EP4311940A1 - Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques - Google Patents

Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4311940A1
EP4311940A1 EP22187973.7A EP22187973A EP4311940A1 EP 4311940 A1 EP4311940 A1 EP 4311940A1 EP 22187973 A EP22187973 A EP 22187973A EP 4311940 A1 EP4311940 A1 EP 4311940A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
actuator
machine
response
lpv
state
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP22187973.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Peter MC CURRY
Christian NORGAARD
Andriy TKACHUK VOLODYMYROVYCH
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Danfoss Scotland Ltd
Original Assignee
Danfoss Scotland Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Danfoss Scotland Ltd filed Critical Danfoss Scotland Ltd
Priority to EP22187973.7A priority Critical patent/EP4311940A1/fr
Publication of EP4311940A1 publication Critical patent/EP4311940A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04B—POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS
    • F04B51/00—Testing machines, pumps, or pumping installations
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04B—POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS
    • F04B1/00—Multi-cylinder machines or pumps characterised by number or arrangement of cylinders
    • F04B1/04—Multi-cylinder machines or pumps characterised by number or arrangement of cylinders having cylinders in star- or fan-arrangement
    • F04B1/053—Multi-cylinder machines or pumps characterised by number or arrangement of cylinders having cylinders in star- or fan-arrangement with actuating or actuated elements at the inner ends of the cylinders

Definitions

  • the invention relates to methods and control arrangements for determining a state of a hydraulic machine.
  • the invention relates to fault diagnostics for electronically commutated hydraulic machines.
  • Hydraulic machines such as hydraulic pumps or motors are typically complex devices involving several moving parts and interacting sub-assemblies, with the associated potential for various fault states to arise.
  • an electronically commutated hydraulic machine such as an electronically commutated pump, also referred to as a 'digital displacement pump'
  • faults of varying degrees of severity may arise.
  • Other faults are more global in nature, in that the fault affects multiple components of the ECM, and such faults tend to present a greater risk of damage to the machine.
  • a particular source of potential fault states in an ECM is the lubrication arrangement that facilitates relative movement between components to minimise wear.
  • the hydraulic fluid to be displaced is often also used for lubrication.
  • a crankcase housing a machine shaft, piston cylinder units (PCUs) and the associated valves may be flooded with the hydraulic fluid to immerse the components requiring lubrication.
  • an air pocket may form around a component and therefore deprive that component of lubricating fluid.
  • a component For the case of a valve, this may be referred to as a 'dry valve' scenario.
  • Such faults can be identified and remedied in various ways, although if not addressed can lead to failure of the associated component, such as a PCU of the ECM.
  • a PCU may become airlocked due to incorrect purging of fluid, during initial filling or fluid replacement, for example.
  • the hydraulic fluid may alternatively be overly aerated or otherwise contaminated.
  • Such faults can become more global in nature, in that multiple components within the crankcase may be inadequately lubricated.
  • 'dry running' a critical fault state may arise that threatens damage to the running surfaces of the shaft and failure of the ECM.
  • An aspect of the invention provides a method of determining a state of an electronically commutated hydraulic machine.
  • the machine has a machine shaft that is connected to a set of piston assemblies.
  • the piston assemblies may be piston cylinder units or pump modules, for example.
  • Each piston assembly comprises a respective electromechanical actuator, such as a solenoid actuator.
  • the method comprises performing a diagnostic routine while the machine shaft is stationary, the diagnostic routine comprising: operating each of the actuators of the set of piston assemblies; detecting, for each actuator, a signal indicative of a response of the actuator as the actuator is operated; and analysing each of the detected actuator response signals to determine the state of the machine.
  • Performing the diagnostic routine while the machine shaft is stationary enables the state of the machine to be determined before operating the machine. If the state of the machine includes one or more faults, discovering this before operating the machine enables preventative action to be taken to avoid incurring a risk of damage by operating the machine shaft when a fault exists.
  • the diagnostic routine may be performed at any suitable time. For example, the routine may be performed automatically each time the machine is to be operated, to validate the state of the machine before commencing operation. The diagnostic routine may also be performed on command. In some circumstances, the machine may be stopped to perform the diagnostic routine, and then the machine may be restarted once the routine completes.
  • a response of an actuator may comprise movement of a component of the actuator.
  • the actuator comprises a solenoid actuator
  • the moving component may be an armature.
  • Each signal indicative of a response of an actuator may comprise a signal corresponding to a back-electromotive force generated by movement of a component of the actuator.
  • Analysing a detected actuator response signal optionally comprises identifying any abnormalities in the actuator response signal. Identifying abnormalities in a detected actuator response signal may comprise comparing the detected actuator response signal with a reference response and/or with one or more threshold values.
  • the method may comprise analysing two or more of the detected actuator response signals collectively to determine the state of the machine.
  • the method may comprise analysing the detected actuator response signals in accordance with the respective positions of the actuators with respect to the machine and/or with respect to each other. Such methods may comprise determining whether the respective responses of adjacent actuators are anomalous. The position of an actuator having an anomalous response may be taken into account to determine the likely cause of the anomaly.
  • the method may comprise commencing rotation of the machine shaft in dependence on the determined the state of the machine, and optionally preventing rotation of the machine shaft and/or generating an alarm if the state of the machine comprises a fault.
  • This advantageously enables the method to identify faults before incurring a risk of damage to the machine shaft by operating the shaft when a fault state exists.
  • the fault may affect two or more of the actuators and therefore potentially be indicative of a fault that affects various parts of machine, such as a low fluid level in a crankcase of the machine.
  • Operating an actuator may comprise issuing a control signal to a drive circuit associated with the actuator.
  • Operating an actuator may comprise energising and then de-energising the actuator, in which case each signal indicative of a response of an actuator may comprise an indication of movement of a component of the actuator following de-energisation.
  • Operating an actuator may comprise progressively increasing an electrical current supplied to the actuator.
  • analysing the detected actuator response signal may comprise determining a value of the electrical current at which the actuator began to move. This may provide information that enables a fault to be characterised, for example if the value of the electrical current at which the actuator began to move deviates from an expected value.
  • Each actuator may be operable to open and close a respective fluid valve of the machine, for example a low-pressure valve.
  • Each actuator may be integrated with its respective valve.
  • Determining the state of the machine may comprise detecting one or more faults.
  • faults may include, for example, any of: a low fluid level; an airlocked actuator or valve; a broken actuator spring; a detached component associated with an actuator, such as a valve member associated with the actuator; resistance to actuator movement; or an erroneous state of fluid in the machine, for example if the fluid is overly aerated or otherwise contaminated, or more generally the fluid being other than it should be.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a controller for an electronically commutated hydraulic machine, the controller being configured to perform the method of the above aspect.
  • the machine has a machine shaft that is connected to a set of piston assemblies.
  • the piston assemblies may be piston cylinder units or pump modules, for example.
  • Each piston assembly comprises a respective electromechanical actuator, such as a solenoid actuator.
  • the controller comprises: an output configured to issue control signals for operating the actuators of the set of piston assemblies; an input configured to receive signals indicative of responses of the actuators as the actuators are operated; and a processing module or processor configured to analyse the detected actuator response signals.
  • the controller is configured to perform a diagnostic routine while the machine shaft is stationary, the diagnostic routine comprising: operating each of the actuators of the set of piston assemblies; detecting, for each actuator, a signal indicative of a response of the actuator as the actuator is operated; and analysing each of the detected actuator response signals to determine the state of the machine.
  • the diagnostic routine may be performed by the processing module, for example, using signals received by the input.
  • the invention also extends to an electronically commutated hydraulic machine comprising a controller of either of the above aspects.
  • embodiments of the invention provide diagnostic routines for hydraulic machines to identify and characterise faults that have the potential to damage the machine.
  • the diagnostic routines are advantageously performed before commencing operation of the machine, and in particular before allowing a machine shaft of the machine to rotate. This allows faults to be identified and corrective and/or preventative action to be taken before any damage is incurred.
  • the diagnostic routines involve operating electromechanical actuators of valves of an ECM while a machine shaft is stationary, and monitoring how the valves respond.
  • a 'response' of a valve may refer to the time that the valve takes to transition between closed and open states, for example. Any abnormalities in the responses are identified, for example through a comparison with a reference, expected response. In turn, such abnormalities are indicative of the existence of a fault.
  • the nature of the fault can be characterised, at least to some extent, by analysing the characteristics of the or each anomalous response and by taking the positions of the valves indicating faults into account.
  • Embodiments of the invention are therefore predicated on the insight that diagnosing faults before commencing operation of the machine enables some situations in which the machine is damaged to be avoided.
  • the responses of the valves may be monitored by detecting back-EMF generated by transitional movement of the valve members, which beneficially enables the diagnostic routine to be implemented with existing hardware and without requiring dedicated sensors for monitoring valve movement.
  • FIG. 1 shows a portion of an ECM 10 in which fault diagnostic routines may be implemented to identify and characterise faults before running the ECM 10, which faults may otherwise incur a risk of damage.
