EP2326909B1 - Verfahren zur simulierung von schüssen in einem stadtgebiet - Google Patents

Verfahren zur simulierung von schüssen in einem stadtgebiet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2326909B1
EP2326909B1 EP09741393A EP09741393A EP2326909B1 EP 2326909 B1 EP2326909 B1 EP 2326909B1 EP 09741393 A EP09741393 A EP 09741393A EP 09741393 A EP09741393 A EP 09741393A EP 2326909 B1 EP2326909 B1 EP 2326909B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
shot
laser
radio
target
target device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09741393A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2326909A1 (de
Inventor
Willy Rabineau
Thierry Vinatier
Michel Fichoux
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GDI SIMULATION
Original Assignee
GDI SIMULATION
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GDI SIMULATION filed Critical GDI SIMULATION
Publication of EP2326909A1 publication Critical patent/EP2326909A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2326909B1 publication Critical patent/EP2326909B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41J—TARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J5/00—Target indicating systems; Target-hit or score detecting systems
    • F41J5/02—Photo-electric hit-detector systems
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
    • F41G3/2616—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
    • F41G3/2622—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
    • F41G3/2655—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile in which the light beam is sent from the weapon to the target
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
    • F41G3/2616—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
    • F41G3/2622—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
    • F41G3/2683—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile with reflection of the beam on the target back to the weapon
    • F41G3/2688—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile with reflection of the beam on the target back to the weapon using target range measurement, e.g. with a laser rangefinder
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41J—TARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J2/00—Reflecting targets, e.g. radar-reflector targets; Active targets transmitting electromagnetic or acoustic waves
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41J—TARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J5/00—Target indicating systems; Target-hit or score detecting systems
    • F41J5/24—Targets producing a particular effect when hit, e.g. detonation of pyrotechnic charge, bell ring, photograph

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for simulating firing with a simulation weapon towards a target among several combat actors, during a simulation of combat training in urban areas.
  • the present invention finds a particularly advantageous, but not exclusive, application in the field of simulation for the technical and tactical training of crews in the context of field exercises regiment or combat training center in urban areas.
  • a method of the prior art of the art is known to WO 02/055951 A1 .
  • exercise actors such as land vehicles, aircraft and pedestrians are equipped with such as missiles, rockets or small arms, associated with a firing simulator.
  • the shooting simulator is intended to simulate a real shot of the combat weapon by laser technology.
  • the firing simulator includes an optical block equipped with a non-dangerous low power laser transceiver associated with the aiming system of the combat weapon.
  • the actors of the exercise are also provided with a target device intended to equip them with a target function allowing them to play a role of target, during the simulation of the training.
  • the target device comprises a calculator provided with an interface for programming the target, a reflective marker of the laser shot at the receiver of the optical block of the firing simulator, a detector of the laser firing issued by the firing simulator and an alarm triggered when the detector has detected a laser shot.
  • the detection beacons of exercise players located behind obstacles do not detect laser fire. Indeed, the walls of buildings and some obstacles stop the laser beam. By therefore, the combat actors behind these obstacles will not be affected by any simulated fire regardless of the type of weapon simulated, which does not correspond to reality.
  • target devices around the building or obstacle so that at least one of these target devices detects the laser shot.
  • the calculator associated with the target device having detected the shot determines the alarm of which actor of the fight located behind the obstacle is to be triggered. This determination is made according to the position of the combat actors behind the obstacle at the time of the laser shot.
  • the combat actor located in the firing axis of the simulator is considered by the computer as destroyed and its alarm is triggered.
  • the laser transmitters on exercise weapons have laser beams with different angular apertures.
  • the angular aperture of a laser transmitter is approximately equivalent to that of the weapon that it equips.
  • the number of target devices to be placed on an obstacle depends on the width of the obstacle and the angular opening of the weapon. For example, for a 20-meter-wide building and a laser transmitter with a 20-centimeter angle opening, it is necessary to equip the building with about 100 target devices spaced 20 centimeters apart so that the laser shot is detected by at least a target device.
  • the object of the invention is precisely to respond to this need by modifying simulation mode real shots without changing the laser technology while overcoming the disadvantages of the techniques outlined above.
  • the invention uses a shooting simulator using laser technology and another technology able to propagate the information contained in the laser shot through obstacles.
  • the technology used to propagate information contained in laser firing through obstacles is radio technology.
  • the invention thus considerably reduces the number of target devices to be placed around the obstacles of an urban training area. This reduction in the number does not alter the result of the simulation.
  • the invention thus facilitates and considerably reduces the cost of training in urban areas. Indeed for a building where he was It is necessary to place 100 target devices outside the building, with the invention it is sufficient to place at least one around the building and a few tens of radio detectors inside the building.
  • the actors in combat are composed of a tank 10, and two actors 12 and 13 pedestrians such as infantrymen.
  • the actors 12 and 13 are located behind an obstacle such as the interior of a building 14.
  • the actors 12 and 13 are on two different levels of the building 14.
  • the tank 10 is outside the building 14.
  • the firing simulator 40 comprises a laser firing device 43, a radio wave firing device 50 and a control circuit 18.
  • the exterior of the buildings is provided with at least one laser target device 60 as described in FIG. figure 4 .
  • the interior of the buildings is provided with at least one radio target device 80 as described in FIG. figure 5 .
  • Each radio target device 80 is preferably assigned to a combatant in the building.
  • the shooter in the example of figure 1 , is the tank 10 armed with a barrel 15.
  • the aiming system of the barrel 14 is associated with the axis of a laser rangefinder 47 of the laser firing device 43 and with an antenna 51 of the radio firing device 50.
  • the aiming system of the barrel 15 is pointed towards a target materialized by the building 14 located at a duration D of the tank 11.
  • the laser rangefinder 47 of the laser firing device 43 comprises a laser emitter 41, for example a laser diode, for producing low power laser pulses in the form of a light beam with a given repetition frequency of a few kHz.
  • the laser transmitter 41 makes it possible to transform the useful signal containing a firing information into a laser wave of sufficient power to link to a laser target device 60.
  • Shooting information includes shooting characteristics such as the type of ammo, the time and date of the shot, and the identity of the shooter.
  • the laser rangefinder 47 also has a laser receiver 41, such as a light-sensitive diode.
  • the laser firing device 43 comprises a device 44 for scanning a laser beam emitted by the transmitter 41.
  • the laser firing device 43 is coupled to a control circuit 18 through a communication bus 48.
  • the communication bus 48 can be in particular optical fibers or cables in which electrical signals or radio waves circulate.
  • the control circuit 18 is able to trigger the emission of the laser beam by the transmitter 41, to ensure the processing of the signals received by the receiver 42, to ensure the activation of the scanning device 44 and to ensure the processing of data received from them.
  • the laser firing device 43 has a graphical human machine interface.
  • This interface 45 comprises various descriptive titles whose provision guides the user in entering programming information of the firing function of the laser firing device 43. This interface 45 allows the user to configure and control the laser firing device 43 of the tank 10.
  • the radio firing device 50 comprises a radio transmitter 53 and a radio receiver 54.
  • the radio transmitter 53 is an electronic telecommunication equipment, which, via the radio antenna 51, radiates electromagnetic waves into the radio space.
  • the radio receiver 54 allows the radio firing device 50 to provide a bidirectional link with radio target devices.
  • the radio transmitter 53 makes it possible to transform the useful signal containing the firing information into a radio wave of sufficient power to link to a radio target device 80.
  • the radio transmitter 53 comprises the antenna 51 enabling said radio fire device to carry out a radio link with radio target devices.
  • the antenna 51 is preferably orientable. It is oriented towards the axis of the aiming system of the barrel 15. It is preferably directed to concentrate the radiated energy in a direction of space, here the axis of view of the barrel 15.
  • the antenna 51 can also be rotatable depending on the type of aiming system of the weapon.
  • the radio firing device 50 is coupled to the control circuit 18 through the communication bus 48.
  • the control circuit 18 is able to ensure the triggering of the emission of radio waves by the radio transmitter 53 and to ensure the processing of the signals received by the radio receiver 54.
  • the control circuit 18 comprises a microprocessor 21, a memory 22 of shooting simulation program and a memory 23 of data interconnected by an internal bus.
  • actions are attributed to devices or programs, that is to say that these actions are executed by a microprocessor of this apparatus or of the apparatus comprising the program, said microprocessor then being controlled by instruction codes stored in a memory of the device.
  • instruction codes make it possible to implement the means of the apparatus and thus to carry out the action undertaken.
  • the firing program memory 22 is divided into several zones, each zone corresponding to a function or operating mode of the program of the firing simulator 40.
  • a zone 26 comprises instruction codes for processing the information entered on the interface 45 and activate the firing function of the firing simulator 40 as a result of a validation by the user of this input.
  • this activation causes the simultaneous emission of a first laser shot and a second radio wave firing simulating a real shot of the shell 16.
  • this activation causes the emission of a first laser shot simulating the actual fire of the shell 16 followed by emission of a second radio wave firing.
  • this activation causes the emission of a first radio wave firing simulating the actual fire of the shell 16 followed by a second laser firing emission.
  • a zone 27 comprises instruction codes for activating the scanning device 44, during the emission of a laser beam emitted by the transmitter 41.
  • An area 28 comprises instruction codes for processing data received from the receiver 42. 29 has instruction codes for activating radio fire.
  • a field 30 includes instruction codes for processing data received from the receiver 54.
  • the control circuit 18 determines the parameters of the shot in order to simulate in time a ballistic behavior of the shell 16.
  • the parameters of the shot may include the temperature of the powder, aerological conditions, winds etc.
  • the control circuit 18 determines a fictitious trajectory T supposed to be the trajectory of the simulated shell 16.
  • This trajectory T is developed in real time from, in particular, the aiming parameters of the gun, the duration D of the laser shot and the ballistic behavior of the simulated shell 16.
  • the fictitious trajectory T of the simulated shell 16 is known at every moment by tables or by calculation. The simulated trajectory T thus allows the control circuit 18 to create a relationship between a distance traveled by the munition and the time.
  • the circuit 18 controls the emission of a laser shot and / or a radio shot.
  • the circuit 18 simultaneously controls the emission of the laser firing simulating the shell 16 and the activation of the scanning device 44.
  • the activation of the scanning device 44 makes it possible to carry out a displacement of the emitted laser beam, along the trajectory T, so as to explore a certain field to observe the building 14.
  • This scan represents a simulation in time of the laser shot to represent the behavior ballistic simulated shell 16.
  • the displacement of the laser beam according to the trajectory T made by the scanning device 44 is preferably a two-dimensional scan, namely a horizontal scan or "bearing” and a vertical scan or "site".
  • the figure 4 shows an example of such a laser target device 60.
  • the target device 60 includes a laser detector 63 and a laser reflector 64.
  • the laser reflector 64 is able to reflect the incident signal to the receiver 42 of a firing simulator 40.
  • the target device 60 equips the obstacles, it comprises a transmitter 65 able to convert the received laser signal into a signal capable of propagate through the obstacle such as preferably a radio wave.
  • the transmitter 65 also transmits the converted signal to the interior of the building 14.
  • the detector 63, the reflector 64 and the transmitter 65 are connected to a computer 67 by a transmission path 68.
  • the transmission channel 68 may in particular be cables in which electrical signals or radio waves or optical fibers circulate.
  • the computer 67 may be implanted in the laser target device 60. It may also be distinct from the laser target device 60. It can in this case be incorporated into a central computer management training simulation.
  • the computer 67 comprises a microprocessor 72 and a program memory 69 interconnected by a bus 70.
  • the target program memory 69 is divided into several areas, each area corresponding to a function or mode of operation of the program of the target function of the target device 60.
  • a zone 71 includes instruction codes for processing and analyzing the characteristics of a laser shot detected by the detector 63.
  • An area 72 includes instruction codes for developing and transmitting a laser shot detection acknowledgment signal to the simulator.
  • a zone 73 includes instruction codes for converting the received laser signal into a signal able to propagate through obstacles. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the laser signal is converted into a radio signal.
  • a zone 74 has instruction codes for transmitting the converted signal to the interior of the building 14.
  • This radio wave 11 has, for example, a wavelength of 100 meters to 1 kilometer. The wavelength depends on the type of transmitter 53 of the radio firing device 50.
  • radio wave makes it possible to carry fire information through obstacles. Indeed, when a radio wave encounters an obstacle, part of the wave continues to spread beyond the obstacle in an attenuated manner.
  • the radio target devices 80 are provided with means of transmission capable of communicating with a Discriminatory body 90 to determine which of these actors is probably affected by this simulated fire.
  • the figure 5 shows an example of a target device 80 radio equipping the interior of the building 14.
  • the device 80 radio target comprises a transmitter 81 radio and a receiver 82 radio.
  • the radio target device 80 may be equivalent to the radio firing device 50.
  • the radio transmitter 81 includes a radio antenna 83.
  • the radio receiver 54 allows the radio target device 80 to provide a bidirectional link with radio firing devices 50.
  • the receiver 82 receives the radio wave 11 with the firing information.
  • the receiver 82 transmits to the discrimination member 100 a fire detection signaling comprising the firing information contained in the received radio wave 11, via a transmission bus 84.
  • the radio transmitter 81 transmits to the receiver 54 of the radio firing device 50 an acknowledgment signal for the reception of the radio wave 11.
  • This acknowledgment signaling comprises inter alia the identity of the radio target device, the time and date of reception of the radio wave 11.
  • the discrimination member 90 is a set of resources, memories and processors in a multitasking environment. It can also be a real or virtual complete machine in a cluster of machines.
  • this discrimination member 90 is a central computer for managing the simulation of the training. It comprises, inter alia, a microprocessor 91, a memory 92 of shot simulation program and a memory 93 of data interconnected by an internal bus 94.
  • the discriminating program memory 92 is divided into several areas, each area corresponding to a function or mode of operation of the discriminating member 90.
  • An area 95 includes instruction codes for receiving shot detection signaling transmitted by the radio target devices 80.
  • a zone 96 comprises instruction codes for applying a discrimination operation to the received signaling, according to at least one previously defined discrimination criterion.
  • a zone 97 comprises instruction codes for selecting, depending on the result of the discriminating operation, the device or devices 80 radio targets that are affected.
  • An area 98 includes instruction codes to determine the destroyed or non-destroyed character of the radio target device 80 that has been selected based on vulnerability criteria stored in the data memory.
  • An area 99 includes instruction codes for transmitting an alarm activation signal 86.
  • This alarm 86 may be placed near the selected radio target device 80. It can also be placed in the radio target device 80. It can be worn by actors in combat. This alarm 86 may be an audible, visual, or mechanical alarm such as vibrator.
  • This activation signal can also be used to cut the power supply of the electric components of the actor to the selected combat, for example to stop the power supply of the radio.
  • the figure 6 illustrates a second embodiment of the invention where all the actors in combat are behind light obstacles in the urban area.
  • a light obstacle is an obstacle that can pass a laser shot. It can be formed by a coppice or a partition.
  • the actors in combat are composed of 6 infantry 103 to 108 located inside a building 100 and separated by partitions.
  • Building 100 consists of 6 rooms. Parts 101a, 101b and 101c are located on the first level. Pieces 102a, 102b and 102c are located respectively above pieces 101a, 101b and 101c.
  • Infantryman 103 is in Room 102a
  • Infantryman 105 is in Room 101b
  • Infantry 104 and 106 are in Room 102b
  • Infantryman 108 is in Room 101c
  • Infantryman 107 is in Exhibit 101b. room 102c.
  • All infantry 103 to 108 are equipped with a light combat weapon such as a rifle equipped with a firing simulator 40.
  • the firing simulator 40 is described in FIG. figure 3 .
  • Infantry 103 to 108 are equipped with a laser target device 60, a radio target device 80 and a destruction alarm 109.
  • the laser target device 60, the radio target device 80 and the destruction alarm 109 may be attached to a garment worn by the infantry 103 to 108.
  • the laser target device 60 is coupled to a computer 112.
  • This computer 112 may be implanted. in the laser target device 60. It may also be distinct from the laser target device 60. In this case, it can be incorporated in a central computer for managing the simulation of training.
  • the computer 112 comprises a microprocessor 113 connected to a memory 114 programmed by a bus 115.
  • the target program memory 114 is divided into several areas, each area corresponding to a function or mode of operation of the program of the target function of the target device 60.
  • a zone 116 comprises instruction codes for processing and analyzing the characteristics of a laser shot detected by the detector 63.
  • An area 117 comprises instruction codes for developing and transmitting a laser shot detection acknowledgment signaling signal intended for the simulator.
  • a zone 118 includes instruction codes for transmitting an alarm activation signal 109. This alarm 109 may be an audible, visual, or mechanical alarm such as a buzzer.
  • the shooter in the example of figure 5 is the infantryman 103 located in the building 100.
  • the rifle sighting system 110 is associated with the axis of a laser rangefinder 47 of the laser firing device 43 and an antenna 51 of the firing device 50 radio.
  • the sighting system of the barrel 15 is pointed towards a target materialized by the partition of the part 102 b.
  • the control circuit 18 determines the firing parameters in order to simulate in time a ballistic behavior of the projectile of the rifle 110. Then, the control circuit 18 determines a fictitious trajectory T supposed to be the trajectory of the simulated projectile.
  • the circuit 18 controls the emission of a laser shot and / or a radio shot. During a transmission of a laser shot, the circuit 18 simultaneously controls the emission of the laser shot simulating the simulated projectile and the activation of the scanning device 44. Activation of the scanning device 44 makes it possible to move the emitted laser beam along the trajectory T so as to explore a certain field to observe the targeted zone of the part 102b.
  • laser target devices carried by the infantry 104 to 108 located in the scanning field detect the laser firing issued, then the computer 112 associated with said laser target device sends an activation signal to the alarm 109.
  • the circuit 18 When transmitting a radio wave firing, the circuit 18 controls the emission of a radio wave firing.
  • the radio target devices infantry 104 to 108 detect the radio wave firing. They transmit to the discrimination member 90 a fire detection signaling. Discriminating member 90 selects a radio target device among those having issued the signaling according to previously defined discrimination criteria. Then, the discrimination member 90 determines the destroyed character or not of the selected radio target device. Depending on the result of this determination, it activates alarm 109.
  • the figure 7 shows an illustration of means implementing the method of the invention.
  • the figure 7 shows the second embodiment of the invention where a first laser shot is issued followed by a second radio wave firing.
  • the figure 7 shows a preliminary step 200 in which the laser and radio target devices are in standby mode.
  • the target function is activated.
  • the laser and radio target devices will not come out of this standby state until they have detected a simulated firing respectively laser or radio.
  • the laser transmitter 41 emits a laser shot simulating a munition of the simulation weapon.
  • the laser shot is moved along a trajectory T calculated to explore a certain field to observe the target.
  • the firing simulator 40 is in the listening phase of a signal transmitted by a reflector of a laser target device.
  • This listening phase is almost equal to a duration D of a laser shot.
  • This duration D of a laser shot previously defined, is generally of the order of hundreds of milliseconds.
  • the computer of this laser target device considers, in a step 205, said infantryman as destroyed.
  • the computer emits, at a step 206, an alarm activation signal of the corresponding laser target device.
  • the computer of this laser target device converts the received laser shot into a signal, radio wave, able to propagate through the obstacles. Then, it retransmits the converted signal to inside the building.
  • the radio target devices 80 When the radio target devices 80 detect a radio signal, then they transmit, at a step 209, to the discriminator a shot detection signaling.
  • the discrimination member analyzes the characteristics contained in the received signals by applying to them a discrimination operation. Depending on the result of this operation, it privileges, in a step 211, preferably a signaling among those received.
  • the discrimination member applies the discrimination operation to the values of discrimination criteria contained in the signaling.
  • the discrimination criterion is preferably the power of the radio wave detected by the radio target device.
  • the discrimination operation can be a maximum. The higher the detected power, the more the target device is privileged as the target.
  • the discrimination criterion is based on the difference between a point of impact of the laser shot on the combatant and a critical point of vulnerability of said actor to the combat previously defined.
  • the discrimination operation may be a minimum. The smaller the gap, the more the target device is privileged as the target.
  • the discrimination criteria mentioned above may be combined thus making it possible to refine the identification of the target to be considered as affected.
  • the criteria of discrimination are not limited to those cited, other criteria of discrimination may be used.
  • the discriminator considers said radio target device not to be hit by fire.
  • the discriminator can refine the result of the discriminating operation using other discrimination criteria such as the detection power of the radio wave.
  • the discrimination member When, the difference between the point of impact of the laser firing and the critical point of vulnerability of one of the signalings issued by a target device is lower than the other differences of the other indications, the discrimination member considers said target device 60 as being the one hit by the shot.
  • the discriminator determines the consequences of the laser firing on the actor in combat of the radio target device selected in step 211. To do this, it calculates the destroyed character of the radio target device having the character affected according to previously determined vulnerability criteria. Vulnerability criteria may include the laser fire impact zone, the number of shots, the type of ammunition and / or the vital functions.
  • the destroyed character of the actor in combat can be obtained via a destruction percentage matrix able to convert a laser shot into a damage value.
  • the destruction percentage matrix is obtained by simulation results or by experimental results via vulnerability criteria. It is specific to each type of actor in combat.
  • the discriminator After extracting the value of damage, the discriminator calculates the percentage of life consumed by the actor in combat. To do this, it adds this damage value to those already recorded. If the result of the addition is less than 100%, the actor in combat is simply considered as hit otherwise he is considered destroyed.
  • the discriminating organ When the discriminating organ deems an actor in combat to be destroyed, then at step 213 it transmits an activation signal to the alarm of the corresponding radio target device.
  • a reflector of a laser target device reflects the incident signal to the receiver 42 of the firing simulator 40, then the firing simulator does not activate the device 50 of radio shots, a step 203.
  • the target devices 60 are located outside the scanning field then they do not detect the laser firing simulating the shell 16. And as, the laser is stopped by the obstacles, the laser shot will not be detected by the possible devices 60 target laser equipping the actors behind the obstacle. By therefore, these players located in the area of impact of the laser shot will not be considered affected by this shot, which does not correspond to reality.
  • control circuit 18 activates the emission of a second radio wave 11 towards the target, if at the end of the listening phase, no reflector has reflected the incident signal. towards the shooting simulator.
  • the radio target devices having detected the radio wave sends a shot detection signal to the discriminator in step 209.
  • the discriminator then successively executes steps 210 to 213.
  • the laser target devices When the laser shot is fired simultaneously from the radio, it can happen that both laser and radio target devices detect the simulation shot. In order to prevent target devices laser and radio, which have detected a shot, from being considered as affected, it is preferable that the laser target devices also transmit to the discrimination member 90 a fire detection signaling. Laser target device fire detection signaling overrides the radio target device detection signaling. The discrimination member sends an activation signal to the alarm associated with the laser target devices having sent a fire detection signal.
  • the radio target devices having detected the radio wave firing emit an acknowledgment of firing signal to the firing simulator 40 and a signaling signal. firing detection towards the discrimination member 90. Then, steps 210 to 213 are executed. If during the duration D of a laser firing, no transmitter of a radio target device emits an acknowledgment of fire reception signal to the firing simulator 40, then the firing simulator activates the laser firing device. If no laser target device detects the laser shot then the shot is considered as not affecting any actor. If, on the other hand, at least one laser target device detects the laser shot then steps 204 to 213 are executed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Drilling And Exploitation, And Mining Machines And Methods (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Fire-Extinguishing By Fire Departments, And Fire-Extinguishing Equipment And Control Thereof (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Verfahren zum Simulieren von Schüssen im Stadtgebiet mit einer Simulationswaffe (15, 110), bei dem:
    - man eine Umgebung mit einem Ziel (12-13, 104-108), einer Funkzielvorrichtung (80) und einer Laserzielvorrichtung (60) ausstattet,
    - man die Simulationswaffe (15, 110) in Richtung des Umfeldes des Zieles (12-13, 104-102) richtet,
    - man einen ersten Simulationsschuss mit der Simulationswaffe (15, 110) abgibt, wobei dieser erste Simulationsschuss eine Aussendung eines Laserstrahles (16) oder einer Funkwelle (11) umfasst,
    - man einen zweiten Simulationsschuss mit der Simulationswaffe (15, 110) abgibt, wobei dieser zweite Simulationsschuss jeweils eine Aussendung einer Funkwelle oder eines Laserstrahles umfasst,
    - die Laserzielvorrichtung (60), die mit einem Einschlagdetektor (63) für diese Laserstrahlung ausgestattet ist, ein repräsentatives Erfassungssignal darüber auslöst, dass die Laserzielvorrichtung (60) des Zieles (12-13, 104-108) die Laserstrahlung (60) erfasst hat.
    - die Funkzielvorrichtung (80) des Zieles (12-13, 104-108), die die Funkwelle (11) erfasst hat, eine Kennung (209) zur Erfassung der Funkwelle in Richtung eines Unterscheidungsorganes (90) aussendet, das das Erfassungssignal auslöst,
    wenn mehrere Funkzielvorrichtungen (80) in der Nähe des Umfeldes des Zieles (12-13, 104-108) die Funkwelle erfassen, sie jeweils eine Kennung (209) zur Erfassung der Funkwelle in Richtung eines Unterscheidungsorganes (90) aussenden,
    - das Unterscheidungsorgan (90) unter den Funkzielvorrichtungen (80), die die Funkwelle erfasst haben, jene bestimmt (210, 211), die entsprechend ihrer Kennung(en) als getroffen anzusehen ist (sind).
  2. Simulationsverfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass:
    - man gleichzeitig den ersten und den zweiten Schuss abgibt.
  3. Simulationsverfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine aufeinanderfolgende Abgabe des ersten und des zweiten Schusses die folgenden Schritte umfasst:
    - die Zielvorrichtung, die den ersten Schuss erfasst hat, sendet eine Kennung als Empfangsbestätigung für die Erfassung des Schusses an die Simulationswaffe (15, 110),
    - wenn die Simulationswaffe (15, 110) am Ende einer vorbestimmten Dauer (D) eines Laserschusses keine Kennung als Empfangsbestätigung für die Erfassung des Schusses empfangen hat,
    - man den zweiten Schuss abgibt.
  4. Simulationsverfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass:
    - man eine Außenfläche eines Hindernisses (14, 100) des Stadtgebietes mit einer Laserzielvorrichtung ausstattet,
    - man eine Innenfläche des Hindernisses mit einer Funkzielvorrichtung ausstattet, die einem Ziel zugeordnet ist,
    - wenn die besagte Laserzielvorrichtung einen Laserstrahl erfasst, man den erfassten Laserstrahl in eine Funkwelle umwandelt, und man die Funkwelle in Richtung der Innenseite des Hindernisses überträgt (208),
    - die Funkzielvorrichtung, die die Funkwelle erfasst hat, eine Funkkennung (209) zur Erfassung des Schusses in Richtung des Unterscheidungsorganes aussendet.
  5. Simulationsverfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass:
    - die Kennung (209) zur Erfassung des Funkwellenschusses (11) Merkmale des erfassten Funkwellenschusses (11), wie den Munitionstyp und die Identität des Schützen und Werte der Unterscheidungskriterien umfasst,
    - eines der Unterscheidungsmerkmale vor allem die erfasste Leistung des Funkwellenschusses (11) und/ oder die Abweichung zwischen einem Einschlagpunkt des Schusses und einer kritischen Verwundbarkeitsstelle ist.
  6. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    - das Unterscheidungsorgan einer getroffenen Funkziclvorrichtung (80) in Abhängigkeit von einem Verwundbarkeitskriterium ein Merkmal für zerstört zuordnet (212).
  7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    - man das Erfassungssignal auslöst, wenn die getroffene Funkzielvorrichtung (80) ein Merkmal für zerstört aufweist,
    - man das Erfassungssignal auswertet, um einen Alarm (109) auszulösen, der sich im Umfeld des Zieles (12-13, 104-108) befindet.
  8. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    - man über eine vorbestimmte Matrix für den zerstörungsprozentsatz einen Prozentsatz verbrauchten Lebens des getroffenen Zieles (12-13, 104-108) berechnet,
    - man das Erfassungssignal auslöst, wenn der Prozentsatz verbrauchten Lebens größer oder gleich 100% ist.
EP09741393A 2008-09-10 2009-09-10 Verfahren zur simulierung von schüssen in einem stadtgebiet Active EP2326909B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0856064A FR2935788B1 (fr) 2008-09-10 2008-09-10 Procede de simulation de tirs en zone urbaine
PCT/FR2009/051699 WO2010029257A1 (fr) 2008-09-10 2009-09-10 Procédé de simulation de tirs en zone urbaine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2326909A1 EP2326909A1 (de) 2011-06-01
EP2326909B1 true EP2326909B1 (de) 2012-04-04

Family

ID=40386484

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09741393A Active EP2326909B1 (de) 2008-09-10 2009-09-10 Verfahren zur simulierung von schüssen in einem stadtgebiet

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2326909B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE552472T1 (de)
ES (1) ES2383134T3 (de)
FR (1) FR2935788B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2010029257A1 (de)
ZA (1) ZA201101483B (de)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3048498B1 (fr) * 2016-03-04 2018-10-12 Gdi Simulation Procede de simulation d'une explosion dans un espace predefini et agencement et engins pour sa mise en oeuvre
CN114373358B (zh) * 2022-03-07 2023-11-24 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 一种基于快速建模的航空飞机维护作业模拟训练系统

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE425819B (sv) * 1978-03-02 1982-11-08 Saab Scania Ab Forfaringssett och anordning for ovningsskjutning
DE3028545C2 (de) * 1980-07-28 1983-08-18 Precitronic Gesellschaft für Feinmechanik und Electronic mbH, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren zur Schußsimulation bei beweglichen Zielen mittels Lichtsignalen
US5966226A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-10-12 Oerlikon-Contraves Ag Combat communication system
SE521874C2 (sv) * 2001-01-10 2003-12-16 Saab Ab Stridssimulering

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2010029257A1 (fr) 2010-03-18
ZA201101483B (en) 2011-10-26
EP2326909A1 (de) 2011-06-01
FR2935788B1 (fr) 2013-10-25
ATE552472T1 (de) 2012-04-15
FR2935788A1 (fr) 2010-03-12
ES2383134T3 (es) 2012-06-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6254394B1 (en) Area weapons effect simulation system and method
US8550817B2 (en) Trajectory simulation system utilizing dynamic target feedback that provides target position and movement data
US5823779A (en) Electronically controlled weapons range with return fire
US20110059421A1 (en) Apparatus and method for automated feedback and dynamic correction of a weapon system
KR20030005234A (ko) 정밀 포격 시뮬레이터 시스템 및 방법
NZ556285A (en) Method for simulating ammunition fire from a weapon
CA2361478C (en) Method and device for simulating detonating projectiles
US7052276B2 (en) System and method for combat simulation
EP2356397B1 (de) Verfahren zum simulieren von schiessen und zum implementieren dieses verfahrens geeigneter schiesssimulator
EP2326909B1 (de) Verfahren zur simulierung von schüssen in einem stadtgebiet
EP1890104A1 (de) Vorrichtung für die Beleuchtung eines Bereichs
EP2791612B1 (de) Waffenabfeuerings- und zielsimulator sowie verfahren dafür
JP2014145531A (ja) 射撃訓練システム
EP2120000B1 (de) Verfahren zur Schussunterscheidung während einer Schusssimulation
Weiner Ballistic Missile Defense Systems Analysis
Osner Countermeasure Allocation and Load-Out Optimisation
Matsumura et al. Rapid Force Projection Technologies: Assessing the Performance of Advanced Ground Sensors
Wang et al. Analysis on underwater acoustic countermeasure equipment for submarine
KR20020028808A (ko) 대전차 모의 교전 시스템 및 방법
Center National Defense Research Institute
Rapanotti et al. ModSAF-based development of operational requirements for light armored vehicles
Whitehurst et al. A guide to using suppressor in studies of large scale air operations
Smith et al. A model of an Integrated Air Defense System (IADS) for the TACOPS program
Mosbrooker Eyesafe laser application in military and law enforcement training
Smith DTIC Sflecte 0

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110308

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ARNOLD & SIEDSMA AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 552472

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009006264

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2383134

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20120618

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20120404

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120804

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120806

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120705

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20120924

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009006264

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120910

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20130927

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20130926

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20130926

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20130926

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20130927

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20130927

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20130927

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120910

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009006264

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140910

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140930

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140910

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150401

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140930

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120404

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 552472

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20160107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140911

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230927

Year of fee payment: 15