JPH10267848A - Method for emission spectroscopic analysis - Google Patents

Method for emission spectroscopic analysis

Info

Publication number
JPH10267848A
JPH10267848A JP7797397A JP7797397A JPH10267848A JP H10267848 A JPH10267848 A JP H10267848A JP 7797397 A JP7797397 A JP 7797397A JP 7797397 A JP7797397 A JP 7797397A JP H10267848 A JPH10267848 A JP H10267848A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
intensity
accuracy
spectral
threshold value
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP7797397A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Wataru Tanimoto
亘 谷本
Akira Yamamoto
山本  公
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Steel Corp filed Critical Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority to JP7797397A priority Critical patent/JPH10267848A/en
Publication of JPH10267848A publication Critical patent/JPH10267848A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve analysis accuracy by obtaining a relationship of a repeatability and a spectral intensity of a base element beforehand, setting as a threshold value the spectral intensity of the base element of a highest measurement accuracy, and obtaining a concentration when the spectral intensity is within a range of the threshold value. SOLUTION: In comparing changes in spectral intensity of Al/Fe, Al, O and Fe at points (A) and (B), while a spectral intensity ratio of Al/Fe is high, Al shows no intensity change, O shows high intensity and Fe has low intensity. When an Al oxide or the like is discharged, the intensity of Fe is considered to be abnormally low. As such, when a concentration of Al dissolved in a steel plate is to be measured, a relationship of the intensity ratio of Al/Fe and intensity of Fe is obtained, the intensity of Fe showing a large variance is detected, data are removed actually in the vicinity of the intensity, and accuracy is obtained. The intensity of Fe of a best accuracy is set as a threshold value. An optimum value is thus detected for every measurement.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、不活性ガス雰囲気
中で金属試料と対電極との間で多数回のスパーク放電を
行い試料中の元素分析を行う発光分光分析方法に関す
る。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an emission spectroscopy method for performing elemental analysis in a sample by performing a large number of spark discharges between a metal sample and a counter electrode in an inert gas atmosphere.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来発光分光分析では放電ごとのマトリ
ックス元素の強度をモニターし、強度低下したスパーク
は発光不良によるものとし、強度が非常に高いときは異
常発光であるとし、検出器の飽和などが発生したものと
考え、これらの異常値を除去して分析値を求めていた。
その除外する値(しきい値)はスパーク強度の低い所及
び高い所の両方の数%〜20%程度としていた。このよ
うなしきい値で測定データを適宜カットして精度を高め
るようにしていた。すなわち、今までは、しきい値を適
当に決めていた。しきい値が大きすぎるとデータ量が減
少してばらつきが大きくなり精度不良となるという問題
があり、しきい値を小さくすると、異常値がばらつくと
いう問題がある。
2. Description of the Related Art In conventional emission spectroscopy, the intensity of matrix elements for each discharge is monitored. Sparks with reduced intensity are attributed to poor light emission. When the intensity is extremely high, abnormal emission is determined. Therefore, it was considered that the abnormalities occurred, and these abnormal values were removed to obtain an analysis value.
Excluded values (thresholds) were set to several percent to 20% at both low and high spark intensity locations. The measurement data is appropriately cut at such a threshold value to improve the accuracy. That is, the threshold value has been appropriately determined until now. If the threshold value is too large, there is a problem that the data amount decreases, the variation increases, and the accuracy becomes poor. If the threshold value is reduced, an abnormal value varies.

【0003】ところがこのような従来の方法では分析精
度が必ずしも良くならず、適宜定める上記しきい値が最
良の値であるか否か不明であった。
However, in such a conventional method, the analysis accuracy is not always improved, and it is unclear whether or not the above-mentioned appropriately determined threshold value is the best value.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は上記実情に鑑
み、上記しきい値の適正な決定方法を探究した結果完成
したものであって、しきい値を最も適正に定め、分析精
度を高めることを目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above circumstances, the present invention has been completed as a result of a search for an appropriate method for determining the threshold value. The purpose is to:

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、多数の試料に
より実際に精度を計算して精度が最高になるように決定
する方法であって、その技術手段は、不活性ガス雰囲気
中で金属試料と対電極との間で多数回のスパーク放電を
行い試料中の元素分析を行う発光分光分析方法におい
て、予め繰り返し測定精度と母材元素のスペクトル強度
との関係を求め、測定精度が最も高くなる母材元素のス
ペクトル強度を求め、これをしきい値とし、1放電毎の
母材元素のスペクトル強度を測定し、このスペクトル強
度が前記しきい値の範囲内にあるときのデータから濃度
を求めることを特徴とする発光分光分析方法である。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is a method of actually calculating accuracy by using a large number of samples and determining the accuracy so that the accuracy is maximized. In an emission spectroscopy method in which a number of spark discharges are performed between a sample and a counter electrode to perform elemental analysis in the sample, the relationship between the measurement accuracy and the spectrum intensity of the base material element is determined in advance, and the measurement accuracy is the highest. The spectrum intensity of the base material element is determined, and the obtained value is used as a threshold value. The spectrum intensity of the base material element is measured for each discharge, and the concentration is determined from the data when the spectrum intensity is within the range of the threshold value. This is an emission spectroscopic analysis method characterized by being determined.

【0006】前記測定データは測定元素と母材元素のス
ペクトル強度比とし、このスペクトル強度比と母材元素
のスペクトル強度との関係を求めると精度の高い測定を
行うことができる。
When the measured data is a spectrum intensity ratio between the measured element and the base material element, and a relationship between the spectrum intensity ratio and the spectrum intensity of the base material element is obtained, highly accurate measurement can be performed.

【0007】[0007]

【発明の実施の形態】Al濃度が250ppm含有され
る珪素鋼板のAl濃度分析において、発光分光分析方法
で得られる1放電毎のスペクトル強度比を調べたところ
図2が得られた。図2は横軸が放電回数、縦軸は1放電
ごとのAl/Feスペクトルの強度比である。Al/F
eスペクトル強度比は、通常は約1〜2の範囲にある
が、異常に高くなる場合があり、異常放電と呼ばれてい
るが、これが、分析精度を低下させる原因となる。した
がって異常放電となったデータを棄却すれば精度は向上
する。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION In the Al concentration analysis of a silicon steel sheet having an Al concentration of 250 ppm, FIG. 2 was obtained by examining the spectral intensity ratio for each discharge obtained by the emission spectral analysis method. In FIG. 2, the horizontal axis represents the number of discharges, and the vertical axis represents the intensity ratio of the Al / Fe spectrum for each discharge. Al / F
The e-spectral intensity ratio is usually in the range of about 1 to 2, but may be abnormally high, and is called abnormal discharge, which causes a decrease in analysis accuracy. Therefore, the accuracy can be improved by rejecting the data having an abnormal discharge.

【0008】図2の放電回数1120〜1200回目の
部分を拡大して図3に示した。図3にはAl/Feスペ
クトル強度比とともに、Al、O、Feスペクトル強度
も示した。図3において、A、B点でAl/Feスペク
トル強度比が高くなっている。これらのA、B点におけ
るAl、O、Feのスペクトル強度の変動を見ると (イ)Al強度は正常である (ロ)O強度が高くなっており、酸化物に放電されたた
めと考えられる (ハ)Fe強度が低い。 となっている。Alの酸化物などに放電するとFe強度
が異常に低くなることが考えられ、Fe強度が異常に低
くなった放電でのデータを除去すると、精度が向上す
る。すなわち、Fe強度が低いデータを棄却すれば、A
l強度が正常であるのにスペクトル強度比が異常な点は
除外される。次に、C点では、 (a)Al強度が高い (b)Fe強度も高い (c)Al/Fe強度比は正常 となっている。以上から、Al/Fe強度比とFe強度
の関係を抽出して調べた。その結果を図4に示した。図
4より、Fe強度が低くなると、Al/Feの強度のば
らつきが大きくなる。特にFeの強度が、1000以下
となると大きくばらつくことが知見された。
FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of the portion of the 1120 to 1200 discharges shown in FIG. FIG. 3 also shows the Al, O, and Fe spectral intensities along with the Al / Fe spectral intensity ratio. In FIG. 3, the Al / Fe spectral intensity ratio is high at points A and B. The fluctuations in the spectrum intensities of Al, O, and Fe at points A and B are as follows: (a) Al intensity is normal; (b) O intensity is high, which is considered to be due to discharge to the oxide ( C) Fe strength is low. It has become. It is conceivable that the discharge to the Al oxide or the like causes an abnormal decrease in the Fe intensity. If data in the discharge in which the Fe intensity is abnormally reduced is removed, the accuracy is improved. That is, if data with low Fe intensity is rejected, A
Points where the 1 intensity is normal but the spectral intensity ratio is abnormal are excluded. Next, at the point C, (a) the Al intensity is high, (b) the Fe intensity is high, and (c) the Al / Fe intensity ratio is normal. From the above, the relationship between the Al / Fe intensity ratio and the Fe intensity was extracted and examined. The result is shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 4, when the Fe intensity decreases, the variation in the Al / Fe intensity increases. In particular, it has been found that when the strength of Fe is 1000 or less, it greatly varies.

【0009】そこで、不良データを除去するため、Fe
強度を変えて繰り返し精度を求めたところ図1の結果を
得た。すなわち、最も繰り返し精度が低くなる最適値が
存在することが明らかになった。図1に示す実施例の分
析精度は、全データでの繰り返し精度(σ)は、4.7
ppmであったが、Fe強度が1100未満のデータを
除去したときの繰り返し精度(σ)は、2.6ppmで
あり、本発明による実施例では分析精度が著しく向上し
た。
Therefore, in order to remove defective data, Fe
When the repetition accuracy was obtained by changing the strength, the result of FIG. 1 was obtained. That is, it has been clarified that there is an optimum value at which the repetition accuracy is lowest. The analysis accuracy of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 is such that the repetition accuracy (σ) for all data is 4.7.
ppm, but the repetition accuracy (σ) when removing data having an Fe intensity of less than 1100 was 2.6 ppm. In the examples according to the present invention, the analysis accuracy was significantly improved.

【0010】実施例では、検量線用の試料を複数回測定
したデータを用いて、測定元素と母材元素のスペクトル
強度比と母材元素のスペクトル強度の関係からしきい値
を決定した。この時、 (1)予め多数回の測定結果で最適値を決定しておき、
この値でデータ処理する (2)数回測定した実際のデータを用いて最適値を決定
し、この値でデータ処理する という2つの方法が考えられるが、何れでも良い。
In the examples, the threshold value was determined from the relationship between the spectral intensity ratio of the measured element and the base material element and the spectral intensity of the base material element, using data obtained by measuring the calibration curve sample a plurality of times. At this time, (1) an optimum value is determined in advance by a number of measurement results,
Data processing is performed using this value. (2) There are two methods of determining an optimum value using actual data measured several times and performing data processing using this value. Either method may be used.

【0011】[0011]

【発明の効果】従来、発光分光分析で測定精度を向上さ
せる目的で、しきい値を適宜のパーセンテージで規定
し、不良データを除外するようにしていたが、本発明で
は、鋼板中の溶解Al濃度を測定する場合に、Al/F
e強度比とFe強度の関係を求め、ばらつきが大きくな
るFe強度を見出し、この強度付近で実際にデータ除去
し、精度を求め、精度が最良となったFe強度をしきい
値とし、毎回測定毎に最適値をみつけるようにしたか
ら、迅速に分析精度の高いデータを得ることができるよ
うになった。
Conventionally, in order to improve the measurement accuracy in the emission spectroscopy, the threshold value is specified by an appropriate percentage to exclude defective data. When measuring the concentration, use Al / F
Find the relationship between the e-intensity ratio and the Fe intensity, find the Fe intensity at which the variation increases, actually remove the data near this intensity, determine the accuracy, measure the Fe intensity at which the accuracy is the best as the threshold, and measure each time Since the optimum value is found every time, data with high analysis accuracy can be obtained quickly.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】しきい値となるFeスペクトル強度を変化させ
てデータ除去したときの繰返し精度の変化を示すグラフ
である。
FIG. 1 is a graph showing a change in repetition accuracy when data is removed by changing an Fe spectrum intensity serving as a threshold.

【図2】1放電ごとのAl/Feスペクトル強度比を示
すグラフである。
FIG. 2 is a graph showing an Al / Fe spectrum intensity ratio for each discharge.

【図3】1放電ごとのAl、O、Fe、Al/Feスペ
クトル強度比を示すグラフである。
FIG. 3 is a graph showing Al, O, Fe, and Al / Fe spectral intensity ratios for each discharge.

【図4】Feスペクトル強度とAl/Feスペクトル強
度との関係を示すグラフである。
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the Fe spectrum intensity and the Al / Fe spectrum intensity.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 不活性ガス雰囲気中で金属試料と対電極
との間で多数回のスパーク放電を行い試料中の元素分析
を行う発光分光分析方法において、予め繰り返し測定精
度と母材元素のスペクトル強度との関係を求め、該測定
精度が最も高くなる母材元素のスペクトル強度を求め、
これをしきい値とし、1放電毎の母材元素のスペクトル
強度を測定し、該スペクトル強度が前記しきい値の範囲
内にあるときのデータから濃度を求めることを特徴とす
る発光分光分析方法。
1. An emission spectroscopic analysis method for performing elemental analysis in a sample by performing a number of spark discharges between a metal sample and a counter electrode in an inert gas atmosphere. Determine the relationship with the intensity, determine the spectral intensity of the base metal element is the highest measurement accuracy,
An emission spectroscopy method comprising: measuring a spectrum intensity of a base material element for each discharge with the threshold value as a threshold; and obtaining a concentration from data when the spectrum intensity is within the range of the threshold value. .
【請求項2】 前記データは測定元素と母材元素のスペ
クトル強度比であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の発
光分光分析方法。
2. The emission spectral analysis method according to claim 1, wherein said data is a spectral intensity ratio of a measured element and a base material element.
JP7797397A 1997-03-28 1997-03-28 Method for emission spectroscopic analysis Pending JPH10267848A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7797397A JPH10267848A (en) 1997-03-28 1997-03-28 Method for emission spectroscopic analysis

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7797397A JPH10267848A (en) 1997-03-28 1997-03-28 Method for emission spectroscopic analysis

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH10267848A true JPH10267848A (en) 1998-10-09

Family

ID=13648856

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP7797397A Pending JPH10267848A (en) 1997-03-28 1997-03-28 Method for emission spectroscopic analysis

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH10267848A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100862786B1 (en) 2006-12-19 2008-10-13 주식회사 포스코 Apparatus measuring impurities of molten iron and method sameof

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100862786B1 (en) 2006-12-19 2008-10-13 주식회사 포스코 Apparatus measuring impurities of molten iron and method sameof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20170191940A1 (en) Method for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and calibration
CN112362638A (en) Method for measuring MC6 chromium content by photoelectric direct-reading spectrometer
JPH10267848A (en) Method for emission spectroscopic analysis
JP3671600B2 (en) Method for measuring particle size distribution of oxide inclusions in metals
JP5454403B2 (en) Sol. A method for highly accurate determination of Al and sol. Process operation method of high-precision determination method of Al
CN109540872A (en) Use the method for direct-reading spectrometer measurement nickel-base alloy ingredient
JP2978089B2 (en) Particle size distribution measurement method for inclusions in metal
JP4537253B2 (en) Determination of nonmetallic inclusion composition by emission spectroscopy
JPH11160239A (en) Quantitative determination method for very small inclusion in iron and steel
JP3323768B2 (en) Analysis of trace amounts of lead in stainless steel by emission spectroscopy
JPH0961357A (en) Method for quantitatively determining minute nonmetal inclusion by emission spectro analysis
JPH08184564A (en) Emission spectrochemical analytical method
JP3572734B2 (en) Emission spectroscopy method
JP2007178321A (en) Evaluation method of macrosegregation due to emission spectral analysis
JPH0943150A (en) Method for measuring composition and particle size distribution of inclusion of metal
KR100347578B1 (en) Method for promptly measuring molten metal inclusion
JPH0961356A (en) Emission spectrometric analyzing method
JPH03135752A (en) Method and apparatus for emission spectrochemical analysis of sulfur in steel
TW202400989A (en) Method for emission spectrochemical analysis of antimony in metal material, method for measuring concentration of antimony in molten steel during refining and production method of steel raw material
JPS6337891B2 (en)
JPH0831367A (en) Peak searching method for spectrograph
JPH10318926A (en) Emission spectrochemical analysis method of si in silicon steel
JP4631413B2 (en) Spark discharge emission spectroscopic analysis method of S element in stainless steel
JPH11160240A (en) Quantitative determination method for shape of positive element in metal by emission spectrochemical analysis
JPH07260691A (en) Analysis method of steel material and emission spectral analysis device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20050316

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Effective date: 20050322

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20050712