US20140073461A1 - Golf ball - Google Patents

Golf ball Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140073461A1
US20140073461A1 US13/606,825 US201213606825A US2014073461A1 US 20140073461 A1 US20140073461 A1 US 20140073461A1 US 201213606825 A US201213606825 A US 201213606825A US 2014073461 A1 US2014073461 A1 US 2014073461A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
core
ball
weight
parts
golf ball
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/606,825
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Yuichiro OZAWA
Daisuke Arai
Hiroshi Higuchi
Takashi Ohira
Katsunori Sato
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd filed Critical Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Priority to US13/606,825 priority Critical patent/US20140073461A1/en
Assigned to BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD. reassignment BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARAI, DAISUKE, HIGUCHI, HIROSHI, OHIRA, TAKASHI, OZAWA, YUICHIRO, SATO, KATSUNORI
Priority to JP2013177859A priority patent/JP6197491B2/ja
Publication of US20140073461A1 publication Critical patent/US20140073461A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
    • A63B37/0077—Physical properties
    • A63B37/0084—Initial velocity
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/0022—Coatings, e.g. paint films; Markings
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/0023—Covers
    • A63B37/0029—Physical properties
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/005—Cores
    • A63B37/0051—Materials other than polybutadienes; Constructional details
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/005—Cores
    • A63B37/006—Physical properties
    • A63B37/0065—Deflection or compression
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/0004—Surface depressions or protrusions
    • A63B37/0018—Specified number of dimples
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/0004—Surface depressions or protrusions
    • A63B37/0019—Specified dimple depth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/0004—Surface depressions or protrusions
    • A63B37/002—Specified dimple diameter
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
    • A63B37/0072—Characteristics of the ball as a whole with a specified number of layers
    • A63B37/0074—Two piece balls, i.e. cover and core
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
    • A63B37/0077—Physical properties
    • A63B37/008—Diameter
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
    • A63B37/0003—Golf balls
    • A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
    • A63B37/0077—Physical properties
    • A63B37/0083—Weight; Mass

