JP2020080132A - Legal document data correction method, legal document data correction system and legal document data correction program - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a legal document data correction method and system easily capable of not only understanding a task feeling contained in a legal document but also taking a concrete measure to overcome the task feeling.SOLUTION: The legal document correction method comprises: a review result recording step for recording a review result for each prescribed unit of sentences to constitute a legal document; a review result outputting step for outputting the recorded review result of the legal document; a response information input acceptance step for accepting input of response information which is information on whether a response to the output review result is required or not; and a correction step for correcting the review result of the legal document that is recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document by prescribed unit when the response information is accepted.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 4

Description

The present invention relates to a method, a system, a program and the like for correcting the content of legal document data.

Since legal documents such as contracts require specialized knowledge to judge whether the contents are advantageous or disadvantageous to themselves from a legal point of view, in order for general consumers and new employees of companies to make the judgment, Prerequisite knowledge needs to be accumulated.

In addition, people with specialized knowledge, such as legal professionals and legal staff of companies, often check many legal documents on a daily basis, and these legal documents include many standard rules. However, even though there is no need for confirmation as in the case of general effort obligation regulations, legal documents must be read once to determine whether confirmation is required, which makes the work extremely complicated. Was becoming.

Under such a sense of problem, it is required to make a risk judgment of a legal document by a mechanical process, and a technique to meet such a request has been conventionally known. Specifically, in Patent Document 1, the words included in the contract are positioned as cautionary words, cautionary predicates, and the like, which are formed according to the combination of these words. A technique for determining the risk level of a sentence is disclosed.

JP2012-208547A

However, the technology described in Patent Document 1 merely determines the degree of risk of sentences that form a legal document such as individual clauses of a contract. Therefore, even if the technology is applied, it is difficult to say that the legal staff will be able to arrange the order of the processes for checking a large number of legal documents, and that the work cost will be improved. ..

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides a review result recording step of recording a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that should constitute legal document data, and legal document data recorded in the review result recording step. Review result output step for outputting the review result of, and a correspondence information input acceptance step for accepting an input of correspondence information that is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step, and a correspondence information input acceptance step When the corresponding information is accepted in, the method of correcting the legal document data having the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the step of correcting the legal document data in predetermined units is proposed. To do.

We also propose a system and program based on the same configuration.

The present invention mainly configured as described above facilitates not only grasping the feeling of problem contained in the legal document but also taking concrete measures for overcoming the problem.

The figure which shows an example of the display screen of the user terminal which is a terminal which the user who is going to amend a part of contract contract using the legal document data amendment system of this invention manages. The figure which shows an example of the functional block of the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 1. A schematic diagram showing an example of a configuration when the functional configurations of the legal document data correction system of the first embodiment are collectively realized as one piece of hardware. The figure which shows an example of the flow of a process in the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 1. The figure which shows an example of the functional block of the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 2. The figure which shows an example of the flow of a process in the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 2.

First, FIG. 1 is shown. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of the present invention, and is a diagram showing an example of a display screen of a user terminal which is a terminal managed by the user when a contract document is corrected using the legal document data correction system of the present invention. Is. In the same figure, as Article 14 of the contract agreement, "The second party can subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the prior written consent of A." The result of reviewing the prescribed text is displayed as "disadvantageous". Here, the users are listed under the titles "Owner's Articles", "Own Advantage", and "Equal Relationship" displayed on the same screen (listed under "Equal Relationship"). (The contents are partially omitted for convenience of the image area.) "The second party can subcontract all or part of the work to a third party only with the consent of A." "Advantageous" Notation or "The trustee cannot entrust all or part of this work to a third party. However, this is not the case with the prior consent of the entrustor." "Slightly advantageous" After confirming the recommended sentences such as, a screen is displayed in which the corresponding information is about to be input in order to correct Article 14 to a content that is advantageous to oneself. In the present invention, when the user outputs the corresponding information based on the display on the screen, the input of the corresponding information is accepted, and the contract contract data is corrected for a predetermined unit of sentence including Article 14. Is characterized by.

Hereinafter, each embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. First, the mutual relationship between the embodiment and the claims is as follows. First, the first embodiment mainly corresponds to claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and the like. The second embodiment mainly corresponds to claim 3 and the like. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments at all, and has the technical idea described in each claim of the claims according to common general technical knowledge, and various modifications are possible within the scope not departing from the gist thereof. Can be carried out in various ways.

Hereinafter, each embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. First, the mutual relationship between the embodiment and the claims is as follows. First, the first embodiment mainly corresponds to claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and the like. The second embodiment mainly corresponds to claim 5 and the like. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments at all, and has the technical idea described in each claim of the claims according to common general technical knowledge, and various modifications are possible within the scope not departing from the gist thereof. Can be carried out in various ways.

<<Embodiment 1>>
<Outline>
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of functional blocks of the legal document data correction system of this embodiment. As shown in the figure, the “legal document data correction system” 0200 of this embodiment includes a “review result recording unit” 0201, a “recommended sentence holding unit” 0202, and a “review result output unit” 0203. , And “corresponding information input acceptance unit” 0204 and “correction unit” 0205.

It should be noted that the legal document data correction system described in detail below can also be configured so that one or more functions of the function can be realized by a plurality of devices, and each of the functional blocks is hardware. Alternatively, it may be realized as software. Taking a computer as an example, a CPU, main memory, GPU, image memory, bus, secondary storage device (hard disk or non-volatile memory), keyboard, operation buttons, touch panel, electronic pen for touching the touch panel, etc. Various input devices, microphones, displays, other output devices, other external peripheral devices and other hardware components, interfaces for the external peripheral devices, communication interfaces, driver programs for controlling those hardware, Other application programs are included.

Then, by the arithmetic processing of the CPU in accordance with the program expanded on the main memory, the data etc. input from the input device or other interface and held in the memory or the hardware are processed and accumulated, or each of the hardware or Instructions for controlling software are generated. Here, the above program may be realized as a plurality of modularized programs, or may be realized as one program by combining two or more programs.

<Functional configuration>
The “review result recording unit” 0201 is configured to record a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that should constitute the legal document data. The "prescribed unit text that should compose the legal document data" here is, specifically, the individual clauses that compose the legal document for each "article" unit or included in the "article". It is conceivable that each unit of “unit” or “go” is a unit.

In addition, the review results of sentences that span multiple “articles” are collectively recorded as one unit, or instead of each one of the clauses, “liability guarantee liability (nonconformance liability for contract)” “attribution of intellectual property right” As described above, the review result may be recorded for each legal theme.
By being able to record the review results in various modes, it is possible to output the review results suitable for the user.

The review result recorded in the review result recording unit means a result of judgment as to whether or not the content of the text of the predetermined unit described above is advantageous to the user. The method and content of the specific review result may be appropriately determined. Specifically, it is possible to record the result of the review using the learned model obtained through machine learning using natural language processing. The advantages and disadvantages may be determined and recorded using a predetermined table regarding the relationship between words included in each sentence.

The recording form of the review result may be a content for determining whether it is advantageous or unfavorable for each predetermined unit of text, or a determination of whether it is advantageous or not in a plurality of stages. In addition, when it is not possible to unequivocally judge whether the text is advantageous or disadvantageous, a review that intentionally encourages the user to make a voluntary decision, such as "Please judge based on the relationship with the other party" You may output the result. Further, the review result may be recorded as character information, or may be recorded as color information or other visual information. With such a configuration, the user can intuitively confirm the review result.

Further, the review result can be recorded not only for the sentence that actually constitutes the legal document data but also for the sentence that should constitute the legal document data. Specifically, when general legal document data does not include a sentence related to a matter that should be included, information to that effect may be recorded as a review result.

The above points will be described with reference to specific examples. When the contract document regarding the contract contract that outsources the manufacturing of a specific product is legal document data, regarding the method of inspection/inspection when deciding the product to be manufactured in the contract and how to decide the pass/fail judgment If it is found as a result of the review that the regulation was not included, the review result is not advantageous or disadvantageous, and the review result stating that "the inspection method is not prescribed" is recorded.

The “recommended sentence storage unit” 0202 is configured to store a predetermined unit of sentence as a recommended sentence in association with the user's position. The user's position is defined according to the nature of the legal document. For example, in the case of the contract contracts already mentioned, the positions of the orderer (orderer) and the orderer (contractor) are linked. The attached recommended sentences will be retained respectively.

To explain the recommended texts more concretely, when taking a non-disclosure agreement as an example of legal document data, the clauses/texts and confidentiality relating to the purpose of concluding the agreement will be determined according to the position of the discloser/recipient of the confidential information. There may be cases where different contents are included as compared with the contract contract described above, such as the clauses and sentences concerning the definition of information and the clauses and sentences concerning the authority to handle confidential information.

Furthermore, it is possible to retain plural kinds of recommended sentences for one position and one legal matter. Specifically, it is possible to provide a plurality of types of recommended sentences according to the relative relationship between the user and the other party. By making it possible to record the review results according to the relative relationships such as "other party's advantage", "equal relationship", "own advantage", the review result becomes a scoop ruler and can be used as a reference for individual transactions. It becomes possible to avoid adverse effects that do not happen.

By the way, the recommended sentences mentioned here can be appropriately updated and can be managed by the user himself. Specifically, it is conceivable that a user can input a sentence in the template of legal document data that he or she commonly uses as a recommended sentence and store it in the recommended sentence storage unit. .. By adopting this configuration, the correction unit described later can perform correction processing based on the user's own template, and provides corrected legal document data that is more versatile for the user. It will be possible.

The “review result output unit” 0203 is configured to output the review result of the legal document recorded in the review result recording unit. As for the review result here, as already described in the description of the review result recording section, it is based on the position of the user (such as the contractor and the discloser of confidential information) and the relative position with the other party (such as the other party's advantage). , One or a plurality of types of review results are output for each predetermined unit. The specific output content of the review result can be appropriately selected by the user through the terminal managed by the user, and may be output in the detailed content data including the recommended text, and the advantages and disadvantages may vary. It may be output only as visual information such as information. In other words, the review result output by the review result output unit naturally includes a mode in which the recommended sentence held in the recommended sentence holding unit is not used.

Note that the output mode of the review results can also be selected as appropriate, such as a method of sending an email to the email address designated by the user in advance, a website available to the user, a method of displaying and outputting on the application screen, etc. Conceivable.

The “correspondence information input receiving unit” 0204 is configured to receive the input of correspondence information, which is the information regarding the necessity or non-necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output by the review result output unit. The "correspondence information" referred to here specifically includes not only information for requesting corrections, additions, and deletions of a predetermined unit of text corresponding to the review result, but also text related to matters that should normally be included. It may be information that requires a response such as addition of a sentence related to the matter that should be included in response to the review result indicating that it is not included. In some cases, the content may require that all items of the review results corresponding to one legal document data should be dealt with, or in some cases that only some of the items should be dealt with in response to the user's selection. It may be.

The mode of accepting correspondence information input can be freely set as appropriate. Specifically, the user selects the necessity of correspondence for each predetermined unit of text through a terminal managed by the user, and A method is conceivable in which the output result is received as correspondence information and input is accepted.

It should be noted that the correspondence information is not limited to the case where the correction or the like needs to be dealt with, and may be configured to receive information having the content that the correspondence is not required. By receiving the information of the content as the corresponding information, it is possible to manage that the legal document data is operated as the version having the legal content as it is as the information.

Furthermore, it is desirable to specify the relationship between the user and the other party as the content of the correspondence information. Specifically, it is desirable to accept the input of the contents including the relationship such as whether the other party is advantageous in the transaction, whether it is an equal relationship, or whether the user himself is advantageous. By adopting this configuration, it is possible to make the correction content in the correction unit according to the specific situation of the user.

When the “correction unit” 0205 receives the correspondence information in the correspondence information input reception unit, the recommended sentence holding unit holds the review result of the legal document recorded in the review result recording unit or the legal document data in the recommended sentence holding unit. Is configured to be corrected for each predetermined unit. As used herein, "using recommended sentences held in the recommended holding unit" specifically means, in the legal document data, the expression content of the recommended sentences regarding the portion that needs to be corrected by the correspondence information. Means the process of reflecting. More specifically, it is conceivable that the sentence requiring correction is replaced with the recommended sentence and then output as the corrected legal document data. When the input of the correspondence information of the content corresponding to the review result indicating the shortage is received, it is conceivable to perform a process of additionally writing the shortage.

Here, a specific example of the correction process in the correction unit will be described in more detail by taking the case of the contract contract mentioned above as an example. Here, we first give an example of the rules regarding subcontracting to a third party in a contract contract, that is, “subcontracting”. In the original contract, the sentence "The second party can subcontract all or part of the work to a third party only with the prior written consent of A." Therefore, it is assumed that, as a result of the review for the user who is the contractor, the content of the sentence is "disadvantageous". In this case, when the input of the correspondence information is accepted from the user, the sentence is corrected to the content advantageous to the user. At this time, for example, it is assumed that the recommended sentence holding unit holds three types of recommended sentences associated with the sentence. Specifically, as the recommendation sentence 1, "The contractor subcontracts all or part of this work to a third party only with the prior written consent (including e-mail) of the orderer. ," as recommended sentence 2, "The contractor may subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the consent of the ordering party.", Recommended sentence 3 As the statement, "the contractor can subcontract all or part of the work of this case to a third party by notifying the orderer in advance or after the fact."

Here, in the recommendation information holding unit, it is assumed that the recommendation sentence 1 is positioned as "orderer's advantage", the recommendation sentence 2 is "equal position", and the recommendation sentence 3 is as "contractor advantage". That is, when accepting subcontracting, the recommended sentence 1 is a correction of the content that allows a simple method of e-mail in addition to the document as a method of obtaining consent, and the recommended sentence 2 is even wider, and the consent is obtained. It means that the method is not limited to any means, and that it does not matter whether it is before or after, and in the recommendation sentence 3, it means that subcontracting is allowed without notification even if consent is required. There is.

In consideration of the above-described holding status of various information, it is conceivable that the correction unit first performs a correction process using the recommended sentence 3 that is positioned as the most advantageous content for the contractor user. More specifically, the recommended sentence 3 is replaced with a sentence that requires correction in the correspondence information.

By the way, like the recommended sentences given here, one or more character contents that are candidates for correction wording according to the contents of the review result are positioned as correction candidate contents, and one or more are output, and from the input management terminal of the output destination. It is conceivable to accept the selection of and to perform the correction processing according to the selection. If you adopt a configuration that accepts the user's selection according to the individual content of the review result. It is possible to make modifications that meet the needs of users.

In addition, when the correspondence information includes the relationship between the user and the other party in advance, the correction process may be performed based on the relationship. For example, in the case where the content of “orderer's advantage” is included as the relationship, the content related to the relationship included in the corresponding information is referred to when making a correction by the correction unit, and the recommendation sentence 3 Instead, the correction process using the recommended sentence 1 is performed. If this configuration is adopted, it is possible to provide the same effect to the user without adopting the configuration for outputting the correction candidate content each time and accepting the selection, reducing the load on the user and depending on the position. Flexible correction processing can be performed.

Here, it is desirable that the result of the correction processing in the correction unit is recorded in a format in which the fact that the correction processing has been performed can be confirmed in the legal document data. Although the specific format may be decided as appropriate, a method of changing the font, color, and size of the characters of the modified part and recording it, etc. A method of outputting the modified parts so that they can be visually recognized on one legal document data. Is desirable. By adopting this configuration, it becomes possible to present the corrected legal document data to the other party as it is, and to easily confirm the fact of the correction.

By the way, when outputting the correction result, it may be possible to output it in the original text format with the recommended text replaced, but the fluctuation of the text expression between the recommended text and the original legal text data was corrected. It is desirable to output above. To re-use the example of the contract contract, the notation of the parties was "contractor" and "orderer" in all the recommended sentences, whereas the notation of the parties in the original legal document data was "Otsu". It is "Kou". When making corrections in the correction section, for standard expressions such as "Kou" and "Otsu", the fact that they correspond to the prescribed expressions in the recommended sentence is defined and held as similarity/non-affinity relationship determination rules. It is desirable to make corrections using the rejection rules and output the results. By performing the correction process using the dictionary corresponding to the predetermined expression, it is possible to reduce the trouble of the correction work by the user himself and the risk of omission of correction.

<Specific configuration>
FIG. 3 is shown here. The figure is a schematic diagram showing an example of a configuration when the functional configurations of the legal document data correction system of the present embodiment are collectively realized as one piece of hardware. Each device has a “CPU” 0301, a “storage device (storage medium)” 0302, a “main memory” 0303, an “input interface” 0304, and an “output interface” 0305 for executing various arithmetic processes. , A “network interface” 0306, and transmits/receives information to/from external peripheral devices such as a “touch panel” 0307 and a “display” 0308 via the input/output interface. Further, information is transmitted/received to/from an external device such as the “user terminal” 0309 via the network interface. The specific mode of this network interface may be wired or wireless, and the communication method may be direct or indirect. Therefore, it is also possible to adopt a so-called cloud computing format in which information is transmitted and received between a specific external device or a user of the device and a server managed by a third party associated therewith.

Various programs as described below are stored in the storage device, and the CPU reads these various programs into the work area of the main memory, develops them, and executes them. Note that these configurations are connected to each other by a data communication path such as a "system bus" 0399 to transmit/receive and process information (the basic configuration of the above configuration is equivalent to that of any other device described below). The same is true for).

(Specific configuration of the recommended sentence holder)
The recommended sentence holding unit is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and is particularly configured by storing text data forming a recommended sentence in a storage area of a computer. Specifically, the CPU reads the "recommended sentence holding program" 0310 from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, and stores the text data at an address determined for each predetermined unit. The recommended sentence data can be written, created, or changed from an internal or external terminal.

(Specific configuration of review result recording section)
The review result recording unit is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “review result recording program” 0320 from the storage device into the main memory and executes the program, and a predetermined unit that constitutes the legal document data. The review result for each sentence is received and stored at a predetermined address in the main memory.

(Specific configuration of review result output section)
The review result output unit is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and is obtained by the CPU reading the “review result output program” 0330 from the storage device into the main memory and executing the program, and executing the review result recording program. The review result is read and the review result is output to a predetermined output destination.

(Specific configuration of the corresponding information input reception part)
The corresponding information input receiving unit is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “corresponding information input receiving program” 0340 from the storage device into the main memory and executes it in accordance with the output from the user terminal. Then, the input of the correspondence information, which is the information regarding the necessity of correspondence to the review result output by the execution of the review result output program, is received, and the received information is stored in a predetermined address of the main memory.

(Specific configuration of correction section)
The correction unit is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “correction program” 0350 from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, and the correspondence information received by the correspondence information input reception program Accordingly, the review result of the legal document recorded by the execution of the review result recording program or the process of correcting the legal document data is performed for each predetermined unit, and the processing result is stored in a predetermined address of the main memory.

When executing the correction program, the "correction candidate content input acceptance sub-step" is read out to the main memory and executed, and the character content that is a candidate for the correction wording according to the content of the review result recorded in the review result recording step is executed. One or more correction candidate contents are output so that the selection from the user terminal is accepted, and the "content usage correction subprogram" is read out to the main memory and executed to use the correction candidate contents for which the selection is accepted. Alternatively, the legal document data may be modified to be adopted.

<Process flow>
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the flow of processing in the legal document data correction system of the present embodiment. The process flow of the figure consists of the following steps. First, in step S0401, a process of recording a review result for each predetermined unit of text that should constitute the legal document data is performed (review result recording step). Then, in step S0402, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step is output to the user terminal which is a terminal managed by the user (review result output step). Next, in step S0403, it is determined whether or not the correspondence information, which is the information regarding the necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step, is output from the user terminal. When the determination result here is that the content is output, the input of the corresponding information is received as a step S0404 (corresponding information input receiving step). If the output of the determination result is not the content, the same processing is repeated.

In step S0405, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data is corrected for each predetermined unit using the recommended sentence in accordance with the corresponding information received in the corresponding information input receiving step. Yes (correction step).

In the correction step, one or more correction candidate contents, which are character contents that are candidates for a correction word according to the content of the review result recorded in the review result recording step, are output and selected from the user terminal. A configuration is also conceivable, in which the legal document data is corrected using the correction candidate contents for which selection has been received (content use correction sub-step), as well as acceptance (correction candidate content input reception sub-step).

<Effect>
By using the legal document data correction system that adopts the above configuration, it is easy to not only grasp the sense of problem contained in the legal document data, but also take concrete measures to overcome the sense of problem. Become.

<<Embodiment 2>>
<Outline>
The legal document data correction system of the present embodiment is basically the same as the technical features of the legal document data correction system of the first embodiment, but the correction unit outputs a question output unit for outputting one or more question contents. And an answer acceptance means for accepting an input of an answer to the question content output by the question output means from the external terminal, and a review result of the legal text data or the legal text data is corrected in predetermined units according to the accepted answer. An additional technical feature is that it has an answer-dependent correction means. Hereinafter, the above-mentioned features different from those of the first embodiment will be described in detail.

<Functional configuration>
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of functional blocks when the legal document data correction method of the present embodiment is realized by one computer (apparatus). As shown in the figure, the “legal document data correction system” 0500 of this embodiment includes a “review result recording unit” 0501, a “recommended sentence holding unit” 0502, and a “review result output unit” 0503. , "Correspondence information input acceptance section" 0504 and "correction section" 0505, and the correction section further includes "question output means" 0511, "answer acceptance means" 0512, and "answer dependence modification means" 0513. , With. Since the basic configuration is common to the legal document data correction system described with reference to FIG. 2 of the first embodiment, the following differences are “question output means”, “answer acceptance means”, and “answer dependence”. The function of "correction means" will be described.

The “question output means” 0511 is configured to output one or a plurality of question contents. In some cases, the question content is a direct question that is a question that is directly required to correct legal document data, or when it is an indirect question that is a question for selecting a more straightforward question content to perform a specific correction process There is also.

Each individual question content is held in association with a specific type of legal document data, a position in the legal document, and a specific answer. An example of question contents associated with the contract contract is shown below. First of all, in the question contents related to the contract contract from the standpoint of the contractor, for example, "is there a high possibility of subcontracting (subcontracting)?" "Is the daily communication with the other party an electromagnetic tool such as email? It may be assumed that question contents such as “?” “Please select the importance level of the work for subcontracting from the following levels” are held. As described above, the question content may be a question about whether to ask whether it is right or wrong, a question that prompts multiple choices, or a question that allows free description from the user. The format is not limited.

Although one or more question contents are output, when one or more question contents are output, instead of outputting two or more question contents at a time, it is configured to output one or more question contents in multiple times. May be. By outputting the question contents in multiple steps, it is possible to avoid a situation where a user who is forced to answer a large number of question contents at a time gets tired of answers and stops using the system (leaves). be able to.

The “answer accepting unit” 0512 is configured to accept the input of the answer to the question content output from the question output unit from the external terminal. The answer is accepted from the terminal managed by the user in the answer format corresponding to the question format of the question content.

The specific configuration of question output and answer acceptance is a design matter as appropriate, but a configuration such as a chatbot in which question output and answer acceptance are displayed alternately on one screen is adopted. It is desirable to do. If this configuration is adopted, the question and the answer will not be inconsistent and will be displayed in a bite together. Therefore, what question the user should have answered, and the answer to that question is the legal text. You will be able to see the flow of how it is useful for data correction.

The “response-dependent correction means” 0513 is configured to correct the legal document data review result or the legal document data for each predetermined unit according to the received response. “Depending on the answer” means making a correction using text data that is associated with the content of the answer in advance. More specifically, the predetermined answer and the individual recommended sentences held in the recommended sentence holding unit are held in association with each other in advance, and when the answer is accepted, the recommended sentence associated with the answer is displayed. It is conceivable to use it to make corrections.

An appropriate method may be used as the method of associating the recommended sentence with the answer here. IDs may be given to the respective items and they may be associated with each other, or the relation between the answer and the recommended sentence may be recorded in a table in advance, and the recommended sentence may be selected according to the table.

Note that the answer may be associated with a plurality of recommended sentences, and in such a case, a plurality of recommended sentences may be extracted in a selectable format and used for correction. .. In this case, as described in the first embodiment, it is possible to further perform the narrowing-down processing according to the user's position or execute the correction processing after receiving the selection from the user. In any case, by adopting this configuration in which the correction process is performed based on the individual specific response from the user, it is possible to flexibly respond to the user's position and situation.

<Specific configuration>
The hardware configuration of each device constituting the legal document data correction system of the present embodiment is basically the same as the hardware configuration of the legal document data correction system of the first embodiment described with reference to FIG. Therefore, in the following, specific processing of the “question output means”, the “answer acceptance means”, and the “answer dependency correction means” which have not been described so far will be described.

(Specific configuration of question output means)
The question output means is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and when the CPU reads the “correction program” from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, also reads and executes the “question output subprogram”, A process of outputting one or a plurality of question contents is performed.

(Specific structure of answer acceptance means)
The answer acceptance means is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and when the CPU reads the “correction program” from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, also reads the “answer acceptance subprogram” and executes it. An input of an answer to the question content output according to the execution result of the question output subprogram from an external terminal is accepted and stored in a predetermined address of the main memory.

