US20030155508A1 - Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method - Google Patents
Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030155508A1 US20030155508A1 US10/309,277 US30927702A US2003155508A1 US 20030155508 A1 US20030155508 A1 US 20030155508A1 US 30927702 A US30927702 A US 30927702A US 2003155508 A1 US2003155508 A1 US 2003155508A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- workpiece
- electron beam
- circuit pattern
- wafer
- substrate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/26—Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes
- H01J37/28—Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes with scanning beams
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J2237/00—Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
- H01J2237/06—Sources
- H01J2237/08—Ion sources
- H01J2237/0815—Methods of ionisation
- H01J2237/082—Electron beam
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J2237/00—Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
- H01J2237/26—Electron or ion microscopes
- H01J2237/282—Determination of microscope properties
- H01J2237/2826—Calibration
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
Abstract
A workpiece holder for holding a workpiece, which is used for an electron beam application apparatus for processing a workpiece by irradiating the surface of said workpiece with an electron beam, or observing the surface state of a workpiece by detecting secondary electrons produced from the workpiece by irradiation of the workpiece with an electron beam, includes a positioning portion which comes closer to an end portion of said workpiece when said workpiece holder holds the workpiece, thereby positioning the workpiece, in which the surface height of the end portion of the workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion.
Description
- This is a division of application Ser. No. 09/292,626 filed 15 Apr. 1999.
- The present invention relates to a workpiece holder for holding a workpiece such as a semiconductor wafer, a semiconductor fabricating apparatus having the workpiece holder, a semiconductor inspecting apparatus, a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, a charged particle beam application apparatus, a calibrating substrate, a workpiece holding method, a circuit pattern inspecting method, and a charged particle beam application method.
- With the trend toward finer-geometries of circuit-patterns of semiconductor wafers, a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus employing electron beams has come to be put into practical use.
- Techniques concerning such a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus have been described, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 59-192943, Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 05-258703, Sandland, et al., “An electron-beam inspection system for x-ray mask production”, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, Vol.9, No.6, pp.3005-3009 (1991), Meisburger, et al., “Requirements and performance of an electron-beam column designed for x-ray mask inspection”, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, Vol.9, No.6, pp.3010-3014 (1991), Meisburger, et al., “Low-voltage electron-optical system for the high-speed inspection of integrated circuits”, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, Vol.10, No.6, pp.2804-2808 (1992), Hendricks, et al., “Characterization of a New Automated Electron-Beam Wafer Inspection System”, SPIE Vol. 2439, pp.174-183 (20-22 Feb., 1995).
- To inspect a circuit pattern, which comes to be formed in finer-geometries on a wafer having an increased diameter, highly accurately at a high throughput, it is necessary to acquire a pattern image with a higher SN ratio at a very higher speed. To satisfy such a requirement, it is required to keep a higher SN ratio by ensuring the necessary number of electrons to be emitted to the circuit pattern using a large current beam which is equal to or more than 100 times (10 nA or more) that used for a usual scanning electron microscope (SEM), and further, it is essential to highly efficiently detect secondary electrons produced from a substrate and reflection electrons reflected therefrom at a higher speed.
- On the other hand, to prevent a semiconductor substrate having an insulating film such as a resist from being affected by electrification, the semiconductor substrate is irradiated with a low acceleration electron beam of 2 KeV or less. The technique is described on pages 622-623 in “Electron and Ion Beam Handbook” 2nd Edition, edited by 132nd committee of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, published by Nikkan Kogyo Simbun, Ltd. (1986). A large current and low acceleration electron beam, however, makes it difficult to observe a circuit pattern at a high resolution because it produces aberration due to the space-charge effect.
- A method of solving such a problem has been known in which a high acceleration electron beam is retarded directly before a workpiece to irradiate the workpiece with a substantially low acceleration electron beam. The technique has been described, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-open Nos. Hei 02-142045 and Hei 06-139985.
- The outline of one example of an electro-optical system of a prior art circuit pattern inspecting apparatus will be described below with reference to FIG. 9. FIG. 9 is a schematic view of an electro-optical system of the prior art circuit pattern inspecting apparatus.
- A
primary electron beam 201 emitted from anelectron gun 1 with a voltage applied to anextraction electrode 2 passes through acondenser lens 3, ascanning deflector 5, anaperture 6, anobjective lens 9 and the like to be converged and deflected onto asubstrate 10 for a semiconductor device placed onworkpiece stages primary electron beam 201, a retarding voltage is applied from a highvoltage power source 23 to thesubstrate 10. The irradiation of thesubstrate 10 with theprimary electron beam 201 producessecondary electrons 202 from thesubstrate 10. Thesecondary electrons 202 are accelerated to an energy of several KeV by the retarding voltage. AnEXB deflector 8 is provided on the electron gun side of theobjective lens 9 in such a manner as to be adjacent to theobjective lens 9. - The
EXB deflector 8 is adapted to cancel the deflection amounts of theprimary electron beam 201 due to an electric field and a magnetic field each other and to deflect thesecondary electrons 202 by superimposition of the deflection amounts of thesecondary electrons 202 due to the electric field and magnetic field. The acceleratedsecondary electrons 202 thus deflected by theEXB deflector 8 is attracted by an electric field formed by an attraction voltage applied between adetector 13 and anattraction electrode 14 mounted around thedetector 13, to enter thedetector 13. - The
detector 13 is configured as a semiconductor detector. Thesecondary electrons 202 having entered the semiconductor detector produce electron-positive hole pairs which are then taken out as a current to be converted into an electric signal. The output signal is amplified by a pre-amplifier 21, to become a brilliance modulation input for forming an image signal. After an image of one region of the substrate is acquired by the above operation of the electro-optical system, the image output signal is delayed for a time corresponding to one image plane, and then an image of a second region is similarly acquired. These two images are compared with each other by an image comparing/evaluating circuit, to thus detect a defective portion of the circuit pattern. Here, the irradiated position with theprimary electron beam 201 is determined as a position of the substrate on which the electron beam is impinged on the basis of a scanning-deflection signal inputted in thescanning deflector 5. - If the surface height of the substrate is varied by warping of the wafer or the like, however, the irradiated region of the substrate with an electron beam is substantially varied although the electron beam is scanned on the basis of the same deflection signal, that is, the same beam deflection cannot be obtained between two irradiated regions of the substrate.
- To solve such a problem, a prior art electron beam application apparatus such as an electron beam plotting apparatus has adopted the following deflection correcting manner:
- (1) A sample with standard marks formed on at least two surfaces different in thickness is provided at the outermost peripheral portion of a workpiece stage, and a positional offset between image signals obtained from the standard marks having the different heights is calculated.
- (2) The height of each standard mark is converted into a signal by operating an optical sensor for successively measuring the surface height of the workpiece.
- (3) A deflection correcting table corresponding to the height is calculated on the basis of the height signal of each standard mark and the positional offset between image signals of the standard marks. The deflection correcting table is stored, and upon observation of the substrate, the deflection is corrected by calculating a deflection correcting signal corresponding to the surface height of the substrate on the basis of the deflection correcting table.
- With this technique, even if the surface height of a substrate is varied by warping of the wafer or the like, two regions of the substrate which are different in surface height can be equally irradiated with an electron beam on the basis of a corrected deflection signal.
- The technique has been described, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 56-103420. According to this technique, the deflection correcting table can be simply updated by repeatedly observing the standard marks provided at the outer peripheral portion of the workpiece stage on which the wafer is left mounted. As a result, even if there occurs a drift of the deflection amount of a primary electron beam due to the change in the electro-optical system with the elapsed time, the deflection can be corrected in such a manner as to keep up with the change with the elapsed time by re-observing the standard marks about several ten times at a specific period of time during processing of one wafer, and updating the deflection correcting table for each re-observation.
- A circuit pattern inspecting apparatus adopting the above-described deflection correcting method, however, has been not realized so far.
- The gist of the present invention is to provide a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus adopting the above-described deflection correcting method for coping with the warping of a wafer. However, if the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus adopts the above deflection correcting method as it is, there occurs the following problems:
- Since a retarding voltage is applied to a substrate, a primary electron beam is affected by an electric field caused by the retarding voltage directly before reaching the substrate.
