JPH11315637A - Construction method selection support device and recording medium - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To easily select an optimum construction method even at a stage where many items of design conditions specifying a building to be built are not yet determined. SOLUTION: Construction method information of a specific construction method including restriction conditions of the specific construction method concerning a predetermined major item (for example, room application, etc.), among each item of design conditions is taken in, construction restriction condition is checked with design condition of a floor part for which a construction method is selected concerning each major item, aptitude of construction of the specific construction method with respect to each major item is judged each, and the results of comprehensive judgement of aptitude of construction of the specific construction method for the floor part for Which the construction method is selected are set (150 to 154). The abovementioned processing is done for the whole construction method each to display the results of comprehensive judgement of each construction method each (158). Most of design conditions of the major items are determined at an initial stage of design, design conditions are not set for many items each, and the construction method which is assumed to have high aptitude of construction for the floor part for which the construction method is selected is automatically selected from among many construction methods.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a construction method selection support apparatus and a recording medium, and more particularly, to a construction method selection support apparatus and computer for supporting the selection of a construction method to be carried out from a variety of construction methods in construction work. And a recording medium storing a program for causing the method to function as the method selection support device.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In construction work, it is important to keep costs (construction costs) within a prescribed budget and to complete the construction work within a prescribed construction period. In addition, the construction method of each part of the building (the configuration of each member constituting the target part, how to combine it,
Various methods are available for the joint method, construction method, construction procedure, etc.), but the cost and duration of the construction work largely depends on which method is used for each part of the construction. Is done. For this reason, when the construction designer / constructor roughly completes the design of the construction, he or she determines from each of the various parts of the construction that the most suitable construction method is possible (from the design conditions of each part, etc.) It is possible to select the most suitable construction method in terms of cost and construction period), and then create a process plan that specifies in detail what kind of work will be performed at each stage in the construction period.

[0003] In addition, the operation of selecting an optimum construction method requires extensive knowledge on the design and construction of a building, and is a complicated operation requiring an enormous amount of time. For this reason, Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. Hei 7-282112 discloses a skeleton construction method plan in which design information and construction information are modeled to enable simulation of a method plan reflecting various conditions and comparison of the method plans. A system has been proposed. According to this system, it is possible to save the work of selecting a method to some extent, and to easily add a new method.

[0004]

However, in the construction work, even before the start of preparation of the process plan, that is, at the stage of receiving an order for the construction work or at the time of the basic design of the building, the construction master is required. In many cases, it is necessary to estimate the cost of construction work and the construction period for the purpose of presenting to a building, and accordingly, it is necessary to select a construction method to be applied to each part of the construction. On the other hand, in the above-mentioned frame structure planning method system, the planner selects and selects all of the design information and construction information, each of which consists of a large number of items.
Since it is necessary to enter the information, at the stage where the design conditions are undetermined, such as when receiving an order for construction work or basic design of the building, even if the above-mentioned frame structure construction method planning system is used, the design information and construction information Requires a high degree of expertise and experience in order to enter the tentatively, and takes a lot of time. Therefore, there has been a problem that the operation of selecting an optimum method from among many types of methods at the stage where the design conditions are undetermined is very complicated.

[0005] In addition, since the selection of the construction method at the stage where the design conditions are not determined as described above requires a high degree of specialized knowledge and experience, the planners with little knowledge and experience are required to have experience. There is also a problem that despite the fact that there is a tendency to preferentially select the method of construction, and that many types of methods with different characteristics are prepared, the optimum method is not always selected. .

The present invention has been made in view of the above facts, and is intended to easily select an optimal construction method even when many of the design conditions for defining a construction are not yet determined. It is an object of the present invention to obtain a construction method selection support device and a recording medium that can perform the method.

[0007]

According to the first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a construction method selection support apparatus for specifying at least a main item among a large number of items of design conditions for defining a building. Storage means for storing the method information of the specific method including the execution constraint conditions of the method for each of the various methods, input means for inputting information, and the method When information representing the design condition of the main item among the many items of the design condition that defines the selected location is input via the input means,
Comparing the design condition of the main item represented by the input information with the execution constraint condition of the specific method for the main item,
Judgment means for determining the suitability of the implementation of the specific method for the unselected portion of the method, for each of the plurality of methods, and for each of the plurality of methods determined by the determination means First to output aptitude
And output means.

[0008] The storage means according to the first aspect of the present invention includes:
Construction method information of the specific construction method including the execution restriction condition of the specific construction method for at least the main item among the many items of the design conditions for defining the building is stored for each of the various types of construction methods. The main item according to the present invention is an item in which the method of construction that can be performed is greatly different depending on the contents of the design condition among a large number of items of the design condition. , “Room use”, “structure type”, “span length”, “slab thickness”, etc. can be adopted as main items.

Further, the determining means according to the first aspect of the present invention comprises:
When information indicating the design condition of the main item among the many items of the design condition that defines the unselected method of the construction method is input via the input means, the input information is input. For each of the many types of methods, the design conditions of the main items represented by are compared with the execution constraint conditions of the specific method for the main items, and the suitability of the specific method for the non-selected method is determined. As mentioned above, the main items are those that differ greatly in the workable methods depending on the contents of the design conditions. In most cases, the design conditions of the major items are not determined. Even a construction method chooser who has no specialized knowledge or experience can input.

According to the first aspect of the present invention, as described above, the suitability of the specific method for the unselected part of the method is determined by the determining means for each of the various methods. The suitability of the execution is output by the first output means (the information may be displayed on a display means such as a CRT or an LCD, or may be recorded on a recording medium such as paper). By referring to the information output by the first output means, it is possible to easily recognize a construction method having a high suitability for a construction method unselected place among a large number of construction methods, and automatically select a small number of construction methods to be selected. (A method determined to be highly suitable for execution by the determination means: a single method or a plurality of methods), an optimum method can be easily selected. Therefore, according to the first aspect of the present invention, it is possible to easily select an optimum construction method even in a stage where many of the design conditions defining the building are not yet determined.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, the judging means, when judging the suitability of the implementation of the specific method, determines the design condition of the main item and the execution restriction condition of the specific method for the main item. Compare and determine the suitability of the implementation of the specific method for the main item for the method non-selected location is performed for each of a plurality of predetermined main items, the suitability of the implementation of the plurality of main items is the most It is characterized in that the determination result of the suitability of the execution of the main item determined to be low is set as the total determination result of the suitability of the execution of the specific method for the unselected method.

According to the second aspect of the present invention, the suitability of the specific method for the main item is determined for each of a plurality of predetermined main items. The result of the suitability of the main item determined to be low is set as the overall result of the suitability of the specific method. As a result, even when the number of main items is relatively large, the method selector can quickly understand the suitability of each method by referring to the comprehensive judgment result set for each method. it can.

Further, since the comprehensive judgment result is set one by one for each method of construction, it is also possible to represent the comprehensive judgment result with a symbol such as “○”, “△”, “×” or the like. It is preferable that the comprehensive judgment result is described as described above, because the method selection person can instantly grasp the suitability of the implementation of each method.

[0014] According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the invention, the first output means is configured to input, via the input means, information for instructing the output of the reason for determining the suitability of the execution of the specific method. Further, the present invention is characterized in that an execution constraint condition of the specific method is output as the determination reason.

According to the third aspect of the present invention, when the information for instructing the output of the reason for judging the suitability of the execution of the specific method is input, the execution restriction condition of the specific method is output as the judgment reason. Even if the operator is not aware of the implementation constraints of each method, the reason for determining the suitability of implementation for the specific method is unknown, etc. The reason for judging the suitability of implementation of the specific method can be easily grasped.For example, among the main items that are not considered important by the method chooser, the method suitability is low but the method chooser attaches importance With regard to the items, it is also possible for the construction method selector to select a construction method with high suitability for implementation.

Further, since the above-described determination by the determining means is performed by setting a certain design condition for the main item based on the input information, for example, the determining means determines that the suitability for implementation is low. There is a possibility that among the performed methods, there is a method that is determined to have high suitability for implementation by changing the design conditions of the main items. According to the third aspect of the present invention, by referring to the output execution restriction condition of the specific method, the presence or absence of a method that may be determined to be high in execution suitability by changing the design condition of the main item. And it is also possible to partially change the design conditions so that this type of method is judged to be a method with high suitability for implementation.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, the storage means stores information representing the outline of each of the various types of construction methods, and the first output means comprises a specific construction method. When information for instructing the output of the outline is input through the input means, the outline of the specific method is output based on the information stored in the storage means.

According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, when the information instructing the output of the outline of the specific method is input, the specific method is determined based on the information indicating the outline of each of the various methods stored in the storage means. Since the summary of the method is output, by referring to the output summary of the specific method, even if the knowledge and experience of the method selector for the method determined to be highly suitable for execution by the determination means are poor, the method of the method The outline can be easily grasped, and the work of examining whether or not the method should be selected can be easily performed.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, when information instructing selection of an arbitrary method from among various types of methods is input through the input means, a method not selected is selected. Based on the design conditions, calculating means for calculating the construction cost by applying the selected construction method to the construction method unselected location, and the construction cost calculated by the computing means to output the construction cost 2 output means.

According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, when information instructing the selection of an arbitrary method from among various types of methods is input, based on the design conditions of the non-selected method, the method selects the non-selected method. There is provided calculating means for calculating the construction cost by calculating the construction quantity when the selected method is applied, and the construction cost calculated by the calculating means is output by the second output means. In the invention of claim 5, if the construction method selector selects a specific construction method (for example, a construction method determined to be high in suitability for a non-selected construction method), the construction quantity and construction cost are automatically calculated. It is easy to compare the advantages and disadvantages of each method in terms of cost.

Since the design conditions for defining a building (or a place where a construction method has not been selected) are composed of a large number of items, the calculation means and calculation cost by the calculation means according to the fifth aspect of the present invention are as follows. It is necessary to set design conditions for items other than the main items among many items of the design conditions.

Therefore, the invention described in claim 6 is based on claim 5
In the invention of the above, the storage means stores defaults of design conditions of items other than the main items among a number of items of the design conditions defining the building, and the items other than the main items stored in the storage means Third output means for outputting the default of the design condition of the above, and the arithmetic means, the default of the design condition output by the third output means is approved by the information input through the input means, or After at least one of the defaults of the output design conditions is changed in accordance with the information input through the input means, the changed value is approved by the information input through the input means. The construction cost is calculated using the design conditions determined by the above.

In the invention according to claim 6, the default of the design conditions of the items other than the main items among the many items of the design conditions is stored in the storage means. As a default of the design condition, for example, data representing a standard design condition for each item can be set. The third output means outputs the default of the design condition, and the calculating means
The construction cost is calculated using the design conditions determined by confirming the output default, or by confirming the changed value after at least one of the outputted defaults has been changed.

In this way, in the initial stage of the design of a construction in which many of the design conditions are undetermined, the output defaults are approved by the construction method selector, so that other than the main items are approved. The construction cost is calculated using the default as the design condition of the item. In this case, although there is a possibility that the calculation accuracy may slightly decrease as compared with the case where the design conditions of each item are set based on advanced expertise and experience, construction method selectors without advanced expertise or experience Without inputting and setting the design conditions of items other than the items, it is possible to compare the superiority of each method in terms of the construction cost.

At the stage when the design of the building is advanced and the design conditions are determined for many of the design conditions, for the items for which the design conditions are determined, the design conditions for which the default of the design conditions are determined are set. By changing to
The construction cost can be calculated with higher accuracy.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, there is provided the recording medium, wherein the construction method information of the specific construction method including at least a main method execution constraint on at least a main item among a large number of items of the design conditions defining the building is: In the state where each of the many types of construction methods is stored in the storage means, the design conditions of the main item among the many items of the design conditions that define the non-construction method unselected portion of the construction are determined for the construction method unselected portion. When the information to be represented is inputted, the design condition of the main item represented by the inputted information is compared with the constraint on the execution of the specific method for the main item, and the suitability of the execution of the specific method for the non-selected method is selected. And a second step of outputting the suitability of execution of each of the plurality of types of the determined methods. It is recorded a program for causing a computer to execute the.

The recording medium according to the invention of claim 7 includes:
A process including the first step and the second step,
That is, since a program for causing a computer to function as the method selection support device according to the first aspect of the present invention is recorded, the computer reads out and executes the program recorded on the recording medium. As in the case of the invention described above, even when many of the design conditions for defining the building have many undetermined design conditions, the optimum construction method can be easily selected.

[0028]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. In the following, a case where the construction method of the floor of the construction is selected as the construction method selection target location will be described as an example. FIG. 1 shows a personal computer 10 that can function as a method selection support device according to the present invention. The personal computer 10 includes a computer main body 12 and various input / output devices connected to an input / output port 20 of the computer main body 12.

The computer main body 12 includes a CPU 14 and an R
An OM 16, a RAM 18, and an input / output port 20 are provided, which are connected to each other by a data bus, an address bus, a control bus, and the like. In this embodiment, as input / output devices, a CD-ROM driver 22, a floppy disk driver (FDD) 24, a keyboard 26, a mouse 28, a display 30, a printer 32,
And a hard disk drive 34 are connected to the input / output port 20 respectively.

A program for causing the personal computer 10 to function as the construction method selection support device according to the present invention (hereinafter, simply referred to as a "construction method selection support program") is:
For example, a hard disk (not shown) built in the hard disk device 34 or the CD-ROM driver 22
Can be stored in either the CD-ROM 36 loaded in the FDD 24 or the floppy disk (FD) 38 loaded in the FDD 24. When the execution of the construction method selection support program is instructed, a storage medium (hard disk or CD-ROM 36 or FD) storing the construction method selection support program
38), the construction method selection support program is read out, and the personal computer 10 executes the construction method selection support program. Thereby, the personal computer 10 functions as a construction method selection support device. The storage medium (hard disk or CD-ROM 36 or FD 38) storing the method selection support program corresponds to the recording medium described in claim 7.

The keyboard 26 and the mouse 28 are for the operator to input various data and commands, and correspond to the input means of the present invention. Display 3
0 is for displaying a processing result, such as CRT or L
Various display means such as a CD (liquid crystal display) can be applied. The printer 32 is for printing the processing result on paper or other recording medium, and various printing means such as a laser beam printer, a dot printer, and an XY plotter can be applied. The display 30 and the printer 32 constitute a part of the first output unit, the second output unit, and the third output unit of the present invention.

Next, the operation of the present embodiment will be described. Although there are many types of construction methods applicable to the floor of the building, in the present embodiment, each of the many types of construction methods applicable to the floor of the construction (see Table 1 below as an example) is described. Method information is set in advance, and the method information of each method is stored in advance as a method information database (method information DB) in any one of the hard disk, the CD-ROM 36, and the FD 38. Hard disk, CD-
Of the ROM 36 and the FD 38, the storage medium storing the method information DB corresponds to the storage unit according to the first aspect.

[0033]

[Table 1]

As an example, FIG. 2 shows a method information setting screen displayed on the display 30 when changing the method information of a specific method or additionally registering the method information of a new method in the method information DB. . The method information (one record of the method information DB) corresponding to one certain method is configured to include the items shown in FIG. As is clear from FIG. 2, the construction method information includes “construction method ID” and “construction method name”.
In addition to the method identification information of the "method classification", character information indicating the outline of the method ("method outline"), character information indicating the characteristics of the method ("features"), and references for understanding details of the method It is configured to include character information ("reference document"), information indicating the type of application of the method ("application type"), and information indicating the applicable range of the method ("adaptive range").

"Adaptation type" is "room use""structuretype"
It is composed of three types of information of “small beam application”. The “room use” is information indicating the evaluation result of suitability of the execution of the construction method for each of various uses of the room including the floor for which the construction method is selected, and includes “office”, “school”, “house / hotel”. For each room use, such as "factory / warehouse", the suitability of implementation is [○ / △
/ ×]. Further, in this embodiment, the floor part to be selected for the construction method is modeled as a floor part which is rectangular and has four pillars arranged at four corners, and four sides are surrounded by girders respectively arranged between the pillars. (FIG. 9 schematically shows a floor model). "Structure type"
Is information representing an evaluation result of suitability of implementation of the method for each structural type of the girder, corresponding to the floor model,
For each of the structural types “RC”, “SRC”, and “S”, the suitability for implementation is evaluated in three stages in the same manner as described above. Furthermore, “Small beam application” is information indicating the evaluation result of suitability of the implementation method when constructing the floor including the small beam spanning between the large beams, and includes “RC beam”, “S beam”. The suitability of implementation is expressed in three stages in the same manner as described above for each of the small beam structure types.

The "adaptive range" is "rebar spacer".
“Support”, “Applicable span”, “Applicable slab thickness”, “Single weight”, “Specified weight”, “Sound insulation performance”, “Vibration characteristics”, “Fire resistance”, “Corresponding to openings”, “Corresponding to steps”, “Work steps”, “1 group” The information is set for each item such as the number of persons, which indicates the feasibility of the method and the characteristics of the method. Of the above items, “Applicable span” indicates the range of the span length of the floor where the method can be applied (the distance between the cores of the pillars at the four corners of the floor), and “Applicable slab thickness” indicates the floor where the method can be applied. The upper limit value and the lower limit value are set respectively.

In the above method information, "room use"
The information set in each item of “structure type”, “applied span”, and “applied slab thickness” corresponds to the implementation constraint condition of the present invention. Although illustration is omitted in FIG. 2, image data representing a schematic diagram of each method is also added to the method information, and the method information described above indicates “an outline of the method”. Information ”.

In this embodiment, the hard disk, C
Default information indicating default design conditions is stored in any of the storage media of the D-ROM 36 and the FD 38 in advance. In the present embodiment, the items for which the default is set by the default information are, among many items of the design conditions that define the floor of the building, the “dimension near the girder” representing the distance from the column core to the inner surface of the girder, In addition to the “structure type”, “slab thickness”, and “story height” items that indicate the girder structure type, concrete-related items such as “concrete type” and “concrete design standard strength”, and the weighting conditions such as “loading load” Related items, deflection-related items such as "deflection limit at completion", and fire-related work-related items such as "fire resistance" and "fire-resistant flooring" .The default information is as follows.
Defaults are set for various room uses. The hard disk, CD-ROM 36 and F
Among the D38, the storage medium storing the above default information corresponds to the storage unit according to the sixth aspect.

Further, a hard disk, a CD-ROM 36
In any of the storage media of the FD 38 and the FD 38, data representing various unit prices used in construction work is stored as a unit price database (unit price DB). This unit price DB is used when outputting a cost comparison table described later.

On the other hand, the construction method selection support program is used when, for example, it is necessary to estimate the cost of the construction work or the construction period at the stage of receiving an order for the construction work or at the time of basic design of the building. In order to select a construction method for each floor of the object, execution is instructed by a construction method selector (hereinafter, referred to as an operator). Hereinafter, the method selection support processing realized by the personal computer 10 executing the method selection support program by the CPU 14 in accordance with the instruction and functioning as the method selection support device will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. (Hereinafter, the personal computer 10 that is executing the method selection support program will be simply referred to as “method selection support device 10”).

In the construction method selection support processing, first, step 100
, A system main screen as shown in FIG. 6 is displayed on the display 30 as an example. The system main screen is provided with a study target display column 50A for displaying a part of the design conditions of the floor part to be studied for the construction method, and a construction method display column 50B for displaying the study target construction method. A button 52A for inputting information, a button 52B for setting room usage, a button 52C for setting design conditions, a button 52D for setting a method to be studied, and a setting for each method. Button 52E, button 52 for instructing execution of structural calculation
F and a button 52G for outputting a cost comparison table
Is displayed.

In the next step 102, it is determined whether input of project information has been instructed by clicking button 52A on the system main screen. When the determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 104, and it is determined whether or not the setting of the room use is instructed by clicking the button 52B. If this determination is also denied, the process proceeds to step 106, where it is determined whether the setting of the design condition has been instructed by clicking the button 52C. If this determination is also negative, step 1
08, and it is determined whether or not the setting of the study target method has been instructed by clicking the button 52D.
If this determination is also denied, the process proceeds to step 110, and it is determined whether or not termination of the method selection support process has been instructed. If this determination is also negative, the process returns to step 102, and steps 102 to 110 are repeated until any of the determinations in steps 102 to 110 is affirmed.

In the method selection support process according to the present embodiment, the operator clicks the buttons 52A to 52G in order to input various instructions and information, thereby assisting the operator in selecting the method. When the operator clicks the button 52A, the determination in step 102 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 112. For example, a project information input screen as shown in FIG.
Display at 0. Then, in the next step 114, it is determined whether or not the input of the project information has been completed, and the process waits until the determination is affirmed.

In this embodiment, the project information (construction work information) includes, for example, “construction code”, “construction name”.
It is composed of items such as “building area (address)”, “structure type (of building) (ground / underground)”, “frame structure (of building) (ground / underground)”, “number of floors”, etc. As shown,
The project information input screen is provided with input fields for inputting information on the above items. When the project information input screen is displayed, the operator inputs information on each item constituting the project information. When the input of the information of each item is completed (when the button described as “OK” (see FIG. 7) is clicked on the project information input screen), the determination in step 114 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 116. Then, the input project information is stored in a storage medium such as a hard disk, and the process returns to step 100. Thereby, the system main screen is displayed again on the display 30.

After inputting the project information as described above, the operator subsequently clicks the button 52B to register the floor to be selected for the construction method. As a result, the determination in step 104 is affirmed, and step 118
Then, a room use setting screen as shown in FIG. 8 is displayed on the display 30 as an example. On the room use setting screen, the use of the room including the floor to be selected for the construction method, the floor of the room, the span length along the X direction and the Y direction (the direction in which the girders surrounding the floor extend). An input field is provided for inputting design conditions for each item (a part of a large number of items of the design conditions defining the floor of the building). When the room use setting screen is displayed on the display 30, the operator inputs the design conditions of each of the above items out of the design conditions of the floor for which the construction method is selected.

In most cases, the design conditions of the above items are determined at the initial stage of the design of a building (for example, at the time of basic design). Even inexperienced operators can input. It should be noted that “room use” and “span length” among the above items constitute a part of the main items of the present invention.

In the next step 120, it is determined whether the setting of the design conditions for each item such as "room use" has been completed, and the process waits until the determination is affirmed. When the input of the design conditions of each item is completed (when the button described as “OK” is clicked on the room use setting screen (see FIG. 8)), the determination in step 120 is affirmed and the process proceeds to step 122. Then, the design condition of each input item is stored in a storage medium such as a hard disk, so that the floor portion in which the design condition is input is registered as a floor portion for which a method is selected, and the process returns to step 100. As a result, the system main screen is displayed again on the display 30, and the design conditions of the floor registered as the floor to be selected for the construction method (each of the set design conditions) are displayed in the examination target display column 50 A of the system main screen. Design conditions for some of the items, that is, "room use"
“Floor” and “span length” are displayed (see FIG. 6).

As described above, when the design conditions of some items such as “room use” of the floor of the construction method selection target are input,
Subsequently, in order to confirm the design conditions of other items (or change from the default) for the specific floor registered as the floor to be selected for the method of construction, the operator enters the examination target display column 50A on the system main screen. The user selects a specific floor portion displayed and clicks button 52C. As a result, the determination in step 106 is affirmed, and step 12
Then, the process proceeds to step S4, where the default information is searched for using the "room use" of the specific floor selected by the operator as a key, and the default corresponding to the "room use" is taken from the storage medium.

In the next step 126, as an example, FIG.
Is displayed on the display 30 as shown in FIG. Further, as is apparent from FIG. 9, the design condition setting screen displays the design conditions of the items for which the default is set by the default information among the many items of the design conditions that define the floor of the building. In step 126, the default taken in step 124 is displayed on the design condition setting screen. FIG. 9 shows an example of default design conditions for each item when the “room use” is “living room / guest room”. Thus, step 126 corresponds to the third output means according to the sixth aspect. Also, among the items provided with a design condition display column on the design condition setting screen,
“Structural type” and “slab thickness” constitute a part of the main items of the present invention.

In the next step 128, it is determined whether or not the setting of the design condition has been completed for each item for which default is displayed on the design condition setting screen. When the determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 130, and it is determined whether a change of the design condition of any item has been instructed. Step 1
If the determination in step 30 is also negative, the process returns to step 128 and waits until the determination in any of steps 128 and 130 is affirmative.

When the design condition setting screen is displayed on the display 30, the operator confirms the default of the design condition of each item displayed on the design condition setting screen, and the displayed default is the floor of the construction method selection target. Investigate whether it meets the design conditions of the part. In the initial stage of the design of a building, design conditions are often not determined for each item whose default is set by default information. In this case, the operator (especially, an operator without advanced expertise or experience) notifies the completion of the setting of the design conditions without changing the displayed default (indicated as “OK” on the design condition setting screen). Button (see FIG. 9).

As a result, the determination in step 128 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 134, where the condition (default in this case) displayed on the display 30 is stored as a design condition of the floor portion to be selected for the construction method on a hard disk or the like. The data is stored in the medium and the process returns to step 100. In the process rough selection process and the process determination process described later, the process is performed using the design condition of each item for which default is set by default information, but in the present embodiment, the design condition of each item is not determined. Even in the initial stage of the design of a building in many cases, it is possible to perform the rough method selection process or the process determination process using a preset default, so that an operator estimates and sets the design conditions of each item. It is not necessary to perform an operation such as performing an operation, and the burden on the operator can be reduced.

Further, as the design of the building progresses, the design conditions of each item are gradually determined. In this case, the operator displays one of the items displayed on the design condition setting screen. If there is an item that does not match the actual design condition determined as the design of the building progresses (that is, the default design condition), change the displayed design condition. To instruct. This allows
When the determination in step 130 is affirmed, the process proceeds to step 132, where the design conditions are changed and the display is switched according to the instruction from the operator, and the process returns to step 128.

When the change of the design condition is completed and the completion of the setting of the design condition is notified, step 1 is performed in the same manner as described above.
When the determination at 28 is affirmative, the process proceeds to step 134, where the design conditions displayed on the display 30 are stored again as the design conditions of the floor portion for which the method of construction is selected, and the process returns to step 100. With this, when the design conditions of each item are gradually determined as the design of the building progresses, the default can be corrected to the determined design conditions to perform the rough method selection process and the method determination process. And the accuracy of these processes is improved.

In the above processing, step 128
Affirmatively corresponds to the input of the design conditions of “structure type” and “slab thickness” which constitute a part of the main items according to the present invention.

As described above, when the design conditions such as the “structure type” and the “slab thickness” of the floor to be selected for the construction method are confirmed (or changed from the default), the operator subsequently proceeds to the construction method selection. In order to make a rough selection of a construction method to be performed on a specific floor registered as a floor of the system, a specific floor displayed in the examination target display column 50A on the system main screen is selected, and a button 52D is pressed. click. As a result, the determination in step 108 is affirmed, and step 13
Then, the process proceeds to step 6 to perform a rough method selection process. Hereinafter, the method rough selection process will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

That is, in step 150, the method information D
The method information of a specific method is taken in from B. In the next step 152, for each of the main items of “room use”, “structure type”, “span length”, and “slab thickness”, the design condition of the floor selected as the construction method selection target,
The execution constraint set in the construction method information of the specific construction method taken in at 0 is compared with the execution constraint conditions, and the suitability of the execution of the specific construction method for the floor portion to be selected for the construction method is determined for each of the main items.

For example, "room use" of the floor to be selected for the construction method
Is "Room / Guest Room", search the "Room Use" information in the method information of the specific method for information indicating the evaluation result of the suitability of implementation for "Room / Guest Room". As the determination result of the suitability of the execution, the evaluation result represented by the retrieved information is set by replacing the evaluation result with the three-level evaluation of [○ / △ / ×]. Further, for example, when the “structure type” of the floor of the construction method selection target is “SRC building”, the evaluation result of the suitability of the implementation for “SRC building” is obtained from the “structure type” information in the construction method information of the specific construction method. The information represented by the retrieved information is retrieved, and the evaluation result represented by the retrieved information is replaced with a three-level evaluation of [○ / △ / ×] as the determination result of the suitability of the implementation for the “structure type”.

As for the “span length”, for example, the “applied span” in the method information of the specific method is searched, and the “applied span” of the floor portion to be selected for the method is searched.
It is determined whether or not the numerical value is within the numerical value range, and as a result of determining the suitability of the implementation of the “span length”, whether or not the numerical value is within the numerical value range is evaluated in two steps of [○ / ×]. Replace and set. Also, regarding "Slab length",
For example, in the same way as "Span length", search for "applied slab thickness" in the method information of the specific method, and "slab thickness" of the floor of the method to be selected is within the numerical range of "applied slab thickness" searched for. It is determined whether or not the value falls within the numerical range as a result of determining the suitability of the execution of the “slab thickness” by replacing the value with the two-stage evaluation of [○ / ×].

When the suitability of implementation is determined for each major item as described above, the process proceeds to step 154, and among the major items, the determination result for the major item that is determined to be the least suitable for implementation is determined by the method of construction method selection. It is set as a comprehensive judgment result on the suitability of the specific construction method for the target floor. For example, if there is one or more [x] in the determination of suitability of implementation for each major item, set [x] as the overall determination result, and determine the suitability of implementation for each major item. If there is no [×], but there is one or more [△], set [総 合] as the overall judgment result.If all the results of the suitability judgment for each major item are [○], Sets [○] as the comprehensive judgment result.

In the next step 156, step 150
It is determined whether or not the processing of steps 154 to 154 has been performed for all the construction methods whose construction method information is registered in the construction method information DB. If the determination is negative, the process returns to step 150, and steps 150 to 156 are repeated until the determination in step 156 is affirmative. As a result, the suitability of the implementation for the floor of the construction method selection target is determined for each of all the registered construction methods. Note that the above step 150
To 156 are determination means of the present invention (more specifically, claim 2
).

When the determination in step 156 is affirmed, the process proceeds to step 158, and an examination method setting screen as shown in FIG. 10 is displayed on the display 30 as an example. This examination method setting screen displays the comprehensive judgment result of the specific method [○ / △
/ X], a display column 54B for displaying the “small beam application” information of the specific method,
A method display column 54C for displaying the method selected as the method to be studied is provided, a button 56A for displaying a list of the comprehensive judgment results of each method, and selection conditions other than the main item are selected. A button 56B for additionally setting as a button, a button 56C for displaying the method selection reason, and a button 56D for displaying an outline of the method are displayed.

The judgment result display field 54A on the examination method setting screen
Is usually large enough to display only the total judgment result of a single method, but if the operator clicks the button 56A, the total judgment result of a plurality of methods can be displayed as shown in FIG. 11 as an example. When the operator instructs to scroll the display in the determination result display field 54A, the operator can refer to the total determination result of all the construction methods. Thus, step 158 corresponds to the first display means of the present invention.

The comprehensive judgment result displayed in the judgment result display column 54A is used to judge the suitability of the implementation only for the main items among the many items of the design conditions for defining the floor of the building. This is a provisional determination result because it is a result of performing the determination. For this reason, in the legend of the symbol [○ / △ / ×] indicating the comprehensive judgment result displayed on the examination method setting screen, ○ is “suitable”, Δ is “usable”, and × is “required”. And that the comprehensive judgment result displayed in the judgment result display column 54A is not an absolute judgment result.

In the next step 160, it is determined whether or not the selection of the study method to be examined has been completed. If this determination is denied, the flow shifts to step 162, where the determination result display field 54A
It is determined whether or not a specific method is selected from among the methods displayed in the box. If this determination is also denied, the process proceeds to step 164, and it is determined whether or not an instruction to additionally set items other than the main items as selection conditions has been issued. If this determination is also negative, the process returns to step 160, and steps 160 to 164 are repeated until any of the determinations in steps 160 to 164 is affirmed.

During this time, the operator displays the judgment result display field 54
Refer to the comprehensive judgment result of each method displayed in A,
Consider which construction method should be selected as the study method. Since the comprehensive judgment result of each method can be grasped instantly by referring to the symbol representing the comprehensive judgment result, it can be done in a relatively short time to determine which method should be selected as the method to be studied. it can. Then, when a method to be selected as a method to be examined is determined, a judgment result display column 5
An operation of selecting the determined specific method from among the methods displayed in 4A is performed.

As described above, when a specific method is selected from the various methods displayed in the judgment result display field 54A by the operator (the selected specific method is highlighted and displayed as shown in FIG. 11). ), The determination in step 162 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 166. The method information of the selected specific method is fetched from the method information DB, and “small beam application” information is searched from the fetched method information. Based on the information of “applied girder”, the evaluation result of the suitability of the execution of the selected specific method in each case of “no girder”, “RC girder (with)”, “S girder (with)”, etc. , Symbol [表示 / △ / ×] in the display field 54B.

In the next step 168, it is determined whether or not an instruction to display the selection reason for the selected specific method has been given. When the determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 170, and it is determined whether the display of the outline of the selected specific method is instructed. If this determination is also denied, the process proceeds to step 172, where it is determined whether or not information (design conditions) on the beams has been set by the operator, and the process waits until the determination is affirmed. Based on the information displayed in the display field 54B, the operator inputs the girder setting information (information indicating the presence or absence of the girder and the structure type of the girder when the girder is present) for the specific method selected earlier. Then, step 172
Is affirmed, and the routine goes to step 174.

In step 174, the selected specific method is displayed in the method display column 54C as a method to be examined, and the contents of the beam setting information input by the operator are also displayed in the method display column 54C. Return to step 160. This means that the specific method has been selected as the method to be considered.

If any of the methods displayed in the judgment result display field 54A includes a method whose contents are unknown to the operator, the operator is displayed in the judgment result display field 54A. After performing an operation of selecting a specific method whose contents are unknown from among the methods of
Click D. Accordingly, the determination in step 162 is affirmed, and the determination in step 172 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 176, where the method information of the selected specific method is fetched from the method information DB, and the method information is specified from the fetched method information. Information related to the outline of the construction method (including image data representing the outline diagram) is extracted. Then, as an example, a method introduction sheet screen as shown in FIG. 12 is displayed on the display 30, and the extracted information is edited and displayed on the method introduction sheet screen.

FIG. 12 shows a method introduction sheet screen of “FC board slab method” as an example. By referring to the construction method introduction sheet screen, the operator can easily grasp the outline of the construction method whose content is unknown, and can easily determine whether or not to add the construction method to be examined. Thus, steps 170, 1
76 corresponds to the first output means according to claim 4. When the operator has finished referring to the method introduction sheet screen (when the button indicated by “x” at the upper right of the method introduction sheet screen (see FIG. 12) is clicked), the display of the method introduction sheet screen ends. Step 16
Return to 0.

If any of the methods displayed in the judgment result display field 54A includes a method whose determination reason or the like of the displayed overall judgment result is unknown, the operator displays the judgment result. After performing an operation of selecting a specific method whose determination reason or the like is unknown from among the methods displayed in the column 54A, the box 56C is clicked. Accordingly, the determination in step 162 is affirmed and the determination in step 168 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 178, where the method information of the selected specific method is fetched from the method information DB, and from the fetched method information, The main items of “room use”, “structure type”, “applied span”, and “applied slab thickness” are extracted (that is, execution constraint conditions). Then, as an example, a method selection reason reference screen as shown in FIG. 13 is displayed on the display 30, and the extracted information is edited and displayed on the method selection reason reference screen.

FIG. 13 shows, as an example, a method selection reference screen for the "E-deck method", which corresponds to the design conditions of the main items of the floor to be selected for the method among the displayed information. Information is highlighted. By referring to the construction method selection reason reference screen, the operator can easily grasp the judgment reason of the construction method of which the judgment reason of the comprehensive judgment result is unknown.

Further, as described above, the comprehensive judgment result is the judgment result of the suitability of the execution for the main item judged to be the lowest execution suitability among the judgment results of the suitability of the execution for each main item. Among the methods with [△] or [x] displayed as the overall judgment result, there is a possibility that there is a method whose suitability for specific major items is judged as “suitable (○)” There is. On the other hand, for example, when the operator places special emphasis on the judgment result of a specific main item among the main items, by displaying the method selection reference screen, the overall judgment result is not [○], It is also possible to confirm the presence or absence of a method that has been determined to be “suitable (）)” for the main items that the operator places importance on, and it is also possible to select such a method as a method to be studied.

Further, the suitability of the specific construction method for the floor part to be selected for the construction method depends on the design condition of the floor part to be selected for the construction method,
This is done by collating the implementation constraints of the specific method for each major item, but especially in the initial stage of the design of the structure, the design conditions are also set for the major items of the floor for which the method is selected. It may be tentative, and there may be a construction method in which the overall judgment result changes to “suitable (○)” by changing the design condition of a specific main item.
In particular, when there is a possibility that the design condition of the main item may be changed, by displaying the method selection reason reference screen, it is possible for the operator to confirm the presence or absence of the above-described method.

As described above, steps 168 and 178 correspond to the first output means. In addition,
When the operator finishes referencing the method selection reason reference screen (when the button labeled “OK” is clicked on the method selection reason reference screen (see FIG. 13)), the display of the method selection reason reference screen ends. Then, the process returns to step 160.

By the way, among various constructions, there may be a case where it is desired to judge the suitability of each construction method for the floor by giving importance to items other than the main items. In such a case, the operator clicks on box 56B. Accordingly, the determination in step 164 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 180, where a selection condition addition setting screen as shown in FIG. 14 is displayed on the display 30 as an example. In the present embodiment, as items other than the main items that can be added as selection conditions to the determination of the suitability of implementation, as shown in FIG.
Four items, "corresponding to floor steps", "corresponding to sound insulation performance", and "vibration characteristics" are prepared.

When the operator selects at least one of the above items and notifies the completion of the selection (when the button labeled “OK” on the selection condition addition setting screen (see FIG. 14) is clicked), The selected item is added as a main item, and the process returns to step 150. As a result, the processing / determination after step 150 is repeated again, and the suitability of the implementation is determined for each method by the items added by the operator in addition to the predetermined main items,
A new comprehensive judgment result is set and displayed for each construction method.

When the selection of the study method to be studied is completed (the button labeled “OK” on the study method setting screen (FIG. 1)
0 or see FIG. 11)), step 1
The determination at 60 is affirmative, and the method selection process shown in FIG. 4 ends, and the process proceeds to step 138 of the flowchart in FIG. At step 138, a construction method determination process is performed. Hereinafter, this method of determining a construction method will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

In step 200, the system main screen is displayed on the display 30, and a list of all the methods selected as the study target in the previous method selection process is displayed in the method display column 50B of the system main screen. In the next step 202, it is determined whether or not the setting of the method-specific conditions for the specific study target method has been instructed. When the determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 204, and it is determined whether or not the execution of the structural calculation for the specific method to be studied is instructed. If this determination is also denied, the process proceeds to step 206, where it is determined whether output of the cost comparison table has been instructed. If this determination is also denied, the process returns to step 202 until the determination of any of steps 202 to 206 is affirmed.
Steps 202 to 206 are repeated.

When the selection of the construction method to be examined is completed by the above-described construction method rough selection processing, the operator first determines the construction method to be carried out on the floor portion to be subjected to the construction method selection, and firstly sets the condition for each construction method to be examined. Is set, the specific study target construction method is selected from the study target construction methods listed in the construction method display column 50B, and the button 52E is clicked. As a result, the process proceeds to step 208 after the determination in step 202. In this embodiment, as a method-specific condition setting screen, as shown in FIG. 15, a method-specific condition setting screen (FIG. 15 (FIG. 15)) for setting design conditions for each item of “type of floor form” and “support” A)) and a method-specific condition setting screen for setting design conditions for each item of “small beam formwork type”, “slab design method”, “floor / girder connection receiving hardware type” (FIG. 15B) 2) are prepared. The two types of method-specific condition setting screens are selectively used depending on the type of the method.

In step 208, in order to set the conditions for each method (conditions of items different for each method) for the specific method to be studied selected by the operator, a method for each method corresponding to the specific method to be studied is set. A condition setting screen is displayed on the display 30. Then, the next step 210
Then, it is determined whether the setting of the method-specific conditions is completed, and the process waits until the determination is affirmed. When the method-specific condition setting screen is displayed, the operator sets design conditions for items for which setting is requested on the displayed screen.

The items for which the conditions are set on the above-described method-specific condition setting screen are the minimum necessary items for performing the structural calculation described later, and any items are displayed on the method-specific condition setting screen. When the operator clicks the button marked "▼", the options are displayed in a list.
15B, a schematic diagram showing the structure of each type is shown from the beginning as shown in FIG. 15B), so that the operator can easily set the conditions of each item.

When the setting of the method-specific design conditions by the operator is completed (when the button labeled “OK” (see FIGS. 15A and 15B) is clicked on the method-specific condition setting screen), When the determination in step 210 is affirmative, the process proceeds to step 212, and the process-specific conditions set by the operator are stored in a storage medium such as a hard disk, and then the process returns to step 200. As a result, the system main screen is displayed again on the display 30. The operator sequentially selects, from among the various methods to be examined listed in the method display column 50B, the methods determined to be more likely to be employed, and sequentially instructs the setting of the method-specific design conditions. Therefore, for each method selected by the operator, the setting of the method-specific design conditions is performed in order.

After the method-specific conditions are set as described above, the operator then proceeds to execute the structural calculation for the specific method to be studied, and then the list of the objects to be studied listed in the method display column 50B is displayed. After selecting the specific study target construction method from the construction methods, the button 52F is clicked. As a result, the determination in step 204 is affirmed, and step 2
Move to 16. In step 216, first, the design conditions of the floor portion to be selected for the construction method (design conditions of each item including the main items set on the room use setting screen and the design condition setting screen) are fetched. Also, in step 218, in order to perform a structural calculation for the selected specific study target construction method, the conditions of the specific study target construction method (the girder setting information set on the study method setting screen and the condition setting for each construction method) are set. And the method-specific conditions set on the screen).

In step 220, the specific study method to be selected is applied to the floor to be selected based on the design conditions of the floor method to be selected and the conditions of the specific study method to be studied. Perform structural calculations in case. In step 222, the construction quantity such as the amount of concrete, the amount of reinforcing steel, and the area of the formwork is calculated based on the result of the structure calculation in step 220. Then, in the next step 224, a structure calculation result display screen as shown in FIG. 16 is displayed on the display 30 as an example, and the structure calculation result in step 220 and the calculation result of the construction quantity in step 222 are displayed on the structure calculation result display screen. To be displayed.

By referring to the structure calculation result display screen, the operator can confirm the structure calculation result and the construction quantity when the specific study target construction method is applied to the floor part of the construction method selection target. In addition, when a button described as “quantity breakdown” is clicked on the structural calculation result display screen, details of the construction quantity (quantity by part) are displayed on the display 30 and described as “confirmation of calculation process”. When the button is clicked, the cross section calculation result, the bending examination result, the bending moment calculation result, the total of the concrete stress, the bending fracture safety, and the like are displayed on the display 30 as a calculation process of the structural calculation (not shown).

When the operator confirms the contents displayed on the structural calculation result display screen (when the button “OK” is clicked on the structural calculation result display screen (see FIG. 16)), the process returns to step 200. Then, the system main screen is re-displayed on the display 30 and the construction method display column 50 is displayed.
B displays the date and time when the structural calculation was performed. In addition, the operator judges the possibility that it is likely to be adopted from among the various methods to be studied listed in the method display column 50B, and sequentially selects the methods in which the design conditions are set for each method, and sequentially selects the structural methods. Are instructed in order. Therefore, the structural calculation is sequentially performed for each method selected by the operator.

When the execution of the structural calculation and the like is completed as described above, the operator then clicks the button 52G to output a cost comparison table for each of the studied methods for which the structural calculation has been performed. Thereby, step 206
Is affirmed, the process proceeds to step 228, and the data of the unit price DB stored in the storage medium is fetched. In the next step 230, the construction quantity for each study method to be studied calculated in the previous step 222 is fetched, and based on the construction quantity and the unit price DB data, each study method Calculate the cost (construction cost) when applying.

The above-mentioned step 230, together with the above-mentioned steps 218 and 220, corresponds to the calculating means according to the fifth aspect. In addition, when the design conditions of each item of the floor part to be selected for the method of construction are set on the design condition setting screen, and a default is adopted as the design condition for at least a part of the items, in step 216, the method of selecting the method of construction is selected. As the floor design conditions, design conditions including some defaults are fetched, and the structural calculation, the calculation of the construction quantity, and the calculation of the cost are sequentially performed using the design conditions. Therefore, steps 218, 220 and 230 correspond to the calculating means according to claim 6 in more detail.

In the next step 232, FIG.
The cost comparison display screen as shown in FIG.
Is displayed on the cost comparison display screen at step 230. In addition, this cost comparison display screen may be
It is also possible for the printer 32 to print out a cost comparison table. By referring to the cost comparison display screen (or the printed cost comparison table), the operator can grasp the construction cost when each study method is applied to the floor of the construction method selection target. It is easy to judge the superiority of each method under study in terms of cost.

In the next step 234, it is determined whether or not the operator has decided to adopt a specific method as the method to be performed on the floor to be selected for the method, and the process waits until the determination is affirmed. If the determination in step 234 is affirmative, the process proceeds to step 236, and the specific method determined to be adopted by the operator is stored in a storage medium such as a hard disk. When the process of step 236 is performed, the process determination process ends, and the process returns to step 100 of the flowchart of FIG. If there is another floor for which a construction method should be selected, the above-described processing is repeated to support the selection and determination of the construction method. When the end of the method selection support process is instructed, the determination in step 110 is affirmed, and the method selection support process ends.

In the above description, a case has been described in which the floor portion is adopted as a construction method unselected portion and the selection of a construction method for the floor portion is supported. However, the present invention is not limited to this. Other places (for example, underground parts of structures)
Needless to say, it can be used to support the selection of the construction method to be implemented.

In the above description, the keyboard 26 and the mouse 28 have been described as examples of the input means according to the present invention. However, a pointing device (for example, a digitizer) other than the mouse 28 may be used.

[0095]

As described above, according to the first aspect of the present invention, the construction method information of the specific construction method including the execution restriction conditions of the specific construction method for at least the main items among the many items of the design conditions for defining the building. Is stored for each of the many types of construction methods, and information representing the design conditions of the main items of the many items of the design conditions that define the non-construction method unselected portions of the construction is input. Then, the design conditions of the input main items are compared with the execution constraints of the specific method, and the suitability of the specific method for the unselected method is determined for each of the many types of method. Is output, so that even in the stage where many of the design conditions defining the construction are undetermined, the optimum construction method can be easily selected. .

According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the invention, the suitability of the specific method for the main item is determined for each of a plurality of predetermined main items. Of the main items determined to be the least suitable for implementation, the results of the determination of suitability for implementation are set as the overall determination of suitability for implementation of the specified method, so in addition to the above effects, the number of major items is relatively small. Even in the case where there are many methods, there is an effect that the method selector can grasp the suitability of each method in a short time.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, when information for instructing the output of the reason for determining the suitability of the specific method is input, the execution constraint of the specific method is set as the determination reason. Output, in addition to the above effects,
This has the effect that the method selection person can easily grasp the reason for determining the suitability of the implementation for the specific method.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, when the information for instructing the output of the outline of the specific method is input, the outline of each of the various types of the methods stored in the storage means is deleted. Since the outline of the specific method is output based on the information represented, in addition to the above-mentioned effects, even if the method selector has little knowledge and experience for the method judged to be highly suitable for execution by the judgment means, the method This has an effect that the outline of the method can be easily grasped, and the work of examining whether to select the method can be easily performed.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the present invention, when an arbitrary construction method is selected from a variety of construction methods, the construction method unselected location is determined based on the design conditions of the construction unselected location. Calculates the construction cost by applying the selected construction method and calculates the construction cost, and outputs the calculated construction cost.In addition to the above effects, it is easy to compare the superiority of each construction method in terms of construction cost Can be carried out at the same time.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in the invention of the fifth aspect, defaults of design conditions of items other than the main items among a large number of items of the design conditions defining the building are stored, and the default is stored. Since the output default is approved, or the output default is approved, or the changed value is approved after at least one of the output defaults is changed, the construction cost is calculated using the determined design conditions. In addition to the above-mentioned effects, at the stage where many of the design conditions that define the construction are undetermined, at the stage where the design conditions are undetermined, the construction method selector without advanced expertise and experience can This has the effect that it is possible to compare the superiority.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, the construction method information of the specific construction method including the execution constraint condition of the specific construction method for at least the main item among the many items of the design conditions for defining the building is used for a large number of construction methods. When information indicating the design condition of the main item among the many items of the design condition that specifies the construction method unselected portion is input to the construction method unselected portion of the building in the stored state, the input is performed. A first step of comparing the design conditions of the specified main items with the execution constraint conditions of the specific method and determining the suitability of the specific method for the unselected part of the method for each of the many types of the method;
Since a program for causing a computer to execute a process including a second step of outputting suitability for execution of each of the determined many types of construction methods is recorded on a recording medium, a number of items of design conditions for defining a construction are recorded. Most have an excellent effect that the most suitable method can be easily selected even in the stage where the design conditions are not determined.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of a personal computer according to an embodiment that can function as a method selection support device according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an image diagram showing an example of a method information setting screen.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the contents of a construction method selection support process according to the embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the contents of a rough method selection process according to the embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the contents of a method of determining a construction method according to the embodiment.

FIG. 6 is an image diagram showing an example of a system main screen.

FIG. 7 is an image diagram showing an example of a project information input screen.

FIG. 8 is an image diagram showing an example of a room use setting screen.

FIG. 9 is an image diagram showing an example of a design condition setting screen.

FIG. 10 is an image diagram showing an example of a study method setting screen.

FIG. 11 is an image diagram showing an example of a state in which a comprehensive judgment result of each method is displayed in a list on an examination method setting screen.

FIG. 12 is an image diagram showing an example of a construction method introduction sheet screen.

FIG. 13 is an image diagram showing an example of a construction method selection reason reference screen.

FIG. 14 is an image diagram showing an example of a selection condition addition setting screen.

FIGS. 15A and 15B are image diagrams showing an example of a method-specific condition setting screen.

FIG. 16 is an image diagram showing an example of a structure calculation result display screen.

FIG. 17 is an image diagram showing an example of a cost comparison display screen.

[Explanation of symbols]

 Reference Signs List 10 construction method selection support device 14 CPU 26 keyboard 28 mouse 30 display 32 printer 34 hard disk device 36 CD-ROM 38 FD

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on front page (72) Inventor Hirohisa Nakano 1-18-22 Nishiki, Naka-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi Nagoya Branch of Takenaka Corporation

Claims (7)

[Claims] 1. A storage means for storing method information of a specific method including at least a main method execution constraint condition for at least a main item of a large number of items of design conditions for defining a building for a plurality of types of methods. Input means for inputting information; and information representing the design condition of the main item among a large number of items of the design conditions defining the construction method unselected location for the construction method unselected location of the building is When input via the input means, the design condition of the main item represented by the input information is compared with the execution restriction condition of the specific method for the main item, and the execution of the specific method is performed on the non-selected method. Determining means for determining the suitability of each of the plurality of methods, and outputting the suitability of execution for each of the plurality of methods determined by the determining means. 1. A method selection support device comprising: (1) an output means; 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining unit compares a design condition of a main item with an execution constraint condition of the specific method on the main item when determining suitability of the specific method. Judgment of the suitability of the specified method for the item is performed for each of a plurality of predetermined main items, and the suitability of the main item for which the suitability of the main item is judged to be the lowest among the plurality of main items is determined. 2. The method selection support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the determination result is set as an overall determination result of the suitability of the execution of the specific method for the non-selected method. 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first output unit is configured to output the reason for determining the suitability of the specific method by inputting the information via the input unit. 2. A method selection support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said method outputs an execution constraint condition. 4. The storage means stores information representing the outline of each of the many types of construction methods, and the first output means outputs information indicating an output of the outline of a specific construction method to the input means. 2. The method selection support device according to claim 1, wherein, when input through the method, an outline of the specific method is output based on information stored in the storage unit. 3. 5. When the information instructing selection of an arbitrary method from among the plurality of methods is input via the input means, the method is selected based on the design condition of the unselected position. A calculating means for calculating the construction cost by calculating the construction quantity when the selected method is applied to the location; and a second output means for outputting the construction cost calculated by the calculating means. The method selection support device according to claim 1, further comprising: 6. The storage means stores defaults of design conditions of items other than the main items among a large number of design conditions defining the building, and is stored in the storage means. A third output unit that outputs a default of a design condition of an item other than the main item, wherein the calculation unit receives the default of the design condition output by the third output unit via the input unit; Or at least one of the defaults of the output design conditions has been changed in accordance with the information input through the input means, and then input through the input means. 6. The construction method selection support device according to claim 5, wherein the construction cost is calculated by using the design condition determined by approving the changed value based on the information. 7. The method information of the specific method including at least a main method execution constraint condition of at least a main item among a large number of items of design conditions for defining a building is stored in the storage means for each of the various methods. When the information indicating the design condition of the main item among the many items of the design conditions defining the construction method unselected location is input to the construction method unselected location of the building, Comparing the design condition of the main item represented by the obtained information with the execution restriction condition of the specific method for the main item, and determining the suitability of the specific method for the method non-selected location,
A program for causing a computer to execute a process including a first step performed for each of the plurality of types of construction methods, and a second step of outputting suitability for execution of the determined plurality of types of construction methods is recorded. Recording medium.