(Specific structure of response-dependent correction means)
The answer-dependent correction means is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and when the CPU reads the "correction program" from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, also reads and executes the "answer-dependent correction subprogram". Then, the legal document data is corrected for each predetermined unit in accordance with the answer obtained by executing the answer acceptance subprogram.

<Process flow>
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the flow of processing in the legal document data correction system of the present embodiment. The process flow of the figure consists of the following steps. First, in step S0601, a process of recording a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that constitutes legal document data is performed (review result recording step). Then, in step S0602, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step is output to the user terminal which is a terminal managed by the user (review result output step). Next, in step S0603, it is determined whether or not the correspondence information, which is the information regarding the necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step, is output from the user terminal. When the content of the judgment result is output, the input of the corresponding information is received as a step S0604 (corresponding information input receiving step). If the output of the determination result is not the content, the same processing is repeated.

After step S0604, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data is amended for every predetermined unit using the recommended sentence (correction step). First, in step S0605, one or a plurality of question contents are output according to the correspondence information received in the correspondence information input reception step (question output substep). After that, in step S0606, an input of an answer to the question content output in the question output substep from the external terminal is accepted (answer acceptance substep). After that, in step S0607, it is determined whether to repeat the same process regarding question output and answer input acceptance, and if the result of the determination here is that it is not necessary to repeat, the response accepted in addition to the correspondence information is determined in step S0608. According to the above, the text of the review result or the legal document data is corrected for each predetermined unit (answer-dependent correction substep).

<Effect>
By adopting the legal document data modification method of the present embodiment, it becomes possible to perform modification processing that satisfies the user's demand more than when adopting the legal document data modification method of the first embodiment.

0200...Legal document data correction system, 0201...Review result recording unit, 0202...Recommended sentence holding unit, 0203...Review result output unit, 0204...Corresponding information input acceptance unit, 0205...・Correction section

Claims (7)

A review result recording step of recording a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that should constitute the legal document data,
A review result output step for outputting the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step,
A correspondence information input receiving step for receiving input of correspondence information which is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step,
When the corresponding information is received in the corresponding information input receiving step, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the correcting step of correcting the legal document data in predetermined units,
A method for correcting legal document data that has a. The correction steps are
A correction candidate content input reception sub-step that outputs one or more correction candidate contents that are character contents that are candidates for a correction word according to the content of the review result recorded in the review result recording step and that accepts selection.
A content use correction sub-step of correcting legal document data for each predetermined unit using the received correction candidate contents,
The method for correcting legal document data according to claim 1, further comprising: Holds a similarity rule, which is a language rule that regulates the similarity of multiple notations,
The method of correcting legal document data according to claim 1, wherein the correcting step further includes a similarity determination correction sub-step of correcting the legal document data using a similarity determination rule. If the content of the correspondence information received in the correspondence information input receiving step does not require correction, the correction step does not correct the predetermined unit portion of the legal document data corresponding to the correspondence information. The method for correcting legal document data according to any one of Items 1 to 3. The correction steps are
A question output sub-step for outputting one or more question contents,
An answer acceptance substep of accepting an input of an answer to the question content output in the question output substep from the external terminal,
A response-dependent correction sub-step of correcting the legal document data review result or the legal document data in predetermined units according to the received response;
The method for correcting legal document data according to any one of claims 1 to 4, comprising: A review result recording unit that records review results for each predetermined unit of text that should constitute legal document data,
A recommended sentence holding unit that holds a predetermined unit of sentence as a recommended sentence in association with the user's position,
A review result output unit that outputs the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording unit,
A correspondence information input receiving unit that receives input of correspondence information that is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output by the review result output unit,
When the correspondence information input receiving unit receives the correspondence information, the review result of the legal document recorded in the review result recording unit or the recommended sentence holding unit holds the legal document data in the recommended sentence holding unit for each predetermined unit. A correction section to correct,
A legal document data correction system having. A review result recording step of recording a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that should constitute the legal document data,
A review result output step of outputting a review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step,
A correspondence information input receiving step for receiving input of correspondence information which is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step,
When the corresponding information is received in the corresponding information input receiving step, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the correcting step of correcting the legal document data in predetermined units,
A legal document data correction program that enables the computer to execute.