US20010055707A1 - Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell - Google Patents

Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010055707A1
US20010055707A1 US09/819,875 US81987501A US2001055707A1 US 20010055707 A1 US20010055707 A1 US 20010055707A1 US 81987501 A US81987501 A US 81987501A US 2001055707 A1 US2001055707 A1 US 2001055707A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stack
fuel cell
purge
fluid
reactant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/819,875
Inventor
Joy Roberts
Jean St-Pierre
Marian van der Geest
Abderrahmane Atbi
Nicholas Fletcher
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ballard Power Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Ballard Power Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ballard Power Systems Inc filed Critical Ballard Power Systems Inc
Priority to US09/819,875 priority Critical patent/US20010055707A1/en
Assigned to BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VAN DER GEEST, MARIAN E., FLETCHER, NICHOLAS J., ATBI, ABDERRAHMANE, ROBERTS, JOY A., ST.-PIERRE, JEAN
Publication of US20010055707A1 publication Critical patent/US20010055707A1/en
Priority to US10/833,228 priority patent/US7482085B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04007Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids related to heat exchange
    • H01M8/04029Heat exchange using liquids
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/02Details
    • H01M8/0202Collectors; Separators, e.g. bipolar separators; Interconnectors
    • H01M8/0267Collectors; Separators, e.g. bipolar separators; Interconnectors having heating or cooling means, e.g. heaters or coolant flow channels
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04007Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids related to heat exchange
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04223Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells
    • H01M8/04225Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells during start-up
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04223Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells
    • H01M8/04228Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells during shut-down
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04223Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells
    • H01M8/04253Means for solving freezing problems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04223Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids during start-up or shut-down; Depolarisation or activation, e.g. purging; Means for short-circuiting defective fuel cells
    • H01M8/04268Heating of fuel cells during the start-up of the fuel cells
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04298Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems
    • H01M8/043Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems applied during specific periods
    • H01M8/04303Processes for controlling fuel cells or fuel cell systems applied during specific periods applied during shut-down
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/24Grouping of fuel cells, e.g. stacking of fuel cells
    • H01M8/241Grouping of fuel cells, e.g. stacking of fuel cells with solid or matrix-supported electrolytes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/24Grouping of fuel cells, e.g. stacking of fuel cells
    • H01M8/2457Grouping of fuel cells, e.g. stacking of fuel cells with both reactants being gaseous or vaporised
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/10Fuel cells with solid electrolytes
    • H01M2008/1095Fuel cells with polymeric electrolytes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M2300/00Electrolytes
    • H01M2300/0017Non-aqueous electrolytes
    • H01M2300/0065Solid electrolytes
    • H01M2300/0082Organic polymers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04082Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration
    • H01M8/04089Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants
    • H01M8/04119Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants with simultaneous supply or evacuation of electrolyte; Humidifying or dehumidifying
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/04Auxiliary arrangements, e.g. for control of pressure or for circulation of fluids
    • H01M8/04082Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration
    • H01M8/04089Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants
    • H01M8/04119Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants with simultaneous supply or evacuation of electrolyte; Humidifying or dehumidifying
    • H01M8/04156Arrangements for control of reactant parameters, e.g. pressure or concentration of gaseous reactants with simultaneous supply or evacuation of electrolyte; Humidifying or dehumidifying with product water removal
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30Hydrogen technology
    • Y02E60/50Fuel cells