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a golf ball composed of a core and a cover. More specifically, the invention relates to a golf ball which, by being capable of having a higher rebound and by having a reduced spin rate, can achieve an increased distance, which shortens the vulcanization time for the core-forming rubber composition and thus improves productivity, and which has a good durability even in long-term use.
  • two-piece solid golf balls are composed of a core and a cover, with the core being a rubber crosslinked material of certain desirable properties obtained by using a base rubber composed primarily of cis-1,4-polybutadiene rubber to which compounding ingredients such as a co-crosslinking agent, a metal oxide and an organic peroxide have been added.
  • JP-A 59-49779 teaches, as the rubber composition for the core of a two-piece solid golf ball, the compounding of a given amount of zinc methacrylate as a co-crosslinking agent in cis-1,4-polybutadiene rubber.
  • zinc methacrylate is used in this way in a core-forming rubber composition, achieving good ball durability in long-term use has been difficult.
  • JP-A 2003-70936, JP-A 2007-61614, JP-A 2007-301357, JP-A 2010-115485, JP-A 2010-115486, JP-A 2004-180793, JP-A 2008-149190, JP-A 2009-195761, JP-A 2005-27814, and JP-A 2010-269147 all describe, as rubber compositions for the cores of two-piece solid golf balls, the compounding of given amounts of zinc acrylate in cis-1,4-polybutadiene rubber.
  • zinc acrylate is used in the core-forming rubber composition, achieving good ball durability in long-term use has been difficult.
  • JP-A 2002-126128 Prior art relating to this invention is described in JP-A 2002-126128, which is directed at a one-piece golf ball having an optimized internal hardness profile from the surface toward the center of the ball.
  • this prior-art golf ball lacks a satisfactory durability to “surface loss” when hit with the sharp portion of a clubhead, such as the leading edge of an iron.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a golf ball which, by being capable of having a higher rebound and by having a reduced spin rate, can achieve an increased distance, which shortens the vulcanization time for the core-forming rubber composition and thus improves productivity, and which has a good durability even in long-term use.
  • the inventors have conducted extensive investigations in order to attain the above objects and, as a result of repeated improvements in core-forming rubber compositions which contain cis-1,4-polybutadiene rubber and use methacrylic acid as the co-crosslinking agent, have found that by using zinc oxide as the metal oxide and also including an organosulfur compound, and by moreover increasing the amount of crosslinking initiator included to a higher than normal level of from 1.2 to 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, the vulcanization time for the rubber composition can be shortened, enabling productivity to be increased.
  • the inventors have discovered that, by using this rubber composition in a golf ball, the golf ball is capable of having a higher rebound and has a reduced spin rate, enabling an increased distance to be achieved, in addition to which the ball has a good durability even in long-term use.
  • the invention provides the following golf balls.
  • a golf ball comprising a core and a cover, wherein the core is formed of a rubber composition comprising a base rubber, a co-crosslinking agent, a crosslinking initiator, a metal oxide and an organosulfur compound, the co-crosslinking agent being methacrylic acid, the metal oxide being zinc oxide, and the rubber composition containing the crosslinking initiator in an amount of from 1.2 to 5 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, and wherein the ball as a finished product has an initial velocity of at least 74.3 m/s.
  • the organosulfur compound is included in an amount of from 0.01 to 3 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber.
  • the cover is formed of a resin material which has a breaking strength of from 20 to 80 MPa and an elongation of from 150 to 6000.
  • CH deflection
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a golf ball according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a core illustrating positions A to F in the core hardness profile.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a dimple cross-section.
  • FIG. 4A is a top view and FIG. 4B is a side view showing an example of a dimple configuration.
  • FIG. 5 is a top view showing the markings that were placed on the golf balls fabricated in the examples and the comparative examples.
  • the golf ball of the invention has a structure which, although not subject to any particular limitation, is exemplified by, as shown in FIG. 1 , a two-piece solid golf ball G having a core 1 and a cover 2 that encases the core.
  • the cover 2 has a surface on which, typically, a plurality of dimples D are formed.
  • the core 1 and the cover 2 are each shown as single layers, although either or both may be composed of a plurality of layers.
  • the core is obtained by vulcanizing a rubber composition composed primarily of a rubber material.
  • the rubber composition used to form the core includes a base rubber, a co-crosslinking agent, a crosslinking initiator, a metal oxide and an organosulfur compound, and may optionally include also an antioxidant, a fatty acid metal salt and an inert filler.
  • the base rubber used in this rubber composition is preferably polybutadiene.
  • the polybutadiene used as the rubber component must have a cis-1,4 bond content of at least 60% (here and below, “%” refers to percent by weight), preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%. If the cis-1,4 bond content is too low, the rebound may decrease.
  • the polybutadiene has a 1,2-vinyl bond content of preferably 2% or less, more preferably 1.7% or less, and even more preferably 1.5% or less.
  • the polybutadiene has a Mooney viscosity (ML 1+4 (100° C.)) which is preferably at least 30, more preferably at least 35, and even more preferably at least 40, but is preferably not more than 100, more preferably not more than 80, even more preferably not more than 70, and most preferably not more than 60.
  • Mooney viscosity ML 1+4 (100° C.)
  • Mooney viscosity refers to an industrial indicator of viscosity (JIS K6300) as measured with a Mooney viscometer, which is a type of rotary plastometer. This value is represented by the unit symbol ML 1+4 (100° C.), wherein “M” stands for Mooney viscosity, “L” stands for large rotor (L-type), and “1+4” stands for a pre-heating time of 1 minute and a rotor rotation time of 4 minutes. The “100° C.” indicates that measurement was carried out at a temperature of 100° C.
  • the polybutadiene In order to obtain the rubber composition in a molded and vulcanized form having a good rebound, it is preferable for the polybutadiene to be one that has been synthesized using a rare-earth catalyst or a Group VIII metal compound catalyst.
  • the rare-earth catalyst is not subject to any particular limitation, although preferred use can be made of a catalyst which employs a lanthanum series rare-earth compound. Also, where necessary, an organoaluminum compound, an alumoxane, a halogen-bearing compound and a Lewis base may be used in combination with the lanthanum series rare-earth compound.
  • an organoaluminum compound, an alumoxane, a halogen-bearing compound and a Lewis base may be used in combination with the lanthanum series rare-earth compound.
  • the compounds mentioned in JP-A 11-35633, JP-A 11-164912 and JP-A 2002-293996 can be advantageously used as the various above compounds.
  • a neodymium catalyst that employs a neodymium compound, which is a lanthanide series rare-earth compound, is especially recommended.
  • a polybutadiene rubber having a high cis-1,4 bond content and a low 1,2-vinyl bond content can be obtained at an excellent polymerization activity.
  • the polybutadiene has a molecular weight distribution Mw/Mn (Mw being the weight-average molecular weight, and Mn being the number-average molecular weight) of at least 1.0, preferably at least 2.0, more preferably at least 2.2, even more preferably at least 2.4, and most preferably at least 2.6.
