JP6582337B1 - Legal document data correction method, legal document data correction system, and legal document data correction program - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides a method, a system, and a program that facilitate not only grasping a sense of problem included in a legal document but also taking specific measures for overcoming the sense of problem. A method for correcting a legal document, comprising: a review result recording step for recording a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that constitutes the legal document; and a review result output for outputting a review result of the recorded legal document. Step, a correspondence information input receiving step for accepting input of correspondence information as information on necessity of correspondence regarding the output review result, and a review result of the legal document recorded in the review result recording step when the correspondence information is accepted Or a correction step of correcting the legal document for each predetermined unit. [Selection] Figure 4

Description

The present invention relates to a method, a system, a program, and the like for correcting the contents of legal document data.

Legal documents such as contracts require specialized knowledge to determine whether the content is advantageous or unfavorable from a legal point of view, so in order for general consumers and new employees to make decisions, It is necessary to accumulate prerequisite knowledge.

In addition, people with specialized knowledge, such as professionals and legal personnel of companies, sometimes check many legal documents on a daily basis, and these legal documents contain many standard rules. Even though there is no need for confirmation as in the general provisions for effort, it is necessary to read the legal document once to determine whether confirmation is necessary, and the work is extremely complicated. It was.

Under such a sense of problem, it is required to make a risk determination of a legal document by mechanical processing, and a technology that meets such a request has been known. Specifically, in Patent Document 1, a word included in a contract is positioned as a caution object, a caution predicate, or the like that requires attention, and is configured by the word according to a combination of these words. A technique for determining the danger level of a sentence is disclosed.

JP2012-208547

However, the technique described in Patent Document 1 merely determines the risk level of sentences that constitute a legal document such as individual clauses of a contract. Therefore, even if this technology is applied, it is difficult for legal officers to say that it is possible to sort out the order of processing for checking a large number of legal documents, and it is difficult to say that the effect of increasing the work cost can be obtained. .

In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention provides a review result recording step for recording a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that constitutes legal document data, and legal document data recorded in the review result recording step. A review result output step for outputting the review results, a response information input reception step for receiving input of response information that is information related to necessity of response regarding the review results output in the review result output step, and a response information input reception step When the correspondence information is received at the step, the review method of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the correction step of correcting the legal document data for each predetermined unit is proposed. To do.

We also propose systems and programs based on similar configurations.

According to the present invention having the above-described configuration, it is easy not only to grasp the sense of problem included in the legal document but also to take specific measures for overcoming the sense of problem.

The figure which shows an example of the display screen of the user terminal which is a terminal which the user who is going to correct a part of contract contract using the legal document data correction system of this invention manages The figure which shows an example of the functional block of the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 1. Schematic which shows an example of the structure at the time of realizing each functional structure of the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 1 collectively as one hardware. The figure which shows an example of the flow of a process in the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 1. The figure which shows an example of the functional block of the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 2. The figure which shows an example of the flow of a process in the legal document data correction system of Embodiment 2.

First, FIG. 1 is shown. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of the present invention, and is a diagram showing an example of a display screen of a user terminal which is a terminal managed by a user when correcting a contract contract using the legal document data correction system of the present invention. It is. In the same figure, as Article 14 of the contract agreement, “But may only subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the prior written consent of A”. The review result of the specified text is displayed as “disadvantage”. Here, the users are described under the titles “Company's Article”, “Company Advantage” and “Equal Relationship” displayed on the same screen (described under “Equal Relationship”). (The contents are partially omitted for the convenience of the image area.) “You can subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the consent of Party A.” “Advantage” Notation or “Trustee may not entrust all or part of this work to a third party. However, this shall not apply if prior consent of the trustee is obtained.” “Slightly advantageous” After confirming the recommended sentence such as, a screen on which the corresponding information is about to be input to correct Article 14 to the contents advantageous to the self is displayed. In the present invention, when the user outputs the correspondence information based on the display on the screen, the contract agreement data is corrected for a predetermined unit of text including Article 14 after receiving the input of the correspondence information. It is characterized by.

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. First, the relationship between the embodiment and the claims is as follows. First, the first embodiment mainly corresponds to claims 1, 2, 3, 5 , 6, and the like. The second embodiment mainly corresponds to claim 4 and the like. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, and has technical ideas described in the claims of the claims in accordance with the common general technical knowledge, and various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It can be implemented in an embodiment.

<< Embodiment 1 >>
<Overview>
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of functional blocks of the legal document data correction system of this embodiment. As shown in the figure, the “legal document data correction system” 0200 of the present embodiment includes a “review result recording unit” 0201, a “recommended sentence holding unit” 0202, a “review result output unit” 0203, , “Corresponding Information Input Accepting Unit” 0204 and “Correction Unit” 0205.

It should be noted that the legal document data correction system described in detail below may be configured to realize one or more functions of the function by a plurality of devices, and the function blocks are all hardware. Or it may be realized as software. Taking a computer as an example, CPU, main memory, GPU, image memory, bus, secondary storage device (hard disk or nonvolatile memory), keyboard, operation buttons, touch panel, electronic pen for touching touch panel, etc. Hardware components such as various input devices, microphones, displays and other various output devices, other external peripheral devices, interfaces for external peripheral devices, communication interfaces, driver programs for controlling these hardware, Other application programs are listed.

And by the arithmetic processing of the CPU according to the program developed on the main memory, the data inputted from the input device or other interface etc. and held in the memory or hardware are processed and accumulated, An instruction for controlling the software is generated. Here, the program may be realized as a plurality of modularized programs, or may be realized as a single program by combining two or more programs.

<Functional configuration>
The “review result recording unit” 0201 is configured to record a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that should constitute legal document data. The “text of a predetermined unit that should constitute legal document data” here means, specifically, the individual clauses constituting the legal document for each “article” unit or included in the “article”. It is conceivable that the unit is “unit” or “unit”.

In addition, the review results of sentences across multiple “Articles” are recorded together as a single unit, or “Defective Liability (Contract Nonconformity Liability)” “Intellectual Property Rights Attribution” For example, the review result may be recorded for each legal theme.
Since various types of review results can be recorded, review results suitable for the user can be output.

Note that the review result recorded in the review result recording unit means that the content of the text in the predetermined unit already described is a determination result of whether it is advantageous for the user. The method and content of the specific review results may be determined as appropriate. Specifically, it may be possible to record the results of the review using the learned model obtained through machine learning using natural language processing. The relationship between the words included in each sentence may be determined and recorded by using a predetermined table to determine advantages and disadvantages.

The recording form of the review result may be a content that determines whether or not each sentence of a predetermined unit is advantageous or unfavorable and a degree of whether or not it is advantageous in a plurality of stages. In addition, when it is difficult to determine whether the text is advantageous or unfavorable, a review that encourages users to make voluntary decisions, such as “Please judge based on the relationship with the other party” The result may be output. The review result may be recorded as character information, or may be recorded as color information or other visual information. With this configuration, the review result can be intuitively confirmed by the user.

Further, the review result can be recorded not only for the text that actually constitutes the legal document data but also for the text that should constitute the legal document data. More specifically, when a general legal document data does not include a sentence related to a matter that should be included, information to that effect may be recorded as a review result.

The above points will be described with specific examples. When contracts related to contracts that entrust the manufacture of specific products are used as legal document data, the method for determining inspection / acceptance and determining acceptance / rejection when delivering products to be manufactured in the contract If it is found as a result of the review that the rules are not included, the review result is recorded as a review result that is not advantageous and disadvantageous, and that “the inspection method is not defined”.

The “recommended sentence holding unit” 0202 is configured to hold a predetermined unit of sentence as a recommended sentence in association with the user's position. The user's position is determined according to the nature of the legal document. For example, in the case of the contract contract example already mentioned, it is tied to the position of the orderer (orderer) and the contractor (contractor). Each recommended sentence will be retained.

To explain the recommendation text more specifically, when taking a non-disclosure agreement as an example of legal document data, depending on the position of the person who disclosed and received the confidential information, the clause / text and the secret regarding the purpose of the contract conclusion respectively. There may be cases where the contents of the provisions / texts relating to the definition of information and the provisions / texts concerning the right to handle confidential information are different from those of the previous contract.

Furthermore, a plurality of recommended sentences can be provided and held for one position and one legal matter. Specifically, it is conceivable to provide a plurality of types of recommendation texts according to the relative relationship between the user and the other party. By making it possible to record review results according to relative relationships such as “opposite advantage”, “equivalent relationship”, and “self advantage”, the review result becomes a leverage ruler and can be used as a reference for individual transactions. It will be possible to avoid such negative effects.

Incidentally, the recommendation text here can be updated as appropriate, and can also be managed by the user himself. Specifically, it is conceivable that a sentence in the model of legal document data that the user uses for general purposes is input as a recommended sentence and held in the recommended sentence holding unit. . By adopting this configuration, it becomes possible to perform correction processing on the basis of the user's own template in the correction unit described later, and provide corrected legal document data that is more versatile for the user. It becomes possible.

The “review result output unit” 0203 is configured to output the review result of the legal document recorded by the review result recording unit. The review results here are based on the user's position (contractor, disclosure of confidential information, etc.) and the relative position of the other party (advantages, etc.) as already described in the review result recording section. One or a plurality of types of review results are output for each predetermined unit. The specific output contents of the review results can be appropriately selected by the user through the terminal managed by the user, and may be output as detailed content data including recommended texts. It may be output only as visual information such as information. That is, the review result output by the review result output unit naturally includes an aspect in which the recommended text held by the recommended text holding unit is not used.

The review result output mode can also be selected as appropriate, such as a method of sending an email to a user's pre-designated email address, a website that can be used by the user, and a method of displaying and outputting on the application screen. Conceivable.

The “corresponding information input accepting unit” 0204 is configured to accept input of correspondence information that is information related to necessity of handling related to the review result output by the review result output unit. “Correspondence information” here includes, in particular, information related to matters that should be included, in addition to information that requires correction such as correction, appending, and deletion of a predetermined unit of text corresponding to the review result. It may be information for requesting a response such as addition of a sentence related to a matter to be included in a review result indicating that it is not included. In some cases, it may be required to respond to all matters out of the review results corresponding to one legal document data, or in other cases, it may be necessary to respond only to a part according to the user's choice. There may be.

The reception mode of the correspondence information input can be freely set as appropriate. Specifically, the user selects necessity of correspondence for each predetermined unit of text through a terminal managed by the user, and the selection result A method of receiving an output result as correspondence information and receiving an input can be considered.

The correspondence information is not limited to the case where the above-described correction is required, and may be configured to accept information indicating that no correspondence is required. By accepting the information of the contents as correspondence information, it is possible to manage as information that the legal document data is operated as a legally valid version with the contents.

Furthermore, it is desirable to define the relationship between the user and the other party as the contents of the correspondence information. More specifically, it is desirable to accept input including contents such as whether the other party is advantageous in terms of transaction, an equal relationship, or whether the user is advantageous. By adopting this configuration, it is possible to make the content of correction in the correction unit in accordance with the individual specific situation of the user.

“Correction unit” 0205 receives the correspondence information in the correspondence information input reception unit, and recommends the review result of the legal document recorded in the review result recording unit or the recommended sentence holding the legal document data in the recommendation sentence holding unit It is comprised so that it may correct for every predetermined unit using. The phrase “using the recommended text held in the recommendation holding section” here means, specifically, the content of the recommended text for the part of the legal document data that needs to be corrected by the correspondence information. Means the process of reflecting. More specifically, it is conceivable that a sentence requiring correction is output as a revised version of legal document data after being replaced with a recommended sentence. When input of correspondence information having contents corresponding to a review result indicating a shortage is accepted, it is conceivable to perform a process of additionally writing the shortage contents.

Here, a specific example of the correction process in the correction unit will be described in more detail by taking the case of the contract as mentioned above as an example. Here, the provisions regarding subcontracting to a third party in a contract contract, that is, “subcontracting” are given as an example. The original contractual agreement contains a sentence stating that "Our company may subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the prior written consent of Party A". It is assumed that the content of “disadvantage” is output as a review result for the user who is a contractor. In this case, when the input of correspondence information is received from the user, the sentence is corrected to contents advantageous to the user. At this time, for example, it is assumed that the recommended sentence holding unit holds three types of recommended sentences associated with the sentence. Specifically, as recommendation sentence 1, “The contractor re-entrusts all or part of this work to a third party only when the orderer's prior written consent (including e-mail) is obtained. "Recommendation sentence 2", "Subcontractor can subcontract all or part of this work to a third party only with the consent of the ordering party", recommendation sentence 3 As follows: “The contractor can re-entrust all or part of this work to a third party by notifying the orderer in advance or after the fact”.

Here, in the recommendation information holding unit, it is assumed that the recommendation sentence 1 is positioned as “orderer's advantage”, the recommendation sentence 2 as “equivalent position”, and the recommendation sentence 3 as “contractor's advantage”. In other words, when accepting subcontracting, the recommendation sentence 1 is a way of getting consent, in addition to the written amendment of the contents that allow a simple method of e-mail, and the recommendation sentence 2 is more widely accepted. In addition to the correction of the contents not to ask any means, it also means the correction of the contents that do not ask before and after, and the recommendation sentence 3 does not need to obtain consent, subcontracting is allowed only if notified Yes.

Considering the above-described status of holding various information, it is conceivable that the correction unit first performs a correction process using the recommendation sentence 3 that is positioned as the most advantageous content for the user who is a contractor. More specifically, a process of replacing the recommended sentence 3 with a sentence that requires correction in the correspondence information is performed.

By the way, like the recommended sentence mentioned here, one or more character contents that are candidates for correction wording according to the contents of the review result are positioned as correction candidate contents, and the input destination management terminal of the output destination It is conceivable to accept the selection and perform a correction process according to the selection. If you adopt a configuration that accepts the user's selection according to the individual contents of the review results. Modifications that meet user demands are possible.

In addition, when the relationship between the user and the other party is included in the correspondence information in advance, the correction processing based on the relationship may be performed. For example, in the case where the content of “orderer's advantage” is included as the relationship, when the correction unit performs correction, the content related to the relationship included in the corresponding information is referred to, and the recommendation sentence 3 Instead, the correction process using the recommended sentence 1 is performed. If this configuration is adopted, the same effect can be provided to the user without adopting a configuration in which the correction candidate content is output each time and the selection is accepted. Flexible correction processing becomes possible.

Here, it is desirable that the result of the correction process in the correction unit is recorded in a format in which the correction process can be confirmed on the legal document data. Although the specific format may be determined as appropriate, a method of outputting the corrected portion so that the corrected portion can be visually recognized on one legal document data, such as a method of recording by changing the font, color and size of the character of the corrected portion It is desirable that By adopting this configuration, it becomes possible to present the corrected legal document data to the other party as it is, and to easily confirm the fact of the correction.

By the way, when outputting the correction result, it may be a method of outputting the recommended text as it is, but the fluctuation of the sentence expression between the recommended text and the original legal document data was corrected. It is desirable to output above. Using the previous example of the contract again, the notation of the parties in all the recommended texts was “contractor” and “ordering party”, whereas the notation of the parties in the original legal document data was “O”. It is “Kou”. When making corrections in the correction unit, a standard expression such as “Class A” or “B” is defined in advance as corresponding to the predetermined expression of the recommended text, and is stored as a similarity determination rule. It is desirable to make corrections using the rejection rule and output the result. By performing the correction process using the dictionary corresponding to the predetermined expression, it is possible to reduce the trouble of correction work by the user himself and the risk of correction omission.

<Specific configuration>
FIG. 3 is shown here. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a configuration when the functional components of the legal document data correction system of the present embodiment are combined and realized as one piece of hardware. Each of the devices has “CPU” 0301, “storage device (storage medium)” 0302, “main memory” 0303, “input interface” 0304, and “output interface” 0305 for executing various arithmetic processes. And “network interface” 0306, and exchanges information with external peripheral devices such as “touch panel” 0307 and “display” 0308 via the input / output interface. In addition, information is transmitted / received to / from an external device such as a “user terminal” 0309 via a network interface. The specific mode of this network interface is not limited to wired or wireless, and the communication method is not directly or indirectly related. Therefore, it is possible to adopt a so-called cloud computing format in which information is transmitted and received between a specific external device or a server managed by a third party associated with the user of the device.

Various programs as described below are stored in the storage device, and the CPU reads out these various programs into the work area of the main memory, and develops and executes them. These configurations are connected to each other by a data communication path such as “system bus” 0399 and perform transmission / reception and processing of information (the basic configuration of the above configuration is any of the other devices described below). The same applies to.)

(Specific configuration of the recommended text holding unit)
The recommended sentence holding unit is specifically configured by a computer program and computer hardware, and is particularly configured by storing text data constituting the recommended sentence in a storage area of the computer. Specifically, the CPU reads the “recommended sentence holding program” 0310 from the storage device to the main memory and executes it, and stores the text data at an address determined for each predetermined unit. The recommended text data can be written or created and changed from an internal or external terminal.

(Specific configuration of review result recording part)
The review result recording unit is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads out the “review result recording program” 0320 from the storage device to the main memory and executes it, and is a predetermined unit that should constitute legal document data. The review result for each sentence is received and stored in a predetermined address of the main memory.

(Specific configuration of the review result output unit)
The review result output unit is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “review result output program” 0330 from the storage device to the main memory and executes it, and is obtained by executing the review result recording program. The review result is read out, and the review result is output to a predetermined output destination.

(Specific configuration of the correspondence information input reception unit)
The correspondence information input receiving unit is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “corresponding information input reception program” 0340 from the storage device to the main memory and executes it in response to the output from the user terminal. Then, it accepts input of correspondence information, which is information regarding necessity of correspondence to the review result output by executing the review result output program, and stores the received information at a predetermined address of the main memory.

(Specific configuration of the correction part)
Specifically, the correction unit includes a computer program and computer hardware, and the CPU reads the “correction program” 0350 from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, and the correspondence information received by the correspondence information input reception program. In response to this, a process for correcting the review result of the legal document or the legal document data recorded by the execution of the review result recording program is performed for each predetermined unit, and the process result is stored in a predetermined address of the main memory.

When executing the correction program, the “correction candidate content input acceptance sub-step” is read into the main memory and executed, and the text content that is a candidate for the correction wording according to the content of the review result recorded in the review result recording step One or a plurality of correction candidate contents are output so as to receive selection from the user terminal, and the “content use correction subprogram” is read out and executed in the main memory, and the correction candidate contents for which selection has been received are used. A configuration for correcting legal document data may be employed.

<Process flow>
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the flow of processing in the legal document data correction system of this embodiment. The flow of processing in the figure consists of the following steps. First, in step S0401, a process of recording a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that constitutes legal document data is performed (review result recording step). In step S0402, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step is output to a user terminal that is a terminal managed by the user (review result output step). Next, in step S0403, it is determined whether or not correspondence information, which is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step, is output from the user terminal. If it is the content that the determination result is output here, the input of the corresponding information is accepted as step S0404 (corresponding information input receiving step). If the content of the determination result is not included, the same process is repeated.

In step S0405, according to the correspondence information received in the correspondence information input acceptance step, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data is corrected for each predetermined unit using the recommended text. (Correction step).

In the correction step, one or a plurality of correction candidate contents, which are text contents that are candidates for the correction wording according to the contents of the review result recorded in the review result recording step, are output and selected from the user terminal. A configuration is also conceivable in which the legal document data is corrected (content use correction sub-step) using the correction candidate content that has been selected, as well as being accepted (correction candidate content input reception sub-step).

<Effect>
By using the legal document data correction system that employs the above configuration, it is easy not only to grasp the sense of issues contained in legal document data, but also to take specific measures to overcome those issues. Become.

<< Embodiment 2 >>
<Overview>
The legal document data correction system according to the present embodiment is basically the same as the technical features of the legal document data correction system according to the first embodiment, but the correction unit outputs one or a plurality of question contents. And answer accepting means for accepting an input of an answer to the question content output from the external terminal by the question output means, and correcting the legal document data review result or the relevant legal document data for each predetermined unit according to the accepted answer It is provided with the point which has an answer dependence correction means as a further technical feature. Hereinafter, the features different from those of the first embodiment will be described in detail.

<Functional configuration>
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of functional blocks when the legal document data correction method of the present embodiment is realized by a single computer (apparatus). As shown in the figure, the “legal document data correction system” 0500 of the present embodiment includes a “review result recording unit” 0501, a “recommended sentence holding unit” 0502, a “review result output unit” 0503, , “Corresponding information input reception unit” 0504 and “correction unit” 0505, and the correction unit further includes “question output unit” 0511, “answer reception unit” 0512, “answer dependence correction unit” 0513, Have. Since the basic configuration is common to the legal document data correction system described with reference to FIG. 2 of the first embodiment, the “question output means”, “answer reception means”, and “answer dependence” which are the differences are described below. The function of “correction means” will be described.

The “question output unit” 0511 is configured to output one or a plurality of question contents. The question content may be a direct question that is directly required to correct legal document data, or it may be an indirect question that is a question for selecting more straightforward question content to perform a specific correction process There is also.

Each individual question content is held in association with a specific type of legal document data, a position in the legal document, and a specific answer. An example of question content associated with a contract is shown below. First of all, in the question content associated with the contract contract from the standpoint of the contractor, for example, “Is there a high possibility of subcontracting (subcontracting)?” “Is daily exchange with the other party an electromagnetic tool such as e-mail? It is possible that question content such as “Please select the importance of the work to request subcontracting from the following levels” is held. In this way, the question content may be content that asks whether the question is correct or not, may be content that encourages multiple choice, and may be content that allows free description from the user. The format is not limited.

In addition, one or a plurality of question contents are output. However, when a plurality of question contents are output, two or more question contents are not output at a time, but one or a plurality of question contents are output in a plurality of times. May be. By dividing the output of question content into multiple times, users who are forced to answer a large amount of question content at a time are prevented from getting bored with answers and stopping the use of the system. be able to.

The “answer accepting unit” 0512 is configured to accept an input of an answer to the question content output from the external terminal by the question output unit. Answers are sent from a terminal managed by the user in an answer format corresponding to the question format of the question content.

The specific configuration of question output and answer reception is a matter of design as appropriate, but a configuration is adopted in which question output and answer reception are displayed alternately on a single screen, such as a chat bot. It is desirable to do. If this structure is adopted, the question and the answer will be displayed without being inconsistent, so what the question should be answered for the user, and the answer to the question is legal text You will be able to see the flow of how it is useful for data correction.

The “response dependency correcting means” 0513 is configured to correct the review result of the legal document data or the legal document data for each predetermined unit according to the received answer. “According to the answer” means that correction is performed using text data previously associated with the contents of the answer. More specifically, a predetermined answer and each recommended sentence held in the recommended sentence holding unit are held in association in advance, and when the answer is received, the recommended sentence associated with the answer is displayed. It is conceivable to use it for correction.

In addition, there may be an appropriate method as a method of associating the recommendation sentence and the answer here. Each may be associated with an ID, or the relation between the answer and the recommended sentence may be recorded in a table in advance, and the recommended sentence may be selected according to the table.

There may be cases where an answer is associated with a plurality of recommended sentences. In such a case, a plurality of recommended sentences may be extracted in a selectable format and used for correction. . In this case, as described in the first embodiment, it is conceivable to further perform a narrowing process according to the user's position, or to execute a correction process after receiving a selection from the user. In any case, by adopting this configuration that performs correction processing based on individual specific responses by the user, it becomes possible to respond flexibly according to the user's position and situation.

<Specific configuration>
The hardware configuration of each device constituting the legal document data correction system of this embodiment is basically the same as the hardware configuration of the legal document data correction system of the first embodiment described with reference to FIG. Accordingly, the following will describe specific processing of “question output means”, “answer reception means”, and “answer dependence correction means” that have not been described so far.

(Specific configuration of question output means)
The question output means is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and when the CPU reads the “correction program” from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, the “question output subprogram” is also read and executed, A process of outputting one or a plurality of question contents is performed.

(Specific configuration of answer acceptance means)
The answer accepting means is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware, and when the CPU reads the “correction program” from the storage device to the main memory and executes it, the “answer accepting subprogram” is also read and executed, An input of an answer to the question content output according to the execution result of the question output subprogram from the external terminal is received and stored at a predetermined address in the main memory.

(Specific configuration of response-dependent correction means)
The answer-dependent correction means is specifically composed of a computer program and computer hardware. When the CPU reads the “correction program” from the storage device into the main memory and executes it, the “response-dependent correction subprogram” is also read and executed. The legal document data is corrected every predetermined unit according to the answer obtained by executing the answer acceptance subprogram.

<Process flow>
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a processing flow in the legal document data correction system of this embodiment. The flow of processing in the figure consists of the following steps. First, in step S0601, a process for recording a review result for each predetermined unit of sentence that constitutes legal document data is performed (review result recording step). In step S0602, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step is output to a user terminal that is a terminal managed by the user (review result output step). Next, in step S0603, it is determined whether or not correspondence information that is information related to necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step is output from the user terminal. If it is the content that the determination result here has been output, input of the corresponding information is accepted as step S0604 (corresponding information input receiving step). If the content of the determination result is not included, the same process is repeated.

After step S0604, the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data is corrected for each predetermined unit using the recommended text (correction step). First, in step S0605, one or a plurality of question contents are output according to the correspondence information accepted in the correspondence information input acceptance step (question output substep). Thereafter, in step S0606, an input of an answer to the question content output from the external terminal in the question output substep is received (answer reception substep). After that, in step S0607, it is determined whether or not the same processing relating to question output and answer input reception is to be repeated. If the determination result here does not need to be repeated, the response received in addition to the correspondence information in step S0608 In response to this, the sentence of each predetermined unit of the review result or the legal document data is corrected (response dependent correction sub-step).

<Effect>
By employing the legal document data correction method of the present embodiment, it becomes possible to perform a correction process that satisfies the user's demand more than when the legal document data correction method of the first embodiment is employed.

0200 ... Legal document data correction system, 0201 ... Review result recording unit, 0202 ... Recommended sentence holding unit, 0203 ... Review result output unit, 0204 ... Corresponding information input receiving unit, 0205 ...・ Correction part

Claims (6)

A review result recording step for recording a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that constitutes legal document data with text information, color information, and other visual information ;
A review result output step for outputting a review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step;
A correspondence information input acceptance step for accepting input of correspondence information, which is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step;
When the correspondence information is accepted in the correspondence information input acceptance step, a correction step for correcting the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data for each predetermined unit;
A method for correcting legal document data having
The correction steps are
A correction candidate content input receiving sub-step for outputting one or a plurality of correction candidate contents, which are character contents that are candidates for correction wording according to the contents of the review result recorded in the review result recording step, and receiving a selection;
A content usage correction substep for correcting legal document data for each predetermined unit using the received correction candidate content;
A method for correcting legal document data. Holds similarity determination rules, which are language rules that govern the similarity of multiple notation methods,
The legal document data correction method according to claim 1 , wherein the correction step further includes a similarity determination correction substep of correcting the legal document data using the similarity relationship determination rule. When the content of the correspondence information received at the correspondence information input acceptance step is content that does not require correction, the correction step does not correct the predetermined unit portion of the legal document data corresponding to the correspondence information. Item 3. A method for correcting legal document data according to item 1 or 2 . The correction steps are
A question output sub-step for outputting one or more question contents;
An answer acceptance substep for accepting an input of an answer to the question content output in the question output substep from the external terminal;
A response-dependent correction sub-step for correcting the legal document data review result or the legal document data for each predetermined unit according to the received response;
The method of correcting legal document data according to any one of claims 1 to 3 . A review result recording unit that records the review results for each predetermined unit of text that should constitute legal document data in text information, color information, and other visual information ,
A recommended text holding unit that holds a predetermined unit of text as a recommended text in association with the user's position;
A review result output unit that outputs a review result of legal document data recorded in the review result recording unit;
A correspondence information input accepting unit that accepts input of correspondence information that is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output unit;
When the corresponding information is received by the corresponding information input receiving unit, the review result of the legal document recorded by the review result recording unit or the recommended text holding the legal document data in the recommended text holding unit is used for each predetermined unit. A correction part to be corrected;
A legal document data correction system having a,
The correction part
Correction candidate content input receiving means for outputting one or a plurality of correction candidate contents, which are character contents that are candidates for correction wordings according to the contents of the review result recorded in the review result recording unit, and receiving selection;
Content usage correction means for correcting legal document data for each predetermined unit using the received correction candidate content;
A legal document data correction system. A review result recording step for recording a review result for each sentence of a predetermined unit that constitutes legal document data with text information, color information, and other visual information ;
A review result output step for outputting a review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step;
A correspondence information input acceptance step for accepting input of correspondence information, which is information regarding necessity of correspondence regarding the review result output in the review result output step;
When the correspondence information is accepted in the correspondence information input acceptance step, a correction step for correcting the review result of the legal document data recorded in the review result recording step or the legal document data for each predetermined unit;
A legal document data correction program for making it executable by a computer,
The correction steps are
A correction candidate content input receiving sub-step for outputting one or a plurality of correction candidate contents, which are character contents that are candidates for correction wording according to the contents of the review result recorded in the review result recording step, and receiving a selection;
A content usage correction substep for correcting legal document data for each predetermined unit using the received correction candidate content;
A program for correcting legal document data.