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to techniques to improve the cold start capability of an electrochemical fuel cell. More particularly, the present invention relates to apparatus for improving the cold start capability of fuel cell electric power generation systems that include a solid polymer fuel cell stack.
  • Electrochemical fuel cells convert fuel and oxidant to electricity and reaction product.
  • Solid polymer electrochemical fuel cells generally employ a membrane electrode assembly (“MEA”), which comprises an ion exchange membrane or solid polymer electrolyte disposed between two electrodes typically comprising a layer of porous, electrically conductive sheet material, such as carbon fiber paper or carbon cloth.
  • MEA membrane electrode assembly
  • the MEA contains a layer of catalyst, typically in the form of finely comminuted platinum, at each membrane/electrode interface to induce the desired electrochemical reaction.
  • the electrodes are electrically coupled to provide a circuit for conducting electrons between the electrodes through an external circuit.
  • the fuel stream moves through the porous anode substrate and is oxidized at the anode electrocatalyst layer.
  • the oxidant stream moves through the porous cathode substrate and is reduced at the cathode electrocatalyst layer to form a reaction product.
  • the catalyzed reaction at the anode produces hydrogen cations (protons) from the fuel supply.
  • the ion exchange membrane facilitates the migration of protons from the anode to the cathode.
  • the membrane isolates the hydrogen-containing fuel stream from the oxygen-containing oxidant stream.
  • oxygen reacts with the protons that have crossed the membrane to form water as the reaction product.
  • the MEA is disposed between two electrically conductive fluid flow field plates or separator plates.
  • Fluid flow field plates have at least one flow passage formed in at least one of the major planar surfaces thereof.
  • the flow passages direct the fuel and oxidant to the respective electrodes, namely, the anode on the fuel side and the cathode on the oxidant side.
  • the fluid flow field plates act as current collectors, provide support for the electrodes, provide access channels for the fuel and oxidant to the respective anode and cathode surfaces, and provide channels for the removal of reaction products, such as water, formed during operation of the cell.
  • Separator plates typically do not have flow passages formed in the surfaces thereof, but are used in combination with an adjacent layer of material which provides access passages for the fuel and oxidant to the respective anode and cathode electrocatalyst, and provides passages for the removal of reaction products.
  • the preferred operating temperature range for solid polymer fuel cells is typically 50° C. to 120° C., most typically about 75° C. to 85° C.
  • Two or more fuel cells can be electrically connected together in series to increase the overall power output of the assembly.
  • one side of a given fluid flow field or separator plate can serve as an anode plate for one cell and the other side of the fluid flow field or separator plate can serve as the cathode plate for the adjacent cell.
  • Such a multiple fuel cell arrangement is referred to as a fuel cell stack, and is usually held together in its assembled state by tie rods and end plates.
  • the stack typically includes inlet ports and manifolds for directing the fluid fuel stream (such as substantially pure hydrogen, methanol reformate or natural gas reformate, or a methanol-containing stream in a direct methanol fuel cell) and the fluid oxidant stream (such as substantially pure oxygen, oxygen-containing air or oxygen in a carrier gas such as nitrogen) to the individual fuel cell reactant flow passages.
  • the stack also commonly includes an inlet port and manifold for directing a coolant fluid stream, typically water, to interior passages within the stack to absorb heat generated by the fuel cell during operation.
  • the stack also generally includes exhaust manifolds and outlet ports for expelling the depleted reactant streams and the reaction products such as water, as well as an exhaust manifold and outlet port for the coolant stream exiting the stack.
  • various fuel, oxidant and coolant conduits carry these fluid streams to and from the fuel cell stack.
  • Solid polymer fuel cells generally employ perfluorosulfonic ion exchange membranes, such as those sold by DuPont under its NAFION trade designation and by Dow under the trade designation XUS 13204.10.
  • perfluorosulfonic ion exchange membranes such as those sold by DuPont under its NAFION trade designation and by Dow under the trade designation XUS 13204.10.
  • the fuel and oxidant reactant streams are typically humidified before they are introduced to solid polymer fuel cells so as to facilitate proton transport through the ion exchange membrane and to avoid drying (and damaging) the membrane separating the anode and cathode of each cell.
  • Each reactant stream exiting the fuel cell stack generally contains water.
  • the outlet fuel stream from the anodes generally contains the water added to humidify the incoming fuel stream plus any product water drawn across the membrane from the cathode.
  • the outlet oxidant stream from the cathodes generally contains the water added to humidify the incoming oxidant stream plus product water formed at the cathode.
  • the freezing temperature of water means the freezing temperature of free water, that is, 0° C. at 1 atmosphere. It may also be necessary or desirable when ceasing operation of the solid polymer fuel cell stack to improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of the stack by reducing the amount of water remaining within the fuel, oxidant and coolant passages of the stack. Upon freezing, water remaining within stack passages will expand and potentially damage structures within the stack such as, for example, the membrane/electrocatalyst interface, the reactant passageways, conduits and seals, as well as the porous electrode substrate material.
  • a measure of electrochemical fuel cell performance is the voltage output from the cell for a given current density. Higher performance is associated with a higher voltage output for a given current density or higher current density for a given voltage output.
  • an electric power generation system includes a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit; when so connected, the stack may supply electric current to the external circuit.
  • the stack comprises at least one solid polymer fuel cell and fluid stream passages for directing fluid streams through at least one of the fuel cells.
  • the system also includes a purge system that has a purge conduit having an inlet end connectable to a purge fluid supply, and an outlet end connectable to at least one of the fluid stream passages.
  • the purge system also has a purge flow control device that controls the flow of a pressurized purge fluid through the purge conduit such that water can be purged from at least one of the fluid stream passages after a supply of electric current from the stack to the external circuit has been interrupted.
  • the purge system is operable to improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of its fuel cell stacks by reducing the amount of water remaining within the passages of the stack prior to stack freezing.
  • the fluid stream passages of the stack include passages for oxidant and fuel reactant streams. Any or all of the oxidant and fuel stream passages can connected to the purge conduit upstream of the stack, so that purge fluid can be directed to one or both of the oxidant and fuel passages and through the fuel cell(s). Additionally, a coolant passage may be connected to the purge conduit upstream of the stack to enable purge fluid to be transmitted therethrough.
  • the purge flow control device controls the purge operation during stack shut-down.
  • a suitable purge flow control device includes a control valve connected to the purge conduit, and a control unit that is communicative with at least the control valve and optionally with one or more additional devices and sensors.
  • the control unit is a microcontroller that is responsive to one or more input signals, and can control one or more devices. Upon receipt of an input signal to shut down the stack, the microcontroller opens a switch connecting the stack to the external circuit, thereby interrupting the supply of current from the stack to the circuit. Then, the control unit shuts off the reactant flow and opens the purge control valve for a selected period of time.
  • the purge system may further include a pressure regulator connected to the purge conduit and communicative with the control unit, to enable regulation of the pressure of purge fluid supplied to at least one of the reactant passages.
  • a suitable purge fluid is an inert gas, such as nitrogen. “Inert” in this sense means a fluid that is substantially non-reactive in the fuel cell.
  • an electric power generation system that has a humidifier bypass system.
  • Such an electric power generation system comprises a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit; when connected, the stack may supply electric current to the external circuit.
  • the stack comprises at least one solid polymer fuel cell, reactant stream passages for directing reactant streams through at least one of the fuel cells, a humidifier in fluid communication with at least one of the reactant stream passages for humidifying a reactant stream supplied to the fuel cell stack, and a humidifier bypass system.
  • the humidifier bypass system comprises at least one bypass conduit for transmitting at least one reactant from a reactant supply to the stack in fluid isolation from the humidifier, and a bypass control device for selectively directing flow of the reactant streams to the fuel cell stack through the humidifier or the humidifier bypass conduit.
  • Each bypass conduit typically includes an inlet end that is connected to one of the reactant stream passages upstream of the humidifier or directly to one of the reactant supplies, and an outlet end that is connected to one of the reactant stream inlet passages downstream of said humidifier and upstream of the stack.
  • the control device is operable to direct reactant fluid through the humidifier and to the stack during normal operation, that is, while electrical power is being generated by the stack, and through the bypass conduit and to the stack during a shut down procedure (for example, after supply of electric current from the stack to the external circuit has been interrupted).
  • the control device may include at least one bypass inlet valve connected to one of the reactant passages upstream of the humidifier, and at least one bypass outlet valve connected to the same reactant passage downstream of the humidifier.
  • the bypass conduit connects the bypass inlet and outlet valves so that reactant fluid can be transmitted in fluid isolation from the humidifier directly to the stack.
  • the bypass control device preferably further includes a control unit communicative with the bypass inlet and outlet valves and with an input signal source.
  • the control unit may be a micro-controller or other similar device.
  • FIG. 1 is an exploded side view of a typical solid polymer electrochemical fuel cell with a membrane electrode assembly interposed between two fluid flow field plates.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective cut-away view of an electrochemical fuel cell stack.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric power generation system incorporating a nitrogen gas purge system.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric power generation system incorporating a humidifier bypass purge system.
  • FIG. 5 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot A) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot B) for a 10-cell stack, operation of which was commenced after the stack had equilibrated at a core temperature of ⁇ 11° C.
  • FIG. 6 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot C) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot D) for a 4 cell stack, operation of which was commenced at a core temperature of ⁇ 19° C.
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a DowPontTM membrane exposed to three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 9 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to one shorter duration cold purge freeze/thaw cycle.
  • FIG. 10 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a DowPontTM membrane exposed to three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 11 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 12 is a plot of cell voltage, for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 112 membrane, after each of a series of 55 cold purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 13 is a plot of stack voltage against operating time for an 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack which was subjected to a series of freeze-thaw-operation cycles, interspersed with four heat treatment cycles.
  • FIG. 14 is a plot of stack voltage against current density for the fuel cell stack used to generate the data of FIG. 12, before and after heat treatment
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a typical fuel cell 10 .
  • Fuel cell 10 includes a membrane electrode assembly 12 interposed between anode flow field plate 14 and cathode flow field plate 16 .
  • Membrane electrode assembly 12 consists of an ion exchange membrane 20 interposed between two electrodes, namely, anode 21 and cathode 22 .
  • anode 21 and cathode 22 comprise a substrate of porous electrically conductive sheet material 23 and 24 , respectively, for example, carbon fiber paper or carbon cloth.
  • Each substrate has a thin layer of electrocatalyst 25 and 26 , respectively, disposed on one surface thereof at the interface with membrane 20 to render each electrode electrochemically active.
  • anode flow field plate 14 has at least one fuel flow channel 14 a formed in its surface facing anode 21 .
  • cathode separator plate 16 has at least one oxidant flow channel 16 a formed in its surface facing cathode 22 .
  • channels 14 a and 16 a form the reactant flow field passages for the fuel and oxidant, respectively.
  • the flow field plates are electrically conductive.
  • a fuel cell stack 100 includes a plurality of fuel cell assemblies, a series of which is designated as 111 in FIG. 2. Each of the fuel cell assemblies includes a membrane electrode assembly 112 interposed between a pair of fluid flow field plates 114 , 116 . Fuel cell stack 100 also includes a first end plate 130 and a second end plate 140 .
  • Plate 130 includes fluid inlet ports 132 , 134 , 136 for introducing fluid fuel, oxidant and coolant streams, respectively, to the stack.
  • Plate 140 includes fluid outlet ports 142 , 144 , 146 for exhausting fluid fuel, oxidant and coolant streams, respectively, from the stack.
  • the fluid outlet ports are fluidly connected to the corresponding fluid inlet ports via passages within the stack.
  • the fuel cell assemblies have a series of openings formed therein, which cooperate with corresponding openings in adjacent assemblies to form fluid manifolds 152 , 154 , 156 , 162 , 164 , 166 within the stack 100 .
  • the fluid manifolds are each circumscribed by a sealant material or gasket.
  • a peripheral seal at the exterior perimeter of each fuel cell fluidly isolates the interior, electrochemically active portion of the fuel cell from the external environment.
  • a fuel stream entering the stack via fuel inlet port 132 is directed to the individual fuel flow field plates via manifold 152 . After passing through the fuel flow field plate channels, the fuel stream is collected in manifold 162 and exhausted from the stack via fuel outlet port 142 . Similarly, an oxidant stream entering the stack via oxidant inlet port 134 is directed to individual oxidant flow field plates via manifold 154 . After passing through the oxidant flow field plate channels, the oxidant stream is collected in manifold 164 and exhausted from the stack via oxidant outlet port 144 .
  • a fluid coolant (typically water) introduced via coolant inlet port 136 is directed to coolant plate assemblies (not shown) in the stack 100 via manifold 156 .
  • Coolant manifolds 156 , 166 may be fitted with a compliant mechanism (not shown), such as tube cushions or inserts made of closed cell foam, to accommodate the expansion of freezing water.
  • Tie rods 170 extend between end plates 130 and 140 to compress and secure stack 100 in its assembled state with fastening nuts 172 disposed at opposite ends of each tie rod, and disc springs 174 interposed between the fastening nuts 172 and end plates 130 , 140 .
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric power generation system 200 comprising a fuel cell stack 210 and a nitrogen gas purge system 250 .
  • the fuel cell stack 210 includes negative and positive bus plates 212 , 214 , respectively, to which an external circuit comprising a variable load 216 is electrically connectable to the stack 210 by closing switch 218 .
