US20150238306A1 - Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same - Google Patents

Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150238306A1
US20150238306A1 US14/627,871 US201514627871A US2015238306A1 US 20150238306 A1 US20150238306 A1 US 20150238306A1 US 201514627871 A US201514627871 A US 201514627871A US 2015238306 A1 US2015238306 A1 US 2015238306A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vascular graft
graft
grafts
microns
tissue
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/627,871
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Andrew J. Marshall
Max Maginness
Adrienne Oda
Brandt Scanlan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Healionics Corp
Original Assignee
Healionics Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Healionics Corp filed Critical Healionics Corp
Priority to US14/627,871 priority Critical patent/US20150238306A1/en
Publication of US20150238306A1 publication Critical patent/US20150238306A1/en
Assigned to HEALIONICS CORPORATION reassignment HEALIONICS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAGINNESS, MAX, MARSHALL, ANDREW J., ODA, Adrienne, SCANLAN, Brandt
Priority to US16/457,530 priority patent/US20190321159A1/en
Priority to US17/457,246 priority patent/US20220087811A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/04—Macromolecular materials
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/04—Hollow or tubular parts of organs, e.g. bladders, tracheae, bronchi or bile ducts
    • A61F2/06—Blood vessels
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/0077—Special surfaces of prostheses, e.g. for improving ingrowth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/14—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L31/146—Porous materials, e.g. foams or sponges
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/0077—Special surfaces of prostheses, e.g. for improving ingrowth
    • A61F2002/0081—Special surfaces of prostheses, e.g. for improving ingrowth directly machined on the prosthetic surface, e.g. holes, grooves
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2210/00—Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2210/0076—Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof multilayered, e.g. laminated structures

Definitions

  • This invention relates to vascular grafts, such as artificial blood vessels.
  • Prosthetic vascular grafts are artificial tubular blood conduits or patches. They are commonly used to replace or repair diseased segments of natural arteries or veins. They are also routinely used as arteriovenous shunts to present a suitable vascular access site for dialysis treatment.
  • a vascular graft is directly connected (e.g., by suturing) at the ends of the graft to the cut edges of a native vessel (“end-to-end”) or to the side of the native vessel (“end-to-side”).
  • vascular graft materials include porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and porous polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron®). They can also be made from porous elastomeric materials such as silicone or polyurethane.
  • FIG. 1 shows a conventional elastomeric polyurethane-based vascular graft in a Tri-Layer Thoralon® Design. More specifically, the vascular graft ( 100 ) comprises a microporous inner layer ( 110 ), a solid intermediate layer ( 120 ) and a microporous outer layer ( 130 ).
  • the microporous inner layer ( 110 ) is the blood-contacting layer when in use. Its microporous structure is generally rich with surface modifying additives (SMA) to enhance blood-device compatibility and to minimize platelet adhesion.
  • SMA surface modifying additives
  • the solid intermediate layer ( 120 ) prevents any communicating pathway between the inner and outer layers and gives the graft its strength, flexibility and self-sealing properties.
  • the microporous outer layer ( 130 ) is designed to enhance graft anchoring by promoting fibrotic tissue ingrowth.
  • the microporous outer layer ( 130 ) is embedded with thin monofilament polyester fibers ( 134 ) to provide reinforcement and kink resistance.
  • stenosis i.e., a narrowing or stricture at the outflow anastomosis, which leads to thrombosis and occlusion of the graft.
  • the occlusive failure of the grafts can be especially severe for replacements of small caliber vessels (less than 6 mm internal diameter), limiting the use of prosthetic grafts in these cases.
  • Stenosis also presents a major medical problem in dialysis care.
  • prosthetic arteriovenous graft is the safest option for long-term vascular access.
  • occlusive failure could limit the average lifespan of a dialysis graft to less than two years.
  • vascular grafts capable of maintaining long-term patency and methods for maintain graft patency by using the same.
  • vascular graft comprising: a blood-contacting layer formed of a first microporous biomaterial; a nonporous intermediate layer; and a tissue-interface layer having a textured microporous surface that contacts host tissue when implanted, the tissue-interface layer being formed of a second microporous biomaterial, wherein the textured microporous surface is capable of reducing fibrotic capsular formation.
  • Another embodiment provides a method of maintaining patency in the vascular graft described above, and comprises: pre-hydrating the vascular graft to remove any air in the first microporous biomaterial; and implanting the vascular graft by directly connecting the vascular graft to a native blood vessel.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross section of a conventional vascular graft.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross section of a vascular graft made entirely of elastomeric silicone according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section of a vascular graft according to another embodiment, in which a conventional ePTFE graft is modified with microporous and macrotextured surface geometry.
  • FIG. 4 shows another view of the vascular graft of FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 5 shows volumetric blood flows in arteriovenous shunts over time in a vascular graft according to an embodiment as compared to a conventional/control vascular graft.
  • FIGS. 6A-6D are angiography images of blood flow paths 2 months after implantation for a conventional ePTFE shunt versus a vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B show lengthwise cross sections of explanted vascular grafts of conventional ePTFE with spiral reinforcement and the vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of cross sections of a conventional ePTFE graft and a vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • IVUS intravascular ultrasound
  • FIGS. 9A and 9B show the exterior capsule tissue morphology for a conventional ePTFE graft and a vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • FIG. 10 shows the relative bacterial concentrations within the porous graft walls for a conventional ePTFE graft and a vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • FIG. 11 shows the peak velocity ratio (PVR) in a conventional ePTFE graft as compared to the PVR of a vascular graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B are fluoroscopic angiography images of the venous anastomosis region for conventional ePTFE grafts and vascular grafts according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B are intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of cross sections of conventional ePTFE grafts and vascular grafts according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • IVUS intravascular ultrasound
  • FIG. 14 shows a quantitative comparison of the degrees of stenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia and/or thrombus in conventional ePTFE grafts and vascular grafts according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 15 shows the evolution of the flow volume over time for conventional ePTFE grafts as compared to vascular grafts according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 16 compares plots of the cross-sectional compliance for conventional ePTFE grafts and vascular grafts according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIGS. 17A and 17B are Doppler ultrasound images of longitudinal cross sections of a conventional ePTFE graft and a contralaterally implanted graft according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, respectively.
  • vascular grafts generally have certain surface features for better anchorage in the tissue.
  • a microporous outer layer is typically designed to promote fibrous tissue ingrowth with the micropores. See FIG. 1 .
  • the graft is anchored as it becomes partially or completely encapsulated in fibrous tissue.
  • the fibrotic encapsulation while a useful feature for graft anchorage, contributes to graft stenosis, which can progress to occlusive failure of the graft.
  • vascular grafts that reduce fibrotic encapsulation. Owing to surface features that include tightly controlled surface topography and microporosities, the vascular grafts of the various embodiments are capable of minimizing stenosis, thereby enhancing the lifetime of the grafts. Also disclosed are methods of preserving long-term patency of a vascular graft.
  • Stenosis is known to occur due to neointimal hyperplasia and thrombotic deposition, which are mediated by the flow characteristics of the blood within the lumen.
  • reduced flow which correlates to lowered Wall Shear Stresses (WSS)
  • WSS Wall Shear Stresses
  • Conventional approaches to minimizing or managing stenosis include promoting more favorable WSS conditions, e.g., by improving hemodynamics or reducing compliance mismatch between the graft and the native vessels.
  • One example for reducing the effects of compliance mismatch is to use interrupted sutures at the anastomosis, which allows each suture to move independently.
  • Other known techniques that seek to widen the venous anastomosis of dialysis grafts, thereby diffusing the flow and providing more favorable hemodynamics have also been shown to be beneficial.
  • none of the conventional approaches have achieved wide acceptance in a clinical setting.
  • capsular contraction can be a primary contributor to graft stenosis.
  • capsular contraction occurs, the constricting force from collagen lattice contraction radially compresses the graft.
  • a vascular graft is typically made from flexible porous polymers, the radial compression narrows the lumen. Narrower lumen leads to a drop in flow rate, which is associated with reduced WSS.
  • the reduced WSS in turn causes upregulation of neointimal hyperplasia and thrombotic deposition, compounding the effect by promoting further stenosis.
  • vascular grafts capable of suppressing fibrotic encapsulation can effectively minimize or alleviate stenosis that otherwise would have developed due to capsular contraction during the first months of implant.
  • the vascular graft retains the ability to expand radially.
  • pressure in the lumen increases.
  • the graft expands radially, thus reducing resistance to flow and compensating for the stenosis.
  • the enhanced radial compliance can create a net increase in the graft flow in response to the hyperplasia at the outflow, which creates a self-stabilizing effect.
  • vascular grafts configured to suppress fibrotic encapsulation.
  • FIG. 2 shows a vascular graft according to an embodiment.
  • the vascular graft ( 200 ) comprises: a blood-contacting layer ( 210 ) formed of a first microporous biomaterial; a nonporous intermediate layer ( 220 ); and a tissue-interface layer ( 230 ) having a textured microporous surface that contacts host tissue when implanted, the tissue-interface layer being formed of a second microporous biomaterial, wherein the textured microporous surface is capable of reducing fibrotic capsular formation.
  • the textured microporous surface has both microporosity and macrotextures that have depressions ( 230 a ) and protrusions ( 230 b ).
  • the textured microporous surface allows for vascularized tissue ingrowth (as opposed to fibrotic tissue ingrowth) in the micropores and as such, reduces fibrotic encapsulation.