- In general, since a change in electric field is distributed axisymmetrically with respect to the central axis of the primary electron beam, the primary electron beam can be deflected to a desired region by uniformly adjusting the deflection sensitivity irrespective of the position of the wafer. However, at the outer peripheral portion of the wafer, there is produced a nonaxisymmetric disturbance of an electric field caused by the retarding voltage due to the sectional shape of the wafer itself and the sectional structure of an end portion of the workpiece stage on which the water is mounted.
- In the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, since a signal is obtained by one large current scanning only, a retarding voltage being as high as several times or more that used for another electron beam application apparatus is required to restrict the beam diameter into a desired value and to allow a low acceleration electron beam to be impinged on the substrate. Accordingly, the amount of change in electric field caused by the retarding voltage becomes larger than that for another electron beam application apparatus.
- As a result, depending on whether or not an observation region of the substrate, that is, an irradiated region with a primary electron beam is located near the outer peripheral portion of the wafer, there occurs an unnegligible difference of the beam, called “beam deflection”, between the two irradiated regions located near the outer peripheral portion and in the central portion of the wafer although these regions are irradiated with the primary electron beam on the basis of the same deflection signal.
- In such circumstances, even if a deflection correcting table is prepared by providing, like another electron beam application apparatus, standard marks formed on at least two surfaces different in thickness at the outermost peripheral portion of a workpiece stage, the deflection correcting table is affected by the beam distortion inherent to the outer peripheral portion of the workpiece stage. As a result, a suitable deflection correcting signal for the associated position cannot be obtained by referring to the deflection correcting table on the basis of the measurement result of the surface height of the workpiece at the central portion of the workpiece stage, giving rise to a problem in which there occurs a deviation in irradiated position with the electron beam.
- The deviation in irradiated position with the electron beam leads to a deviation in pixel in an image signal obtained from the deviated position, thereby causing degradation of the accuracy in comparative inspection of the images. If the deviation in pixel exceeds a specific allowable range, there occurs a problem that the inspection accuracy is critically degraded in the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus aimed at comparative inspection of images.
- On the other hand, of a semiconductor fabricating apparatus and a semiconductor inspecting apparatus, an electron beam application apparatus for processing a workpiece by irradiating a workpiece with an electron beam or inspecting the workpiece using an electron beam is required to emit an electron beam in vacuum. Further, to improve the processing accuracy of a workpiece or improving the resolution of an image obtained upon inspection, it is required to control the irradiation energy intensity of the emitted electron beam.
- In recent years, the electron beam application apparatus such as an electron beam plotting apparatus for processing a pattern of a semiconductor by irradiating it with an electron beam, a length measuring SEM (scanning electron microscope) for measuring a width or the like of a pattern on the surface of a semiconductor, or an analyzing SEM for analyzing the material of a semiconductor by irradiating the semiconductor with an electron beam, has adopted a retarding method of applying a voltage to a workpiece for controlling the irradiation energy intensity of an electron beam. The technique has been described, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-open Nos. Hei 05-258703 and Hei 06-188294.
- However, a workpiece holder used for the electron beam application apparatus such as a length measuring SEM or analyzing SEM has failed to cope with a variation in electric field caused at an end portion of a workpiece due to a retarding voltage applied to the substrate. As a result, if it is intended to irradiate an end portion of a workpiece with an electron beam, the accuracy of the relationship between the irradiated position with the electron beam and the actual workpiece position is significantly degraded due to a variation in electric field, so that there occurs a problem that a portion near the end portion of the workpiece cannot be processed, analyzed or inspected.
- A first object of the present invention is to solve the above problems of the prior art,and to highly fast, stably acquire highly accurate images from irradiated positions with an electron beam on a circuit pattern at the step of fabricating a semiconductor device including an insulating material or a mixture of an insulating material and a conductive material, without occurrence of any deviation in the irradiated position in the images to be comparatively inspected, automatically comparing the images with each other thereby inspecting defects of the circuit pattern without occurrence of errors, and feeding back the result to the conditions of fabricating the semiconductor device thereby increasing the reliability of the semiconductor device and reducing the defective percentage thereof.
- As a means for achieving the above object, a typical example of a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus of the present invention will be described.
- The circuit pattern inspecting apparatus of the present invention basically includes an irradiation optical system for converging a primary charged particle beam while deflecting the primary charged particle beam so as to scan first and second regions of a circuit pattern of a workpiece with the primary charged particle beam; a retarding/accelerating means for retarding the primary charged particle beam, and accelerating secondary charged particles produced from the workpiece by the irradiation of the workpiece with the primary charged particle beam and reflection electrons reflected from the workpiece; a workpiece stage for holding the workpiece; a sensor for measuring the surface height of an irradiated position of the workpiece with the primary charged particle beam; a detector for detecting the secondary charged particles produced from the workpiece; and an image forming means for forming an image of the irradiated region of the workpiece from a signal detected by the detector. The apparatus further includes an outer peripheral sample having outer peripheral standard marks formed on at least two surfaces different in thickness in the direction of the axis of the primary charged particle beam, the outer peripheral sample being provided at an outer peripheral portion of a substrate mounting area of the workpiece stage; a central sample having central standard marks formed on at least two surfaces different in thickness in the direction of the axis of the primary charged particle beam, the central sample being provided at a central portion of the substrate mounting area of the workpiece stage; a storing means for storing image signals obtained from the outer peripheral standard marks of the outer peripheral sample and the central standard marks of the central sample; a computing means for computing a distortion amount of the primary charged particle beam inherent to the outer peripheral portion from the outer peripheral and central standard mark image signals; an eliminating means for eliminating the distortion amount inherent to the outer peripheral portion from the outer peripheral standard mark image signals; a storing means for preparing a deflection correcting table in accordance with the height of the workpiece on the basis of the outer peripheral standard mark image signals from which the distortion amount has been eliminated, and storing the deflection correcting table; a deflection correcting signal generating circuit for taking out a deflection correcting signal from the deflection correcting table in accordance with the surface height signal obtained by the sensor; and a control means for controlling to irradiate the outer peripheral sample having the outer peripheral standard marks at a desired timing to update the deflection correcting table.
- In addition, preferably, a shield electrode is provided in the vicinity of the above substrate to reduce the disturbance of the electric field caused by a retarding voltage.
- The function of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus and circuit pattern inspecting method will be described below. The above circuit pattern inspecting apparatus compares the dependence of the workpiece height on the corrected amount of deflection at the central portion of the workpiece stage with that at the outer peripheral portion of a workpiece, to obtain a distortion amount inherent to the outer peripheral portion of the workpiece. Then, the dependence of height on the corrected amount of deflection at the outer peripheral portion of the workpiece is calculated by eliminating the distortion amount inherent to the outer peripheral portion from the standard mark signal of the outer peripheral portion, to obtain a deflection correcting amount at the outer peripheral portion which is equivalent to the deflection correcting amount obtained at the central portion.
- Further, since a suitable deflection correcting table can be prepared only on the basis of the standard mark at the outer peripheral portion, the deflection correcting table can be updated by repeating desired times the calculation of the deflection correcting amount at the outer peripheral portion while holding the wafer on the workpiece stage. As a result, the deflection correcting table including the dependence of surface height, which is capable of keeping up with the drift of the electron beam, can be accurately obtained without reducing the throughput.
- On the other hand, at the outermost peripheral portion of a wafer, there exists a region in which the deflection cannot be corrected on the basis of the same correcting table to produce the positional deviation, and if the result of image comparison at the region is outputted, there is a possibility that a large number of misdetections occur. For this reason, the present invention is configured such that the inspection is not performed in a region in which the deflection cannot be corrected on the basis of the same correcting table. This allows highly accurate inspection with no misdetection.
- The provision, in the vicinity of the workpiece, of a shield electrode having the same potential as the retarding voltage of the workpiece has makes it possible to reduce the disturbance of an electric field near the workpiece, and hence to more extend a region on the wafer in which deflection can be corrected on the basis of the same correcting table.
- According to the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus having the above functions, it is possible to highly fast, stably acquire highly accurate images from irradiated positions with an electron beam on a circuit pattern at the step of fabricating a semiconductor device including an insulating material or a mixture of an insulating material and a conductive material, without occurrence of any deviation in the irradiated position under a condition that a high retarding voltage is applied to a substrate, and automatically comparing the images with each other, thereby inspecting defects of the circuit pattern without occurrence of errors.