  • Mw/Mn molecular weight distribution
  • the upper limit is preferably 6.0 or less, more preferably 5.0 or less, and even more preferably 4.5 or less. If Mw/Mn is too low, the workability may decrease. On the other hand, if Mw/Mn is too high, the resilience may decrease.
  • the proportion of the overall rubber represented by the polybutadiene is preferably at least 40 wt %, more preferably at least 60 wt %, even more preferably at least 80 wt %, and most preferably at least 90 wt %.
  • the above polybutadiene may represent fully 100 wt % of the base rubber.
  • cis-1,4-polybutadiene rubbers which may be used include the high-cis products BR01, BR11, BR02, BR02L, BR02LL, BR730 and BR51, all of which are available from JSR Corporation.
  • Rubber components other than the above polybutadiene may also be used in the base rubber, insofar as the objects of the invention are attainable.
  • Illustrative examples of rubber components other than the above polybutadiene include polybutadienes other than the above polybutadiene, and other diene rubbers such as styrene-butadiene rubbers, natural rubbers, isoprene rubbers and ethylene-propylene-diene rubbers.
  • Isoprene rubbers which may be used include those having a cis-1,4 bond content of at least 60 wt %, preferably at least 80 wt %, and more preferably at least 90 wt %, and having a Mooney viscosity (ML 14 (100° C.)) of at least 60, preferably at least 70, and more preferably at least 80, with an upper limit of 90 or less, and preferably 85 or less.
  • the product IR2200 available from JSR Corporation may be used.
  • Styrene-butadiene rubbers which may be used include solution-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers and emulsion-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers.
  • styrene bond content of from 5 to 500
  • emulsion-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber has a styrene bond content of from 15 to 500.
  • the proportion of the overall rubber represented by rubber components other than polybutadiene is preferably 0 wt % or more, more preferably at least 2 wt %, and most preferably at least 5 wt %, but is preferably not more than 60 wt %, more preferably not more than 40 wt %, even more preferably not more than 20 wt %, and most preferably not more than 10 wt %.
  • Methacrylic acid is used as the co-crosslinking agent in the present invention.
  • methacrylic acid is included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, of preferably at least 5 parts by weight, more preferably at least 7 parts by weight, even more preferably at least 12 parts by weight, and most preferably at least 13 parts by weight.
  • the upper limit in the amount of methacrylic acid is preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 35 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 25 parts by weight.
  • Including too much methacrylic acid may make the core too hard, giving the ball an unpleasant feel on impact.
  • including too little methacrylic acid may make the core too soft, likewise giving the ball an unpleasant feel on impact.
  • an organic peroxide as the crosslinking initiator.
  • examples of commercial products that may be advantageously used for this purpose include Percumyl D and Perhexa C40 (both from NOF Corporation), and Trigonox 29-40b (from Akzo Nobel N.V.). These may be used singly or as combinations of two or more thereof.
  • the crosslinking initiator is included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, of preferably at least 1.2 parts by weight, more preferably at least 1.25 parts by weight, and even more preferably at least 1.3 parts by weight.
  • the upper limit in the amount of crosslinking initiator is preferably not more than 5.0 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 4.0 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 3.5 parts by weight. Including too much crosslinking initiator may make the core too hard, giving the ball an unpleasant feel on impact and also substantially lowering the durability to cracking. On the other hand, including too little crosslinking initiator may make the core too soft, giving the ball an unpleasant feel on impact and also substantially lowering productivity.
  • Zinc oxide is used as the metal oxide in this invention. Metal oxides other than zinc oxide may be used together with the zinc oxide, insofar as the objects of the invention are attainable.
  • the metal oxide is included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, of preferably at least 5 parts by weight, more preferably at least 7 parts by weight, even more preferably at least 12 parts by weight, and most preferably at least 13 parts by weight.
  • the upper limit in the amount of metal oxide is preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 35 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 25 parts by weight. Including too much or too little may make it impossible to obtain a suitable weight and a suitable hardness and rebound.
  • An inert filler may be included in the rubber composition.
  • Preferred use may be made of, for example, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate or silica as the inert filler. Any one of these may be used alone or two or more may be used in combination.
  • the amount of inert filler included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber may be set to preferably at least 1 part by weight, and more preferably at least 5 parts by weight.
  • the upper limit in the amount of inert filler included may be set to preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight. If the amount of inert filler included is too large or too small, a suitable weight and a good hardness and rebound may not be achieved.
  • an organosulfur compound is included in the rubber composition.
  • Illustrative examples include thiophenols, sulfides, alkylmercaptans, and preferably pentachlorothiophenol and metal salts of pentachlorothiophenol.
  • the amount of the organosulfur compound included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 0.01 part by weight, more preferably at least 0.03 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 0.05 part by weight.
  • the upper limit is preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 2.5 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 2 parts by weight.
  • an antioxidant may also be included in the rubber composition.
  • an antioxidant may also be included in the rubber composition.
  • use may be made of the commercial products Nocrac NS-6, Nocrac NS-30 and Nocrac 200, all available from Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. These may be used singly or as combinations of two or more thereof.
  • the amount of antioxidant included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, and more preferably at least 0.15 part by weight, but is preferably not more than 1.0 part by weight, more preferably not more than 0.7 part by weight, and even more preferably not more than 0.4 part by weight. Including too much or too little antioxidant may make it impossible to achieve a suitable core hardness gradient, as a result of which a good rebound, good durability and good spin rate-lowering effect on full shots may not be achieved.
  • a fatty acid metal salt may be included in the rubber composition.
  • the vulcanization time for the core-forming rubber composition is shortened, making it possible to increase productivity.
  • the fatty acid metal salt include the zinc salts and magnesium salts of higher fatty acids such as stearic acid, palmitic acid, 12-hydroxystearic acid, behenic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, arachidic acid, lignoceric acid, lauric acid and myristic acid. These may be used singly or two or more may be used in combination.
  • the amount of fatty acid metal salt included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, more preferably at least 0.15 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 0.2 part by weight.
  • the upper limit is preferably not more than 5 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 3 parts by weight.