  • the entire graft is composed of elastomeric materials, such as silicone or polyurethane-based co-polymers. Elastomeric mechanical properties are particularly advantageous when used in combination with the capsule-suppressing exterior surface geometry of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 Another embodiment is shown in FIG. 3 , in which a conventional graft ( 300 ), such as an ePTFE graft, is surface-treated to provide a tissue-interface layer ( 310 ).
  • the tissue-interface layer comprises granules of various sizes made of the second microporous material. The sizes of the granules define macrotextures, similar to those of FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 4 is another view of such a vascular graft coated with a textured microporous surface layer.
  • vascular graft or “graft” refers to a flexible tubular structure or a patch that can be coupled directly to native blood vessels.
  • Fibrotic encapsulation or “fibrotic capsular formation” refers to the formation of a dense, fibrous, largely avascular capsule that partially or completely surrounds an implant such as a vascular graft. Implantation of a foreign object naturally induces an inflammatory reaction of the body, also referred to as foreign body response (FBR).
  • FBR foreign body response
  • host macrophages are attracted to the surface of the implant. The macrophages arrive in sufficient numbers to spread over all surfaces of the implant that interface with the host tissue.
  • these macrophages trigger a cascade of cytokines and chemokines that recruit fibroblasts and other extracellular matrix-building cells to the tissue adjacent to the implant.
  • the degree of fibrotic encapsulation can be measured by the thickness of the dense fibrotic capsules surrounding the implant.
  • reducing fibrotic encapsulation is relative to fibrotic encapsulation that would have occurred in the absence of the textured microporous surface.
  • “reducing” fibrotic encapsulation refers to at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 40%, or at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80% of reduction over a period of 8 weeks or 12 weeks of implantation, as compared to the fibrotic encapsulation that would have occurred in an otherwise similarly constructed vascular graft but without the textured microporous surface.
  • “Microporous biomaterial” is a biocompatible material that may comprise an array of spherical or substantially spherical pores that are substantially connected. As used herein, “substantially connected” means that essentially every pore is connected to at least two, and preferably to at least four other pores. Typically, the mean pore diameter can be between 10 and 100 micrometers. The preferred pore diameter is between 20 and 40 micrometers, between 30 and 40 micrometers, between 25 and 35 micrometers, between 20 and 30 micrometers, or between 25 and 30 micrometers. Preferably, according to certain embodiments, the majority of the pores will be of such a preferred pore size.
  • the geometries of the pores may, according to non-limiting theory, constrain the invading macrophage cells and prevent them from spreading or aggregating into giant cells.
  • the pore geometry thus may provide spatial cues that trigger the macrophages to secrete anti-fibrotic and pro-angiogenic factors.
  • the mean diameter of the connection between the pores may, in certain preferred embodiments, be between 5 and 50 micrometers.
  • the preferred diameter of the pore connections is between 8 and 25 micrometers, more preferably between 10 and 20 micrometers.
  • the majority of the pore connections will be of the preferred size.
  • a macrophage cell diameter is typically about 10 to 15 micrometers in size, so the pore connections should be large enough to accommodate facile cell migration though the scaffold.
  • vascular endothelial capillaries are typically about 10 micrometers in diameter, so the scaffold should have pore connections large enough to permit ingrowth of a capillary network to support and nourish cells inside the scaffold.
  • a microporous material that has continuously interconnected pores throughout the entire material is also called an “open pore” or “open cell” structure.
  • the first microporous biomaterial of the blood-contacting layer and the second microporous material of the tissue-interface layer may be the same or different.
  • they can be made of different materials, e.g., ePTFE for the blood contacting layer and silicone rubber for the tissue-interface layer.
  • the first microporous material and the second microporous material are considered different even if they are of the same material (e.g., silicone rubber) but have different degrees of microporosity (pore sizes or interpore openings).
  • vascular grafts The components of the vascular grafts according to various embodiments are described in further detail below.
  • the blood-contacting layer is generally the innermost layer that defines the lumen of the graft. Because it contacts the blood, the microporosity of this layer is selected to minimize platelet adhesion.
  • the blood-contacting layer is an open-pore microporous biomaterial with generally uniform pore diameter, where the pore diameter is larger than 20 microns and smaller than 50 microns, and wherein the diameter of substantially all interpore openings (e.g., more than 90%) between neighboring pores are larger than 5 microns and smaller than 30 microns.
  • the biomaterial is a hydrogel, silicone rubber, expanded fluoropolymer, or a polymer.
  • the inner blood contacting layer is composed of microporous sphere-templated biomaterial (STAR) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,792,628 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), which allows capillary ingrowth and has pore geometry suited for low thrombogenicity. This also improves infection resistance and resistance to bacterial biofilms by allowing immune cell access into every pore.
