JP2864920B2 - Silicon wafer quality inspection method - Google Patents

Silicon wafer quality inspection method

Info

Publication number
JP2864920B2
JP2864920B2 JP4349724A JP34972492A JP2864920B2 JP 2864920 B2 JP2864920 B2 JP 2864920B2 JP 4349724 A JP4349724 A JP 4349724A JP 34972492 A JP34972492 A JP 34972492A JP 2864920 B2 JP2864920 B2 JP 2864920B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wafer
oxide film
ripple pattern
density
ripple
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP4349724A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH06177220A (en
Inventor
亮二 星
豊 北川原
卓夫 竹中
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd filed Critical Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Priority to JP4349724A priority Critical patent/JP2864920B2/en
Publication of JPH06177220A publication Critical patent/JPH06177220A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2864920B2 publication Critical patent/JP2864920B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Crystals, And After-Treatments Of Crystals (AREA)
  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
  • Weting (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、シリコンウェーハの結
晶品質検査方法、詳しくは該シリコンウェーハ上に形成
される酸化膜の絶縁耐圧特性(酸化膜耐圧)を間接的に
評価する方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for inspecting the crystal quality of a silicon wafer, and more particularly, to a method for indirectly evaluating the withstand voltage characteristics (oxide film withstand voltage) of an oxide film formed on the silicon wafer.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来のシリコンウェーハ検査法では、シ
リコン単結晶棒を育成した後、該単結晶棒の品質を評価
する方法として、該単結晶棒から所定厚さに切り出した
アズカットウェーハの表面をフッ酸と硝酸の混合液でエ
ッチングして該ウェーハ表面の歪みを除去した後、さら
にK2Cr27 とフッ酸と水との混合液中で選択エッチ
ングした時に現われるさざ波模様状の欠陥を観察してい
た(特願平3−074733号)。さらに、この方法に
よりカウントされたさざ波模様の個数と半導体ウェーハ
上に形成されたMOS型半導体装置の酸化膜耐圧との間
には関係が見られるので、上記のウェーハ検査方法はシ
リコン単結晶棒成長後に切り出されたウェーハを使用し
て迅速かつ安価に酸化膜耐圧評価と同等の評価を行うこ
とができるものであった(特願平3−076875
号)。
2. Description of the Related Art In a conventional silicon wafer inspection method, after growing a silicon single crystal rod, as a method of evaluating the quality of the single crystal rod, a surface of an as-cut wafer cut out from the single crystal rod to a predetermined thickness is used. Is etched with a mixed solution of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid to remove the distortion of the wafer surface, and then is subjected to selective etching in a mixed solution of K 2 Cr 2 O 7 , hydrofluoric acid and water. (Japanese Patent Application No. 3-074733). Further, since there is a relationship between the number of ripples counted by this method and the withstand voltage of the oxide film of the MOS type semiconductor device formed on the semiconductor wafer, the above-described wafer inspection method is based on the silicon single crystal rod growth method. Using a wafer cut out later, an evaluation equivalent to an oxide film breakdown voltage evaluation can be performed quickly and inexpensively (Japanese Patent Application No. Hei 3-076875).
issue).

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、従来技術にお
いては、第1に選択エッチングした時にエッチングされ
た量を考慮したさざ波模様の単位体積当たりの密度が酸
化膜耐圧不良率から計算される酸化膜中欠陥の単位体積
当たりの密度(以下等価欠陥密度という)に比べて低か
った。特にさざ波模様の密度が低い場合には正確な酸化
膜耐圧不良率の予測が難しかった。第2に、上記選択エ
ッチングを施した場合には、さざ波模様だけではなくさ
ざ波模様を伴わないピットも表われる。しかし、このピ
ットにも着目したが、該ピットは観察が非常に難しい、
というような問題があった。
However, in the prior art, first, the density per unit volume of the ripple pattern in consideration of the amount etched at the time of selective etching is calculated from the oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate. It was lower than the density of medium defects per unit volume (hereinafter referred to as equivalent defect density). Particularly when the density of the ripple pattern is low, it is difficult to accurately predict the oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate. Secondly, when the selective etching is performed, not only a ripple pattern but also pits without a ripple pattern appear. However, we paid attention to this pit, but it was very difficult to observe it.
There was such a problem.

【0004】本発明は、上記の点を解決しようとするも
ので、その目的は、実際の酸化膜耐圧を測定する場合に
比べ非常に迅速かつ安価に、また従来の方法に比べて精
度よく正確に不良率を予測できるシリコンウェーハの品
質検査方法を提供することにある。
The present invention is intended to solve the above-mentioned problems, and has as its object to provide a method which is very quick and inexpensive as compared with the case of actually measuring the breakdown voltage of an oxide film, and which is more accurate and more accurate than conventional methods. Another object of the present invention is to provide a silicon wafer quality inspection method capable of predicting a defective rate.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明のシリコンウェー
ハの品質検査方法は、シリコン単結晶棒を育成した後、
該単結晶棒を所定厚さのウェーハに切り出し、該アズカ
ットウェーハの表面について、ポリッシュにより鏡面仕
上げを行ったのち、KCrとフッ酸と水との混
合液で選択的にエッチングし、その表面に現われたさざ
波模様の個数と、該さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピット
の個数との和をカウントして結晶の品質を評価すること
を特徴とする。なお、本明細書において、上記「さざ波
模様を伴わないエッチピット」とは、さざ波模様の先端
部に位置するエッチピット以外のエッチピットを意味す
る。
According to the method for inspecting the quality of a silicon wafer of the present invention, after growing a silicon single crystal rod,
The single crystal rod is cut into a wafer of a predetermined thickness, the surface of the as-cut wafer is mirror-finished by polishing, and then selectively etched with a mixed solution of K 2 Cr 2 O 7 , hydrofluoric acid and water. The quality of the crystal is evaluated by counting the sum of the number of ripple patterns appearing on the surface and the number of etch pits not having the ripple pattern. In this specification, the above-mentioned "ripple wave"
`` Etch pit without pattern '' is the tip of the ripple pattern
Means an etch pit other than the etch pit located in the section
You.

【0006】本発明は、ポリッシュによる鏡面仕上げ
と、K2Cr27 とフッ酸と水との混合液中での選択エ
ッチングとによりウェーハ表面に表われたピットの観察
を容易にかつ正確にしたものである。さらに、さざ波模
様の密度とさざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットの密度を
足し合わせることにより、より精度よく、酸化膜耐圧の
不良率を予測できるようにしたものである。
The present invention makes it possible to easily and accurately observe pits appearing on a wafer surface by mirror finishing with polishing and selective etching in a mixed solution of K 2 Cr 2 O 7 , hydrofluoric acid and water. It was done. Furthermore, by adding the density of the ripple pattern and the density of the etch pits without the ripple pattern, the defect rate of the oxide film breakdown voltage can be more accurately predicted.

【0007】なお、本発明において酸化膜耐圧が不良で
あるとは、シリコンウェーハ上に5〜15mm2 、膜厚
が15〜40nmのゲート酸化膜を形成し、この酸化膜
上に形成した燐ドープシリコン電極とシリコン単結晶基
板との間に直流電圧を印加した場合に、ゲート電流が電
流密度で1mA/cm2 以上流れ始めたときの酸化膜に
かかる電界強度が8MV/cm未満であるものをいう。
また、このときの電界強度が8MV/cm以上であるも
のを良品という。
In the present invention, the term "poor oxide film breakdown voltage" means that a gate oxide film having a thickness of 5 to 15 mm 2 and a thickness of 15 to 40 nm is formed on a silicon wafer, and a phosphorus doped film formed on the oxide film is formed. When a DC voltage is applied between the silicon electrode and the silicon single crystal substrate, the electric field intensity applied to the oxide film when the gate current starts flowing at a current density of 1 mA / cm 2 or more is less than 8 MV / cm. Say.
In addition, those having an electric field strength of 8 MV / cm or more at this time are referred to as non-defective products.

【0008】本発明における前記ポリッシングは、鏡面
仕上げ後のウェーハ表面粗さが500μm角の範囲内で
10nm以下となるように行うことが好ましい。また、
前記選択的エッチングは10〜60分間、特に25〜3
5分間行うことが好ましい。鏡面仕上げ、選択エッチン
グの条件をこのように設定することにより、ウェーハ表
面のさざ波模様と、該さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピッ
トとを、より容易にかつ正確に観察することができる。
In the present invention, the polishing is preferably performed such that the wafer surface roughness after mirror finishing is 10 nm or less within a range of 500 μm square. Also,
The selective etching is for 10 to 60 minutes, in particular 25 to 3 minutes.
It is preferable to carry out for 5 minutes. By setting the conditions for the mirror finish and the selective etching in this way, it is possible to more easily and accurately observe the ripple pattern on the wafer surface and the etch pits not accompanied by the ripple pattern.

【0009】[0009]

【作用】上記手順によりウェーハ表面に現われたさざ波
模様の個数と、さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットの個
数との合計数の密度と、酸化膜不良率とをプロットする
と、データのバラツキが小さい散布図が得られ、前記密
度と酸化膜不良率との間に強い正の相関関係が見られる
うえ、該密度は、酸化膜耐圧不良率から計算で求められ
る酸化膜中の等価欠陥密度にかなり近似するようにな
る。
When the density of the total number of ripple patterns appearing on the wafer surface according to the above procedure, the number of etch pits without the ripple pattern, and the oxide film defect rate are plotted, the scatter diagram showing a small variation in data is obtained. Is obtained, and a strong positive correlation is observed between the density and the oxide film defect rate. In addition, the density closely approximates the equivalent defect density in the oxide film calculated from the oxide film breakdown voltage defect rate. Become like

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】以下に本発明の実施例を挙げて、本発明をさ
らに詳細に説明する。チョクラルスキー(CZ)法によ
り種々の条件で成長させたシリコン単結晶棒からウェー
ハを切り出し、該ウェーハの表面をポリッシュして表面
粗さを500μm角の範囲で10nm以下としたのち、
酸化膜耐圧の測定および、K2Cr2 7 とフッ酸と水と
の混合液であるSECCO液(F.Secco D’A
ragona;J,Electrochem.Soc.
119(1972)948)を用い30分間選択エッチ
ングを行った。そして、このウェーハをSECCO液中
に立てて静止保持したときにウェーハ上方部に広がる、
図1に示すようなさざ波模様11と、図2に示すような
さざ波模様11を伴わないエッチピット12とを、光学
顕微鏡を用いて観察すると共にその数をカウントするこ
とにより該さざ波模様11の個数の密度およびさざ波模
様を伴わないエッチピット12との合計数の密度(いず
れも個数/cm3 )を測定した。
The present invention will now be described with reference to examples of the present invention.
This will be described in more detail. Czochralski (CZ) method
From silicon single crystal rods grown under various conditions
Cut out c and polish the surface of the wafer
After making the roughness 10 nm or less in the range of 500 μm square,
Measurement of oxide film breakdown voltage and KTwoCrTwo O7And hydrofluoric acid and water
SECCO solution (F. Secco D'A)
ragona; J, Electrochem. Soc.
Selective etch for 30 minutes using 119 (1972) 948)
Was performed. Then, put this wafer in SECCO solution
Spreads over the upper part of the wafer when held stationary
A ripple pattern 11 as shown in FIG. 1 and a ripple pattern 11 as shown in FIG.
Optical pits 12 without ripples 11
Observe with a microscope and count the number.
With this, the density of the number of the ripple patterns 11 and the ripple pattern
The density of the total number of etch pits 12 without
Number of pieces / cmThree) Was measured.

【0011】一方、酸化膜耐圧の測定および酸化膜耐圧
不良率の計算は、次のようにして行った。上記ウェーハ
について900℃で100分間のゲート酸化を行い、厚
さ25nmの酸化膜を形成し、この酸化膜上にポリシリ
コンを堆積し燐を拡散して面積8mm2 の電極パターン
を形成した。そして、この電極とシリコン基板の間に直
流電圧を印加し、ゲート電流が電流密度で1mA/cm
2 以上流れ始めたときの酸化膜にかかる電界強度が8M
V/cm未満のものを不良品すなわち酸化膜耐圧不良と
した。
On the other hand, the measurement of the oxide film breakdown voltage and the calculation of the oxide film breakdown voltage defect rate were performed as follows. Gate oxidation was performed on the wafer at 900 ° C. for 100 minutes to form an oxide film having a thickness of 25 nm. Polysilicon was deposited on the oxide film and phosphorus was diffused to form an electrode pattern having an area of 8 mm 2 . Then, a DC voltage is applied between the electrode and the silicon substrate, and the gate current is 1 mA / cm in current density.
Electric field intensity applied to the oxide film when it starts to flow 2 or more is 8M
Those having a voltage of less than V / cm were regarded as defective products, that is, oxide film breakdown voltage defects.

【0012】この実施例の結果を図1〜4に示す。図1
はさざ波模様11の形状を示すエッチピット13の概略
図、図2はさざ波模様11を伴わないエッチピット12
を示す概略図、図3は「さざ波模様+さざ波模様を伴わ
ないエッチピットの密度」と「酸化膜耐圧不良率」との
関係を示す散布図であり、図4は「選択エッチングによ
る欠陥密度」と、前記酸化膜耐圧不良率から求められる
(集積回路ハンドブック、丸善株式会社、1968、
p.520)「酸化膜中の等価欠陥の密度」との関係を
示す散布図である。但し、前記「選択エッチングによる
密度」とは、「さざ波模様の密度」と「さざ波模様+さ
ざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットの密度」を総称したも
のである。
The results of this example are shown in FIGS. FIG.
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an etch pit 13 showing the shape of a ripple pattern 11, and FIG. 2 is an etch pit 12 without a ripple pattern 11.
FIG. 3 is a scatter diagram showing the relationship between “ripple pattern + etch pit density without ripple pattern” and “oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate”, and FIG. 4 is “defect density by selective etching”. And the oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate (integrated circuit handbook, Maruzen Co., 1968,
p. FIG. 520 is a scatter diagram showing a relationship with “equivalent defect density in oxide film”; However, the "density by selective etching" is a general term for "density of ripple pattern" and "density of etch pit without ripple pattern + ripple pattern".

【0013】図3から、さざ波模様の個数とさざ波模様
を伴わないエッチピットの個数との合計値より計算した
密度(個数/cm3 )と、酸化膜耐圧不良との間には強
い正の相関関係があることがわかる。
From FIG. 3, there is a strong positive correlation between the density (number / cm 3 ) calculated from the sum of the number of ripple patterns and the number of etch pits without ripple patterns and the oxide film breakdown voltage failure. It turns out that there is a relationship.

【0014】また、図4を参照して明らかなように、ア
ズカットウェーハ上に現われたさざ波模様のみの欠陥密
度(個数/cm)と酸化膜中の等価欠陥密度(個数/
cm)との関係をプロットした散布図(比較例)と、
鏡面仕上げしたウェーハ上に現われたさざ波模様の個数
とさざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットの個数との合計数
より計算した欠陥密度と酸化膜中の等価欠陥密度との関
係をプロットした散布図(本発明の実施例)とを比較す
ると、本発明に従う後者の散布図のほうが相関関係のバ
ラツキが小さくなり、しかも選択エッチングによる欠陥
密度は酸化膜中の等価欠陥密度に、より近づく結果と
った。 以上のことから、さざ波模様(のみ)の個数の密
度を測定するよりも、さざ波模様の個数と、さざ波模様
を伴わないエッチピットの個数との合計数の密度を測定
するほうが、より高精度にシリコンウェーハの品質検査
を行うことができることがわかった。
Further, as apparent with reference to FIG. 4, the equivalent defect density of the oxide film in the defect density of only a ripple pattern appearing on as-cut wafer (number / cm 3) (number /
scatter plot (comparative example) plotting the relationship with cm 3 ),
Scatter plot plotting the relationship between the defect density calculated from the total number of ripple patterns appearing on the mirror-finished wafer and the number of etch pits without the ripple pattern and the equivalent defect density in the oxide film (the present invention) example) a comparison of the, variation in better correlation of the latter scatter diagram according to the present invention is small and defect density by selective etching in an equivalent defect density in the oxide film, it more closer results
Was. From the above, the number of ripples (only)
Rather than measuring the degree, the number of ripples and ripples
Of the number of etch pits and the total number without etch pits
Performing silicon wafer quality inspection with higher accuracy
I found that can be done.

【0015】上記した特願平3−074733号の明細
書に記載された方法によりウェーハを処理した。 すなわ
ち、上記実施例で得た切り出しウェーハ(鏡面仕上げな
しのアズカットウェーハ)を試料とし、該ウェーハの表
面をフッ酸と硝酸との混合液でエッチングして表面の歪
みを除去したのち、該表面をSECCO液により30分
間選択エッチングし、該エッチング面を光学顕微鏡で観
察した。その結果、エッチング面には図1に示すよう
な、さざ波模様11とその先端部のエッチピット13は
観察できたものの、図2に示すような、さざ波模様11
を伴わないエッチピット12を観察することはできなか
った。このように、上記従来技術によるウェーハ表面の
処理方法では、さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットを再
現性良く、正確に観察することが難しく、このため従来
技術では、シリコンウェーハの酸化膜耐圧不良率を正確
に予測するのが困難であることがわかった。従って、さ
ざ波模様として現われる欠陥だけが酸化膜耐圧不良の要
因ではなく、さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットも酸化
膜耐圧を劣化させる要因の一つであると考えられる。
The specification of Japanese Patent Application No. 3-077333 mentioned above.
The wafer was processed according to the method described in the publication. Sand
The cut wafer (as-cut wafer without mirror finish) obtained in the above example was used as a sample, and the surface of the wafer was etched with a mixed solution of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid to remove the surface distortion. Was selectively etched with a SECCO solution for 30 minutes, and the etched surface was observed with an optical microscope. As a result, although the rippled pattern 11 and the etch pit 13 at the tip of the rippled pattern 11 could be observed on the etched surface, as shown in FIG.
Was not observed. Thus, the surface of the wafer according to the prior art described above is
In the processing method, the etch pits without ripples
It is difficult to observe accurately and accurately.
Technology accurately measures the oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate of silicon wafers
Proved difficult to predict. Therefore, it is considered that only the defect appearing as the ripple pattern is not a factor of the oxide film breakdown voltage defect, and the etch pit without the ripple pattern is also a factor of deteriorating the oxide film breakdown voltage.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の効果】以上の説明で明らかなように、本発明に
よれば、シリコン単結晶棒の微小欠陥を検査するに当た
り、ポリッシュにより鏡面仕上げを行ったのち、K2
27 とフッ酸と水との混合液で選択的にエッチング
し、その表面に現われたさざ波模様の個数と、該さざ波
模様を伴わないエッチピットの個数との和をカウントす
ることにより、実際の酸化膜耐圧を測定する場合に比べ
非常に迅速かつ安価に、また従来の方法に比べて精度よ
く不良率を予測できる。
As is apparent from the above description, according to the present invention, when inspecting a micro defect of a silicon single crystal rod, a mirror finish is performed by polishing, and then K 2 C
By selectively etching with a mixture of r 2 O 7 , hydrofluoric acid and water, and counting the sum of the number of ripple patterns appearing on the surface and the number of etch pits without the ripple pattern, The defect rate can be predicted very quickly and inexpensively as compared with the case of measuring the actual oxide film breakdown voltage, and more accurately than the conventional method.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】実施例における、さざ波模様の形状を示す概略
図である。
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a rippled shape in an example.

【図2】実施例における、さざ波模様を伴わないエッチ
ピットを示す概略図である。
FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing an etch pit without a ripple pattern in the example.

【図3】実施例における、さざ波模様+さざ波模様を伴
わないエッチピットの密度と、酸化膜耐圧不良率との関
係を示すグラフである。
FIG. 3 is a graph showing a relationship between a ripple pattern + a density of etch pits not accompanied by a ripple pattern and an oxide film breakdown voltage failure rate in the example.

【図4】比較例における、さざ波模様の密度と酸化膜中
の等価欠陥密度との関係、および実施例における、さざ
波模様+さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピットの密度と酸
化膜中の等価欠陥密度との関係を示すグラフである。
FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the density of the ripple pattern and the equivalent defect density in the oxide film in the comparative example, and the density of the etch pits without the ripple pattern and the equivalent defect density in the oxide film in the example. 6 is a graph showing the relationship of.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

11 さざ波模様 12 さざ波模様を伴わないエッチピット 13 さざ波模様先端部のエッチピット 11 Ripple pattern 12 Etch pit without ripple pattern 13 Etch pit at the tip of ripple pattern

Claims (3)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 シリコン単結晶棒を育成した後、該単結
晶棒を所定厚さのウェーハに切り出し、該ウェーハの表
面について、ポリッシュにより鏡面仕上げしたのち、K
2Cr27 とフッ酸と水との混合液で選択的にエッチン
グし、その表面に現われたさざ波模様の個数と、さざ波
模様を伴わないエッチピットの個数との和をカウントし
て結晶の品質を評価することを特徴とするシリコンウェ
ーハの品質検査方法。
1. After growing a silicon single crystal rod, the single crystal rod is cut into a wafer of a predetermined thickness, and the surface of the wafer is mirror-finished by polishing,
Selectively etched with a mixture of 2 Cr 2 O 7 and hydrofluoric acid and water, and the number of ripple pattern appearing on the surface, by counting the sum of the number of etch pits without ripple pattern of crystalline A quality inspection method for a silicon wafer characterized by evaluating quality.
【請求項2】 前記鏡面仕上げによりウェーハの表面粗
さを、500μm角の範囲内で10nm以下とすること
を特徴とする請求項1に記載のシリコンウェーハの品質
検査方法。
2. The quality inspection method for a silicon wafer according to claim 1, wherein the surface roughness of the wafer is reduced to 10 nm or less within a range of 500 μm square by the mirror finishing.
【請求項3】 前記選択的エッチングを10〜60分間
行うことを特徴とする請求項1に記載のシリコンウェー
ハの品質検査方法。
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the selective etching is performed for 10 to 60 minutes.
JP4349724A 1992-12-02 1992-12-02 Silicon wafer quality inspection method Expired - Lifetime JP2864920B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4349724A JP2864920B2 (en) 1992-12-02 1992-12-02 Silicon wafer quality inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4349724A JP2864920B2 (en) 1992-12-02 1992-12-02 Silicon wafer quality inspection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06177220A JPH06177220A (en) 1994-06-24
JP2864920B2 true JP2864920B2 (en) 1999-03-08

Family

ID=18405677

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4349724A Expired - Lifetime JP2864920B2 (en) 1992-12-02 1992-12-02 Silicon wafer quality inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2864920B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10335402A (en) * 1997-06-02 1998-12-18 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Method of evaluating semiconductor wafer, manufacturing semiconductor device and semiconductor device manufactured thereby

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08760B2 (en) * 1991-03-14 1996-01-10 信越半導体株式会社 Quality inspection method for silicon wafers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06177220A (en) 1994-06-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5534112A (en) Method for testing electrical properties of silicon single crystal
KR100293288B1 (en) Evaluation Method of Semiconductor Wafers
KR20180083326A (en) Method of judging defective area
Miyazaki et al. Influence of crystal-originated “particle” microstructure on silicon wafers on gate oxide integrity
JP2864920B2 (en) Silicon wafer quality inspection method
JPH07263429A (en) Selective etching liquid
EP0702204A2 (en) A method of evaluating silicon wafers
US4668330A (en) Furnace contamination
KR100252214B1 (en) Analysing method of bare wafer
JPH07249666A (en) Iron concentration measurement method of silicon wafer
JP3629694B2 (en) Silicon wafer evaluation method
JP2000208578A (en) Evaluation method for silicon wafer and silicon wafer
JPH0862122A (en) Method for evaluating oxygen precipitation defect density of silicon water
US5849603A (en) Method of processing a surface of a semiconductor substrate
KR20000027700A (en) Method for measuring crystal defect affecting electric characteristics of wafer
JP4200845B2 (en) Method for measuring point defect distribution of silicon single crystal ingot
US6275293B1 (en) Method for measurement of OSF density
JPH1154579A (en) Evaluation of semiconductor substrate
JP2003142544A (en) Method for evaluating minute defect in silicon wafer
KR100862312B1 (en) Method for measuring wafer defect in semiconductor device
JPH09199562A (en) Quality inspection method of silicon wafer
KR0180799B1 (en) Internal defect measuring method of silicon wafer
JPH1174493A (en) Inspecting method for defect of soi wafer
JP2003270167A (en) Method for evaluating grown-in defect density of silicon wafer
JP4370812B2 (en) SOI wafer inspection method