EP2184803B1 - Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerunsleitung, Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung und Filterantenne mit einer solchen Leitung - Google Patents

Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerunsleitung, Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung und Filterantenne mit einer solchen Leitung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2184803B1
EP2184803B1 EP09175194.1A EP09175194A EP2184803B1 EP 2184803 B1 EP2184803 B1 EP 2184803B1 EP 09175194 A EP09175194 A EP 09175194A EP 2184803 B1 EP2184803 B1 EP 2184803B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
differential
strip
conducting strips
filter
line
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09175194.1A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2184803A1 (de
Inventor
Raffi Bourtoutian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives CEA
Original Assignee
Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives CEA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives CEA filed Critical Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives CEA
Publication of EP2184803A1 publication Critical patent/EP2184803A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2184803B1 publication Critical patent/EP2184803B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01PWAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
    • H01P9/00Delay lines of the waveguide type
    • H01P9/006Meander lines
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01PWAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
    • H01P1/00Auxiliary devices
    • H01P1/20Frequency-selective devices, e.g. filters
    • H01P1/201Filters for transverse electromagnetic waves
    • H01P1/203Strip line filters
    • H01P1/20327Electromagnetic interstage coupling
    • H01P1/20336Comb or interdigital filters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01PWAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
    • H01P1/00Auxiliary devices
    • H01P1/20Frequency-selective devices, e.g. filters
    • H01P1/201Filters for transverse electromagnetic waves
    • H01P1/203Strip line filters
    • H01P1/20327Electromagnetic interstage coupling
    • H01P1/20354Non-comb or non-interdigital filters
    • H01P1/20381Special shape resonators
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01PWAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
    • H01P3/00Waveguides; Transmission lines of the waveguide type
    • H01P3/02Waveguides; Transmission lines of the waveguide type with two longitudinal conductors
    • H01P3/026Coplanar striplines [CPS]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01PWAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
    • H01P9/00Delay lines of the waveguide type
    • H01P9/04Interdigital lines
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q5/00Arrangements for simultaneous operation of antennas on two or more different wavebands, e.g. dual-band or multi-band arrangements
    • H01Q5/30Arrangements for providing operation on different wavebands
    • H01Q5/307Individual or coupled radiating elements, each element being fed in an unspecified way
    • H01Q5/314Individual or coupled radiating elements, each element being fed in an unspecified way using frequency dependent circuits or components, e.g. trap circuits or capacitors
    • H01Q5/335Individual or coupled radiating elements, each element being fed in an unspecified way using frequency dependent circuits or components, e.g. trap circuits or capacitors at the feed, e.g. for impedance matching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q9/00Electrically-short antennas having dimensions not more than twice the operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q9/04Resonant antennas
    • H01Q9/16Resonant antennas with feed intermediate between the extremities of the antenna, e.g. centre-fed dipole
    • H01Q9/28Conical, cylindrical, cage, strip, gauze, or like elements having an extended radiating surface; Elements comprising two conical surfaces having collinear axes and adjacent apices and fed by two-conductor transmission lines
    • H01Q9/285Planar dipole

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a coplanar differential bi-ribbon delay line. It also relates to a higher order differential filter and a filter antenna equipped with such a bi-ribbon delay line.
  • Radio frequency transmit / receive systems powered by differential electrical signals are very attractive for current and future wireless communications systems, especially for autonomous communicating object concepts.
  • a differential supply is a supply of two signals of equal amplitude in phase opposition. It helps reduce, or even eliminate, unwanted "common mode” noise in transmit and receive systems.
  • a non-differential power supply causes the radiation of an undesired cross component due to the common mode flowing on the non-symmetrical power cables.
  • the use of a differential power supply eliminates the cross-radiation of the measurement cables and thus makes it possible to obtain reproducible measurements independent of the measurement context as well as perfectly symmetrical radiation diagrams.
  • the "push-pull" power amplifiers whose structure is differential have several advantages, such as the doubling of the output power and the elimination of higher order harmonics.
  • the low noise differential amplifiers offer several perspectives in terms of reduction of the noise factor. Also, the use of a differential structure prevents unwanted triggering of the oscillators by common mode noise.
  • a differential bi-ribbon delay line as described in document WO 2006/088227 may be useful for connecting two differential devices, such as for example two filter devices, so as to form a higher order filter.
  • the differential bi-ribbon delay line must have the characteristics of a quarter-wave phase shift line ( ⁇ / 2) to be used as an impedance inverter.
  • a differential bi-band delay line may be useful in a large number of applications requiring the connection of differential devices, including as a phase-shifter.
  • a phase-shifter for example, in a power application of an antenna array, where several different antennas are powered by one or more sources, at least one phase shifter of this type can be advantageously envisaged.
  • differential CPS CoPlanar Stripline
  • coplanar band line For “coplanar band line”
  • differential CPS CoPlanar Stripline
  • the differential CPS technology makes it possible to benefit from the advantages of the differential structures while allowing a simple coplanar integration with discrete elements: it is not necessary to create connections of type via to connect the elements between them.
  • ground plane makes it possible to envisage a simple and less disturbing connection with, for example, a differential antenna.
  • a bi-ribbon line for propagation of a differential signal comprises two rectilinear conductive strips arranged in parallel on the same face of a dielectric substrate and each comprising a first and a second end.
  • the first two ends of the two conductive strips form two conductors of a first bi-ribbon port connecting to a first external differential device.
  • the two second ends of the two conductive strips form two conductors of a second bi-ribbon port connecting to a second external differential device.
  • a differential bi-band delay line designed in this way can optimally connect to external devices designed in differential CPS technology.
  • the delay that it induces and its impedance are directly related to its length, the spacing between its two conductive strips and their width.
  • bi-ribbon delay line having a better compactness while maintaining the same performance in terms of phase shift and impedance matching as a bi-ribbon propagation line. predetermined phase shift delay.
  • the subject of the invention is therefore a coplanar differential bi-ribbon delay line, comprising two conductive strips disposed on the same face of a dielectric substrate and each comprising a first and a second end, the first two ends of the two conductive strips forming two conductors of a first bi-ribbon port connecting to a first external differential device, the two second ends of the two conductive strips forming two conductors of a second bi-ribbon port connecting to a second external differential device, this bi-ribbon line wafer being further shaped in the form of a printed circuit for presenting structural discontinuities generating at least one impedance jump and at least one capacitive coupling with interdigitated capacitance between its two conducting strips so as to reproduce a predetermined phase shift , the interdigital capacitance being formed by at least one pair of fingers ductors connected respectively by one of their ends to the two conductive strips.
  • the printed circuit of the L, C type thus created has, thanks to its discontinuities (impedance jump and capacitive coupling), an inductance L and a capacitance C such that it can reproduce the phase shift characteristics of a propagation line.
  • a phase shift is thus created which, in the case of a propagation line, is normally a function of its length.
  • At least one of the structural discontinuities comprises a variation of the distance between the two conductive strips for performing an impedance jump.
  • a first discontinuity of increasing the distance between the two conductive strips and a second discontinuity of reduction of the distance between the two conductive strips form an area of the substrate in which the bi-ribbon line has a spacing between its conductive strips greater than the spacing between the two conductors of each of its bi-ribbon connection ports.
  • the interdigitated capacitance is formed in the area of the substrate in which the bi-ribbon line has a greater spacing between its conductive strips, the pair of conductive fingers extending laterally inwardly of this area from two conductive strips.
  • the structure discontinuities are generating at least one impedance jump and at least one capacitive coupling between its two conductive strips so as to reproduce a quarter-wave phase shift.
  • the subject of the invention is also a higher order differential filter comprising two coplanar coupled resonator differential filtering devices and a bi-band transmission line of a differential signal as defined above, this bi-ribbon line being connected, via its first bi-ribbon port, to one of the two filtering devices and, via its second bi-ribbon port, to the other of the two filtering devices.
  • each of the two coplanar coupled resonator differential filtering devices comprises a pair of coupled resonators disposed on the same face of a dielectric substrate, each resonator comprising two conductive strips positioned symmetrically with respect to a plane perpendicular to the face on which the resonator is arranged, these two conductive strips being respectively connected to two conductors of a differential bi-ribbon port of the corresponding differential filtering device, each conducting band of each resonator being further folded back on itself so as to form a capacitive coupling between its two ends.
  • each conductive strip makes it possible to envisage a smaller filter size, for geometrical reasons. Furthermore, the fact that this refolding is designed to form a capacitive coupling between the two ends of each conductive strip creates at least one additional frequency transmission zero ensuring high bandwidth and out-of-band rejection performance. filtering device. Finally, the capacitive coupling by folding also generating a magnetic coupling, the size of each conductive strip can be further reduced while ensuring the same filtering function of the assembly.
  • the subject of the invention is also a differential dipole filter antenna comprising at least one higher order differential filter as defined above.
  • a differential dipole filter antenna according to the invention may comprise a radiating structure shaped to integrate in its external dimensions said differential filter of higher order.
  • the coplanar differential bi-ribbon delay line 10 shown in FIG. figure 1 comprises two conductive strips 12 and 14 disposed on the same flat face 16 of a dielectric substrate.
  • the conductive strip 12 comprises a first end E1 and a second end S1.
  • the second conductive strip 14 comprises a first end E2 and a second end S2.
  • the first two ends E1 and E2 of the two conductive strips 12 and 14 respectively form two conductors of a first bi-ribbon port 18 for connection to a first external differential device (not shown) and the two second ends S1 and S2 of the two bands. Conductors respectively form two conductors of a second bi-ribbon port 20 for connection to a second external differential device (not shown).
  • the two conductive strips 12 and 14 are rectilinear. They are also parallel and symmetrical with respect to a plane P perpendicular to the plane face 16 and forming a virtual electric ground plane of the differential bi-ribbon line. They are of a width w and distant from each other by a distance s, these two parameters w and s defining the characteristic impedance of the bi-ribbon line 10.
  • this length I defining the phase shift generated by the bi-ribbon line on a differential signal that it propagates and therefore its impedance matching. This is why, for a predetermined phase shift, for example a quarter-wave phase shift, a certain length of this bi-ribbon propagation line is necessary, which generates an additional bulk of the device in which the bi-ribbon line 10 is integrated.
  • This electrical circuit comprises two conducting wires 22 and 24 between which a capacitor C is arranged in parallel. Each portion of conducting wire 22 or 24, between one of the terminals of the capacitor C and one of the ends E1, E2, S1 and S2 of the circuit further comprises an inductance L.
  • This electric circuit model produces a bi-ribbon delay line, of predetermined phase shift and obtained by given values of the capacitance C and inductances L.
  • the same electric circuit with discrete elements L and C can be realized using a bi-ribbon line 30 such as that shown on FIG. figure 3 according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • This bi-ribbon line 30 can therefore be modeled by the same electrical circuit as the bi-ribbon line 10.
  • the bi-ribbon line 10 Like the bi-ribbon line 10, it comprises two conductive strips 32 and 34 disposed on the same plane face 36 of a dielectric substrate. But unlike the bi-ribbon line 10, the two conductive strips 32 and 34 are shaped as a printed circuit having discontinuities in structure.
  • the conductive strip 32 comprises a first end E'1 and a second end S'1.
  • the second conductive strip 34 comprises a first end E'2 and a second end S'2.
  • the first two ends E'1 and E'2 of the two conductive strips 32 and 34 respectively form two conductors of a first bi-ribbon port 38 for connection to a first external differential device (not shown) and the two second ends S ' 1 and S'2 of the two conductive strips respectively form two conductors of a second bi-ribbon port 40 for connection to a second external differential device (not shown).
  • the capacitive coupling and the impedance jumps of the bi-ribbon line 30, conferring on it a predetermined phase shift, are directly generated by structural discontinuities themselves generating an inductance and a capacitance. More specifically, these structural discontinuities comprise, on the one hand, linearity failures of the conductive strips 32 and 34 and, on the other hand, additional conductive branch formations extending from the conductive strips 32 and 34.
  • the breaks in linearity make it possible to vary the distance between the two conductive strips for achieving at least one impedance jump.
  • the first conductive strip 32 has several linearity breaks allowing a portion 32A of this conductive strip 32 to be further from the plane of symmetry P than the portions E'1 and S'1 forming the ends of this conductive strip 32 , while maintaining the portions E'1, S'1 and 32A parallel to the plane of symmetry P.
  • These linearity breaks are made by a portion 32B of the conductive strip 32, extending laterally and orthogonally to the plane P of one end of the portion E'1 towards one end of the portion 32A, and by a portion 32C of the conductive strip 32, extending laterally and orthogonally at the plane P of the other end of the portion 32A towards one end of the portion S'1.
  • the second conductive strip 34 has a plurality of linearity breaks enabling a portion 34A of this conductive strip 34 to be further from the plane of symmetry P than the portions E '2 and S'2 forming the ends of this conductive strip. 34, while maintaining the portions E'2, S'2 and 34A parallel to the plane of symmetry P.
  • These linearity breaks are made by a portion 34B of the conductive strip 34, extending laterally and orthogonally to the plane P d one end of the portion E'2 to one end of the portion 34A, and a portion 34C of the conductive strip 34, extending laterally and orthogonally to the plane P of the other end of the portion 34A towards one end of the serving S'2.
  • the bi-ribbon line 30 has a first structure discontinuity, increasing the distance between its two conductive strips 32 and 34, made by the portions 32B and 34B, for the realization of a first impedance jump. by increasing this impedance. Indeed, the impedance increases with the distance between the two conductive strips.
  • It also has a second structure discontinuity, reducing the distance between its two conductive strips 32 and 34, made by the portions 32C and 34C, for performing a second impedance jump by reducing this impedance.
  • additional conductive branches extending from the conductive strips 32 and 34 make it possible to create at least one interdigitated capacitor for carrying out the capacitive coupling between the two conductive strips 32 and 34.
  • an interdigitated capacitance is formed by two conductive fingers 32D and 34D extending parallel to each other and orthogonal to the plane P, facing each other over at least a part of their length.
  • the conductive finger 32D consists of a portion of a band rectilinear conductor whose one end is secured to the portion 32A of the first conductive strip 32 and the other end remains free, while the conductive finger 34D consists of a rectilinear conductive strip portion whose end is secured to the portion 34A of the second conductive strip 34 and the other end remains free.
  • the pair of conductive fingers thus extends laterally inwardly of the rectangular zone defined above from the portions 32A and 34A of the two conductive strips 32 and 34, which makes it possible to take advantage of the zone of the substrate in which the bi-line -tape 30 has a greater spacing between its conductive strips 32 and 34 to form the interdigitated capacitance.
  • the length I 'of the bi-ribbon line 30 thus produced is substantially smaller than the length I of a bi-ribbon line 10 of the state of the art with an identical equivalent electrical circuit, thanks to the structural discontinuities.
  • a bi-ribbon line according to the invention has a better compactness while retaining the same characteristics as a bi-ribbon line of the state of the art.
  • a higher order differential filter according to the invention therefore comprises at least two differential coplanar coupled resonator filtering devices and at least one differential bi-ribbon line according to the invention, for example that described with reference to FIG. figure 3 this bi-ribbon line being connected via its first bi-ribbon port 38, to one of the two filtering devices and, via its second bi-ribbon port 40, to the other of the two filtering devices.
  • Each of the two filtering devices can for example be designed according to the example illustrated by the figure 12 of the document "Broadband and compact coupled coplanar stripline filters with impedance steps", by Ning Yang et al, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, No. 12, December 2007 .
  • the compactness of the filtering devices to which the differential bi-ribbon line is connected could also be advantageously improved. Combined with the improved compactness of the bi-ribbon line according to the invention, it would then allow to consider a higher order filter even more compact.
  • the differential filter device 50 with coupled resonators shown in FIG. figure 4 comprises at least one pair of resonators 52 and 54, coupled to one another by capacitive coupling and arranged on the same plane face 56 of a dielectric substrate.
  • the first resonator 52 consisting of a bi-ribbon line portion, is connected to two conductors E “1 and E” 2 of a bi-ribbon connection port to a transmission line of a differential signal.
  • These two conductors E “1 and E” 2 of the bi-ribbon port are symmetrical with respect to a plane P 'perpendicular to the plane face 56 and forming a virtual electric ground plane. They are of a width w and distant from each other by a distance s, these two parameters s and w defining the impedance of the bi-ribbon port.
  • the second resonator 54 also consisting of a bi-ribbon line portion, is connected to two conductors S “1 and S" 2 of a bi-ribbon connection port to a transmission line of a differential signal.
  • These two conductors S “1 and S” 2 of the bi-ribbon port are also symmetrical with respect to the virtual electrical ground plane P '.
  • the two resonators 52 and 54 are themselves symmetrical with respect to an axis normal to the plane P 'situated on the plane face 56. Therefore, the filtering device 50 is symmetrical between its differential input and output so that These can be totally reversed.
  • the two conductors E “1 and E” 2 will be chosen by convention as the dual-input port of the filtering device 50, for receiving an unfiltered differential signal.
  • the two conductors S “1 and S" 2 will be chosen by convention as being the dual-band output port of the filtering device 50, for the supply of the filtered differential signal.
  • the first resonator 52 comprises two conductive strips identified by their references LE1 and LE2. These two conductive strips LE1 and LE2 are positioned symmetrically with respect to the virtual electrical ground plane P '. They are respectively connected to the two conductors E “1 and E” 2 of the input port.
  • the second resonator 54 comprises two conductive strips identified by their references LS1 and LS2. These two conductive strips LS1 and LS2 are also positioned symmetrically with respect to the virtual electrical ground plane P '. They are respectively connected to the two conductors S "1 and S" 2 of the output port.
  • the capacitive coupling of the two resonators 52 and 54 is ensured by the arrangement in opposite but non-contact of their respective pairs of conductive strips.
  • the conductive strips LE1 and LS1 located on the same side with respect to the virtual electrical ground plane P ', are arranged facing each other at a distance e from one another.
  • This distance e between the two resonators 52 and 54 mainly influences the bandwidth of the filtering device 50 and has a side effect on its characteristic impedance.
  • the distance e must be small enough to increase the bandwidth but also sufficiently important not to generate unwanted reflection within the bandwidth.
  • each conductive strip must be of length ⁇ / 4, where ⁇ is the apparent wavelength, for a substrate considered, corresponding to the frequency high operating filter device.
  • the conductive strips LE1, LE2, LS1 and LS2 are advantageously folded back on themselves so as to locally form additional capacitive and magnetic couplings between their two ends.
  • the size of the filtering device 50 is thus reduced for at least two reasons: the collapses geometrically generate a size reduction of the assembly, but moreover, thanks to the capacitive and magnetic couplings, the size of each conductive strip can be further reduced. while ensuring a good functioning of the resonators.
  • This capacitive and magnetic coupling further generates a feedback between the input and the output of each conductive strip, so as to create one or more additional transmission zeros at frequencies higher than the upper limit of the bandwidth of the filter device 50 The high band rejection is thus improved.
  • the four conductive strips are of generally annular shape, their ends being folded inside this annular general shape over a portion of predetermined length thereof.
  • the folding of the ends of each conductive strip is located on a portion of this conductive strip disposed vis-à-vis the other conductive strip of the same resonator.
  • the folds of ends of the conductive strips LE1 and LE2 are arranged vis-à-vis on both sides of the plane of symmetry P 'and close thereto.
  • the conductive strip LE1 is generally rectangular in shape and consists of rectilinear conductive segments.
  • a first segment LE1 1 having a first free end of the conductive strip LE1 extends inwardly of the rectangle formed by the conductive strip over a length L in a direction orthogonal to the virtual ground plane P '.
  • a second segment LE1 2 connected to this first segment at right angles, constitutes a part of the rectangle side parallel to the virtual ground plane P 'and close to it.
  • a third segment LE1 3 connected to this second segment at right angles, constitutes the side of the rectangle orthogonal to the virtual ground plane P 'and connected to the conductor E "1 of the input port
  • a fourth segment LE1 4 connected to this third segment at right angles, constitutes the side of the rectangle parallel to the virtual ground plane P 'and close to an outer edge of the substrate
  • a fifth segment LE1 5 connected to this fourth segment at right angles, constitutes the side of the orthogonal rectangle to the virtual ground plane P 'and opposite the side LE1 3.
  • a sixth segment LE1 6 connected to this fifth segment at right angles, constitutes as the second segment LE1 2 a portion of the side of the rectangle parallel to the virtual ground plane P'
  • ur L in a direction orthogonal to the virtual ground plane P ', that is to say parallel to the segment LE1 1 and vis-à-vis it over the entire length L of folding.
  • the segments LE1 1 and LE1 7 are spaced a constant distance e S over their entire length which ensures their capacitive coupling.
  • the conductive strip LE1 can also be seen as consisting of a folded main conductive strip connected at one of its ends to the conductor E "1, this main conductive strip comprising the segments LE1 1 , LE1 2 and the part of the segment LE1 3 located between the segment LE1 2 and the conductor E "1, and a stub-type branch folded on the main conductive strip, this stub-type branch comprising the other part of the segment LE1 3 , and the segments LE1 4 to LE1 7 .
  • the "stub" type branch is then considered to be placed at the junction between the main conducting strip and the conductor E "1. It should theoretically have a total length of ⁇ / 4, but the capacitive and magnetic couplings generated by the folding of the conductive strip LE1 on itself can reduce this length, especially 10 to 20% on the derivation in "stub".
  • segment LE1 4 makes it possible to bring the segments LE1 3 and LE1 5 closer together, but also the segments LE1 3 and LE1 1 , or the segments LE1 5 and LE1 7 , so as to multiply the number of capacitive and magnetic couplings generated by the folding of the conductive strip LE1 on itself. These multiple couplings improve the operation of the filtering device 50.
  • the coupling length L between the two folded ends ie the two segments LE1 1 and LE1 7 , mainly influences the bandwidth of the filtering device 50, but also has a side effect on the high band rejection. The more it increases, the lower the bandwidth but the higher the band rejection is improved.
  • the distance e S between the two folded ends mainly influences the high-band rejection of the filtering device 50: the smaller it is, the higher the rejection in the high band. It should be noted, however, that this distance can not be less than a limit imposed by the precision of the etching of the conductive strip LE1 on the substrate.
  • the conductive strip LE2 consists, like the conductive strip LE1, of seven conductive segments LE2 1 to LE2 7 disposed on the plane face 56 of the substrate symmetrically to the seven segments LE1 1 to LE1 7 with respect to the virtual ground plane P ' .
  • the two conductive strips LE1 and LE2 are spaced a constant distance e 1 , corresponding to the distance separating the segments LE1 2 and LE1 6 , on the one hand, the segments LE2 2 and LE2 6 , on the other hand.
  • This distance e 1 mainly influences the impedance of the first resonator 52, that is to say the input impedance of the filtering device 50, but also has a side effect on the bandwidth of the filtering device 50. More it increases, the more the impedance increases and less markedly, the more the bandwidth is reduced.
  • the conductive strips LS1 and LS2 each consist, like the conductive strips LE1 and LE2, of seven conducting segments. LS1 1 to LS1 7 and LS2 1 to LS2 7 respectively, printed on the flat face 56 of the substrate symmetrically to the segments of the conductive strips LE1 and LE2 with respect to this axis.
  • the two conductive strips LS1 and LS2 are spaced a constant distance e 2 equal to e 1 , corresponding to the distance separating the segments LS1 2 and LS1 6 , on the one hand, of the segments LS2 2 and LS2 6 , on the other hand.
  • This distance e 2 also mainly influences the impedance of the second resonator 54, that is to say the output impedance of the filtering device 50, but also a side effect on the bandwidth of the filter device 50. The more it increases, the more the impedance increases and less markedly, the lower the bandwidth is reduced.
  • the distance e separating the two resonators 52 and 54 corresponds to the distance separating the segments LE1 5 and LE2 5 , on the one hand, from the segments LS1 5 and LS2 5 , on the other hand.
  • the capacitive coupling between the two resonators 52 and 54 is thus established over the entire length of the segments LE1 5 and LE2 5 , on the one hand, and the segments LS1 5 and LS2 5 , on the other hand.
  • the figure 5 schematically presents an equivalent electric circuit of the filtering device 50 previously described.
  • a first inverter 60 represents an impedance jump, from Z 0 to Z 1 , at the input of the filtering device 50.
  • the impedance Z 0 is determined by the parameters s and w of the conductors E “1 and E. 2 of the input port, while the impedance Z 1 is determined in particular by the distance e 1 between the conductive strips LE 1 and LE 2.
  • a second inverter 62 represents the corresponding impedance jump, from Z 1 to Z 0 , at the output of the filtering device 50.
  • the first and second coupled resonators 52 and 54 are each represented by an LC circuit with capacitance C and inductance L in parallel. These two LC circuits are connected, on the one hand, respectively to the first and second inverters 60 and 62 and, on the other hand, to ground.
  • a feedback circuit LC 64 with capacitance C1 and inductance L1. parallel, connected, on the one hand, to the junction 66 between the first resonator 52 and the first inverter 60 and, on the other hand, to the junction 68 between the second resonator 54 and the second inverter 62.
  • This LC feedback circuit 64 improves the high band rejection of the filtering device 50 by adding one or more transmission zeros in the high frequencies.
  • the graphic shown on the figure 6 represents the characteristic of a frequency response in transmission and reflection of the filtering device described above.
  • the reflection coefficient S 11 of this frequency response shows a bandwidth of -10 dB (generally accepted definition of the bandwidth in reflection) of between about 3.2 and 4.4 GHz.
  • -10 dB generally accepted definition of the bandwidth in reflection
  • the bandwidth is widened by the presence of two distinct reflection zeros within this bandwidth, these two zeros being due to the presence of the two coupled resonators remote from e in the filtering device 50.
  • the portion of curve S 11 situated between these two reflection zeros can go back up to -10 dB, which generates a separation of the enlarged bandwidth into two distinct bandwidths. Therefore, the distance e should not be too small not to cause reflection greater than -10 dB in the extended bandwidth.
  • the transmission coefficient S 21 of the frequency response shows a bandwidth of -3 dB (generally accepted definition of the bandwidth in transmission), between about 2.7 and 4.5 GHz, as well as two transmission zeros at about 5.1 and 6.9 GHz.
  • One of these two out-of-band transmission zeros is due to the coupling between the two resonators of the filter device 50 over the entire length of their portions LE1 5 , LE2 5 on the one hand and LS1 5 , LS2 5 on the other hand .
  • the other of these two transmission zeros is due to the additional intra-resonator couplings created by the folding of the conductive strips on themselves.
  • These two transmission zeros cause a high rejection of the high band filter and an asymmetry of the frequency response due to the low band mean rejection. But this asymmetry can be advantageous, especially for a direct integration application of the filtering device 50 in a differential antenna. Indeed, such antennas generally have high resonances low frequency and therefore equivalent to high-pass filters, which compensates for the asymmetry of the filter device 50 by improving its low band rejection.
  • FIG. 7 A second example of differential filtering device with improved compactness is shown schematically on the figure 7 .
  • This device 50 ' comprises a pair of resonators 52' and 54 ', coupled to each other by capacitive coupling and disposed on the same plane face 56 of a dielectric substrate. These two resonators are similar to those, 52 and 54, of the device of the figure 4 .
  • the two resonators 52 'and 54' are not symmetrical with respect to an axis normal to the plane P 'situated on the plane face 56. Indeed, the distance e 1 separating the two conductive strips LE1 and LE2 of the first resonator 52 'is distinct from the distance e 2 between the two conductive strips LS1 and LS2 of the second resonator 52'. In the illustrated example, the distance e 2 is greater than the distance e 1 .
  • the capacitive coupling between the two resonators 52 'and 54' is not broken so far. Indeed, due to the folding of the conductive strips on themselves, they remain in vis-à-vis at least a portion of their length, more specifically at least a portion of the lengths LE1 5 and LS1 5, d the one hand, and lengths LS2 and LE2 5 5, on the other hand. In comparison with the existing one, it would not be possible, for example, to conceive of such a difference between the distances e 1 and e 2 in the filtering device described with reference to FIG.
  • these distances e 1 and e 2 make it possible to adjust respectively the input and output impedances of the filtering device 50 ', it is thus possible to design a bandpass filtering device which also fulfills an adaptation function of impedances between the circuits to which it is intended to be connected.
  • the distance e 1 thus generates an input impedance Z 1 smaller than the output impedance Z 2 generated by the distance e 2 .
  • This second example allows the direct integration of a filtering device according to the invention with differential antennas and differential active circuits of different impedances. Note, however, that such a direct integration with a single filter device works all the better that the difference between the impedances Z 1 and Z 2 is small.
  • a set of several filtering devices according to the second example of the invention added in series can be used to facilitate the impedance matching between very different impedance circuits.
  • Such a set with two filtering devices is for example represented diagrammatically on the figure 8 .
  • an amplifier 70 is connected to the input of a first filtering device 72, via the input port 74 of this first filtering device. Since the impedance of the amplifier 70 has a value Z 1 , the first filtering device 72 is designed, by adjusting the distance between the folded conductive strips of its first resonator, to present a conjugate value input impedance Z 1 * thus ensuring a maximum power transfer between the first filtering device 72 and the amplifier 70.
  • An antenna 76 is connected to the output of a second filtering device 78 via the output port 80 of this second filtering device. Since the impedance of the antenna 76 has a value Z 2 , the second filtering device 78 is designed, by adjusting the distance between the folded conductive strips of its second resonator, to present a conjugate value output impedance Z 2 * thus ensuring maximum power transfer between the second filter device 78 and the antenna 76.
  • the two filtering devices 72 and 78 are advantageously connected to each other via a quarter-wave line 82 according to the invention fulfilling an inverter function, the output of the first filtering device 72 and the input of the second device.
  • filtering 78 being designed, by adjusting the distance between the folded conductive strips of the second resonator of the first filtering device 72 and the distance between the folded conductive strips of the first resonator of the second filtering device 78, to present the same impedance Z 0 .
  • This same impedance Z 0 ensures the adaptation of impedances and can be chosen so as to ensure the best possible rejection.
  • the adaptation of the impedances Z 1 and Z 2 which can be very different is via an intermediate impedance Z 0 through the assembly comprising the two asymmetric filtering devices 72 and 78 and the quarter wave line 82 .
  • the presence of the quarter wave line 82 between the two filtering devices 72 and 78 also makes it possible to improve overall the performance of the higher order filter thus constituted, in terms of bandwidth.
  • FIG. 9 A third example of differential filtering device with improved compactness is shown schematically on the figure 9 .
  • This filtering device 50 "comprises a pair of resonators 52" and 54 ", coupled together by capacitive coupling and disposed on the same plane face 56 of a dielectric substrate.
  • the two resonators 52 "and 54" are symmetrical with respect to an axis normal to the plane P 'situated on the plane face 56.
  • these two distances could be different, as in the second example, for the filtering device to further fulfill an impedance matching function.
  • this third example is distinguished from the first and second examples by the general shape of the folded conductive strips.
  • the four conductive strips are of generally annular shape, their ends being folded inside this annular general shape over a portion of predetermined length thereof, but they are more precisely of generally square shape. .
  • each of them has additional folding on at least a portion of the sides of the square general shape.
  • the conductive strip LE1 comprises three additional folds LE1 8 , LE1 9 and LE1 10 in the three sides of the square general shape not having the folding of its two ends.
  • the three additional folds are directed towards the inside of the square general shape. They are for example in the form of niche.
  • the conductive strips LE2, LS1 and LS2 comprise the same additional folds, referenced LE2 8 , LE2 9 and LE2 10 for the conductive strip LE2; LS1 8 , LS1 9 and LS1 10 for the conductive strip LS1; LS2 8 , LS2 9 and LS2 10 for the conductive strip LS2.
  • each conductive strip LE1, LE2, LS1 and LS2 implies a generally square shape of the filtering device 50 ", so the compactness of the latter is optimal.
  • the additional folds create additional capacitive and magnetic couplings that can further improve the performance of the filter device 50 ".
  • the length L of the folding of the two ends of each conductive strip within its square general shape can be adjusted to adjust the bandwidth of the filter device 50 ".
  • the dimensions of the filter device 50 "are obtained close to ⁇ / 20 per side.
  • an improved compactness filter device is not limited to the examples described above. Other geometric shapes are possible for such a filtering device, from the moment they provide for a folding of each conductive strip of each resonator on itself so as to form a capacitive coupling between its two ends.
  • This filter device with improved compactness is particularly suitable for the design, with a bi-ribbon line according to the invention, of a smaller order of higher order filter.
  • a higher order differential filter 90 etched on a substrate 92 has two coplanar coupled resonator differential filtering devices 94 and 96 in accordance with the first example shown in FIG. figure 4 . It further comprises a differential bi-ribbon line 98 conforming to that shown in FIG. figure 3 connected, via one of its two bi-ribbon ports, to one of the two differential filtering devices and, via its other bi-ribbon port, to the other of the two differential filtering devices.
  • a higher order differential filter 100 etched on a substrate 102 comprises two coplanar coupled resonator differential filtering devices 104 and 106 in accordance with the third example illustrated in FIG. figure 9 . It further comprises a differential bi-ribbon line 108 conforming to that shown in FIG. figure 3 connected, via one of its two bi-ribbon ports, to one of the two differential filtering devices and, via its other bi-ribbon port, to the other of the two differential filtering devices.
  • this higher order filter is for example designed to operate in a high frequency band allocated to Ultra Wide Band communications, according to the European ULB standard, or even between 6 and 9 GHz.
  • the dimensions of this higher order filter 100 with improved compactness are then 6 mm long by 3.5 mm wide.
  • the graphic shown on the figure 12 represents the characteristic of a frequency response in transmission and in reflection of the higher-order filter illustrated on the figure 11 .
  • the reflection coefficient S 11 of this frequency response shows a bandwidth of -10 dB (generally accepted definition of the bandwidth in reflection) of between about 6 and 9 GHz and has four reflection zeros in the bandwidth.
  • the transmission coefficient S 21 of this frequency response shows a bandwidth of -3 dB (generally accepted definition of the bandwidth in transmission), also between about 6 and 9 GHz, and a transmission zero at about 9.8 GHz.
  • This transmission zero causes a high rejection of the high band filter and an asymmetry of the frequency response due to the low band mean rejection. Rejections of the order of 50 dB in the high band and 30 dB in the low band are obtained. However, as indicated above, this asymmetry may be advantageous, especially for a direct integration application of this filter 100 in a differential antenna.
  • FIG. 13 to 15 schematically illustrate three examples of differential filter dipole antennas each advantageously incorporating a differential filter of higher order with improved compactness such as that illustrated in FIG. figure 11 .
  • the filtering dipole antenna 110 shown in FIG. figure 13 comprises on the one hand a radiating electric dipole 112 and on the other hand a higher order differential filter 100 such as that described with reference to FIG. figure 11 .
  • the electric dipole 112 is more precisely a coplanar thick dipole etched on a substrate and whose radiating structure is of elliptical shape. This type of dipole is very wide bandwidth.
  • the relative bandwidth defined by the relationship ⁇ f / f 0 , where ⁇ f is the width of the bandwidth and f 0 the central operating frequency of the antenna, may exceed 100%.
  • the two arms of the dipole 112 are directly connected to the two conductors of the output port of the filter 100.
  • the two conductors of the input port of the filter 100 are for their part to be supplied with a differential signal.
  • the filtering dipole antenna 120 shown on the figure 14 comprises on the one hand a radiating electric dipole 122 and on the other hand a higher order differential filter 100 such as that described with reference to FIG. figure 11 .
  • the electric dipole 122 is more precisely a coplanar thick dipole etched on a substrate and whose radiating structure is of "butterfly" shape. More specifically, the radiating structure of the dipole has a thin portion, in a central zone of the antenna comprising the connection to the filter 100, which widens outwardly of the antenna on both sides of the dipole.
  • This type of radiating dipole is medium bandwidth. Its relative bandwidth ⁇ f / f 0 is of the order of 20%.
  • the two arms of the dipole 122 are directly connected to the two conductors of the output port of the filter 100.
  • the conductors of the input port of the filter 100 are intended to be fed with a differential signal.
  • the filtering dipole antenna 130 represented on the figure 15 comprises on the one hand a radiating electric dipole 132 and on the other hand a differential filter of higher order 100 such as that described with reference to FIG. figure 11 .
  • the electric dipole 132 is more precisely a coplanar thick dipole etched on a substrate and whose radiating structure is of "butterfly" shape. However, it differs from the electric dipole 122 in particular in that the two broad ends of its radiating structure, oriented towards the outside of the antenna, are shaped to integrate in their external dimensions (ie greater length and greater width) the filter This results in a further gain in compactness of the filter antenna 130 relative to the filter antenna 120.
  • the two arms of the dipole 132 are directly connected to the two conductors of the output port of the filter 100.
  • the two conductors of the input port of the filter 100 are for their part to be supplied with a differential signal.
  • a differential dipole filter antenna according to the invention is smaller than a conventional corresponding antenna, in particular due to the better compactness of the differential bi-ribbon line used.
  • a differential dipole filter antenna according to the invention is more efficient because it may comprise a larger number of filtering devices to achieve an even higher order filtering, thus more efficient in terms of bandwidth.
  • this differential bi-ribbon delay line also facilitates its realization in hybrid technology and its integration in monolithic technology with structures comprising discrete elements mounted on area.
  • it is simple to conceive of it as an element of a higher order filter in integration with a differential dipole antenna with a broadband coplanar radiating structure, as has been illustrated by several examples, by chemical or mechanical etching on substrates with low or high permittivity depending on the applications and desired performance.
  • a higher order filter according to the invention can also find applications in the millimeter frequency band where its small size and its high performance allow it to be integrated in monolithic technology with antennas and active circuits.
  • a bi-ribbon line according to the invention can be used as a phase-shifter, for example in a power supply application of an antenna array where several different antennas with different phase-shifts are fed by the same source.
  • the antennas can be connected to each other by bi-ribbon lines according to the invention.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Control Of Motors That Do Not Use Commutators (AREA)

Claims (6)

  1. Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerungsleitung (30), umfassend zwei leitfähige Bänder (32, 34), die auf einer gleichen Seite (36) eines dielektrischen Substrats angeordnet sind und jeweils ein erstes und ein zweites Ende (E'1, E'2, S'1, S'2) umfassen, wobei die zwei ersten Enden (E'1, E'2) der zwei leitfähigen Bänder, die zwei Leiter eines ersten Zweiband-Verbindungsanschlusses (38) bilden, mit einer ersten externen Differenzialvorrichtung verbunden werden können, wobei die zwei zweiten Enden (S'1, S'2) der zwei leitfähigen Bänder, die zwei Leiter eines zweiten Zweiband-Verbindungsanschlusses (40) bilden, mit einer zweiten externen Differenzialvorrichtung verbunden werden können, wobei die Verzögerungsleitung in Form einer Leiterplatte gebildet ist, um Diskontinuitäten der Struktur (32B, 32C, 32D, 34B, 34C, 34D), aufzuweisen, wobei die Diskontinuitäten der Struktur mindestens einen Impedanzsprung zwischen ihren zwei leitfähigen Bändern (32, 34) erzeugen, um eine vorbestimmte Phasendifferenz zu reproduzieren, und mindestens Folgendes umfassen:
    - eine erste Diskontinuität (32B, 34B) der Erhöhung der Distanz zwischen den zwei leitfähigen Bändern (32, 34) zur Durchführung von mindestens einem Impedanzsprung, und eine zweite Diskontinuität (32C, 34C) der Reduzierung der Distanz zwischen den zwei leitfähigen Bändern (32, 34) zur Durchführung von mindestens einem Impedanzsprung, wodurch ein Bereich des Substrats gebildet wird, in dem die Zweiband-Leitung eine Entfernung zischen ihren leitfähigen Bändern aufweist, die größer als die Entfernung zwischen den zwei Leitern (E'1, E'2, S'1, S'2) jedes seiner Zweiband-Verbindungsanschlüsse (38, 40) ist, und dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die coplanare Differential-Zweiband-Verzögerungsleitung mindestens Folgendes umfasst:
    - eine interdigitale Kapazität, die aus mindestens einem Paar von leitenden Fingern (32D, 34D), die jeweils durch eines ihrer Enden an die zwei leitfähigen Bänder verbunden sind, im Bereich des Substrats gebildet wird, in dem die Zweiband-Leitung eine größere Entfernung zwischen ihren leitfähigen Bänden (32, 34) aufweist, wobei sich das Paar von leitenden Fingern (32D, 34D) seitlich hin zum Inneren dieses Bereichs ausgehend von des zwei leitfähigen Bändern erstreckt.
  2. Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerungsleitung (30) nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Diskontinuitäten der Struktur (32B, 32C, 32D, 34B, 34C, 34D) mindestens einen Impedanzsprung und mindestens eine kapazitive Kopplung zwischen ihren zwei leitfähigen Bändern (32; 34) erzeugen, um eine Viertelwellen-Phasendifferenz zu reproduzieren.
  3. Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung (90; 100), umfassend zwei Differential-Filtervorrichtungen (94, 96; 104, 106) mit coplanaren gekuppelten Resonatoren und eine coplanare Differential-Zweiband-Verzögerungsleitung (98, 108) nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei diese Zweiband-Leitung über ihren ersten Zweibandanschluss mit der einen der zwei Filtervorrichtungen und, über ihren zweiten Zweibandanschluss, mit der anderen der zwei Filtervorrichtungen verbunden ist.
  4. Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung (90; 100) nach Anspruch 3, wobei jede der zwei Differenzial-Filtervorrichtungen (94, 96; 104, 106) mit coplanaren gekuppelten Resonatoren ein Paar gekuppelter Resonatoren (52, 54 ; 52', 54') umfasst, die auf einer gleichen Seite (56) eines dielektrischen Substrats angeordnet sind, wobei jeder Resonator zwei leitfähige Bänder (LE1, LE2, LS1, LS2) umfasst, die auf symmetrische Weise mit Bezug auf eine senkrechte Ebene zur Seite (56) positioniert sind, auf der der Resonator (52, 54 ; 52', 54') angeordnet ist, wobei diese zwei leitfähigen Bänder (LE1, LE2, LS1, LS2) jeweils mit zwei Leitern (E"1, E"2, S"1, S"2) eines Zweiband-Verbindungsanschlusses der entsprechenden Differential-Filtervorrichtung verbunden sind, wobei jedes leitende Band (LE1, LE2, LS1, LS2) jedes Resonators (52, 54; 52', 54') außerdem auf sich selbst gefaltet ist, um eine kapazitive Kopplung zwischen seinen zwei Enden zu bilden.
  5. Differenzial-Filter-Dipolantenne (110; 120; 130), umfassend mindestens einen Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung (90; 100) nach Anspruch 3 oder 4.
  6. Differenzial-Filter-Dipolantenne (130) nach Anspruch 5, umfassend eine konforme Strahlungsstruktur (132), um in ihre Außenabmessungen den Differentialfilter höherer Ordnung (90; 100) zu integrieren.
EP09175194.1A 2008-11-07 2009-11-06 Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerunsleitung, Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung und Filterantenne mit einer solchen Leitung Active EP2184803B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0806220A FR2938378B1 (fr) 2008-11-07 2008-11-07 Ligne a retard bi-ruban differentielle coplanaires, filtre differentiel d'ordre superieur et antenne filtrante munis d'une telle ligne

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2184803A1 EP2184803A1 (de) 2010-05-12
EP2184803B1 true EP2184803B1 (de) 2016-01-06

Family

ID=40792752

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09175194.1A Active EP2184803B1 (de) 2008-11-07 2009-11-06 Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerunsleitung, Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung und Filterantenne mit einer solchen Leitung

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US8305283B2 (de)
EP (1) EP2184803B1 (de)
FR (1) FR2938378B1 (de)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI540787B (zh) * 2014-12-09 2016-07-01 啟碁科技股份有限公司 巴倫濾波器及射頻系統
US10056699B2 (en) 2015-06-16 2018-08-21 The Mitre Cooperation Substrate-loaded frequency-scaled ultra-wide spectrum element
US9991605B2 (en) 2015-06-16 2018-06-05 The Mitre Corporation Frequency-scaled ultra-wide spectrum element
FR3048143B1 (fr) * 2016-02-23 2018-06-15 Sagem Defense Securite Circuit imprime en technologie uniplanaire
CN107658553B (zh) * 2017-08-16 2024-01-09 深圳市维力谷无线技术股份有限公司 一种应用于uhf频段物联网天线
US10854993B2 (en) 2017-09-18 2020-12-01 The Mitre Corporation Low-profile, wideband electronically scanned array for geo-location, communications, and radar
US10886625B2 (en) 2018-08-28 2021-01-05 The Mitre Corporation Low-profile wideband antenna array configured to utilize efficient manufacturing processes
EP3913735A4 (de) * 2019-01-17 2022-09-07 Rosenberger Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. Filter
CN109768357B (zh) * 2019-02-25 2020-12-08 广东曼克维通信科技有限公司 一种传输零点可控的基片集成波导滤波器
CN112909455B (zh) * 2019-11-19 2022-04-05 英业达科技有限公司 噪声抑制滤波器及制作噪声抑制滤波器的方法
CN111696959B (zh) * 2020-06-19 2022-07-01 安徽大学 晶圆级封装中球栅阵列毫米波宽带匹配结构及设计方法
CN112332048B (zh) * 2020-10-27 2021-06-25 南通大学 一种平衡式滤波移相器

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3946342A (en) * 1973-08-10 1976-03-23 Texas Instruments Incorporated Weighting surface wave filters by withdrawing electrodes
WO1998000880A1 (en) * 1996-06-28 1998-01-08 Superconducting Core Technologies, Inc. Planar radio frequency filter
US5815050A (en) * 1996-12-27 1998-09-29 Thin Film Technology Corp. Differential delay line
US6029075A (en) * 1997-04-17 2000-02-22 Manoj K. Bhattacharygia High Tc superconducting ferroelectric variable time delay devices of the coplanar type
KR100549967B1 (ko) * 2003-12-10 2006-02-08 한국전자통신연구원 초고주파 가변 소자용 강유전체 에피택셜 박막 및 이를이용한 초고주파 가변 소자
WO2005086276A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2005-09-15 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) An improved tuneable delay line
JP5077554B2 (ja) * 2005-02-16 2012-11-21 日本電気株式会社 光通信装置
JP3984639B2 (ja) * 2005-03-30 2007-10-03 松下電器産業株式会社 伝送線路
JP4565146B2 (ja) * 2005-09-06 2010-10-20 独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 マルチバンド超広帯域バンドパスフィルタ

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2938378A1 (fr) 2010-05-14
US8305283B2 (en) 2012-11-06
FR2938378B1 (fr) 2015-09-04
US20100117759A1 (en) 2010-05-13
EP2184803A1 (de) 2010-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2184803B1 (de) Coplanare Differenzial-Zweiband-Verzögerunsleitung, Differenzialfilter höherer Ordnung und Filterantenne mit einer solchen Leitung
EP2184801B1 (de) Differentialfiltervorrichtung mit koplanar gekoppelten Resonatoren und Filterantenne mit einer entsprechenden Vorrichtung
EP2345104B1 (de) Differenz-dipolantennensystem mit einer koplanaren strahlungsstruktur und sender-/empfängereinrichtung
EP0285503B1 (de) Filter mit Elementen mit verteilten Parametern, wobei zwei Arten von Kopplungsvorrichtungen vorhanden sind
EP1601101B1 (de) BALUN Transformator und Tiefpassfilter
EP1427053B1 (de) Richtkoppler
EP0714151A1 (de) Breitbandige Monopolantenne in uniplanarer gedruckter Schaltungstechnik und Sende- und/oder Empfangsgerät mit einer derartiger Antenne
FR3070224A1 (fr) Antenne plaquee presentant deux modes de rayonnement differents a deux frequences de travail distinctes, dispositif utilisant une telle antenne
EP2022129B1 (de) Hochfrequenz- oder hyperfrequenz-zirkulator
EP3417507B1 (de) Elektromagnetisch reflektierende platte mit metamaterialstruktur und miniaturantennenvorrichtung mit solch einer platte
FR2751471A1 (fr) Dispositif rayonnant a large bande susceptible de plusieurs polarisations
EP2202838B1 (de) Kompakt geschalteter MEMS-Kondensator
EP3235058B1 (de) Drahtplattenantenne mit einem kapazitiven dach mit einem schlitz zwischen der speisungssonde und dem kurzschlussdraht
WO2002071610A1 (fr) Filtre a ondes acoustiques de surface
EP3224897B1 (de) Filtriervorrichtung und filtrieranordnung mit einer elektrisch leitenden streifenstruktur
EP0015610B1 (de) Spiegelfrequenzreflektierendes Mikrowellenfilter und Mikrowellenempfänger mit einem solchen Filter
FR2871618A1 (fr) Filtre basse-bande hyperfrequence de type finline
EP3605734B1 (de) Antennevorrichtung umfassend mindestens zwei antennen und electrische verbindung auf gleichem substrat
EP0373028B1 (de) Passives Bandpassfilter
EP2507865B1 (de) Kompakter planarer vhf/uhf-leistungsimpedanztransformator
EP0487396A1 (de) Passives Bandpassfilter
FR3054044B1 (fr) Surface selective en frequence commandable et multifonctionnelle
FR2849718A1 (fr) Filtre passe-bande hyperfrequence en guide d'ondes plan e, a reponse pseudo-elliptique
EP1568098B1 (de) Breitband-mikrowellenbandtrenneinrichtung
FR2911998A1 (fr) Antenne large bande

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20101109

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150811

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 769559

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009035526

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 769559

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160407

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160506

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160506

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009035526

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20161007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161130

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20161130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20091106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20211123

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211122

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009035526

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20221106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221106

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230601

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231116

Year of fee payment: 15