JP6639816B2 - Cosmetics - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a moisturizing cosmetic having an excellent feeling upon use.

One of the uses of cosmetics is to prevent drying of the skin, regulate moisture on the surface of the skin, and give the skin a moist feeling. For this reason, various components are added to cosmetics as a humectant. Commonly used humectants include polyhydric alcohols such as glycerin, 1,3-butylene glycol and sorbitol, and biological moisturizing components such as amino acids, organic acids and hyaluronic acid. These moisturizers have a moisturizing effect and at the same time give the skin an unpleasant feel. For this reason, when these humectants are blended, various techniques have been proposed so as not to give a sticky feeling of use. In addition, it has been pointed out that the humectant gives an unpleasant feeling of use such as a slimy feeling and a squeaky feeling in addition to the sticky feeling.
For example, Patent Document 1 discloses that when a general humectant is added in a large amount to an externally applied composition, the obtained externally applied composition has a good moisturizing effect on the skin, but gives a sticky feeling of use. When a sugar alcohol of 4 to 6 is blended with silicone oil, the resulting oil-in-water type external composition is more effective against the skin than an external composition obtained by simply blending a general humectant or mucopolysaccharide. It is disclosed that the composition for external use has an excellent moisturizing effect and has no sticky feeling.
Patent Document 2 discloses that a disinfecting composition containing a lower alcohol, a cationic bactericide, and a wetting agent has a cyclic or chain silicone having a specific structure and / or an IOB value (inorganic value and organic value). It is disclosed that when a polyhydric alcohol fatty acid ester having a ratio of (value ratio) of 0.22 to 0.85 is blended, stickiness of glycerin can be suppressed.

JP 2001-354510 A JP-A-7-165571

  An object of the present invention is to provide a moisturizing cosmetic composition which has a high moisturizing effect, does not have a sticky feeling, a slimy feeling, and a squeaky feeling, and is excellent in use feeling.

  The present inventor has found that when tripropylene glycol is blended with a cosmetic containing a humectant, an excellent cosmetic with reduced unpleasant feeling of use such as sticky feeling and squeaky feeling caused by the humectant can be obtained. In general, the moisturizing effect is reduced when the amount of the humectant is reduced to suppress the stickiness, but the addition of tripropylene glycol does not cause a decrease in the moisturizing effect. Feeling and squeaky feeling are suppressed. The present invention proposes a new cosmetic based on these findings.

The main configuration of the present invention is as follows.
(1) It contains a humectant and tripropylene glycol, and the humectant contains any one or more of glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, 1,3-butylene glycol, sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol and glucose. A cosmetic in which the total amount of the humectant and tripropylene glycol per cosmetic is 10 to 30% by mass, and the blending ratio of the humectant and tripropylene glycol is 1: 1 to 10: 1.

  By adopting the constitution of the present invention, it is possible to provide a moisturizing cosmetic composition which reduces sticky feeling, slimy feeling, and squeaky feeling caused by the moisturizing agent and is excellent in use feeling.

The present invention relates to a cosmetic containing a humectant and tripropylene glycol.
The components of the cosmetic of the present invention will be described.
<Moisturizer>
The humectant used in the present invention may be any substance having a skin moisturizing function (wetting function) required for cosmetics. As such a substance, a polyhydric alcohol and various substances having a moisturizing effect can be used. Examples of the substance having a moisturizing effect other than polyhydric alcohols include sugar alcohols, monosaccharides, mucopolysaccharides, collagen, organic acids, and amino acids.
Polyhydric alcohols include glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, methyl gluses, trehalose, 1,3-butylene glycol, 1,2-pentanediol, etc .; sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol; and monosaccharides: glucose. Can be exemplified.
Among them, glycerin is widely used as a raw material for cosmetics. As glycerin, concentrated glycerin for cosmetics manufactured by Miyoshi Oil & Fats Co., Ltd., concentrated glycerin manufactured by Shin Nippon Rika Co., Ltd., concentrated glycerin manufactured by Kao Corporation, and the like can be used. As diglycerin, Unigly G-2 manufactured by NOF Corporation and diglycerin 801 manufactured by Sakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. can be used. As polyglycerin, PGL # 250, PGL # 350 and the like manufactured by Sakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. can be used. Polyglycerin PGL # 250 is a polyglycerin containing 35 to 55% by mass of triglycerin, and polyglycerin PGL # 350 is a polyglycerin containing 20 to 40% by mass of tetraglycerin. As sorbitol, Solvit D-70 manufactured by Mitsubishi Corporation Foodtech Co., Ltd. or the like can be used. Sorbit D-70 is a mixed raw material composed of 70% by mass of sorbitol and 30% by mass of water. As 1,3-butylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol manufactured by Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. and 1,3-butylene glycol manufactured by KH Neochem Co., Ltd. can be used.
As the mucopolysaccharide, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate and acetylated hyaluronic acid can be used.
As the organic acid, lactic acid, sodium lactate, citric acid, and sodium citrate can be used.
As amino acids, valine, leucine, isoleucine, threonine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, lysine, glycine, alanine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, cysteine, cystine, tyrosine, proline, hydroxyproline, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, hydroxylysine, arginine , Ornithine and histidine.
In addition, although not exemplified here, substances having a moisturizing function other than those described above are also provided in the present invention as long as they are provided as cosmetic raw materials or those which satisfy the component standards and safety as cosmetics. Can be used.

  The amount of the humectant used in the present invention is usually added to cosmetics in an appropriate amount according to the type and form of the cosmetic.

<Tripropylene glycol>
Tripropylene glycol is produced as a by-product when propylene glycol is produced by a propylene oxide hydration reaction, and is used as an intermediate material for a polyester resin, a water-soluble oil agent, and a solvent for ink. When used in the present invention, any material having safety that can be used as a cosmetic can be used. As such a tripropylene glycol, “Tripropylene glycol” manufactured by Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. can be exemplified.

The cosmetic of the present invention contains a humectant and tripropylene glycol to provide a moisturizing cosmetic having reduced unpleasant feeling of use such as stickiness, sliminess, and squeaky feeling derived from the humectant. The total amount of the humectant and tripropylene glycol is preferably 1 to 30% by mass, particularly preferably 10 to 30% by mass, based on the total mass of the cosmetic. If the total amount of the humectant and tripropylene glycol is less than 1% by mass, the moisturizing effect may be insufficient, and if it exceeds 30% by mass, a sticky feeling may be caused.
Further, it is preferable to mix the humectant and the tripropylene glycol so that the mixing ratio is 1: 1 to 10: 1.

Oils and fats such as vegetable oils, hydrocarbon oils, higher fatty acids, higher alcohols, and silicones can be blended with the cosmetic of the present invention as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired. As the surfactant, an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, an amphoteric surfactant, and a nonionic surfactant can be blended. Further, a preservative, a sequestering agent, a thickener, a powder component, an ultraviolet absorber, an ultraviolet blocker, a fragrance, a pH adjuster and the like can be contained.
In addition, vitamins, skin activators, blood circulation promoters, resident bacteria control agents, active oxygen scavengers, anti-inflammatory agents, anti-cancer agents, whitening agents, bactericides and other medicinal ingredients, may also contain bioactive ingredients. it can.

  As fats and oils, for example, camellia oil, evening primrose oil, macadamia nut oil, olive oil, rapeseed oil, corn oil, sesame oil, jojoba oil, germ oil, liquid oils such as wheat germ oil, glycerin trioctanoate, cocoa butter, coconut oil, hardened Solid oils and fats such as coconut oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, molle, molle kernel oil, hydrogenated oil, hydrogenated castor oil, beeswax, candelilla wax, cotton wax, bran wax, lanolin, lanolin acetate, liquid lanolin, sugarcane wax, etc. Waxes.

  Examples of the hydrocarbon oil include liquid paraffin, squalene, squalane, microcrystalline wax and the like.

  Examples of higher fatty acids include lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and the like.

Examples of the higher alcohol include straight-chain alcohols such as lauryl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, and behenyl alcohol; and branched-chain alcohols such as monostearyl glycerin ether, lanolin alcohol, and octyl dodecanol.
Sterols such as cholesterol and phytosterol can also be used.

  Examples of the silicone include dimethyl polysiloxane as a chain polysiloxane, methylphenyl polysiloxane, and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane as a cyclic polysiloxane.

  Examples of the anionic surfactant include fatty acid salts such as sodium laurate, higher alkyl sulfates such as sodium lauryl sulfate, alkyl ether sulfates such as POE lauryl sulfate triethanolamine, N-acyl sarcosine acid, sulfosuccinate, N-acyl amino acid salts and the like.

  Examples of the cationic surfactant include an alkyltrimethylammonium salt such as stearyltrimethylammonium chloride, benzalkonium chloride, and benzethonium chloride.

  Examples of the amphoteric surfactant include betaine surfactants such as alkyl betaine and amido betaine.

  Examples of the nonionic surfactant include sorbitan fatty acid esters such as sorbitan monooleate, and hydrogenated castor oil derivatives.

  Preservatives include methyl paraben, ethyl paraben and the like.

  Examples of the sequestering agent include edetates such as disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate, edetic acid, and edetate sodium salt.

  As the thickener, a water-soluble polymer substance can be blended. Such a water-soluble polymer substance may be any of a natural polymer, a semi-synthetic polymer, and a synthetic polymer. Examples of the natural polymer include tragacanth gum, karaya gum, xanthan gum, guar gum, cationized guar gum, anionized guar gum, tara gum, gum arabic, tamarind gum, juran gum, locust bean gum, carrageenan, quince seed, dextran and the like. Examples of the semi-synthetic polymer include hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, cationized cellulose, propylene glycol alginate, sodium alginate, bentonite and the like. Examples of the synthetic polymer include carboxyvinyl polymer, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, dialkyl polyethylene glycol, polyoxyethylene dioleate methylglucoside, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol distearate, and synthetic smectite.

  Examples of the ultraviolet absorber include paraaminobenzoic acid, phenyl salicylate, isopropyl paramethoxycinnamate, octyl paramethoxycinnamate, and 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone.

  Pharmaceutical components include vitamin A oil, vitamin A such as retinol, vitamin B2 such as riboflavin, B6 such as pyridoxine hydrochloride, L-ascorbic acid, L-ascorbic acid phosphate, and L-ascorbic acid monopalmitin. Acid esters, L-ascorbic acid dipalmitate, vitamin Cs such as L-ascorbic acid-2-glucoside, pantothenic acids such as calcium pantothenate, vitamin Ds such as vitamin D2 and cholecalciferol; α-tocopherol; Vitamins such as vitamin Es such as tocopherol acetate and DL-α-tocopherol nicotinate are exemplified.

  Other medicinal ingredients include whitening agents such as placenta extract, glutathione, and saxifrage extract, skin activators such as royal jelly, capsaicin, zingerone, cantaristinki, ittamol, caffeine, and γ-oryzanol tannate. Accelerators, glycyrrhizic acid derivatives, glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives, anti-inflammatory agents such as azulene, amino acids such as arginine, serine, leucine and tryptophan, maltose sucrose condensates of resident bacteria control agents, and lysozyme chloride.

  In addition, chamomile extract, parsley extract, wine yeast extract, grapefruit extract, honeysuckle extract, rice extract, grape extract, hop extract, rice bran extract, loquat extract, oak extract, yokuinin extract, assembly extract, melilot extract, birch extract, peony extract, peony extract , Soapwort extract, Loofah extract, Pepper extract, Lemon extract, Gentian extract, Perilla extract, Aloe extract, Rosemary extract, Sage extract, Thyme extract, Tea extract, Seaweed extract, Cucumber extract, Clove extract, Carrot extract, Malonier extract, Various extracts such as hamamelis extract and mulberry extract may be blended.

  The cosmetic of the present invention can be a skin cosmetic such as a lotion, an emulsion, a cream, a gel, a pack, a mask, or a hair cosmetic such as a shampoo, a rinse and a hair restorer. In addition, sunscreen cosmetics, make-up cosmetics, and bath preparations can be used. Further, it may be a drug or a quasi-drug containing a medical ingredient.

  The cosmetic of the present invention can be produced by a conventional method.

Hereinafter, test examples, examples, and comparative examples are shown, and the operation and effect of the present invention will be described.

Sensory evaluation test
Apply the test sample or cosmetic to 10 skilled professional sensory evaluators on the inner part of the upper arm to give a sticky feeling, a slimy feeling, a feeling of familiarity with the skin, and a sense of finger squeaky feeling after familiarization. Evaluation items were evaluated. A three-step evaluation was made according to the following criteria.

[Sticky feeling]
：: 7 or more of 10 persons evaluated that there was no sticky feeling Δ: 3 to 6 persons of 10 persons evaluated that there was no sticky feeling ×: Evaluation of 2 or less that there was no sticky feeling

[Slimy feeling]
：: 7 or more of 10 persons evaluated that there was no sliminess. Δ: 3 to 6 of 10 persons evaluated that there was no sliminess. ×: Evaluation of 2 or less that there was no sliminess.

[Skin familiarity]
：: 7 or more out of 10 evaluated that the familiarity with the skin was good Δ: 3 to 6 out of 10 evaluated that the familiarity with the skin was good ×: Evaluation that the familiarity with the skin was good 2 Less than

[Finger stagnation after getting used to the skin (feeling squeak)]
：: 7 or more out of 10 persons evaluated that there was no squeaky feeling after the skin had been adapted.
Δ: 3 to 6 out of 10 people evaluated that there was no squeaky feeling after adaptation to skin ×: 2 or less evaluated that there was no squeaky feeling after adaptation to skin

  The above-mentioned "sticky feeling", "slimy feeling", "skin familiarity" and "squeaky feeling" are all main sensory evaluation items when applying cosmetics to skin, but generally, Consumers seeking moisturizing cosmetics place great emphasis on the “moisturizing effect” of the target skin, so even if some “stickiness” or “sliminess” caused by the moisturizer may occur, There is a tendency to allow the feeling. On the other hand, the “squeaking feeling” is an unacceptable and unpleasant feeling of use, and is a sensory evaluation item that the prescription designer of cosmetics pays the most attention to.

(1) Sensory evaluation test when tripropylene glycol and various humectants were each made into an aqueous solution A humectant such as tripropylene glycol and a polyhydric alcohol such as glycerin was prepared to be a 10% by mass aqueous solution. (That is, 14.28% by mass of sorbitol (70%) and 13.33% by mass of maltitol (75%)). This concentration was determined with reference to the concentration blended as a humectant in the lotion. Each aqueous solution was applied to the skin and subjected to a sensory evaluation.
Table 1 shows the test results.

  Neither the 10% by mass aqueous solution of tripropylene glycol nor the 10% by mass aqueous solution containing the humectant satisfied all the above-mentioned sensory evaluation items. Only for tripropylene glycol, the “squeaking feeling” was evaluated as “△”, and other items were evaluated as “〇”. In addition, 1,2-pentanediol was evaluated as “×” for “squeaking feeling”, and evaluated as “〇” for other items. From this test result, it was found that tripropylene glycol and various humectants did not give a very good feeling of use when applied to the skin at a concentration at which a moisturizing effect could be expected.

(2) Sensory evaluation test of aqueous solution in which tripropylene glycol is combined with various humectants An aqueous solution (basic formulation of moisturizing cosmetics) in which 1 to 5% by mass of tripropylene glycol and 5 to 10% by mass of humectant are prepared (Examples 1 to 17), and the sensory evaluation was performed in the same manner. The humectants include glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, 1,3-butylene glycol, sorbitol (70%), maltitol (75%), anhydrous crystalline glucose, which have been evaluated to be sticky in the test of (1), Mannitol was selected. In Examples 1 to 9, the concentration was 5% by mass of tripropylene glycol and 5% by mass of each humectant. In Example 10, tripropylene glycol was 5% by mass and mannitol was 10% by mass. Example 11 was 1% by mass of tripropylene glycol and 9% by mass of glycerin, and Example 12 was 2% by mass of tripropylene glycol and 8% by mass of glycerin. In Examples 13 to 17, tripropylene glycol was 5% by mass, and glycerin, diglycerin, two kinds of polyglycerin, and 1,3-butylene glycol were each blended at 10% by mass. Table 2 below shows a list of compounding amounts and the results of the sensory evaluation of each example.

As shown in the above-mentioned Table 1, various aqueous humectants are not so preferable when applied to the skin when applied alone to an aqueous solution in which the moisturizing effect can be expected to have a moisturizing effect. Was seen. However, as shown in Table 2, the evaluation of almost all sensory evaluation items was improved to ○ by combining tripropylene glycol and various humectants.
In Table 2, when paying attention to the “feeling of fingers (squeaking feeling) after being familiar with the skin” which is the most important sensory evaluation item in the prescription design of the moisturizing cosmetic, the tripropylene glycols of Examples 7 to 9, The aqueous solution in which any one of sorbitol, maltitol, and anhydrous crystalline glucose was combined as a humectant was evaluated as “poor (squeaky feeling) after accustomed to the skin”. In the aqueous solutions of Examples 6 and 10 in which tripropylene glycol was combined with mannitol as a humectant, when mannitol was 5% by mass (Example 6), the evaluation of "finger sticking (squeaking feeling) after being familiar with the skin" was evaluated. Was ○, and when mannitol was 10% by mass (Example 10), the evaluation of “finger stasis (feeling of squeaking) after being familiar with the skin” was △.
On the other hand, glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, and 1,3-butylene glycol can be combined with tripropylene glycol to increase the amount of the humectant from 5% by mass to 10% by mass. The evaluation of “finger stagnantness (squeaking feeling)” was evaluated as ○ (Examples 13 to 17). It has been found that the combination of tripropylene glycol is very effective in the formulation design of a moisturizing cosmetic containing a large amount of a humectant.
When the tripropylene glycol of Examples 13 to 17 and 10% by mass of any of glycerin, diglycerin, two kinds of polyglycerin and 1,3-butylene glycol as a humectant were blended, "stickiness", " Any of the items of “slimy feeling” and “skin familiarity” has a rating of “△”, and all of these moisturizers were evaluated as “x” when a 10% by mass aqueous solution was used. From the results, it can be seen that the use feeling is clearly improved by combining tripropylene glycol in an amount of 5% by mass.
In addition, as described above, in the moisturizing cosmetics in which the moisturizing effect is regarded as the most important, "stickiness", "sliminess", and "inferior feeling to the skin" are more permissive than "squeaky feeling". Considering that this is an evaluation item, in a cosmetic (Examples 13 to 17) containing a large amount of a humectant at 10% by mass (10 to 15% by mass in total of tripropylene glycol and a humectant), a “sticky feeling” was obtained. Although the evaluation results of "", "slimy feeling" and "skin familiarity" are "A", it can be determined that generally good feeling of use is obtained.
In addition, glycerin has been tested at various concentrations, but when tripropylene glycol is used in combination, when glycerin (9% by mass) is mixed with 1% by mass of tripropylene glycol, a sticky feeling, a slimy feeling, It was found that the feeling of rubbing and squeaking were improved (see Example 11). From this, it is presumed that the blending amount of tripropylene glycol and the humectant exerts its effect when blended in an amount of 10% by mass or more based on the humectant blended in the cosmetic.
As described above, by comparing the evaluation tests in Tables 1 and 2, the moisturizer alone gives a sticky feeling to the skin, a slimy feeling, a feeling of familiarity with the skin, and a finger stagnant feeling after being familiar (squeaking feeling). Although it was poor, it was found that all of these feelings were improved when used in combination with tripropylene glycol.
In addition, in the sensory evaluation test, the sensory evaluator commented that as the blending amount of tripropylene glycol increased, a good feeling that the skin became smoother was obtained.

(3) Sensory evaluation test of aqueous solution prepared by combining two types of moisturizers Used in the test of (1) to confirm that combining tripropylene glycol with various moisturizers gives an excellent feeling of use Dipropylene glycol, 1,2-pentanediol, 1,3-butylene glycol, glycerin, diglycerin, and polyglycerin, which are two types of moisturizers, each of which was mixed with 5% by mass of an aqueous solution (total of moisturizers) The amount was 10% by mass) (Comparative Examples 1 to 12), and the sensory evaluation was performed in the same manner.
Table 3 shows the combinations of the formulations and the results of the sensory evaluation.

As shown in Table 3, even if two types of humectants are selected and combined, it is possible to improve all of the sticky feeling, the slimy feeling, the familiarity with the skin, and the finger tightness (squeaky feeling) after the familiarity with the skin. The result was not possible, and the result of “x” evaluation remained.
Focusing on the most important sensory evaluation item “fingering after skin familiarity (squeaking feeling)” in the prescription design of a moisturizing cosmetic, a combination of 1,3-butylene glycol and polyglycerin PGL # 250 (comparative example) In 11), the "feeling of squeaking" was evaluated as "good", and the effect of improving the feeling of use was excellent considering that each evaluation of the single component was "x" (see Table 1). However, in the evaluation of the feeling of stickiness, the feeling of sliminess, and the feeling of familiarity with the skin, all of the evaluation items were evaluated as “x”, which exceeded the level that was acceptable as a moisturizing cosmetic. Was.

As described above, from the results of the organoleptic tests of Examples and Comparative Examples, tripropylene glycol, when blended in a cosmetic with a humectant, has a sticky sensation, a slimy sensation derived from the moisturizing component, poor adaptation to skin, and a squeaky sensation. Has been found to improve. In particular, when glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, and 1,3-butylene glycol are selected as the humectant, by combining with tripropylene glycol, even if the amount of the humectant is increased, an important feeling of use in the moisturizing cosmetic is obtained. It was a cosmetic with an excellent feeling of use that did not cause certain "finger stagnation (squeaking feeling) after it became familiar with the skin". In addition, in the combination of glycerin and tripropylene glycol, it is clear that adding 1% by mass of tripropylene glycol improves all the sticky feeling, slimy feeling, poor adaptation to skin, and squeaky feeling derived from glycerin. It became. From this, it is presumed that the blending amounts of tripropylene glycol and the humectant exhibit excellent effects when they are blended in an amount of 10% by mass or more based on the humectant blended in the cosmetic. Glycerin is widely used as a humectant in cosmetics because of its excellent moisturizing effect. In particular, the present invention is a technique that can be widely applied to cosmetics in which a feeling of use is important.
In the following, formulation examples of the present invention are shown. In addition, the evaluation of the user who uses this is shown.

Formulation Example 1
Lotion (combined ingredients) (% by mass)
1. Glycerin 10
2. Tripropylene glycol 1
3. Sodium hyaluronate 0.1
4. Carboxymethyldextran Na 0.1
5. pH adjuster qs 6. Preservative appropriate amount

Components 1 to 6 were mixed to obtain a lotion. The lotion of Formulation Example 1 was a non-greasy, moisturizing lotion with a long lasting moist feeling. In addition, there was no squeaky feeling.

Formulation Example 2
Emulsion (mixed ingredients) (% by mass)
1. Glycerin 8
2.1.3-Butylene glycol 5
3. Tripropylene glycol 3
4.1 1,2-pentanediol 1
5. Citric acid 0.01
6. Sodium citrate 0.1
7. Xanthan gum 0.08
8. Squalane 3
9. Dimethicone 1
10. Polysorbate 60 0.8
11. Sorbitan stearate 0.3
12. Purified water residue

An emulsion was obtained by a conventional method. The emulsion of Formulation Example 2 was a non-greasy, good-moisturizing emulsion that maintained a moist feeling. In addition, there was no squeaky feeling.

Formulation Example 3
Particle-containing pack cosmetics (components) (% by mass)
1. Polyethylene powder 0.12
2.1,3-butylene glycol 5
3.1 1,2-pentanediol 1.5
4. Glycerin 10
5. Diglycerin 8
5. Tripropylene glycol 5
6. Carboxymethylcellulose Na 4
7. Locust Bean Gum 0.15
8. pH adjuster qs 9. Purified water residue

All the components were uniformly mixed to obtain a particle-containing pack cosmetic. The particle-containing pack cosmetic of Formulation Example 3 was not sticky, and had an excellent moist feeling even after washing.

Formulation Example 4
Sheet-shaped mask (compounding component) (% by mass) 1.1,3-butylene glycol 6
2.1,2-pentanediol 2
3. Glycerin 6
4. Tripropylene glycol 3
5. Pentaerythrityl tetraethylhexanoate 5
6. Dimethicone 1
7. Di (phytosteryl / octyldodecyl) lauroyl glutamate 0.1
8. Polyglyceryl stearate-10 2
9. (Acrylates / alkyl acrylate (C10-30)) crosspolymer 0.15
10. Potassium hydroxide 0.05
11. pH adjuster qs. Purified water residue

All components were uniformly mixed to obtain a milky cosmetic. The nonwoven fabric was impregnated to obtain a sheet-shaped mask. The mask of Formulation Example 4 was applied to the face for 15 minutes, applied to the skin, and after peeling off the mask, it was not sticky, had a good moist feeling, and the effect was maintained. In addition, there was no squeaky feeling.

Formulation Example 5
Hair care treatment lotion (combination component) (% by mass) 1.1,3-butylene glycol 5
2.1,2-pentanediol 1.5
3. Diglycerin 1
4. Tripropylene glycol 5
5. Stearyl trimethyl ammonium chloride 0.5
6. Methylphenyl polysiloxane 1
7. Dimethicone 1
8. pH adjuster qs 9. Ethanol 30
10. Purified water residue

All components were mixed uniformly to obtain a treatment lotion. The treatment lotion of Formulation Example 5 was excellent in moist feeling without stickiness even on the hair.

Formulation Example 6
Beauty essence (combination component) (% by mass) 1.1,3-butylene glycol 2
2.1,2-pentanediol 1.5
3. Glycerin 10
4. Tripropylene glycol 15
5. Hydrogenated lecithin 0.1
7. Dimethicone 2
8. SIMULGEL NS 2
9. pH adjuster appropriate amount10. Purified water residue

All ingredients were mixed uniformly to obtain a beauty essence. A essence excellent in non-greasy and moist feeling was obtained. In addition, there was no squeaky feeling. SIMUGEL NS is a premix material mainly containing (hydroxyethyl acrylate / acryloyldimethyltaurine Na) copolymer manufactured by SEPPIC.

Formulation Example 7
Liquid foundation (mixed ingredients) (% by mass)
1.1,3-butylene glycol 10
2. Glycerin 10
3. Tripropylene glycol 8
4. Cyclomethicone 10
5. Dimethicone copolyol 3
6. Dimethicone 0.5
7. Neopentyl glycol dioctanoate 2.5
8. Hydrogenated lecithin 0.4
9. Na hyaluronate 0.03
10. Hydrolyzed collagen 0.01
11. Silylated silica 0.2
12. Mica 3
13. Talc 2
14． Al 2 hydroxide
15. Distearate Al 0.2
16. Iron oxide 1
17． Titanium oxide 12
18. Purified water residue

All components were uniformly mixed to obtain a liquid foundation. The liquid foundation of Prescription Example 7 was excellent in moist feeling without stickiness or squeaking.

Claims (1)

A cosmetic comprising a humectant and tripropylene glycol, wherein the humectant comprises at least one of glycerin, diglycerin, polyglycerin, 1,3-butylene glycol, sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol and glucose; the total amount is 10 to 30 wt% humectant and tripropylene glycol per compounding ratio of humectant and tripropylene glycol 1: 1 to 10: 1 and is a cosmetic.