EP2927088B1 - Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails - Google Patents

Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2927088B1
EP2927088B1 EP14163390.9A EP14163390A EP2927088B1 EP 2927088 B1 EP2927088 B1 EP 2927088B1 EP 14163390 A EP14163390 A EP 14163390A EP 2927088 B1 EP2927088 B1 EP 2927088B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
test protocol
check sums
tool
programming tool
programming
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14163390.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2927088A1 (fr
Inventor
Daniel Sigg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Schweiz AG
Original Assignee
Siemens Schweiz AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Schweiz AG filed Critical Siemens Schweiz AG
Priority to EP14163390.9A priority Critical patent/EP2927088B1/fr
Publication of EP2927088A1 publication Critical patent/EP2927088A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2927088B1 publication Critical patent/EP2927088B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L3/00—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal
    • B61L3/02—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control
    • B61L3/08—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically
    • B61L3/12—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using radio waves
    • B61L3/125—Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal at selected places along the route, e.g. intermittent control simultaneous mechanical and electrical control controlling electrically using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using radio waves using short-range radio transmission
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L19/00—Arrangements for interlocking between points and signals by means of a single interlocking device, e.g. central control
    • B61L19/06—Interlocking devices having electrical operation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/50—Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades
    • B61L27/53—Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades for trackside elements or systems, e.g. trackside supervision of trackside control system conditions
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/60—Testing or simulation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for paperless commissioning of a control unit, in particular a MiniLEU S11, a LEU S21 and a MSTT signal, for a train protection component, in particular an ETCS balise, a signal, a switch.
  • a control unit in particular a MiniLEU S11, a LEU S21 and a MSTT signal
  • a train protection component in particular an ETCS balise, a signal, a switch.
  • ETCS European Train Control System
  • the corresponding train control units such as ETCS balises, signals, level crossings, axle counters and switches, and their associated control units, such as offered by Siemens AG under the names MiniLEU S11, LEU S21 and MSTT Signal, to be installed in the lines and programmed according to the configuration with the corresponding control data.
  • MiniLEU S11, LEU S21 and MSTT Signal offered by Siemens AG under the names MiniLEU S11, LEU S21 and MSTT Signal
  • the present invention is therefore based on the object of specifying a method for the paperless commissioning of a control unit for a train control component, which facilitates the commissioning of commissioning while at the same time maintaining the required safety level according to SIL4.
  • the control unit is also regarded synonymously as the target system.
  • the commissioning staff is only once again requested, within the scope of the provided second test protocol, to confirm the agreement of the calculated checksums with the encrypted setpoints for the checksums.
  • the first test protocol can be displayed in very simple form on the programming tool, eg "Checksum comparison OKAY".
  • the second test protocol is transmitted from the programming tool to a database and archived in the database.
  • a particularly advantageous embodiment of the present method can be achieved if the encrypted setpoint values for the checksums are transmitted to the programming tool in a non-machine readable and evaluable manner. In this way, it is ensured that the calculated actual checksum is actually determined by the control unit was erroneously output the encoded setpoint values for the checksums as actual values in the programming tool and not via any error whatsoever.
  • This procedure is particularly relevant because the control data and the control units implemented with it must correspond to the highest level of safety in the railway sector, SIL4, although the programming tool used and the software for the configuration of the control unit do not have to fulfill any safety level in the sense of a SIL level.
  • the encrypted setpoint values for the checksums are transmitted in the form of an integrated image.
  • Such images are neither electronically nor readable for the programming tool.
  • the second test protocol in the form of a vector-based page description language, preferably in pdf format, created.
  • the figure shows schematically the procedure of the method for paperless start-up of a waypoint, such as, e.g. a transparent data ETCS balise as Switzerlandbeein Letungsech with its associated control unit 20 - also called target system.
  • a waypoint such as, e.g. a transparent data ETCS balise as Switzerlandbeein Letungsappel with its associated control unit 20 - also called target system.
  • a configuration tool 10 provides examination-relevant data for a programming tool 12.
  • the project planning tool 10 can, for example, a An interlocking system or a control system from which it receives the relevant test-relevant data. Alternatively, however, the project planning tool 10 can also be trained so that the test-relevant data can be generated with this tool.
  • control data 14 for the train control unit also referred to as target system
  • a template 16 for a second test protocol and encrypted set values 18 of checksums for checking the correct loading of the control data 14 onto the control unit 20 are included in the test-relevant data.
  • control unit 20 is programmed by the programming tool 12 with the control data 14 provided by the configuration tool 10.
  • the commissioning staff may be made for the commissioning staff to connect the programming tool 12, wired or wirelessly, to the control unit 20 on site and transmit the data via the corresponding interface.
  • control unit 20 now calculates actual checksums 22 for the programmed control data 14 on the control unit 20 using a key 24 unknown to the programming tool 12. In this way, with the required security level of SIL4, it is ensured that the non-secure programming tool 12 is not in is able to determine the correct actual examination sums 22 themselves.
  • the actual test sums calculated by the control unit 20 (it may also be a single checksum) are then transferred to the programming tool 12.
  • the programming tool 12 assembles a first test protocol 28 by automatically comparing the determined actual checksums 22 with the set values 18 for the checksums.
  • SIL4 is that the programming tool 12, the setpoints 18 never in plain text (in the sense of machine readable and evaluable) has available, but by a predetermined combination of the determined by the control unit 20 IST checksums 22 with the supplied by the configuration tool and with the programming tool 12 not known key 26 encrypted setpoint values 18 for the checksums in the case of a correct programming of the control unit 20 comes to a predefined constant value. The test is completed when this predefined constant value has been reached.
  • a fifth step 5 the calculated checksums 22 and the encrypted checksum setpoints 18 are displayed on the commissioning / review tool 29 programming tool 12. This can also be done, for example, only in the simplified form that the programmer displays "Checksum (s) OK".
  • the setpoint values 18 for the checksums have been supplied by the configuration tool 10 to the programming tool 12 in such a way that the setpoint values 18 can not be read and evaluated directly by machine, but nevertheless can be displayed for the commissioning personnel, e.g. in the form of an integrated picture.
  • the commissioning staff then has to acknowledge this second test protocol, whereby in the present exemplary embodiment there is only an indication of the second test protocol if the correspondence between the calculated checksums 22 and the encrypted set values 18 for the checksums is given.
  • the name 30 of the acknowledging tester is also deposited with reference to the second test protocol.
  • the programming tool 12 creates a second test protocol 32 in the form of a pdf file, with reference to the already transmitted template 16, adding the identity / name 30 of the tester and the calculated checksums 22 and encrypted setpoints 18 for the checksums.
  • a special method is used to ensure that the desired checksum 18 contained in the second test protocol 32 can not be used directly by the non-secure programming tool 12.
  • the set checksum 18 can therefore be provided, for example, as an image that can not be read and evaluated directly by machine.
  • the generation of the pdf file for the second test protocol 32 can therefore be implemented on the programming tool 12 as a separate process that is executed in isolation from the rest of the data processing.
  • the generated second test protocol 32 can optionally also be signed with an electronic signature.
  • the second test protocol 32 is transmitted in this step by the programming tool 12 to a database 36 and archived there.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Claims (5)

  1. Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'une unité de commande (20), notamment d'une MiniLEU S11, d'une LEU S21 et d'un signal MSTT, pour une composante de sécurité de train, notamment une balise ETCS, un signal, un aiguillage, comprenant les étapes suivantes :
    a) mise à disposition de données déterminantes pour le contrôle au moyen d'un outil de configuration (10) pour un outil de programmation (12), les données déterminantes pour le contrôle étant les données de commande (14) pour l'unité d'influence du train, un modèle (16) pour un deuxième protocole de contrôle (32) et des valeurs théoriques (18) codées de sommes de contrôle destinées au contrôle du téléchargement correct des données de commande (14) sur l'unité de commande (20) ;
    b) programmation de l'unité de commande (20) par l'outil de programmation (12) à l'aide des données de commande (14) mises à disposition par l'outil de configuration (10) ;
    c) calcul sur l'unité de commande (20), à l'aide d'une clé (24) non connue de l'outil de programmation (12), de sommes de contrôle réelles (22) pour les données de commande (14) programmées, et transmission sur l'outil de programmation (12) de ces sommes de contrôle (22) calculées ;
    d) comparaison des sommes de contrôle (22) calculées avec les valeurs théoriques (18) codées pour les sommes de contrôle dans le cadre d'un premier protocole de contrôle pour la mise à disposition d'un deuxième protocole de contrôle (28) sur l'outil de programmation (12) ;
    e) représentation du résultat du premier protocole de contrôle sur l'outil de programmation (12) et confirmation par un contrôleur (29) d'une concordance des sommes de contrôle (22) calculées et de la valeur théorique (18) codée pour les sommes de contrôle, et
    f) établissement du deuxième protocole de contrôle (32) à l'aide du modèle (16) fourni par l'outil de configuration (10) pour le deuxième protocole de contrôle (32), en y ajoutant l'identité (30) du contrôleur (29) ainsi que les sommes de contrôle (22) calculées et les valeurs théoriques (18) codées pour les sommes de contrôle de manière isolée sur l'outil de programmation (12).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le deuxième protocole (32) est transmis par l'outil de programmation (12) à une banque de données (36) et est archivé dans la banque de données (36).
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2,
    caractérisé en ce que les valeurs théoriques (18) codées pour les sommes de contrôle sont transmises à l'outil de programmation (12) de manière non mécaniquement lisible et évaluable.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3,
    caractérisé en ce que
    les valeurs théoriques (18) codées pour les sommes de contrôle sont transmises sous forme d'une image insérée.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que
    le deuxième protocole (32) est établi sous forme d'un langage de description de page, basé sur vecteurs, de préférence au format pdf.
EP14163390.9A 2014-04-03 2014-04-03 Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails Active EP2927088B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14163390.9A EP2927088B1 (fr) 2014-04-03 2014-04-03 Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14163390.9A EP2927088B1 (fr) 2014-04-03 2014-04-03 Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2927088A1 EP2927088A1 (fr) 2015-10-07
EP2927088B1 true EP2927088B1 (fr) 2017-09-13

Family

ID=50473067

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14163390.9A Active EP2927088B1 (fr) 2014-04-03 2014-04-03 Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2927088B1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3854659A1 (fr) 2020-01-22 2021-07-28 Siemens Mobility AG Procédé de mise en service sans papier d'un point de voie pour le trafic ferroviaire

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107985348B (zh) * 2017-10-20 2021-01-26 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 一种控制方法和列车运行控制系统

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITSV20020056A1 (it) * 2002-11-14 2004-05-15 Alstom Transp Spa Dispositivo e metodo di verifica di motori software logici di comando di impianti ferroviari, in particolare di impianti di stazione
DE102007006130A1 (de) * 2007-02-02 2008-08-07 Siemens Ag Verfahren, mobiles Bediengerät und Anordnung zum Übertragen von Daten an ein Streckenelement des spurgebundenen Verkehrs

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3854659A1 (fr) 2020-01-22 2021-07-28 Siemens Mobility AG Procédé de mise en service sans papier d'un point de voie pour le trafic ferroviaire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2927088A1 (fr) 2015-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102012217591A1 (de) Verfahren und Anordnung zum Überwachen eines durch zwei Achszähl-Sensoreinheiten begrenzten Streckenabschnitts
EP2683589B1 (fr) Système de guidage du trafic ferroviaire
EP2121409B1 (fr) Procédé, appareil de commande mobile et dispositif permettant de transmettre des données à un élément de parcours de transport guidé
EP3782870A1 (fr) Procédé et poste de commande centrale destinés au fonctionnement d'une voie ferrée
WO2016000905A1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule ferroviaire
EP2927088B1 (fr) Procédé de mise en service dématérialisée d'un point de parcours pour le trafic sur rails
EP3938265A1 (fr) Procédé servant à définir l'occupation d'une voie, ainsi que dispositif compteur d'essieux
DE102014206741A1 (de) Verfahren und Systemkonfiguration zum Reorten eines Schienenfahrzeuges
DE102008045050A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Zugbeeinflussung
DE102012221714A1 (de) Verfahren zur Fehleroffenbarung bei einem Stellwerksrechnersystem und Stellwerksrechnersystem
EP2193973B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle d'unités d'influence de traction avec des données d'état de signaux de trajectoires pour des postes tout relais
EP3854659A1 (fr) Procédé de mise en service sans papier d'un point de voie pour le trafic ferroviaire
EP3795451B1 (fr) Procédé de localisation d'un véhicule dans une station destinée à un arrêt du véhicule
DE102012217814A1 (de) Langsamfahrstelle einer Bahnstrecke
EP3013666B1 (fr) Procédé d'exploitation d'un système de commande automatique de la marche d'un train et système de commande automatique de la marche d'un train
DE102014201551A1 (de) Verfahren zur Fehleroffenbarung bei einem Stellwerksrechnersystem und Stellwerksrechnersystem
EP2794382B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de détecter des données de projection d'un dispositif de détection pour surveiller et/ou réguler le trafic ferroviaire
EP3109127A1 (fr) Procédé de communication d'une dilatation d'une autorité de mouvement d'un centre de contrôle sur une unité de commande
DE102013209546A1 (de) Verfahren zum Ersetzen eines ersten Stellwerkes durch ein zweites Stellwerk
EP2945831B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande automatique de trains par etcs de niveaux l1 et/ou l2
WO1998007609A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de commande et de controle d'une installation de commande de trafic
EP2852519B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande permettant d'entrer des instructions de commande pour la gestion d'une installation technique
EP2117904B1 (fr) Procédé d'affichage à chevauchement de sections de données d'état de composants qui sont pertinentes pour la commande
EP3587214B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande de balises
DE102012211333A1 (de) Positionsbestimmung von Schienenfahrzeugen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160304

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B61L 3/12 20060101AFI20170314BHEP

Ipc: B61L 27/00 20060101ALI20170314BHEP

Ipc: B61L 19/06 20060101ALI20170314BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170413

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 927824

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014005407

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171213

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171213

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180113

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014005407

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180430

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180403

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180403

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180403

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180403

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502014005407

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MAIER, DANIEL OLIVER, DIPL.-ING. UNIV., DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502014005407

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, ZUERICH, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: PC

Ref document number: 927824

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Effective date: 20190612

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170913

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140403

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170913

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230720

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240619

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240311

Year of fee payment: 11