  • the ECM 10 is configured to operate as a hydraulic pump, but it should be appreciated that embodiments of the invention are equally applicable to ECMs configured as a hydraulic motor or as a pump/motor. More generally, diagnostic routines according to the invention may be implemented in any type of hydraulic machine.
  • the ECM includes a machine shaft defining a driveshaft 12 that is driven by a prime mover (not shown) such as an internal combustion engine or an electric motor, for example.
  • the driveshaft 12 is housed within a crankcase 14 that has a circular cross-section in Figure 1 , with the driveshaft 12 having a central axis defining a shaft axis that is aligned with the centre of the crankcase 14.
  • the driveshaft 12 carries an eccentric cam 16, which may be fixed to or integral with the driveshaft 12.
  • a set of six identical PCUs 18 are arranged in a circular array around the cam 16.
  • Each PCU 18 has a longitudinal axis 20 that extends radially within the crankcase 14 and therefore orthogonally to the shaft axis.
  • the PCUs 18 are equiangularly spaced around the driveshaft 12, and hence the respective longitudinal axes 20 of the PCUs 18 are spaced in a common plane at 60° intervals around the shaft axis.
  • the top-most PCU 18 is labelled as 0° in Figure 1 .
  • the top-most cylinder is correspondingly in an off-vertical orientation.
  • Each PCU 18 comprises a piston slipper 22 that engages a tubular outer face of the cam 16 to form a running interface with the cam 16 and therefore act as a cam follower.
  • the eccentricity of the cam 16 causes the cam 16 to drive the PCUs 18 in angular succession, via their respective piston slippers 22.
  • crankcase 14 The interior of the crankcase 14 is designed to be flooded with hydraulic liquid at low pressure, typically the same fluid that is displaced in the PCUs 18, which fluid serves as lubricating fluid for the components of the ECM 10.
  • a diagnostic routine may be used to determine whether the crankcase 14 is fully flooded as intended, or whether the level of fluid in the crankcase 14 is low such that a fault state exists.
  • FIG. 2 shows an individual PCU 18 in more detail.
  • the PCU 18 comprises a piston 24 received within a cylinder 26, defining a working chamber 28 therebetween.
  • a piston rod 30 extends towards the cam 16, a distal end of the piston rod 30 carrying or defining the piston slipper 22 that engages the cam 16.
  • Reciprocating movement of the piston slipper 22 as the cam 16 rotates during pumping drives corresponding linear reciprocating movement of the piston 24 relative to and within the cylinder 26, causing pressurisation of hydraulic fluid in the working chamber 28.
  • the working chamber 28 comprises two fluid ports, namely a low-pressure port 32 and a high-pressure port 34. Hydraulic fluid is drawn into the working chamber 28 through the low-pressure port 32 at relatively low pressure, for example from a low-pressure manifold. The hydraulic fluid is then pressurised and discharged from the working chamber 28 at elevated pressure through the high-pressure port 34.
  • the low-pressure port 32 therefore defines an inlet of the PCU
  • the high-pressure port 34 defines an outlet of the PCU.
  • valve arrangement 36 includes a low-pressure valve (LPV) 38 that acts to open and close the low-pressure port 32, and a high-pressure valve (HPV) 40 that acts to open and close the high-pressure port 34.
  • LUV low-pressure valve
  • HPV high-pressure valve
  • the LPV 38 opens while the piston 24 undergoes a filling or intake stroke, corresponding to downward movement in Figure 2 , and closes as the piston 24 undergoes a pumping stroke to displace the hydraulic fluid at elevated pressure, corresponding to upward movement in Figure 2 .
  • the HPV 40 operates in a complementary manner and so opens during the pumping stroke to permit the pressurised fluid to be discharged, and closes during the intake stroke.
  • the LPV 38 is shown schematically in Figure 2 , in a left portion of the valve arrangement 36.
  • the LPV 38 is configured as a face-sealing poppet valve that acts as a check valve.
  • the LPV 38 comprises a valve member defining a low-pressure poppet (LPP) 42, which is configured to engage a low-pressure valve seat 44 to close the low-pressure port 32 when required, and correspondingly to lift from the low-pressure valve seat 44 to open the low-pressure port 32.
  • the LPP 42 is biased away from the low-pressure valve seat 44 by an LPV return spring 46, and so the LPV 38 is configured as a normally-open valve.
  • the LPV 38 is configured to be normally open, and is thus open during intake strokes, primarily under the action of a spring force provided by the LPV return spring 46.
  • a spring force provided by the LPV return spring 46.
  • hydrodynamic forces acting on the LPP 42 generally align and compound with the respective spring force.
  • Closing movement of the LPV 38 is controlled by a solenoid actuator (shown in Figure 3 ) that is integrated with the LPV 38, as described further below.
  • the LPV 38 can therefore be closed selectively, enabling the volume of fluid admitted to the working chamber 28 on each cycle to be regulated. This, in turn, controls the extent to which the fluid is pressurised in each pumping stroke. Accordingly, the output of the PCU 18 is independently controllable from the output of other PCUs.
  • the HPV 40 is shown to the right of the valve arrangement 36 in Figure 2 , and is also configured as a face-sealing poppet valve that acts as a check valve.
  • the HPV 40 therefore comprises a high-pressure valve member defining a high-pressure poppet (HPP) 48.
  • the HPP 48 is configured to engage a high-pressure valve seat 50 to close the high-pressure port 34 when required, and correspondingly to lift from the high-pressure valve seat 50 to open the high-pressure port 34.
  • the HPP 48 is biased into engagement with the high-pressure valve seat 50 by an HPV return spring 52, and so the HPV 40 is configured as a normally-closed valve.
  • the HPP 48 is on an opposite side of its valve seat 50 to the working chamber 28, and so the HPV 40 is configured to open passively during pumping strokes when the fluid pressure in the working chamber 28 overcomes the opposing force provided both by the spring force of the HPV return spring 50, and the pressure force acting on the other side of the HPP 48 connected to the high-pressure manifold, to allow high-pressure fluid to be discharged.
  • the HPV 40 is also solenoid-actuated to enable the HPV 40 to be opened selectively.
  • Figure 3 shows an electrical arrangement 54 for operating the LPV 38, although it is noted that the HPV 40 may be configured in a similar manner when applied to a motor or pump/motor.
  • the LPV 38 comprises a solenoid actuator 56 having an armature 58 that is arranged within a coil defining a solenoid 60, so that energising the solenoid with an electrical current induces downward linear movement of the armature 58 in the orientation shown in Figure 3 .
  • the solenoid 60 is de-energised the armature 58 moves upwardly under the action of the LPV return spring 46.
  • the LPP 42 is mounted to the upper end of the armature 58 so that the LPP 42 and the armature 58 define an armature assembly.
  • the LPP 42 is carried by the armature 58 when the armature assembly moves on energisation and de-energisation of the solenoid 60. Accordingly, energising the solenoid 60 moves the LPP 42 downwardly to engage the low-pressure valve seat 44, compressing the LPV return spring 46 in the process, and transitioning the LPV 38 to a closed state in which the LPP 42 closes the low-pressure port 32.
  • the armature assembly is returned by the LPV return spring 46 to an open position in which the LPP 42 is lifted away from the low-pressure valve seat 44 to open the LPV 38 and the low-pressure port 32.
  • the LPV 38 therefore has an energise-to-close configuration in this example.
  • Figure 3 also shows that the electrical arrangement 54 further includes a controller 62, a drive circuit 64, and a sensing circuit 66. These are known electrical components and so are described only in overview here.
  • the controller 62 is configured to issue control signals to the drive circuit 64 in accordance with measurements received from the sensing circuit 66, to control energising and de-energising of the solenoid 60 and, in turn, operation of the LPV 38.
  • the controller 62 includes an input 68 for receiving feedback signals from the sensing circuit 66, a processor or processing module 70 for analysing the feedback signals and generating control signals accordingly, and an output 72 for issuing the control signals to the drive circuit 64.
  • the drive circuit 64 selectively energises and de-energises the solenoid 60, to close and open the LPV 38 respectively, in response to control signals received from the controller 62.
  • the sensing circuit 66 is configured to produce a signal that is indicative of an electrical current in the solenoid 60, although in other examples the sensing circuit 66 may alternatively be configured to detect a voltage in the solenoid 60, or both a current and a voltage.
  • the ability of the sensing circuit 66 to detect an electrical current and/or voltage in the solenoid 60 entails that it will also detect any back-electromotive force, also referred to as 'counter-electromotive force' or 'back-EMF', that is induced in the solenoid 60 by movement of the armature 58 within the solenoid 60 under the action of the LPV return spring 46 as the LPV 38 opens following de-energisation.
  • each LPV 38 of the ECM 10 comprises a respective drive circuit 64 and sensing circuit 66 in this embodiment, whereas the controller 62 is common to all of the LPVs 38 to enable the control of the LPVs 38 to be coordinated.
  • the controller 62 may correspond to a main controller 62 of the ECM 10, for example. It is also possible for each LPV 38 to have a dedicated controller, however.
  • a single drive circuit may drive all of the LPVs 38, and correspondingly a single sensing circuit may monitor responses of all of the LPVs 38.
  • the hardware of the ECM 10 described thus far is known, and may broadly correspond to the ECM described in the Applicant's earlier application, WO 2021/044148 , for example.
  • This hardware provides context for diagnostic routines for identifying faults that shall now be described. It is reiterated that diagnostic routines and corresponding control arrangements for diagnosing faults according to the invention may be implemented in different hydraulic machines, however.
  • the diagnostic routine involves operating the LPV 38 of each PCU 18 while the driveshaft 12 is stationary, and monitoring the response of the LPV 38 to check for anomalies.
  • operating an LPV 38 entails energising the associated solenoid 60 to close the LPV 38, and then de-energising the solenoid 60 to allow the LPV 38 to open passively.
  • the response of an LPV 38 to being operated refers to its behaviour when operated, particularly in terms of transitional movement between open and closed states.
  • the movement of the armature 58 generates back-EMF in the solenoid 60 of the LPV 38 that can be detected by the sensor circuit.
  • the characteristics of the back-EMF reading are indicative of the movement of the armature 58 and so can be analysed to infer the state of the LPV 38 and to identify anomalies.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a normal response of an LPV 38 as indicated by the back-EMF in the solenoid 60 as measured by the sensor circuit.
  • the response profile shown in Figure 4 therefore defines a reference response, against which measured responses may be compared to identify anomalies indicative of a fault.
  • Figure 4 shows the profile of the current measured by the sensor circuit over the course of a single operation of the LPV 38, that operation comprising energising the LPV 38 to close and then de-energising the LPV 38 to allow it to re-open.
  • Figure 4 shows an initial static phase in which the measured current is constant, corresponding to a period during which the solenoid 60 is energised by the drive circuit 64 and thus closed.
  • the solenoid 60 is de-energised and the electromagnetic field acting on the armature 58 begins to decay. This manifests as a downward curve in Figure 4 , as the current measured by the sensor circuit falls.
  • the armature assembly does not begin to move immediately when the solenoid 60 is de-energised. Instead, the armature assembly remains stationary until the residual electromotive force created by the decaying magnetic field, combined with a stiction force holding the armature assembly in place, falls below the spring force provided by the return spring 46, such that a net force acts to lift the LPP 42 from its seat 44.
  • Movement of the armature assembly initiates a dynamic phase.
  • the moment at which the LPP 42 lifts and the dynamic phase commences manifests as an increase in the measured current shown in Figure 4 , which corresponds to the back-EMF that is induced in the solenoid 60 by the movement of the armature 58.
  • the current continues to increase for a short period, reflecting acceleration of the armature 58 and a corresponding increase in the induced back-EMF. Acceleration of the armature 58 is opposed by a range of forces that arise in the dynamic phase, including hydrodynamic, frictional and eddy-making resistance forces.
  • the current then reaches a peak, 'back-EMF_max', corresponding to an amplitude of the back-EMF, beyond which the current falls again sharply to resume the original trajectory of the decaying magnetic field.
  • the peak current corresponds to termination of the movement of the armature 58, which in turn ceases the induction of back-EMF in the solenoid 60. Accordingly, the peak current measurement defines the moment at which the LPV 38 reaches its open state and so defines a reopening time, 't reopening '.
  • the period between de-energising the solenoid 60 and completion of reopening of the LPV 38 defines a response time, T response , of the LPV 38.
  • the response time therefore reflects the total time for the LPV 38 to reopen fully after de-energisation.
  • the response time of an LPV 38 in part reflects of the medium through which the armature 58 and LPP 42 move through while opening.
  • Figure 4 reflects the normal situation, in which the LPP 42 and the armature 58 are immersed in hydraulic fluid.
  • the hydraulic fluid is relatively dense and viscous, and so presents significant resistance to movement of the armature assembly.
  • Figure 5 shows the response of an LPV 38 that is 'dry', in that there is no hydraulic fluid around the armature assembly, which is instead surrounded by air. This may be because the LPV 38 is encased by an air bubble, or because the level of hydraulic fluid in the crankcase 14 is low, for example. Air has a lower density and viscosity compared to hydraulic fluid and so presents less resistance to movement of the armature assembly. It follows that the armature assembly moves faster in this situation, and so the LPV response time is reduced.
  • the response of an LPV 38 to being operated when the driveshaft 12 is stationary can be used to infer whether the LPV 38 is functioning properly.
  • a response that differs from the expected response shown in Figure 4 is indicative of a fault. More specifically, either or both of the response time T response of the LPV 38 and the amplitude of the response may be analysed to detect an abnormality with respect to the expected response of the LPV 38.
  • faults There are various faults that may cause the response to deviate from the expected response. Some of these faults are local in nature, including a dry valve state as represented in Figure 5 , a broken return spring 46 or detachment of the LPP 42 from the armature 58, for example. Other faults are more global, including a low fluid level in the crankcase 14 and the physical state of the hydraulic fluid being other than it should be, for example due to being overly aerated or otherwise contaminated, for example with air, water or diesel.
  • a more global fault may be present, such as a low fluid level in the crankcase 14 or a poor physical state of the hydraulic fluid. In either case, it is preferable not to activate the ECM 10 until the fault has been remedied. To assess this, the positions of the faulty LPVs 38, both relative to the other LPVs 38 and spatially within the crankcase 14, can be taken into account. There are various ways to do so, one of which is shown in Figure 6 .
  • Figure 6 shows a process defining a diagnostic routine 80 for detecting faults in the ECM 10, which routine 80 involves operating the LPVs 38 while the ECM 10 is otherwise inactive and the driveshaft 12 is stationary. It is envisaged that the routine 80 may be performed at start-up of the ECM 10 as part of an initialisation procedure, although the routine 80 may be performed at other times and at different frequencies. The diagnostic routine 80 may also be used as part of a commissioning process to confirm proper configuration of the ECM 10.
  • the routine 80 starts by operating, at step 82, each of the LPVs 38 of the ECM 10.
  • the LPVs 38 may be operated simultaneously or at different times, for example in succession.
  • operating an LPV 38 entails energising the LPV 38 to close the LPV 38 for a short period, and then de-energising the LPV 38 to allow it to open.
  • a complete cycle of energisation followed by de-energisation therefore represents a single operation of the LPV.
  • each LPV 38 as it is operated is detected by its respective sensing circuit 66.
  • the sensing circuits 66 detect signals indicative of the electrical current in the solenoid 60 of the LPV. These signals are transmitted to the controller 62 as response signals, which are analysed by the controller 62 to determine whether the amplitude and/or the response time T response of the response signals are as expected.
  • the controller 62 applies threshold values to the characteristics of the response signals, based on the reference response shown in Figure 4 , to determine whether the measured values are within expected threshold ranges.
  • the diagnostic routine 80 finds that LPV 38 to be operating correctly. If an LPV 38 exhibits a response that lies outside the threshold values, that LPV 38 is flagged at step 84 as indicating a fault.
  • step 86 If all of the LPVs 38 are determined at step 86 to have response signals within the thresholds and so are operating correctly, such that none are flagged, the prime mover is started at step 88, to commence rotation of the driveshaft 12 and the diagnostic routine 80 terminates.
  • the controller 62 then checks whether more than one LPV is flagged at step 90. If only one LPV 38 is found to be flagged, the fault can be assumed to be localised to that LPV 38. In this example, the prime mover is allowed to start at step 92, subject to further testing. Once the driveshaft 12 begins to rotate, further tests can be performed at step 94 to characterise the fault in the flagged LPV 38. Once the nature of the fault has been assessed at step 96, either the flag can be cleared at step 98 or, if a fault is verified and requires corrective action, the prime mover can be stopped and/or an alarm can be generated for an operator at step 100.
  • the ECM 10 may not be allowed to start if even a single LPV 38 is flagged.
  • the diagnostic routine 80 continues to assess the nature of the faults further, in particular to determine whether the indicated faults are localised, or if they collectively suggest a global fault such as a low fluid level in the crankcase 14.
  • the next step of the routine 80 is to identify at step 102 the position of each flagged LPV 38.
  • the LPVs 38 can be identified with reference to the angular positions of their respective PCUs 18 with respect to the shaft axis, as shown in Figure 1 . Accordingly, references below to an LPV 38 at a particular angle refers to the LPV 38 of the PCU 18 at that angle.
  • each flagged LPV 38 can then be used to evaluate the likelihood that the indicated faults relate to a global fault.
  • the proximity of flagged LPVs 38 to each other is used as an indicator of a global fault.
  • the controller 62 checks at step 104 whether flagged LPVs 38 are adjacent to each other, meaning that the flagged LPVs 38 are at 60° to each other with respect to the shaft axis in this example.
  • the flagged LPVs 38 are assumed to be subject to separate localised faults. For example, if the LPVs 38 at 60° and 180° are flagged but the remaining LPVs 38 are not flagged, the fault indicated for the LPV 38 at 60° can be assumed to be localised and different to the fault indicated for the LPV 38 at 180°. In this situation, the routine proceeds to steps 92, 94 and 96 and so the prime mover is activated to commence rotation of the driveshaft 12. Further tests can then be performed at step 94 to characterise the faults in the flagged LPVs 38.
  • the outcome of these further tests may require an individual PCU 18 to be deactivated, or the ECM 10 to be stopped entirely at step 100 so that the fault can be remedied.
  • the further testing may reveal one or more of the faults to be minor or even false positives, such that the associated flags can be cleared at step 98.
  • the controller 62 also takes into account the spatial orientation of the flagged LPVs 38 as an additional or alternative way to characterise faults. For example, if the fluid level in the crankcase 14 is low, it would be expected that all LPVs 38 above the fluid level would be flagged, whereas LPVs 38 below the fluid level would not be expected to be flagged. So, for example, if the LPVs 38 at 0° and 60° are flagged but the LPV 38 at 300° is not flagged, this suggests that something other than a low fluid level is the cause of the problems in the flagged LPVs 38.
  • the controller 62 applies a criterion that more than two LPVs 38 must be flagged and adjacent to indicate a global fault.
  • flagging of the LPV 38 at 0° alone is deemed acceptable, in all other low fluid level situations at least three adjacent LPVs 38 will be flagged, since the LPVs 38 at 60° and 300° are at the same vertical level (in the instance the 0° top-most cylinder is at or very close to vertical).
  • the flagged, adjacent LPVs 38 are counted at step 106. If no more than two adjacent LPVs 38 are found to be flagged at step 108, the faults are assumed to be local to the flagged LPVs 38 such that it is safe to operate the ECM 10 without risking damage, and so the prime mover is started at step 92. Once the ECM 10 is operating, other tests can be performed to determine the precise nature of the faults in the flagged LPVs 38. These tests may reveal the flagged LPVs 38 to be operating correctly, such that the controller 62 flagged the LPVs 38 incorrectly, in which case the flags are removed and the ECM 10 continues to operate. Otherwise, if a fault is confirmed then the ECM 10 can be deactivated and the fault can be reported to an operator of the ECM 10.
  • the controller 62 determines that a global fault is likely to exist that threatens damage to the ECM 10 if it is activated.
  • the controller 62 therefore takes preventative action by prohibiting operation of the prime mover and/or generating an alarm that is indicated to an operator of the ECM 10 at step 100.
  • the fault can then be investigated further without ever having risked damage to the ECM 10 by operating whilst in a fault state.
  • the prime mover may not be started on identifying a localised fault in one or more LPVs 38. Instead, if an air bubble around an LPV 38 is suggested, the machine can be bled of air or refilled as necessary to remove the bubble. The diagnostic routine 80 can then be repeated to confirm whether the fault is resolved.
  • the logic and criteria applied in the diagnostic routine 80 for characterising faults based on the readings of the LPV responses may vary, for example based on operating experience or to represent varying degrees of caution.
  • the prime mover may be prohibited from operating if a single LPV 38 is flagged.
  • Specific spatial patterns for flagged valves may be defined that are deemed to indicate global faults or to be otherwise unacceptable.
  • two or three non-adjacent flagged LPVs 38 may be sufficient to trigger prohibiting of the prime mover.
  • the routine 80 helps to identify fault states that could cause severe damage to the ECM 10 if it is allowed to operate, and therefore prevents that damage from arising. This is achieved without requiring any sensors or other additional hardware to be fitted to the ECM 10, and so does not contribute unwanted complexity.
  • a second diagnostic test can be used before allowing the driveshaft 12 to rotate.
  • the second diagnostic test may be applied to each LPV 38 or, if used in combination with the diagnostic routine 80 described above, only to flagged LPVs 38.
  • the drive circuit 64 of the LPV 38 is controlled to increase an electrical current supplied to the solenoid 60 of the LPV 38 gradually, and the feedback received from the sensing circuit 66 is analysed to find the current at which the armature assembly begins to move to close the LPV.
  • the expected response is known and so a threshold range for the current required to close the LPV 38 can be applied to determine whether the LPV response is normal.
  • Increasing the current supplied to a solenoid 60 may be implemented by increasing a duty cycle of a pulse-width modulated (PWM) signal used to control the LPV, for example.
  • PWM pulse-width modulated
  • the two diagnostic tests described above can be combined, by energising each LPV 38 with a gradually increasing current to close the LPV, and then de-energising the LPV.
  • the current or voltage in the solenoid 60 measured by the sensor circuit throughout the operation can then be analysed to determine both the current at which the LPV 38 closed, and therefore whether the return spring 46 is faulty, and the response of the LPV 38 during reopening and therefore whether any other abnormalities are indicated.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Fluid-Pressure Circuits (AREA)
EP22187973.7A 2022-07-29 2022-07-29 Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques Pending EP4311940A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP22187973.7A EP4311940A1 (fr) 2022-07-29 2022-07-29 Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP22187973.7A EP4311940A1 (fr) 2022-07-29 2022-07-29 Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4311940A1 true EP4311940A1 (fr) 2024-01-31

Family

ID=82786418

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP22187973.7A Pending EP4311940A1 (fr) 2022-07-29 2022-07-29 Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4311940A1 (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2386027A2 (fr) * 2010-02-23 2011-11-16 Artemis Intelligent Power Limited Machine à fluide de travail et son procédé de fonctionnement
CN109270863A (zh) * 2018-10-10 2019-01-25 上海新力动力设备研究所 一种具有状态检测功能的电磁阀驱动电路
WO2021044148A1 (fr) 2019-09-03 2021-03-11 Artemis Intelligent Power Limited Appareil hydraulique et procédé de fonctionnement
CN215813074U (zh) * 2021-06-07 2022-02-11 天津瑞能电气有限公司 一种电磁阀反向电动势监测系统

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2386027A2 (fr) * 2010-02-23 2011-11-16 Artemis Intelligent Power Limited Machine à fluide de travail et son procédé de fonctionnement
CN109270863A (zh) * 2018-10-10 2019-01-25 上海新力动力设备研究所 一种具有状态检测功能的电磁阀驱动电路
WO2021044148A1 (fr) 2019-09-03 2021-03-11 Artemis Intelligent Power Limited Appareil hydraulique et procédé de fonctionnement
CN215813074U (zh) * 2021-06-07 2022-02-11 天津瑞能电气有限公司 一种电磁阀反向电动势监测系统

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7877194B2 (en) Diagnosis method for solenoid valve based on noise detection
JP2007255394A (ja) ポンプ故障診断装置
EP2432983B1 (fr) Localisation de malfonctionnement d'un systeme d'injection de carburant
US20080141957A1 (en) Valve performing detection and modification strategy for internal combustion engine
EP2889480B1 (fr) Système de diagnostic et procédé de diagnostic pour machine hydraulique et transmission hydraulique et générateur de turbine éolienne
US20080240932A1 (en) Pump, real-time, general and incremental condition diagnosis
JP5530786B2 (ja) 圧力保持弁の検査装置および検査方法
JP4605812B2 (ja) 検査法
EP4311940A1 (fr) Diagnostic de défauts dans des machines hydrauliques
CN109952422B (zh) 用于检查高压喷射系统的压力传感器的方法、控制设备、高压喷射系统和机动车
EP1862658B1 (fr) Régulateur et procédé de régulation pour un dipositif de commande d'un moteur
US20210180536A1 (en) Method for diagnosing a digital flow-control valve of a high-pressure fuel injection pump
JP2005009398A (ja) 内燃機関の高圧燃料供給システムの異常診断装置
JP5278290B2 (ja) 燃料噴射システムの故障診断装置
US10378501B2 (en) Systems and method for performing prognosis of fuel delivery systems using solenoid current feedback
JP2000274378A (ja) 液圧回転機の作動状態診断装置
EP3211275B1 (fr) Procédé et système de diagnostic pour machine hydraulique, machine hydraulique et générateur de puissance de type à énergie renouvelable
EP3211276B1 (fr) Machine hydraulique avec système de diagnostic, appareil de génération de puissance de type à énergie renouvelable et procédé de diagnostic de machine hydraulique
CN113803184B (zh) 一种检测限压阀是否卡在关闭位置的方法
JPH1047144A (ja) 燃料噴射装置の異常診断装置
JP2019529783A (ja) 自動車の高圧噴射システムの高圧ポンプを動作させる方法ならびに制御装置および自動車
EP3211395B1 (fr) Procédé et système de diagnostic pour machine hydraulique, machine hydraulique et générateur de puissance de type à énergie renouvelable
JP2016142149A (ja) 異常診断装置
US20190154031A1 (en) Pump Monitoring Using Acoustical Characterizations
JP2010121595A (ja) 内燃機関の制御装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR