EP2508835B1 - Dispositif cible - Google Patents

Dispositif cible Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2508835B1
EP2508835B1 EP12002522.6A EP12002522A EP2508835B1 EP 2508835 B1 EP2508835 B1 EP 2508835B1 EP 12002522 A EP12002522 A EP 12002522A EP 2508835 B1 EP2508835 B1 EP 2508835B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
target
value
distance
correction factor
line
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12002522.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2508835A1 (fr
Inventor
Konrad A. Roider
Andreas Zimmermann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Swarovski Optik AG and Co KG
Original Assignee
Swarovski Optik AG and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Swarovski Optik AG and Co KG filed Critical Swarovski Optik AG and Co KG
Priority to EP18167201.5A priority Critical patent/EP3367047B1/fr
Publication of EP2508835A1 publication Critical patent/EP2508835A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2508835B1 publication Critical patent/EP2508835B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/06—Aiming or laying means with rangefinder
    • F41G3/065—Structural association of sighting-devices with laser telemeters
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/06—Aiming or laying means with rangefinder
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G1/00—Sighting devices
    • F41G1/38—Telescopic sights specially adapted for smallarms or ordnance; Supports or mountings therefor
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G1/00—Sighting devices
    • F41G1/44—Spirit-level adjusting means, e.g. for correcting tilt; Means for indicating or correcting tilt or cant
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G1/00—Sighting devices
    • F41G1/46—Sighting devices for particular applications
    • F41G1/473—Sighting devices for particular applications for lead-indicating or range-finding, e.g. for use with rifles or shotguns

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for determining a replacement distance to be considered in place of the target distance for sighting a target with a target device of a firearm according to claims 1 and 6.
  • Target devices in particular rifle scopes, are usually mounted on the weapon and shot in conjunction with this
  • Weapons are to be understood as weapons which fire a projectile under an extended or slightly curved trajectory directly onto a target. This shooting takes place at a fixed firing distance of, for example, 100 m with a horizontally aligned sighting line on a target and using a typical for the weapon ammunition (laboratory).
  • the barrel axis of the firearm is tilted about an attachment angle relative to the sight line of the target barrel.
  • this attachment angle is adjusted so that the actual point of impact of the projectile coincides with the desired impact point that is the target targeted.
  • deviations from these shooting conditions must be taken into account. Influencing factors that cause a change in the ballistics, for example, air pressure and temperature, the initial speed and the coefficient of resistance or ballistic coefficient of the projectile, lateral tilting of the firearm or an angle shot up or down.
  • the deviation in an angular shot is due to the changed direction of the projectile movement relative to the direction of the force acting on the projectile gravity.
  • a comparison of the projectile trajectory at the angle shot with the projectile trajectory in a horizontal shot shows that the projectile trajectory is somewhat flatter with an angle shot relative to the sight line. If the line of sight or the breakpoint were to be aimed at the target as in a horizontal shot, a so-called high shot would occur. Such can be prevented by reducing the departure angle (increase), that is, the angle between the travel axis and a horizontal plane. This can be done either by reducing the attachment angle (sighting angle) or the elevation angle (terrain angle) respectively.
  • This correction of the value of the departure angle at which the destination device relative to the destination or the correction with which the sighting line is aligned with the destination is equivalent to the consideration of a substitute distance which is used instead of the actual target distance for the sighting of the destination.
  • This can also be expressed by the concept of equivalent horizontal distance E. This is important, for example, when using a so-called ballistic reticle (reticule), wherein in the reticle different vertical markings are provided, which correspond to different spot-shot distances.
  • reticule ballistic reticle
  • aiming device is set at an angle shot, as if the target would not be in the actual distance D but in a common horizontal plane with the firearm below a target distance with a value corresponding to the equivalent horizontal distance, now also a spot shot is guaranteed .
  • Another way of taking into account the necessary correction of the orientation of the firearm or sighting device for sighting the target is to adjust the reticle (height) of the height according to the equivalent horizontal distance over the height tower of the target device.
  • modern aiming devices are known which have integrated ballistic calculators and display necessary corrections either numerically or in the form of variable breakpoints.
  • the Fig. 1 shows the relative spatial arrangement with an angle shot up from a guard 1 to a target 2.
  • the target 2 is located in a relative to a shooter 1 associated horizontal plane 3 elevated position.
  • a line of sight 4 or sight line between the shooter 1 and the target 2 accordingly includes a so-called elevation angle (terrain angle) ⁇ 5 with the horizontal plane 3.
  • a target distance D 6 is further defined.
  • the Fig. 2 shows the trajectory 7 of a projectile when aiming the target 2 with an aiming device 8 of a firearm 9 at an angle shot upwards at the elevation angle ⁇ 5.
  • a horizontal shot is shown on a target 2 '. It should be assumed for the sake of simplicity that the value of the target distance D 6 to the target 2 'or to the target 2 is equal to the Einschtigdistanz the firearm. 9
  • a running axis 10 of the firearm 9 is arranged relative to the line of sight or line of sight 4 of the aiming device 8 pivoted about an attachment angle 11.
  • This attachment angle 11 is adjusted during insertion of the firearm 9 such that the trajectory 7 'of the projectile intersects the horizontal plane 3 in the Einschtigdistanz.
  • the actual point of impact of the projectile coincides with the desired impact point of the arranged in the Einschnetdistanz target 2 '.
  • the firing of the firearm 9 takes place in a customary manner in that a series of shots is carried out on a target Z located in the shooting distance. That is, the distance between the location of the shooter 1 and the mouth of the firearm 9 and the target Z is selected equal to the Einsch sueddistanz, which also the mouth of the firearm 9 and the target Z are in the common horizontal plane 3. If, after a shot at the target Z, a deviation of the point of impact of the projectile from the target Z is detected, then a change in the relative position between the line of sight 4 and the barrel axis 10 of the firearm 9 is made, with which it is to be achieved that the impact point of the Projectile comes to rest closer to the target Z in the execution of another shot.
  • Such a change in the relative position of the line of sight 4 relative to the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 is usually carried out by making an adjustment to a height tower 16 of the sighting device 8 or a riflescope, by the course of the line of sight 4 through the visual beam path Target device 8 is changed through.
  • a height tower 16 of the sighting device 8 or a riflescope By such a change, both deviations of the impact point of the projectile from the target Z in the horizontal and in the vertical direction can be compensated.
  • the attachment angle 11 is changed in such a setting on the height tower 16.
  • the sequence of test shots and readjustments of the relative position of the line of sight 4 relative to the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 is continued until a sufficiently high accuracy is achieved.
  • the firing of the firearm 9 takes place under a tilting angle inclined with respect to the horizontal plane 3 with a predefined value.
  • This can be favorable for a firearm 9, which is regularly fired, for example, from a high seat over an otherwise level, horizontal terrain.
  • the firing of the firearm 9 at a preselected shoot-in angle may be done with a negative value.
  • This is in turn carried out by continuing with the firearm 9 a series of trial shots and readjustments of the relative position of the line of sight 4 relative to the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 until a sufficiently high accuracy is achieved.
  • the Fig. 3 shows an image when looking through the aiming device 8 when aiming the target 2 according to FIG Fig. 2 ,
  • the target device 8 has a target tag assembly with a crosshair 12 and additional targets 13, 14 and 15.
  • the arrangement of the image of the target 2 relative to the reticle 12 and the target marks 13, 14, 15 corresponds to that situation in which the above-explained correction is already taken into account.
  • the line of sight 4 of the target device 8 - it corresponds to the crossing point of the crosshairs 12 - is aligned at a point below the target 2. Accordingly, the image of the target 2 appears above the reticle 12 - in this case, coincident with the target 13.
  • the picture according to Fig. 3 can also be interpreted in connection with the execution of a horizontal shot in which the target 2 is located with the firearm 9 in the same horizontal plane 3. If, as shown, arranged above the reticle 12 target mark 13 aligned with the target 2, this can only be hit by the projectile, if its distance from the firearm 9 is smaller than the Einschtigdistanz (corresponding crosshairs 12). For horizontal shots can thus target the target 13, the crosshairs 12, the target 14 and the target 15 different values of the target distance D 6 are assigned. Namely, the values of the target distance D 6 are increasing in the same order (target 13, reticle 12, target 14, and target 15). This could be done, for example, as part of a calibration of the target mark arrangement with corresponding target distances D 6.
  • the values of the target distance D 6 for horizontal shots assigned to the target marks 13, 14, 15 and the crosshair 12 are now also important for angle shots at an elevation angle ⁇ 5, in which they are referred to as the so-called equivalent horizontal distance E for taking account of the above-described correction of the orientation the firearm 9 or the line of sight 4 of the target device 8 are used on the target 2.
  • the shooter 1 uses an aiming distance for sighting.
  • Ballistic programs eg QuickTARGET, EXBAL, Sierra Infinity
  • Such devices allow the correction to be taken into account either by numerically specifying the equivalent horizontal distance E or by displaying a variable breakpoint (ie, variable targets 13, 14, 15).
  • a correction factor KF is used, which depends on several parameters.
  • KF KF D . ⁇ . Component assembly . ...
  • a device 21 for determining the equivalent horizontal distance E is provided, which is preferably equipped with a central microprocessor 22 for the automated implementation of the method.
  • This device 21 further comprises a range finder 23 for measuring the target distance D 6 and a tilt sensor 24 for measuring the elevation angle ⁇ 5 at which the target 2 appears to the shooter 1. Based on the values for the target distance D 6 and the elevation angle ⁇ 5, the microprocessor 22 can calculate a corresponding correction without taking into account further data. However, predefined correction factors KF can also be kept in a memory 25 for simplification and / or acceleration, so that the microprocessor 22 can perform a calculation of the equivalent horizontal distance E by linking the measurement signals obtained from the range finder 23 and the inclination sensor 24. The result of the calculation is displayed on a display 26.
  • the shooter 1 can then align the firearm 9 and the aiming device 8 to the target 2 by selecting the target corresponding to the displayed equivalent horizontal distance E (in this embodiment, the aiming mark 13) or changing the attachment angle by adjusting the elevation tower according to the displayed equivalent horizontal distance E and make a shot.
  • the device 21 for determining the equivalent horizontal distance E can be designed both as a device independent of the firearm 9 and the target device, but can alternatively also form part of the firearm 9 or the target device 8.
  • the display 26 of the device 21 is preferably integrated into the beam path of the target device 8.
  • the display 26 is superimposed in one of the image planes of the optics of the target device 8, so that the value of the calculated equivalent horizontal distance E appears to the shooter 1 in the same field of view represented by the target device 8
  • the target device 8 in which the rangefinder 23 is at least partially integrated into the optical beam path of the target device 8. This can be realized, for example, in that - e.g. upon execution of the range finder 23 by a laser distance meter - the laser beam emitted to the target 2 and / or the laser light reflected from the target 2 passes through the objective lens 8 lens.
  • the calculation thereof is based on a correction based on a value pair of a value of the target distance D 6 and a value of the elevation angle ⁇ 5. It has surprisingly been found that with a correction that is determined solely for different values of target distances D 6 and different values of elevation angles ⁇ 5, the advantages of the methods described above (namely simple and accurate) can be linked without their disadvantages (necessity of knowledge about the ballistic data of the laboratory and limitation to short distances and small elevation angles) to have to accept. A sufficiently accurate calculation of the equivalent horizontal distance E for sighting the target 2 is thus possible.
  • correction Factor Table 1 ⁇ 1 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 3 D 1 KF 11 KF 12 Thirteenth D 2 KF 21 KF 22 KF 23 D 3 KF 31 KF 32 KF 33
  • correction factors KF ij to pairs of values (D i , ⁇ j ) can take place, for example, after carrying out appropriate test shots.
  • Fig. 5 shows a flowchart of the method steps in the inventive method for determining the equivalent horizontal distance E for sighting of the target 2 with the target device 8 of the firearm 9.
  • a first step 31 the measurement of the target distance D 6 using the rangefinder 23.
  • the elevation angle ⁇ 5 is determined by means of the tilt sensor 24.
  • the method steps 31 and 32 can also take place simultaneously.
  • the device 21 Fig.
  • the microprocessor 22 can automatically determine the correction in a subsequent method step 33. This is preferably done by the microprocessor 22 determining the correction factor KF corresponding to the measured values from a correction factor table.
  • correction Factor Table 2 10 ° 30 ° D [m] 100 0.986 0.876 200 0.987 0.884 300 0,989 0,893 400 0.990 0.902 500 0.991 0.910
  • equivalent horizontal distances E can be determined using a correction factor table in which the correction factors KF are dependent only on the target distance D 6 and the elevation angle ⁇ 5. This is the case, although the trajectories of the projectile, that is to say the trajectories 7, are relatively strongly dependent on the data of the laboratory of the different ammunition.
  • the assays / ammunition selected in this example include a relatively wide range of assays and provide an average of very different types of ammunition from the determined correction factors KF ij .
  • the .300 WIN MAG has a very flat trajectory 7 and is thus suitable for long shots.
  • the 7x57 R TMR has a relatively strongly curved trajectory 7 and is thus suitable only for short target distances D 6.
  • the Labor ist .308 WIN HMK is finally settled between the first two.
  • the ammunitions or laboratories used in this exemplary embodiment are those with a very flat trajectory or trajectory 7 'of the projectile, as used for direct firing or direct fire. Characteristic of these ammunition is a high number of razors. That is, in the execution of a horizontal shot, high values of the quotient result from the target distance D 6 and the distance between the trajectory peak of the trajectory 7 'and the line of sight 4' (FIG. Fig. 2 ).
  • the method according to the invention is advantageously suitable for ammunition and direct-shot laboratory tests with a number of rasts having a value in the range greater than 100, preferably with a value in the range greater than 300.
  • the presentation of the Fig. 6 shows the sighting of the target 2 with the target device 8 at - after the shooting of the weapon 9 unchanged - relative position of the line of sight 4 through the Visual beam path of the target device 8 relative to the barrel axis 10 of the firearm 9.
  • a change in Trajekotrie 7 of the projectile towards a relative to the line of sight 4 slightly flatter trajectory and the target 2 would be missed above.
  • no shot is fired at the target 2 in this situation, but instead by the shooter 1, the device 21 (FIG. Fig. 4 ) while keeping the reticle 12 aligned with the target 2.
  • microprocessor 22 of device 21 determines the equivalent horizontal distance E, which is finally displayed on display 26.
  • Sagittarius 1 will now select the target corresponding to the displayed equivalent horizontal distance E. This is equivalent to the selection of a different from the line of sight 4, new sighting line 41, which includes a relative to the attachment angle 11 smaller angle 42 with the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9
  • the shooter 1 now has the ability to align the sighting line 42 on the target 2 out.
  • the weapon 9 is pivoted so far by the shooter 1 that the sighting line 41 forms the new line of sight on the target 2, whereby the trajectory of the projectile according to the trajectory 7 changes to the target 2 out.
  • the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 is thus in Fig. 7 opposite the position in Fig. 6 pivoted at an angle corresponding to the difference between the attachment angle 11 and the new attachment angle 42.
  • the relative position between the line of sight 4 of the target device 8 and the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 is thereby achieved a direct change of the attachment angle 11 by means of the height tower 16. That is, for the sighting of the target 2 in both situations, the same reticle 12 (FIG. Fig. 4 ) is aligned with the objective 2.
  • the weapon 9 is rotated by an angle corresponding to the value of the difference between the original attachment angle 11 and the new modified attachment angle 42 by the shooter 1 pivoted to hit the target 2 safely when making a shot.
  • the described adjustment to the height tower 16 for changing the relative position between the line of sight 4 passing through the visual beam path of the aiming device 8 and the running axis 10 of the weapon 9 can be done manually by the shooter 1, but advantageously automatically, for example by an electromotive adjustment , executed.
  • the required correction when sighting a target 2 when executing an angle shot is thus feasible by a method for determining a replacement distance between a location of a shooter 1 and a point of impact of a projectile in the horizontal plane 3.
  • the replacement distance is taken into account instead of the target distance D 6 when sighted by the shooter 1.
  • This requires first shooting the weapon 9, wherein the relative position of the line of sight 4 is set by the visual beam path of the target device 8 and the riflescope relative to the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 so that for a predeterminable projectile and a predetermined Einsch mandistanz for horizontal shots a desired high accuracy is achieved.
  • the target distance D 6 between the location and the target 2, which are arranged on the line of sight 4, and the elevation angle ⁇ 5, which is enclosed by the line of sight 4 with the horizontal plane 3, are then determined. Then, based on exclusively on non-ballistic characteristics, such as the determined target distance D 6 and the elevation angle ⁇ 5, a correction function determined by applying the correction function on the measured value of the target distance D 6 then the value of a replacement distance in a horizontal plane 3 is determined. This value of the replacement distance is then used to change the relative position between the line of sight 4 and the barrel axis 10 of the weapon 9 by the difference between the previously determined target distance and the determined replacement distance.
  • the correction function is preferably realized by correction factors KF from a correction factor table, in each of which a value of the target distance D 6 and a value of the weft angle ⁇ 5 is assigned a value of the correction factor KF.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Claims (9)

  1. Procédé de détermination d'une distance de remplacement entre un endroit et un point d'impact d'un projectile dans un plan horizontal (3) commun avec l'endroit, dans lequel une distance cible (D) (6) entre l'endroit et une cible (2) qui sont disposés sur une ligne de visée (4) est déterminée, et dans lequel un angle d'élévation α (5), qui est formé par la ligne de visée (4) avec le plan horizontal (3), est déterminé, un éloignement horizontal E équivalent étant calculé en tant que distance de remplacement par la multiplication de la distance cible (D) (6) par un facteur de correction KF, caractérisé en ce qu'une valeur d'un facteur de correction KF(D, a) pour un couple de valeurs (D, α)formé d'une valeur de la distance cible (D) (6) et d'une valeur de l'angle d'élévation α (5) est calculée par interpolation sur la base des facteurs de correction KFij d'un tableau de facteurs de correction, une valeur du facteur de correction KFij étant, dans le tableau de facteurs de correction, affectée respectivement à un couple de valeurs (Di, αj) formé d'une valeur de la distance cible (D) (6) et d'une valeur de l'angle d'élévation α (5) (c'est-à-dire KFij = KF(Di, αj)),
    et en ce que les étapes suivantes sont effectuées
    a) à partir de données de la recette d'une munition, des valeurs du facteur de correction KF sont calculées avec un programme de balistique pour les différents couples de valeurs (Di, aj) du tableau de facteurs de correction ;
    b) les calculs selon l'étape a) sont effectués pour différentes munitions ;
    c) les valeurs respectives du facteur de correction KFij pour les différents couples de valeurs (Di, αj) dans le tableau de facteurs de correction sont calculées par la formation d'une valeur moyenne à partir de valeurs de facteurs de correction KFij pour les différentes munitions.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'un indice de rasance du projectile présente une valeur supérieure à 100.
  3. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'une formation pondérée de valeur moyenne est utilisée, et en ce que la pondération dépend de la distance cible (D) (6).
  4. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'une formation pondérée de valeur moyenne est utilisée, et en ce que la pondération dépend de l'indice de rasance du projectile.
  5. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que, pour la formation pondérée de valeur moyenne, des contributions de recettes avec un indice de rasance élevé sont pondérées plus fortement et des contributions de recettes avec un indice de rasance relativement petit sont pondérées plus faiblement.
  6. Dispositif (21) de détermination d'une distance de remplacement entre un endroit et un point d'impact d'un projectile dans un plan horizontal (3) commun avec l'endroit pour la visée d'une cible (2) pour un tir angulaire avec un angle d'élévation α (5) avec un affichage (26) pour une valeur de la distance de remplacement, le dispositif (21) comprenant un télémètre (23) destiné à la mesure d'une distance cible (D) (6) et un capteur d'inclinaison (24) destiné à la mesure de l'angle d'élévation α (5) entre une ligne de visée (4) vers la cible (2) et le plan horizontal (3), et
    celui-ci comprenant un microprocesseur (22) qui est constitué pour calculer en tant que distance de remplacement un éloignement horizontal E équivalent par la multiplication de la distance cible (D) (6) par un facteur de correction KF, caractérisé en ce que le microprocesseur (22) calcule une valeur d'un facteur de correction KF(D, a) pour un couple de valeurs (D, a) formé d'une valeur de la distance cible (D) (6) et d'une valeur de l'angle d'élévation α (5) par interpolation sur la base des facteurs de correction KFij d'un tableau de facteurs de correction, et prélève des valeurs des facteurs de correction KFij à partir d'une mémoire (25),
    une valeur du facteur de correction KFij étant, dans le tableau de facteurs de correction, affectée respectivement à un couple de valeurs (Di, αj) formé d'une valeur de la distance cible (D)i (6) et d'une valeur de l'angle d'élévation αj (5).
  7. Dispositif (21) selon la revendication 6, caractérisé en ce que le télémètre (23) comprend un télémètre laser.
  8. Système de visée (8), en particulier lunette de visée, avec un dispositif (21) destiné à la détermination d'une distance de remplacement à prendre en compte à la place de la distance cible (D) (6) pour la visée d'une cible (2) avec le système de visée (8) d'une arme à feu (9) selon l'une des revendications 6 ou 7, caractérisé en ce qu'un affichage (26) du dispositif (21) pour une valeur de la distance de remplacement est visible pour un tireur (1) lors de la visée.
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 1 avec une lunette de visée (8) montée sur une arme (9), caractérisé en ce qu'une position relative d'une ligne de visée (4) est réglée par la trajectoire de faisceau visuelle de la lunette de visée (8) relativement à un axe de canon (10) de l'arme (9) dans le cas d'un projectile pouvant être prédéfini sur une distance de réglage pouvant être prédéfinie entre l'endroit et le point d'impact du projectile dans le plan horizontal (3), suite à quoi la position relative déterminée entre la ligne de visée (4) et l'axe de canon (10) est détectée, et en ce qu'une cible (2) est visée avec l'arme (9) par le fait que la ligne de visée (4) de la lunette de visée (8) est alignée avec la cible (2), suite à quoi la distance cible (D) (6) entre l'endroit et la cible (2) qui sont disposés sur la ligne de visée (4) est déterminée, et l'angle d'élévation α (5) qui est formé par la ligne de visée (4) avec le plan horizontal (3) est déterminé, sur quoi l'éloignement horizontal E équivalent est calculé, et la position relative entre la ligne de visée (4) et l'axe de canon (10) est réglée d'une valeur correspondant à la différence de la distance cible (D) (6) prédéterminée et sur l'éloignement horizontal E équivalent déterminé.
EP12002522.6A 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif cible Active EP2508835B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18167201.5A EP3367047B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif de visée

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ATA490/2011A AT511318B1 (de) 2011-04-06 2011-04-06 Zieleinrichtung

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18167201.5A Division-Into EP3367047B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif de visée
EP18167201.5A Division EP3367047B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif de visée

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2508835A1 EP2508835A1 (fr) 2012-10-10
EP2508835B1 true EP2508835B1 (fr) 2018-05-30

Family

ID=46000663

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18167201.5A Active EP3367047B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif de visée
EP12002522.6A Active EP2508835B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif cible

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18167201.5A Active EP3367047B1 (fr) 2011-04-06 2012-04-06 Dispositif de visée

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US8733647B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP3367047B1 (fr)
AT (1) AT511318B1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7654029B2 (en) 2005-11-01 2010-02-02 Leupold & Stevens, Inc. Ballistic ranging methods and systems for inclined shooting
BE1024404B1 (fr) * 2016-07-15 2018-02-14 Fn Herstal S.A. Lunette de visee
AT519554B1 (de) 2017-09-22 2018-08-15 Swarovski Optik Kg Verfahren zur Ermittlung einer Ersatzdistanz zwischen einem Standort und einem Ersatzauftreffpunkt eines Geschoßes
US10962331B2 (en) * 2019-06-06 2021-03-30 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Dynamic weapon to target assignment using a control based methodology
CN115031580B (zh) * 2022-06-20 2023-10-24 无锡市星迪仪器有限公司 高精度火炮校正方法、处理装置及高精度火炮校正系统

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070137091A1 (en) * 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 John Cross Handheld rangefinder operable to determine hold over ballistic information

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DD277742A1 (de) * 1988-12-06 1990-04-11 Zeiss Jena Veb Carl Zielfernrohr
US6873406B1 (en) 2002-01-11 2005-03-29 Opti-Logic Corporation Tilt-compensated laser rangefinder
US8006429B2 (en) * 2004-11-30 2011-08-30 Leupold & Stevens, Inc. Locking turret knob
US7654029B2 (en) * 2005-11-01 2010-02-02 Leupold & Stevens, Inc. Ballistic ranging methods and systems for inclined shooting
US8081298B1 (en) 2008-07-24 2011-12-20 Bushnell, Inc. Handheld rangefinder operable to determine hold-over ballistic information

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070137091A1 (en) * 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 John Cross Handheld rangefinder operable to determine hold over ballistic information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8733647B2 (en) 2014-05-27
US20120298749A1 (en) 2012-11-29
EP3367047A1 (fr) 2018-08-29
EP3367047B1 (fr) 2020-12-16
AT511318A1 (de) 2012-10-15
AT511318B1 (de) 2014-12-15
EP2508835A1 (fr) 2012-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1304539B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif
DE2736598A1 (de) Fadenkreuz fuer optische vorrichtungen
DE2710904C2 (fr)
EP2508835B1 (fr) Dispositif cible
DE202005017276U1 (de) Fadenkreuz für ein Schußwaffen-Zielsystem und Gewehr-Zielfernrohr
DE3145035A1 (de) "zielfernrohr"
DE102008053948A1 (de) Visierfadenkreuz mit einstellbaren Sichtmarken für eine ballistische Kompensation
DE102005007910A1 (de) Feuerwaffe für langsam fliegende Geschosse
DE19719977C1 (de) Video-Visier mit integrierter Feuerleitung für Gewehre
EP3367044B1 (fr) Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée
DE3209111A1 (de) Feuerleitanlage fuer ein geschuetz
DE102018133064A1 (de) Ballistisches Zielsystem mit digitalem Verstellrad
DE3507007C2 (fr)
DE102012213747A1 (de) Verfahren und Zieleinrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Treffers eines Zielobjekts
DE2143871A1 (de) Feuerleitverfahren und -vorrichtung
EP2538166B1 (fr) Dispositif de conduite de tir
EP2047317B1 (fr) Lunette de visee
EP3460378B1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination d'une distance de remplacement entre un emplacement et un point d'impact de remplacement d'un étage
DE1951622B2 (de) Anordnung zur simulierten darstellung von schussbahnen
DE1946972B2 (de) Visiereinrichtung, insbesondere zielfernrohr
DE738327C (de) Auf die zur Verwendung kommende Feuerwaffe abgestimmtes Zielfernrohr, dessen Abkommen zwei uebereinanderliegende Marken enthaelt
DE256155C (fr)
DE3545831A1 (de) Verfahren zum ueben des zielens unter verwendung eines laserschusssimulators und eines zielseitigen retroreflektors sowie schusssimulator zur durchfuehrung dieses verfahrens
DE200726C (fr)
AT43412B (de) Einrichtung an Fernrohren zur Ermittelung von Visierstellungen.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130410

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20171219

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1004058

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012012750

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180830

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180830

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180831

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502012012750

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20190418

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190406

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200430

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210309

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502012012750

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SWAROVSKI-OPTIK AG & CO KG., AT

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SWAROVSKI-OPTIK KG., ABSAM, AT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: PC

Ref document number: 1004058

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Owner name: SWAROVSKI-OPTIK AG & CO KG., AT

Effective date: 20221220

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230307

Year of fee payment: 12

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230309

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20230310

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20240311

Year of fee payment: 13