EP3378724A1 - Procédé de détermination sécurisée d'une information de sortie actuelle dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire - Google Patents

Procédé de détermination sécurisée d'une information de sortie actuelle dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3378724A1
EP3378724A1 EP17162269.9A EP17162269A EP3378724A1 EP 3378724 A1 EP3378724 A1 EP 3378724A1 EP 17162269 A EP17162269 A EP 17162269A EP 3378724 A1 EP3378724 A1 EP 3378724A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
information
client device
determined
output information
input information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP17162269.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3378724B1 (fr
Inventor
Pierre LE MAGUET
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales Management and Services Deutschland GmbH
Original Assignee
Thales Management and Services Deutschland GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales Management and Services Deutschland GmbH filed Critical Thales Management and Services Deutschland GmbH
Priority to PL17162269T priority Critical patent/PL3378724T3/pl
Priority to EP17162269.9A priority patent/EP3378724B1/fr
Priority to DK17162269.9T priority patent/DK3378724T3/da
Priority to PT171622699T priority patent/PT3378724T/pt
Priority to ES17162269T priority patent/ES2767065T3/es
Publication of EP3378724A1 publication Critical patent/EP3378724A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3378724B1 publication Critical patent/EP3378724B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L1/00Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
    • B61L1/16Devices for counting axles; Devices for counting vehicles
    • B61L1/169Diagnosis
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L1/00Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
    • B61L1/20Safety arrangements for preventing or indicating malfunction of the device, e.g. by leakage current, by lightning
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L15/00Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
    • B61L15/0081On-board diagnosis or maintenance
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L21/00Station blocking between signal boxes in one yard
    • B61L21/04Electrical locking and release of the route; Electrical repeat locks
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/40Handling position reports or trackside vehicle data
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/50Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades
    • B61L27/53Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades for trackside elements or systems, e.g. trackside supervision of trackside control system conditions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/50Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades
    • B61L27/57Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades for vehicles or trains, e.g. trackside supervision of train conditions

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for the reliable determination of a current output information in the field of railway technology after failure of a client device connected to at least one sensor device via a network with an evaluation unit.
  • Client devices are used in train operation to determine output information based on input information previously detected by one or more sensor devices.
  • the client device comprises an evaluation unit for receiving and processing the input information.
  • the client device can also process internal state information.
  • An improvement in this regard is the in EP 1 498 336 B1 described method for determining the occupancy state of a track section, in which after a restart of an axle counting system (client device) synchronized counts (input information) and status information (output information) are stored in the points of delivery. After a restart of the axle counting system, this stored information is transmitted to the evaluation unit together with the current count values. If the difference of the stored values equals the difference of the current values, the track section is considered free.
  • a disadvantage of this method is that it is defined only for determination of occupancy states.
  • the storage locations are external components whose connection and storage costs are very high.
  • the object of the invention is to propose a method with which a reliable determination of output information in the field of railway technology, which is derived from detected input information, can be ensured even in the event of failure of the state and output information determining client device, the method applicable to different railway engineering areas should be.
  • the method steps a) to d) are repeated for different reference times and a continuity test is carried out with regard to a continuous operation of the sensor device.
  • the method steps a) to d) are carried out repeatedly, so that Einhol seeds be stored at different reference times in the sensor device and can be retrieved from the client device, wherein at least the most recent stored Einholinformation remains stored in the sensor device.
  • a regular transmission of the input information from the sensor device to the client device is provided.
  • the continuity check is independent of failures from the client device.
  • the current output information is determined on the basis of the last stored data record and on the basis of the transferred inbound information which was determined during the failure of the client device and was transmitted to the client device as wake-up information after reactivation of the client device.
  • the task of the client device is to determine output information based on input information.
  • the input information comprises data which are determined by the sensor device.
  • the storage device is part of the network and may be connected to the client device or part of the client device.
  • the memory device is independent of the operating state of the client device, ie if the client device fails (eg due to a crash or shutdown), the data stored in the memory device is not lost.
  • an internal state information eg the number of axes within a track section
  • the output information eg occupancy state of the track section
  • Output information is information obtained from input information from the client device. Output information may be obtained directly from the input information transmitted from the client device or together with internal state information that previously determined from the transmitted input information has been. However, the input information and internal state information used to determine output information must refer to the same point in time. A current state or output information is that state or output information which was determined on the basis of last-determined input information. Output information is output from the client device for processing by other devices. The output information corresponds in many cases to the state information, but may also be information derived from the state information (eg, occupancy states derived from the number of axles within a track section).
  • the fetch information comprises a selection of the data of the input information.
  • the selection is defined so that the Einhol seeds that have been archived since the reference time, make it possible at any time, upon reactivation of the client device to determine the current state information of the client device based on the last stored record again.
  • the catching information stored in the sensor device can (but does not have to) include all the data of the determined input information. For example, in the case of a cyclically determining point of delivery, only those count states in which the count state has changed must be archived.
  • the retrieve information transmitted after reactivation of the client device comprises, in particular, those retrieve information that was determined and stored during the failure of the client device and therefore could not be transmitted to the client device and / or processed by the client device before the client device was reactivated. If no input information was detected in the period between failure and reactivation of the client device, the information is transmitted that nothing has changed during the failure of the client device.
  • the retrieval information stored in the sensor device is related to a reference time and includes a corresponding time mark.
  • the stored data set comprises the input information determined at a specific time and the state information and / or output information determined therefrom, which are stored in the memory device.
  • the stored data record is characterized in that its data components are reliably consistent, ie the input information and the output information or state information determined therefrom describe field states at the same time T archiving .
  • a special variant of the method according to the invention provides that the data record for storage is transmitted from the client device to the storage device via the network.
  • an external memory is used as memory device as memory device, which is connected by the network with the client device.
  • the network may include a sensor network and a system network, wherein the system network connects the client device to the storage device and the sensor network connects the sensor device to the client device.
  • the sensor network is used to transmit the input information and possibly of re-request messages, confirmation messages and continuity information.
  • the system network typically (but not necessarily) has greater bandwidth and / or computing capacity than the sensor network.
  • the storage device is then integrated in the client device.
  • the storage device must then be a non-volatile memory, i. a memory in which the contents remain stored at least until the client device is reactivated.
  • a continuity information is determined during reactivation and transmitted together with the collection information.
  • the continuity information indicates whether the sensor device has been in safe operation since the last time it was archived. This ensures that the data used to determine the output information after the client device fails is complete. If the continuity information does not contain confirmation of continuity or if continuity information is not provided, the stored dataset may be incomplete or erroneous. If the record is incomplete or incorrect, the client device can update the current one Not sure to determine output information. The system must then be reinitialized using methods other than those described in this patent.
  • all catch-up information stored between failure and reactivation of the client device is transmitted from the sensor device to the client device.
  • this variant is not optimized in view of the storage capacity requirement, it is particularly easy to develop because it enables the same process steps for determining the current output information as in normal operation for determining the output information during the reactivation.
  • the sensor device receives a confirmation message after a data record has been archived-be it directly from the memory device or indirectly from the client device.
  • the confirmation message which is assigned to the reference time concerned, it can be reconstructed by the sensor device that the input information was already processed before the reference time and has flowed into the already archived state information.
  • the sensor device knows that the collection information, which was stored before the reference time, is no longer needed for future reactivations and thus the corresponding storage space can be released.
  • the size of the memory for the collection information and the associated costs can be limited.
  • the corresponding input information can be classified as "not transmitted” and can then (after) be transferred after reactivation of the client device as Einholinformation.
  • the sensor device retains its entire history in a ring buffer and overwrites the oldest elements if no more storage space is available.
  • the ring buffer can be pre-sized to allow a failure of the client device to ring buffer not crowded.
  • the memory requirement can also be limited. In this case no confirmation message is necessary.
  • the client device After reactivation of the client device, the client device preferably transmits a new request to the sensor device, which triggers the transmission of the collection information.
  • the transmission of the continuity information is preferably also triggered by the new request.
  • count values are determined as input information. Based on the counts, the occupancy state of a track section is determined as output information.
  • the occupancy state of a track section is determined as output information.
  • the occupancy state of a track section is determined as output information.
  • the memory device is integrated in the client device as non-volatile memory.
  • occupancy condition of at least one track section is determined as input information.
  • the output information is a train position.
  • a client device can then be used an interlocking and as a sensor device Achsonneausncetician.
  • one or more train positions are determined as input information.
  • the status or the dismantling of a route is determined.
  • a sensor device can then be a signal box and client equipment as a line center be used.
  • the term "driveway” refers to the linking of driveway elements (eg track sections and their occupancy, intersections, level crossing, points and signals in a suitable position) to a technically secured track.
  • the status of a driveway describes u. A. which track sections the route includes, and their conditions in the route connection: eg "still to drive", "occupied”, “free of trains but still as flank protection to secure", "in the context of the route no longer requiring insurance".
  • the occupancy state of one or more track sections and, as output information, the status or a reduction of at least one route are determined as input information.
  • An axle counting evaluation unit or a track circuit evaluation unit can then be used as the sensor device and a line center can be used as the client device.
  • the line center is, for example, a Radio Block Center (RBC) belonging to a European Train Control Systems (ETCS).
  • RBC Radio Block Center
  • ETCS European Train Control Systems
  • one and the same device may have the function of a client device for determining an output information (occupancy state) from input information (counts) as well as the function of a sensor device for determining input information (occupancy state), from which another one Client worn (interlocking) another output information (status of the route) can be determined.
  • states (circuit state, position state, etc.) of safety-relevant elements of a route are input information determined.
  • the status or a reduction of at least one route is determined, for example, whether the route is released.
  • a sensor device can then be used a field element control unit and as a client device a line center.
  • the continuity of the circuit state of the element within a predetermined period of time and thus the technical safety of a route is monitored as state information.
  • the interlocking can enable or block the corresponding route (output information).
  • one or more train positions or field element states, in particular of points, and road statuses are determined as input information.
  • the output information is determined by the Movement Authority.
  • a sensor device can then be used a signal box or a field element control unit and a train control.
  • a route center can be used.
  • Fig. 1a shows by way of example sensor devices 1 with six sensor units 11 , which are connected by a sensor network 2 with a client device 3 .
  • the sensor device 1 detected measured values (input information I e i n) for a reference point in time, due to the in the client device 3 output information I from (and possibly status information I zust -. S. Fig. 1b ) for the reference time.
  • the output information I out can then be forwarded by the client device 3.
  • a system network 4 the output information I and the transmitted input information I is a basis of which the output information I from it has been determined (ie belonging to the same reference time input information I and output information I off) transmitted to a storage device 5 and stored as a data record DS ,
  • a device is shown in which the memory device is integrated in the client device 3. While at the in Fig. 1a In the case of the device shown in FIG. 2, the network comprises a sensor network 2 and a system network 4, in the case of the in Fig. 2 shown device on a system network 4 are omitted.
  • the memory device In order for the data in the memory device 5 not to be lost in the event of a failure of the client device 3, the memory device must comprise a permanent (non-volatile) memory or a memory that has a retention time that should be designed longer than the duration of a failure of the client device 3 is expected.
  • no output information I out can be calculated.
  • the input information measured by the sensor device 1 is acquired at each reference time I a, or a selection thereof stored as Einholinformation I hol in the sensor device 1, at least temporarily, so that after reactivation the stored during the failure Einholmes I hol (T N ... T N + M) may be transmitted to the client device.
  • Fig. 2 shows a typical sequence of a preferred variant of the method according to the invention.
  • the sensor device 1 is determined to be a reference time point T 1 (for example by measurement) the input information I a (T 1), is stored by the a selection as Einholinformation I hol (T 1) in the sensor device. 1
  • the input information I a (T 1) is transmitted to the client device. 3
  • the client device 3 sends after receipt of the input information I a (T 1) each include a confirmation message (not shown) on the sensor device 1, thereby I hol (T 1) can be authorized for example, deleting the corresponding data stored in the sensor device 1 Einholapa.
  • the client device 3 is determined based on the transmitted input information I a (T 1) the output information I from (T 1) or state information from the output information can be derived from (T 1) I (not shown), and transmits these together with the is carried out corresponding input information I a (T 1) as a data set DS (T 1) to the memory device 5. the same procedure to the other reference points (T 2 ... T N).
  • the client device 3 fails after the reference time (T N ) and is reactivated after the time (T N + M ).
  • a (T N + M) are determined by the sensor means further input information I a (T N + 1) ... I determined and Einhol seeds I hol (T N + 1) ...
  • a transmission of Einhol seeds I hol (t N + 1) ... I hol (t N + M) to the client device 3 is not possible during the outage.
  • the client device 3 can send a new request NA to the sensor devices 1, which is a transmission of Einho-la I get (T N + 1 ) ... I get (T N + M ) (or if this is sufficient , only a part of it, eg the most recent Einholinformation I get (T N + M )) triggers.
  • I hol (T N + M ) is transmitted in the process variant shown together with a continuity information KI to ensure that the sensor devices are not themselves failed 1 during the failure of the client device. 3
  • a transmission request ÜI of the last data record DS (T N ) stored in the memory device 5 takes place.
  • a current output information I out (T N + M ) can be determined.
  • counting points can be used as sensor device and an axle counting evaluation unit can be used as client device.
  • the counting points determine counting values as input information (by means of which the number of axes which have passed the counting point in one direction minus the number of axes which have passed the counting point in the other direction) can be deduced, from which the axle counting evaluation unit occupancy states of the track section, which is limited by the points of delivery, determined.
  • the current occupancy state can be done by the last stored in the memory device record DS (T N ) and the current (ie last determined) counter values I a (T N + M ) of the points of delivery.
  • axle counting evaluation units of an axle counting system and client equipment can be used as a sensor device, the axle counting evaluation units determining slip conditions of track sections as input information from which the interlocking the status of a route (eg which track sections can be released as a route) determined.
  • the axle counting evaluation units After failure of the interlocking of the current status of the traveling road can be obtained by the most recently stored in said storage means data set DS (T N) and the detected during the failure of the signal box assignment states I a (T N + 1) ... I a (T N + M ) respectively.
  • T N storage means data set DS
  • the interlocking In order to determine train positions as output information, it is possible to use the interlocking as a sensor device and as a client device a route center, the interlockings determining the status of routes and / or occupancy sections and / or switches from which the line center determines train positions. After failure of the line center, the current train position can be done by the last stored in the memory device record DS (T N ) and the determined during the failure of the line center status of routes and / or occupancy sections and / or switches. It is imperative that all Einholze I stored during the failure of the interlocking a (T N + 1) ... I a (T N + M) (status determined) are transmitted to the centralized track control station.
  • a route as output information can be used as a sensor device signal monitoring units and as a client device interlocking
  • the signal monitoring units determine circuit states of the train signal from which the interlocking determines the continuity of the circuit state as state information, which is a criterion for a release or a Blockade of the driveway can serve.
  • the continuity of the current circuit state can be obtained by the most recently stored in said storage means data set DS (T N) and the detected during the failure of the interlocking circuit states I a (T N + 1) ... I a (T N + M ) within the given period. It is imperative that all stored during the failure of the interlocking as Einhol seeds I a (T N + 1) ... I a (T N + M) (determined switching states) are transmitted to the centralized track control station, if the predetermined in the Fall period.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
EP17162269.9A 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Procédé de détermination fiable d'information de sortie actuel dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire Active EP3378724B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL17162269T PL3378724T3 (pl) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Sposób niezawodnego określania aktualnych informacji wyjściowych w dziedzinie technologii kolejowej
EP17162269.9A EP3378724B1 (fr) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Procédé de détermination fiable d'information de sortie actuel dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire
DK17162269.9T DK3378724T3 (da) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Fremgangsmåde til sikker fastslåelse af aktuel udlæsningsinformation inden for det jernbanetekniske område
PT171622699T PT3378724T (pt) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Método para determinação fiável de uma informação de saída atual no domínio da tecnologia ferroviária
ES17162269T ES2767065T3 (es) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Procedimiento para la determinación confiable de una información de salida actual en el campo de la técnica ferroviaria

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP17162269.9A EP3378724B1 (fr) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Procédé de détermination fiable d'information de sortie actuel dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3378724A1 true EP3378724A1 (fr) 2018-09-26
EP3378724B1 EP3378724B1 (fr) 2019-10-23

Family

ID=58638654

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17162269.9A Active EP3378724B1 (fr) 2017-03-22 2017-03-22 Procédé de détermination fiable d'information de sortie actuel dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3378724B1 (fr)
DK (1) DK3378724T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2767065T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL3378724T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT3378724T (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0631921A2 (fr) * 1993-06-30 1995-01-04 Alex. Friedmann Kommanditgesellschaft Dispositif pour commander et régler des composants électriques, électroniques ou électro-mécaniques dans des véhicules ferroviaires
EP1498336B1 (fr) 2003-07-18 2005-09-07 Alcatel Procédé et point de comptage pour la détection d'une occupation de la voie
DE102007061807A1 (de) * 2007-12-19 2009-07-09 Db International Gmbh Sicheres Verfahren zum Steuern von Elementen der Leit- und Sicherungstechnik mit kabelloser Datenübertragung über große Stellentfernungen hinweg
EP2253525A1 (fr) * 2009-05-18 2010-11-24 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Procédé de contrôle de train, dispositif et système

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0631921A2 (fr) * 1993-06-30 1995-01-04 Alex. Friedmann Kommanditgesellschaft Dispositif pour commander et régler des composants électriques, électroniques ou électro-mécaniques dans des véhicules ferroviaires
EP1498336B1 (fr) 2003-07-18 2005-09-07 Alcatel Procédé et point de comptage pour la détection d'une occupation de la voie
DE102007061807A1 (de) * 2007-12-19 2009-07-09 Db International Gmbh Sicheres Verfahren zum Steuern von Elementen der Leit- und Sicherungstechnik mit kabelloser Datenübertragung über große Stellentfernungen hinweg
EP2253525A1 (fr) * 2009-05-18 2010-11-24 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Procédé de contrôle de train, dispositif et système

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL3378724T3 (pl) 2020-04-30
DK3378724T3 (da) 2020-01-27
PT3378724T (pt) 2020-01-28
ES2767065T3 (es) 2020-06-16
EP3378724B1 (fr) 2019-10-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE3431171A1 (de) Gleisfreimeldeeinrichtung mit achszaehlung
DE112016007518T5 (de) Zugsteuersystem, bodensteuervorrichtung und bordeigene steuervorrichtung
DE60131474T2 (de) Wartungsmeldung auf Basis der Fahrparameter eines Aufzugs
DE4221841C2 (de) Überwachungs-Kontrollsystem zur Überwachung mehrerer überwachter Geräte
DE2701925C3 (de) Fahrzeugsteuerung mit zwei Bordrechnern
EP0739802B1 (fr) Méthode d'amélioration de la disponibilité de compteurs d'essieux à sections multiples
EP1857982A2 (fr) Système de diagnostic pour véhicule auxiliaire, en particulier des engins de construction
EP3378724B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination fiable d'information de sortie actuel dans le domaine de la technique ferroviaire
EP0123132B1 (fr) Système de surveillance pour un système de transmission numérique
EP1050503B1 (fr) Système d'aide pour ascenseurs
EP3817961A1 (fr) Procédé d'échange sécurisé et d'affichage sécurisé de données d'état de composants de sécurité
DE3924266A1 (de) Verfahren zum betrieb einer signaltechnisch sicheren schnittstelle
DE3136586C2 (fr)
DE3235733C2 (fr)
EP1430458B1 (fr) Procede de surveillance d'une installation d'automatisation
EP3882762B1 (fr) Procédé d'installation d'un nouveau logiciel et système
EP2992394B1 (fr) Système de commande pour véhicule ferroviaire
EP1485896B1 (fr) Procede de surveillance d'une installation d'automatisation
DE102017216844B4 (de) Verfahren zur Identifizierung von Langsamfahrstellen auf einer Strecke
EP0995180B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de commande d'installations de feux de signalisation en fonction de la circulation routiere
WO2022258276A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de comptage de passagers pour compter les passagers
DE1928667C3 (de) Minusachsensperrschaltung für Weichenwirkzonen in Ablauf steil werken mit selbsttätiger Programmsteuerung
DE102021209674A1 (de) Verfahren zum automatisierten Fahren eines Kraftfahrzeugs und automatisiert fahrendes Kraftfahrzeug
EP4197824A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de la pression des pneus
DE102004052249B3 (de) Erweitertes Monitoring für eine Vielzahl von Prozessen über Agenten

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190325

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190513

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502017002619

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1193316

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: RIEDERER HASLER AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE AG, LI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: FGE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20200124

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Ref document number: 3378724

Country of ref document: PT

Date of ref document: 20200128

Kind code of ref document: T

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20200121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200123

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200124

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2767065

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20200616

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502017002619

Country of ref document: DE

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200223

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240226

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20240228

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20240315

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240213

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240208

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20240322

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20240213

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20240222

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240212

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240213

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240314

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240401

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240409

Year of fee payment: 8

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Free format text: CASE NUMBER: APP_35437/2024

Effective date: 20240613