  • a ground or abraded powder of vulcanized rubber may be included in a small amount of 40 parts by weight or less per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber.
  • the ground or abraded powder may be compounded in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, which is more than 0 wt %, preferably at least 2 wt %, and most preferably at least 5 wt %, but is preferably not more than 40 wt %, more preferably not more than 35 wt %, even more preferably not more than 30 wt %, and most preferably not more than 25 wt %.
  • the ground or abraded powder of vulcanized rubber is a vulcanizate which contains rubber and unsaturated carboxylic acid or a metal salt thereof. It is desirable for the ground or abraded powder of vulcanized rubber used to have a particle size which is preferably at least 20 ⁇ m, more preferably at least 25 ⁇ m, and most preferably at least 30 ⁇ m, but is preferably not more than 3,000 ⁇ m, more preferably not more than 2,000 ⁇ m, and most preferably not more than 1,500 ⁇ m. Adding a crushed or abraded powder of vulcanized rubber has such effects as improving the productivity of the vulcanizate and increasing the durability to cracking. However, including too much may markedly lower the workability of the rubber composition and the productivity.
  • the core may be produced by using a known method to vulcanize and cure the rubber composition containing the various above ingredients.
  • production may be carried out by using a mixing apparatus such as a Banbury mixer or a roll mill to mix the rubber composition, compression molding or injection molding the mixed composition in a core mold, then curing the molded body by suitable heating at a temperature sufficient for the organic peroxide and co-crosslinking agent to act, such as under conditions of between about 100° C. and 200° C. for a period of from 10 to 40 minutes.
  • the core hardness profile of the invention may be achieved by a combination of the vulcanization conditions and adjustment of the rubber formulation.
  • the core diameter although not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 38.0 mm, more preferably at least 38.9 mm, and even more preferably at least 39.3 mm, but is preferably not more than 42.1 mm, and more preferably not more than 41.1 mm. At a core diameter outside of this range, the durability of the ball to cracking may worsen dramatically and the initial velocity of the ball may decrease.
  • the specific gravity of the core be at least 1.05, preferably at least 1.08, and more preferably at least 1.1, but not more than 1.2, preferably not more than 1.15, and more preferably not more than 1.13.
  • the core deflection under loading i.e., the deflection by the core when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) (which deflection is referred to here and below as “CH”), is preferably at least 2.0 mm, more preferably at least 2.3 mm, and even more preferably at least 2.4 mm, but is preferably not more than 7.0 mm, more preferably not more than 6.0 mm, even more preferably not more than 5.0 mm, and most preferably not more than 4.5 mm. If the core deflection CH is too small, the feel of the golf ball on impact may be so hard as to make the ball unpleasant to use. On the other hand, if the core deflection is too large, the feel of the golf ball on impact may be so soft as to make the ball unpleasant to use, in addition to which the productivity may decline considerably.
  • Letting (C) be the JIS-C hardness at a position 5 mm in from the surface toward the center of the core, the value of (C) is preferably at least 68, more preferably at least 70, and even more preferably at least 72, but is preferably not more than 88, more preferably not more than 86, and even more preferably not more than 84.
  • Letting (D) be the JIS-C hardness at a position 10 mm in from the surface toward the center of the core, the value of (D) is preferably at least 65, more preferably at least 66, and even more preferably at least 67, but is preferably not more than 80, more preferably not more than 78, and even more preferably not more than 76.
  • the hardness relationship (A)>(B) ⁇ (C)>(D)>(E)>(F) it is preferable for the hardness relationship (A)>(B) ⁇ (C)>(D)>(E)>(F) to be satisfied, for the value (A) ⁇ (F) to be at least 20, for the core to be formed in such a way that (A) has the highest hardness value among (A) to (F), and for the value (A) ⁇ (C) to be in a range of from 3 to 15. If the above conditions are not satisfied, the ball may have a diminished feel on impact and a reduced durability to cracking.
  • the value of (A) ⁇ (C) has a lower limit of preferably at least 3, and more preferably at least 4, and an upper limit of preferably not more than 15, more preferably not more than 13, and even more preferably not more than 11.
  • the value of (A) ⁇ (F) has a lower limit of preferably at least 20, and more preferably at least 21, and an upper limit of preferably not more than 50, more preferably not more than 40, and even more preferably not more than 35.
  • the core may be subjected to surface treatment with a solution containing a haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof.
  • adhesion between the core surface and the adjoining cover material can be further enhanced by abrading the surface of the core (referred to below as “surface grinding”).
  • Such surface grinding removes the skin layer from the surface of the vulcanized core, and thus makes it possible to enhance the ability of the solution of haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof to penetrate the core surface and also to increase the surface area of contact with the adjoining cover material.
  • Exemplary surface grinding methods include buffing, barrel grinding and centerless grinding.
  • the haloisocyanuric acid and metal salts thereof are compounds of the following formula (I).
  • X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom or an alkali metal atom. At least one occurrence of X is a halogen atom.
  • Preferred halogen atoms include fluorine, chlorine and bromine, with chlorine being especially preferred.
  • Preferred alkali metal atoms include lithium, sodium and potassium.
  • haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof include chloroisocyanuric acid, sodium chloroisocyanurate, potassium chloroisocyanurate, dichloroisocyanuric acid, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, sodium dichloroisocyanurate dihydrate, potassium dichloroisocyanurate, trichloroisocyanuric acid, tribromoisocyanuric acid, dibromoisocyanuric acid, bromoisocyanuric acid, sodium and other salts of dibromisocyanuric acid, as well as hydrates thereof, and difluoroisocyanuric acid.
  • chloroisocyanuric acid sodium chloroisocyanurate, potassium chloroisocyanurate, dichloroisocyanuric acid, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, potassium dichloroisocyanurate and trichloroisocyanuric acid are preferred because they are readily hydrolyzed by water to form acid and chlorine, and thus play the role of initiating addition reactions to the double bonds on the diene rubber molecules.
  • trichloroisocyanuric acid provides an especially outstanding adhesion-improving effect.
  • the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof is preferably used as a solution obtained by dissolution in water or an organic solvent.
  • the content of the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof in the treatment solution may be set to preferably at least 0.5 part by weight, more preferably at least 1 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 3 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of water. If the content of haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof is too low, the adhesion improving effect expected after core surface treatment may not be obtained and the durability to impact may be poor.
  • the upper limit is the saturated solution concentration. However, from the standpoint of cost effectiveness, it is preferable to set the upper limit to about 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of water.
  • the core is immersed in the treatment solution for a length of time which, although not subject to any particular limitation, may be set to preferably at least 0.3 second, more preferably at least 3 seconds, and even more preferably at least 10 seconds.
  • the upper limit is preferably not more than 5 minutes, and more preferably not more than 4 minutes. If the immersion time is too short, the anticipated treatment effects may not be obtained, whereas if the immersion time is too long, a loss in ball productivity may occur.
  • an organic solvent in cases where an organic solvent is used, a known organic solvent may be employed, with the use of an organic solvent which is soluble in water being especially preferred. Examples include ethyl acetate, acetone and methyl ethyl ketone. Of these, acetone is especially preferred on account of its ability to penetrate the core surface.
  • a water-soluble solvent is preferable because such solvents readily take up moisture; either the moisture which has been taken up readily undergoes a hydrolysis reaction with the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a salt thereof deposited on the core surface or, when water washing is used in a subsequent step, the affinity of water to the core surface increases, along with which a hydrolysis reaction between the water and the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof more readily arises.
  • the content of the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof in the solution is preferably at least 0.3 wt %, more preferably at least 1 wt %, and even more preferably at least 2.5 wt %. At less than 0.3 wt %, the adhesion improving effect anticipated following core surface treatment may not be obtained, possibly resulting in a poor durability to impact.
  • the upper limit in the content may be as high as the saturated solution concentration. However, from the standpoint of cost effectiveness, when prepared as an acetone solution, for example, setting the upper limit in content to about 10 wt % is preferred.
  • the core is immersed in the solution for a length of time which is preferably at least 0.3 second, more preferably at least 3 seconds, and even more preferably at least 10 seconds,.
  • the upper limit is preferably not more than 5 minutes, and more preferably not more than 4 minutes. If the immersion time is too short, the desired effects of treatment may not be obtained, whereas if the immersion time is too long, a loss in ball productivity may occur.
  • the method of treating the core surface with a haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof is exemplified by methods which involve coating the surface of the core with a solution of haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof by brushing or spraying on the solution, and methods in which the core is immersed in a solution of the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof. From the standpoint of productivity and high penetrability of the core surface by the solution, the use of an immersion method is especially preferred.
  • the core has been surface treated with a solution containing haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof, it is preferable to wash the surface of the core with water.
  • Water washing of the core surface may be carried out by a method such as running water, spraying, or soaking in a washing tank.
  • the washing method should be one that is not too vigorous. Accordingly, preferred use may be made of washing by soaking in a washing tank. In such a case, it is desirable to place the cores to be washed from about one to five times in a washing tank that has been filled with fresh water.
  • the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof penetrates to the interior of the diene rubber making up the core and approaches the vicinity of the double bonds on the backbone. Water then enters the core surface, whereupon the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof is hydrolyzed by the water, releasing the halogen.
  • the halogen attacks a double bond on the diene rubber backbone located nearby, as a result of which an addition reaction proceeds.
  • the liberated isocyanuric acid is added, together with the halogen, to the diene rubber backbone while retaining its cyclic structure.
  • the added isocyanuric acid has three —NHCO— structures on the molecule.
  • —NHCO— structures are thereby conferred to the core surface that has been treated with the haloisocyanuric acid and/or a metal salt thereof, adhesion with the cover material improves further. It is most likely because of this that the durability of the golf ball to impact improves. Moreover, when a polyurethane elastomer or polyamide elastomer having the same —NHCO— structures on the polymer molecules is used as the cover material, the affinity increases even further, presumably increasing the durability to impact.
  • cover resin material in this invention No particular limitation is imposed on the cover resin material in this invention, provided the material has a breaking strength of from 20 to 80 MPa and an elongation of from 150 to 600%.
  • preferred use may be made of an ionomer resin or a thermoplastic resin such as polyurethane.
  • the use of a resin material composed primarily of polyurethane is especially preferred.
  • use may be made of a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer or a thermoset polyurethane resin, with the use of a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer being especially preferred.
  • the breaking strength of the cover resin material is at least 20 MPa, preferably at least 25 MPa, more preferably at least 30 MPa, and most preferably at least 35 MPa, but not more than 80 MPa, preferably not more than 75 MPa, more preferably not more than 70 MPa, and most preferably not more than 65 MPa.
  • the elongation of the cover resin material is at least 150%, preferably at least 200%, and more preferably at least 250%, but not more than 600%, preferably not more than 550%, more preferably not more than 520%, and most preferably not more than 490%.
  • the breaking strength and elongation are measured by methods in general accordance with JIS K 7311-1995.
  • the thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer has a structure composed of soft segments formed from a polymeric polyol (polymeric glycol) and hard segments formed from a chain extender and a diisocyanate.
  • the polymeric polyol serving as a starting material may be any which has hitherto been used in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethane materials, and is not subject to any particular limitation.
  • Exemplary polymeric polyols include polyester polyols and polyether polyols. Polyether polyols are more preferable than polyester polyols because they enable thermoplastic polyurethane materials having a high rebound resilience and excellent low-temperature properties to be synthesized.
  • polyether polyols include polytetramethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol.
  • Polytetramethylene glycol is especially preferred from the standpoint of the rebound resilience and the low-temperature properties.
  • the polymeric polyol has an average molecular weight of preferably from 1,000 to 5,000.
  • an average molecular weight of from 2,000 to 4,000 is especially preferred.
  • the chain extender employed is preferably one which has hitherto been used in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethane materials.
  • Illustrative examples include, but are not limited to, 1,4-butylene glycol, 1,2-ethylene glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol.
  • These chain extenders have an average molecular weight of preferably from 20 to 15,000.
  • the diisocyanate employed is preferably one which has hitherto been used in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethane materials.
  • Illustrative examples include, but are not limited to, aromatic diisocyanates such as 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, and aliphatic diisocyanates such as hexamethylene diisocyanate.
  • aromatic diisocyanates such as 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate
  • aliphatic diisocyanates such as hexamethylene diisocyanate.
  • control of the crosslinking reaction during injection molding may be difficult.
  • the use of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate which is an aromatic diisocyanate, is most preferred.
  • thermoplastic polyurethane material composed of the above materials.
  • Illustrative examples include those available under the trade names Pandex T8180, Pandex T8195, Pandex T8290, Pandex T8295 and Pandex T8260 (all available from DIC Bayer Polymer, Ltd.), and those available under the trade names Resamine 2593 and Resamine 2597 (available from Dainichiseika Color & Chemicals Mfg. Co., Ltd.).
  • the cover has a thickness which is preferably at least 0.3 mm, more preferably at least 0.5 mm, and even more preferably at least 0.7 mm, but is preferably not more than 1.9 mm, more preferably not more than 1.8 mm, and even more preferably not more than 1.7 mm. If the cover thickness is larger than the above range, the ball rebound may decrease and the flight performance may worsen. On the other hand, if the cover thickness is smaller than the above range, the durability to cracking may decrease. In particular, when the ball is hit thin, or “topped,” the cover may tear.
  • the cover has a specific gravity which is preferably at least 1.13, more preferably at least 1.14, and even more preferably at least 1.15, but is preferably not more than 1.30, more preferably not more than 1.20, and even more preferably not more than 1.17.
  • the cover material has a Shore D hardness which is preferably at least 30, more preferably at least 35, and even more preferably at least 38, but is preferably not more than 57, more preferably not more than 55, even more preferably not more than 53, and most preferably not more than 51. If the Shore D hardness of the cover is higher than the above range, the appearance performance in long-term use (durability of markings) may decline, in addition to which the flight performance may markedly decrease. On the other hand, if the Shore D hardness of the cover is lower than the above range, the durability to cracking may markedly decrease and, particularly when the ball is topped, the cover may tear. In addition, the spin rate may become very high, possibly shortening the distance traveled by the ball.
  • the golf ball of the invention typically has numerous dimples formed on the surface thereof, each dimple having a spatial volume below a flat plane circumscribed by an edge of the dimple.
  • the sum of the dimple spatial volumes expressed as a ratio (VR) with respect to the volume of a hypothetical sphere representing the ball were it to have no dimples on the surface thereof, is preferably in a range of from 0.8 to 1.7, the lower limit being more preferably 0.83, even more preferably 0.85, and most preferably 0.86, and the upper limit being more preferably 1.5, even more preferably 1.3, and most preferably 1.2.
  • the dimples formed on the golf ball of the invention preferably satisfy conditions (1) and (2) below. Although satisfying both of the following conditions (1) and (2) at the same time is preferred, it is acceptable for either one of these conditions alone to be satisfied.
  • the dimples it is preferable for the dimples to have a peripheral edge provided with a roundness represented by a radius of curvature R in a range of from 0.5 to 2.5 mm.
  • the lower limit of the radius of curvature R is more preferably 0.6 mm, and even more preferably 0.7 mm, and the upper limit is more preferably 1.8 mm, and even more preferably 1.5 mm.
  • the ratio ER of a collective number of dimples RA having a radius of curvature R to diameter D ratio (R/D) of at least 20%, divided by a total number of dimples N on the surface of the ball is in a range of from 15 to 95%.
  • the ratio R/D is expressed as a percentage (R/D ⁇ 100%), a larger value indicating a dimple in which the rounded part of the dimple accounts for a larger proportion of the dimple size and which has a smoother cross-sectional shape.
  • the ratio ER indicates the number of such smooth dimples as a proportion of the total number of dimples; by setting ER in a range of from 15 to 95%, damage to the paint film at dimple edges can be effectively suppressed.
  • the upper limit in the ratio R/D is preferably not more than 60%, and more preferably not more than 40%.
  • the lower limit in the ratio ER is more preferably 20%, and even more preferably 25%, and the upper limit is more preferably 90%, even more preferably 85%, and most preferably 70%.
  • condition (3) it is preferable for condition (3) to be satisfied. That is, as condition (3), it is preferable for the ball to have thereon a plurality of dimple types of differing diameter, and for the ratio DER of a combined number of dimples DE obtained by adding together dimples having an own diameter and having an own radius of curvature larger than or equal to a radius of curvature of dimples of larger diameter than the own diameter plus dimples of a type having a largest diameter, divided by the total number N of dimples on the surface of the ball, to be at least about 80%.
  • the radius of curvature R representing the roundness provided to the peripheral edges of the dimples is smaller at smaller dimple diameters.
  • above condition (3) by such means as adjusting the depth, sets the radius of curvature R representing the roundness of the peripheral edge to be as large as possible even in dimples having a small diameter, thus forming dimples having a smooth cross-sectional shape, and also increases the proportion of such smooth dimples by setting the above ratio DER to at least 80%, in this way more effectively suppressing damage to the paint film.
  • the ratio DER is more preferably at least 85%, even more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 93%.
  • the upper limit in the ratio DER is 100%.
  • the dimples on the golf ball of the invention preferably satisfy conditions (4) to (6) below. Although it is preferable for all of the following conditions (4) to (6) to be satisfied at the same time, it is acceptable for any one of these conditions alone to be satisfied.
  • the number of dimple types of differing diameter D on the ball is 3 or more, and more preferable for dimples of at least five types to be formed.
  • the diameters D of the dimples are preferably set in a range of from 1.5 mm to 7 mm, the lower limit being more preferably 1.8 mm and the upper limit being more preferably 6.5 mm.
  • the depths of the dimples are preferably set in a range of from 0.05 mm to 0.35 mm, the lower limit being more preferably 0.1 mm and the upper limit being more preferably 0.3 mm, and even more preferably 0.25 mm.
  • the total number N of dimples on the surface of the ball is preferably not more than 380, and more preferably not more than 350.
  • the total number N of dimples is even more preferably in a range of from 220 to 340.
  • the dimples are formed in such a way that the surface coverage SR of the dimples, which is the sum of individual dimple surface areas, each defined by a flat plane circumscribed by an edge of the dimple (dash-dot line in FIG. 3 ), expressed as a percentage of the surface area of a hypothetical sphere representing the ball were it to have no dimples on the surface thereof (broken line in FIG. 3 ), is from 60 to 74%.
  • the intervals between neighboring dimples become too narrow, which may make it difficult to provide the dimple edges with a roundness having the radius of curvature specified in above condition (1).
  • the surface coverage SR has a lower limit of more preferably 65%, and even more preferably 68%, and an upper limit of more preferably 73%.
  • a white enamel paint is generally applied as a first coat, following which a clear paint is applied.
  • a clear paint is applied in the inventive ball, in order to ensure a good appearance, it is preferable to apply a clear paint to the surface of the ball.
  • the resulting clear coat has a thickness at dimple lands (Y) which is at least 10 ⁇ m, preferably at least 12 ⁇ m, and most preferably at least 13 ⁇ m, but is not more than 30 ⁇ m, preferably not more than 25 ⁇ m, and most preferably not more than 20 ⁇ m; and a thickness at dimple edges (Z) which is at least 8 ⁇ m, preferably at least 10 ⁇ m, and most preferably at least 11 ⁇ m, but is not more than 28 ⁇ m, preferably not more than 23 ⁇ m, and most preferably not more than 18 ⁇ m.