  • the system includes a fuel (hydrogen) circuit, an oxidant (air) circuit, and a coolant water circuit.
  • the reactant and coolant streams are circulated in the system 200 in various conduits illustrated schematically in FIG. 3.
  • a hydrogen supply 220 is connected to the stack 210 ; hydrogen pressure is controllable by pressure regulator 221 . Water in the hydrogen stream exiting the stack 210 is accumulated in a knock drum 222 , which can be drained by opening valve 223 . Unreacted hydrogen is recirculated to stack 210 by a pump 224 in recirculation loop 225 . An air supply 230 is connected to the stack 210 , the pressure of which is controllable by pressure regulator 231 . Water in the air stream exiting the stack 210 is accumulated in reservoir 232 , which can be drained by opening valve 233 , and the air stream is vented from the system via valve 234 .
  • coolant water loop 240 water is pumped from reservoir 232 and circulated through stack 210 by pump 241 .
  • the temperature of the water is adjusted in a heat exchanger 242 .
  • Purge system 250 is used to purge the hydrogen and oxidant passages in fuel cell stack 210 with a low humidity, non-reactive gas such as nitrogen.
  • Flow of purge gas from a purge gas supply 260 to the hydrogen and air inlet passages 261 , 262 is transmitted through purge supply conduits 268 , 269 and three way valves 266 , 267 connected to respective hydrogen and air inlet passages 261 , 262 upstream of the stack 210 .
  • the flow of nitrogen through each purge conduit 268 , 269 is controlled by respective flow regulating valves 263 , 264 .
  • a micro-controller (not shown) or similar electronic control unit may be provided to automate at least some of the purge system operation.
  • the microcontroller is programmed to control valves 221 , 231 , 263 , 264 , 265 266 , 267 , and switch 218 .
  • the micro-controller opens switch 218 to interrupt the flow of electricity from the stack 210 to the circuit, then closes air and hydrogen supply valves 221 , 231 and opens valves 263 , 264 , 266 , 267 to enable purge fluid to be transmitted through conduits 268 , 269 to air and hydrogen conduits 261 , 262 and through the stack 210 .
  • An additional purge conduit and three way valve may be connected to the coolant loop upstream of the stack 210 to enable purging of the coolant loop during the shut down procedure.
  • the micro-controller is adapted accordingly to shut down pump 241 and heat exchanger 242 prior to directing purge fluid to the coolant loop.
  • the reactant streams themselves can be employed as the purge streams.
  • the purge fluid if it is a gas, is dry or at least not humidified.
  • reactant stream humidifiers if any are bypassed to provide streams having water carrying capacity greater than humidified reactant streams.
  • a humidifier bypass purge system 300 replaces the nitrogen gas purge system 250 and comprises a series of valves and conduits that cooperate to direct the supply oxidant and fuel streams in fluid isolation from a humidifier.
  • upstream three-way bypass valves 302 , 304 are provided on respective fuel and oxidant inlet passages 261 , 262 between the oxidant and fuel supply sources 220 , 230 , and a humidifier 306 .
  • the humidifier 306 is preferably a contact-type gas humidifier; however other types of humidifiers known to a person skilled in the art can be used, for example, a membrane humidifier.
  • a fuel bypass conduit 308 is connected to upstream fuel bypass valve 302 and to a downstream three-way valve 267 connected to fuel inlet passage 261 downstream of humidifier 306 and upstream of stack 210 .
  • an oxidant bypass conduit 310 is connected to upstream oxidant bypass valve 304 and to a downstream three-way valve 266 connected to the oxidant inlet passage 262 downstream of the humidifier 306 and upstream of stack 210 .
  • the respective oxidant and fuel upstream and downstream bypass valves 302 , 304 , 267 , 266 are operated to direct reactant flow through humidifier 306 and to stack 210 during normal stack operation, and through bypass conduits 308 , 310 to stack 210 during a purging operation.
  • the bypass conduits 308 , 310 are in fluid isolation from the humidifier 306 , reactant supplied to the stack 210 via the bypass conduits 308 , 310 avoid humidification.
  • a control device (not shown ) similar to that used to control the purge system 250 may be programmed to control the humidification bypass operation.
  • FIG. 5 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot A) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot B) for a 10-cell stack to which the flow of fuel and oxidant was restored after the stack had equilibrated at a core temperature of ⁇ 11° C.
  • the stack had been operating previously, and therefore the reactant flow passages contained moist gases.
  • the reactant and coolant water passages within the stack were purged by circulating dry, compressed air through them.
  • the stack core temperature was then lowered below the freezing temperature of water by exposing the stack to a surrounding environment with a temperature below the freezing temperature of water.
  • the stack was typically placed in an insulated chamber, with the fluid and electrical connections to the stack fitted through the chamber walls. Cold nitrogen gas from a liquid nitrogen source was circulated through the chamber.
  • the stack core temperature was measured using a thermocouple positioned in a thermally conductive plate located between two fuel cells in the center of the stack. Stack voltage, stack current and ambient temperature were also monitored.
  • FIG. 6 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot C) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot D) for a 4-cell stack, operation of which was commenced at a core temperature of ⁇ 19° C.
  • the reactant passages within the stack were purged by circulating dry nitrogen. Coolant water remained in the coolant passages.
  • the purge fluid is an inert gas such as nitrogen. Circulation of hydrogen and air was commenced with a load (50 amp) connected. Approximately 2 minutes transpired before the output current reached 50 amps. The load was increased to 260 amps once the stack reached about 30° C., and the coolant pump was then activated. One cell in the stack was not operating properly; hence the lower than normal average cell voltages.
  • the fluid coolant stream is not circulated until the stack has reached a temperature at or near the desired stack operating temperature.
  • the circulating fluid coolant stream assuming it is not preheated, will absorb and carry away heat otherwise available to warm the stack. Refraining from circulating the fluid coolant stream therefore expedites the warming of the stack to its desired operating temperature.
  • freeze tolerance refers to the ability of a fuel cell or fuel cell stack to maintain substantially the same performance after one or more freeze/thaw cycles.
  • the reactant passages including the manifolds and individual fuel cell reactant flow passages within a fuel cell stack, are preferably purged with a fluid stream before the temperature of the stack is decreased to below the freezing temperature of water.
  • a fluid which is not reactive in the fuel cell environment such as nitrogen gas
  • a liquid may be used as the purge fluid.
  • it would be a liquid that does not freeze at the temperature to which the fuel cell is to be exposed, and which has no detrimental effect on the fuel cell components.
  • cold purging it has been found that improved cold start capability and freeze tolerance of fuel cells to multiple freeze/thaw cycles can also be achieved when one or more of the fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages are purged after the stack core temperature has been reduced to at or below normal room temperature (hereinafter referred to as “cold purging”).
  • hot purging The beneficial effect of purging is not quite so pronounced when the stack passages are purged at a temperature within the normal stack operating temperature range (hereinafter referred to as “hot purging”).
  • both MEAs had 3.87 mg/cm 2 platinum black electrocatalyst applied by hand to carbon fiber paper.
  • the Nafion® 1135 membrane employed in MEA No. 513-15 had an equivalent weight of 1100 and a thickness of about 85 ⁇ m (dry).
  • the DowPontTM membrane employed in MEA No. 513-22 had an equivalent weight of 800 and a thickness of about 100 ⁇ m (wet).
  • the Mark 513 cell was assembled and run overnight at 600 ASF (6458 ASM) at an air/fuel pressure of 30/30 psig (207/207 kPa gauge) and a stoichiometry of 2/1.5 respectively.
  • the fuel was substantially pure hydrogen.
  • “Stoichiometry” is the ratio of the amount of reactant supplied to the fuel cell stack to the amount of reactant actually consumed in the fuel cell stack. In this instance, a fuel stoichiometry of 1.5 means that 150 parts of hydrogen are supplied to the fuel cell for each 100 parts actually consumed in the fuel cell.
  • the cell was cooled from its normal operating temperature (approximately 85° C.) to room temperature (approximately 23° C.) before purging. In each case, the fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages were purged for approximately 7 minutes with nitrogen.
  • the cell containing the Nafion® 1135 membrane was taken through a fourth freeze/thaw cycle with a purge duration of only approximately 1 minute (results shown in FIG. 8).
  • the cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The freezer temperature was approximately ⁇ 20° C.
  • the duration of the freeze ranged from 15-20 hours. After removal from the freezer, the coolant lines were connected and the cell was heated to 50° C. At that point, operation of the fuel cell was commenced at 50 ASF (538.2 ASM) with excess fuel and oxidant flow rates. When the cell temperature reached 60° C., the current density was increased to 600 ASF (6458 ASM) and the cell was operated for at least one hour or until cell voltage had stabilized. A polarization test from 0 to 1000 ASF (0 to 10764 ASM) was performed for each of the two MEAs tested, using two different oxidant streams: air and substantially pure oxygen.
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-22 (DowPontTM membrane).
  • Plots 1 - 4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • Plots 5 - 8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • the four plots in FIG. 7 are difficult to distinguish from one another.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane).
  • Plots 1 - 4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • Plots 5 - 8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Again, for each of the oxidant streams, the four plots in FIG. 8 are difficult to distinguish from one another.
  • FIG. 9 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane).
  • Plots 1 - 2 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after the fourth cold purge freeze/thaw cycle described above, in which a shorter purge duration (approximately 1 minute) was used.
  • Plots 3 - 4 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ) and after the fourth cold purge freeze/thaw cycle described above. Again, for each of the oxidant streams, the two plots in FIG. 8 are difficult to distinguish from one another, indicating that a shorter duration purge can give satisfactory results.
  • each cell was purged at stack operating temperature (approximately 85° C.) before cooling.
  • the fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages were purged for approximately 1 minute with nitrogen.
  • the cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing.
  • the freezer temperature was approximately ⁇ 20° C.
  • the duration of the freeze ranged from 15-20 hours.
  • the coolant lines were connected and the cell was heated to operating temperature and operation commenced using essentially the same procedure employed for the cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • a polarization test from 0 to 1000 ASF (0 to 10764 ASM) was performed for each of the two MEAs tested, again using two different oxidant streams: air and substantially pure oxygen.
  • FIG. 10 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-22 (DowPontTM membrane).
  • Plots 1 - 4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • Plots 5 - 8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • a significant mass transport effect appears to occur at higher current densities on air after the third freeze cycle, based on the increased difference between the air and oxygen performance levels.
  • FIG. 11 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane.
  • Plots 1 - 4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above.
  • Plots 5 - 8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ⁇ ), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Again, a significant mass transport effect appears to occur at higher current densities on air, based on the progressively increasing difference between the air and oxygen performance levels after each freeze/thaw cycle.
  • the MEA had a screen printed anode containing 0.34-0.38 mg/cm 2 platinum black electrocatalyst and a screen printed cathode containing 0.73-0.82 mg/cm 2 platinum black electrocatalyst on carbon fiber paper, both with a Nafion spray coating (0.2 mg/cm 2 ).
  • the cell was tested in a temperature-controlled environmental chamber at an air/fuel pressure of 27/27 psig (186/186 kPa gauge) and a stoichiometry of 1.8/1.2 respectively.
  • the fuel was a simulated methanol reformate stream (composition 63.5% hydrogen; 22.5% carbon dioxide; 13% nitrogen; 1% methanol and 40 parts per million (ppm) carbon monoxide), and a 4% air bleed was employed at the anode.
  • the fuel and oxidant streams were humidified.
  • the cell was cooled from its normal operating temperature (approximately 80° C.) to a chamber temperature at which no part of the stack was below 0° C., but where the cell temperature was approximately 30° C. before purging.
  • the oxidant passages were purged for approximately 10 seconds with dry (unhumidified) air.
  • the cell inlets and outlets were closed by actuated valves, and the temperature in the chamber was reduced to approximately ⁇ 25° C.
  • the duration of each freeze was approximately 1 hour. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The cell was then thawed to 5° C.
  • FIG. 12 shows the results obtained after each of 55 such cycles with the cell voltage measured once it had stabilized at 1.0 A/cm 2 during the 30 minutes of operation at that current density (Plot A) and once it had stabilized at 0.5 A/cm 2 during the second period of operation at that current density (Plot B).
  • the performance degradation over the 55 cycles was negligible: approximately ⁇ 0.1 mV/cycle at 0.5 A/cm 2 and approximately ⁇ 0.2 mV/cycle at 1.0 A/cm 2 .
  • FIG. 13 shows a plot of stack voltage against operating time for an 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack which was subjected to a series of freeze-thaw-operation cycles.
  • oxidant and coolant passages Prior to freezing the fuel, oxidant and coolant passages were purged with dry gas.
  • the cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing.
  • the freezer temperature was approximately ⁇ 20° C. The duration of the freeze in each case was greater than 12 hours. After some cycles the stack was operated normally, and after other cycles the stack operating temperature was increased to above its normal operating temperature for a period, before normal operation was resumed.
  • the stack was operated on humidified air and hydrogen, both at 30 psig (207 kPa gauge), at stoichiometries of 2.0 and 1.5 respectively, at a current density of 700 ASF (7535 ASM) to generate the data shown in FIG. 12.
  • the coolant inlet temperature was 75° C. with a ⁇ T (change in temperature from inlet to outlet) of 10° C. at 1000 ASF (10764 ASM).
  • FIG. 14 shows a plot of stack voltage as a function of current density for the 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack used to generate the data of FIG. 13.
  • Plots A, B and C show performance curves for operation on air, and plots D, E and F for operation on oxygen.
  • Plots A and D show the stack performance before any of the heat treatments referred to the description of FIG. 13 but after the final freeze cycle
  • plots B and E show the stack performance immediately after the fourth heat treatment
  • plots C and F show the stack performance about 2 days after the fourth heat treatment.
  • the results on air show a substantial and sustained improvement in post-freezing performance after the heat treatment.
  • the improvement is believed to be attributable to improved mass transport in the MEA, based on the fact that on oxygen the performance was not significantly affected by the heat treatment. This indicates that performance loss after freezing may be, at least in part, due to mass transport difficulties in the cells, which have a more significant effect on air than on a substantially pure oxidant stream. These detrimental effects could be due to retained water in the membrane electrode assembly. It is possible that the heat treatment method assists in removing residual water from the membrane electrode assembly, and thereby improves performance at start-up, particularly on air.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Fuel Cell (AREA)

Abstract

An electric power generation system has components that improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of a constituent fuel cell stack. The components cooperate to reduce the amount of water remaining within the passages of the stack. The system includes a purge system that is connectable to the oxidant supply, the fuel supply and/or the coolant passages upstream of the stack. When the stack is shut down, the stack is disconnected from an external circuit, and purge fluid is directed by the purge system through the stack before the stack falls below the freezing point of water. In systems where the fuel and/or oxidant streams are humidified prior to their introduction into the stack, a humidifier bypass system may be provided in place of the purge system. The humidifier bypass system directs reactant fluid to the stack in fluid isolation from the humidifier, so that the inlet reactant streams are unhumidified.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/406,318, entitled “Methods for Improving the Cold Starting Capability of an Electrochemical Fuel Cell”. The '318 application is, in turn, a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/138,625 filed Aug. 24, 1998, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Commencing Operation of a Fuel Cell Electric Power Generation System Below the Freezing Temperature of Water”. The '625 application is, in turn, a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/659,921 filed Jun. 7, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,186 issued Aug. 25, 1998, also entitled “Method and Apparatus for Commencing Operation of a Fuel Cell Electric Power Generation System Below the Freezing Temperature of Water”. The '318, '625 and '921 applications are each hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.[0001]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to techniques to improve the cold start capability of an electrochemical fuel cell. More particularly, the present invention relates to apparatus for improving the cold start capability of fuel cell electric power generation systems that include a solid polymer fuel cell stack. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Electrochemical fuel cells convert fuel and oxidant to electricity and reaction product. Solid polymer electrochemical fuel cells generally employ a membrane electrode assembly (“MEA”), which comprises an ion exchange membrane or solid polymer electrolyte disposed between two electrodes typically comprising a layer of porous, electrically conductive sheet material, such as carbon fiber paper or carbon cloth. The MEA contains a layer of catalyst, typically in the form of finely comminuted platinum, at each membrane/electrode interface to induce the desired electrochemical reaction. In operation the electrodes are electrically coupled to provide a circuit for conducting electrons between the electrodes through an external circuit. [0003]
  • At the anode, the fuel stream moves through the porous anode substrate and is oxidized at the anode electrocatalyst layer. At the cathode, the oxidant stream moves through the porous cathode substrate and is reduced at the cathode electrocatalyst layer to form a reaction product. [0004]
  • In fuel cells employing hydrogen as the fuel and oxygen-containing air (or substantially pure oxygen) as the oxidant, the catalyzed reaction at the anode produces hydrogen cations (protons) from the fuel supply. The ion exchange membrane facilitates the migration of protons from the anode to the cathode. In addition to conducting protons, the membrane isolates the hydrogen-containing fuel stream from the oxygen-containing oxidant stream. At the cathode electrocatalyst layer, oxygen reacts with the protons that have crossed the membrane to form water as the reaction product. The anode and cathode reactions in hydrogen/oxygen fuel cells are shown in the following equations: [0005]
  • Anode reaction: H2→2H++2e
  • Cathode reaction: ½O2+2H++2e→H2O
  • In typical fuel cells, the MEA is disposed between two electrically conductive fluid flow field plates or separator plates. Fluid flow field plates have at least one flow passage formed in at least one of the major planar surfaces thereof. The flow passages direct the fuel and oxidant to the respective electrodes, namely, the anode on the fuel side and the cathode on the oxidant side. The fluid flow field plates act as current collectors, provide support for the electrodes, provide access channels for the fuel and oxidant to the respective anode and cathode surfaces, and provide channels for the removal of reaction products, such as water, formed during operation of the cell. Separator plates typically do not have flow passages formed in the surfaces thereof, but are used in combination with an adjacent layer of material which provides access passages for the fuel and oxidant to the respective anode and cathode electrocatalyst, and provides passages for the removal of reaction products. The preferred operating temperature range for solid polymer fuel cells is typically 50° C. to 120° C., most typically about 75° C. to 85° C. [0006]
  • Two or more fuel cells can be electrically connected together in series to increase the overall power output of the assembly. In series arrangements, one side of a given fluid flow field or separator plate can serve as an anode plate for one cell and the other side of the fluid flow field or separator plate can serve as the cathode plate for the adjacent cell. Such a multiple fuel cell arrangement is referred to as a fuel cell stack, and is usually held together in its assembled state by tie rods and end plates. The stack typically includes inlet ports and manifolds for directing the fluid fuel stream (such as substantially pure hydrogen, methanol reformate or natural gas reformate, or a methanol-containing stream in a direct methanol fuel cell) and the fluid oxidant stream (such as substantially pure oxygen, oxygen-containing air or oxygen in a carrier gas such as nitrogen) to the individual fuel cell reactant flow passages. The stack also commonly includes an inlet port and manifold for directing a coolant fluid stream, typically water, to interior passages within the stack to absorb heat generated by the fuel cell during operation. The stack also generally includes exhaust manifolds and outlet ports for expelling the depleted reactant streams and the reaction products such as water, as well as an exhaust manifold and outlet port for the coolant stream exiting the stack. In a power generation system various fuel, oxidant and coolant conduits carry these fluid streams to and from the fuel cell stack. [0007]
  • When an electrical load (comprising one or more load elements) is placed in an electrical circuit connecting the electrodes, the fuel and oxidant are consumed in direct proportion to the electrical current drawn by the load, which will vary with the ohmic resistance of the load. [0008]
  • Solid polymer fuel cells generally employ perfluorosulfonic ion exchange membranes, such as those sold by DuPont under its NAFION trade designation and by Dow under the trade designation XUS 13204.10. When employing such membranes, the fuel and oxidant reactant streams are typically humidified before they are introduced to solid polymer fuel cells so as to facilitate proton transport through the ion exchange membrane and to avoid drying (and damaging) the membrane separating the anode and cathode of each cell. [0009]
  • Each reactant stream exiting the fuel cell stack generally contains water. The outlet fuel stream from the anodes generally contains the water added to humidify the incoming fuel stream plus any product water drawn across the membrane from the cathode. The outlet oxidant stream from the cathodes generally contains the water added to humidify the incoming oxidant stream plus product water formed at the cathode. [0010]
  • In some fuel cell applications, such as, for example, motive applications, it may be necessary or desirable to commence operation of a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell stack when the stack core temperature is below the freezing temperature of water. As used herein, the freezing temperature of water means the freezing temperature of free water, that is, 0° C. at 1 atmosphere. It may also be necessary or desirable when ceasing operation of the solid polymer fuel cell stack to improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of the stack by reducing the amount of water remaining within the fuel, oxidant and coolant passages of the stack. Upon freezing, water remaining within stack passages will expand and potentially damage structures within the stack such as, for example, the membrane/electrocatalyst interface, the reactant passageways, conduits and seals, as well as the porous electrode substrate material. [0011]
  • If there is an expectation that a solid polymer fuel cell stack will be subjected to cold temperatures, especially temperatures below the freezing temperature of water, one or more special start-up and shutdown techniques and associated apparatus may be used. These techniques may improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of the stack, and improve the subsequent fuel cell performance. A measure of electrochemical fuel cell performance is the voltage output from the cell for a given current density. Higher performance is associated with a higher voltage output for a given current density or higher current density for a given voltage output. [0012]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • According to one aspect of the invention, an electric power generation system is provided that includes a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit; when so connected, the stack may supply electric current to the external circuit. The stack comprises at least one solid polymer fuel cell and fluid stream passages for directing fluid streams through at least one of the fuel cells. The system also includes a purge system that has a purge conduit having an inlet end connectable to a purge fluid supply, and an outlet end connectable to at least one of the fluid stream passages. The purge system also has a purge flow control device that controls the flow of a pressurized purge fluid through the purge conduit such that water can be purged from at least one of the fluid stream passages after a supply of electric current from the stack to the external circuit has been interrupted. The purge system is operable to improve the cold start capability and freeze tolerance of its fuel cell stacks by reducing the amount of water remaining within the passages of the stack prior to stack freezing. [0013]
  • The fluid stream passages of the stack include passages for oxidant and fuel reactant streams. Any or all of the oxidant and fuel stream passages can connected to the purge conduit upstream of the stack, so that purge fluid can be directed to one or both of the oxidant and fuel passages and through the fuel cell(s). Additionally, a coolant passage may be connected to the purge conduit upstream of the stack to enable purge fluid to be transmitted therethrough. [0014]
  • The purge flow control device controls the purge operation during stack shut-down. A suitable purge flow control device includes a control valve connected to the purge conduit, and a control unit that is communicative with at least the control valve and optionally with one or more additional devices and sensors. In one aspect, the control unit is a microcontroller that is responsive to one or more input signals, and can control one or more devices. Upon receipt of an input signal to shut down the stack, the microcontroller opens a switch connecting the stack to the external circuit, thereby interrupting the supply of current from the stack to the circuit. Then, the control unit shuts off the reactant flow and opens the purge control valve for a selected period of time. [0015]
  • The purge system may further include a pressure regulator connected to the purge conduit and communicative with the control unit, to enable regulation of the pressure of purge fluid supplied to at least one of the reactant passages. [0016]
  • A suitable purge fluid is an inert gas, such as nitrogen. “Inert” in this sense means a fluid that is substantially non-reactive in the fuel cell. [0017]
  • According to another aspect of the invention, an electric power generation system is provided that has a humidifier bypass system. Such an electric power generation system comprises a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit; when connected, the stack may supply electric current to the external circuit. The stack comprises at least one solid polymer fuel cell, reactant stream passages for directing reactant streams through at least one of the fuel cells, a humidifier in fluid communication with at least one of the reactant stream passages for humidifying a reactant stream supplied to the fuel cell stack, and a humidifier bypass system. The humidifier bypass system comprises at least one bypass conduit for transmitting at least one reactant from a reactant supply to the stack in fluid isolation from the humidifier, and a bypass control device for selectively directing flow of the reactant streams to the fuel cell stack through the humidifier or the humidifier bypass conduit. [0018]
  • Each bypass conduit typically includes an inlet end that is connected to one of the reactant stream passages upstream of the humidifier or directly to one of the reactant supplies, and an outlet end that is connected to one of the reactant stream inlet passages downstream of said humidifier and upstream of the stack. [0019]
  • The control device is operable to direct reactant fluid through the humidifier and to the stack during normal operation, that is, while electrical power is being generated by the stack, and through the bypass conduit and to the stack during a shut down procedure (for example, after supply of electric current from the stack to the external circuit has been interrupted). The control device may include at least one bypass inlet valve connected to one of the reactant passages upstream of the humidifier, and at least one bypass outlet valve connected to the same reactant passage downstream of the humidifier. The bypass conduit connects the bypass inlet and outlet valves so that reactant fluid can be transmitted in fluid isolation from the humidifier directly to the stack. The bypass control device preferably further includes a control unit communicative with the bypass inlet and outlet valves and with an input signal source. The control unit may be a micro-controller or other similar device. [0020]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is an exploded side view of a typical solid polymer electrochemical fuel cell with a membrane electrode assembly interposed between two fluid flow field plates. [0021]
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective cut-away view of an electrochemical fuel cell stack. [0022]
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric power generation system incorporating a nitrogen gas purge system. [0023]
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric power generation system incorporating a humidifier bypass purge system. [0024]
  • FIG. 5 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot A) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot B) for a 10-cell stack, operation of which was commenced after the stack had equilibrated at a core temperature of −11° C. [0025]
  • FIG. 6 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot C) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot D) for a 4 cell stack, operation of which was commenced at a core temperature of −19° C. [0026]
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a DowPont™ membrane exposed to three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles. [0027]
  • FIG. 8 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles. [0028]
  • FIG. 9 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to one shorter duration cold purge freeze/thaw cycle. [0029]
  • FIG. 10 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for a fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a DowPont™ membrane exposed to three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles. [0030]
  • FIG. 11 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a Nafion® 1135 membrane exposed to three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles. [0031]
  • FIG. 12 is a plot of cell voltage, for the fuel cell containing a membrane electrode assembly with a [0032] Nafion® 112 membrane, after each of a series of 55 cold purge freeze/thaw cycles.
  • FIG. 13 is a plot of stack voltage against operating time for an 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack which was subjected to a series of freeze-thaw-operation cycles, interspersed with four heat treatment cycles. [0033]
  • FIG. 14 is a plot of stack voltage against current density for the fuel cell stack used to generate the data of FIG. 12, before and after heat treatment[0034]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a [0035] typical fuel cell 10. Fuel cell 10 includes a membrane electrode assembly 12 interposed between anode flow field plate 14 and cathode flow field plate 16. Membrane electrode assembly 12 consists of an ion exchange membrane 20 interposed between two electrodes, namely, anode 21 and cathode 22. In conventional fuel cells, anode 21 and cathode 22 comprise a substrate of porous electrically conductive sheet material 23 and 24, respectively, for example, carbon fiber paper or carbon cloth. Each substrate has a thin layer of electrocatalyst 25 and 26, respectively, disposed on one surface thereof at the interface with membrane 20 to render each electrode electrochemically active.
  • As further shown in FIG. 1, anode [0036] flow field plate 14 has at least one fuel flow channel 14 a formed in its surface facing anode 21. Similarly, cathode separator plate 16 has at least one oxidant flow channel 16 a formed in its surface facing cathode 22. When assembled against the cooperating surfaces of electrodes 21 and 22, channels 14 a and 16 a form the reactant flow field passages for the fuel and oxidant, respectively. The flow field plates are electrically conductive.
  • Turning now to FIG. 2, a [0037] fuel cell stack 100 includes a plurality of fuel cell assemblies, a series of which is designated as 111 in FIG. 2. Each of the fuel cell assemblies includes a membrane electrode assembly 112 interposed between a pair of fluid flow field plates 114, 116. Fuel cell stack 100 also includes a first end plate 130 and a second end plate 140.
  • [0038] Plate 130 includes fluid inlet ports 132, 134, 136 for introducing fluid fuel, oxidant and coolant streams, respectively, to the stack. Plate 140 includes fluid outlet ports 142, 144, 146 for exhausting fluid fuel, oxidant and coolant streams, respectively, from the stack. The fluid outlet ports are fluidly connected to the corresponding fluid inlet ports via passages within the stack.
  • The fuel cell assemblies have a series of openings formed therein, which cooperate with corresponding openings in adjacent assemblies to form [0039] fluid manifolds 152, 154, 156, 162, 164, 166 within the stack 100. The fluid manifolds are each circumscribed by a sealant material or gasket. In addition, a peripheral seal at the exterior perimeter of each fuel cell fluidly isolates the interior, electrochemically active portion of the fuel cell from the external environment.
  • A fuel stream entering the stack via [0040] fuel inlet port 132 is directed to the individual fuel flow field plates via manifold 152. After passing through the fuel flow field plate channels, the fuel stream is collected in manifold 162 and exhausted from the stack via fuel outlet port 142. Similarly, an oxidant stream entering the stack via oxidant inlet port 134 is directed to individual oxidant flow field plates via manifold 154. After passing through the oxidant flow field plate channels, the oxidant stream is collected in manifold 164 and exhausted from the stack via oxidant outlet port 144. A fluid coolant (typically water) introduced via coolant inlet port 136 is directed to coolant plate assemblies (not shown) in the stack 100 via manifold 156. The coolant stream is collected in manifold 166 and exhausted from the stack via coolant outlet port 146. Coolant manifolds 156, 166 may be fitted with a compliant mechanism (not shown), such as tube cushions or inserts made of closed cell foam, to accommodate the expansion of freezing water. Tie rods 170 extend between end plates 130 and 140 to compress and secure stack 100 in its assembled state with fastening nuts 172 disposed at opposite ends of each tie rod, and disc springs 174 interposed between the fastening nuts 172 and end plates 130, 140.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fuel cell electric [0041] power generation system 200 comprising a fuel cell stack 210 and a nitrogen gas purge system 250. The fuel cell stack 210 includes negative and positive bus plates 212, 214, respectively, to which an external circuit comprising a variable load 216 is electrically connectable to the stack 210 by closing switch 218. The system includes a fuel (hydrogen) circuit, an oxidant (air) circuit, and a coolant water circuit. The reactant and coolant streams are circulated in the system 200 in various conduits illustrated schematically in FIG. 3.
  • A [0042] hydrogen supply 220 is connected to the stack 210; hydrogen pressure is controllable by pressure regulator 221. Water in the hydrogen stream exiting the stack 210 is accumulated in a knock drum 222, which can be drained by opening valve 223. Unreacted hydrogen is recirculated to stack 210 by a pump 224 in recirculation loop 225. An air supply 230 is connected to the stack 210, the pressure of which is controllable by pressure regulator 231. Water in the air stream exiting the stack 210 is accumulated in reservoir 232, which can be drained by opening valve 233, and the air stream is vented from the system via valve 234.
  • In the [0043] coolant water loop 240, water is pumped from reservoir 232 and circulated through stack 210 by pump 241. The temperature of the water is adjusted in a heat exchanger 242.
  • [0044] Purge system 250 is used to purge the hydrogen and oxidant passages in fuel cell stack 210 with a low humidity, non-reactive gas such as nitrogen. Flow of purge gas from a purge gas supply 260 to the hydrogen and air inlet passages 261, 262 is transmitted through purge supply conduits 268, 269 and three way valves 266, 267 connected to respective hydrogen and air inlet passages 261, 262 upstream of the stack 210. The flow of nitrogen through each purge conduit 268, 269 is controlled by respective flow regulating valves 263, 264.
  • A micro-controller (not shown) or similar electronic control unit may be provided to automate at least some of the purge system operation. In a simple set-up, the microcontroller is programmed to control [0045] valves 221, 231, 263, 264, 265 266, 267, and switch 218. Upon receipt of instructions to shut down the system, the micro-controller opens switch 218 to interrupt the flow of electricity from the stack 210 to the circuit, then closes air and hydrogen supply valves 221, 231 and opens valves 263, 264, 266, 267 to enable purge fluid to be transmitted through conduits 268, 269 to air and hydrogen conduits 261, 262 and through the stack 210.
  • An additional purge conduit and three way valve (both not shown) may be connected to the coolant loop upstream of the [0046] stack 210 to enable purging of the coolant loop during the shut down procedure. The micro-controller is adapted accordingly to shut down pump 241 and heat exchanger 242 prior to directing purge fluid to the coolant loop.
  • Alternatively, the reactant streams themselves can be employed as the purge streams. Preferably the purge fluid, if it is a gas, is dry or at least not humidified. Thus, when employing the reactant streams as the purge streams, reactant stream humidifiers (if any) are bypassed to provide streams having water carrying capacity greater than humidified reactant streams. Referring to FIG. 4, a humidifier [0047] bypass purge system 300 replaces the nitrogen gas purge system 250 and comprises a series of valves and conduits that cooperate to direct the supply oxidant and fuel streams in fluid isolation from a humidifier. Particularly, upstream three- way bypass valves 302, 304 are provided on respective fuel and oxidant inlet passages 261, 262 between the oxidant and fuel supply sources 220, 230, and a humidifier 306. The humidifier 306 is preferably a contact-type gas humidifier; however other types of humidifiers known to a person skilled in the art can be used, for example, a membrane humidifier. A fuel bypass conduit 308 is connected to upstream fuel bypass valve 302 and to a downstream three-way valve 267 connected to fuel inlet passage 261 downstream of humidifier 306 and upstream of stack 210. Similarly, an oxidant bypass conduit 310 is connected to upstream oxidant bypass valve 304 and to a downstream three-way valve 266 connected to the oxidant inlet passage 262 downstream of the humidifier 306 and upstream of stack 210. The respective oxidant and fuel upstream and downstream bypass valves 302, 304, 267, 266 are operated to direct reactant flow through humidifier 306 and to stack 210 during normal stack operation, and through bypass conduits 308, 310 to stack 210 during a purging operation. As the bypass conduits 308, 310 are in fluid isolation from the humidifier 306, reactant supplied to the stack 210 via the bypass conduits 308, 310 avoid humidification. A control device (not shown ) similar to that used to control the purge system 250 may be programmed to control the humidification bypass operation.
  • FIG. 5 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot A) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot B) for a 10-cell stack to which the flow of fuel and oxidant was restored after the stack had equilibrated at a core temperature of −11° C. [0048]
  • The stack had been operating previously, and therefore the reactant flow passages contained moist gases. Before decreasing the stack core temperature below the freezing temperature of water, the reactant and coolant water passages within the stack were purged by circulating dry, compressed air through them. The stack core temperature was then lowered below the freezing temperature of water by exposing the stack to a surrounding environment with a temperature below the freezing temperature of water. For the purposes of the examples described herein, the stack was typically placed in an insulated chamber, with the fluid and electrical connections to the stack fitted through the chamber walls. Cold nitrogen gas from a liquid nitrogen source was circulated through the chamber. The stack core temperature was measured using a thermocouple positioned in a thermally conductive plate located between two fuel cells in the center of the stack. Stack voltage, stack current and ambient temperature were also monitored. [0049]
  • When circulation of hydrogen and air through the stack was commenced at a stack core temperature of −11° C. (at time=0 minutes), the open circuit voltage was normal. A load (360 amp) was connected in the circuit after approximately three minutes, causing the stack core temperature to rise rapidly while the voltage decreased but recovered gradually. Once operation of the stack had commenced, the exothermic reaction of hydrogen and oxygen within the stack and the resistive heating due to internal ohmic losses caused the stack core temperature to rise. [0050]
  • FIG. 6 is a composite plot of fuel cell stack voltage versus time in minutes (plot C) and fuel cell stack core temperature versus time in minutes (plot D) for a 4-cell stack, operation of which was commenced at a core temperature of −19° C. [0051]
  • Again, as the stack had been operating previously, before decreasing the stack core temperature to −19° C., the reactant passages within the stack were purged by circulating dry nitrogen. Coolant water remained in the coolant passages. Preferably the purge fluid is an inert gas such as nitrogen. Circulation of hydrogen and air was commenced with a load (50 amp) connected. Approximately 2 minutes transpired before the output current reached 50 amps. The load was increased to 260 amps once the stack reached about 30° C., and the coolant pump was then activated. One cell in the stack was not operating properly; hence the lower than normal average cell voltages. [0052]
  • During commencement of stack operation, it has been found advantageous to refrain from circulating the fluid coolant stream within the stack until the stack has reached a temperature above the freezing temperature of water. More preferably, the fluid coolant stream is not circulated until the stack has reached a temperature at or near the desired stack operating temperature. In this regard, the circulating fluid coolant stream, assuming it is not preheated, will absorb and carry away heat otherwise available to warm the stack. Refraining from circulating the fluid coolant stream therefore expedites the warming of the stack to its desired operating temperature. [0053]
  • The cold start capability and freeze tolerance of fuel cells can be improved by reducing the amount of water remaining within the passages of the stack upon cessation of operation and reduction of stack core temperature to near or below the freezing temperature of water. As used herein, “freeze tolerance” refers to the ability of a fuel cell or fuel cell stack to maintain substantially the same performance after one or more freeze/thaw cycles. [0054]
  • The reactant passages, including the manifolds and individual fuel cell reactant flow passages within a fuel cell stack, are preferably purged with a fluid stream before the temperature of the stack is decreased to below the freezing temperature of water. Preferably a fluid which is not reactive in the fuel cell environment, such as nitrogen gas, is used. A liquid may be used as the purge fluid. Preferably it would be a liquid that does not freeze at the temperature to which the fuel cell is to be exposed, and which has no detrimental effect on the fuel cell components. [0055]
  • The greater water carrying capacity of unhumidified reactant purge streams will result in more effective absorption and removal of water from the reactant stream conduits and porous components of the stack. Although all the reactant and coolant passages may be desirably purged in some situations, it has also been found effective in many cases to purge the oxidant stream passages only. This can simplify the system and the shutdown sequence. [0056]
  • It has been found that improved cold start capability and freeze tolerance of fuel cells to multiple freeze/thaw cycles can also be achieved when one or more of the fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages are purged after the stack core temperature has been reduced to at or below normal room temperature (hereinafter referred to as “cold purging”). The beneficial effect of purging is not quite so pronounced when the stack passages are purged at a temperature within the normal stack operating temperature range (hereinafter referred to as “hot purging”). [0057]
  • EXAMPLES—PURGE METHODS
  • Experimental Details [0058]
  • The effect of cold and hot purging on membrane electrode assemblies having two different membrane types, Nafion® 1135 and a DowPont™ membrane, in a Ballard Mark 513 single fuel cell with an internal humidifier was investigated. Separate water feed lines for the coolant and humidification streams were employed. The coolant outlet temperature was 85° C. with a ΔT (change in temperature from inlet to outlet) of 10° C. at 1000 amps per square foot (ASF) (10764 amps per square foot (ASM)), using air as the oxidant. Both MEAs had a screen printed anode containing 3.87 mg/cm[0059] 2 platinum black electrocatalyst on carbon fiber paper. For the cathode, both MEAs had 3.87 mg/cm2 platinum black electrocatalyst applied by hand to carbon fiber paper. The Nafion® 1135 membrane employed in MEA No. 513-15 had an equivalent weight of 1100 and a thickness of about 85 μm (dry). The DowPont™ membrane employed in MEA No. 513-22 had an equivalent weight of 800 and a thickness of about 100 μm (wet).
  • The Mark 513 cell was assembled and run overnight at 600 ASF (6458 ASM) at an air/fuel pressure of 30/30 psig (207/207 kPa gauge) and a stoichiometry of 2/1.5 respectively. The fuel was substantially pure hydrogen. “Stoichiometry” is the ratio of the amount of reactant supplied to the fuel cell stack to the amount of reactant actually consumed in the fuel cell stack. In this instance, a fuel stoichiometry of 1.5 means that 150 parts of hydrogen are supplied to the fuel cell for each 100 parts actually consumed in the fuel cell. [0060]
  • Cold Purge Freeze/Thaw Cycles [0061]
  • For the initial series of three freeze/thaw cycles (results shown in FIGS. 7 and 8), the cell was cooled from its normal operating temperature (approximately 85° C.) to room temperature (approximately 23° C.) before purging. In each case, the fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages were purged for approximately 7 minutes with nitrogen. The cell containing the Nafion® 1135 membrane was taken through a fourth freeze/thaw cycle with a purge duration of only approximately 1 minute (results shown in FIG. 8). The cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The freezer temperature was approximately −20° C. The duration of the freeze ranged from 15-20 hours. After removal from the freezer, the coolant lines were connected and the cell was heated to 50° C. At that point, operation of the fuel cell was commenced at 50 ASF (538.2 ASM) with excess fuel and oxidant flow rates. When the cell temperature reached 60° C., the current density was increased to 600 ASF (6458 ASM) and the cell was operated for at least one hour or until cell voltage had stabilized. A polarization test from 0 to 1000 ASF (0 to 10764 ASM) was performed for each of the two MEAs tested, using two different oxidant streams: air and substantially pure oxygen. [0062]
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-22 (DowPont™ membrane). Plots [0063] 1-4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ♦), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Plots 5-8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ▴), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. For each of the oxidant streams, the four plots in FIG. 7 are difficult to distinguish from one another.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane). Plots [0064] 1-4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ♦), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Plots 5-8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ▴), and after each of the three cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Again, for each of the oxidant streams, the four plots in FIG. 8 are difficult to distinguish from one another.
  • FIG. 9 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane). Plots [0065] 1-2 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ♦), and after the fourth cold purge freeze/thaw cycle described above, in which a shorter purge duration (approximately 1 minute) was used. Plots 3-4 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ▴) and after the fourth cold purge freeze/thaw cycle described above. Again, for each of the oxidant streams, the two plots in FIG. 8 are difficult to distinguish from one another, indicating that a shorter duration purge can give satisfactory results.
  • Thus, based on the results shown in FIGS. 7, 8 and [0066] 9 for both MEAs, substantially no mass transport losses were exhibited over the series of three or four freeze/thaw cycles. The performance after each freeze/thaw cycle was maintained at approximately baseline (prior to freezing) polarization levels. Both MEAs thus exhibited favorable freeze/thaw tolerance when the cold purging technique was used.
  • Hot Purge Freeze/Thaw Cycles [0067]
  • For a subsequent series of three freeze/thaw cycles, each cell was purged at stack operating temperature (approximately 85° C.) before cooling. The fuel, oxidant, coolant and humidification passages were purged for approximately 1 minute with nitrogen. The cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The freezer temperature was approximately −20° C. The duration of the freeze ranged from 15-20 hours. After removal from the freezer, the coolant lines were connected and the cell was heated to operating temperature and operation commenced using essentially the same procedure employed for the cold purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. A polarization test from 0 to 1000 ASF (0 to 10764 ASM) was performed for each of the two MEAs tested, again using two different oxidant streams: air and substantially pure oxygen. [0068]
  • FIG. 10 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-22 (DowPont™ membrane). Plots [0069] 1-4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ♦), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Plots 5-8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ▴), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. A significant mass transport effect appears to occur at higher current densities on air after the third freeze cycle, based on the increased difference between the air and oxygen performance levels.
  • FIG. 11 is a plot of voltage as a function of current density for the fuel cell containing MEA 513-12 (Nafion® 1135 membrane. Plots [0070] 1-4 show the performance on air prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ♦), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Plots 5-8 show the performance on oxygen prior to freezing (which is the plot with the solid line and solid data points ▴), and after each of the three hot purge freeze/thaw cycles described above. Again, a significant mass transport effect appears to occur at higher current densities on air, based on the progressively increasing difference between the air and oxygen performance levels after each freeze/thaw cycle.
  • The particularly favorable results obtained with the cold purge technique were further supported by the following test in which a single fuel cell was cycled through 55 freeze/thaw cycles, with the purge technique used on the coolant and cathode side passages only. [0071]
  • Experimental Details [0072]
  • The effect of repeated cold purging on a membrane electrode assembly having a [0073] Nafion® 112 membrane, in a Ballard Mark 513 single fuel cell with an external humidifier was investigated. Separate water feed lines for the coolant and humidification streams were employed. The coolant inlet temperature was 70° C. with a ΔT (change in temperature from inlet to outlet) of 15° C. at 1 A/cm2 using air as the oxidant. The MEA had a screen printed anode containing 0.34-0.38 mg/cm2 platinum black electrocatalyst and a screen printed cathode containing 0.73-0.82 mg/cm2 platinum black electrocatalyst on carbon fiber paper, both with a Nafion spray coating (0.2 mg/cm2).
  • The cell was tested in a temperature-controlled environmental chamber at an air/fuel pressure of 27/27 psig (186/186 kPa gauge) and a stoichiometry of 1.8/1.2 respectively. The fuel was a simulated methanol reformate stream (composition 63.5% hydrogen; 22.5% carbon dioxide; 13% nitrogen; 1% methanol and 40 parts per million (ppm) carbon monoxide), and a 4% air bleed was employed at the anode. The fuel and oxidant streams were humidified. [0074]
  • For the series of 55 freeze/thaw cycles (results shown in FIG. 12), the cell was cooled from its normal operating temperature (approximately 80° C.) to a chamber temperature at which no part of the stack was below 0° C., but where the cell temperature was approximately 30° C. before purging. In each case, the oxidant passages were purged for approximately 10 seconds with dry (unhumidified) air. The cell inlets and outlets were closed by actuated valves, and the temperature in the chamber was reduced to approximately −25° C. The duration of each freeze was approximately 1 hour. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The cell was then thawed to 5° C. and then heated, by circulating warm coolant, to 65° C. At that point, operation of the fuel cell was commenced at 0.5 A/cm[0075] 2 for 60 minutes, then at 1.0 A/cm2 for 30 minutes, then for a second time at 0.5 A/cm2 for 30 minutes.
  • FIG. 12 shows the results obtained after each of 55 such cycles with the cell voltage measured once it had stabilized at 1.0 A/cm[0076] 2 during the 30 minutes of operation at that current density (Plot A) and once it had stabilized at 0.5 A/cm2 during the second period of operation at that current density (Plot B). At both current densities the performance degradation over the 55 cycles was negligible: approximately −0.1 mV/cycle at 0.5 A/cm2 and approximately −0.2 mV/cycle at 1.0 A/cm2.
  • EXAMPLES—HEAT TREATMENT METHODS
  • FIG. 13 shows a plot of stack voltage against operating time for an 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack which was subjected to a series of freeze-thaw-operation cycles. Prior to freezing the fuel, oxidant and coolant passages were purged with dry gas. During the freezing cycles, the cell inlets and outlets were capped and the cell was placed in a freezer. Internal sealing pressure within the cell was maintained during freezing. The freezer temperature was approximately −20° C. The duration of the freeze in each case was greater than 12 hours. After some cycles the stack was operated normally, and after other cycles the stack operating temperature was increased to above its normal operating temperature for a period, before normal operation was resumed. The stack was operated on humidified air and hydrogen, both at 30 psig (207 kPa gauge), at stoichiometries of 2.0 and 1.5 respectively, at a current density of 700 ASF (7535 ASM) to generate the data shown in FIG. 12. The coolant inlet temperature was 75° C. with a ΔT (change in temperature from inlet to outlet) of 10° C. at 1000 ASF (10764 ASM). [0077]
  • Referring to FIG. 13, between 425 and 882 hours the stack was operated, frozen several times, and then started up having been warmed to 50° C. Data points obtained directly after a freeze cycle are marked “F”. It can be seen that the cell performance deteriorated after each freeze cycle. After 882 hours the stack was started up after freeze cycles having been warmed to only 10° C. After 950 hours the stack was started up after freeze cycles having been warmed to only 0° C. The performance losses observed did not appear to be significantly affected by the start temperature. [0078]
  • A substantial improvement in performance after freezing was obtained in 4 cases where stack operation was commenced and then the stack operating temperature was increased to above the normal stack operating temperature of about 85° C., namely, to approximately 100° C. Data points obtained directly after such heat treatments are marked “H”. [0079]
  • FIG. 14 shows a plot of stack voltage as a function of current density for the 8-cell Ballard Mark 513 fuel cell stack used to generate the data of FIG. 13. Plots A, B and C show performance curves for operation on air, and plots D, E and F for operation on oxygen. Plots A and D show the stack performance before any of the heat treatments referred to the description of FIG. 13 but after the final freeze cycle, plots B and E show the stack performance immediately after the fourth heat treatment, and plots C and F show the stack performance about 2 days after the fourth heat treatment. The results on air show a substantial and sustained improvement in post-freezing performance after the heat treatment. The improvement is believed to be attributable to improved mass transport in the MEA, based on the fact that on oxygen the performance was not significantly affected by the heat treatment. This indicates that performance loss after freezing may be, at least in part, due to mass transport difficulties in the cells, which have a more significant effect on air than on a substantially pure oxidant stream. These detrimental effects could be due to retained water in the membrane electrode assembly. It is possible that the heat treatment method assists in removing residual water from the membrane electrode assembly, and thereby improves performance at start-up, particularly on air. [0080]
  • While particular elements, embodiments and applications of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings [0081]

Claims (22)

What is claimed is:
1. An electric power generation system comprising
(a) a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit for supplying electric current to said external circuit, said stack comprising at least one solid polymer fuel cell and fluid stream passages for directing fluid streams through said at least one fuel cell; and
(b) a purge system comprising a purge conduit having an inlet end connectable to a purge fluid supply and an outlet end connected to at least one of said fluid stream passages, and a purge flow control device for controlling the flow of a pressurized purge fluid through said purge conduit such that water is capable of being purged from at least one of said fluid stream passages after a supply of electric current from said stack to said external circuit has been interrupted.
2. The electric power generation system of
claim 1
wherein said fluid stream passages are reactant stream passages.
3. The electric power generation system of
claim 2
wherein said reactant stream passages comprise oxidant stream passages.
4. The electric power generation system of
claim 2
wherein said reactant stream passages comprise fuel stream passages.
5. The electric power generation system of
claim 1
wherein said fluid stream passages comprise a coolant passage.
6. The electric power generation system of
claim 1
wherein said purge flow control device comprises a control valve connected to said purge conduit.
7. The electric power generation system of
claim 6
wherein said purge flow control device further comprises a control unit communicative with said control valve and with an input signal source.
8. The electric power generation system of
claim 7
wherein said control unit is a microcontroller.
9. The electric power generation system of
claim 1
wherein said purge system further comprises a pressure regulator associated with said purge conduit for regulating the pressure of said purge fluid from said purge fluid supply to said at least one reactant passage.
10. The electric power generation system of
claim 1
wherein said purge fluid is inert.
11. The electric power generation system of
claim 11
wherein said purge fluid is nitrogen.
12. An electric power generation system comprising:
(a) a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit for supplying electric current to said external circuit, said stack comprising at least one solid polymer fuel cell, and reactant stream passages for directing reactant streams through said at least one fuel cell; and
(b) a humidifier in fluid communication with at least one of said reactant stream passages, for humidifying a reactant stream supplied to said fuel cell stack; and
(c) a humidifier bypass system comprising at least one bypass conduit for directing said reactant stream to said stack in fluid isolation from said humidifier and a bypass control device for selectively directing flow of said reactant stream to said fuel cell stack through either of said humidifier and said humidifier bypass conduit.
13. The electric power generation system of
claim 12
wherein said at least one bypass conduit comprises an inlet end connected to one of said reactant stream passages upstream of said humidifier, and an outlet end connected to one of said reactant stream passages downstream of said humidifier.
14. The electric power generation system of
claim 12
wherein said at least one bypass conduit comprises an inlet end connectable to a reactant supply, and an outlet end connected to one of said reactant stream passages downstream of said humidifier.
15. The electric power generation system of
claim 12
wherein said control device is operable such that said reactant fluid is directed to said humidifier while electrical power is being generated by the stack and to said bypass conduit after a supply of electric current from said stack to said external circuit has been interrupted.
16. The electric power generation system of
claim 15
wherein said bypass control device comprises a bypass inlet valve connected to one of said reactant passages upstream of said humidifier, and a bypass outlet valve connected to one of said reactant passages downstream of said humidifier, and wherein said bypass conduit is connected to said bypass inlet and outlet valves.
17. The electric power generation system of
claim 16
wherein said bypass control device further comprises a control unit communicative with said bypass inlet and outlet valves and with an input signal source.
18. The electric power generation system of
claim 18
wherein said control unit is a microcontroller.
19. The electric power generation system of
claim 12
wherein one of said reactant passages is an oxidant flow passage.
20. The electric power generation system of
claim 12
wherein one of said reactant passages is a fuel flow passage.
21. An electric power generation system comprising
(a) a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit for supplying electric current to said external circuit, said stack comprising at least one solid polymer fuel cell, and fluid stream passages for directing fluid streams through said at least one fuel cell; and
(b) a mechanism for directing the flow of a pressurized purge fluid from a purge fluid supply to at least one of said fluid stream passages such that water can be purged from said at least one purged fluid stream passage after a supply of electric current from said stack to said external circuit has been interrupted.
22. An electric power generation system comprising
(a) a fuel cell stack connectable to an external electrical circuit for supplying electric current to said external circuit, said stack comprising at least one solid polymer fuel cell, and reactant stream passages for directing reactant streams through said at least one fuel cell;
(b) apparatus for humidifying at least one of said reactant streams supplied to said fuel cell stack; and
(c) a humidifier bypass system comprising apparatus for directing at least one of said reactant streams to said stack in fluid isolation from said humidifying apparatus, and apparatus for selectively directing flow of said reactant streams to said fuel cell stack through said humidifying apparatus or in fluid isolation from said humidifying apparatus.
US09/819,875 1996-06-07 2001-03-28 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell Abandoned US20010055707A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/819,875 US20010055707A1 (en) 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US10/833,228 US7482085B2 (en) 1996-06-07 2004-04-26 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/406,318 US6479177B1 (en) 1996-06-07 1999-09-27 Method for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US09/819,875 US20010055707A1 (en) 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/406,318 Continuation-In-Part US6479177B1 (en) 1996-06-07 1999-09-27 Method for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/833,228 Continuation-In-Part US7482085B2 (en) 1996-06-07 2004-04-26 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010055707A1 true US20010055707A1 (en) 2001-12-27

Family

ID=23607450

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/406,318 Expired - Lifetime US6479177B1 (en) 1996-06-07 1999-09-27 Method for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US09/819,506 Pending US20020009623A1 (en) 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Methods and apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of a fuel cell
US09/819,875 Abandoned US20010055707A1 (en) 1996-06-07 2001-03-28 Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US10/293,728 Abandoned US20030077487A1 (en) 1996-06-07 2002-11-12 Methods for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/406,318 Expired - Lifetime US6479177B1 (en) 1996-06-07 1999-09-27 Method for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US09/819,506 Pending US20020009623A1 (en) 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Methods and apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of a fuel cell

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/293,728 Abandoned US20030077487A1 (en) 1996-06-07 2002-11-12 Methods for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (4) US6479177B1 (en)
EP (3) EP1222704B1 (en)
JP (2) JP2003510786A (en)
AT (3) ATE555512T1 (en)
AU (1) AU7396700A (en)
CA (1) CA2384863C (en)
DE (2) DE60027586T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1691439T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2001024296A1 (en)

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030031904A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2003-02-13 Haltiner Karl J. Plate construction of high temperature air-to-air heat exchanger
WO2003058740A1 (en) * 2002-01-08 2003-07-17 Nissan Motor Co.,Ltd. Fuel cell system and method of removal of water during shutdown for improving freeze tolerance
US20030162063A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-08-28 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system, and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
WO2003096460A1 (en) * 2002-05-14 2003-11-20 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and related startup method
US20040005487A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2004-01-08 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system
US20040241512A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel-cell system
US20050037247A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-17 Shinichi Takahashi Fuel cell system and method for removal of water from fuel cells
US20050118473A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2005-06-02 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell device and related control method
US20050153180A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Yao-Sheng Hsu Functional test and demonstration apparatus for fuel cell power system
US20050164054A1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2005-07-28 John Wheat Parallel stack antifreeze system
FR2873498A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-01-27 Conception & Dev Michelin Sa STOPPING A FUEL CELL SUPPLIED WITH PURE OXYGEN
US20060029837A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-09 Sennoun Mohammed E Humidifier bypass system and method for PEM fuel cell
US20060280977A1 (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Denso Corporation Fuel cell system
US20080311439A1 (en) * 2007-06-15 2008-12-18 Michelin Recherche Et Technique S.A. Shut-down procedure for a fuel cell fed with pure oxygen
CN100446318C (en) * 2003-04-09 2008-12-24 丰田自动车株式会社 Fuel cell system
US20090069963A1 (en) * 2007-09-06 2009-03-12 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell vehicle
WO2010031601A1 (en) * 2008-09-17 2010-03-25 Belenos Clean Power Holding Ag Method of shut-down and starting of a fuel cell
US20100112398A1 (en) * 2007-05-10 2010-05-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
US20100209817A1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-08-19 Sony Corporation Fuel cell system and electronic device
US8057943B2 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-11-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell running system, and valve-freeze preventing method in the fuel cell running system
US20120077063A1 (en) * 2010-09-20 2012-03-29 Schuetzbach Peter Electrical system
CN104051761A (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-17 福特全球技术公司 Fuel cell system and method to prevent water-induced damage
US20160036072A1 (en) * 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Hyundai Motor Company Air supply device using cooling water heater of fuel cell vehicle
US20160149228A1 (en) * 2014-11-20 2016-05-26 Arbl Co., Ltd. Electrode Catalyst and Fuel cell Using The Same
WO2018111958A1 (en) * 2016-12-13 2018-06-21 3M Innovative Properties Company Bipolar plate-electrode assemblies and electrochemical cell stacks and liquid flow batteries therefrom
US10256485B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2019-04-09 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell purge line system
US11205788B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2021-12-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell purge line system
US20220376282A1 (en) * 2021-05-20 2022-11-24 Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and condensate water storage device

Families Citing this family (118)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7482085B2 (en) * 1996-06-07 2009-01-27 Bdf Ip Holdings Ltd. Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US7098163B2 (en) * 1998-08-27 2006-08-29 Cabot Corporation Method of producing membrane electrode assemblies for use in proton exchange membrane and direct methanol fuel cells
WO2000065677A1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2000-11-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Operating concept for direct methanol fuel cells
US8980492B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2015-03-17 Encite Llc Method and apparatus for controlling an array of power generators
US8518594B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2013-08-27 Encite, Llc Power cell and power chip architecture
US6312846B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2001-11-06 Integrated Fuel Cell Technologies, Inc. Fuel cell and power chip technology
DE10013687B4 (en) 2000-03-21 2007-06-28 Nucellsys Gmbh Fuel cell system and method for operating the same
US6627339B2 (en) * 2000-04-19 2003-09-30 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Fuel cell stack integrated with a waste energy recovery system
US6630264B2 (en) * 2000-05-01 2003-10-07 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Solid oxide fuel cell process gas sampling for analysis
US6558826B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2003-05-06 Plug Power Inc. Fuel cell system fluid recovery
US20020076582A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-06-20 Reiser Carl A. Procedure for starting up a fuel cell system using a fuel purge
JP2002231293A (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-08-16 Toshiba Corp Purge device for fuel cell system and its method
JP4405097B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2010-01-27 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell stack and operation method thereof
JP4864224B2 (en) * 2001-04-03 2012-02-01 本田技研工業株式会社 Residual water discharge device for fuel cell
US6596426B2 (en) * 2001-04-05 2003-07-22 Utc Fuel Cells, Llc Method and apparatus for the operation of a cell stack assembly during subfreezing temperatures
US7179554B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2007-02-20 Plug Power Inc. Fuel cell systems
JP4867094B2 (en) * 2001-07-19 2012-02-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US6875533B2 (en) * 2001-07-19 2005-04-05 Elringklinger Ag Fuel cell unit and composite block of fuel cells
JP4250877B2 (en) * 2001-08-07 2009-04-08 ソニー株式会社 Power supply
US6727013B2 (en) * 2001-09-07 2004-04-27 General Motors Corporation Fuel cell energy management system for cold environments
EP1306916B1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2016-09-28 NuCellSys GmbH Fuel cell system and method for operating the same
KR100439814B1 (en) * 2001-12-08 2004-07-12 현대자동차주식회사 Apparatus and method for operation of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell below the freezing temperature of water
JP4096575B2 (en) * 2002-02-15 2008-06-04 日産自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US7282285B2 (en) 2002-04-05 2007-10-16 Utc Fuel Cells, Llc Method and apparatus for the operation of a cell stack assembly during subfreezing temperatures
JP2004031127A (en) * 2002-06-26 2004-01-29 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell system
US6864000B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2005-03-08 Utc Fuel Cells, Llc Shutdown procedure to improve startup at sub-freezing temperatures
US6673481B1 (en) * 2002-07-01 2004-01-06 Utc Fuel Cells, Llc Initiating operation of an electric vehicle or other load powered by a fuel cell at sub-freezing temperature
JP4140294B2 (en) * 2002-07-05 2008-08-27 日産自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
JP4380231B2 (en) * 2002-07-30 2009-12-09 株式会社デンソー Fuel cell system
US7579097B2 (en) * 2002-08-16 2009-08-25 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Fuel cell voltage feedback control system
US6887598B2 (en) * 2002-08-16 2005-05-03 Generals Motors Corporation Control system and method for starting a frozen fuel cell
TW200414596A (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-08-01 Du Pont Method for regeneration of performance in a fuel cell
AU2003299059A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-19 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method for regeneration of performance in a fuel cell
WO2004079845A2 (en) 2003-03-07 2004-09-16 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Methods of operating fuel cells having closed reactant supply systems
JP2004311277A (en) * 2003-04-09 2004-11-04 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
JP2004327366A (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-18 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell stack and its fuel cell system
US7112379B2 (en) * 2003-05-05 2006-09-26 Utc Fuel Cells, Llc Vacuum assisted startup of a fuel cell at sub-freezing temperature
JP4525008B2 (en) * 2003-07-02 2010-08-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Energy output device and method for controlling energy output device
DE10334843A1 (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-24 P21 - Power For The 21St Century Gmbh Fuel cell operating medium management in which loads in conveying arrangements in supply and discharge lines are varied during flow reversal periods
JP5000073B2 (en) * 2003-09-08 2012-08-15 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell stack below freezing start method, fuel cell stack below freezing start system, and fuel cell stack designing method
US7479337B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2009-01-20 General Motors Corporation Fuel cell shutdown and startup using a cathode recycle loop
JP4692869B2 (en) * 2003-10-24 2011-06-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Abnormality detection device for fuel cell system
JP2005141943A (en) * 2003-11-04 2005-06-02 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
US20050175874A1 (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-11 Alessi Donald P.Jr. Cooling subsystem for an electrochemical fuel cell system
US20050175875A1 (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-11 Nelson Amy E. Cooling subsystem for an electrochemical fuel cell system
US7270903B2 (en) 2004-02-27 2007-09-18 Ford Motor Company Temperature-based vehicle wakeup strategy to initiate fuel cell freeze protection
JP2005259526A (en) * 2004-03-11 2005-09-22 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Conditioning method for fuel cell
JP2005276547A (en) * 2004-03-24 2005-10-06 Honda Motor Co Ltd Shut down device and method of fuel cell
JP4722409B2 (en) * 2004-04-12 2011-07-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system
JP5002885B2 (en) * 2004-04-26 2012-08-15 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US7270904B2 (en) * 2004-08-18 2007-09-18 General Motors Corporation Procedures for shutting down fuel cell system by using air purge at low cell temperature
JP2006073427A (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-16 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell system
US7282287B2 (en) * 2004-11-24 2007-10-16 Utc Power Corporation Purging water with reactant air pump powered by operational fuel cell system during shutdown
US20060121322A1 (en) * 2004-12-02 2006-06-08 Haas Herwig R Systems and methods for fuel cell shutdown
JP4852917B2 (en) * 2004-12-16 2012-01-11 日産自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US20060134475A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Liqing Hu Air humidifying system for fuel cell stack
US20060134472A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Bach Peter J Summer and winter mode operation of fuel cell stacks
JP4675623B2 (en) * 2004-12-28 2011-04-27 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system and control method thereof
JP4765329B2 (en) * 2005-01-31 2011-09-07 日産自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US7659017B2 (en) * 2005-02-17 2010-02-09 Daimier Ag Drying method for fuel cell stacks
US7393602B2 (en) * 2005-04-14 2008-07-01 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Method to begin coolant circulation to prevent MEA overheating during cold start
US7887963B2 (en) * 2005-04-25 2011-02-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Mitigating fuel cell start up/shut down degradation
JP4644064B2 (en) 2005-07-28 2011-03-02 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system
JP5086584B2 (en) * 2005-10-21 2012-11-28 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system and scavenging method in the system
JP4976695B2 (en) * 2006-01-16 2012-07-18 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system
JP4856428B2 (en) * 2006-01-17 2012-01-18 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell system and operation method thereof
US7759010B2 (en) * 2006-01-27 2010-07-20 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Pulsed coolant control for improved stack cold starting
JP5070707B2 (en) * 2006-02-06 2012-11-14 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US8962200B2 (en) * 2006-02-15 2015-02-24 Ford Motor Company Humidity measuring device and method
US9819037B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2017-11-14 Encite Llc Method and apparatus for cleaning catalyst of a power cell
US7883813B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2011-02-08 Bloom Energy Corporation Fuel cell system ventilation scheme
US7704617B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-04-27 Bloom Energy Corporation Hybrid reformer for fuel flexibility
US8822094B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2014-09-02 Bloom Energy Corporation Fuel cell system operated on liquid fuels
US20070292724A1 (en) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-20 Gilchrist Ian T System and method to start a fuel cell stack during a cold-start condition
JP2008041646A (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-02-21 Canon Inc Fuel cell system and activation treatment method of fuel cell
WO2008030394A2 (en) * 2006-09-06 2008-03-13 Bloom Energy Corporation Flexible fuel cell system configuration to handle multiple fuels
US7807311B2 (en) 2006-10-16 2010-10-05 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Apparatus for hydrogen-air mixing in a fuel cell assembly and method
JP5157163B2 (en) * 2006-12-27 2013-03-06 トヨタ自動車株式会社 FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND FUEL CELL SYSTEM MOUNTING BODY
KR100708343B1 (en) 2007-01-30 2007-04-18 한국기계연구원 A polymer electrolyte membrane type fuel cell
KR100862590B1 (en) * 2007-04-26 2008-10-09 한국기계연구원 Direct methanol fuel cell
EP1995811A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-26 Electro Power Systems S.p.A. Method for purging pem-type fuel cells
US7754361B2 (en) * 2007-05-30 2010-07-13 Idatech, Llc Fuel cell systems with maintenance hydration by displacement of primary power
US8034500B2 (en) 2007-05-30 2011-10-11 Idatech, Llc Systems and methods for starting and operating fuel cell systems in subfreezing temperatures
US20080299423A1 (en) * 2007-05-30 2008-12-04 Laven Arne Fuel cell systems with maintenance hydration
DE102007026003A1 (en) 2007-06-04 2008-12-11 Daimler Ag Fuel cell system with improved cold start properties and method
WO2008152794A1 (en) * 2007-06-08 2008-12-18 Panasonic Corporation Polymer electrolyte fuel cell
US8920997B2 (en) 2007-07-26 2014-12-30 Bloom Energy Corporation Hybrid fuel heat exchanger—pre-reformer in SOFC systems
DE102007044760A1 (en) * 2007-09-19 2009-04-09 Daimler Ag Method and control unit for automatic selection of an operating mode for a vehicle with fuel cells
GB2453127A (en) 2007-09-26 2009-04-01 Intelligent Energy Ltd Fuel Cell System
GB2453126B (en) * 2007-09-26 2013-02-06 Intelligent Energy Ltd Fuel cell system
WO2009105191A2 (en) 2008-02-19 2009-08-27 Bloom Energy Corporation Fuel cell system containing anode tail gas oxidizer and hybrid heat exchanger/reformer
US8920984B2 (en) * 2008-02-19 2014-12-30 Ford Motor Company System and method for purging water from a fuel cell stack
FR2929761B1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2010-05-28 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR STORING A NEGATIVE TEMPERATURE FUEL CELL
KR100981320B1 (en) 2008-04-18 2010-09-10 한국기계연구원 Combine device for A fuel cell
US8574731B2 (en) * 2008-10-29 2013-11-05 Motorola Mobility Llc Device and method for augmenting the useful life of an energy storage device
WO2010073383A1 (en) 2008-12-26 2010-07-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
WO2010073386A1 (en) * 2008-12-26 2010-07-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
EP2383826B1 (en) 2008-12-26 2018-05-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Device for estimating the water content of a fuel cell and fuel cell system
WO2010073385A1 (en) * 2008-12-26 2010-07-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US8192885B2 (en) * 2009-01-26 2012-06-05 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Shutdown strategy for enhanced water management
US8076038B2 (en) * 2009-03-31 2011-12-13 American Air Liquide, Inc. Fuel cell with vertical displacement
US20100310954A1 (en) * 2009-06-04 2010-12-09 Madeleine Odgaard Method for frost protection in a direct methanol fuel cell
JP4525837B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2010-08-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Energy output device and method for controlling energy output device
US8932775B2 (en) * 2010-05-28 2015-01-13 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for controlling the operation of a fuel cell
CN103229340B (en) * 2010-12-07 2016-01-20 百拉得动力系统公司 Be used in fuel cell plant operating system and the method for subfreezing environmental condition
FR2971087B1 (en) * 2011-02-01 2013-01-18 Soc Tech Michelin RECYCLING LOOP FOR FUEL CELL
DE102012218636A1 (en) * 2012-10-12 2014-04-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Determination of the fuel cell input humidity via pressure sensors and a mass flow-dependent control of the humidifier bypass
US8986899B2 (en) * 2012-10-29 2015-03-24 Gm Global Technology Operations, Llc Systems and methods for enhancing fuel cell vehicle startup
KR101628443B1 (en) 2013-12-10 2016-06-08 현대자동차주식회사 Dehydration Control System and Method of Fuel Cell Stack
US10013049B2 (en) 2014-03-26 2018-07-03 Ethicon Llc Power management through sleep options of segmented circuit and wake up control
FR3030895B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2017-01-13 Michelin & Cie FUEL CELL SYSTEM
FR3030894B1 (en) * 2014-12-19 2016-12-09 Michelin & Cie METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FUEL CELL
JP6508161B2 (en) 2016-10-18 2019-05-08 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
JP6597566B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2019-10-30 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
US11031613B2 (en) 2017-07-03 2021-06-08 The Boeing Company Fuel cell power system for an unmanned surface vehicle
US11035628B2 (en) 2018-05-30 2021-06-15 Fuelcell Energy, Inc. System for fast draining of an airfan heat exchanger and methods of using the same
JP7347315B2 (en) * 2020-04-20 2023-09-20 トヨタ自動車株式会社 fuel cell system
DE102022202915A1 (en) * 2022-03-24 2023-09-28 Robert Bosch Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Device and method for conditioning and rinsing an anode of a fuel cell stack

Family Cites Families (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3507702A (en) * 1967-02-15 1970-04-21 United Aircraft Corp Fuel cell system including cooling and humidifying means
US5041344A (en) * 1984-12-14 1991-08-20 Fuji Electric Corporate Research And Development Ltd. Fuel cell cooling device
JPS61165966A (en) * 1985-01-17 1986-07-26 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Regeneration of fuel electrode of fuel cell
JPS62136774A (en) * 1985-12-10 1987-06-19 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Heat insulating method for fuel cell stack
US4729932A (en) * 1986-10-08 1988-03-08 United Technologies Corporation Fuel cell with integrated cooling water/static water removal means
US5082753A (en) * 1989-07-19 1992-01-21 Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. Cooling device for fuel cell
US5021303A (en) * 1989-12-18 1991-06-04 Institute Of Gas Technology Molten carbonate fuel cell start-up process
JP2781630B2 (en) * 1989-12-28 1998-07-30 三菱重工業株式会社 Method for activating a joined body of a solid polymer electrolyte membrane and an electrode
JP2718239B2 (en) * 1990-03-19 1998-02-25 富士電機株式会社 Solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell power generator
US5084144A (en) 1990-07-31 1992-01-28 Physical Sciences Inc. High utilization supported catalytic metal-containing gas-diffusion electrode, process for making it, and cells utilizing it
US5366818A (en) * 1991-01-15 1994-11-22 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Solid polymer fuel cell systems incorporating water removal at the anode
US5200278A (en) * 1991-03-15 1993-04-06 Ballard Power Systems, Inc. Integrated fuel cell power generation system
JPH0547394A (en) * 1991-08-08 1993-02-26 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell and operating method thereof
US5230966A (en) * 1991-09-26 1993-07-27 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Coolant flow field plate for electrochemical fuel cells
US5262249A (en) * 1991-12-26 1993-11-16 International Fuel Cells Corporation Internally cooled proton exchange membrane fuel cell device
JPH06140065A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-05-20 Toshiba Corp Fuel cell power generating system
DE59306256D1 (en) 1992-11-05 1997-05-28 Siemens Ag Method and device for water and / or inert gas disposal of a fuel cell block
JP3407914B2 (en) 1993-01-28 2003-05-19 マツダ株式会社 Fuel cell vehicle
JP3599761B2 (en) 1993-09-28 2004-12-08 バラード パワー システムズ インコーポレイティド Fuel cell warm-up system
FI110218B (en) 1993-12-30 2002-12-13 Fortum Oil & Gas Oy Methods and apparatus for preventing electrochemical devices from cooling
JP3509168B2 (en) * 1994-02-23 2004-03-22 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
JPH07272737A (en) * 1994-03-31 1995-10-20 Toyota Motor Corp Stop device for fuel cell
JP3465346B2 (en) * 1994-05-09 2003-11-10 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell generator
JPH0822834A (en) * 1994-07-07 1996-01-23 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell and its starting device
JPH08195211A (en) * 1995-01-18 1996-07-30 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
JP3721596B2 (en) * 1995-03-01 2005-11-30 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Vehicle fuel cell control device
US5503944A (en) * 1995-06-30 1996-04-02 International Fuel Cells Corp. Water management system for solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell power plants
JP3505010B2 (en) * 1995-07-07 2004-03-08 本田技研工業株式会社 Fuel cell and its fastening method
JPH09312165A (en) * 1996-05-23 1997-12-02 Aqueous Res:Kk Fuel cell generating device and operating method thereof
US5798186A (en) 1996-06-07 1998-08-25 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for commencing operation of a fuel cell electric power generation system below the freezing temperature of water
JPH1032009A (en) * 1996-07-16 1998-02-03 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Manufacture of fuel cell
JPH10223249A (en) * 1997-02-03 1998-08-21 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and flow path freezing prevention method for fuel cell system
JPH11242962A (en) * 1997-12-22 1999-09-07 Aqueous Reserch:Kk Fuel cell device
US6329089B1 (en) * 1997-12-23 2001-12-11 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for increasing the temperature of a fuel cell
US6410175B1 (en) 1998-11-12 2002-06-25 Ballard Power Systems Inc. Fuel cell system with improved starting capability
JPH11273704A (en) 1998-03-20 1999-10-08 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Fuel cell apparatus
US6103410A (en) 1998-06-05 2000-08-15 International Fuel Cells Corporation Start up of frozen fuel cell
US6068941A (en) 1998-10-22 2000-05-30 International Fuel Cells, Llc Start up of cold fuel cell
JP2000164233A (en) * 1998-11-26 2000-06-16 Toshiba Corp Power generating system for solid high molecular fuel cell
JP4081896B2 (en) 1998-12-02 2008-04-30 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Fuel cell system
CA2371257A1 (en) 1999-04-23 2000-11-02 Energy Partners, L.C. Freeze tolerant fuel cell system and method
JP2000324617A (en) 1999-05-06 2000-11-24 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Fuel battery in mobile body
DE19931061A1 (en) 1999-07-01 2001-01-11 Mannesmann Ag Arrangement for heating / cooling a fuel cell and fuel cell system

Cited By (56)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6759155B2 (en) * 2000-05-01 2004-07-06 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Plate construction of high temperature air-to-air heat exchanger
US20030031904A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2003-02-13 Haltiner Karl J. Plate construction of high temperature air-to-air heat exchanger
US20040115495A1 (en) * 2002-01-08 2004-06-17 Akihiro Asai Fuel cell system and related method
WO2003058740A1 (en) * 2002-01-08 2003-07-17 Nissan Motor Co.,Ltd. Fuel cell system and method of removal of water during shutdown for improving freeze tolerance
CN100446315C (en) * 2002-01-08 2008-12-24 日产自动车株式会社 Fuel cell system and method of removal of water during shutdown for improving freeze to lerance
US7718289B2 (en) * 2002-01-08 2010-05-18 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and related method
JP2003203665A (en) * 2002-01-08 2003-07-18 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell system
WO2003073547A3 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-06-24 Nissan Motor Freeze-protected fuel cell system and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
US20030162063A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-08-28 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system, and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
KR101029506B1 (en) 2002-02-27 2011-04-18 유티씨 파워 코포레이션 A fuel cell system, and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
US6955861B2 (en) 2002-02-27 2005-10-18 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system, and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
WO2003073547A2 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-09-04 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Freeze-protected fuel cell system and method of protecting a fuel cell from freezing
US7402352B2 (en) 2002-05-14 2008-07-22 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and related startup method
WO2003096460A1 (en) * 2002-05-14 2003-11-20 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and related startup method
CN1322621C (en) * 2002-05-14 2007-06-20 日产自动车株式会社 Fuel cell system and related startup method
US20040005487A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2004-01-08 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system
EP1383193A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2004-01-21 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system with controlled water removing purge device
US7390585B2 (en) 2002-07-05 2008-06-24 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system
US20050118473A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2005-06-02 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell device and related control method
US7537850B2 (en) * 2002-08-27 2009-05-26 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell device and related control method
CN100446318C (en) * 2003-04-09 2008-12-24 丰田自动车株式会社 Fuel cell system
US7655336B2 (en) * 2003-05-29 2010-02-02 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel-cell system
US20040241512A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel-cell system
US7563526B2 (en) 2003-08-11 2009-07-21 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and method for removal of water from fuel cells
US20050037247A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-17 Shinichi Takahashi Fuel cell system and method for removal of water from fuel cells
US20050153180A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Yao-Sheng Hsu Functional test and demonstration apparatus for fuel cell power system
US20050164054A1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2005-07-28 John Wheat Parallel stack antifreeze system
US7485382B2 (en) * 2004-01-22 2009-02-03 General Motors Corporation Parallel stack antifreeze system
US7901821B2 (en) 2004-07-20 2011-03-08 Conception Et Developpement Michelin S.A. Stopping a fuel cell supplied with pure oxygen
FR2873498A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-01-27 Conception & Dev Michelin Sa STOPPING A FUEL CELL SUPPLIED WITH PURE OXYGEN
WO2006012954A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-02-09 Conception Et Developpement Michelin S.A. Stopping a fuel cell supplied with pure oxygen
US20060029837A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-09 Sennoun Mohammed E Humidifier bypass system and method for PEM fuel cell
US20060280977A1 (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Denso Corporation Fuel cell system
US8057943B2 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-11-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell running system, and valve-freeze preventing method in the fuel cell running system
US8236460B2 (en) 2007-05-10 2012-08-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
US20100112398A1 (en) * 2007-05-10 2010-05-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
EP2017916A2 (en) 2007-06-15 2009-01-21 Societe de Technologie Michelin Shutdown of a fuel cell supplied with pure oxygen
US9048472B2 (en) 2007-06-15 2015-06-02 Michelin Recherche Et Technique S.A. Fuel cell shut-down procedure including vaporization phase
US20080311439A1 (en) * 2007-06-15 2008-12-18 Michelin Recherche Et Technique S.A. Shut-down procedure for a fuel cell fed with pure oxygen
US7908049B2 (en) * 2007-09-06 2011-03-15 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell vehicle
US20090069963A1 (en) * 2007-09-06 2009-03-12 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell vehicle
US20100209817A1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-08-19 Sony Corporation Fuel cell system and electronic device
CN102217128A (en) * 2008-09-17 2011-10-12 贝伦诺斯清洁电力控股有限公司 Method of shut-down and starting of a fuel cell
US9413020B2 (en) 2008-09-17 2016-08-09 Belenos Clean Power Holding Ag Method of shut-down and starting of a fuel cell
WO2010031601A1 (en) * 2008-09-17 2010-03-25 Belenos Clean Power Holding Ag Method of shut-down and starting of a fuel cell
US20120077063A1 (en) * 2010-09-20 2012-03-29 Schuetzbach Peter Electrical system
US11205788B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2021-12-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell purge line system
US10256485B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2019-04-09 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell purge line system
US20140272646A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell system and method to prevent water-induced damage
US9960438B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2018-05-01 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fuel cell system and method to prevent water-induced damage
CN104051761A (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-17 福特全球技术公司 Fuel cell system and method to prevent water-induced damage
US20160036072A1 (en) * 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Hyundai Motor Company Air supply device using cooling water heater of fuel cell vehicle
US10439236B2 (en) * 2014-07-31 2019-10-08 Hyundai Motor Company Air supply device using cooling water heater of fuel cell vehicle
US20160149228A1 (en) * 2014-11-20 2016-05-26 Arbl Co., Ltd. Electrode Catalyst and Fuel cell Using The Same
WO2018111958A1 (en) * 2016-12-13 2018-06-21 3M Innovative Properties Company Bipolar plate-electrode assemblies and electrochemical cell stacks and liquid flow batteries therefrom
US20220376282A1 (en) * 2021-05-20 2022-11-24 Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system and condensate water storage device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5325929B2 (en) 2013-10-23
EP1672727A3 (en) 2006-06-28
CA2384863C (en) 2009-05-19
DE60041368D1 (en) 2009-02-26
AU7396700A (en) 2001-04-30
EP1222704A1 (en) 2002-07-17
ATE420468T1 (en) 2009-01-15
US6479177B1 (en) 2002-11-12
US20020009623A1 (en) 2002-01-24
EP1222704B1 (en) 2006-04-26
US20030077487A1 (en) 2003-04-24
ATE324674T1 (en) 2006-05-15
DE60027586D1 (en) 2006-06-01
EP1691439B1 (en) 2012-04-25
JP2011151043A (en) 2011-08-04
WO2001024296A1 (en) 2001-04-05
CA2384863A1 (en) 2001-04-05
JP2003510786A (en) 2003-03-18
DK1691439T3 (en) 2012-07-09
EP1672727A2 (en) 2006-06-21
EP1672727B1 (en) 2009-01-07
DE60027586T2 (en) 2007-04-26
EP1691439A1 (en) 2006-08-16
ATE555512T1 (en) 2012-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6479177B1 (en) Method for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
US5798186A (en) Method and apparatus for commencing operation of a fuel cell electric power generation system below the freezing temperature of water
US7132179B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of a fuel cell
US7482085B2 (en) Apparatus for improving the cold starting capability of an electrochemical fuel cell
JP3455725B2 (en) Freezing and protection of fuel cells by drying under reduced pressure
US20030003336A1 (en) Method and apparatus for adjusting the temperature of a fuel cell by facilitating methanol crossover and combustion
US6403249B1 (en) Humidification of a PEM fuel cell by air-air moisture exchange
AU2001268867A1 (en) Water recovery in the anode side of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell
EP1328989A2 (en) Water recovery on the anode side of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell
JP4072707B2 (en) Solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell power generator and its operation method
JP3606514B2 (en) Stacked fuel cell system
JP3141619B2 (en) Solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell power generator
EP1098381A1 (en) High polymer electrolyte fuel cell
JP4552236B2 (en) Fuel cell device
JP3895899B2 (en) Solid polymer fuel cell power generator and solid polymer fuel cell operating method
JP2000164232A (en) Solid high molecular fuel cell system
US7534511B2 (en) Thermal control of fuel cell for improved cold start
JP2001325974A (en) Fuel cell power generation system
US20230299321A1 (en) Method for a frost start of a fuel cell device, fuel cell device and motor vehicle having a fuel cell device
JP2006049133A (en) Fuel cell system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS, INC., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROBERTS, JOY A.;ST.-PIERRE, JEAN;VAN DER GEEST, MARIAN E.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012028/0291;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010430 TO 20010609

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION