JP6938348B2 - Contract content evaluation device, contract content evaluation method and program - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a contract content evaluation device, a contract content evaluation method, and a program.

In general, when concluding a contract, a person in charge of the legal department or the like examines the contents of the contract described in the contract. On the other hand, there is known a technique that allows a person in charge who has no experience or knowledge to easily examine a contract at the stage of creating a contract (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2010-231743

However, in the prior art, by presenting a clause related to a certain risk to the user, it is possible to create a contract that avoids the risk, but the contract negotiation does not proceed in relation to the contract partner. There was a case. For example, when a certain clause described in a contract is changed to a contract condition that avoids risk, the contract condition is not accepted by the contract partner.

On the other hand, even if it is evaluated that there is a risk in some provisions, it may be possible to conclude a contract if other provisions are favorable contract conditions. In other words, even if it is evaluated that the contract conditions are unfavorable under certain provisions of the contract, it may be possible to conclude the contract if it can be evaluated that the contract contents are valid or advantageous as a whole. ..

The embodiment of the present invention has been made in view of the above points, and an object of the present invention is to evaluate the contents of the contract.

In order to solve the above problems, the embodiment of the present invention is a contract content evaluation device that evaluates contract contents based on a contract, and provides contract clause evaluation information in which evaluation values for each contract clause and contract conditions are set. With reference to, for each one or more contract clauses and contract conditions representing the contract contents, a calculation means for calculating the evaluation value of the contract clause and the contract conditions, and a sum of the evaluation values calculated by the calculation means and the evaluation values. Based on the above, it is characterized by having the contract clause and contract conditions, and an evaluation means for evaluating the contract contents.

You can evaluate the contents of the contract.

It is a figure which shows an example of the whole structure of the contract content evaluation system which concerns on this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the functional structure of the contract content evaluation apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the contract clause evaluation information. It is a figure which shows an example of the contract information. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the evaluation process of a contract content. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation request screen of a contract content. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation result screen. It is a figure explaining an example of the case of evaluating the contract contents of each ordering contract.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

<Overall configuration>
First, the overall configuration of the contract content evaluation system 1 for evaluating the contract content will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 1, the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment includes a contract content evaluation device 10 and one or more terminal devices 20. The contract content evaluation device 10 and the terminal device 20 are communicably connected to each other via a network such as a LAN (Local Area Network).

The contract content evaluation device 10 obtains the entire contract content represented by each clause of the contract based on the information on the evaluation conditions (for example, the type of business and scale of the contract partner) and the information on the contract concluded in the past. It is a computer to evaluate.

The terminal device 20 is, for example, a PC (personal computer) used by a user such as a contractor. The user can evaluate the contract contents by the contract contents evaluation device 10 by using the terminal device 20.

The configuration of the contract content evaluation system 1 shown in FIG. 1 is an example, and may be another configuration. For example, the contract content evaluation device 10 may be a computer system composed of one or more computers. Further, the contract content evaluation device 10 and the terminal device 20 may be integrally configured.

<Functional configuration>
Next, the functional configuration of the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the functional configuration of the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 2, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment has a contract content evaluation processing unit 100. The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 is realized by a process of causing a CPU (Central Processing Unit) or the like to execute one or more programs installed in the contract content evaluation device 10.

Further, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment has a contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 and a contract information storage unit 300. Each of these storage units can be realized by using, for example, an auxiliary storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or an SSD (Solid State Drive). Even if at least one of these storage units is realized by using a storage device or the like (for example, a DB (database) server or the like) connected to the contract content evaluation device 10 via a network. good.

The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 performs a process of evaluating the contract content based on the contract content evaluation request received from the terminal device 20. The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 includes an evaluation request receiving unit 110, a contract analysis unit 120, a contract content evaluation unit 130, and an evaluation result providing unit 140.

The evaluation request receiving unit 110 receives an evaluation request for the contract contents from the terminal device 20. The contract content evaluation request includes information on the evaluation conditions set by the terminal device 20 (hereinafter, "evaluation condition information") and contract information indicating the document data of the contract. The evaluation condition information includes, for example, information such as the company name, industry, scale, transaction prospect, and competitive situation of the contract partner.

The contract analysis unit 120 analyzes the contract information included in the evaluation request of the contract contents received by the evaluation request receiving unit 110, and extracts each clause included in the contract.

The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 and the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300, and each clause related to the contract and these. Evaluate the entire contract content represented by each clause.

The evaluation result providing unit 140 transmits the evaluation result by the contract content evaluation unit 130 to the terminal device 20. By transmitting the evaluation result to the terminal device 20, the evaluation result of the contract content is provided to the terminal device 20.

The contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 stores the contract clause evaluation information. Here, the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of contract clause evaluation information.

As shown in FIG. 3, the contract clause evaluation information includes "contract clause", "contract condition", and "evaluation point" as data items.

A "contract clause" is a clause relating to a contract. The contract clauses include, for example, a clause relating to liability for damages and a clause relating to intellectual property rights.

"Contract conditions" are conditions that can be set for each contract clause. For example, the contract conditions that can be set for the A clause (the clause relating to liability for damages) include "no description", "equivalent to the company's template", "upper limit of contract amount", and "unlimited". Similarly, for example, the contract conditions that can be set for the B clause (intellectual property right) are "no description", "all reservations", "equivalent to the company's template", "conditional transfer", and "no condition". There is "transfer all". The contract condition "not described" is a condition indicating that the corresponding clause is not described in the contract.

"Evaluation points" are points determined in advance for each contract clause and contract conditions. The higher the points, the more favorable the contract conditions (low risk contract conditions), while the lower the points, the more disadvantageous contract conditions (high risk contract conditions).

For example, the contract conditions "not stated", "equivalent to in-house template", "upper limit of contract amount", and "unlimited" in clause A (clause regarding liability for damages) have "+1" and "0" as evaluation points, respectively. , "-1", and "-2" are set. This indicates that the contract conditions of Clause A (the clause regarding liability for damages) increase the risk in the order of "no description", "equivalent to in-house template", "upper limit of contract amount", and "unlimited".

Similarly, for example, the contract conditions "all reservations", "no description", "in-house template equivalent", "conditional transfer", and "unconditional transfer" of the B clause (the clause concerning intellectual property rights) include As evaluation points, "+3", "+1", "0", "-1", and "-3" are set, respectively. This is because the contract conditions of clause B (terms related to intellectual property rights) are risky in the order of "all reservations", "no description", "equivalent to in-house template", "conditional transfer", and "all unconditional transfer". It shows that it will be higher.

As described above, the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 stores the contract clause evaluation information in which the evaluation points for the contract conditions are associated with each contract clause.

The contract information storage unit 300 stores contract information. Here, the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of contract information.

As shown in FIG. 4, the contract information includes data items such as "contract number", "contract date", "order classification", "contract details", "company name", and "industry". , "Scale", "evaluation result", "number of problem occurrences", and "related contract number" are included.

The "contract number" is identification information that uniquely identifies the contract information. The "contract date" is the date on which the contract was concluded. If the contract has not been concluded yet (for example, in the case of inquiries), a blank (or information indicating that the contract has not been made) is set on the contract date.

The “ordering / ordering classification” is a classification indicating whether the contract is an order contract or an ordering contract. "Contract content" is the content of the contract. Each clause, etc. described in the contract is set in the contract contents. In addition, for example, the contract amount may be further set in the contract content.

The "company name" is the name of the contract partner. "Industry" is the industry of the contract partner. "Scale" is the scale of the contract partner (for example, the amount of capital).

The "evaluation result" is the evaluation result of the contract contents. The evaluation result of the contract content includes, for example, the evaluation points of each clause related to the contract, as will be described later.

The “number of times a problem has occurred” is, for example, the number of times a problem has occurred and a clause that has become a problem after the contract has been concluded. For example, in the contract information of the contract number "0001", the occurrence event "B clause: once" is set. This means that after the conclusion of the contract, some problem (for example, the problem related to the attribution of intellectual property rights) occurred once regarding the B clause (the clause related to intellectual property rights).

The number of times the problem occurs is set or updated by the administrator of the contract content evaluation device 10 or the like, for example, when some problem occurs after the contract is concluded, the clause related to the problem and the number of times the problem occurs are set or updated by the administrator of the contract content evaluation device 10. ..

The "related contract number" is a contract number of other related contract information. For example, the related contract number "0003" is set in the contract information of the contract number "0004" and the contract information of the contract number "0005". This indicates that an ordering contract with a contract number "0004" and an ordering contract with a contract number "0005" are generated according to the order contract with the contract number "0003". More specifically, for example, it is a case where a part of the system development work generated by the order contract with Bank X is ordered from the software company B and the software company C.

As described above, the contract information storage unit 300 stores the contract information of the contract concluded in the past and the contract information of the contract for which the contract has not been concluded for each contract number.

<Evaluation processing of contract details>
Next, the process of evaluating the contract content by the contract content evaluation device 10 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of the evaluation process of the contract contents.

First, the evaluation request receiving unit 110 receives the evaluation request of the contract contents from the terminal device 20 (step S101). The evaluation request of the contract contents includes the evaluation condition information and the contract information.

Here, the user of the terminal device 20 sets the evaluation condition information and the contract information on the evaluation request screen G100 of the contract content shown in FIG. 6, for example, so that the user of the contract content evaluation device 10 can obtain the contract content. You can send an evaluation request.

The contract content evaluation request screen G100 shown in FIG. 6 includes a company name input field G110, an industry selection field G120, a scale selection field G130, a transaction prospect selection field G140, a competition status selection field G150, and a contract premise selection. A column G160, a contract setting column G170, and an evaluation request button G180 are included.

In the company name input field G110, the company name of the contract partner is input. In the industry selection field G120, the industry of the contract partner is selected. In the scale selection field G130, the scale of the contract partner is selected.

In the transaction prospect selection column G140, the transaction prospect with the contract partner is selected. The transaction prospects that can be selected in the transaction prospect selection column G140 include, for example, "high continuity" indicating that a continuous contract is likely to be expected, and "high continuity" indicating that a continuous contract is not likely to be expected. Examples include "small continuity" and "unknown" indicating that it is unclear whether or not a continuous contract can be expected.

In the competition status selection field G150, the competition status in the contract with the contract partner is selected. As the competitive situation that can be selected in the competitive situation selection column G150, for example, "many competitors" indicating that there are many competitors, "less competitors" indicating that there are few competitors, and whether or not there are competitors is unknown. "Unknown" or the like indicating that is mentioned.

In the contract premise selection field G160, preconditions related to the contract are selected. As contract premise that can be selected in the contract premise selection column G160, for example, "A clause (damage liability) indicating that clause A (information on liability for damages) is" not described "or" equivalent to the company's template "is I will not give up. " In this way, in the contract premise selection field G160, preconditions for a certain clause can be selected.

The information (company name, industry, scale, transaction prospect, competitive situation, contract premise) input or selected in the company name input field G110-10 contract premise selection field G160 is the evaluation condition information. It should be noted that some of these pieces of information may not be input or selected. For example, the transaction outlook, competitive situation, contract premise, etc. may not be selected.

In the contract setting field G170, a storage destination of contract information (contract document data, etc.) stored in a storage device or the like of the terminal device 20 is set. In the contract setting field G170, for example, a storage destination of contract information stored on a document server or a cloud server may be set.

When various information is input, selected or set in the above company name input field G110 to contract setting field G170 and then the evaluation request button G180 is pressed by the user, the terminal device 20 displays these various information. (That is, the evaluation request of the contract content including the evaluation condition information and the contract information) is transmitted to the contract content evaluation device 10.

Next, the contract analysis unit 120 analyzes the contract information included in the evaluation request of the contract contents received by the evaluation request receiving unit 110, and extracts each clause included in the contract (step S102). .. For example, the contract analysis unit 120 analyzes the contract information and reads a sentence starting with "Article ○", "Article ○ Item ○", "Article ○ Item ○ Item ○", or the like. After specifying, these specified sentences may be extracted. As a result, a sentence indicating each clause described in the contract (that is, a sentence indicating the contract conditions of each clause) is extracted.

Next, the contract content evaluation unit 130 calculates the evaluation points of each clause related to the contract by referring to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 (step S103).

For example, when the contract condition of the clause "A clause (the clause relating to liability for damages)" extracted in step S103 above is "equivalent to the company's template", the contract content evaluation unit 130 sends the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 to the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200. With reference to the stored contract clause evaluation information, the evaluation point of clause A is calculated as "0". Similarly, for example, when the contract condition of the clause "B clause (the clause relating to intellectual property rights)" extracted in step S103 above is "all transfer without conditions", the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates the contract clause. The evaluation point of the B clause is calculated as "-3" by referring to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the information storage unit 200.

On the other hand, for example, there may be a case where "A clause (a clause relating to liability for damages)" is not extracted in step S103 above (that is, a clause A is not described in the contract). In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200, and sets the evaluation point of the A clause to "+1" (that is, the contract condition "not described"). Corresponding evaluation point) is calculated. The same applies to other provisions.

As a result, the evaluation points of each clause related to the contract (including clauses not stated in the contract) are calculated.

The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300, and evaluates the contract content based on the evaluation points calculated in step S103 above (step S104).

The contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate the contract content by, for example, the methods shown in (1) to (7) below or a method in which one or more of these methods are combined.

(1) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the total of the evaluation points calculated in step S103 above is negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is disadvantageous when the total evaluation points are negative, and determines that the contract content is valid or advantageous when the total evaluation points are 0 or more. Just evaluate.

(2) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract premise included in the evaluation condition information is satisfied. For example, when the contract premise is "I will not give up the A clause (liability for damages)", the contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the evaluation point of the A clause is 0 or more. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when it is determined that the contract premise is not satisfied.

(3) The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300, and determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate from the company name included in the evaluation condition information.

For example, suppose that the company name included in the evaluation condition information is "X Bank". Further, for example, it is assumed that the problem related to the B clause is set to a predetermined number of times or more (for example, once or more) in the "problem occurrence number" in the contract information of Bank X stored in the contract information storage unit 300. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when the evaluation point of the B clause is negative.

(4) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate from the type of industry included in the evaluation condition information.

For example, in a contract with a company belonging to a certain industry, if it is considered that there is no problem in making a favorable contract for a certain clause, it is determined whether or not the evaluation point of the clause is negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when the evaluation point of the clause is negative.

On the other hand, for example, in the case of a contract with a company belonging to a certain industry, if it is considered that a favorable contract cannot be made for a certain clause, whether or not the evaluation point of the clause is positive or not. judge. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when the evaluation points of the clause are positive.

(5) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate based on the scale included in the evaluation condition information.

For example, if it is considered that a company larger than a predetermined size cannot make a favorable contract for a certain clause, it is determined whether or not the evaluation point of the clause is positive. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when the evaluation points of the clause are positive.

On the other hand, for example, in a company whose size is smaller than a predetermined size, if it is considered that there is no problem in making a favorable contract for a certain clause, it is determined whether or not the evaluation point of the clause is negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not valid when the evaluation point of the clause is negative.

(6) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate from the transaction prospects included in the evaluation condition information.

For example, when the transaction outlook is "high continuity", even if some evaluation points are negative to some extent or the total evaluation points are negative to some extent, the contract content evaluation unit 130 Evaluates that the contract content is appropriate. Similarly, for example, in the case of "small continuity", a certain evaluation point is negative to some extent (assuming that the range of negativeness is smaller than that in the case of "large continuity") or evaluation. Even if the total points are negative to some extent (the range of negative is smaller than when "continuity is large"), the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is appropriate. do.

(7) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate based on the competitive situation included in the evaluation condition information.

For example, when the competition situation is "competitive", even if a certain evaluation point is negative to some extent or the total evaluation point is negative to some extent, the contract content evaluation unit 130 , Evaluate that the contract content is appropriate. Similarly, for example, in the case of "low competition", a certain evaluation point is negative to some extent (assuming that the range of minus is smaller than that in the case of "high competition"), or the evaluation point is Even if the total is negative to some extent (the range of negative is smaller than that in the case of "many competitors"), the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is appropriate.

Next, the evaluation result providing unit 140 transmits the evaluation result evaluated in step S104 to the terminal device 20 (step S105). As a result, the evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7, for example, is displayed on the terminal device 20.

The evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7 includes an evaluation point display column G210 and an evaluation result display column G220. In the evaluation point display column G210, the evaluation points of each clause related to the contract and the total of the evaluation points of each of these clauses are displayed. In the evaluation result display column G220, the evaluation result of the entire contract content (for example, "advantageous", "valid", "invalid", etc.) is displayed. In the evaluation result display column G220, the evaluation result of a certain clause (for example, the evaluation result of the clause subject to the contract premise) may be displayed.

Further, the evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7 includes a correction proposal display button G230 and a registration button G240. When the amendment proposal display button G230 is pressed by the user, the amendment proposal of the contract is displayed on the terminal device 20.

Here, the proposed amendment of the contract is, for example, a contract in which, among the provisions of the evaluated contract contents, the provisions evaluated as not valid are amended so as to have reasonable contract conditions. For example, if a clause does not meet the contract premise, it is a contract in which the clause is modified to meet the contract premise.

Further, when the registration button G240 is pressed by the user, the contract information based on the contract to be evaluated (that is, the contract set in the contract setting field G170) is registered in the contract information storage unit 300. Thereby, for example, when the contract content is evaluated to be appropriate, the contract information based on the contract of the contract content can be stored in the contract information storage unit 300.

As described above, in the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment, the contract content based on each clause described in the contract is based on the evaluation condition information (for example, information on the contract partner and the preconditions of the contract). Can be evaluated. Therefore, it becomes possible to evaluate the contract contents based on various information such as the type and scale of the contract partner and the transaction outlook.

Moreover, the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment can not only evaluate the validity of each clause but also evaluate the validity of the entire contract content. Therefore, for example, even if the contract conditions are unfavorable in a certain clause, it is possible to evaluate that the contract contents as a whole are advantageous or appropriate. Therefore, for example, it is possible to prevent a situation in which contract negotiations are delayed due to a part of the contract content having a disadvantageous clause even though the contract content is advantageous or reasonable as a whole.

<Evaluation of contract details between ordering contracts>
In the above, the contract contents of this contract are evaluated by calculating the evaluation points of each clause related to a certain contract, but if the contracts are related to each other, the contract contents of these interrelated contracts are evaluated. You may evaluate whether or not they are consistent. As an example, a case of evaluating the contract contents between ordering contracts will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example in the case of evaluating the contract contents of the ordering contracts.

As shown in FIG. 8, it is assumed that the contract conditions of the A clause are "unlimited" and the contract conditions of the B clause are "all reservations" in the contents of the order contract with the Y bank. At this time, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment is the contract condition of Article A in the ordering contract (ordering contract to software company B and ordering contract to software company C) related to the ordering contract with the Y bank. And, it is evaluated whether or not the contract conditions of the B clause and the contract conditions of the A clause and the B clause in the order contract are consistent.

Specifically, whether the contract condition of clause A in the ordering contract with software company B is "unlimited" and whether the contract condition of clause A in the ordering contract with software company C is "unlimited". Judge whether or not. In the example shown in FIG. 8, since the contract condition of the A clause in the ordering contract with the software company C is the "ordering amount upper limit", it is evaluated as inconsistent.

Similarly, whether the contract condition of the B clause in the ordering contract with the software company B is "all transfer" and whether the contract condition of the B clause in the ordering contract with the software company C is "all transfer". Judge whether or not. In the example shown in FIG. 8, since the contract conditions of the B clause in the ordering contract with the software company B and the software company C are all "transferred", it is evaluated to be consistent.

As described above, by evaluating the consistency of mutually related contracts, for example, in an ordering contract related to a certain ordering contract, the contract is made with a contract content that is more disadvantageous than the ordering contract. Such a situation can be prevented.

The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment disclosed specifically, and various modifications and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of claims.

1 Contract content evaluation system 10 Contract content evaluation device 20 Terminal device 100 Contract content evaluation processing unit 110 Evaluation request receiving unit 120 Contract analysis unit 130 Contract content evaluation unit 140 Evaluation result providing unit 200 Contract clause evaluation information storage unit 300 Contract information storage Department

Claims (6)

It is a contract content evaluation device that evaluates contract content based on a contract.
With reference to the contract clause evaluation information in which the evaluation value for each contract clause and contract condition is set, the evaluation value of the contract clause and contract condition is calculated for each one or more contract clauses and contract conditions representing the contract contents. Calculation means and
And evaluation means for at least one of the sum of the evaluation value and the evaluation value of the calculating means is calculated, based on the information about the counterparty of the contract, to evaluate the pre-Symbol agreement Contents,
A contract content evaluation device characterized by having. The information about the contract partner includes the type of business and scale of the contract partner, the outlook for transactions with the contract partner, and the competitive situation regarding the contract based on the contract.
The evaluation means
The industries included in information on the counterparty, the scale, according to claim 1 wherein the transaction forecasts, and which Zui least one based of the competition, to evaluate the pre-Symbol agreement Contents, characterized in that The contract content evaluation device described in. The evaluation means
Further, also based on the contract assumption showing a prerequisite in a contract, to assess the pre-Symbol agreement Contents, contract evaluation apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that. The evaluation means
Furthermore, a past agreement with previous Kichigiri counterparties, by referring to the contract information including the number of occurrences of the problem corresponding to one or more contractual terms representing the contract, to the number of occurrences of the problem based on, for evaluating the pre-Symbol contract Description, it contract evaluation device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein. The contract content evaluation device that evaluates the contract content based on the contract
With reference to the contract clause evaluation information in which the evaluation value for each contract clause and contract condition is set, the evaluation value of the contract clause and contract condition is calculated for each one or more contract clauses and contract conditions representing the contract contents. Calculation procedure and
At least one of the sum of the evaluation value and the evaluation value of the calculation procedure has been calculated, the evaluation procedure based on the information on the counterparty of the contract, to evaluate the pre-Symbol agreement Contents,
A contract content evaluation method characterized by executing. A program for causing a computer to function as each means in the contract content evaluation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images