EP4072912B1 - Dispositif de freinage redondant - Google Patents

Dispositif de freinage redondant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4072912B1
EP4072912B1 EP19828983.7A EP19828983A EP4072912B1 EP 4072912 B1 EP4072912 B1 EP 4072912B1 EP 19828983 A EP19828983 A EP 19828983A EP 4072912 B1 EP4072912 B1 EP 4072912B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
wheel
brake controller
wheel slip
brake
slip limit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19828983.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP4072912A1 (fr
Inventor
Leo Laine
Leon HENDERSON
Christian Oscarsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Volvo Truck Corp
Original Assignee
Volvo Truck Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Volvo Truck Corp filed Critical Volvo Truck Corp
Publication of EP4072912A1 publication Critical patent/EP4072912A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP4072912B1 publication Critical patent/EP4072912B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/17—Using electrical or electronic regulation means to control braking
    • B60T8/1701—Braking or traction control means specially adapted for particular types of vehicles
    • B60T8/1708—Braking or traction control means specially adapted for particular types of vehicles for lorries or tractor-trailer combinations
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/32—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration
    • B60T8/321—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration deceleration
    • B60T8/329—Systems characterised by their speed sensor arrangements
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/17—Using electrical or electronic regulation means to control braking
    • B60T8/1755—Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve
    • B60T8/17551—Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve determining control parameters related to vehicle stability used in the regulation, e.g. by calculations involving measured or detected parameters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/18—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to vehicle weight or load, e.g. load distribution
    • B60T8/1881—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to vehicle weight or load, e.g. load distribution characterised by failure-responsive means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/32—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration
    • B60T8/321—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration deceleration
    • B60T8/323—Systems specially adapted for tractor-trailer combinations
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2201/00—Particular use of vehicle brake systems; Special systems using also the brakes; Special software modules within the brake system controller
    • B60T2201/16—Curve braking control, e.g. turn control within ABS control algorithm
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2210/00—Detection or estimation of road or environment conditions; Detection or estimation of road shapes
    • B60T2210/10—Detection or estimation of road conditions
    • B60T2210/12—Friction
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60Y—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO ASPECTS CROSS-CUTTING VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY
    • B60Y2306/00—Other features of vehicle sub-units
    • B60Y2306/13—Failsafe arrangements
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60Y—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO ASPECTS CROSS-CUTTING VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY
    • B60Y2400/00—Special features of vehicle units
    • B60Y2400/81—Braking systems

