JP2019101539A - Contract content evaluation device and contract content evaluation method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

To evaluate a content of a contract.SOLUTION: A contract content evaluation device evaluating a content of a contract based on a contract document, has calculation means calculating evaluation values for a contract item and a contract condition for each of one or more contract items and the contract conditions that represent the content of the contract referring to contract term evaluation information to which evaluation values for the contract term and the contract condition are set, and evaluation means evaluating the contract term, the contract condition, and the content of the contract based on the evaluation values that the calculation means calculated and a summation of the evaluation values.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to a contract content evaluation device, a contract content evaluation method, and a program.

  In a company etc., generally, the contract contents described in the contract are examined by persons in charge of the legal department etc. when concluding the contract. On the other hand, there is known a technology capable of easily examining a contract even if a person in charge has no experience or knowledge at the stage of creating the contract (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

JP, 2010-231743, A

  However, in the prior art, presenting a clause relevant to a certain risk to the user makes it possible to create a contract that avoids the risk, but the contract negotiation does not progress in relation to the counterparty. There was a case. For example, when a clause described in a contract is changed to a risk-avoided contract condition, the contract condition is not accepted by the counterparty.

  On the other hand, even if certain clauses are evaluated to be risky, it may be possible to enter into contracts if other clauses and the like have favorable contract terms. That is, even if certain terms of the contract are evaluated as adverse contract terms, it may be possible to enter into a contract if it can be evaluated that the entire contract content is reasonable or advantageous. .

  The embodiment of the present invention has been made in view of the above point, and has an object to evaluate the contents of a contract.

  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the embodiment of the present invention is a contract content evaluation apparatus for evaluating the content of a contract based on a contract, which is provided with contract clause evaluation information in which an evaluation value for each contract clause and contract condition is set. Calculation means for calculating the evaluation value of the contract clause and the contract condition for each of the one or more contract clauses and contract conditions representing the content of the contract, and the total of the evaluation value calculated by the calculation means and the evaluation value And the evaluation means for evaluating the terms and conditions of the contract and the contents of the contract.

  Contract content can be evaluated.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a figure which shows an example of the whole structure of the contract content evaluation system which concerns on this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of a function structure of the contract content evaluation apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of contract clause evaluation information. It is a figure which shows an example of contract information. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the evaluation process of the content of a contract. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation request screen of the content of a contract. It is a figure which shows an example of an evaluation result screen. It is a figure explaining an example in the case of evaluating the contract contents of order acceptance / contraction mutually.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

<Overall configuration>
First, the overall configuration of the contract content evaluation system 1 for evaluating the content of a contract will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the entire configuration of a contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment includes a contract content evaluation device 10 and one or more terminal devices 20. The contract content evaluation device 10 and the terminal device 20 are communicably connected via a network such as a LAN (Local Area Network), for example.

  The contract content evaluation device 10 calculates the entire contract content represented by each clause of the contract based on the information on the evaluation conditions (for example, the type and size of the contract counterpart, etc.) and the information on the contract concluded in the past, etc. It is a computer to evaluate.

  The terminal device 20 is, for example, a PC (personal computer) or the like used by a user such as a person in charge of contract. The user can use the terminal device 20 to evaluate the contract content by the contract content evaluation device 10.

  The configuration of the contract content evaluation system 1 shown in FIG. 1 is an example, and may be another configuration. For example, the contract content evaluation device 10 may be a computer system configured by one or more computers. Further, the contract content evaluation device 10 and the terminal device 20 may be integrally configured.

<Functional configuration>
Next, the functional configuration of the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a functional configuration of the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment has a contract content evaluation processing unit 100. The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 is realized by processing that causes one or more programs installed in the contract content evaluation device 10 to be executed by a CPU (Central Processing Unit) or the like.

  Further, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment includes a contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 and a contract information storage unit 300. Each of these storage units can be realized using, for example, an auxiliary storage device such as a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid state drive (SSD). Even if at least one storage unit of these storage units is realized using a storage device or the like (for example, a DB (database) server or the like) connected to contract content evaluation device 10 via a network good.

  The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 performs processing of evaluating the contract content based on the evaluation request of the contract content received from the terminal device 20. The contract content evaluation processing unit 100 includes an evaluation request reception unit 110, a contract document analysis unit 120, a contract content evaluation unit 130, and an evaluation result provision unit 140.

  The evaluation request receiving unit 110 receives an evaluation request for contract contents from the terminal device 20. The evaluation request for the contents of the contract includes information on the evaluation condition set by the terminal device 20 (hereinafter, "evaluation condition information") and contract information indicating the document data and the like of the contract. The evaluation condition information includes, for example, information such as the name of the contractor's company, the type of business, the size, the transaction prospect, and the competition status.

  The contract document analysis unit 120 analyzes the contract document information included in the evaluation request of the contract content received by the evaluation request reception unit 110, and extracts each clause included in the contract document.

  The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 and the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300 to determine each clause related to the contract, and Evaluate the entire contract content represented by each clause.

  The evaluation result providing unit 140 transmits the evaluation result of the contract content evaluation unit 130 to the terminal device 20. The evaluation result is transmitted to the terminal device 20, whereby the evaluation result of the contract content is provided to the terminal device 20.

  The contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 stores contract clause evaluation information. Here, the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of contract clause evaluation information.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the contract clause evaluation information includes, as data items, "contract clause", "contract terms", and "evaluation points".

  "Contract clause" is a clause regarding a contract. Contract clauses include, for example, clauses on liability for damages and clauses on intellectual property rights.

  "Contract condition" is a condition that can be set for each contract clause. For example, as contract conditions that can be set for the A clause (the clause on liability for damages), there are "No description", "Company model equivalent", "Contract amount limit", and "Unlimited". Similarly, for example, as contract conditions that can be set for the B clause (intellectual property right), "No description", "All reserved", "Company model equivalent", "Conditional transfer", and "No condition" There is "all transfer". The terms and conditions "not described" are conditions that indicate that the relevant clause is not described in the contract.

  The "evaluation points" are points determined in advance for each of the contract terms and conditions. A higher point represents a more favorable contract condition (a contract condition with a lower risk), while a lower point represents a disadvantageous contract condition (a higher risk contract condition).

  For example, the contract conditions "No description", "Company equivalent", "Contract amount limit", and "Unlimited" of A clause (clause regarding damages) are "+1" and "0" as evaluation points, respectively. , “−1” and “−2” are set. This indicates that the terms and conditions of clause A (the clause on liability for damages) have higher risks in the order of "No description", "Company model equivalent", "Contract amount limit" and "Unlimited".

  Similarly, for example, the contract conditions "all reserved", "not described", "company model equivalent", "conditional transfer", and "conditional all transfer" of the B clause (clause regarding intellectual property right), As evaluation points, “+3”, “+1”, “0”, “−1” and “−3” are respectively set. This is because the contract conditions of clause B (clause regarding intellectual property right) are risks in the order of “all reserved”, “not described”, “company model equivalent”, “conditional transfer” and “conditional all transfer”. It shows that it becomes high.

  Thus, the contract term evaluation information storage unit 200 stores, for each contract term, contract term evaluation information associated with evaluation points for contract terms.

  The contract information storage unit 300 stores contract information. Here, the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of contract information.

  As shown in FIG. 4, in the contract information, as data items, "contract number", "contract date", "order placement / order classification", "contract content", "company name" and "industry" as data items , “Scale”, “evaluation result”, “number of problems occurring”, and “related contract number”.

  The “contract number” is identification information that uniquely identifies contract information. “Contract date” is the date when the contract is concluded. In addition, when the contract has not been concluded (for example, in the case of an inquiry stage, etc.), blank (or information indicating that the contract has not been made, etc.) is set as the contract date.

  The "order placement / order classification" is a classification indicating whether the contract is an order acceptance contract or an order contract. “Content of contract” is the content of the contract. In the contract content, each clause etc. described in the contract is set. For example, a contract amount may be set as the contract content.

  "Company name" is the name of the contractor. The “industry” is the industry of the contractor. “Scale” is the size of the counterparty (eg, amount of capital, etc.).

  "Evaluation result" is the evaluation result of the contract content. The evaluation results of the contract content include, for example, evaluation points of each clause related to the contract, as described later.

  The “number of problems occurring” is, for example, the clause and the number of problems occurring after the conclusion of the contract. For example, in the contract information of the contract number "0001", the occurrence event "B clause: once" is set. This means that some problems (for example, a problem regarding attribution of intellectual property right) have occurred once with respect to the B clause (clause concerning intellectual property right) after the conclusion of the contract.

  The number of times of occurrence of a problem is set or updated by the administrator of the contract content evaluation device 10 or the like, for example, when a certain problem occurs after the conclusion of a contract, the clause regarding the problem and the number of occurrences of the problem .

  The "related contract number" is a contract number of other related contract information. For example, the related contract number "0003" is set to the contract information of the contract number "0004" and the contract information of the contract number "0005". This indicates that the order contract of the contract number "0004" and the order contract of the contract number "0005" occur according to the order reception contract of the contract number "0003". More specifically, for example, it is a case where a part of the system development work generated by an order contract with bank X is ordered to software company B and software company C.

  Thus, the contract information storage unit 300 stores, for each contract number, the contract information of the contract concluded in the past and the contract information of the contract for which the contract has not been concluded yet.

<Evaluation of contract contents>
Next, the process of evaluating the content of the contract by the contract content evaluation device 10 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of the process of evaluating the contents of a contract.

  First, the evaluation request receiving unit 110 receives an evaluation request for contract contents from the terminal device 20 (step S101). The evaluation request for the contents of the contract includes evaluation condition information and contract information.

  Here, the user of the terminal device 20 sets the evaluation condition information and the contract document information, for example, on the evaluation request screen G100 of the contract content shown in FIG. Evaluation requests can be sent.

  In the evaluation request screen G100 for contract contents shown in FIG. 6, a company name input column G110, a business type selection column G120, a scale selection column G130, a transaction prospect selection column G140, a competition status selection column G150, and a contract premise selection A column G160, a contract document setting column G170, and an evaluation request button G180 are included.

  In the company name input field G110, the company name of the contract counterpart is input. In the industry selection column G120, the industry of the contract counterpart is selected. In the size selection field G130, the size of the counterparty is selected.

  In the transaction forecast selection field G140, a transaction forecast with a counterparty is selected. For example, “high continuity” indicating that a continuous contract can be expected is likely to be selectable as the transaction prospect that can be selected in the transaction prospect selection column G140, and “notice that a continuous contract can not be expected” “Continuity small”, “unknown” indicating that it is unclear whether or not a continual contract can be expected.

  In the competitive situation selection field G150, the competitive situation in the contract with the contractor is selected. As the competition status that can be selected in the competition status selection field G150, for example, "a large number of competitors" indicates that there are many competitors, "a small amount of competition" indicates that there are few competitors, and it is unknown whether or not competitors exist. “Unknown” or the like indicating that the

  In the contract premise selection column G160, the preconditions on the contract are selected. As the contract premise that can be selected in the contract premise selection column G160, for example, the “A clause (responsibility for liability)” indicates that the A clause (information on liability for damages) is “not described” or “equivalent to in-house model”. "I will not give it". Thus, in the contract premise selection field G160, it is possible to select the precondition for a certain clause.

  Information (company name, business type, size, transaction prospect, competition status, contract premise) input or selected in the company name input field G110 to contract premise selection field G160 is evaluation condition information. Note that some of the pieces of information may not be input or selected. For example, trade prospects, competitive situations, contract premise, etc. may not be selected.

  In the contract document setting field G170, a storage destination of contract document information (document data of contract document, etc.) stored in a storage device or the like of the terminal device 20 is set. In the contract document setting field G170, for example, the storage destination of the contract document information stored on the document server or the cloud server may be set.

  When various items of information are input, selected or set in the above company name input field G110 to contract document setting field G170, and the evaluation request button G180 is pressed by the user, the terminal device 20 uses the various information. A contract content evaluation request including (that is, evaluation condition information and contract information) is transmitted to the contract content evaluation device 10.

  Next, the contract document analysis unit 120 analyzes the contract document information included in the evaluation request of the contract content received by the evaluation request reception unit 110, and extracts each clause included in the contract document (step S102). . The contract document analysis unit 120 analyzes, for example, contract document information, and a sentence beginning with "Article X", "Item X Section 0", "Item X Section X Item # 0", etc. Once identified, these identified sentences may be extracted. As a result, a sentence indicating each clause described in the contract (that is, a sentence in which the terms and conditions of each clause are described) is extracted.

  Next, the contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 to calculate an evaluation point of each clause related to the contract (step S103).

  For example, when the contract condition of the clause “A clause (clause regarding liability for damages)” extracted in the above step S103 is “Company equivalent”, the contract content evaluation unit 130 causes the contract condition evaluation information storage unit 200 to The evaluation point of the A clause is calculated as “0” with reference to the stored clause evaluation information. Similarly, for example, when the contract condition of the clause “Clause B (clauses related to intellectual property rights)” extracted in step S103 above is “all transfer without conditions”, the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates the contract clauses. The evaluation point of the B clause is calculated as “−3” with reference to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the information storage unit 200.

  On the other hand, for example, there may be a case where “A clause (claim related to damages)” is not extracted in the above-mentioned step S103 (ie, when A clause is not described in the contract). In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract clause evaluation information stored in the contract clause evaluation information storage unit 200 and sets the evaluation point of the A clause to “+1” (that is, the contract condition “not described”). Calculate with the corresponding evaluation point). The same is true for the other clauses.

  As a result, evaluation points of each clause of the contract (including the clause not described in the contract) are calculated.

  The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300, and evaluates the content of the contract based on the evaluation points calculated in step S103 described above (step S104).

  The contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate the content of the contract, for example, by the method shown in the following (1) to (7) or a method combining one or more of these methods.

  (1) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the total of the evaluation points calculated in step S103 above is negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is disadvantageous when the total of the evaluation points is negative, and that the contract content is appropriate or advantageous when the total of the evaluation points is 0 or more. It should be evaluated.

  (2) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the contract premise included in the evaluation condition information is satisfied. For example, when the contract premise is “A clause (disclaimer of liability) is not given”, the contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the evaluation point of the A clause is 0 or more. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when it is determined that the contract premise is not satisfied.

  (3) The contract content evaluation unit 130 refers to the contract information stored in the contract information storage unit 300 and determines whether the contract content is appropriate from the company name included in the evaluation condition information.

  For example, it is assumed that the company name included in the evaluation condition information is "X bank". Further, for example, it is assumed that the “problem occurrence number” in the contract information of the bank X stored in the contract information storage unit 300 is set to a predetermined number or more (for example, once or more) of the problems related to the B clause. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when the evaluation point of the B clause is negative.

  (4) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the contract content is appropriate based on the type of industry included in the evaluation condition information.

  For example, in a contract with a company belonging to a certain type of industry, if it is considered acceptable to make an advantageous contract for a certain clause, it is determined whether the evaluation point of the clause is not negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when the evaluation point of the clause is negative.

  On the other hand, for example, in a contract with a company belonging to a certain industry, if it is considered that an advantageous contract can not be made for a certain clause, it is judged whether the evaluation point of the clause is not positive. judge. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when the evaluation point of the clause is positive.

  (5) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the content of the contract is appropriate from the scale included in the evaluation condition information.

  For example, in a company of a size larger than a predetermined size, when it is considered that an advantageous contract can not be made for a certain clause, it is determined whether the evaluation point of the clause is not positive. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when the evaluation point of the clause is positive.

  On the other hand, for example, in a company whose size is smaller than a predetermined value, when it is considered that there is no problem in making an advantageous contract for a certain clause, it is determined whether the evaluation point of the clause is not negative. In this case, the contract content evaluation unit 130 may evaluate that the contract content is not appropriate when the evaluation point of the clause is negative.

  (6) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether or not the contract content is appropriate from the transaction prospect included in the evaluation condition information.

  For example, when the transaction prospect is "continuity large", the contract content evaluation unit 130 even if a certain evaluation point is negative to some extent or the total evaluation point is negative to some extent. Evaluates that the contract content is appropriate. Similarly, for example, in the case of "low continuity", a certain evaluation point is somewhat negative (it is assumed that the negative range is smaller than in the case of "high continuity"), and evaluation is made. Even if the sum of points is somewhat negative (it is assumed that the negative range is smaller than in the case of "continuity large"), the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is appropriate. Do.

  (7) The contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether the contract content is appropriate or not from the competition situation included in the evaluation condition information.

  For example, if the competition situation is "many competitions", the contract content evaluation unit 130 determines whether a certain evaluation point is to some extent negative or the total evaluation points is to some extent negative. Evaluate that the contract content is appropriate. Similarly, for example, in the case of "less competitive", a certain evaluation point is somewhat negative (it is assumed that the negative range is smaller than in the case of "many competing"), or the evaluation point is Even if the total is somewhat negative (it is assumed that the negative range is smaller than in the case of "many competitions"), the contract content evaluation unit 130 evaluates that the contract content is appropriate.

  Next, the evaluation result providing unit 140 transmits the evaluation result evaluated in step S104 described above to the terminal device 20 (step S105). Thereby, on the terminal device 20, for example, an evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7 is displayed.

  The evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7 includes an evaluation point display field G210 and an evaluation result display field G220. The evaluation point display field G210 displays the evaluation points of the clauses related to the contract and the total of the evaluation points of the clauses. In the evaluation result display field G220, the evaluation result of the entire contract content (for example, "advantage", "valid", "not valid", etc.) is displayed. In the evaluation result display field G220, the evaluation result of a certain clause (for example, the evaluation result of the clause that is the subject of the contract premise) may be displayed.

  Further, the evaluation result screen G200 shown in FIG. 7 includes a correction proposal display button G230 and a registration button G240. When the correction proposal display button G230 is pressed by the user, the terminal device 20 displays the correction proposal of the contract.

  Here, the proposed amendment of the contract refers to, for example, a contract in which clauses which are judged to be inappropriate among the clauses of the evaluated contract contents are corrected to be appropriate contract conditions. For example, if a clause does not meet the contract premise, it means a contract that modifies the clause to meet the contract premise.

  Further, when the registration button G240 is pressed by the user, contract information based on the contract subject to be evaluated (that is, the contract written in the contract setting field G170) is registered in the contract information storage unit 300. Thereby, for example, when it is evaluated that the contract content is appropriate, the contract information storage unit 300 can store contract information based on the contract of the contract content.

  As described above, in the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment, the content of the contract based on each clause described in the contract based on the evaluation condition information (for example, the information on the contract counterpart, the precondition of the contract, etc.) Can be evaluated. For this reason, the contents of the contract can be evaluated based on various types of information such as the type and size of the contract counterpart, the transaction prospect, and the like.

  Moreover, in the contract content evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment, not only the validity of each clause can be evaluated, but also the validity of the entire contract content can be evaluated. Therefore, for example, even in the case of an adverse contract condition in a certain clause, it can be evaluated that the entire contract content is advantageous or appropriate. Therefore, it is possible to prevent, for example, a situation in which contract negotiation is delayed due to an adverse clause in a part of the contract content despite the fact that the entire contract content is advantageous or appropriate.

<Evaluation of the contract contents of each ordering contract>
In the above, the contract content of this contract was evaluated by calculating the evaluation points of each clause related to one contract, but if the contracts are mutually related, the contract content of these mutually related contracts It may be evaluated whether or not they are consistent. As an example, the case of evaluating the contract contents of the ordering contract will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining an example in the case of evaluating the contract contents of the ordering contract.

  As shown in FIG. 8, in the contents of an order contract with Bank Y, it is assumed that the contract condition of the A clause is "unlimited" and the contract condition of the B clause is "all reserved". At this time, the contract content evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment is the contract condition of the A clause in the order contract (order contract with software company B and order contract with software company C) related to the order contract with the Y bank. Evaluate whether the terms and conditions of Clause B and the terms of Clause A and the terms of Clause B in the order contract are consistent.

  Specifically, whether the contract condition of the A clause in the order contract to the software company B is "unlimited" and whether the contract condition of the A clause in the order contract to the software company C is "unlimited" It is determined whether or not it is not. In the example shown in FIG. 8, since the contract condition of the A clause in the order contract to the software company C is "order limit", it is evaluated that they are not consistent.

  Similarly, whether the contract condition of the B clause in the order contract to the software company B is "all transfer" and whether the contract condition of the B clause in the order contract to the software company C is "all transfer" It is determined whether or not it is not. In the example shown in FIG. 8, since the contract conditions of the B clause in the order contract to the software company B and the software company C are both “all transfer”, it is evaluated that they are consistent.

  As described above, by evaluating the integrity of the mutually related contracts, for example, in an order contract related to a certain order contract, the contract is executed with a contract content that is more disadvantageous than the order contract. It is possible to prevent such a situation.

  The present invention is not limited to the above specifically disclosed embodiments, and various modifications and changes are possible without departing from the scope of the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Contract content evaluation system 10 Contract content evaluation apparatus 20 Terminal device 100 Contract content evaluation processing part 110 Evaluation request reception part 120 Contract document analysis part 130 Contract content evaluation part 140 Evaluation result provision part 200 Contract evaluation information storage part 300 Contract information storage Department

Claims (6)

A contract content evaluation device that evaluates the content of a contract based on a contract,
The evaluation value of the contract clause and the contract condition is calculated for each of one or more of the contract clause and the contract condition representing the contract content with reference to the contract clause evaluation information in which the evaluation value for each contract clause and the contract condition is set. Calculation means,
An evaluation unit that evaluates the contract clause and the contract conditions and the contract content based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation unit and the total of the evaluation value;
Contract content evaluation device characterized by having. The evaluation means is
Furthermore, the terms and conditions of the contract and the contract conditions based on at least one of the type and size of the counterparty of the contract of the contract, the transaction prospect with the contractor, and the competition situation regarding the contract based on the contract; The contract content evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein the contract content is evaluated. The evaluation means is
The contract content evaluation device according to claim 1 or 2, further evaluating the contract terms and the contract terms and the contents of the contract based on a contract premise that indicates a premise in a contract. The evaluation means is
Further, the number of occurrences of the problem is referred to with reference to the contract information including the content of the past contract with the contractee of the contract and the number of occurrences of the problem corresponding to one or more contract terms representing the content of the contract. The contract content evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the contract terms and conditions and the contract contents are evaluated on the basis of the above. The contract content evaluation device that evaluates the content of the contract based on the contract,
The evaluation value of the contract clause and the contract condition is calculated for each of one or more of the contract clause and the contract condition representing the contract content with reference to the contract clause evaluation information in which the evaluation value for each contract clause and the contract condition is set. Calculation procedure,
An evaluation procedure for evaluating the contract terms and conditions and the contract content based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation procedure and the sum of the evaluation value;
The contract content evaluation method characterized by performing.   The program for functioning a computer as each means in the contract content evaluation apparatus as described in any one of Claims 1-4.

Images