JP2010070852A - ALLOY COMPOSITION, Fe-BASED NANO-CRYSTALLINE ALLOY, FORMING METHOD OF THE SAME AND MAGNETIC COMPONENT - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an Fe-based nano-crystalline alloy which has high saturation magnetic flux density and high magnetic permeability, and a method of forming the same. <P>SOLUTION: The alloy composition has a composition formula of Fe<SB>a</SB>B<SB>b</SB>P<SB>x</SB>C<SB>y</SB>Cu<SB>z</SB>. Parameters meet the following conditions: 79≤a≤86 at%; 5≤b≤13 at%; 0<c≤8 at%; 1≤x≤8 at%; 0≤y≤5 at%; 0.4≤z≤1.4 at% and 0.08≤z/x≤0.8. Alternatively, parameters meet the following conditions: 81≤a≤86 at%; 6≤b≤10 at%; 2≤c≤8 at%; 2≤x≤5 at%; 0≤y≤4 at%; 0.4≤z≤1.4 at% and 0.08≤z/x≤0.8. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy suitable for use in transformers, inductors, motor cores, and the like, and a method for producing the same.

  When a non-magnetic metal element such as Nb is used when obtaining a nanocrystalline alloy, there arises a problem that the saturation magnetic flux density is lowered. If the amount of Fe is increased and the amount of nonmagnetic metal elements such as Nb is decreased, the saturation magnetic flux density can be increased, but another problem that the crystal grains become coarse occurs. As an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy that clears such a problem, there is one disclosed in Patent Document 1, for example.

JP 2007-270271 A

However, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy of Patent Document 1 has a large magnetostriction of 14 × 10 ⁻⁶ and a low magnetic permeability. Further, since a large amount of crystals are precipitated in the rapidly cooled state, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy of Patent Document 1 has poor toughness.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy having a high saturation magnetic flux density and a high magnetic permeability, and a method for producing the same.

  As a result of intensive studies, the inventors of the present invention have found that a specific alloy composition can be used as a starting material for obtaining an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy having a high saturation magnetic flux density and a high magnetic permeability. . Here, the specific alloy composition is represented by a predetermined composition formula, has an amorphous phase as a main phase, and has excellent toughness. When a specific alloy composition is heat-treated, nanocrystals composed of a bccFe phase can be precipitated. This nanocrystal can significantly reduce the saturation magnetostriction of the Fe-based nanocrystal alloy. This reduced saturation magnetostriction results in high saturation flux density and high magnetic permeability. Thus, the specific alloy composition is a useful material as a starting material for obtaining an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy having a high saturation magnetic flux density and a high magnetic permeability.

One aspect of the present invention, beneficial starting material of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys, an alloy composition of the formula _{Fe a B b Si c P x} C y Cu z, 79 ≦ a ≦ 86at%, 5 ≦ b ≦ 13 at%, 0 <c ≦ 8 at%, 1 ≦ x ≦ 8 at%, 0 ≦ y ≦ 5 at%, 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.4 at%, and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.8 An alloy composition is provided.

Another aspect of the present invention, beneficial starting material of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys, an alloy composition of the formula _{Fe a B b Si c P x} C y Cu z, 81 ≦ a ≦ 86at%, 6 ≦ b ≦ 10 at%, 2 ≦ c ≦ 8 at%, 2 ≦ x ≦ 5 at%, 0 ≦ y ≦ 4 at%, 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.4 at%, and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.8 An alloy composition is provided.

  An Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy produced using any of the above alloy compositions as a starting material has a low saturation magnetostriction, a high saturation magnetic flux density, and a high magnetic permeability.

It is a figure which shows the relationship between the heat processing temperature and the coercive force Hc of the Example and comparative example of this invention. It is a copy of the high-resolution TEM image of a comparative example. The left shows an image in a state before heat treatment, and the right shows an image in a state after heat treatment. 2 is a copy of a high resolution TEM image of an embodiment of the present invention. The left shows an image in a state before heat treatment, and the right shows an image in a state after heat treatment. It is a figure which shows the DSC profile of the Example of this invention, and the DSC profile of a comparative example.

The alloy composition according to the embodiment of the present invention is suitable as a starting material for an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy and has a composition formula of Fe _a B _b Si _C P _x C _y Cu _z . Where 79 ≦ a ≦ 86 at%, 5 ≦ b ≦ 13 at%, 0 <c ≦ 8 at%, 1 ≦ x ≦ 8 at%, 0 ≦ y ≦ 5 at%, 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.4 at%, and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.8. Preferably, the following conditions are satisfied for b, c, x: 6 ≦ b ≦ 10; 2 ≦ c ≦ 8; and 2 ≦ x ≦ 5. The following conditions are preferably satisfied for y, z and z / x: 0 ≦ y ≦ 3 at%; 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.1 at%; and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.55. Note that 3 at% or less of Fe, Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Mo, W, Cr, Co, Ni, Al, Mn, Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Bi, Y, N, O In addition, among the rare earth elements, one or more elements may be substituted.

  In the above alloy composition, the Fe element is a main element and an essential element responsible for magnetism. In order to improve the saturation magnetic flux density and reduce the raw material price, it is basically preferable that the ratio of Fe is large. If the Fe ratio is less than 79 at%, a desired saturation magnetic flux density cannot be obtained. When the proportion of Fe is more than 86 at%, formation of an amorphous phase under liquid quenching conditions becomes difficult, and the crystal grain size varies or becomes coarse. That is, when the proportion of Fe is more than 86 at%, a homogeneous nanocrystalline structure cannot be obtained, and the alloy composition has deteriorated soft magnetic properties. Accordingly, the Fe ratio is desirably 79 at% or more and 86 at% or less. In particular, when a saturation magnetic flux density of 1.7 T or more is required, the proportion of Fe is preferably 81 at% or more.

  In the above alloy composition, the B element is an essential element for forming an amorphous phase. When the ratio of B is less than 5 at%, it becomes difficult to form an amorphous phase under liquid quenching conditions. When the proportion of B is more than 13 at%, ΔT decreases, a homogeneous nanocrystalline structure cannot be obtained, and the alloy composition has deteriorated soft magnetic properties. Therefore, the ratio of B is desirably 5 at% or more and 13 at% or less. In particular, when the alloy composition needs to have a low melting point for mass production, the ratio of B is preferably 10 at% or less.

  In the above alloy composition, Si element is an essential element responsible for amorphous formation, and contributes to stabilization of nanocrystals in nanocrystallization. If Si is not contained, the ability to form an amorphous phase is lowered, and a more uniform nanocrystal structure cannot be obtained. As a result, soft magnetic properties are deteriorated. When the proportion of Si is more than 8 at%, the saturation magnetic flux density and the amorphous phase forming ability are lowered, and the soft magnetic characteristics are further deteriorated. Accordingly, the Si ratio is desirably 8 at% or less (not including 0). In particular, when the proportion of Si is 2 at% or more, the amorphous phase forming ability is improved, a continuous ribbon can be stably produced, and a homogeneous nanocrystal can be obtained by increasing ΔT.

  In the alloy composition, the P element is an essential element responsible for amorphous formation. In the present embodiment, by using a combination of B element, Si element, and P element, the amorphous phase forming ability and the stability of nanocrystals are improved as compared with the case where only one of them is used. . When the proportion of P is less than 1 at%, it becomes difficult to form an amorphous phase under liquid quenching conditions. When the ratio of P is more than 8 at%, the saturation magnetic flux density is lowered and the soft magnetic characteristics are deteriorated. Therefore, the ratio of P is desirably 1 at% or more and 8 at% or less. In particular, when the ratio of P is 2 at% or more and 5 at% or less, the amorphous phase forming ability is improved, and a continuous ribbon can be stably produced.

  In the above alloy composition, the C element is an element responsible for amorphous formation. In this embodiment, by using a combination of B element, Si element, P element, and C element, the amorphous phase forming ability and the stability of nanocrystals are improved as compared with the case where only one of them is used. I am going to do that. Moreover, since C is inexpensive, the amount of other metalloids is reduced by adding C, and the total material cost is reduced. However, when the proportion of C exceeds 5 at%, there is a problem that the alloy composition becomes brittle and soft magnetic properties are deteriorated. Therefore, the C ratio is desirably 5 at% or less. In particular, when the proportion of C is 3 at% or less, it is possible to suppress variation in composition due to evaporation of C during dissolution.

  In the alloy composition, Cu element is an essential element contributing to nanocrystallization. Here, the combination of Si element, B element, P element and Cu element or the combination of Si element, B element, P element, C element and Cu element contributes to nanocrystallization before the present invention. It should be noted that it was not known. Also, it should be noted that Cu element is basically expensive, and when the proportion of Fe is 81 at% or more, the alloy composition is likely to be embrittled or oxidized. If the Cu content is less than 0.4 at%, nanocrystallization becomes difficult. When the Cu content is higher than 1.4 at%, the precursor composed of the amorphous phase becomes inhomogeneous, so that a homogeneous nanocrystalline structure cannot be obtained when forming the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy, and the soft magnetic properties are deteriorated. To do. Therefore, it is desirable that the Cu ratio is 0.4 at% or more and 1.4 at% or less, and considering the embrittlement and oxidation of the alloy composition in particular, the Cu ratio is 1.1 at% or less. preferable.

  There is a strong attractive force between P atoms and Cu atoms. Accordingly, when the alloy composition contains a specific ratio of P element and Cu element, a cluster having a size of 10 nm or less is formed. Has a fine structure. More specifically, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to the present embodiment includes bccFe crystals having an average particle size of 25 nm or less. In the present embodiment, the specific ratio (z / x) of the ratio (x) of P and the ratio (z) of Cu is 0.08 or more and 0.8 or less. Outside this range, a homogeneous nanocrystalline structure cannot be obtained, and thus the alloy composition cannot have excellent soft magnetic properties. The specific ratio (z / x) is preferably 0.08 or more and 0.55 or less in consideration of embrittlement and oxidation of the alloy composition.

  The alloy composition in the present embodiment can have various shapes. For example, the alloy composition may have a continuous ribbon shape or a powder shape. The continuous ribbon-shaped alloy composition can be formed using a conventional apparatus such as a single roll manufacturing apparatus or a twin roll manufacturing apparatus used for manufacturing an Fe-based amorphous ribbon. The alloy composition in powder form may be produced by a water atomizing method or a gas atomizing method, or may be produced by pulverizing a ribbon-like alloy composition.

  In particular, considering the demand for high toughness, it is preferable that the continuous ribbon-shaped alloy composition can be tightly bent in a 180 ° bending test in a state before heat treatment. Here, the 180 ° bending test is a test for evaluating toughness, and the sample is bent so that the bending angle is 180 ° and the inner radius is zero. That is, according to the 180 ° bending test, the sample is bent tightly (◯) or broken (×). In the evaluation described later, it was checked whether a 3 cm long strip sample was bent at its center and bent tightly (◯) or broken (×).

  The alloy composition according to the present embodiment can be molded to form a magnetic core such as a wound magnetic core, a laminated magnetic core, or a dust core. Moreover, components, such as a transformer, an inductor, a motor, and a generator, can be provided using the magnetic core.

The alloy composition according to the present embodiment has an amorphous phase as a main phase. Therefore, when the alloy composition according to the present embodiment is heat-treated in an inert atmosphere such as an Ar gas atmosphere, it is crystallized twice or more. The temperature at which crystallization starts first is the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ), and the temperature at which the second crystallization starts is the second crystallization start temperature (T _x2 ). Further, a temperature difference between the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ) and the second crystallization start temperature (T _x2 ) is ΔT = T _x2 −T _x1 . When simply referred to as “crystallization start temperature”, it means the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ). In addition, these crystallization temperatures can be evaluated by performing thermal analysis at a temperature increase rate of about 40 ° C./min using, for example, a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) apparatus.

When the alloy composition according to the present embodiment is heat-treated at a temperature increase rate of 100 ° C./min or more and at a crystallization start temperature (that is, the first crystallization start temperature) or more, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to the present embodiment Can be obtained. In order to obtain a homogeneous nanocrystalline structure during the formation of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy, the difference ΔT between the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ) and the second crystallization start temperature (T ^x2 ) of the alloy composition is 100 It is preferable that it is 200 degreeC or more.

The Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to the present embodiment thus obtained has a high magnetic permeability of 10,000 or higher and a high saturation magnetic flux density of 1.65 T or higher. In particular, by selecting the ratio of P (x), the ratio of Cu (z), the specific ratio (z / x), and the heat treatment conditions, the amount of nanocrystals can be controlled to reduce saturation magnetostriction. The saturation magnetostriction is desirably 10 × 10 ⁻⁶ or less in order to avoid the deterioration of the soft magnetic characteristics, and the saturation magnetostriction is 5 × 10 ⁻⁶ or less in order to obtain a high permeability of 20,000 or more. Is preferred.

  The magnetic core can be formed using the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to the present embodiment. Moreover, components, such as a transformer, an inductor, a motor, and a generator, can be comprised using the magnetic core.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to a plurality of examples.

(Examples 1-46 and Comparative Examples 1-22)
The raw materials were weighed so as to have the alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 46 and Comparative Examples 1 to 22 of the present invention listed in Tables 1 to 7 below, and arc-melted. Then, the melted alloy composition was processed in the atmosphere by a single roll liquid quenching method, and continuous strips having various thicknesses of about 3 mm in width and about 5 to 15 m in length were produced. The phase of the alloy composition of these continuous ribbons was identified by the X-ray diffraction method. The first crystallization start temperature and the second crystallization start temperature were evaluated using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Furthermore, the alloy compositions of Examples 1-46 and Comparative Examples 1-22 were heat-treated under the heat treatment conditions described in Tables 8-14. The saturation magnetic flux density Bs of each heat-treated alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The coercive force Hc of each alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 2 kA / m using a direct current BH tracer. The magnetic permeability μ of each alloy composition was measured using an impedance analyzer under conditions of 0.4 A / m and 1 kHz. The measurement results are shown in Tables 1-14.

  As understood from Tables 1 to 7, all of the alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 46 had the amorphous phase as the main phase in the state after the rapid cooling treatment.

  Moreover, as understood from Tables 8 to 14, the alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 46 after the heat treatment were nanocrystallized, and the average particle size of the bccFe phase contained therein was 25 nm or less. On the other hand, the alloy compositions of Comparative Examples 1 to 22 after heat treatment had variations in crystal grain size or were not nanocrystallized (in Tables 8 to 14, alloys that were not nanocrystallized were x ). Similar results can be seen from FIG. In FIG. 1, the graphs of Comparative Example 7, Comparative Example 14, and Comparative Example 15 indicate that the coercive force Hc increases as the processing temperature increases. On the other hand, the graphs of Examples 5 and 6 include a curve indicating that the coercive force Hc decreases as the processing temperature increases. This reduction in coercive force Hc is caused by nanocrystallization.

  Referring to FIG. 2, the alloy composition before heat treatment of Comparative Example 7 has initial microcrystals having a grain size of more than 10 nm. Therefore, the ribbon of the alloy composition is bent tightly during the 180 ° bending test. Damaged without being able to. Referring to FIG. 3, the alloy composition before heat treatment of Example 5 has initial crystallites having a grain size of 10 nm or less, and therefore the ribbon of the alloy composition is bent tightly during a 180 ° bending test. it can. In addition, as shown in FIG. 3, the heat-treated alloy composition of Example 5 (ie, Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy) has homogeneous Fe-based nanocrystals with an average particle size of 15 nm which is smaller than 25 nm. This provides the excellent coercivity Hc of FIG. Other Examples 1-4, 6-46 are also the same as Example 5, each alloy composition before heat treatment has initial fine crystals with a grain size of 10 nm or less, and each alloy composition after heat treatment (Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy) has homogeneous Fe-based nanocrystals having an average particle size of 25 nm or less. Therefore, each alloy composition (Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy) after the heat treatment of Examples 1 to 46 can have a good coercive force Hc.

As understood from Tables 1 to 7, the difference in crystallization start temperature ΔT (= T _x2 −T _x1 ) of the alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 46 is 100 ° C. or higher. When such an alloy composition is heat-treated under conditions such that the highest ultimate heat treatment temperature is between the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ) and the second crystallization start temperature (T _x2 ), as shown in Tables 1 to 14 Excellent soft magnetic properties (coercivity Hc, permeability μ) can be obtained. FIG. 4 also shows that the crystallization start temperature difference ΔT of the alloy compositions of Examples 5, 6, 20, and 44 is 100 ° C. or more. On the other hand, the DSC curve in FIG. 4 shows that the difference in crystallization start temperature ΔT of the alloy compositions of Comparative Example 7 and Comparative Example 19 is narrow. Due to the narrow crystallization start temperature difference ΔT, the soft magnetic properties of the alloy compositions after heat treatment of Comparative Examples 7 and 19 are poor. In FIG. 4, the alloy composition of Comparative Example 22 has a wide crystallization start temperature difference ΔT at first glance. However, this wide crystallization start temperature difference ΔT is because the main phase is a crystal phase as shown in Table 7. Therefore, the soft magnetic properties of the alloy composition after heat treatment of Comparative Example 22 are poor.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 9 and 10 listed in Tables 8 and 9 correspond to the case where the Fe amount is changed from 78 to 87 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 1 to 10 listed in Table 9 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, the range of 79 to 86 at% is the condition range of the Fe amount. When the Fe amount is 81 at% or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.7 T or more can be obtained. Therefore, in applications that require a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs such as a transformer or a motor, the Fe amount is preferably 81 at% or more. On the other hand, the Fe amount in Comparative Example 9 is 78 at%. In the alloy composition of Comparative Example 9, the main phase is an amorphous phase as shown in Table 2. However, as shown in Table 9, the crystal grains after the heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 1 to 10 described above. The Fe amount in Comparative Example 10 is 87 at%. With the alloy composition of Comparative Example 10, a continuous ribbon cannot be produced. Moreover, as shown in Table 2, the alloy composition of Comparative Example 10 has a main phase as a crystal phase.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 11 to 17 and Comparative Examples 11 and 12 listed in Table 10 correspond to the case where the B amount is changed from 4 to 14 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 11 to 17 listed in Table 10 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, the range of 5 to 13 at% is the condition range for the B amount. Particularly, it is preferable that the B content is 10 at% or less because the alloy composition has a wide crystallization start temperature difference ΔT of 120 ° C. or more and the melting end temperature of the alloy composition is lower than that of the Fe amorphous. The B amount in Comparative Example 11 is 4 at%, and the B amount in Comparative Example 12 is 14 at%. As shown in Table 10, the alloy-side organisms of Comparative Example 11 and Comparative Example 12 have coarsened crystal grains after the heat treatment, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are the above-described Examples 11 to 11. It is outside the range of 17 characteristics.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 18 to 25 and Comparative Example 13 listed in Table 11 correspond to the case where the Si amount is changed from 0.1 to 10 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 18 to 25 listed in Table 11 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, the range of 0 to 8 at% (excluding 0) is the condition range of the Si amount. The Si amount in Comparative Example 13 is 10 at%. The alloy composition of Comparative Example 13 has a low saturation magnetic flux density Bs, the crystal grains after heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are the characteristics of Examples 18 to 25 described above. It is out of range.

  The alloy compositions according to Examples 26 to 33 and Comparative Examples 14 to 17 listed in Table 12 correspond to cases where the P amount is changed from 0 to 10 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 26 to 33 listed in Table 12 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, a range of 1 to 8 at% is a condition range for the P amount. In particular, the P content is preferably 5 at% or less because the alloy composition has a wide crystallization start temperature difference ΔT of 120 ° C. or more and a saturation magnetic flux density Bs exceeding 1.7 T. The P amount in Comparative Examples 14 to 16 is 0 at%. In the alloy compositions of Comparative Examples 14 to 16, the crystal grains after the heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 26 to 33 described above. The amount of P in Comparative Example 17 is 10 at%. Also in the alloy composition of Comparative Example 17, the crystal grains after the heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 26 to 33 described above.

  The alloy compositions according to Examples 34 to 39 and Comparative Example 18 listed in Table 13 correspond to the case where the C amount is changed from 0 to 6 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 34 to 39 listed in Table 13 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, the range of 0 to 5 at% is the condition range for the C amount. Here, when the amount of C is 4 at% or more, the thickness of the continuous ribbon exceeds 30 μm as in Examples 38 and 39, and adhesion bending becomes difficult during the 180-degree bending test. Therefore, the C amount is preferably 3 at% or less. The C amount in Comparative Example 18 is 6 at%. In the alloy composition of Comparative Example 18, the crystal grains after the heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 34 to 39 described above.

  The alloy compositions according to Examples 40 to 46 and Comparative Examples 19 to 22 listed in Table 14 correspond to the case where the amount of Cu is changed from 0 to 1.5 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 40 to 46 shown in Table 14 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Accordingly, 0.4 to 1.4 at% is a condition range for the amount of Cu. The Cu amount of Comparative Example 19 is 0 at%, and the Cu amount of Comparative Example 20 is 0.3 at%. In the alloy compositions of Comparative Example 19 and Comparative Example 20, the crystal grains after the heat treatment are coarsened, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 40 to 46 described above. . The amount of Cu in Comparative Example 21 and Comparative Example 22 is 1.5 at%. The alloy compositions of Comparative Example 21 and Comparative Example 22 also have coarsened crystal grains after the heat treatment, and both the magnetic permeability μ and the coercive force Hc are outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 40 to 46 described above. is there. In addition, in the alloy compositions of Comparative Examples 22 and 23, as shown in Table 7, the main phase is not an amorphous phase but a crystalline phase.

For the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys obtained by heat-treating the alloy compositions of Example 1, Example 2, Example 5, Example 6 and Example 44, the saturation magnetostriction was measured using a strain gauge method. As a result, the saturation magnetostrictions of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of Example 1, Example 2, Example 5, Example 6 and Example 44 were 8.2 × 10 ⁻⁶ and 5.3 × 10 ^{−5, respectively.} They were 3.8 × 10 ⁻⁶ , 3.1 × 10 ⁻⁶ and 2.3 × 10 ⁻⁶ . On the other hand, the saturation magnetostriction of Fe amorphous is 27 × 10 ⁻⁶ , and the saturation magnetostriction of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2007-270271 (Patent Document 1) is 14 × 10 ⁻⁶ . Compared to these, the saturation magnetostriction of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of Example 1, Example 2, Example 5, Example 6 and Example 44 is very small. Therefore, Examples 1 and 2 The Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of Example 5, Example 6, and Example 44 have high magnetic permeability, low coercivity, and low iron loss. Thus, the reduced saturation magnetostriction improves soft magnetic characteristics and contributes to suppression of noise and vibration. Therefore, the saturation magnetostriction is desirably 10 × 10 ⁻⁶ or less. In particular, in order to obtain a magnetic permeability of 20,000 or more, the saturation magnetostriction is preferably 5 × 10 ⁻⁶ or less.

(Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Examples 23 to 25)
The raw materials were weighed so as to have the alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Examples 23 to 25 of the present invention listed in Table 15 below, and dissolved by high frequency induction melting treatment. Thereafter, the melted alloy composition was processed in the atmosphere by a single roll liquid quenching method to produce a continuous ribbon having a thickness of about 20 and about 30 μm, a width of about 15 mm, and a length of about 10 m. The phase of the alloy composition of these continuous ribbons was identified by the X-ray diffraction method. Their toughness was evaluated by a 180 ° bending test. Regarding the continuous ribbon having a thickness of about 20 μm, the first crystallization start temperature and the second crystallization start temperature were evaluated using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Further, for Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Examples 23 to 25, an alloy composition having a thickness of about 20 μm was heat-treated under the heat treatment conditions described in Table 16. The saturation magnetic flux density Bs of each heat-treated alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The coercive force Hc of each alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 2 kA / m using a direct current BH tracer. The measurement results are shown in Table 15 and Table 16.

  As understood from Table 15, all of the continuous ribbons having a thickness of about 20 μm made of the alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 have the amorphous phase as the main phase in the state after the rapid cooling treatment, and 180 ° It was possible to bend tightly during the bending test.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Examples 23 and 24 listed in Table 16 correspond to the case where the specific ratio z / x is changed from 0.06 to 1.2. The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 listed in Table 16 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Accordingly, the range of 0.08 to 0.8 is the condition range of the specific ratio z / x. As understood from Examples 52 to 54, when the specific ratio z / x is larger than 0.55, the ribbon having a thickness of about 30 μm becomes brittle, and the ribbon is partially broken by the 180 ° bending test (Δ). Or it is completely damaged (×). Therefore, the specific range z / x is preferably 0.55 or less. Similarly, if the Cu content exceeds 1.1 at%, the ribbon becomes brittle, so the Cu content is preferably 1.1 at% or less.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Example 23 listed in Table 16 correspond to the case where the Si amount is changed from 0 to 4 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 listed in Table 16 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, as described above, it is understood that a range larger than 0 at% is a condition range of the Si amount. As understood from Examples 49 to 53, when the Si amount is less than 2 at%, crystallization and embrittlement occur, and it becomes difficult to form a thick continuous ribbon. Therefore, considering toughness, the Si amount is preferably 2 at% or more.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 and Comparative Examples 23 to 25 listed in Table 16 correspond to cases where the P amount is changed from 0 to 4 at%. The alloy compositions of Examples 47 to 55 listed in Table 16 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Therefore, as described above, it is understood that a range larger than 1 at% is a condition range of the P amount. As understood from Examples 52 to 55, when the amount of P is less than 2 at%, it crystallizes and becomes brittle, making it difficult to form a thick continuous ribbon. Therefore, in consideration of toughness, the P content is preferably 2 at% or more.

(Examples 56 to 64 and Comparative Example 26)
The raw materials were weighed so as to have the alloy compositions of Examples 56 to 64 of the present invention and Comparative Example 26 listed in Table 17 below, and arc-melted. Then, the melted alloy composition was processed in the atmosphere by a single roll liquid quenching method, and continuous strips having various thicknesses of about 3 mm in width and about 5 to 15 m in length were produced. The phase of the alloy composition of these continuous ribbons was identified by the X-ray diffraction method. The first crystallization start temperature and the second crystallization start temperature were evaluated using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Furthermore, the alloy compositions of Examples 56 to 64 and Comparative Example 26 were heat-treated under the heat treatment conditions described in Table 18. The saturation magnetic flux density Bs of each heat-treated alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The coercive force Hc of each alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 2 kA / m using a direct current BH tracer. The magnetic permeability μ of each alloy composition was measured using an impedance analyzer under conditions of 0.4 A / m and 1 kHz. The measurement results are shown in Table 17 and Table 18.

  As understood from Table 17, all of the alloy compositions of Examples 56 to 64 had the amorphous phase as the main phase in the state after the rapid cooling treatment.

  The alloy compositions of Examples 56 to 64 and Comparative Example 26 listed in Table 18 correspond to the case where a part of the Fe amount is replaced with Nb element, Cr element, and Co element. The alloy compositions of Examples 56 to 64 listed in Table 18 have a permeability μ of 10,000 or more, a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more, and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. Accordingly, the range of 0 to 3 at% is a replaceable range of the Fe amount. The amount of Fe substitution in Comparative Example 26 is 4 at%. The alloy side organism of Comparative Example 26 has a low saturation magnetic flux density Bs, which is outside the range of the characteristics of Examples 56 to 64 described above.

(Examples 65-69 and Comparative Examples 27-29)
The raw materials were weighed so as to have the alloy compositions of Examples 65 to 69 and Comparative Examples 27 to 29 of the present invention listed in Table 19 below, and dissolved by high frequency induction dissolution treatment. Then, the melted alloy composition was processed in the atmosphere by a single roll liquid quenching method to produce a continuous ribbon having a thickness of 25 μm, a width of 15 or 30 mm, and a length of about 10 to 30 m. The phase of the alloy composition of these continuous ribbons was identified by the X-ray diffraction method. Their toughness was evaluated by a 180 ° bending test. Further, the alloy compositions of Examples 65 and 66 were heat-treated under heat treatment conditions of 475 ° C. × 10 minutes. Similarly, the alloy compositions of Examples 67 to 69 and Comparative Example 27 were heat treated under heat treatment conditions of 450 ° C. × 10 minutes, and the alloy composition of Comparative Example 28 was heat treated under heat treatment conditions of 425 ° C. × 30 minutes. . The saturation magnetic flux density Bs of each heat-treated alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The coercive force Hc of each alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 2 kA / m using a direct current BH tracer. The iron loss of each alloy composition was measured under an excitation condition of 50 Hz-1.7 T using an AC BH analyzer. The measurement results are shown in Table 19.

  As understood from Table 19, all of the alloy compositions of Examples 65 to 69 have the amorphous phase as the main phase in the state after the rapid cooling treatment, and can be tightly bent in the 180 ° bending test. It was something.

  Furthermore, the continuous ribbon-shaped Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy obtained by heat-treating the alloy compositions of Examples 65 to 69 has a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more and a coercive force Hc of 20 A / m or less. ing. Further, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of Examples 65 to 69 can be excited even under an excitation condition of 1.7 T, and have an iron loss lower than that of the electromagnetic steel sheet. Therefore, when this is used, a magnetic component with low energy loss can be provided.

(Examples 70 to 74 and Comparative Examples 30 and 31)
The raw materials of Fe, Si, B, P and Cu were weighed so as to have an alloy composition of Fe _84.8 B ₁₀ Si ₂ P ₂ Cu _1.2 and dissolved by high-frequency induction melting treatment. Thereafter, the melted alloy composition was processed in the atmosphere by a single roll liquid quenching method to produce a plurality of continuous ribbons having a thickness of about 25 μm, a width of 15 mm, and a length of about 30 m. As a result of phase identification by the X-ray diffraction method, these continuous ribbon-shaped alloy compositions had an amorphous phase as a main phase. Further, these continuous ribbons could be bent tightly without breaking during the 180 ° bending test. Thereafter, these alloy compositions were heat-treated under the heat treatment conditions of 450 ° C. × 10 minutes for the holding portion and 60 to 1200 ° C./min for the rate of temperature increase, and the sample alloys of Examples 70 to 74 and Comparative Example 30 Got. A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet was prepared as Comparative Example 31. The saturation magnetic flux density Bs of each heat-treated alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The coercive force Hc of each alloy composition was measured in a magnetic field of 2 kA / m using a direct current BH tracer. The iron loss of each alloy composition was measured under an excitation condition of 50 Hz-1.7 T using an AC BH analyzer. Table 20 shows the measurement results.

  As understood from Table 20, the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy obtained by heat-treating the above-described alloy composition at a heating rate of 100 ° C./min or more has a saturation magnetic flux density Bs of 1.65 T or more and 20 A / m. It has the following coercive force Hc. Moreover, those Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys can be excited even under an excitation condition of 1.7 T, and have a lower iron loss than that of the electromagnetic steel sheet.

(Examples 75 to 78 and Comparative Examples 32 and 33)
The raw materials of Fe, Si, B, P, and Cu were weighed so as to have an alloy composition of Fe _83.3 B ₈ Si ₄ P ₄ Cu _0.7, and melted by high-frequency induction melting treatment to produce a master alloy. This mother alloy was processed by a single roll liquid quenching method to produce a continuous ribbon having a thickness of about 25 μm, a width of 15 mm, and a length of about 30 m. This continuous ribbon was heat-treated in an Ar atmosphere at 300 ° C. for 10 minutes. The continuous ribbon after the heat treatment was pulverized to obtain a powder of Example 75. The powder of Example 75 had a particle size of 150 μm or less. These powder and epoxy resin were mixed so that the epoxy resin might be 4.5 weight%. The mixture was passed through a sieve having a mesh size of 500 μm to obtain a granulated powder having a particle size of 500 μm or less. Next, the granulated powder was molded using a mold having an outer diameter of 13 mm and an inner diameter of 8 mm under the condition of a surface pressure of 7,000 kgf / cm ² to prepare a toroidal shaped molded body having a height of 5 mm. The molded body thus produced was cured in a nitrogen atmosphere at 150 ° C. for 2 hours. Furthermore, the compact and the powder were heat-treated in an Ar atmosphere at 450 ° C. for 10 minutes.

The raw materials of Fe, Si, B, P, and Cu were weighed so as to have an alloy composition of Fe _83.3 B ₈ Si ₄ P ₄ Cu _0.7, and melted by high-frequency induction melting treatment to produce a master alloy. This mother alloy was processed by the water atomization method to obtain a powder of Example 76. The powder of Example 76 had an average particle size of 20 μm. Further, the powder of Example 76 was subjected to air classification to obtain powders of Example 77 and Example 78. The powder of Example 77 had an average particle size of 10 μm, and the powder of Example 78 had an average particle size of 3 μm. The powder of each Example 76, 77 or 78 and the epoxy resin were mixed so that the epoxy resin would be 4.5% by weight. The mixture was passed through a sieve having a mesh size of 500 μm to obtain a granulated powder having a particle size of 500 μm or less. Next, the granulated powder was molded using a mold having an outer diameter of 13 mm and an inner diameter of 8 mm under the condition of a surface pressure of 7,000 kgf / cm ² to prepare a toroidal shaped molded body having a height of 5 mm. The molded body thus produced was cured in a nitrogen atmosphere at 150 ° C. for 2 hours. Furthermore, the compact and the powder were heat-treated in an Ar atmosphere at 450 ° C. for 10 minutes.

  The Fe-based amorphous alloy and the Fe—Si—Cr alloy were processed by the water atomization method to obtain powders of Comparative Examples 32 and 33. The powders of Comparative Examples 32 and 33 had an average particle size of 20 μm. These powders were processed as in Examples 75-78.

  Using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), the amount of heat generated at the first crystallization peak of the obtained powder was measured and compared with that of an amorphous single-phase continuous ribbon. The amorphization rate (ratio of contained amorphous phase) was calculated. The saturation magnetic flux density Bs and coercive force Hc of the heat-treated powder were measured in a magnetic field of 800 kA / m using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VMS). The iron loss of the heat-treated molded body was measured under an excitation condition of 300 kHz-50 mT using an AC BH analyzer. Table 21 shows the measurement results.

  As understood from Table 21, the alloy compositions of Examples 75 to 78 have nanocrystals having an average particle diameter of 25 nm or less after the heat treatment. In addition, the alloy compositions of Examples 75 to 78 have a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and a low coercive force Hc compared to Comparative Example 32 (Fe-based amorphous) and Comparative Example 33 (Fe—Si—Cr). ing. The dust core produced using the powders of Examples 75 to 78 also has a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and a low coercive force Hc, as compared with Comparative Example 33 (Fe—Si—Cr). Therefore, when this is used, a small and highly efficient magnetic component can be provided.

  As long as the nanocrystals after heat treatment have an average particle size of 25 nm or less, the alloy composition before heat treatment may be partially crystallized. However, as can be understood from Examples 76 to 78, in order to obtain a low holding force and a low iron loss, a higher amorphization rate is preferable.

Claims (15)

An alloy composition of formula _{Fe a B b Si c P x} C y Cu z, 79 ≦ a ≦ 86at%, 5 ≦ b ≦ 13at%, 0 <c ≦ 8at%, 1 ≦ x ≦ 8at%, An alloy composition in which 0 ≦ y ≦ 5 at%, 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.4 at%, and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.8. An alloy composition of formula _{Fe a B b Si c P x} C y Cu z, 81 ≦ a ≦ 86at%, 6 ≦ b ≦ 10at%, 2 ≦ c ≦ 8at%, 2 ≦ x ≦ 5at%, An alloy composition in which 0 ≦ y ≦ 4 at%, 0.4 ≦ z ≦ 1.4 at%, and 0.08 ≦ z / x ≦ 0.8.   The alloy composition according to claim 1 or 2, wherein 0≤y≤3at%, 0.4≤z≤1.1at% and 0.08≤z / x≤0.55. .   The alloy composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein 3 at% or less of Fe is Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Mo, W, Cr, Co, Ni, Al, Mn , Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Bi, Y, N, O and an alloy composition formed by substitution with one or more elements among rare earth elements.   The alloy composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the alloy composition has a continuous ribbon shape.   The alloy composition according to claim 5, wherein the alloy composition is capable of tight bending during a 180 ° bending test.   The alloy composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the alloy composition has a powder shape. 8. The alloy composition according to claim 1, wherein the first crystallization start temperature (T _x1 ) having a difference (ΔT = T _x2 −T _x1 ) of 100 ° C. to 200 ° C. An alloy composition having a crystallization start temperature (T _x2 ).   The alloy composition according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the alloy composition is a nano-heterostructure composed of an amorphous and an initial microcrystal existing in the amorphous, and an average grain size of the initial microcrystal. An alloy composition having a nanoheterostructure having a thickness of 0.3 to 10 nm.   The magnetic component comprised using the alloy composition in any one of Claim 1 thru | or 9.   A step of preparing the alloy composition according to any one of claims 1 to 9, a temperature increase rate of 100 ° C or more per minute, and a processing temperature of a crystallization start temperature of the alloy composition or more. A method for producing an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy comprising the step of heat-treating the alloy composition under conditions.   An Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy having a permeability of 10,000 or more and a saturation magnetic flux density of 1.65 T or more produced by the method according to claim 11.   The Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to claim 12, wherein the average particle size is 10 to 25 nm. 14. The Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy according to claim 12 or 13, wherein the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy has a saturation magnetostriction of 10 × 10 ⁻⁶ or less.   The magnetic component comprised using the Fe group nanocrystal alloy in any one of Claim 12 thru | or 14.

Images