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to redundancy in braking systems for heavy duty vehicles.
  • the disclosure is particularly relevant to vehicles configured for autonomous drive.
  • the invention can be applied in heavy-duty vehicles, such as trucks and construction equipment.
  • cargo transport vehicles such as semi-trailer vehicles and trucks
  • the invention is not restricted to this particular type of vehicle but may also be used in other types of vehicles such as cars.
  • the braking system of a heavy duty vehicle is key to safe vehicle operation.
  • the braking system not only limits vehicle velocity when needed, but also plays an important role in maintaining vehicle stability.
  • a heavy duty vehicle with a malfunctioning brake system therefore represents a significant risk. It is desired to minimize this risk.
  • redundancy may be added to the braking system. Redundancy may be added both the control system as well as to the actuators, e.g., the disc or drum brakes.
  • US 2017/0210361 A1 discloses a brake controller layout for a heavy-duty vehicle comprising redundancy.
  • US 6345225 discloses an electromechanical brake system.
  • US 6317675 discloses an electromechanical brake system comprising a pedal simulator.
  • WO 2017/215751 discloses a wheel controller comprising a wheel slip calculation module.
  • US 6095621 discloses a brake system.
  • the braking system comprises a first brake controller arranged to control braking on a first wheel, and a second brake controller arranged to control braking on a second wheel, based on a respective wheel slip limit and on a respective brake torque request, wherein the first and the second brake controllers are interconnected via a back-up connection arranged to allow one of the first and the second brake controller to assume braking control of the wheel of the other of the first and the second brake controller in case of brake controller failure.
  • the braking system also comprises a control unit arranged to, in response to brake controller failure, reduce the wheel slip limit associated with the failed brake controller to a reduced wheel slip limit.
  • wheel slip becomes unlikely despite operating with a failed brake controller. This way it becomes easier to predict vehicle response to control inputs, which is an advantage.
  • the first brake controller is arranged to control braking on a front axle left wheel
  • the second brake controller is arranged to control braking on a front axle right wheel
  • the first and second brake controllers are arranged as fail-operational brake controllers.
  • the herein disclosed techniques are particularly suitable for controlling slip limits imposed on front axle brake controllers, since they play an important role in vehicle control, especially during hard braking maneuvers. By the disclosed techniques, safe vehicle operation and ability to generate lateral tyre forces can be maintained despite brake controller failure on a front axle brake device.
  • control unit is arranged to obtain data related to road friction from a functional brake controller, and to configure the wheel slip limit associated with the failed brake controller in dependence of the data related to road friction.
  • This way the safety margin can be adjusted depending on driving scenario, which leads to increased overall control efficiency.
  • road friction conditions are favorable, i.e., when road traction is good, a smaller safety margin may be added to the imposed wheel slip limit, while less favorable driving conditions may imply a larger safety margin added to the wheel slip limit imposed on the failed brake controller operating via the back-up connection.
  • the data related to road friction comprises a peak wheel slip value detected by the functional brake controller and/or road friction coefficient estimated by the functional brake controller. Knowing peak wheel slip value and/or estimated road friction allows for setting the wheel slip limit of the failed brake controller in a reliable and efficient manner.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit is determined based on a table of reduced slip limits, wherein the table of reduced slip limits is configured to be indexed by a wheel slip value determined for a wheel on the same side of the vehicle as the failed brake controller.
  • a set of wheel slip limits for different driving conditions is stored in the table.
  • a suitable wheel slip limit can then be selected based on the current driving scenario. For instance, suppose a front left brake controller fails, while favorable traction conditions are seen by the same side rear axle brake controllers, then a smaller reduction in posed wheel slip limit on the failed brake controller may be tabulated compared to the case when the same side rear axle brake controllers detect low friction conditions.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit is determined as the smallest peak wheel slip detected by a functional brake controller of a wheel on the same side of the vehicle as the failed brake controller, and reduced by a pre-determined safety factor.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit will vary depending on driving conditions in a local road area, while being robust due to the addition of the safety margin.
  • the safety margin may, e.g., be on the order of 20% of the initially imposed wheel slip limit.
  • the control unit is arranged to increase brake torque and/or wheel slip limit on one or more trailer wheels in response to front axle brake controller failure.
  • the tractor may, e.g., have entered some distance into a turn, where significant lateral forces are needed in order to successfully negotiate the turn, while the trailer is still not subject to large lateral forces since it has not entered as far into the turn. In case of wheel slip on the front axle wheels, the tractor may not be able to generate the required lateral forces. Slowing down the vehicle combination using the trailer may allow the tractor unit to regain road purchase and thus generate the required lateral forces.
  • control unit is arranged to increase the configured wheel slip limit associated with the failed brake controller from the reduced wheel slip limit up to a back-up mode wheel slip limit. After the failure has taken place, and control algorithms and operations have stabilized, the slip situation can be evaluated. The effects of the brake controller failure on vehicle controllability can be reduced by increasing wheel slip level up towards the initially configured wheel slip limit that was in place prior to the brake controller failure, but only if driving conditions are such as to warrant an increase in imposed wheel slip limit of the failed brake controller.
  • a wheel speed sensor associated with a wheel on the front axle is arranged cross-wise connected to a brake controller associated with a wheel on the other side of the front axle.
  • This cross-wise connection allows a WEM to monitor wheel speed on a wheel that it is controlled via the back-up connection. This increases the controllability and observability of the wheel associated with the failed brake controller, which is an advantage.
  • the vehicle comprises first and second rear wheel axles, wherein a wheel speed sensor associated with a wheel on the first rear axle is arranged connected to a brake controller associated with a wheel on the second rear wheel axle and on the same side as the wheel on the first rear axle.
  • a brake controller on the rear axle is able to obtain wheel speed data from a wheel on the same side of the vehicle as its own wheel, which is an advantage.
  • wheel lift-off may be detected by comparing the two or more different wheel speed measurements. Imposed wheel slip limit can be reduced in response to detecting wheel lift-off.
  • Figures 1A-C illustrate a number of example vehicles 100 for cargo transport.
  • Figure 1A shows a truck supported on wheels 120, 140, and 160, some of which are driven wheels.
  • Figure 1B shows a semitrailer vehicle combination where a tractor unit 101 tows a trailer unit 102.
  • the front part of the trailer unit 102 is supported by a fifth wheel connection 103, while the rear part of the trailer unit 102 is supported on a set of trailer wheels 180.
  • Figure 1C shows a truck with a dolly unit 104 arranged to tow a trailer unit 102.
  • the front part of the trailer unit is then supported on a set of dolly wheels 190, while the rear part of the trailer is supported on a set of trailer wheels 180.
  • Each vehicle 100 comprises a control unit 110, such as a vehicle motion management (VMM) control module.
  • VMM vehicle motion management
  • This control unit may potentially comprise a number of sub-units distributed across the vehicle 100, or it can be a single physical unit.
  • the control unit controls vehicle operation.
  • the control unit 110 may, e.g. allocate brake force between wheels to maintain vehicle stability.
  • Each of the wheel brake controllers is communicatively coupled to the control unit 110, allowing the control unit to communicate with the brake controllers, and thereby control vehicle braking.
  • Vehicle combinations such as those discussed above are known in general and will not be discussed in more detail herein.
  • the techniques disclosed herein are applicable to a wide range of different vehicle combinations and vehicle types, not just to the combinations shown in Figures 1A-1C . It is furthermore appreciated that the techniques disclosed herein are also applicable to, e.g., an electrically powered vehicles or a hybrid electric vehicles.
  • Each wheel is associated with a wheel brake 130, 150, 160 (trailer unit wheel brakes are not indicated in Figures 1A-1C ).
  • This wheel brake may, e.g., be a pneumatically actuated disc brake or drum brake, but some aspects of the disclosure are also applicable for regenerative brakes which produce electrical power during vehicle retardation.
  • the wheel brakes are controlled by brake controllers.
  • brake controller brake modulator, and wheel end module will be used interchangeably. They are all to be interpreted as a device which controls applied braking force on at least one wheel of a vehicle, such as the vehicle 100.
  • a service brake system is a system which brakes the vehicle during drive operation, as opposed to a parking brake system which is configured to keep the vehicle in a fixed position when parked.
  • Brake force will herein be quantified as brake torque. It is straightforward to translate between brake torque and brake force.
  • Recent development in service brake systems comprises an arrangement that instead includes individual brake controllers at each wheel of the vehicle.
  • each brake controller is responsible for controlling the brake force, preventing wheel locking and carrying out diagnostics on a respective wheel of the controller.
  • a control output of each controller can also be connected to a 'back-up' port on one of the other brake controllers. This way a controller can assume the function of a faulty controller by operating its connection to the back-up port of the faulty controller.
  • the connection to the back-up port may be a pneumatic connection.
  • the faulty controller then only needs to open up access between the back-up port and the brake actuator in order to allow an external controller to control wheel braking by the actuator of the failed controller.
  • FIGS 2A-B schematically illustrate a set-up 200, 250 like this; a left wheel end module (WEM) 210l is arranged to control braking of a left front axle wheel 120l via a control connection 213l.
  • the control connection may, e.g., be a pneumatic connection for actuating a disc brake or the like.
  • a right WEM 210r is arranged to control braking of a right front axle wheel 120r via a similar control connection 213r.
  • the two WEMs are linked by a back-up connection 220, allowing each WEM to assume control of the braking of the other wheel. Thus, if one of the WEMs fail the other can take over in order to maintain vehicle braking capacity, effectively providing brake control redundancy.
  • Each WEM 210l, 210r comprises means 211l, 211r for generating braking force on its respective wheel.
  • a default mode shown in Figure 2A
  • the back-up ports 214l, 214r are disconnected from the respective wheel brake by switches 212l, 212r.
  • These 'switches' may, e.g., be pneumatic valves in case the back-up connection 220 is a pneumatic connection.
  • a WEM 210l, 210r fails, it flips its respective switch 212l, 212r such that the other WEM can assume control via the control connection 220.
  • the change in mode from an active mode where the controller is in control of the brake to a slave mode where the controller passes control to the other controller may be automatically triggered by, e.g., loss of electrical power or the like.
  • one front axle WMM 210l, 210r When one front axle WMM 210l, 210r fails, it may therefore use the other (still functional) WEM for brake control.
  • the switch 212l, 212r may be operated automatically upon WEM failure, or it may be operated remotely from the control unit 110.
  • the switch is a pneumatic valve
  • the valve may, e.g., be default open and/or remotely controllable from the control unit 110, i.e., if the brake controller dies, the valve automatically opens (either on its own or by external control signal) to allow control by the other brake controller.
  • FIG 2B schematically illustrates a scenario 250 where the left front axle controller 210l has failed. If, for instance, the left wheel 120l brake controller 210I suffers an electrical fault it will automatically fail to a state that passes the pneumatic pressure applied to its back-up port 214l, such that the back-up connection 220 becomes connected to the control connection 213l. Both wheels 120l, 120r will therefore now be controlled by the right hand brake controller 210r as shown in Figure 3 , with the failed controller 210l acting as a slave, making the overall system 200 fail-operational.
  • a vehicle operating according to the scenario 250 may face challenges when negotiating difficult driving scenarios. This is at least in part because of the longer control connection between controller and actuator via the back-up connection, which may limit control loop bandwidth.
  • FIG 3A shows a scenario 300 where the tractor unit 101 enters a road stretch 310 with a closing curve characteristic.
  • the vehicle combination 101, 102 needs to be able to generate significant lateral forces 330, 340 in addition to the longitudinal force 320. This is only possible if wheel slip is kept below a limit, as shown in Figure 6 , where F x is tyre (or wheel) longitudinal force, F y is tyre (or wheel) lateral force. It is seen in Figure 6 that, as longitudinal wheel slip increases, the ability to generate lateral forces F y decrease significantly. Wheel slip control ability may be limited when operation is based on the back-up connection 220, since control loop time constants and the like may be prolonged compared to normal operation. It is important that the vehicle combination is able to maintain operation where wheel slip is controlled, even when confronted with WEM failure.
  • Figure 3B shows another scenario 350 where the vehicle combination 101, 102 enters a road stretch 360 with a patch 370 having low friction, such as a locally icy area.
  • This low friction area 370 may cause significant wheel slip on one side of the vehicle combination 101, 102, which in turn will limit the ability of the vehicle to generate sufficient lateral forces to negotiate the curve.
  • it is important that the vehicle combination is able to maintain operation where wheel slip is controlled, even when confronted with WEM failure.
  • VMM domain may send wheel torque request and wheel slip limit to each local brake controller.
  • This limit is usually selected to give maximum braking performance.
  • this slip limit is herein manipulated to a lower value than normal. This value can correspond to a value that is still within the linear region of the tyres force vs slip curve for all foreseeable road conditions (see Figure 6 ). This will prevent wheel lock on both wheel, therefore preventing undesired loss of lateral tyre force.
  • the VMM or vehicle control unit 110 may use the trailer 102 as an 'anchor' in order to slow down the vehicle and avoid significant wheel slip.
  • the vehicle control unit 110 is arranged to increase brake torque and/or wheel slip limit on one or more trailer wheels in response to front axle brake controller failure.
  • the tractor may, e.g., have entered some distance into a turn, where significant lateral forces are needed in order to successfully negotiate the turn, while the trailer is still not subject to large lateral forces since it has not entered as far into the turn. In case of wheel slip on the front axle wheels, the tractor may not be able to generate the required lateral forces. Slowing down the vehicle combination using the trailer may allow the tractor unit to regain road purchase and thus generate the required lateral forces.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example brake device system 400 layout according to the present teaching.
  • Each wheel has a corresponding WEM, numbered from 1 to 6 in Figure 4 .
  • Each wheel also has at least one associated wheel speed sensor (WS), numbered from 1 to 6 in Figure 4 . Wheel speed sensors and their use for vehicle control is known and will not be discussed in more detail herein.
  • a vehicle motion management module is a control unit 110 arranged to control at least part of the vehicle braking functionality. This unit will be discussed in more detail below in connection to Figure 5 . As noted above, the VMM may not only use the braking system for deceleration of the vehicle 100, but also for controlling vehicle stability as it maneuvers, e.g., using the trailer 102 as an anchor as discussed above in connection to Figures 3A and 3B .
  • Front axle WEMs 210l, 210r are arranged to be fail operational.
  • 'fail operational' means that one controller may fail without the vehicle loosing significant braking capability, since the other controller will take over via the back-up connection 220. Also, vehicle stability will likely not be critically affected since braking capability on the front axle wheels is substantially maintained.
  • a failed WEM on the front axle will set the switch 212l, 212r (not shown in Figure 4 ) to open stage and the still functioning WEM on the front axle takes control of the other wheel also.
  • Each wheel 120l, 120r on the front axle 105 has an associated wheel speed sensor WS1, WS2.
  • the data from the wheel speed sensor may be used to control braking in a known manner.
  • Cross-connections 440, 450 between one or more wheel speed sensors on one side of the vehicle may be connected to the brake controller on the other side of the vehicle.
  • Rear axle WEMs i.e., WEM 3, WEM 4, WEM 5, WEM 6 in Figure 4 , are, according to some aspects, arranged to be fail silent.
  • 'fail silent' means that one controller may fail without any back-up controller stepping in to maintain braking capability on the corresponding wheel. The wheel of the failed controller then effectively becomes an unbraked free-running wheel.
  • the WEMs on one side share the wheel speeds sensors for redundancy, as shown in Figure 4 by connections 460l, 460r, 470l, 470r. This way at least hard braking can be made even with a failed wheel speed sensor on a rear axle wheel.
  • first rear axle 106 brake controllers WEM3, WEM4 may, according to some aspects, be arranged in fail-operational mode as shown in Figure 2A and 2B instead of in fail-silent mode as shown in Figure 4 .
  • second rear axle 107 brake controllers WEM5, WEM6 may, according to some aspects, be arranged in fail-operational mode as shown in Figure 2A and 2B instead of in fail-silent mode as shown in Figure 4 .
  • An advantage with connecting wheel speed sensors on different rear axles to a brake controller is that the brake controller can compare the different wheel speeds and thereby detect, e.g., wheel lift-off conditions and the like. This detection may be communicated to the control unit 110.
  • FIG. 5 schematically shows a system for vehicle control.
  • a traffic situation management (TSM) module 510 plans a vehicle trajectory and, based on the planned trajectory, requests acceleration and curvature profiles 520 from the VMM 110.
  • the VMM 110 responds back with current vehicle capabilities and status 530, whereby the TSM module can update and maintain the planned trajectory to, e.g., ensure vehicle safety while optimizing vehicle operation.
  • TSM traffic situation management
  • the VMM module 110 has access to various forms of sensor data 550 from which a vehicle state can be inferred.
  • the sensor data may, e.g., comprise external data from any combination of: one or more global positioning system (GPS) receivers, one or more radio detection and ranging (radar) transceivers, one or more light detection and ranging (lidar) transceivers, and one or more vision based sensors, such as cameras and the like.
  • Sensor data may also comprise internal sensor data from, e.g., wheel speed sensors, steering angle sensors, brake and drive torque estimators, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, and the like.
  • GPS global positioning system
  • radar radio detection and ranging
  • lidar light detection and ranging
  • vision based sensors such as cameras and the like.
  • Sensor data may also comprise internal sensor data from, e.g., wheel speed sensors, steering angle sensors, brake and drive torque estimators, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, and the like.
  • IMU inertial measurement unit
  • the external and the internal sensor data is input to a motion and state estimation module 540 which filters the data and estimates vehicle state.
  • the vehicle state may comprise variables related to, e.g., position of the chassis in a global reference system, roll, pitch and yaw in the global reference system, as well as longitudinal velocities v x i for each wheel in a local wheel reference frame. Knowing as longitudinal velocities v x i for each wheel, in the coordinate system of the wheel, is important, as it allows the system to accurately determine wheel slip ⁇ .
  • the VMM or control unit 110 determines a force allocation 560 to meet the requests from the TSM module 510.
  • This force allocation may comprise setting torque requests T REQ i on specific wheel brakes as well as controlling propulsion sources and steering angles.
  • the VMM module also specifies a wheel slip limit for each WEM, ⁇ LIM i , to be adhered to by the given WEM.
  • a WEM say the i-th WEM 570, receives wheel speed v x i , wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i , and torque request T REQ i .
  • the WEM controls 580 its respective brake device 590 and potentially also a failed WEM via the back-up connection 220.
  • slip is positive for propulsion slip and negative for braking slip.
  • the limit refers to the absolute value of wheel slip.
  • an increased wheel slip limit refers to either a larger allowed positive wheel slip limit or a smaller allowed negative wheel slip limit according to the definition above.
  • the largest wheel slip ⁇ PEAK i detected over a time window may be reported back to the VMM, and also an estimated road friction coefficient ⁇ EST i .
  • the estimated road friction coefficient may correspond to a value ⁇ such that achievable lateral tyre force F y is limited by F y ⁇ ⁇ F z where F z is the normal force acting on a tyre.
  • the WEM may also determine and report back a current torque capability T CAP i .
  • the wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i is adjusted as discussed above.
  • An example wheel slip limit for a failing WEM is shown vs time in Figure 7 .
  • the slip limit ⁇ LIM shown in figure 7 is the slip limit effectively applied to both wheels on the axle where one brake controller configured in fail-operational mode has failed.
  • the WEM is initially configured with some wheel slip limit ⁇ CON 710.
  • the WEM then, at time t 1 720, fails for some reasons, and enters slave mode where wheel brake control is via the back-up connection 220.
  • the wheel slip limit is automatically reduced 601 down to a reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW 730.
  • This reduced wheel slip limit implies that the vehicle control is executed with larger safety margins where wheel slip is unlikely.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit may, e.g., correspond to a region of linear obtainable tyre lateral force.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW 730 is then maintained for a period of time up to time t 2 .
  • time t 2 is has been determined that vehicle control safety margins can be reduced, e.g., due to other WEMs reporting low peak wheel slip values ⁇ PEAK and/or high estimated road friction conditions ⁇ EST .
  • the wheel slip limit associated with the failed WEM is then, at time t 2 740, gradually increased 750 up to a back-up wheel slip limit value ⁇ BU 770 which is reached at time t 3 760.
  • This back-up wheel slip limit value ⁇ BU 770 may equal the originally configured wheel slip limit ⁇ CON 710, or it can be some other value.
  • the back-up wheel slip limit value is, however, often below the wheel slip limit value used when the brake controller is fully functional.
  • the system includes the cross connections 440, 450 of wheel speed sensors or not.
  • the functioning WEM will control the applied brake pressure (sent to both wheels) according to the wheel speed measured on just one wheel. It is in that case important to select a slip limit with sufficient safety margin so that it is unlikely that wheel lock will occur on the wheel with a faulty controller where no feedback exists.
  • the functioning brake controller can follow the slip limit with a 'select low' approach - i.e. the brake pressure will be controlled at a level such that neither wheel is allowed to exceed the configured slip limit.
  • Figure 7 shows an example of operations in a braking system for a heavy duty vehicle 100.
  • the braking system comprises a first brake controller WEMi, 570, arranged to control braking on a first wheel 120, 150, 170, and a second brake controller WEMi, 570, arranged to control braking on a second wheel 120, 150, 170, based on a respective wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i , and on a respective brake torque request T REQ i .
  • the first and the second brake controllers are interconnected via a back-up connection 220 arranged to allow one of the first and the second brake controller to assume braking control of the wheel of the other of the first and the second brake controller in case of brake controller failure.
  • the braking system comprises a control unit 110 arranged to, in response to brake controller failure, reduce 701 the configured wheel slip limit ⁇ CON , 710, associated with the failed brake controller to a reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW , 730.
  • vehicle control margins are increased in response to brake controller failure.
  • the increased margins may, e.g., be warranted since there will be some additional delay in the braking system due to the added length of control connections between the master brake controller operating the back-up connection 220 and the failed brake controller operating in slave mode.
  • the first brake controller 570 WEM1
  • the second brake controller 570, WEM2 is arranged to control braking on a front axle 101 right wheel 120r, whereby the first and second brake controllers are arranged as fail-operational brake controllers.
  • This set-up was exemplified and discussed above in connection to Figures 2A and 2B .
  • control unit 110 is arranged to obtained data related to road friction from a functional brake controller, and to configure the wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the failed brake controller in dependence of the data related to road friction.
  • the wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the failed brake controller may be increased by an amount, since no significant safety margins may be needed.
  • road friction conditions reported by functional brake controllers are not favorable, e.g., due to wet or icy road conditions, the safety margin may even need to be increased beyond that originally configured.
  • the data related to road friction comprises a peak wheel slip value ⁇ PEAK detected by the functional brake controller.
  • the peak wheel slip value is an indication of the road friction conditions. For instance, in case some controller has detected high wheel slip values, then a significant safety margin may be warranted, and vice versa.
  • the functional brake controller used to determine road friction conditions is preferably a brake controller associated with a wheel on the same side of the vehicle 100 as the failed brake controller. This is because the road friction conditions detected by a brake controller associated with a wheel on the same side of the vehicle 100 as the failed brake controller is likely to exhibit a larger degree of correlation with the failed brake controller compared to a brake controller on the other side of the vehicle 100.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit 730 is determined based on a table of reduced slip limits.
  • This table of reduced slip limits may be configured to be indexed by a wheel slip value determined for a wheel on the same side of the vehicle as the failed brake controller.
  • the table may be pre-determined and stored in the control unit 110.
  • the reduced wheel slip limit is determined as the smallest peak wheel slip detected by a functional brake controller of a wheel on the same side of the vehicle as the failed brake controller, and reduced by a pre-determined safety factor.
  • control unit 110 may also be arranged to increase the configured wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the failed brake controller from the reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW i , 730 up to a back-up mode wheel slip limit ⁇ BU , 770.
  • This can, for instance, be done if overall road conditions are found to be favorable. For instance, the road surface may be dry and even with no ice formation, therefore providing favorable braking conditions.
  • the increase is preferably gradual and smooth.
  • the increase from the reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW i , 730 up to the back-up mode wheel slip limit ⁇ BU , 770 may be a linear function 750 or at least a pricewise linear function such as an increase over a series of consecutive smaller steps.
  • the difference between the back-up mode wheel slip limit ⁇ BU , 770 and the initially configured wheel slip limit may be set according to driving scenario, however, the back-up mode wheel slip limit 770 is preferably below the initially configured wheel slip limit 710.
  • the control unit 110 shown in Figures 4 and 5 may furthermore be arranged to control the braking system 400 via at least a first data bus 420 and a second data bus 430 separate from the first data bus.
  • the first data bus 420 is then arranged to control at least the first brake controller WEM1 and a fourth brake controller WEM4, and the second data bus 430 is arranged to control at least the second brake controller WEM2 and a third brake controller WEM3.
  • This way one of the data busses may fail without the vehicle suffering total loss of braking capability.
  • Figure 4 also shows a number of wheel speed sensors arranged in connection to respective wheels.
  • the wheel speed sensors may be cross-wise connected, i.e., optionally, a wheel speed sensor WS1, WS2 associated with a wheel 120l, 120r on the front axle 101 is arranged connected to 440, 450 a brake controller WEM1, WEM2 associated with a wheel 120l, 120r on the other side of the front axle.
  • the rear axle WEMs on one side share wheel speeds sensors for redundancy, as shown in Figure 4 by connections 460l, 460r, 470l, 470r.
  • the vehicle comprises first 106 and second 107 rear wheel axles, wherein a wheel speed sensor WS3, WS4 associated with a wheel 140l, 140r on the first rear axle 102 is arranged connected to 460l, 470r, 460l, 470r a brake controller WEM5, WEM6 associated with a wheel 160l, 160r on the second rear wheel axle 107 and on the same side as the wheel on the first rear axle 102.
  • An advantage with connecting wheel speed sensors on different rear axles to a brake controller is that the brake controller can compare the different wheel speeds and thereby detect, e.g., wheel lift-off conditions and the like. This detection may be communicated to the control unit 110. When this happens, the control unit 110 may reduce the configured wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the brake controller that detects wheel lift-off.
  • Figure 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method for braking a heavy duty vehicle 100. Aspects of the method were discussed above in connection to Figure 6 . The method comprises;
  • the method comprises obtaining S3 data related to road friction from a functional brake controller, and configuring S4 the wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the failed brake controller in dependence of the data related to road friction.
  • the data related to road friction comprises a peak wheel slip value ⁇ PEAK detected by the functional brake controller S31.
  • the functional brake controller is a brake controller associated with a wheel on the same side of the vehicle 100 as the failed brake controller S32.
  • the method optionally also comprises increasing S5 the configured wheel slip limit ⁇ LIM i associated with the failed brake controller from the reduced wheel slip limit ⁇ LOW , 730 up to a back-up mode wheel slip limit ⁇ BU , 770.
  • FIG. 9 schematically illustrates, in terms of a number of functional units, the components of a control unit 110 according to embodiments of the discussions herein.
  • This control unit 110 may be comprised in the vehicle 100.
  • Processing circuitry 910 is provided using any combination of one or more of a suitable central processing unit CPU, multiprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor DSP, etc., capable of executing software instructions stored in a computer program product, e.g. in the form of a storage medium 930.
  • the processing circuitry 910 may further be provided as at least one application specific integrated circuit ASIC, or field programmable gate array FPGA.
  • the processing circuitry 910 is configured to cause the control unit 110 to perform a set of operations, or steps, such as the methods discussed in connection to Figure 8 .
  • the storage medium 930 may store the set of operations
  • the processing circuitry 910 may be configured to retrieve the set of operations from the storage medium 930 to cause the control unit 110 to perform the set of operations.
  • the set of operations may be provided as a set of executable instructions.
  • the processing circuitry 910 is thereby arranged to execute methods as herein disclosed.
  • the storage medium 930 may also comprise persistent storage, which, for example, can be any single one or combination of magnetic memory, optical memory, solid state memory or even remotely mounted memory.
  • the control unit 110 may further comprise an interface 920 for communications with at least one external device such as a suspension system sensor or IMU.
  • the interface 920 may comprise one or more transmitters and receivers, comprising analogue and digital components and a suitable number of ports for wireline or wireless communication.
  • the processing circuitry 910 controls the general operation of the control unit 110, e.g., by sending data and control signals to the interface 920 and the storage medium 930, by receiving data and reports from the interface 920, and by retrieving data and instructions from the storage medium 930.
  • Other components, as well as the related functionality, of the control node are omitted in order not to obscure the concepts presented herein.
  • Figure 10 illustrates a computer readable medium 1010 carrying a computer program comprising program code means 1020 for performing the methods illustrated in Figure 10 , when said program product is run on a computer.
  • the computer readable medium and the code means may together form a computer program product 1000.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Regulating Braking Force (AREA)

Claims (19)

  1. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) pour un véhicule lourd (100), le système de freinage comprenant un premier dispositif de commande de frein (WEMi, 570) agencé pour commander le freinage sur une première roue (120, 150, 170), et un second dispositif de commande de frein (WEMi, 570) agencé pour commander le freinage sur une seconde roue (120, 150, 170), sur la base d'une limite de patinage de roue (λLIM i, 710) respective et d'une demande de couple de frein (TREQ i) respective, dans lequel les premier et second dispositifs de commande de frein sont interconnectés via une connexion de secours (220) agencée pour permettre à l'un du premier et du second dispositif de commande de frein d'assumer la commande de freinage de la roue de l'autre du premier et du second dispositif de commande de frein en cas de défaillance de dispositif de commande de frein, caractérisé en ce que le système de freinage comprend une unité de commande (VMM, 110) agencée pour, en réponse à une défaillance de dispositif de commande de frein, réduire (701) la limite de patinage de roue (λLIM i, 710) associée au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant à une limite de patinage de roue (λLIM i, 730) réduite.
  2. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le premier dispositif de commande de frein (WEM1, 570) est agencé pour commander le freinage sur une roue gauche (1201) d'essieu avant (101), et dans lequel le second dispositif de commande de frein (WEM2, 570) est agencé pour commander le freinage sur une roue droite (120r) d'essieu avant (101), moyennant quoi les premier et second dispositifs de commande de frein sont agencés en tant que dispositifs de commande de frein opérationnels après défaillance.
  3. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel l'unité de commande (110) est agencée pour obtenir des données relatives au frottement routier à partir d'un dispositif de commande de frein fonctionnel, et pour configurer la limite de patinage de roue (λLIM i, 730, 750, 770) associé au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant en fonction des données relatives au frottement routier.
  4. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon la revendication 3, dans lequel les données relatives au frottement routier comprennent une valeur maximale de patinage de roue (λPEAK) détectée par le dispositif de commande de frein fonctionnel et/ou un coefficient de frottement routier estimé (µEST).
  5. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel la limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLIM i, 730) est déterminée sur la base d'un tableau de limites de patinage réduites (λLOW, 730), dans lequel le tableau de limites de patinage réduites est configuré pour être indexé par une valeur de patinage de roue déterminée pour une roue du même côté du véhicule que le dispositif de commande de frein défaillant.
  6. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel la limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLOW, 730) est déterminée comme étant le plus petit patinage maximal de roue détecté par un dispositif de commande de frein fonctionnel d'une roue du même côté du véhicule que le dispositif de commande de frein défaillant, et réduit d'un facteur de sécurité prédéterminé.
  7. Système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel l'unité de commande (110) est agencée pour augmenter le couple de frein et/ou la limite de patinage de roue sur une ou plusieurs roues de remorque (180) en réponse à une défaillance de dispositif de commande de frein d'essieu avant.
  8. Système de freinage (700) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel l'unité de commande (110) est agencée pour augmenter la limite de patinage de roue configurée (λLIM i, 750) associée au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant à partir de la limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLOW i, 730) jusqu'à une limite de patinage de roue de mode de secours (λBU, 770) .
  9. Système de freinage (700) selon la revendication 8, dans lequel la limite de patinage de roue de mode de secours (λBU, 770) est inférieure ou égale à la limite de patinage de roue initialement configurée (λCON i, 710) .
  10. Système de freinage (700) selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans lequel l'augmentation (750) à partir de la limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLOW i, 730) jusqu'à la limite de patinage de roues de mode de secours (λBU, 770) est une fonction linéaire (750).
  11. Système de freinage (400) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel un capteur de vitesse de roue (WS1, WS2) associé à une roue (1201, 120r) sur l'essieu avant (101) est agencé en connexion transversale à (440, 450) un dispositif de commande de frein (WEM1, WEM2) associé à une roue (1201, 120r) de l'autre côté de l'essieu avant.
  12. Système de freinage (400) selon une quelconque revendication précédente, dans lequel le véhicule comprend des premier (106) et second (107) essieux de roue arrière, dans lequel un capteur de vitesse de roue (WS3, WS4) associé à une roue (1401, 140r) sur le premier essieu arrière (106) est agencé en connexion à (4601, 470r, 4601, 470r) un dispositif de commande de frein (WEM5, WEM6) associé à une roue (1601, 160r) sur le second essieu de roue arrière (107) et du même côté que la roue sur le premier essieu arrière (106).
  13. Système de freinage (400) selon la revendication 12, dans lequel un dispositif de commande de frein de roue d'essieu arrière est agencé pour détecter un décollage de roue en comparant une sortie de capteur de vitesse de roue d'un premier capteur de vitesse de roue d'essieu arrière (106) et d'un second capteur de vitesse de roue d'essieu arrière (107) respectifs, dans lequel l'unité de commande (110) est agencée pour réduire la limite de patinage de roue configurée (λLIM i) associée au dispositif de commande de frein qui détecte un décollage de roue.
  14. Véhicule (100) comprenant le système de freinage (200, 250, 400, 500, 700) selon une quelconque revendication précédente.
  15. Procédé pour freiner un véhicule lourd (100), le procédé comprenant :
    la configuration (S1) d'un système de freinage comprenant un premier dispositif de commande de frein (570, WEMi) agencé pour commander le freinage sur une première roue (120, 150, 170), et un second dispositif de commande de frein (570, WEMi) agencé pour commander le freinage sur une seconde roue (120, 150, 170), sur la base d'une limite de patinage de roue configurée (λLIM i) respective et d'une demande de couple de frein (TREQ i) respective, dans lequel les premier et second dispositifs de commande de frein sont interconnectés via une connexion de secours (220) agencée pour permettre à l'un du premier et du second dispositif de commande de frein d'assumer la commande de freinage de la roue de l'autre du premier et du second dispositif de commande de frein en cas de défaillance de dispositif de commande de frein, caractérisé en ce que le procédé comprend, en réponse à une défaillance de dispositif de commande de frein,
    la réduction (S2, 701) de la limite de patinage de roue configurée (λLIM i, 710) associée au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant à une limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLIM i, 730) .
  16. Procédé selon la revendication 15, comprenant
    l'obtention (S3) de données relatives au frottement routier à partir d'un dispositif de commande de frein fonctionnel, et
    la configuration (S4) de la limite de patinage de roue (λLIM i) associée au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant en fonction des données relatives au frottement routier.
  17. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 15 à 16, comprenant
    l'augmentation (S5, 750) de la limite de patinage de roue configurée (λLIM i) associée au dispositif de commande de frein défaillant à partir de la limite de patinage de roue réduite (λLOW i, 730) jusqu'à une limite de patinage de roue de mode de secours (λBU, 770) .
  18. Programme informatique (1020) comprenant un moyen de code de programme pour réaliser les étapes selon l'une quelconque des revendications 15 à 17 lorsque ledit programme est exécuté sur un ordinateur ou sur un circuit de traitement (910) d'une unité de commande (110).
  19. Support lisible par ordinateur (1010) portant un programme informatique (1020) comprenant un moyen de code de programme pour réaliser les étapes selon l'une quelconque des revendications 15 à 17 lorsque ledit produit de programme est exécuté sur un ordinateur ou sur un circuit de traitement (910) d'une unité de commande (110).
EP19828983.7A 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 Dispositif de freinage redondant Active EP4072912B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2019/084369 WO2021115565A1 (fr) 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 Commande d'un système de dispositif de frein redondant

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4072912A1 EP4072912A1 (fr) 2022-10-19
EP4072912B1 true EP4072912B1 (fr) 2024-03-27

Family

ID=69061264

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19828983.7A Active EP4072912B1 (fr) 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 Dispositif de freinage redondant

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20230023411A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP4072912B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP7411805B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR20220106806A (fr)
CN (1) CN114761291A (fr)
WO (1) WO2021115565A1 (fr)

Family Cites Families (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4441624A1 (de) * 1994-11-23 1996-05-30 Teves Gmbh Alfred Schaltungsanordnung für eine Bremsanlage mit Blockierschutzregelung
DE19732764B4 (de) 1997-07-30 2004-04-29 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Übertragungseinrichtung für Steuersignale, insbesondere in Fahrzeugen
JP2001523618A (ja) * 1997-11-22 2001-11-27 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト 電気機械式ブレーキ装置
EP1032518B1 (fr) * 1997-11-22 2003-05-28 Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG Systeme de freinage electromecanique
US6120109A (en) * 1998-04-09 2000-09-19 Westinghouse Air Brake Company Electronic emergency brake load weigh device
US6728621B1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2004-04-27 General Motors Corporation Anti-lock braking system controller for adjusting slip thresholds on inclines
DE10316452A1 (de) 2003-04-10 2004-10-21 Robert Bosch Gmbh Elektrisches, dezentrales Bremssystem in einem Fahrzeug
US7150506B2 (en) 2003-09-29 2006-12-19 Haldex Brake Products Ab Control network for brake system
JP4754993B2 (ja) 2006-02-16 2011-08-24 デルファイ・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレーテッド 分布システムのためのフォールトトレランスのノードアーキテクチャー
EP2144795B1 (fr) * 2007-04-05 2014-06-11 Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de freinage de véhicule et système de freinage de véhicule
EP2172378B1 (fr) * 2008-10-06 2019-07-03 Volvo Car Corporation Procédé et dispositif pour le freinage par récupération d'un véhicule
US8200408B2 (en) * 2008-12-22 2012-06-12 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for active traction control of a vehicle
JP5332693B2 (ja) * 2009-02-16 2013-11-06 日産自動車株式会社 制動力制御装置及び制動力制御方法
WO2013045584A1 (fr) * 2011-09-28 2013-04-04 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Système de freinage à régulation de glissement, destiné à des véhicules électriques
US9061671B2 (en) * 2013-08-27 2015-06-23 Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc Driver braking demand indicator apparatus for a heavy vehicle
JP6589416B2 (ja) 2015-07-02 2019-10-16 三菱自動車工業株式会社 電動ブレーキ装置
DE102015009160A1 (de) * 2015-07-14 2017-01-19 Wabco Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum elektronischen Regeln einer Fahrzeugverzögerung eines bremsschlupfgeregelten Fahrzeuges
JP6869269B2 (ja) * 2016-06-15 2021-05-12 ボルボトラックコーポレーション 車両の車輪制御装置
JP6577444B2 (ja) * 2016-11-24 2019-09-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 車両の制動制御装置
JP2018086927A (ja) 2016-11-29 2018-06-07 いすゞ自動車株式会社 連結車両の制動力低下判定装置
WO2018124971A1 (fr) * 2016-12-30 2018-07-05 Elaphe Propulsion Technologies Ltd. Agencement permettant de déterminer un couple maximal admissible
EP3398825B1 (fr) * 2017-05-03 2020-03-11 Volvo Car Corporation Procédé et système de calcul d'une estimation de friction de route
CN112074439B (zh) * 2018-05-03 2023-02-17 沃尔沃卡车集团 重型车辆冗余制动系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7411805B2 (ja) 2024-01-11
US20230023411A1 (en) 2023-01-26
JP2023505501A (ja) 2023-02-09
WO2021115565A1 (fr) 2021-06-17
KR20220106806A (ko) 2022-07-29
CN114761291A (zh) 2022-07-15
EP4072912A1 (fr) 2022-10-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3787944B1 (fr) Commande de mouvement redondant pour véhicule doté d'un agencement de freinage redondant
CN114454866A (zh) 用于重型车辆的基于车轮滑移的车辆运动管理
CN110099826B (zh) 用于控制车辆的牵引和制动的电子系统及相关方法
EP4061651B1 (fr) Unité de contrôle et méthode surveillance de la répartition de la charge d'un véhicule
US20230068987A1 (en) Differential electrical drive arrangement for heavy duty vehicles
KR20230033589A (ko) 동적으로 구성된 사이드슬립 리미트에 기반한 차량 제어
US20220314953A1 (en) Braking system for an autonomous vehicle
JP6924995B2 (ja) 空気供給システム
EP4072912B1 (fr) Dispositif de freinage redondant
CN116039638A (zh) 冗余线控制动系统及车辆
CN115476832A (zh) 一种基于线控制动的冗余安全控制系统
CN117222558A (zh) 用于制动车辆的制动系统和方法
US20230012982A1 (en) A redundant brake device system
CN114728638A (zh) 用于控制车辆的辅助制动的方法
CN114291054B (zh) 一种行车制动联控系统、行车制动控制方法及车辆
US20220063575A1 (en) Vehicle motion management with a redundant wheel control safety net function
EP4001031B1 (fr) Système de freinage électropneumatique pour un véhicule doté d'un système de frein de stationnement utilisé en tant que système de décélération de sauvegarde
CN116215559A (zh) 基于轮胎传感器负载估计的冗余车辆控制系统
CN116442969A (zh) 车辆防抱死制动系统及其控制方法和车辆
CN114364585A (zh) 用于商用车的制动系统
CN116215560A (zh) 基于轮胎传感器的冗余车辆控制系统

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20220620

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20231017

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: OSCARSSON, CHRISTIAN

Inventor name: HENDERSON, LEON

Inventor name: LAINE, LEO

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019049144

Country of ref document: DE