KR101817053B1 - Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract - Google Patents

Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR101817053B1
KR101817053B1 KR1020160022424A KR20160022424A KR101817053B1 KR 101817053 B1 KR101817053 B1 KR 101817053B1 KR 1020160022424 A KR1020160022424 A KR 1020160022424A KR 20160022424 A KR20160022424 A KR 20160022424A KR 101817053 B1 KR101817053 B1 KR 101817053B1
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
etoh
extract
activity
obesity
present
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020160022424A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR20170100189A (en
Inventor
부희옥
김학현
이문순
권수정
도마에 나오시
Original Assignee
주식회사 웰파이토
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 주식회사 웰파이토 filed Critical 주식회사 웰파이토
Priority to KR1020160022424A priority Critical patent/KR101817053B1/en
Publication of KR20170100189A publication Critical patent/KR20170100189A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR101817053B1 publication Critical patent/KR101817053B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K36/00Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
    • A61K36/18Magnoliophyta (angiosperms)
    • A61K36/185Magnoliopsida (dicotyledons)
    • A61K36/34Campanulaceae (Bellflower family)
    • A61K36/344Codonopsis
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23LFOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L33/00Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L33/10Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof using additives
    • A23L33/105Plant extracts, their artificial duplicates or their derivatives
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23VINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2002/00Food compositions, function of food ingredients or processes for food or foodstuffs
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23VINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2200/00Function of food ingredients
    • A23V2200/30Foods, ingredients or supplements having a functional effect on health
    • A23V2200/308Foods, ingredients or supplements having a functional effect on health having an effect on cancer prevention
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23VINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2200/00Function of food ingredients
    • A23V2200/30Foods, ingredients or supplements having a functional effect on health
    • A23V2200/332Promoters of weight control and weight loss

Abstract

The present invention relates to an antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunomodulating composition comprising roots extract as an active ingredient. The dodok extract according to the present invention is excellent in antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancing activity, and is free from toxicity and side effects due to natural products, and can be used safely even when taken for a long time.

Description

An antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immuno-promoting composition comprising a rosemary extract of the present invention as an active ingredient (Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract)

The present invention relates to a composition for antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancement, which comprises rosacea extract as an active ingredient.

Dodok is a perennial plant of the dicotyledonous plant, the podocarpus, and is a plant indigenous to humid grasslands, forests, or valleys such as Korea, Japan, China, and the Far East of Russia . It is mainly used for edible roots and also called ginseng or white ginseng. The roots of dodok are thick like bellflower, and when cutting plants, white juice comes out. Leaves are alternate and at the end of short branch, four leaves are facing each other and facing each other. They are long oval with length of 3-10cm and width of 1.5-4cm. Leaf edges are flat, green on the front, white on the back. In August-September, bell-shaped flowers often run from the end of the short branch to the bottom. Calyx is green, length 2-5cm, and butterfly 6-10cm. The corolla is 2.7 ~ 3.5cm long and the end is divided into 5 pieces and dried backward. The surface is light green and the inside has purple spots. The fruit ripens in September. Young leaves in spring, edible roots in autumn. The raw ginseng (沙 蔘) is a term referring to dried root.

Obesity is one of the most prevalent diseases in which the pattern of disease is rapidly changing to a developed country type as the hygiene environment is improved due to the improvement of the living standard and the average life span is extended due to the westernization of the diet. Thus, adult diseases have emerged as the biggest medical problem today, and the obesity, which is a major cause of these adult diseases, is increasing rapidly. Obesity refers to the phenomenon that extra calories are accumulated in the body in the form of fat by consuming excessive calories compared to the calories consumed. Obesity is thought to be caused by various causes such as genetic influences, environmental influences due to westernized diet, and psychological effects due to stress. However, the precise cause and mechanism of obesity has not been established yet. However, since obesity can act not only as a problem of obesity itself, but also as a cause of diseases such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes (Manson et al., New England J. Med., 333, pp677-685, 1995; JAMA, 282, pp1523-1529, 1999). There is a growing interest in the treatment of obesity worldwide.

In addition, studies on the regulation of the human immune system against the natural extract have been actively conducted because the immune system abnormality breaks health and causes various diseases. Therefore, the development of immunomodulators for safe natural products that can minimize side effects can be a very important material for the development of food, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. For example, mulberry bark and shiitake mushrooms are used as immunostimulants, starfish, longevity, and mushroom as anti-cancer adjuvants. Licorice, licorice glycyrrhizin, sea cucumber, Research is underway on cell differentiation. The development of immunomodulatory agents using these natural materials has attracted many people's interest and interest because they can safely treat cancer and chronic inflammatory diseases without side effects.

In order to solve such a problem, it is urgently required to develop a composition having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity-enhancing effect derived from natural materials that does not cause side effects and is safe.

Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2010-0071397

Accordingly, the present inventors have completed the present invention by confirming that it has antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancing activity.

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a pharmaceutical composition having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity-enhancing activity, comprising the extract of Rootgrass as an active ingredient.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a health functional food having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immuno-promoting activity comprising roeae extract as an active ingredient.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunostimulating activity, comprising the extract of Rootgrass as an active ingredient.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the doduck may be a Korean three-year roots grown in Hwasun, Muju, Jecheon, Hoengseong or Uljin.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the extract may be extracted with at least one solvent selected from the group consisting of lower alcohols having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, ethyl acetate, acetone, water and hexane.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the extract may be one that increases DPPH, nitrite or ABTS cation scavenging activity.

The present invention provides a health functional food having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immuno-promoting activity, comprising the extract of Rootgrass as an active ingredient.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the doduck may be a Korean three-year roots grown in Hwasun, Muju, Jecheon, Hoengseong or Uljin.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the food is selected from the group consisting of beverage, meat, chocolate, foods, confectionery, pizza, ram noodles, gums, candy, ice cream, alcoholic beverages, .

The present invention relates to a composition composition having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immuno-promoting activity, which comprises roots extract as an active ingredient. The extract according to the present invention is excellent in antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immuno-stimulating activity and thus can be usefully used as a pharmaceutical composition. In addition, there is no cytotoxicity, there is no toxicity to the drug, and no side effects, so that it can be safely used even when taken for a long period of time.

Fig. 1 shows the kind of dodec used in the present invention.
Figure 2 shows the roots of Duck Root Extract and its fractions.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the results of SOD enzyme activity assay of the fractions of Fusarium oxysporum extract according to the present invention.
nH: n-hexane
MC: Methylene chloride
EA: Ethyl acetate
BA: Butyl alcohol
DW: distilled water
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the results of SOD enzyme activity assay of roeae extract according to the ethanol content according to the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the results of the CAT activity assay of the fractions of Fusarium oxysporum according to the present invention.
nH: n-hexane
MC: Methylene chloride
EA: Ethyl acetate
BA: Butyl alcohol
DW: distilled water
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the results of CAT activity assay for roeae extract according to the ethanol content according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the results of assaying the APX activity of the fractions of Rootgrass extract according to the present invention.
nH: n-hexane
MC: Methylene chloride
EA: Ethyl acetate
BA: Butyl alcohol
DW: distilled water
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the results of assaying APX activity of roeae extract according to the ethanol content according to the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the results of POD activity assay of the extract of Fusarium exudata according to the present invention.
nH: n-hexane
MC: Methylene chloride
EA: Ethyl acetate
BA: Butyl alcohol
DW: distilled water
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the results of POD activity assay of Root Root Extract according to ethanol content according to the present invention.
FIG. 11 shows the results of cell viability measurement of the Hwasun daetuck extract using the solvent according to the ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
FIG. 12 shows the results of cell viability measurement of Uljinchoduk extract using a solvent according to ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
FIG. 13 shows the results of measurement of cell survival rate of the solvent-use transversal roots extract according to the ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
14 shows the results of measurement of cell viability of Jeju dodok extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
15 shows the results of cell viability measurement of Jecheon duck extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
FIG. 16 shows the results of measurement of cell viability of the extract of Mujoo-dodok extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of 3T3-L1 cells.
Fig. 17 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Hwasun dodok extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human T cells.
18 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Uljinchuk extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human T cells.
FIG. 19 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of the transversal sextet leaf extract using the solvent according to the ethanol content of human T cells.
20 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Jeju Dodok extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human T cells.
21 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Jecheon duck extract using a solvent according to ethanol content of human T cells.
22 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Mujootak extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human T cells.
23 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Hwasun daetuck extract using the solvent according to the ethanol content of human B cells.
24 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Uljinchuk extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human B cells.
FIG. 25 shows the results of cell growth measurement of the solvent-induced Hoechst etudes extract according to the ethanol content of human B cells.
26 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Jeju Dodok extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human B cells.
FIG. 27 shows the results of measurement of cell growth of Jecheon duck extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human B cells.
FIG. 28 shows the results of cell growth measurement of the extract of Mujoochuk extract using a solvent according to the ethanol content of human B cells.

The present invention is characterized by providing a pharmaceutical composition for antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancement, which comprises the extract of Rootgrass as an active ingredient.

The dodec according to the present invention can be obtained by extracting and isolating from nature using extraction and isolation methods known in the art, and the 'extract' defined in the present invention is extracted from dodec using an appropriate solvent , For example, hot water extracts of rosemary, polar solvent-soluble extracts, or non-polar solvent-soluble extracts.

As a suitable solvent for extracting the extract from roeae, any solvent acceptable in the art may be used, and water or an organic solvent may be used. Examples of the solvent include alcohols having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, acetone, ether, and the like, including purified water, methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, Various solvents such as benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate, methylene chloride, hexane and cyclohexane may be used alone or in combination. But is not limited to.

As the extraction method, any one of the methods such as hot water extraction method, cold extraction method, reflux cooling extraction method, solvent extraction method, steam distillation method, ultrasonic extraction method, elution method and compression method can be selected and used. In addition, the desired extract may be further subjected to a conventional fractionation process or may be purified using a conventional purification method. There is no limitation on the method for producing the roeae extract of the present invention, and any known method can be used.

For example, the roots extract contained in the composition of the present invention can be prepared into a powdery state by an additional process such as vacuum distillation, freeze-drying or spray-drying, or the like, with the primary extract extracted by the hot water extraction or solvent extraction method described above . Further, the primary extract can be further purified by using various chromatographies such as silica gel column chromatography, thin layer chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography and the like, You can get it.

Therefore, in the present invention, roeae extract is a concept including all the extracts, fractions and tablets obtained in each step of extraction, fractionation or purification, their diluted solutions, concentrates or dried products.

The pharmaceutical composition of the present invention may be prepared by using pharmaceutically acceptable and physiologically acceptable adjuvants in addition to the above-mentioned active ingredients. Examples of the adjuvants include excipients, disintegrants, sweeteners, binders, coating agents, swelling agents, lubricants, A lubricant or a flavoring agent can be used.

The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated into a pharmaceutical composition containing at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier in addition to the above-described active ingredients for administration.

The pharmaceutical composition may be in the form of powders, granules, tablets, capsules, suspensions, emulsions, syrups, solutions, aerosols, excipients, injections, transdermal drugs, suppositories and the like. For example, for formulation into tablets or capsules, the active ingredient may be combined with an oral, non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable inert carrier such as ethanol, glycerol, water, and the like. Also, if desired or necessary, suitable binders, lubricants, disintegrants and coloring agents may also be included as a mixture. Suitable binders include, but are not limited to, natural sugars such as starch, gelatin, glucose or beta-lactose, natural and synthetic gums such as corn sweeteners, acacia, tracker candles or sodium oleate, sodium stearate, magnesium stearate, Sodium acetate, sodium chloride, and the like. Disintegrants include, but are not limited to, starch, methyl cellulose, agar, bentonite, xanthan gum and the like. Acceptable pharmaceutical carriers for compositions that are formulated with a liquid include sterilized and sterile water, sterile water, Ringer's solution, buffered saline, albumin injection solution, dextrose solution, maltodextrin solution, glycerol, ethanol, And other conventional additives such as an antioxidant, a buffer, and a bacteriostatic agent may be added as needed. In addition, diluents, dispersants, surfactants, binders, and lubricants may be additionally added to formulate into injectable solutions, pills, capsules, granules or tablets such as aqueous solutions, suspensions, emulsions and the like. Further, it can be suitably formulated according to each disease or ingredient, using the method disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Science, Mack Publishing Company, Easton PA as an appropriate method in the field.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the roots extract of the present invention may be contained at a concentration of 0.1 μg / ml to 500 μg / ml based on the total weight of the composition.

