EP2622800B1 - Vorrichtung und verfahren zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken - Google Patents

Vorrichtung und verfahren zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2622800B1
EP2622800B1 EP11764326.2A EP11764326A EP2622800B1 EP 2622800 B1 EP2622800 B1 EP 2622800B1 EP 11764326 A EP11764326 A EP 11764326A EP 2622800 B1 EP2622800 B1 EP 2622800B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data packet
node
nodes
distance
hop
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11764326.2A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2622800B2 (de
EP2622800A1 (de
Inventor
Javier Espina Perez
Daniel Martin Goergen
Tim Corneel Wilhelmus Schenk
Oscar Garcia Morchon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Signify Holding BV
Original Assignee
Philips Lighting Holding BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=43064852&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2622800(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Philips Lighting Holding BV filed Critical Philips Lighting Holding BV
Priority to EP11764326.2A priority Critical patent/EP2622800B2/de
Priority to PL11764326T priority patent/PL2622800T5/pl
Publication of EP2622800A1 publication Critical patent/EP2622800A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2622800B1 publication Critical patent/EP2622800B1/de
Publication of EP2622800B2 publication Critical patent/EP2622800B2/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/021—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control in wireless networks with changing topologies, e.g. ad-hoc networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00—Communication routing or communication path finding
    • H04W40/02—Communication route or path selection, e.g. power-based or shortest path routing
    • H04W40/20—Communication route or path selection, e.g. power-based or shortest path routing based on geographic position or location
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1867—Arrangements specially adapted for the transmitter end
    • H04L1/188—Time-out mechanisms
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1867—Arrangements specially adapted for the transmitter end
    • H04L1/1887—Scheduling and prioritising arrangements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/28—Flow control; Congestion control in relation to timing considerations
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/04—Protocols specially adapted for terminals or networks with limited capabilities; specially adapted for terminal portability
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/12—Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks
    • H04L67/125—Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks involving control of end-device applications over a network
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/0226—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control based on location or mobility
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W8/00—Network data management
    • H04W8/02—Processing of mobility data, e.g. registration information at HLR [Home Location Register] or VLR [Visitor Location Register]; Transfer of mobility data, e.g. between HLR, VLR or external networks
    • H04W8/04—Registration at HLR or HSS [Home Subscriber Server]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L2001/0092—Error control systems characterised by the topology of the transmission link
    • H04L2001/0097—Relays

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a device, a system and a method for controlling data packet transmissions in a wireless network.
  • wireless mesh networks attract more and more attention, e.g. for remote control of illumination systems, building automation, monitoring applications, sensor systems and medical applications.
  • a remote management of outdoor luminaires so-called telemanagement
  • this is driven by environmental concerns, since remote control systems or so-called telemanagement systems enable the use of different dimming patterns, for instance as a function of time, weather conditions and season, allowing a more energy-efficient use of the outdoor lighting system.
  • this is also driven by economical reasons, since the increased energy efficiency also reduces operational costs.
  • the system can remotely monitor power usage and detect lamp failures, which allows for determining the best time for repairing luminaires or replacing lamps.
  • RF radio-frequency
  • a data collector In a star network, a data collector has a direct communication path to every node in the network. However, this typically requires a high-power/high-sensitivity base-station-like controller placed at a high location (e.g. on top of a building), which makes the solution cumbersome to deploy and expensive.
  • a mesh network the plurality of nodes does in general not communicate directly with the controller, but via so-called multi-hop communications. In a multi-hop communication, a data packet is transmitted from a sender node to a destination node via one or more intermediate nodes.
  • Nodes act as routers to transmit data packets from neighboring nodes to nodes that are too far away to reach in a single hop, resulting in a network that can span larger distances. By breaking long distances in a series of shorter hops, signal strength is sustained. Consequently, routing is performed by all nodes of a mesh network, deciding to which neighboring node the data packet is to be sent. Hence, a mesh network is a very robust and stable network with high connectivity and thus high redundancy and reliability.
  • mesh network transmission techniques can be divided in two groups: flooding-based and routing-based mesh networks.
  • a flooding-based mesh network all data packets are forwarded by all nodes in the network. Therefore, a node does not have to make complicated routing decisions, but just broadcasts the data packet.
  • the technique is quite robust.
  • Routing-based mesh networks can be further divided into proactive and reactive schemes.
  • proactive routing-based mesh networks all needed network paths are stored in routing tables in each node. The routing tables are kept up to date, e.g.
  • the number of hops a data packet has to travel is large as compared to a hop distance in small networks.
  • 20-40 hops are likely to occur.
  • the delivery chance of an individual data packet decreases with its hop distance, since with every hop, there is a chance that the data packet gets lost.
  • a big disadvantage in common wireless mesh networks is constituted by the very limited network scalability. This is due to the fact that every data packet or message is transmitted multiple times due to the forwarding, whereby the overall network throughput is reduced. Also, data packet collisions are more likely to occur causing data packet losses, further reducing the overall performance.
  • improving the success and reliability of multi-hop end-to-end transmissions is particularly crucial in large-scale multi-hop networks, such as street illumination systems with a high number of luminaire nodes, since end-to-end retransmissions are far more resource/bandwidth costly and delay intensive than in typical smaller networks.
  • acknowledgement mode In order to determine whether a data packet is successfully delivered or got lost, data packet transmissions are commonly performed in acknowledgement mode.
  • a hop-by-hop acknowledgement mode every hop of the multi-hop transmission is confirmed by the receiving node to the preceding transmitting node.
  • this leads to high network load.
  • end-to-end acknowledgements are used, wherein the final destination node confirms the receipt of the data packet to the initial sender node.
  • the sender node waits for a predetermined time, so-called acknowledgement time-out, before retransmitting the data packet for which it was expecting the acknowledgement.
  • the acknowledgement time-out is fixed and common to all nodes of the network.
  • WO 2009071692 A1 describes a method for characterizing a communication link by considering transmission characteristics of both a MAC layer and a network layer.
  • EP 1 300 990 B1 describes a method involving transmitting data from a first station via at least a second station to at least one further station. At the interfaces between the stations various data processing requirements are used. The data processing requirements are determined depending on a geographic distance to a defined origin, in particular to a first transmission point. Data processing requirements become less stringent with increasing distance.
  • KR 2009 0056070 A discloses a method of selecting a relay node by using a competition window in a vehicle ad-hoc network.
  • a source node calculates a competition window including all nodes within transmission range.
  • Each node within the competition window has a message transmission waiting time that is inverse proportional to its distance from the source node.
  • a node whose message transmission waiting time is expired first is selected as a relay node.
  • US 6,721,537 B1 describes a method for broadcasting a message in an incomplete radio communication network having a fluctuating number of subscribers for forwarding the message.
  • Each subscriber has a transmitting and receiving device for messages and a positioning system for determining its global position. After receiving the message the subscribers determine their own position and the distance from the sender of the message, who is also a subscriber, and transmit the message, with their own position, to further subscribers after a predetermined waiting period, which decreases monotonically as the distance increases.
  • EP 1 940 089 A1 describes a data transmission method for controlling an arrival delay.
  • a node calculates a cumulative delay of a received packet by using an arrival delay of the packet and a cumulative delay cumulated up to the previous hop. The node then compares the cumulative delay with a target cumulative delay, thereby controlling a transmission profile for the packet so that an expected cumulative delay at the next node becomes closer to a target value. The node writes the cumulative delay in a header of the packet and transmits the packet to the next node using the set transmission profile.
  • EP 1 764 964 A2 describes a technology that uses a visibility function within a network environment, in particular a vehicular ad-hoc network including a set of nodes. At least one of the nodes can directly transmit to one or more of a subset of the set of nodes.
  • the visibility function characterizes a non-uniform resolution profile within the network environment that extends over at least one node outside the subset of nodes.
  • the sent situation information is conditioned to propagate through the network environment according to the visibility function.
  • the node can also receive situation information that includes a visibility parameter. Once the situation information is received, the node can evaluate the visibility parameter to determine whether the situation information is eligible for continued propagation through the network environment. If the situation information is eligible for continued propagation the node then transmits the situation information.
  • KR 100 832 519 B1 describes a lighting control system using a wireless tag provided to control a lighting group according to a user position by sensing a lighting control signal of the wireless tag through a second wireless switch and transmitting the signal from the second wireless switch to a first wireless switch through an ad-hoc network.
  • WO 00/79721 A2 discloses a system for adjusting a time-out for message retransmission, wherein a round-trip communications delay between two devices that communicate with one another over a communications network is repeatedly measured. More specifically, the retransmission time-out is adjusted based upon at least one of the round-trip communications delays that are repeatedly measured. A message that is not acknowledged during the adjustable retransmission time-out is retransmitted.
  • the present invention is based on the idea to adjust a probability that a data packet has to be retransmitted based on a distance the data packet has already traveled. By these means, it is possible to minimize the probability that a data packet having already traveled for a large number of hops has to be retransmitted, which would further increase its high delay. Thereby, the total communication delay for long routes can be decreased.
  • a device for a node of a wireless network for controlling a data packet transmission, when the node operates as an intermediate node in a multi-hop data packet transmission.
  • the control unit of the device can adjust transmission parameters for forwarding a received data packet based on a distance that the data packet has already traveled from a sender node. This increases the probability for a long-traveled data packet to survive the final hops before arriving at its destination node.
  • the transmission parameters include at least one of a maximum number of retransmissions at a lower protocol layer, a maximum number of medium access attempts, a transmit power level, a delay time for retransmission and a back-off time for medium access attempts.
  • medium access attempt relates to the process of carrier sensing and the subsequent transmitting or retransmitting of a data packet, when the medium is free.
  • the back-off time for medium access attempts denotes the time interval between subsequent medium access attempts.
  • the delay time for retransmission refers to the time between subsequent retransmissions.
  • the transmit power level is related to the signal strength of the transmitted data packet.
  • two sets of transmission parameters are predefined, one relating to standard transmission parameters, the other to preferential transmission parameters for accelerated processing or forwarding of the data packet.
  • the transmission parameters may be set to the preferential transmission parameters, it is determined that the distance traveled by the data packet exceeds a certain threshold.
  • the transmission parameters may be a function of the travel distance of the data packet, so that they are continuously adjusted.
  • a type of the data packet may be considered. For this, the network node or the device may be able to determine the type of the data packet, e.g. whether it is a time-critical or time-uncritical data packet or which priority rank the data packet has.
  • data packets reported by the luminaire nodes may have different priorities such as statistical or power status data with low priority as against alarm messages or traffic accident reports with high priority.
  • the transmission parameters are adjusted such that a transmission probability of long-traveled data packets during the last hops is increased.
  • long-traveled data packets will be prioritized on the expense of short-traveled data packets, resulting in a reduced end-to-end-delay for data packet transmissions between distant nodes and in an inherent homogenization of the end-to-end delay in the network.
  • this will have the advantage of synchronized luminaire behavior, e.g. in response to a broadcast dimming command.
  • the device may be adapted to be added or coupled to an existing node or a control center of the wireless network.
  • the device is associated with a network node, which may also be a data collector node.
  • the data collector node may be any node that is configured to communicate with a control center of the network and may function as a kind of gateway.
  • the device may be adapted to be inserted in an existing circuit board or to be connected to an existing controller of the node. This is in particular useful for improving or upgrading an existing system such as a street lighting system.
  • the device may further comprise a memory and/or a transceiving unit for receiving and transmitting data packets.
  • the wireless network may have mesh topology, wherein each node may act as a router. Such a network has increased redundancy and reliability.
  • the transmission of a data packet from a sender node to a destination node may be performed in a multi-hop mode via at least one intermediate node.
  • the nodes of the wireless network are stationary, as it is mainly the case for large outdoor lighting systems.
  • the positions of at least some nodes may be known to at least some of the other nodes of the network and/or to a control center of the network.
  • at least some of the nodes may store a routing table for data packet transmission from the respective node to a closest data collector node.
  • a routing protocol for data packet transmission to the closest data collector node is based on many-to-one routing.
  • a data packet is transmitted to the neighboring node that is closer to one of the data collector nodes.
  • the distance between two nodes is defined by a hop distance, a GPS-based distance and/or an Euclidean distance.
  • the hop distance between two nodes may be characterized by the hop count, i.e. the number of hops required for transmitting a data packet between the two nodes, or by the number of intermediate nodes forwarding the data packet to the final destination node.
  • a Euclidean distance refers to the spatial distance between the two nodes, whereas a GPS-based distance may be derived from the GPS positions of the sender node, the destination node and/or the intermediate node.
  • the traveled distance may be determined as the distance between the GPS positions of the sender node and the intermediate node.
  • the traveled distance can be determined using a distance to be traveled, i.e. the distance between sender node and destination node, and the distance between the intermediate node and the destination node, determined from the respective GPS positions of the intermediate node and the destination node.
  • the metric of the distance may be chosen according to a routing protocol applied in the network. If the routing protocol uses a hop count metric, it will be easy to determine the hop distance between two nodes.
  • the network addresses of the nodes are related to their geographic or GPS position, it will be advantageous to use a GPS-based or Euclidian distance to define the distance between the sender node and the intermediate node.
  • the communication functions of the control unit can be sub-divided into different layers.
  • a higher protocol layer of the control unit e.g. a network layer, transport layer or application layer, may be adapted to consider information available in an underlying lower protocol layer, or the other way around.
  • the network layer may use parameters determined by the medium access control (MAC) layer.
  • MAC medium access control
  • the distance information may be obtained from a routing table, a hop-counter, a time-to-live counter, a local clock signal, a GPS location and/or a network address of the sender node and/or of the destination node.
  • the routing table or the local clock signal may be stored in the device, whereas the hop-counter, the time-to-live counter and/or information about the sender node may be included in a data packet.
  • the time-to-live counter of a data packet relates to a counter with an initial value relating to a maximum allowed travel time of the data packet. The time-to-live counter is decreased with every hop. When its value is zero, the data packet is dropped.
  • an intermediate node may determine the distance based on information included in the data packet or stored locally in the node, in order to adjust transmission parameters for a data packet to be forwarded.
  • a hop count or a time-to-live count may also be stored in the intermediate node for a plurality of sender nodes.
  • Another possibility to determine the distance information is using a difference between an initial time-to-live count and a final time-to-live count. Possibly, the initial time-to-live count is known or equal for all nodes of the system.
  • the distance information may be derived from techniques for building-up routing tables for the wireless network.
  • the hop count can be the hop count of the data packet received from the sender node, the average of the last n data packets received from the sender node, the maximum hop count over the last n data packets received from the sender node, a moving average of hop counts of the data packets received from the sender node over time, or the like.
  • the transmission parameters may be adjusted based on a type of the data packet to be sent, e.g. whether it is a time-critical or a time-uncritical data packet or what priority rank the data packet has.
  • the control unit of the device may further be able to determine the type of the data packet.
  • Data packet transmission may be performed by wireless radio-frequency transmissions. Since radio-frequency transmissions do not require high transmission power and are easy to implement and deploy, costs for setting up and operating a network using the device can be reduced. This is especially important for large networks, e.g. a telemanagement network for lighting systems. However, data packet transmission may alternatively use infrared communication, free-space-visible-light communication or powerline communication.
  • the device is used in luminaire nodes of a lighting system for telemanagement of luminaire nodes.
  • the luminaire nodes can be easily switched on/off and/or the diming pattern of the luminaire nodes can be controlled based on parameters, such as daytime, season, weather, ambience brightness, occurrence of traffic accidents, presence of road works, etc. Possibly, at least some of these parameters are determined by sensors provided with the luminaire nodes and reported to a control center.
  • a device for a node of a wireless network for controlling data packet transmission, when the node operates as a sender node.
  • the device comprises a control unit that can adjust an answer time-out based on a distance between the sender node and the destination node.
  • the answer time-out refers to a waiting time, during which a sender node waits for an answer from a destination node B. If the answer time-out has passed and the sender node has received no answer data packet, the sender node will retransmit the data packet, to which the sender node expects to receive the answer.
  • This answer data packet may include an acknowledgement, data or both.
  • the answer time-out is called acknowledgement time-out defining a time interval, during which a sender node waits for an acknowledgement indicating successful data packet transmission.
  • the acknowledgement time-out has passed without the sender node having received an acknowledgement, the sender node will start retransmission of the data packet.
  • the delay of detecting a failed transmission is reduced, thus decreasing the end-to-end delay of a successful transmission due to retransmissions close to the minimum possible value.
  • this will further decrease the delay of control commands, so that luminaire nodes will react faster, e.g. to dimming or switching commands.
  • a system for controlling data packet transmission in a wireless network.
  • the system comprises a control center and a plurality of nodes. At least one of the control center and the nodes comprises the device according to one of the above-described embodiments.
  • the control center is adapted to control the function or operation of the nodes in the wireless network. For instance, when the nodes are associated with the luminaires of a lighting system, e.g. a street lighting system, the control center may control the nodes individually and/or in groups based on their spatial distribution with respect to their dimming pattern and operation state.
  • at least one of the nodes comprises a memory and/or a sensor. If the node comprises a sensor, the node may be adapted to transmit the sensor data to the control center.
  • a method for controlling data packet transmission in a wireless mesh network having a plurality of nodes.
  • a data packet is received by an intermediate node from a sender node.
  • the transmission parameters for the data packet are adjusted based on a distance between the sender node and the intermediate node and the data packet is processed according to these transmission parameters.
  • this method is applied in a telemanagement system for lighting systems.
  • Preferred applications of the present invention are outdoor lighting systems (e.g. for streets, parking and public areas), indoor lighting systems for general area lighting (e.g. for malls, arenas, parking, stations, tunnels etc.) or sensor networks.
  • outdoor lighting systems e.g. for streets, parking and public areas
  • indoor lighting systems for general area lighting e.g. for malls, arenas, parking, stations, tunnels etc.
  • sensor networks e.g. for sensor networks.
  • the present invention will be explained further using the example of an outdoor lighting system for street illumination.
  • the telemanagement of outdoor luminaires via radio-frequency network technologies is receiving increasing interest, in particular solutions with applicability for large-scale installations with segments of say above 200 luminaires.
  • a typical network with mesh topology is shown.
  • a plurality of nodes 10 (N) is connected to each other by wireless communication paths 40.
  • Some of the nodes 10 function as data collector nodes 50 (N/DC), which receive data packets from the surrounding nodes 10 via single-hop or multi-hop transmissions and transmit them to a control center 60 and vice versa.
  • the data collector nodes 50 may operate in the manner of gateways between the nodes 10 and the control center 60.
  • the wireless communication path 40 between the nodes 10 and data collector nodes 50 may be constituted by radio frequency transmissions, while the connection 70 between the data collector nodes 50 and the control center 60 may make use of the Internet, mobile communication networks, radio systems, ethernet, DSL, cable or other wired or wireless data transmission systems.
  • communication is very asymmetric.
  • Most of the traffic is generated by the nodes 10, e.g. reporting their state, sensor values or power usage to the control center 60.
  • the other traffic consists of control commands from the control center 60 to the different nodes 10, e.g. for adjusting a dimming pattern or switching on/off lamps. Therefore, most traffic is constituted by N-to-1 traffic (unicasts), whereas the traffic from the control center 60 to the nodes 10 consists of 1-to-N traffic, either in unicast, multicast or broadcast mode.
  • the number of luminaire nodes 10 is extremely high in an outdoor lighting system such as a street lighting system.
  • the size of the network is very large, especially when compared to common wireless mesh networks , which typically contain less than 200 nodes.
  • the nodes 10 have limited processing capabilities due to cost considerations, so that processing and memory resources in the luminaire nodes 10 will be limited.
  • communication protocols for transmitting data packets between single nodes 10 should consider the limited resources for efficient and fast data packet transmission.
  • the telemanagement system for an outdoor lighting control network is stationary, i.e. the nodes 10 do not move.
  • all luminaire nodes 10 may be connected to mains power. Consequently, network changes will be mainly due to a changing environment, e.g. due to traffic.
  • nodes 10 are stationary, the physical positions of the nodes 10, for instance GPS coordinates, may be known in the system, enabling geographic or position-based routing. Furthermore, telemanagement of an outdoor lighting system does not require a high data rate. However, there are some scenarios, where a low response time is needed for a certain type of messages or data packets. For instance, when a traffic accident is detected, nodes 10 of the corresponding area can be controlled as to immediately switch to full power.
  • the data packet transmission from a data collector node 50 to the respective luminaire nodes 10 can be performed by flooding, wherein all data packets are forwarded by all receiving nodes 10 in the network.
  • the data packet contains at least information about the sender node 10 and one or more destination nodes 10.
  • the data packet is then decoded by the at least one destination node 10.
  • a routing-based solution is preferred, wherein every node 10 selects as intermediate node 10 a neighboring node 10 that is closer to one of the data collector nodes 50.
  • a proactive routing structure is used, since the routes to the data collector nodes 50 are regularly used.
  • a routing table is stored in every node 10, indicating which neighboring node 10 is closer to one of the data collector nodes 50.
  • data packets can be sent to the closest data collector node 50 in a very efficient and fast way.
  • each node 10 keeps information about multiple downlink neighboring nodes 10 as alternative routes in order to increase reliability. If one neighboring node 10 is not reachable due to strong interference or complete failure, then the routing protocol has additional alternatives to route the data packet to the data collector node 50.
  • a data collector node 50 surrounded by a plurality of nodes 10 is shown, illustrating multi-hop unicast data transmission from a sender node A to the data collector node 50 (destination node B) via a plurality of intermediate nodes N1...Ni.
  • the nodes 10 have different hop distances to the data collector node 50 as indicated by radius 501 and 502. For instance, a node A within radius 501, but outside radius 502 will need two hops h1 and h2 for transmitting data packets to the data collector node 50 being the destination node B, i.e. a data packet has to be transmitted from this node A to the data collector node 50 via an intermediate node N1.
  • a node 10 within radius 502 can transmit its data packets directly in one hop to the data collector node 50.
  • the destination node B can be any node 10 and is not necessarily a data collector node 50.
  • a hop distance can be defined for every pair of a sender node A and a destination node B.
  • a parameter for characterizing the hop distance is the hop count, i.e. the number of hops required to transmit the data packet from the sender node A to the destination node B.
  • a Euclidean distance d between the sender node A and the destination node B is illustrated. Between any two nodes 10, the Euclidean distance is defined as the geometric distance between two points. If the network addresses of the nodes 10 are based on GPS positions of the respective nodes 10, also a GPS-based distance may be used. The distance between two nodes 10 is then defined as the distance between their GPS positions. In particular, when the nodes 10 of the network are equally distributed over the network area, a Euclidean or GPS-based distance between two nodes can be characteristic for the number of hops performed on average when transmitting a data packet between two nodes and thus also for the transmission time. Alternatively, the distance can refer to the actual distance traveled by the data packet.
  • a distance measured along streets can be used, rather than a Euclidian distance, since data packets will likely travel along these paths.
  • This is illustrated in fig. 2C , showing street luminaire nodes 10 arranged along streets.
  • the distance between two luminaire nodes 10 can also refer to a street distance, which is defined as the spatial distance or the hop distance along streets of a road system.
  • a device 100 according to the present invention is shown.
  • the device 100 can be associated with a node 10 or data collector node 50 of a wireless multi-hop mesh network, e.g. to luminaires of a lighting system.
  • the device 100 comprises a control unit 200.
  • either the node 10 or 50 or the device 100 comprises a transceiving unit 300 for transmitting or receiving data packets via wireless communication paths 40, e.g. via radio-frequency transmission.
  • the control unit 200 of the device 100 may be sub-divided into different layers according to its functions in data packet transmission. For instance, when using an OSI-layer model, the control unit 200 will comprise a physical layer for defining the interaction of the device 100 with a transmission medium, a MAC layer providing addressing and channel access control mechanisms in a multi-node network, a network layer providing a plurality of functions and procedures, e.g. network routing functions, a transport layer providing reliable data transfer services to higher protocol layers using e.g. flow control, segmentation/desegmentation or error control and an application layer for identifying communication partners, determining resource availability or synchronizing communication.
  • any node 10 may act as an intermediate Ni forwarding a received data packet to the next intermediate node Ni or to the final destination node B.
  • the data packet When a long-traveled data packet is dropped at an intermediate node Ni, the data packet will have to be retransmitted by its sender node A (end-to-end retransmission), which at least doubles the accumulated end-to-end delay and the spending of network resources, i.e. system bandwidth. Therefore, according to one embodiment of the present invention, it is suggested that transmission parameters for processing a data packet to be forwarded are adjusted in an intermediate node Ni based on a traveled distance of the data packet.
  • a flow diagram is shown, illustrating the adjustment of transmission parameters for a data packet to be forwarded.
  • a data packet is received at the intermediate node Ni, either from the sender node A or from another intermediate node Ni.
  • the distance between the receiving intermediate node Ni and the sender node A is determined (S41). Based on this distance, the transmission parameters for the data packet are adjusted (S42) and the data packet is processed using these transmission parameters (S43). This may for instance influence an order of a data packet queue, a priority rank parameter, etc., so that a long-traveled data packet may be processed faster.
  • the data packet is forwarded to the next node 10 (S44) using the determined transmission parameters.
  • the transmission parameters can refer to MAC parameters, e.g. a maximum number of MAC-layer retransmissions, a maximum number of channel access attempts, a transmit power level, a delay time for retransmission or a back-off time interval for channel access, or a combination thereof.
  • the maximum number of MAC-layer retransmissions determines how often the MAC layer is allowed to retry the transmission of a data packet.
  • the maximum number of channel access attempts relates to the maximum allowed number of times that a MAC layer is allowed to perform carrier sensing in order to get channel access for transmitting a data packet.
  • the transmit power level refers to the transmission energy used for the data packet to be forwarded and is thus strongly related to the signal strength of the data packet.
  • the delay time for retransmission denotes a delay between subsequent transmission attempts of a data packet and the back-off time interval for channel access refers to a time interval between two subsequent channel access attempts.
  • the transmission parameters can be adjusted such, that a probability for a long-traveled data packet to successfully pass the final hops to its destination is increased. For instance, the maximum number of MAC layer retransmissions or the maximum number of channel access attempts or the transmit power level can be increased or the delay time for retransmission or the back-off time interval for channel access can be reduced. Of course, also a combination of these adjustments can be chosen.
  • the intermediate node Ni can determine the distance traveled by the data packet based on local information stored in the intermediate node or on information included in the data packet.
  • the distance between two nodes can be defined using a metric, such as a hop distance, a GPS-based distance or a Euclidean distance.
  • the distance information can be derived therefrom.
  • the distance can be derived based on a hop distance between the sender node A and the intermediate node Ni.
  • the hop distance is characterized by the number of hops (hop count) a data packet has traveled from the sender node A.
  • the hop distance information is already available at a network layer, e.g. when using routing tables with hop count metric. In this case, sender nodes A together with the respective distances from the intermediate node Ni are stored in the intermediate node Ni.
  • the distance information can also be explicitly generated, e.g. by the network layer, using a hop counter or a time-to-live counter included in a data packet.
  • the hop counter included in the data packet is increased every hop during the multi-hop transmission from the sender node A to the destination node B.
  • the intermediate node Ni may then derive the hop distance information from the hop counter, i.e. a hop count.
  • the hop count can also relate to the mean or average hop count over the last n data packets received from the sender node A.
  • the hop count may be chosen as the maximum hop count of the last n data packets received from sender node A or as a sliding-window-average of hop counts of the last n data packets over time.
  • the hop count information can be stored at the network layer for determining the hop distance for this sender node A.
  • a time-to-live counter can be used.
  • the time-to-live counter (TTL) is a header field with an initial value that is greater than the maximum required number of hops.
  • TTL time-to-live counter
  • the time-to-live counter is decreased. Data packets with a current time-to-live counter of zero will be dropped in order to avoid infinite forwarding of undeliverable data packets.
  • a hop count can be derived from the difference between an initial time-to-live count before the first hop and a final time-to-live count when receiving the data packet.
  • the intermediate node Ni either knows the initial value of the time-to-live counter or the initial time-to-live count is embedded in the data packet.
  • a local clock signal of the intermediate node may be used as a reference to be compared with a start time or transmission time stamp, which indicates the start of the transmission at the sender node A.
  • a travel time can be derived and thus, when using an average transmission speed, also the distance traveled by the data packet.
  • distance information and in particular, hop count information can also be generated by the use of other techniques for building-up routing tables, e.g. by regularly sending beacon messages.
  • an intermediate node Ni can identify a distance traveled by a data packet, e.g. on the basis of a hop counter or of a sender address included in the data packet.
  • Long-traveled data packets exhibit high hop count values or a large difference between the GPS positions of the sender node A (e.g. indicated in the sender address field) and of the intermediate node Ni (at least known locally to the intermediate node Ni).
  • the distance to be traveled i.e. the distance between the sender node A and the destination node B, may be included in the data packet.
  • the distance traveled can be calculated as the distance between the sender node A and the destination node B minus the distance between the intermediate node Ni and the destination node B.
  • the end-to-end delay can be decreased close to the minimum possible value and homogenized over the network.
  • the adjustment of the transmission parameters is applicable to dynamic routing protocols, wherein the number of hops from a certain sender node A can vary.
  • At least two sets of transmission parameters are stored in the intermediate node Ni, one relating to normal processing or forwarding of a data packet, the other relating to privileged processing or forwarding.
  • the preferential transmission parameters for the hop of the data package to the next node 10 are chosen. This can for example be indicated by setting a flag in the data packet.
  • the transmission parameters can also be adjusted in more than two levels.
  • the adjustment of the transmission parameters may be proportional to the distance traveled by the data packet.
  • a type of the data packet may be determined as additional parameter influencing the adjustment of the transmission parameters.
  • the transmission parameters for long-traveled time-critical data packets may be adjusted to more favorable transmission parameters that particularly accelerate the processing and the transmission than shorter traveled time-uncritical data packets. Possibly, even a priority rank included in the data packet may be considered for the adjustment of the transmission parameters. Consequently, long-traveled data packets are more likely than shorter traveled data packets to successfully hop to the next node 10. This may even occur at the expense of short-traveled data packets and thereby result in delay homogenization.
  • the answer time-out should take a value as small as possible in order to minimize the end-to-end communication delay.
  • the answer time-out refers to the time period, for which any sender node A waits for an answer for the sent data packet from the destination node B before retransmitting the data packet.
  • the answer may include an acknowledgement indicating successful transmission of the data packet sent by the sender node A or data requested by the sender node A or both. If the answer includes an acknowledgement, the answer time-out is also referred to acknowledgement time-out. In the prior art, the acknowledgement time-out is fixed and common for all nodes 10.
  • the communication delay for closely neighbored nodes 10 is equal to the one for distant nodes 10, possibly resulting in unnecessary delays of data packet retransmissions. Therefore, according to a further embodiment of the present invention, the answer time-out for a data packet is adjusted based on a distance to be traveled by the data packet, i.e. the distance between the sender node A and the destination node B, as illustrated in Fig. 5 using the example of adjusting an acknowledgement time-out.
  • S50 When processing a data packet to be sent or when sending a data packet (S50), the distance between the sender node A and the destination node B is determined (S51). Based on this distance, the acknowledgement time-out for this data packet is adjusted (S52).
  • the acknowledgement time-out of a sender node A can be optimized, thus minimizing the end-to-end communication delay.
  • the minimum value of the acknowledgement time-out equals the expected or average roundtrip time for a data packet transmission between the source node and the destination node, i.e. the time for delivery of the data packet plus the time for delivery of the acknowledgement.
  • the minimum value of the answer time-out can be set to the minimum value of the roundtrip time or the like.
  • the sender node A When the sender node A does not receive an acknowledgement for the sent data packet within the acknowledgement time-out, the sender node A will retransmit the data packet (S53).
  • the order of the steps may be changed, i.e. steps S51 and/or S52 can be performed before sending the data packet (S50).
  • the sender node A can determine the distance to the destination node B either from data stored in the sender node A, e.g. a routing table, a list of distances to potential destination nodes, distance information received before from the destination node B or the like.
  • the sender node A may determine the distance to the destination node B from a hop counter or a time-to-live counter included in a data packet received from the destination node B.
  • the hop count derived from a data packet or the mean or maximum hop count derived from the last n data packets received from destination node B may be used for the reverse path.
  • the factor 2 is for the round trip, since the hop count only relates to one way.
  • a hop count for the round trip may be used instead.
  • the acknowledgement time-out is greater than or equal to the average roundtrip time.
  • the hop_time can relate to an average time period required on average for forwarding a data packet to the next intermediate node Ni in a multi-hop transmission. This may be characteristic for the network. Again, the hop time may depend on the type of the data packet, e.g.
  • the hop_time can also be replaced with other characteristic times, for instance a medium hop time or a success hop time, i.e. a time interval, in which a certain percentage, e.g. 90% -99% of the hops are successfully taken.
  • a success hop time i.e. a time interval, in which a certain percentage, e.g. 90% -99% of the hops are successfully taken.
  • the acknowledgement time-out is similarly calculated using a characteristic time for the chosen metric.
  • the answer time-out can additionally be based on a current traffic load in the network, which will result in a higher hop time. This can be determined e.g. by an amount of network traffic observed or received by the sender node A, or by how many packets the sender node A sent out in the last time period T.
  • the receiver node B (or any of the intermediate nodes Ni) can report information about a network load to the sender node A, e.g. as part of a data packet or together with an acknowledgement.
  • transmission parameters are adjusted based on a traveled distance of a data packet, this can be additionally considered for the adjustment of the answer time-out.
  • Adjusting the transmission parameters or the answer time-out is not only applicable to unicast data packets sent to only one destination node B.
  • the embodiment can also be applied in broadcast and multicast cases, wherein a data packet is transmitted to several destination nodes B. In these cases, different sets of transmission parameters or different answer time-outs for different destination nodes B in a multicast group can be taken into account, e.g. the maximum acknowledgement time-out for the nodes in the group is selected.
  • the delay for operation commands can thus be minimized.
  • the transmission parameters of the intermediate node Ni can be adjusted for the data packet based on the distance travelled by this data packet.
  • the survival chance of long-travelled data packets is increased, thus reducing the end-to-end communication delay.
  • data packets perceive comparable delays irrespective of the required number of hops, which is beneficial for an application and also for a transport layer. This is in particular useful, if data packets have to be retransmitted at higher layers in case of data packet loss.
  • a reduced mean and maximum delay can be achieved as well as higher delay homogeneity in the network.
  • the answer time-out can be adjusted for each individual pair of sender node A and destination node B, further reducing the end-to-end transmission delay in a wireless network.
  • overall network resources can be saved.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von Datenpaketübertragungen in einem mehrere Knoten (10, 50) aufweisenden, drahtlosen Netzwerk, umfassend:
    eine Steuereinheit (200), die so eingerichtet ist, dass sie Übertragungsparameter eines Zwischenknotens (Ni) zur Weiterleitung eines von dem Zwischenknoten (Ni) empfangenen Datenpakets aufgrund einer von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegten Distanz zwischen dem Zwischenknoten (Ni) und einem Senderknoten (A) einstellt,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    die Übertragungsparameter auf bevorzugte Übertragungsparameter für das Datenpaket eingestellt werden, wenn ermittelt wird, dass die von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegte Distanz einen vorher festgelegten Schwellenwert überschreitet.
  2. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Vorrichtung (100) zur Kopplung mit einem Knoten (10) und/oder mit einem Datenkollektorknoten (50) geeignet ist, und/oder wobei das drahtlose Netzwerk ein Mesh-Netzwerk ist, und/oder wobei Knoten (10) des drahtlosen Netzwerks stationär sind und/oder Positionen von Knoten (10) des drahtlosen Netzwerks bekannt sind, und/oder wobei eine Datenpaketübertragung von dem Senderknoten (A) zu einem Zielknoten (B) über mehrere Zwischenknoten (Ni) in einem Multi-Hop-Modus durchgeführt wird.
  3. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei die Distanz zwischen zwei Knoten (10, 50) durch eine Hop-Distanz, eine GPS-basierte und/oder euklidische Distanz definiert wird.
  4. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die Übertragungsparameter zumindest eine maximale Anzahl von erneuten Übertragungen bei einer niedrigeren Schicht, eine maximale Anzahl von Medienzugriffsversuchen, einen Sendeleistungspegel, eine Verzögerungszeit bei erneuter Übertragung oder eine Backoff-Zeit bei Medienzugriffsversuchen umfassen.
  5. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die Übertragungsparameter in Abhängigkeit der von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegten Distanz kontinuierlich eingestellt werden, und/oder wobei die Übertragungsparameter in Abhängigkeit eines Typs des Datenpakets eingestellt werden.
  6. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die Übertragungsparameter so eingestellt werden, dass eine Übertragungswahrscheinlichkeit von Datenpaketen, die eine einen vorher festgelegten Schwellenwert überschreitende Distanz zurückgelegt haben, erhöht wird.
  7. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegte Distanz von einem Hop-Zähler, einem Time-to-Live-Zähler, einer Routing-Tabelle, einer in dem Datenpaket enthaltenen Information, einer GPS-Position des Senderknotens (A) und/oder einer Netzwerkadresse des Senderknotens (A) abgeleitet wird.
  8. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei eine Distanzinformation einer oberen Schicht von einer niedrigeren Schicht durch schichtenübergreifende Kommunikation übermittelt wird.
  9. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei eine Distanzinformation durch Verwenden einer Differenz zwischen einer initialen Time-to-Live-Zählung und einer finalen Time-to-Live-Zählung des Datenpakets und/oder durch Anwenden von Techniken zum Erstellen von Routing-Tabellen erzeugt wird.
  10. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 7, wobei eine Hop-Zählung einer Hop-Zählung eines von dem Senderknoten (A) zuletzt empfangenen Datenpakets, einer durchschnittlichen Hop-Zählung über die von dem Senderknoten (A) empfangenen letzten n Datenpakete, einer maximalen Hop-Zählung über die von dem Senderknoten (A) empfangenen letzten n Datenpakete und/oder einem Sliding Window Average von Hop-Zählungen von, von dem Senderknoten (A) über die Zeit empfangenen Datenpaketen entspricht.
  11. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die Vorrichtung (100) im Telemanagement eines Beleuchtungssystems zur Ein-/Ausschaltung und/oder Steuerung von Dimmungsmustern von Leuchtenknoten (10, 50) und/oder zur Mitteilung von Sensordaten und/oder des Leuchtenstatus verwendet wird.
  12. Vorrichtung nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche, wobei die Steuereinheit (200) weiterhin so eingerichtet ist, dass, wenn die Vorrichtung als Senderknoten (A) arbeitet, sie aufgrund einer Distanz von einem Senderknoten (A) zu einem Zielknoten (B) einen Antwort-Timeout für ein zu übertragendes Datenpaket einstellt.
  13. System zur Steuerung von Datenpaketübertragungen in einem drahtlosen Netzwerk, wobei das System umfasst:
    eine Steuerzentrale (60); sowie
    mehrere Knoten (10, 50), wobei zumindest einige von diesen die Vorrichtung (100) nach einem der vorangegangenen Ansprüche umfassen;
    wobei Datenpakete von einem Senderknoten (A) über Zwischenknoten (Ni) zu einem Zielknoten durch Multi-Hop-Übertragungen in dem drahtlosen Netzwerk übertragen werden.
  14. System nach Anspruch 13, wobei die Knoten (10, 50) Leuchten eines Beleuchtungssystems zugeordnet sind.
  15. Verfahren zur Steuerung von Datenpaketübertragungen in einem mehrere Knoten (10, 50) aufweisenden, drahtlosen Netzwerk, wobei das Verfahren die folgenden Schritte umfasst, wonach:
    ein Datenpaket an einem Zwischenknoten (Ni) empfangen wird;
    Übertragungsparameter aufgrund einer von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegten Distanz zwischen einem Senderknoten (A) und dem Zwischenknoten (Ni) eingestellt wird;
    das Datenpaket aufgrund der eingestellten Übertragungsparameter verarbeitet wird, und
    das Datenpaket weitergeleitet wird,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    die Übertragungsparameter auf bevorzugte Übertragungsparameter für das Datenpaket eingestellt werden, wenn ermittelt wird, dass die von dem Datenpaket zurückgelegte Distanz einen vorher festgelegten Schwellenwert überschreitet.
EP11764326.2A 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 System zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken Active EP2622800B2 (de)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11764326.2A EP2622800B2 (de) 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 System zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken
PL11764326T PL2622800T5 (pl) 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 Układ optymalizacji opóźnienia pełnych przesyłów pakietów danych w sieciach bezprzewodowych

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20100185952 EP2437440A1 (de) 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verzögerungsoptimierung von End-to-End-Datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen Netzwerken
EP11764326.2A EP2622800B2 (de) 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 System zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken
PCT/IB2011/053940 WO2012042411A1 (en) 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 Device and method for delay optimization of end-to-end data packet transmissions in wireless networks

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2622800A1 EP2622800A1 (de) 2013-08-07
EP2622800B1 true EP2622800B1 (de) 2017-08-23
EP2622800B2 EP2622800B2 (de) 2020-03-18

Family

ID=43064852

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100185952 Ceased EP2437440A1 (de) 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verzögerungsoptimierung von End-to-End-Datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen Netzwerken
EP11764326.2A Active EP2622800B2 (de) 2010-10-01 2011-09-09 System zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100185952 Ceased EP2437440A1 (de) 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verzögerungsoptimierung von End-to-End-Datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen Netzwerken

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US9119142B2 (de)
EP (2) EP2437440A1 (de)
JP (1) JP6118252B2 (de)
CN (1) CN103119898B (de)
PL (1) PL2622800T5 (de)
TW (1) TW201218696A (de)
WO (1) WO2012042411A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9241298B2 (en) * 2011-11-18 2016-01-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Devices and methods for facilitating access probe sequences
KR101458852B1 (ko) * 2012-02-10 2014-11-12 폴리콤 인코포레이티드 멀티-홉 ｒｔｐ 스트림에서의 중요 패킷 손실 처리 시스템 및 방법
JP6048502B2 (ja) * 2012-07-23 2016-12-21 富士通株式会社 通信装置
EP2904761B1 (de) 2012-10-01 2016-05-11 ABB Research Ltd. Packetpriorisierung in einem drahtlosen industrienetzwerk
CN103916448B (zh) * 2013-01-09 2018-05-18 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 基于云传输平台的数据传输方法、系统及相应的云传输平台
US9509636B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-11-29 Vivint, Inc. Multicast traffic management within a wireless mesh network
US8879613B1 (en) 2013-08-06 2014-11-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic frame selection when requesting tone map parameters in mesh networks
JP6244744B2 (ja) * 2013-08-28 2017-12-13 株式会社リコー 通信装置、通信方法及び通信システム
US9712332B2 (en) 2014-03-11 2017-07-18 Vivint, Inc. Node directed multicast traffic management systems and methods for mesh networks
WO2015167500A1 (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. Flood disable on network switch
US9923836B1 (en) * 2014-11-21 2018-03-20 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Systems and methods for configuring a delay based scheduler for an access node
FR3030991B1 (fr) * 2014-12-22 2018-03-23 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Reseau de dispositifs de mesure communiquant par liaison radio
CN104734808B (zh) * 2015-03-07 2018-05-29 浙江理工大学 一种无线传感网络中最差时延感知跨层优化方法
DE102015207985B4 (de) * 2015-04-30 2024-08-22 Zumtobel Lighting Gmbh Verfahren und System zur Übermittlung von Steuerbefehlen für verteilt angeordnete Einheiten
CN104967813A (zh) * 2015-07-04 2015-10-07 马岩 视频会议的超时重发方法及系统
KR102419647B1 (ko) * 2015-09-10 2022-07-11 삼성전자주식회사 패킷을 전송하는 장치 및 방법
CN105263121B (zh) * 2015-09-17 2018-10-12 重庆邮电大学 一种机会车载网络中基于十字路口的路由方法
US10027581B2 (en) * 2015-10-19 2018-07-17 Cisco Technology, Inc. Routing traffic over chaotic networks
CN105897582A (zh) * 2015-12-07 2016-08-24 乐视云计算有限公司 节点间距离的度量方法及系统
US20170163509A1 (en) * 2015-12-07 2017-06-08 Le Holdings (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Inter-node distance metric method and system
SE540352C2 (en) * 2016-01-29 2018-07-24 Icomera Ab Wireless communication system and method for trains and other vehicles using trackside base stations
DE102016102525A1 (de) * 2016-02-15 2017-08-17 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. Kommunikationssystem zur Datenkommunikation mit wenigstens einem Fahrzeug im Straßenverkehr
US9900079B2 (en) * 2016-03-21 2018-02-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. Reliable connectionless low power coverage extension
JP6635866B2 (ja) * 2016-04-20 2020-01-29 大阪瓦斯株式会社 無線通信システム
GB2565987B (en) * 2016-07-29 2021-08-18 Motorola Solutions Inc Wireless ad-hoc network flooding mechanism to intelligently locate required responders
US11234122B2 (en) * 2016-08-10 2022-01-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Packet forwarding in a wireless mesh network
EP3497843A4 (de) * 2016-08-11 2019-12-18 Hopzero, Inc. Verfahren und system zur begrenzung der reichweite von datenübertragungen
DE102016125636A1 (de) * 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 Osram Gmbh Betreiben von einer Sendeeinrichtung einer eine Leuchteinrichtung aufweisenden Beleuchtungseinrichtung
EP3367613A1 (de) * 2017-02-28 2018-08-29 ABB Schweiz AG System und verfahren zur verbesserung der latenz in einem drahtlosen gebäudeautomationsnetzwerk
CN111279644B (zh) * 2017-10-27 2022-08-09 瑞典爱立信有限公司 用于更新无线网格网络中重传次数的方法和设备
CN109905897B (zh) * 2017-12-08 2022-11-18 华为技术有限公司 数据传输的方法和装置
US10944669B1 (en) 2018-02-09 2021-03-09 GoTenna, Inc. System and method for efficient network-wide broadcast in a multi-hop wireless network using packet echos
KR102107392B1 (ko) * 2018-02-28 2020-05-07 주식회사 노비스텍 가로등 무선원격 관제시스템
CA3107919A1 (en) 2018-07-27 2020-01-30 GoTenna, Inc. Vinetm: zero-control routing using data packet inspection for wireless mesh networks
CN109039906B (zh) * 2018-10-24 2020-10-30 常熟理工学院 一种智能车联网的路由实现方法
US10754559B1 (en) * 2019-03-08 2020-08-25 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Active-active storage clustering with clock synchronization
US10602402B1 (en) * 2019-08-28 2020-03-24 Ambit Microsystems (Shanghai) Ltd. Method and system for adjusting packet length and mobile device using the method
JP7364539B2 (ja) * 2020-08-03 2023-10-18 本田技研工業株式会社 ネットワーク管理装置、ネットワーク管理方法、及びプログラム
US11758367B2 (en) * 2021-05-10 2023-09-12 Cisco Technology, Inc. Multicast tree topology having multicast hubs for different multicast areas in a Wi-SUN FAN data network
CN113938859B (zh) * 2021-12-13 2022-03-15 深圳市永达电子信息股份有限公司 用于移动设备的集中式和分散式通信的集成系统和方法

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000079721A2 (en) 1999-06-21 2000-12-28 Ericsson, Inc. Time-out adjustment method based on round-trip delay measurement for data retransmission
US20030007454A1 (en) 2001-07-09 2003-01-09 International Business Machines Corporation Traffic management in packet-based networks
US6721537B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2004-04-13 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for disseminating a message
EP1347601B1 (de) 2002-03-18 2005-09-14 Nec Corporation Mehrstrecken-Netzwerk zum Senden von Paketen deren Grösse durch die Anzahl der Sprünge festgestellt wird
EP1764964A2 (de) 2005-09-02 2007-03-21 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogrammprodukte zur Datenausbreitung in einem Ad-hoc-Netzwerk
EP1300990B1 (de) 2001-10-02 2007-08-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Kommunikationsvorrichtung zum Durchführen einer Distanz-bezogenen Dienstgüte in einem Kommunikationssystem
KR100832519B1 (ko) 2007-03-13 2008-05-26 (주)에스디시스템 무선태그를 이용한 조명제어시스템 및 그 방법
EP1940089A1 (de) 2006-12-28 2008-07-02 Nec Corporation Datenübertragungsverfahren und Vorrichtung mit gesteuertem Übertragungsprofil
KR20090056070A (ko) 2007-11-29 2009-06-03 대구대학교 산학협력단 차량 애드혹네트워크에서 경쟁윈도우를 이용한 릴레이노드선정방법
CN101651963A (zh) 2009-07-09 2010-02-17 南京工业大学 一种ieee 802.11 wlan中基于区分服务的传输控制方法

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3539338B2 (ja) * 2000-03-23 2004-07-07 日本電気株式会社 優先データ転送方法
US8571415B1 (en) * 2001-07-19 2013-10-29 Alcatel Lucent Regenerators placement mechanism for wavelength switched optical networks
US8639251B2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2014-01-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods of and apparatuses for cell-differentiated handover in a mobile communications systems
US7768926B2 (en) * 2006-03-09 2010-08-03 Firetide, Inc. Effective bandwidth path metric and path computation method for wireless mesh networks with wired links
JP2007335943A (ja) * 2006-06-12 2007-12-27 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> 無線基地局およびマルチホップ制御方法
KR100789773B1 (ko) * 2006-12-08 2007-12-28 한국전자통신연구원 다중 홉 무선 근거리통신망에서 메쉬 네트워킹 자동 설정방법과, 가상 링크 설정 방법과, 패킷 전송 방법 및 이를위한 무선 단말기
JP2011507322A (ja) 2007-12-05 2011-03-03 トムソン ライセンシング 通信ネットワークにおける通信リンクを特徴付ける方法
KR20090065230A (ko) 2007-12-17 2009-06-22 한국전자통신연구원 계층 구조를 갖는 무선 센서망 및 이를 위한 라우팅 방법
US8301955B2 (en) 2008-01-15 2012-10-30 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus performing express retransmission of frames
US8345607B2 (en) * 2008-03-10 2013-01-01 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Coexistence and collocation of remote network and local network radios
ES2326949B1 (es) * 2008-03-18 2010-07-14 Clarity Systems, S.L. Procedimiento utilizado por un servidor de streaming para realizar una transmision de un fichero multimedia en una red de datos.
CN101631357A (zh) * 2008-07-18 2010-01-20 中国移动通信集团公司 一种选择性应答分组传输方法、装置及终端
US8483077B2 (en) * 2009-09-16 2013-07-09 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. QoS in multi-hop wireless networks
JP5589410B2 (ja) * 2010-01-29 2014-09-17 沖電気工業株式会社 通信システム及び通信装置
EP2572534A1 (de) 2010-05-21 2013-03-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Verfahren und vorrichtung zur weiterleitung von datenpaketen
WO2012042426A1 (en) 2010-10-01 2012-04-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Device and method for reliability enhancement for data packet transmissions in wireless networks
CN103119887B (zh) 2010-10-01 2017-04-19 飞利浦灯具控股公司 用于对无线网络中的数据分组传输进行调度的设备和方法
EP2437428A1 (de) 2010-10-01 2012-04-04 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Vorrichtung und Verfahren für den Datenabgleich zur Datenpaketübertragung in drahtlosen Netzwerken
WO2012052804A1 (en) * 2010-10-20 2012-04-26 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for adjacent channel emission limit
US20130155919A1 (en) * 2011-12-20 2013-06-20 Korea Basic Science Institute Method of potential routing, method of potential scheduling, and mesh node

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6721537B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2004-04-13 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for disseminating a message
WO2000079721A2 (en) 1999-06-21 2000-12-28 Ericsson, Inc. Time-out adjustment method based on round-trip delay measurement for data retransmission
US20030007454A1 (en) 2001-07-09 2003-01-09 International Business Machines Corporation Traffic management in packet-based networks
EP1300990B1 (de) 2001-10-02 2007-08-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Kommunikationsvorrichtung zum Durchführen einer Distanz-bezogenen Dienstgüte in einem Kommunikationssystem
EP1347601B1 (de) 2002-03-18 2005-09-14 Nec Corporation Mehrstrecken-Netzwerk zum Senden von Paketen deren Grösse durch die Anzahl der Sprünge festgestellt wird
EP1764964A2 (de) 2005-09-02 2007-03-21 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogrammprodukte zur Datenausbreitung in einem Ad-hoc-Netzwerk
EP1940089A1 (de) 2006-12-28 2008-07-02 Nec Corporation Datenübertragungsverfahren und Vorrichtung mit gesteuertem Übertragungsprofil
KR100832519B1 (ko) 2007-03-13 2008-05-26 (주)에스디시스템 무선태그를 이용한 조명제어시스템 및 그 방법
KR20090056070A (ko) 2007-11-29 2009-06-03 대구대학교 산학협력단 차량 애드혹네트워크에서 경쟁윈도우를 이용한 릴레이노드선정방법
CN101651963A (zh) 2009-07-09 2010-02-17 南京工业大学 一种ieee 802.11 wlan中基于区分服务的传输控制方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201218696A (en) 2012-05-01
US20130188562A1 (en) 2013-07-25
EP2437440A1 (de) 2012-04-04
JP2013543692A (ja) 2013-12-05
CN103119898A (zh) 2013-05-22
PL2622800T3 (pl) 2018-01-31
US9119142B2 (en) 2015-08-25
PL2622800T5 (pl) 2020-07-27
JP6118252B2 (ja) 2017-04-19
CN103119898B (zh) 2016-04-13
EP2622800B2 (de) 2020-03-18
WO2012042411A1 (en) 2012-04-05
EP2622800A1 (de) 2013-08-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2622800B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur verzögerungsoptimierung von end-to-end-datenpaketübertragungen in drahtlosen netzwerken
JP5992421B2 (ja) 無線ネットワークでデータパケットを負荷分散するデバイス及び方法
US10397823B2 (en) Device and method for scheduling data packet transmission in wireless networks
EP2643951B1 (de) System und verfahren zur optimierung der datenübertragung zu knoten in einem drahtlosen mesh-netzwerk
JP5364728B2 (ja) ローカル・ピア・グループ（ｌｐｇ）に基づく車両アドホックネットワークにおける高信頼度マルチキャスト方法
US10219319B2 (en) Device and method for controlling a node of a wireless network
JP2014507828A (ja) 通信ネットワークの少なくとも１つのアプリケーションのデータ通信を制御するためのコンポーネント、システム、及び方法
WO2012042454A1 (en) Device and method for reducing delay of data packet transmissions in wireless networks
WO2012042426A1 (en) Device and method for reliability enhancement for data packet transmissions in wireless networks
Khomami et al. Achieving a reliable V-2-V communication for safety messages
CN112567883A (zh) 用于应用数据交换的方法和节点设备

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130502

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0012560000

Ipc: H04L0012701000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 12/801 20130101ALI20170217BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/08 20060101ALI20170217BHEP

Ipc: H04W 40/20 20090101ALI20170217BHEP

Ipc: H04L 12/701 20130101AFI20170217BHEP

Ipc: H04W 84/18 20090101ALI20170217BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170315

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ESPINA PEREZ, JAVIER

Inventor name: GOERGEN, DANIEL MARTIN

Inventor name: GARCIA MORCHON, OSCAR

Inventor name: SCHENK, TIM CORNEEL WILHELMUS

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 922414

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170823

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 922414

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171123

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171124

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171223

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171123

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MOLNIA, DAVID

Effective date: 20180523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170909

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110909

RIC2 Information provided on ipc code assigned after grant

Ipc: H04W 28/02 20090101ALI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04L 1/18 20060101AFI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04L 12/841 20130101ALI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04L 1/00 20060101ALI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/08 20060101ALI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04W 40/20 20090101ALI20190628BHEP

Ipc: H04L 12/801 20130101ALI20190628BHEP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20200318

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170823

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V., NL

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V., EINDHOVEN, NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602011040894

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0012701000

Ipc: H04L0045000000

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230421

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240924

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240925

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20240827

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240924

Year of fee payment: 14