  • STAR microporous sphere-templated biomaterial
  • the tissue-interface layer is the outermost layer of the vascular graft that directly contacts the host tissue when implanted.
  • the degree of microporosity of the tissue-interface layer is selected to minimize foreign body response and fibrotic encapsulation.
  • the outer layer is a biomaterial that has interconnected pores that are larger than 20 microns and smaller than 200 microns, and where the connections between neighboring pores (i.e., interpore openings) are larger than 5 microns and smaller than 50 microns.
  • the biomaterial is a hydrogel, silicone rubber, expanded fluoropolymer, or a polymer.
  • Microporous biomaterials can be prepared according to methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,972,628 and 8,318,193, which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Other suitable microporous biomaterials include porous polyurethane-based co-polymers or porous silicones as described in US 20140005783 A1, US 20140005784 A1, US 20130209661 A1, US 20130295379 A1, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,487,012 B2.
  • Macrotextured microporous ePTFE disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,509 A, is also suitable.
  • the outer layer has a textured microporous surface, which refers to a bio-interface between the host tissue and the graft.
  • the textured microporous surface also referred to as “macrotextured,” has surface topography that can contribute to reducing fibrotic capsule formation.
  • the surface topography includes peaks and valleys of specific dimensions. More specially, a peak represents a projection or protrusion in the surface topography, whereas a valley represents a depression in the surface topography and is a space defined by two or more adjacent peaks. The height of a given peak is typically measured relative to the floor of the adjacent valley. In certain embodiments, the height of a peak is greater than 200 microns and less than 1000 microns.
  • An exemplary exterior surface geometry for reducing the foreign body response is the microporous and macrotextured geometry disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,372,423 and 8,647,393, in the name of Healionics Corporation, which patents are incorporated herein by references in their entireties.
  • This surface geometry is optimized to promote a minimally-fibrotic densely vascularized ingrowth into the microporous structure, and also promotes a thinner, looser, less-aligned, more vascularized exterior tissue capsule.
  • This surface geometry is particularly well-suited for covering a vascular graft because it also provides protection against bacterial colonization and infection, which is the second most common complication for vascular grafts.
  • porous polyurethane-based co-polymers or porous silicones as described in US 20140005783 A1, US 20140005784 A1, US 20130209661 A1, US 20130295379 A1, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,487,012 B2 could also be used for this purpose.
  • Macrotextured microporous ePTFE such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,509 A, for example, could also potentially be adapted for this purpose.
  • the intermediate layer bonds the blood-contacting layer and the tissue-interface layer together.
  • the intermediate layer thus could be an adhesive layer.
  • the intermediate layer is impermeable to blood and serum, thereby preventing leakage. This may confer the additional advantage of blocking cytokines from outside the graft to reach the lumen, as these cytokines could potentially promote neointimal hyperplasia.
  • the layer can also be used to add toughness or suture retention strength.
  • Having a fully or partially impermeable layer has the added advantage of allowing the graft to be implanted in a prehydrated state by which the air in the pores (particularly those on the inner layer) has been fully displaced before implantation.
  • the removal of air in the pores confers improved initial thromboresistance and improves infection resistance.
  • the graft may have fenestrations in the impermeable layer to permit tissue ingrowth and angiogenesis from the adventitial surface.
  • the intermediate layer may be non-porous but otherwise the same biomaterial as that of the blood-contacting layer or the tissue-interface layer.
  • the entire graft is made of elastomeric silicone, in which the intermediate layer is non-porous.
  • the intermediate layer is an adhesive layer.
  • a conventional ePTFE graft can be first coated with a biocompatible adhesive, thus forming the intermediate layer, followed by a coating of granules of a second microporous material to provide the textured microporous surface of the tissue-interface layer.
  • the graft may be composed fully or partially of bioresorbable materials.
  • the graft may comprise hydrogel.
  • the graft may comprise gels or polymers made from natural proteins.
  • the graft may comprise synthetic materials.
  • the graft may have radial reinforcement features for kink resistance.
  • the graft may have built-in pre-stresses (with the inner layer in axial tension, and the outer layer in axial compression) to improve kink resistance while preserving radial compliance.
  • the microporous material can further be treated with agents, additives, or coatings for reducing thrombogenicity, resisting fibrotic encapsulation, resisting infection, or reducing hydrophobicity.
  • a tissue interface surface capable of enabling radial expansion of the graft wall can encourage a compensatory and potentially self-stabilizing flow behavior in prosthetic grafts, which in turn contributes to maintaining patency of the graft.
  • neointimal hyperplasia (known to be the primary cause of graft occlusion) was nearly completely suppressed by the presence of the textured microporous surface at the exterior of the graft that interfaces with the host tissue.
  • the compensatory flow effect occurs because the preserved radial compliance allows a change in the collapsibility of the graft.
  • An increase in pressure within the graft causes an increase in the average hydraulic diameter because high-frequency hydraulic diameter fluctuations due to turbulence are attenuated.
  • the compensatory flow effect depends on wall compliance, but does not require elastomeric wall properties.
  • patency can be improved with improved blood-device compatibility that minimizes platelet adhesion.
  • the air in the micropores of the blood-contacting layer is completely displaced in a hydrating step immediately prior to implantation. The air can be removed by repeatedly soaking the graft in saline and subject to vacuum.
  • a method of maintaining patency in a vascular graft comprises:
  • implanting the vascular graft by directly connecting the vascular graft to a native blood vessel.
  • maintaining patency refers to less than 20%, less than 10%, or less than 5% reduction of the internal circumference of a cross section of the graft lumen over a period of 12 weeks following implantation.
  • maintaining patency refers to less than 50%, less than 40%, less than 30%, less than 20%, less than 10%, or less than 5% occlusion (by neointimal hyperplasia and/or thrombus) of the cross-sectional area bounded by the inner surface of the graft wall over a period of 12 weeks or following implantation.
  • maintaining patency refers to a PVR of less than 2.0 over a period of 12 weeks following implantation, where the PVR is the peak systolic velocity at the stenosis divided by the peak systolic velocity at midgraft.
  • control grafts and test grafts were fitted with mid-graft percutaneous ports.
  • vascular grafts were implanted in an ovine arteriovenous (AV) shunt model.
  • the control grafts were soaked in heparinized saline prior to implant according to standard clinical practice.
  • the test grafts were prehydrated by immersing in heparinized saline and cycling vacuum until bubbles were no longer visible. The prehydration step ensured that all the air in the pores was displaced.
  • the grafts were implanted bilaterally in a straight ipsilateral configuration (distal carotid artery to proximal jugular vein).
  • the animals were placed on antiplatelet therapy (salicylic acid and clopidogrel) for the duration of the study.
  • the grafts were monitored for 8 weeks with noninvasive Doppler ultrasound. At the end of the 8-week period, the animals were sacrificed and the grafts were evaluated with fluoroscopic angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS). Tissues were paraffin processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
  • silicone grafts according to one embodiment had improved patency, improved flow stability, resistance to tissue encapsulation, resistance to capsule constriction, and improved resistance to bacterial colonization when compared to the control grafts.
  • FIG. 5 shows the volumetric blood flow (ml/min) of the control grafts as compared to the silicone grafts. As shown, while the control grafts have downward trending flow, indicating that stenosis was limiting the flow; the silicone test grafts according to the embodiments of the present disclosure have stable flow over the period of 8 weeks following implantation.
  • FIG. 6A is the angiography image of the control venous graft ( 100 ) coupled to a native vein ( 160 ).
  • a mid-graft port ( 170 ) was also shown.
  • the mid-graft point is T-shaped and is further coupled to an arterial segment graft ( 172 ), which is connected to a native artery ( 174 ).
  • FIG. 6B is an enlarged view of the control venous graft ( 100 ), which shows the narrowing of the blood flow path (arrow). In particular, constrictions are shown along the length of the graft ( 100 a, 100 b, 100 c and 100 d ).
  • FIG. 6C is the angiography image of a silicone test graft ( 200 ) coupled to a native vessel ( 260 ).
  • a mid-graft port ( 270 ) was also shown.
  • the mid-graft point is T-shaped and is further coupled to an arterial segment graft ( 272 ), which is connected to a native artery ( 274 ).
  • FIG. 6D is an enlarged view of the test graft, which shows that the blood path (arrow) was unaltered and no constrictions were observed.
  • FIG. 8A shows the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image of the venous end of the control ePTFE graft ( 100 ), which was pinched by capsular contraction, as seen by its constricted profile ( 180 ).
  • FIG. 8B shows the IVUS image of the venous end of the silicone test graft ( 200 ), which retained its round profile ( 280 ) that is significantly larger than that of the control graft.
  • IVUS intravascular ultrasound
  • FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B demonstrate the advantageous tissue response of the tissue encapsulating the graft.
  • FIG. 9A shows that the control graft ( 100 ) was encapsulated with thicker, denser and more aligned capsule tissue ( 190 ) around the graft.
  • FIG. 9B shows that the silicone graft ( 200 ) had a much thinner and looser capsule tissue ( 290 ) around the graft.
  • FIG. 10 further demonstrates, based on color-thresholding of histological images of graft sections, reduced bacterial colonization in the silicone test grafts as compared to the control grafts.
  • the silicone test graft showed a 1000-fold lower amount of bacteria colonies within the porous structure of the graft wall.
  • an ePTFE graft was modified with STAR Biomaterial by dip-coating the outer surface with an adhesive (NuSil MED-2214 silicone), and then adhering a monolayer of granules of sphere-templated microporous silicone.
  • These STAR-treated ePTFE grafts had a surface topography formed by ⁇ 300-micron size microporous granules having 35-micron spherical pores, which were interconnected by about 15-micron interpore openings.
  • Vascular grafts were implanted in an ovine arteriovenous (AV) shunt model. As in Example 1, the control grafts were soaked in heparinized saline prior to implant according to standard clinical practice. The test grafts were prehydrated to displace the air in the pore space by immersing the test grafts in heparinized saline and cycling vacuum until bubbles were no longer visible.
  • AV ovine arteriovenous
  • the grafts were implanted bilaterally in a straight ipsilateral configuration (distal carotid artery to proximal jugular vein).
  • the grafts were monitored for 12 weeks with noninvasive Doppler ultrasound. At the end of the 12-week period, the animals were sacrificed and the grafts were evaluated with fluoroscopic angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS).
  • IVUS Intravascular Ultrasound
  • ePTFE vascular grafts that were surface-modified demonstrated improved patency, reduced stenosis, reduced neointimal hyperplasia, increased capsule tissue compliance, and reversal of the flow-vs-hyperplasia feedback loop from progressively pathologic to self-stabilizing, when compared to the unmodified ePTFE control grafts.
  • FIG. 11 shows the results of peak velocity ratio (PVR), defined as the peak systolic velocity at the venous anastomosis divided by the peak velocity at midgraft, as measured by Doppler ultrasound over the 12-week period.
  • PVR peak velocity ratio
  • the STAR-treated ePTFE grafts demonstrated much-improved PVR that stabilized after 6 weeks, suggesting a trend of self-stabilizing behavior and reversal of the flow-vs-hyperplasia feedback loop.
  • the PVR in the control grafts rose after 4 weeks, indicating a progression of stenosis.
  • FIG. 12A shows the angiograph images of control grafts, in which stenosis ( 300 a, 300 b ) in the flow path near the venous anastomosis were clearly visible.
  • angiograph images of the STAR-treated grafts show that the flow path for the STAR-treated grafts was relatively smooth, with no obvious stenosis ( FIG. 12B ).
  • FIG. 13A shows the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of graft cross sections at the narrowest point along the control grafts. As shown, the control grafts were occluded with neointimal hyperplasia and/or thrombus (white areas). By comparison, the areas of occlusion (white) in the STAR-treated grafts were substantially diminished ( FIG. 13B ).
  • IVUS intravascular ultrasound
  • FIG. 14 graphically presents the results of FIG. 13A and FIG. 13B by plotting the average percent lumen area occluded. As shown, for STAR-treated grafts, the percentage lumen area occluded by hyperplasia or thrombus is less than 1 ⁇ 3 of the occlusion observed in the control grafts.
  • FIG. 15 shows the evolution of the flow for both control and STAR-treated grafts.
  • the average flow volume was nearly 50% greater in the 3rd month of the study than in the 2nd month. The controls did not show this increase.
  • FIG. 16 shows that the STAR-treated grafts had increased cross-sectional compliance.
  • the positive slopes indicate that the mid-graft lumen area expanded proportionally to the Bernoulli's equation-based pressure drop across the venous anastomosis orifice.
  • the control grafts had near-zero slopes, indicating the rigidity in the control grafts as a result of perigraft capsular contraction.
  • an ePTFE graft was modified with STAR Biomaterial by dip-coating the outer surface with an adhesive (NuSil MED-2214 silicone), and then adhering a monolayer of granules of sphere-templated microporous silicone.
  • These STAR-treated ePTFE grafts had a surface topography formed by ⁇ 300-micron size microporous granules having 35-micron spherical pores, which are interconnected by about 15-micron interpore openings.
  • the vascular grafts were implanted in a small caliber arterial bypass model.
  • the control grafts were soaked in heparinized saline prior to implant according to standard clinical practice.
  • the test grafts were prehydrated by immersing in heparinized saline and cycling vacuumed until bubbles were no longer visible. The prehydration step ensured that all the air in the pores was displaced.
  • the grafts were implanted bilaterally in end-to-side configuration in the carotid arteries, then the artery ligated midway between anastomoses.
  • the grafts were monitored for 8 weeks with noninvasive Doppler ultrasound. At the end of the 8-week period, the animals were sacrificed and the grafts were evaluated with fluoroscopic angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS).
  • IVUS Intravascular Ultrasound
  • FIG. 17A and FIG. 17B show longitudinal ultrasound images of a STAR-treated test graft and a control graft at 6 weeks, respectively.
  • the STAR-treated graft has a larger lumen diameter throughout the length with an average diameter of 4.8 mm, as compared to that of the control graft with an average diameter of 4.0 mm. This result suggests that the STAR-treated graft had a lower degree of perigraft capsular contraction due to the surface treatment.
US14/627,871 2014-02-21 2015-02-20 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same Abandoned US20150238306A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/627,871 US20150238306A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2015-02-20 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US16/457,530 US20190321159A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2019-06-28 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US17/457,246 US20220087811A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2021-12-01 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461943178P 2014-02-21 2014-02-21
US201461984537P 2014-04-25 2014-04-25
US14/627,871 US20150238306A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2015-02-20 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/457,530 Continuation US20190321159A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2019-06-28 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150238306A1 true US20150238306A1 (en) 2015-08-27

Family

ID=52598840

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/627,871 Abandoned US20150238306A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2015-02-20 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US16/457,530 Abandoned US20190321159A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2019-06-28 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US17/457,246 Pending US20220087811A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2021-12-01 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/457,530 Abandoned US20190321159A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2019-06-28 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US17/457,246 Pending US20220087811A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2021-12-01 Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (3) US20150238306A1 (ja)
EP (1) EP3068453B1 (ja)
JP (2) JP2017506921A (ja)
CN (2) CN115040288A (ja)
WO (1) WO2015127254A1 (ja)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018039651A1 (en) 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 Healionics Corporation Corrugated microporous tissue interface for improved performance and infection resistance of vascular grafts and other implantable devices
US20180185131A1 (en) * 2015-06-19 2018-07-05 University of Pittsburgh - of the Commonwealth Sys tem of Higher Education Biodegradable vascular grafts
WO2020049177A1 (en) 2018-09-06 2020-03-12 Biomodics Aps A medical tubular device
US10667897B2 (en) 2017-01-24 2020-06-02 University Of Washington Pro-healing elastic angiogenic microporous vascular graft
WO2022177431A1 (en) 2021-02-19 2022-08-25 Instructure Labs B.V. Textured surfaces of biocompatible polymeric materials

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3537992B1 (en) 2016-11-10 2021-08-18 Merit Medical Systems, Inc. Anchor device for vascular anastomosis
US11383072B2 (en) 2017-01-12 2022-07-12 Merit Medical Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for selection and use of connectors between conduits
US11622846B2 (en) * 2017-03-24 2023-04-11 Merit Medical Systems, Inc. Subcutaneous vascular assemblies for improving blood flow and related devices and methods
JP2020521618A (ja) * 2017-05-30 2020-07-27 エボニック カナダ インク．Ｅｖｏｎｉｋ Ｃａｎａｄａ Ｉｎｃ． 変性された表面を有する血管グラフト
CN109498843B (zh) * 2018-12-27 2019-11-08 郑州大学 一种顺应性可调的多层复合人工血管的制备方法
CN109498209B (zh) * 2018-12-27 2019-11-01 郑州大学 一种顺应性可调的多层复合人工血管
WO2022209633A1 (ja) * 2021-03-30 2022-10-06 テルモ株式会社 人工血管
CN113274557B (zh) * 2021-04-30 2022-05-17 上海大学 一种具有单侧药物释放能力载药血管支架覆膜及其制备方法
WO2023086925A1 (en) * 2021-11-15 2023-05-19 The Texas A&M University System Anticoagulant acellular vascular grafts and methods thereof

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030017775A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-01-23 Scimed Life Systems. Inc.. Composite ePTFE/textile prosthesis
US8318193B2 (en) * 2003-10-01 2012-11-27 University Of Washington Crosslinked porous biomaterials

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6464650A (en) * 1987-09-04 1989-03-10 Ube Industries Artificial blood vessel
WO1992002195A1 (fr) * 1990-07-31 1992-02-20 Ube Industries, Ltd. Vaisseau sanguin artificiel et procede de production associe
US5354329A (en) * 1992-04-17 1994-10-11 Whalen Biomedical, Inc. Vascular prosthesis having enhanced compatibility and compliance characteristics
US5466509A (en) 1993-01-15 1995-11-14 Impra, Inc. Textured, porous, expanded PTFE
US5632772A (en) * 1993-10-21 1997-05-27 Corvita Corporation Expandable supportive branched endoluminal grafts
JP3229776B2 (ja) * 1995-06-08 2001-11-19 テルモ株式会社 人工血管
US6428571B1 (en) * 1996-01-22 2002-08-06 Scimed Life Systems, Inc. Self-sealing PTFE vascular graft and manufacturing methods
US5800512A (en) * 1996-01-22 1998-09-01 Meadox Medicals, Inc. PTFE vascular graft
US20020084178A1 (en) * 2000-12-19 2002-07-04 Nicast Corporation Ltd. Method and apparatus for manufacturing polymer fiber shells via electrospinning
US7510571B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2009-03-31 Boston Scientific, Scimed, Inc. Pleated composite ePTFE/textile hybrid covering
US6926735B2 (en) * 2002-12-23 2005-08-09 Scimed Life Systems, Inc. Multi-lumen vascular grafts having improved self-sealing properties
US7792628B2 (en) 2007-09-27 2010-09-07 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Electrical assist for reducing emissions and torsion response delay in a hybrid electric vehicle
WO2011094155A2 (en) 2010-01-28 2011-08-04 Allergan, Inc. Open celled foams, implants including them and processes for making same
EP2555810B1 (en) 2010-04-08 2018-08-22 Healionics Corporation Implantable medical devices having microporous surface layers and method for reducing foreign body response to the same
US20140005783A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Allergan, Inc. Textured prosthesis with reduced capsular contracture response
US20140005784A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Allergan, Inc. Textured prosthesis with reduced capsular contracture response

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030017775A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-01-23 Scimed Life Systems. Inc.. Composite ePTFE/textile prosthesis
US8318193B2 (en) * 2003-10-01 2012-11-27 University Of Washington Crosslinked porous biomaterials

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180185131A1 (en) * 2015-06-19 2018-07-05 University of Pittsburgh - of the Commonwealth Sys tem of Higher Education Biodegradable vascular grafts
US10603156B2 (en) * 2015-06-19 2020-03-31 University of Pittsburgh—of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education Biodegradable vascular grafts
WO2018039651A1 (en) 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 Healionics Corporation Corrugated microporous tissue interface for improved performance and infection resistance of vascular grafts and other implantable devices
US10751203B2 (en) 2016-08-26 2020-08-25 Healionics Corporation Corrugated microporous tissue interface for improved performance and infection resistance of vascular grafts and other implantable devices
US10667897B2 (en) 2017-01-24 2020-06-02 University Of Washington Pro-healing elastic angiogenic microporous vascular graft
WO2020049177A1 (en) 2018-09-06 2020-03-12 Biomodics Aps A medical tubular device
WO2022177431A1 (en) 2021-02-19 2022-08-25 Instructure Labs B.V. Textured surfaces of biocompatible polymeric materials
NL2027599B1 (en) 2021-02-19 2022-09-19 Instructure Labs B V Biocompatible polymeric implant material having a textured surface
NL2027599A (en) 2021-02-19 2022-09-19 Instructure Labs B V Biocompatible polymeric implant material having a textured surface
US11890394B2 (en) 2021-02-19 2024-02-06 Instructure Labs B.V. Surface textures of medical devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015127254A1 (en) 2015-08-27
JP2017506921A (ja) 2017-03-16
EP3068453B1 (en) 2023-05-31
WO2015127254A8 (en) 2016-01-21
JP7105296B2 (ja) 2022-07-22
CN105899243A (zh) 2016-08-24
US20220087811A1 (en) 2022-03-24
US20190321159A1 (en) 2019-10-24
CN115040288A (zh) 2022-09-13
EP3068453A1 (en) 2016-09-21
JP2021058668A (ja) 2021-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220087811A1 (en) Vascular grafts and method for preserving patency of the same
US11135054B2 (en) Interatrial shunts having biodegradable material, and methods of making and using same
US8066758B2 (en) Vascular graft with kink resistance after clamping
US20130079700A1 (en) Composite prosthetic shunt device
JP2010104428A (ja) 多孔性構造体を具備する医療用装置又は器具
AU2005285314A1 (en) Prosthetic valve with pores
KR20140132366A (ko) 향상된 생체적합성 표면 및 이러한 표면을 일체화한 장치
Kenney et al. Comparison of noncrimped, externally supported (EXS) and crimped, nonsupported Dacron prostheses for axillofemoral and above-knee femoropopliteal bypass
WO2020217194A1 (en) Interatrial shunts having biodegradable material, and methods of making and using same
US20230270548A1 (en) Implantable component with socket
US20130325140A1 (en) Device for placement in a hollow organ, in particular for holding open said hollow organ and method for producing such device
US10751203B2 (en) Corrugated microporous tissue interface for improved performance and infection resistance of vascular grafts and other implantable devices
RU2731317C1 (ru) Биологический сосудистый протез с усиливающим внешним каркасом
US9345808B2 (en) Structure having fibres which are adhesively bonded to one another in locations
Wilhelmi et al. Materials used for hemodialysis vascular access: current strategies and a call to action
US20190046312A1 (en) Devices and methods for endothelialization of magnetic vascular grafts
JP5302273B2 (ja) 多孔性構造体を具備する医療用装置又は器具
JP2010104806A (ja) 多孔性構造体を具備する医療用装置又は器具

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HEALIONICS CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARSHALL, ANDREW J.;MAGINNESS, MAX;ODA, ADRIENNE;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:037585/0288

Effective date: 20150612

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION