EP2708342A1 - Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil - Google Patents

Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2708342A1
EP2708342A1 EP12184353.6A EP12184353A EP2708342A1 EP 2708342 A1 EP2708342 A1 EP 2708342A1 EP 12184353 A EP12184353 A EP 12184353A EP 2708342 A1 EP2708342 A1 EP 2708342A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
wire
bow
sensor
sensors
monitoring system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12184353.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2708342B1 (fr
Inventor
Najib El Haddaoui
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyo Advanced Technologies Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Applied Materials Switzerland SARL
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Applied Materials Switzerland SARL filed Critical Applied Materials Switzerland SARL
Priority to EP12184353.6A priority Critical patent/EP2708342B1/fr
Priority to CN2012207084610U priority patent/CN203204380U/zh
Priority to CN201210556851.5A priority patent/CN103676770A/zh
Priority to JP2013187972A priority patent/JP2014060397A/ja
Publication of EP2708342A1 publication Critical patent/EP2708342A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2708342B1 publication Critical patent/EP2708342B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B28—WORKING CEMENT, CLAY, OR STONE
    • B28D—WORKING STONE OR STONE-LIKE MATERIALS
    • B28D5/00—Fine working of gems, jewels, crystals, e.g. of semiconductor material; apparatus or devices therefor
    • B28D5/0058—Accessories specially adapted for use with machines for fine working of gems, jewels, crystals, e.g. of semiconductor material
    • B28D5/0064—Devices for the automatic drive or the program control of the machines
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B28—WORKING CEMENT, CLAY, OR STONE
    • B28D—WORKING STONE OR STONE-LIKE MATERIALS
    • B28D5/00—Fine working of gems, jewels, crystals, e.g. of semiconductor material; apparatus or devices therefor
    • B28D5/04—Fine working of gems, jewels, crystals, e.g. of semiconductor material; apparatus or devices therefor by tools other than rotary type, e.g. reciprocating tools
    • B28D5/045—Fine working of gems, jewels, crystals, e.g. of semiconductor material; apparatus or devices therefor by tools other than rotary type, e.g. reciprocating tools by cutting with wires or closed-loop blades

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a wire bow monitoring system, a semiconductor wire saw device, and a method for monitoring a wire bow.
  • embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a wire bow monitoring system, a wire saw device, and a method for monitoring a wire bow for sawing semiconductor materials used for solar cells.
  • Semiconductor wire saws or synonymously called “wire saws”, “wire saw devices” or “semiconductor wire saw devices” herein, are used to cut workpieces of hard materials, e.g. silicon. Workpieces or ingots are cut or wafered using wire saws for cropping, squaring, or slicing.
  • wire is fed from a spool and is guided and tensioned by wire guide cylinders.
  • wire saws e.g. those used in combination with silicon carbide particles in a slurry
  • diamond wire often used in combination with a coolant.
  • a hard material such as silicon carbide or diamond abrade the workpiece to make the cut.
  • the wire is moved rapidly along its length, which is also called horizontally” herein, and the workpiece is moved comparatively slowly by a workpiece supply plate or table in a cutting direction substantially perpendicular (herein also called “vertically") to the direction of the wire.
  • a vertical force of the wire on the workpiece is thus applied along the cutting direction, and the reactive force of the workpiece on the wire causes the wire to be deformed or bowed in the direction opposite to the cutting direction.
  • the wire bow increases, at a certain value of the bow it may lead to a breakage of the wire, which requires a time consuming exchange of the wire. Breakage of the wire and subsequent exchange thereof reduces the overall efficiency of the wire saw.
  • stopping the cutting process in intervals in order to measure the bow by an operator is time and cost consuming.
  • a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device for a wire saw device, a wire saw device, a method for monitoring a wire bow in a wire saw device, and a method for operating a wire saw device are provided.
  • a wire bow monitoring system for a semiconductor wire saw device.
  • the wire bow monitoring system comprises a sensor arrangement configured to be positioned adjacent to a wire of the wire saw device, wherein the sensor arrangement is adapted to detect a bow of the wire, wherein the sensor arrangement comprises at least one of an inductive sensor, a capacitive sensor and a contact sensor.
  • a method for monitoring a wire bow in a semiconductor wire saw device comprises conducting at least one of an inductive measurement, a capacitive measurement and a contact measurement of a wire; detecting a bow of the wire.
  • a method for operating a semiconductor wire saw device includes setting at least one wire saw device parameter and cutting a workpiece by means of the wire.
  • the method furthermore includes monitoring the wire bow of the wire as described herein and adjusting the at least one wire saw device parameter if the wire bow exceeds a threshold value.
  • Embodiments are also directed at apparatuses for carrying out the disclosed methods and include apparatus parts for performing each described method step. These method steps may be performed by way of hardware components, a computer programmed by appropriate software, by any combination of the two or in any other manner. Furthermore, embodiments according to the invention are also directed at methods by which the described apparatus operates. It includes method steps for carrying out every function of the apparatus.
  • the information about a bow provided by monitoring of a wire bow is particularly useful to adjust a table speed and/or a cutting speed, thereby minimizing wear and breakage of the wire and maximizing throughput and cut yield.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 4 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device, wherein the wire of the wire saw device is bowed;
  • Fig. 5 shows a schematic view of a sensor board of a wire bow monitoring system according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 6 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 7 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 8 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 9 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 10 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 11 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig. 12 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig 13 shows a flow diagram of a method for monitoring a wire bow in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein;
  • Fig 14 shows a flow diagram of a method for monitoring a wire bow in a wire saw device according to further embodiments described herein.
  • wire saw, wire saw device, wire sawing device, and wire cutting device are used interchangeably.
  • workpiece support plate and workpiece supply plate are used interchangeably.
  • sawing and cutting are used interchangeably; and wafer-cutting wire saw and waferer are used interchangeably.
  • a workpiece may comprise one or more separate pieces, for example a plurality of semiconductor pieces or ingots.
  • the wire saw is adapted to perform the cutting by use of a single wire, multiple wires, one or more rows of one or more wires, or one or more webs of one or more wires.
  • the term "wire" may refer to multiple wires.
  • workpiece supply plate workpiece support plate
  • supply plate workpiece support plate
  • support plate workpiece support plate
  • wire portion within the workpiece and “wire within the workpiece” are used interchangeably.
  • a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device.
  • the wire bow monitoring system includes a sensor arrangement configured to be positioned adjacent to a wire of the wire saw device.
  • the sensor arrangement is adapted to detect a bow of the wire.
  • the sensor arrangement includes at least one of an inductive sensor, a capacitive sensor and a contact sensor.
  • the wire bow monitoring system and the wire saw device allows the automatic adjustment of the cutting process in real time. Furthermore, the wire bow measurement is an excellent indicator for cutting efficiency.
  • Fig. 1 shows a wire bow monitoring system 10 for a wire saw device according to an embodiment.
  • the wire bow monitoring system includes a sensor arrangement 20.
  • the sensor arrangement 20 is adapted to be positioned adjacent to a wire of the wire saw device and is adapted to detect a bow of the wire.
  • the sensor arrangement includes at least one of an inductive sensor, a capacitive sensor and a contact sensor.
  • Reference number 22 shall refer to the sensor, independent of whether it is an inductive sensor, capacitive sensor or a contact sensor.
  • the inductive sensor and the capacitive sensor are typically adapted to sense the vicinity of the wire if it is iron based.
  • the one or more sensors may be digital or analog.
  • the sensor may respond with, for instance, 0 if the distance between the sensor and the wire is below a threshold distance, and the sensor may respond with 1 if the distance is above the threshold value.
  • the threshold distance also called “threshold value” herein, may be pre-set, for instance by an operator during or before the cutting process, or it may correspond to the sensing distance of the sensor, i.e., the sensor is capable to detect the presence of the wire only up to the sensing distance.
  • the threshold value may be between 0.1 mm and 1.0 mm, particularly between 0.2 mm and 0.6 mm.
  • digital sensor shall thus be understood as any arrangement, which includes a sensor that provides a digital measurement outcome. It is typically irrelevant whether the electronics is digital or analogous. The provision of a digital sensor is particularly advantageous when a multitude of sensors are provided with their measurement outcomes typically evaluated jointly.
  • the sensor arrangement includes a plurality of sensors.
  • all sensors of the plurality of sensors are the same sensor type.
  • the sensor arrangement may be provided either with a plurality of inductive sensors, or a plurality of capacitive sensors, or a plurality of contact sensors.
  • the one or more sensors of the present disclosure are typically in communication with a control unit, such as control unit 50 in Fig. 2 .
  • the communication may particularly be a data communication, in particular from the sensor to the control unit wherein the one or more sensors provide the control unit with the measurement results.
  • the control unit may evaluate the one or more measurement results.
  • the control unit may additionally or alternatively trigger a reaction.
  • the control unit is adapted to be in communication with the wire saw device for initiating a reaction of the wire saw device as a response to the bow measurement results.
  • the control unit such as control unit 50 of Fig. 2
  • the wire bow monitoring system is provided with a separate control unit that is in data communication with the control unit of the wire saw device.
  • Fig. 2 may particularly be advantageous to measure not only the presence of a bow in the wire but also a value corresponding to the dimension of the bow.
  • all of the sensors may be either inductive sensors or capacitive sensors.
  • the value corresponding to the dimension may particularly be an angle of the wire as compared to a wire orientation in an unstressed situation of the wire, as will be exemplified below in more detail.
  • Fig. 3 shows a wire bow monitoring system 10 for a wire saw device 100 according to embodiments.
  • the wire saw device 100 is exemplarily shown as including a wire 30, which is guided by two wire guides 130 (also called “guide cylinders” or “pulleys") along its length.
  • the wire may be arranged in parallel, forming wire rows or a wire web.
  • the wire provided forms a wire web in particular in the cutting area of the wire saw.
  • the term "wire web” normally relates to the web formed by the wire between two guide cylinders. It should be understood that a wire may form more than one wire web which is defined as an area in which a sawing process is performed.
  • the one or more wires may form multiple wire webs, for instance two wire webs both adapted for cutting a workpiece.
  • a workpiece or an ingot 120 is mounted to a table 110, which is configured to move against the wire 30 in order to cut the ingot.
  • the wire guides are typically adapted to rotate in order to transport the wire.
  • the wire guides are normally configured to rotate at a circumferential speed (i.e., the speed at the outer circumference) of at least 5 m/s or even 10 m/s. It is typical that the wire saw is operated between 10 m/s and 15 m/s during standard operation whereas the speed may be smaller during start and stop. Also, in the event of a back and forth movement of the wire, the wire is decelerated from time to time in order to accelerate it in the opposite direction.
  • the wire moves substantially along its longitudinal length.
  • the term "substantially” shall particularly embrace vibrations or the like.
  • the movement is typically relatively rapidly in comparison to the typical perpendicular motion of the workpiece, such as a semiconductor ingot.
  • the wire motion can alternatively be in a reciprocating manner, in which the motion of the wire along its length is in periodically reversed direction.
  • the wire is brought into contact with a workpiece 120 to cut the workpiece, for instance, into a plurality of wafers.
  • the wire or wires forming a wire web can be moved relative to the workpiece, the workpiece can be moved relative to the wire or wire web, or the wire and the workpiece can both be moved relative to each other.
  • the wire saw monitoring system 10 includes a sensor arrangement 20 and a control unit 50.
  • the sensor arrangement 20 is configured to be positioned adjacent to the wire 30 and may include a sensor board 24 with several sensors 22 mounted to it.
  • the number of sensors can be at least 2, at least 4, or even at least 8, 10 or even 16.
  • the sensors 22 are configured to detect the wire bow.
  • the data measured and collected by the sensors is typically forwarded to the control unit 50 where it may be further processed, such as evaluated. For instance, logic levels (i.e., 0 or 1 outcomes) of each sensor may be used to monitor a progression of the wire bow.
  • Fig. 4 shows the same embodiment wherein the wire (web) undergoes a bow due to the workpiece being pressed in the cutting direction.
  • the logic states of all the sensors are typically the same if there is no wire bow or only a small wire bow. "Small" in this context means that the wire bow does not exceed a threshold value for the wire-sensor distance.
  • the wire bow may increase and the logic states of one or more of the sensors may also change.
  • the two sensors closer to the workpiece i.e., in the embodiments illustrated with respect to Figs. 3 and 4 , the two sensors to the right
  • the two sensors further away from the workpiece i.e., the two sensors to the left in Figs. 3 and 4
  • the threshold value of the sensors may be selected such that the following information can be gained: Signal sensor 1 Signal sensor 2 Signal sensor 3 Signal sensor 4 Interpretation 0 0 0 0 ⁇ 2° 0 0 0 1 2° ⁇ 4° 0 0 1 1 4° ⁇ 6° 0 1 1 1 6° ⁇ 8° 1 1 1 ⁇ >8° any other signal constellation failure
  • the absolute bow length L refers to the maximal deviation of the wire from its rest position in the cutting direction.
  • the absolute bow length L is exemplarily illustrated in Fig. 4 and denoted with reference number 140.
  • the threshold value of the sensors may be selected such that the following information can be gained: Signal sensor 1 Signal sensor 2 Signal sensor 3 Signal sensor 4 Interpretation 0 0 0 0 0 L ⁇ 3mm 0 0 0 1 3mm ⁇ L ⁇ 6mm 0 0 1 1 6mm ⁇ L ⁇ 9mm 0 1 1 1 9mm ⁇ L ⁇ 12mm 1 1 1 L>12mm any other signal constellation failure
  • the sensor arrangement or the wire saw as described herein may be configured to trigger a reaction, such as an amendment of the operational status of the wire saw, such as at least one operation parameter, in dependence of the measurement results.
  • a reaction such as an amendment of the operational status of the wire saw, such as at least one operation parameter, in dependence of the measurement results.
  • no reaction may be triggered as long as the bow angle ⁇ is below 6°, or the absolute bow length is below 9 mm.
  • the speed of the wire may be increased, such as by 10%, and/or the cutting speed (i.e., the moving speed of the workpiece in the cutting direction) may be reduced, such as by 10%.
  • the speed of the wire may be increased even more, such as by at least 20%, and/or the cutting speed may be reduced even more, such as by at least 20%.
  • a maximal bow angle such as at least 8° or at least 12 mm absolute bow length in the present example
  • the wire saw device may be halted and/or an operator may be alarmed.
  • any other measurement result such as that all sensors measure the distance between them and the wire as being below the threshold value with one intermediate sensor, or a sensor further away from the workpiece than at least part of the other sensors, indicating a distance above the threshold value, this has to be interpreted as a failure of the system. This is because the bow is always in the direction of the cutting direction. In other words, neither do negative angles ⁇ represent a situation that happens in practice nor is it possible that a sensor senses a smaller distance than its neighbor further away from the workpiece.
  • control unit 50 determines the value of the wire bow and controls the wire saw device so as to avoid a breakage of the wire.
  • control unit 50 is configured to adjust a wire speed and/or a table speed depending on the wire bow.
  • the control may be a feedback loop control.
  • the sensor arrangement further includes at least one sensor board, wherein the sensors are mounted to the sensor board in at least two rows.
  • the sensors are mounted to the sensor board in at least two rows.
  • the term "row of sensor” refers particularly to an arrangement where the sensors of different rows are spaced apart from each other, such as in a direction substantially perpendicular to the wire orientation and/or an orientation substantially parallel to the wire orientation. "Substantially” in this context typically includes a deviation of 20°, more typically 10°.
  • each sensor provides information about different wires.
  • Such an inclusion is typically very hard and thus difficult to cut through.
  • the cutting of all the other wires proceeds without any problems whereas said one wire remains stuck at the inclusion so that the bow dimension of this wire increases while the ingot is pushed in the cutting direction. According to this embodiment, such a disastrous bow development can be measured and the control can trigger a reaction, as described.
  • Fig. 5 shows a schematic view of the sensor board 24 with 4x4 sensors 22 mounted to it.
  • the overall numbers of sensors are typically be calculated as k times n with k and n both being positive integers, wherein, for instance, k denotes the number of sensors in the orientation substantially parallel to the wire orientation, and n denotes the number of sensors in the orientation substantially perpendicular to the wire orientation.
  • the number of sensors arranged substantially perpendicular to the wire orientation may be at least two, at least four, or at least six. Additionally or alternatively, the number of sensors arranged substantially parallel to the wire orientation may be at least two, at least four, or at least six.
  • the overall number of sensors may be up to 20 or even 30. Additionally or alternatively, it may be at least 9 or 16.
  • the sensors may be positioned in a diagonal pattern on the board.
  • a diagonal pattern requires at least four sensors arranged in a parallelogram-type fashion.
  • each sensor is centered above or below a wire that is different than the wire that all the other sensors are centered above or below.
  • the multitude of sensors can particularly be inductive sensors or capacitive sensors.
  • Inductive sensors are particularly beneficial in that they are insensitive to water, oil, dirt, non-metallic particles, target color, ability to withstand high shock and vibration environments.
  • structured wire or diamond wire is utilized for the wire saw device of the present disclosure.
  • the wire may be monofilament steel wire.
  • the wire is from approximately 80 to 350 micrometer, for example 120 micrometer steel gauge wire.
  • the structured wire is a crimped wire, wherein, for example, saw wire being made of a metallic wire being provided with a plurality of crimps.
  • Diamond wire is a wire with a coating, wherein diamond particles are embedded in the coating.
  • the methods of operating and/or controlling the wire bow monitoring system and the wire saw device can be conducted by means of computer programs, software, computer software products and the interrelated controllers, which can typically have a CPU, a memory, a user interface, and input and output means being in communication with the corresponding components of the wire saw device.
  • These components can be one or more of the following components: motors, wire break detection units, wire tracking devices, and the like, which will be described in more detail below.
  • the wire speed that is the speed of the wire moving through the wire saw can be, for example, 10 m/s or even higher. Typically, the wire speed can be in a range of 10 to 15 m/s. However, higher wire speeds, such as of 20 m/s, 25 m/s or 30 m/s can also be desirable.
  • the feed spool with unused wire typically rotates with a rotation speed of up to several thousands rotations per minute. For example, 1000 to 2000 rpm can be provided for unwinding the wire.
  • the wire web may be arranged horizontally, as illustrated in the figures herein.
  • the wire saw may furthermore include two vertically arranged webs.
  • the vertically arranged webs are used for transporting the wire between the horizontally oriented working areas. During transport between the working areas the wire can cool down.
  • the working areas are oriented vertically.
  • a multi-wire saw is used.
  • a multi-wire saw allows high productivity and high quality slicing of silicon wafers for the semiconductor and photovoltaic industries.
  • a multi-wire saw includes typically a high-strength steel wire that may be moved uni-directionally (i.e., only in the forward direction) or bi-directionally (i.e., backwards and forwards) to perform the cutting action.
  • the wire may be provided with diamonds on its surface.
  • the throughput may be increased by a factor of 2 or even more in comparison to conventional steel wire.
  • the speed with which the material to be sawed is moved relatively to the moving wire may be referred to as the material feed rate.
  • the material feed rate in the embodiments described herein may be in the range of 2 ⁇ m/s to 15 ⁇ m/s, typically about 6 ⁇ m/s to 10 ⁇ m/s for a wafer cutting wire saw.
  • At least one sensor for measuring the wire bow is movably arranged. By moving the at least one sensor it is possible to follow the wire and thus to maintain a high sensing accuracy. This is because the measurement results are of higher quality in the proximity of the sensor than further away.
  • the control may move one or more of the at least one sensor to follow the bow.
  • the control may be adapted to guide the one or more sensor in such a way that their distance to the wire remains constant. It is possible to deduce the dimension of the bow from the distance that the one or more sensors are moved in order to keep the distance constant.
  • not all of the sensors are movably arranged but only some of them.
  • the wire bow monitoring system includes a control unit adapted to control the sensor arrangement and/or the wire saw device depending on the data received from the sensor arrangement.
  • the wire bow monitoring system further includes an actuator adapted to change a distance between the sensor arrangement and the wire.
  • the sensor arrangement further includes at least a rod, wherein the sensor is mounted to the rod, or the plurality of sensors are mounted to the rod, for instance, in a row.
  • the rod may be movable.
  • Fig. 6 shows a schematic view of a wire bow monitoring system for a wire saw device according to embodiments.
  • the sensor arrangement includes a movable rod 40 having sensors 22 mounted thereto.
  • the sensors may be contact sensors, inductive sensors, or capacitive sensors. As shown, and not limited to the embodiment of Fig. 6 , the sensors are mounted to the rod in a row.
  • a linear actuator 60 may generally and not limited to the embodiment of Fig. 6 be provided to allow the rod 40 to be movable in the cutting direction, as indicated by the arrows 105 in Fig. 6 , and vice versa.
  • the actuator is typically in data communication with the control unit of the wire bow monitoring system or the wire saw device.
  • the linear actuator is a stepper which drives a screw ball. Because of the use of a linear actuator, the wire bow distance may be measured with a high accuracy. Not limited to this embodiment, the wire bow measurement results may by memorized in order to provide functional information about the wire bow in dependence of the time. This information may be useful for learning to better understand the cutting process and particularly the bow creation, in particular in view of other cutting parameters, such as wire speed, wire tension, amount of provided slurry, and table speed.
  • wire bow system it is also possible to couple the wire bow system according to embodiments described herein with a wire breakage detection system.
  • an existing wire breakage detection system may already include sensors that can be beneficially used also for the wire bow detection as described herein.
  • the senor is a contact sensor.
  • the contact sensor may be positioned close to the wire, for instance, at position X.
  • the interpretation of position X may be as follows: Should the wire's bow increase such that it arrives at position X, a reaction of the wire saw device should be triggered.
  • the control unit drives the linear actuator in order to move down the rod away from the wire by one increment, until there is no contact between the rod and the wire (see Fig. 8 ).
  • the position of the actuator and of the rod is evaluated and maybe memorized by the control unit. Due to the linear actuator the wire bow can be measured with a very good accuracy as a function of time.
  • the rod may be electronically connected to the control unit of the wire bow monitoring system and/or of the wire saw device. Using the information about the wire bow the control unit can adjust wire saw operating parameters such as wire speed or table speed in order to reduce the wire bow and to avoid wire breakage.
  • Figs. 7 and 8 also exemplify that, according to general embodiments described herein, at least one sensor may be provided on each side of the workpiece. Thereby, it is possible to detect the bow building up at both sides of the workpiece. Where the standard situation may be a symmetrical bow around the center of the workpiece, asymmetric bow creation may be detected by these embodiments. Not only the bow dimension might be used to trigger a reaction of the wire saw device, but also the level of asymmetry of the bow might be used to trigger a reaction.
  • FIG. 9-11 A further example of the present disclosure is illustrated with respect to Figs. 9-11 .
  • the figures show a workpiece 120 to be cut that is pushed by the table 110 towards the wire 30 web.
  • Two sensors 22, i.e., one sensor for each side of the workpiece, are positioned on a rod 40.
  • an actuator schematically shown as 60 may be linked to the rod 40 to move the rod in the cutting direction or vice versa.
  • the sensors In the absence of a wire bow, the sensors, for instance, inductive sensors, detect the presence of the wire (see Fig. 9 ).
  • the sensors detect the presence of the wire (see Fig. 9 ).
  • the wire bow increases during the cutting process and the wire moves away from the sensors, at least one sensor 22 senses an increase of the distance between the sensor and the wire. This may happen when the sensor signal exceeds or underruns a selectable threshold value.
  • the increase of the distance is steadily measured.
  • the output of the sensor changes (see Fig. 10 ).
  • the actuator is moved in the bow direction, i.e., the cutting direction that is denoted with arrows 70 in Fig. 10 .
  • the actuator may move the rod by one increment in order to bring the rod 40 and the sensors closer to the wire again.
  • the information gained from the sensor and the necessary movement distance may be used to deduce the extension of the wire bow and to thereby avoid wire breakage by triggering an appropriate reaction, as discussed, upon wire bow extension that overruns a threshold value.
  • the current position of the actuator may be memorized by the wire bow monitoring system.
  • the one or more sensor(s) may be pivotably positioned.
  • the axis of rotation of the one or more sensor(s) is typically perpendicular to the wire orientation. In case there is a wire web, the axis of rotation is typically parallel with the plane formed by the wire web.
  • the sensor(s) may be pivoted by pivoting the rod to which the one or more sensor(s) is mounted to.
  • Fig. 11 Such an embodiment is exemplarily illustrated in Fig. 11 wherein the rod 40 is rotatable around its axis.
  • the rotation is illustrated with arrows 45.
  • the shown rotation direction of the sensor i.e. clockwise rotation of the left sensor and counter-clock wise rotation of the right sensor, correspond to a situation wherein the bow increases, and the sensors follow this increase by an increase of their rotation angle.
  • the pivotably arranged sensors are adapted to be controlled or, are controlled, respectively, such that the alignment of the sensor surface with regard to the wire can remain substantially constant despite an amendment in the bow.
  • "Substantially" in this context includes a deviation of not more than 5°, typically not more than 2°.
  • the senor has a surface that is oriented parallel to the wire in order to obtain optimum measurement results. If the wire starts to bow, and the sensor orientation remains unchanged, the wire will no longer be parallel to the sensor surface with the result that the wire has different distance to the sensor in dependence on the position on the sensor. This may, in some embodiments, reduce the sensing quality. By adapting the orientation of the sensor, the sensing quality can remain at a high quality.
  • control unit is adapted to pivot the sensor in dependence of the position of the wire. This may be done synchronously with moving the sensor translationally, i.e., up and down in the orientation of the exemplary embodiments of the figures, to follow the wire bow, such as by moving the rod up and down. Since an optimum sensor orientation may be known for every bow dimension, and since this information may be stored in the control unit of the wire bow monitoring system of the wire saw device, such as in a memory unit of the control unit, the control unit may adapt the rotation angle of the sensor as a function of the dimension of the bow. Typical rotation angles of the sensor correspond to the bow angle ⁇ . They are typically up to 20°, or only up to 15°.
  • the rod may be rotated by one angle increment in order to optimize both the sensing distance between the sensors and the wire and the sensor orientation with respect to the wire.
  • Fig. 12 depicts a cross-sectional side view of the embodiments of Figs. 10 and 11 .
  • all sensors may be pivoted synchronously.
  • the sensors 22 may be arranged on one board 40 that is rotated as a whole.
  • a wire saw device including a wire bow monitoring system according to the embodiments described above.
  • the wire saw may be adapted to cut one, two, three or even four workpieces such as an ingot synchronously.
  • typical wire saws as described herein are provided with four guide cylinders for guiding the wire wherein two webs are formed and used as cutting area. Consequently, according to embodiments, at least one sensor arrangement as described herein may be provided for each of the two webs adapted for cutting workpieces.
  • a method for monitoring a wire bow in a wire saw device includes conducting at least one of an inductive measurement, a capacitive measurement and a contact measurement of a wire.
  • the method furthermore includes detecting a bow of the wire.
  • detecting may include evaluating the measurement results, in particular by means of a control unit.
  • control unit controls the sensor arrangement and/or the wire saw device depending on the data received from the sensor arrangement.
  • Figs. 13 and 14 shall illustrate the methods according to the present disclosure.
  • Fig 13 shows a flow diagram of a method for monitoring a wire bow in a wire saw device according to embodiments described herein. The method includes conducting at least one of an inductive measurement, a capacitive measurement and a contact measurement of a wire (block 101); and detecting or determining a bow of the wire (block 102).
  • Fig. 14 depicts a similar embodiment, with the added step of controlling a sensor arrangement and/or a wire saw device (block 103) using the data received from the sensor arrangement.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)
  • Processing Of Stones Or Stones Resemblance Materials (AREA)
EP12184353.6A 2012-09-14 2012-09-14 Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil Active EP2708342B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12184353.6A EP2708342B1 (fr) 2012-09-14 2012-09-14 Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil
CN2012207084610U CN203204380U (zh) 2012-09-14 2012-12-19 线弯曲监控系统和线锯装置
CN201210556851.5A CN103676770A (zh) 2012-09-14 2012-12-19 专用于线锯的线弯曲监控系统
JP2013187972A JP2014060397A (ja) 2012-09-14 2013-09-11 ワイヤソー専用のワイヤ湾曲監視システム

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12184353.6A EP2708342B1 (fr) 2012-09-14 2012-09-14 Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2708342A1 true EP2708342A1 (fr) 2014-03-19
EP2708342B1 EP2708342B1 (fr) 2017-05-03

Family

ID=47189706

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12184353.6A Active EP2708342B1 (fr) 2012-09-14 2012-09-14 Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2708342B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2014060397A (fr)
CN (2) CN203204380U (fr)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014167392A1 (fr) * 2013-04-09 2014-10-16 Meyer Burger Ag Dispositif de contrôle et procédé de contrôle de lame à fil et scie à fil
FR3010922A1 (fr) * 2013-09-24 2015-03-27 Commissariat Energie Atomique Procede et dispositif de decoupe filaire d'un materiau
EP2954965A1 (fr) * 2014-06-11 2015-12-16 Applied Materials Switzerland Sàrl Procédé et système de sciage d'un lingot
WO2015188859A1 (fr) * 2014-06-11 2015-12-17 APPLIED MATERIALS SWITZERLAND SàRL Système de scie à fil
FR3026035A1 (fr) * 2014-09-23 2016-03-25 Commissariat Energie Atomique Dispositif de decoupe par fil comportant un systeme de detection et de mesure d'une fleche du fil
EP3015238A1 (fr) * 2014-10-29 2016-05-04 Applied Materials Switzerland Sàrl Système de surveillance de fil
CN105984041A (zh) * 2014-10-29 2016-10-05 应用材料瑞士有限责任公司 线监测系统
CN106891451A (zh) * 2017-02-22 2017-06-27 平凉中电科新能源技术有限公司 一种金刚线多线切割机断线检测方法
WO2020120777A1 (fr) 2018-12-14 2020-06-18 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Procedés de suivi de la coupe en fonction de la flêche d'au moins un fil de coupe et dispositif associé
CN113334595A (zh) * 2021-06-08 2021-09-03 福州天瑞线锯科技有限公司 不规则脆硬材料工件的切割方法及设备
WO2023094155A1 (fr) 2021-11-29 2023-06-01 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Installation et procédé de désassemblage d'un module photovoltaïque

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2708342B1 (fr) * 2012-09-14 2017-05-03 Toyo Advanced Technologies Co., Ltd. Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil
CN106313353B (zh) * 2015-07-03 2019-01-08 天津职业技术师范大学 一种多线切割机线网线弓在线监测装置及方法
JP6919852B2 (ja) * 2016-09-27 2021-08-18 株式会社テック技販 インゴットの切断装置、および、インゴットの切断装置に使用される荷重検出装置
CN107214868B (zh) * 2017-07-04 2019-02-01 杨凌美畅新材料股份有限公司 一种多线切割机整体附加张力检测方法
JP7105433B2 (ja) * 2017-08-07 2022-07-25 株式会社クリハラント 切断補助装置およびそれを有するワイヤー式切断装置
CN116277559B (zh) * 2023-05-17 2023-08-18 浙江求是半导体设备有限公司 晶棒切割系统及金刚线寿命检测方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070252425A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Radkevich Olexy V System and method for cutting soluble scintillator material
US20100006082A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Wire slicing system
WO2011070386A1 (fr) * 2009-12-11 2011-06-16 Applied Materials, Inc. Dispositif de contrôle du fil d'un appareil de sciage au fil hélicoïdal et son procédé d'utilisation

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS55153963A (en) * 1979-05-21 1980-12-01 Ricoh Co Ltd Charge wire diagnosis system of copying machine
JPH11188603A (ja) * 1997-12-25 1999-07-13 Tokyo Seiko Co Ltd ワイヤ式切断加工装置における被切断材の送り速度制御装置および方法
JP4066112B2 (ja) * 1999-01-28 2008-03-26 株式会社スーパーシリコン研究所 ワイヤソーの制御方法及びワイヤソー
JP2003127058A (ja) * 2001-10-23 2003-05-08 Sharp Corp ワイヤソー
JP2007030117A (ja) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-08 Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd ウエーハの製造方法及びワイヤソー
JP2007276097A (ja) * 2006-04-03 2007-10-25 Takatori Corp ワイヤソー
JP2007326167A (ja) * 2006-06-07 2007-12-20 Toyo Advanced Technologies Co Ltd ワイヤソー
JP5610976B2 (ja) * 2010-10-22 2014-10-22 トーヨーエイテック株式会社 ワイヤソー
CN202428570U (zh) * 2011-04-07 2012-09-12 苏州协鑫光伏科技有限公司 带有线弓探测器的多线切割机
EP2708342B1 (fr) * 2012-09-14 2017-05-03 Toyo Advanced Technologies Co., Ltd. Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070252425A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Radkevich Olexy V System and method for cutting soluble scintillator material
US20100006082A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Wire slicing system
WO2011070386A1 (fr) * 2009-12-11 2011-06-16 Applied Materials, Inc. Dispositif de contrôle du fil d'un appareil de sciage au fil hélicoïdal et son procédé d'utilisation

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014167392A1 (fr) * 2013-04-09 2014-10-16 Meyer Burger Ag Dispositif de contrôle et procédé de contrôle de lame à fil et scie à fil
FR3010922A1 (fr) * 2013-09-24 2015-03-27 Commissariat Energie Atomique Procede et dispositif de decoupe filaire d'un materiau
WO2015044145A1 (fr) * 2013-09-24 2015-04-02 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Procede et dispositif de decoupe filaire d'un materiau
EP2954965A1 (fr) * 2014-06-11 2015-12-16 Applied Materials Switzerland Sàrl Procédé et système de sciage d'un lingot
WO2015188859A1 (fr) * 2014-06-11 2015-12-17 APPLIED MATERIALS SWITZERLAND SàRL Système de scie à fil
FR3026035A1 (fr) * 2014-09-23 2016-03-25 Commissariat Energie Atomique Dispositif de decoupe par fil comportant un systeme de detection et de mesure d'une fleche du fil
WO2016046107A1 (fr) * 2014-09-23 2016-03-31 Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Dispositif de decoupe par fil comportant un systeme de detection et de mesure d'une fleche du fil et procédé de mise en oeuvre d'un tel dispositif
EP3015238A1 (fr) * 2014-10-29 2016-05-04 Applied Materials Switzerland Sàrl Système de surveillance de fil
CN105984042A (zh) * 2014-10-29 2016-10-05 应用材料瑞士有限责任公司 线监测系统、线锯装置以及用于监测线的方法
CN105984041A (zh) * 2014-10-29 2016-10-05 应用材料瑞士有限责任公司 线监测系统
CN106891451A (zh) * 2017-02-22 2017-06-27 平凉中电科新能源技术有限公司 一种金刚线多线切割机断线检测方法
WO2020120777A1 (fr) 2018-12-14 2020-06-18 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Procedés de suivi de la coupe en fonction de la flêche d'au moins un fil de coupe et dispositif associé
FR3090432A1 (fr) 2018-12-14 2020-06-26 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Procédé de suivi de la coupe en fonction de la flèche d’au moins un fil de coupe et dispositif associé
CN113334595A (zh) * 2021-06-08 2021-09-03 福州天瑞线锯科技有限公司 不规则脆硬材料工件的切割方法及设备
WO2023094155A1 (fr) 2021-11-29 2023-06-01 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Installation et procédé de désassemblage d'un module photovoltaïque
FR3129627A1 (fr) 2021-11-29 2023-06-02 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Installation et procédé de désassemblage d'un module photovoltaïque

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103676770A (zh) 2014-03-26
EP2708342B1 (fr) 2017-05-03
CN203204380U (zh) 2013-09-18
JP2014060397A (ja) 2014-04-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2708342B1 (fr) Système de surveillance de cintrage de fils pour une scie à fil
EP3015238A1 (fr) Système de surveillance de fil
EP2586582B1 (fr) Système de commande de scie à fil et scie à fil
EP2954965A1 (fr) Procédé et système de sciage d'un lingot
US5115403A (en) Workpiece workability detection method and a method for cutting a workpiece by means of a cutting machine utilizing that method
JP4049900B2 (ja) ワイヤソー切断装置
EP2218532B1 (fr) Dispositif de machine à scier à fil et son procédé de fonctionnement
WO2014167392A1 (fr) Dispositif de contrôle et procédé de contrôle de lame à fil et scie à fil
JP2009231760A (ja) ブレード破損／磨耗検出装置
US20150290728A1 (en) Wire saw apparatus and cut-machining method
EP2815834A1 (fr) Système de surveillance de fil destiné à une scie à fil et procédé de surveillance d'une scie à fil
EP2586583A1 (fr) Système de commande de scie à fil et scie à fil
EP3015237A1 (fr) Système de surveillance de fil
JP6256870B2 (ja) ワイヤソー及びその制御方法
KR101230268B1 (ko) 와이어 소우 머신의 장력 조절 장치
JP4615242B2 (ja) 回転ブレード交換時期判定方法および切削装置
JPH11156694A (ja) ワイヤーソー切断方法および装置
WO2013041140A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil permettant de découper des pièces à semi-conducteurs
EP2647458A1 (fr) Fil pour scie à fil à semi-conducteur et scie à fil
JPH08197327A (ja) 鋸盤による加工方法およびその鋸盤
CN108568740B (zh) 线状锯及线状锯的工件切断加工方法
JPH07108526A (ja) スライシングマシン
EP2933049A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance de guide de fil et procédé de surveillance d'un guide de fil
US11130185B2 (en) Reversible metal-detecting sawmill system
Suzuki et al. Study on precision slicing process of single-crystal silicon by using dicing wire saw

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140606

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160211

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: TOYO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161117

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 889477

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170515

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012031844

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 889477

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: MICHELI AND CIE SA, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170803

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170804

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170803

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170903

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012031844

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180206

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170914

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171002

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230920

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20231001

Year of fee payment: 12