EP2364559B1 - Erzeugung und signalisierung von ue-listen zur unterstützung von frequenzselektivem repeater-betrieb - Google Patents

Erzeugung und signalisierung von ue-listen zur unterstützung von frequenzselektivem repeater-betrieb Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2364559B1
EP2364559B1 EP09756795A EP09756795A EP2364559B1 EP 2364559 B1 EP2364559 B1 EP 2364559B1 EP 09756795 A EP09756795 A EP 09756795A EP 09756795 A EP09756795 A EP 09756795A EP 2364559 B1 EP2364559 B1 EP 2364559B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
repeater
base station
ues
signals
white list
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP09756795A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2364559A1 (de
Inventor
Muhammad Kazmi
Jiansong Gan
Robert Baldemair
Zhang Zhang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority to EP12178444.1A priority Critical patent/EP2521393A3/de
Publication of EP2364559A1 publication Critical patent/EP2364559A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2364559B1 publication Critical patent/EP2364559B1/de
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14—Relay systems
    • H04B7/15—Active relay systems
    • H04B7/155—Ground-based stations
    • H04B7/15528—Control of operation parameters of a relay station to exploit the physical medium
    • H04B7/1555—Selecting relay station antenna mode, e.g. selecting omnidirectional -, directional beams, selecting polarizations
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14—Relay systems
    • H04B7/15—Active relay systems
    • H04B7/155—Ground-based stations
    • H04B7/15528—Control of operation parameters of a relay station to exploit the physical medium
    • H04B7/15542—Selecting at relay station its transmit and receive resources
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14—Relay systems
    • H04B7/15—Active relay systems
    • H04B7/155—Ground-based stations
    • H04B7/15528—Control of operation parameters of a relay station to exploit the physical medium
    • H04B7/15535—Control of relay amplifier gain
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/24—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field for communication between two or more posts
    • H04B7/26—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field for communication between two or more posts at least one of which is mobile
    • H04B7/2603—Arrangements for wireless physical layer control
    • H04B7/2606—Arrangements for base station coverage control, e.g. by using relays in tunnels
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/24—Cell structures
    • H04W16/26—Cell enhancers or enhancement, e.g. for tunnels, building shadow
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
    • H04W52/04—TPC
    • H04W52/38—TPC being performed in particular situations
    • H04W52/46—TPC being performed in particular situations in multi hop networks, e.g. wireless relay networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W84/00—Network topologies
    • H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
    • H04W84/04—Large scale networks; Deep hierarchical networks
    • H04W84/042—Public Land Mobile systems, e.g. cellular systems
    • H04W84/047—Public Land Mobile systems, e.g. cellular systems using dedicated repeater stations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to wireless telecommunication systems. More particularly, and not by way of limitation, the invention is directed to a method of supporting frequency-selective repeaters in a wireless telecommunication system.
  • LTE-Advanced Long Term Evolution
  • BS base station
  • Layer 1 relays also referred to as advanced repeaters
  • the main difference between an advanced repeater and a conventional repeater is that the advanced repeater includes one or several advanced functions, such as advanced antenna processing and/or frequency-selective (FS) amplification.
  • FS frequency-selective
  • FIG. 1 is an illustrative drawing showing the basic principle of conventional FS repeater operation. It is assumed in this illustration that UEs are scheduled such that each user occupies a part of the entire bandwidth. Among these UEs, UE1 and UE2 are associated with the same repeater and others are not associated with this repeater. If the repeater is a conventional repeater, it amplifies the entire bandwidth regardless of how the users are scheduled. If the repeater is an FS repeater, it only amplifies the resource blocks (RBs) allocated to UE1 and UE2. FS repeaters are particularly beneficial in Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) systems - e.g.
  • FDMA Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access OFDMA
  • OFDMA Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • scheduling is modeled in the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer and is performed by a scheduler residing in the radio network node such as base station or eNodeB or Node B.
  • the scheduler assigns RBs for the downlink (assignments) as well as for the uplink (grants) and transmits them together with a UE identifier using the downlink control channel such as the Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH).
  • MAC Medium Access Control
  • the scheduler assigns RBs for the downlink (assignments) as well as for the uplink (grants) and transmits them together with a UE identifier using the downlink control channel such as the Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH).
  • PDCCH Physical Downlink Control Channel
  • the mobile terminal or User Equipment can be configured to transmit downlink channel state information (CSI) such as Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reports on a configured uplink control channel or resource such as the Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) or on a dedicated or shared channel or resource such as the Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH).
  • CQI reports are typically based on some sort of downlink pilot or reference signal such as a downlink common reference signal (CRS).
  • CRS downlink common reference signal
  • the uplink channel-dependent scheduling is typically based on the quality measured by the eNode B on some sort of uplink pilot or reference signal such as Sounding Reference Signals (SRS).
  • SRS Sounding Reference Signals
  • the scheduler uses the reported CQI information to perform fast channel dependent link adaptation and to change allocations in the time and frequency domains.
  • Repeaters can get the assignments and grants by listening to the downlink control channel such as the PDCCH.
  • an FS repeater would be required to listen to any control channel that carries scheduling information. Besides acquiring the scheduling information, the UE-repeater association relationships are needed in order for the FS repeater to work properly.
  • a repeater that is associated with a particular UE only amplifies the signals transmitted towards the associated UE or from the associated UE to the base station.
  • WO 2004/032371 A1 discloses a system and method for extending the coverage area and communication capacity of a spread spectrum based wireless network through the use of intelligent repeaters.
  • the system comprises a wireless communications network augmented with low cost channel selective repeaters that is capable of repeating only desired signals, thereby suppressing undesirable interference and increasing network capacity.
  • the repeaters can be integrated into an existing wireless network with minimal impact to the existing network topology or control structure.
  • the BS or eNodeB classifies UEs into two categories or lists of users: a white list containing UEs that may need the assistance of repeaters, and a black list containing UEs that do not need repeater assistance.
  • the eNodeB may broadcast one of these two lists depending on the number of UEs in each list. For example, if 90 percent of the UEs are on the black list, it is more efficient to transmit the black list. However, if 90 percent of the UEs are on the white list, it is more efficient to transmit the white list.
  • the eNodeB should inform the repeaters which list is being broadcast. Each repeater then decides on its own whether to amplify signals for a given UE by listening to the broadcast information from the eNodeB and measuring signals from the UE.
  • One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method of supporting frequency-selective repeaters in a wireless telecommunication system having a base station that serves a plurality of UEs and one or more frequency-selective repeaters that amplify and forward signals between the base station and a portion of the UEs.
  • the method includes the steps of identifying by the base station, UEs for either a black list that identifies UEs for which signals are not to be amplified by a given repeater or a white list that identifies UEs for which signals are allowed to be amplified by the repeater; and sending the black list or white list from the base station to the repeater.
  • the method also includes detecting by the repeater, an identity of a UE within the repeater's transmission range; determining whether the detected UE is on the black list or white list; and when the UE is on the black list, determining by the repeater that signals scheduled for the UE are not to be amplified.
  • the repeater determines whether to amplify signals scheduled for the UE.
  • the repeater may amplify signals for all white list UEs, or it may apply additional criteria.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a base station for supporting frequency-selective repeaters in a wireless telecommunication system, wherein the base station serves a plurality of UEs, and a frequency-selective repeater amplifies and forwards signals between the base station and a portion of the UEs.
  • the base station includes a UE classifier for identifying UEs that either require or do not require amplification by the repeater; and an interface unit for notifying the repeater of the identified UEs.
  • the UE classifier may place the UEs on either a black list that identifies UEs for which signals are not to be amplified by the repeater or a white list that identifies UEs for which signals are allowed to be amplified by the repeater
  • the repeater includes an interface unit for receiving a list of UEs from the base station; and means for amplifying and forwarding signals only to UEs identified by the received list.
  • the repeater may include a list analyzer for determining whether the received list is a black list that identifies UEs for which signals are not to be amplified by the repeater or a white list that identifies UEs for which signals are allowed to be amplified by the repeater; and a UE classifier for determining which white list UEs should have their signals amplified.
  • a base station for supporting frequency-selective repeaters as set out in Claim 9.
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a portion of an LTE/SAE network architecture 10 suitable for implementing the system of the present invention.
  • the Evolved Packet Core within the SAE core network portion of the architecture includes a Mobility Management Entity (MME) 11 and a Serving Gateway (S-GW) 12.
  • MME Mobility Management Entity
  • S-GW Serving Gateway
  • the LTE access portion of the architecture includes a plurality of eNodeBs 13 and 14.
  • An advanced repeater, eNodeR 15, interfaces with the eNodeB 14 utilizing an Un interface for transmission of data and for the eNodeB to configure the eNodeR.
  • a UE 16 communicates with the network through the repeater, eNodeR 15.
  • the BS or eNodeB 14 provides a black list of UEs to the eNodeR 15.
  • UEs belonging to the black list are considered to have good enough signal quality with respect to the eNodeB (for example, signal quality above a predefined threshold level) and hence do not need the assistance of a repeater. Therefore, the eNodeR does not amplify RBs scheduled to these UEs (i.e., in the black list).
  • the eNodeR may amplify RBs scheduled to a UE that is not on the black list.
  • the BS or eNodeB 14 provides a white list of UEs to the eNodeR 15.
  • UEs belonging to the white list are considered to have poor signal quality with respect to the eNodeB (for example, signal quality below the predefined threshold level) and hence need the assistance of a repeater.
  • the eNodeR should amplify RBs scheduled to these UEs (i.e., in the white list) if the eNodeR can provide good enough signal strength to these UEs.
  • the eNodeB may create and monitor the black list or white list of UEs using one or more of the algorithms described below.
  • the eNodeB continuously updates the lists triggered whenever new UEs enter the system (initial access or via handover), radio conditions of existing UEs change due to mobility, or existing UEs leave the system.
  • the eNodeB creates the black/white lists based on uplink received signal strength level. For example, the eNodeB places a given UE on the black list if the uplink received signal power level (Rx) or quality from the given UE is above a predefined threshold level (Rt_BS). At this signal strength level, the UE can be well served directly by the eNodeB and does not require amplification by the eNodeR. Alternatively, the eNodeB may place the given UE on the white list if the uplink received signal power level (Rx) or quality from the given UE is below a predefined threshold level (Rt_BS). The Rx level may be measured by the eNodeB during initial access (RACH) or on any other channel during operation.
  • RACH initial access
  • the eNodeB creates the black/white lists based on the round trip time (RTT) of a signal from the eNodeB to the UE and back. If the round trip time is less than a predefined threshold (i.e., RTT ⁇ RTT_t_BS), the eNodeB places the UE on the black list. A lower value of RTT means the UE is close to the eNodeB and can be well served directly by the base station without repeater intervention. Alternatively, the eNodeB may place the given UE on the white list if the RTT is greater than a predefined threshold. The eNodeB may measure the RTT during the RACH transmission or during the call.
  • RTT round trip time
  • the eNodeB creates the black/white lists based on an estimated direction of arrival (DoA).
  • DoA estimated direction of arrival
  • the eNodeB can create different black lists (or white lists) for different eNodeRs. This is because the eNodeB knows the position of each eNodeR with respect to itself, and thus can identify UEs operating in the direction of each eNodeR. This method enables the creation of more accurate black/white list(s) since they can be specific to each eNodeR in the vicinity of the serving eNodeB.
  • the eNodeB creates the black/white lists based on downlink measurements.
  • the measurements are performed by the UE on the pilot or reference signals transmitted by the eNodeRs and the eNodeB.
  • This embodiment assumes that the eNodeRs transmit their own pilot signals.
  • the UE reports these measurements to the eNodeB.
  • the eNodeB then utilizes these reported measurements to create the black/white lists. Since the UE measurements are performed on multiple eNodeRs, the eNodeB can create repeater-specific black/white lists. It should be noted that although this embodiment utilizes eNodeR pilot signals, other embodiments of the present invention do not require that the eNodeRs transmit pilot signals in order to create the black/white lists.
  • the eNodeB creates the black/white lists based on UE transmit power.
  • the UE reports its transmitted power or power headroom (PH) to the network.
  • the PH is the difference between the UE maximum output power and the UE transmitted power measured in the decibel (dB) scale.
  • PH can also be expressed in the linear scale in which case it is the ratio of the UE maximum output power to the UE transmitted power.
  • dB decibel
  • PH can also be expressed in the linear scale in which case it is the ratio of the UE maximum output power to the UE transmitted power.
  • PH is measured and reported by the UE to the base station in the dB scale.
  • a smaller PH value means the UE is transmitting with a higher power level.
  • a larger PH value means the UE is transmitting with a lower power level.
  • the eNodeB uses the power measurement to decide whether this UE should be added to a black list or a white list.
  • a UE close to the eNodeB will transmit at a lower transmit power. If the reported UE transmit power is below a predefined threshold level (i.e., UE transmit power ⁇ Tx_power_threshold), the UE may be added to a black list since the UE is close to the eNodeB and can be served directly by the eNodeB without repeater assistance. If the UE is reporting PH instead of transmit power, and the UE's reported PH is above a predefined threshold level (i.e., UE PH > PH_threshold), the UE is again operating at a relatively low power level.
  • a predefined threshold level i.e., UE transmit power ⁇ Tx_power_threshold
  • the UE may be added to a black list since the UE is close to the eNodeB and can be served directly by the eNodeB without repeater assistance. Conversely, when the UE is operating at a relatively high power level, as determined by the reported UE transmit power or UE PH, the eNodeB may place the UE on a white list.
  • a black/white list may also be created as a function of the ratio of UE transmitted bit rate to the UE transmitted power.
  • the UE When a UE is close to the eNodeB, the UE will require lower transmit power for the same bit rate. Therefore, if the ratio of UE transmitted bit rate to the UE transmitted power is above a predefined threshold, the eNodeB may add the UE to the back list.
  • the eNodeB may create the black/white lists using combinations of the methodologies described above.
  • the eNodeB signals the list to the eNodeR via the eNodeB-eNodeR interface such as the Un interface.
  • the eNodeB may broadcast the black/white list to all its eNodeRs through common signaling. This is particularly useful whenever there is a common white list for all eNodeRs. Signaling overheads on broadcast channels should be kept low. Therefore, the shorter of the black and white lists is preferably broadcast together with an ID (for example, 1 bit) to indicate whether the list is a white list or a black list.
  • the eNodeB may create and maintain a number of black lists or white lists. This means the eNodeB maintains repeater-specific lists or a list for a group of eNodeR.
  • the embodiment in which the lists are created based on the DoA of signals facilitates the creation of a repeater-specific list.
  • the lists are not broadcasted but are sent directly to an eNodeR or a group of eNodeRs via dedicated signaling (for an individual eNodeR) or multicast signaling (for a group of eNodeRs).
  • the eNodeB transmits the list (black list or white list) to the eNodeR via the Un interface or any other suitable interface between the eNodeB and the eNodeR.
  • the Un interface may include a fixed line such as a fiber optic line or a wireless communication channel.
  • the behavior of the eNodeR may be controlled purely by the black/white list received from the eNodeB or by a combination of the black/white list and other factors.
  • the behavior of the eNodeR is controlled purely by a black list provided by the eNodeB.
  • the eNodeR does not amplify the RBs scheduled for UEs on the black list since these UEs can be adequately served by the eNodeB directly.
  • the eNodeR may, however, amplify RBs scheduled for non-black list UEs.
  • the behavior of the eNodeR is controlled purely by a white list provided by the eNodeB.
  • the eNodeR amplifies the RBs scheduled for UEs on the white list, but does not amplify RBs scheduled for non-white list UEs.
  • the behavior of the eNodeR is controlled by a combination of the black/white list and a repeater autonomous algorithm.
  • the eNodeR does not amplify RBs scheduled for black list UEs.
  • the eNodeR may or may not amplify the RBs scheduled for a given white list UE (UE i ) depending on the outcome of the eNodeR's autonomous algorithm.
  • the eNodeR autonomous algorithm may utilize one or more of the following methods to decide whether the eNodeR should amplify the RBs scheduled for a given white list UE (UE i ).
  • the threshold level (R RTT,UE ⁇ Rep ) may be configured by the eNodeB via the X3 interface or may be selected by the eNodeR autonomously. Alternatively the threshold may be a standardized value.
  • the eNodeR autonomously decides whether to amplify a white listed UE based on received signal strength or RTT
  • a situation may arise that none of the eNodeRs amplify the RBs scheduled for a particular white listed UE. This may occur because the UE does not require amplification.
  • the UE may require amplification but due to reasons such as inappropriate threshold levels used at the eNodeR, the UE is not amplified.
  • the eNodeR may signal the eNodeB with the identifiers of any white listed UEs that are not amplified by the eNodeR over a certain time period (To) or in the last N transmissions. All these parameters may be configured at the eNodeRs by the eNodeB.
  • the eNodeB may deduce that none of the eNodeRs has amplified the RBs scheduled for a particular white listed UE. In this case, the eNodeB may conclude that the particular UE was incorrectly placed on the white list, and may move the UE to a black list. Alternatively, the eNodeB may direct one of the eNodeRs (for example, the best eNodeR based on a suitable criterion such as DoA) to amplify the RBs scheduled for the particular white listed UE.
  • the eNodeB may direct one of the eNodeRs (for example, the best eNodeR based on a suitable criterion such as DoA) to amplify the RBs scheduled for the particular white listed UE.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the steps of a first exemplary embodiment of the method of the present invention.
  • an eNodeB identifies UEs for a black list.
  • the eNodeB sends the black list to at least one eNodeR.
  • the eNodeR detects the identity of a UE within the eNodeR's transmission range.
  • the eNodeR determines whether the UE is on the black list. If the UE is on the black list, the method moves to step 25, where the eNodeR does not amplify RBs scheduled for this UE. However, if the UE is not on the black list, the method moves to step 26 where the eNodeR amplifies RBs scheduled for the UE.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the steps of a second exemplary embodiment of the method of the present invention.
  • an eNodeB identifies UEs for a white list.
  • the eNodeB sends the white list to at least one eNodeR.
  • the eNodeR detects the identity of a UE within the eNodeR's transmission range.
  • the eNodeR determines whether the UE is on the white list. If the UE is on the white list, the method moves to step 35; where the eNodeR amplifies RBs scheduled for the UE. However, if the UE is not on the white list, the method moves to step 36 where the eNodeR does not amplify RBs scheduled for this UE.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart of the steps of a third exemplary embodiment of the method of the present invention.
  • an eNodeB identifies UEs for a white list.
  • the eNodeB sends the white list to at least one eNodeR.
  • the eNodeR detects the identity of a UE within the eNodeR's transmission range.
  • the eNodeR determines whether the UE is on the white list. If the UE is not on the white list, the method moves to step 45 where the eNodeR does not amplify RBs scheduled for this UE.
  • the method moves to step 46, where the eNodeR determines from an autonomous algorithm whether to amplify RBs scheduled for the UE.
  • the algorithm may be based, for example, on the measured signal strength from the UE at the eNodeR or on the measured RTT/propagation delay between UE and the eNodeR as described above.
  • the eNodeR reports to the eNodeB which UEs were amplified. If a white listed UE was not amplified, the eNodeB may take corrective action.
  • FIG. 6 is a simplified block diagram of an eNodeB 51 modified in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
  • a UE Classifier 52 classifies UEs for either a black list or a white list. As described above, the classification may be based on different factors. Thus, the UE Classifier is illustrated as having inputs from an Rx-based Classifier 52a, an RTT-based Classifier 52b, a DoA-based Classifier 52c, a DL-RS-based Classifier 52d, and a UE TX/PH-based Classifier 52e. The UE Classifier may decide classifications based on one or a combination of inputs.
  • the UE Classifier 52 sends the black/white list to an Un interface unit 53, which transmits the black/white list to at least one eNodeR.
  • the eNodeR may use an autonomous algorithm to determine whether to amplify RBs scheduled for those UEs.
  • the eNodeR then reports the IDs of the amplified UEs to the eNodeB through the Un interface unit.
  • the eNodeR reports the IDs of the non-amplified UEs to the eNodeB.
  • the operations of the eNodeB 51 may be controlled by a processor 54 running computer software programs stored on a program memory 55.
  • the eNodeB may take corrective action.
  • the processor may cause the UE Classifier 52 to reclassify the UE as a black list UE, or may send an instruction through the Un interface unit 53 instructing the eNodeR to amplify the RBs scheduled for the white listed UE.
  • FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of an eNodeR 61 modified in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
  • An X3 interface unit 62 receives the black/white list from the eNodeB 51 and sends it to a black/white list analyzer 63 to determine whether the list is a black list or a white list based, for example, on an identifier added by the eNodeB. If the list is a black list, an instruction 64 is generated instructing the eNodeR not to amplify RBs scheduled for UEs on the list. If the list is a white list, the list is provided to a White List UE Classifier 65, which determines which of the UEs on the white list should be amplified.
  • the classification may be based on different factors.
  • the White List UE Classifier is illustrated as having inputs from an Rx-based Classifier 65a and/or an RTT-based Classifier 65b. If the conditions for amplification are met for a particular UE, the White List UE Classifier notifies an RB Amplifier 66, which sends amplified RBs to the particular UE (on the downlink from the eNodeB) or to the eNodeB (on the uplink from the UE). The White List UE Classifier then reports the IDs of the amplified UEs to the eNodeB 51 through the X3 interface unit 62.
  • the White List UE Classifier reports the IDs of the non-amplified UEs to the eNodeB 51.
  • the operations of the eNodeR 61 may be controlled by a processor 67 running computer software programs stored on a program memory 68.
  • the foregoing description shows how the present invention reduces signaling overhead compared to the conventional signaling between the eNodeB, repeaters, and the UEs.
  • overall interference is reduced since appropriate UE-repeater association enables the repeater to amplify only the signals from the most relevant UEs.
  • the present invention is applicable to both uplink and downlink signaling.
  • the eNodeR amplifies the power of the RBs transmitted by the UEs in the uplink
  • the eNodeR amplifies the power of the RBs transmitted by the eNodeB in the downlink.
  • the DL control channel e.g., PDCCH
  • the invention is particularly beneficial in the UL because UL coverage is worse than the DL counterpart. Additionally, the invention is easier to implement in the UL since it is easier to implement fast RB switching on/off in the UL where the UE-eNodeR association is a precondition. This is, however, because there are no common signals in the UL, and there is enough time (4 ms) between receiving the UL scheduling information and starting the actual UL transmission. Therefore, fast RB switching on/off may be realized by reading scheduling information (e.g., on PDCCH) which is sent on the DL, and performing switching on and off of UL RBs, which is done in the digital domain.
  • scheduling information e.g., on PDCCH
  • eNodeB and eNodeR may be implemented by hardware, firmware, and/or by software program instructions stored on a program memory and run on a processor.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Radio Relay Systems (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Verfahren zum Unterstützen frequenzselektiver Repeater (15, 61) in einem drahtlosen Telekommunikationssystem mit einer Basisstation (14, 51), die eine Vielzahl von Benutzerausrüstungen (16), UEs, versorgt, und einem oder mehreren frequenzselektiven Repeater, die Signale zwischen der Basisstation und einem Teil der UEs verstärkt und weiterleitet, wobei das Verfahren gekennzeichnet ist durch die Schritte zum:
    - Identifizieren, durch die Basisstation (14, 51), von UEs für entweder eine schwarze Liste, die UEs identifiziert, für die Signale durch einen bestimmten Repeater nicht verstärkt werden sollen, oder eine weiße Liste, die UEs identifiziert, für die es erlaubt ist, dass Signale durch den Repeater (15, 61) verstärkt werden;
    - Senden der schwarzen Liste oder der weißen Liste von der Basisstation (14, 51) an den Repeater (15, 61);
    - Erfassen, durch den Repeater (15, 61), einer Identität von einer UE in dem Sendebereich des Repeaters;
    - Bestimmen, ob die erfasste UE in der schwarzen Liste oder der weißen Liste ist;
    - wenn die UE in der schwarzen Liste ist, Bestimmen, durch den Repeater, dass Signale nicht verstärkt werden, die für die UE geplant sind; und
    - wenn die UE in der weißen Liste ist, Bestimmen, durch den Repeater, ob die Signale verstärkt werden, die für die UE geplant sind.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt zum Identifizieren von UEs (16) für die schwarze Liste oder die weiße Liste ein Platzieren einer UE in der weißen Liste enthält, wenn zumindest eines der folgenden Kriterien erfüllt ist:
    ein empfangener Signalstärken-Uplink-Pegel von einem Signal von der UE, gemessen an der Basisstation, ist geringer als ein vordefinierter Uplink-Signalstärken-Schwellenwert;
    eine Rundlaufzeit, RTT, von einem Signal von der Basisstation zu der UE und zurück ist größer als ein vorbestimmter RTT-Schwellenwert;
    eine geschätzte Ankunftsrichtung, DoA, von einem Signal von der UE, empfangen an der Basisstation, zeigt an, dass die UE in einer Richtung von der Basisstation zu einer bekannten Position des Repeaters arbeitet;
    ein empfangener Signalstärken-Downlink-Pegel von einem Signal von der Basisstation, gemessen an der UE und gemeldet an die Basisstation, ist geringer als ein vordefinierter Downlink-Signalstärken-Schwellenwert;
    ein empfangener Signalstärken-Pegel von einem Referenzsignal von dem Repeater, gemessen an der UE und gemeldet an die Basisstation, ist größer als ein vordefinierter Signalstärken-Schwellenwert;
    eine Sendeleistung der UE, gemeldet an die Basisstation, ist größer als ein vordefinierter Leistungsschwellenwert; und
    ein Leistungs-Headroom der UE, gemeldet an die Basisstation, ist geringer als ein vordefinierter Leistungs-Headroom-Schwellenwert, wobei der UE-Leistungs-Headroom die Differenz zwischen der maximalen UE-Ausgangsleistung und der gesendeten oder geschätzten UE-Leistung ist.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt zum Bestimmen durch den Repeater (15, 61), ob Signale zu verstärken sind, die für eine UE in der weißen Liste geplant sind, immer ein Verstärken von Signalen enthält, die für die UE geplant sind, wenn die UE in der weißen Liste ist.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt zum Bestimmen durch den Repeater (15, 61), ob Signale zu verstärken sind, die für eine UE in der weißen Liste geplant sind, ein Verstärken von Signalen enthält, die für die UE geplant sind, wenn eine Signalqualität, gemessen für die UE, wie an dem Repeater gemessen, einen vordefinierten Schwellenwert-Pegel übersteigt; und wobei der Schritt zum Verstärken von Signalen, die für die UE geplant sind, wenn die Signalqualität-Messung für die UE einen vordefinierten Schwellenwert-Pegel überschreitet, ein Verstärken von Signalen enthält, die für UE geplant sind, wenn eine empfangene Signalstärke oder eine Fehlerrate ein vordefiniertes Kriterium erfüllt.
  5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt zum Bestimmen durch den Repeater (15, 61), ob Signale zu verstärken sind, die für eine UE in der weißen Liste geplant sind, ein Verstärken von Signalen enthält, die für die UE geplant sind, wenn eine Rundlaufzeit für ein Signal zwischen der UE und dem Repeater geringer als ein vordefinierter Wert ist.
  6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das drahtlose Telekommunikationssystem eine Vielzahl frequenzselektiver Repeater (15, 61) an unterschiedlichen Orten umfasst, und das Verfahren ferner ein Erzeugen durch die Basisstation einer unterschiedlichen schwarzen Liste oder weißen Liste für jeden Repeater umfasst; und
    Senden eines Berichts an die Basisstation durch jeden der Vielzahl von Repeatern, wodurch die Identität der UEs angezeigt werden, für die jeder Repeater die Signale verstärkt, oder der UEs, für die jeder Repeater die Signale nicht verstärkt hat.
  7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, ferner umfassend:
    Bestimmen, durch die Basisstation (14, 51), dass die Repeater gescheitert sind, das Signal zu verstärken, das mit einer weißen UE-Liste assoziiert ist; und,
    ansprechend darauf, Neuklassifizieren der weißen UE-Liste als eine schwarze UE-Liste.
  8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, ferner umfassend:
    Bestimmen, durch die Basisstation (14, 51), dass die Repeater gescheitert sind, das Signal zu verstärken, das mit einer weißen UE-Liste assoziiert ist; und,
    ansprechend darauf, Anweisen von einem der Repeater, das Signal zu verstärken und weiterzuleiten, das mit der weißen UE-Liste assoziiert ist.
  9. Basisstation (14, 51) zum Unterstützen von frequenzselektiver Repeatern in einem drahtlosen Telekommunikationssystem, wobei die Basisstation ausgebildet ist zum Versorgen einer Vielzahl von Benutzerausrüstungen, UEs, und ein oder mehrere frequenzselektive Repeater ausgebildet sind zum Verstärken und Weiterleiten von Signalen zwischen der Basisstation und einem Teil der UEs, wobei die Basisstation gekennzeichnet ist durch:
    einen UE-Klassifikator zum Identifizieren von UEs, die eine Verstärkung durch den Repeater entweder erfordern oder nicht erfordern; und
    eine Schnittstelleneinheit zum Benachrichtigen des Repeaters über die identifizierten UEs.
  10. Basisstation (14, 51) nach Anspruch 9, wobei der UE-Klassifikator ausgebildet ist zum Platzieren der UEs in einer schwarzen Liste, die UEs identifiziert, für die Signale durch den Repeater nicht zu verstärken sind, oder eine weiße Liste, die UEs identifiziert, für die es erlaubt ist, Signale durch den Repeater zu verstärkt, wobei der UE-Klassifikator ein Mittel umfasst, um zumindest eines der folgenden Kriterien zu berücksichtigen, wenn UEs für die schwarze Liste oder die weiße Liste identifiziert werden:
    ein empfangener Signalstärken-Uplink-Pegel eines Signals von der UE gemessen an der Basisstation;
    eine Rundlaufzeit, RTT, von einem Signal von der Basisstation zu der UE und zurück;
    eine geschätzte Ankunftsrichtung, DoA, von einem Signal von der UE, empfangen an der Basisstation;
    ein empfangener Signalstärken-Downlink-Pegel von einem Signal von der Basisstation, gemessen an der UE und gemeldet an die Basisstation;
    einen empfangenen Signalstärken-Pegel von einem Referenzsignal von dem Repeater, gemessen an der UE und gemeldet an die Basisstation;
    eine Sendeleistung der UE, gemeldet an die Basisstation; und
    einen Leistungs-Headroom der UE, gemeldet an die Basisstation; und
    wobei das drahtlose Telekommunikationssystem eine Vielzahl frequenzselektiver Repeater an unterschiedlichen Positionen umfasst, und der UE-Klassifikator ein Mittel zum Erzeugen einer unterschiedlichen schwarzen Liste oder weißen Liste für jeden Repeater enthält.
  11. Basisstation (14, 51) nach Anspruch 10, wobei
    die Schnittstelleneinheit ein Mittel zum Empfangen eines Berichts von jedem der Vielzahl von Repeatern umfasst, der die Identitäten von entweder den UEs anzeigt, für die jeder Repeater die Signale verstärkt, oder den UEs, für die jeder Repeater die Signale nicht verstärkt; wobei ein Prozessor in der Basisstation ausgebildet ist zum Analysieren des empfangenen Berichts und zum Bestimmen, ob die Repeater gescheitert sind, die Signale für eine weiße UE-Liste zu verstärken; und
    wobei, ansprechend auf die Bestimmung, dass die Repeater gescheitert sind, die Signale für eine weiße UE-Liste zu verstärken, der Prozessor ausgebildet ist, um zu bewirken, dass der UE-Klassifikator die weiße UE-Liste als eine schwarze UE-Liste neu klassifiziert.
  12. Basisstation (14, 51) nach Anspruch 10, wobei:
    die Schnittstelleneinheit ein Mittel zum Empfangen eines Berichts von jedem der Vielzahl von Repeatern umfasst, der die Identitäten von entweder den UEs anzeigt, für die jeder Repeater die Signale verstärkt, oder den UEs, für die jeder Repeater die Signale nicht verstärkt;
    wobei ein Prozessor in der Basisstation ausgebildet ist zum Analysieren der empfangenen Berichte und zum Bestimmen, ob die Repeater gescheitert sind, die Signale für eine weiße UE-Liste zu verstärken; und
    wobei, ansprechend auf das Bestimmen, dass die Repeater gescheitert sind, die Signale für eine weiße UE-Liste zu verstärken, der Prozessor ausgebildet ist, um zu bewirken, dass die Schnittstelleneinheit eine Anweisung an einen der Repeater sendet, um die Signale der weißen UE-Liste zu verstärken und weiterzuleiten.
  13. Frequenzselektiver Repeater (15, 61) in einem drahtlosen Telekommunikationssystem zum Verstärken und Weiterleiten von Signalen zwischen einer Basisstation und einer Vielzahl von Benutzereinrichtungen, UEs, die durch die Basisstation versorgt werden, wobei der Repeater gekennzeichnet ist durch:
    eine Schnittstelleneinheit zum Empfangen einer Liste von UEs von der Basisstation; und
    ein Mittel zum Verstärken und Weiterleiten von Signalen nur an die UEs, die durch die empfangene Liste identifiziert werden.
  14. Frequenzselektiver Repeater (15, 61) nach Anspruch 13, wobei der Repeater umfasst:
    einen Listen-Analysator zum Bestimmen, ob die empfangene Liste eine schwarze Liste ist, die UEs identifiziert, für die Signale durch den Repeater nicht zu verstärken sind, oder eine weiße Liste, die UEs identifiziert, für die es erlaubt ist, dass Signale durch den Repeater verstärkt werden; und
    einen UE-Klassifikator zum Bestimmen, welche UEs der weißen Liste deren Signale verstärkt werden sollen.
  15. Frequenz-selektiver Repeater (15, 61) nach Anspruch 13, wobei die Schnittstelleneinheit ein Mittel umfasst zum Senden eines Berichts an die Basisstation, der die Identitäten von entweder den UEs anzeigt, für die der Repeater die Signale verstärkt, oder den UEs, für die der Repeater die Signale nicht verstärkt.
EP09756795A 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und signalisierung von ue-listen zur unterstützung von frequenzselektivem repeater-betrieb Not-in-force EP2364559B1 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12178444.1A EP2521393A3 (de) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und Signalisierung von Benutzereinrichtungslisten zur Unterstützung des Betriebs eines frequenzselektiven Verstärkers

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11430708P 2008-11-13 2008-11-13
US12/580,340 US8654701B2 (en) 2008-11-13 2009-10-16 Creation and signalling of UE lists to support frequency selective repeater operation
PCT/IB2009/007402 WO2010055388A1 (en) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Creation and signalling of ue lists to support frequency selective repeater operation

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12178444.1A Division-Into EP2521393A3 (de) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und Signalisierung von Benutzereinrichtungslisten zur Unterstützung des Betriebs eines frequenzselektiven Verstärkers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2364559A1 EP2364559A1 (de) 2011-09-14
EP2364559B1 true EP2364559B1 (de) 2012-10-10

Family

ID=42165682

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12178444.1A Withdrawn EP2521393A3 (de) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und Signalisierung von Benutzereinrichtungslisten zur Unterstützung des Betriebs eines frequenzselektiven Verstärkers
EP09756795A Not-in-force EP2364559B1 (de) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und signalisierung von ue-listen zur unterstützung von frequenzselektivem repeater-betrieb

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12178444.1A Withdrawn EP2521393A3 (de) 2008-11-13 2009-11-10 Erzeugung und Signalisierung von Benutzereinrichtungslisten zur Unterstützung des Betriebs eines frequenzselektiven Verstärkers

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US8654701B2 (de)
EP (2) EP2521393A3 (de)
JP (2) JP5379242B2 (de)
AU (1) AU2009315367B2 (de)
CA (1) CA2743099C (de)
DK (1) DK2364559T3 (de)
WO (1) WO2010055388A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109711314A (zh) * 2018-12-21 2019-05-03 西安电子科技大学 基于特征融合与sae的雷达辐射源信号分类方法

Families Citing this family (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101697596B1 (ko) * 2009-01-29 2017-01-18 엘지전자 주식회사 전송 전력을 제어하는 방법 및 이를 위한 장치
WO2010117311A1 (en) * 2009-04-07 2010-10-14 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for allocating resources to user equipments in a telecommunications system
WO2010123282A2 (ko) 2009-04-22 2010-10-28 엘지전자 주식회사 릴레이 통신 시스템에서 기준신호 전송 방법 및 장치
KR101618283B1 (ko) * 2009-05-22 2016-05-04 삼성전자주식회사 통합 다중 포인트 통신을 위한 정보 피드백 방법
US20110143675A1 (en) * 2009-06-09 2011-06-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for facilitating radio link monitoring and recovery
EP2456252B1 (de) * 2009-07-16 2017-04-26 Fujitsu Limited Drahtloses kommunikationssystem, basisstation, relaisstation und verfahren für drahtlose kommunikation
WO2011008148A1 (en) * 2009-07-16 2011-01-20 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and arrangement for repeater/relay control
US20110136484A1 (en) * 2009-12-07 2011-06-09 Volker Braun User admission, power, rate and mobility control method for relay communication systems
KR101298590B1 (ko) * 2009-12-21 2013-08-26 한국전자통신연구원 무선 통신 시스템에서 중계 장치 및 방법
US8363554B2 (en) * 2009-12-23 2013-01-29 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Method and system for fault detection using round trip time
CN108900288B (zh) 2010-04-06 2023-09-05 北京璟石知识产权管理有限公司 信道状态信息的传输方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质
US9350475B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2016-05-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Physical layer signaling to user equipment in a wireless communication system
US20110250919A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-10-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Cqi estimation in a wireless communication network
US9515773B2 (en) * 2010-04-13 2016-12-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Channel state information reporting in a wireless communication network
US9307431B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2016-04-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Reporting of channel properties in heterogeneous networks
US8504052B2 (en) * 2010-05-06 2013-08-06 Nokia Corporation Measurements and fast power adjustments in D2D communications
JP2011259228A (ja) * 2010-06-09 2011-12-22 Hitachi Ltd 情報配信システム、固定局および移動局
WO2011160100A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Channel quality reporting for different types of subframes
EP2589162B1 (de) * 2010-06-30 2016-08-10 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Interferenzverringerung in relaissystemen
US9136953B2 (en) 2010-08-03 2015-09-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference estimation for wireless communication
KR101852637B1 (ko) * 2010-08-16 2018-04-26 지티이 (유에스에이) 인크. Ｌｔｅ-어드밴스 시스템들에서의 ｃｓｉ-ｒｓ 자원 할당을 위한 방법들 및 시스템들
WO2012046989A2 (en) * 2010-10-04 2012-04-12 Lg Electronics Inc. Power limited case signalling
EP3203788B1 (de) 2010-11-05 2019-09-04 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Energiereservensteuerungselement, verfahren zur übermittlung von leistungsinformationen aus einem benutzergerät, verfahren zur verarbeitung empfangener leistungsinformation sowie ein entsprechendes benutzergerät und basisstation
US8737333B2 (en) * 2010-11-08 2014-05-27 Acer Incorporated Method of power reporting and communication device thereof
US9374767B2 (en) * 2011-03-09 2016-06-21 Intel Deutschland Gmbh Communication devices and methods for network signaling
US8855000B2 (en) 2011-04-28 2014-10-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference estimation using data traffic power and reference signal power
US8902855B2 (en) 2011-08-01 2014-12-02 Intel Corporation Opportunistic device-to-device communication
US9572123B2 (en) 2012-03-14 2017-02-14 Fujitsu Limited Multiple time advance for radio access networks
IL222786A (en) 2012-11-01 2016-09-29 Elta Systems Ltd Enable Boost to Downlink channels on a cellular communication system
CN103906179A (zh) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-02 中国电信股份有限公司 上报用户终端的频率支持信息的方法和系统
US8989807B2 (en) 2013-02-28 2015-03-24 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH Communication terminal device, communication device, communication network server and method for controlling
WO2014188415A1 (en) 2013-05-23 2014-11-27 Elta Systems Ltd. Add-on apparatus for channel compensation of frequency diversity communications and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US9960832B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2018-05-01 Elta Systems Ltd. Add-on apparatus for synchronization of frequency diversity communications and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US10128932B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2018-11-13 Elta Systems Ltd. Receiver, system and method for frequency diversity communications using beacon and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US11743897B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2023-08-29 Qualcomm Incorporated Techniques for configuring uplink channels in unlicensed radio frequency spectrum bands
GB2529300B (en) * 2014-06-23 2018-02-07 Airties Kablosuz Iletism Sanayi Ve Disticaret As Systems and methods for selecting an optimum communication route in a wireless network
WO2016054111A1 (en) * 2014-09-29 2016-04-07 Hughes Network Systems, Llc Inter-gateway interference management and admission control for a cdma satellite communications system
US10397832B2 (en) 2015-04-03 2019-08-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Source ID-based packet filtering method in wireless communication system and terminal using method
WO2016167635A1 (ko) * 2015-04-17 2016-10-20 엘지전자 주식회사 무선 통신 시스템에서 d2d 신호의 측정/릴레이 선택 방법 및 장치
KR101736957B1 (ko) * 2016-03-28 2017-05-17 (주) 헬로팩토리 비콘 신호 중계 방법, 시스템 및 이를 위한 장치
WO2018053511A1 (en) 2016-09-19 2018-03-22 Ntt Innovation Institute, Inc. Threat scoring system and method
US11757857B2 (en) 2017-01-23 2023-09-12 Ntt Research, Inc. Digital credential issuing system and method
CN107122733B (zh) * 2017-04-25 2019-10-11 西安电子科技大学 基于nsct和sae的高光谱图像分类方法
US10742669B2 (en) * 2017-08-09 2020-08-11 NTT Security Corporation Malware host netflow analysis system and method
IL256681B (en) * 2017-12-31 2021-06-30 Elta Systems Ltd Partial repeater device for uplink transmission–system, method and computer software product
US10645705B1 (en) * 2018-07-02 2020-05-05 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Use of successive interference cancellation and non-orthogonal coding to facilitate uplink communication from multiple devices on shared air interface resources
US11330603B2 (en) * 2019-08-12 2022-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Sounding based beam management and repeater association
CA3123347A1 (en) * 2020-06-26 2021-12-26 Wilson Electronics, Llc. Time division duplex (tdd) network protection repeater

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3007069B2 (ja) * 1998-03-05 2000-02-07 日本電信電話株式会社 無線パケット転送方法
US7006461B2 (en) * 2001-09-17 2006-02-28 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system for a channel selective repeater with capacity enhancement in a spread-spectrum wireless network
RU2007136114A (ru) * 2005-03-29 2009-04-10 Мацусита Электрик Индастриал Ко., Лтд. (Jp) Система связи, устройство ретрансляции и способ ретрансляции
US7944871B2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2011-05-17 Panasonic Corporation Communication relay apparatus and communication relay method
JP2007074304A (ja) * 2005-09-06 2007-03-22 Ntt Docomo Inc 中継局選択装置及び中継局選択方法
KR101137340B1 (ko) * 2005-10-18 2012-04-19 엘지전자 주식회사 릴레이 스테이션의 보안 제공 방법
JP4890559B2 (ja) * 2005-11-11 2012-03-07 エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド 中継通信制御方法
JP4935168B2 (ja) * 2006-04-21 2012-05-23 アイコム株式会社 通信システム及び通信制御方法
JP4560018B2 (ja) * 2006-08-11 2010-10-13 日本電信電話株式会社 接続制御システム、接続制御装置、接続制御方法および接続制御プログラム
US7990912B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-02 Go2Call.Com, Inc. VoIP enabled femtocell with a USB transceiver station
US8863235B2 (en) * 2008-05-13 2014-10-14 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Time-dependent white list generation
EP2134116A1 (de) * 2008-06-11 2009-12-16 Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe B.V. Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Identifizierung von mindestens einem Endgerät, für das zwischen dem mindestens einen Endgerät und einer Basisstation übertragene Signale mittels Relais weitergeleitet werden müssen

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109711314A (zh) * 2018-12-21 2019-05-03 西安电子科技大学 基于特征融合与sae的雷达辐射源信号分类方法
CN109711314B (zh) * 2018-12-21 2021-04-02 西安电子科技大学 基于特征融合与sae的雷达辐射源信号分类方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20140153478A1 (en) 2014-06-05
CA2743099A1 (en) 2010-05-20
EP2521393A3 (de) 2013-08-28
US20100120397A1 (en) 2010-05-13
EP2521393A2 (de) 2012-11-07
WO2010055388A1 (en) 2010-05-20
AU2009315367B2 (en) 2015-01-22
AU2009315367A1 (en) 2011-07-07
EP2364559A1 (de) 2011-09-14
JP5706496B2 (ja) 2015-04-22
CA2743099C (en) 2017-07-25
DK2364559T3 (da) 2012-11-05
JP5379242B2 (ja) 2013-12-25
US8654701B2 (en) 2014-02-18
JP2014039298A (ja) 2014-02-27
JP2012509040A (ja) 2012-04-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2364559B1 (de) Erzeugung und signalisierung von ue-listen zur unterstützung von frequenzselektivem repeater-betrieb
US10506577B2 (en) Systems and methods for adaptive transmissions in a wireless network
US9014171B2 (en) Method and system for uplink interference management in heterogeneous cellular networks
KR101536496B1 (ko) 이종 셀룰러 네트워크에서 랜덤 액세스 간섭 완화를 위한 방법 및 시스템
EP2377340B1 (de) Lokale kommunikation zwischen mobilstationen über eine oder mehrere relaisstationen
US9344946B2 (en) Methods and arrangements in a network node
CN109923843B (zh) 新无线电中的循环前缀管理
KR101305722B1 (ko) Ｍｉｍｏ 송신을 위한 셀 선택
US20120257588A1 (en) Base station device and mobile communication method
KR20140009902A (ko) 상향링크 사운딩 참조신호 전송전력 제어방법 및 그 단말, 송수신포인트
JP2015050575A (ja) 無線基地局、ユーザ端末及び送信電力制御方法
WO2013183491A1 (ja) 無線基地局、ユーザ端末、無線通信システム及び干渉推定方法
US10880906B2 (en) Apparatuses, methods and computer programs for implementing fairness and complexity-constrained a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) scheme
US20110237290A1 (en) Transmission power control method, base station apparatus and mobile station apparatus
KR20210055065A (ko) 시간 영역 리소스 구성 방법 및 액세스 네트워크 디바이스
JP7385340B2 (ja) 端末、無線通信方法、基地局及びシステム
US20130102307A1 (en) Radio base station apparatus, mobile terminal device, and cell selecting method
US20230113017A1 (en) Network node, device to device user equipment, and methods in a radio communications network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110610

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 16/26 20090101AFI20120313BHEP

Ipc: H04B 7/26 20060101ALI20120313BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 579420

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121015

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009010372

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121206

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: EE

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Ref document number: E007263

Country of ref document: EE

Effective date: 20121016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20121126

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 579420

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130110

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130210

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130111

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130211

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130110

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: EE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Ref document number: E007263

Country of ref document: EE

Effective date: 20121130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130711

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121110

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009010372

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130711

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121110

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091110

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20191022

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20191125

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20191127

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20201125

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20201127

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211126

Year of fee payment: 13

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009010372

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230601