  • the ratio Z/Y of edge areas (Z) to land areas (Y), expressed as a percentage (Z/Y ⁇ 100), is at least 60%, preferably at least 70%, and most preferably at least 80%, but is not more than 100%, and preferably not more than 95%. Outside the above range, the durability of markings at dimple edges decreases dramatically in long-term use.
  • the ball diameter is at least 42 mm, preferably at least 42.3 mm, and more preferably at least 42.67 mm, but is not more than 44 mm, preferably not more than 43.8 mm, more preferably not more than 43.5 mm, and even more preferably not more than 43 mm.
  • the ball weight is preferably at least 44.5 g, more preferably at least 44.7 g, even more preferably at least 45.1 g, and most preferably at least 45.2 g, but is preferably not more than 47.0 g, more preferably not more than 46.5 g, and even more preferably not more than 46.0 g.
  • the ball deflection (BH) when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) is preferably at least 2.0 mm, more preferably at least 2.3 mm, and even more preferably at least 2.4 mm, but is preferably not more than 7.0 mm, more preferably not more than 6.0 mm, even more preferably not more than 5.0 mm, and most preferably not more than 4.5 mm.
  • the ratio CH/BH of the respective deflections CH and BH is preferably at least 0.95, more preferably at least 0.96, and even more preferably at least 0.97, but is preferably not more than 1.1, more preferably not more than 1.08, and even more preferably not more than 1.07. If the ratio CH/BH is too large, the hardness (deflection) of the finished ball will be very hard relative to the core hardness (deflection). That is, because the cover becomes harder, the feel on impact may decrease and the quality of the appearance may decline with long-term use.
  • the cover will be very soft, which may significantly lower the durability to cracking and lead to cracking of the cover, particularly when the ball is topped.
  • the spin rate may undergo a large increase, which may result in a shorter distance of travel by the ball.
  • the finished ball has an initial velocity (BV) with a lower limit of at least 74.3 m/s, preferably at least 74.5 m/s, and more preferably at least 75 m/s, and with an upper limit of preferably not more than 77.62 m/s. If the initial velocity (BV) of the ball falls below the above lower limit, the distance traveled by the ball may decrease. On the other hand, if the initial velocity (BV) of the finished ball exceeds the above upper limit, the ball will be in violation of the R&A Rules of Golf.
  • the golf ball of the invention upon initial measurement, has a deflection BH1 (mm) when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) and an initial velocity BV1 (m/s) and, when measured again after being left to stand for 350 days following initial measurement, has a deflection BH2 (mm) when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) and an initial velocity BV2 (m/s), such that the difference BH2 ⁇ BH1 is preferably not more than 0.2 mm, more preferably not more than 0.15 mm, and even more preferably not more than 0.1 mm, and such that the difference BV2 ⁇ BV1 is preferably not more than 0.3 m/s, more preferably not more than 0.2 m/s, and even more preferably not more than 0.1 m/s.
  • the golf ball of the invention by being capable of having an increased rebound and by having a reduced spin rate, can achieve an increased distance. Moreover, the inventive ball shortens the vulcanization time of the core-forming rubber composition, thus improving productivity, and has a good durability even in long-term use.
  • Rubber materials formulated as shown in Table 1 below were furnished for the fabrication of golf balls in the Examples and Comparative Examples. These rubber compositions were suitably mixed using a kneader or roll mill, then vulcanized under the temperature and time conditions in Table 1 to produce solid cores in the respective examples. Ingredient amounts in the table below are shown in parts by weight.
  • a plurality of protrusions corresponding to the dimple pattern were formed in the mold cavity, by means of which dimples were impressed onto the surface of the cover at the same time that the cover was injection-molded. Details on the dimples are given below in Table 3. The markings shown in FIG. 5 were printed on the ball surface.
  • the ball was clear-coated with a paint composed of 100 parts by weight of polyester resin (acid value, 6; hydroxyl value, 168) (solids)/butyl acetate/propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (PMA) in a weight ratio of 70/15/15 as the base; 150 parts by weight of a non-yellowing polyisocyanate, specifically an adduct of hexamethylene diisocyanate (available from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. as Takenate D-160N; NCO content, 8.5 wt %; solids content, 50 wt %) as the curing agent; and 150 parts by weight of butyl acetate.
  • a coating of white enamel paint was applied as a base coat for clear coating.
  • the deflections (mm) of, as the test spheres, the cores and finished balls when compressed at a rate of 10 mm/min under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) were measured.
  • the tests were performed using a model 4204 test system from Instron Corporation.
  • the initial velocity was measured using an initial velocity measuring apparatus of the same type as the USGA drum rotation-type initial velocity instrument approved by the R&A.
  • the cores and balls used as the samples were held isothermally at a temperature of 23 ⁇ 1° C. for at least 3 hours, then tested in a room temperature (23 ⁇ 2° C.) chamber.
  • Ten samples were each hit twice, and the time taken for the samples to traverse a distance of 6.28 ft (1.91 m) was measured and used to compute the initial velocity.
  • a cover sheet was formed and, after holding the samples isothermally at 23 ⁇ 1° C., the Shore D hardness was measured in accordance with ASTM D-2240.
  • the resin materials and rubber materials were formed into 2 mm thick sheets, and held in a 23 ⁇ 1° C. atmosphere for two weeks. These samples were shaped into dumbbell-shaped test specimens in accordance with JIS K 7311-1995, and the specimens were subjected to measurement in a 23 ⁇ 2° C. atmosphere at a test rate of 5 mm/s, also in accordance with JIS K 7311-1995. The average breaking strength and elongation of each material were calculated from the measured values for five specimens.
  • a TourStage X-Drive 701 (loft angle, 9°), manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd., was mounted as the driver
  • the rubber material in Comparative Example 11 had a breaking strength of 15 MPa and an elongation of 880.
  • the hardness profile was not optimized and the spin rate was high. As a result, the distance traveled by the ball decreased. Moreover, the cover had a small breaking strength and a small elongation, as a result of which the finished ball had a poor durability to abrasion and exhibited a large decrease in flight performance. In addition, the cover was hard, giving the ball a poor feel on shots with a driver.
  • the hardness profile was not optimized and the spin rate was high. As a result, the distance traveled by the ball decreased. Moreover, the cover had a small breaking strength and a small elongation, as a result of which the finished ball had a poor durability to abrasion and exhibited a large decrease in flight performance.
  • the surface rubber material in the one-piece construction had a small breaking strength and a small elongation, as a result of which the finished ball had a poor durability to cracking and a poor durability to abrasion, and exhibited a large decrease in flight performance.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
US13/606,825 2012-09-07 2012-09-07 Golf ball Abandoned US20140073461A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/606,825 US20140073461A1 (en) 2012-09-07 2012-09-07 Golf ball
JP2013177859A JP6197491B2 (ja) 2012-09-07 2013-08-29 ゴルフボール

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/606,825 US20140073461A1 (en) 2012-09-07 2012-09-07 Golf ball

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140073461A1 true US20140073461A1 (en) 2014-03-13

Family

ID=50233824

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/606,825 Abandoned US20140073461A1 (en) 2012-09-07 2012-09-07 Golf ball

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20140073461A1 (ja)
JP (1) JP6197491B2 (ja)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140357407A1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2014-12-04 Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20170106245A1 (en) * 2015-10-20 2017-04-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US10300344B2 (en) 2015-10-20 2019-05-28 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20190290971A1 (en) * 2015-10-20 2019-09-26 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US11179605B2 (en) 2015-10-20 2021-11-23 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6525844B2 (ja) * 2015-10-15 2019-06-05 住友ゴム工業株式会社 ゴルフボール用ゴム組成物およびゴルフボール

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040210021A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2004-10-21 Harris Kevin M. Golf balls with thermoplastic silicone-urethane copolymers
US20050256274A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2005-11-17 Voorheis Peter R Golf ball core compositions
US7175542B2 (en) * 2005-04-07 2007-02-13 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Multi-piece solid golf ball
US7270613B2 (en) * 2004-02-04 2007-09-18 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US7322892B1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-01-29 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20090143170A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Method for preparing golf ball and golf ball
US20090209366A1 (en) * 2008-02-19 2009-08-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20100125005A1 (en) * 2008-11-14 2010-05-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20100255934A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2010-10-07 Murali Rajagopalan Compositions for golf equipment
US20100298066A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2010-11-25 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Composition for use in golf balls and sports equipment
US20110130222A1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2011-06-02 Murali Rajagopalan Compositions for golf equipment
US20110244982A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2011-10-06 Harris Kevin M Golf ball comprising renewable resource component

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6214870A (ja) * 1985-07-11 1987-01-23 横浜ゴム株式会社 ソリツドゴルフボ−ル
KR0179448B1 (ko) * 1996-12-26 1999-02-01 황춘근 골프공
JP5057046B2 (ja) * 2007-07-02 2012-10-24 ブリヂストンスポーツ株式会社 ゴルフボール
US20080161128A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US7481722B2 (en) * 2007-02-13 2009-01-27 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Solid golf ball
US20120129629A1 (en) * 2010-11-19 2012-05-24 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
JP5703107B2 (ja) * 2011-04-18 2015-04-15 ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 ゴルフボール

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110130222A1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2011-06-02 Murali Rajagopalan Compositions for golf equipment
US20040210021A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2004-10-21 Harris Kevin M. Golf balls with thermoplastic silicone-urethane copolymers
US20100255934A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2010-10-07 Murali Rajagopalan Compositions for golf equipment
US7270613B2 (en) * 2004-02-04 2007-09-18 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20050256274A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2005-11-17 Voorheis Peter R Golf ball core compositions
US20100298066A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2010-11-25 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Composition for use in golf balls and sports equipment
US7175542B2 (en) * 2005-04-07 2007-02-13 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Multi-piece solid golf ball
US7322892B1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-01-29 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20090143170A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Method for preparing golf ball and golf ball
US7867419B2 (en) * 2007-11-29 2011-01-11 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Method for preparing golf ball and golf ball
US20090209366A1 (en) * 2008-02-19 2009-08-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20100125005A1 (en) * 2008-11-14 2010-05-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20110244982A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2011-10-06 Harris Kevin M Golf ball comprising renewable resource component

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140357407A1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2014-12-04 Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US9855467B2 (en) * 2013-05-31 2018-01-02 Dunlop Sports Co. Ltd. Golf ball
US20170106245A1 (en) * 2015-10-20 2017-04-20 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US9889342B2 (en) * 2015-10-20 2018-02-13 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US10300344B2 (en) 2015-10-20 2019-05-28 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US20190290971A1 (en) * 2015-10-20 2019-09-26 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US10695618B2 (en) * 2015-10-20 2020-06-30 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball
US11179605B2 (en) 2015-10-20 2021-11-23 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf ball

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2014050696A (ja) 2014-03-20
JP6197491B2 (ja) 2017-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8932151B2 (en) Solid golf ball
US9636547B2 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
JP5365018B2 (ja) ソリッドゴルフボール
US10363461B2 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
US9764200B2 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
US7160940B2 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
US7344455B1 (en) Solid golf ball
US7273425B2 (en) Solid golf ball
JP5201316B2 (ja) マルチピースソリッドゴルフボール
US20120100933A1 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
US20080045357A1 (en) Golf ball
JP2013230362A (ja) ゴルフボール
US20140073461A1 (en) Golf ball
US20130095955A1 (en) Solid golf ball
US20120277020A1 (en) Practice golf ball
US9044644B2 (en) Solid golf ball
US8905859B2 (en) Solid golf ball
US20120157234A1 (en) Multi-piece solid golf ball
US20140073455A1 (en) Golf ball
US20120277021A1 (en) Practice golf ball
US20140073460A1 (en) Golf ball
JP2014069045A (ja) ソリッドゴルフボール
US20120277025A1 (en) Practice golf ball
US20120277023A1 (en) Practice golf ball
US20120277024A1 (en) Practice golf ball

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OZAWA, YUICHIRO;ARAI, DAISUKE;HIGUCHI, HIROSHI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:029322/0429

Effective date: 20121029

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION