JP2008070147A - Product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and product sorting program - Google Patents

Product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and product sorting program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008070147A
JP2008070147A JP2006246726A JP2006246726A JP2008070147A JP 2008070147 A JP2008070147 A JP 2008070147A JP 2006246726 A JP2006246726 A JP 2006246726A JP 2006246726 A JP2006246726 A JP 2006246726A JP 2008070147 A JP2008070147 A JP 2008070147A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
life
product
user
manufactured
use condition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2006246726A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4674192B2 (en
Inventor
Akira Osawa
陽 大澤
Hiroshi Ikeda
池田  啓
Jinichiro Goto
仁一郎 後藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP2006246726A priority Critical patent/JP4674192B2/en
Publication of JP2008070147A publication Critical patent/JP2008070147A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4674192B2 publication Critical patent/JP4674192B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve the yields of products that differ in conditions of use by each user. <P>SOLUTION: A conditions of use receiving part 11 receives conditions of use for eachuser, to store this in a user data table 21. A required lifetime calculation part 14 calculates the required lifetime which satisfies the conditions of use for each user, to store the same in a user data table 21. An inspection data receiving part 12 receives the inspection data for each product, to store the same in a product data table 22. A predicted lifetime calculating part 15 calculates the predicted lifetime, corresponding to the inspected data of each product and stores the same in the product data table 22. A sorting part 19, constituted to compare the required lifetime stored in the user data table 21, with the predicted lifetime stored in the product data table 22 and allots the product, of which the predicted lifetime is longer than the required lifetime, to the user who requests the required lifetime. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、ユーザ毎に使用条件が異なる製造品の仕分け方法、この方法を実行する装置、及び製造品の仕分けプログラムに関する。   The present invention relates to a method for sorting manufactured products having different use conditions for each user, an apparatus for executing the method, and a program for sorting manufactured products.

従来、製造品の仕分け方法としては、例えば、以下の特許文献1に記載された方法がある。   Conventionally, as a method for sorting manufactured products, for example, there is a method described in Patent Document 1 below.

この方法は、製造品の外観検査を行い、この外観検査の結果に応じて、この製造品が予め定められた品質基準を満たすか否かにより、良品であるか否かを判断し、不良品であると判断した場合には、この製造品を取り除くという方法である。   This method performs an appearance inspection of a manufactured product, determines whether the manufactured product satisfies a predetermined quality standard, and determines whether it is a non-defective product according to the result of the visual inspection. If it is determined that this is the case, this product is removed.

ところで、ガスタービンの部品、例えば、動翼、静翼等でも、以上の方法と同様に、外観検査により、予め定められた品質基準を満たしていないものは不良品として扱われる。このガスタービン部品は、高温の燃焼ガスにさらされるため、鋳物品であることが多い。このような鋳物品は、その製造方法に習熟した後に製造しても、その歩留まりは、あまり高くない。   By the way, in the case of gas turbine parts, for example, moving blades, stationary blades, and the like, those that do not satisfy a predetermined quality standard are treated as defective products by visual inspection, as in the above method. This gas turbine component is often a cast article because it is exposed to hot combustion gases. Even if such a cast article is manufactured after familiarizing with its manufacturing method, its yield is not so high.

特開平5−278838号公報JP-A-5-278838

ガスタービン部品は、その使用条件がユーザ毎に異なっていることが多い。このため、従来技術のように、部品を、一律な品質基準により良品であるか不良品であるかに仕分けると、不良品とされた部品の中にも、ユーザが提示した使用条件をクリアするものがある。従って、従来技術では、ユーザが提示した使用条件をクリアするものまでも、不良品として扱うことがあり、部品の歩留まりを上げることができず、結果として製造コストが高くなってしまうという問題点がある。   Gas turbine components often have different usage conditions for each user. For this reason, as in the prior art, when a part is classified as a non-defective product or a defective product according to a uniform quality standard, the usage conditions presented by the user are cleared even for the defective product. There is something. Therefore, in the prior art, even those that clear the usage conditions presented by the user may be handled as defective products, and the yield of components cannot be increased, resulting in a high manufacturing cost. is there.

本発明は、このような従来の問題点に着目してなされたもので、製造品の歩留まりを上げて、製造コストを低下させることができる製造品の仕分け方法、この方法を実行する装置、及び製造品の仕分けプログラムを提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made paying attention to such conventional problems, and a method of sorting manufactured products that can increase the yield of manufactured products and reduce the manufacturing cost, an apparatus that executes this method, and The purpose is to provide a product sorting program.

前記問題点を解決するための製造品の仕分け方法は、
製造品に関するユーザの使用条件を受け付ける使用条件受付工程と、
前記製造品の使用条件と、該使用条件を満たすために必要な該製造品の必要寿命との相関関係を示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、前記使用条件受付工程で受け付けたユーザの使用条件に応じた必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算工程と、
複数の前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付ける検査結果受付工程と、
製造後検査の結果と製造品の寿命との相関関係を示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、前記検査結果受付工程で受け付けた複数の前記製造後検査の結果毎に、各製造後検査の結果に応じた予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算工程と、
複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算工程で求められた前記必要寿命よりも、前記予測寿命演算工程で求められた前記予測寿命の方が長い製造品を、前記ユーザへ供給する製造品とする仕分け工程と、
を含むことを特徴とする。
A method for sorting manufactured products to solve the above problems is as follows.
A use condition accepting step for accepting a user's use condition for a manufactured product;
Using the required life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the use condition of the manufactured product and the required life of the manufactured product necessary to satisfy the use condition, the user use condition received in the use condition receiving step A required life calculation process to obtain the required life according to
An inspection result receiving step for receiving results of post-manufacturing inspection of the plurality of manufactured products;
For each of the results of each post-manufacturing inspection for each of a plurality of results of the post-manufacturing inspection received in the inspection result receiving step, using a predicted life calculation formula indicating a correlation between the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the life of the manufactured product. A predicted life calculation step to obtain a predicted life according to
Among the plurality of manufactured products, a manufactured product that supplies the user with a product having a longer predicted life calculated in the predicted life calculation step than the required life calculated in the required life calculation step. Sorting process and
It is characterized by including.

ここで、前記製造品の仕分け方法は、
前記予測寿命演算工程で予測寿命が求められた複数の前記製造品が、少なくとも3以上に分けた寿命クラスのうちのどのクラスに属するかを定めるクラス分け工程を含み、
前記仕分け工程では、3以上の寿命クラスに分けられた複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算工程で求められた前記必要寿命よりも予測寿命が長い寿命クラスの製造品を、前記ユーザへの供給する製造品とする、ものであってもよい。
Here, the method of sorting the manufactured products is as follows:
A classifying step for determining which class of the life class divided into at least three or more of the manufactured products for which the predicted life is calculated in the predicted life calculation step;
In the sorting step, among the plurality of manufactured products divided into three or more life classes, a product of a life class having a predicted life longer than the required life determined in the required life calculation step is sent to the user. It may be a manufactured product to be supplied.

また、前記問題点を解決するための製造品の仕分けプログラムは、
製造品に関するユーザの使用条件を受け付ける使用条件受付ステップと、
前記製造品の使用条件と、該使用条件を満たすために必要な該製造品の必要寿命との相関関係を示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、前記使用条件受付ステップで受け付けたユーザの使用条件に応じた必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算ステップと、
複数の前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付ける検査結果受付ステップと、
製造後検査の結果と製造品の寿命との相関関係を示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、前記検査結果受付ステップで受け付けた複数の前記製造後検査の結果毎に、各製造後検査の結果に応じた予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算ステップと、
複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算ステップで求められた前記必要寿命よりも、前記予測寿命演算ステップで求められた前記予測寿命が長い製造品を、前記ユーザへ供給する製造品とする仕分けステップと、
をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする。
In addition, a product sorting program for solving the above problems is as follows:
A use condition accepting step for accepting a user's use condition regarding the manufactured product;
Using the required life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the use condition of the manufactured product and the required life of the manufactured product necessary to satisfy the use condition, the user use condition received in the use condition receiving step The required life calculation step to obtain the required life according to
An inspection result receiving step for receiving results of post-manufacturing inspections of the plurality of manufactured products;
For each of the plurality of post-manufacturing inspection results received in the inspection result receiving step, each post-manufacturing inspection result is calculated using a predicted life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the life of the manufactured product. A predicted life calculation step for obtaining a corresponding predicted life,
Among the plurality of manufactured products, a manufactured product having the predicted life calculated in the predicted life calculation step longer than the required life calculated in the required life calculation step is a product supplied to the user. Sorting steps;
Is executed by a computer.

また、前記問題点を解決するための製造品の仕分け装置は、
コンピュータに前記プログラムをインストールしたものである。
In addition, a product sorting apparatus for solving the above problems is
The program is installed on a computer.

本発明によれば、複数の製造品のそれぞれの寿命を検査結果に基づいて予測する一方で、各ユーザ毎に製造品の使用条件を満たす必要寿命を求め、この必要寿命よりも予測寿命が長い製品をユーザに割り当てるようにしている。このため、例えば、従来の品質基準を満たさない製造品があっても、使用条件が比較的緩やかなユーザがいれば、この製造品は取り除かれることなく、このユーザに割り当てられる。したがって、不良品として取り除かれる製造品の数量は減少し、製造品の歩留まりを高めることができる。また、使用条件の厳しいユーザに対しては、予測寿命が長い製造品が割り当てられるので、従来技術のように、単に品質基準を上回る製造品を割り当てるよりも、ユーザが満足する製造品を供給することができる。   According to the present invention, while predicting the respective lifetimes of a plurality of manufactured products based on the inspection results, the required lifetime satisfying the usage conditions of the manufactured products is obtained for each user, and the predicted lifetime is longer than this required lifetime. Assign products to users. For this reason, for example, even if there is a manufactured product that does not satisfy the conventional quality standard, if there is a user whose use conditions are relatively mild, the manufactured product is assigned to this user without being removed. Therefore, the number of manufactured products that are removed as defective products is reduced, and the yield of manufactured products can be increased. In addition, since a product with a long predicted life is assigned to a user who has severe use conditions, a product that satisfies the user is supplied rather than simply assigning a product exceeding the quality standard as in the prior art. be able to.

以下、本発明に係る一実施形態としての製造品の仕分け装置について、図面を用いて説明する。   Hereinafter, a product sorting apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

まず、本実施形態の仕分け装置で仕分けする製造品について簡単に説明する。本実施形態で対象となる製造品は、ガスタービンの動翼である。この動翼は、鋳物品で、その寿命個体数分布は、図8に示すように、ある寿命を中心としてほぼ正規分布を成している。従来技術では、前述したように、外観検査の結果、予め定めた品質基準Sを満たさないものを不良品として、取り除いている。   First, manufactured products to be sorted by the sorting apparatus of this embodiment will be briefly described. The manufactured product targeted in this embodiment is a moving blade of a gas turbine. This moving blade is a cast article, and its life population distribution is almost normal with a certain life as the center, as shown in FIG. In the prior art, as described above, products that do not satisfy the predetermined quality standard S as a result of the appearance inspection are removed as defective products.

次に、本実施形態の仕分け装置について説明する。   Next, the sorting apparatus of this embodiment will be described.

本実施形態の仕分け装置10は、図1に示すように、キーボード等の入力装置1から動翼のユーザ使用条件等を受け付ける使用条件受付部11と、検査データ入力装置4からLAN等の無線又は有線ネットワークNを介して動翼の検査データ等を受け付ける検査データ受付部12と、ディスプレイ2やプリンタ3等の出力装置に各種演算処理結果等を出力する出力部13と、ユーザ使用条件に応じた製造品の必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算部14と、検査データに応じた製造品の予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算部15と、ユーザ使用条件に応じて複数の製造品を仕分ける仕分け部15と、各種データが記憶される記憶領域20と、を備えている。   As shown in FIG. 1, the sorting device 10 according to the present embodiment includes a use condition receiving unit 11 that receives a user use condition of a moving blade from an input device 1 such as a keyboard, and a wireless such as a LAN from an inspection data input device 4. An inspection data receiving unit 12 for receiving moving blade inspection data via the wired network N, an output unit 13 for outputting various arithmetic processing results to an output device such as the display 2 and the printer 3, and the like according to user usage conditions A required life calculating unit 14 for obtaining a required life of a manufactured product, a predicted life calculating unit 15 for obtaining a predicted life of a manufactured product according to inspection data, a sorting unit 15 for sorting a plurality of manufactured products according to user use conditions, And a storage area 20 in which various data are stored.

予測寿命演算部15は、製造品の検査データに応じた品質指数Qiを算出する品質指数算出部16と、この品質指数Qiに応じた製造品の寿命Leを予測する予測寿命算出部17と、寿命予測された各製造品を後述の寿命クラスに分ける寿命クラス分け部18と、を有している。   The predicted life calculation unit 15 includes a quality index calculation unit 16 that calculates a quality index Qi corresponding to the inspection data of the manufactured product, a predicted life calculation unit 17 that predicts the life Le of the manufactured product corresponding to the quality index Qi, A life classifying unit 18 that divides each product whose life has been predicted into life classes to be described later.

また、記憶領域20には、ユーザ使用条件等が格納されるユーザ情報テーブル21と、製造品の情報が格納される製造品情報テーブル22と、ユーザ使用条件から、この使用条件を満たすために必要な製造品の必要寿命Lrを求めるため必要寿命演算式が格納される第1の演算式格納領域25と、製造品の検査データからこの製造品の品質指数Qiを求めるための品質指数演算式が格納される第2の演算式格納領域26と、製造品の品質指数Qiからこの製造品の予測寿命Leを求めるための予測寿命演算式が格納される第3の演算式格納領域27と、が設定されている。各演算式格納領域25,26,27には、実際に、製造品の仕分けを行う前に、ユーザ自身が過去の実績結果等から導き出した各演算式を設定しておく。   In addition, the storage area 20 is required to satisfy this usage condition from a user information table 21 storing user usage conditions and the like, a manufactured product information table 22 storing product information, and user usage conditions. There is a first calculation formula storage area 25 in which a required life calculation formula is stored for obtaining a required life Lr of a manufactured product, and a quality index calculation formula for determining the quality index Qi of the manufactured product from the inspection data of the manufactured product. A second arithmetic expression storage area 26 to be stored and a third arithmetic expression storage area 27 in which a predicted life expression for obtaining the predicted life Le of the manufactured product from the quality index Qi of the manufactured product is stored. Is set. In each arithmetic expression storage area 25, 26, 27, each arithmetic expression derived by the user himself / herself from past results is set before actually sorting manufactured products.

ユーザ情報テーブル21には、図3に示すように、ユーザを識別するためのユーザIDが格納されるフィールドと、ユーザ使用条件の一つであるタービンの予定総運転時間が格納されるフィールドと、同じくユーザ使用条件の一つであるタービンの予定総起動回数が格納されるフィールドと、これらユーザ使用条件を満たすために必要な製造品の必要寿命が格納されるフィールドと、この必要寿命を満たす実際の製造品の番号が格納されるフィールドと、がある。   In the user information table 21, as shown in FIG. 3, a field for storing a user ID for identifying the user, a field for storing a scheduled total operation time of the turbine, which is one of user use conditions, Similarly, a field for storing the total number of times the turbine is scheduled to start, which is one of the user usage conditions, a field for storing the required life of manufactured products necessary to satisfy these user usage conditions, and an actual condition that satisfies this required life And a field in which the number of the manufactured product is stored.

また、製造品情報テーブル22には、図4に示すように、実際の製造品を識別するための製造品番号が格納されるフィールドと、その製造品の製造後検査のデータが格納されるフィールドと、このデータに基づいて予測された予測寿命が格納されるフィールドと、予測寿命に応じた寿命クラスが格納されるフィールドと、この製造品が供給されるユーザIDが格納されるフィールドと、がある。   Further, as shown in FIG. 4, the manufactured product information table 22 includes a field for storing a manufactured product number for identifying an actual manufactured product and a field for storing post-manufacturing inspection data of the manufactured product. A field in which a predicted life predicted based on this data is stored, a field in which a life class corresponding to the predicted life is stored, and a field in which a user ID to which the manufactured product is supplied are stored. is there.

なお、以上で説明した仕分け装置10は、実際には、図2に示すように、コンピュータであり、外部との入出力処理を行うインタフェース31と、各種演算を実行するCPU32と、CPU32が実行するための仕分けプログラム等が格納されているプログラムメモリ33と、CPU32が各種演算を実行する際に使用するワークメモリ34と、各種データ等が格納されるハードディスク装置35と、を有している。このコンピュータで、前述の必要寿命演算部14、予想寿命演算部15、仕分け部19は、いずれも、仕分けプログラム等が格納されているプログラムメモリ33と、この仕分けプログラムを実行するCPU32をと有して構成される。また、使用条件受付部11、検査データ受付部12、出力部13は、いずれも、インタフェース31と、仕分けプログラム等が格納されているプログラムメモリ33と、この仕分けプログラム等を実行するCPU32をと有して構成される。また、記憶領域20は、ハードディスク装置35を有して構成される。   The sorting apparatus 10 described above is actually a computer as shown in FIG. 2, and is executed by an interface 31 for performing input / output processing with the outside, a CPU 32 for executing various calculations, and the CPU 32. A program memory 33 in which a sorting program for storing the data is stored, a work memory 34 used when the CPU 32 executes various calculations, and a hard disk device 35 in which various data and the like are stored. In this computer, the above-mentioned required life calculation unit 14, expected life calculation unit 15, and sorting unit 19 all have a program memory 33 in which a sorting program and the like are stored, and a CPU 32 that executes this sorting program. Configured. Each of the use condition receiving unit 11, the inspection data receiving unit 12, and the output unit 13 includes an interface 31, a program memory 33 in which a sorting program and the like are stored, and a CPU 32 that executes the sorting program and the like. Configured. The storage area 20 includes a hard disk device 35.

次に、本実施形態の仕分け装置10の動作について説明する。   Next, the operation of the sorting apparatus 10 of this embodiment will be described.

