EP3050032A1 - Procédé de vérification d'un document de valeur ayant un substrat polymère et une fenêtre transparente, et moyen servant à mettre en oeuvre le procédé - Google Patents

Procédé de vérification d'un document de valeur ayant un substrat polymère et une fenêtre transparente, et moyen servant à mettre en oeuvre le procédé

Info

Publication number
EP3050032A1
EP3050032A1 EP14777006.9A EP14777006A EP3050032A1 EP 3050032 A1 EP3050032 A1 EP 3050032A1 EP 14777006 A EP14777006 A EP 14777006A EP 3050032 A1 EP3050032 A1 EP 3050032A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
value
image
pixels
edge
see
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP14777006.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3050032B1 (fr
Inventor
Shanchuan Su
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Publication of EP3050032A1 publication Critical patent/EP3050032A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3050032B1 publication Critical patent/EP3050032B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for testing a value document with a polymer substrate and at least one see-through window and means for carrying out the method.
  • value documents are understood leaf-shaped objects that represent, for example, a monetary value or an authorization and therefore should not be arbitrarily produced by unauthorized persons. They therefore have features which are not easy to manufacture, in particular to be copied, whose presence is an indication of the authenticity, i. the production by an authorized agency.
  • Important examples of such value documents are coupons, vouchers, checks and in particular banknotes.
  • the invention relates to the testing of a certain type of valuable documents, namely those with a polymer substrate and at least one see-through window.
  • the value documents have a polymer substrate, which is understood to comprise at least one polymeric layer which at least partially serves as a carrier.
  • a polymer substrate which is understood to comprise at least one polymeric layer which at least partially serves as a carrier.
  • they are polymer banknotes.
  • Value documents with such polymer substrates usually have on the surface of the polymer substrate one or preferably a plurality of cover layers which are opaque in the visible wavelength range and are applied in a planar manner; Often the top layer or the top layers are printed. With this or this, among other things, an appearance similar to a paper value document should be achieved.
  • the topmost topcoat serves as, among other things Carrier for printing inks, with which the document of value is printed.
  • the document of value need only have an opacity in the visible wavelength range, as is customary in the case of paper value documents.
  • the value document with the cover layers can still be very slightly translucent.
  • the value documents to be tested or tested within the scope of the invention furthermore have a see-through window, which is understood below to mean a region of the value document which is transparent or translucent for optical radiation in a predetermined wavelength range, preferably the visible spectrum, and no opaque, planar having applied cover layer.
  • the transparency can, as far as the transparency or translucency is given, printed flat with a transparent or translucent ink or printed with any other inks or a material used to form the top layer in the screen printing.
  • the see-through window may have any shape and is bounded by at least one planar area formed by the one or more cover layers.
  • a problem of such value documents is that they may lose ink or parts of the opaque surface applied cover layer in individual places during use or circulation. For example, the ink or opaque layer may flake off at these locations. Such a deviation from a new document of value caused by loss of the opaque layer and / or the printing ink thereon may be referred to as printing removal in the context of the present invention. Such places are errors of the value document and may reduce its usability or fitness for circulation. It would therefore be desirable to be able to examine documents of value for such prints. The test is not easy, however, as there can be significant variations between different batches of print.
  • the present invention is therefore based on the object to provide a method for testing a value document with a polymer substrate and a see-through window, by means of which the cover layer can be checked well for the presence of pressure drops, as well as to provide means for performing the method.
  • the object is achieved by a method for testing a value document with a polymer substrate and at least one see-through window, in which a digital transmission image of the value document is detected, wherein the transmission image comprises pixels in which transmission image determines an edge brightness value for the brightness of an edge of the at least one see-through window determining, using the edge brightness value, a threshold for detecting a print error that is smaller than the edge brightness value but greater than the minimum brightness in the transmission image, and searching for pixels of the transmission image present in at least a predetermined portion of the transmission image and lie outside the at least one see-through window and its edge and which have a brightness above the
  • the object is further achieved by a device for testing a value document with a polymer substrate and at least one see-through window, with an evaluation device that is designed to be execute inventive method.
  • the evaluation device can be designed to detect a digital transmission image of the value document, the transmission image comprising pixels to determine an edge brightness value for the brightness of a border of the at least one see-through window in the transmission image, a threshold value for the recognition of a boundary brightness value To determine printing error, which is smaller than the edge brightness value, but greater than the minimum brightness in the transmission image, and to search pixels of the transmission image, which lie in at least a predetermined portion of the transmission image and outside the at least one see-through window and its edge and the have a brightness that is above the threshold.
  • the inventive method can be carried out in particular by means of the device according to the invention.
  • the device has the evaluation device.
  • This may comprise a data processing device, which may comprise, for example, a computer or at least one processor and / or at least one FPGA, for processing the transmission image.
  • the evaluation device can have a memory in which a computer program is stored, so that the evaluation device, preferably the data processing device, executes the method according to the invention when the computer program is executed.
  • the object is therefore also achieved by a computer program for execution by means of a data processing device having program code, in the execution of which the data processing device executes a method according to the invention.
  • the task is further solved by a physical data carrier, which is readable by means of a data processing device and on which a computer program according to the invention is stored.
  • transmission images of the mentioned value documents are used to detect print removal in the mentioned value documents.
  • the transmission images may be transmission images in a predetermined wavelength range of the visible spectrum, for example in the green region.
  • the transmission images are transmission images in the infrared wavelength range, ie IR
  • a see-through window has an edge with a particularly due to scattering, particularly high intensity or brightness, which is suitable for determining the threshold value, so that fluctuations between different pressure batches no longer play such a large role.
  • the edge is meant a region limiting the transmission window in the transmission image, which may be one or more pixels wide.
  • the method first detects the digital transmission image that includes pixels whose characteristics are described by pixel data.
  • the transmission image describes, spatially resolved, the intensity detected in a transmission examination with visible light or preferably in a transmission examination with IR or infrared radiation.
  • the pixel data may include a value for a brightness that corresponds to the intensity of the transmitted transmission radiation.
  • the digital image is only detected, for example, corresponding pixel data are read or received.
  • the device preferably the evaluation device, can for this purpose have a suitable interface via which the digital image can be detected.
  • the transmission image is detected by means of an optical transmission sensor.
  • the device preferably further comprises an optical transmission sensor for detecting a digital transmission image, the value document, which is coupled to the evaluation device via a signal connection; the evaluation device is then designed to record an image of the transmission sensor as a digital image.
  • the transmission sensor may, for example, be a transmission sensor for detecting a transmission image in the visible wavelength range.
  • the optical transmission sensor comprises or is an optical transmission sensor for detecting a digital infrared transmission image of the value document.
  • the transmission sensor can in particular have a source for optical radiation in a predefined visible wavelength range or infrared wavelength range and a receiver for optical radiation which has passed through the value document in the predefined visible wavelength range or infrared wavelength range.
  • the edge brightness value for the brightness of an edge of the at least one see-through window is determined.
  • the border brightness value can be determined differently depending on the embodiment of the method and on the value document type of the value document.
  • the value document type is given at least by the type of the value document, for example check or banknote. For banknotes, the value document type is further given by the currency, the denomination or denomination and optionally the issue and / or the location in the transport path.
  • the edge brightness value determined is a maximum of the brightness of the pixels of the entire transmission image of the value document.
  • the evaluation device is then preferably designed to determine as the edge brightness value a maximum of the brightness of the pixels of the entire transmission image of the value document.
  • the edge brightness value can be determined very quickly, brightness maxima over columns or rows of the transmission image are readily available. The exact location of the see-through window then does not need to be determined.
  • an area of the transmission image showing the at least one see-through window with its edge can be determined, and as edge brightness value the maximum of the brightnesses of at least two of the pixels of at least the edge of the image of the see-through window can be used. But it is also possible that the maximum of the brightnesses of the area of the transmission image is determined and as Edge brightness value is used.
  • the evaluation device of the device can then preferably be designed to determine an area of the transmission image showing the at least one see-through window with its edge, and to use as boundary brightness value the maximum of the brightnesses of at least two of the pixels at least the edge of at least the edge of the see-through window , or it may be designed to determine the maximum of the brightnesses of the area of the image and to use it as an edge brightness value.
  • the shape and size of the region and optionally also the position of the region on the document of value can preferably be specified for a respective value document type and in particular be chosen so that it surrounds the see-through window and its edge in the transmission image or an edge region of suitable width around the see-through window.
  • the value document type of the value document can then be determined beforehand. The edge brightness values thus obtained have proved to be particularly favorable for determining the threshold value.
  • the mean or, preferably, the maximum of the boundary brightness values of the plurality of see-through windows can preferably be used as the boundary brightness value.
  • the evaluation device can then be designed accordingly.
  • the edge brightness value is used to determine the threshold value.
  • the threshold value is smaller than the determined edge brightness value, but greater than the minimum brightness in the transmission image.
  • the threshold value is determined to be greater than an average over the brightnesses of the pixels in at least one predetermined part of the transmission image or an average over the brightnesses of the pixels of the transmission image of the entire value document.
  • the evaluation device of the device is then preferably designed to determine the threshold value so that it is greater than an average value over the brightnesses of the pixels in at least one predetermined part of the transmission image or an average value over the brightnesses of the pixels of the transmission image of the entire value document , This results in a more reliable detection of pressure drops. This is the case in particular in the preferred embodiment of the method in which the predetermined part of the transmission image does not show the see-through window and the edge of the see-through window.
  • the predetermined portion may preferably include the entire value document without a predetermined range including the see-through window and its border. If the value document has a number of review windows, the predetermined section may preferably include the entire value document without predetermined areas, each containing a see-through window and its respective border. The region or regions are particularly preferably chosen such that their surface is not at all or at most 10% larger than the surface of the see-through window and its edge.
  • pixels found in the search which are within the predetermined portion of the transmission image and outside of the
  • See-through window and its edge and which have a brightness of above the threshold are marked as deviation pixels.
  • the evaluation device can then be designed to identify search pixels found within the predetermined section of the transmission image and outside the see-through window and its edge, which have a brightness which is above the threshold value, as deviation pixels. This can simplify the further investigation of possible print separations.
  • the marking can take place, for example, by storing corresponding data or shifting pixel data describing the pixels to other memory areas.
  • At least one signal can then be formed and / or at least one datum can be stored that represents the result of the search.
  • the evaluation device can then preferably be designed to determine how many pixels were found during the search. It can then be stored preferably a corresponding value.
  • the evaluation device of the device can then preferably be designed to determine a spatial distribution of the pixels found in the search, ie those pixels of the transmission image. of which are in the predetermined section and whose brightness is above the threshold.
  • a spatial distribution of the pixels found in the search ie those pixels of the transmission image. of which are in the predetermined section and whose brightness is above the threshold.
  • the evaluation device can then be designed, in particular, to determine quantities of deviation pixels in which the two pixels of the same quantity in the transmission image are adjacent in each case when determining the spatial distribution of the pixels found during the search.
  • pixels which are adjacent in the transmission image are preferably understood to be pixels which are directly or next to one another in the transmission image, that is to say have a minimum distance from one another.
  • pixels which are adjacent in the transmission image are understood to be pixels which are next or next-nearest neighbors. It is then possible to determine the number of sets and, for each of the sets, the number of pixels therein and / or the area corresponding to the pixels.
  • a condition value for the value document is determined as a function of the result of the search, preferably as a function of the determined number and / or the determined spatial distribution of the pixel found during the search.
  • the evaluation device of the device can then preferably be designed to determine a state value for the value document as a function of the result of the search, preferably as a function of the determined number and / or the determined spatial distribution of the pixels found during the search.
  • the state value can be an indication of the presence of a pressure erosion and stored.
  • the pixels found in the search are again those of the pixels of the transmission image that are in the given section and outside the white part. at least one see-through window and its edge and their brightness is above the threshold.
  • the aforementioned number of sets and the maximum number of pixels of the sets may be used in determining the state value. This allows a particularly good statement about the importance of the damage to the value document or the fitness for circulation, ie suitability for further use in the money cycle. When determining the condition value, results of other tests of the value document can still be used.
  • the invention further relates to an apparatus for processing documents of value with a device for supplying quality documents, an output device for receiving processed, d. H. sorted value documents, and a transport device for transporting isolated value documents from the feed device to the output device.
  • the device further comprises a device according to the invention for checking the transported value documents.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a value-document processing device in the form of a banknote sorting device
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of an infrared transmission image of a value document with a polymer substrate and at least one see-through window that can be detected by the device in FIG. 1 for a value document
  • 3 shows a schematic view of a section through the value document on which the transmission image in FIG. 2 is based, along the line A-A ', FIG.
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified flowchart of a first embodiment of a method for checking a value document with a see-through window, which method can be carried out by means of the device in FIG.
  • FIG. 5 shows a schematic illustration of the position of deviation pixels in the image in FIG. 2.
  • a value-document processing device 10 in FIG. 1 in the example an apparatus for processing value documents 12 in the form of banknotes, is designed for sorting value documents as a function of the recognition of the authenticity and the state of processed value documents.
  • the components of the device described below are arranged in a housing of the device, not shown, or held on this, as far as they are not referred to as external.
  • the device has a feeder 14 for feeding value documents, an output device 16 for receiving processed, d. H. sorted value documents, and a transport device 18 for transporting isolated value documents from the feed device 14 to the output device 16.
  • the accessory device 14 in the example includes an input compartment 20 for a value document stack and a singler 22 for singling value documents from the value document stack in the input compartment 20 and for supplying the singled value documents to the transport device 18.
  • the output device 16 has three output sections 24, 25 and 26, in which processed value documents sorted by the result of the processing can be sorted.
  • each of the sections comprises a stacking compartment and a stacking wheel, not shown, by means of which supplied value documents can be stored in the stacking compartment.
  • one of the output sections may be replaced by a device for destroying banknotes.
  • the transport device 18 has at least two, in the example three branches 28, 29 and 30, at the ends of each of the output sections 24 and 25 and 26 is arranged, and at the branches via controllable by control signals switches 32 and 34, by means of which Value documents in response to control signals to the branches 28 to 30 and thus the output sections 24 to 26 can be fed.
  • a sensor device 38 is arranged which measures physical properties of the value documents during the transport of value documents forms the measurement results reproducing sensor signals.
  • the sensor device 38 has three sensors, namely an optical reflectance sensor 40, which detects a residual color image and a remission IR image of the value document, an optical transmission sensor 42, which transmits a transmission color image and a transmission IR image of the value document detected, and a transmission ultrasonic sensor 44, the spatially resolved as ultrasound property detects the ultrasonic transmission of the document of value or measures and is hereinafter referred to simply as an ultrasonic sensor for the sake of simplicity.
  • the formed by the sensors Sensor signals correspond to measurement data or raw data of the sensors, which depending on the sensor may already have been subjected to a correction, for example as a function of calibration data and / or noise properties.
  • the value document processing device 10 has an input / output device 46.
  • the input / output device 46 is realized by a touch-sensitive display device ("touch screen") Keyboard and a display device, such as an LCD display include.
  • a control and evaluation device 48 is connected via signal connections to the sensor device 38, the input / output device 46 and the transport device 18, in particular the points 32 and 34.
  • the control and Ausenseeinrichrung 48 forms a data processing device and has in addition to corresponding not shown in the figures data interfaces for the sensor device 38 and its sensors via a processor 50 and connected to the processor 50 memory 52 in which at least one computer program is stored with program code ,
  • the control and evaluation device 48 or the processor 50 evaluates the signals or measured values of the sensor device 38 and controls the device in accordance with the properties of the value documents.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 or the processor 50 evaluates the signals or measured values of the sensor device 38 and controls the device in accordance with the properties of the value documents.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 or the processor 50 evaluates the signals or measured values of the sensor device 38 and controls the device in accordance with the properties of the value documents.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 or the processor 50 evaluates the signals or measured values of the sensor device 38 and controls the device in accordance with the properties of the value documents.
  • it in its function as an evaluation device, it can evaluate the sensor signals, in particular for determining an authenticity class and / or a state
  • control and evaluation device 48 further controls the input / output device 46, inter alia, for displaying operating data, and obtains these operating data corresponding to inputs of an operator. In operation, documents of value from the feeder are separated and transported past or through the sensor device 38.
  • the sensor device 38 detects or measures physical properties of the value document transported past or through it and forms sensor signals or measurement data which describe the measured values for the physical properties.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 classifies the value document into one of predefined authenticity and / or state classes and controls the transport device 18 by issuing control signals, in this case more precisely Turnouts 32 and 34, respectively, so that the value document is output according to its class determined in the classification in an output section of the output device 16 assigned to the class.
  • the assignment to one of the given authenticity classes or the classification takes place while depending on at least one predetermined authenticity criterion.
  • the transmission sensor 42 has an illumination section, by means of which a predetermined detection range of the transport path can be illuminated with optical radiation in the visible and in a predetermined infrared wavelength range.
  • a predetermined detection range of the transport path can be illuminated with optical radiation in the visible and in a predetermined infrared wavelength range.
  • On the opposite side of the transport path 18 has the
  • Transmission sensor 42 via a detection device for spatially resolved detection of a color image in the wavelength range of visible light and an infrared transmission image in the predetermined infrared wavelength range.
  • the transmission sensor 42 is designed as a line sensor which, during the transport of the value document by the sensor, successively detects transmission line images of strips of the value document extending transversely to the transport direction of the value document. Accordingly, the detection device comprises detector lines.
  • the transmission sensor 42 assembles the acquired line images into digital transmission images comprising pixels whose characteristics are described by pixel data. In particular, it acquires a digital infrared transmission image of the value document with the formation of pixel data describing the pixels of the image and transmits this to the evaluation device 48.
  • the pixel data for one pixel describe in particular a brightness which describes the intensity received by the detection device for the pixel
  • value documents of predefined value document types are checked, have a polymer substrate and a see-through window.
  • FIGS. 3 and 2 An example of such a value document of one of these predetermined value document types and its infrared transmission image is shown in FIGS. 3 and 2, respectively.
  • FIG. 2 schematically shows the infrared transmission image of the value document 54
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic sectional view along the line AA 'in FIG. 2.
  • the document of value 54 has a sheet-like transparent polymer substrate 56 as a carrier, which has surface layers 58 applied in a planar manner on both surfaces, which have a comparable or greater opacity with the opacity of banknote paper, at least in the visible wavelength range. These cover layers are shown hatched in the figures.
  • Printed on this layer with suitable printing ink is a printed image 59, which is indicated only schematically in FIG.
  • the value document 54 has a see-through window 60.
  • the see-through window 60 is formed, inter alia, by the absence of a planar cover layer in its area.
  • the cover layers 58 therefore extend over the entire document of value with the exception of the see-through window 60.
  • the see-through window there is still an imprint 62 with a transparent printing ink in the present example, which is shown dotted in FIG.
  • the imprint comprises cover layer material applied in screen printing, which in the example in FIG. 2 forms a triangle.
  • an edge 64 which surrounds the see-through window 60 is shown in addition to the elements mentioned.
  • This edge 64 is characterized by a particularly high receiving intensity or brightness, which is probably due to scattered radiation, since it corresponds to an edge region around the see-through window, which still has a flat top layer.
  • the thickness of this cover layer, or when using a plurality of cover layers arranged one above the other, their number, may differ from the thickness or number in the other regions of the document of value 54.
  • FIG. 2 further shows two regions 68 corresponding to pressure drops, i. H. Areas in which the cover layers 58, optionally imprinted, abraded or chipped.
  • a first exemplary embodiment of a method for testing a value document with a polymer substrate and at least one transparent window, in particular the presence of at least one pressure erosion, is roughly sketched at least in part in FIG. 4 in the form of a sequence diagram.
  • a computer program is stored in the control and evaluation device 48, more precisely its memory 52, in the execution of which the control and evaluation device 48, more precisely the processor 50, carries out the first embodiment of the method.
  • step S10 a digital infrared transmission image of a value document transported by the transmission sensor 42 is detected by means of the transmission sensor 42.
  • the transmission sensor 42 detects optical radiation emanating from the value document, in particular in the predefined infrared wavelength range, and forms the corresponding detected intensities representing measuring signals. From this pixel data for pixels of a digital infrared image value document formed, which detects the control and evaluation device 48.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 determines its value document type and position using a color image of the value document detected by means of the reflectance sensor 40.
  • the value document type the currency and the denomination of the value document are determined as the location of one of the four possible orientations of the value document in the transport path, which are obtainable by rotating the value document around axes parallel and transversely to the transport direction.
  • step S14 the control and evaluation device 48 determines, depending on the value document type determined and the position of the value document, a range or see-through window area 66 (see FIG. 2) for the see-through window 60 in the detected window infrared transmission image.
  • This range is chosen so that the see-through window 60 and its edge 64, taking into account possible fluctuations in its production with a given certainty, is within the range 66, but its size is as small as possible under this condition. In particular, it shows the see-through window 60 with its edge 64.
  • step S16 the control and evaluation device 48 determines an edge brightness value of the edge 64 of the see-through window 60. In the present exemplary embodiment, the control and evaluation device 48 determines the maximum of the brightnesses of the pixels of the region 66 of the infrared transmission image and stores the maximum as an edge brightness value.
  • step S18 the control and evaluation device 48 calculates an average of the brightnesses in a predetermined part of the transmission image. In the present example, this part is the entire transmission image with the exception of the region 66 or without the region 66.
  • step S20 the control and evaluation device 48 then determines a threshold value for the detection of a pressure erosion which is smaller than the edge brightness value but greater than the minimum brightness in the transmission image. For value documents of the value document type present here, due to the design, the brightnesses in the region 66 are always above the minimum brightness in the remaining transmission image, as long as there are no print removals. More specifically, therefore, the control and evaluation unit 48 sets the threshold value to be larger than the average value determined in step S18. In this example, the
  • Threshold is a weighted average of the boundary brightness value and the mean, with the weighting factor given for the value document type. This can be determined, for example, by examining predetermined reference value documents of the specified value document type with print removals.
  • step S22 the control and evaluation device 48 searches for pixels which lie in at least one predetermined section of the transmission image and outside the at least one see-through window and its edge and have a brightness which is above the threshold value.
  • the given transmission section here uses the entire transmission image, with the exception of the region 66 which was used to determine the edge brightness value.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 marks the found pixels whose brightness exceeds the threshold value as deviation pixels. To mark, in this example, identifiers of the pixels representing the location are stored.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 determines the number of deviation pixels determined in step S22 and stores a corresponding value.
  • it determines a spatial distribution of the pixels found in step S22. For this purpose, it determines sets of deviation pixels in which two of the pixels of the same set are adjacent. For this, reference may be made, inter alia, to methods under the name l, blob-labeling , l algorithms. Adjacent pixels in this embodiment are pixels at a minimum distance from each other.
  • the pixels of the quantities thus determined each form contiguous regions in the transmission frame, ie, from each pixel of a respective set, a path leading via adjacent pixels leads to each other pixel of the respective quantity.
  • Each of these quantities can thus represent a pressure reduction.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 then calculates the number of the quantities thus found and the number of pixels, ie deviation pixels, in these quantities.
  • the number of sets and the numbers of pixels are stored.
  • Fig. 5 schematically shows pixels of the transmission image in Fig. 2.
  • pixels which were not recognized as deviation pixels are represented as white filled squares and deviation pixels are squares filled with black. It is easy to see that two sets of 70 and 70 'contiguous deviation pixels were detected, each having different numbers of pixels. These quantities correspond exactly to areas 68 with pressure drops.
  • step S26 the control and evaluation device 48 then determines, depending on the determined number of deviation pixels, the number of determined quantities and the number of pixels in the sets, a state value indicating whether the value document is still reusable or is capable of running or not.
  • the control and evaluation device 48 can compare the number of deviation pixels with a permissible maximum number and the number of sets in relation to the number of the total deviation pixels determined with a predetermined limit value.
  • this state value may represent whether there is at least one print removal or not.
  • control and evaluation device 48 then, as described above, control the transport device 18.
  • state values determined using the remission sensor and using the ultrasound sensor may additionally be taken into account during the activation.
  • a second embodiment differs from the previous embodiment solely in that the step S16 is replaced by a step S16 1 .
  • the control and off value device 48 or the computer program therein is then changed accordingly. All other steps and components are unchanged.
  • the step S16 'differs from the step S16 in that the maximum brightness value of the pixels of the entire transmission image is determined as the edge brightness value. It is exploited that the design of the value documents of the specified value document type does not provide areas in which the transmission is greater than that of the edge 64.
  • a third exemplary embodiment differs from the first exemplary embodiment only in that the step 16 is replaced by a step S16 ", the control and evaluation device 48 or the computer program. grarnm in it is then changed accordingly. All other steps and components are unchanged.
  • the step S16 "differs from the step S16 only in that the area 66 is replaced by a strip-shaped area 66 'extending from one edge of the value document to the opposite edge of the value document, extending transversely to the transport direction of the value document in the transmission image 66 'is further selected such that the see-through window 60 and its edge 64, taking into account possible fluctuations in its production, are within the range 66' with a given certainty, but its size is as small as possible under this condition, in particular it shows the see-through window 60 with its edge 64.
  • Yet another embodiment differs from the first embodiment solely in that step S16 is replaced by a step S16 "The control and evaluation 48 and the computer program therein is then changed accordingly. All other steps and components are unchanged.
  • the step S16 " 1 differs from the step S16 in that the average value of the brightnesses of at least two of the pixels of at least the edge is used as the edge brightness value More specifically, a number N of, for example, 10 or 20 is given and the N become largest Brightnesses in area 66 determine what, according to the design of the value documents of the specified value document type, corresponds to the N highest brightnesses of edge 64. The mean value over the N greatest brightnesses is now used as the edge brightness value.
  • Yet another embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that in step S16 first the pixels in the edge 64 are determined and then the maximum of the brightnesses of only the detected pixels of the edge is used as edge brightness value.
  • exemplary embodiments may differ from the above-described exemplary embodiments in that value documents of a value document type which have at least two see-through windows but are constructed analogously to the value documents described above are checked.
  • the step S14 is then modified in such a way that for the at least two see-through windows in each case a see-through window area which corresponds to the area 66 of the first exemplary embodiment is determined.
  • an edge brightness value for the respective see-through window can now be determined for all see-through windows analogously to the preceding exemplary embodiments.
  • One of the edge brightness values, the maximum of the boundary brightness values determined for the individual see-through windows, or an average value of the boundary brightness values determined for the individual see-through windows can then be used as edge brightness value.
  • the following steps then differ from the steps of the previously described embodiments in that areas of the value document or parts of the transmission image which are none of the see-through windows and none of the see-through windows are used to determine the mean value of the brightnesses and to search for deviation pixels include or show.
  • exemplary embodiments differ from the exemplary embodiments described above in that instead of the infrared transmission images, transmission images in a predefined visible wavelength range are used.
  • the transmission color image captured by the transmission sensor 42 more specifically its green image, may be used.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé servant à la vérification d'un document de valeur ayant un substrat polymère et au moins une fenêtre transparente. Ledit procédé consiste à : détecter une image numérique de transmission du document de valeur, l'image de transmission comprenant des pixels; déterminer une valeur de luminosité de bord dans l'image pour la luminosité d'un bord de la ou des fenêtres transparentes; déterminer à l'aide de la valeur de luminosité de bord une valeur de seuil pour la reconnaissance d'une usure d'encre d'impression qui est inférieure à la valeur de luminosité de bord, mais supérieure à la luminosité minimale dans l'image; vérifier si des pixels, qui sont situés dans au moins un secteur prédéfini de l'image et en dehors de la ou des fenêtres transparentes et de leur bord, présentent une luminosité qui est au-dessus du seuil.
EP14777006.9A 2013-09-27 2014-09-25 PROCÉDÉ DE TEST DES DOCUMENTS DE VALEUR EN POLYMÈRE AVEC FENÊTRE TRANSPARENTE
ET DISPOSITIF METTANT EN OEUVRE DU PROCEDE Active EP3050032B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102013016120.7A DE102013016120A1 (de) 2013-09-27 2013-09-27 Verfahren zum Prüfen eines Wertdokuments mit einem Polymersubstrat und einem Durchsichtsfenster und Mittel zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
PCT/EP2014/002606 WO2015043751A1 (fr) 2013-09-27 2014-09-25 Procédé de vérification d'un document de valeur ayant un substrat polymère et une fenêtre transparente, et moyen servant à mettre en œuvre le procédé

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3050032A1 true EP3050032A1 (fr) 2016-08-03
EP3050032B1 EP3050032B1 (fr) 2021-12-15

Family

ID=51627255

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14777006.9A Active EP3050032B1 (fr) 2013-09-27 2014-09-25 PROCÉDÉ DE TEST DES DOCUMENTS DE VALEUR EN POLYMÈRE AVEC FENÊTRE TRANSPARENTE
ET DISPOSITIF METTANT EN OEUVRE DU PROCEDE

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US9865116B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3050032B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN105556576B (fr)
AU (1) AU2014327792B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2920541C (fr)
DE (1) DE102013016120A1 (fr)
MX (1) MX357185B (fr)
WO (1) WO2015043751A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105069893B (zh) * 2015-08-17 2017-09-29 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 一种检测纸币的方法及装置
GB2548546A (en) * 2016-02-18 2017-09-27 Checkprint Ltd Method and apparatus for detection of document tampering
CN106355742B (zh) * 2016-08-26 2022-12-02 威海华菱光电股份有限公司 透射式原稿读取装置

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3139365C2 (de) * 1981-10-02 1993-10-14 Gao Ges Automation Org Verfahren zur Überprüfung des Randbereichs von Banknoten und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
GB2325883B (en) * 1997-06-03 2000-01-12 Portals Ltd A security article,a method and manufacture of the security article,a method of verifying authenticity of the security article and security paper
JP4180715B2 (ja) * 1998-12-14 2008-11-12 株式会社東芝 印刷物の汚損度判別装置
GB0106817D0 (en) * 2001-03-19 2001-05-09 Rue De Int Ltd Monitoring method
KR101297702B1 (ko) * 2004-03-08 2013-08-22 카운슬 오브 사이언티픽 앤드 인더스트리얼 리서치 적분된 투과 및 반사 스펙트럼 응답을 이용한 개선된 위조 화폐 검출기
KR101333278B1 (ko) * 2004-03-09 2013-12-02 카운슬 오브 사이언티픽 앤드 인더스트리얼 리서치 시각적인 반사 스펙트럼 반응을 이용한 향상된 위조 화폐 검출기
JP4563740B2 (ja) * 2004-07-13 2010-10-13 グローリー株式会社 画像照合装置、画像照合方法および画像照合プログラム。
DE102004036229A1 (de) * 2004-07-26 2006-02-16 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Prüfung von Banknoten
CN100595799C (zh) * 2007-02-07 2010-03-24 张健 一种二维货币自动识别方法及系统
US8139208B2 (en) * 2008-09-11 2012-03-20 Toshiba International Corporation Ultrasonic detection system and method for the detection of transparent window security features in bank notes
DE102009057348A1 (de) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung von Banknoten
JP2010277252A (ja) * 2009-05-27 2010-12-09 Toshiba Corp 紙葉類判別装置
DE102009032227A1 (de) * 2009-07-08 2011-01-13 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Prüfung von Wertdokumenten
KR101865415B1 (ko) * 2011-05-11 2018-06-07 삼성전자주식회사 모바일 통신기를 이용하는 위폐 감별법
CN102169608B (zh) * 2011-05-27 2013-03-13 徐端全 多光谱纸币验钞机对纸币的处理方法
DE102011121912A1 (de) * 2011-12-21 2013-06-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Untersuchung eines Wertdokuments

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX2016003742A (es) 2016-05-16
CN105556576A (zh) 2016-05-04
CA2920541A1 (fr) 2015-04-02
US20160232732A1 (en) 2016-08-11
AU2014327792B2 (en) 2019-01-17
MX357185B (es) 2018-06-29
CA2920541C (fr) 2019-02-05
AU2014327792A1 (en) 2016-05-05
WO2015043751A1 (fr) 2015-04-02
DE102013016120A1 (de) 2015-04-02
EP3050032B1 (fr) 2021-12-15
US9865116B2 (en) 2018-01-09
CN105556576B (zh) 2018-08-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE2824849C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut
EP2095341B1 (fr) Procédé de détection des encrassements et/ou l'usure de l'encre dans la zone des transitions de couleur sur des documents de valeur et moyens en vue de mettre en oeuvre le procédé
DE60112890T2 (de) Verfahren zur überwachung von dokumenten
EP2143081B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour vérifier des documents-valeurs
EP0342647A2 (fr) Méthode pour l'examen de matériau en feuilles
WO2012084145A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination d'un ensemble de données de référence de classe, pour la classification de documents de valeur
DE102010021803A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Echtheitsprüfung von Wertdokumenten
EP2761604B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle de la qualité de fabrication d'une caractéristique de sécurité d'un document de valeur
EP3108461B1 (fr) Procédé d'examen d'un document de valeur et moyens d'exécution du procédé
DE102013015224A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen von Wertdokumenten auf Irregularitäten
EP3050032B1 (fr) PROCÉDÉ DE TEST DES DOCUMENTS DE VALEUR EN POLYMÈRE AVEC FENÊTRE TRANSPARENTE
ET DISPOSITIF METTANT EN OEUVRE DU PROCEDE
EP2936456A1 (fr) Procédé de traitement de documents de valeur et moyen d'exécution dudit procédé
EP3443542B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de vérification de documents de valeur, en particulier des billets de banque, et système de traitement de documents de valeur
DE102013006925A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten, insbesondere Banknoten, sowie Wertdokumentbearbeitungssystem
WO2011082792A1 (fr) Procédé pour vérifier des documents de valeur
EP3111426A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination d'un résultat de tri pour un document de valeur et moyen de mise en oeuvre du procédé
EP3014588B1 (fr) Procede pour la mise a disposition de donnees de mesue d'un dispositif de traitement de documents de valeur et dispositif de traitement de documents de valeur
EP2656327B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour l'examen de l'état optique de documents de valeur
DE102009032227A1 (de) Verfahren für die Prüfung von Wertdokumenten
EP2920769B1 (fr) L'appareil et methode pour evaluer les documents de valeur
EP3503046B1 (fr) Système de détection d'une caractéristique de sécurité lisible par machine d'un document de valeur, ledit système comportant un dispositif de traitement et une caméra connectée audit dispositif ainsi que procédé de remplacement d'une caméra d'un tel système
EP3170154B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de vérification de conformité de documents de valeur
EP3134878B1 (fr) Procede de verification d'un document de valeur
DE102013010741A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bereitstellung von Messdaten einer Vorrichtung zur Bearbeitung von Wertdokumenten und Wertdokumentbearbeitungsvorrichtung
DE102020002587A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Substrats mit einem Lumineszenzstoff

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160428

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07D 7/06 20060101AFI20210611BHEP

Ipc: G07D 7/12 20160101ALI20210611BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210715

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014016040

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1456067

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220315

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220316

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220418

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014016040

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220415

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220916

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220925

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1456067

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211215

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240930

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240923

Year of fee payment: 11