SU912172A1 - Method of treating vasomotor and allergic rhinites - Google Patents

Description

(B) METHOD OF TREATMENT OF VASOMOTOR AND ALLERGIC RINITES

The invention relates to medicine, namely to otolaryngology.

A known method of treating vasomotor and allergic rhinitis is by acting on the receptor apparatus of the nasal cavity through the mucous membrane with zinc ions, calcium chloride, novocaine, introduced by the method of endoscopic electrophoresis with a constant electric current.

However, the known method of treating vasomotor and allergic rhinitis is often not very effective or not at all effective. In addition, endonous electrophoresis of zinc and especially calcium chloride is often accompanied by irritation of the skin of the vestibule of the nasal cavity, which makes it impossible to continue this procedure until the disappearance of this complication. As a result, the treatment time is delayed for more than 10 days.

The aim of the invention is to reduce the duration of treatment.

This goal is achieved by the fact that in carrying out the method of treating vasomotor and allergic rhinitis by applying a constant electric current to the nasal mucosa, a direct current is applied to the mucous membrane of the positive side of the mucosa of the side wall

10 nose at the front end of the middle turbinate and the mucous membrane of the front sections of the middle nasal passage with a current of 10-30 μA for 10-60 min daily for 6-tO.

15 days.

A method for treating patients with vasomotor and allergic rhinitis is as follows.

Sterile electrode special

Claims (2)

20, the structures are introduced into the nasal cavity in the region of the anterior part of the middle nasal passage and pressed against the mucosa so that the electrode one9 temporarily touches the mucosa of the side wall sections of the nose located in front of the anterior end of the middle turbinate and the mucosa of the anterior sections of the middle nasal passage. The electrode is connected to the positive pole of the galvanic apparatus. Another electrode is fixed on the skin of the back surface of the neck or shoulder of this side and connected to the negative pole of the galvanic apparatus. Treatment begins with the application of a constant electric current of 10 µA for 10 minutes. In the absence of a negative reaction from the nasal mucosa (desquamation of the epithelium, etc.), the current is increased to 20–30 µA, and the duration of the procedure to 20–60 min. In some patients, even in the absence of a response from the mucous membrane, but with dizziness The overall discomfort current intensity and duration of the procedure are left at the original level. In addition, the strength and duration of the procedure vary depending on the effectiveness of the treatment. With correctly selected parameters of the procedure already during | conducting a session, patients feel significant relief, improvement in the general condition and reduction in nasal congestion. At the beginning of the procedure, patients, especially those with allergic rhinitis, experience continuous sneezing, tearing, and discharge of clear fluid from the nose. By the end of the procedure, these phenomena are significantly weakened or completely disappear. After the electrotreatment session, all patients, especially those with allergic rhinitis, feel good. On examination of the nasal cavity immediately after the procedure, a significant decrease in mucosal edema in the area of the middle nasal passage and middle nasal conch is noted. The middle nasal passage becomes wide, the mucous membrane of the membrane is significantly bleached, only the injected blood vessels remain. In patients with allergic rhinitis, a marked reduction in edema of the mucous membrane and in the area of the inferior nasal concha is determined. Along with this, by the end of the procedure, patients have headache, pain in the forehead and nose. The indicated improvement after the first procedure in some patients persisted for a while, and in others, over a period of 8-10 hours. The duration of the positive effect gradually increased from procedure to procedure. PRI me R 1. Sick A., 35 years. Directed with a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Before treatment, she underwent a course of treatment with novocainic intranasal blockades, intramedical injections of dimed | lola, suprastin, intranasal electrophoresis with calcium chloride. However, improvement did not occur. When examining the mucous membrane, the nasal cavity is swollen, cyanotic, the nasal passages are sharply narrowed, nasal breathing is absent. The treatment by the proposed method. Already during the first procedure, nasal breathing improved significantly. The positive effect was maintained for 12 hours. During the treatment period, 6 procedures were performed for each half of the nose. By the end of the treatment, the mucous membrane was completely normal, the effects of allergic rhinitis disappeared. PRI me R 2. Patient B., 52 years old. Directed with a diagnosis of vasomotor rhinitis. Before going to the clinic, he was treated with the use of intranasal novocaine blockades, the general treatment was 8ita (group B, prozerin by us. The effect of treatment did not come. When examining the mucous membrane, the nasal membrane was swollen, bluish, spot spot was determined, nasal breathing was sharp The nasal passages were narrowed. The proposed method was treated (8 procedures per half of the nose). At the end of the treatment, a persistent positive cusp occurred: 4th effect: the mucous membrane of the nose got normal coloring, edema disappeared, nasal passages free, nasal breathing free. Example 3 Patient S., age 18. Directed with a diagnosis of vasomotor rhinitis. Before treatment, the treatment with a known method did not give an effect. nasal cavities, nasal breathing was severely hindered. The proposed method was treated (10 procedures for each half of the nose). After treatment, the following clinical effect was observed: the mucous membrane of the nasal cavities returned to normal, the nasal passages became wide them, nasal breathing free. The presented clinical observations show that the treatment of vasomotor and allergic rhinitis according to the proposed method gives a good clinical one in those cases when the treatment with the known method turned out to be ineffective. A stable clinical effect was observed in 23 patients after 7-10 procedures, and in 7 patients after 4-6 procedures. Thus, the proposed method of treating BaaoNk TopHMx and allergic rhinitis compared with the known method is more effective, allowing to achieve a stable clinical effect in those cases when the known method of treatment does not work, and thereby shorten the duration of treatment of these diseases. DETAILED DESCRIPTION A method for treating vasomotor and allergic rhinitis by applying a constant electric current to the nasal mucosa, characterized in that, in order to shorten the treatment time, the positive polarity is applied to the mucous membrane of the side wall of the nose at the anterior end of the middle nasal conch and the mucous membrane of the anterior compartments of the middle nasal entrance with a current of 10-30 μA for 10-60 minutes daily for 6-10 days. Sources of information taken into account in the examination 1. Likhachev A, G., Goldman I. And, Chronic allergic rhinosinusitis. M., 1967, p.