JP2003058037A - Device for monitoring progress of training - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To easily recognizably display the progress of training and also display a misoperation in the training using a plant operation simulator. SOLUTION: A result of operation carried out with a plant operation simulator is collected and stored as an operation item. Meanwhile, a standard operation item and a standard operation procedure indicating the order of operations for each item are stored beforehand. The conducted operation item and the stored information is compared and the operation items are classified into three categories-a conducted standard operation item, a conducted extra operation item other than the standard operation item and an unconducted operation item. From these classification data, a standard operation procedure flow 35 is displayed on a display screen and, based on the stored data, the conducted standard operation item is displayed in gray color and the unconducted operation item is displayed in white for easy recognition of the state of progress in the operation. Also, by displaying the extra operation item as an extra operation result item list 36, misoperation can easily be checked.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a training progress monitoring device that provides information for grasping the progress of a current operation in training performed using a plant operation training device. .

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art As a method of displaying the progress status of a driving operation in a conventional plant operation training apparatus, there is a method of displaying a history of executed operation items and a method of reaching a representative point of the progress of the plant operation. There was something to display.
FIG. 19 shows a configuration example of a system of a training progress monitoring device that displays a history of performed operation items. In FIG. 19, reference numeral 1 denotes an operation input processing function, and operation item names are registered in advance. 2 is a plant simulation processing function, 3 is a plant operation training device, 4 is an operation record item recording device, 7 is an operation item editing function, and 8 is an output device such as a CRT display or a printer.

When the plant operation training apparatus 3 is operated, the operation input processing function 1 of the plant operation training apparatus 3 produces an operation input signal. The operation input signal includes the item name of the operation performed. The generated operation input signal is input to the plant simulation processing function 3 that calculates the state of the plant by simulation, and is also input to the operation record item recording device 4. The operation input signals input to the operation record item recording device 4 are stored as operation history data in the order in which the operation input signals are generated, that is, in the order in which the operations are performed. The operation history data stored in the operation record item recording device 4 is converted into a format for display by the operation item editing function 7 and output to the output device 8.
The output device 8 receiving the operation history data displays the operation item history. In the display of the operation item history, the operation item names are displayed in the order in which the operations are performed, so that the operation item names performed and the order in which the operations are performed can be grasped.

FIG. 20 shows the operation items 12 that have been executed.
It is the example displayed together with the operation order 11 showing the order in which the operations were performed. The display of the operation sequence 11 is performed by, for example, providing a counter in the operation input processing function 1 to add a serial number to the operation item name information when generating the operation input signal. In the example of FIG. 20, the item name of the performed operation and the operation sequence can be grasped.

FIG. 21 shows an example of the configuration of a system for displaying that a representative time point of the progress of plant operation has been reached.
In FIG. 21, 1 is an operation input processing function, 2 is a plant simulation processing function, 3 is a plant operation training device, 13 is a plant progress state determination logic processing function, 14 is a plant progress state display editing function, and 8 is an output device. .

In advance, the operation procedure to be performed during plant operation is divided into a plurality of progress stages, and the plant progress state determination logic for determining the success or failure of the completion condition of each stage is registered in the plant progress state determination logic processing function 13. I'll do it. The name of each progress stage is registered in the progress order in the plant progress status display editing function. Furthermore, like the previous example,
An operation item name is registered in the operation input processing function 1.

The operation carried out by the plant operation training apparatus 3 is converted into an operation input signal by the operation input processing function 1 constituting the plant operation training apparatus 3. The operation input signal is input to the plant simulation processing function 2 that calculates the plant response characteristic by the operation, and is also input to the plant progress state determination logic processing function 13. The plant simulation processing function 2 performs a simulation operation on the plant state, and outputs the result to the plant progress state determination logic processing function 13 as a plant state signal. here,
Specifically, the plant state is the operating / stopping state of equipment, the opening / closing state of valves, the temperature, pressure, flow rate, etc. of each part in the plant.

[0008] A plant progress state determination logic processing function 1 that receives an operation input signal and a plant state signal
3 determines whether or not the completion condition of each progress stage is satisfied by the plant progress state determination logic, and outputs the determination result to the plant progress state display editing function 14. The plant progress status display editing function displays the name of each operation stage on the output device 8 in a distinguishable manner such as changing the color according to the success or failure of the completion condition determined by the plant progress status determination logic processing function 13.

FIG. 22 shows an example of a plant progress state determination logic. In FIG. 22, 16 is an input signal to the determination logic, 17 is a determination logic, and 18 is an output signal of the determination result. The plant progress state determination logic uses the operation input signal, the plant operation state signal, and the determination results of other plant progress state determination logics as the input signal 16.
The determination is made according to the determination logic 17, and the determination result 18 is output.

FIG. 23 shows a display example of the plant operation progress state in the system for displaying that the representative time point of the plant operation progress has been reached. In FIG. 23, 19
Each of a to 19h represents a progressing stage. Progressive stage 19a-
A progress state determination logic as shown in FIG. 22 is prepared for each of 19h and is registered in advance in the plant progress state determination logic processing function 13. The plant progress status determination logic processing function 13 determines whether or not each of the progress stages 19a to 19h is completed according to the determination logic, and the plant progress status display editing function 14 displays the determination result on the output device 8. In FIG. 23, one of the steps
Assuming that the completion conditions 9a and 19b are satisfied, that is, this stage has already been completed, the background is displayed in gray.

This function is a plant automatic start / stop control system (APS: used in an actual power generation unit).
This is the same as the function that determines the passage of the representative operating point at each operation stage, which is represented by the breakpoint display function of Automatic Plant Startup / shutdown).

[0012]

As described above, in the method of displaying the history of the operation items, it is possible to confirm the operation-executed items and the operation order, but to detect the unexecuted items or the operation-missing items. I can't do that. In addition, whether the performed operation is the operation that should be originally included in the standard operating procedure,
Alternatively, it is impossible to distinguish whether the operation is an extra operation that is not included in the standard operating procedure.

On the other hand, with the method using the plant progress state determination logic, it is possible to determine the passage of a typical operation state set as the progress stage, but whether or not each operation operation item existing during the progress stage has been executed. I can't judge. Using this method, in order to determine whether all the operations to be performed, for all operation items to be performed, it is necessary to register the plant progress state determination logic in advance, thermal power plant, etc., In a large-scale plant, since there are many operation items and each progress status determination logic is complicated, creating a plant progress status determination logic for all operation items to be performed is a huge work, Not realistic. Also, this method cannot identify extra operations that should not be performed.

According to the present invention, in the conventional method of judging the progress of training in the plant operation training apparatus, the unoperated item,
It was made to solve the above-mentioned problem that it is not possible to determine all items of operation omissions and items of extra operations, and at each operation stage of training using the plant operation training device, It is an object of the present invention to provide a training progress monitoring device that enables recognition and grasp of items that have not been operated and items that should be performed next.

[0015]

(1) An operation progress monitoring device according to claim 1 of the present invention comprises an operation item collecting means for collecting operation contents carried out using a plant operation training device as operation items. , The standard operation procedure database in which the standard operation items and the operation procedures in which the standard operations are ordered are registered in advance, and the collected operation items and the registered standard operation items are compared, and the performed standard operation items and standard operations are performed. Operation item comparison means for classifying into three types of operation items, which are performed extra operation items other than items, and non-implemented standard operation items, and the operation items classified into the above three types are output and displayed on a display printer or the like. , Or output means for outputting to the outside.

(2) In the operation progress monitoring apparatus according to claim 2 of the present invention, in the claim 1, the standard operation procedure database is an AND condition of a plurality of standard operation items, an OR condition, or a combination of these conditions. It includes conditions.

(3) In the operation progress monitoring device according to claim 3 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the output means is an operation item classified into three types, or at least any one of them or The two types of operation items are displayed in a list format for each type.

(4) In the operation progress monitoring apparatus according to claim 4 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the output means lists the executed standard operation items and the executed extra operation items in the order of operation. In addition to being displayed in a format, the above two items are identified and displayed by color, mark, or the like.

(5) In the operation progress monitoring device according to claim 5 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the output means displays the standard operation item corresponding to the executed operation item and the operation procedure thereof. The operation flow chart is displayed with reference to the standard operation procedure database, and the standard operation items on the operation flow chart are displayed as the standard operation items that have been executed and the standard operation items that have not been executed.

(6) In the operation progress monitoring device according to claim 6 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the range of temperature and pressure at a predetermined location of the plant is restricted within the standard operation item. If there is an operation permission condition for operating within the allowable range, it is registered in the standard operation procedure database in advance, and the operation item comparison means, when the performed operation item corresponds to the standard operation item, the operation permission is set. The output means determines whether or not the condition is met, displays the operation flow chart by referring to the standard operation item database and the standard operation item corresponding to the standard operation item performed above, and displays the operation flow diagram. The operation item is displayed according to the determination result.

(7) In the operation progress monitoring device according to claim 7 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the standard operation item is limited to the temperature / pressure range at a predetermined location of the plant. If there is an operation permission condition for operating within the allowable range, it is registered in the standard operation procedure database in advance, and the operation item comparison means, when the performed operation item corresponds to the standard operation item, the operation permission is set. It is determined whether or not the conditions are met, and the output means displays the list in a list format together with the implemented standard operation items, or the implemented standard operation items and other extra operation items, unimplemented standard operation items, etc., The operation item is displayed according to the determination result, or the output unit displays only the operation item that violates the operation permission condition.

(8) In the operation progress status monitoring device according to claim 8 of the present invention, in claim 1 or 2, the operation item comparison means determines whether or not the operation is performed according to the standard operation procedure. The output means refers to the standard operation item corresponding to the performed operation item and its operation procedure from the standard operation procedure database to display the operation flow chart, and also displays the operation flow chart according to the determination result. The operation items are identified and displayed.

(9) According to a ninth aspect of the present invention, in the operation progress monitoring device according to any one of the fifth, sixth and eighth aspects, the output means is implemented in addition to the operation flow chart display. The extra items are displayed in a list format, or the standard operation items that have been performed and the extra operation items that have been performed are displayed in the order of operation, and the above two items are displayed in a list format so as to be distinguishable from each other. It is displayed.

(10) According to a tenth aspect of the present invention, there is provided the operation progress monitoring apparatus according to any one of the first to ninth aspects, in which the output means is arranged in the order in which the operation is performed for each performed operation item. It is displayed with an operation number.

(11) In the operation progress status monitoring device according to claim 11 of the present invention, in any one of claims 1 to 9, the output means gives the operation time of the operation performed to each operation item performed. It is what was displayed.

[0026]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Embodiment 1. FIG. 1 shows the configuration of a training progress monitoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
In FIG. 1, 1 is an operation input processing function, 2 is a plant simulation processing function, 3 is a plant operation training device, which is called a simulator for plant operation training. An operation result item recording device (operation item collecting means) 4 collects and records operation contents as operation items. Reference numeral 5 denotes a standard operation procedure storage device (standard operation procedure database) in which standard operation items and operation procedures in which the standard operations are ordered are registered in advance. 6 is an operation item comparison function (operation item comparison means),
Reference numeral 7 is an operation item editing function, 8 is an output device such as a CRT display or printer, and 9 is a training progress display device. The operation item editing function 7 and the output device 8 form an output means.

Next, the operation of the training progress monitoring system will be described. The operation of the training progress monitoring system includes
There are three items: (1) operation collection during training, (2) comparison with standard operation items, and (3) display of training progress.

(1) Operation collection at the time of training Similar to the conventional method of displaying the history of the executed operation items, the operation signals performed by the plant operation training apparatus 3 are operation signal names as operation signal names. Are recorded in the operation record item recording device 4 in the order of, that is, in the order in which the operation is performed.

(2) Comparison with standard operating procedure items In the standard operating procedure storage device 5, procedure data of standard operating procedure items defined according to the operating procedure of the plant is registered in advance. The standard operation procedure data defines the operation procedure based on the standard operation procedure, and the operation procedure to be performed is described at the operation item level as in the standard operation procedure flow chart shown in FIG. Has been done.

As described above, FIG. 2 shows an example of standard operation procedure data. The standard operation procedure data defines the items to be operated and the order in accordance with the progress of operation. For operation of the plant, it is sufficient to operate any one of a plurality of series of equipment having equivalent functions (OR condition)
The operation items of one group should be operated in any order (AND conditions) and combinations of these OR conditions and AND conditions are included, but the degree of freedom in these operating operations is also included in the standard operating procedure data. It has been described. In the example of FIG. 2, these degrees of freedom express an OR condition by connecting each operation in parallel, such as “operation 4a” and “operation 4b”. Further, “operation 3a” to “operation 3e” are items (AND conditions) that should be operated on in any order in a group of operation items (AND condition), and are connected in parallel to AN.
It is expressed by adding the symbol 20 of the D condition, and "Operation 1
Such as "a" and "operation 5", it is necessary to operate any one series.

The operation record data taken into the operation record item recording device 4 is input to the operation item comparison function 6 online every time the operation is carried out, and the standard operation procedure storage device 5 is provided.
It is compared with standard operating procedure data stored in. If the operation item of the operation result data is an operation item included in the standard operation procedure, it is determined that the item to be operated has been executed, and if it is not included, it is determined as an extra operation. Further, among the items of the standard operation procedure, it is possible to judge that the items that match the items of the operation result data have been operated, and those that are not included in the operation result data are the unimplemented items. From this, the operation items carried out in driving training are classified into items included in the standard operation procedure and extra operation items each time,
In addition, the operation items remaining in the standard operation procedure data become the unexecuted operation items.

The operation record data and the standard operation procedure data can be compared by, for example, searching for operation items having the same item name in order from the beginning. For example, when comparing the standard operation procedure data of FIG. 2 with the operation record data 24 of FIG. 3, first, the item having the same name as the first item “operation 1” of the operation record data 24 is set to the standard operation of FIG. When searching from the beginning of the operation procedure data in order, the item "Operation 1" at the beginning of the standard operation procedure data matches the item name, so both are considered to be the same operation and this item is included in the standard operation operation. The operation (hereinafter referred to as “executed standard operation”) is added to the list (FIG. 4, item “operation 1”), and already performed in the first item “operation 1” of the standard operation procedure data of FIG. A mark (not shown) for the performed operation is attached.

Next, the second item "operation 2a1" of the operation result data 24 is searched in order from the beginning of the standard operation procedure data. First, the first item "operation 1" of the standard operation procedure data is ignored since it is an operation already performed. Next, the second item "operation 2a" of the standard operation procedure data
1 ”and the second item“ operation 2a ”of the operation result data 24.
1 ”is the same as the item name, so this item is put in the list of performed standard operations (FIG. 4, item“ operation 2a1 ”), and the second item“ operation 2a ”of the standard operation procedure data is entered.
1 ”is marked with a mark (not shown) of the operation already performed.

In the case of the third item "Operation X", even if each item in FIG. 2 is searched in sequence, there is no item with the same name, so this item is not included in the standard operation and is performed. (Hereinafter, referred to as “extra operation”) (FIG. 4, item “operation X”). Similarly, the fourth item “operation 2a2” has the same item name as the third item “operation 2a2” in FIG. 2, so this item is added to the list of performed standard operations (FIG. 4, item “operation 2a2”). 2a2 ”), the item“ operation 2a2 ”in FIG. 2 is marked with a mark (not shown) of the operation already performed. Since the item with the same name does not exist in FIG. 2, the item “operation Y” is added to the list of extra operations (FIG. 4, item “operation Y”).

When all the items of the operation record data 24 have been classified, the items in the standard operation procedure data that are not marked with the operation already performed are included in the standard operation and are not yet implemented. It is added to the list of operations that have not been performed (hereinafter, referred to as “unimplemented standard operations”) (FIG. 4, items “operation 2b1” to “operation 5”).

(3) Display of training progress status The operation items classified and compared are sent to the operation item editing function 7. The operation item editing function 7 transforms the obtained classification result into a format for displaying and displays it on the output device 8. FIG. 4 shows the operation item classification result list 25 in which the implemented standard operation items 41, the extra operation items 42, and the unimplemented standard operation items 43.
In this example, each item classified into three types is displayed in a list format. Here, in the item on which the operation is performed, the sequence number of the operation (hereinafter, referred to as “operation sequence”) 1, 2 ,,
3, ... are attached.

This is, for example, the operation record item recording device 4
When the operation input signal from the operation input processing function 1 is input, the operation order is input in the input order (FIG. 3, operation order 1 to 5).
It is done by giving. In this method,
The operation results may be stored in the operation result item recording device 4 and classified and displayed offline after the operation is completed, or may be classified and displayed online each time the operation is performed.

In addition, in FIG.
Although each item classified into three types of 1, the extra operation item 42, and the unexecuted standard operation item 43 is displayed, any one kind or two kinds of classification items may be displayed as necessary.

Embodiment 2. In FIG. 4 of the first embodiment,
The operation item name and the order in which the operation was performed are displayed, but in the same way, the time when the operation was performed (hereinafter, "operation time"
Is also displayed, the time when the operation is performed and the time interval between the operation items can be grasped. The operation time is displayed, for example, in the operation record item recording device 4, when the operation input signal from the operation input processing function 1 is input, the time information at the time of the operation signal input is added. FIG. 5 is an example in which the operation item 21 is displayed in the operation item classification result list 26 together with the operation item and the operation order.

Embodiment 3. Based on the classification of the operation items obtained by using the first embodiment, the operation items on the operation procedure flow diagram are displayed separately for the executed standard operation items and the unexecuted standard operation items, thereby performing the plant operation operation. It is possible to make it easier to visually grasp the progress status of.
In the first embodiment, when the operation item comparison device 6 compares the standard operation procedure of FIG. 2 with the operation result data of FIG. 3, the operation items “operation 1” “operation 2a1” “operation 2” of FIG.
"a2" is marked with a mark (not shown) of the operation already performed. Therefore, the operation procedure flow chart with this mark is passed to the operation item editing function 7. The operation item editing function 7
When the operation procedure flow chart is displayed on the output device 8, the operation item with the mark of the operation already performed is displayed separately from the other operation items.

FIG. 6 shows the implemented standard operation items ("operation 1").
By making the background of “operation 2a1” and “operation 2a2” gray, it indicates that the item has already been executed, and by making the background white, the other operations are items that have not been executed yet. It is an example showing that. In this way, by displaying the operation items on the operation procedure flow diagram by distinguishing between the performed standard operation items and the unimplemented standard operation items, the operations already performed in the flow of the operation procedure flow diagram are displayed. Can be grasped visually. In addition, in the third embodiment, the items are identified and displayed by changing the background color of the characters. However, the items may be identified and displayed by another method such as bolding or blinking.

Fourth Embodiment When displaying the operational procedure flow chart obtained by using the third embodiment, the operational sequence and the operational time may be added and displayed. The operation order and the operation time are displayed by adding a serial number or time to each operation item when an operation input signal is input to the operation result item recording device 4.

FIG. 7 is an example in which the operation sequence is displayed with the operation order added. Here, it is assumed that the training is performed in the order of “operation 1”, “operation 2a2”, and “operation 2a1”. In FIG. 7, according to the order of the performed operations,
Each operation is numbered 12, 3, ... It is possible to understand that the order of the operations is wrong by the fact that the "3" attached to the "operation 2a1" and the "2" attached to the "operation 2a2" go backward in the operation flow chart.

Embodiment 5. With the method described in the third embodiment, the performed standard operation item and the unexecuted standard operation item can be confirmed, but the extra operation item cannot be confirmed. Therefore, by displaying the list of extra operation items at the same time as the operation procedure flow chart displayed by the method of the first embodiment, it is possible to simultaneously confirm the implemented standard operation items, unimplemented standard operation items, and extra operation items. Is possible.

FIG. 8 is an example in which the operation procedure flow 35 obtained by the method of the third embodiment and the list 36 of extra operation items obtained by the method of the first embodiment are displayed on the same screen. By using the method of the fifth embodiment, it is possible to simultaneously confirm the executed standard operation item, the unexecuted standard operation item, and the extra operation item. Although the operation procedure flow diagram and the list of extra operation items are displayed on the same screen in the present embodiment, they may be displayed on different output devices or may be displayed by switching screens. .

Sixth Embodiment The operation procedure flow diagram and the list of extra operation items obtained by using the fifth embodiment may be displayed with the operation order and operation time. FIG. 9 is an example in which the operation sequence is added to the operation procedure flow 35 and the list of extra operation items 36. By adding the operation order, it is possible to understand the order relationship between the performed standard operation and the extra operation. Also,
As in the case of the fourth embodiment, if a reverse number is attached to the flow of the operation procedure flow diagram, it can be understood that the operation order is wrong.

Embodiment 7. Based on the classification of the operation items obtained by using the first embodiment, the operation items on the operation result item list are displayed separately for the executed standard operation items and the extra operation items, so that the plant operation operation is appropriate. It is possible to make it easier to visually grasp whether or not the work is being performed.

In the first embodiment, the operation item comparison device 6
Then, the standard operation procedure of FIG. 2 and the operation result data of FIG. 3 are compared, and the performed operation items are classified into a list of performed standard operations and a list of extra operations. , Mark the extra operation items, put them in the same list, and use the operation item editing function 7 as the operation result item list.
Pass to. When displaying the operation record item list on the output device 8, the operation item editing function 7 performs a process of distinguishing marked items.

FIG. 10 shows an example in which the extra operation items among the operation items on the operation result item list 23 are displayed separately. Similar to the operation items “operation X” and “operation Y” in the first embodiment (FIG. 4), the operation items “operation X” and “operation Y” in FIG. 10 are extra operation items, and are displayed in bold type. , It is distinguished from the implemented standard operation items.

As described above, by distinguishing and displaying the extra operation items among the operation items on the operation result item list 23, it is possible to confirm which operation is the extra operation which is not included in the standard operation procedure. As a result, it is possible to confirm the number of items that were originally included in the standard operating procedure and the number of items that were included in the standard operating procedure and that were not included in the standard operating procedure.
You can visually grasp at what stage the extra operation was performed. In this embodiment, the items are displayed in bold type to distinguish the items. However, it is also possible to use other methods such as changing the character color or the background color or blinking the items.

Embodiment 8. In the sixth embodiment, the display example of displaying the list of extra operation items at the same time as the operation procedure flow chart is described using the third embodiment, but at the same time the operation procedure flow chart is displayed using the third embodiment. The operation record item list may be displayed using the seventh embodiment.

FIG. 11 shows an operation procedure flow chart according to the second embodiment, and also displays the operation result item list 23 according to the fourth embodiment, which is displayed by dividing the same screen into two screens. It is an example. Using the eighth embodiment,
As in the sixth embodiment, it is possible to simultaneously confirm the performed standard operation item, the performed extra operation item, and the non-executed standard operation item, and at the same time as in the seventh embodiment, at which stage the extra operation is performed. You can visually understand what was done. In the present embodiment, the operation procedure flow 35,
The operation record item list 23 is displayed on the same screen,
These may be displayed on different output devices, or may be displayed by switching screens.

Ninth Embodiment The operation procedure flow chart and the operation result item list obtained by using the eighth embodiment may be displayed with the operation order and the operation time. FIG. 12 is an example in which the operation procedure flow 35 and the operation result item list 23 are given an operation order. For the same operation item “operation a”, “operation b”, and “operation g”, the same operation order (1, respectively) in the operation procedure flow 35 and the operation result item list 23.
2, 4) are attached, which is useful for understanding that both are the same item. Further, as in the case of the fourth embodiment, if a reverse number is attached to the flow of the operation procedure flow diagram, it can be understood that the operation order is wrong.

Embodiment 10. In the first embodiment, the implemented operation items are classified into the implemented standard operation items and the extra operation items. However, the operating state of the plant that is the operation permissible condition is set in advance for the implemented standard operation items. In this case, it is also possible to determine whether or not the operation permission condition is satisfied, and to make it possible to determine on the operation procedure flow diagram for the item for which the condition is not satisfied.

The operation permitting condition is a condition for controlling the timing of operation and the state of the plant, and is represented by a condition such as "the output of the plant is X% or more during operation".
FIG. 13 is a system configuration diagram of the training progress monitoring device that determines and displays the operation permission condition. Hereinafter, in the system of FIG. 13, a method of displaying on the operation procedure flow chart whether or not the operation permission condition is satisfied will be described.

In the system of FIG. 13 as well, as in the case of the first embodiment (FIG. 1), standard operating procedure data is registered in the standard operating procedure storage device 5 in advance. In the tenth embodiment, the items of the standard operation procedure data further include
The operation permission conditions are attached in advance. The operation performed by the plant operation training apparatus 3 is classified into the performed standard operation item or the extra operation item in the operation item comparison function 6 as in the first embodiment. If it is determined that the standard operation item has been performed, if the operation item corresponding to the standard operation procedure data has an operation allowance condition, the operation allowance condition is determined based on the plant state simulated by the plant simulation processing function. Determine if it holds.

When the operation permission condition is attached and the condition is not satisfied (hereinafter, referred to as "operation permission condition violation"), the operation permission condition violation is indicated in the corresponding operation item on the standard operation procedure flow chart. Is attached. The operation item editing function 7 displays the standard operation procedure flow chart on the output device 8 based on the result of the operation item comparing function 6. As in the case of the third embodiment, the operation item editing function 7 distinguishes and displays the performed standard operation items and the extra operation items. Further, among the performed standard operation items, the mark indicating the violation of the operation permission condition is displayed. The attached operation items are displayed separately.

FIG. 14 shows the item "operation a" on which the operation is performed.
The backgrounds of the “operation b”, the “operation c”, and the “operation g” are grayed out, and in particular, the frame of the item “operation c” violating the operation permissive condition is identified by thickening. In the present embodiment, the item borders are displayed by thickening the frame lines of the items.However, the letter color or the background color is changed, the letters are bolded, or blinking is displayed to distinguish the items. Moreover, you may distinguish by another method.

Further, in the present embodiment, the violation of the operation permission condition is displayed on the operation procedure flow chart, but it may be displayed in the list format. In FIG. 15, "operation permission condition violation" is displayed on the operation result item list, which is displayed together with the extra operation items. Alternatively, a mark may be added to an item that violates the operation permissible condition and displayed on the list of performed standard operation items. As a mark, an item that violates the operation permission condition can be identified by changing the character color or the background color.
Also, create a list of items that violate the operation permission conditions,
It is also possible to display.

Eleventh Embodiment In the method described in the fourth embodiment, by adding the operation order on the standard operation procedure flow chart, it is possible to grasp that the operation order is wrong by the operation order that is the reverse of the flow of the flow chart. It is also possible to grasp the error in the operation sequence by distinguishing and displaying the operation items performed before the above operation is completed. In the standard operation procedure registered in the standard operation procedure flow chart, a plurality of operation routes may exist in parallel as in the example shown in FIG.

Here, the steps from the parallel arrangement of a plurality of operation routes until the operation routes are merged again, and the step originally consisting of one operation item will be referred to as operation steps. FIG. 16 is a diagram in which the standard operation procedure of FIG. 2 is divided into operation stages. When the operation of each operation step is performed, it is possible to grasp the error of the operation order by determining whether the previous operation step is completed and displaying it as the operation order error when it is not completed. Completion of the previous operating phase
For example, when the first operation of each operation step is performed, it is determined whether the last operation of the previous operation step has been performed according to the following cases. Whether or not a certain operation item on the standard operation procedure has been performed is the same as in the method of the first embodiment, each time the operation item is performed, the corresponding item on the standard operation procedure is marked as operated. It can be determined by setting.

(1) The first item is always judged to have no operation procedure violation. For example, when the item “operation 1” in FIG. 16 is operated, there is no previous operation, and therefore there is no operation procedure violation. (2) If the previous operation stage consists of one operation item,
It is determined whether the operation item has been performed. For example,
When the item “operation 2a1” in FIG. 16 is operated, the previous operation step is the operation item “operation 1”. Therefore, if this is not operated, it is determined that there is an operation procedure violation, and the item “operation 2a1” indicates an operation procedure violation. Attach a mark (not shown).

(3) In the case where the previous operation stage is a sequence that can be performed in any order but all routes should be processed (hereinafter referred to as "AND operation"), the last operation of all routes has already been performed. Determine if there is. For example, when the item “operation 4a” in FIG. 16 is operated, it goes back to FIG.
Since there is the symbol 20 indicating the operation of the condition, it can be seen that the previous operation stage is the AND operation. Therefore, if any one of the last operation item “operation a”, “operation b”, “operation c”, “operation d”, and “operation e” of each previous route is not operated,
As the operation procedure is violated, an operation procedure violation mark (not shown) is attached to the item “operation 4a”.

(4) If the previous operation stage is one in which any route can be processed (hereinafter referred to as "OR operation"), the last operation of any one route has already been performed. Determine if there is. For example, the item “operation 3” in FIG.
When “a” is operated, it can be seen from FIG. 16 that the route is branched into a plurality of routes. Here, since there is no symbol 20 representing the operation of the AND condition, it can be seen that the previous operation stage is the OR operation. Therefore, if all the operation items “operation 2a2” and “operation 2b2” at the last of the previous routes have not been operated, it is determined that there is an operation procedure violation, and an operation procedure violation mark (not shown) is given to “operation 3a”. Attach.

In the above, only the head item of each operation stage can be judged as a violation of the operation procedure. However, by applying this judgment hierarchically to each route of the operation stage, each operation item can be judged. is there. For example, operation step 2 in FIG.
Consists of the routes of the items "operation 2a1" and "operation 2a2" and the routes of the items "operation 2b1" and "operation 2b2".
In FIG. 17, the routes of the items “operation 2a1” and “operation 2a2” are divided into operation stages. Operation item "Operation 2a"
2 ”is performed, the operation item“ operation 2a1 ”is the previous operation stage. Therefore, if the operation item“ operation 2a1 ”has not been executed, the operation item“ operation 2a2 ”is marked as an operation procedure violation mark (see FIG. (Not shown).

FIG. 18 is a flowchart of the operation procedure of FIG.
In this example, the backgrounds of the performed standard operation items "operation 1", "operation 2a1", and "operation 2a2" are gray, and the background of the operation procedure violation item "operation 4a" is shaded in gray. In the present embodiment, the background color is shaded gray to indicate the distinction of items, but it is also possible to use other methods such as changing the character color, making it bold, blinking, or the like.

[0067]

As described above, according to the present invention, the operation items to be executed are classified into three types, that is, the executed standard operation items, the executed extra items, and the unexecuted standard operation items, and output. The operation status can be easily confirmed, and the predetermined operation items classified in the standard operation procedure flow chart, the list of extra operation items, etc. are displayed for identification, so that the operation can be more easily confirmed. .

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a training progress monitoring device system according to a first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an operation flow diagram of the training progress monitoring device according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a list showing operation record data of the training progress monitoring device according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of a list in which operation items are classified according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a diagram in which an operation time is added to a list in which operation items are classified according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a diagram in which performed standard operations are distinguished on the standard operation procedure flow chart according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a diagram in which an already-executed standard operation is distinguished and an operation order is added on the standard operation procedure flow chart according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an extra operation item list displayed simultaneously with the example of FIG. 6 according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a diagram in which the operation order is added to the example of FIG. 8 according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a diagram in which extra operation items are distinguished on the operation result item list according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a diagram in which the example of FIG. 6 and the example of FIG. 11 according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention are displayed simultaneously.

FIG. 12 shows an example in which an operation order is added to the example of FIG. 11 according to the ninth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a system configuration of a training progress monitoring device according to a tenth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a violation of permissible operating conditions on the flow chart according to the tenth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a violation of permissible operating conditions on a list according to the tenth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a diagram in which a standard operation procedure according to an eleventh embodiment of the present invention is divided into operation stages.

FIG. 17 is a diagram in which one route of the standard operation procedure according to the eleventh embodiment of the present invention is divided into operation stages.

FIG. 18 is a diagram in which operating procedure violation items are distinguished and displayed on the standard operating procedure flow diagram according to the eleventh embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a system configuration of a conventional training progress monitoring device.

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing a conventional operation record item list.

FIG. 21 is a diagram showing a system configuration of a training progress monitoring device that displays a conventional plant operation progress state.

FIG. 22 is a diagram of a conventional progress determination logic.

FIG. 23 is a diagram showing a conventional plant operation progress state.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 Operation Input Processing Function 2 Plant Simulation Processing Function 1 Plant Operation Training Device 4 Operation Result Item Recording Device (Operation Item Collection Means) 5 Standard Operation Procedure Storage Device (Standard Operation Procedure Database) 6 Operation Item Comparison Function (Operation Item Comparison Means) 7 Operation item editing function (output means) 8 Output device (output means) 9 Training progress status display device 10 Operation history display device 11 Operation sequence (operation number) 12 Operation item 20 AND condition symbol 21 Operation time 23 Operation result item list 24 Operation result data 25, 26 Operation item classification result list 35 Standard operation procedure flow 36 Extra operation result item list 41 Performed standard operation 42 Extra operation 43 Unexecuted operation

   ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continued front page    (72) Inventor Masanobu Masanobu             2-3 2-3 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo             Inside Ryo Electric Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Takashi Kokubo             4-1, Egasaki-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa             Tokyo Electric Power Company Energy & Environment Research Center             Within

Claims (11)

[Claims] 1. A standard operation procedure database in which operation item collection means for collecting operation contents performed using a plant operation training apparatus as operation items, and standard operation items and operation procedures in which the standard operations are ordered in advance are registered. Then, the collected operation items are compared with the registered standard operation items, and three types of operation items, that is, a standard operation item that has been executed, a redundant operation item that has been executed other than the standard operation item, and a standard operation item that has not been executed An operation progress monitoring device comprising operation item comparison means for classifying, and output means for outputting and displaying the operation items classified into the above three types on a display / printer or the like, or for outputting to the outside. 2. The operation progress monitoring apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the standard operation procedure database includes an AND condition of a plurality of standard operation items, an OR condition, or a condition obtained by combining these conditions. 3. The output unit according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the operation items classified into three types, or at least one or two types of operation items are displayed in a list format collectively for each type. An operation progress monitoring device characterized by: 4. The output means according to claim 1, wherein the output means displays the standard operation items that have been executed and the extra operation items that have been executed in a list format in the order of operation, and the both items are classified by color, mark, etc. An operation progress monitoring device characterized by being identified and displayed by. 5. The output means according to claim 1, wherein the output means refers to the standard operation item corresponding to the executed operation item and its operation procedure from the standard operation procedure database, and displays the operation flow chart. An operation progress monitoring device characterized in that a standard operation item on an operation flow diagram is displayed as a standard operation item that has been performed and a standard operation item that has not been performed. 6. In claim 1 or claim 2, if there is an operation permissible condition for operating within the permissible range by limiting the temperature / pressure range of a predetermined location of the plant within the standard operation item, When registered in the standard operation procedure database, the operation item comparison means determines whether or not the performed operation item meets the above-mentioned operation permission condition when the operation item corresponds to the above-mentioned standard operation item, and the output means is the above-mentioned. The standard operation item corresponding to the performed standard operation item and its operation procedure are referred to from the standard operation procedure database to display an operation flow chart, and the operation item is identified and displayed according to the above determination result. Operation progress monitoring device. 7. In claim 1 or claim 2, if there is an operation permissible condition for limiting the temperature / pressure range of a predetermined location of the plant and operating within the permissible range within the standard operation item, When registered in the standard operation procedure database, the operation item comparing means determines whether or not the operation allowable condition meets the above operation permitting condition when the executed operation item corresponds to the standard operation item, and the output means executes the operation. Displayed in a list format together with the already-executed standard operation items or the already-executed standard operation items and other extra operation items, unexecuted standard operation items, etc., and the operation items are identified and displayed according to the determination result, or, The operation progress monitoring device, wherein the output means displays only operation items that violate the operation permission conditions. 8. The operation item comparison unit according to claim 1 or 2, determines whether or not an operation is performed according to a standard operation procedure, and the output unit is a standard operation corresponding to the performed operation item. An operation progress state characterized by displaying an operation flow chart by referring to an item and its operation procedure from a standard operation procedure database, and displaying the operation item on the operation flow chart in accordance with the above judgment result. Monitoring equipment. 9. The output means according to any one of claims 5, 6 and 8, in addition to the display of the operation flow chart, the executed extra items are in the form of a list or the executed standard operation items and the executed extra items. An operation progress monitoring device characterized in that operation items are displayed in a list format so as to be distinguishable from each other in an operation order, and displayed on two screens of the operation flow chart and the list format. 10. The operation progress status according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the output means displays the operation items by giving operation numbers in the order in which the operations are performed. Monitoring equipment. 11. The operation progress monitoring device according to claim 1, wherein the output unit displays the operation time of the operation performed for each performed operation item.