JP2017161784A - Learning support program, learning support device, and learning support method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve comprehension of the content of leaning.SOLUTION: A learning support program causes a computer to execute: processing of acquiring, from each of a plurality of terminal devices to which first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each of the questions and the number of times of answers, and summing up the answer time and number of times of answers for each of the questions; processing of extracting, from the first learning content information, second learning content information including questions determined to be re-distributed to the plurality of terminal devices on the basis of summed-up results; and processing of storing the second learning content information in a storage device.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 12

Description

  The present invention relates to a learning support program, a learning support apparatus, and a learning support method.

  In recent years, in educational sites such as elementary and junior high schools, learning using tablet computers distributed to students has begun.

  Specifically, for example, homework is used as an electronic learning material, and students are allowed to work on homework electronic learning material at home using a terminal device such as a tablet computer brought home. Is already known.

  In addition, as a method for improving the level of understanding of learning content on a class-by-class basis, teachers spend a lot of time to answer questions and answers that many students have made mistakes from learning content that they worked on in class. There is known a technique for extracting the problems that have not been well-understood by many students, and causing the students to implement them.

  For example, conventionally, a technique is disclosed in which an exercise with an end time later than an erroneous operation or a target end time is extracted and executed again based on the self-study exercise results. Conventionally, a technique has been disclosed in which the time taken for an answer is measured, and the problem for which the answer time is determined to be a predetermined value or more is output again.

JP 7-248720 A JP 7-49649 A

  In the conventional method for improving the understanding level of learning content in class units, it is assumed that the teacher knows the understanding level of learning content for each student. However, if the student takes the terminal device home, etc., and learns individually, the teacher cannot grasp the time when the student worked on the problem, the number of times the answer was repeated until the correct answer, etc. It becomes difficult to make each student understand the level of understanding of the learning content.

  For this reason, when a student individually learns, it is difficult to extract a problem with a low level of understanding and to improve the level of understanding of the learning content in the entire class that has been learned.

  In addition, with the techniques disclosed in the past, it is possible to extract a problem that is not well understood for each student and repeat it. However, a problem that is poorly understood by multiple persons is extracted and extracted for the entire multiple persons. The problem cannot be repeated.

  In one aspect, the present invention aims to improve the understanding of learning content.

  According to one aspect, learning history information including an answer time and an answer count for each question is obtained from each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, and the question A second process including a process for counting the answer time and the number of answers for each time, and a question that is determined as a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices from the first learning content information based on the totaled result. A computer is caused to execute processing for extracting learning content information and processing for storing the second learning content information in a storage device.

  Each of the above processes may be a functional unit that realizes each of the above processes, a method of causing each computer to execute each of the processes as a procedure, and a computer-readable storage medium that stores the program.

  Improve the level of understanding of the learning content.

It is a figure explaining an example of a system configuration of a learning support system of a first embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware constitutions of a learning assistance server. It is a figure which shows an example of the student database of 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning content database of 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning history database of 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the threshold value database of 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the total database of 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining the functional structure of the learning assistance server and student terminal of 1st embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the student terminal of 1st embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the learning assistance server of 1st embodiment. It is a 1st figure which shows the example of a display of the student terminal in 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining the operation | movement of a learning assistance server concretely. It is a 2nd figure which shows the example of a display of the student terminal in 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining an example of a system configuration of a learning support system of a second embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the threshold value database of 2nd embodiment. It is a figure explaining the function structure of the learning assistance server of 2nd embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the learning assistance server of 2nd embodiment. It is a figure explaining an example of the system configuration | structure of the learning assistance system of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning content database of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning history database of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the threshold value database of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the total database of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure explaining the functional structure of each apparatus which the learning assistance system of 3rd embodiment has. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the student terminal of 3rd embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the learning assistance server of 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows the example of a display of the student terminal in 3rd embodiment.

(First embodiment)
Embodiments will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a system configuration of the learning support system according to the first embodiment.

  The learning support system 100 of the present embodiment includes a learning support server 200, terminal devices 300-1, 300-2,..., 300-N, and a terminal device 400.

  In the learning support system 100 of the present embodiment, the learning support server 200 distributes electronic learning materials to the terminal devices 300-1, 300-2, ..., 300-N. In each of the terminal devices 300-1, 300-2,..., 300-N, learning using electronic learning materials is performed by the user of each terminal device. For example, the electronic learning material is created in the terminal device 400 and stored in the learning support server 200.

  The learning support system 100 of this embodiment is used for education in elementary and junior high schools, for example, and the terminal devices 300-1, 300-2,..., 300-N are mainly used by students. Therefore, in the following description of the embodiments, the terminal devices 300-1, 300-2,..., 300-N are referred to as student terminals 300-1, 300-2,. Moreover, in the following description, when not distinguishing each of the student terminals 300-1, 300-2,..., 300-N, the student terminals 300-1, 300-2,. Is simply referred to as a student terminal 300.

  The terminal device 400 of this embodiment is mainly used by a teacher. Therefore, in the following description of the embodiment, the terminal device 400 is referred to as a teacher terminal 400.

  In the present embodiment, the electronic learning material distributed from the learning support server 200 to the student terminal 300 is referred to as learning content. Further, in the present embodiment, when the student takes home the student terminal 300 to which the learning content is distributed to the home or the like and tackles this learning content is referred to as “take-out learning”.

  The learning support server 200 according to the present embodiment includes a student database 210, a learning content database 220, a learning history database 230, a threshold database 240, an aggregation database 250, and a learning support processing unit 260. The student database 210 stores information related to students who are learning. The learning content database 220 stores electronic content distributed to the student terminal 300. The learning history database 230 stores information indicating the result (learning history) of the approach to learning content for each student. The threshold value database 240 stores threshold values used for determination of problem extraction. The total database 250 stores the result of totaling the learning history.

  In the take-out learning, the learning support processing unit 260 according to the present embodiment totals information indicating the results of the efforts on the learning content from the student terminal 300 for each student, and includes the questions included in the learning content based on the counting results. Then, it is determined whether or not there is a problem determined that the understanding of the students who have worked on the learning content is not established. If there is a problem determined not to be fixed, the learning support processing unit 260 registers the corresponding question in the learning content database 220 as new learning content for improving the understanding level of the learning content. .

  In this embodiment, the information indicating the result of the approach to the learning content is synonymous with the information indicating the degree of understanding of the student for each question, and the answer time for each question included in the learning content is the answer before the answer is correct. Including the number of repetitions.

  The student terminal 300 according to the present embodiment includes a learning processing unit 310. The learning processing unit 310 causes a student who is a user of the student terminal 300 to perform learning using the learning content stored in the learning support server 200 by the teacher terminal 400.

  In addition, the learning processing unit 310 causes a student who is a user of the student terminal 300 to perform learning using new learning content registered in the learning support server 200 for improving the understanding level of the learning content.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, questions to be performed by all the students are extracted again based on the result of totaling information indicating the results of the efforts for the learning contents for each student. For this reason, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to raise the level of understanding of the learning content of all the students who have worked on the learning content.

  Below, the learning support server 200 of this embodiment is demonstrated. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the learning support server.

  The learning support server 200 according to the present embodiment is, for example, a tablet computer, and the input device 21, the output device 22, the drive device 23, the auxiliary storage device 24, the memory device 25, and the arithmetic unit connected to each other via the bus B. A processing device 26 and an interface device 27 are included.

  The input device 21 is for inputting various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a keyboard or a mouse. The output device 22 is for outputting various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a display. The interface device 27 includes a modem, a LAN card, and the like, and is used for connecting to a network.

  The learning support program is at least a part of various programs that control the learning support server 200. The learning support program is provided by, for example, distribution of the storage medium 28 or downloading from a network. The storage medium 28 on which the learning support program is recorded is a storage medium that records information optically, electrically, or magnetically such as a CD-ROM, a flexible disk, or a magneto-optical disk, and information such as a ROM or flash memory. Various types of storage media, such as a semiconductor memory that electrically records data, can be used.

  The learning support program is installed from the storage medium 28 to the auxiliary storage device 24 via the drive device 23 when the storage medium 28 storing the learning support program is set in the drive device 23. The learning support program downloaded from the network is installed in the auxiliary storage device 24 via the interface device 27.

  The auxiliary storage device 24 stores the installed learning support program and also stores necessary files, data, and the like. The memory device 25 reads and stores the learning support program from the auxiliary storage device 24 when the computer is activated. The arithmetic processing unit 26 implements various processes as described later according to the learning support program stored in the memory device 25.

  Further, the learning support server 200 of the present embodiment may be a tablet computer, for example. In that case, instead of the input device 21 and the output device 22, a display operation device such as a touch panel having a display function may be provided. Note that the student terminal 300 and the teacher terminal 400 of the present embodiment are general tablet computers and the like, and the hardware configuration is the same as that of the learning support server 200 shown in FIG.

  Next, each database included in the learning support server 200 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. Each database described below may be provided in the auxiliary storage device 24, the memory device 25, or the like of the learning support server 200, for example.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a student database according to the first embodiment. The student database 210 of this embodiment has a student ID and a student name as information items, and these are associated with each other.

  The value of the item “student ID” indicates an identifier for identifying a student. In this embodiment, a student ID is assigned to the student terminal 300 of each student. Therefore, in the following description, the student ID is also an identifier for identifying the student terminal 300. The value of the item “student name” indicates the name of the student.

  In FIG. 3, for example, the student with the student ID “1001” has the name “AAA”, and the student with the student ID “1002” has the name “BBB”.

  In the following description, information including the value of the item “student ID” and the values of other items corresponding to the item “student ID” is referred to as student information. In other words, the student information of this embodiment is user information of the student terminal 300.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a learning content database according to the first embodiment. The learning content database 220 of the present embodiment includes a learning ID, a question ID, a question content, and a correct answer as information items. In the learning content database 220, the item “learning ID” is associated with another item. In the following description, information including the value of the item “learning ID” and the values of other items in the learning content database 220 is referred to as learning content information.

  The value of the item “learning ID” indicates an identifier for identifying learning contents. The value of the item “question ID” indicates an identifier for identifying a question included in the learning content. The value of the item “question content” indicates the content of the question. The value of the item “correct answer” indicates the correct answer of the question.

  In FIG. 4, in the learning content of learning ID “0001-1”, the question with question ID “001” is a question that asks for a character that falls in the blank of “First Session”, and the correct answer is “one”. Show.

  Although FIG. 4 shows an example in which a question with one correct answer is stored in the learning content database 220, the present invention is not limited to this. The questions stored in the learning content database 220 may be, for example, a discussion format. In such a case, since there are many correct answer patterns, the value of the item “correct answer” may not be included in the learning content information.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a learning history database according to the first embodiment. The learning history database 230 of this embodiment has learning ID, question ID, student ID, number of executions, and answer time as information items, and each item is associated. In the following description, information including the value of each item in the learning history database 230 is referred to as learning history information.

  The value of the item “number of times of execution” indicates the number of times the answer is input before the correct answer of the question is input in the student terminal 300. In other words, the value of the item “number of times of execution” indicates the number of times that the answer is repeated until the question is correctly answered in the student terminal 300 (number of answers). If the value of the item “correct answer” is not included in the learning content information, the value of the item “number of executions” is all “1”.

  The value of the item “answer time” indicates the time from when the question answer screen is displayed on the student terminal 300 until the correct answer of the question is input.

  In FIG. 5, in the learning content of learning ID “0001-1”, for the question of question ID “001”, the student of student ID “1002” repeats the answer twice before answering correctly, and the correct answer is input. You can see that it took 18 seconds. In other words, the student with the student ID “1002” re-inputs the answer twice in 18 seconds until the answer to the question with the question ID “001” is correctly answered in the learning content with the learning ID “0001-1”. Recognize.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the threshold database according to the first embodiment. The threshold database 240 according to the present embodiment includes items and thresholds as information items, which are associated with each other.

  The value of the item “item” indicates an item to be determined using a threshold value. The value of the item “threshold value” indicates a threshold value used for determining whether to extract a question.

  In FIG. 6, the threshold value of the item “number of executions” is 1.5 times, and the threshold value of the item “answer time” is 20 seconds.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a summary database according to the first embodiment. The tabulation database 250 of the present embodiment has learning ID, question ID, average execution count, and average answer time as information items, and each item is associated. In the following description, information including the value of the item “learning ID” and the values of other items in the aggregation database 250 is referred to as aggregation information.

  The value of the item “average number of executions” indicates the average value of the number of executions of the question with the corresponding question ID in the learning history database 230. The value of the item “average answering time” indicates an average value of answering times of questions corresponding to the question ID in the learning history database 230.

  In FIG. 7, in the learning content of the learning ID “0001”, the average number of times the question with the question ID “001” is 1.3333 times, and the average answer time is 12.5 seconds.

  Next, functions of the learning support server 200 and the student terminal 300 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the functional configuration of the learning support server and the student terminal according to the first embodiment.

  First, the functional configuration of the learning support server 200 will be described. The learning support server 200 of this embodiment includes a learning support processing unit 260. The learning support processing unit 260 is realized by the arithmetic processing device 26 of the learning support server 200 executing a learning support processing program stored in the memory device 25 or the like.

  The learning support processing unit 260 according to the present embodiment includes a totaling unit 261, a threshold determination unit 262, a question extraction unit 263, an ID generation unit 264, a question registration unit 265, and a database update unit 266.

  The totaling unit 261 of the present embodiment accepts an instruction to totalize learning history information in the learning history database 230, totals the number of executions and answer time for each question in the learning history database 230, and stores the totaled information in the totaling database 250. To do. Details of the totaling instruction to the totaling unit 261 will be described later.

  The threshold determination unit 262 refers to the aggregation information for each question by the aggregation unit 261 and the threshold database 240, and for each question, determines whether or not the corresponding threshold is exceeded for each of the average number of executions and the average answer time. judge.

  The question extraction unit 263 includes a learning ID and a question ID included in the aggregate information determined by the threshold determination unit 262 to determine that either the average number of executions or the average answer time, or both exceed the corresponding threshold, and learning Learning content information having the same ID and question ID is extracted from the learning content database 220.

  The ID generation unit 264 sets the learning ID included in the learning content information extracted by the question extraction unit 263 as a new learning ID, and sets the learning content information including the newly assigned learning ID. The learning ID of the present embodiment includes a value indicating the number of times of execution of the corresponding learning content.

  The question registration unit 265 registers (stores) learning content information including the learning ID assigned by the ID generation unit 264 in the learning content database 220.

  In the present embodiment, the learning content information registered by the question registration unit 265 and including the learning ID assigned by the ID generation unit 264 is learning content information to be distributed to the student terminal 300. Therefore, the question extraction unit 263 of this embodiment extracts learning content information that is redistributed to the student terminal 300.

  When the database update unit 266 acquires the learning history information from the student terminal 300, the database updating unit 266 updates the learning history database 230.

  Next, the functional configuration of the student terminal 300 will be described. The student terminal 300 according to the present embodiment includes a learning processing unit 310. The learning processing unit 310 is realized by the arithmetic processing device of the student terminal 300 executing a learning program stored in a memory device or the like. The learning program may be downloaded from the learning support server 200 to the student terminal 300, for example.

  The learning processing unit 310 according to the present embodiment includes an input receiving unit 311, a learning content acquisition unit 312, a display control unit 313, a time measurement unit 314, a correctness determination unit 315, and a learning history transmission unit 316.

  The input receiving unit 311 receives input to the student terminal 300. Specifically, the input receiving unit 311 receives an input of an answer to a question at the student terminal 300. The input reception unit 311 receives selection of learning content.

  The learning content acquisition unit 312 acquires learning content information corresponding to the selected learning content. The display control unit 313 displays a question answer screen on the student terminal 300 based on the acquired learning content information.

  The time measurement unit 314 measures the time from when the question answer screen is displayed until the correct answer is input on the student terminal 300.

  The correctness determination unit 315 refers to the acquired learning content information and determines whether or not the input answer is correct. Specifically, the correctness determination unit 315 performs correctness determination when the acquired learning content information includes the value of the item “correct answer” and does not include the value of the item “correct answer”. It is assumed that correct / incorrect determination is not performed.

  In addition, the correctness determination unit 315 determines whether or not the input answer is correct when it is determined that correctness is determined.

  The learning history transmission unit 316 transmits learning history information indicating a result of an approach to learning content in the student terminal 300. Specifically, for each question, the student terminal 300 associates the number of times the answer has been repeated before answering correctly, the time measured by the time measurement unit 314, the learning ID, the question ID, and the student ID, and learning history information. The learning history information is transmitted to the learning support server 200.

  Next, operations of the learning support server 200 and the student terminal 300 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10. First, the operation of the student terminal 300 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 9 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the student terminal according to the first embodiment. The student terminal 300 according to the present embodiment receives an input of a learning ID to be tackled by the input receiving unit 311 of the learning processing unit 310 (step S901). Subsequently, the learning processing unit 310 acquires learning content information corresponding to the input learning ID by the learning content acquisition unit 312, and causes the display control unit 313 to display an answer screen including the question (step S902).

  Subsequently, the learning processing unit 310 starts time measurement by the time measurement unit 314 (step S903). Subsequently, the input receiving unit 311 receives an input of an answer (step S904). Subsequently, the learning processing unit 310 ends the time measurement by the time measurement unit 314 (step S905).

  Next, the learning processing unit 310 determines whether the correctness determination of the input answer is performed by the correctness determination unit 315 (step S906). Specifically, the correctness determination unit 315 determines whether or not the value of the item “correct answer” is included in the learning content information including the question displayed in step S902.

  If it is determined in step S906 that correct / incorrect determination is not performed, the learning processing unit 310 proceeds to step S909 described later.

  If it is determined in step S906 that correct / incorrect determination is to be performed, the learning processing unit 310 performs correct / incorrect determination using the correct / incorrect determination unit 315 to determine whether the answer is correct (step S907).

  Subsequently, if the answer is not correct as a result of the correctness determination by the correctness determination unit 315 (step S908), the learning processing unit 310 returns to step S903. In addition, when the answer is correct, the learning processing unit 310 determines whether or not the answer has been received for all the questions included in the acquired learning content information (step S909).

  If it is determined in step S909 that answers have not been received for all questions, the learning processing unit 310 returns to step S902 to display an answer screen including the next question.

  In step S909, when answers to all questions are received, the learning processing unit 310 transmits learning history information to the learning support server 200 by the learning history transmitting unit 316 (step S910), and the process is terminated. Specifically, for each question, the learning history transmission unit 316 counts the number of times the answer is input, the time from when the answer screen is displayed until the correct answer is input, the question ID, the student ID, and the learning. The learning history information associated with the ID is transmitted to the learning support server 200. In the learning support server 200, the learning history information is stored in the learning history database 230.

  Next, processing of the learning support server 200 of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 10 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the learning support server of the first embodiment.

  When the learning support processing unit 260 of the learning support server 200 according to the present embodiment receives the totaling instruction (step S1001), the totaling unit 261 uses the totaling item 261 to determine the value of the item “execution count” and the items from the learning history database 230. The value of “answer time” is acquired (step S1002).

  Here, a totaling instruction to the learning support processing unit 260 of the present embodiment will be described. The aggregation instruction of the present embodiment may be performed by a teacher at the teacher terminal 400, for example. In this case, the learning support server 200 accepts an aggregation instruction input at the teacher terminal 400.

  Further, the aggregation instruction according to the present embodiment may be given to the learning support processing unit 260 when the learning support server 200 detects that the predetermined time has come, for example.

  When the teacher terminal 400 gives a total instruction, for example, the teacher gives guidance to a plurality of students so as to tackle the learning content, and after the learning by the plurality of students is finished, the teacher gives a problem with a low degree of understanding. For example, when trying to extract.

  More specifically, for example, a case where a review of the learning content set as the homework in the class of the previous day is performed in the class of the next day. In this case, the teacher can give a totaling instruction to the learning support server 200, extract a problem with a low level of understanding, and allow the student to work on it again, thereby raising the level of understanding of the learning content in the entire class. Can do.

  Further, the case where the totaling instruction is given at a predetermined time is, for example, a case where the teacher sets the time for totaling in advance. In the present embodiment, for example, if the time for aggregation is set to a time before the start of the class, such as 8 o'clock every morning, a learning material (learning content) for reviewing the previous day's learning content at a predetermined time every morning ) Will be prepared before class.

  Next, the learning support processing unit 260 calculates the average number of executions and the average answer time for each question by the totaling unit 261, and stores it in the totaling database 250 (step S1003).

  In the present embodiment, the counting unit 261 calculates the average number of executions and the average answer time from the acquired number of executions and the answer time. However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the totaling unit 261 may calculate each of the average execution count and the average answer count after excluding the minimum value and the maximum value from the acquired execution count and answer time.

  Subsequently, the learning support processing unit 260 uses the threshold determination unit 262 to determine whether or not the average number of executions of the question exceeds a threshold corresponding to the item “number of executions” in the threshold database 240 (whether or not it is greater than the threshold). Determination is made (step S1004). In step S1004, when the threshold value is not exceeded (below the threshold value), the learning support processing unit 260 proceeds to step S1006 described later.

  In step S1004, when the threshold value is exceeded, the learning support processing unit 260 uses the question extraction unit 263 to extract the corresponding question (step S1005). Specifically, the question extraction unit 263 becomes a target of redistribution of learning content information including a learning ID and a question ID corresponding to the average number of executions compared with the threshold value from the learning content database 220 to the student terminal 300. Extracted as learning content information.

  Next, the learning support processing unit 260 determines whether or not the average answer time of the question exceeds the threshold corresponding to the item “answer time” of the threshold value database 240 by the threshold value determination unit 262 (step S1006). If the threshold is not exceeded in step S1006, the learning support processing unit 260 proceeds to step S1008 described later.

  If the threshold value is exceeded in step S1006, the learning support processing unit 260 uses the question extraction unit 263 to extract the corresponding question (step S1007). Specifically, the question extraction unit 263 extracts learning content information including a learning ID and a question ID corresponding to the average answer time compared with the threshold from the learning content database 220.

  Subsequently, the learning support processing unit 260 determines whether or not the processing up to step S1007 has been completed for all questions (step S1008). In step S1008, when the processing has not been completed for all questions, the learning support processing unit 260 returns to step S1003.

  In step S1008, when the processing is completed for all questions, the learning support processing unit 260 generates a new learning ID by the ID generation unit 264 (step S1009). Specifically, the ID generation unit 264 newly generates a learning ID that indicates the number of times the learning content indicated by the learning ID included in the extracted learning content information.

  Next, the learning support processing unit 260 stores the extracted learning content information in the learning content database 220 in association with the new learning ID by the question registration unit 265 (step S1010), and ends the process.

  Next, with reference to FIGS. 11 and 12, the operation of the student terminal 300 and the operation of the learning support server 200 according to the present embodiment will be specifically described.

  FIG. 11 is a first diagram illustrating a display example of a student terminal according to the first embodiment. A screen 111-1 shown in FIG. 11A shows an example of an answer screen for the question with the learning ID “0001-1” and the question ID “001”. A screen 111-2 illustrated in FIG. 11B illustrates an example of an answer screen for a question with a learning ID “0001-1” and a question ID “002”.

  Each of the screens 111-1 and 111-2 includes answer fields 112-1 and 112-2 for inputting an answer to the question, buttons 113-1 and 113-2 for requesting correct / incorrect determination, and an answer screen for the next question. Buttons 114-1 and 114-2 to be changed to are displayed.

  In the student terminal 300 of the present embodiment, the learning processing unit 310 uses, for example, the learning ID “0001-1” as the time from when the screen 111-1 is displayed on the student terminal 300 until the button 114-1 is operated. , And measured as the answer time for the question with the question ID “001”.

  In addition, the learning processing unit 310 according to the present embodiment deletes the answer input in the answer column 112-1 if the answer is not correct as a result of performing the correct / incorrect determination by operating the button 113-1. The column 112-1 may be blank again. In the present embodiment, the number of times the answer is input to the answer column 112-1 may be counted as the number of times the answer is executed.

  Further, in the present embodiment, when the answer is correct as a result of the correct determination made by operating the button 113-1, the button 114-1 may be operated.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram for specifically explaining the operation of the learning support server. FIG. 12 shows an example in which learning content information associated with a new learning ID is registered in the learning content database 220. The process for registering learning content information associated with a new learning ID will be specifically described below.

  The learning content database 220 of this embodiment stores the learning content of the learning ID “0001” having a plurality of questions (see FIG. 4). In addition, the result of each student working on the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1” is stored in the learning history database 230 (see FIG. 5).

  When the learning support server 200 accepts the instruction for counting the learning history information, the learning support server 200 counts the number of executions and the answer time of the learning history database 230 for each question ID, and stores the average number of times of execution and the average answer time for each question ID in the tabulation database 250. Store.

  In the total database 250, in the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1”, the average number of executions of the question with the question ID “001” is 1.3333, and the average answer time is 12.5 seconds. Further, in the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1”, the average number of executions of the question with the question ID “002” is 2.0, and the average answer time is 12 seconds (FIG. 7).

  When the learning support database 200 completes the aggregation of the learning history database 230, the learning support server 200 refers to the threshold database 240 and determines whether the average number of executions and the average answer time for each question exceed the threshold.

  In the present embodiment, the threshold for the average number of executions is 1.5, and the threshold for the average answer time is 20 seconds (see FIG. 6).

  Therefore, the learning support server 200 extracts the question ID “002” having an average execution count of 2.0 times and exceeding the threshold value 1.5 times in the aggregation database 250, and learning ID “0001−” from the learning content database 220. 1 ”and learning content information including question ID“ 002 ”are extracted. Further, the learning support server 200 extracts the question ID “003” having an average answer time of 21.25 seconds and exceeding the threshold of 20 seconds in the total database 250, and learning ID “0001-1” from the learning content database 220. ”And learning content information including question ID“ 003 ”are extracted.

  Then, the learning support server 200 generates a new learning ID “0001-2” for the learning ID “0001-1” of the learning content information including the learning ID “0001-1” and the question ID “002”. In the present embodiment, the value following the learning ID “0001-” indicates the number of times the learning content indicated by the learning ID “0001” has been performed.

  For example, the learning ID “0001-1” indicates that it is provided to the student terminal 300 when the learning content indicated by the learning ID “0001” is performed for the first time. The learning ID “0001-2” indicates that it is provided to the student terminal 300 when the learning content indicated by the learning ID “0001” is performed for the second time.

  The learning support server 200 newly stores learning content information with the learning ID “0001-2” as the learning ID of the learning content information including the learning ID “0001-1” and the question ID “002” in the learning content database 220. To do. In addition, the learning support server 200 newly sets the learning content information 220 with the learning ID “0001-2” as the learning ID of the learning content information including the learning ID “0001-1” and the question ID “003”. To store.

  The learning content database 220-1 in FIG. 12 shows a state in which learning content information is newly stored.

  In the learning content database 220-1, it can be seen that the learning content 221 of the learning ID “0001-2” is stored.

  The questions included in the learning content 221 are determined to be questions with a low level of understanding and a lack of understanding based on the results of learning history information of the students of the class in the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1”. It is a question. In other words, the questions included in the learning content 221 are questions that correspond to questions that many students answered repeatedly to answer correctly, questions that many students took time to answer, or both. .

  In the present embodiment, for example, as a review of the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1” by the teacher, the learning content 221 is implemented by all the students, so that the understanding is fixed in the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1”. Students can repeatedly ask questions that are determined to be missing.

  Therefore, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to improve the understanding level of the learning content in the entire class.

  Hereinafter, with reference to FIG. 13, a case where the learning content is repeatedly performed in the student terminal 300 will be described.

  FIG. 13 is a second diagram illustrating a display example of the student terminal according to the first embodiment. 13A and 13B show examples of learning ID selection screens on the student terminal 300. FIG. A screen 131-1 illustrated in FIG. 13A illustrates an example of a screen for selecting the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1”. A screen 131-2 illustrated in FIG. 13B illustrates an example of a screen for selecting the learning content of the learning ID “0001-2”.

  On the screen 131-1, a button 132-1 for selecting the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1” is displayed. When the button 132-1 is operated, the student terminal 300 acquires the learning content including the learning content information to which the learning ID “0001-1” is assigned, and executes the processing illustrated in FIG.

  In the student terminal 300, the learning support processing unit 260 learns the learning content 221 including the learning content information of the learning ID “0001-2” from the totaling result of the learning history information corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1”. When stored in the content database 220, a button 132-2 for selecting the learning content 221 is displayed as in the screen 131-2.

  On the screen 131-2, the button 132-1 is displayed in a state where it cannot be selected. Therefore, it can be seen on the screen 131-2 that the learning content of the learning ID “0001-1” has been completed. When the button 132-2 is selected on the screen 131-2, the student terminal 300 acquires the learning content 221 and executes the process of FIG.

  In the present embodiment, the learning ID generated by the ID generation unit 264 includes a value indicating the number of times the learning content has been performed. However, the present invention is not limited to this. The learning ID generated by the ID generation unit 264 of the present embodiment may be a learning ID that is different from the learning ID indicating the learning content performed last time.

  In the present embodiment, the learning support processing unit 260 may aggregate learning history information and generate learning contents to be implemented until there are no more questions to be extracted. Specifically, for example, the learning support processing unit 260 according to the present embodiment determines the learning history until there is no student who repeats an answer to correct the question included in the learning content or a student who takes time to answer. You may repeat the process which totals information and produces | generates the learning content to implement. In this way, by repeatedly carrying out the learning content, it is possible to establish an understanding of the question.

  For example, in the present embodiment, when the learning history information of the learning content 221 is stored in the learning history database 230 and an aggregation instruction is given, the learning support processing unit 260 causes each question included in the learning ID “0001-2”. Then, the average number of executions and the average answer time are totaled, and each is compared with a threshold value.

  Then, when one or both of the average number of executions and the average answer time exceed the threshold, the learning support processing unit 260 learns the learning content information including the learning ID “0001-2” and the corresponding question ID. The learning content information in which “0001-3” is newly stored in the learning content database 220.

  Then, the learning content of learning ID “0001-3” is stored in the learning content database 220-1. The teacher causes the student to perform the learning content of the learning ID “0001-3”, so that even if the learning content 221 is implemented as the first review, the teacher has learned again about the question that has not yet fully understood. Can be made.

  In the present embodiment, the learning support server 200 and the teacher terminal 400 are separate devices, but the present invention is not limited to this. The teacher terminal 400 may also serve as the learning support server 200, or the learning support server 200 may serve as the teacher terminal 400.

(Second embodiment)
The second embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that the threshold value is changed according to the number of times the learning content is performed. In the following description of the second embodiment, only differences from the first embodiment will be described, and those having the same functional configuration as the first embodiment will be used in the description of the first embodiment. The description is omitted.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a system configuration of the learning support system according to the second embodiment.

  The learning support system 100A of this embodiment includes a learning support server 200A. The learning support server 200A includes a threshold database 240A instead of the threshold database 240 included in the learning support server 200 of the first embodiment. In addition, the learning support server 200A of the present embodiment includes a learning support processing unit 260A.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a threshold database according to the second embodiment. The threshold database 240A of the present embodiment includes items, threshold 1, threshold 2, and threshold 3 as information items. The value of the item “threshold value 1” indicates a threshold value corresponding to the learning content performed for the first time. Specifically, for example, the value of the item “threshold 1” is a value that is compared with the average number of executions and the average answer time of the aggregate information totaled from the learning history information indicating the result of executing the learning ID “0001-1”. is there. In the item “threshold 1”, the value corresponding to the average number of executions is 1.5, and the value corresponding to the average answer time is 20 seconds.

  The value of the item “threshold value 2” indicates a threshold value corresponding to the content of learning performed the second time. That is, the value of the item “threshold value 2” is a value that is compared with the average number of executions and the average answer time of the aggregate information totaled from the learning history information indicating the result of executing the learning ID “0001-2”. In the item “threshold value 2”, the value corresponding to the average number of executions is 1.3 times, and the value corresponding to the average answer time is 18 seconds.

  The value of the item “threshold value 3” indicates a threshold value corresponding to the learning content performed for the third time. That is, the value of the item “threshold value 3” is a value that is compared with the average number of executions and the average answer time of the aggregated information totaled from the learning history information indicating the result of executing the learning ID “0001-3”. In the item “threshold 3”, the value corresponding to the average number of executions is 1.1 times, and the value corresponding to the average answering time is 15 seconds.

  As described above, in the threshold value database 240A of the present embodiment, the threshold value used when extracting questions decreases as the number of learning history aggregations increases.

  Next, a functional configuration of the learning support server 200A of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating the functional configuration of the learning support server according to the second embodiment.

  The learning support server 200A of the present embodiment includes a learning support processing unit 260A. The learning support processing unit 260A of the present embodiment includes a threshold acquisition unit 267 in addition to the units included in the learning support processing unit 260 of the first embodiment.

  The threshold acquisition unit 267 according to the present embodiment refers to the learning ID included in the aggregation information and the threshold database 240A, and acquires a threshold used for determination by the threshold determination unit 262.

  Hereinafter, the operation of the learning support server 200A according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 17 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the learning support server of the second embodiment.

  The processing in step S1701 and step S1702 in FIG. 17 is the same as the processing in step S1001 and step S1002 in FIG.

  Subsequent to step S1702, the learning support processing unit 260A uses the threshold acquisition unit 267 to acquire the learning ID of the learning history information from which the values of the items “execution count” and “answer time” are acquired from the learning history database 230, and the threshold database. The threshold corresponding to the learning ID is acquired with reference to 240A (step S1703).

  Specifically, for example, when the learning ID of the learning history information that acquired the values of the items “execution count” and “answer time” is “0001-1”, the threshold acquisition unit 267 sets the item from the threshold database 240A. The value of “threshold 1” is acquired. Further, for example, when the learning ID of the learning history information that acquired the values of the items “execution count” and “answer time” is “0001-2”, the threshold acquisition unit 267 reads the item “threshold 2” from the threshold database 240A. ”Is obtained.

  The processing from step S1704 to step S1711 in FIG. 17 is the same as the processing from step S1003 to step S1010 in FIG.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, the threshold used for the question extraction determination is reduced in accordance with the number of times the learning history information is aggregated. In other words, in the present embodiment, as the number of times of tackling the same learning content increases, it is required to answer with a small number of times of implementation and a short answer time in order to determine that the understanding is firmly established. .

  For example, it is expected that the questions extracted from the learning content will usually decrease each time the data is collected. It is presumed that the level of the class is low, the class has a standard understanding, but the understanding of a specific student is extremely behind. For example, when the number of questions that are extracted each time data is collected decreases, it is assumed that the understanding of the entire class has been firmly established.

  In this way, in this embodiment, as the number of times of tackling the same learning content increases, the condition for determining that the learning content is understood becomes stricter, so the teacher understands the degree of improvement of the student's understanding level. be able to.

  In the present embodiment, the threshold value of the threshold value database 240A is set in advance, but the present invention is not limited to this. The threshold value of the threshold value database 240A may be changed, for example, by a teacher, or may be calculated with reference to the threshold value used for the previous learning every time a learning ID is generated.

(Third embodiment)
The third embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. In the third embodiment, as items of learning history information, an item indicating whether or not a hint has been referred to a question, an item indicating whether or not an answer has been made to the next question, and whether or not the answer is correct The point which added the item to show differs from 2nd embodiment. Therefore, in the following description of the third embodiment, only differences from the second embodiment will be described, and those having the same functional configuration as the description of the second embodiment will be described in the second embodiment. The same reference numerals as those used in the description are given, and the description thereof is omitted.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an example of a system configuration of the learning support system according to the third embodiment.

  The learning support system 100B of this embodiment includes a learning support server 200B and a student terminal 300A. The learning support server 200 of the present embodiment includes a learning content database 220A, a learning history database 230A, a threshold database 240B, a totaling database 250A, and a learning support processing unit 260B. The student terminal 300A of the present embodiment has a learning processing unit 310A.

  Below, with reference to FIG. 19 thru | or FIG. 22, each database which the learning assistance server 200B of this embodiment has is demonstrated.

  FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating an example of a learning content database according to the third embodiment. The learning content database 220 </ b> A of the present embodiment includes an item “hint” as an item of information in addition to each item of the learning content database 220.

  The value of the item “hint” indicates information that suggests an answer to the corresponding question content. In the following description, information that is the value of the item “hint” is referred to as hint information.

  FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating an example of a learning history database according to the third embodiment. The learning history database 230A according to the present embodiment includes items “hint reference presence / absence”, “giving up”, and “correct / incorrect” in addition to each item of the learning history database 230 as information items.

  The value of the item “hint reference presence / absence” indicates whether or not the hint information is referred to when answering the question content of the corresponding question ID in the student terminal 300A of the corresponding student ID. Specifically, when the value of the item “hint reference presence / absence” is “1”, it indicates that the hint information is referred to, and when the value of the item “hint reference presence / absence” is “0”, the hint information is Indicates that it was not referenced.

  The value of the item “Give Up” indicates whether or not the student terminal 300A of the corresponding student ID has advanced to the next question without answering the question content of the corresponding question ID. Specifically, the value of the item “Give Up” indicates whether or not a give up button described later has been operated. Specifically, when the value of the item “Give Up” is “1”, it indicates that the give up button has been operated. When the value of the item “Give Up” is “0”, the give up button has not been operated. It shows that.

  The value of the item “correct / incorrect” indicates whether or not the answer input at the student terminal 300A of the corresponding student ID is correct. Specifically, when the value of the item “correct” is “1”, it indicates that the answer is correct, and when the value of the item “correct” is “0”, it indicates that the answer is incorrect. Show.

  In the following description of the present embodiment, information including the value of the item “question ID” and the values of other items in the learning history database 230A is referred to as learning history information. In other words, the learning history information of the present embodiment includes, for each question, information indicating whether hint information has been referred to, information indicating whether a give-up operation has been performed, and information indicating whether the answer is correct.

  FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating an example of a threshold database according to the third embodiment. The threshold database 240B of the present embodiment includes “hint reference rate”, “give-up rate”, and “correct answer rate” as the value of the item “item” in addition to the value of the item “item” included in the threshold database 240A. In the threshold database 240B, threshold 1, threshold 2, and threshold 3 are associated with “hint reference rate”, “giving up rate”, and “correct answer rate”, respectively.

  In the present embodiment, the threshold value 1 corresponding to each of the “hint reference rate”, “give-up rate”, and “correct answer rate” is a threshold value used for the first aggregation of learning history information. In addition, the threshold value 2 corresponding to each of the “hint reference rate”, “giving up rate”, and “correct answer rate” is a threshold value used in the second aggregation of learning history information. Further, the threshold value 3 corresponding to each of the “hint reference rate”, “giving up rate”, and “correct answer rate” is a threshold value used for the third totalization of the learning history information.

  FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating an example of a summary database according to the third embodiment. The aggregation database 250A of the present embodiment includes items “hint reference rate”, “give-up rate”, and “correct answer rate” as information items in addition to the items included in the aggregation database 250.

  The value of the item “hint reference rate” indicates the rate at which the hint information for each question is referred to in the learning history database 230A. In other words, the value of the item “hint reference rate” indicates the ratio of the students who referred to the hint information among all the students who worked on the learning contents for each question.

  The value of the item “give-up rate” indicates the rate at which the give-up button for each question is operated in the learning history database 230A. In other words, the value of the item “Give-Up Rate” indicates the ratio of students who gave up among all the students who worked on the learning content for each question.

  The value of the item “correct answer rate” indicates the correct answer rate for each question in the learning history database 230A. In other words, the value of the item “correct answer rate” indicates the ratio of students whose answers are correct among all the students who have worked on the learning content for each question.

  In the following description of the present embodiment, information including the value of the item “question ID” and the values of other items in the aggregation database 250A is referred to as aggregation information. In other words, the aggregate information of the present embodiment is information including the average number of executions for each question, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct answer rate.

  Next, the functional configuration of the learning support server 200B of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating the functional configuration of each device included in the learning support system according to the third embodiment.

  First, the functional configuration of the learning support server 200B will be described. The learning support processing unit 260B of the learning support server 200B according to this embodiment includes a totaling unit 261A, a threshold determination unit 262A, a question extraction unit 263A, an ID generation unit 264, a question registration unit 265, a database update unit 266, and a threshold acquisition unit 267A. Have.

  The totaling unit 261A of the present exemplary embodiment totals the learning history information stored in the learning history database 230A for each question. Specifically, the totaling unit 261A calculates the average number of executions, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct answer rate for each question.

  Whether the threshold determination unit 262A exceeds the threshold with reference to the threshold database 240B for each of the average number of executions, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct rate for each question compiled by the counting unit 261A Determine.

  The question extraction unit 263A extracts the question ID according to the determination result by the threshold determination unit 262A. The threshold acquisition unit 267A refers to the threshold database 240B and acquires respective thresholds of the average number of executions, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct answer rate corresponding to the learning ID.

  Next, the functional configuration of the student terminal 300A will be described. The learning processing unit 310A of the student terminal 300A according to the present embodiment includes a learning history transmission unit 316A instead of the learning history transmission unit 316 included in the learning processing unit 310.

  The learning history transmission unit 316A according to the present embodiment transmits learning history information indicating a result of an approach to learning content in the student terminal 300A. Specifically, the learning history transmission unit 316A includes the number of times of execution for each question, the answer time, information indicating whether a reference instruction for hint information has been received, and information indicating whether an operation on the give-up button has been received. The learning history information is associated with information indicating whether the answer is correct, and the learning history information is transmitted to the learning support server 200B.

  Next, the operation of each device in the learning support system 100B of this embodiment will be described. FIG. 24 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the student terminal according to the third embodiment.

  In FIG. 24, the processing from step S2401 to step S2403 is the same as the processing from step S901 to step S903 in FIG.

  The learning processing unit 310A of the present embodiment determines whether or not the input receiving unit 311 has received an input of an answer to the question (step S2404). In step S2404, when the input of the answer is not accepted, the learning processing unit 310A proceeds to step S2410 described later.

  In step S2404, when the input of the answer is received, the learning processing unit 310A determines whether a display switching instruction is received by the input receiving unit 311 (step S2405). In step S2405, when the switching instruction is not received, the learning processing unit 310A returns to step S2404.

  In step S2405, when a switching instruction is received, the learning processing unit 310A ends the time measurement by the time measurement unit 314 (step S2406). Subsequently, in the learning processing unit 310A, the correctness determination unit 315 determines whether the input answer is correct (step S2407).

  Next, the learning processing unit 310A determines whether or not all questions have been answered (step S2408). If it is determined in step S2408 that all the questions have not been answered, the learning processing unit 310A returns to step S2402.

  If all questions are answered in step S2408, the learning processing unit 310A transmits learning history information to the learning support server 200B (step S2409), and the process ends.

  In step S2404, if the answer input is not accepted, the learning processing unit 310A determines whether the input accepting unit 311 has accepted the input of the hint information reference instruction (step S2410). In step S2410, when the reference instruction is received, the display control unit 313 displays the hint information acquired together with the learning content on the student terminal 300A (step S2411), and the process returns to step S2404.

  If the reference instruction has not been received in step S2410, the learning processing unit 310A determines whether the input receiving unit 311 has received an input of a give-up instruction (step S2412). If it is determined in step S2412 that no give-up instruction has been input, the learning processing unit 310A returns to step S2404.

  In step S2412, when receiving an input of give-up instruction, the learning processing unit 310A ends the time measurement by the time measurement unit 314 (step S2413), and proceeds to step S2408.

  Next, the operation of the learning support server 200B of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 25 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the learning support server according to the third embodiment.

  When the learning support processing unit 260B of the present embodiment receives the aggregation instruction (step S2501), the aggregation unit 261A acquires learning history information of all the students from the learning history database 230 (step S2502). The learning history information of the present embodiment includes information indicating whether or not the hint information has been referred to, information indicating whether or not a give-up instruction has been performed, and information indicating whether or not the answer is correct.

  Next, the learning support processing unit 260B acquires threshold information from the threshold database 240B by the threshold acquisition unit 267A (step S2503). Subsequently, in the learning support processing unit 260B, the totaling unit 261A calculates the average number of executions for each question, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct answer rate based on the learning history information acquired in Step S2502 (Step S2502). S2504).

  The processing from step S2505 to step S2508 following step S2504 is the same as the processing from step S1705 to step S1708 in FIG.

  Subsequent to step S2508, the learning support processing unit 260B determines whether the hint reference rate of the question exceeds the threshold by the threshold determination unit 262A (step S2509). In step S2509, when the hint reference rate is larger than the threshold value, the learning support processing unit 260B causes the question extraction unit 263A to extract the question ID of the corresponding question (step S2510).

  In step S2509, when the hint reference rate is equal to or less than the threshold, the learning support processing unit 260B proceeds to step S2511 described later.

  Subsequent to step S2510, the learning support processing unit 260B determines whether the give-up rate of the question exceeds the threshold by the threshold determination unit 262A (step S2511). If the give-up rate is greater than the threshold value in step S2511, the learning support processing unit 260B extracts the question ID of the corresponding question using the question extraction unit 263A (step S2512).

  If the give-up rate is equal to or less than the threshold value in step S2510, the learning support processing unit 260B proceeds to step S2513 described later.

  Subsequent to step S2512, the learning support processing unit 260B determines whether the correct answer rate of the question is equal to or less than the threshold by the threshold determination unit 262A (step S2513). In step S2513, when the correct answer rate is equal to or less than the threshold value, the learning support processing unit 260B causes the question extraction unit 263A to extract the question ID of the corresponding question (step S2514).

  In step S2513, when the accuracy rate is not less than or equal to the threshold value, that is, when the accuracy rate is greater than the threshold value, the learning support processing unit 260B proceeds to step S2515 described later.

  The processing from step S2515 to step S2517 is the same as the processing from step S1709 to step S1711 in FIG.

  Hereinafter, the processing of the learning support processing unit 260B of the present embodiment will be specifically described with reference to FIGS.

  In the total database 250A shown in FIG. 22, the question ID “004” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1” has an average execution count of 1.3333 and an average answer time of 12.5 seconds. The rate is 67%, the give-up is 0%, and the accuracy rate is 100%.

  Here, the threshold acquisition unit 267A acquires the threshold corresponding to the threshold 1 because the learning ID is “0001-1”.

  In the question ID “004” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1”, the hint reference rate is 67%, which exceeds the threshold value of 50%. In addition, the average number of executions other than that, the average answer time, and the give-up rate do not exceed the threshold value, and the correct answer rate is equal to or less than the threshold value.

  Therefore, in this embodiment, the question ID “004” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1” is extracted because the hint reference rate has exceeded the threshold, and the learning ID corresponding to the learning content to be performed again. Corresponding to “0001-2”.

  In the question ID “004” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1”, the correct answer rate is high, and the average number of executions, average answer time, and give-up rate are less than or equal to the threshold value. However, the hint reference rate exceeds the threshold value. This indicates that there are many students who quickly derived the correct answer by referring to the hint information, and it cannot be said that the understanding has actually taken root.

  Further, in the total database 250A, the question ID “005” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1” is the extraction target because the give-up rate exceeds the threshold.

  This indicates that there were a certain number of students who gave up trying to tackle this question over and over again, and it cannot be said that understanding has been firmly established.

  Further, in the total database 250A, the question ID “006” corresponding to the learning ID “0001-1” is the extraction target because the correct answer rate is equal to or less than the threshold value.

  This indicates that there were a certain number of students who could not lead to the correct answer of this question within the average number of implementations and average answer time, and it cannot be said that the understanding is firmly established.

  As described above, in this embodiment, by increasing the number of items used for determining whether or not to extract a question, it is possible to improve the accuracy of extracting a problem whose understanding has not been established. In other words, in the present embodiment, it is possible to extract questions that cannot be extracted by comparing the average number of executions, the average answer time, and the respective thresholds, although the understanding is not sufficiently fixed.

  Next, a display example of the screen of the student terminal 300A of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 26 is a diagram illustrating a display example of a student terminal according to the third embodiment. A screen 111-1 </ b> A illustrated in FIG. 26A illustrates an example of an answer screen for a question with a learning ID “0001-1” and a question ID “001”. A screen 111-2A illustrated in FIG. 26B illustrates an example of an answer screen for the question with the learning ID “0001-1” and the question ID “001”.

  On each of screens 111-1A and 111-2A, give-up buttons 115-1 and 115-2 for instructing give-up and hint buttons 116-1 and 116-2 for instructing reference of hint information are displayed. .

  In the student terminal 300A of the present embodiment, for example, when the give-up button 115-1 is operated on the screen 111-1A, the learning processing unit 310A displays the answer screen for the next question while the answer column 112-1 remains blank. Switch the display.

  For example, when the hint button 116-2 is operated on the screen 111-2A, the learning processing unit 310A displays the hint information 117 in the vicinity of the answer column 112-2.

  As described above, in this embodiment, it is determined whether or not the understanding of the learning content has been established using items other than the number of times of answering the question and the answering time.

  Therefore, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to improve the accuracy of extracting a question if the understanding is not established.

  In the present embodiment, for each question extracted by counting, among the items included in the counting information, the item causing the extraction may be displayed on the teacher terminal 400. Specifically, the learning support processing unit 260 </ b> B of the present embodiment determines which item of the average number of executions, the average answer time, the hint reference rate, the give-up rate, and the correct answer rate in the tabulation information for each question extracted by tabulation. Depending on the comparison result between this value and the threshold value, it may be displayed on the teacher terminal 400 whether or not the question has been extracted.

  In the present embodiment, by causing the teacher terminal 400 to display the cause item that is the extraction target, it is possible to present the teacher's understanding of the question to the teacher for each question.

In the disclosed technology, forms such as the following supplementary notes are conceivable.
(Appendix 1)
From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question A process of counting the number of answers,
A process of extracting second learning content information including questions determined to be redistributed to the plurality of terminal devices from the first learning content information based on the totaled results;
A learning support program for causing a computer to execute a process of storing the second learning content information in a storage device.
(Appendix 2)
The process of counting is
From the answer time and the number of answers for each question, including the process of calculating the average answer time and the average number of answers for each question,
The extraction process is:
The learning support according to appendix 1, wherein a question in which at least one of the average answer time or the average answer count is larger than a threshold set for each of the average answer time and the average answer count is determined as a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices. program.
(Appendix 3)
The storing process is:
The learning support program according to appendix 1 or 2, wherein a learning identifier different from a learning identifier included in the first learning content information is assigned to the second learning content information and stored in the storage device.
(Appendix 4)
The learning identifier is
The learning support program according to supplementary note 3, including a value indicating the number of times corresponding learning content information is distributed to the plurality of terminal devices.
(Appendix 5)
In the storage device, an answer time threshold value compared with the average answer time and an answer number threshold value compared with the average answer number are stored in association with each other,
The answer time threshold and the answer count threshold are:
The learning support program according to appendix 4, which is set for each value indicating the number of times included in the learning identifier.
(Appendix 6)
The learning support program according to supplementary note 5, wherein the answer time threshold value and the answer frequency threshold value become smaller each time the value indicating the number becomes larger.
(Appendix 7)
The learning history information is
Hint presence / absence information indicating whether or not an instruction to refer to hint information for the question has been performed, and give-up information indicating whether or not an instruction to leave the question unanswered has been performed,
The process of counting is
Hint reference rate indicating the rate at which hint information is obtained for each question and the give-up information is obtained and the hint information is instructed, and the rate at which the question is left unanswered A give-up rate for each question,
The extraction process is:
Any one of appendices 1 to 6, wherein a question in which at least one of the hint reference rate and the give-up rate is larger than a threshold set for each of the hint reference rate and the give-up rate is determined as a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices. The learning support program described in the section.
(Appendix 8)
The learning history information is
Including correct / incorrect information indicating correct / incorrect answer to the question,
The process of counting is
Obtaining the correct / incorrect information, and calculating a correct answer rate indicating a ratio that the answer is correct for each question,
The extraction process is:
The learning support program according to appendix 7, wherein a question with which the correct answer rate is equal to or less than a threshold set for the correct answer rate is determined as a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices.
(Appendix 9)
From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question A counting unit that counts the number of answers;
Based on the totaled results, from the first learning content information, an extraction unit that extracts second learning content information including a question determined to be a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices;
And a storage unit that stores the second learning content information in a storage device.
(Appendix 10)
A computer-aided learning support method comprising:
From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question Total the number of answers,
Based on the totaled results, from the first learning content information, second learning content information including a question determined to be a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices is extracted.
A learning support method for storing the second learning content information in a storage device.
(Appendix 11)
A learning support method by a learning support system having a learning support device and a plurality of terminal devices,
Each of the plurality of terminal devices
Obtaining the answer time and the number of answers for each of a plurality of questions included in the first learning content information distributed from the learning support device, and transmitting to the learning support device;
The learning support device totals the answer time and the number of answers for each question,
Based on the totaled results, from the first learning content information, second learning content information including a question determined to be a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices is extracted.
A learning support method for storing the second learning content information in a storage device.

  The present invention is not limited to the specifically disclosed embodiments, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the claims.

100, 100A, 100B Learning support system 200, 200A, 200B Learning support server 210 Student database 220, 220A Learning content database 230, 230A Learning history database 240, 240A, 240B Threshold database 250, 250A Aggregation database 260, 260A, 260B Learning support Processing unit 261, 261A Totaling unit 262, 262A Threshold judgment unit 263, 263A Question extraction unit 264 ID generation unit 265 Question registration unit 266 Database update unit 267, 267A Threshold acquisition unit 300, 300A Student terminal 310, 310A Learning processing unit 400 Teacher Terminal

Claims (5)

From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question A process of counting the number of answers,
A process of extracting second learning content information including questions determined to be redistributed to the plurality of terminal devices from the first learning content information based on the totaled results;
A learning support program for causing a computer to execute a process of storing the second learning content information in a storage device. The process of counting is
From the answer time and the number of answers for each question, including the process of calculating the average answer time and the average number of answers for each question,
The extraction process is:
The learning according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the average answer time and the average answer count is determined to be a target of redistribution to the plurality of terminal devices, with a question that is larger than a threshold set for each of them. Support program. The storing process is:
The learning support program according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a learning identifier different from a learning identifier included in the first learning content information is assigned to the second learning content information and stored in the storage device. From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question A counting unit that counts the number of answers;
Based on the totaled results, from the first learning content information, an extraction unit that extracts second learning content information including a question determined to be a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices;
And a storage unit that stores the second learning content information in a storage device. A computer-aided learning support method comprising:
From each of the plurality of terminal devices to which the first learning content information including a plurality of questions is distributed, learning history information including an answer time for each question and the number of answers is acquired, and the answer time for each question Total the number of answers,
Based on the totaled results, from the first learning content information, second learning content information including a question determined to be a redistribution target for the plurality of terminal devices is extracted.
A learning support method for storing the second learning content information in a storage device.

Images