- A second object of the present invention is to provide an electron beam application apparatus having a function of controlling an electron beam irradiation energy with a retarding voltage, which is capable of irradiating a position of a workpiece with an electron beam without reducing the accuracy of the irradiated position.
- An electron beam application apparatus includes a vacuum chamber in which a workpiece such as a semiconductor device is irradiated with an electron beam, a loader for carrying the workpiece in the vacuum chamber, a movable stage for allowing the workpiece to be mounted thereon and adjusting an irradiated position with the electron beam, a workpiece holder disposed between the stage and the workpiece for holding the workpiece, a power source for applying a retarding voltage to the workpiece, a position measuring device for measuring the moved amount or the position of the stage, an electron source and a deflector for irradiating the workpiece with an electron beam for processing or observing the workpiece, and an information processing device for observing, analyzing, or inspecting the workpiece by making use of information obtained by detecting reflection electrons or secondary electrons produced from the workpiece. The height of a boundary portion between a portion, on the electron beam incident side, of the workpiece holder and the workpiece is set to be substantially equal to the height of the workpiece surface. With this configuration, since the electric field distribution of the workpiece surface is nearly uniform up to the end portion of the workpiece, a variation in electric field caused by the retarding voltage can be prevented. As a result, it is possible to irradiate the entire surface with an electron beam without reducing the positional accuracy.
- FIG. 1 is a vertical sectional view showing the configuration of a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to the present invention;
- FIG. 2 is a plan view showing a state in which a substrate to be inspected is mounted in the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus;
- FIGS. 3A and 3B are electric field distribution diagrams each showing the result of simulation of an inner electric field;
- FIG. 4 is a typical diagram illustrating an electron trajectory;
- FIG. 5 is a graph showing a relationship between extension of an irradiated position with an electron and a target deflected position;
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating an operational procedure of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to the present invention, in which the plan view of a substrate to be inspected is additionally shown;
- FIG. 7 is a typical diagram showing one-example of image display;
- FIG. 8 is a plan view showing a state in which a substrate to be inspected is mounted on a workpiece stage;
- FIG. 9 is a vertical sectional view showing the configuration of a prior art circuit pattern inspecting apparatus;
- FIG. 10 is a vertical sectional view of essential components of a semiconductor inspecting apparatus using an electron beam;
- FIG. 11 is a perspective view, with parts partially cutaway, showing the configurations of a workpiece stage and a workpiece holder of a semiconductor inspecting apparatus using an electron beam;
- FIGS. 12A and 12B are a plan view and a vertical sectional view of a workpiece holder shown in FIG. 2, respectively;
- FIG. 13 is a plan view of another workpiece holder, in which the cross-section thereof is additionally shown;
- FIG. 14 is a plan view of a prior art workpiece holder, in which the side view thereof is additionally shown;
- FIGS.15A, and 15B and 15C are a plan view and sectional views showing the workpiece holding configuration of another prior art workpiece holder, respectively;
- FIG. 16 is an electric field distribution diagram showing the result of simulation of an electric field distribution of a workpiece along the vertical cross-section of the workpiece surface;
- FIG. 17A and 17B are electric field distribution diagrams each showing the result of simulation of an electric field distribution of a workpiece along the vertical cross-section of the workpiece surface; and
- FIG. 18A and 18B are electric field distribution diagrams each showing the result of simulation of an electric field distribution of a workpiece along the vertical cross-section of the workpiece surface.
- Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
- First, embodiments of a circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, a circuit pattern inspecting method, and a calibration substrate according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.1 to 8.
- [First Embodiment]
- A circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.1 to 7.
- One basic conception of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to this embodiment is to accurately inspect a circuit pattern by using a deflection correcting table which is optimized in a region being as wide as possible by taking into account a disturbance of an electric field due to a retarding voltage applied to a substrate as a high negative potential, which disturbance of an electric field appears along sectional shapes of outer peripheral portions of the substrate and a workpiece stage.
- Another basic conception of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus is to provide an electrode for flattening the disturbance of an electric field caused by retarding voltage, thereby making small the correction-disable region to a degree negligible from the viewpoint of the practical use.
- FIG. 1 is a vertical sectional view showing the configuration of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus of the present invention. The circuit pattern inspecting apparatus in this embodiment will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 1. The circuit pattern inspecting apparatus basically includes an electro-
optical system 101, aworkpiece chamber 102, acontrol unit 103, and animage processing unit 104. - The electro-
optical system 101 is composed of anelectron gun 1, an electronbeam extraction electrode 2, acondenser lens 3, ascanning deflector 5, anaperture 6, ashield pipe 7, anEXB deflector 8, anobjective lens 9, anearth electrode 15, and ashield electrode 16. - The
workpiece chamber 102 is composed of anX-Y stage 11, arotating stage 12, an opticalheight measuring device 26, and alength measuring device 27 for monitoring a position to be irradiated. Asecondary electron detector 13 is located under theobjective lens 9, and an output signal from thesecondary electron detector 13 is amplified by apre-amplifier 21 and is then processed into digital data by anAD convertor 22. - The
image processing unit 104 is composed of animage storing units computing unit 33, and adefect decision unit 34. The electron beam image and optical image incorporated in theimage processing unit 104 are displayed on amonitor 32. - An operational command and operation condition for each unit of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus are inputted/outputted in/from the
control unit 103. Various conditions upon generation of the electron beam, such as an acceleration voltage, deflection width of an electron beam, deflection speed, moving speed of a workpiece stage, and signal incorporation timing of the detector, are previously inputted in thecontrol unit 103. - A correction signal is created from signals supplied from the optical
height measuring device 26 andlength measuring device 27 for monitoring a position to be irradiated. Such a correction signal is fed to apower supply 25 for theobjective lens 9 and ascanning signal generator 24 via acorrection control circuit 28 in order that an electron beam 210 is usually impinged on a correct position. - The
electron gun 1 employs a thermal field emission electron source of a diffusion supply type, which allows creation of images less variation in brightness to be comparatively inspected and which allows high speed inspection because the gun can increase an electron beam current. - The
electron beam 201 is extracted from theelectron gun 1 by applying a voltage to theextraction electrode 2. The acceleration of theelectron beam 201 is performed by applying a high negative voltage to theelectron gun 1. Theelectron beam 201 with an energy equivalent to the potential applied thereto, for example, 12 keV in this embodiment advances toward theworkpiece stage 11, and is converged through thecondenser lens 3 and further finely restricted through theobjective lens 9, to be thus impinged on asubstrate 10 to be inspected (for example, wafer or chip) mounted on theX-Y stage 11. - A negative voltage, that is, a retarding voltage can be applied from a high
voltage power source 23 to thesubstrate 10. Theearth electrode 15 is provided between thesubstrate 10 and theEXB deflector 8 to form an electric field caused by retarding voltage between theearth electrode 15 and thesubstrate 10. It is easy to adjust an electron beam energy to be emitted to thesubstrate 10 at the optimum value by controlling the highvoltage power source 23 connected to thesubstrate 10. - In this embodiment, a negative potential of −11.5 kV as the retarding voltage is applied to the
substrate 10. The formation of an image is performed in accordance with either a method of two-dimensionally scanning theelectron beam 201 while allowing theX-Y stage 11 to remain at rest or a method of one-dimensionally scanning theelectron beam 201 and continuously moving theX-Y stage 11 in the direction substantially perpendicular to the scanning direction. - In the case of inspecting only a specific location of the
substrate 10, the inspection can be efficiently performed in accordance with the former method in which thestage 11 remains at rest, while in the case of inspecting a wide region of thesubstrate 10, the inspection can be efficiently performed in accordance with the latter method in which thestage 11 is continuously moved. - A surface image of the
substrate 10 is acquired by irradiating thesubstrate 10 with the finely restrictedelectron beam 201 to producesecondary electrons 202, and detecting thesecondary electrons 202 in synchronization with the scanning of theelectron beam 201 and the movement of thestage 11. - The automatic inspection performed in this embodiment is essential to make fast the inspecting speed, and accordingly, such automatic inspection does not adopt the scanning at a low speed with a beam current of the pA order or the scanning repeated by a plurality of times, which scanning has been adopted in a usual SEM. That is to say, in the automatic inspection performed in this embodiment, an image is formed by only one scanning of a large current electron beam being equal to or more than about 100 times that used for the usual SEM, for example, 100 nA.