In the meantime, 'dodok' of the present invention is a perennial plant of dicotyledonous plants and lobsters, and is distributed in Korea, Japan, China and Russian Far East, Or a plant native to the valley. It is mainly used for edible roots and also called ginseng or white ginseng. The roots of dodok are thick like bellflower, and when cutting plants, white juice comes out. Leaves are alternate and at the end of short branch, four leaves are facing each other and facing each other. They are long oval with length of 3-10cm and width of 1.5-4cm. Leaf edges are flat, green on the front, white on the back. In August-September, bell-shaped flowers often run from the end of the short branch to the bottom. Calyx is green, length 2-5cm, and butterfly 6-10cm. The corolla is 2.7 ~ 3.5cm long and the end is divided into 5 pieces and dried backward. The surface is light green and the inside has purple spots. The fruit ripens in September. Young leaves in spring, edible roots in autumn.

The inventors of the present invention have experimentally confirmed that the above extract of Dusty rosemary has antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancing activity.

More specifically, according to one embodiment of the present invention, the antioxidative activity of Duckweed extract was examined, and the effect of DPPH, ABTS, and nitrite scavenging activity of Duckweed extract was investigated.

The present inventors conducted an MTT assay to measure the anticancer effect of Duckweed extract according to another embodiment. As a result of the test using the human cancer cell line, the duck dog extract of the present invention was found to have anticancer effect Respectively.

In addition, the present inventors tried to verify the effect of enhancing the immune function of Duckweed extract according to another embodiment. As a result of the test using T cells and B cells, which are human immune cells, Indicating the promotion.

Furthermore, the present inventors evaluated the anti-obesity effect of the extract of Dulcidae using 3T3-L1 cell. As a result, the cell survival rate was decreased depending on the treatment concentration of Dulcidae extract. Showed efficacy.

Therefore, the inventors of the present invention have found that a composition comprising the extract of the present invention as an active ingredient can be used as a composition for antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity, or immunity enhancement based on the experimental results obtained in the following examples.

Further, the present invention provides a health functional food having antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity-enhancing properties, comprising the extract of Rootgrass as an active ingredient.

In the present invention, the term 'immunological enhancement' or 'immunity enhancement' refers to a cell-growth promoting action of T cells and B cells, and may include immune cells other than the above-described immune cells.

In the present invention, 'anti-obesity' refers to the ability of cells to inhibit α-amylase, α-glucose, pancreatic lipase inhibition and adipocyte differentiation, and the concentration of the composition for anti-obesity may be 10 to 1000 μg / ml .

In the present invention, 'obesity' means that the amount of fat in the body is excessively increased. Obesity is caused by an imbalance in the synthesis and degradation of fat in adipocytes. Obesity, which is caused by excess fat accumulation, increases the risk of developing chronic degenerative diseases and increases the risk of coronary artery disease, hypertension, stroke, hyperlipemia and diabetes .

In the present invention, " prevention " means any disease or disease for which the term is applied by administration of the composition of the present invention, or any action that inhibits or delays the progress of one or more symptoms of the disease or condition.

In the present invention, " improvement " means any disease or disease to which the term applies as a result of administration of the composition of the present invention, or any action in which one or more symptoms of the disease or disease are alleviated or beneficially altered.

In the present invention, " treatment " means, unless otherwise indicated, reversing, alleviating, inhibiting or preventing the disease or disorder to which the term applies, or one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder And the term " treatment " as used herein refers to an act of treating when " treating " is defined as described above.

The term " administration " as used herein is meant to provide any desired composition of the invention to a subject in any suitable manner.

The composition of the present invention may be a food composition. In addition to containing the active ingredient doodak extract, such a food composition may contain various flavors or natural carbohydrates as an additional ingredient such as a conventional food composition.

Examples of the above-mentioned natural carbohydrates include monosaccharides such as glucose, fructose and the like; Disaccharides such as maltose, sucrose and the like; And polysaccharides, for example, conventional sugars such as dextrin, cyclodextrin and the like, and sugar alcohols such as xylitol, sorbitol and erythritol. The above-described flavors can be advantageously used as natural flavorings (tau martin), stevia extracts (e.g., rebaudioside A, glycyrrhizin, etc.) and synthetic flavors (saccharin, aspartame, etc.).

The food composition of the present invention can be formulated in the same manner as the above pharmaceutical composition and used as a functional food or added to various foods. Foods to which the composition of the present invention can be added include, for example, beverages, meat, chocolates, foods, confectionery, pizza, ram noodles, other noodles, gums, candy, ice cream, alcoholic beverages, vitamin complexes, .

In addition, the food composition may contain various additives such as various nutrients, vitamins, minerals (electrolytes), synthetic flavors and flavors such as natural flavors, coloring agents and aggravating agents (such as cheese and chocolate), pectic acid and its salts , Alginic acid and its salts, organic acids, protective colloid thickeners, pH adjusting agents, stabilizers, preservatives, glycerin, alcohols, carbonating agents used in carbonated drinks and the like. In addition, the food composition of the present invention may contain natural fruit juice and pulp for the production of fruit juice drinks and vegetable drinks.

Dodok extract, which is an effective ingredient of the present invention, is a natural substance and has little toxicity and side effects. Therefore, it can be safely used for long-term use for antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancement.

The health functional food of the present invention can be manufactured and processed in the form of tablet, capsule, powder, granule, liquid, ring and the like for the purpose of antioxidation, anti-cancer, anti-obesity or immunity enhancement.

In the present invention, the term "health functional food" refers to a food prepared and processed by using raw materials or ingredients having useful functions in accordance with Law No. 6727 on Health Functional Foods, and the nutritional control on the structure and function of the human body Or for the purpose of obtaining a beneficial effect for health use such as physiological action.

The health functional foods of the present invention may contain conventional food additives and, unless otherwise specified, whether or not they are suitable as food additives are classified according to the General Rules for Food Additives approved by the Food and Drug Administration, Standards and standards.

Examples of the food items included in the above food additives include chemical compounds such as ketones, glycine, calcium citrate, nicotinic acid, and cinnamic acid; Natural additives such as persimmon extract, licorice extract, crystalline cellulose, high color pigment and guar gum; L-glutamic acid sodium preparations, noodle-added alkalis, preservative preparations, tar coloring preparations and the like.

For example, the health functional food in the form of tablets may be prepared by granulating a mixture of the active ingredient of the present invention, Mallinberry extract, with an excipient, a binder, a disintegrant and other additives in a conventional manner, Alternatively, the mixture can be directly compression molded. In addition, the health functional food of the tablet form may contain a mating agent or the like if necessary.

The hard capsule of the capsule type health functional food can be prepared by filling a normal hard capsule with a mixture of an effective ingredient of the present invention dodok extract and an additive such as an excipient and the soft capsule may contain additives such as excipients And filling the mixture with a capsule base such as gelatin. The soft capsule may contain a plasticizer such as glycerin or sorbitol, a coloring agent, a preservative and the like, if necessary.

The health functional food of the ring form can be prepared by molding a mixture of the extract of Dodok, the active ingredient of the present invention, excipient, binder, disintegrant and the like by a conventionally known method, and if necessary, Or the surface may be coated with a material such as starch, talc.

The granular health functional food may be prepared by granulating a mixture of the active ingredient of the present invention, Mallinberry extract, excipient, binder, disintegrant and the like, into granules by a known method, and if necessary, ≪ / RTI >

The health functional food may be a beverage, a meat, a chocolate, a food, a confectionery, a pizza, a ramen, a noodle, a gum, a candy, an ice cream, an alcoholic beverage, a vitamin complex and a health supplement food.

     Hereinafter, the present invention will be further described by way of examples. These examples are for further illustrating the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

<Preparation Example 1> Preparation of Doduk

The material used in the present invention was purchased from a farmhouse and purchased from 6 farms (Jeju Island, Chunnam Province, Hwasun, Jeonbuk Province, Jecheon, Chungcheongbuk-do, Gyeongbuk, Uljin). The above materials were used in experiments for establishing optimum extraction conditions for developing a health functional food having blood pressure lowering effect using rosewood.

&Lt; Example 1 >

In order to elucidate the optimal extraction conditions according to the conditions of hot water extraction, two kinds of conditions were used to obtain a hot water extract. First, 10 times of distilled water was added to 50 g of freeze-dried dodok sample, and the whole was extracted three times at 100 ° C for 20 minutes to obtain a hot-water extract. In another condition, 50 g of freeze- And repeatedly extracted three times to obtain a hot water extract. Each of the hot-water extracts obtained above was cooled and filtered at room temperature, and the extract was concentrated using a rotary evaporator. As a result of measuring the yield by lyophilizing the concentrated extracts, the yields of 100 째 C extracts from whole roots were higher than those obtained from 70 째 C, and their antioxidant activities were also higher in 100 째 C hot water extracts (See Tables 1 to 3).

On the other hand, for the uniformity of raw materials collected from each region, freeze-dried dodok samples were sorted and removed by using a brush, washed with a brush, cut into a suitable size, and freeze-dried Dried and then powdered and used as an experimental sample.

Yield of extract sample according to hot water extraction Extraction temperature Yield (g) Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju 100 ℃ 31.25 + - 0.51 30.62 + 0.71 31.81 + - 0.63 32.39 + - 0.41 30.87 ± 0.62 32.08 + - 0.37 70 ℃ 26.50 + - 0.48 27.17 + - 0.25 26.85 ± 0.82 27.92 + - 0.38 25.79 ± 0.27 24.86 + - 0.45 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to hot water extraction Culture region Extraction temperature DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun 100 ℃ 8.56 ± 0.28 11.03 + - 0.67 16.38 ± 0.58 21.35 ± 0.77 48.55 + 0.49 70 ℃ 9.15 ± 1.08 12.37 + - 0.58 15.92 + - 0.51 22.27 ± 1.09 45.65 ± 0.57 Uljin 100 ℃ 9.52 + - 0.67 12.18 ± 0.39 15.22 + - 0.83 19.28 占 1.21 45.28 + - 1.15 70 ℃ 8.26 ± 0.37 12.67 ± 0.45 16.35 ± 0.92 17.56 ± 0.78 42.51 + - 0.76 Hoengseong 100 ℃ 8.92 ± 0.25 10.28 ± 0.21 15.05 + - 0.68 20.16 ± 0.65 40.38 ± 1.31 70 ℃ 9.29 ± 0.85 13.08 + - 0.78 16.72 ± 0.62 21.23 ± 1.37 41.61 + - 1.03 Jeju 100 ℃ 10.29 ± 0.89 13.52 + - 0.37 20.88 ± 0.56 23.62 + -0.94 47.95 ± 0.86 70 ℃ 8.67 ± 0.63 13.71 ± 0.57 19.25 + - 0.83 24.07 ± 0.75 46.19 + 0.79 Jecheon 100 ℃ 9.38 ± 0.52 10.92 ± 0.73 14.69 ± 0.48 18.86 ± 0.59 46.29 ± 0.83 70 ℃ 10.32 + - 0.62 11.62 + 0.48 13.97 ± 0.69 17.57 + - 0.72 45.27 + - 0.61 Muju 100 ℃ 8.65 ± 0.85 10.87 ± 0.62 15.48 ± 1.18 20.86 ± 0.71 45.62 ± 0.86 70 ℃ 9.07 ± 0.39 11.15 ± 0.27 15.86 + - 0.82 18.92 + 0.73 44.85 ± 1.25 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

ABTS radical scavenging activities according to hot water extraction
Culture region
Extraction temperature ABTS radical scavenging activity,% of control
Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun 100 ℃ 6.58 ± 0.67 9.07 ± 0.92 17.62 ± 0.86 27.35 ± 0.78 39.53 + 1.21 68.72 ± 1.36 70 ℃ 6.23 ± 0.76 8.75 ± 0.59 17.92 + 0.48 25.83 + - 0.96 39.08 + - 0.82 65.28 ± 1.83 Uljin 100 ℃ 7.53 ± 0.73 9.81 ± 0.65 19.62 ± 0.79 26.28 ± 0.85 41.25 + - 0.57 69.65 + 0.83 70 ℃ 8.06 ± 0.69 10.12 + - 0.85 18.85 + 0.64 28.51 + - 0.93 37.85 +/- 1.45 68.31 + 1.31 Hoengseong 100 ℃ 7.82 + - 0.41 10.31 ± 0.77 18.63 + - 0.84 26.77 ± 1.25 38.52 + - 0.87 70.25 + - 0.81 70 ℃ 8.16 ± 0.66 11.08 + - 0.58 18.33 + - 0.93 27.09 + - 0.57 39.57 + - 0.92 67.82 + - 0.87 Jeju 100 ℃ 8.81 ± 0.63 11.92 + - 0.83 20.35 + - 0.86 27.67 + - 0.68 41.39 ± 1.91 72.16 ± 1.87 70 ℃ 8.63 ± 0.81 10.75 + - 0.58 20.86 ± 1.25 29.28 ± 0.84 38.25 + 1.45 72.08 ± 1.37 Jecheon 100 ℃ 7.62 ± 0.73 11.06 + - 0.82 17.82 ± 0.57 26.77 ± 1.08 40.21 + 1.36 68.37 ± 1.68 70 ℃ 8.32 + - 0.85 10.83 + - 0.68 16.59 + - 0.61 28.31 + - 0.95 39.25 + - 1.28 69.13 + - 1.23 Muju 100 ℃ 8.29 + - 0.72 11.27 ± 0.55 18.92 + 0.78 26.85 ± 1.25 39.57 ± 1.36 67.83 + - 0.98 70 ℃ 8.12 ± 0.69 9.78 + - 0.85 16.38 ± 0.63 29.18 ± 0.52 37.62 ± 1.75 68.36 ± 1.36 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

< Example  2> Room temperature extraction

For the extraction at room temperature, 50 g of freeze-dried Deodorant powder was extracted three times at a ratio of 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of ethanol (EtOH), and the extract was completely concentrated by using a reduced pressure concentrator, Recovery rate.

As a result, it was found that ethanol extracts of 50% ethanol showed higher recovery than those of ethanol extracts of 30% and 70%.

Yield of extract sample according to the percentage EtOH solvent solvent Yield (g) Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju EtoH 30% 16.12 + - 0.44 13.08 + - 0.65 16.55 + - 0.44 7.17 ± 0.05 11.04 + - 0.41 17.64 ± 0.60 EtoH 50% 19.50 ± 0.55 14.46 ± 0.47 18.22 + - 0.54 10.53 + - 0.18 13.65 + - 0.85 16.62 + - 0.55 EtoH 70% 16.31 ± 0.09 12.67 ± 0.09 16.64 ± 0.36 7.13 ± 0.17 12.34 ± 0.36 14.24 + - 0.74 EtoH 100% 6.36 ± 0.48 5.11 + - 0.14 4.73 ± 0.25 2.70 + - 0.74 14.24 + - 0.33 4.89 ± 0.07 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

< Example  3> Reflux cooling extraction

In the reflux cooling extraction, 10 times of distilled water was added to 50 g of freeze-dried dodder sample in a flask equipped with a vertical reflux condenser, and then extracted three times for 12 hours at 100 ° C. Ethanol extraction was carried out in a vertical reflux condenser- Of 70% alcohol and then extracted three times at 70 ° C for 3 hours. The extract was cooled and filtered at room temperature, and the extract was concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The extract was lyophilized and then the weight was measured.

As a result, it was found that the water extraction reflux extraction showed higher recovery than the ethanol reflux cooling extraction, and that the antioxidant activity showed high efficacy in the ethanol extraction from all regions.

Yield of extract sample according to reflux extraction Reflux extraction Yield (g) Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju D.W. 31.25 + - 0.51 30.62 + 0.71 31.81 + - 0.63 32.39 + - 0.41 30.87 ± 0.62 32.08 + - 0.37 70% EtOH 26.50 + - 0.48 27.17 + - 0.25 26.85 ± 0.82 27.92 + - 0.38 25.79 ± 0.27 24.86 + - 0.45 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to reflux extraction Culture region Reflux extraction DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun D.W. 9.62 ± 0.36 15.21 + - 0.87 19.63 + - 0.65 25.38 + - 0.92 53.26 ± 0.88 70% EtOH 10.58 ± 0.53 17.21 + - 0.46 19.86 ± 0.93 27.15 + - 1.16 56.28 0.97 Uljin D.W. 8.21 + - 0.51 13.68 ± 0.78 18.57 ± 0.92 23.62 ± 1.03 47.39 ± 0.82 70% EtOH 10.37 + - 0.85 16.53 + - 0.71 20.29 ± 0.86 26.32 ± 0.63 53.98 ± 0.73 Hoengseong D.W. 10.21 + - 0.47 14.83 + - 0.66 20.08 ± 0.25 23.89 ± 0.39 51.67 ± 1.56 70% EtOH 9.83 + - 0.78 16.52 + - 0.93 21.05 ± 0.72 25.61 + - 1.31 54.29 ± 1.75 Jeju D.W. 9.11 + - 0.33 12.52 + - 0.65 16.48 ± 0.68 27.92 + 1.58 53.96 ± 0.87 70% EtOH 10.75 0.65 19.17 + - 0.86 22.18 ± 0.71 27.06 + - 0.76 55.86 +/- 1.47 Jecheon D.W. 8.52 ± 0.28 12.92 + - 0.92 18.53 + - 0.58 24.16 ± 0.69 49.69 ± 0.86 70% EtOH 10.18 ± 0.73 13.28 ± 0.29 17.83 ± 0.63 23.73 + 1.31 52.32 + - 1.27 Muju D.W. 9.26 ± 0.83 17.35 ± 0.65 18.92 + - 0.62 23.75 ± 0.93 48.62 ± 0.88 70% EtOH 9.03 + - 0.38 16.84 ± 0.32 21.06 ± 0.58 25.66 ± 0.86 49.78 ± 0.93 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

ABTS radical scavenging activities according to reflux extraction Culture region Reflux extraction ABTS radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun D.W. 7.89 ± 0.53 9.63 ± 0.78 18.21 + - 0.53 28.09 + - 0.68 41.36 ± 1.17 69.85 ± 0.97 70% EtOH 10.07 ± 0.81 12.28 ± 0.63 23.08 + - 0.63 31.27 ± 0.87 42.31 + - 0.91 72.99 + - 0.88 Uljin D.W. 8.25 ± 0.75 9.69 ± 0.69 19.68 ± 0.82 26.76 ± 0.69 42.21 ± 0.59 69.38 ± 0.79 70% EtOH 9.27 ± 0.52 12.18 ± 0.81 24.17 ± 0.51 28.62 + 0.78 42.86 ± 1.18 73.21 + - 1.12 Hoengseong D.W. 8.63 ± 0.36 11.92 + - 0.72 20.36 + - 0.93 27.81 + - 0.81 43.52 + 0.89 67.82 + - 1.23 70% EtOH 10.12 ± 0.28 12.98 + - 0.55 24.57 ± 0.78 29.38 ± 0.59 44.19 + - 0.78 70.27 + - 0.93 Jeju D.W. 9.21 ± 0.83 11.39 ± 0.87 22.67 ± 0.59 29.38 ± 0.98 41.27 ± 0.75 70.18 + 1.31 70% EtOH 8.93 ± 0.48 12.81 + - 0.71 25.18 + - 0.63 30.21 ± 0.89 44.36 ± 0.86 73.84 ± 1.08 Jecheon D.W. 7.82 ± 0.59 12.05 + - 0.85 21.17 ± 0.52 26.93 + - 1.02 40.81 + 1.67 68.92 + 1.25 70% EtOH 9.06 + - 0.76 12.88 ± 0.65 23.62 ± 0.68 27.85 + - 0.91 45.06 ± 1.18 68.73 + - 0.75 Muju D.W. 9.15 ± 0.72 10.87 ± 0.59 19.63 + - 0.71 27.87 + - 0.82 39.56 + - 0.93 67.22 ± 0.82 70% EtOH 10.25 + - 0.53 11.68 + - 0.81 20.92 + 0.85 29.65 ± 0.52 43.08 ± 1.22 69.76 ± 0.79  * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

< Example  4> Enzymatic decomposition extraction

(W: w: w) of enzyme cellulase: pectinase: amyloglucosidase at a ratio of 3: 2: 1, 3: 2: 2, 3: 1: 2 (2% w / w) were added to each of these ratios, and the mixture was extracted at 45 ° C for 10 hours. Each of the enzyme extracts was cooled at room temperature, filtered, concentrated by rotary evaporator, and the yield was determined on the basis of 30 brix concentrate yield. As a result, relatively high yield was obtained at the ratio of 3: 2: 2 enzyme. However, in order to investigate the optimum ratio more closely, it is necessary to carry out a supplementary experiment by treating the enzyme mixture ratio more variously. Antioxidant activity also showed a generally high efficacy at the 3: 2: 2 ratio.

Effect of mixing ratio of macerating enzyme on yield of extracted by macerating enzymatic extraction Mixing ratio
(W / W / W)
Yield (g / 30brix)
Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju Control 280.75 + - 8.57 302.58 +/- 7.51 305.58 ± 10.21 315.62 + - 6.28 306.25 + - 6.21 311.27 ± 7.53 3: 2: 1 316.32 + - 8.57 328.25 + - 7.51 326.38 ± 10.21 335.63 + - 6.28 323.52 + - 6.21 335.27 + - 7.53 3: 2: 2 319.83 + - 8.57 331.26 + - 7.51 329.67 ± 10.21 337.26 + - 6.28 327.86 ± 6.21 336.75 ± 7.53 3: 1: 2 317.76 + - 8.57 330.29 + - 7.51 329.83 + - 10.21 335.29 + - 6.28 326.55 + - 6.21 335.87 ± 7.53 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.
The control was value by hot-water (100 ° C) extraction method.

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to mixing ratio by macerating enzymatic extraction
Culture region
Mixing ratio
(W / W / W)
DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control
Concentration (mg / mL) One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun Control 8.25 + - 0.35 10.38 ± 0.27 18.52 + - 0.62 23.01 + - 0.58 39.53 + - 0.86 3: 2: 1 9.38 ± 0.92 12.25 ± 1.02 19.78 ± 0.76 25.36 + - 0.92 42.27 + - 0.81 3: 2: 2 9.25 + - 0.77 13.18 ± 0.92 22.26 ± 0.83 26.93 + 1.13 43.55 + - 0.99 3: 1: 2 10.08 + - 1.03 13.22 + - 0.75 20.38 ± 0.79 25.65 + 0.81 43.26 ± 0.87 Uljin Control 9.32 ± 0.63 10.53 + - 0.52 19.77 + - 0.93 22.51 + - 0.85 40.29 + - 0.81 3: 2: 1 10.23 ± 0.29 12.38 ± 0.87 21.08 ± 0.56 24.58 ± 0.27 43.31 + - 0.92 3: 2: 2 9.86 ± 0.39 13.72 ± 0.79 23.62 ± 0.53 27.06 + - 0.67 45.28 ± 0.87 3: 1: 2 10.03 + - 0.86 14.16 ± 0.92 23.08 + - 0.75 24.29 + - 0.93 44.32 + - 0.59 Hoengseong Control 9.29 ± 0.67 11.85 ± 0.85 19.27 ± 0.63 21.69 ± 0.91 39.87 ± 0.75 3: 2: 1 10.93 ± 0.55 13.21 + - 0.46 20.18 ± 1.25 24.63 + - 0.78 43.57 + - 0.92 3: 2: 2 9.85 ± 0.53 15.29 ± 0.77 24.06 ± 0.86 25.86 ± 0.63 44.29 + - 0.76 3: 1: 2 10.12 + - 0.33 13.83 ± 0.92 21.68 ± 0.63 25.05 ± 0.52 43.93 + - 0.82 Jeju Control 10.23 + - 0.76 13.51 + - 0.55 18.65 ± 0.73 25.02 + - 0.92 40.35 + - 0.85 3: 2: 1 10.03 + - 0.86 15.69 ± 0.78 23.27 ± 0.67 25.13 + - 1.18 42.95 ± 1.34 3: 2: 2 9.78 + - 0.53 16.05 + 0.81 25.29 + - 0.75 26.87 + - 0.62 46.16 + - 0.58 3: 1: 2 10.15 ± 0.29 14.87 ± 0.52 23.86 + - 0.48 25.32 ± 0.73 45.36 ± 0.69 Jecheon Control 8.26 ± 0.81 10.68 ± 0.76 17.28 ± 0.59 22.06 + - 0.52 40.24 0.75 3: 2: 1 9.52 + - 0.63 14.29 ± 0.78 22.09 + - 0.95 25.27 ± 0.65 41.38 ± 0.72 3: 2: 2 9.78 ± 0.82 13.85 + 0.49 21.52 + 0.78 25.62 + - 0.56 43.27 + - 0.76 3: 1: 2 10.18 ± 0.35 12.399 + - 0.62 22.86 ± 0.69 23.27 + - 0.85 43.07 + - 0.82 Muju Control 9.25 + 0.26 10.79 ± 0.91 16.85 ± 0.68 22.28 ± 0.71 39.82 ± 0.65 3: 2: 1 8.79 ± 0.76 12.18 ± 0.92 20.83 ± 0.78 23.69 ± 1.19 40.79 + - 0.87 3: 2: 2 9.87 ± 0.52 13.63 + - 0.41 22.18 ± 0.73 23.93 + - 0.65 42.51 + - 0.58 3: 1: 2 9.26 ± 0.65 14.53 + - 0.36 21.66 ± 0.31 22.78 ± 0.86 42.16 ± 0.73 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

ABTS radical scavenging activities according to mixing ratio by macerating enzymatic extraction Culture region Mixing ratio
(W / W / W)
ABTS radical scavenging activity,% of control
Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 20 Hwasun Control 6.82 + - 0.53 8.73 ± 0.33 15.66 ± 0.97 23.59 + - 0.75 35.82 ± 0.65 61.58 ± 1.23 3: 2: 1 6.33 ± 0.65 8.56 ± 0.96 18.61 + - 0.82 22.72 ± 0.68 36.39 ± 1.26 65.25 + - 0.82 3: 2: 2 7.23 ± 0.73 9.83 + - 0.62 17.95 ± 0.86 26.89 ± 0.75 38.56 + - 0.58 66.28 ± 1.53 3: 1: 2 7.54 ± 0.87 9.37 ± 0.52 18.18 ± 0.66 25.35 + - 0.93 38.05 1.51 65.78 ± 1.32 Uljin Control 6.21 ± 0.58 9.35 ± 0.83 17.29 + - 0.38 26.86 ± 0.83 37.29 ± 0.68 63.57 + 0.75 3: 2: 1 7.16 ± 0.83 10.25 + - 0.75 19.53 + - 0.59 25.78 ± 0.68 38.55 ± 1.29 66.29 + - 0.85 3: 2: 2 7.15 + 0.79 9.83 ± 0.91 19.86 ± 0.69 26.58 ± 0.81 39.83 + 1.58 70.17 ± 1.69 3: 1: 2 7.85 + - 0.66 10.09 + - 0.39 18.69 ± 0.53 27.52 + - 0.72 38.65 + - 0.85 70.28 + - 0.68 Hoengseong Control 7.56 ± 0.52 9.27 ± 0.49 17.85 ± 0.83 25.68 + - 0.71 36.73 ± 0.39 65.28 ± 1.42 3: 2: 1 8.23 + - 0.61 10.09 + - 0.89 18.92 ± 0.77 26.58 ± 0.58 38.78 ± 1.53 68.59 ± 1.39 3: 2: 2 7.51 + - 0.75 11.18 ± 0.68 19.85 ± 0.89 29.53 + - 0.49 40.62 + - 0.85 71.64 + 1.15 3: 1: 2 8.78 ± 0.69 10.85 ± 0.81 19.18 ± 0.86 26.79 ± 0.78 39.13 + - 1.71 69.72 ± 1.53 Jeju Control 7.25 + 0.93 10.29 ± 0.52 16.58 ± 0.85 28.35 + 0.78 36.53 + - 0.56 65.02 ± 1.09 3: 2: 1 7.38 ± 0.73 10.57 + - 0.65 19.68 + - 0.81 29.52 + - 0.58 39.48 ± 0.85 68.12 ± 1.18 3: 2: 2 8.36 + - 0.85 9.53 + - 0.52 21.68 + - 0.66 28.58 ± 0.79 42.52 ± 1.29 70.82 + 0.78 3: 1: 2 8.52 ± 0.59 10.18 ± 0.88 18.62 ± 0.82 29.49 + - 0.65 38.58 ± 0.58 70.75 ± 1.42 Jecheon Control 6.88 ± 0.69 9.52 ± 0.73 17.92 + 0.75 27.58 ± 0.83 39.15 + 1.68 66.27 ± 1.55 3: 2: 1 8.05 + - 0.82 10.18 ± 0.98 18.73 + - 0.56 27.88 + - 0.85 40.53 + - 0.78 70.58 ± 1.31 3: 2: 2 8.69 ± 0.61 10.13 + - 0.59 17.83 + - 0.51 30.25 + - 0.85 38.83 + - 0.67 68.19 + 1.45 3: 1: 2 7.25 + - 0.56 9.83 + - 0.98 18.28 ± 0.89 28.63 + - 0.68 40.48 ± 1.56 66.93 + - 1.12 Muju Control 7.37 ± 0.72 10.15 ± 0.59 17.18 ± 0.79 25.35 + - 0.68 39.53 + - 0.58 63.82 + - 0.83 3: 2: 1 8.16 ± 0.59 9.87 + - 0.63 19.38 ± 0.58 28.52 ± 0.83 41.25 + 1.35 69.15 ± 1.52 3: 2: 2 7.83 + - 0.82 9.58 ± 0.78 17.55 + 0.71 28.63 + - 0.59 39.68 ± 0.89 68.65 ± 1.12 3: 1: 2 9.13 ± 0.73 10.25 + - 0.91 18.69 ± 0.82 27.52 + - 0.75 37.62 ± 1.51 69.39 ± 1.45 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

< Example  4> By extraction solvent , By fraction  Extract preparation

4-1. Extraction and solvent fraction

 The cultivated doducks of each region were selected, washed, freeze dried, and then extracted three times with 70% alcohol at room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain an extract. The concentrated extracts were lyophilized and then suspended in distilled water to obtain n-hexane, methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, butyl alcohol, and D.W. Followed by sequential extraction and fractionation (see Fig. 2).

4-2. Yield by solvent fraction

 The lyophilized frozen dough was repeatedly extracted with 70% alcohol at room temperature three times, and then the extract was concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain lyophilized powder. 50 g of the lyophilized powder was fractionated by repeating three times for each solvent such as n-hexane, methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, butyl alcohol and DW (distilled water), and then the extract was completely concentrated with a vacuum concentrator and then weighed And the recovery of each fraction was investigated. Regardless of region, all samples showed the highest recoveries in water extraction and very low yields in the ethyl acetate layer (see Table 11).

Yield of extract sample according to solvent fractions solvent Yield (g) Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju n-Hexane 0.66 + 0.03 0.43 + 0.07 0.69 + 0.11 1.36 + 0.08 0.68 ± 0.07 0.42 + 0.07 MethyleneChloride 0.24 0.12 0.51 ± 0.05 0.21 ± 0.09 0.41 + - 0.10 0.50 + - 0.05 0.28 + 0.14 Ethyl Acetate 0.10 0.04 0.14 + 0.03 0.11 + 0.02 0.16 ± 0.12 0.17 + 0.07 0.11 + 0.09 n-BuOH 2.61 + - 0.10 2.91 + 0.07 1.83 + 0.07 3.43 ± 0.09 3.89 ± 0.12 2.78 + 0.02 D.W 46.39 ± 0.45 46.01 + - 0.24 47.16 + - 0.87 44.64 ± 0.29 44.76 ± 0.88 46.41 ± 0.65 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

4-3. By extraction solvent  yield

 10 g of lyophilized powder obtained by lyophilization was repeated three times for each solvent such as EtOH, MeOH, Ether, Acetone, and distilled water, and the extract was completely concentrated by using a reduced pressure concentrator, Recovery rate. As a result, water extraction showed the highest recovery rate in all six cultivars and yield was relatively low in ether and acetone layers.

Yield of extract solvent Yield (g) Culture region Hwasun Uljin Hoengseong Jeju Jecheon Muju EtOH 1.25 ± 0.01 0.80 + 0.03 0.68 ± 0.01 0.38 + 0.03 0.72 ± 0.01 0.73 ± 0.01 MeOH 3.29 ± 0.02 2.09 ± 0.02 3.06 ± 0.02 1.23 + 0.04 1.91 + 0.03 2.31 ± 0.01 Ether 0.11 + - 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.13 + - 0.01 0.12 + - 0.01 0.11 + 0.02 0.12 + 0.02 Acetone 0.12 + - 0.01 0.11 + 0.02 0.10 ± 0.01 0.12 + 0.02 0.11 + - 0.01 0.13 + - 0.01 Water 5.06 + 0.04 2.26 + 0.02 4.66 + 0.04 3.59 + 0.07 4.96 ± 0.09 3.91 ± 0.03 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

< Experimental Example  1> By region Cultivated  Antioxidant activity test according to extraction condition

 Experiments were carried out to establish the criteria for the preparation of optimal extracts by verifying differences in the physiological functions of each of the extracts according to each extraction condition.

1-1. DPPH radical scavenging ability

Antioxidant activity of each extract was measured by hydrogen electron donating ability by the method of Choi et al. (2003). Dissolve samples of various concentrations in a methanol (or DMSO) solvent, mix 900 μL of DPPH solution (100 μM) with 100 μL of each sample and stir. This mixture was reacted in a dark place for 30 minutes and absorbance was measured at 517 nm. The hydrogen electron donating ability was evaluated by repeating each experiment three times and then calculating the degree of decrease in absorbance of the control by the following equation.

An = (A0-A) / A0 100

An: Antioxidant activity against DPPH radical scavenging activity (%)

A0: Absorbance of DPPH solution without added sample

A: The absorbance of DPPH in the reaction solution and the absorbance of the sample

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to culture region in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant Culture region DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 Codonopsis lanceolata Hwasun 7.67 0.30 8.50 0.70 10.07 ± 0.29 11.37 + - 0.46 13.45 + 0.49 Uljin 8.70 ± 0.24 9.84 0.24 10.98 + - 0.76 13.50 + - 0.35 16.54 ± 1.07 Hoengseong 8.89 ± 0.15 10.18 ± 0.26 10.41 ± 0.35 12.47 + - 0.40 15.27 ± 0.24 Jeju 9.53 + - 0.25 10.68 ± 0.23 11.48 ± 0.43 13.84 0.35 14.98 + - 0.41 Jecheon 9.34 ± 0.38 10.64 ± 0.91 12.59 + - 0.35 13.69 + - 0.43 17.25 + - 0.30 Muju 10.03 + - 0.80 11.25 + - 0.77 12.70 + - 0.46 13.58 + - 0.61 18.16 ± 0.26 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to extract solvents in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant Culture region Solvent DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) One 2.5 5 10 20 Codonopsis lanceolata Hwasun EtOH 9.21 + - 0.13 11.65 + 1.53 19.57 ± 1.40 22.00 ± 1.20 41.51 + - 0.24 MeOH 11.17 ± 1.12 14.14 + - 0.62 19.30 ± 0.59 22.17 ± 1.38 52.45 + 0.40 D.W 7.82 + - 0.76 12.17 + - 0.72 18.28 + - 0.67 22.50 + - 0.80 54.15 + - 0.34 Acetone 7.13 + - 0.84 9.87 ± 0.81 13.43 ± 0.78 18.40 + - 0.74 43.62 ± 0.31 Ether 9.70 + - 0.76 13.16 ± 1.24 15.81 ± 1.20 20.04 + - 1.14 46.47 ± 1.19 Uljin EtOH 8.55 + 1.36 10.34 ± 1.65 18.39 ± 1.50 21.13 + - 0.69 41.60 +/- 1.30 MeOH 9.95 + 0.78 12.96 ± 0.75 18.19 ± 0.71 23.74 ± 0.12 51.62 ± 0.81 D.W 5.56 + - 0.54 10.02 + - 0.52 16.28 + - 0.48 24.12 ± 1.07 51.07 + - 0.41 Acetone 9.01 ± 0.99 11.69 ± 0.96 15.17 + - 0.92 20.04 0.87 43.53 + - 0.82 Ether 9.05 + - 0.76 12.82 + - 0.72 15.47 ± 0.70 19.72 ± 0.67 43.91 + - 0.81 Hoengseong EtOH 9.51 + - 0.13 11.65 ± 0.69 19.57 + - 0.12 20.32 + - 0.40 39.49 + - 0.82 MeOH 10.69 0.98 13.68 + - 0.95 18.87 ± 0.89 22.86 ± 1.49 55.87 ± 0.56 D.W 6.70 + - 0.44 11.11 + - 0.41 17.29 ± 0.39 24.10 + - 0.46 53.97 + 0.47 Acetone 9.60 0.31 11.44 + 1.13 14.94 ± 1.09 19.82 ± 1.02 46.53 ± 1.18 Ether 9.89 + - 0.80 14.64 ± 1.18 17.24. + -. 1.14 21.40 ± 1.08 47.23 + - 0.98 Jeju EtOH 9.36 ± 0.71 11.50 ± 0.69 19.44 + 0.63 22.65 ± 1.45 39.49 + - 0.60 MeOH 10.19 + - 0.84 13.19 ± 0.81 18.41 + - 0.76 22.62 ± 0.32 51.90 ± 0.65 D.W 9.88 0.41 14.96 ± 1.09 20.88 ± 1.02 23.82 ± 0.22 54.53 + - 0.61 Acetone 8.86 ± 0.87 11.36 ± 1.02 14.86 ± 0.98 19.75 + 0.93 45.16 + - 0.60 Ether 8.10 + - 0.47 11.90 + - 0.45 14.59 ± 0.44 18.88 + - 0.41 45.53 + - 0.60 Jecheon EtOH 6.99 ± 1.10 9.19 ± 1.07 17.33 + - 0.98 21.38 ± 0.70 42.61 + - 0.60 MeOH 9.81 + - 0.80 12.83 ± 0.78 18.07 ± 0.73 22.86 ± 1.54 52.08 + - 0.72 D.W 8.49 + 0.89 13.97 ± 2.09 19.95 + 1.94 25.63 + - 0.23 52.85 + 1.38 Acetone 6.16 ± 0.26 8.60 + - 0.25 12.21 + - 0.24 17.25 + - 0.23 49.87 ± 0.79 Ether 7.88 + - 0.54 10.69 ± 0.52 14.38 ± 0.50 18.68 + - 0.48 50.21 + 0.78 Muju EtOH 7.11 + - 0.67 9.31 ± 0.65 17.44 ± 0.60 22.72 ± 1.04 41.41 ± 0.18 MeOH 12.74 + 0.33 15.66 ± 0.32 20.73 + - 0.30 24.93 + - 0.43 51.80 ± 1.07 D.W 10.42 + - 0.40 15.65 + - 0.45 21.51 + - 0.41 22.22 + - 0.50 51.73 + - 0.95 Acetone 8.15 ± 1.11 10.59 ± 1.35 14.12 ± 1.29 19.05 ± 1.22 49.61 ± 0.68 Ether 7.23 ± 0.24 11.07 ± 0.23 13.78 ± 0.22 18.11 ± 0.21 49.96 ± 0.68 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

DPPH radical scavenging activities according to the percentage of EtOH solvent in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant
Cuture region
Solvent DPPH radical scavenging activity,% of control
Concentration (mg / mL) One 2.5 5 10 20 Codonopsis lanceolata Hwasun EtOH 30% 3.65 ± 0.34 7.88 ± 0.91 11.08 + - 1.14 23.39 ± 1.02 34.47 ± 1.40 EtOH 50% 3.24 ± 0.44 8.03 + - 0.38 10.65 ± 0.57 21.31 ± 0.28 26.70 + - 0.48 EtOH 70% 4.71 + - 0.45 9.32 ± 0.21 12.14 + - 0.38 20.30 ± 0.83 31.40 +/- 0.33 EtOH 100% 9.32 + - 0.95 11.09 + - 0.24 16.17 ± 0.56 25.31 + - 0.77 41.13 + 1.83 Uljin EtOH 30% 3.64 ± 0.38 8.69 0.94 9.93 + 0.66 21.24 + 1.38 31.36 ± 1.99 EtOH 50% 2.33 ± 0.11 8.65 ± 0.24 11.56 + - 0.41 22.90 + - 0.42 26.50 + - 0.77 EtOH 70% 4.30 ± 0.15 9.12 ± 0.73 12.39 + - 0.47 23.29 ± 0.53 35.10 ± 1.68 EtOH 100% 7.26 ± 0.36 10.67 ± 0.36 13.42 + - 0.42 25.31 ± 1.09 44.31 + - 0.31
Hoengseong
EtOH 30% 4.14 ± 0.75 9.96 + 0.59 12.11 ± 0.80 23.26 + 2.04 36.12 ± 2.87
EtOH 50% 4.77 ± 0.03 6.54 ± 0.43 11.68 ± 0.20 20.68 ± 0.16 27.25 + - 0.27 EtOH 70% 3.44 ± 0.45 8.66 ± 0.21 12.23 + - 0.34 20.52 ± 1.33 31.99 ± 1.26 EtOH 100% 7.42 ± 0.91 12.10 ± 0.73 12.80 ± 0.91 25.04 + - 0.21 43.61 + - 0.40
Jeju
EtOH 30% 6.07 ± 0.44 7.17 ± 0.94 11.33 + - 0.82 23.48 ± 1.35 37.48 + - 0.46
EtOH 50% 2.89 ± 0.17 9.97 + 0.09 9.25 + - 0.57 20.86 ± 0.97 31.11 + 1.54 EtOH 70% 4.92 ± 0.06 10.32 + 0.13 13.58 ± 0.87 22.80 ± 1.30 35.70 ± 0.88 EtOH 100% 8.28 + - 0.33 13.31 + - 0.43 16.35 ± 0.35 25.97 ± 1.54 40.71 + - 0.42
Jecheon
EtOH 30% 6.39 ± 0.26 9.31 ± 0.91 12.31 + - 0.83 21.59 ± 1.19 36.71 ± 0.77
EtOH 50% 2.90 + - 0.10 8.66 ± 0.22 9.12 ± 0.35 21.53 + - 1.25 27.47 ± 0.12 EtOH 70% 4.60 ± 0.22 9.15 ± 0.36 13.20 ± 0.50 20.25 + - 0.56 30.73 + - 0.52 EtOH 100% 8.30 0.94 13.24 + - 0.67 14.11 ± 0.37 28.03 + - 1.12 43.48 ± 0.76 Muju EtOH 30% 3.95 ± 0.86 9.91 + - 0.62 12.53 + - 0.83 23.64 + - 0.99 36.53 ± 1.17 EtOH 50% 5.08 ± 0.73 7.56 ± 0.32 9.96 + 0.25 21.15 ± 1.92 26.22 ± 1.02 EtOH 70% 3.28 ± 0.55 8.75 ± 0.75 12.27 ± 0.35 21.03 ± 1.17 30.99 + - 0.81 EtOH 100% 9.27 + - 0.67 12.44 + 0.76 13.95 ± 0.90 25.88 ± 1.59 42.69 ± 1.53 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

The DPPH scavenging activity of the extracts at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg / mL and DPPH removal efficiencies by EtOH extract concentration were not significantly different between the two cultivars. However, , And the higher the concentration of EtOH, the higher the efficacy. Overall, the increase in DPPH scavenging activity showed a concentration-dependent tendency that was proportional to the concentration.

1-2. ABTS  Cation ( ABTS +) Scatters

A solution of 7.4 mM ABTS (2,2'-azinbis- (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and 2.6 mM potassium persulphate was added and reacted in the dark for about 15 hours. The absorbance at 414 nm 1.5, 150 μl of each sample was added to each diluted solution, and the mixture was shaken for 10 seconds with a vortex mixer, allowed to stand at room temperature for 90 minutes, and the absorbance was measured at 414 nm. And the absorbance was measured by the same method. The cationic scavenging activity was expressed as AEAC (relative ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity), which was calculated as 1.000 when the scavenging activity of ascorbic acid was 1.000, Which was calculated by the following equation.

    RAEAC = Caa x? As

               Aaa Cs

ΔAaa: change in absorbance when ascorbic acid is added, Caa: concentration of ascorbic acid

ΔAs: Absorbance change when sample is loaded, Cs: Sample concentration

ABTS radical scavenging activities according to extract solvents in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant Culture
region
Solvent ABTS radical scavenging activity,% of control
Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 20 Codonopsis lanceolata Hwasun EtOH 8.17 ± 0.69 11.13 + - 0.67 18.71 + - 0.61 22.21 + - 0.67 34.70 ± 1.02 65.11 + - 0.71 MeOH 7.48 ± 1.79 10.58 ± 1.73 12.87 + - 0.94 23.16 ± 1.00 35.06 + 1.63 70.15 + 1.78 D.W 5.28 ± 0.62 8.15 ± 0.60 19.01 + - 0.53 26.87 + - 0.48 38.25 + - 1.11 68.66 + - 0.94 Acetone 6.35 ± 0.84 10.20 ± 0.81 19.51 + - 0.72 26.58 + - 0.66 35.84 ± 1.41 71.72 + 1.44 Ether 7.79 + - 0.42 10.27 + - 0.41 18.07 ± 1.05 27.53 + - 0.93 37.89 ± 1.71 72.26 ± 0.22 Uljin EtOH 6.71 + - 0.94 9.71 + - 0.91 12.35 ± 0.89 21.58 ± 0.80 33.17 + - 0.68 65.54 + 0.71 MeOH 7.68 ± 0.60 10.78 ± 0.58 15.55 ± 0.55 25.83 + - 0.49 37.34 + 1.24 70.30 ± 0.59 D.W 6.65 ± 0.51 9.48 ± 0.49 20.18 ± 0.44 27.93 + - 0.39 40.01 + - 0.33 69.01 + - 1.12 Acetone 6.57 ± 0.84 10.40 ± 1.27 15.21 ± 0.59 22.66 ± 0.53 31.93 ± 0.96 70.00 + - 0.42 Ether 4.62 ± 0.84 7.18 ± 0.81 13.48 ± 0.78 23.46 ± 0.69 34.72 ± 1.77 71.01 + - 2.05 Hoengseong EtOH 6.64 ± 0.96 9.65 + 0.93 17.35 + - 0.85 26.05 ± 0.76 38.48 ± 2.04 71.64 ± 0.90 MeOH 9.38 ± 0.58 12.42 + - 0.56 17.16 ± 1.09 26.43 + - 1.15 39.20 ± 1.41 71.14 ± 1.02 D.W 8.28 ± 0.63 11.06 + - 0.61 21.57 ± 0.54 29.19 + 0.49 43.19 + - 0.62 71.75 ± 1.24 Acetone 6.35 ± 0.71 10.20 ± 0.69 16.87 ± 0.72 24.17 + - 0.66 33.74 ± 0.58 73.00 ± 2.07 Ether 5.93 ± 1.34 8.46 ± 1.31 15.28 占 1.21 25.05 ± 1.07 36.97 ± 1.34 71.16 1.52 Jeju EtOH 7.77 + - 0.40 10.74 ± 0.39 18.76 ± 0.93 27.32 ± 0.83 38.65 ± 1.39 72.09 + - 0.75 MeOH 8.50 + - 0.85 11.56 + - 0.82 18.84 ± 0.97 28.73 + - 0.85 40.65 + 0.71 71.88 + - 0.34 D.W 5.67 ± 0.91 8.53 ± 0.89 19.34 ± 0.78 27.18 + - 0.71 40.22 + 1.35 71.21 1.55 Acetone 8.99 ± 0.99 12.73 + - 0.95 21.78 ± 0.85 28.65 + 0.78 37.65 ± 0.68 72.52 0.30 Ether 7.72 + - 0.55 10.20 ± 0.53 16.89 + 0.49 26.48 ± 0.44 38.62 ± 0.36 71.66 + - 0.62 Jecheon EtOH 6.38 ± 0.63 9.39 ± 0.61 17.94 + 1.10 24.16 ± 1.13 37.35 + - 0.94 72.82 ± 1.77 MeOH 7.68 ± 1.07 10.78 ± 1.03 15.55 + - 0.98 25.29 ± 1.34 39.02 + 1.89 72.09 ± 1.34 D.W 8.47 ± 0.60 11.25 + - 0.58 21.74 ± 0.51 29.34 + - 0.46 41.18 + - 0.38 69.09 + - 0.61 Acetone 6.57 ± 0.84 10.40 ± 0.81 19.69 + - 0.72 26.75 ± 0.86 34.52 + - 1.13 71.23 + - 1.14 Ether 6.48 ± 0.52 8.99 ± 0.51 12.17 + - 0.76 22.31 + - 0.68 34.22 + 1.58 69.09 + - 0.74 Muju EtOH 7.51 + - 0.81 10.48 ± 0.78 18.71 + - 0.93 28.53 + - 0.37 39.22 + 1.57 71.96 1.52 MeOH 9.11 ± 0.60 12.16 ± 0.58 17.10 ± 0.97 26.82 ± 1.11 40.88 ± 1.72 72.20 ± 0.62 D.W 5.35 ± 0.79 8.22 ± 0.77 19.06 ± 0.68 26.93 + - 0.61 40.13 + - 1.63 70.37 + 1.94 Acetone 6.35 ± 1.18 10.20 ± 1.13 19.51 + - 1.01 26.58 ± 0.92 34.38 ± 1.42 71.08 + - 0.63 Ether 7.66 + - 0.57 10.13 + - 0.55 15.59 + - 0.67 25.33 + - 0.60 38.26 ± 1.75 70.99 + - 0.82 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

