EP2503527A1 - Système de communication, notamment pour alarme et son procédé de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Système de communication, notamment pour alarme et son procédé de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2503527A1
EP2503527A1 EP12001162A EP12001162A EP2503527A1 EP 2503527 A1 EP2503527 A1 EP 2503527A1 EP 12001162 A EP12001162 A EP 12001162A EP 12001162 A EP12001162 A EP 12001162A EP 2503527 A1 EP2503527 A1 EP 2503527A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
telegram
received
reception strength
limit value
limit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12001162A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2503527B1 (fr
Inventor
Markus Bahlinger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hekatron Vertriebs GmbH
Original Assignee
Hekatron Vertriebs GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hekatron Vertriebs GmbH filed Critical Hekatron Vertriebs GmbH
Publication of EP2503527A1 publication Critical patent/EP2503527A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2503527B1 publication Critical patent/EP2503527B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/20—Calibration, including self-calibrating arrangements
    • G08B29/24—Self-calibration, e.g. compensating for environmental drift or ageing of components
    • G08B29/26—Self-calibration, e.g. compensating for environmental drift or ageing of components by updating and storing reference thresholds
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
    • G08B25/007—Details of data content structure of message packets; data protocols

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a communication system, in particular for danger alarm systems comprising interconnected hazard alarms, and to a method for operating such a communication system, and to a communication terminal using the method for use in the communication system.
  • a security alarm system in which the receivers are brought into an installation mode during the system installation in which the received signal is disturbed at the receiver and therefore a higher quality reception signal is required than in normal operation. If the receivers in installation mode can receive all the transmitters of the system, a quality reserve for communication in normal operation is assumed.
  • the EP0874341 suggests that, during installation of an alarm system, the transmission energy be reduced compared to normal operation. Receivers that are installed are changed to their position until a position is found where the signals transmitted with lower transmission power can be received.
  • Both systems limit communication range during system installation and can only detect faults at this stage. You also need additional switching elements in the send or Receive circuit that can switch between different power levels when sending or receiving and are inflexible regarding the range control and limited to the installation mode.
  • In the from the US 5,801,626 become known system transmission disturbances can also be detected after the installation phase.
  • Separate monitoring signals are sent to check for undisturbed reception. Receiving a signal measures the signal strength and determines if it is a monitoring signal. If the received signal is a monitor signal, then the measured signal strength is compared to a fixed threshold. If the measured signal strength falls below the threshold value, then the monitoring signal is rejected and not answered. For all other signals, the reception strength is ignored.
  • the threshold is determined here in the receiving device based on the signal strength, which during the reception of at least a portion of the signal z. B. the preamble is measured. If the signal strength exceeds the threshold value determined on the basis of the measured values, the signal is processed further, otherwise it is discarded. Although the latter reduces the disturbing influence of neighboring systems, but remains prone to error in this regard, if z. B. as a first signal, a weak signal is received and therefore the threshold is determined too low, also can not affect the range here targeted and flexible.
  • the invention is therefore based on the object of specifying an operating method, a communication system and a communication terminal, in particular for communication in hazard detection systems, which do not have the disadvantages of the prior art, or at least mitigate it.
  • a limit value for the reception strength of a receiver in a telegram to be transmitted is provided for controlling the communication range.
  • a sending system subscriber z. B. a smoke detector depending on its operating mode or the type of receiving device from a limit and adds it z. B. in the header of a telegram to be sent.
  • the Limit value can be in the form of a received field strength value (RSSI) or even only as a relative value from a relative scale of z. 0-10.
  • a lower limit can be z. B. be selected during an installation mode, while possibly even the maximum possible value is selected in an alarm.
  • the telegram is sent. All receivers within the physical range can receive the transmitted telegram. When receiving a telegram, the receivers simultaneously determine the reception strength with which the telegram is received. This they can z. B. by means of a built-in most radio chips RSSI function (Received Signal Strength Indication) do. Even during the reception or shortly thereafter, the limit value for the reception strength is extracted from the telegram and compared with the reception strength during the reception.
  • RSSI function Receiveived Signal Strength Indication
  • the telegram is discarded or the possibly still ongoing reception is aborted.
  • a comparison of the own receiver address with the address of the receiver to which the telegram may be directed can also be made. If it is already established that the addresses do not match, then the comparison of the reception strength with the limit value may be omitted, since the telegram is discarded anyway.
  • the limit value for the reception strength is to be sent in the same telegram with the reception strength of which the limit value is compared.
  • the limit value for the reception strength and the other data to be transmitted are divided into two or more telegrams. It is therefore particularly preferable for the limit value to be transmitted and received within the same telegram group whose telegrams are subject to the limit value.
  • the limit value for a receive field strength that applies to the following or a series of subsequent telegrams could be sent in a telegram.
  • the telegram containing the reception threshold for subsequent messages is transmitted with a higher transmission power and / or redundantly possibly even on different channels and / or must first be confirmed by the receiver before the subsequent messages are sent.
  • the method for operating a communication system regulates the range of the communication and thus also represents a method for communicating.
  • the communication system is formed by a hazard detection system.
  • the invention relates hence a method for communicating in a hazard detection system.
  • a hazard detection system often consists of at least one device, such as a security alarm center for receiving messages and detectors with sensors for hazard characteristics such as smoke, the detectors having at least one transmitter for sending alarm or status messages.
  • a preferred type of hazard detection system is formed of several interconnected hazard alarms, each hazard alarm is equipped in addition to sensors and transmitters with receiver and alarm and display means.
  • a system user in particular a hazard detector, provides a limit for receiving strength in a message to be sent.
  • the telegram is sent and can be received by a second system subscriber in particular a hazard detector.
  • the reception strength z. B. determined as RSSI value and compared with the limit value from a previously received message, but preferably with the received from the same telegram limit value. If it is determined in this comparison that the received strength falls below the limit, then the telegram is discarded.
  • the invention also relates to a communication system with at least one transmitting system subscriber, which is set up in particular for the transmission of danger messages and with at least one receiving system subscriber, which is set up in particular for receiving danger messages.
  • the sending system subscriber contains a first range control, which provides the receiving system subscriber with a limit for the reception strength in a telegram.
  • the receiving system subscriber includes a second range control, which comprises a measuring device for the reception strength of the received messages and a comparison device.
  • the comparison device is set up to compare the reception strength measured when receiving a telegram with the limit value that was provided by the transmitting system subscriber in a previously transmitted telegram, but preferably in the same telegram.
  • the second range control is also set up to discard the received message if the measured reception strength falls below the limit.
  • a transmitting system subscriber can also receive corresponding devices for receiving and a receiving system subscriber also the corresponding devices for transmission.
  • the communication system is formed by a hazard detection system in which the system participants in particular danger detectors communicate with each other by z. For example, you can exchange status and alarm messages with each other and finally display to system users.
  • a hazard detection system consists of at least two interconnected hazard detectors, which are set up in particular for detecting and reporting smoke, temperature, fire and / or gases.
  • Each of these hazard detectors includes a transmitter and a receiver, and first and second range controllers.
  • the first range control is set up to provide a limit for receiving strength in a telegram to be sent.
  • the second range control comprises a first measuring device for the received strength of the received telegrams and a comparison device.
  • the comparison device is set up to compare the reception strength measured when a telegram is received with the limit value provided by the first range control of the transmitting danger detector in a previously sent but preferably in the same telegram.
  • the second range control is set up to reject the received telegram if the measured reception strength falls below the limit value.
  • the invention relates to a communication terminal, which is formed in a preferred embodiment as a hazard detector with one or more sensors.
  • the sensors are in particular configured to detect hazard parameters such as smoke, temperature, fire and / or gas.
  • the communication terminal according to the invention has a transmitter, a receiver and a control device, and a first and a second range control.
  • the first range control is set up to provide a limit for receiving strength in a telegram to be sent.
  • the second range control comprises a measuring device for the reception strength of received telegrams and a comparison device.
  • the comparison device is in turn set up to compare the reception strength measured on reception of a telegram with the limit value provided by the first range control of a transmitting danger detector in a previously transmitted telegram, but preferably in the same telegram.
  • the second range control or the control device are set up to discard the received telegram if the measured reception strength falls below the limit value.
  • the single FIGURE shows a communication system according to the invention with two communication terminals according to the invention which are designed as hazard warning detectors.
  • FIG. 1 shows an example of a communication system (1) in the form of a hazard detection system (1) which is shown here by way of example with several hazard warning devices (2).
  • the system could also from a danger center (ggf.14) with one or more satellites z. B. danger detector (2) exist.
  • the hazard warning devices (2) have a control unit (9) which controls and coordinates environmental measurements by means of the sensors (10) and communication with other hazard warning devices.
  • the control unit (9) also assumes the evaluation of the signals of the sensors (10).
  • the hazard warning (2) include display and alarm means (13) with which states z. B. malfunctions such as too low battery detector (2) and alarms can be displayed.
  • a hazard warning (2) both own states and alarms, as well as other hazard warning (2) display.
  • a hazard warning device (2) contains at least one receiver (3) with which it can receive corresponding information from other hazard warning detectors (2).
  • a hazard alert (2) also includes a transmitter (4).
  • the transmitter (4) is associated with a first range control (5).
  • the first range control (5) inserts in a selected, but preferably in each telegram to be sent, the danger alarm (2) to other hazard warning (2) or possibly to a control center, a limit on the reception strength, the reception of the telegram is evaluated by a hazard warning (2) or possibly a central office.
  • an inventive hazard warning device (2) also contains a receiver (3).
  • the receiver (3) is associated with a second range control (6).
  • the second range control (6) comprises a measuring device (7) for the reception strength with which a telegram is received and a comparison device (8).
  • the measuring device (7) for the reception strength is usually a part of the receiver (3), which is the reception strength of the second range control (6) z. In the form of an RSSI signal or value. Therefore, the logical rather than the physical assignment is presented here.
  • the comparison device (8) compares the measured reception strength with the limit value previously extracted from a telegram, wherein the limit value from a previously transmitted telegram is preferably extracted from the same telegram. If in this comparison If it is determined that the measured reception strength falls below the limit value, the received telegram is discarded. In the event that the reception of the telegram is still in progress, it can then be terminated immediately. Discarding the telegram may be effected in that the second range control (6) does not forward the telegram to the control unit (9) or by giving a signal to the control unit (9) which indicates to the control unit (9) received telegram not evaluate but discard.
  • the selection of the reception strength limit values by the first range control (5) takes place on the basis of different criteria. These include various operating modes, states of the danger detector such as malfunction, the device type to which a telegram is addressed and the content of the telegram itself.
  • the first range control (5) can be used for example. B. choose during a installation mode, a very low limit, which is always exceeded in the further operation. Here, a sufficient signal to noise ratio is maintained even with subsequent changes in the transmission properties.
  • a mute command sent by a hazard warning (2), which has not detected an alarm itself then in the telegram that contains the mute command, a lower limit may be provided, whereupon only detectors (2) in the vicinity of this detector (2) stop the alarm.
  • a high limit can be selected so that all other detectors (2) in the system (1) stop the alarm.
  • all detectors (2) it is conceivable for all detectors (2) to specify a low limit even in the normal operating mode in order not to disturb adjacent systems (1) of the same type. Due to the unlike the logical range unchanged physical range, it is also conceivable with a service tool (14) z.
  • a tablet PC or a smartphone with matching app that is used to monitor the states of each in a system (1) existing hazard warning (2) to receive all telegrams from a greater distance and evaluate without through a reduced transmission power to be limited. This service tool would simply ignore the limit.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Fire Alarms (AREA)
EP12001162.2A 2011-03-23 2012-02-22 Système de communication, notamment pour alarme et son procédé de fonctionnement Active EP2503527B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE201110014889 DE102011014889A1 (de) 2011-03-23 2011-03-23 Kommunikationssystem insbesondere für Gefahrenmelder und Verfahren zu dessen Betrieb

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2503527A1 true EP2503527A1 (fr) 2012-09-26
EP2503527B1 EP2503527B1 (fr) 2016-12-14

Family

ID=45841146

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12001162.2A Active EP2503527B1 (fr) 2011-03-23 2012-02-22 Système de communication, notamment pour alarme et son procédé de fonctionnement

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2503527B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102011014889A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016015368A1 (de) 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA Medizinische Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer medizinischen Vorrichtung
DE102018204214A1 (de) * 2018-03-20 2019-09-26 Geze Gmbh Drahtloskomponente einer Brandschutz-Feststellanlage oder einer Brandmeldeanlage, Verfahren zur Darbietung der Signalstärke

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4593273A (en) * 1984-03-16 1986-06-03 Narcisse Bernadine O Out-of-range personnel monitor and alarm
US4754261A (en) 1987-03-30 1988-06-28 Pittway Corporation Security system
DE4408268A1 (de) * 1994-03-11 1995-09-21 Grundig Emv Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Störsicherheit einer Funkalarmanlage
US5801626A (en) 1996-05-20 1998-09-01 Pittway Corporation Alarm communications system with supervision signal RSSI analysis
EP0874341A2 (fr) 1997-04-21 1998-10-28 Pittway Corporation Installation et surveillance avec consommation d'énergie réduite des dispositifs de sécurité sans fil
US6150936A (en) * 1996-05-20 2000-11-21 Pittway Corporation Method and system for analyzing received signal strength
WO2006102183A2 (fr) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-28 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. Systeme de communication bidirectionnel permettant de suivre les positions et les etats de vehicules a roues
US20110014910A1 (en) 2009-07-20 2011-01-20 Intellon Corporation Channel reuse in communication systems

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4593273A (en) * 1984-03-16 1986-06-03 Narcisse Bernadine O Out-of-range personnel monitor and alarm
US4754261A (en) 1987-03-30 1988-06-28 Pittway Corporation Security system
DE4408268A1 (de) * 1994-03-11 1995-09-21 Grundig Emv Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Störsicherheit einer Funkalarmanlage
US5801626A (en) 1996-05-20 1998-09-01 Pittway Corporation Alarm communications system with supervision signal RSSI analysis
US6150936A (en) * 1996-05-20 2000-11-21 Pittway Corporation Method and system for analyzing received signal strength
EP0874341A2 (fr) 1997-04-21 1998-10-28 Pittway Corporation Installation et surveillance avec consommation d'énergie réduite des dispositifs de sécurité sans fil
WO2006102183A2 (fr) * 2005-03-18 2006-09-28 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. Systeme de communication bidirectionnel permettant de suivre les positions et les etats de vehicules a roues
US20110014910A1 (en) 2009-07-20 2011-01-20 Intellon Corporation Channel reuse in communication systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2503527B1 (fr) 2016-12-14
DE102011014889A1 (de) 2012-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE10358650B4 (de) System und Verfahren zum Identifizieren von Störungen in einem Kommunikationsspektrum
DE60015043T2 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Luftdruckkontrolle von Reifen
DE102012216689B4 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung eines Ethernet-basierten Kommunikationsnetzwerks in einem Kraftfahrzeug
DE10320176B3 (de) Verfahren zur Selektion der Frequenzkanäle eines ein Frequenzsprungverfahren verwendenden Funksystems
EP2437226A2 (fr) Système d'alarme de détecteur de fumée et procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'alarme de détecteur de fumée
EP2503527B1 (fr) Système de communication, notamment pour alarme et son procédé de fonctionnement
DE102019134540B4 (de) Verfahren zur Fehlerüberwachung einer Antennenanlage einer Basisstation, Überwachungssystem, Testeinrichtung, Basisstation und Computerprogramm hierzu
DE102015210633B4 (de) Bordinterne Kommunikationsvorrichtung
EP1227604B1 (fr) Procédé de connection dans un réseau de données
EP0770977A1 (fr) Procédé pour l'augmentation de la sécurité de transmission d'un dispositif d'alarme radio
DE102018204214A1 (de) Drahtloskomponente einer Brandschutz-Feststellanlage oder einer Brandmeldeanlage, Verfahren zur Darbietung der Signalstärke
DE3327489C2 (fr)
DE10338825A1 (de) Diagnoseeinrichtung und Diagnoseverfahren für ein Mehrantennensystem
EP2478721B1 (fr) Réseau radio comportant des dispositifs utilisateurs radio exécutant des mesures de canaux en mode diagnostic
DE102010032369B4 (de) Anmeldeverfahren für Funkkommunikationssysteme
WO2018114079A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance d'au moins une ligne de haut-parleur
DE4334216C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Überwachung von Funkeinrichtungen
EP1477951B1 (fr) Méthode et appareil de surveillance du fonctionnement des voies de transmission radio dans un système de signalisation d'alarmes
DE102009039200B4 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung des eingestellten Abtastzeitpunktes eines CAN-Gerätes
WO2019029994A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance d'un état d'occupation d'une place de stationnement dans un espace de stationnement ainsi que système pourvu d'un tel dispositif et procédé de fonctionnement d'un tel dispositif et d'un tel système
DE69726793T2 (de) Automatisches Alarmsystem mit Überwachungssignalanalyse
EP1560349B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour surveiller des cables haute fréquence
DE102023105658A1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung einer position eines senders und system
DE202019105376U1 (de) Funk-Basisstation für eine Funkrufanordnung
DE102006056465B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen des Funkverkehrs innerhalb eines Raumes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121221

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160817

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 854224

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012008994

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170314

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170228

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170414

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170414

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170314

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502012008994

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170915

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170314

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170314

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161214

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240216

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240216

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240301

Year of fee payment: 13