- A unit image for 1000×1000 pixels is acquired as a first image at a rate of 10 msec, and the second image is acquired on the basis of an image signal which is delayed for a time equivalent to one image. That is to say, the second image is incorporated in synchronization with the first image. Both the images are then comparatively evaluated to thus search a defect on the
substrate 10. - FIG. 2 is a plan view showing a state in which the substrate is mounted on the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, and FIGS. 3A and 3B are electric field distribution diagrams each showing the result of simulation of an inner electric field of the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus. The
substrate 10 is mounted on theworkpiece stage 11. When a retarding voltage is applied to thesubstrate 10 mounted as shown in FIG. 2, there occurs an electric field caused by retarding voltage along the shape of thesubstrate 10 as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. - Referring to FIG. 2, four projections C1, C2, C3 and C4 are provided on the
workpiece stage 11 in such a manner as to surround the periphery of thesubstrate 10, wherein one projection C1 of these projections is configured to be movable via a spring. The surface of thesubstrate 10 is regarded as flattened in the macroscopic view, and as shown in FIG. 3A, when the central portion of thesubstrate 10 is observed, it may have an electric field distribution with no disturbance. - On the contrary, at the outer peripheral portion of the
substrate 10, as shown in FIG. 2, the sectional shape of thesubstrate 10 itself is uneven and also the projections C1, C2, C3 and C4 functioning as substrate pressers are provided, and accordingly, as shown in FIG. 3B, an electric field is disturbed around the projections C1, C2, C3 and C4. Here, by the effect of theshield electrode 16 provided between the workpiece 10 and theearth electrode 15, the disturbance of an electric field caused by retarding voltage is reduced. Thebeam 201 is affected by such an electric field distribution as follows: - FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the trajectory of the
primary electron beam 201, and FIG. 5 is a graph showing a relationship between the extension of an actual irradiated position with theprimary electron beam 201 and a target deflected position. As shown in FIG. 4, theprimary electron beam 201 is not impinged on theworkpiece 10 along a linear trajectory from an intersection between a beam axis and a deflected beam, so-called deflection fulcrum (not shown) but it is retarded from a high acceleration state as nearing the vicinity of theworkpiece 10 and is impinged on theworkpiece 10 while being very slightly extended from the linear trajectory by the effect of the axisymmetric deflection action of the electric field caused by the retarding voltage. In the case where thebeam 201 is impinged on the central portion of thesubstrate 10, assuming that the surface of thesubstrate 10 is substantially flattened in a macroscopic view, it is sufficient for only the above axisymmetric extension to be taken into account. - Referring to FIG. 4, in the case of irradiation of the central portion of the
substrate 10, theprimary electron beam 201 reaches an irradiated position x1 linearly shifted from a predetermined irradiated position x0 on the basis of a deflection signal. The irradiated position x1 becomes a value corresponding to the surface height of theworkpiece 10 as shown in FIG. 5. - On the contrary, in the case of irradiation of the outer peripheral portion of the
substrate 10, thebeam 201 is further deflected by the disturbance of the neighborhood electric field caused along the sectional shape of thesubstrate 10. As shown in FIG. 5, upon observation of the outer peripheral portion, thebeam 201 reaches an irradiated position x2 which is shifted from the irradiated position x1 substantially in parallel to one direction on thesubstrate 10. The shifted amount (x2−x1) is equivalent to a beam distortion amount, which is dependent on the sectional shape of the portion, in the vicinity of the irradiated position, of thesubstrate 10. - As a result of examination, it becomes apparent that the shifted amount (x2−x1) can account for about several tens % of the deflection width of the beam, and that the beam distortion amount (x2−x1) is, strictly speaking, not linearly changed from the predetermined irradiated position. The fact that the beam distortion amount at the outer peripheral portion of the substrate is the non-linear and non-negligible amount causes the following two problems:
- One problem is that both the correction upon observation of the outer peripheral portion and the correction upon observation of the central portion cannot be performed using the same correction table. Another problem is that if a standard mark sample for preparing a deflection correction table is provided at the outer peripheral portion of the
workpiece stage 11, the prepared correction table itself contains the distortion amount of theprimary electron beam 201, with a result that the deflection cannot be suitably corrected using such a deflection correction table. - Additionally, in this circuit pattern inspecting apparatus which is aimed at automatically, relatively inspecting images at a high speed, it is required to prepare a deflection correction table for a short period of time while keeping up with the beam drift due to a change in the electro-
optical system 101 with the elapsed time. - To be more specific, the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to the present invention is adapted to relatively inspect images while correcting deflection of an electron beam in accordance with a procedure shown in FIG. 6. FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating the operational procedure for the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, in which the plan view of a substrate to be inspected is additionally shown. First, a basic calibration flow is executed upon periodical maintenance of the circuit pattern apparatus.
- A calibrating wafer in which a sample with standard marks formed on two surfaces different in thickness (+200 μm, −200 μm) is buried is loaded on the central portion of the
workpiece stage 11, and images at the surface heights zH and zL of the central standard marks are acquired. The image signals thus obtained are stored in a central standard marksignal storing unit 35. The range of each of the surface heights zH and zL of the standard marks is set at a value nearly equal to a variation range of the surface height of thesubstrate 10 caused by warping of thesubstrate 10. Next, asample 17 with standard marks formed on two surfaces different in thickness is similarly provided at the outermost peripheral portion of the workpiece stage, and images therefrom are acquired and stored in an outer peripheral standard marksignal storing unit 36. - The standard mark image signals thus obtained in accordance with the present invention are shown in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 is a typical diagram showing one example of image indication.
- As shown in FIG. 7, a true configuration of the standard mark [xk], a central standard mark signal [x3] and an outer peripheral standard mark signal [x2] form different mark images, respectively. The signals read from the storing
unit 35 in which the central standard mark signal [x3] is stored and from the storingunit 36 in which the outer peripheral standard mark signal [x2] is stored are converted into a distortion coefficient [B] by a comparingunit 37. That is to say, an outer peripheral distortion coefficient B is calculated from a positional deviation between the central and outer peripheral standard mark signals and is stored in an outer peripheral distortionamount storing unit 38. - The outer peripheral distortion coefficient B is defined by the following equations (1) and (2)
- [x 2(zH)]=[B(zH)][x 3(zH)] (1)
- [x 2(zL)]=[B(zL)][x 3(zL)] (2)
- While the outer peripheral distortion amount B upon periodical maintenance is stored, the next calibration flow based on the outer peripheral standard marks is carried out for each wafer. Like the basic calibration, images of a sample with standard marks formed on two surfaces having heights zH and zL provided at the outermost peripheral portion of the workpiece stage are formed. The absolute value of the difference between zH and zL, (|zH−zL|) is set at 400 μm.
- The positional signals of the outer peripheral standard marks [x2(zH)] and [x2(zL)] are stored in the storing
unit 36. An outer peripheral deflection distortion coefficient C is calculated by comparing the outer peripheral standard mark signal [x2] with the true position xk of the standard mark using acomputing circuit 39 for removing the outer peripheral distortion amount. - The outer peripheral deflection distortion coefficient C is defined by the following two equations (3) and (4):
- [x 2(zH)]=[C(zH)][xk]=([A(zH)]+[B(zH)])[xk] (3)
- [x 2(zL)]=[C(zL)][xk]=([A(zL)]+[B(zL)])[xk] (4)
- The above distortion amount contains a distortion amount inherent to the outer peripheral portion because the standard mark is positioned at the outermost peripheral portion of the workpiece stage.
- The distortion amount [B] caused only at the outer peripheral portion, which is obtained by the difference between the outer peripheral standard mark signal and the central standard mark signal on the basis of the above equations (1) and (2), is substituted in the above equations (3) and (4), to eliminate the outer peripheral distortion coefficient [B], thereby obtaining a deflection distortion coefficient [A] equivalent to the central distortion amount.
- The deflection distortion coefficient [A] is defined by the following equations (5) and (6):
- [A(zH)]=[C(zH)]−[B(zH)] (5)
- [A(zL)]=[C(zL)]−[B(zL)] (6)
- The deflection distortion coefficient [A] has been obtained from a specific height, that is, each of the standard marks formed on the two surfaces of the workpiece, and accordingly, a specific deflection correcting table can be calculated on the basis of the deflection distortion coefficient [A], and further a general deflection correcting table for an arbitrary height can be calculated by a storing
unit 40. - Assuming that the height dependency of the general deflection correcting table is linear, the general deflection correcting table can be obtained for each height using a so-called interpolation method.
- [A(z)]=([A(zH)]−[A(zL)])×(z−zL)/[(zH−zL)+[A(zL)]
- In this way, by the above two-stage calibration of the deflection correcting table, the highly accurate deflection correcting table not affected by the beam distortion can be updated without frequently performing the basic calibration flow requiring replacement of the
substrate 10 and taking a long period of time. - After the deflection correcting table is accomplished by the calibration flow described above and is stored, the usual inspection begins.
- First, a region to be inspected of the
substrate 10 is successively measured by the workpieceheight measuring device 26, and height signals are fed to a deflection correctingsignal generating circuit 29. Thecircuit 29 creates a deflection correcting signal while referring to the deflection correcting table. Thebeam 201 is deflected on the basis of the deflection correcting signal, to take out an image signal. The image signals thus taken out are processed by adelay circuit 31 such that the first image signal is delayed from the second one for a time equivalent to one image, and are compared with each other by thecomputing unit 33. The presence or absence of a defect is decided by thedefect decision unit 34 on the basis of the compared result. In this embodiment, to allow the deflection correcting table to highly accurately keep up with the drift of thebeam 201 caused by a change in the electro-optical system 101 with the elapsed time, the observation of the image of outer peripheralstandard mark 17 and the update of the deflection correcting table are carried out at one timing for each wafer by anupdate control unit 41 for updating the deflection correcting table. - A new outer peripheral mark signal and the existing outer peripheral distortion amount are computed, and a deflection correcting table is updated by eliminating the distortion amount. The updating timing of the deflection correcting table can be previously set in the update control means41.
- Further, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6, a region of the
substrate 10 narrower than the outer periphery by a width of 10 mm is decided as a region in which deflection cannot be corrected using the same deflection correcting table, that is, as an inspection disable area by an inspection unavailable region control means 42. That is to say, the decision for such a region is regarded as unavailable by thedefect decision unit 34, and such a region is not irradiated with theelectron beam 201. - The reason for this is that since the
workpiece stage 11 has the anisotropic configuration in which the beam distortion is uneven, the correction in consideration of the dependence of the position of the substrate on the correcting table becomes very complicated and takes a lot of time. - The width of the sample with the outer peripheral standard marks is set at 10 mm in consideration of a range in which the beam can be corrected using the same deflection correcting table, and an image is acquired at the center of the sample surface at each height of the standard mark. The sample with the central standard marks is configured to be larger in its area than the sample with the outer peripheral standard marks, and the image formation of each central standard mark is performed at a position separated 10 mm or more than the boundary between the two surfaces of the standard marks.
- According to this embodiment, it is possible to reduce the misdetection ratio by 20% as compared with the case in which the inspection is performed by correcting deflection not in consideration of the beam distortion using the same electro-optical system.
- In the above embodiment, description is made using the electron source and electron beam are used; however, in the case of using a charged particle source and charged particle beam, the same configuration as that of the above electro-optical system is called an irradiation optical system.
- [Second Embodiment]
- A circuit pattern inspecting apparatus according to another embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 8.
- FIG. 8 is a plan view, similar to FIG. 2, showing a state in which a substrate to be inspected is mounted on a workpiece stage. This embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that a
workpiece stage 11 having an isotropic configuration is used, and accordingly, this embodiment will be described only with reference to the partial configuration view of FIG. 8. Theworkpiece stage 11 of an electrostatic chuck type is 100 μm or less higher than the surface of asubstrate 10 as the workpiece and wider 10 mm than the outer periphery of thesubstrate 10 in the moving direction. - A portion, having a center angle of 180° or more, of the
workpiece stage 11 located around thesubstrate 10 is movable, and after the substrate is mounted on theworkpiece stage 11, the movable portion of theworkpiece 11 is moved in proximity to thesubstrate 10 and fixed at a position in contact with the outer periphery of thesubstrate 10. This configuration is complicated and is hard in actual operation, but is advantageous in that the beam distortion caused at an end portion of thesubstrate 10 is reduced, thereby making it possible to inspect the nearly entire surface of thesubstrate 10, for example, a range having an outer limit positioned 3 mm inwardly from the outer periphery of thesubstrate 10. In this embodiment, it is not required to generate an unavailable signal from the inspection unavailable region control means 42. - [Third Embodiment]
- A further embodiment of the present invention will be described below. In this embodiment, while not shown, the inside diameter of the
shield electrode 16 is reduced to half, that is, changed from 30 mm Φ to 15 mm Φ. As a result, the disturbance of an electric field caused by a retarding voltage is reduced. This makes it possible to inspect a range having an outer limit positioned 7 mm inwardly from the outer periphery of thesubstrate 10. - As described above, according to the present invention, there can be obtained the circuit pattern inspecting apparatus or circuit pattern inspecting method of previously taking into account the disturbance of an electric field caused in the vicinity of the outer peripheral portion of the
substrate 10 as the workpiece to which a high negative retarding voltage is applied, thereby highly accurately correcting the deflection of theprimary electron beam 201 in such a manner as to be matched with the height of an irradiated position of thesubstrate 10 with theelectron beam 201 without receiving adverse effect of the distortion of thebeam 201 at the outer peripheral portion of thesubstrate 10. In the above apparatus or method, the deflection correcting table is prepared on the basis of the outer peripheralstandard marks 17; however, there may be adopted another configuration in which the diameter of theworkpiece stage 11 is made sufficiently larger than the size of the wafer and the standard marks 17 are provided inwardly from the outer periphery of theworkpiece stage 11 sufficiently to prevent occurrence of the beam distortion. - The effect of the disturbance of an electric field is varied by changing a retarding voltage and thereby the inspection effective region is varied. In consideration of such a change, the inspection unavailable region control means42 is provided. This enables inspection with less wastage. In addition, the numeral values described in the above embodiments are for illustrative purposes only, and it is to be understood that the present invention may be of course carried out under different specifications. For example, the circuit pattern can be more efficiently, highly accurately inspected by optimizing the width and height of each of the substrate pressing projection of the workpiece stage and substrate drop hole, and the thickness and size of the workpiece with the standard marks in consideration of the conditions such as the size and thickness of the substrate, a variation range of the surface height of the substrate due to warping, and a retarding voltage.
- As described above, according to the present invention, even if a highly retarding voltage is applied to a substrate as a workpiece, the deflection of the primary electron beam can be highly fast, highly accurately corrected in such a manner as to be matched with the height of the workpiece without receiving adverse effect of the beam distortion caused at the outer peripheral portion of the substrate. As a result, with respect to a circuit pattern at the step of fabricating a semiconductor device including an insulating material or a mixture of an insulating material and a conductive material, it is possible to highly fast, stably acquire highly accurate images from desired positions of the circuit pattern by irradiating the positions with an electron beam, without occurrence of any deviation between the irradiated positions, and automatically comparing the images with each other, thereby inspecting defects of the circuit pattern without occurrence of errors.
- [Fourth Embodiment]
- A further embodiment of the present invention will be described below.
- As one example of an electron beam application apparatus, a semiconductor inspecting apparatus using an electron beam will be described. FIG. 10 is a vertical sectional view showing main parts of the semiconductor inspecting apparatus using an electron beam. The semiconductor inspecting apparatus inspects whether or not a semiconductor wafer or a circuit pattern formed on a circuit pattern mask for transferring the circuit pattern on the wafer is desirably prepared. Accordingly, in the semiconductor inspecting apparatus, a wafer or mask is taken as a workpiece.
- Referring to FIG. 10, an electro-optical system of the semiconductor inspecting apparatus includes an
electron gun 502 for emitting electrons with electric power supplied from apower source 501; anelectron beam 503 extracted from theelectron gun 502; acondenser lens 506 a and anobjective lens 506 b for converging theelectron beam 503 so as to irradiate awafer 510 as the workpiece with theelectron beam 503; adeflector 511 for deflecting theelectron beam 503 so as to irradiate a desired position of thewafer 510 with theelectron beams 503; and amirror body 505 containing asecondary electron detector 515 for detecting secondary electrons produced from thewafer 510 by irradiation of thewafer 510 with theelectron beam 503 and aWien filter 514 for changing the direction of the secondary electrons toward thesecondary electron detector 515. The values of currents applied to thedeflector 511 andobjective lens 506 b are controlled by acontrol unit 513. - The
wafer 510 is carried from aload lock chamber 519 into aworkpiece chamber 507 and mounted on aworkpiece holder 521 in theworkpiece chamber 507 by a carryingunit 520. The position of theworkpiece holder 521 is fixed by pallet guides 526 of amovable stage 508. Themirror body 505 andworkpiece chamber 507 are evacuated viaexhaust units 504 a and 504 b andexhaust units gate valve 518 is provided between theload lock chamber 519 andworkpiece chamber 507, whichgate valve 518 is opened only when thewafer 510 is carried in theworkpiece chamber 507. - Since the scanning range of the
electron beam 503 by thedeflector 511 is narrower than the size of thewafer 510, thestage 508 is continuously or intermittently moved to allow a desired circuit pattern of thewafer 510 to be irradiated with theelectron beam 503. At this time, the alignment of thewafer 510 is performed by measuring the position of thestage 508 using alaser interferometer 512, and correcting the position of thewafer 510 by superimposing a corrected amount representative of the position of thestage 508 on the deflected amount of theelectron beam 503 by thecontrol unit 513. - The secondary electrons produced from the
wafer 510 by irradiation of thewafer 510 with theelectron beam 503 are deflected toward thesecondary electron detector 515 by theWien filter 514 and are detected by thesecondary electron detector 515. The detected amount of the secondary electrons is amplified by anamplifier 516, being processed by aninformation processing unit 517, and is outputted as an image signal from theinformation processing unit 517. - To improve the resolution of an image of the secondary electrons, the voltage applied to the
electron beam 503 may be increased; however, depending on the kind of the workpiece, there may occur an inconvenience that the workpiece is destroyed by the energy of the highvoltage electron beam 503. To cope with such an inconvenience, there is known a method of retarding theelectron beam 503 just before the workpiece by applying a negative retarding voltage from a retardingpower source 509 to the workpiece. This method is particularly effective for inspecting a workpiece such as a semiconductor wafer. - FIG. 11 is a perspective view, with parts partially cutaway, showing the configurations of the
stage 508 andworkpiece holder 521. - The
workpiece holder 521 is fixed on thestage 508 while being guided by the pallet guides 526. Thewafer 510 is mounted on theworkpiece holder 521 via an electrostatically attractingunit 521 a. A holdingplate 521 b surrounds thewafer 510. Theworkpiece holder 521 is provided with a carryingport 531 through which thewafer 510 is transferred in or from theworkpiece holder 521. Thestage 508 is moved by drive rods 525 a and 525 b in the directions alonglinear guides - FIGS. 12A and 12B are a plan view and a vertical sectional view of the
workpiece holder 521 shown in FIG. 11, respectively. FIG. 12A shows a state before the holdingplate 521 b located around thewafer 510 is moved, and FIG. 12B shows a state after the holdingplate 521 b located around thewafer 510 is moved. Referring to FIG. 12A, thewafer 510 is carried into theworkpiece holder 521 through the carryingport 531 and is mounted on theelectrostatically attracting unit 521 a. Then, as shown in FIG. 12B, thewafer 510 is lifted by alifting mechanism 528 in the liftingdirection 536 up to a height being nearly equal to that of the holdingplate 521 b, so that the surface height of thewafer 510 becomes nearly equal to that of the holdingplate 521 b of theworkpiece holder 521. Next, the holdingplate 521 b divided into two or more parts is slid by aholder sliding mechanism 532 in theslide direction 535 toward the center of thewafer 510, to be brought in contact with an end portion of thewafer 510. In this embodiment, the holdingplate 521 b is divided into four parts. - Although it may be desirable that the surface height of the
wafer 510 be perfectly equal to that of the holdingplate 521 b of theworkpiece holder 521, it is difficult to make the surface height of thewafer 510 perfectly equal to that of the holdingplate 521 b from the viewpoints of machining accuracy, assembling accuracy and the like. Accordingly, it is required to set a dimensional tolerance with respect to the identification between both the surface heights of thewafer 510 and holdingplate 521 b, and such a dimensional tolerance has been experimentally found by the present inventors (which will be described in detail later). - Although a
slight gap 537 is set between thewafer 510 and holdingplate 521 b in this embodiment, it may be desirable not to be present therebetween. From the viewpoint of practical use, however, thegap 537 may be formed therebetween depending on machining accuracies of the outer peripheral dimension of thewafer 510 and the dimension of the holdingplate 521 b. The dimensional tolerance of such a gap will be described later. - [Fifth Embodiment]
- FIG. 13 is a plan view of a
workpiece holder 521 as a further embodiment of the present invention, in which the vertical cross section of theworkpiece holder 521 is additionally shown. Awafer 510 is mounted on an electrostatically attractingunit 521 a, and one of a plurality of holdingpins 539 is moved in thepin moving direction 540 to fix the position of thewafer 510. Then, a holdingplate 521 c is moved in the liftingdirection 536, so that the surface height of thewafer 510 becomes nearly equal to that of the holdingplate 521 c. - FIG. 14 and FIGS. 15A to15C show configurations of prior art workpiece holders. FIG. 14 is a plan view of the first prior art workpiece holder, in which the side view of the workpiece holder is additionally shown.
- Referring to FIG. 14, a
wafer 510 is mounted on a supportingstage 530 fixed on aworkpiece holder 521, and the position of thewafer 510 is fixed by a plurality ofbearings 529. Accordingly, the height of theworkpiece holder 521 located around an end portion of thewafer 510 is lower than that of thewafer 510 by an amount equivalent to the thickness of thewafer 510. - FIG. 15A, and FIGS. 15B and 15C are a plan view and sectional views of the second prior art workpiece holder, respectively. Referring to FIG. 15A, a
wafer 510 is mounted on an electrostatically attractingunit 521 a fixed on aworkpiece holder 521, and the position of thewafer 510 is fixed by a plurality ofclaws 523 a. The cross-section of theclaw 523 a for pressing thewafer 510 can be configured as that of aclaw 523 b shown in FIG. 15B or configured as that of aclaw 523 c shown in FIG. 15C. That is to say, theseclaws 523 a (523 b, 523 c) project inwardly of the peripheral portion of thewafer 510. Assuming that thewafer 510 fixed on such a prior art workpiece holder is irradiated with an electron beam while a retarding voltage is applied to thewafer 510, the following simulation of an electric field distribution is made. - FIGS. 16, 17A and17B, and 18A and 18B each show a electric field distribution diagram showing the result of simulation of an electric field distribution on the surface of the
wafer 510 in the case where thewafer 510 is fixed on theworkpiece holder 521 and is irradiated with anelectron beam 503 while a retarding voltage is applied to thewafer 510. In the figures, a plurality of lines designateequipotential lines 524 connecting points having equal voltages to each other. - FIG. 16 shows the case where a central portion of the
wafer 510 is irradiated with theelectron beam 503, in which the trajectory of theelectron beam 503 is designated by the vertical line at the center of the figure. Theequipotential lines 524 on the surface of thewafer 510 extend in parallel to the surface of thewafer 510 up to the vicinity of ashield electrode 541. In such a region, there does not occur any change such as disturbance, that is, there is no dimensional effect due to the retarding potential applied to theelectron beam 503. Theequipotential lines 524 are separated from the surface of thewafer 510 in the vicinity of theshield electrode 541. - FIGS. 17A and 17B are each an electric field distribution diagram showing the result of simulation of an electric field on the surface of the
wafer 510 in the case where a projection of theworkpiece holder 521 is 1 mm higher than an end portion of thewafer 510; wherein FIG. 17A shows the case where an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is 5 mm separated from the projection, and FIG. 17B shows the case where an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is 10 mm separated from the projection. - From the comparison between the results shown in FIGS. 17A and 17B, it is apparent that a variation in electric field in FIG. 17A is larger than that in FIG. 17B, that is, the variation in electric field becomes larger as the projection becomes closer to the irradiated position with the
electron beam 503. To be more specific, in a range, apart 5 mm from the projection, of thewafer 510, there is a high possibility that the electric field is varied to disturb the irradiated position with theelectron beam 503. - FIGS. 18A and 18B are each an electric field distribution diagram showing the result of simulation of an electric field on the surface of the
wafer 510 in the case where an end portion of thewafer 510 projects from theworkpiece holder 521 to form a space under the end portion of thewafer 510; wherein FIG. 18A shows the case where an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is 5 mm separated from the end portion of thewafer 510; and FIG. 18B shows the case where an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is 10 mm separated from the end portion of thewafer 510. - From the comparison between the results shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B, it is apparent that a variation in
equipotential lines 524 in FIG. 18A is larger than that in FIG. 18B. That is to say, as the irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 becomes closer to the end portion of thewafer 510, the variation inequipotential lines 524 becomes larger to make higher the possibility of disturbance of the irradiated position with theelectron beam 503. Accordingly, it must be avoided to provide a large space under the end portion of thewafer 510. - The above electric field simulation shows that if a high projection is provided outside an end portion of the
wafer 510 or a space is provided under an end portion of thewafer 510, the outer limit of a range in which an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is not disturbed is located at least 10 mm inwardly from the end portion of thewafer 510. - From the above electric field simulation, it is also apparent that in order to prevent a variation in electric field at an end portion of the
wafer 510 and hence to prevent adverse effect exerted on an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503, it is effective to make the height of a portion, around the end portion of thewafer 510, of theworkpiece holder 521 equal to the surface height of thewafer 510. - Depending on errors caused at the machining and assembling steps, it is difficult to make the height of the
wafer 510 perfectly equal to that of theworkpiece holder 521; however, as the results of experiments performed by the present inventors, it is apparent that if a difference between heights of an end portion of thewafer 510 andworkpiece holder 521 is ±200 μm, the adverse effect of such a difference in height exerted on an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is almost negligible. - With respect to the
gap 537 shown in FIGS. 12 and 13, which is formed between thewafer 510 and holdingplate 521 b (521 c) resulting from the machining accuracy, the results of experiments performed by the present inventors show that if thegap 537 is 0.5 mm or less, the adverse effect of thegap 537 exerted on an irradiated position with theelectron beam 503 is almost negligible. - In this way, the electron beam application apparatus including the function of controlling an irradiation energy of an electron beam with a retarding voltage may be configured to prevent a variation in electric field by making the height of a workpiece nearly equal to that of a workpiece holder, setting a dimensional tolerance with respect to a difference in height between the workpiece and workpiece holder, or providing a range of the workpiece in which the heights are nearly equal to each other. This makes it possible to irradiate an end portion of the workpiece with the electron beam without reducing the accuracy of an irradiated position with the electron beam.
- As described above, the electron beam application apparatus according to the present invention, which includes the function of controlling an irradiation energy of an electron beam with a retarding voltage, exhibits the effect of irradiating a workpiece with an electron beam without reducing the accuracy of an irradiated position with the electron beam.
Claims (12)
1. A workpiece holder for holding a workpiece, said workpiece holder being used for an electron beam application apparatus for processing a workpiece by irradiating the surface of said workpiece with an electron beam, or observing the surface state of a workpiece by detecting secondary electrons produced from said workpiece by irradiation of said workpiece with an electron beam, comprising:
a positioning portion which comes closer to an end portion of said workpiece when said workpiece holder holds said workpiece, thereby positioning said workpiece,
wherein the surface height of the end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion.
2. A workpiece holder according to claim 1 , wherein a difference in height between the surface height of the end portion of said workpiece and said positioning portion is in a range of 200 μm or less.
3. A workpiece holder according to claim 1 , wherein a gap between the end portion of said work piece and said positioning portion is in a range of 0.5 mm or less.
4. A workpiece holder according to claim 1 , wherein the surface height of a portion of said workpiece in a region having an outer limit positioned at least 10 mm or more inwardly from the end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion.
5. A semiconductor inspecting apparatus for irradiating the surface of a workpiece with an electron beam, and detecting secondary electrons produced by the irradiation, thereby observing or inspecting the surface state of said workpiece, comprising:
a workpiece holder including a positioning portion for positioning said workpiece,
wherein the surface height of an end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion when said workpiece is held by said workpiece holder.
6. A semiconductor inspecting apparatus according to claim 5 , wherein a difference in height between the surface height of the end portion of said workpiece and said positioning portion is in a range of 200 μm or less.
7. A semiconductor inspecting apparatus according to claim 5 , wherein a gap between the end portion of said workpiece and said positioning portion is in a range of 0.5 mm or less.
8. A semiconductor inspecting apparatus according to claim 5 , wherein the surface height of a portion of said workpiece in a region having an outer limit positioned at least 10 mm or more inwardly from the end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion.
9. A method of holding a workpiece, which is used for an electron beam application apparatus, for processing a workpiece by irradiating the surface of a workpiece being held with an electron beam or observing the surface state of a workpiece by detecting secondary electrons produced by the irradiation of said workpiece with an electron beam, comprising:
holding said workpiece in such a manner that the surface height of an end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of a positioning portion which comes closer to the end portion of said workpiece and positions said workpiece.
10. A method of holding a workpiece according to claim 9 , wherein said workpiece is held in such a manner that a difference in height between the surface height of the end portion of said workpiece and said positioning portion is in a range of 200 μm or less.
11. A method of holding a workpiece according to claim 9 , wherein said workpiece is held in such a manner that a gap between the end portion of said workpiece and said positioning portion is in a range of 0.5 mm or less.
12. A method of holding a workpiece according to claim 9 , wherein said workpiece is held in such a manner that the surface height of a portion of said workpiece in a region having an outer limit positioned at least 10 mm or more inwardly from the end portion of said workpiece is nearly equal to the height of said positioning portion.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/309,277 US20030155508A1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-26 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP10897298 | 1998-04-20 | ||
JP10-108972 | 1998-04-20 | ||
JP10-135404 | 1998-05-18 | ||
JP13540498 | 1998-05-18 | ||
US09/292,626 US6509564B1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 1999-04-15 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
US10/309,277 US20030155508A1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-26 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/292,626 Division US6509564B1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 1999-04-15 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030155508A1 true US20030155508A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 |
Family
ID=26448790
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/292,626 Expired - Fee Related US6509564B1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 1999-04-15 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
US10/309,276 Abandoned US20030111616A1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-04 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
US10/309,277 Abandoned US20030155508A1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-26 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
US10/309,275 Expired - Fee Related US6768113B2 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-26 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/292,626 Expired - Fee Related US6509564B1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 1999-04-15 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
US10/309,276 Abandoned US20030111616A1 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-04 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/309,275 Expired - Fee Related US6768113B2 (en) | 1998-04-20 | 2002-12-26 | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US6509564B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8106355B1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2012-01-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated inspection using cell-cell subtraction perpendicular to stage motion direction |
US8664594B1 (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2014-03-04 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Electron-optical system for high-speed and high-sensitivity inspections |
Families Citing this family (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6559456B1 (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2003-05-06 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Charged particle beam exposure method and apparatus |
JP4093662B2 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2008-06-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Scanning electron microscope |
JP4097884B2 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2008-06-11 | エスアイアイ・ナノテクノロジー株式会社 | Scanning charged particle beam microscope |
US6864493B2 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2005-03-08 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Charged particle beam alignment method and charged particle beam apparatus |
JP2003331774A (en) * | 2002-05-16 | 2003-11-21 | Toshiba Corp | Electron beam equipment and device manufacturing method using the equipment |
US7354834B2 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2008-04-08 | Dongbu Electronics Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor devices and methods to form trenches in semiconductor devices |
JP4349964B2 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2009-10-21 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Small electron gun |
US7665946B2 (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2010-02-23 | Advanced Display Process Engineering Co., Ltd. | Transfer chamber for flat display device manufacturing apparatus |
US7038204B2 (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2006-05-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for reducing proximity effects in electron beam lithography |
JP4519567B2 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2010-08-04 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Scanning electron microscope and sample observation method using the same |
JP4359232B2 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2009-11-04 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Charged particle beam equipment |
US20060194516A1 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-31 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Processing apparatus and processing method |
US7176681B2 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2007-02-13 | Siemens Power Generation, Inc. | Inspection of composite components using magnetic resonance imaging |
JP4520426B2 (en) * | 2005-07-04 | 2010-08-04 | 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー | Electron beam drift correction method and electron beam writing method |
JP4875905B2 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2012-02-15 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Sample holding device and charged particle beam device |
JP4801518B2 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2011-10-26 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Charged particle beam microscopic method and charged particle beam apparatus |
JP5164355B2 (en) * | 2006-09-27 | 2013-03-21 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Charged particle beam scanning method and charged particle beam apparatus |
US7599051B1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2009-10-06 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Calibration of a substrate inspection tool |
DE102006059162B4 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2009-07-09 | Carl Zeiss Nts Gmbh | Particle-optical arrangement |
JP2008311351A (en) * | 2007-06-13 | 2008-12-25 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corp | Charged particle beam apparatus |
JP5227643B2 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2013-07-03 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | An electron beam application device that enables observation with high resolution and high contrast |
JP2009302415A (en) * | 2008-06-17 | 2009-12-24 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corp | Charged-particle beam device, test piece holding system, method for holding test piece, and method for detaching test piece |
JP5380443B2 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2014-01-08 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Semiconductor inspection equipment |
US9721754B2 (en) * | 2011-04-26 | 2017-08-01 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Method and apparatus for processing a substrate with a focused particle beam |
JP7026469B2 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2022-02-28 | 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー | Electron beam image acquisition device and electron beam image acquisition method |
KR102409943B1 (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2022-06-16 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method of detecting a defect and apparatus for performing the same |
CN114322865B (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2023-12-08 | 长江存储科技有限责任公司 | Method and device for measuring semiconductor device and storage medium |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4584479A (en) * | 1982-10-19 | 1986-04-22 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Envelope apparatus for localized vacuum processing |
Family Cites Families (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5687670A (en) | 1979-12-15 | 1981-07-16 | Anelva Corp | Dry etching apparatus |
JPS56103420A (en) | 1980-01-23 | 1981-08-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Compensating method for deflection distortion in charged particle beam apparatus |
JPS56124234A (en) * | 1980-03-05 | 1981-09-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Correcting method for electron beam deflection |
US4442188A (en) * | 1981-01-02 | 1984-04-10 | Amdahl Corporation | System for specifying critical dimensions, sequence numbers and revision levels on integrated circuit photomasks |
US4400235A (en) | 1982-03-25 | 1983-08-23 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Etching apparatus and method |
JPS59192943A (en) | 1983-04-15 | 1984-11-01 | Hitachi Ltd | Defect inspecting device repetitive pattern |
JPS60167245A (en) | 1984-02-10 | 1985-08-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Sample holding device |
JPS61119686A (en) | 1984-11-14 | 1986-06-06 | Teru Ramu Kk | Parallel flat plate type plasma etching device |
JPH0663107B2 (en) | 1984-11-14 | 1994-08-17 | 東京エレクトロン山梨株式会社 | Parallel plate type dry etching device |
JPS61142752A (en) | 1984-12-14 | 1986-06-30 | Nec Corp | Wafer holder of ion implanting apparatus |
JPS61143930A (en) | 1984-12-17 | 1986-07-01 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Sample holder for x-ray microanalyzer |
US4871420A (en) | 1984-12-18 | 1989-10-03 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Selective etching process |
JPH089787B2 (en) | 1987-07-24 | 1996-01-31 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Plasma etching device |
JP2821153B2 (en) | 1988-11-24 | 1998-11-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Charged particle beam application equipment |
US4975586A (en) | 1989-02-28 | 1990-12-04 | Eaton Corporation | Ion implanter end station |
JPH0379158A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1991-04-04 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Digital copying machine |
JPH0410343A (en) | 1990-02-05 | 1992-01-14 | Nissin Electric Co Ltd | Charging-up suppressing system |
JP3148353B2 (en) | 1991-05-30 | 2001-03-19 | ケーエルエー・インストルメンツ・コーポレーション | Electron beam inspection method and system |
JP3079158B2 (en) | 1991-12-04 | 2000-08-21 | 味の素株式会社 | Detergent composition |
JP3730263B2 (en) | 1992-05-27 | 2005-12-21 | ケーエルエー・インストルメンツ・コーポレーション | Apparatus and method for automatic substrate inspection using charged particle beam |
US5717204A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1998-02-10 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Inspecting optical masks with electron beam microscopy |
JP2927627B2 (en) | 1992-10-20 | 1999-07-28 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Scanning electron microscope |
JPH07253311A (en) * | 1994-03-15 | 1995-10-03 | Fujitsu Ltd | Calibration method, pattern inspection method and pattern position decision method for pattern inspection device and manufacture of semiconductor device |
US5466940A (en) | 1994-06-20 | 1995-11-14 | Opal Technologies Ltd. | Electron detector with high backscattered electron acceptance for particle beam apparatus |
JP3323021B2 (en) * | 1994-12-28 | 2002-09-09 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Scanning electron microscope and sample image observation method using the same |
JPH09320505A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1997-12-12 | Hitachi Ltd | Electron beam type inspecting method, device therefor, manufacture of semiconductor, and its manufacturing line |
-
1999
- 1999-04-15 US US09/292,626 patent/US6509564B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-12-04 US US10/309,276 patent/US20030111616A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-12-26 US US10/309,277 patent/US20030155508A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-12-26 US US10/309,275 patent/US6768113B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4584479A (en) * | 1982-10-19 | 1986-04-22 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Envelope apparatus for localized vacuum processing |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8106355B1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2012-01-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated inspection using cell-cell subtraction perpendicular to stage motion direction |
US8664594B1 (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2014-03-04 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Electron-optical system for high-speed and high-sensitivity inspections |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20030146382A1 (en) | 2003-08-07 |
US20030111616A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 |
US6509564B1 (en) | 2003-01-21 |
US6768113B2 (en) | 2004-07-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6509564B1 (en) | Workpiece holder, semiconductor fabricating apparatus, semiconductor inspecting apparatus, circuit pattern inspecting apparatus, charged particle beam application apparatus, calibrating substrate, workpiece holding method, circuit pattern inspecting method, and charged particle beam application method | |
US7521679B2 (en) | Inspection method and inspection system using charged particle beam | |
US7312449B2 (en) | Electron beam system and method of manufacturing devices using the system | |
JP5307181B2 (en) | Sample surface inspection method and inspection apparatus | |
US6310341B1 (en) | Projecting type charged particle microscope and projecting type substrate inspection system | |
US6914441B2 (en) | Detection of defects in patterned substrates | |
US7696487B2 (en) | Circuit pattern inspection apparatus | |
US20050194535A1 (en) | Sample surface inspection method and inspection system | |
JP3791095B2 (en) | Circuit pattern inspection method and inspection apparatus | |
JP2000314710A (en) | Inspection method and device for circuit pattern | |
JP3823073B2 (en) | Inspection method and inspection apparatus using electron beam | |
US20060049348A1 (en) | Charged particle beam column and method of its operation | |
US7479634B2 (en) | Electron beam apparatus and device manufacturing method using the same | |
JP3463599B2 (en) | Sample holder, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, semiconductor inspection equipment, circuit pattern inspection equipment, charged particle beam application equipment, calibration substrate, sample holding method, circuit pattern inspection method, and charged particle beam application method | |
US6512227B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting patterns of a semiconductor device with an electron beam | |
JP2002118158A (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting circuit pattern | |
JP3952997B2 (en) | Semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and semiconductor inspection apparatus | |
US7132301B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reviewing voltage contrast defects in semiconductor wafers | |
US20090261251A1 (en) | Inspection apparatus and inspection method | |
JP4702295B2 (en) | Semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and semiconductor inspection apparatus | |
JP2006294627A (en) | Electron beam device and device manufacturing method using this device | |
JP2002251974A (en) | Electron beam type visual inspection device | |
JP2004157135A (en) | Method of and apparatus for inspecting circuit pattern |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |