JP5919986B2 - Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same - Google Patents

Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5919986B2
JP5919986B2 JP2012091904A JP2012091904A JP5919986B2 JP 5919986 B2 JP5919986 B2 JP 5919986B2 JP 2012091904 A JP2012091904 A JP 2012091904A JP 2012091904 A JP2012091904 A JP 2012091904A JP 5919986 B2 JP5919986 B2 JP 5919986B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
weld
toe
terminal
hitting
weld toe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2012091904A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2012228732A (en
Inventor
隆洋 ▲崎▼本
隆洋 ▲崎▼本
森影 康
康 森影
聡 伊木
聡 伊木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2012091904A priority Critical patent/JP5919986B2/en
Priority to CN201280029299.2A priority patent/CN103596722B/en
Priority to KR1020137029931A priority patent/KR101799376B1/en
Priority to PCT/JP2012/002605 priority patent/WO2012140920A1/en
Publication of JP2012228732A publication Critical patent/JP2012228732A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5919986B2 publication Critical patent/JP5919986B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K31/00Processes relevant to this subclass, specially adapted for particular articles or purposes, but not covered by only one of the preceding main groups
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K37/00Auxiliary devices or processes, not specially adapted to a procedure covered by only one of the preceding main groups
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K33/00Specially-profiled edge portions of workpieces for making soldering or welding connections; Filling the seams formed thereby
    • B23K33/004Filling of continuous seams
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • C21D7/06Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface by shot-peening or the like
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/50Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for welded joints
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2103/00Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
    • B23K2103/02Iron or ferrous alloys
    • B23K2103/04Steel or steel alloys

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Butt Welding And Welding Of Specific Article (AREA)
  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鋼橋などの優れた疲労特性が要求される鋼構造物に好適な溶接継手を形成するための、打撃端子およびハンマーピーニング処理方法並びにそれを用いた溶接継手に関するものであって、溶接止端部の形状改善により応力集中を緩和させて、上記溶接継手部の疲労強度の向上を図るものである。   The present invention relates to a striking terminal and a hammer peening treatment method and a welded joint using the same for forming a welded joint suitable for a steel structure that requires excellent fatigue characteristics such as a steel bridge, The stress concentration is relaxed by improving the shape of the weld toe and the fatigue strength of the weld joint is improved.

近年、鋼橋の老朽化に伴い腐食や疲労に伴う損傷事例の報告が増加している。これらの防止には、まず検査体制を確立することが必要であるが、特に、疲労損傷の場合は、通過車両などの作用外力を軽減するだけでは足りずに、設計製作面からの溶接品質の向上が重要である。   In recent years, with the aging of steel bridges, reports of damage cases due to corrosion and fatigue are increasing. In order to prevent these problems, it is necessary to first establish an inspection system. Especially in the case of fatigue damage, it is not enough to reduce the external force of the passing vehicle, etc. Improvement is important.

また、溶接部は、割れなどの欠陥が存在して溶接止端の形状が不適切な場合に、応力集中が生じやすい。その結果、繰り返し応力と溶接残留応力の影響とが重畳して疲労ノッチが発生し、疲労破壊をもたらす場合がある。そこで、疲労破壊の防止のために、種々の観点から提案がなされている。   In addition, stress concentration tends to occur in the welded portion when defects such as cracks exist and the shape of the weld toe is inappropriate. As a result, the repeated stress and the influence of the welding residual stress are superimposed to generate a fatigue notch, which may lead to fatigue failure. Therefore, proposals have been made from various viewpoints for preventing fatigue fracture.

例えば、特許文献1には、溶接部の疲労強度向上方法およびそれを用いた溶接構造物に関し、溶接止端の近傍を超音波振動しながら打撃して塑性変形させる加工装置を用いて、特定寸法の溝を所定の打撃条件で加工することで、高速に、作業者の熟練度に依存しなくとも安定して溶接構造物の疲労強度を向上させられる技術が記載されている。   For example, Patent Document 1 relates to a method for improving the fatigue strength of a welded portion and a welded structure using the welded portion, and uses a processing device that strikes and plastically deforms the vicinity of a weld toe while being ultrasonically vibrated. A technique is described in which the fatigue strength of a welded structure can be stably improved at high speed by processing the groove under predetermined hitting conditions without depending on the skill level of the operator.

特許文献2には、レーザ衝撃ピーニング方法に関し、レーザ光源からのパルスレーザビームを使用して、表面の薄層もしくはプラズマを形成する表面のコーティングを瞬間的に気化させてその爆発力により表面の一部に局所的に圧縮力を発生させる方法で、ガスタービンエンジンのファン動翼に圧縮残留応力を導入することが記載されている。   Patent Document 2 relates to a laser shock peening method, which uses a pulsed laser beam from a laser light source to instantaneously vaporize a surface thin layer or a surface coating that forms a plasma, and to explode the surface. It is described that compressive residual stress is introduced into a fan rotor blade of a gas turbine engine by a method in which a compressive force is locally generated in a part.

特許文献3には、溶接継手の疲労特性改善打撃処理方法およびその装置に関する技術が記載され、特に、先端が特定寸法の打撃ピンを用い、溶接止端近傍に対して打撃痕を形成することにより、特定寸法の溝部を形成するように鋼板表面を圧縮することで、溶接部に圧縮残留応力を導入する技術が記載されている。   Patent Document 3 describes a technique related to a fatigue treatment improving impact processing method and apparatus for a welded joint, and in particular, by using an impact pin with a tip having a specific size and forming an impact mark near the weld toe. A technique is described in which compressive residual stress is introduced into a weld by compressing the surface of a steel sheet so as to form a groove having a specific dimension.

通常、ハンマーピーニングは、ピーニング装置を作業者が溶接止端に対してチップ先端(打撃端子とも言う)を斜め上方から当てるように持ち、ピーニング装置の荷重を溶接止端に預けるようにして作業することで作業負荷を軽減している。   Normally, hammer peening is carried out by holding the peening device so that the tip of the tip (also referred to as a striking terminal) is applied obliquely from above to the weld toe and entrusting the load of the peening device to the weld toe. This reduces the workload.

そのため、図1に示す母材1にリブ2を直立させた面外ガセット継手に対してハンマーピーニング処理を施した場合、ピーニング装置の打撃端子5の先端により溶接止端4に応力集中箇所となる深い溝6が形成され、溶接ビード3の先端部から疲労き裂7が発生する場合があった。   Therefore, when hammer peening is applied to the out-of-plane gusset joint in which the rib 2 is erected on the base material 1 shown in FIG. 1, a stress concentration portion is formed at the weld toe 4 by the tip of the striking terminal 5 of the peening device. In some cases, a deep groove 6 is formed, and a fatigue crack 7 is generated from the tip of the weld bead 3.

他方、非特許文献1には、ハンマーピーニングおよびTIG処理による高強度鋼(SM570)の溶接継手部の疲労強度向上に関し、ハンマーピーニングを施した場合に、上述したような疲労き裂が発生して溶接部の疲労強度が低下する問題に対し、溶接止端の応力集中や残留応力を低減させるための新たなハンマーピーニング法について検討した結果が記載されている。   On the other hand, in Non-Patent Document 1, regarding the improvement of the fatigue strength of the welded joint of high strength steel (SM570) by hammer peening and TIG treatment, the fatigue crack as described above occurs when hammer peening is performed. The result of examining a new hammer peening method for reducing the stress concentration at the weld toe and the residual stress is described for the problem that the fatigue strength of the welded portion decreases.

すなわち、ハンマーピーニングを施す前に、グラインダで溶接止端の一部を予め研削することおよびハンマーピーニングを3パス程度の複数回行うことが疲労ノッチの発生防止に有効であると記載されている。   That is, it is described that grinding a part of the weld toe in advance with a grinder and performing hammer peening a plurality of times of about three passes before hammer peening is effective in preventing the occurrence of fatigue notches.

特開2006−175512号公報JP 2006-175512 A 特開2006−159290号公報JP 2006-159290 A 特開2010−29897号公報JP 2010-29897 A

IMPROVING FATIGUE STRENGTH OF WELDED JOINTS BY HAMMER PEENING TIG−DRESSING:Kengo ANAMI、Chitoshi MIKI、Hideki TANI、Haruhito YAMAMOTO、Structual Eng./Earthquake Eng.、JSCE、Vol.17、NO.1、57s−68s、2000 April)IMPROVING FATIGUE STRENGTH OF WELDED JOINTS BY HAMMER PEENING TIG-DRESSING: Kengo ANAMI, Chitoshi MIKI, Hideki TANI, Haruto YAMActu, Str. / Earthquake Eng. , JSCE, Vol. 17, NO. 1, 57s-68s, 2000 April) 図解溶接用語辞典、日刊工業、昭和46年9月20日第4版53頁Illustrated welding terminology dictionary, Nikkan Kogyo, September 20, 1971, 4th edition, page 53

溶接構造物を製造する際には、作業環境、作業能率および溶接継手性能を考慮した溶接方法が選定され、溶接部の疲労強度向上のため、上掲した特許文献1等に記載の溶接部の疲労強度向上方法が施される。また、疲労特性に優れた溶接継手の特徴が明確であれば、溶接方法の選定と同様に最適な疲労強度向上方法を選定することが可能となる。   When manufacturing a welded structure, a welding method is selected in consideration of the work environment, work efficiency, and welded joint performance. In order to improve the fatigue strength of the welded part, the welded part described in Patent Document 1 and the like listed above is selected. A method for improving fatigue strength is applied. In addition, if the characteristics of a welded joint having excellent fatigue characteristics are clear, it is possible to select an optimum fatigue strength improving method in the same manner as selecting a welding method.

しかしながら、特許文献1記載の超音波によるハンマーピーニング方法は、使用する装置が従来の空気圧で端子を駆動する装置と比較すると、高価でしかも入手が困難であるという問題がある。
また、特許文献2記載のレーザ衝撃ハンマーピーニング方法は、素材の前処理が必要で、かつ装置が高価で大きいため、鋼橋の製造に適用することは難しいという問題がある。
However, the hammer peening method using ultrasonic waves described in Patent Document 1 has a problem that the device to be used is expensive and difficult to obtain compared to a conventional device that drives a terminal with air pressure.
Further, the laser shock hammer peening method described in Patent Document 2 has a problem that it is difficult to apply to the manufacture of a steel bridge because the material needs to be pretreated and the apparatus is expensive and large.

他方、特許文献3には、耐疲労特性に優れた溶接構造物が記載され、疲労き裂発生危険部の溶接部として好ましい溶接部が開示されているものの、実構造物に適用した場合、当該溶接部を得るための装置は入手困難であり、施工能率の点でも問題が残っている。また、特許文献3記載の打撃処理方法は、先端曲率半径が、金属材料の厚さの1/2以下でかつ2〜10mmの打撃ピンを用い、打撃ピンが打撃中に溶接金属に触れない範囲で、母材金属材料表面に打撃痕を与えるものであるが、打撃端子先端が半球状のため、打撃回数が数多く必要であり、溶接継手部に対して効率的に圧縮残留応力を導入するのは困難である。   On the other hand, Patent Document 3 describes a welded structure excellent in fatigue resistance characteristics, and discloses a welded portion that is preferable as a welded portion of a fatigue crack occurrence risk portion. An apparatus for obtaining a welded portion is difficult to obtain, and problems remain in terms of construction efficiency. Moreover, the hit | damage processing method of patent document 3 uses the hit | damage pin whose tip curvature radius is 1/2 or less of the thickness of a metal material and 2-10 mm, and the hit pin does not touch a weld metal during hitting In this case, the surface of the base metal material is struck, but since the tip of the impact terminal is hemispherical, it requires a large number of impacts and efficiently introduces compressive residual stress to the welded joint. It is difficult.

さらに、非特許文献1に記載の技術であっても、予め研削することを要し、またハンマーピーニングを複数回行うことなど、施工能率の点で問題が残っている。   Furthermore, even the technique described in Non-Patent Document 1 still has problems in terms of construction efficiency, such as requiring grinding in advance and performing hammer peening a plurality of times.

本発明は、上記した現状に鑑み開発されたもので、ハンマーピーニング処理を施して、溶接継手部の疲労強度向上を図るための打撃端子およびそれを用いる方法およびその方法を用いた疲労強度特性に優れる溶接継手を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been developed in view of the above-described present situation, hammer hammer peening treatment, a striking terminal for improving the fatigue strength of a welded joint, a method using the same, and fatigue strength characteristics using the method An object is to provide an excellent welded joint.

発明者らは、溶接継手の疲労強度を向上させるために、特に疲労き裂が発生しやすい溶接止端部についてその特性を鋭意検討した。その結果、溶接止端部の応力集中を低減させると同時に溶接による引張残留応力を軽減させる手段、すなわちハンマーピーニング処理による打撃端子の形状を略蒲鉾形状にすることで、空気圧振動方式の簡単な装置であっても止端部形状の改善と溶接部への圧縮残留応力の導入とを同時に実現できることを見出した。
本発明は、上記した知見に基づきなされたものである。
In order to improve the fatigue strength of the welded joint, the inventors diligently studied the characteristics of the weld toe portion where fatigue cracks are particularly likely to occur. As a result, it is a simple device of the pneumatic vibration method by reducing the stress concentration at the weld toe and at the same time reducing the tensile residual stress due to welding, that is, the shape of the hammering terminal by hammer peening treatment is made into a substantially bowl shape Even so, it has been found that improvement of the shape of the toe portion and introduction of compressive residual stress to the weld can be realized simultaneously.
The present invention has been made based on the above findings.

すなわち、本発明の要旨構成は次のとおりである。
.空気圧振動方式の打撃端子を用い、溶接止端部に打撃を付加することによって溶接継手部の疲労強度向上を図るハンマーピーニング処理方法において、
上記打撃端子として、その先端部における、該打撃端子の進行方向の断面が台形状であり、また、該端子の進行方向の先端での長さが1mm以上10mm以下であり、かつその進行方向に対する直角断面での曲率半径が1mm以上10mm以下の円弧状になる端子を用い、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる領域に打撃を付加し、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる領域である溶接止端部に対して曲率半径が2mm以上の打撃痕を形成することを特徴とするハンマーピーニング処理方法。
That is, the gist configuration of the present invention is as follows.
1 . In a hammer peening treatment method that uses a pneumatic vibration type striking terminal and applies a blow to the weld toe to improve the fatigue strength of the welded joint,
As the striking pin, at its distal end, a traveling direction of the cross section of the striking pin trapezoidal shape, the length in the advance direction of the distal end of the terminal is at 1mm or 10mm or less, and for that direction of travel using a terminal radius of curvature in a cross section perpendicular become less arcuate 10mm or more 1 mm, and adding a shot area as the base material over the weld metal across the weld toe, weld the base material across the weld toe A hammer peening treatment method characterized by forming an impact mark having a radius of curvature of 2 mm or more with respect to a weld toe which is a region extending over a metal.

.前記打撃端子を用いて打撃を付加するに際し、その打撃角度を母材の表面に対して60°±20°の範囲とすることを特徴とする前記に記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 2 . 2. The hammer peening treatment method according to 1 above, wherein, when the impact is applied using the impact terminal, the impact angle is in a range of 60 ° ± 20 ° with respect to the surface of the base material.

.前記打撃端子の進行方向に対する直角断面で、該打撃端子の先端部を、楕円形の長径を軸とした楕円弧状とし、該楕円形の短径を1mm以上としたことを特徴とする前記またはに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 3 . 1 or 2 characterized in that the tip of the impact terminal has an elliptical arc shape with the major axis of the ellipse as an axis, and the minor axis of the ellipse is 1 mm or more in a cross section perpendicular to the traveling direction of the impact terminal. 2. The hammer peening processing method according to 2.

.前記溶接止端部が、溶接止端を挟んで、溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域にわたることを特徴とする前記1〜3のいずれかに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 4 . The hammer peening treatment method according to any one of the above items 1 to 3 , wherein the weld toe portion extends over an area of 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side across the weld toe. .

.前記1〜4のいずれかに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法を用い、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる溶接止端部に打撃を付加する、溶接継手の製造方法であって、
上記打撃により形成された打撃痕の曲率半径が2mm以上であることを特徴とする溶接継手の製造方法
5 . A method for manufacturing a welded joint , wherein the hammer peening treatment method according to any one of 1 to 4 is used, and a hammer is applied to the weld toe portion across the base metal and the weld metal with the weld toe interposed therebetween,
A method for manufacturing a welded joint , wherein a radius of curvature of a hitting mark formed by the hitting is 2 mm or more.

.前記溶接止端部が、溶接止端を挟んで、溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域にわたることを特徴とする前記に記載の溶接継手の製造方法 6 . 6. The method for manufacturing a welded joint according to 5 above, wherein the weld toe spans a region of 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side across the weld toe.

本発明によれば、フラックスチッパーのように、従来の空気圧により端子を駆動する装置であっても、溶接止端部に効果的な打撃処理を行うことができる。すなわち、容易に溶接部の疲労強度改善効果が得られ、産業上、極めて有用な技術である。   According to the present invention, even a device that drives a terminal by a conventional air pressure, such as a flux chipper, can perform an effective striking process on the weld toe. That is, the effect of improving the fatigue strength of the welded portion can be easily obtained, which is an extremely useful technique in industry.

ハンマーピーニングにおいて、溶接止端に生じる欠陥を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the defect which arises in a weld toe in hammer peening. 本発明に係る溶接継手により止端形状が改善される原理を説明する概略図である。It is the schematic explaining the principle by which a toe shape is improved by the welded joint which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る溶接継手の打撃に用いる打撃端子のX、Y、Z方向を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the X, Y, Z direction of the impact terminal used for the impact of the welded joint which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る溶接継手の打撃に用いる打撃端子を説明する図で(a)はXZ断面、(b)はYZ断面の形状を示す図である。It is a figure explaining the hit | damage terminal used for hit | damage of the welded joint which concerns on this invention, (a) is an XZ cross section, (b) is a figure which shows the shape of a YZ cross section. 本発明に係る溶接継手の打撃に用いる他の打撃端子を説明する図で(a)はXZ断面、(b)はYZ断面の形状を示す図である。It is a figure explaining the other impact terminal used for the impact of the welded joint which concerns on this invention, (a) is a XZ cross section, (b) is a figure which shows the shape of a YZ cross section. (a)〜(b)は、廻し溶接を施した角回し溶接継手を示す図である。(a)-(b) is a figure which shows the square turn welded joint which performed the turn welding. 止端形状のプロファイルを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the profile of a toe end shape. 破断に至るまでの応力載荷回数と、応力範囲との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the frequency | count of stress loading until it leads to a fracture | rupture, and a stress range.

以下、本発明の実施形態について、図面を参照して具体的に説明する。
なお、以下の説明で用いる図面は、特徴をわかりやすくするために、便宜上、特徴となる部分を模式的に示している。そのために、各構成要素の寸法比率などが実際と異なる場合がある。
Embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the drawings.
Note that the drawings used in the following description schematically show a feature portion for convenience in order to make the feature easy to understand. Therefore, the dimensional ratio of each component may differ from the actual one.

本発明は、溶接ビードの溶接止端部に、打撃端子(以下、単に端子ともいう)を押し付けながら、打撃端子を溶接線方向に移動操作する、いわゆるハンマーピーニング処理を施すことによって、溶接継手部の疲労強度を改善する方法を提供するものである。
なお、本発明の説明において、止端または溶接止端は、母材の面と溶接金属の表面との交線を意味する(非特許文献2参照)。
The present invention provides a welded joint portion by applying a so-called hammer peening process in which a striking terminal is moved in the weld line direction while pressing a striking terminal (hereinafter also simply referred to as a terminal) against the weld toe of the weld bead. It provides a method for improving the fatigue strength.
In the description of the present invention, the toe or the weld toe means a line of intersection between the surface of the base material and the surface of the weld metal (see Non-Patent Document 2).

本発明で対象とする母材、リブおよび溶接金属は、従来公知の溶接継手に用いられているものであれば、そのいずれもが適用できる。また、一つの部材に他の部材を溶接して取り付けた溶接継手に対して、本発明は幅広く適用することが可能であるが、その使用箇所の構造や負荷状況などから、疲労き裂が発生し易い溶接部および溶接ビードを有する溶接継手を対象とすれば、本発明の効果が一段と発揮される。なお、上記した溶接部等は、例えば、橋梁においては橋桁と橋脚との溶接部、船舶においては船側の縦通肋骨部材と側板との溶接部などが挙げられる。   Any of the base material, rib, and weld metal used in the present invention can be applied as long as it is used in a conventionally known weld joint. In addition, the present invention can be widely applied to welded joints in which other members are attached by welding to one member, but fatigue cracks occur due to the structure and load conditions of the place of use. The effects of the present invention can be further exhibited if a welded joint having a welded part and a weld bead that are easy to perform is targeted. Examples of the welded portion described above include a welded portion between a bridge girder and a pier in a bridge, and a welded portion between a longitudinal rib member on a ship side and a side plate in a ship.

図2は、本発明に係るハンマーピーニング処理方法によって疲労特性が向上する原理を説明するための概略図であり、母材1に、リブ2を廻し溶接で溶接した際の溶接継手部を、溶接線方向に対して垂直な断面で示した図である。同図より、溶接ビード3の止端4に対して、所定の角度で端子を押し付けることによって、母材および溶接金属が加圧されて塑性変形(図中、点線で表示)を生じた打撃痕8となっていることが分かる。   FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining the principle that fatigue characteristics are improved by the hammer peening treatment method according to the present invention. The welded joint portion when the rib 2 is welded to the base material 1 is welded. It is the figure shown with the cross section perpendicular | vertical with respect to a line direction. From the figure, the impact mark in which the base metal and the weld metal are pressed by the terminal against the toe 4 of the weld bead 3 to cause plastic deformation (indicated by a dotted line in the figure). It turns out that it is eight.

図3は、X方向が打撃の進行方向と直角な方向(溶接線方向に直角な方向)、Y方向が打撃の進行方向(溶接線方向に平行な方向)と定義した場合のX方向、Y方向およびZ方向を説明する図であり、以下に説明するX方向、Y方向およびZ方向はこの定義に従っている。   FIG. 3 shows the X direction when the X direction is defined as the direction perpendicular to the striking direction (direction perpendicular to the weld line direction), and the Y direction is defined as the striking direction (direction parallel to the weld line direction). It is a figure explaining a direction and Z direction, and the X direction, Y direction, and Z direction which are demonstrated below are based on this definition.

図4および5に、本発明に従う打撃端子の先端の形状を示す。
本発明における打撃端子は、図4に示すように、打撃端子の先端部が、進行方向(Y方向)に対して直角となる断面(XZ断面)において、ammの長さを有する頂部に、曲率半径(r):1mm以上10mm以下の円弧状の外周部(図4(a))を有するものであって、かつ進行方向(Y方向)に1mm以上10mm以下の長さbmmを有する略蒲鉾形状(図4(b))のものである。なお、上記の長さaは、5〜9.5mmの範囲が好適である。これは、母材および止端側の広い範囲に打撃することができ、溶接部における止端形状の平滑化に有利だからである。
4 and 5 show the shape of the tip of the impact terminal according to the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 4, the striking terminal according to the present invention has a tip having a length of a 1 mm in a cross section (XZ cross section) in which the tip of the striking terminal is perpendicular to the traveling direction (Y direction). The radius of curvature (r 1 ) has an arcuate outer periphery (FIG. 4A) of 1 mm or more and 10 mm or less, and a length b 1 mm of 1 mm or more and 10 mm or less in the traveling direction (Y direction). It is a thing of the substantially bowl shape (FIG.4 (b)) which has. The above length a 1 in the range of 5~9.5mm are preferred. This is because it is possible to hit a wide range of the base material and the toe side, which is advantageous for smoothing the toe shape in the welded portion.

上記の曲率半径(r)は、1mm未満の場合、止端に応力集中が発生し易い変形が形成される。一方、10mm超の場合、打撃の際の打撃端子と止端部との接触面積が大きくなり過ぎ、止端部に十分な圧縮残留応力を導入することができない。従って、曲率半径(r)は1mm以上10mm以下とする。 When the curvature radius (r 1 ) is less than 1 mm, a deformation that easily causes stress concentration at the toe is formed. On the other hand, if it exceeds 10 mm, the contact area between the hitting terminal and the toe portion at the time of hitting becomes too large, and sufficient compressive residual stress cannot be introduced into the toe portion. Therefore, the radius of curvature (r 1 ) is 1 mm or more and 10 mm or less.

図5は、本発明の他の例に係る打撃端子の形状を示している。同図に示したように、打撃端子の先端部は、進行方向(Y方向)に対して直角となる断面(XZ断面)において、頂部に楕円形の長径(r)を軸として長さammの楕円弧状の外周部を有し、楕円形の短径(r)を1mm以上(図5(a))とし、図4に示した端子と同じく、進行方向(Y方向)に1mm以上10mm以下の長さbmmを有する略蒲鉾形状に形成されたものである(図5(b))。なお、上記の長さaは、5〜9.5mmの範囲が好適である。これは、母材および止端側の広い範囲に打撃することができ、溶接部における止端形状の平滑化に有利だからである。 FIG. 5 shows the shape of a striking terminal according to another example of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the tip of the striking terminal has a length a with an ellipse major axis (r 3 ) as the axis in the cross section (XZ cross section) perpendicular to the traveling direction (Y direction). It has an elliptical arc-shaped outer periphery of 2 mm, has an elliptical minor axis (r 2 ) of 1 mm or more (FIG. 5A), and is 1 mm in the traveling direction (Y direction), like the terminal shown in FIG. It is formed in a substantially bowl shape having a length b 2 mm of 10 mm or less (FIG. 5B). The length a 2 of the above, the range of 5~9.5mm are preferred. This is because it is possible to hit a wide range of the base material and the toe side, which is advantageous for smoothing the toe shape in the welded portion.

上記の楕円弧状の外周部を有する打撃端子の場合、楕円形の短径(r)が1mm未満では、止端部に応力集中部が発生する変形が形成されるため、楕円形の短径(r)は1mm以上とする。なお、その上限に特段の制限はないが、2mm程度が好ましい。
また、楕円形の長径(r)は、8mmを越えると溶接止端に打撃することが困難になるため、短径より大きく、6mm程度までが好ましい。
In the case of the striking terminal having the elliptical arc-shaped outer peripheral portion, if the elliptical minor axis (r 2 ) is less than 1 mm, a deformation in which a stress concentration portion is generated at the toe portion is formed. (R 2 ) is 1 mm or more. The upper limit is not particularly limited, but is preferably about 2 mm.
Further, if the major axis (r 3 ) of the ellipse exceeds 8 mm, it is difficult to hit the weld toe, and therefore, the major axis (r 3 ) is preferably larger than the minor axis and about 6 mm.

図4および5に示した打撃端子は、上述したように、いずれも進行方向(Y方向)に1mm以上10mm以下の長さbおよびbを有している。そのそれぞれが1mm未満の長さでは、止端に圧縮残留応力を効果的に付与することが出来ないだけでなく、打撃端子にかかる力が大きくなるため先端が潰れやすくなって、頻繁に先端の交換が必要となる。一方、10mm超の長さでは、止端に応力集中部が発生する変形が形成されるだけでなく、止端部に効果的な打撃を付加するために大きな力が必要となるので、大規模な打撃装置になってしまう。従って、bおよびbはそれぞれ1mm以上、10mm以下の範囲とする。
また、bおよびbは、aおよびaと同じかより小さいことが好ましい。これは、打撃端子の接触面積が過度に大きくなると、単位面積あたりにかかる力が弱くなって安定した形状が得られにくいからである。
4 and 5, as described above, each has a length b 1 and b 2 of 1 mm or more and 10 mm or less in the traveling direction (Y direction). If each length is less than 1 mm, not only can the compressive residual stress not be applied effectively to the toe, but the force applied to the striking terminal increases and the tip tends to collapse, frequently Replacement is required. On the other hand, when the length exceeds 10 mm, not only is the deformation where a stress concentrated portion is generated at the toe, but also a large force is required to apply an effective blow to the toe, so a large scale is required. It becomes a powerful striking device. Accordingly, b 1 and b 2 are each in the range of 1 mm or more and 10 mm or less.
Further, b 1 and b 2 are preferably the same as or smaller than a 1 and a 2 . This is because if the contact area of the impact terminal becomes excessively large, the force applied per unit area is weakened and it is difficult to obtain a stable shape.

本発明では、母材の表面に対して60°±20°の角度で、溶接止端部に対し打撃を付加することが重要である。
というのは、80°を超えた場合には、溶接金属に対して効果的な打撃を付加することが若干困難となり、一方、40°に満たないと、母材に対して効果的な打撃を付加することができないおそれが招来するからである。
In the present invention, it is important to apply a blow to the weld toe at an angle of 60 ° ± 20 ° with respect to the surface of the base material.
This is because if it exceeds 80 °, it is somewhat difficult to add an effective blow to the weld metal, while if it is less than 40 °, an effective blow to the base metal is difficult. This is because there is a risk that it cannot be added.

本発明において、打撃角度を調整する方法は、従来公知の方法によることができるが、例えば、打撃開始直前に60度の頂角を持ち、上記Y方向に一定の厚みのある板を母材上に置き、その上にフラックスチッパーを載置して角度を確認してから打撃すれば良い。また、角度を任意に変えられる台に載置したり、透明プラスチック製の分度器を脇に置いて共同作業者に目視で確認してもらったりしながら、打撃することもできる。
ただし、打撃中の目視による確認は、困難であり、危険も伴うことから、打撃開始時に、打撃端子の先端を打撃位置に接触させた状態で、角度の目視確認をすれば問題はない。
すなわち、角度の確認については一連の作業のうち、初回の打撃の際に範囲内に入っていることを確認できればよい。これは、作業者本人が確認することが困難であることと、全ての作業中に確認することは非効率であるという理由からである。
In the present invention, the hitting angle can be adjusted by a conventionally known method. For example, a plate having an apex angle of 60 degrees just before the start of hitting and having a certain thickness in the Y direction is formed on the base material. It is only necessary to place a flux chipper on it and check the angle before hitting. Further, it is possible to strike while placing it on a table whose angle can be arbitrarily changed, or placing a transparent plastic protractor aside and having a collaborator check visually.
However, since visual confirmation during hitting is difficult and dangerous, there is no problem if the angle is checked with the tip of the hitting terminal in contact with the hitting position at the start of hitting.
That is, regarding the confirmation of the angle, it is only necessary to confirm that it is within the range at the time of the first hit in the series of operations. This is because it is difficult for the operator himself to confirm, and it is inefficient to confirm during all work.

また、本発明では、1箇所の溶接部に対して1回の打撃でも、十分に溶接継手の疲労強度を向上させることができるが、止端部内で、打撃する角度を、上記した角度の範囲内で適宜変えることができる。例えば、母材側の打撃の際には、60°より大きな角度で打撃し、ついで止端近傍に対しては60°程度、さらに溶接金属側では、60°より小さな角度で打撃をすることができる。なお、打撃の開始は、母材側からでも溶接金属側からでも行うことができる。また、本発明では、複数回、打撃施工処理をするうちの、少なくとも1回が溶接止端にかかっていればよく、その他の打撃は、母材または溶接金属側のいずれかへの打撃となってしまってもよい。ただし、その結果として、母材、溶接金属の双方に打撃痕が形成されていることが必要である。   Further, in the present invention, the fatigue strength of the welded joint can be sufficiently improved even with a single impact on one welded portion, but the angle to be struck within the toe is within the range of the angle described above. Can be changed as appropriate. For example, when striking on the base metal side, it is possible to strike at an angle larger than 60 °, then to the vicinity of the toe, about 60 °, and on the weld metal side, it is possible to strike at an angle smaller than 60 °. it can. The hitting can be started from the base metal side or the weld metal side. In the present invention, it is sufficient that at least one of the hammering treatments is applied to the weld toe, and the other hammering is performed on either the base metal or the weld metal side. You may. However, as a result, it is necessary that striking marks are formed on both the base material and the weld metal.

本発明において、溶接止端部は、溶接止端を挟んで打撃痕が形成されている母材と溶接金属にわたる領域を意味する。また、その範囲は、溶接止端を基準にして打撃痕の終点(縁)までの長さを測定し、溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域とすることが好ましい。というのは、それぞれが2mmに満たない場合は、溶接継手部の疲労強度の改善が十分に達成されないおそれがあるからである。
なお、その上限に特段の制限はないが、溶接金属側では、8mm程度であり、一方、母材側では、10mm程度である。
In the present invention, the weld toe portion means a region extending between the base metal and the weld metal on which a hitting mark is formed across the weld toe. Further, the range is preferably determined by measuring the length to the end point (edge) of the impact mark with reference to the weld toe, and setting the region to be 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side. This is because if each is less than 2 mm, the fatigue strength of the welded joint may not be sufficiently improved.
In addition, although there is no special restriction | limiting in the upper limit, it is about 8 mm on the weld metal side, On the other hand, it is about 10 mm on the base material side.

本発明では、上述したようなそれぞれのハンマーピーニング処理条件によって、溶接止端部に打撃を付加して、溶接継手部の疲労強度を改善した溶接継手を形成する。
その際に、上記打撃により形成された打撃痕の曲率半径を、2mm以上とすることが本発明では必須である。
というのは、打撃痕の曲率半径が2mmに満たないと、打撃の付加による応力集中緩和の効果が十分に得られないからである。なお、その上限に特段の制限はないが、溶接部の脚長を越えない程度が好ましい。
According to the present invention, a weld joint is formed in which the fatigue strength of the weld joint portion is improved by hitting the weld toe portion according to the respective hammer peening treatment conditions as described above.
At that time, it is essential in the present invention that the radius of curvature of the hitting mark formed by the hitting is 2 mm or more.
This is because if the radius of curvature of the hitting trace is less than 2 mm, the effect of stress concentration relaxation due to the addition of hitting cannot be sufficiently obtained. Although there is no particular limitation on the upper limit, it is preferable that the upper limit does not exceed the leg length of the weld.

また、本発明に従う溶接継手は、前述したように、その溶接止端部が、溶接止端を基準にして溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域にわたっていることが好ましい。   In addition, as described above, the weld joint according to the present invention preferably has a weld toe extending over a region of 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side with respect to the weld toe.

本発明に用いる打撃端子は、前述した形状以外、従来公知の打撃端子を用いることができるが、例えば、工具鋼など、引張強さが1000MPa以上のものを挙げることができる。   As the hitting terminal used in the present invention, hitherto known hitting terminals can be used in addition to the shape described above, and examples thereof include tool steel having a tensile strength of 1000 MPa or more.

本発明に用いる打撃の装置は、従来公知の溶接部の打撃用装置を用いることができるが、フラックスチッパーのように、従来の空気圧で端子を駆動する装置を用いると、設備に要するコストが低減できるために望ましい。   The hitting device used in the present invention can use hitherto known welding devices, but using a conventional device that drives terminals with air pressure, such as a flux chipper, reduces the cost of equipment. Desirable because it can.

端子の先端部を、XZ断面(端子の進行方向に直角な断面)において、頂部の曲率半径を4.5mmとし、YZ断面(端子の進行方向の断面)の長さを5mmとした打撃端子と、XZ断面(端子の進行方向に直角な断面)において、長径:6mm、短径:3mmとして、長径を軸にした楕円弧状とし、YZ断面(端子の進行方向の断面)の長さを9mmとした打撃端子と、端子の先端部を曲率半径が1.5mmの半球状である打撃端子とをそれぞれ準備した。また、図6(a)に示す平行部幅:150mm×長さ:500mm×板厚:12mmの母材1(SM490Y)に、75mm×50mmのリブ2(SM490Y)に廻し溶接3(ワイヤーMXZ200−1.2Φ、100%CO、240A−30V−40CPM、10.8KJ/cm)を施した角回し溶接継手を準備した。
ついで、上記溶接継手の止端に、上記打撃端子によるハンマーピーニングを、空気圧:約6kg/cm、周波数:90Hzの各条件を固定条件とし、母材に対する打撃の角度(以下、打撃角度という)を45〜70°(度)の範囲内で施した。なお、打撃角度は、打撃開始直前に、透明プラスチック製の分度器を脇に置いて、共同作業者に目視で確認してもらった。
表1に、試験No.と上記の端子形状、打撃角度をそれぞれ示す。
An impact terminal in which the tip of the terminal has an XZ cross section (cross section perpendicular to the terminal traveling direction), a top radius of curvature of 4.5 mm, and a YZ cross section (terminal cross section in the traveling direction) length of 5 mm; In the XZ cross section (cross section perpendicular to the traveling direction of the terminal), the major axis is 6 mm, the minor axis is 3 mm, the elliptical arc is formed with the major axis as the axis, and the length of the YZ section (the cross section in the terminal traveling direction) is 9 mm. A striking terminal having a hemispherical shape with a radius of curvature of 1.5 mm was prepared for each of the striking terminals. Further, a parallel part width: 150 mm × length: 500 mm × plate thickness: 12 mm shown in FIG. 6A is turned around a 75 mm × 50 mm rib 2 (SM490Y) and welded 3 (wire MXZ200− A corner-turn welded joint with 1.2Φ, 100% CO 2 , 240A-30V-40CPM, 10.8 KJ / cm) was prepared.
Next, hammer peening by the impact terminal is applied to the toe end of the welded joint, the air pressure is about 6 kg / cm 2 , and the frequency is 90 Hz. The angle of impact on the base material (hereinafter referred to as impact angle) Was applied within a range of 45 to 70 ° (degrees). The striking angle was checked by a collaborator by placing a transparent plastic protractor aside just before the striking.
Table 1 shows the test No., the terminal shape, and the hitting angle.

ハンマーピーニング処理した後の溶接継手の止端半径を、シリコンゴムキャスティングにより実測した。
また、破断回数(応力範囲:200MPa)は、図6(a)に示した試験体を用いて、疲労試験機に母材1の両端をチャッキングし、リブ2の長手方向に繰返し応力(応力比:0.1,周波数:5〜10Hz)を与えることにより求めた。なお、本発明では、破断回数が応力範囲:200MPaにおいて10回を超えていることが良好であるとした。
さらに、上記打撃端子による打撃痕の領域(溶接止端部)の大きさを測定した。具体的には、デジタルノギスを用い、リブ端を基準として、打撃前に予めリブ端−溶接止端の距離を測定しておき、打撃後に再びリブ端を基準として、打撃痕の縁までの距離を、溶接金属側、母材側でそれぞれ測定した。その後、溶接止端から打撃痕の縁までの距離を溶接金属側、母材側で差分をとることによりそれぞれ求めた。
打撃痕の曲率半径(止端半径)、破断回数(応力範囲:200MPa)および溶接止端部の範囲の測定結果を、表1にそれぞれ併記する。
The toe radius of the welded joint after the hammer peening treatment was measured by silicon rubber casting.
The number of breaks (stress range: 200 MPa) was determined by using the test body shown in FIG. 6A to chuck both ends of the base material 1 in a fatigue testing machine and repeatedly applying stress (stress) in the longitudinal direction of the rib 2. Ratio: 0.1, frequency: 5 to 10 Hz). In the present invention, the number of breaks is preferably over 10 6 times in the stress range: 200 MPa.
Furthermore, the magnitude | size of the area | region (welding toe part) of the impact mark by the said impact terminal was measured. Specifically, the distance between the rib end and the weld toe is measured before hitting with a digital caliper as a reference, and the distance to the edge of the hitting mark again with the rib end as a reference after hitting. Were measured on the weld metal side and the base metal side, respectively. Thereafter, the distance from the weld toe to the edge of the impact mark was obtained by taking the difference on the weld metal side and the base metal side, respectively.
Table 1 shows the measurement results of the radius of curvature (toe radius), the number of breaks (stress range: 200 MPa), and the range of the weld toe, respectively.

Figure 0005919986
Figure 0005919986

表1より、本発明の端子形状を用いて、母材の表面に対する角度を60°±20°とした場合は、いずれも打撃痕の曲率半径が2mm以上となった。また、破断試験においては、溶接部が破断する前に、試験体(母材)のチャッキング部が破断してしまったが、溶接部の破断までの回数はいずれも、応力範囲:200MPaにおいて、少なくとも10回を超えていることが分かる。一方、処理なしは、応力が引張応力となっており、曲率半径:1.5mmの半球状の端子を用いた場合は、処理なしに比べれば打撃痕の曲率半径が大きくなっているものの、溶接部の破断回数に劣っていることが認められた。打撃端子の先端が半球形状のものでは、先端の強度が十分ではなく、打撃時に母材に圧縮の残留応力を十分導入することができない。また、打撃後に1.5mmの半球状の端子の先端は潰れていた。 From Table 1, when the angle with respect to the surface of the base material was set to 60 ° ± 20 ° using the terminal shape of the present invention, the radius of curvature of the hitting mark was 2 mm or more. In the break test, the chucking portion of the specimen (base material) broke before the weld portion broke, but the number of times until the weld portion broke was all in the stress range: 200 MPa, It can be seen that there are at least 10 6 times. On the other hand, without treatment, the stress is tensile stress, and when using a hemispherical terminal with a radius of curvature of 1.5 mm, the radius of curvature of the striking scar is larger than that without treatment, but welding It was recognized that the number of breaks of the part was inferior. If the tip of the impact terminal has a hemispherical shape, the strength of the tip is not sufficient, and sufficient compressive residual stress cannot be introduced into the base material at the time of impact. Further, the tip of the 1.5 mm hemispherical terminal was crushed after hitting.

また、本発明と溶接ままの止端形状のプロファイルを図7に示す。同図より、本発明に従う溶接止端部は、溶接ままに比べると止端部の形状がなめらかになっていることが分かる。従って、本発明は、形状改善効果によって、上記した応力集中緩和の効果が発現していることが分かる。   FIG. 7 shows the profile of the toe shape as welded with the present invention. From the figure, it can be seen that the weld toe according to the present invention has a smoother shape than the welded toe. Therefore, it can be seen that the effect of stress concentration relaxation described above is manifested in the present invention due to the shape improvement effect.

続いて、図6(b)に示す母材1の代わりに母材1´を使用し、平行部幅:100〜150mm×長さ:700mm×板厚:16mmの母材1´(SM490Y)に、75mm×50mmのリブ2(SM490Y)に廻し溶接3(ワイヤーMXZ200−1.2Φ、100%CO、240A−30V−40CPM、10.8KJ/cm)を施した角回し継手についても疲労試験を行った。
発明例については、打撃端子の先端半径:4.5mm,3mmおよび1.5mmの3種類、長さ:3mm,5mmおよび9mmの3種類を準備した。一方、比較例として、グラインダ処理を施したもの(比較例Aシリーズ)と溶横後の処理を行わなかったもの(溶接まま、比較例Bシリーズ)の疲労試験を行った。
試験結果を表2に示す。
Subsequently, the base material 1 ′ is used instead of the base material 1 shown in FIG. 6B, and the parallel part width: 100 to 150 mm × length: 700 mm × plate thickness: 16 mm is used as the base material 1 ′ (SM490Y). , turning the 75 mm × 50 mm ribs 2 (SM490Y) welding 3 (wire MXZ200-1.2Φ, 100% CO 2, 240A -30V-40CPM, 10.8KJ / cm) a fatigue test also angular turning joint subjected to went.
About the example of an invention, the tip radius of a hitting terminal: Three types, 4.5 mm, 3 mm, and 1.5 mm, and the length: Three types, 3 mm, 5 mm, and 9 mm were prepared. On the other hand, as a comparative example, a fatigue test was performed on those subjected to the grinder treatment (Comparative Example A series) and those not subjected to the treatment after melting (as welded, Comparative Example B series).
The test results are shown in Table 2.

Figure 0005919986
Figure 0005919986

本破断に至るまでの応力載荷回数と、応力範囲との関係を図8に示す。同図および表2より、応力範囲が250MPa以下で、本発明に従う場合、JSSC(日本鋼構造協会)の設計曲線のC等級を十分に満足していることが分かる。特に、打撃端子の先端が曲率半径:1.5mmのものについても十分な疲労寿命が得られており、これは、先端が半球形状のものに比べて、十分な長さを有しているため、先端の強度が高く、止端部に十分な圧縮残留応力を導入できるからである。一方、比較例AシリーズではD等級程度、また比較例BシリーズではE等級程度となっていた。従って、本発明に従うことにより、溶接ままの継手よりも2等級以上向上し、さらに従来のグラインダ処理よりも1等級以上向上していることが分かる。   FIG. 8 shows the relationship between the number of times of stress loading up to the final break and the stress range. From this figure and Table 2, it can be seen that when the stress range is 250 MPa or less and according to the present invention, the C grade of the design curve of JSSC (Japan Steel Structure Association) is sufficiently satisfied. In particular, a sufficient fatigue life is obtained even when the tip of the impact terminal has a curvature radius of 1.5 mm, because this has a sufficient length compared to the tip having a hemispherical shape. This is because the strength of the tip is high and sufficient compressive residual stress can be introduced into the toe portion. On the other hand, it was about D grade in the comparative example A series and about E grade in the comparative example B series. Therefore, it can be seen that, according to the present invention, two or more grades are improved over the welded joint, and one grade or more is improved over the conventional grinder treatment.

1,1´ 母材
2 リブ
3 溶接金属(ビード)
4 止端
5 打撃端子(チッパー)
6 溝
7 疲労き裂
8 打撃痕
1,1 'base material 2 rib 3 weld metal (bead)
4 toe 5 hammering terminal (chipper)
6 groove 7 fatigue crack 8 impact mark

Claims (6)

空気圧振動方式の打撃端子を用い、溶接止端部に打撃を付加することによって溶接継手部の疲労強度向上を図るハンマーピーニング処理方法において、
上記打撃端子として、その先端部における、該打撃端子の進行方向の断面が台形状であり、また、該端子の進行方向の先端での長さが1mm以上10mm以下であり、かつその進行方向に対する直角断面での曲率半径が1mm以上10mm以下の円弧状になる端子を用い、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる領域に打撃を付加し、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる領域である溶接止端部に対して曲率半径が2mm以上の打撃痕を形成することを特徴とするハンマーピーニング処理方法。
In a hammer peening treatment method that uses a pneumatic vibration type striking terminal and applies a blow to the weld toe to improve the fatigue strength of the welded joint,
As the striking pin, at its distal end, a traveling direction of the cross section of the striking pin trapezoidal shape, the length in the advance direction of the distal end of the terminal is at 1mm or 10mm or less, and for that direction of travel using a terminal radius of curvature in a cross section perpendicular become less arcuate 10mm or more 1 mm, and adding a shot area as the base material over the weld metal across the weld toe, weld the base material across the weld toe A hammer peening treatment method characterized by forming an impact mark having a radius of curvature of 2 mm or more with respect to a weld toe which is a region extending over a metal.
前記打撃端子を用いて打撃を付加するに際し、その打撃角度を母材の表面に対して60°±20°の範囲とすることを特徴とする請求項に記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 2. The hammer peening method according to claim 1 , wherein when hitting is applied using the hitting terminal, the hitting angle is in a range of 60 ° ± 20 ° with respect to the surface of the base material. 3. 前記打撃端子の進行方向に対する直角断面で、該打撃端子の先端部を、楕円形の長径を軸とした楕円弧状とし、該楕円形の短径を1mm以上としたことを特徴とする請求項またはに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 In section perpendicular with respect to the traveling direction of the striking pin, claim 1 of the tip of the striking pin, the major axis of the ellipse and the axis and the elliptical arc shape, characterized in that the minor axis of the elliptic circle was over 1mm or hammer peening method according to. 前記溶接止端部が、溶接止端を挟んで、溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域にわたることを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法。 The hammer peening process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the weld toe spans a region of 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side across the weld toe. Method. 前記請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載のハンマーピーニング処理方法を用い、溶接止端を挟んで母材と溶接金属にわたる溶接止端部に打撃を付加する、溶接継手の製造方法であって、
上記打撃により形成された打撃痕の曲率半径が2mm以上であることを特徴とする溶接継手の製造方法
A method for manufacturing a welded joint , wherein the hammer peening method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 is used, and a hammer is applied to a weld toe across a base metal and a weld metal with the weld toe interposed therebetween,
A method for manufacturing a welded joint , wherein a radius of curvature of a hitting mark formed by the hitting is 2 mm or more.
前記溶接止端部が、溶接止端を挟んで、溶接金属側に2mm以上でかつ母材側に2mm以上の領域にわたることを特徴とする請求項に記載の溶接継手の製造方法6. The method for manufacturing a welded joint according to claim 5 , wherein the weld toe portion extends over a region of 2 mm or more on the weld metal side and 2 mm or more on the base metal side with the weld toe interposed therebetween.
JP2012091904A 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same Active JP5919986B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012091904A JP5919986B2 (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same
CN201280029299.2A CN103596722B (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Impact termination, hammering method and utilize the welding point of the method
KR1020137029931A KR101799376B1 (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Impact tip, method for hammer peening, and method for manufacturing weld joint using the same
PCT/JP2012/002605 WO2012140920A1 (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Impact tip, hammer peening method, and weld joint using same

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011090185 2011-04-14
JP2011090185 2011-04-14
JP2012091904A JP5919986B2 (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012228732A JP2012228732A (en) 2012-11-22
JP5919986B2 true JP5919986B2 (en) 2016-05-18

Family

ID=47009109

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012091904A Active JP5919986B2 (en) 2011-04-14 2012-04-13 Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5919986B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101799376B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103596722B (en)
WO (1) WO2012140920A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5252112B1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2013-07-31 Jfeエンジニアリング株式会社 Peening construction method
CN111132793B (en) * 2017-09-27 2021-09-07 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Hammering method for lap fillet welded joint and welded structure
JP6696604B1 (en) * 2019-03-08 2020-05-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Needle peening method

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3002229B2 (en) * 1990-05-14 2000-01-24 川崎製鉄株式会社 Method for improving the fatigue strength of welded joints
CN1102478C (en) * 2000-10-27 2003-03-05 重庆大学 Crack welding and repairing process for ferrous metal parts
JP3899007B2 (en) * 2002-10-08 2007-03-28 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method for improving fatigue strength of lap fillet welded joints
JP2006082127A (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-03-30 Nippon Steel Corp Method for improving fatigue property of component formed by liquid phase diffusion joining and component formed by liquid phase diffusion joining
JP2006320960A (en) * 2005-04-20 2006-11-30 Nippon Steel Corp Metal member and metal structure excellent in fatigue crack development and propagation suppressing characteristics, and its manufacturing method
NO324010B1 (en) * 2005-04-19 2007-07-30 Aibel As Method for achieving increased fatigue strength in welded metal joints and hammer heads for use in cold working
JP2008110374A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-15 Nippon Steel Corp Friction stir welding method and apparatus
JP5364981B2 (en) * 2007-05-25 2013-12-11 新日鐵住金株式会社 Ships with excellent fatigue durability and methods for improving ship fatigue durability
JP4987816B2 (en) * 2008-07-28 2012-07-25 新日本製鐵株式会社 Automatic impact processing method and automatic impact processing apparatus for improving the fatigue characteristics of welded joints
JP5844551B2 (en) * 2010-05-31 2016-01-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Manufacturing method of welded joint

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012140920A1 (en) 2012-10-18
CN103596722A (en) 2014-02-19
KR101799376B1 (en) 2017-11-20
JP2012228732A (en) 2012-11-22
KR20130137047A (en) 2013-12-13
CN103596722B (en) 2016-10-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2014014831A (en) Fatigue strength improving method of weld zone and welded joint
JP2011131260A (en) Method for increasing fatigue strength of weld zone, and weld joint
JP5919986B2 (en) Hammer peening treatment method and welded joint manufacturing method using the same
KR101577261B1 (en) Method for preventing fatigue damage in welded structures, tool for forming impact area, and welded structure
KR102243326B1 (en) Method of peening lap fillet welded joint and welded structures
JP5844551B2 (en) Manufacturing method of welded joint
JP4895407B2 (en) Peening method and welded joint using it
JP5898498B2 (en) Method for improving fatigue strength of welded part and welded joint
JP4757697B2 (en) Method for improving fatigue performance of fillet welds
JP2006175512A (en) Method for increasing fatigue strength of weld zone and welded structure using the same
JP6495569B2 (en) Tool for forming impact marks
JP2013233590A (en) Welded joint superior in fatigue characteristic
JP5977077B2 (en) Welding peening method
JP2007283355A (en) Ultrasonic impact treatment method of weld toe and ultrasonic impact treated weld toe superior in fatigue resistant characteristic
JP6747416B2 (en) Tool for forming impact mark and method for producing welded joint
JP2014172043A (en) Method of executing peening and weld joint executed thereby
JP6314670B2 (en) Structure with excellent fatigue characteristics
WO2012164774A1 (en) Welded joint
JP5599652B2 (en) Welded joint
JP6798111B2 (en) Fatigue life improvement method and structure manufacturing method
JP6339760B2 (en) Method for suppressing fatigue damage of welded structure and tool for forming hitting marks
JP5955752B2 (en) Method for suppressing fatigue damage of welded structure and tool for forming hitting marks
JP2013136094A (en) Weld structure of steel
JP6051817B2 (en) Method for suppressing fatigue damage of welded structure, tool for forming impact mark used in the method, and welded structure
JP2012106285A (en) Weld joint and method for manufacturing the weld joint

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20150223

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20151124

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160119

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160315

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160328

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5919986

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250