JP3086670B2 - Super abrasive whetstone - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a resin, FRP,
CFRP, non-ferrous metal materials, wood-based materials (natural wood, plywood, laminated materials, etc.), gypsum board, rubber, semi-fired ceramics and other easily clogged materials, and super-abrasives for grinding large amounts of chips The present invention relates to a grain whetstone and a method for manufacturing the same.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Resins, FRP, CFRP, wood-based materials,
Conventionally, an electrodeposited superabrasive grindstone in which superabrasive grains are fixed to a single layer by plating has been used for grinding nonferrous metal materials, gypsum boards, rubber, semi-baked ceramics, and the like. This electrodeposited superabrasive grindstone is made by applying superabrasive grains to a grindstone base metal by applying plating technology.The base metal is immersed in a plating solution to form a cathode, and the superabrasive grains are placed on the base metal. Plating. Normally, nickel plating is used for plating, and when energized, the nickel plating is deposited on the base metal avoiding the superabrasive grains (diamond, CBN), which are insulators, and is deposited so as to fill gaps between the superabrasive grains. When the deposition thickness of the nickel plating becomes 50% or more of the particle diameter of the superabrasive grains, the nickel plating becomes a state in which the superabrasive grains are firmly fixed.

Therefore, when the deposition thickness of the nickel plating exceeds 50% of the grain size of the superabrasive grains, the nickel plating is terminated, and the superabrasive grains are further firmly strengthened by removing the base metal from the plating solution. The electrodeposited superabrasive stone fixed to gold is completed. The resulting electrodeposited superabrasive grindstone has a higher holding force for the superabrasive grains than resin-bonded, metal-bonded, and vitrified bond super-abrasive grindstones.
In addition, since the protruding ends of the superabrasive grains have a high height, the volume (volume) of the chip pocket is relatively large, so that the chips are discharged smoothly and have little clogging.

[0004] In addition, the method for producing an electrodeposited superabrasive grindstone is such that superabrasive grains are fixed to a base metal by plating. One of the major features is that it can produce a complete whetstone. By taking advantage of this feature, electrodeposited superabrasive grindstones are used for most of the superabrasive grindstones for total pattern grinding of ferrite, samarium cobalt, neodymium magnets, ceramics, glass, rubber, and the like. Recently, after polishing superabrasive grains to a base metal by plating, grinding the protruding ends of the superabrasive grains with a diamond whetstone and aligning the heights of the protruding ends of the superabrasive grains to grind gears etc. We have also established a highly accurate electrodeposition superabrasive grinding wheel manufacturing technology.

[0005] Further, as another type of superabrasive grindstone,
As shown in Japanese Patent Publication No. 55-22194, there is a metal base (base metal) 1 in which diamond abrasive grains a are fixed with a brazing material b (see FIGS. 1 and 6). This superabrasive wheel also has a characteristic that the volume of the tip pocket is relatively large and clogging is less likely.

[0006]

As described above, an electrodeposited superabrasive grindstone is a superabrasive having about 50 to 70% of its average particle size embedded in nickel plating, and has excellent sharpness and sharpness. Although the pockets are relatively large, in the above-described grinding of a material such as a resin, for example, in the case of a resin, since the volume of the swarf is 10 times or more the grinding volume, a rough processing in which the proportion of the swarf is particularly large However, in order to prevent clogging, the volume of the chip pocket is not sufficient, and clogging often occurs, and the chip pocket must be removed frequently, which is problematic in terms of workability.

In addition, nickel plating is not chemically bonded to superabrasive grains, but only mechanically grips the superabrasive grains. Therefore, the holding power of the superabrasive grains is not sufficient, and the superabrasive grains fall off. In addition to this, the plating layer tends to recede (thinning) due to abrasion due to chips generated during grinding, and when the plating recedes, superabrasive grains fall off one after another, reducing the sharpness and eventually grinding. Since the ability to perform the polishing is completely lost, there is also a problem that the life of the electrodeposited superabrasive stone is short.

On the other hand, the brazing superabrasive grindstone bonds the superabrasive grains a to the base metal 1 very strongly because the brazing material b easily wets the surface of the superabrasive grains a. For this reason, there is an advantage that the superabrasive grains a are less likely to fall off and have a longer life than the electrodeposited superabrasive grains.

However, in the conventional superabrasive grain whetstone with brazing, a paste-like brazing material b is adhered to the outer peripheral surface of a base (base metal) 1, and the base metal 1 is super-abraded with a brazing material b layer. The superabrasive grains a are transferred to the brazing material b layer by rolling on the surface on which the grains a are scattered, and thereafter, the brazing material b is melted by heating.
The superabrasive grains a are brazed to the base metal 1 by the molten brazing material b.

For this reason, as shown in FIG. 6, the superabrasive grains a are hardened at one place or, conversely, are arranged at a large distance. In such a non-uniform arrangement of the superabrasive grains a, in the grinding process, the cutting powder causes early clogging at the hardened portion A, and the clogging grows around, and the grinding ability of the grinding stone is increased. Causes a decrease in This is severe in the rough processing of the above-mentioned resin and the like, and improvement is desired.

The present invention is also applicable to the rough processing of resin and the like.
The objective is to eliminate early clogging.

[0012]

In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention relates to a brazing method as shown in FIG. In an abrasive wheel, the average particle size L of the superabrasive particles a is 100 μm or more.
The size was 1000 μm, and the superabrasive grains a were uniformly and regularly arranged.

If the average grain size L of the superabrasive grains a is less than 100 μm, the grinding efficiency is remarkably reduced, and it is not particularly suitable for rough machining. Conversely, if it exceeds 1000 μm, there is a problem in finishing accuracy. The superabrasive grains a are likely to fall off, and the grinding efficiency is reduced. In addition, when the superabrasive grains a are uniformly and regularly arranged, partial clogging does not occur, and even if clogging occurs, the superabrasive grains a become uniform over the entire area of the abrasive grain surface. By doing so, efficient grinding with less clogging can be performed.

As the regular array pattern of the superabrasive grains a, there are, for example, those shown in FIGS. 3A to 3D. In FIGS. 3A and 3B, the superabrasive grains a having a square shape are shown. And the angle θ between adjacent superabrasive grains a may be appropriately determined as a right angle ((b) in the figure), 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, or the like. As in c) and (d), if the range is 0.3 ≦ P ₁ / P ₂ ≦ 3, the shape need not be a square, and a good result can be obtained with the arrangement. 0.
If it is less than 3, clogging tends to occur, and if it exceeds 3, the grinding efficiency is reduced. Further, as shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 (a), the rows in which the superabrasive grains a are arranged at equal intervals are inclined with respect to the rotation direction of the grindstone, and the superabrasive grains a in one row are adjacent to the other row. If the three super-abrasive grains a are in the middle of the adjacent super-abrasive grains a so as to form a substantially equilateral triangle, the best result is obtained such that no uncut portion occurs.

The regular arrangement of super-abrasive grains does not require a uniform arrangement over the entire surface of the abrasive grains, for example, the arrangement shown in FIG.
3 (a) to 3 (d) are mixed at a certain interval in the direction of rotation of the grindstone, and the point is that the superabrasive grains a are uniform and different from those of FIG. It is sufficient if the clogging is extremely small as compared with the grindstone of FIG.

In this superabrasive grinding wheel, the maximum thickness of the brazing material layer is set to 25 to 50% of the average particle size L of the superabrasive grains a, and the volume of the tip pocket c is set to 2 to 50% of the volume of the superabrasive grains.
It is good to be 20 times.

Conventionally, even in a brazed superabrasive grindstone,
Although the maximum thickness 1 of the brazing material layer is formed so as to exceed 50% of the average grain size of the superabrasive grains, as described above, the brazing material b makes the surface of the superabrasive grains a smoothly. Wet and strong bonding force of superabrasive grains a to base metal 1 can be obtained with chemical bonding. For this reason, even if the maximum thickness 1 of the brazing material layer does not exceed 50% of the average grain size L of the superabrasive grains a, a sufficient fixing force can be obtained. However, if it is less than 25%, the superabrasives a are undesirably dropped.

When the brazing material layer is thinner, the chip pocket c is inevitably increased. However, the chip pocket c is also increased by increasing the interval P between the superabrasive grains a. For this reason, they are appropriately set so that the volume of the tip pocket c is 2 to 20 times the volume of the superabrasive grains. If it is less than 2 times, a sufficient amount of cutting powder cannot be held and clogging will occur, while if it exceeds 20 times, the workpiece will directly hit the brazing material layer and the grinding efficiency will decrease. Average particle size 200
In the case of using coarse super-abrasive grains of μm or more, about 5-1
Good results are obtained in the range of 5 times.

A hard coating such as nickel plating or chromium plating is applied to the surface of the brazing material b layer so as to minimize abrasion due to chips or the like and maintain the holding force of the superabrasive grains a. Is preferred.

The above-mentioned superabrasive grindstone is used for grinding resin, rubber or a composite material containing these as a main component, or a non-ferrous metal material, which generates a large amount of swarf due to its high ability to discharge swarf. Is preferred. Examples of the non-ferrous metal material include a zinc alloy and an aluminum alloy.

The method for manufacturing the superabrasive grindstone is such that a paste-like brazing material b is applied to the outer peripheral surface of the base metal 1 so that the superabrasive grains a are uniform in the brazing material b layer. Then, a heat treatment is performed to melt the brazing material b, and the super-abrasive grains a are brazed to the base metal 1 by the molten brazing material b.

Here, the paste is generally obtained by kneading a powder of the brazing material b with a binder, and has a certain degree of viscosity. Therefore, it is easy to set the superabrasive grains a. Or by machine. The heating temperature depends on the brazing material b, and is 900 to 1000 in a vacuum or an inert atmosphere.
About ℃.

The brazing material b is preferably an Ag-Cu-based brazing material, but a brazing material containing a small amount of Ti is more preferable because it particularly wets the surface of diamond abrasive grains well. The type of hard particles mixed into the brazing material b is as follows:
Diamond abrasive grains, CBN abrasive grains, SiC abrasive grains, Al ₂ O
One or two or more of oxide particles such as ₃ and carbide particles such as WC are appropriately selected and employed. The average particle size is preferably 30% or less of the average particle size of the superabrasives. If it exceeds 30%, the bonding strength of the brazing material is reduced. The content of the hard particles with respect to the brazing material is preferably 5 vol% to 50 vol%. If the content is less than 5 vol%, the effect of the content cannot be sufficiently obtained, and if the content exceeds 50 vol%, the bonding strength of the brazing material is reduced.

[0024]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS As shown in FIGS.
m, thickness (width) T: 15 mm, mounting hole diameter H: 20 mm, on the outer peripheral surface of the steel base 1, diamond abrasive grains a (# 50,
The average particle diameter d: 0.3 mm) was changed to P in FIG.
= 2 mm, θ = 60 degrees, and only one layer was fixed with silver solder b. In this case, the thickness 1 of the brazing material b was set so that the volume of the tip pocket c was approximately eight times the volume of the superabrasive grains a. First, a paste-like brazing material b was applied to the outer peripheral surface of the base metal 1, and diamond abrasive grains a were regularly arranged on the brazing material b layer by a handset.
After performing this over the entire surface, the brazing material b was melted by heating to about 1000 ° C., and the diamond abrasive grains a were fixed to the base metal 1 to produce a superabrasive abrasive wheel.

In this superabrasive grindstone, polycarbonate W, which is often used as a plastic eyeglass lens material,
Was subjected to a grinding test under the following conditions as shown in FIG.

Workpiece dimensions: Φ50 mm Workpiece material: polycarbonate Grinding wheel peripheral speed: 1300 m / min Polishing liquid: JIS W2 2% aqueous solution
.

As a result of the above-mentioned grinding test, no clogging of the superabrasive grain was observed at all, good sharpness was maintained for a long time, and highly efficient grinding was possible.

On the other hand, the influence of the case where the volume of the tip pocket c is small was examined by changing only P of the embodiment. Here, P = 1 mm, and the thickness l of the brazing material layer was set so that the volume of the tip pocket c was approximately one time the volume of the superabrasive grains a. When the grinding test was performed under the above conditions, clogging occurred immediately after the start of grinding, and an increase in grinding resistance was recognized.

Further, the influence of the case where the volume of the tip pocket c is large was investigated by changing only P of the embodiment. Here, P = 3 mm, and the brazing material thickness 1 was set such that the volume of the tip pocket c was approximately 22 times the volume of the superabrasive grains. Similarly, when the grinding test was performed under the above conditions, the workpiece W tended to come into direct contact with the brazing material layer from the start of the grinding, and the grinding could not be continued. Further, it was recognized that the sharpness was considerably inferior to that of the examples.

From the above results, it was found that if the volume of the tip pocket c was too small, clogging would occur, and if the volume was too large, the brazing material layer would come into contact with the workpiece. Thus, it can be said that the volume of the tip pocket c is preferably about 2 to 20 times the volume of the superabrasive grains a.

Further, diameter D: 150 mm, thickness T: 1
An electrodeposited whetstone having a diameter of 0 mm and a mounting hole diameter H of 31.7 mm was manufactured, and the relationship between the electrodeposited whetstone, the cutting speed (mm / min) and the load current (A) under the conditions shown in Table 1 below is shown. It is shown in FIG.

[0032]

[Table 1]

From the above results, it can be understood that the embodiment is superior in various points to the conventional example.

In the embodiment, the base metal 1 is disk-shaped, but it goes without saying that the present invention can be applied to other base metal-shaped grindstones such as cup-shaped ones.

[0035]

As can be understood from the above description, the present invention can efficiently grind a material that generates a large amount of cuttings or is easily clogged.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of one embodiment.

FIG. 2 is an enlarged plan view of a main part of the embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a layout diagram of superabrasives.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of brazing superabrasives.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a relationship between a cutting speed and a load current.

FIG. 6 is an enlarged plan view of a main part of a conventional example.

[Explanation of symbols]

 a Super abrasive grain b Brazing material c Tip pocket 1 Metal

──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-3-131475 (JP, A) JP-A-4-336968 (JP, A) JP-A-5-277951 (JP, A) JP-A-4- 336965 (JP, A) Fully open sho 59-191256 (JP, U) Fully open sho 61-169570 (JP, U) (58) Fields investigated (Int. Cl. ⁷ , DB name) B24D 3/00 310 B24D 3/00 320 B24D 3/00 340

Claims (3)

(57) [Claims] A super abrasive grain a is provided on an outer peripheral surface of a disk-shaped base metal 1.
A superabrasive grindstone fixed only by a brazing material b or a brazing material b containing hard particles, wherein the average particle size L of the superabrasive particles a is 100 μm to 1000 μm.
And each superabrasive grain a is arranged in rows arranged at equal intervals in the rotation direction of the grindstone.
And the superabrasive grains a in one adjacent row
In the middle of adjacent superabrasive grains a in the other row,
The superabrasive grains a form a substantially equilateral triangle, and the maximum thickness 1 of the brazing material b layer is an average grain size of the superabrasive grains a.
25-50% of diameter L and volume of tip pocket
Is 2 to 20 times the volume of the superabrasive grains a . 2. The superabrasive grinding wheel according to claim 1, wherein a hard coating such as nickel plating or chromium plating is applied to the surface of the brazing material b layer. 3. The superabrasive grinding wheel according to claim 1, which is used for grinding a resin, rubber, a composite material containing these as a main component, and a nonmetallic material.