まず、図5に示すフローチャートに従って、ユーザ使用条件を受け付けたときの処理について説明する。   First, processing when a user use condition is accepted will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

まず、オペレータ等がキーボード1等を操作して、製造品の納品を希望しているユーザのIDと、このユーザの使用条件を入力する。使用条件受付部11は、これを受け付けて(S10)、ユーザ情報テーブル21の該当フィールドに格納する(S11)。ユーザ使用条件としては、ここで、前述したように、タービンの予定総運転時間Trと、タービンの予定総起動回数Nである。   First, an operator or the like operates the keyboard 1 or the like to input the ID of a user who wishes to deliver a manufactured product and the usage conditions of the user. The use condition receiving unit 11 receives this (S10) and stores it in the corresponding field of the user information table 21 (S11). Here, as the user use conditions, as described above, the planned total operation time Tr of the turbine and the planned total number of times N of startup of the turbine.

必要寿命演算部14は、ユーザ情報テーブル21にユーザ使用条件が格納されると、第1の演算式格納領域25に格納されている、以下の式(1)に示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、ユーザ使用条件を満たすために必要な製造品の必要寿命Lrを求める(S12)。   When the user usage conditions are stored in the user information table 21, the required life calculation unit 14 uses the required life calculation formula shown in the following formula (1) stored in the first calculation formula storage area 25. The required life Lr of the manufactured product required to satisfy the user use condition is obtained (S12).

Lr=Tr+20・N・・・・・・・・・・(1)
Tr:タービンの予定総運転時間
N:タービンの予定総起動回数
この必要寿命演算式は、タービンの起動回数を、その20倍がタービンの運転時間に相当するものとして扱っている。なお、以上の式(1)は、必要寿命演算式の一例であり、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。
Lr = Tr + 20 · N (1)
Tr: Total planned operation time of turbine
N: Scheduled total number of start-ups of the turbine This required life calculation formula treats the number of start-ups of the turbine as 20 times the time corresponding to the operation time of the turbine. The above formula (1) is an example of the necessary life calculation formula, and the present invention is not limited to this.

具体的に、例えば、図3に示すユーザ情報テーブル21中のユーザID「a01」の製造品に求められる必要寿命Lrは、タービンの予定総運転時間Trが11500(hr)で、タービンの予定総起動回数Nが50(回)であるから、式(1)により、12500(hr)となる。   Specifically, for example, the required life Lr required for the manufactured product of the user ID “a01” in the user information table 21 shown in FIG. 3 is the estimated total operating time Tr of the turbine of 11500 (hr), Since the number of activations N is 50 (times), it is 12500 (hr) according to the equation (1).

必要寿命演算部14は、必要寿命Lrを求めると、これをユーザ情報テーブル21の該当フィールドの格納する(S14)。   When the required life calculation unit 14 obtains the required life Lr, it stores it in the corresponding field of the user information table 21 (S14).

以上で、ユーザ使用条件の受付時の処理は終了する。   This is the end of the process when accepting the user use conditions.

次に、検査データの取得方法について、図7を用いて説明する。   Next, a method for acquiring inspection data will be described with reference to FIG.

図7は、実際に製造した動翼の中央断面(実線)と、設計動翼の中央断面(破線)を示している。本実施形態では、設計動翼の中央断面に対する、製造動翼の中央断面の総ズレ面積、つまり同図中のハッチングを施した部分の総面積を、製造動翼のゆがみ量を表す検査データとする。なお、本実施形態では、以下で説明するように、製造動翼のゆがみ量を示すデータを検査データとし、このデータに基づいて、製造品の品質指数及び予測寿命を求めているが、本発明はこれに限定されるものではなく、例えば、動翼表面に見られる総亀裂数や、全亀裂の合計長さ等を検査データとし、このデータに基づいて、製造品の品質指数及び予測寿命を求めてもよい。   FIG. 7 shows a central section (solid line) of the actually manufactured moving blade and a central section (broken line) of the designed moving blade. In this embodiment, the total deviation area of the central cross section of the production rotor blade relative to the central cross section of the design rotor blade, that is, the total area of the hatched portion in FIG. To do. In this embodiment, as described below, the data indicating the distortion amount of the manufacturing blade is used as inspection data, and the quality index and the predicted life of the manufactured product are obtained based on this data. Is not limited to this. For example, the inspection data is the total number of cracks found on the blade surface, the total length of all cracks, etc. You may ask for it.

次に、図6に示すフローチャートに従って、検査データを受け付けたときの処理について説明する。   Next, processing when test data is received will be described according to the flowchart shown in FIG.

複数の製造品の検査データは、オペレータ等により検査データ入力装置4に入力される。仕分け装置10の検査データ受付部12は、この検査データ入力装置4から、ネットワークNを介して、製造品の識別子である製造番号毎に検査データを受け付け(S20)、これを製造品情報テーブル22の該当フィールドに格納する(S21)。   The inspection data of a plurality of manufactured products is input to the inspection data input device 4 by an operator or the like. The inspection data receiving unit 12 of the sorting apparatus 10 receives inspection data from the inspection data input device 4 via the network N for each manufacturing number that is an identifier of a manufactured product (S20), and receives this data in the manufactured product information table 22. (S21).

予測寿命演算部15の品質指数算出部16は、製造品情報テーブル22に複数の製造品の検査データが格納されると、第2の演算式格納領域26に格納されている、以下の式(2)に示す品質指数演算式を用いて、検査データSに応じた製造品の品質指数Qiを求める(S22)。   When the inspection data of a plurality of manufactured products is stored in the manufactured product information table 22, the quality index calculating unit 16 of the predicted life calculating unit 15 stores the following formula ( The quality index Qi of the manufactured product corresponding to the inspection data S is obtained using the quality index calculation formula shown in 2) (S22).

Qi=−2.5・S+10・・・・・・・・・・(2)
この品質指数演算式は、検査データSがほぼ0、つまり、設計動翼の中央断面に対する、製造動翼の中央断面の総ズレ面積がほぼ0のときに、最高の品質指数10が得られ、検査データ(ゆがみ量)Sが増加するに連れて、次第に品質指数が小さくなるように定められている。
Qi = -2.5 · S + 10 (2)
In this quality index calculation formula, when the inspection data S is almost 0, that is, when the total deviation area of the central section of the manufacturing blade relative to the central section of the design blade is almost 0, the highest quality index 10 is obtained. It is determined that the quality index gradually decreases as the inspection data (distortion amount) S increases.

品質指数算出部16が複数の製造品の品質指数Qiを求めると、予測寿命算出部17は、第3の演算式格納領域27に格納されている、以下の式(3)に示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、品質指数Qiに応じた製造品の予測寿命Leを求める(S23)。   When the quality index calculation unit 16 obtains the quality indexes Qi of a plurality of manufactured products, the predicted life calculation unit 17 stores the predicted life calculation shown in the following formula (3) stored in the third calculation formula storage area 27. Using the equation, the predicted life Le of the manufactured product corresponding to the quality index Qi is obtained (S23).

Le=800・Qi+7000・・・・・・・・・・(3)
なお、以上の式(3)は、予測寿命演算式に一例であり、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。また、ここで、検査データSから品質指数Qiを求め、このQiから予測寿命Leを求めているが、式(3)のQiに、式(2)を代入し、この新たな式で、検査データSから直接予測寿命Leを求めるようにしてもよい。
Le = 800 ・ Qi + 7000 (3)
In addition, the above Formula (3) is an example in a prediction lifetime calculation formula, and this invention is not limited to this. Here, the quality index Qi is obtained from the inspection data S, and the predicted life Le is obtained from this Qi. The expression (2) is substituted into Qi of the expression (3), and the inspection is performed using this new expression. The predicted life Le may be obtained directly from the data S.

具体的に、例えば、図4に示す製品情報テーブル22中の製品番号「1」の製造品の場合、検査データが2.0(cm2)であるから、品質指数Qiは5となり、この品質指数に対する予測寿命Leが11000(hr)となる。また、製造番号「3」の製造品の場合、検査データが0.2(cm2)であるから、品質指数Qiは9.5となり、この品質指数に対する予測寿命Leが14600(hr)となる。 Specifically, for example, in the case of the manufactured product with the product number “1” in the product information table 22 shown in FIG. 4, since the inspection data is 2.0 (cm 2 ), the quality index Qi is 5 and The predicted life Le is 11000 (hr). Further, in the case of the manufactured product with the production number “3”, since the inspection data is 0.2 (cm 2 ), the quality index Qi is 9.5, and the predicted life Le for this quality index is 14600 (hr).

予測寿命算出部17が各製造品の予測寿命Leを求めると、寿命クラス分け部18は、予測寿命Leに応じて、各製造品を寿命クラスに分ける(S24)。ここでは、図7に示すように、基準となる寿命Lsを10000(hr)とし、1.3Ls以上をAクラス、1.3Ls未満で1.1Ls以上をBクラス、1.1Ls未満でLs以上をCクラス、Ls未満で0.9Ls以上をDクラスとする。したがって、例えば、予測寿命Leが11000(hr)の製造番号「1」の製造品は、Bクラスとなり、予測寿命Leが14600(hr)の製造番号「3」の製造品は、Aクラスとなる。なお、図8中の丸付きの数字は、各クラスに存在する製造品の製造番号を示している。   When the predicted life calculation unit 17 obtains the predicted life Le of each manufactured product, the life classifying unit 18 divides each manufactured product into life classes according to the predicted life Le (S24). Here, as shown in FIG. 7, the reference life Ls is 10000 (hr), 1.3 Ls or more is A class, less than 1.3 Ls is 1.1 Ls or more is B class, less than 1.1 Ls is L class or more is C class, Less than Ls and 0.9 Ls or more is D class. Therefore, for example, a product with a production number “1” with an estimated life Le of 11000 (hr) is class B, and a product with a production number “3” with an estimated life Le of 14600 (hr) is in class A. . In addition, the number with a circle in FIG. 8 has shown the serial number of the manufactured goods which exist in each class.

予測寿命演算部15は、以上のように、各製造品毎に、予測寿命Le及び寿命クラスを求めると、これらを製造品情報テーブル22の該当フィールドに格納する(S25)。   As described above, when the predicted life calculating unit 15 obtains the predicted life Le and the life class for each manufactured product, the predicted life calculating unit 15 stores them in the corresponding fields of the manufactured product information table 22 (S25).

製造品情報テーブル22に各製造品の寿命クラスが格納されると、仕分け部19は、製品情報テーブル22に格納されている各製造品毎の寿命クラスと、ユーザ情報テーブル21に格納されているユーザ毎の必要寿命とを比較し、必要寿命よりも、長い寿命が設定されている寿命クラスの製造品を、当該必要寿命を要求するユーザに割り当てる。具体的には、ユーザID「a01」のユーザに対しては、その必要寿命12500(hr)よりも長い寿命が設定されている寿命クラス「A」の製造品、つまり、製造品番号「3」の製造品が割り当てられる。なお、これは、製造品番号「3」の製造品の寿命クラスが「A」であるから、この製造品は、この寿命クラスの寿命よりも短い必要寿命12500(hr)が要求されるユーザ、つまり、ユーザID「a01」のユーザに割り当てられる、とも言える。以下、製造番号「1」の製造品はユーザID「a02」のユーザに割り当てられ、製造番号「2」の製造品はユーザID「d01」のユーザに割り当てられ、製造番号「4」の製造品はユーザID「b01」のユーザに割り当てられ、製造番号「5」の製造品はユーザID「c01」のユーザに割り当てられる。仕分け部19は、各製造品の割り当てユーザを定めると、製造品情報テーブルのユーザIDのフィールドに該当ユーザIDを格納し、ユーザ情報テーブル21の製造品番号のフィールドに該当製造番号を格納する。   When the life class of each manufactured product is stored in the manufactured product information table 22, the sorting unit 19 stores the life class for each manufactured product stored in the product information table 22 and the user information table 21. The required life for each user is compared, and a product of a life class in which a life longer than the required life is set is assigned to a user who requests the required life. Specifically, for the user with the user ID “a01”, the product of the life class “A” whose life is longer than the necessary life 12500 (hr), that is, the product number “3”. Of manufactured goods. In addition, since the life class of the product with the product number “3” is “A”, this product is a user who requires a required life 12500 (hr) shorter than the life of this life class, That is, it can be said that the user ID “a01” is assigned. Hereinafter, the product with the production number “1” is assigned to the user with the user ID “a02”, the product with the production number “2” is assigned to the user with the user ID “d01”, and the product with the production number “4”. Is assigned to the user with the user ID “b01”, and the product with the production number “5” is assigned to the user with the user ID “c01”. When the sorting unit 19 determines the assigned user of each manufactured product, the sorting unit 19 stores the corresponding user ID in the user ID field of the manufactured product information table, and stores the corresponding manufactured number in the manufactured product number field of the user information table 21.

以上で、検査データを受け付けてから仕分けまでの処理が終了する。   This completes the process from receiving the inspection data to sorting.

オペレータ等は、以上の仕分け結果を知りたいときには、キーボード1等を用いて、ユーザ情報テーブル21又は製造品情報テーブル22のデータを呼び出し、これをディスプレイ2又はプリンタ3に出力させる。   When an operator or the like wants to know the above sorting results, he calls the data of the user information table 21 or the manufactured product information table 22 using the keyboard 1 or the like, and causes the display 2 or the printer 3 to output the data.

以上のように、本実施形態では、複数の製造品のそれぞれの寿命を検査結果に基づいて予測する一方で、各ユーザ毎に製造品の使用条件を満たす必要寿命を求め、この必要寿命よりも予測寿命が長い製品をユーザに割り当てるようにしている。このため、例えば、図7に示すように、従来の品質基準Sの製造品の寿命が基準寿命Lsであるとした場合、品質基準Sを満たさない製造品(製造品番号「5」)があっても、使用条件が比較的緩やかなユーザがいれば、この製造品は取り除かれることなく、このユーザに割り当てられる。したがって、不良品として取り除かれる製造品の数量は激減し、製造品の歩留まりを高めることができる。また、使用条件の厳しいユーザに対しては、予測寿命が長い製造品が割り当てられるので、従来技術のように、単に品質基準Sを上回る製造品を割り当てるよりも、ユーザが満足する製造品を供給することができる。   As described above, in the present embodiment, while predicting the respective lifetimes of a plurality of manufactured products based on the inspection results, the required lifetimes that satisfy the usage conditions of the manufactured products are obtained for each user, Products with a long expected life are assigned to users. For this reason, for example, as shown in FIG. 7, when the life of a product manufactured according to the conventional quality standard S is the standard life Ls, there is a product that does not satisfy the quality standard S (manufactured product number “5”). However, if there is a user whose use conditions are relatively mild, the manufactured product is assigned to this user without being removed. Therefore, the quantity of manufactured products that are removed as defective products is drastically reduced, and the yield of manufactured products can be increased. In addition, products with a long expected life are assigned to users with severe usage conditions, so products that satisfy the user are supplied rather than simply assigning products that exceed the quality standard S as in the prior art. can do.

本発明に係る一実施形態における仕分け装置の機能構成図である。It is a functional lineblock diagram of a sorting device in one embodiment concerning the present invention. 本発明に係る一実施形態における仕分け装置のハードウェア構成図である。It is a hardware block diagram of the sorting apparatus in one Embodiment concerning this invention. 本発明に係る一実施形態におけるユーザ情報テーブルのデータ構成を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the data structure of the user information table in one Embodiment which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る一実施形態における製造品情報テーブルのデータ構成を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the data structure of the manufactured goods information table in one Embodiment which concerns on this invention. 本発明に一実施形態における使用条件を受け付けたときの仕分け装置の動作を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the sorting apparatus when the use condition in one Embodiment is received in this invention. 本発明に係る一実施形態における検査データを受け付けたときの仕分け装置の動作を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the sorting apparatus when the test | inspection data in one Embodiment which concerns on this invention is received. 製造品である動翼の検査データを説明するための説明図である。It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the test | inspection data of the moving blade which is a manufactured product. 製造品の寿命個体数分布曲線を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the lifetime population distribution curve of manufactured goods.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10:仕分け装置、11:使用条件受付部、12:検査データ受付部、13:出力部、14:必要寿命演算部、15:予測寿命演算部、16:品質指数演算部、17:予測寿命算出部、18:寿命クラス分け部、19:仕分け部、20:記憶領域、21:ユーザ情報テーブル、22:製造品情報テーブル 10: Sorting device, 11: Use condition receiving unit, 12: Inspection data receiving unit, 13: Output unit, 14: Required life calculating unit, 15: Expected life calculating unit, 16: Quality index calculating unit, 17: Expected life calculating Part: 18: life classifying part, 19: sorting part, 20: storage area, 21: user information table, 22: manufactured product information table

Claims (6)

ユーザ毎に使用条件が異なる製造品の仕分け方法において、
前記製造品に関するユーザの使用条件を受け付ける使用条件受付工程と、
前記製造品の使用条件と、該使用条件を満たすために必要な該製造品の必要寿命との相関関係を示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、前記使用条件受付工程で受け付けたユーザの使用条件に応じた必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算工程と、
複数の前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付ける検査結果受付工程と、
製造後検査の結果と製造品の寿命との相関関係を示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、前記検査結果受付工程で受け付けた複数の前記製造後検査の結果毎に、各製造後検査の結果に応じた予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算工程と、
複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算工程で求められた前記必要寿命よりも、前記予測寿命演算工程で求められた前記予測寿命の方が長い製造品を、前記ユーザへ供給する製造品とする仕分け工程と、
を含むことを特徴とする製造品の仕分け方法。
In the method of sorting manufactured products with different usage conditions for each user,
A use condition accepting step for accepting a user's use condition regarding the manufactured product;
Using the required life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the use condition of the manufactured product and the required life of the manufactured product necessary to satisfy the use condition, the user use condition received in the use condition receiving step A required life calculation process to obtain the required life according to
An inspection result receiving step for receiving results of post-manufacturing inspection of the plurality of manufactured products;
For each of the results of each post-manufacturing inspection for each of a plurality of results of the post-manufacturing inspection received in the inspection result receiving step, using a predicted life calculation formula indicating a correlation between the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the life of the manufactured product. A predicted life calculation step to obtain a predicted life according to
Among the plurality of manufactured products, a manufactured product that supplies the user with a product having a longer predicted life calculated in the predicted life calculation step than the required life calculated in the required life calculation step. Sorting process and
A method for assembling manufactured products, comprising:
請求項1に記載の製造品の仕分け方法において、
前記予測寿命演算工程で予測寿命が求められた複数の前記製造品が、少なくとも3以上に分けた寿命クラスのうちのどのクラスに属するかを定めるクラス分け工程を含み、
前記仕分け工程では、3以上の寿命クラスに分けられた複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算工程で求められた前記必要寿命よりも予測寿命が長い寿命クラスの製造品を、前記ユーザへの供給する製造品とする、
ことを特徴とする製造品の仕分け方法。
The method for sorting manufactured products according to claim 1,
A classifying step for determining which class of the life class divided into at least three or more of the manufactured products for which the predicted life is calculated in the predicted life calculation step;
In the sorting step, among the plurality of manufactured products divided into three or more life classes, a product of a life class having a predicted life longer than the required life determined in the required life calculation step is sent to the user. The product to be supplied by
A method for sorting manufactured products.
請求項1及び2のいずれか一項に記載の製造品の仕分け方法において、
前記製造品は、タービン部品であり、
前記使用条件受付工程で受け付けるタービン部品の使用条件は、タービンの予定総運転時間、及びタービンの予定総起動回数を含み、
前記必要寿命演算式は、前記予定総運転時間と前記予定総起動回数を変数とする式である、
ことを特徴とする製造品の仕分け方法。
In the method for assembling the manufactured product according to any one of claims 1 and 2,
The manufactured product is a turbine component,
The usage conditions of the turbine parts received in the usage condition reception step include a planned total operation time of the turbine and a planned total number of times the turbine is started,
The required life calculation formula is a formula using the planned total operation time and the planned total number of activations as variables,
A method for sorting manufactured products.
ユーザ毎に使用条件が異なる製造品の仕分け装置において、
前記製造品に関するユーザの使用条件を受け付ける使用条件受付手段と、
前記製造品の使用条件と、該使用条件を満たすために必要な該製造品の必要寿命との相関関係を示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、前記使用条件受付手段が受け付けたユーザの使用条件に応じた必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算手段と、
複数の前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付ける検査結果受付手段と、
製造後検査の結果と製造品の寿命との相関関係を示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、前記検査結果受付手段が受け付けた複数の前記製造後検査の結果毎に、各製造後検査の結果に応じた予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算手段と、
複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算手段が求めた前記必要寿命よりも、前記予測寿命演算手段が求めた前記予測寿命の方が長い製造品を、前記ユーザへ供給する製造品とする仕分け手段と、
を備えていることを特徴とする製造品の仕分け装置。
In the sorter for manufactured products with different usage conditions for each user,
Use condition accepting means for accepting a user's use condition regarding the manufactured product;
Using the required life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the use condition of the manufactured product and the required life of the manufactured product required to satisfy the use condition, the use condition of the user received by the use condition receiving means A required life calculating means for obtaining the required required life,
An inspection result receiving means for receiving a result of a post-manufacturing inspection of the plurality of manufactured products;
For each of the plurality of post-manufacturing inspection results received by the inspection result accepting means, the result of each post-manufacturing inspection is calculated using a predicted life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the life of the manufactured product. A predicted life calculation means for obtaining a corresponding predicted life;
Among the plurality of manufactured products, a manufactured product having a longer predicted life calculated by the predicted life calculation means than the required life calculated by the required life calculation means is a product supplied to the user. Sorting means,
A device for sorting manufactured products, comprising:
ユーザ毎に使用条件が異なる製造品の仕分けプログラムにおいて、
前記製造品に関するユーザの使用条件を受け付ける使用条件受付ステップと、
前記製造品の使用条件と、該使用条件を満たすために必要な該製造品の必要寿命との相関関係を示す必要寿命演算式を用いて、前記使用条件受付ステップで受け付けたユーザの使用条件に応じた必要寿命を求める必要寿命演算ステップと、
複数の前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付ける検査結果受付ステップと、
製造後検査の結果と製造品の寿命との相関関係を示す予測寿命演算式を用いて、前記検査結果受付ステップで受け付けた複数の前記製造後検査の結果毎に、各製造後検査の結果に応じた予測寿命を求める予測寿命演算ステップと、
複数の前記製造品のうち、前記必要寿命演算ステップで求められた前記必要寿命よりも、前記予測寿命演算ステップで求められた前記予測寿命が長い製造品を、前記ユーザへ供給する製造品とする仕分けステップと、
をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする製造品の仕分けプログラム。
In a product sorting program with different usage conditions for each user,
A use condition accepting step for accepting a user's use condition regarding the manufactured product;
Using the required life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the use condition of the manufactured product and the required life of the manufactured product necessary to satisfy the use condition, the user use condition received in the use condition receiving step The required life calculation step to obtain the required life according to
An inspection result receiving step for receiving results of post-manufacturing inspections of the plurality of manufactured products;
For each of the plurality of post-manufacturing inspection results received in the inspection result receiving step, each post-manufacturing inspection result is calculated using a predicted life calculation formula indicating the correlation between the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the life of the manufactured product. A predicted life calculation step for obtaining a corresponding predicted life,
Among the plurality of manufactured products, a manufactured product having the predicted life calculated in the predicted life calculation step longer than the required life calculated in the required life calculation step is a product supplied to the user. Sorting steps;
A product sorting program characterized by causing a computer to execute the process.
請求項5に記載の製造品の仕分けプログラムにおいて、
前記使用条件受付ステップでは、前記製造品に関するユーザの使用条件と共に、該ユーザのユーザ識別子を受け付け、前記コンピュータに予め設定したユーザ情報記憶領域に、該使用条件と該ユーザ識別子と関連付けて記憶し、
前記必要寿命演算ステップでは、前記ユーザ情報記憶領域に記憶されている前記使用条件と前記ユーザ識別子とを読み出し、該使用条件に応じた前記必要寿命を求め、該必要寿命を該ユーザ識別子と関連付けて該ユーザ情報記憶領域に記憶し、
前記検査結果受付ステップでは、前記製造品の製造後検査の結果を受け付けると共に、該製造品の製造品識別子を受付、前記コンピュータに予め設定した製造品情報記憶領域に、該製造検査の結果と該製造品識別子とを関連付けて記憶し、
前記予測寿命演算ステップでは、前記製造品情報記憶領域に記憶されている前記製造後検査の結果と前記製造品識別子とを読み出し、該製造後検査の結果に応じた前記予測寿命を求め、該予測寿命を該製造品識別子と関連付けて該製造品情報記憶領域に記憶し、
前記仕分けステップでは、前記製造品情報記憶領域に記憶されている複数の製造品識別に対して、各製造品識別子に関連付けられたそれぞれの予測寿命よりも、前記ユーザ情報記憶領域に記憶されている前記必要寿命が短い前記ユーザ識別子を関連付ける、
ことを特徴とする製造品の仕分けプログラム。
In the product sorting program according to claim 5,
In the use condition receiving step, the user identifier of the user is received together with the user use condition related to the manufactured product, and the user condition storage area preset in the computer is stored in association with the use condition and the user identifier.
In the required life calculation step, the use condition and the user identifier stored in the user information storage area are read out, the required life corresponding to the use condition is obtained, and the required life is associated with the user identifier. Storing in the user information storage area,
In the inspection result receiving step, the result of the post-manufacturing inspection of the manufactured product is received, the manufactured product identifier of the manufactured product is received, and the result of the manufacturing inspection is stored in the manufactured product information storage area preset in the computer. Store the product identifier in association with it,
In the predicted life calculation step, the result of the post-manufacturing inspection and the product identifier stored in the product information storage area are read out, the predicted life according to the result of the post-manufacturing inspection is obtained, and the prediction Storing the life in association with the product identifier in the product information storage area;
In the sorting step, the plurality of manufactured product identifications stored in the manufactured product information storage area are stored in the user information storage area rather than the respective predicted lifetimes associated with the manufactured product identifiers. Associating the user identifier with the short required lifetime;
A product sorting program characterized by that.
JP2006246726A 2006-09-12 2006-09-12 Manufacturing product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and manufacturing product sorting program Expired - Fee Related JP4674192B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006246726A JP4674192B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2006-09-12 Manufacturing product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and manufacturing product sorting program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006246726A JP4674192B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2006-09-12 Manufacturing product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and manufacturing product sorting program

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008070147A true JP2008070147A (en) 2008-03-27
JP4674192B2 JP4674192B2 (en) 2011-04-20

Family

ID=39291870

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006246726A Expired - Fee Related JP4674192B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2006-09-12 Manufacturing product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and manufacturing product sorting program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4674192B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180211336A1 (en) * 2017-01-23 2018-07-26 United Technologies Corporation Classification of Gas Turbine Engine Components and Decision for Use

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06119171A (en) * 1992-10-06 1994-04-28 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Expert system
JPH10256800A (en) * 1997-03-17 1998-09-25 Nagoya Denki Kogyo Kk Method for setting decision criterion freely in equipment for inspecting mounted printed wiring board
JPH11142298A (en) * 1997-11-05 1999-05-28 Babcock Hitachi Kk Life-cycle management type system for plant maintenance-assistance
JP2005195422A (en) * 2004-01-06 2005-07-21 Ho Jinyama Facility diagnostic apparatus

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06119171A (en) * 1992-10-06 1994-04-28 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Expert system
JPH10256800A (en) * 1997-03-17 1998-09-25 Nagoya Denki Kogyo Kk Method for setting decision criterion freely in equipment for inspecting mounted printed wiring board
JPH11142298A (en) * 1997-11-05 1999-05-28 Babcock Hitachi Kk Life-cycle management type system for plant maintenance-assistance
JP2005195422A (en) * 2004-01-06 2005-07-21 Ho Jinyama Facility diagnostic apparatus

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180211336A1 (en) * 2017-01-23 2018-07-26 United Technologies Corporation Classification of Gas Turbine Engine Components and Decision for Use
CN108345722A (en) * 2017-01-23 2018-07-31 联合工艺公司 The classification of combustion turbine engine components and use decision

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4674192B2 (en) 2011-04-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Crappé et al. PROTEOFORMER: deep proteome coverage through ribosome profiling and MS integration
Safari et al. A hybrid method for flowshops scheduling with condition-based maintenance constraint and machines breakdown
US7474988B2 (en) Maintenance system and method and program therefor
US20130138355A1 (en) Method and system for evaluating sequences
KR101544457B1 (en) The method for parameter investigation to optimal design
JP2006344167A5 (en)
GB2456619A (en) Managing errors generated in an apparatus
JP6033115B2 (en) Maintenance work timing judgment device, maintenance work timing judgment system, maintenance work timing judgment method and program
JP5134601B2 (en) Production schedule creation device
JP6129802B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
US20130061202A1 (en) Methods for assessing deliverable product quality and devices thereof
Liu et al. New meta-heuristic for dynamic scheduling in permutation flowshop with new order arrival
Bonfert et al. A context-based approach to identify the most likely mapping for RNA-seq experiments
JP4674192B2 (en) Manufacturing product sorting method, apparatus for executing the method, and manufacturing product sorting program
JP2005326953A (en) Software quality evaluation system and method, and program for evaluating software quality
CN112488552A (en) Method and system for constructing service index, electronic equipment and storage medium
JP2012003524A (en) Steel product design support system, steel product design support method, and computer program
JP2010020617A (en) Design example retrieval device, and design example retrieval program
JP2007272653A (en) Job scheduling device and job scheduling method
JP6161367B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
JP2010020573A (en) System for managing life cycle of equipment and method therefor
JP2009104664A (en) Manufacturability support system and manufacturability support program
JP2008084306A (en) Production support method and program of industrial product
JP2008040980A (en) Information processor, predicted processing time calculation method and program
JP2016168615A (en) Hole expansion ratio prediction method and hole expansion ratio predictor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080507

A761 Written withdrawal of application

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A761

Effective date: 20091016

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110118

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110124

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 4674192

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140128

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees