2723625C1 (ru) | Способ каталитического гидрооблагораживания остатка газового конденсата |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JXTG NIPPON OIL & ENERGY CORPORATION, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MATSUSHITA, KOICHI;REEL/FRAME:043282/0807 Effective date: 20170808 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP, ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |