EP2439722A1 - Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule - Google Patents

Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2439722A1
EP2439722A1 EP10009934A EP10009934A EP2439722A1 EP 2439722 A1 EP2439722 A1 EP 2439722A1 EP 10009934 A EP10009934 A EP 10009934A EP 10009934 A EP10009934 A EP 10009934A EP 2439722 A1 EP2439722 A1 EP 2439722A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
display data
relevant
pixel
safety
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10009934A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2439722B1 (fr
Inventor
David Manuel Gruenert
Stephan Haag
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pixy AG
Original Assignee
Pixy AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=43627025&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2439722(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Pixy AG filed Critical Pixy AG
Priority to EP10009934.0A priority Critical patent/EP2439722B1/fr
Priority to BRPI1105104-3A priority patent/BRPI1105104A2/pt
Publication of EP2439722A1 publication Critical patent/EP2439722A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2439722B1 publication Critical patent/EP2439722B1/fr
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G3/00—Control arrangements or circuits, of interest only in connection with visual indicators other than cathode-ray tubes
    • G09G3/006—Electronic inspection or testing of displays and display drivers, e.g. of LED or LCD displays
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2330/00—Aspects of power supply; Aspects of display protection and defect management
    • G09G2330/12—Test circuits or failure detection circuits included in a display system, as permanent part thereof
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2340/00—Aspects of display data processing
    • G09G2340/02—Handling of images in compressed format, e.g. JPEG, MPEG
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2358/00—Arrangements for display data security
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2380/00—Specific applications
    • G09G2380/10—Automotive applications
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G5/00—Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators
    • G09G5/36—Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators characterised by the display of a graphic pattern, e.g. using an all-points-addressable [APA] memory

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for checking pixel-formatted display data for display on a screen of a display device in the vehicle.
  • the cabs are increasingly equipped with display devices, which have screens that are equipped based on the LCD (Liquid Cristal Display) technology. Accordingly, safety-related basic data, such as the speed, the temperature, the pressure, the oil level or the state of the brake system must be displayed digitally on the screen of the display device in the cab.
  • LCD Liquid Cristal Display
  • the safety requirements for safety-relevant hardware and software are defined in rail traffic by the safety standards EN 50126, EN 50128 and EN 50129.
  • the representation of the speed, for example, on the screen of the display device is classified according to the intended safety standard as safety level SIL ("safety-integrity level") - 2, while the monitoring of the brake system must meet the safety level SIL-4.
  • the SIL-2 safety level means that the user of the display device must be informed in the rail traffic as soon as the SIL-2 safety level is not met. However, the safety system itself does not have to be a measure to be hit. In the case of the safety requirement for safety level SIL-4, for example, the brake system as a safety system must react immediately.
  • the focus is placed on the security level SIL-2, so that safety-related basic data, such as the speed on the screen of the display device are displayed correctly.
  • the publication DE 10 2005 011 942 discloses a method for error disclosure when applying a security-relevant display with a first, driven via a first data source display element and a second, driven via a second data source display element for displaying a detected measured value.
  • the first display element is concealed relative to the second display element, and in the absence of overlap of the two display elements, an error disclosure to the user.
  • the publication DE 10 2004 039 498 discloses a method for monitoring the state of an LCD display, in particular the frozen state of this display, wherein the attachment of a light sensor takes place in a small area in which the display control computer generates a specific, alternating bit pattern and the output signal of the light sensor to the input of a independent controller leads.
  • the controller receives the bit pattern data from the control computer and compares it with the bit pattern from the light sensor. If there is a mismatch between the bit pattern received from the control computer and the bit pattern from the light sensor, an alarm is triggered.
  • the present invention is therefore based on the object of providing a method for monitoring security-relevant pixel-formatted display data, which enables both rapid and reliable monitoring of the security-relevant display data and, in the event of an error or interruption, discloses this to a user.
  • the object is achieved by the method according to claim 1.
  • An inventive method is used to check pixel-formatted display data, which by means of a Calculator generated from security-related basic data and supplied to the display on a screen of a display device, in particular a LCD (Liquid Cristal Display) monitor in the cab of a vehicle, the screen.
  • the security-relevant pixel-formatted display data are tapped in front of the screen and converted in a monitor by means of a compressor into security-relevant compressed display data and fed to a verifier.
  • a reference data set with predefined, safety-relevant compressed reference display data is stored in a memory of the monitor.
  • the safety-related basic data in the supervisor determine which predefined safety-related compressed reference display data from the reference data record is supplied to the verifier.
  • the verifier compares the predefined safety-related compressed reference display data supplied with it and the safety-relevant compressed display data with one another and, if the verification fails, reveals this to a user by means of a first signal on the display device.
  • the advantage of such a method is the rapid evaluation of exclusively security-relevant pixel-formatted display data, since the compressor considerably reduces the data volume and the reviewer already has compressed reference display data available for the comparison.
  • Another advantage is the double protection of the security relevant basic data to be evaluated: On the one hand, the pixel formatted display data is generated by the computer and the supervisor is compressed and on the other hand, the current safety relevant basic data in a second path
  • the compressor reduces a color depth of the pixel-formatted display data, in particular from an 18-bit or 24-bit color level over an 8-bit gray level to a gray level of less than 8 bits per pixel.
  • This has the advantage that the pixel-formatted display data has a smaller data volume.
  • the review of the security-relevant pixel-formatted display data is accelerated and the necessary computing power is reduced.
  • the compressor further reduces a resolution of a multi-pixel subfield to a pixel, such that the pixel formatted display data is present as compressed display data.
  • This causes a further reduction of the data volume of the security-relevant pixel-formatted display data.
  • the advantage with this type of compression of the pixel-formatted display data is that the distance, also called Hamming distance, can be chosen between two security-relevant pixel-formatted display data in such a way that the probability of a false check result is minimized or reduced below the permissible value.
  • the checker controls a signal lamp, in particular an LED, in particular, to form a second signal on the display device such that it is lit or flashing.
  • the reviewer switches on a backlight of the screen and, if there is no match, forms the first signal.
  • the safety-related basic data is supplied to a controller in the monitor in order to read the memory and to supply the corresponding predefined safety-related reference display data to the reviewer.
  • the memory is stored in a storage medium, in particular a flash.
  • a storage medium in particular a flash. This has the advantage that data can be stored directly in the monitor, which can be accessed very quickly or from which the data can be read quickly.
  • the basic data in addition to the security-relevant basic data, the basic data also has non-safety-relevant basic data, so that the computer generates pixel-formatted display data from the security-relevant and non-safety-relevant basic data. This causes that in a screen page selected by the user, both security-related and non-security-relevant display data of the selected screen page the
  • the tapped pixel-formatted display data is fed to a region filter and filtered out of these the non-safety-relevant pixel-formatted display data, so that the reviewer performs the check exclusively on the basis of the security-relevant pixel-formatted display data.
  • This has the effect that the non-safety-relevant display data has no relevance for checking the security-relevant display data and thus the reviewer has to evaluate a smaller volume of data.
  • the computer when generating the pixel-formatted display data, the computer integrates a screen control signal, such as a start-of-line signal, and a window filter filters out of the tapped pixel-formatted display data this screen control signal.
  • a screen control signal such as a start-of-line signal
  • a window filter filters out of the tapped pixel-formatted display data this screen control signal.
  • the pixel-formatted display data are converted by means of a data converter of serial LVDS data into parallel video data, in particular into an RGB color space with a color depth of 18 bits or 24 bits.
  • the LVDS data are so-called low voltage differential signals, which are currently suitable for LCD monitors as a data format to display pixel-formatted display data for display.
  • parallel video data such as RGB666 video data
  • RGB666 video data does not require conversion by the data converter.
  • RGB666 video signals can be fed directly to the window filter, compressor or regional filter.
  • additional hardware is saved, which leads accordingly to the cost reduction of the hardware.
  • An in Fig. 1 exemplified display device 10 which is intended for use in the cab of a vehicle, in particular a rail vehicle, provides basic data 12 in a form suitable for the particular application on a screen 14.
  • the screen 14 has controls 16, by means of which a user of the display device 10, depending on the situation in which the vehicle is located, can bring a selected screen page 18 on the screen 14 of the display device 10 for display. For example, in a railway station, the position of the doors can be selected as the screen page 18, while the speed of the vehicle can be displayed on another selected screen page 18 while driving.
  • signal lamps 19 mounted on the screen 14, in particular LEDs 20, 22, 24, 26, status information can be displayed to the user.
  • an optical marker 28 and the identification of a security-relevant region 13 and a non-safety-relevant region 15 are shown in the screen 14 in the screen page 18. The operation of these elements will be described in detail in connection with the description of Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 explained.
  • the basic data 12 which are to be displayed on the screen 14 are transmitted via a fieldbus system such as the CAN bus, the MVB (Multi-Vehicular Bus System). or transmitted via an Ethernet data line to a computer 30 in the display device 10.
  • the computer 30 visualizes the basic data 12 on the screen 14 by converting the basic data 12 into pixel-formatted display data 32 by means of software.
  • the software can be executed, for example, on an operating system in the computer 30, such as Linux.
  • safety-relevant basic data 34 such as, for example, the speed
  • basic safety data 36 such as the fill level of a water tank, for example.
  • the safety-related basic data 34 must meet the safety level SIL-2, as stated in the introduction. They must also be transmitted in accordance with safety level SIL-2.
  • the computer 30 itself does not meet the safety requirements of rail traffic, since the conversion of safety-related basic data 34 in pixel-formatted display data 32 only the security level SIL-0 (dotted areas shown in FIG Fig. 1 ) Fulfills. Thus, the pixel-formatted display data 32 must be tapped before delivery to the screen 14 of the display device 10 and in a monitor 38, the security level SIL-2 (unshaded areas shown in FIG Fig. 1 ), be tested.
  • the pixel-formatted display data 32 are converted into compressed display data 44 by means of a compression method 42. Only the security-relevant pixel-formatted display data 46 in FIG security-related compressed display data 48 converted.
  • the monitor 38 also has the same security-related basic data 34 as the computer 30.
  • a memory 50 of the monitor 38 stores a reference data record 52 with predefined, safety-relevant compressed reference display data 54.
  • the safety-relevant basic data 34 determine in the monitor 38 which predefined safety-relevant compressed reference display data 54 from the reference data set 52 are supplied to the checker 40.
  • the memory 50 can be stored in a storage medium, in particular in a flash.
  • the predefined safety-related compressed reference display data 54 and safety-related compressed display data 48 supplied to the checker 40 are compared with one another. After an evaluation 56 of this review, corresponding signaling is then initiated.
  • the monitor 38 has outputs 58, 60, 62, 64, 66 for initiating the corresponding signaling.
  • a mismatch between the safety-relevant compressed pixel-formatted display data 48 and the safety-relevant compressed reference display data 54 during the check this is indicated to the user by means of a first signal 68 on the display device 10, in particular by the signal lamps 19.
  • the SIL-2 LED 24 or optionally the marker LED 26 or an external device 70 can be used for the signaling.
  • the computer 30, the result of the failed check signaled is another error disclosure in the case of a faulty check.
  • Another error disclosure in the case of a faulty check is the switching off of the backlight 23 by the monitor 38.
  • the in Fig. 2 shown monitor 38 receives, as to Fig. 1 executed, the same safety-related basic data 34 as the computer 30, which generates 34 pixel-formatted display data 32 from the safety-related basic data.
  • the pixel-formatted display data 32 tapped before being fed to the screen 14 of the display device 10 are likewise fed to the monitor 38.
  • a module 72 'integrated in the display device 10 or in the monitor 38 which is referred to as the AIM (Display Integrity Module) 72, is part of the supervisor 38 and is responsible for the processing of the safety-related basic data 34 and the pixel-formatted display data 32
  • AIM 72 may be implemented as a FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), DSP (Digital Signal Processor), CPU (Central Processing Unit) or ASIC (Application Specific Intergrated Circuit).
  • the data to be read by the AIM 72 must be pre-converted in the case of a data format incompatible with the AIM 72.
  • configuration data 76 such as reference data 78 and / or initialization parameters 80, can be transmitted to the AIM 72 and stored in the memory 50.
  • these configuration data 76 typically must first pass through a controller 81, especially if the configuration data 76 is not AIM 72 compliant.
  • AIM 72 compatible data may be RGB666 data 91 as in Fig. 2 shown in dashed lines.
  • AIM 72 device-specific configuration data 76 ' such as a timer 82 or a reset function 84, can be sent by the configurator 74 directly to the AIM 72.
  • the reference data record 52 is stored in the memory 50 in configuration mode 74 'with predefined, safety-relevant compressed reference display data 54.
  • the configuration data 76 and initialization parameters 80 are read from the respective hardware components of the supervisor 38 and AIM 72, respectively, preempting the AIM 72 and checking the memory 50 to ensure that no Error in the memory 50 is present.
  • the tapped, pixel-formatted display data 32 as well as the safety-related basic data 34 can now be read by the AIM 72.
  • the pixel-formatted display data 32 may be so-called serial LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signal) data 93 which is not compatible with the AIM 72 data format, these pixel-formatted display data 32 may need to be converted to parallel video data 92 (this path is by means of a data converter 90) in Fig. 2 shown).
  • the data converter 90 in particular uses 18-bit and 24-bit LVDS pixel-formatted display data 32 as input data accepted.
  • the resolution and color depth of the video data 92 can be adjusted.
  • the data converter 90 may be applied either as part of the AIM 72 on the FPGA or ASIC, or separately (dashed in Fig.2 ) may be arranged in the monitor 38 by the ASIC or FPGA.
  • the video data 92 generated by the data converter 90 from the pixel-formatted display data 32 are fed to a window filter 94.
  • the window filter 94 detects the video data 92, which were generated for the user-selected screen page 18 and should be displayed on the screen 14 of the display device 10.
  • All inactive pixel-formatted display data 96 and so-called screen control signals 98, such as a start-of-line signal 98 ', are filtered out by the window filter 94.
  • the non-displayed area for screen pages 18, in particular the area for the screen control signals 98 can be defined.
  • pixel-formatted display data 32 are further processed by a compressor 100.
  • the compressor 100 reduces the color depth of individual pixels and / or summarizes several pixels in a pixel, as clearly shown in FIG Fig. 3 shown and in detail in the description of the figures Fig. 3 is explained.
  • the compression rate for the reduction of the color depth and the reduction of the resolution can be set in configuration mode 74 '.
  • the security-relevant regions 13 (see FIG Fig. 1 ) on the screen side 18 and which exclusively have the security-relevant compressed pixel-formatted display data 48 are filtered out by means of a region filter 104.
  • the region filter 104 filters out all the captured pixel-formatted display data 32 except for the security-relevant display data 46, which are located in the security-relevant regions 13.
  • corresponding regions 106 are in Fig. 5 for security-relevant screen pages 108.
  • the position of the security-relevant regions 13 on predefined screen pages 18 can be determined by means of an identification number.
  • the sequence of the above-mentioned filters can be arbitrarily selected in the compression method 42.
  • the video data 92 after the window filter 94 receive a new filtering by the region filter 104 and then only the compressor 100 is used.
  • the checker 38 would receive from the compressor 100 exclusively safety-relevant compressed display data 48 in the corresponding safety-relevant regions 13.
  • the safety-relevant compressed display data 48 located in the safety-relevant regions 13 are supplied to the checker 40 in separate registers 112. Subsequently, the checker 40 compares the safety-relevant compressed display data 48 with the safety-related compressed reference display data 54, which was determined by the safety-related basic data 34 and supplied to the checker 38 from the memory 50 in the operating mode 89.
  • An intermediate register 114 between the verifier 40 and the evaluation 56 allows a kind of buffering of the comparison results from the verifier 38. This may be necessary if, for example, a speed of 26 km / h is changed to another speed 27 km / h and the computer accordingly Time is required to bring this new speed on the screen 14 of the display device 10 for presentation. Even when changing the screen page 18, the computer requires time to implement the representation, so that the buffering is necessary here. Since the check lasts about 20 ms, which is too fast for the human eye, the buffer 114 also serves the user so that he can view the pixel-formatted display data 32 on the screen 14 sufficiently long to perceive it correctly.
  • Fig. 3 the speed of the vehicle of 26 km / h is displayed in the form of pixel-formatted display data 32 in the safety-relevant region 13. That is, the pixel-formatted display data 32 has been pre-filtered by the window filter 94 and the region filter 104, respectively, so that they are arranged on the screen side 18 in the relevant security-relevant region 13.
  • This first state 115 corresponds to the state after the data conversion from serial LVDS 93 into parallel video data 92 or after the direct supply of, for example, RGB666 data 91, so that either 18-bit or 24-bit video data 92 is present.
  • a first compression step 116 the color depth is reduced from 18 bits or 24 bits over an 8 bit gray level to a gray level smaller than 8 bits, in particular to a 1 bit black and white stage per pixel (in FIG Fig. 3 , second state view from above).
  • a second compression step 118 multiple pixel subfields 120, as in FIG Fig. 4 shown reduced to 1 pixel.
  • the advantage with this type of compression of the pixel-formatted display data 32 is that the distance, also called Hamming distance, can be selected between two security-relevant pixel-formatted display data 46 in such a way that the probability of a false check result is minimized or reduced below the permissible value ,
  • the latter can, for example, provide the defective security-relevant region 13 with an "X", as in FIG Fig. 3 shown in dashed lines.
  • the reviewer 38 recognizes the region 106 marked "X" by the computer and accepts that the security-related base data 34 in this region 106 is faulty.
  • the compression method 42 takes into account the perception of the human eye, where errors of individual pixels are generally of no relevance.
  • the marking of security-relevant screen pages 108 and non-security-relevant screen pages 110 can take place by means of the optical marker 28, as in FIG Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 shown.
  • the computer 30 converts the safety-related basic data 34 supplied to it and the basic data 36 which is not relevant to safety, that is to say the basic data 12 of a selected screen page 18, into pixel-formatted display data 32.
  • the corresponding pixel-formatted display data 32 are then supplied to the screen 14 for display.
  • a first optical marker 122 can be integrated into the pixel-formatted display data 32, as in FIG Fig. 5 shown.
  • a second optical marker 124 can be integrated into the pixel-formatted display data 32, as in FIG Fig. 6 shown.
  • the first optical marker 122 and the second optical marker 124 have information features with which the monitor 38 can distinguish the security-relevant screen pages 108 from the non-security-relevant screen pages 110.
  • the monitor 38 In configuration mode 74 ', if the optical marker 28 is to be used, the monitor 38 must be programmed with appropriate marker reference data. Accordingly, in the ready state, the supervisor 38 may compare the optical marker 28 with marker reference data during the review. On the one hand, if the monitor 38 determines that the second optical marker 124 is present, the check is turned off. However, if the monitor 38 determines that the first optical marker 122 is present, or if there is no match between the optical marker 28 and the marker reference data, a check is made.
  • the optical marker 28 consists of a sequence of predefined pixel patterns 130 and is located in particular at a predefined location in the security-relevant screen 108, as in Fig. 5 or in the non-security-relevant screen page 110, as in Fig. 6 shown.
  • the second optical marker 124 has a different sequence of pixel patterns 130 than the first optical marker 122.
  • the sequence and the time interval of a pixel pattern 130 are monitored by the monitor 38. If there is no match of correct sequence 128 and / or time interval 132 of the pixel pattern 130 with marker reference data, the supervisor 38 performs the control.
  • the signal 68 is sent to the display device 10 to indicate to the user that and which optical marker 28 is present (see Fig. 5 and Fig.6 ). This can be done, for example, by switching on the marker LED 26 and / or an external device 70, as related to Fig. 1 explained.
  • the computer 30 receives a set of predefined screen pages 18 which can be selected by the user, and the supervisor 38 receives the reference data set 78 discussed in the upper sections and the initialization parameters 80 (see FIG Fig. 2 ).
  • the desired screen page 18 may be selected on the screen 14 of the display device 10 by the user.
  • the backlight 23 and the SIL-2 LED 24 are turned off.
  • the error can also be signaled to the computer 30 so that it notes, for example, an "X" on the faulty safety-relevant region 13, instead of a speed, as in FIG Fig. 3 shown.
  • the SIL-2 LED 24 lights up and the backlight 23 remains lit.
  • the SIL-2 LED 24 and the SIL-2 LED 24 are identical to each other.
  • Marker LED 26 combined in one LED, so that the latter is always turned on when both the conditions for switching on the marker LED 26 as well as the conditions for switching on the SIL-2 LED 24 are met.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Control Of Indicators Other Than Cathode Ray Tubes (AREA)
EP10009934.0A 2010-09-20 2010-09-20 Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule Revoked EP2439722B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10009934.0A EP2439722B1 (fr) 2010-09-20 2010-09-20 Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule
BRPI1105104-3A BRPI1105104A2 (pt) 2010-09-20 2011-09-19 processo para verificaÇço de dados de display formatados em pixel para apresentaÇço em um monitor de um aparelho indicador em um veÍculo

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10009934.0A EP2439722B1 (fr) 2010-09-20 2010-09-20 Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2439722A1 true EP2439722A1 (fr) 2012-04-11
EP2439722B1 EP2439722B1 (fr) 2013-06-19

Family

ID=43627025

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10009934.0A Revoked EP2439722B1 (fr) 2010-09-20 2010-09-20 Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2439722B1 (fr)
BR (1) BRPI1105104A2 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2833349A1 (fr) 2013-07-31 2015-02-04 Deuta-Werke GmbH Procédé et dispositif de représentation d'un état relevant de la sécurité
EP3040862A1 (fr) * 2014-12-30 2016-07-06 Matthias Auchmann Procédé et system pour l'affichage sécurisé des données relatives à la sécurité
WO2018041777A1 (fr) * 2016-08-31 2018-03-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Surveillance d'une indication dans une cabine de conduite d'un moyen de transport
DE102016217518A1 (de) 2016-09-14 2018-03-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung einer Nichtanzeige eines vorgegebenen Bildes, insbesondere eines Warnsymbols, in einem Display einer Anzeigevorrichtung
IT202200006290A1 (it) * 2022-03-30 2023-09-30 Hitachi Rail Sts S P A Gruppo di verifica, per verificare l'attendibilita' di informazioni di veicolo visibili su uno schermo video, in particolare per un veicolo su rotaia

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10252124A1 (de) 2002-11-04 2004-05-27 Siemens Ag Vorrichtung zur Geschwindigkeitsanzeige in Fahrzeugen
US20040145598A1 (en) * 2003-01-24 2004-07-29 Microsoft Corporation System and method for determining display subsystem compliance
DE102004039498A1 (de) 2004-08-14 2006-02-23 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung des Zustandes eines TFT - bzw. LCD-Display für eine sicherheitsrelevante "Man-Machine-Interface" (MMI)
DE102005011942A1 (de) 2005-03-14 2006-09-21 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Verfahren zur Fehleroffenbarung bei Anwendung einer sicherheitsrelevanten Anzeige, insbesondere auf Basis eines LCD- bzw. TFT-Displays oder einer analogen Technolgie
WO2007054275A2 (fr) * 2005-11-12 2007-05-18 Diehl Aerospace Gmbh Procede pour surveiller la commande de presentations d'images, notamment a partir de donnees brutes relatives a la securite
WO2007071378A1 (fr) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-28 Funkwerk Information Technologies Gmbh Procede et dispositif de surveillance sure et d'evaluation d'etats de fonctionnement d'au moins un systeme de controle du trafic et utilisation de ce procede et de ce dispositif
WO2009050106A1 (fr) * 2007-10-10 2009-04-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Dispositif de contrôle, dispositif d'affichage et procédé pour vérifier la validité de signaux d'affichage

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10252124A1 (de) 2002-11-04 2004-05-27 Siemens Ag Vorrichtung zur Geschwindigkeitsanzeige in Fahrzeugen
US20040145598A1 (en) * 2003-01-24 2004-07-29 Microsoft Corporation System and method for determining display subsystem compliance
DE102004039498A1 (de) 2004-08-14 2006-02-23 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung des Zustandes eines TFT - bzw. LCD-Display für eine sicherheitsrelevante "Man-Machine-Interface" (MMI)
DE102005011942A1 (de) 2005-03-14 2006-09-21 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Verfahren zur Fehleroffenbarung bei Anwendung einer sicherheitsrelevanten Anzeige, insbesondere auf Basis eines LCD- bzw. TFT-Displays oder einer analogen Technolgie
WO2007054275A2 (fr) * 2005-11-12 2007-05-18 Diehl Aerospace Gmbh Procede pour surveiller la commande de presentations d'images, notamment a partir de donnees brutes relatives a la securite
WO2007071378A1 (fr) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-28 Funkwerk Information Technologies Gmbh Procede et dispositif de surveillance sure et d'evaluation d'etats de fonctionnement d'au moins un systeme de controle du trafic et utilisation de ce procede et de ce dispositif
WO2009050106A1 (fr) * 2007-10-10 2009-04-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Dispositif de contrôle, dispositif d'affichage et procédé pour vérifier la validité de signaux d'affichage

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2833349A1 (fr) 2013-07-31 2015-02-04 Deuta-Werke GmbH Procédé et dispositif de représentation d'un état relevant de la sécurité
DE102013012679A1 (de) * 2013-07-31 2015-02-05 Deuta-Werke Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Darstellung eines sicherheitsrelevanten Zustands
EP3040862A1 (fr) * 2014-12-30 2016-07-06 Matthias Auchmann Procédé et system pour l'affichage sécurisé des données relatives à la sécurité
US10152952B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2018-12-11 Matthias Auchmann Method and system for the safe visualization of safety-relevant information
WO2018041777A1 (fr) * 2016-08-31 2018-03-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Surveillance d'une indication dans une cabine de conduite d'un moyen de transport
DE102016217518A1 (de) 2016-09-14 2018-03-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung einer Nichtanzeige eines vorgegebenen Bildes, insbesondere eines Warnsymbols, in einem Display einer Anzeigevorrichtung
IT202200006290A1 (it) * 2022-03-30 2023-09-30 Hitachi Rail Sts S P A Gruppo di verifica, per verificare l'attendibilita' di informazioni di veicolo visibili su uno schermo video, in particolare per un veicolo su rotaia

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BRPI1105104A2 (pt) 2013-01-22
EP2439722B1 (fr) 2013-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2439722B1 (fr) Procédé de vérification de données d'affichage pixellisées pour la représentation sur un écran d'appareil d'affichage dans un véhicule
EP2273369B1 (fr) Procédé de représentation d'une information relative à la sécurité sur un dispositif d'affichage et dispositif d'exécution du procédé
EP2833349B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de représentation d'un état relevant de la sécurité
EP2698618B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'évaluation de la qualité d'un phare
DE102005027887A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Information eines Fahrzeugführers
EP0645711A1 (fr) Procédé d'opération d'un dispositif d'affichage et dispositifs pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procédé
DE102008025530B4 (de) Einrichtung zur Prüfung der Funktion einer Leuchteinrichtung eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102016202620A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Überwachen eines räumlichen Bereichs, insbesondere in der Umgebung oder innerhalb eines Fahrzeugs
DE102015219496A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bestimmen der Funktionsfähigkeit eines Fahrerassistenzsystems eines Fahrzeugs, Vorrichtung, Fahrerassistenzsystem, Kraftfahrzeug
EP2439644B1 (fr) Procédé de marquage de pages d'écran relatives et non relatives à la sécurité sur un appareil d'affichage à l'aide d'un marqueur optique
EP3405944B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de contrôle d'une validité de données d'image dans un dispositif d'affichage en tenant compte de données de contrôle
DE102012014493B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur redundanten Erkennung einer Drehrichtung
DE102011051188B4 (de) Matrixadressiertes Anzeigesystem
DE102015012889B4 (de) Anzeigevorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überprüfung von Anzeigeinhalten
EP1416283B1 (fr) Dispositif d'affichage de la vitesse d'un véhicule
EP1802489B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour commander un eclairage de vehicule automobile
WO2018041777A1 (fr) Surveillance d'une indication dans une cabine de conduite d'un moyen de transport
DE102008021241B4 (de) Messwert-Anzeige, insbesondere im Führerstand eines Schienenfahrzeugs
EP3899915A1 (fr) Procédé de validation de données d'image d'environnement, dispositif, programme d'ordinateur et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur
EP3826875B1 (fr) Système de surveillance automatique de la signalisation de l'état du véhicule et procédé de surveillance d'un dispositif de signalisation de l'état du véhicule
WO2017125323A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour contrôler la validité de données d'image dans un système d'affichage
DE102018205144B3 (de) Testverfahren zur Erkennung von Fehler-Frames bei hochauflösenden Scheinwerfern
WO2019179712A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'affichage sécurisé d'un contenu d'image utile pour la présentation sur une unité d'affichage dans un véhicule automobile
DE102022113271B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Fahrzeuginnenraumüberwachungssystems, Steuereinrichtung, Fahrzeuginnenraumüberwachungssystem und Fahrzeug
DE102012012728A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Rückgewinnen einer Anzeigeinformation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME RS

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121003

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130425

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL AND PARTN, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 618038

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502010003685

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130919

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130821

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131021

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131019

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: PIXY A.G.

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: DEUTA-WERKE GMBH

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502010003685

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130920

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PLAY Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100920

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130920

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140920

PLAT Information related to reply to examination report in opposition deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDORE3

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

PLAT Information related to reply to examination report in opposition deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDORE3

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160921

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20160823

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 618038

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150920

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 502010003685

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 502010003685

Country of ref document: DE

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PLX

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20170714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20130619

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20130619

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MA03

Ref document number: 618038

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130619

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED