KR101192980B1 - Manufacturing method of wildlife animal repellent composition - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: A wild animal repelling composition is provided to effectively prevent crops from wild animals without environmental damage. CONSTITUTION: A method for preparing an bird repelling composition comprises: a step of mixing 4 wt% of surfactant, 15 wt% of alcohol, 0.5 wt% of phenoxy ethanol, and purified water(S110); a step of mixing 0.1-7.5 wt% of smoke flavor, calcium, spearmint, blackpepper, Cinnamomi cortex, Platycodon grandiflorum, or dried block for 10 minutes(S120); a step of mixing 3-17 wt% of castor extract 0.5-7 wt% of methole+capsicin or methyl andranylate at 80 Deg.C.; and a step of filtering the mixture. [Reference numerals] (S110) First mixing step; (S120) Second mixing step; (S130) Final step

Description

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF WILDLIFE ANIMAL REPELLENT COMPOSITION}

The present invention relates to a wild animal blocker composition and a method for providing the same, which continuously dissipates the smells avoided by the wild animals, thereby preventing access to the damaging agricultural products and facilities, thereby preventing the access of the wild animals. Technology.

The present invention relates to a wild animal blocker composition. At present, the damage caused by wild animals to crops is at a serious level. For example, wild animals, including wild boar and elk, are the most damaging animals during the harvest season, and have not been officially reported as accurate statistics, but domestic wild boar is about 5.5 billion won, and elk is 24 It has been reported in the newspaper that about 100 million won and the bristles are responsible for about 500 million won, and considering the uncounted damage, the damage is expected to be much larger than the above figures.

Globally, wild animals that cause crop problems vary from country to country. Since wild boar is the biggest problem among the wild animals that damage crops in Korea, the following description will be given of the present invention taking a boar as an example, but the present invention is not limited to wild boar, but is applicable to all wild animals. Find out in advance.

In the case of Korea, wild boar numbers have increased rapidly in the past decades due to the protection of wild animals. In addition, it has boldness to come to the city center to find food and to attack people. Until now, various patents for combating harmful wildlife have been proposed, but the effect is still insufficient, and there is no technology currently applied to farms.

For example, Korean Patent Application No. 2010-0003412 as a wildlife repellent composition is 0.1 to 5% by weight of capsaicin extract; 5-25% by weight of bark extract; 0.01-2% by weight of pine essential oil; 0.1 to 10 weight percent cinnamon essential oil; 0.1-20% by weight peppermint essential oil; 0.1 to 2% by weight sodium monofluorophosphate; 40 to 80 weight percent thickener; 0.1-2% by weight of an ultraviolet absorbent; And 10 to 40% by weight of a stabilizer.

However, the conventional wildlife repellent composition has a problem that too many components, too many components and unnecessary components such as UV absorbers or stabilizers compared to the efficiency.

The present invention provides a wildlife blocking composition and a method for producing the same, which can be formulated in an environmentally friendly natural composition and effectively blocks wildlife from crops without environmental damage.

Wildlife blocker composition according to one embodiment to achieve the above object is 3% to 15% castor extract; 0.5% to 7% of a garlic extract, selected from <menthol + capsaicin>, methyl andranilate; 0.1 to 7.5% additional ingredient; And all or part of the remainder of the emulsifier.

At this time, the additional component may be one of peppermint, smoke, high active calcium, egg powder (Egg Solid), spearmint, black pepper, cinnamon, bellflower, blood (Dried Blood).

In addition, the emulsifier may include 4% surfactant, 15% alcohol based on the total content of the composition.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method of preparing a wildlife blocking agent includes a first mixing step of mixing the above-mentioned additional components and an emulsifier; A second mixing step of additionally mixing one of the above-mentioned castor extract, garlic extract, <menthol + capsaicin>, and methyl anthranilate after the first mixing step; And a final step of filtering the mixture of the third mixing step to obtain a wildlife blocking agent.

The wildlife blocking composition according to the present invention can be formulated in an environmentally friendly natural composition complex and has the effect of effectively blocking wildlife from crops without environmental damage.

1 is a flowchart of a method of preparing a wildlife blocker composition according to one embodiment.
Figure 2 is a photograph of the process of animal testing the wild animal blocker composition according to Preparation Example 1.
Figure 3 is a photograph of the process of animal testing wild boar blocking composition according to Preparation Example 2.
Figure 4 is a photograph of the process of animal testing the rat animal wildlife block composition according to Preparation Example 3.
After the high dose application (10 g), medium dose application (5 g), low dose application (1 g) and no addition (control, control) of the wildlife blocking composition according to Example 1 was measured for 28 days The result graph.
Figure 2 is a wild animal blocker composition according to Example 1 is installed on the outside of the paddy field with damage from wild boar damage in Gyeongbuk region, after installing a plurality of containers at regular intervals in the agricultural hanger, After the high dose (10 g) of the wild animal blocker of Example 1 in each container, it is a diagram illustrating a method for testing the wild animal repellent effect.
3 is a result of the experiment in the same manner as the installation diagram of FIG. 2, the site of damage caused by wildlife before and after putting the high-capacity (10 g) in each container hanging on the agricultural hanger composition according to Example 1 This is a picture taken comparing.
Figure 4 is a wild animal blocker composition according to Example 1 after the installation of holding poles, ropes, agricultural hangers and the like outside the apple orchard where the wild boar damage in Gyeongbuk region, and installed a plurality of containers at a predetermined interval on the agricultural hanger , After a high dose (10 g) of the wild animal blocker of Example 1 in each container is a diagram illustrating a method for testing the wildlife evasion effect.
5 is a result of the experiment in the same manner as the installation diagram of Figure 4, the wild animal blocker composition according to Example 1 before and after the high dose (10 g) in each container hanging on the agricultural hanger before and after the damage site The picture taken.

Hereinafter, a wildlife blocking composition according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in more detail.

In the present specification, the content (%) of each component is defined as a volume% but may be a mass%.

In the present specification, the extract refers to an extract or extract from which raw materials are extracted in a general manner. Therefore, the extract in the present specification is to be understood as meaning the extract of the raw material, for example, general garlic regardless of the fine difference between the raw material, for example, the kind and origin of the garlic.

As described above, damages of crops are increasing rapidly and cause damage of crops, as shown in Table 1 (Current damages by crops, unit: million won) and Table 2 (Cross crops (animal) damages, unit: million won). The types and numbers of harmful wildlife are also increasing.

year system Apple ship grape Ho Do rice plant vegetable Other system 82,813 9,651 9,667 1,785 1,692 16,482 12,553 30,983 '0 5 21,137 3,297 2,700 373 317 4,204 2,700 7,546 ' '06 18,549 2,298 2,212 367 466 4,517 2,212 6,477 '0 7 16,604 1,850 1,926 392 464 2,882 2,546 6,544 '0 8 13,807 1,255 1,593 349 207 2,446 2,259 5,698 '0 9 12,716 951 1,236 304 238 2,433 2,836 4,718

year system wild boar elk pheasant Magpie Snow cap Ducks Other system 82,813 33,548 12,920 2,830 16,699 2,577 4,884 9,355 '05 21,137 7,612 2,912 1,016 5,775 362 875 2,585 '06 18,549 8,535 2,667 470 4,597 725 648 907 '07 16,604 6,515 2,397 387 2,612 668 1,153 2,872 '08 13,807 5,578 2,417 466 2,047 485 979 1,835 '09 12,716 5,308 2,527 491 1,668 337 1,229 1,156

Despite many efforts to reduce the harm of wild animals, the present invention does not provide effective methods for reducing the damage of wild animals, but the present invention provides compositions and methods that can effectively reduce the damage of wild animals.

The wildlife blocking composition according to the present invention includes <castor extract> as a first component. In addition, the wildlife blocking composition according to the present invention is the second component <garlic extract (garlic extract) and <menthol (methol, C ₁₀ H ₂₀ O) + capsaicin (capsaicin, C ₁₈ H ₂₇ NO ₃ )>, methyl andranil And optionally one of the rates (methylanthranilate, C ₈ H ₉ NO ₂ ).

Castor means the seed of the castor (Ricinus communis L.). Oil squeezed from castor seeds is called castor oil or castor oil. In the present specification, castor extract means castor oil or castor oil (castor oil).

 The garlic's scientific name is Allium scorodopram, and the garlic's characteristic irritant odor is caused by allicin, which is an enzyme known as an allin in the outposts, especially in the scaly stem, which coexists when cells die or are destroyed. It is decomposed by and becomes an allicin which is an antibacterial substance. Garlic extract herein means an extract or allicin content of garlic.

In addition, the wildlife blocking composition according to the present invention may additionally include peppermint, smoke, high activity calcium, egg powder (Egg Solid), spearmint, black pepper, cinnamon, bellflower, blood (Dried Blood). In addition, the wildlife blocking composition according to the present invention may further include an emulsifier or preservative as an auxiliary component. Emulsifiers may be composed of surfactants, alcohols, purified water (water).

The content of the components of the wild animal blocker composition according to the present invention is 3% to 15% of the first component (castor extract), the second component (<garlic extract>, <menthol + capsaicin>, one selected from methyl andranilate) 0.5 % To 7% and at least one of the additional and auxiliary ingredients make up the remainder.

Specifically, the content of the component of the wild animal blocker composition according to the present invention is one selected from the first component (caster extract) 3% to 15%, the second component (<garlic extract>, <menthol + capsaicin>, methyl andranilate) ) 0.5% to 7%, 4% surfactant in the emulsifier, 15% alcohol, the remaining content of purified water (water). In other words, purified water (water) accounts for the remaining content of other components in the content of 100%.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples. However, it is obvious that the present invention is not limited by the following examples.

The wildlife blocker composition according to the present invention has a different content of components depending on the type of wildlife and other components may be added.

[First Embodiment]

The wildlife blocker composition according to the first embodiment is 70.500% purified water (water), 7.000% methyl adrinylate, 3.000% castor extract, 0.500% phenoxyethanol, 15.000% alcohol,, 4.000 % Surfactant.

shape Raw material name Content (% by volume) Reference amount (g) Water Purified water (water) 70.500 7,050.0 Oil Methyladrenylate 7.000 700.0 Oil Castor Extract 3.000 300.0 - Phenoxyethanol (preservative) 0.500 50.0 - Alcohol 15.000 1,500.0 - Surfactants 4.000 400.0

The wildlife blocking composition according to the first embodiment is not limited but may be used as a blocking agent for birds such as pigeons or magpies.

[Second Embodiment]

The wildlife blocking composition according to the second embodiment is 70.500% purified water (water), 9.300% castor extract, 0.700% garlic extract, 0.500% phenoxyethanol, 15.000% alcohol, 4.000% surfactant as shown in Table 4. Include.

shape Raw material name Content (% by volume) Reference amount (g) Water Purified water (water) 70.500 7,050.0 Oil Castor Extract 9.300 930.0 Oil Garlic Extract 0.700 70.0 - Phenoxyethanol (preservative) 0.500 50.0 - Alcohol 15.000 1,500.0 - Surfactants 4.000 400.0

The wildlife blocker composition according to the second embodiment is not limited but may be used as a mammalian blocker such as wild boar and elk.

[Third Embodiment]

Wild animal blocker composition according to the third embodiment is 70.500% purified water (water), 3.500% castor extract, 0.500% capsaicin, 1.000% menthol, 0.500% phenoxyethanol, 15.000% alcohol, 4.000% as shown in Table 5 Surfactants.

shape Raw material name Content (% by volume) Reference amount (g) Water Purified water (water) 70.500 7,050.0 Oil Castor Extract 3.500 350.0 Oil Capsaicin 0.500 50.0 Oil menthol 1,000 100.0 - Phenoxyethanol (preservative) 0.500 50.0 - Alcohol 15.000 1,500.0 - Surfactants 4.000 400.0

The wildlife blocking composition according to the third embodiment can be used as a blocking agent for rodents such as mice and cats.

Although the components of the wildlife blocking composition and the content of each component in the first to third embodiments have been described, the present invention is not limited thereto.

For example, the wildlife blocker composition may be composed of 0.20% capsaicin, 0.10% garlic extract, 0.10% peppermint, 0.10% castor extract, 0.10% smoked flavor, 0.05% calcium and the remainder of the emulsifier.

In another example, the wildlife blocker composition may comprise 0.50% Bellflower, 0.20% Capsaicin, 0.10% Garlic Extract, 0.10% Peppermint, 0.05% Castor Extract, 0.10% Smoke, 0.05% Calcium and the remainder of the emulsifier.

In another example, the wildlife blocker composition may be composed of 0.50% spearmint, 0.50% peppermint, 0.05% castor extract, 0.10% smoke, 0.05% calcium and the remaining amount of emulsifier.

As another example, the wildlife blocker composition may be composed of 1.00% black pepper, 0.10% peppermint, 0.05% castor extract, 0.10% smoke, 0.05% calcium and the remaining amount of emulsifier.

In another example, a wildlife blocker composition comprises 0.50% dried blood, 0.20% black pepper, 0.10% garlic extract, 0.10% peppermint, 0.05% castor extract, 0.10% smoke, 0.05% calcium and the remainder of the emulsifier May be

In another example, the wildlife blocker composition may be composed of 0.50% cinnamon, 0.20% black pepper, 0.10% garlic extract, 0.10% menthol, 0.05% castor extract, 0.10% smoked flavor, 0.05% calcium and the remaining amount of emulsifier.

As another example, the wildlife blocking composition may be composed of 0.30% spearmint, 0.07% menthol, 0.05% castor extract, 0.10% smoke, 0.05% calcium and the remaining amount of emulsifier.

As another example, the wildlife blocker composition may be composed of 0.50% Egg Sollid, 0.07% Menthol, 0.05% Castor Extract, 0.10% Smoke Flavor, 0.05% Calcium and the remainder of the emulsifier.

Hereinafter, preparation examples and experimental examples of the wildlife blocking composition will be described.

Preparation Example 1 Preparation of Wild Animal Blocker Composition

Referring to Figure 1, the base material (purified water, phenoxyethanol, alcohol, surfactant) shown in Table 3 in order to prepare a wildlife blocking composition is mixed for a certain time, for example 10 minutes (S110).

Next, put the raw material (castor extract, methyl andranilate) of Table 1 here and then mix at a constant temperature, for example, 200 rmp for a certain time, for example 20 minutes at 80 degrees (S120).

Finally, filtered with a mesh cloth to prepare a wild animal blocker composition (S130). This wildlife blocker composition was used as a blocker of the pigeon of Experimental Example 1 below.

Preparation Example 2 Preparation of Wild Animal Blocker Composition

In Example 1, the wild animal blocker composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the raw materials are castor extract and garlic extract of Table 4.

This wildlife blocker composition was used as a blocker of boar of Experimental Example 2 below.

Preparation Example 3 Preparation of Wild Animal Blocker Composition

In Example 1, the wild animal blocker composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the raw materials are castor extract of Table 5, capsaicin, and menthol.

This wildlife blocker composition was used as a blocker of the rat of Experimental Example 3 below.

Experimental Example 1 Evaluation of Dove's Efficacy on Wildlife Blocker Compositions

In order to confirm the repellent effect of the wildlife blocking composition prepared according to Preparation Example 1, the presence of behavioral abnormalities of pigeons was observed using a video camera for 24 hours after a one-week purifying period under laboratory conditions. Was measured. After the wild animal blocker composition prepared according to Preparation Example 1 was applied for a certain amount of feed to the boar feed container and exposed for 7 days, the learning effect of the animals and the adaptation of the wildlife blocker was confirmed.

Table 6 shows the results of measuring feed intake (unit: Kg) for 7 days after applying a high dose of the wild animal blocker composition according to Preparation Example 1 and the control (control, control) in the feed container.

division 1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6 days 7 days Treated group
(Example 1) 2.3 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 Untreated group 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Pigeons exposed to the wildlife blocker composition ingested the feed due to hunger because the test in a limited space as shown in Figure 2 experimental pictures, the intake was significantly reduced compared to the control. In particular, pigeons exposed to the wildlife blocker composition did not consume any feeds from day 6.

Experimental Example 2 Evaluation of Efficacy of Wild Boar on Wildlife Blocker Compositions

In order to confirm the repellent effect of the wild animal blocker composition prepared according to Preparation Example 2, the presence of behavioral abnormalities of the wild boar were observed using a video camera for 24 hours after a one-week purifying period under laboratory conditions. Was measured. After the wild animal blocker composition prepared according to Preparation Example 2 was exposed to a boar feed container containing a certain amount of apples for 7 days, the learning effect of the animals and the adaptation of the wild animal blocker were confirmed.

Table 7 shows the results of measuring the feed intake (unit: g) for 7 days after applying a high dose to the feed container of the wildlife blocking composition according to Preparation Example 2 and no addition (control, control).

division 1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6 days 7 days Treated group
(Example 1) 30 24 22 17 14 10 0 Untreated group 50 73 95 164 185 214 256

The wild boar exposed to the wild animal blocker composition was fed due to hunger because it was tested in a limited space as shown in the experimental photograph of FIG. 3, but the intake was greatly reduced compared to the control group. In particular, the wild boar exposed to the wildlife blocker composition did not have any feed since 7 days.

Experimental Example 3 Evaluation of Efficacy of Mice on Wildlife Blocker Compositions

In order to confirm the repellent effect of the wild animal blocker composition prepared according to Preparation Example 3, the presence of behavioral abnormalities of the wild boar were observed using a video camera for 24 hours after a one-week purifying period under laboratory conditions. Was measured. After the wild animal blocker composition prepared according to Preparation Example 1 was applied for a certain amount of feed to the boar feed container and exposed for 7 days, the learning effect of the animals and the adaptation of the wildlife blocker was confirmed.

Table 8 shows the results of measuring the feed intake (g) for 7 days after applying a high dose of the wildlife blocking composition according to Preparation Example 3 and the control (control, control) in the feed container.

division 1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6 days 7 days Treated group
(Example 1) 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Untreated group 2.1 2.9 3.7 4.6 5.9 6.3 7.5

Rats exposed to the wildlife blocker composition consumed apples due to hunger because they were tested in a limited space as shown in the experimental photograph of FIG. 4, but the intake was significantly reduced compared to the control group. In particular, mice exposed to the wildlife blocker composition did not consume any feeds from day 4.

While the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations are possible within the spirit of the invention, and such modifications and variations belong to the appended claims.

Claims (4)

4% by weight of surfactant, 15% by weight of alcohol, 0.5% by weight of phenoxyethanol and purified water, followed by 0.1 to 7.5% by weight of smoke, calcium, spearmint, black pepper, cinnamon, bellflower, blood meal ( A first mixing step of additionally mixing the selected one of Dried Blood 'for 10 minutes;
A second mixing step of further mixing 3 to 15% by weight of castor extract and 0.5 to 7% by weight of '<menthol + capsaicin>, methyl andranilate' after the first mixing step at 80 ° C .; And
Final step of filtering the mixture of the second mixing step to obtain an algae blocker; Algae blocker composition manufacturing method comprising a. The method of claim 1,
The second mixing step is a bird blocking composition manufacturing method characterized in that the mixing for 20 minutes at 200rpm. delete delete

Images