ABTS radical scavenging activities according to the percentage of EtOH solvent in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant Culture region Solvent ABTS radical scavenging activity,% of control Concentration (mg / mL) 0.5 One 2.5 5 10 20 Codonopsis lanceolata
Hwasun EtOH 30% 4.95 ± 0.58 13.94 + 0.21 19.87 ± 1.28 42.27 ± 0.07 62.05 + 0.78 82.91 + 0.19
EtOH 50% 5.35 ± 0.59 6.13 ± 0.25 10.47 + - 0.13 29.05 + - 0.34 38.08 ± 1.08 73.04 + - 0.54 EtOH 70% 7.21 ± 0.18 13.21 + - 0.71 20.23 + - 0.34 35.45 ± 1.27 55.96 + 1.04 77.33 + - 1.15 EtOH 100% 4.32 ± 0.97 13.17 ± 1.45 18.89 ± 0.96 33.50 ± 0.52 46.87 + - 0.41 79.35 0.30 Uljin EtOH 30% 7.21 + - 0.46 10.02 ± 0.26 16.11 ± 1.57 37.56 ± 1.24 55.26 ± 0.87 77.20 ± 1.30 EtOH 50% 3.40 ± 0.64 7.78 ± 0.27 13.58 + - 0.38 27.53 + - 1.08 40.12 ± 1.12 76.83 + - 0.18 EtOH 70% 5.98 + - 0.40 15.15 ± 0.27 23.83 + - 0.58 42.42 ± 0.89 58.94 + 0.65 83.61 + - 0.50 EtOH 100% 5.52 + - 0.69 10.59 + 0.64 17.83 + - 0.69 30.84 ± 2.92 46.79 ± 0.28 79.31 + - 0.58
Hoengseong
EtOH 30% 5.61 + - 0.70 12.06 ± 0.23 19.70 ± 1.20 38.73 + - 0.18 58.21 + - 1.23 79.52 + - 0.84
EtOH 50% 4.78 + - 0.74 5.86 ± 0.22 14.70 + 0.71 29.02 ± 1.20 38.51 + - 0.94 73.63 ± 0.20 EtOH 70% 7.86 0.70 12.72 + - 0.85 21.40 ± 0.92 37.30 ± 0.93 52.02 ± 0.78 78.23 + - 1.48 EtOH 100% 6.20 0.66 13.68 + - 0.80 22.69 ± 1.17 38.11 + - 0.44 54.72 ± 1.11 81.77 ± 0.33
Jeju
EtOH 30% 5.91 + - 0.43 11.96 + - 0.38 19.75 0.30 38.00 ± 2.41 57.51 ± 1.08 81.62 ± 1.17
EtOH 50% 6.86 ± 0.68 8.28 + - 0.42 17.21 + - 0.61 30.01 + - 1.80 44.46 ± 0.78 80.50 + - 0.37 EtOH 70% 8.83 + - 0.46 13.53 + - 0.41 25.74 +/- 1.47 35.38 ± 0.23 59.46 ± 1.05 84.11 + - 0.13 EtOH 100% 7.00 ± 0.29 14.05 ± 0.88 25.91 + - 0.55 44.46 ± 0.05 63.15 + 0.26 85.62 ± 0.02
Jecheon
EtOH 30% 5.04 0.80 11.93 + - 0.40 16.44 ± 0.27 34.59 ± 0.82 59.03 + - 1.60 77.88 +/- 1.70
EtOH 50% 4.83 ± 0.79 5.63 + - 0.53 12.47 ± 0.89 31.23 ± 2.13 48.86 +/- 0.75 77.15 ± 0.51 EtOH 70% 7.83 + - 0.38 11.77 + - 0.71 22.42 + - 0.82 38.28 ± 1.95 55.64 ± 1.37 80.37 ± 1.07 EtOH 100% 4.89 ± 0.78 15.52 + - 0.50 25.12 ± 0.56 44.77 + - 0.51 65.31 ± 1.82 85.08 ± 0.20 Muju EtOH 30% 7.26 ± 0.90 11.98 ± 0.63 15.08 + - 1.04 32.33 + - 0.58 52.62 ± 0.44 77.62 + 0.66 EtOH 50% 5.25 + 0.33 7.22 0.31 11.45 ± 0.97 31.67 ± 1.78 38.73 + - 0.81 73.60 ± 0.20 EtOH 70% 5.03 + - 0.37 10.14 ± 0.39 23.16 ± 0.98 33.53 + - 1.36 53.58 ± 1.12 77.36 + - 0.80 EtOH 100% 7.57 + - 0.41 12.01 0.30 21.22 ± 0.90 37.80 +/- 1.33 59.89 + - 0.95 83.04 + - 0.51 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

 The ABTS cationic scavenging activity of each solvent was found to be proportional to the concentration of the extract, but there was a significant difference between the extraction solvents such as EtOH, MeOH, DW, Aceton and Ether. And showed relatively high scavenging activity at high concentration of EtOH.

1-3. nitrite Scatters

To measure the nitrite scavenging effect of the sample extract, a volume of 200 μl was adjusted to 20 μl of 1 mM NaNO 2 using 140 μl of an extract of the sample and 40 μl of 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2) or 0.2 M citrate buffer (pH 4.2, 6.0) . After reacting the reaction solution in a constant temperature water bath at 37 ° C for 1 hour, 1000 μl of 2% acetic acid, 1: 1 mixture of 1% sulfanilic acid and 1% naphthylamine prepared with 30% acetic acid, And the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. The absorbance at 520 nm was measured to determine the nitrite scavenging ability as follows.

  N (%) = [1- (A-C) / B] 100

  N: nitrite scavenging ability

  A: absorbance of 1 mM NaNO2 added sample after standing for 1 hour

  B: absorbance of 1NaNO2

  C: absorbance of control

Nitrite scavenging activities according to the percentage of EtOH solvent in Codonopsis lanceolata Plant Culture region Solvent Nitrite scavenging activity (%) pH 1.2 pH 4.2 pH 6.0 Codonopsis lanceolata Hwasun EtOH 30% 76.94 27.60 1.44 EtOH 50% 65.27 10.51 N.D. EtOH 70% 63.40 3.53 N.D. EtOH 100% 33.80 N.D. N.D. Uljin EtOH 30% 74.14 21.20 2.47 EtOH 50% 60.78 14.52 N.D. EtOH 70% 57.80 8.12 N.D. EtOH 100% 34.30 N.D. N.D.
Hoengseong
EtOH 30% 76.66 26.25 N.D.
EtOH 50% 65.27 12.42 N.D. EtOH 70% 61.16 8.98 N.D. EtOH 100% 32.03 N.D. N.D. Jeju EtOH 30% 77.40 21.49 1.34 EtOH 50% 65.27 12.89 N.D. EtOH 70% 59.29 7.83 N.D. EtOH 100% 32.87 N.D. N.D. Jecheon EtOH 30% 73.86 22.54 1.54 EtOH 50% 66.11 11.37 N.D. EtOH 70% 61.06 7.35 N.D. EtOH 100% 35.95 N.D. N.D. Muju EtOH 30% 77.87 25.98 N.D. EtOH 50% 66.67 13.28 N.D. EtOH 70% 63.49 6.02 N.D. EtOH 100% 33.89 N.D. N.D. * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

Most of the extracts were able to decompose more than 60% of nitrite when the pH of the reaction solution was 1.2. However, 100% of nitrite was decomposed by the EtOH extract concentration at pH 1.2, 4.2 and 6.0. The resolution of EtOH was 40% or less. At pH 4.2, the nitrite scavenging activity was almost 30% or less, but almost no activity was observed at pH 6.0. Therefore, the nitrite scavenging activity of extracts of Ettenucine by EtOH extract concentration was the highest at pH 1.2 and the activity gradually decreased or decreased with increasing pH.

< Experimental Example  2> By region Cultivated  Antioxidant enzyme activity assay according to extraction conditions

2-1. Enzyme solution  pharmacy

To 0.5 g of the sample was homogenized with 2 ml of Extract Buffer [100 mM K-PO4 buffer (pH 7.5), 100 mM EDTA, 1% PVP, 100 mM PMSF] and centrifuged at 15.000 g for 20 minutes. . For ascorbate peroxidase (APX), 10 mM was added to the above extraction solution in extraction buffer. Protein quantification was performed according to the Bradford (1976) method using BSA as a standard.

2-2. SOD ( SuperOxide Dismutase )

SOD enzyme activity assays were performed using an assay kit (Sigma, 19160). That is, the photochemical NBT method was used to test the ability of SOD enzyme to inhibit the reduction of NBT (Nitroblue tetrazolium). The reaction solution was adjusted to 50 mM carbonic buffer (pH 10.2), 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM Xanthine and 0.025 mM NBT, and the inhibition of NBT reduction was measured at 450 nm. Each sample was repeated three times, and SOD enzyme activity was converted by the following equation (see FIGS. 3 and 4).

SOD activity (NBT reduction inhibition rate,%) = [(Ablank1-Ablank3) - (Asample-Ablank2)] / (Ablank1-Ablank3)

As a result, the antioxidant enzyme activities of the extracts of Etodol and EtOH extracts were higher in the order of EA> BA> MC> nH> DW in the order of SOD activity, There was no significant difference between the two groups.

2-3. CAT ( Catalase )

CAT activity was measured by the method of Aebi et al. (1984). The reaction solution was 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 10 mM H 2 O 2. CAT activity was measured by adding the extract to the reaction solution and then measuring the absorbance change at 240 mM for 2 minutes (see FIGS. 5 and 6).

As a result, CAT activity showed the highest activity in EA fraction, and 50% and 100% of EtOH extract and Jeju cultivation showed relatively high activity.

2-4. APX  ( Ascorbate Peroxidase )

The activity of APX was measured by the Nacano and Asada (1981) method. The degree of oxidation of ascorbate was measured at 290 nm for 2 minutes. The reaction solution of APX was 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.5 mM ascorbate and 0.2 mM H 2 O 2 (see FIGS. 7 and 8).

As a result, APX activity was higher in order of EA> MC> nH> BA> DW, but BA and DW fractions showed relatively low activity. The APO activity of EtOH extract was relatively high at the 30% extract concentration and the Jeju cultivated doduck was higher in the cultivation area.

2-5. POD ( Peroxidase )

POD activity was measured by the method of Egley et al. (1983). The reaction solution was adjusted to a final concentration of 40 mM K-PO4 buffer (pH 6.9), 1.5 mM guaiacol, and 6.5 mM H2O2. The POD activity was measured by measuring the absorbance at 470 nm for 2 minutes using a spectrophotometer by mixing the sample with the reaction solution (see FIGS. 9 and 10).

As a result, POD activity showed relatively high activity in EA fraction and no significant difference in other fractions. Also, EtOH showed slightly higher activity at 50% and 100% extraction concentration.

<Experimental Example 3> Analysis of antitumor activity of doduk on human cancer cell lines according to extraction conditions of cultivated doduck

 (MTT) (3- (4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl) -2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide) assay was performed to determine the anticancer effect of 6 dermal cultures on human cancer cell lines. Human uterine cancer cell line HeLa, breast cancer cell MCF-7, lung cancer cell Calu-6, human-derived kidney normal cell HEK293 cell line were plated on a 96-well plate and cultured for 24 hours at 37 ° C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cultured cells were treated with 10 μl of each sample to a concentration of 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 μg / ml, and cultured for 24 hours. 10 μl of 0.2 mg / ml MTT solution was added to each well, Lt; / RTI &gt; After the incubation, the supernatant was removed and 100 μl of DMSO was added to each well. After incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader. The cytotoxicity was expressed as a percentage of the absorbance of the control .

Cytotoxicity of extracts from Codonopsis lanceolata cultured at different region on three cancer cell lines and Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cell Cell line Culture region Cell viability (% of control) Concentration (ug / mL) 50 100 200 400 800 HeLa Hwasun 92.25 + - 4.63 79.64 7.95 80.53 + - 9.70 78.31 + - 8.64 73.09 + - 3.03 Uljin 93.99 ± 3.32 94.63 + - 4.37 93.07 + - 4.14 87.46 + - 3.39 88.12 ± 1.17 Hoengseong 95.28 ± 1.56 97.80 ± 3.63 97.12 ± 1.50 92.47 + - 1.23 84.84 0.39 Jeju 92.08 + - 7.41 87.90 ± 1.59 85.51 + 0.79 83.56 + - 2.61 83.16 + - 4.69 Jecheon 99.23 + - 5.85 97.12 ± 9.27 99.27 + - 7.91 86.35 + - 4.47 75.28 + - 3.12 Muju 94.39 ± 1.56 91.91 + - 2.16 87.39 + - 6.88 84.07 ± 1.53 81.91 + - 2.20 Calu-6 Hwasun 87.44 + - 6.99 84.11 + - 3.72 83.35 ± 4.10 84.91 + - 3.10 83.32 + - 2.21 Uljin 89.75 + - 5.30 88.88 +/- 7.30 86.15 + 8.89 82.33 + - 3.66 68.97 ± 2.11 Hoengseong 92.67 ± 1.65 92.85 + 5.05 89.90 + - 4.08 91.18 ± 0.25 88.09 + - 5.40 Jeju 84.57 ± 2.73 81.99 ± 1.14 78.00 ± 1.25 78.14 + - 2.21 79.71 + - 2.77 Jecheon 71.19 + - 5.46 74.33 + - 4.74 74.40 ± 5.26 67.80 ± 3.75 64.28 + 2.96 Muju 87.82 + - 2.44 82.16 + - 5.47 79.73 ± 1.77 73.91 + - 5.00 67.43 + - 1.26 MCF-7 Hwasun 90.51 + - 5.50 89.53 + - 4.58 91.59 ± 3.97 93.88 + - 6.22 92.86 + - 3.95 Uljin 94.70 ± 1.68 95.21 ± 1.99 95.70 ± 3.13 93.61 + - 3.74 90.86 ± 1.73 Hoengseong 92.10 ± 0.54 95.24 + - 0.43 93.38 +/- 1.42 93.61 + 1.61 93.59 + - 5.59 Jeju 91.02 + - 3.41 90.05 + - 4.27 91.40 ± 5.19 90.05 + 0.76 90.40 + - 4.21 Jecheon 89.38 + - 2.74 86.65 ± 1.76 86.47 ± 1.56 86.56 8.38 87.22 + - 4.40 Muju 81.47 + - 8.50 83.27 ± 3.63 83.56 ± 3.20 81.12 ± 2.62 76.25 + - 5.66 HEK293 Hwasun 106.12 ± 2.04 103.74 + - 4.72 99.33 + - 2.48 91.17 + - 2.45 89.35 + - 0.23 Uljin 100.92 + - 0.42 97.96 ± 1.77 92.70 + - 0.51 88.37 + - 2.84 88.39 + - 4.40 Hoengseong 102.28 + - 1.67 98.53 + - 4.40 92.22 ± 3.45 85.94 + 0.49 84.81 + - 3.77 Jeju 102.92 + - 7.27 103.85 + - 4.92 102.24 + - 2.36 96.79 ± 1.26 87.64 ± 0.37 Jecheon 103.94 + 0.75 101.78 ± 1.07 96.48 + 2.95 90.39 + - 0.43 87.86 ± 3.32 Muju 99.78 ± 1.82 94.10 ± 3.72 84.85 ± 2.91 86.96 + - 6.80 86.78 ± 3.33 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

Cytotoxicity of extracts according to percentage of EtOH solvent on human cancer cell line (Calu-6) Cell line Culture region Solvent Cell viability (% of control) Concentration (ug / mL) 50 100 200 400 800 1000 Calu-6 Hwasun EtoH 30% 97.07 ± 2.67 94.02 + - 5.77 91.89 + - 4.79 81.31 + - 4.78 73.33 + - 9.70 71.44 + - 4.60 EtoH 50% 89.32 + 1.84 85.80 +/- 1.33 85.24 + 2.07 83.97 + - 0.67 78.89 ± 1.09 69.23 ± 6.16 EtoH 70% 82.57 ± 5.10 82.53 + - 1.82 82.91 + - 3.57 79.69 + 0.49 71.66 ± 7.51 64.30 + - 4.63 EtoH100% 85.67 + - 6.53 77.38 + - 4.38 73.36 ± 6.07 66.42 + - 2.32 64.23 + - 2.80 63.48 ± 3.32 Uljin EtoH 30% 90.89 + - 5.30 89.09 ± 5.29 85.19 + - 6.84 82.45 + - 7.17 78.45 + - 2.40 70.69 + - 7.54 EtoH 50% 88.13 + - 0.89 85.31 + - 0.55 88.26 ± 0.52 82.10 + - 4.80 59.92 ± 3.33 41.72 ± 5.67 EtoH 70% 85.27 + - 8.29 83.54 + - 2.67 80.62 + 1.04 72.81 + - 4.26 56.37 ± 2.63 38.85 + - 4.65 EtoH100% 82.91 + - 7.73 82.34 + - 3.48 75.24 ± 9.78 72.98 + - 6.96 67.81 + - 7.77 57.23 ± 1.91 Hoengseong EtoH 30% 85.79 + - 5.75 83.06 + - 4.78 81.66 ± 5.60 80.81 6.10 79.41 + - 7.77 59.64 + - 4.75 EtoH 50% 86.34 + - 1.06 82.24 + - 2.76 80.62 + 1.89 77.98 + - 2.37 70.48 ± 3.11 59.49 + 1.44 EtoH 70% 83.21 + - 7.02 80.78 ± 1.88 79.10 ± 2.69 74.08 + - 4.38 65.13 + - 4.41 47.82 + - 7.25 EtoH100% 69.31 + - 8.73 59.10 + - 6.94 61.10 + - 6.48 55.39 + - 9.30 53.72 ± 6.18 50.51 ± 6.19 Jeju EtoH 30% 90.27 + 5.01 81.49 ± 7.54 80.29 + 1.98 77.81 + - 6.24 62.46 + - 4.77 61.66 ± 3.19 EtoH 50% 98.45 + 1.60 89.67 + - 4.62 92.87 ± 3.54 88.96 + 1.66 51.00 + - 5.88 35.66 ± 5.20 EtoH 70% 88.96 1.87 83.89 + - 4.00 86.08 + - 3.62 86.53 + - 1.98 52.66 1.51 38.46 ± 6.28 EtoH100% 94.25 + - 9.73 90.34 7.64 85.05 + 9.03 79.94 + 4.03 70.74 + - 2.48 68.83 + - 7.40 Jecheon EtoH 30% 92.13 + - 2.16 81.91 ± 2.02 87.77 ± 9.61 84.48 + - 7.35 76.51 + - 10.08 76.16 + - 6.80 EtoH 50% 92.69 + - 9.78 84.86 + - 2.41 78.93 8.08 77.03 + - 6.88 73.88 ± 3.76 47.45 + - 4.37 EtoH 70% 80.71 + - 3.49 82.82 + - 6.68 69.31 + - 6.26 66.70 ± 6.34 38.07 8.34 37.63 + - 6.45 EtoH100% 93.29 ± 3.31 90.41 + - 6.91 83.67 + - 5.50 82.11 + - 7.09 74.19 + - 8.85 58.97 + - 5.42 Muju EtoH 30% 87.53 + - 5.61 77.83 + - 2.32 75.20 ± 6.64 72.84 + 9.26 59.93 + - 4.32 54.58 ± 3.88 EtoH 50% 87.73 + - 7.75 85.72 + 1.63 80.55 + - 5.42 78.88 +/- 7.57 77.60 ± 7.91 47.26 ± 5.76 EtoH 70% 86.50 + - 5.56 83.01 + - 0.79 77.66 + - 4.75 72.90 6.11 35.58 ± 3.59 35.35 ± 5.29 EtoH100% 88.07 ± 8.46 83.71 + - 8.14 81.97 + - 8.53 79.18 ± 9.12 70.76 + - 4.23 68.97 1.87 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

