EP2634358B2 - Détection d'obstacles intelligente - Google Patents

Détection d'obstacles intelligente Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2634358B2
EP2634358B2 EP13000171.2A EP13000171A EP2634358B2 EP 2634358 B2 EP2634358 B2 EP 2634358B2 EP 13000171 A EP13000171 A EP 13000171A EP 2634358 B2 EP2634358 B2 EP 2634358B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
collision
motor
drive
routine
roller shutter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13000171.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2634358B1 (fr
EP2634358A1 (fr
Inventor
Matthias Falkenberg
Ralf Kern
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Arca Beteiligungen GmbH
Original Assignee
Arca Beteiligungen GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=47603206&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2634358(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Arca Beteiligungen GmbH filed Critical Arca Beteiligungen GmbH
Publication of EP2634358A1 publication Critical patent/EP2634358A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2634358B1 publication Critical patent/EP2634358B1/fr
Publication of EP2634358B2 publication Critical patent/EP2634358B2/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809—Control
    • E06B2009/6818—Control using sensors
    • E06B2009/6836—Control using sensors sensing obstacle

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a drive device for a darkening device or security device with the features of the preamble of claim 1 and a method for hindrance recognition when driving a darkening device or security device with the features of the preamble of claim 9.
  • the drive device in question can be used for a large number of dimming devices or the like. It is only essential that a movable closure element is present. Examples include roller shutters, blinds, awnings, but also safety devices such as gates and curtains, and in particular roller shutters and roller blinds. The following is the scope of the roller shutters in the foreground, which is not to be understood as limiting.
  • the known drive device ( DE 20 2010 003 095 U1 ) for a dimming device, from which the invention proceeds, has a special arrangement of a magnetoresistive sensor for measuring the distance of a closure element.
  • the magnetoresistive sensor is arranged on a tube motor board, whereas the corresponding trigger magnets are arranged on a magnetic ring of the winding shaft of the closure element. This arrangement makes it possible to continuously obtain sensor signals at any time during the motorized adjustment of the closure element, on the basis of which both the current speed and the position of the closure element can always be determined.
  • the problem underlying the invention is thus to design and further develop a drive device for a darkening device or security device and a method for Hindemiserkennung when driving a darkening device or security device such that effectively distinguish between the presence of a real obstacle and a temporary blockade of the closure element can be.
  • the detected movement of the closure element is not finally recognized immediately for a first irregularity on the presence of an obstacle and the engine off, but initially only the suspicion of the presence of an obstacle noted and started a process by which a mere blockade of the closure element overcome can be.
  • This can be done for example by a limited further propulsion of the motor and thus the winding shaft, which can be constructed to overcome the blockage by the resulting further unwinding and damming of the closure element a weight. Only if it can not be determined by this measure that the blockage of the closure element could be canceled, for example by detecting a rapid forward movement corresponding to a back-sloshing of the closure element, the presence of an obstacle is definitely determined.
  • the exact length of the distance by which the motor performs further forward movement to overcome the blockage can be particularly flexibly stored by a programmable nonvolatile electronic memory according to the preferred embodiment of the drive device of claim 6 and the preferred embodiment of the method of claim 12 Set parameter.
  • the proposed solution is shown in the drawing with reference to a darkening device with a motor 1, here an electric tubular motor, for propelling an adjustable closure element 2 designed as a roller shutter.
  • a motor 1 here an electric tubular motor
  • an adjustable closure element 2 designed as a roller shutter.
  • the proposed drive device for many variants of dimming devices or security devices applicable.
  • An exemplary selection has been given in the introductory part of the description.
  • the drive device furthermore has a sensor 3 for detecting at least one drive state of the closure element 2 and a drive control 4.
  • a drive state can be understood to be any physical quantity directly or indirectly associated with a movement or force, such as indirectly via a winding shaft 5, here an octagonal steel shaft, acting on the closure element 2 torque. This torque can also be calculated indirectly via a calculation of the electrical quantities acting on the motor 1.
  • One or more states of movement of the closure element 2 in the narrower sense may also be understood as the at least one drive state detected by the sensor 3, such as a position or a speed of the closure element 2. Based on this at least one detected drive state, the sensor 3 generates at least one drive detection signal or based on the at least one detected movement state at least one motion detection signal.
  • the at least one drive detection or movement detection signal can be any desired analog or digital signal which transmits information about the at least one drive or movement state of the closure element 2 detected by the sensor 3. When reference is subsequently made to the driving state or the drive detection signal, it is always equally meant to mean a motion state or a motion detection signal.
  • the drive controller 4 controls the engine 1 and is configured to detect a collision event based on the at least one drive detection signal during the propulsion of the engine 1.
  • this basically causes a movement of the closure element 2 in the closing direction, that is to say in general a lowering of the closure element 2 in the downward direction 6a.
  • the closure element 2 is pulled by its own weight in the downward direction 6a, so that the motor 1 so does not push the closure element 2 in the downward direction 6a, but by its rotation allows a further sliding down.
  • the closure element 2 does not move despite appropriate propulsion through the engine 1. This can either be due to the fact that an obstacle 7 is in the path of the closure element 2 and blocks this path or because a jamming of the closure element 2 which does not give rise to an obstacle has occurred.
  • the lack of further movement of the closure element 2 despite propulsion by the engine 1 is understood as a collision event.
  • the drive control 4 can detect such a collision event in that at least one drive or movement detection signal indicates a standstill or too slow a movement of the closure element 2 during propulsion by the motor 1 controlled by the drive control 4.
  • This collision cancellation routine may comprise any actions initiated by the drive control 4, including in particular a control of the motor 1, which are suitable for distinguishing the presence of a true collision with an obstacle 7 from a jamming of the closure element 2 without an obstacle.
  • the drive controller 4 is further configured to decide, based on the at least one drive or movement detection signal during the collision cancellation routine, whether an obstacle rescue routine is being executed. Specifically, the obstacle rescue routine is executed when it has been detected during the collision cancellation routine that the blockage of the shutter member 2 is based on a collision with an obstacle 7, such as in FIG Fig. 2b shown.
  • the obstacle relief routine may again be a routine which comprises any actions initiated by the drive control 4 which are suitable for releasing the obstacle 7 from contact with the colliding closure element 2.
  • the detection of a collision event comprises the assumption of a collision detection state
  • the drive control 4 is adapted to maintain the collision detection state in the case of a decision to execute an obstacle rescue routine, and in case of a decision against execution of an obstacle rescue routine, is set to Cancel collision detection condition.
  • the assumption of a collision detection state can in particular cause a change of the internal state machine of the drive control 4.
  • software of the drive controller 4 can remember the event "obstacle detected” and store it accordingly in the data memory of the drive controller 4.
  • the execution of the obstacle relief routine includes stopping the engine 1 and then moving the engine 1 counter to the propulsion direction. This regularly causes a movement of the closure element 2 in the opening direction, that is, a reversing in the upward direction 6b.
  • the closure element 2 releases from the obstacle 7, so that the closure element 2 can no longer exert any force on the obstacle 7.
  • the collision detection state can be maintained, in particular after execution of the obstacle rescue routine.
  • the drive control 4 can note the presence of an obstacle and, for example, prevent further propulsion of the engine 1 until the collision detection state is canceled again by a user input.
  • the drive controller 4 continues to operate normally. If, accordingly, a collision detection state has first been detected and the software of the drive control 4 has memorized the event "obstacle detected” and stored in the data memory of the drive control 4, then the event "obstacle removed” is noted in this case and the previous event "obstacle detected” deleted from the data memory again.
  • the particularly preferred embodiment of the drive device shown here has the already mentioned winding shaft 5 for winding up the closure element 2.
  • the tubular motor 1 comprises an output 8, which is coupled via a driver 9 with the winding shaft 5.
  • the driver 9 can be axially attachable to the output 8.
  • the winding shaft 5 in turn is preferably connected positively to the driver 9.
  • a freewheel 10 causes the motor 1 can continue to move in a blockade of the closure element 2, either by an obstacle or by an internal deadlock and thereby the output 8 first passes through the freewheeling angle in the forward direction. While the freewheeling angle is being traversed, the motor 1 does not exert sufficient force on the driver 9 and thus the closure element 2 in order to move the carrier 9 further. It can therefore be determined by the sensor 3 that despite propulsion of the motor 1 no movement of the driver 9 takes place. Particularly suitable is a freewheeling angle of 20 ° has been found.
  • the senor 3 is a magnetoresistive sensor 3, which detects the magnetic field generated by a triggering element arrangement 12 arranged on a magnet ring 11 and the change thereof.
  • the trigger element arrangement 12 is chosen so that the magnetic field generated by it at each angular position of the magnetic ring 11 to the sensor 3 allows detecting the change of the magnetic field.
  • the magnetic ring 11 is arranged on the opposite end of the driver 9 of the motor 1, to which also the tubular motor head 13 is located for connection to a stationary counter bearing.
  • the magnetic ring 11 is connected to an adapter ring 14, which is rotatably mounted relative to the tubular motor 1.
  • the magnetic ring 11 can be connected to the winding shaft 5, whereby the drive control 4 from the change in the magnetic field of the trigger element assembly 12 can determine a speed of the winding shaft 5 and thus of the closure element 2 connected thereto. From the initial or final position of the closure element 2 and the speed of the winding shaft 5, the drive control 4 can also determine the position of the closure element 2.
  • the drive control 4 is set up to detect a collision event or a collision detection state when the motor 1 has moved at least by a predetermined collision detection distance in the drive direction and the sensor 3 has detected a drive pattern deviating from a predetermined drive pattern of the closure element 2 during this time.
  • the collision detection path preferably corresponds to the movement of the output 8 about the freewheeling angle.
  • the drive pattern deviating from a predetermined drive pattern of the closure element 2 is a drive pattern corresponding to a falling below a predetermined minimum speed of the closure element 2 and, in particular, a drive pattern corresponding to a stoppage of the closure element 2.
  • FIGS. 6a and 2a, b show a part of a drive detection signal generated by the sensor 3 during the detection of a collision event, here specifically a motion detection signal.
  • the curves 15 correspond to the detected by the sensor 3 magnetic field of the trigger element assembly 12. According to the rotating movement of the trigger element assembly 12 during the propulsion of the motor 1 and thus the winding shaft 5 to the stationarily arranged in the tubular motor sensor 3, the magnetic field detected by the sensor 3 is essential sinusoidal.
  • a first period 16 of the Fig. 6a During the propulsion of the engine 1, the shutter 2 moves freely and smoothly in the downward direction 6a, whereby the motion detection signal generated during this time shows a smooth and expected course. This corresponds to that in the Fig. 2a shown situation of the drive device and the closure element 2, which is unwound from the winding shaft 5 and guided via a circulating roller 17 exits the Behangkasten 18.
  • a collision event especially a collision of the closure element 2 with an obstacle 7.
  • the motor 1 further drives the output 8
  • the closure element 2 does not move further. Since the output 8 is located at a rear stop of the freewheel 10 of the driver 9, the output 8 thus passes through the freewheel 10 during standstill of the driver 9. Accordingly, no change in the magnetic field of the triggering element arrangement 12 detected by the sensor 3 occurs in this time interval 19 instead of, therefore, the motion detection signal no longer has the predetermined sinusoidal pattern profile, but a deviating constant course.
  • the duration of this second time segment 19 corresponds to the time which the output 8 requires for the passage of the freewheel 10. From the deviating course during the second time segment 19, which indicates a stoppage of the winding shaft 5 and thus of the closure element 2, the drive control 4 can detect the collision event.
  • the output 8 After the output 8 has passed through the freewheel 10, the output 8 is located at a front stop of the freewheel 10 and accordingly engages in a further propulsion of the engine 1 in the driver 9, so that the driver 9 now moves again. Accordingly, in the third time segment 20, after passage of the freewheel 10, a regular change in the magnetic field is detected again by the sensor 3 and a corresponding movement detection signal is generated.
  • the shutter member 2 can not move in the downward direction 6a. Rather, the closure element 2 accumulates, on the one hand by the fact that the individual lamellae of the closure element 2 are pushed together and the distance normally between them is shortened, on the other hand by damming and buckling of the closure element 2 within the Behangkastens 18, as shown in Fig. 2b shown. During this further unwinding and damming of the closure element 2, the winding shaft 5 continues to rotate, so that the described regular motion detection signal in the third period 20 is again generated by the sensor 3.
  • the collision cancellation routine comprises the further propulsion of the engine 1 by a predetermined collision cancellation distance.
  • this collision cancellation distance corresponds to a rotation of the winding shaft 5 by a predetermined rotation angle and in particular a predetermined rotation angle of 270 °.
  • Blockage of the movement of the closure element 2 in the downward direction 6 caused by jamming can be overcome by increasing the weight force of the closure element 2 acting in the downward direction 6a by further unwinding the closure element 2 from the winding roll 5. Specifically, this is a consequence of the already described damming and buckling of the closure element 2.
  • the drive device comprises a programmable nonvolatile memory 21, preferably an EEPROM, and the drive control 4 is configured to read out the predetermined collision cancellation distance from the programmable nonvolatile memory 21.
  • the programmable nonvolatile electronic memory 21 may, for example, be arranged on the same board 22 as the sensor 3.
  • the drive control 4 is set up to calculate a position of the closure element 2 based on the at least one drive detection signal and based on whether the closure element 2 is in at least one predetermined position range, for example, an upper short range 23 or lower proximity area 24 to perform a specific collision cancellation routine associated with the respective location area.
  • the upper near region 23 or “near region above” can be defined so that it corresponds to one revolution of the winding shaft through 360 ° starting from a completely wound closure element 2.
  • the closure element 2 is only slightly unwound and consequently the effective weight is only small. Therefore, even slight irregularities, for example in a guide rail of the closure element 2, are enough to cause a blockage here.
  • the drive control 4 is set up in such a way that even with a detected collision event, the motor 1 is in any case driven so far that the winding shaft 5 has made a 360 ° turn starting from a completely wound closure element 2.
  • the at least one predetermined position range comprises an upper close region 23, which is one revolution of the winding shaft 5 in the unwinding direction, starting from a completely wound up Closure element 2 corresponds to a predetermined upper Nahwinkel and the upper Nah Schemes 23 associated special upper collision cancellation routine propulsion of the engine 1 comprises such that the position of the closure element 2 after the special upper collision cancellation routine outside the upper Nah Schemes 23.
  • the collision cancellation route is possibly extended so far that, in any case, after propulsion about the collision cancellation routine, the upper near zone 23 is left, ie the closure element 2 of FIG Winding shaft 5 has been unwound at least by an amount which corresponds to the predetermined upper near angle. This ensures that a minimum weight force of the closure element 2 comes into play in the collision cancellation routine. Only then even if no event "obstacle lifted" is registered, an obstacle relief routine is performed which includes, for example, a reversing and thus a movement of the motor 1 against the advancing direction.
  • the lower near zone 24 or “near zone below” can in turn be defined such that it corresponds to one revolution of the winding shaft 5 by 270 ° starting from a completely unwound closure element 2.
  • the lower lamellae of the closure element 2 for example those of a roller shutter, must be frequently closed, since these tend to bend after some time. Consequently, the detection of a collision event by the drive control 4 is preferably suppressed as soon as the closure element 2 is in the position range of the lower vicinity 24.
  • the first collision cancellation path 25 represents a first example. It starts at a position of the shutter member 2 outside both the upper short range 23 and the lower short range 24, at which position a collision event has been detected, which corresponds to the event "obstacle detected".
  • a regular collision cancellation routine is carried out, which includes a propulsion of the motor 1 corresponding to one revolution of the winding shaft 5 by 270 ° with subsequent stopping.
  • the motor 1 is driven against the advancing direction and thus reversed.
  • the second exemplary collision cancellation path 26 begins with the detection of a collision event corresponding to the event "obstacle detected" at a position of the closure element 2, which corresponds to a rotation of the winding shaft 5 in the unwinding direction, starting from a completely wound closure element 2 of 15 °. Accordingly, this position is within the upper close range 23.
  • the specially executed collision cancellation routine includes one beyond Propulsion of the closure element 2 up to an end position corresponding to 360 °, ie to the end of the upper Nah Kirs 23. Consequently, the upper Nah Quarry 23 is always left upon detection of a collision event within the upper Nah Kunststoffs 23 by the collision cancellation routine.
  • the third exemplary collision cancellation route 27 begins with the collision event "obstacle detected" at a position corresponding to 330 ° starting from a completely wound closure element 2, ie still within the upper vicinity 23. Since the propulsion 270 ° through the general Kollisionshhebungsroutine an end position of the closure element of 600 ° starting from a fully constantly wound closure element 2 and thus sufficient to leave the upper Nah Kunststoffs 23, so despite the collision event "obstacle detected" within the upper Nah Schls 23, the general collision cancellation routine is executed.
  • the fourth exemplary collision cancellation route 28 begins with the collision event "obstacle detected" at a position of the closure element 2 corresponding to 300 ° starting from a completely unwound closure element 2, ie shortly before the lower proximity region 24.
  • the general collision cancellation routine is carried out, so that a propulsion of the closure element 2 takes place up to a position corresponding to 30 °, starting from a completely unwound closure element 2, that is to say within the lower proximity region 24, and subsequently the closure element 2 stops. Meanwhile, it is checked whether the event "obstacle detected" should be retained and an obstacle rescue routine should be performed.
  • the drive control 4 is set up to to decide against the execution of an obstacle relief routine, when during the collision cancellation routine, the sensor 3 detects a slosh movement of the closure element 2.
  • the slosh movement of the closure element 2 corresponds to a jerky movement of the closure element 2, in particular a jerky movement in the downward direction 6a, which is triggered by the pressure built up during the collision cancellation routine.
  • the closure element 2 retrieves that movement in a short time, in the execution of which it has been prevented by the jamming or other circumstances.
  • the closure element 2 spills before, wherein the previously formed bulge of any lamellar elements and their impoundment, as in particular Fig. 2 represented, is resolved.
  • the slosh movement to be recognized as such, satisfies at least one predetermined collision cancellation condition, which may be recognized, for example, from the drive or motion detection signal.
  • This collision cancellation condition preferably includes that the slosh movement comprises a movement about a slosh detection route. If the movement of the shutter 2 can be directly detected and the collision cancellation routine includes the further propulsion of the engine 1 by a predetermined collision elimination distance, the swerve detection distance may be based on, or even identical to, the collision elimination distance. If, however, directly the movement of the winding shaft 5 is detected and the output 8 is coupled to the winding shaft via the freewheel 10, the Schwapperkennungsumble can correspond to the passage of the freewheel in the rearward direction.
  • the collision cancellation routine may include that the sloshing movement is faster than a predetermined minimum sloshing speed.
  • the jerky back sloshing of the closure element 2 occurs, which is characterized in that it triggers a faster movement of the winding shaft 5 over a distance corresponding to the freewheel 10 than in other operation.
  • the speed of the sloshing movement can be checked by means of a drive or movement detection signal, as in US Pat Fig. 6b is illustrated by way of example.
  • the Fig. 6b shows a part of another drive detection signal generated by the sensor 3, here a motion detection signal, represented by the curves 16. These correspond to a substantially sinusoidal difference signal of the curves 15 of FIG Fig. 6 a underlying motion detection signal.
  • This difference signal has proven to be particularly suitable for detecting a slosh movement of the closure element 2.
  • the Indian Fig. 6b specially marked period 30 falls into the execution of a collision cancellation routine.
  • the curves 16 have a peak which clearly exceeds the maximum value of the curves 16 outside of the time segment 30. In this way, they show a particularly rapid movement of the winding shaft 5 through the passage of the freewheel 10 in the reverse direction and thus of the closure element 2 in accordance with a slosh movement.
  • the sensor 3 detects a rapid change in the path of the magnetic pulses.
  • the drive controller 4 detects in the time period 30 that a sloshing movement has taken place and there is no obstacle. Therefore, no obstacle relief routine is executed, but instead the event "obstacle lifted” noted and deleted any event "obstacle detected” deleted from the data memory.
  • the at least one drive state preferably comprises a drive variable based on the torque output by the engine 1, and the drive control is set up to switch off the engine 1 if the detected drive variable deviates from a predefined drive variable behavior during the collision-raising routine.
  • this drive quantity is the torque itself.
  • the engine 1 is an electric motor, it is expedient to detect the torque output by the engine 1. This serves on the one hand to avoid damage or destruction of the engine 1 due to overloading. On the other hand, it can also be prevented that too great a force is exerted on a possible obstacle 7 during the collision cancellation routine.
  • the collision cancellation routine may also be interrupted before propulsion has taken place around the complete collision cancellation route. This can be particularly important if, for some reason, the closure element 2 can not bulge and thus the force emitted by the engine 1 does not cause this bulge but rather acts fully on the obstacle by the closure element 2.
  • the engine 1 is switched off immediately in the event of a deviation.
  • a method for detecting obstacles when driving a darkening device or security device comprises driving a motor for propelling a closure element, preferably a roller shutter or the like, detecting at least one drive state of the closure element, generating at least one drive detection signal based on the at least one detected drive state, preferably based on the at least one detected drive state of the Closure element and the detection of a collision event based on the at least one drive detection signal during the driving.
  • the method is characterized in that it comprises, as further method steps, executing a collision cancellation routine when a collision event has been detected and deciding based on the at least one drive detection signal during the collision cancellation routine whether an obstacle rescue routine is to be executed.
  • Preferred embodiments of the method according to the invention emerge from the preferred embodiments of the drive device according to the invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Operating, Guiding And Securing Of Roll- Type Closing Members (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Dispositif d'entraînement pour un dispositif d'obscurcissement ou un dispositif de sécurité, comprenant un moteur (1) destiné à faire avancer un volet roulant,
    le dispositif d'entraînement comprenant un arbre d'enroulement (5) destiné à l'enroulement du volet roulant (2), et le moteur (1) étant un moteur tubulaire et comprenant un élément de sortie (8) qui est accouplé à l'arbre d'enroulement (5) par le biais d'un élément d'entraînement (9), l'élément d'entraînement (9) étant accouplé à l'élément de sortie (8) par le biais d'un mécanisme à roue libre (10),
    le dispositif d'entraînement comprenant un capteur (3) destiné à détecter au moins un état d'entraînement du volet roulant (2) et à générer au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement, et une commande d'entraînement (4) destinée à commander le moteur (1) et qui est conçue pour identifier un événement de collision en se basant sur l'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement pendant une avance du moteur (1) et est conçue pour exécuter une routine d'annulation de collision en cas d'identification d'un événement de collision, la routine d'annulation de collision comprenant la poursuite de l'avance du moteur (1) sur un segment d'annulation de collision prédéfini et
    la commande d'entraînement (4) étant conçue pour, en se basant sur l'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement, décider pendant la routine d'annulation de collision si une routine de libération d'obstacle est exécutée.
  2. Dispositif d'entraînement selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'identification d'un événement de collision inclut l'adoption d'un état d'identification de collision, la commande d'entraînement (4) étant conçue pour conserver l'état d'identification de collision dans le cas d'une décision d'exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle et étant conçue pour, dans le cas d'une décision de ne pas exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle, annuler l'état d'identification de collision.
  3. Dispositif d'entraînement selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le mécanisme à roue libre a un angle de roue libre de 20°.
  4. Dispositif d'entraînement selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que la commande d'entraînement (4) est conçue pour identifier un événement de collision lorsque le moteur (1) s'est déplacé au moins d'un segment d'identification de collision prédéfini, de préférence conformément au mouvement de l'élément de sortie (8) sur l'angle de roue libre, dans le sens de l'avance et le capteur (3), pendant ce temps, a détecté un modèle d'entraînement différent d'un modèle d'entraînement prédéfini du volet roulant (2), de préférence un modèle d'entraînement correspondant à un passage en dessous d'une vitesse minimale prédéfinie du volet roulant (2), notamment un modèle d'entraînement correspondant à une immobilisation du volet roulant (2).
  5. Dispositif d'entraînement selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que la poursuite de l'avance du moteur (1) sur un segment d'annulation de collision prédéfini correspond à une rotation de l'arbre d'enroulement (5) sur un angle de rotation prédéfini, notamment correspond à un angle de rotation prédéfini de 270°, de préférence en ce que le dispositif d'entraînement comprend une mémoire électronique programmable non volatile (21), de préférence une EEPROM, et le dispositif d'entraînement (4) est conçu pour lire le segment d'annulation de collision prédéfini depuis la mémoire électronique programmable non volatile (21).
  6. Dispositif d'entraînement selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que la commande d'entraînement (4) est conçue pour calculer une position du volet roulant (2) en se basant sur l'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement et, en se basant sur le fait que le volet roulant (2) se trouve ou non dans au moins une plage de positions (23, 24) prédéfinie du volet roulant (2), exécuter une routine d'annulation de collision spéciale associée à la plage de positions (23, 24) respective, de préférence en ce que l'au moins une plage de positions (23, 24) prédéfinie comprend une zone de proximité supérieure (23), laquelle correspond à une rotation de l'arbre d'enroulement (5) dans le sens du déroulement en partant d'un volet roulant (2) entièrement enroulé sur un angle de proximité supérieur prédéfini, de préférence à une rotation de l'arbre d'enroulement (5) sur un angle de proximité supérieur de 360°, et une routine d'annulation de collision supérieure spéciale associée à la zone de proximité supérieure (23) comprend une avance du moteur (1) de telle sorte que la position du volet roulant (2), après la routine d'annulation de collision supérieure spéciale, se trouve en dehors de la zone de proximité supérieure (23) .
  7. Dispositif d'entraînement selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que la commande d'entraînement (4) est conçue pour décider de ne pas exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle si, pendant la routine d'annulation de collision, le capteur (3) détecte un mouvement de ballotement du volet roulant (2), le mouvement de ballotement remplissant de préférence au moins une condition d'annulation de collision prédéfinie, l'au moins une condition d'annulation de collision comprenant notamment le fait que le mouvement de ballotement comprend un mouvement sur au moins un segment d'identification de ballotement et/ou que le mouvement de ballotement se déroule plus rapidement qu'une vitesse de ballotement minimale prédéfinie.
  8. Dispositif d'entraînement selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce que l'au moins un état d'entraînement comprend une grandeur d'entraînement basée sur le couple délivré par le moteur (1), de préférence le couple délivré par le moteur (1), et la commande d'entraînement (4) est conçue pour, en cas d'écart entre la grandeur d'entraînement détectée et un comportement de grandeur d'entraînement prédéfini pendant la routine d'annulation de collision, mettre le moteur (1) hors circuit, de préférence mettre le moteur (1) hors circuit immédiatement.
  9. Procédé d'identification d'obstacles lors de l'entraînement d'un dispositif d'obscurcissement ou d'un dispositif de sécurité qui comprend un dispositif d'entraînement avec un moteur destiné à faire avancer un volet roulant et avec un abre d'enroulement destiné à l'enroulement d'un volet roulant, le moteur étant un moteur tubulaire et comprenant un élément de sorite qui est accouplé à l'arbre d'enroulement par le biais d'un élément d'entraînement, l'élément d'entraînement étant accouplé à l'élément de sortie par le biais d'un mécanisme à roue libre, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes :
    entraînement du moteur destiné à faire avancer le volet roulant; détection d'au moins un état d'entraînement du volet roulant; génération d'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement en se basant sur l'au moins un état d'entraînement détecté du volet roulant; identification d'un événement de collision en se basant sur l'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement pendant l'entraînement ; et exécution d'une routine d'annulation de collision lorsqu'un événement de collision a été identifié, l'exécution de la routine d'annulation de collision comprenant la poursuite de l'entraînement du moteur sur un segment d'annulation de collision prédéfini et
    le procédé comprenant l'étape supplémentaire suivante : décision, en se basant sur l'au moins un signal de détection d'entraînement pendant la routine d'annulation de collision, de si une routine de libération d'obstacle doit être exécutée.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, caractérisé en ce que l'identification d'un événement de collision inclut l'adoption d'un état d'identification de collision, une décision d'exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle incluant la conservation de l'état d'identification de collision et une décision de ne pas exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle incluant l'annulation de l'état d'identification de collision.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 9 ou 10, caractérisé en ce qu'un événement de collision est identifié lorsque le moteur a été entraîné au moins d'un segment d'identification de collision prédéfini dans le sens de l'avance et, pendant ce temps, un modèle d'entraînement différent d'un modèle de mouvement prédéfini du volet roulant a été détecté, de préférence un modèle d'entraînement correspondant à un passage en dessous d'une vitesse minimale prédéfinie du volet roulant, notamment un modèle d'entraînement correspondant à une immobilisation du volet roulant, lequel est différent d'un modèle d'entraînement prédéfini du volet roulant.
  12. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 9 à 11, caractérisé en ce que l'exécution de la routine d'annulation de collision comprend la lecture du segment d'annulation de collision prédéfini depuis une mémoire électronique programmable non volatile, de préférence une EEPROM.
  13. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 9 à 12, caractérisé en ce que la décision est prise de ne pas exécuter la routine de libération d'obstacle si, pendant la routine d'annulation de collision, un mouvement de ballotement du volet roulant est détecté, ce mouvement de ballotement remplissant de préférence au moins une condition d'annulation de collision prédéfinie, l'au moins une condition d'annulation de collision comprenant notamment le fait que le mouvement de ballotement comprend un mouvement sur un segment qui correspond au moins à l'avance du moteur sur le segment d'annulation de collision et/ou que le mouvement de ballotement se déroule plus rapidement qu'une vitesse de ballotement minimale prédéfinie.
  14. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 9 à 13, caractérisé en ce que le procédé comprend les étapes supplémentaires suivantes :
    détection d'une grandeur d'entraînement qui se base sur le couple délivré par le moteur, de préférence le couple délivré par le moteur, et
    mise hors circuit du moteur en cas d'écart entre la grandeur d'entraînement détectée et un comportement de grandeur d'entraînement prédéfini pendant la routine d'annulation de collision, de préférence mise hors circuit immédiate du moteur en cas d'écart entre la grandeur d'entraînement détectée et un comportement de grandeur d'entraînement prédéfini pendant la routine d'annulation de collision.
EP13000171.2A 2012-02-28 2013-01-14 Détection d'obstacles intelligente Active EP2634358B2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012003697A DE102012003697A1 (de) 2012-02-28 2012-02-28 Intelligente Hinderniserkennung

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2634358A1 EP2634358A1 (fr) 2013-09-04
EP2634358B1 EP2634358B1 (fr) 2015-04-22
EP2634358B2 true EP2634358B2 (fr) 2019-01-02

Family

ID=47603206

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13000171.2A Active EP2634358B2 (fr) 2012-02-28 2013-01-14 Détection d'obstacles intelligente

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2634358B2 (fr)
DE (1) DE102012003697A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103774973B (zh) * 2014-01-13 2016-01-13 山东大学 一种百叶窗帘智能控制系统及控制方法
CN106703665A (zh) * 2016-12-29 2017-05-24 江西师范大学 一种纱窗用遮雨卷帘
CN113339856A (zh) * 2021-05-08 2021-09-03 广东纯米电器科技有限公司 挡烟板的开合控制方法、装置、设备和介质

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0716214A2 (fr) † 1994-11-14 1996-06-12 Elero Antriebs- und Sonnenschutztechnik GmbH Procédé et dispositif pour contrÔler l'arrêt d'un volet roulant ou similaire entraîné par un moteur électrique
EP0784146A1 (fr) † 1996-01-12 1997-07-16 Somfy Installation de fermeture ou de protection solaire motorisée
FR2854192A1 (fr) † 2003-04-25 2004-10-29 Chamberlain Group Inc Procede pour faire fonctionner un moteur utilise pour deplacer une barriere mobile et appareil pour la commande de ce moteur
FR2900959A1 (fr) † 2006-05-11 2007-11-16 Fp2X Groupement D Interet Econ Dispositif et procede de commande d'un store ou d'un volet roulant

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1485566A1 (fr) * 2002-03-19 2004-12-15 Hörmann Kg Dissen Systeme de fermeture roulant muni d'un dispositif de detection et procede de controle approprie
DE202009014365U1 (de) 2009-10-23 2011-03-03 Arca Beteiligungen Gmbh Rohrmotor für eine Verdunkelungsvorrichtung o.dgl.
DE202010003095U1 (de) 2010-03-02 2011-11-16 Arca Beteiligungen Gmbh Rohrmotoranordnung für eine Verdunkelungsvorrichtung
DE202010003272U1 (de) * 2010-03-05 2011-10-19 Arca Beteiligungen Gmbh Steuergerät

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0716214A2 (fr) † 1994-11-14 1996-06-12 Elero Antriebs- und Sonnenschutztechnik GmbH Procédé et dispositif pour contrÔler l'arrêt d'un volet roulant ou similaire entraîné par un moteur électrique
EP0784146A1 (fr) † 1996-01-12 1997-07-16 Somfy Installation de fermeture ou de protection solaire motorisée
FR2854192A1 (fr) † 2003-04-25 2004-10-29 Chamberlain Group Inc Procede pour faire fonctionner un moteur utilise pour deplacer une barriere mobile et appareil pour la commande de ce moteur
FR2900959A1 (fr) † 2006-05-11 2007-11-16 Fp2X Groupement D Interet Econ Dispositif et procede de commande d'un store ou d'un volet roulant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102012003697A1 (de) 2013-08-29
EP2634358B1 (fr) 2015-04-22
EP2634358A1 (fr) 2013-09-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1075723B1 (fr) Dispositif de fermeture avec fonction de securite
EP2753485B1 (fr) Système de commande
EP0770757B2 (fr) Méthode pour actionner des vélums ou des choses pareilles par moteur électrique
EP2586959B2 (fr) Dispositif de sécurisation, dispositif de fermeture et unité d'évaluation
WO2005086312A1 (fr) Procede pour surveiller le mouvement de deplacement d'un composant entraine par un dispositif d'entrainement
DE102016101487B4 (de) Fahrzeug-Fensteröffnungsvorrichtung
DE102013106204A1 (de) Steuervorrichtung für ein Öffnungs- und Schließelement und Verfahren zum Steuern des Öffnungs- und Schließelements
DE602004009504T2 (de) Verfahren zur Initialisierung eines motorisierten Rolladens
EP2634358B2 (fr) Détection d'obstacles intelligente
DE102017128542A1 (de) Verfahren zum Erkennen einer Endposition eines Stellantriebs
EP2558669B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un dispositif de fermeture et dispositif de fermeture
EP3660251B1 (fr) Dispositif de protection, en particulier portail industriel
EP3044397B1 (fr) Procédé pour commander un actionneur électrique d'une porte ou vantail de porte et dispositif de commande de porte
EP2058178B1 (fr) Entraînement pour un élément mobile dans un véhicule, comme une caméra déplaçable
DE19700828B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb einer automatischen Türanlage
DE102010049978A1 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung von Bewegungen an einem Rolltor sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
WO2008071538A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour suivre la position d'un élément entraîné par un moteur électrique
EP3405636B1 (fr) Système d'entraînement de porte, porte basculante et procédé permettant de les faire fonctionner
EP1149451B1 (fr) Procede et commande pour commander un dispositif d'entrainement destine a une installation de fermeture d'un batiment ou d'une enceinte
EP4013933B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de la position d'une porte dans un système de porte
EP1359284B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande d'un volet roulant
DE19958308C2 (de) Verfahren und Steuerung zum Steuern einer Antriebsvorrichtung für eine Abschlusseinrichtung eines Gebäudes oder einer Einfriedung
DE102015226108A1 (de) Einklemmschutzverfahren zur Durchführung bei einer motorischen Stellvorrichtung für ein verstellbares Fahrzeugteil sowie zugehörige Stellvorrichtung
WO2003078784A1 (fr) Systeme de fermeture roulant muni d'un dispositif de detection et procede de controle approprie
DE102013004098A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Steuerung elektromotorischer Antriebe für auf- und abwickelbare Stoffbehänge, Rollladen, Rolltore od. dgl.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140304

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20141203

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 723347

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20150422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150824

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150722

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150822

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150723

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SOMFY SAS

Effective date: 20160119

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160131

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: SOMFY SAS

Effective date: 20160119

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160131

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: SOMFY SAS

Effective date: 20160119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130114

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20190102

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 723347

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RADEMACHER GERAETE-ELEKTRONIK GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ARCA BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH, 46414 RHEDE, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: DELTA DORE RADEMACHER GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ARCA BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH, 46414 RHEDE, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RADEMACHER GERAETE-ELEKTRONIK GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RADEMACHER GERAETE-ELEKTRONLK GMBH, 46414 RHEDE, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: DELTA DORE RADEMACHER GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RADEMACHER GERAETE-ELEKTRONLK GMBH, 46414 RHEDE, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013000561

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: DELTA DORE RADEMACHER GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RADEMACHER GERAETE-ELEKTRONIK GMBH, 46414 RHEDE, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240129

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240124

Year of fee payment: 12