Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/022—Site diversity; Macro-diversity
  • H04B7/024—Co-operative use of antennas of several sites, e.g. in co-ordinated multipoint or co-operative multiple-input multiple-output [MIMO] systems
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
  • H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
  • H04B7/0452—Multi-user MIMO systems
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
  • H04W72/00—Local resource management
  • H04W72/12—Wireless traffic scheduling
  • H04W72/121—Wireless traffic scheduling for groups of terminals or users
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L25/00—Baseband systems
  • H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
  • H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
  • H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
  • H04L25/03343—Arrangements at the transmitter end
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L25/00—Baseband systems
  • H04L25/38—Synchronous or start-stop systems, e.g. for Baudot code
  • H04L25/40—Transmitting circuits; Receiving circuits
  • H04L25/49—Transmitting circuits; Receiving circuits using code conversion at the transmitter; using predistortion; using insertion of idle bits for obtaining a desired frequency spectrum; using three or more amplitude levels ; Baseband coding techniques specific to data transmission systems
  • H04L25/497—Transmitting circuits; Receiving circuits using code conversion at the transmitter; using predistortion; using insertion of idle bits for obtaining a desired frequency spectrum; using three or more amplitude levels ; Baseband coding techniques specific to data transmission systems by correlative coding, e.g. partial response coding or echo modulation coding transmitters and receivers for partial response systems
  • H04L25/4975—Correlative coding using Tomlinson precoding, Harashima precoding, Trellis precoding or GPRS
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
  • H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
  • H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
  • H04L27/2602—Signal structure
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
  • H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
  • H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
  • H04L27/2602—Signal structure
  • H04L27/26035—Maintenance of orthogonality, e.g. for signals exchanged between cells or users, or by using covering codes or sequences
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
  • H04L27/32—Carrier systems characterised by combinations of two or more of the types covered by groups H04L27/02, H04L27/10, H04L27/18 or H04L27/26
  • H04L27/34—Amplitude- and phase-modulated carrier systems, e.g. quadrature-amplitude modulated carrier systems

Definitions

• DIDO Distributed- Input Distributed-Output
• NVIS Near Vertical Incidence Skywave
• Prior art multi-user wireless systems may include only a single base station or several base stations.
• a single WiFi base station (e.g., utilizing 2.4 GHz 802.1 lb, g or n protocols) attached to a broadband wired Internet connection in an area where there are no other WiFi access points (e.g. a WiFi access point attached to DSL within a rural home) is an example of a relatively simple multi-user wireless system that is a single base station that is shared by one or more users that are within its transmission range. If a user is in the same room as the wireless access point, the user will typically experience a high-speed link with few
• transmission disruptions e.g. there may be packet loss from 2.4GHz interferers, like microwave ovens, but not from spectrum sharing with other WiFi devices
• a user If a user is a medium distance away or with a few obstructions in the path between the user and WiFi access point, the user will likely experience a medium-speed link. If a user is approaching the edge of the range of the WiFi access point, the user will likely experience a low-speed link, and may be subject to periodic drop-outs if changes to the channel result in the signal SNR dropping below usable levels. And, finally, if the user is beyond the range of the WiFi base station, the user will have no link at all.
• TDMA time-division multiplexed access
• This situation is often seen in coverage areas with high population density, such as within multi-dwelling units.
• a user in a large apartment building with a WiFi adapter may well experience very poor throughput due to dozens of other interfering WiFi networks (e.g. in other apartments) serving other users that are in the same coverage area, even if the user's access point is in the same room as the client device accessing the base station.
• the link quality is likely good in that situation, the user would be receiving interference from neighbor WiFi adapters operating in the same frequency band, reducing the effective throughput to the user.
• MIMO multiple-input multiple-output
• MU-MIMO multiuser MIMO
• MU-MIMO schemes in cellular networks are lack of spatial diversity at the transmit side. Spatial diversity is a function of antenna spacing and multipath angular spread in the wireless links.
• transmit antennas at a base station are typically clustered together and placed only one or two wavelengths apart due to limited real estate on antenna support structures (referred to herein as "towers," whether physically tall or not) and due to limitations on where towers may be located.
• multipath angular spread is low since cell towers are typically placed high up (10 meters or more) above obstacles to yield wider coverage.
• a given sector of a given cell ends up being a shared block of DL and UL spectrum among all of the users in the cell sector, which is then shared among these users primarily in only the time domain.
• cellular systems based on Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) both share spectrum among users in the time domain.
• These methods include limiting transmission power from the base station so as to limit the range of interference, beamforming (via synthetic or physical means) to narrow the area of interference, time-domain multiplexing of spectrum and/or MU-MIMO techniques with multiple clustered antennas on the user device, the base station or both. And, in the case of advanced cellular networks in place or planned today, frequently many of these techniques are used at once.
• MANET mobile ad hoc network
• Mobile ad hoc network is an example of a cooperative self-configuring network intended to provide peer-to-peer communications, and could be used to establish communication among radios without cellular infrastructure, and with sufficiently low-power
• routing protocols can potentially mitigate interference among simultaneous transmissions that are out of range of each other.
• a vast number of routing protocols have been proposed and implemented for MANET systems (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of ad- hoc routing protocols for a list of dozens of routing protocols in a wide range of classes), but a common theme among them is they are all techniques for routing (e.g. repeating) transmissions in such a way to minimize transmitter interference within the available spectrum, towards the goal of particular efficiency or reliability paradigms.
• All of the prior art multi-user wireless systems seek to improve spectrum utilization within a given coverage area by utilizing techniques to allow for simultaneous spectrum utilization among base stations and multiple users.
• the techniques utilized for simultaneous spectrum utilization among base stations and multiple users achieve the simultaneous spectrum use by multiple users by mitigating interference among the waveforms to the multiple users. For example, in the case of 3 base stations each using a different frequency to transmit to one of 3 users, there interference is mitigated because the 3 transmissions are at 3 different frequencies. In the case of sectorization from a base station to 3 different users, each 180 degrees apart relative to the base station, interference is mitigated because the beamforming prevents the 3 transmissions from overlapping at any user.
• transmissions are distributed among different base stations (or ad hoc transceivers) and are structured and/or controlled so as to avoid the RF waveform transmissions from the different base stations and/or different ad hoc transceivers from interfering with each other at the receiver of a given user.
• Prior art multi-user wireless systems add complexity and introduce limitations to wireless networks and frequently result in a situation where a given user's experience (e.g. available bandwidth, latency, predictability, reliability) is impacted by the utilization of the spectrum by other users in the area.
• a given user's experience e.g. available bandwidth, latency, predictability, reliability
• the utilization of the spectrum by other users in the area e.g. available bandwidth, latency, predictability, reliability
• prior art multi-user wireless technology suffers from many limitations. Indeed, with the limited availability of spectrum suitable for particular types of wireless communications (e.g. at wavelengths that are efficient in penetrating building walls), it may be the case that prior art wireless techniques will be insufficient to meet the increasing demands for bandwidth that is reliable, predictable and low-latency.
• Prior art related to the current invention describes beamforming systems and methods for null-steering in multiuser scenarios.
• Beamforming was originally conceived to maximize received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by dynamically adjusting phase and/or amplitude of the signals (i.e., beamforming weights) fed to the antennas of the array, thereby focusing energy toward the user's direction.
• beamforming can be used to suppress interfering sources and maximize signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR).
• SINR signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio
• the weights are computed to create nulls in the direction of the interfering sources.
• the weights are calculated to pre- cancel inter-user interfence and maximize the SINR to every user.
• Alternative techniques for multiuser systems such as BD precoding, compute the precoding weights to maximize throughput in the downlink broadcast channel.
• FIG. 1 illustrates a main DIDO cluster surrounded by neighboring DIDO clusters in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 2 illustrates frequency division multiple access (FDMA) techniques employed in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 3 illustrates time division multiple access (TDMA) techniques employed in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 4 illustrates different types of interfering zones addressed in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 5 illustrates a framework employed in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 7 illustrates a graph showing SER derived from two IDCI-precoding techniques.
• FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary scenario in which a target client moves from a main DIDO cluster to an interfering cluster.
• FIG. 9 illustrates the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) as a function of distance (D).
• FIG. 10 illustrates the symbol error rate (SER) performance of the three scenarios for 4-QAM modulation in flat-fading narrowband channels.
• FIG. 11 illustrates a method for IDCI precoding according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 12 illustrates the SINR variation in one embodiment as a function of the client's distance from the center of main DIDO clusters.
• FIG. 13 illustrates one embodiment in which the SER is derived for 4-QAM modulation.
• FIG. 14 illustrates one embodiment of the invention in which a finite state machine implements a handoff algorithm.
• FIG. 15 illustrates depicts one embodiment of a handoff strategy in the presence of shadowing.
• FIG. 16 illustrates a hysteresis loop mechanism when switching between any two states in Fig. 93.
• FIG. 17 illustrates one embodiment of a DIDO system with power control.
• FIG. 18 illustrates the SER versus SNR assuming four DIDO transmit antennas and four clients in different scenarios.
• FIG. 19 illustrates MPE power density as a function of distance from the source of RF radiation for different values of transmit power according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIGS. 20a-b illustrate different distributions of low-power and high-power DIDO distributed antennas.
• FIGS. 21a-b illustrate two power distributions corresponding to the
• FIG. 22a-b illustrate the rate distribution for the two scenarios shown in Figs. 99a and 99b, respectively.
• FIG. 23 illustrates one embodiment of a DIDO system with power control.
• FIG. 24 illustrates one embodiment of a method which iterates across all antenna groups according to Round-Robin scheduling policy for transmitting data.
• FIG. 25 illustrates a comparison of the uncoded SER performance of power control with antenna grouping against conventional eigenmode selection in U.S. Patent No. 7,636,381.
• FIGS. 26a-c illustrate three scenarios in which BD precoding dynamically adjusts the precoding weights to account for different power levels over the wireless links between DIDO antennas and clients.
• FIG. 28 illustrates one embodiment of a channel matrix frequency response for DIDO 2x2, with a single antenna per client.
• FIG. 30 illustrates exemplary SER for different QAM schemes (i.e., 4-QAM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM).
• FIG. 31 illustrates one embodiment of a method for implementing link adaptation (LA) techniques.
• FIG. 32 illustrates SER performance of one embodiment of the link adaptation (LA) techniques.
• FIG. 36 illustrates one embodiment of a system which employs super-clusters, DIDO-clusters and user-clusters.
• FIG. 37 illustrates a system with user clusters according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIGS. 38a-b illustrate link quality metric thresholds employed in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIGS. 39-41 illustrate examples of link-quality matrices for establishing user clusters.
• FIG. 42 illustrates an embodiment in which a client moves across different different DIDO clusters.
• FIGS. 43-46 illustrate relationships between the resolution of spherical arrays and their area A in one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 47 illustrates the degrees of freedom of an exemplary MIMO system in practical indoor and outdoor propagation scenarios.
• FIG. 48 illustrates the degrees of freedom in an exemplary DIDO system as a function of the array diameter.
• FIG. 49 illustrates a plurality of centralized processors and distributed nodes.
• FIG. 50 illustrates a configuration with both unlicensed nodes and licensed nodes.
• FIG. 51 illustrates an embodiment where obsolete unlicensed nodes are covered with a cross.
• FIG. 52 illustrates one embodiment of a cloud wireless system where different nodes communicate with different centralized processors.
• DIDO Distributed- Input Distributed-Output
• DIDO Distributed- Input Distributed-Output
• RF radio frequency
• M transmit antennas it is possible to create up to (M-l) points of zero RF energy in predefined locations.
• the points of zero RF energy are wireless devices and the transmit antennas are aware of the channel state information (CSI) between the transmitters and the receivers.
• the CSI is computed at the receivers and fed back to the transmitters.
• the CSI is computed at the transmitter via training from the receivers, assuming channel reciprocity is exploited.
• the transmitters may utilize the CSI to determine the interfering signals to be simultaneously transmitted.
• block diagonalization (BD) precoding is employed at the transmit antennas to generate points of zero RF energy.
• receive beamforming computes the weights to suppress interference at the receive side (via null-steering), whereas some embodiments of the invention described herein apply weights at the transmit side to create interference patters that result in one or multiple locations in space with "zero RF energy.”
• receive beamforming computes the weights to suppress interference at the receive side (via null-steering)
• some embodiments of the invention described herein apply weights at the transmit side to create interference patters that result in one or multiple locations in space with "zero RF energy.”
• the systems and methods described herein minimize signal quality under certain conditions and/or from certain transmitters, thereby creating points of zero RF energy at the client devices
• transmit antennas distributed in space provide higher degrees of freedom (i.e., higher channel spatial diversity) that can be exploited to create multiple points of zero RF energy and/or maximum SINR to different users. For example, with M transmit antennas it is possible to create up to (M-l) points of RF energy.
• practical beamforming or BD multiuser systems are typically designed with closely spaced antennas at the transmit side that limit the number of simultaneous users that can be serviced over the wireless link, for any number of transmit antennas M.
• H is the channel matrix obtained by combining the channel vectors (h fe £ C lxM ) from the M transmit antennas to the K users as
• singular value decomposition of the channel matrix H is computed and the precoding weight w is defined as the right singular vector corresponding to the null subspace (identified by zero singular value) of H.
• AWGN additive white Gaussian noise
• singular value decomposition of the channel matrix H is computed and the precoding weight w is defined as the right singular vector corresponding to the null subspace (identified by zero singular value) of H.
• the wireless system is a DIDO system and points of zero RF energy are created to pre-cancel interference to the clients between different DIDO coverage areas.
• a DIDO system is described which includes:
• BTS base transceiver stations
• DIDO cluster Every BTS is connected via the BSN to multiple distributed antennas that provide service to given coverage area called DIDO cluster.
• DIDO cluster In the present patent application we describe a system and method for removing interference between adjacent DIDO clusters. As illustrated in Figure 1, we assume the main DIDO cluster hosts the client (i.e. a user device served by the multi-user DIDO system) affected by interference (or target client) from the neighbor clusters.
• neighboring clusters operate at different frequencies according to frequency division multiple access (FDMA) techniques similar to conventional cellular systems.
• FDMA frequency division multiple access
• the same carrier frequency is reused every third DIDO cluster as illustrated in Figure 2.
• the different carrier frequencies are identified as F 1; F 2 and F 3 .
• this solution yields loss in spectral efficiency since the available spectrum is divided in multiple subbands and only a subset of DIDO clusters operate in the same subband.
• it requires complex cell planning to associate different DIDO clusters to different frequencies, thereby preventing interference.
• such cellular planning requires specific placement of antennas and limiting of transmit power to as to avoid interference between clusters using the same frequency.
• neighbor clusters operate in the same frequency band, but at different time slots according to time division multiple access (TDMA) technique.
• TDMA time division multiple access
• DIDO transmission is allowed only in time slots T 1; T 2 , and T 3 for certain clusters, as illustrated.
• Time slots can be assigned equally to different clusters, such that different clusters are scheduled according to a Round-Robin policy.
• different clusters are characterized by different data rate requirements (i.e., clusters in crowded urban environments as opposed to clusters in rural areas with fewer number of clients per area of coverage), different priorities are assigned to different clusters such that more time slots are assigned to the clusters with larger data rate requirements.
• TDMA as described above may be employed in one embodiment of the invention, a TDMA approach may require time synchronization across different clusters and may result in lower spectral efficiency since interfering clusters cannot use the same frequency at the same time.
• all neighboring clusters transmit at the same time in the same frequency band and use spatial processing across clusters to avoid interference.
• the multi-cluster DIDO system uses conventional DIDO precoding within the main cluster to transmit simultaneous non-interfering data streams within the same frequency band to multiple clients (such as described in the related patents and applications, including 7,599,420; 7,633,994; 7,636,381; and Application Serial No. 12/143,503); (ii) uses DIDO precoding with interference cancellation in the neighbor clusters to avoid interference to the clients lying in the interfering zones 8010 in Figure 4, by creating points of zero radio frequency (RF) energy at the locations of the target clients.
• RF radio frequency
• a target client If a target client is in an interfering zone 410, it will receive the sum of the RF containing the data stream from the main cluster 411 and the zero RF energy from the interfering cluster 412-413, which will simply be the RF containing the data stream from the main cluster.
• adjacent clusters can utilize the same frequency simultaneously without target clients in the interfering zone suffering from interference.
• the performance of DIDO precoding may be affected by different factors such as: channel estimation error or Doppler effects (yielding obsolete channel state information at the DIDO distributed antennas); intermodulation distortion (IMD) in multicarrier DIDO systems; time or frequency offsets.
• IMD intermodulation distortion
• the RF energy at the target client from the interfering clusters is negligible compared to the RF energy from the main cluster, the link performance at the target client is unaffected by the interference. For example, let us assume the client requires 20dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to
• the term "zero RF energy” as used herein does not necessarily mean that the RF energy from interfering RF signals is zero. Rather, it means that the RF energy is sufficiently low relative to the RF energy of the desired RF signal such that the desired RF signal may be received at the receiver. Moreover, while certain desirable thresholds for interfering RF energy relative to desired RF energy are described, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular threshold values.
• interfering zones 8010 There are different types of interfering zones 8010 as shown in Figure 4. For example, "type A” zones (as indicated by the letter “A” in Figure 80) are affected by interference from only one neighbor cluster, whereas “type B” zones (as indicated by the letter “B”) account for interference from two or multiple neighbor clusters.
• Figure 5 depicts a framework employed in one embodiment of the invention.
• the DIDO antennas in the main cluster transmit precoded data signals to the clients MC 501 in that cluster.
• the DIDO antennas in the interfering cluster serve the clients IC 502 within that cluster via conventional DIDO precoding.
• the green cross 503 denotes the target client TC 503 in the interfering zone.
• the DIDO antennas in the main cluster 511 transmit precoded data signals to the target client (black arrows) via conventional DIDO precoding.
• the DIDO antennas in the interfering cluster 512 use precoding to create zero RF energy towards the directions of the target client 503 (green arrows).
• k l,...,K, with K being the number of clients in the interfering zone 8010A, B, U is the number of clients in the main DIDO cluster, C is the number of interfering DIDO clusters 412-413 and I c is the number of clients in the interfering cluster c.
• r k £ NxM is the vector containing the receive data streams at client k, assuming M transmit DIDO antennas and N receive antennas at the client devices; s k £ C Wxl is the vector of transmit data streams to client k in the main DIDO cluster; s u £ C Wxl is the vector of transmit data streams to client u in the main DIDO cluster; s c i £ C Wxl is the vector of transmit data streams to client i in the c interfering DIDO cluster; n k £ C is the vector of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at the N receive antennas of client k; k £ NxM is the DIDO channel matrix from the M transmit DIDO antennas to the N receive antennas at client k in the main DIDO cluster; H c k £ NxM is the DIDO channel matrix from the M transmit DIDO antennas to the N receive antennas t client k in the c th interfering DIDO cluster; W fe £ MxN is the
• the DIDO precoding weights are computed to pre-cancel inter-client interference within the same DIDO cluster.
• block diagonalization (BD) precoding described in the related patents and applications, including 7,599,420; 7,633,994; 7,636,381 ; and Application Serial No. 12/143,503 and [7] can be used to remove inter-client interference, such that the following condition is satisfied in the main cluster
• BD method is used to compute the precoding matrices in the interfering clusters
• the following effective channel matrix is built to compute the weights to the i th client in the neighbor clusters
• c i is the matrix obtained from the channel matrix H c £ i NmI c xM f or me interfering cluster c, where the rows corresponding to the i th client are removed.
• the precoding weights W c ⁇ £ in (1) computed in the neighbor clusters are designed to transmit precoded data streams to all clients in those clusters, while pre-cancelling interference to the target client in the interfering zone.
• the target client receives precoded data only from its main cluster.
• the same data stream is sent to the target client from both main and neighbor clusters to obtain diversity gain.
• the signal model in (5) is expressed as
• W c k is the DIDO precoding matrix from the DIDO transmitters in the c th cluster to the target client k in the interfering zone. Note that the method in (6) requires time synchronization across neighboring clusters, which may be complex to achieve in large systems, but nonetheless, is quite feasible if the diversity gain benefit justifies the cost of implementation.
• FEC forwards error correction
• SIR signal-to-interference
• FIG. 9 shows the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) as a function of D (i.e., as the target client moves from the main cluster 802 towards the DIDO antennas 813 in the interfering cluster 8403).
• the SINR is derived as the ratio of signal power and interference plus noise power using the signal model in (8).
• IDCI the wireless link performance is only affected by noise and the SINR decreases due to pathloss.
• the interference from the DIDO antennas in the neighbor cluster contributes to reduce the SINR.
• FIG 10 shows the symbol error rate (SER) performance of the three scenarios above for 4-QAM modulation in flat-fading narrowband channels.
• SER symbol error rate
• SIR estimate 1101 Clients estimate the signal power from the main DIDO cluster (i.e., based on received precoded data) and the interference-plus-noise signal power from the neighbor DIDO clusters.
• the frame structure can be designed with short periods of silence. For example, periods of silence can be defined between training for channel estimation and precoded data transmissions during channel state information (CSI) feedback.
• the interference-plus-noise signal power from neighbor clusters is measured during the periods of silence from the DIDO antennas in the main cluster.
• null tones are typically used to prevent direct current (DC) offset and attenuation at the edge of the band due to filtering at transmit and receive sides.
• the interference-plus-noise signal power is estimated from the null tones. Correction factors can be used to compensate for transmit/receive filter attenuation at the edge of the band.
• Ps signal-plus-interference-and-noise power
• P IN interference-plus-noise power from neighbor clusters
• the SINR estimate is derived from the received signal strength indication (RSSI) used in typical wireless communication systems to measure the radio signal power.
• RSSI received signal strength indication
• metric in (9) cannot discriminate between noise and interference power level.
• clients affected by shadowing i.e., behind obstacles that attenuate the signal power from all DIDO distributed antennas in the main cluster
• the noise power P in (10) is estimated from the null tones, assuming all DIDO antennas from main and neighbor clusters use the same set of null tones.
• the interference-plus-noise power (P IN ) is estimated from the period of silence as mentioned above.
• the signal-plus-interference-and-noise power (Ps) is derived from the data tones. From these estimates, the client computes the SIR in (10).
• SIR T predefined threshold
• MCS modulation and FEC coding scheme
• orthogonal sequences are used for time synchronization in different DIDO clusters.
• channel estimation is carried out at 1103.
• IDCI-precoding is computed to satisfy the condition in (3).
• the DIDO antennas in the neighbor clusters transmit precoded data streams only to the clients in their cluster, while pre-cancelling interference to the clients in the interfering zone 410 in Figure 4.
• pre-cancelling interference to the clients in the interfering zone 410 in Figure 4.
• DIDO clusters populated by distributed antennas that are located in separate areas or that provide different kinds of services (i.e., low- or high-mobility services).
• the IDCTprecoder to remove inter-cluster interference described above is used as a baseline for handoff methods in DIDO systems.
• Conventional handoff in cellular systems is conceived for clients to switch seamlessly across cells served by different base stations.
• handoff allows clients to move from one cluster to another without loss of connection.
• FIG. 8 To illustrate one embodiment of a handoff strategy for DIDO systems, we consider again the example in Figure 8 with only two clusters 802 and 803. As the client 801 moves from the main cluster (CI) 802 to the neighbor cluster (C2) 803, one embodiment of a handoff method dynamically calculates the signal quality in different clusters and selects the cluster that yields the lowest error rate performance to the client.
• CI main cluster
• C2 neighbor cluster
• Figure 12 shows the SINR variation as a function of the client's distance from the center of clusters CI.
• target SINR 20dB.
• the line identified by circles represents the SINR for the target client being served by the DIDO antennas in CI, when both CI and C2 use DIDO precoding without interference cancellation.
• the SINR decreases as a function of D due to pathloss and interference from the neighboring cluster.
• IDCI-precoding is implemented at the neighboring cluster
• the SINR loss is only due to pathloss (as shown by the line with triangles), since interference is completely removed. Symmetric behavior is experienced when the client is served from the neighboring cluster.
• One embodiment of the handoff strategy is defined such that, as the client moves from CI to C2, the algorithm switches between different DIDO schemes to maintain the SINR above predefined target.
• One embodiment of the handoff strategy is as follows.
• SINR keeps decreasing until it again reaches a target.
• the client decides to switch to the neighbor cluster.
• CI starts using the CSI from the target client to create zero interference towards its direction with IDCI-precoding
• the neighbor cluster uses the CSI for conventional DIDO-precoding.
• the clusters CI and C2 try both DIDO- and IDCI-precoding schemes alternatively, to allow the client to estimate the SIR in both cases. Then the client selects the best scheme, to maximize certain error rate performance metric.
• the cross-over point for the handoff strategy occurs at the intersection of the curves with triangles and rhombus in Figure 12.
• One embodiment uses the modified IDCI- precoding method described in (6) where the neighbor cluster also transmits precoded data stream to the target client to provide array gain.
• the handoff strategy is simplified, since the client does not need to estimate the SINR for both strategies at the crossover point.
• the method described above computes the SINR or SIR estimates for different schemes in real time and uses them to select the optimal scheme.
• the handoff algorithm is designed based on the finite-state machine illustrated in Figure 14.
• the client keeps track of its current state and switches to the next state when the SINR or SIR drops below or above the predefined thresholds illustrated in Figure 12.
• state 1201 both clusters CI and C2 operate with conventional DIDO precoding
• the client is served by cluster CI; in state 1202, the client is served by cluster CI, the BTS in C2 computes IDCI-precoding and cluster CI operates using conventional DIDO precoding; in state 1203, the client is served by cluster C2, the BTS in CI computes IDCI-precoding and cluster C2 operates using conventional DIDO precoding; and in state 1204, the client is served by cluster C2, and both clusters CI and C2 operate with conventional DIDO precoding independently.
• the signal quality or SIR may fluctuate around the thresholds as shown in Figure 15, causing repetitive switching between consecutive states in Figure 14. Changing states repetitively is an undesired effect, since it results in significant overhead on the control channels between clients and BTSs to enable switching between transmission schemes.
• Figure 15 depicts one example of a handoff strategy in the presence of shadowing.
• the shadowing coefficient is simulated according to log-normal distribution with variance 3 [3].
• One embodiment of the invention employs a hysteresis loop to cope with state switching effects.
• the threshold SINR T i can be adjusted within the range A ⁇ .
• This method avoids repetitive switches between states as the signal quality oscillates around SINR T I-
• Figure 16 shows the hysteresis loop mechanism when switching between any two states in Figure 14. To switch from state B to A the SIR must be larger than (SIRxi+Ai/2), but to switch back from A to B the SIR must drop below (SIR T i-Ai/2).
• the threshold SINR T2 is adjusted to avoid repetitive switching between the first and second (or third and fourth) states of the finite- state machine in Figure 14.
• a range of values A 2 may be defined such that the threshold SINR T2 is chosen within that range depending on channel condition and shadowing effects.
• the SINR threshold is dynamically adjusted within the range [SINR T2 , SINR T2 +A 2 ] .
• the variance of the log-normal distribution can be estimated from the variance of the received signal strength (or RSSI) as the client moves from its current cluster to the neighbor cluster.
• the handoff decision is deferred to the DIDO BTSs, assuming communication across multiple BTSs is enabled.
• the SINR or SIR thresholds are derived for different modulation coding schemes (MCSs) and the handoff strategy is designed in combination with link adaptation ⁇ see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 7,636,381) to optimize downlink data rate to each client in the interfering zone.
• MCSs modulation coding schemes
• DIDO systems employ closed-loop transmission schemes to precode data streams over the downlink channel. Closed-loop schemes are inherently constrained by latency over the feedback channel. In practical DIDO systems, computational time can be reduced by transceivers with high processing power and it is expected that most of the latency is introduced by the DIDO BSN, when delivering CSI and baseband precoded data from the BTS to the distributed antennas.
• the BSN can be comprised of various network technologies including, but not limited to, digital subscriber lines (DSL), cable modems, fiber rings, Tl lines, hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks, and/or fixed wireless (e.g., WiFi).
• DSL and cable modem connections typically have between 10-25ms in last- mile latency in the United States, but they are very widely deployed.
• the maximum latency over the BSN determines the maximum Doppler frequency that can be tolerated over the DIDO wireless link without performance degradation of DIDO precoding. For example, in [1] we showed that at the carrier frequency of 400MHz, networks with latency of about 10msec (i.e., DSL) can tolerate clients' velocity up to 8mph (running speed), whereas networks with 1msec latency (i.e., fiber ring) can support speed up to 70mph (i.e., freeway traffic).
• Doppler frequency that can be tolerated over the BSN.
• a BSN with high-latency DSL connections between the DIDO BTS and distributed antennas can only deliver low mobility or fixed- wireless services (i.e., low-Doppler network), whereas a low-latency BSN over a low-latency fiber ring can tolerate high mobility (i.e., high-Doppler network).
• low-Doppler network low-Doppler network
• high-Doppler network high mobility
• a low-Doppler DIDO network consists of a typically larger number of DIDO antennas with relatively low power (i.e., 1W to 100W, for indoor or rooftop installation) spread across a wide area
• a high-Doppler network consists of a typically lower number of DIDO antennas with high power transmission (i.e., 100W for rooftop or tower installation).
• the low-Doppler DIDO network serves the typically larger number of low- Doppler users and can do so at typically lower connectivity cost using inexpensive high- latency broadband connections, such as DSL and cable modems.
• the high-Doppler DIDO network serves the typically fewer number of high-Doppler users and can do so at typically higher connectivity cost using more expensive low-latency broadband connections, such as fiber.
• TDMA time division multiple access
• FDMA frequency division multiple access
• CDMA code division multiple access
• the network selection is based on the type of mobility of each client.
• the Doppler shift of every client is calculated via blind estimation techniques.
• the Doppler shift can be estimated by sending RF energy to the client and analyzing the reflected signal, similar to Doppler radar systems.
• one or multiple DIDO antennas send training signals to the client. Based on those training signals, the client estimates the Doppler shift using techniques such as counting the zero-crossing rate of the channel gain, or performing spectrum analysis.
• the angular velocity v sin ⁇ in (11) may depend on the relative distance of the client from every DIDO antenna. For example, DIDO antennas in the proximity of a moving client yield larger angular velocity and Doppler shift than faraway antennas.
• the Doppler velocity is estimated from multiple DIDO antennas at different distances from the client and the average, weighted average or standard deviation is used as an indicator for the client' s mobility. Based on the estimated Doppler indicator, the DIDO BTS decides whether to assign the client to low- or high-Doppler networks.
• the Doppler indicator is periodically monitored for all clients and sent back to the BTS.
• Doppler velocity i.e., client riding in the bus versus client walking or sitting
• those clients are dynamically re-assigned to different DIDO network that can tolerate their level of mobility.
• the Doppler of low- velocity clients can be affected by being in the vicinity of high-velocity objects (e.g. near a highway), the Doppler is typically far less than the Doppler of clients that are in motion themselves.
• the velocity of the client is estimated (e.g. by using a means such as monitoring the clients position using GPS), and if the velocity is low, the client is assigned to a low-Doppler network, and if the velocity if high, the client is assigned to a high-Doppler network.
• One or multiple data streams (3 ⁇ 4) for every client (1,...,[/) are first multiplied by the weights generated by the DIDO precoding unit.
• Precoded data streams are multiplied by power scaling factor computed by the power control unit, based on the input channel quality information (CQI).
• CQI channel quality information
• the CQI is either fed back from the clients to DIDO BTS or derived from the uplink channel assuming uplink-downlink channel reciprocity.
• the [/ precoded streams for different clients are then combined and multiplexed into M data streams (t m ), one for each of the M transmit antennas. Finally, the streams t m are sent to the digital-to-analog converter (DAC) unit, the radio frequency (RF) unit, power amplifier (PA) unit and finally to the antennas.
• DAC digital-to-analog converter
• RF radio frequency
• PA power amplifier
• the power control unit measures the CQI for all clients.
• the CQI is the average SNR or RSSI.
• the CQI varies for different clients depending on pathloss or shadowing.
• Our power control method adjusts the transmit power scaling factors P k for different clients and multiplies them by the precoded data streams generated for different clients. Note that one or multiple data streams may be generated for every client, depending on the number of clients' receive antennas.
• Figure 18 shows the SER versus SNR assuming four DIDO transmit antennas and four clients in different scenarios.
• the plot with squares refers to the case where clients have different pathloss coefficients and no power control.
• the power control method more power is assigned to the data streams intended to the clients that undergo higher pathloss/shadowing, resulting in 9dB SNR gain (for this particular scenario) compared to the case with no power control.
• FCC Federal Communications Commission
• EM electromagnetic
• DIDO distributed antennas used for indoor/outdoor applications qualify for the FCC category of "mobile" devices, defined as [2]:
• MPE maximum permissible exposure
• LP transmitters located anywhere (i.e., indoor or outdoor) at any height, with maximum transmit power of 1W and 5Mbps consumer-grade broadband (e.g. DSL, cable modem, Fibe To The Home (FTTH)) backhaul connectivity.
• DSL digitalSL
• cable modem cable modem
• Fibe To The Home (FTTH) Fibe To The Home
• High-power (HP) transmitters rooftop or building mounted antennas at height of approximately 10 meters, with transmit power of 100W and a commercial-grade broadband (e.g. optical fiber ring) backhaul (with effectively "unlimited” data rate compared to the throughput available over the DIDO wireless links).
• a commercial-grade broadband (e.g. optical fiber ring) backhaul with effectively "unlimited” data rate compared to the throughput available over the DIDO wireless links).
• LP transmitters with DSL or cable modem connectivity are good candidates for low-Doppler DIDO networks (as described in the previous section), since their clients are mostly fixed or have low mobility.
• HP transmitters with commercial fiber connectivity can tolerate higher client's mobility and can be used in high-Doppler DIDO networks.
• N HP 50 high-power transmitters.
• FIG. 21a and 21b show two power distributions corresponding to the configurations in Figure 20a and Figure 20b, respectively.
• the received power distribution (expressed in dBm) is derived assuming the pathloss/shadowing model for urban environments defined by the 3GPP standard [3] at the carrier frequency of 700MHz. We observe that using 50% of HP transmitters yields better coverage over the selected area.
• Figures 22a-b depict the rate distribution for the two scenarios above.
• the throughput (expressed in Mbps) is derived based on power thresholds for different modulation coding schemes defined in the 3GPP long-term evolution (LTE) standard in [4,5].
• LTE long-term evolution
• the total available bandwidth is fixed to 10MHz at 700MHz carrier frequency.
• Two different frequency allocation plans are considered: i) 5MHz spectrum allocated only to the LP stations; ii) 9MHz to HP transmitters and lMHz to LP transmitters. Note that lower bandwidth is typically allocated to LP stations due to their DSL backhaul connectivity with limited throughput.
• Figures 22a-b shows that when using 50% of HP transmitters it is possible to increase significantly the rate distribution, raising the average per-client data rate from 2.4Mbps in Figure 22a to 38Mbps in Figure 22b.
• t n is the period of time of exposure to radiation with power density S n .
• the average time is 6 minutes, whereas for "uncontrolled” exposure it is increased up to 30 minutes.
• any power source is allowed to transmit at larger power levels than the MPE limits, as long as the average power density in (14) satisfies the FCC limit over 30 minute average for "uncontrolled” exposure.
• DIDO antennas can be conceived as inexpensive wireless devices (similar to WiFi access points) and can be placed anywhere there is DSL, cable modem, optical fiber, or other Internet connectivity.
• FIG. 23 The framework of DIDO systems with adaptive per-antenna power control is depicted in Figure 23.
• the amplitude of the digital signal coming out of the multiplexer 234 is dynamically adjusted with power scaling factors S 1 ; ...,SM, before being sent to the DAC units 235.
• the power scaling factors are computed by the power control unit 232 based on the CQI 233.
• N g DIDO antenna groups are defined. Every group contains at least as many DIDO antennas as the number of active clients (K). At any given time, only one group has N a >K active DIDO antennas transmitting to the clients at larger power level (S 0 ) than MPE limit (MPE).
• K active clients
• MPE MPE limit
• different scheduling techniques i.e., proportional-fair scheduling [8] are employed for cluster selection to optimize error rate or throughput performance.
• the SNR gain (in dB) obtained in DIDO systems with power control and antenna grouping is expressed as a function of the duty factor as
• the total transmit power from all N a of all N g groups is defined as
• Si j (t) is the power spectral density for the i transmit antenna within the j group.
• the power spectral density in (19) is designed for every antenna to optimize error rate or throughput performance.
• Figure 25 compares the (uncoded) SER performance of the above power control with antenna grouping against conventional eigenmode selection in U.S. Patent No. 7,636,381. All schemes use BD precoding with four clients, each client equipped with single antenna.
• the SNR refers to the ratio of per-transmit-antenna power over noise power (i.e., per-antenna transmit SNR).
• the curve denoted with DIDO 4x4 assumes four transmit antenna and BD precoding.
• the curve with squares denotes the SER performance with two extra transmit antennas and BD with eigenmode selection, yielding lOdB SNR gain (at 1% SER target) over conventional BD precoding.
• the antenna ID of every group can be pre-computed and shared among DIDO antennas and clients via lookup tables, such that only K channel estimates are required at any given time.
• K+2 channel estimates are computed and additional computational processing is required to select the eigenmode that minimizes the SER at any given time for all clients.
• Figure 26a shows one scenario where clients (dots) are spread randomly in one area covered by multiple DIDO distributed antennas (crosses). The average power over every transmit-receive wireless link can be computed as
• H the channel estimation matrix available at the DIDO BTS.
• FIG. 26a-c The matrices A in Figures 26a-c are obtained numerically by averaging the channel matrices over 1000 instances.
• Two alternative scenarios are depicted in Figure 26b and Figure 26c, respectively, where clients are grouped together around a subset of DIDO antennas and receive negligible power from DIDO antennas located far away.
• Figure 26b shows two groups of antennas yielding block diagonal matrix A.
• One extreme scenario is when every client is very close to only one transmitter and the transmitters are far away from one another, such that the power from all other DIDO antennas is negligible.
• the DIDO link degenerates in multiple SISO links and A is a diagonal matrix as in Figure 26c.
• the BD precoding dynamically adjusts the precoding weights to account for different power levels over the wireless links between DIDO antennas and clients. It is convenient, however, to identify multiple groups within the DIDO cluster and operate DIDO precoding only within each group. Our proposed grouping method yields the following advantages:
• DIDO precoding is computed only within every group in the cluster. For example, if BD precoding is used, singular value decomposition (SVD) has complexity 0(n ), where n is the minimum dimension of the channel matrix H. If H can be reduced to a block diagonal matrix, the SVD is computed for every block with reduced complexity. In fact, if the channel matrix is divided into two block matrices with dimensions
• the CSI is computed from the clients to the antennas only within the same group.
• antenna grouping reduces the number of channel estimates to compute the channel matrix H.
• antenna grouping further yields reduction of CSI feedback overhead over the wireless links between DIDO antennas and clients.
• different multiple access techniques are defined for the DIDO uplink channel. These techniques can be used to feedback the CSI or transmit data streams from the clients to the DIDO antennas over the uplink.
• feedback CSI and data streams are uplink streams.
• MIMO Multiple-input multiple-output
• the uplink streams are transmitted from the client to the DIDO antennas via open-loop MEVIO multiplexing schemes. This method assumes all clients are time/frequency synchronized. In one embodiment, synchronization among clients is achieved via training from the downlink and all DIDO antennas are assumed to be locked to the same time/frequency reference clock. Note that variations in delay spread at different clients may generate jitter between the clocks of different clients that may affect the performance of MIMO uplink scheme.
• the receive DIDO antennas may use non-linear (i.e., maximum likelihood, ML) or linear (i.e., zeros-forcing, minimum mean squared error) receivers to cancel co-channel interference and demodulate the uplink streams individually.
• ML maximum likelihood
• linear i.e., zeros-forcing, minimum mean squared error
• Time division multiple access Different clients are assigned to different time slots. Every client sends its uplink stream when its time slot is available.
• Frequency division multiple access Different clients are assigned to different carrier frequencies.
• OFDM multicarrier
• CDMA Code division multiple access
• the clients are wireless devices that transmit at much lower power than the DIDO antennas.
• the DIDO BTS defines client sub-groups based on the uplink SNR information, such that interference across subgroups is minimized.
• the above multiple access techniques are employed to create orthogonal channels in time, frequency, space or code domains thereby avoiding uplink interference across different clients.
• the uplink multiple access techniques described above are used in combination with antenna grouping methods presented in the previous section to define different client groups within the DIDO cluster.
• the first subscript indicates the client, the second subscript the transmit antenna.
• H efe H fe W fe is the effective channel matrix for user k.
• the continuous line in Figure 29 refers to client 1, whereas the line with dots refers to client 2.
• LA time/frequency domain link adaptation
• Figure 30 shows the SER for different QAM schemes (i.e., 4-QAM, 16-QAM,
• MCS orders when the channel undergoes deep fades in the time domain or frequency domain (depicted in Figure 28) to provide link-robustness. Contrarily, when the channel is characterized by large gain, the LA method switches to higher MCS orders to increase spectral efficiency.
• One contribution of the present application compared to U.S. Patent No. 7,636,381 is to use the effective channel matrix in (23) and in Figure 29 as a metric to enable adaptation.
• the DIDO BTS computes the CSI from all users. Users may be equipped with single or multiple receive antennas.
• the BTS computes the DIDO precoding weights for all users.
• BD is used to compute these weights.
• the precoding weights are calculated on a tone-by- tone basis.
• Link-quality metric calculation At 3173 the BTS computes the frequency- domain link quality metrics.
• the metrics are calculated from the CSI and DIDO precoding weights for every tone.
• the link-quality metric is the average SNR over all OFDM tones.
• LAI based on average SNR performance
• the link quality metric is the frequency response of the effective channel in (23).
• LA2 based on tone-by- tone performance to exploit frequency diversity. If every client has single antenna, the frequency-domain effective channel is depicted in Figure 29. If the clients have multiple receive antennas, the link-quality metric is defined as the Frobenius norm of the effective channel matrix for every tone.
• multiple link-quality metrics are defined for every client as the singular values of the effective channel matrix in (23).
• Bit-loading algorithm At 3174, based on the link-quality metrics, the BTS determines the MCSs for different clients and different OFDM tones. For LAI method, the same MCS is used for all clients and all OFDM tones based on the SNR thresholds for Rayleigh fading channels in Figure 30. For LA2, different MCSs are assigned to different OFDM tones to exploit channel frequency diversity.
• the BTS transmits precoded data streams from the DIDO distributed antennas to the clients using the MCSs derived from the bit- loading algorithm.
• multiple subcarriers are grouped into subbands and the same MCS is assigned to all tones in the same subband to reduce the overhead due to control information.
• the MCS are adjusted based on temporal variations of the channel gain (proportional to the coherence time). In fixed-wireless channel (characterized by low Doppler effect) the MCS are recalculated every fraction of the channel coherence time, thereby reducing the overhead required for control information.
• Figure 32 shows the SER performance of the LA methods described above.
• the computational complexity of DIDO systems is mostly localized at the centralized processor or BTS.
• the most computationally expensive operation is the calculation of the precoding weights for all clients from their CSI.
• the BTS has to carry out as many singular value decomposition (SVD) operations as the number of clients in the system.
• SVD singular value decomposition
• One way to reduce complexity is through parallelized processing, where the SVD is computed on a separate processor for every client.
• each subcarrier undergoes flat-fading channel and the SVD is carried out for every client over every subcarrier.
• the complexity of the system increases linearly with the number of subcarriers.
• the cyclic prefix (L 0 ) must have at least eight channel taps (i.e., duration of 8 microseconds) to avoid intersymbol interference in outdoor urban macrocell environments with large delay spread [3] .
• the size (N FFT ) of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) used to generate the OFDM symbols is typically set to multiple of L 0 to reduce loss of data rate.
• N FFT 64
• N FFT +L O 89
• One way to reduce computational complexity at the DIDO precoder is to carry out the SVD operation over a subset of tones (that we call pilot tones) and derive the precoding weights for the remaining tones via interpolation.
• Weight interpolation is one source of error that results in inter-client interference.
• optimal weight interpolation techniques are employed to reduce inter-client interference, yielding improved error rate performance and lower computational complexity in multicarrier systems.
• the objective function of the weight interpolation method is defined as
• ⁇ /copt arg min eke0k f(Q k ) (26) where 0 fe is the feasible set of the optimization problem and Q k opt is the optimal solution.
• the objective function in (25) is defined for one OFDM tone.
• the objective function is defined as linear combination of the Frobenius norm in (25) of the matrices for all the OFDM tones to be interpolated.
• the weight interpolation matrix W fe (e fe ) in (25) is expressed as a function of a set of parameters Q k . Once the optimal set is determined according to (26) or (27), the optimal weight matrix is computed.
• the weight interpolation matrix of given OFDM tone n is defined as linear combination of the weight matrices of the pilot tones.
• weight interpolation function for beamforming systems with single client was defined in [11]. In DIDO multi-client systems we write the weight interpolation matrix as
• W k (lN 0 + n, 9 k ) (1 - c n ) ⁇ W(Z) + c n e 0 * ⁇ W(Z + 1) (28)
• Lo is the number of pilot tones
• c n (n— 1)/N 0
• N 0 N FFT /L 0
• the pilot tones are chosen uniformly within the range of the OFDM tones.
• the pilot tones are adaptively chosen based on the CSI to minimize the interpolation error.
• the solid lines in Figure 33 represent the ideal functions, whereas the dotted lines are the interpolated ones.
• the interpolated weights match the ideal ones for the pilot tones, according to the definition in (28). The weights computed over the remaining tones only approximate the ideal case due to estimation error.
• the number of clients is the same as the number of transmit antennas and every client is equipped with single antenna. As the number of clients increases the SER performance degrades due to increase inter-client interference produced by weight interpolation errors.
• weight interpolation functions other than those in (28) are used.
• linear prediction autoregressive models [12] can be used to interpolate the weights across different OFDM tones, based on estimates of the channel frequency correlation.
• RF radio frequency
• the user cluster is a subset of transmitting antennas whose signal can be reliably detected by given user (i.e., received signal strength above noise or interference level). Every user in the system defines its own user-cluter.
• the waveforms sent by the transmitting antennas within the same user-cluster coherently combine to create RF energy at the target user's location and points of zero RF interference at the location of any other user reachable by those antennas.
• the precoding weights (w fe £ C ) that create RF energy to user k and zero RF energy to all other K-l users are computed to satisfy the following condition
• H fe is the effective channel matrix of user k obtained by removing the k-t row of matrix H and 0 ⁇ ⁇ 1 is the vector with all zero entries
• the wireless system is a DIDO system and user clustering is employed to create a wireless communication link to the target user, while pre-cancelling interference to any other user reachable by the antennas lying within the user-cluster.
• a DIDO system is described which includes:
• DIDO clients user terminals equipped with one or multiple antennas
• DIDO distributed antennas transceiver stations operating cooperatively to transmit precoded data streams to multiple users, thereby suppressing inter-user interference
• BTS base transceiver stations
• BSN DIDO base station network
• the DIDO distributed antennas are grouped into different subsets depending on their spatial distribution relative to the location of the BTSs or DIDO clients.
• Super-cluster 3640 is the set of DIDO distributed antennas connected to one or multiple BTSs such that the round- trip latency between all BTSs and the respective users is within the constraint of the DIDO precoding loop;
• DIDO-cluster 3641 is the set of DIDO distributed antennas connected to the same BTS. When the super-cluster contains only one BTS, its definition coincides with the DIDO-cluster;
• User-cluster 3642 is the set of DIDO distributed antennas that cooperatively transmit precoded data to given user.
• the BTSs are local hubs connected to other BTSs and to the
• the BSN can be comprised of various network technologies including, but not limited to, digital subscriber lines (DSL), ADSL, VDSL [6], cable modems, fiber rings, Tl lines, hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks, and/or fixed wireless (e.g., WiFi). All BTSs within the same super-cluster share information about DIDO precoding via the BSN such that the round-trip latency is within the DIDO precoding loop.
• DSL digital subscriber lines
• ADSL ADSL
• VDSL [6] cable modems
• fiber rings fiber rings
• Tl lines hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks
• fixed wireless e.g., WiFi
• One idea associated with the proposed method is that users far enough from the user-cluster are not affected by radiation from the transmit antennas, due to large pathloss. Users close or within the user-cluster receive interference-free signal due to precoding.
• additional transmit antennas can be added to the user-cluster (as shown in Figure 37) such that the condition K ⁇ M is satisfied.
• One embodiment of a method employing user clustering consists of the following steps: a.
• Link-quality measurements the link quality between every DIDO distributed antenna and every user is reported to the BTS.
• the link-quality metric consists of signal-to- noise ratio (SNR) or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR).
• the DIDO distributed antennas transmit training signals and the users estimate the received signal quality based on that training.
• the training signals are designed to be orthogonal in time, frequency or code domains such that the users can distinguish across different transmitters.
• the DIDO antennas transmit narrowband signals (i.e., single tone) at one particular frequency (i.e., a beacon channel) and the users estimate the link-quality based on that beacon signal.
• One threshold is defined as the minimum signal amplitude (or power) above the noise level to demodulate data successfully as shown in Figure 38a. Any link-quality metric value below this threshold is assumed to be zero. The link-quality metric is quantized over a finite number of bits and fed back to the transmitter.
• the training signals or beacons are sent from the users and the link quality is estimated at the DIDO transmit antennas (as in Figure 38b), assuming reciprocity between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) pathloss.
• pathloss reciprocity is a realistic assumption in time division duplexing (TDD) systems (with UL and DL channels at the same frequency) and frequency division duplexing (FDD) systems when the UL and DL frequency bands are reatively close.
• DIDO clusters are the entries to the link-quality matrix shared across all BTSs via the BSN.
• link-quality matrix for the scenario in Figure 37 is depicted in Figure 39.
• the link-quality matrix is used to define the user clusters.
• Figure 39 shows the selection of the user cluster for user U8.
• the subset of transmitters with non-zero link-quality metrics (i.e., active transmitters) to user U8 is first identified. These transmitters populate the user-cluster for the user U8.
• the sub-matrix containing non-zero entries from the transmitters within the user-cluster to the other users is selected.
• the link- quality metrics are only used to select the user cluster, they can be quantized with only two bits (i.e., to identify the state above or below the thresholds in Figure 38) thereby reducing feedback overhead.
• FIG. 40 Another example is depicted in Figure 40 for user Ul.
• the number of active transmitters is lower than the number of users in the sub-matrix, thereby violating the condition K ⁇ M. Therefore, one or more columns are added to the sub-matrix to satisfy that condition. If the number of transmitters exceeds the number of users, the extra antennas can be used for diversity schemes (i.e., antenna or eigenmode selection).
• FIG. 41 Yet another example is shown in Figure 41 for user U4.
• the sub-matrix can be obtained as combination of two sub-matrices.
• TDD systems UL/DL channel reciprocity can be exploited to derive the CSI from training over the UL channel.
• FDD systems feedback channels from all users to the BTSs are required. To reduce the amount of feedback, only the CSI corresponding to the non-zero entries of the link-quality matrix are fed back.
• DIDO precoding is applied to every CSI sub-matrix corresponding to different user clusters (as described, for example, in the related U.S. Patent Applications).
• singular value decomposition (SVD) of the effective channel matrix H k is computed and the precoding weight w fe for user k is defined as the right sigular vector corresponding to the null subspace of H fc .
• the DIDO precoding weight for user k is given by
• one alternative to computing the SVD of ⁇ is to calculate the eigenvalue decomposition of C.
• eigenvalue decomposition There are several methods to compute eigenvalue decomposition such as the power method. Since we are only interested to the eigenvector corresponding to the null subspace of C, we use the inverse power method described by the iteration
• the vector ( ) at the first iteration is a random vector.
• the DIDO precoding calculation requires one matrix inversion.
• There are several numerical solutions to reduce the complexity of matrix inversions such as the Strassen's algorithm [1] or the Coppersmith-Winograd' s algorithm [2,3]. Since C is Hermitian matrix by definition, an alternative solution is to decompose C in its real and imaginary components and compute matrix inversion of a real matrix, according to the method in [4, Section 11.4].
• Another feature of the proposed method and system is its reconfigurability. As the client moves across different DIDO clusters as in Figure 42, the user-cluster follows its moves. In other words, the subset of transmit antennas is constantly updated as the client changes its position and the effective channel matrix (and corresponding precoding weights) are recomputed.
• MAS multiple antenna systems
• Spatial diversity is determined by the distribution of scattering objects in the wireless channel as well as the geometry of transmit and receive antenna arrays.
• Clustered channel model defines groups of scatterers as clusters located around the transmitters and receivers.
• clustered channel models have been validated through practical measurements [1-2] and variations of those models have been adopted by different indoor (i.e., IEEE 802.1 In Technical Group [3] for WLAN) and outdoor (3GPP Technical Specification Group for 3G cellular systems [4]) wireless standards.
• antenna element spacing [5-7]
• number of antennas [8-9]
• array aperture [10-11]
• array geometry [5,12,13]
• polarization and antenna pattern [14-28].
• P is the space that defines the antenna array
• A is the area of the spherical array
• Figure 45 depicts another example where the array size covers even larger area than Figure 44, yielding additional degrees of freedom.
• the array aperture can be approximated by the total area covered by all DIDO transmitters (assuming antennas are spaced fractions of wavelength apart). Then Figure 45 shows that DIDO systems can achieve increasing numbers of degrees of freedom by distributing antennas in space, thereby reducing the size of the areas of coherence. Note that these figures are generated assuming ideal spherical arrays. In practical scenarios, DIDO antennas spread random across wide areas and the resulting shape of the areas of coherence may not be as regular as in the figures.
• Figure 46 shows that, as the array size increases, more clusters are included within the wireless channel as radio waves are scatterered by increasing number of objects between DIDO transmitters. Hence, it is possible to excite an increasing number of basis functions (that span the radiated field), yielding additional degrees of freedom, in agreement with the definition above.
• the multi-user (MU) multiple antenna systems (MAS) described in this patent application exploit the area of coherence of wireless channels to create multiple simultaneous independent non-interfering data streams to different users. For given channel conditions and user distribution, the basis functions of the radiated field are selected to create independent and simultaneous wireless links to different users in such a way that every user experiences interference-free links. As the MU-MAS is aware of the channel between every transmitter and every user, the precoding transmission is adjusted based on that information to create separate areas of coherence to different users.
• the MU-MAS employs non-linear precoding, such as dirty-paper coding (DPC) [30-31] or Tomlinson-Harashima (TH) [32-33] precoding.
• the MU-MAS employs non-linear precoding, such as block diagonalization (BD) as in our previous patent applications [0003- 0009] or zero-forcing beamforming (ZF-BF) [34] .
• BD block diagonalization
• ZF-BF zero-forcing beamforming
• the MU-MAS requires knowledge of the channel state information (CSI).
• the CSI is made available to the MU-MAS via a feedback channel or estimated over the uplink channel, assuming uplink/downlink channel reciprocity is possible in time division duplex (TDD) systems.
• TDD time division duplex
• One way to reduce the amount of feedback required for CSI, is to use limited feedback techniques [35-37].
• the MU-MAS uses limited feedback techniques to reduce the CSI overhead of the control channel.
• Codebook design is critical in limited feedback techniques.
• One embodiment defines the codebook from the basis functions that span the radiated field of the transmit array.
• the areas of coherence change their locations and shape. This is due to the well known Doppler effect in wireless communications.
• the MU-MAS described in this patent application adjusts the precoding to adapt the areas of coherence constantly for every user as the environment changes due to Doppler effects. This adaptation of the areas of coherence is such to create simultaneous non-interfering channels to different users.
• Another embodiment of the invention adaptively selects a subset of antennas of the MU-MAS system to create areas of coherence of different sizes.
• the users are sparsely distributed in space (i.e., rural area or times of the day with low usage of wireless resources), only a small subset of antennas is selected and the size of the area of coherence are large relative to the array size as in Figure 43.
• densely populated areas i.e., urban areas or time of the day with peak usage of wireless services
• more antennas are selected to create small areas of coherence for users in direct vicinity of each other.
• the MU-MAS is a DIDO system as described in previous patent applications [0003-0009].
• the DIDO system uses linear or nonlinear precoding and/or limited feedback techniques to create area of coherence to different users.
• Figure 47 shows the degrees of freedom of MIMO systems in practical indoor and outdoor propagation scenarios. For example, considering linear arrays with ten antennas spaced one wavelength apart, the maximum degrees of freedom (or number of spatial channels) available over the wireless link is limited to about 3 for outdoor scenarios and 7 for indoor. Of course, indoor channels provide more degrees of freedom due to the larger angular spread.
• the number of channels allocated by the FCC grew from the initial 333 in 1983 to 416 in the late 1980s to support the increasing number of cellular clients. More recently, the commercialization of technologies like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and ZigBee has been possible with the use of the unlicensed ISM band allocated by the FCC back in 1985 [17].
• DIDO distributed-input distributed-output
• One embodiment of the system consists of one or multiple centralized processors (CP) 4901-4904 and one or multiple distributed nodes (DN) 4911-4913 that communicate via wireline or wireless connections as depicted in Figure 49.
• the centralized processor is the access core gateway (ACGW) connected to several Node B transceivers.
• the centralized processor is the internet service provider (ISP) and the distributed nodes are Wi- Fi access points connected to the ISP via modems or direct connection to cable or DSL.
• ISP internet service provider
• the system is a distributed-input distributed-output (DIDO) system [0002-0009] with one centralized processor (or BTS) and distributed nodes being the DIDO access points (or DIDO distributed antennas connected to the BTS via the BSN).
• DIDO distributed-input distributed-output
• the DNs 4911 -4913 communicate with the CPs 4901 -4904.
• the information exchanged from the DNs to the CP is used to dynamically adjust the configuration of the nodes to the evolving design of the network architecture.
• the DNs 4911- 4913 share their identification number with the CP.
• the CP store the identification numbers of all DNs connected through the network into lookup tables or shared database. Those lookup tables or database can be shared with other CPs and that information is synchronized such that all CPs have always access to the most up to date information about all DNs on the network.
• the FCC may decide to allocate a certain portion of the spectrum to unlicensed use and the proposed system may be designed to operate within that spectrum. Due to scarcity of spectrum, the FCC may subsequently need to allocate part of that spectrum to licensed use for commercial carriers (i.e., AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint), defense, or public safety. In conventional wireless systems, this coexistence would not be possible, since existing wireless devices operating in the unlicensed band would create harmful interference to the licensed RF transceivers.
• the distributed nodes exchange control information with the CPs 4901-4903 to adapt their RF transmission to the evolving band plan.
• the DNs 4911-4913 were originally designed to operate over different frequency bands within the available spectrum.
• the CPs exchange control information with the unlicensed DNs and reconfigure them to shut down the frequency bands for licensed use, such that the unlicensed DNs do not interfere with the licensed DNs.
• This scenario is depicted in Figure 50 where the unlicensed nodes (e.g., 5002) are indicated with solid circles and the licensed nodes with empty circles (e.g., 5001).
• the whole spectrum can be allocated to the new licensed service and the control information is used by the CPs to shut down all unlicensed DNs to avoid interference with the licensed DNs.
• Figure 51 where the obsolete unlicensed nodes are covered with a cross.
• the wireless system may originally be designed for fixed wireless links with the DNs 4911-4913 connected to outdoor rooftop transceiver antennas. Subsequently, the same system may be updated to support DNs with indoor portable antennas to offer better indoor coverage.
• the FCC exposure limits of portable devices are more restrictive than rooftop transmitters, due to possibly closer proximity to the human body. In this case, the old DNs designed for outdoor applications can be re-used for indoor applications as long as the transmit power setting is adjusted.
• the DNs are designed with predefined sets of transmit power levels and the CPs 4901-4903 send control information to the DNs 4911-4913 to select new power levels as the system is upgraded, thereby meeting the FCC exposure limits.
• the DNs are manufactured with only one power emission setting and those DNs exceeding the new power emission levels are shut down remotely by the CP.
• the CPs 4901 -4903 monitor periodically all DNs 4911 -
• DNs 4913 in the network to define their entitlement to operate as RF transceivers according to a certain standard.
• Those DNs that are not up to date can be marked as obsolete and removed from the network.
• the DNs that operate within the current power limit and frequency band are kept active in the network, and all the others are shut down.
• the DN parameters controlled by the CP are not limited to power emission and frequency band; it can be any parameter that defines the wireless link between the DN and the client devices.
• the DNs 4911-4913 can be reconfigured to enable the coexistence of different standard systems within the same spectrum. For example, the power emission, frequency band or other configuration parameters of certain DNs operating in the context of WLAN can be adjusted to
• the DNs 4911-4913 can be updated to support those standards.
• the DNs are software defined radios (SDR) equipped with programmable computational capability such as such as FPGA, DSP, CPU, GPU and/or GPGPU that run algorithms for baseband signal processing.
• SDR software defined radios
• FPGA field-programmable gate array
• DSP digital signal processor
• GPU graphics processing unit
• GPGPU programmable computational capability
• new baseband algorithms can be remotely uploaded from the CP to the DNs to reflect the new standard.
• the first standard is CDMA-based and subsequently it is replaced by OFDM technology to support different types of systems.
• the sample rate, power and other parameters can be updated remotely to the DNs. This SDR feature of the DNs allows for continuous upgrades of the network as new technologies are developed to improve overall system performance.
• the system described herein is a cloud wireless system consisting of multiple CPs, distributed nodes and a network interconnecting the CPs to the DNs.
• Figure 52 shows one example of cloud wireless system where the nodes identified with solid circles (e.g., 5203) communicate to CP 5206, the nodes identified with empty circles communicate to CP 5205 and the CPs 5205-5206 communicate between each other all through the network 5201.
• the cloud wireless system is a DIDO system and the DNs are connected to the CP and exchange information to reconfigure periodically or instantly system parameters, and dynamically adjust to the changing conditions of the wireless architecture.
• the CP is the DIDO BTS
• the distributed nodes are the DIDO distributed antennas
• the network is the BSN and multiple BTSs are interconnected with each other via the DIDO centralized processor as described in our previous patent applications [0002-0009].
• All DNs 5202-5203 within the cloud wireless system can be grouped in different sets. These sets of DNs can simultaneously create non-interfering wireless links to the multitude of client devices, while each set supporting a different multiple access techniques (e.g., TDMA, FDMA, CDMA, OFDMA and/or SDMA), different modulations (e.g., QAM, OFDM) and/or coding schemes (e.g., convolutional coding, LDPC, turbo codes). Similarly, every client may be served with different multiple access techniques and/or different modulation/coding schemes. Based on the active clients in the system and the standard they adopt for their wireless links, the CPs 5205-5206 dynamically select the subset of DNs that can support those standards and that are within range of the client devices.
• Wi-Fi alliance "Wi-Fi certified makes it Wi-Fi” http://www.wi-fi.org/files/WFA Certification Overview WP en.pdf
• Embodiments of the invention may include various steps as set forth above.
• the steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general- purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps.
• the various components within the Base Stations/APs and Client Devices described above may be implemented as software executed on a general purpose or special purpose processor.
• various well known personal computer components such as computer memory, hard drive, input devices, etc., have been left out of the figures.
• the various functional modules illustrated herein and the associated steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, such as an application- specific integrated circuit ("ASIC") or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
• ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
• certain modules such as the Coding, Modulation and
• Signal Processing Logic 903 described above may be implemented on a programmable digital signal processor ("DSP") (or group of DSPs) such as a DSP using a Texas Instruments Inc.
• DSP programmable digital signal processor
• Instruments' TMS320x architecture (e.g., a TMS320C6000, TMS320C5000, . . . etc).
• the DSP in this embodiment may be embedded within an add-on card to a personal computer such as, for example, a PCI card.
• a variety of different DSP architectures may be used while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention.
• Elements of the present invention may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable instructions.
• the machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, flash memory, optical disks, CD-ROMs, DVD ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, propagation media or other type of machine-readable media suitable for storing electronic instructions.
• the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program which may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
• Signal Processing (AREA)
• Power Engineering (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
• Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
• Radio Transmission System (AREA)
• Mathematical Physics (AREA)
• Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)

Priority Applications (1)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=46888704

Family Applications (2)

Family Applications Before (1)

Country Status (13)

Families Citing this family (45)

Family Cites Families (45)

• 2012
  • 2012-09-12 KR KR1020207000338A patent/KR102171272B1/ko active IP Right Grant
  • 2012-09-12 RU RU2017127936A patent/RU2017127936A/ru not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 2012-09-12 RU RU2014114486A patent/RU2628223C2/ru active
  • 2012-09-12 MX MX2014002900A patent/MX2014002900A/es unknown
  • 2012-09-12 EP EP18186156.8A patent/EP3419188A1/en not_active Withdrawn
  • 2012-09-12 SG SG11201400621TA patent/SG11201400621TA/en unknown
  • 2012-09-12 SG SG10201601953SA patent/SG10201601953SA/en unknown
  • 2012-09-12 KR KR1020147009876A patent/KR102065018B1/ko active IP Right Grant
  • 2012-09-12 KR KR1020187035654A patent/KR102062650B1/ko active IP Right Grant
  • 2012-09-12 EP EP12762167.0A patent/EP2756608A2/en not_active Ceased
  • 2012-09-12 BR BR112014005163A patent/BR112014005163A2/pt not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 2012-09-12 CA CA2848355A patent/CA2848355C/en active Active
  • 2012-09-12 WO PCT/US2012/054937 patent/WO2013040089A2/en active Application Filing
  • 2012-09-12 AU AU2012308632A patent/AU2012308632B2/en active Active
  • 2012-09-12 CN CN201280044869.5A patent/CN103797725B/zh active Active
  • 2012-09-12 JP JP2014530763A patent/JP2014531813A/ja active Pending
  • 2012-09-12 CN CN201810567635.8A patent/CN108832971A/zh active Pending
  • 2012-09-14 TW TW101133865A patent/TWI575914B/zh active
  • 2012-09-14 TW TW108102072A patent/TWI699984B/zh active
  • 2012-09-14 TW TW105139589A patent/TWI651956B/zh active
• 2014
  • 2014-03-04 IL IL231311A patent/IL231311B/en active IP Right Grant
• 2017
  • 2017-04-19 JP JP2017082862A patent/JP6466501B2/ja active Active
  • 2017-12-07 AU AU2017272246A patent/AU2017272246B2/en active Active
• 2019
  • 2019-01-09 JP JP2019001944A patent/JP2019080343A/ja active Pending
  • 2019-07-11 AU AU2019204969A patent/AU2019204969B2/en active Active

Non-Patent Citations (2)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events