Cytotoxicity of extracts according to percentage of EtOH solvent on human cancer cell line (MCF-7) Cell line Culture region Solvent Cell vability (% of control) Concentration (ug / mL) 50 100 200 400 800 1000 MCF-7 Hwasun EtoH 30% 89.90 + - 7.95 91.86 + - 9.70 89.98 ± 5.14 90.54 + - 8.28 85.64 + - 4.74 79.50 ± 4.91 EtoH 50% 93.56 + - 8.03 88.93 + 2.04 83.99 + - 5.06 80.99 + - 2.93 80.76 + - 3.43 75.70 +/- 10.67 EtoH 70% 80.68 + - 3.83 75.39 ± 2.81 71.09 ± 2.81 69.64 + - 3.57 66.04 + 0.07 65.02 + - 2.78 EtoH100% 89.41 + - 8.45 86.76 ± 9.58 81.36 + - 5.35 77.35 ± 6.05 73.22 ± 6.14 72.72 + 5.04 Uljin EtoH 30% 87.66 ± 10.52 86.95 + - 1.54 81.34 + - 3.51 80.88 + - 4.96 75.20 ± 4.10 74.65 + - 4.32 EtoH 50% 94.71 ± 3.71 94.22 + - 5.59 86.81 + - 8.44 82.25 + - 9.84 74.80 ± 8.58 52.86 ± 3.06 EtoH 70% 88.76 + - 2.64 84.99 + - 7.06 78.18 + - 0.98 75.09 + - 8.26 75.77 8.33 58.03 + - 6.63 EtoH100% 83.36 + - 6.24 67.78 + - 6.48 66.39 8.11 60.00 + - 4.87 60.16 + - 5.08 58.26 ± 2.84 Hoengseong EtoH 30% 88.95 + - 4.44 87.33 + 9.29 85.03 + - 8.83 85.03 + - 1.63 77.12 ± 3.80 69.72 ± 4.04 EtoH 50% 84.46 ± 1.17 78.44 + - 0.70 78.49 + - 2.81 78.25 + - 7.08 70.34 + 3.99 60.56 ± 6.13 EtoH 70% 86.87 + - 2.66 78.60 + - 2.63 77.12 + - 2.38 73.44 + 0.66 65.06 + - 3.18 64.48 ± 2.99 EtoH100% 77.27 + - 3.47 70.89 ± 5.90 71.36 + - 9.57 70.92 + - 5.53 63.79 + 9.27 62.42 + 2.03 Jeju EtoH 30% 87.33 + - 6.61 81.39 + - 6.43 77.49 + - 4.83 74.48 ± 5.39 65.37 ± 1.78 54.63 + - 5.80 EtoH 50% 87.21 + - 2.71 83.06 ± 1.68 79.68 ± 1.89 76.03 + - 2.94 56.48 ± 1.02 46.63 + - 5.01 EtoH 70% 85.43 ± 1.19 79.50 ± 3.10 77.09 + - 0.64 72.55 + - 1.85 56.44 + 2.08 49.91 + - 2.51 EtoH100% 79.13 + - 5.49 75.40 + - 9.94 64.51 + - 2.90 60.22 + 2.03 51.35 + - 3.32 54.91 + - 6.57 Jecheon EtoH 30% 90.89 + - 6.80 83.78 + - 7.04 83.88 + - 8.24 75.89 ± 6.13 57.69 + - 6.89 52.84 + 1.49 EtoH 50% 93.46 + - 7.61 80.20 + - 5.02 78.87 + - 2.95 74.03 + - 2.84 51.17 + - 5.54 43.09 + - 8.44 EtoH 70% 67.01 + - 2.35 65.06 + - 9.55 52.89 ± 2.32 50.34 + - 4.32 31.66 ± 6.05 28.88 + - 5.35 EtoH100% 84.16 + - 7.63 78.47 ± 8.28 71.05 8.09 70.60 ± 3.27 68.42 + - 7.18 66.56 ± 5.23 Muju EtoH 30% 90.83 + - 12.38 77.28 ± 1.01 69.66 ± 6.36 66.81 ± 5.96 66.09 + - 8.77 62.17 + - 11.03 EtoH 50% 83.38 +/- 1.47 85.06 + - 5.39 77.76 + - 8.51 74.17 ± 1.59 75.45 + - 6.44 67.08 ± 1.79 EtoH 70% 74.62 ± 3.06 69.04 + - 1.82 65.84 + - 3.43 66.40 +/- 1.38 45.83 ± 3.23 38.67 ± 1.11 EtoH100% 84.34 + - 5.53 74.52 + 1.14 72.02 ± 6.14 65.08 + - 5.98 61.12 + - 5.18 60.55 + - 9.94 * Data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

  The cytotoxicity of human dendritic cell extracts by MTT method showed that the cytotoxicity of human dendritic cells was lower than that of human cancer cells even at the concentration of 800 ug / mL. We need to verify it. In addition, the EtOH extracts showed good effects on both the Calu-6 and MCF-7 cell lines in Jeju, and the 70% EtOH extract showed relatively high toxicity.

< Experimental Example  4> By region Cultivated  An anti-obesity effect of 3T3-L1 cell extract

 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in KCLB No. 10092.1 from Korean Cell Line Bank. Cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS in a 5% CO 2 incubator at 37 ° C in a 75T-flask. After 3 to 4 days, the cells were confluent. Cells were separated by treatment with 0.05% Trypsin / 0.53 mM EDTA, and the cells were collected in a centrifuge (2000 rpm, 2 min). The cell density was diluted to 1104 cells / And cultured by planting. After 2 days, the cells were changed to a new DMEM culture medium containing 10% FBS. When the cells became confluent after 3 to 4 days, the medium supplemented with 5 mg / mL insulin, 0.25 mM dexamethasone and 0.5 mM IBMX was added to the DMEM culture medium two days later Differentiation was induced. After 2 days, the cells were replaced with culture medium containing only 5 mg / mL insulin, and differentiation was induced by changing to a new culture medium every 2 days (Mac Dougald OA, Hwang C.S., Fan H., Lane M. D. 1995). On day 6, cells were cultured in the absence of insulin, and the samples were treated on the 7th day and stained with Oil red O 24 hours later.

4-1. Cytotoxicity measurement

 MTT (methylthiazolyldiphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay for measuring cell viability was performed according to Sladowski et al. The cultured 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in a 96-well plate at 1105 cells / well and cultured for 16-18 hours. The diluted sample extracts were treated for 24 hours. MTT solution dissolved at 5mg / ml was added to 10uL / 990ul medium and incubated at 37 ° C for 3 hours in 5% CO2. After the culture was completed, the culture solution was removed, and the mixture was added to 200 μL / well of DMSO, stirred for 20 minutes, and absorbance was measured at 595 nm using an ELISA reader.

4-2. Oil red O dyeing

 Cell culture medium was discarded and 50 μL of 10% formaldehyde was added to each well to fix the cells, followed by incubation at 4 ° C. for 1 hour. After that, the formaldehyde was discarded and washed three times with PBS. The oil red O staining solution (0.25 g of oil red O dissolved in 50 mL of isopropyl alcohol was mixed with distilled water at a ratio of 3: 2 and filtered with a 0.45 μm filter) Were added, and the cells were stained again at room temperature for 1 hour and then washed three times with PBS. The stained cells were observed under a microscope. After observation, the stained dye in the adipocyte was extracted with 500 μL of isoprophyl alcohol per well and the absorbance was measured at 520 nm by a spectrophotometer (see FIGS. 11 to 16).

 The effect of 3T3-L1 cells on cytotoxicity was investigated. The cell survival rate was decreased depending on the treatment concentration of each sample, and the overall efficacy was relatively higher at the extract concentration of Jeju cultivated etude and EtOH.

<Experimental Example 5> Effect of extraction conditions on growth of immune cells

 The immune function enhancing effect of extractive EtOH was verified by using T cell and B cell (RPMI 8226, KCLB No.10155) which are human immune cells. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS at 5% CO 2 at 37 ° C. After the cells were adjusted to a concentration of 2.5104 cells in a 24-well plate, the cells were filtered with a 0.2 μm filter Samples (0.5 μg / μL) were added to each well for 24 hours and then re-cultured for 8 days. Cells were counted using a hemocytometer in each well while culturing for 8 days. Immunoreactivity was measured according to the cell growth and number of cells as compared with the control not treated with the sample extracts (see FIGS. 17 to 28).

  The results of T cell and B cell growth stimulation of human immune cells, T cell and B cell, showed that the concentration of EtOH extract stimulated the growth in both T cell and B cell, I did not see it.

The present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Therefore, the disclosed embodiments should be considered in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all differences within the scope of equivalents thereof should be construed as being included in the present invention.

Claims (7)

(Step 1) of extracting roasted meat with alcohol;
Separating the extract of step 1 with hexane and separating into a hexane fraction and an aqueous layer (step 2);
Separating the aqueous layer obtained in the step 2 into methylene chloride and separating into a methylene chloride fraction and an aqueous layer (step 3); And
And separating the aqueous layer obtained in the step 3 into ethyl acetate and ethyl acetate fractions (step 4).
The method according to claim 1,
The above-mentioned doduck is a three-year-old root which was cultivated in Korea, Hwasun, Muju, Jecheon, Hoengseong or Uljin.
delete delete delete delete The method according to claim 1,
Wherein the health food is selected from the group consisting of beverage, meat, chocolate, foods, confectionery, pizza, ramen, other noodles, gums, candy, ice cream, alcoholic beverages, vitamin complexes and health supplement foods.
KR1020160022424A 2016-02-25 2016-02-25 Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract KR101817053B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020160022424A KR101817053B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2016-02-25 Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020160022424A KR101817053B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2016-02-25 Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20170100189A KR20170100189A (en) 2017-09-04
KR101817053B1 true KR101817053B1 (en) 2018-01-11

Family

ID=59924187

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020160022424A KR101817053B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2016-02-25 Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR101817053B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102517948B1 (en) * 2022-04-06 2023-04-06 한경수 Pharmaceutical composition and health functional food for prevention or treatment of obesity containing complex medicinal herb extracts

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100921909B1 (en) * 2008-12-26 2009-10-16 강원대학교산학협력단 Composition of healthy food comprising butanol solvent extract of Codonopsis lanceolata Benth et Hook having hematopoietic stem cell proliferation activity

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100921909B1 (en) * 2008-12-26 2009-10-16 강원대학교산학협력단 Composition of healthy food comprising butanol solvent extract of Codonopsis lanceolata Benth et Hook having hematopoietic stem cell proliferation activity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20170100189A (en) 2017-09-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101705548B1 (en) Composition for enhancing immune response comprising extract of Apios americana Medikus or fermented extract of the same
KR101817055B1 (en) Food composition having anti-obesity, anti-cancer, anti-oxidative and immunity enhancing activities
KR101492174B1 (en) Anti-inflammatory and immune-boosting composition containing fermented green coffee bean which is fermented with monascus
KR101705547B1 (en) Composition for antioxidant or anticancer or antidiabete or antimicrobial containing balloon flower extract
KR101062172B1 (en) Anti-cancer health food containing mushroom fermented ginseng powder
KR101261029B1 (en) Composition for preventing or improving the diabete containing suaeda japonica
KR101692032B1 (en) Anti-cancer composition containing erythronium japonicum extract
KR101817053B1 (en) Composition for anti-oxidant or anti-cancer or anti-obesity or immune-enhancing containing Codonopsis lanceolata extract
KR101768612B1 (en) Food composition for improving liver function and method of health tea using thereof
CN102987405B (en) Method for preparing health food capsules by using cordyceps militaris and cocoon extracts
KR20140041187A (en) Anti-cancer composition containing erythronium japonicum extract
KR101636608B1 (en) Composition for antioxidation comprising the seed extract of cornus officinalis
KR102064516B1 (en) An antibacterial composition comprising an leaf and root extract of cudrania tricuspidata, and extract of licorice
KR101962893B1 (en) Composition of comprising vegetable worms extract cultured using mealworm or pupa and process of fabrication the extract
KR20140083493A (en) Composition for anti-obesity comprising extract of Sargassum fulvellum or Sargassum horneri as an effective component
KR101894156B1 (en) Method for producing codonopsis lanceolata extract and uses thereof
KR101498075B1 (en) Composition and health functional food containing extracts of sorghum bran
KR20130082249A (en) Composition for preventing or improving the metabolic syndrome containing parthenocissus tricuspidata extract
KR102626559B1 (en) Composition comprising extract of Hibiscus manihot for immune-enhancement
KR102211035B1 (en) Composition comprising insect extract for treating and improving cancer
KR102120323B1 (en) Composition for hepatoprotective or ameliorating hangover containing herbal extract and edible insect enzyme-decomposed with enzyme
KR101852032B1 (en) Beverages for preventing hyperlipidemia containing Platycodon grandiflorum and its preparing method
KR101906302B1 (en) Composition for Improving Meningioma Using an extract of Rhodiola rosea or an Extract of Inonotus obliquus
KR100912290B1 (en) Novel 6,8-di?,?-demethylallyl-3,5,7,2&#39;,4&#39;,6&#39;-hexahydroxy- flavanone or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, preparation method thereof and composition for removing hangover containing the same as an active ingredient
KR102025572B1 (en) Composition for preventing, ameliorating or treating metabolic diseases comprising mixture of Diospyros lotus leaf and grape fruit stem extract as effective component

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
AMND Amendment
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
AMND Amendment
E601 Decision to refuse application
AMND Amendment
X701 Decision to grant (after re-examination)
GRNT Written decision to grant