EP2062734B1 - Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre - Google Patents

Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2062734B1
EP2062734B1 EP08167028.3A EP08167028A EP2062734B1 EP 2062734 B1 EP2062734 B1 EP 2062734B1 EP 08167028 A EP08167028 A EP 08167028A EP 2062734 B1 EP2062734 B1 EP 2062734B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
nozzles
row
printhead
test pattern
scanning direction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP08167028.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2062734A1 (fr
Inventor
Jan R. Van Hulzen
Jacob A. Westdijk
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Canon Production Printing Netherlands BV
Original Assignee
Oce Technologies BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oce Technologies BV filed Critical Oce Technologies BV
Priority to EP08167028.3A priority Critical patent/EP2062734B1/fr
Publication of EP2062734A1 publication Critical patent/EP2062734A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2062734B1 publication Critical patent/EP2062734B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
    • B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
    • B41J2/01—Ink jet
    • B41J2/21—Ink jet for multi-colour printing
    • B41J2/2132—Print quality control characterised by dot disposition, e.g. for reducing white stripes or banding
    • B41J2/2135—Alignment of dots
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J19/00—Character- or line-spacing mechanisms
    • B41J19/14—Character- or line-spacing mechanisms with means for effecting line or character spacing in either direction
    • B41J19/142—Character- or line-spacing mechanisms with means for effecting line or character spacing in either direction with a reciprocating print head printing in both directions across the paper width
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J29/00—Details of, or accessories for, typewriters or selective printing mechanisms not otherwise provided for
    • B41J29/38—Drives, motors, controls or automatic cut-off devices for the entire printing mechanism
    • B41J29/393—Devices for controlling or analysing the entire machine ; Controlling or analysing mechanical parameters involving printing of test patterns

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for calibrating an inkjet printhead and to a printing apparatus configured for performing such a method.
  • the method may be used with a printing apparatus comprising a printhead arranged for moving in a scanning direction and comprising a row of nozzles, the row of nozzles extending substantially in a medium advance direction, the medium advance direction being substantially perpendicular to said scanning direction.
  • test print comprises a predetermined test pattern from which it may be derived which droplets do not impinge at the intended position and preferably it may be derived how the printhead and thus the ejection of droplets may be controlled such that the droplet does impinge at the intended position, or at least as close to the intended position as possible.
  • a timing of the ejection of a droplet from a nozzle may be controlled by controlling the timing of the corresponding control signal, which control signal is to be supplied to the printhead in response to which the printhead will eject the droplet.
  • the test pattern After printing the test pattern, the test pattern is to be examined in order to determine the misdirected droplets, their position and the corresponding error in the position. Based on the determined position error a correction, such as an adjusted ejection timing (hereinafter also referred to as jet timing).
  • a correction such as an adjusted ejection timing (hereinafter also referred to as jet timing).
  • jet timing an adjusted ejection timing
  • a low-resolution image sensor e.g. a single pixel sensor such as a photo-diode
  • the image sensor moves with the printhead and is as such suitable to be used as a test pattern sensor.
  • the image sensor has a limited field of view and therefore, a test pattern having a size in the medium advance direction corresponding to a size of the row of nozzles of the printhead cannot be imaged by a single scanning movement of the image sensor.
  • multiple scanning movements are required, thereby further requiring an advancing of the print medium for scanning.
  • the resulting scans need to be stitched together.
  • additional errors may occur, deteriorating a result of the measurement and consequently of the calibration.
  • test pattern comprising two parts printed respectively by two groups of nozzles from two sides of a nozzle row of a printhead, whereby the two parts of the test pattern are arranged alternatingly in the scanning direction of the printhead.
  • the object is achieved in a method according to claim 1 and a printing apparatus according to claim 14.
  • the test pattern has a predetermined pattern size in the medium advance direction.
  • the test pattern may be selected to have a pattern size that is equal to, or smaller than a size of the field-of-view of a sensor in the corresponding direction.
  • the row of nozzles of the printhead extends substantially in the medium advance direction and is divided in a number of parts, wherein each part comprises an number of nozzles of the row of nozzles.
  • Each part has a size in the medium advance direction that corresponds to the pattern size.
  • a subset of nozzles comprised in each part used for printing the test pattern is used to print a part of the test pattern.
  • Each part of the test pattern is build from dots originating from a single part of the row of nozzles, while elements of these parts of the test pattern may be intermingled. Since the elements of the separate parts may be intermingled, the elements may be averaged in order to obtain an average position, or the like, while information about the parts of the row of nozzles is still available from the respective parts of the test pattern.
  • the predetermined medium advance distance corresponds to the predetermined pattern size.
  • the medium is advanced over a distance that is substantially equal to the size of the part of the row of nozzles, and a subsequent part of the nozzle row may be adjacent to the previous part of the nozzle row. In this embodiment it is possible to obtain test results from each part of the row of nozzles.
  • the first part and the second part of the test pattern each comprise a number of test elements and the test elements of the first part and the test elements of the second part are arranged alternatingly.
  • the test elements of the parts of the test pattern are positioned alternatingly enabling to employ a number of nozzles of each part of the row of nozzles, which number of nozzles are spread over said part. Use of a spread number of nozzles provides test results that are representative for the whole corresponding part of the row of nozzles.
  • test elements are bar-shaped elements extending in the scanning direction.
  • a bar shaped element enables to obtain insight in a number of print errors resulting from a printhead position error or a printhead orientation error.
  • the bar shaped elements may be adjacent to each other thereby forming a bar-shaped element extending in the media advance direction.
  • the bar-shaped elements are spaced apart in the medium advance direction.
  • an edge of the bar-shaped element still provides information about the respective parts of the row of nozzles.
  • the bar-shaped elements extending in the scanning direction are still individually recognizable and may be separately measured and handled.
  • the latter embodiment may be better suited to be used in combination with automatic image processing for measuring any errors.
  • the former embodiment may be more suited to be used in combination with a printhead in which a single adjustment factor, for example adjusting the jet timing, is applied to all nozzles of the row (compared to applying a respective adjustment to each separate nozzle).
  • the row of nozzles is subdivided in a predetermined number of parts, wherein the number of parts is three or more.
  • the method further comprises repeating the steps of advancing the print medium and printing a further part of the test pattern for each of the third and further parts of the row of nozzles. It is noted that the number of parts of the row of nozzles may be selected based on a field-of-view of an available imaging sensor, as above described.
  • the method may comprise determining a test pattern profile by averaging the test pattern in the media advance direction and calibrating the printhead based on measurements taken from the test pattern profile.
  • the single adjustment factor may be determined based on such an average error, thereby making the average error substantially as small as possible.
  • each part of the test pattern is printed in a first scanning movement of the printhead in a positive scanning direction and in a second scanning movement in a negative scanning direction, the positive and the negative scanning direction being opposite to each other, the method comprising printing reference elements in the first scanning movement and printing calibration elements in the second scanning movement.
  • a difference in the scanning direction between the reference elements and the calibration elements corresponds to a bi-directional error.
  • the bi-directional error indicates a difference in position between an ink dot jetted in the first scanning movement and an ink dot jetted in the second scanning movement, while both were intended to be printed at the same position.
  • the inkjet printer comprises at least two rows of nozzles, the method comprising printing reference elements using a first row of nozzles and printing calibration elements using a second row of nozzles.
  • An inkjet printer may comprise two row of nozzles, either by having (1) two or more printheads each comprising one or more rows of nozzles or (2) at least one printhead comprising two or more rows of nozzles. A difference in position in the scanning direction between the reference elements originating from the first row and the calibration elements originating from the second row corresponds to a mono-directional error.
  • the mono-directional error indicates a difference in position between an ink dot jetted from the first row of nozzles and an ink dot jetted from the second row of nozzles, while both were intended to be printed at the same position. Both the bi-directional error and the mono-directional error should be as small as possible to obtain a good print quality.
  • the test pattern is printed in a first scanning movement of the printhead in a positive scanning direction and a second scanning movement in a negative scanning direction, the positive and the negative scanning direction being opposite to each other.
  • the method comprises determining an average position of the reference elements; determining an average position of the calibration elements; and calibrating the inkjet printhead based on a distance between the respective average positions of the reference elements and the calibration elements.
  • the method comprises determining a distance profile of a first row of nozzles over a full scanning range of a first printhead in the scanning direction, the distance profile indicating a distance between the nozzles of said first row of nozzles as a function of a position of the printhead in the scanning direction; printing the test pattern according to the present invention for each row of nozzles of each printhead over a part of the scanning range of each printhead in the scanning direction; and calibrating each row of nozzles of each printhead over the full scanning range by combining the distance profile of the first row of nozzles of the first printhead and the test patterns printed according to the present invention, taking into account a positional relationship between each row of nozzles and said first row of nozzles.
  • each row of nozzles of each printhead may print only a small test pattern in the scanning direction and only one row of nozzles is used for determining any imperfections over the full width of the printer.
  • the distance profile obtained from the one row of nozzles is compensated for the difference in position and orientation of each row of nozzles and then combined with the respective results of the respective rows of nozzles.
  • the positional relationship between the rows of nozzles is determined from the test patterns printed according to the present invention.
  • respective mono-directional test patterns as above described are suitable for accurately determining the actual positional relationship, although in an embodiment only the nominal positional relationship may be applied.
  • the inkjet printer is configured to be operated in a first print mode and a second print mode, a printing parameter having a first value in the first print mode and having a second value in the second printing mode, the method comprising printing the test pattern according to the present invention in the first print mode and calibrating the printhead for operation in the second print mode based on the test patterns printed in the first print mode taking into account a difference between the first value and the second value of the printing parameter.
  • a speed of a carriage carrying the printhead may be set differently in the respective print modes, thus providing a high-speed print mode and a high-quality print mode. Based on such a difference, calibration of the second print mode may be estimated based on the calibration of the first print mode.
  • the present invention further provides a printing apparatus that is configured to perform the calibration method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 1A schematically illustrates an embodiment of an inkjet printing apparatus
  • the inkjet printing apparatus 10 comprises a print surface 12 arranged on a base frame 14, a number of printheads 18A- 18H arranged on a printhead carriage 16 and a guide assembly 20 for guiding the printhead carriage 16 to scan over the print surface 12 in a scanning direction as indicated by arrow 26.
  • a print medium 22 is supplied on a roll 24, but may as well be supplied as a separate sheet.
  • the print medium 22 may be paper, or the like, or any other suitable print medium.
  • the print medium 24 is movable in a medium advance direction as indicated by arrow 28. Referring to Fig.
  • each printhead 18A- 18H comprises a first row of nozzles 34A and a second row of nozzles 34B.
  • each row of nozzles 34A - 34B extends substantially in the medium advance direction 28.
  • the print medium 22 is positioned on the print surface 12.
  • the printhead carriage 16 is guided along the guide assembly 20 over the print surface 12.
  • each printhead 18A- 18H ejects drops of ink towards the print medium 22 such that a swath of the print image is printed on the print medium 22 as an array of ink dots.
  • a swath may be printed by a single pass of the printhead carriage 16 or by a multiple pass of the printhead carriage 16 depending on a print strategy. In general, multiple passes allow a higher print quality, while a single pass provides a relatively short printing time.
  • the print medium 22 is advanced in the medium advance direction 28 over a distance corresponding to the swath size in the medium advance direction 28 such that a subsequent swath may be printed adjacent to the printed swath.
  • the drops of ink that are ejected from the printheads 18A - 18H are required to impinge on the print medium 22 at a location that is within a predetermined distance from an intended location.
  • Very small errors in a position and/or orientation of each printhead 18A - 18H may however lead to relatively large errors in location of the ejected drops.
  • other error sources may lead to such dot positioning errors as is known to a person skilled in the art.
  • each printhead 18 comprises a single row of nozzles.
  • a reference to the printhead 18 should be interpreted as a reference to a row of nozzles of the printhead 18.
  • the printhead 18 is moving in a positive or negative scanning direction as indicated by respective arrows 30.
  • a (virtual) reference surface 32 is shown for illustrative purposes, which reference surface 32 is perpendicular to the scanning direction 30.
  • a row of dots ejected by the row of nozzles of each printhead 18 is substantially parallel to the reference surface 32.
  • An intended row location i.e. an intended location of a printed row of dots, is indicated by respective dashed lines 36.
  • a trajectory of the ink drops from the printhead 18 to the medium is indicated by dashed arrows 38 and 40.
  • an actual row location i.e.
  • Fig. 2A - 2D an example is shown in which ink drops do not impinge on the print medium at the intended row location, but each ink drop lands at a same distance from its intended location.
  • the actual row location line 42 is substantially parallel to the intended row location line 36.
  • the positioning errors may be corrected, or at least partly compensated, by adjusting an ejection timing.
  • a single adjustment factor may be applied to all nozzles, since the error is substantially equal for each nozzle. Such an error may result from a rotation of the printhead 18 around the X-axis, for example.
  • the error is a bi-directional positioning error.
  • a direction of a deviation depends on the direction of a movement of the printhead 18.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a positive scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the error is a mono-directional positioning error.
  • a direction of a deviation does not depend on the direction of a movement of the printhead 18.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a positive scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in an opposite direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the direction of deviation is the same as the direction of deviation in Fig. 2C .
  • the direction of displacement of the actual row location line 42 may be opposite to the scanning direction 30 - for both positive and negative scanning direction - instead of being the same.
  • Fig. 2E - 2H an example is shown in which ink drops do not impinge on the print medium at the intended row location, but each ink drop lands at a distance from its intended location, but the distance varies per nozzle; in particular, the distance between the intended row location line 36 and the actual row location line 42 increases in a direction of the row of nozzles (X-axis).
  • the positioning errors may be corrected, or at least partly compensated, by adjusting an ejection timing per nozzle.
  • each nozzle is provided with a respective adjustment factor.
  • the error may result from a rotation of the printhead 18 around the Y-axis or the Z-axis, for example. Further, such an error may result from a medium advance error, if the medium is slanted while being advanced, for example.
  • the error is a bi-directional positioning error.
  • a direction of a deviation depends on the direction of a movement of the printhead 18.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a positive scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the error is a mono-directional positioning error.
  • a direction of a deviation does not depend on the direction of a movement of the printhead 18.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a positive scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in the same direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the printhead 18 moves in a negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 30, and the actual row location line 42 is displaced in an opposite direction relative to the intended row location line 36.
  • the direction of deviation is the same as the direction of deviation in Fig. 2G .
  • a bi-directional positioning error is an error resulting from a difference in scanning movement direction of the printhead.
  • a mono-directional positioning error is an error resulting from a difference in the row of nozzles from which the ink dots originate.
  • a bi-directional error a single row of nozzles may be used and a distance between dots printed in a positive scanning movement direction may be determined; for determining a mono-directional error, two rows of nozzles may be used and a distance between dots printed by a first row of nozzles and dots printed by a second row of nozzles may be determined. This is elucidated below with reference to Fig. 3A and 3B .
  • an actual positioning error is usually a combination of a bi-directional positioning error and a mono-directional positioning error.
  • the bi-directional positioning error and the mono-directional positioning error are determined.
  • a first timing adjustment factor for correcting or at least partly compensating the bi-directional positioning error and a second timing adjustment factor for correcting or at least partly compensating the mono-directional positioning error may be determined and introduced, thereby correcting or at least partly compensating the actual positioning error.
  • Fig. 3A shows a part of an embodiment of a test pattern 50 for determining a bi-directional positioning error.
  • the test pattern 50 comprises a number of bar-shaped elements, in particular a first bar-shaped element 52, a second bar-shaped element 54 and a third bar-shaped element 56.
  • a center line C52, C54, C56, respectively, is indicated.
  • the bar-shaped elements 52, 54, 56 are alternatingly printed in a positive scanning movement and a negative scanning movement of the printhead to be calibrated as indicated by the arrows 58, 60, 62 indicating the scanning movement corresponding to the bar-shaped elements 52, 54, 56, respectively.
  • An arrow d1 indicates a first distance between the center line C54 of the second bar-shaped element 54 and the center line C52 of the first bar-shaped element 52.
  • An arrow d2 indicates a second distance between the center line C54 of the second bar-shaped element 54 and the center line C56 of the third bar-shaped element 56.
  • the printhead to be calibrated is controlled such that the intended positions of the center lines C52, C54 and C56 are spaced apart at a same distance. Due to a bi-directional positioning error, the distance between adjacent bar-shaped elements may be disturbed as elucidated hereinafter with reference to Fig. 3A . In Fig. 3A , it is assumed that a bi-directional positioning error corresponding to the error as illustrated in Fig. 2A - 2B is present.
  • the first and the third bar-shaped elements 52 and 56 are printed by the printhead moving in the positive scanning direction.
  • the second bar-shaped element 54 is printed by the printhead moving in the negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrow 60. Due to the bi-directional positioning error, the first and the third bar-shaped elements 52, 56 are shifted in the negative scanning direction relative to the second bar-shaped element 54. Consequently, the first distance d1 is larger than the second distance d2. If no bi-directional positioning error would be present, the first distance d1 and the second distance d2 would have been equal.
  • the test pattern 50 is selected such that a mono-directional positioning error does not influence a measurement result. This is achieved by printing the bar-shaped elements 52, 54, 56 alternatingly in the positive and in the negative scanning direction. A position of each bar-shaped element 52, 54, 56 is influenced by a mono-directional positioning error. However, since the measurement result depends on the mutual distances d1, d2 the mono-directional positioning errors are eliminated from the measurement.
  • Fig. 3B shows a part of an embodiment of a test pattern 70 for determining a mono-directional positioning error.
  • the test pattern 70 comprises a number of bar-shaped elements, in particular a first bar-shaped element 72, a second bar-shaped element 74 and a third bar-shaped element 76.
  • a center line C72, C74, C76, respectively, is indicated.
  • the bar-shaped elements 72, 74, 76 are each partly printed in a positive scanning movement and partly in a negative scanning movement of the printhead as indicated by the arrows 78A, 78B, 80A, 80B, 82A, 82B indicating the scanning movement corresponding to the bar-shaped elements 72, 74, 76, respectively.
  • An arrow d3 indicates a third distance between the center line C74 of the second bar-shaped element 74 and the center line C72 of the first bar-shaped element 72.
  • An arrow d4 indicates a fourth distance between the center line C74 of the second bar-shaped element 74 and the center line C76 of the third bar-shaped element 76.
  • the printhead to be calibrated is controlled such that the intended positions of the center lines C72, C74 and C76 are spaced apart at a same distance. Due to a mono-directional positioning error, the distance between adjacent bar-shaped elements may be disturbed as elucidated hereinafter with reference to Fig. 3B . In Fig. 3B , it is assumed that a mono-directional positioning error corresponding to the error as illustrated in Fig. 2C - 2D is present.
  • the first and the third bar-shaped elements 72 and 76 are constituted of dots printed by a first row of nozzles moving in the positive scanning direction and dots printed by the first row of nozzles moving in the negative scanning direction.
  • the second bar-shaped element 74 is constituted of dots printed by a second row of nozzles moving in the positive scanning direction and dots printed by the second row of nozzles moving in the negative scanning direction, as indicated by arrows 80A, 80B.
  • the center lines C72, C76 of the first and the third bar-shaped elements 72, 76, respectively, are shifted in the negative scanning direction relative to the center line C74 of the second bar-shaped element 74. Consequently, the third distance d3 is larger than the fourth distance d4. If no mono-directional positioning error would be present, the third distance d3 and the fourth distance d4 would have been equal.
  • the test pattern 70 is selected such that a bi-directional positioning error does not influence a measurement result. This is achieved by determining a position of the respective center lines of the bar-shaped elements 72, 74 and 76. Although each bar-shaped element 72, 74, 76 is influenced by a bi-directional positioning error, the bi-directional error only results in an increase of a size of the bar-shaped element in the scanning direction. An average position, such as the position of a center line, is not altered or influenced by such a widening of the bar-shaped element. Since the measurement result depends on the mutual distances d3, d4 between such center lines, the bi-directional positioning errors are eliminated from the measurement.
  • Fig. 4 shows an embodiment of a sensor assembly 90 for detecting a test pattern 92 comprising a number of pattern elements 94A, 94B, 94C.
  • the sensor assembly comprises an imaging device 100 and an optical lens assembly 102.
  • the sensor assembly 90 may further be provided with a lighting source.
  • the sensor assembly 90 is mounted such that it may scan over the test pattern 92 in a scanning direction 96.
  • the sensor assembly 90 may be mounted on the printhead carriage ( Fig. 1A - 1B ).
  • the sensor assembly 90 is arranged to detect light reflected on the test pattern 92 in order to generate a test signal that may be processed by suitable processing hardware and/or software.
  • the imaging device 100 is a single pixel device, e.g. a photo diode.
  • a single pixel imaging device 100 generates a signal that may be regarded as a result of an averaging over a measurement spot 98, hereinafter also referred to as a field-of-view of the imaging device 100.
  • a person skilled in the art readily understands how the signal is constructed and how a center line of each element 94A - 94C may be determined from such a signal, e.g. using image processing techniques and/or suitable mathematical techniques such as correlation techniques.
  • the field-of-view 98 of the sensor assembly 90 in particular in the medium advance direction, is smaller than the row of nozzles in the medium advance direction.
  • Multiple scans of the sensor assembly 90 over the test pattern 92 in order to build an image of the whole test pattern 92 in the medium advance direction may result in introduction of unknown artifacts and consequently undesired measurement errors.
  • Fig. 5A and 5B illustrate how a test pattern may be constructed in order to eliminate a need to perform multiple imaging scans.
  • a printhead 130 is illustrated having a single row of nozzles 140.
  • the row of nozzles 140 is virtually divided in four similar parts 142, 144, 146 and 148.
  • the number of parts may be selected based on a size of a measurement spot or field-of-view of an imaging device (see also Fig. 4 and the description relating thereto), for example.
  • a first intermediate result 110A after a first step of printing the test pattern is shown.
  • a second intermediate result 110B after a second step of printing the test pattern is shown.
  • a first part of test pattern is partly printed.
  • a first part of bar-shaped elements 112A, 116A are printed, while the printhead 130 moves in a positive scanning direction 120.
  • the first part of the test pattern is completed by printing a first part of a bar-shaped element 114B.
  • the printhead 130 moves in the negative scanning direction 122.
  • the second intermediate result 110B is generated.
  • the second intermediate result 110B corresponds to the first part of the test pattern.
  • the first part of the test pattern corresponds to the part of the test pattern that is printed by a first part 148 of the row of nozzles 140.
  • the medium is moved relative to the printhead 130 in the medium advance direction 124.
  • the medium is advanced such that the bar-shaped elements 112B, 114B and 116B are aligned with a second part 146 of the row of nozzles 140.
  • a third step and a fourth step may be performed by scanning the printhead 130 in a positive scanning direction and in a negative scanning direction 120, 122, respectively, thereby printing a second part of the test pattern.
  • the second part of the test pattern may comprise further parts of the bar-shaped elements 112B, 114B, 116B. These further parts may be adjacent to the parts comprised in the first part of the test pattern.
  • a fifth step and a sixth step may be performed using a third part 144 of the row of nozzles 140.
  • a seventh step may be performed using a fourth part 142 of the row of nozzles 140 scanning in a positive scanning movement 126.
  • a third intermediate result 110C - after the seventh step - is illustrated on the left-hand side of Fig. 5B .
  • the bar-shaped elements 112C and 116C have obtained their final shape, each comprising four parts of the test pattern, each part of the test pattern corresponding to a part of the row of nozzles 140.
  • the bar-shaped element 114C has a shape that comprises three parts of the test pattern.
  • the fourth part is added to the bar-shaped element 114C in an eighth step by scanning in a negative scanning movement 128, thereby obtaining its final shape as illustrated on the right-hand side of Fig. 5B .
  • a final result 110D is illustrated having three bar-shaped elements 112D, 114D and 116D.
  • Each bar-shaped element 112D, 114D, 116D comprises a number of sub-bars extending in the scanning direction.
  • Each sub-bar comprises an element of each one of the four parts of the test pattern.
  • all sub-bars may be adjacent such that a single bar-shaped element extending in the medium advance direction is constructed.
  • all elements originating from separate parts of the row of nozzles are spaced apart, thus resulting in a bar-shaped element extending in the medium advance direction, which element is formed by a number of lines extending in the scanning direction, as illustrated in Fig. 6A - 6F .
  • a method for constructing a test pattern 110D for determining a bi-directional positioning error is elucidated.
  • the test pattern 110D thus corresponds to the test pattern 50 as illustrated in Fig. 3A .
  • the test pattern 70 as illustrated in Fig. 3B may likewise be constructed by virtually dividing a row of nozzles of the printhead in a number of parts. Then, a first and a third bar-shaped element are printed using a first row of nozzles, while a second bar-shaped element, positioned between the first and the third bar-shaped element, is printed using another row of nozzles.
  • test patterns are illustrated for at least partly compensating a positional error that may be compensated by applying a single timing adjustment for all nozzles (cf. Fig. 2A - 2D ).
  • the method and corresponding test pattern may as well be applied for determining a compensation for each nozzle (cf. Fig. 2E - 2H ), albeit that a higher resolution imaging device is required in such a method.
  • Fig. 6A - 6F six test patterns are shown, each comprising three bar-shaped elements 210, 220, 230; 310, 320, 330; 410, 420, 430; 510, 520, 530; 610, 620, 630; 710, 720, 730, respectively, each extending in a medium advance direction 201.
  • Fig. 6A and 6B are printed with a printhead being rotated around the Y-axis ( Fig. 1A - 1B ).
  • Fig. 6A is a test pattern for determining a bi-directional positioning (cf. Fig. 3A );
  • Fig. 6B is a test pattern for determining a mono-directional positioning error (cf. Fig. 3B ).
  • Fig. 6C and 6D are printed with a printhead being rotated around the Z-axis ( Fig. 1A- 1B ).
  • Fig. 6C is a test pattern for determining a bi-directional positioning (cf. Fig. 3A );
  • Fig. 6D is a test pattern for determining a mono-directional positioning error (cf. Fig. 3B ).
  • Fig. 6E and 6F are printed with a printing apparatus in which the medium is slanted, i.e. rotated around the Y-axis.
  • Fig. 6E is a test pattern for determining a bi-directional positioning (cf. Fig. 3A );
  • Fig. 6F is a test pattern for determining a mono-directional positioning error (cf. Fig. 3B ).
  • Fig. 6A three bar-shaped elements 210, 220, 230 are shown.
  • the bar-shaped elements 210, 220, 230 extend in the medium advance direction 201, as above mentioned.
  • the bar-shaped elements 210, 220, 230 are formed by a number of lines extending in a scanning direction 202, which lines are spaced apart. The lines are alternatingly printed from a respective part of a row of nozzles of a printhead.
  • the row of nozzles of the printhead has been virtually divided in four parts.
  • a first line 211 is a part of a first part of the test pattern and has been printed by a subset of nozzles comprised in a first part of the row of nozzles.
  • a second line 212 is a part of a second part of the test pattern and has been printed by a subset of nozzles comprised in a second part of the row of nozzles.
  • a third line 213 is a part of a third part of the test pattern and has been printed by a subset of nozzles comprised in a third part of the row of nozzles.
  • a fourth line 214 is a part of a fourth part of the test pattern and has been printed by a subset of nozzles comprised in a fourth part of the row of nozzles.
  • a set 240 of four lines is repeated, thereby alternating the lines originating from different parts of the row of nozzles.
  • the same is applicable to a set 340 ( Fig. 6B ), a set 440 ( Fig. 6C ), a set 540 ( Fig. 6D ), a set 640 ( Fig. 6E ) and a set 740 ( Fig. 6F ).
  • each set 240, 340, 440, 540, 640, 740 provides information about a positioning error of the dots ejected from the row of nozzles.
  • an average position of the bar-shaped elements 210, 220 and 230 is not influenced.
  • the bi-directional and mono-directional positioning errors described in relation to Fig. 3A and 3B , respectively, are still derivable from the bar-shaped elements 210, 220 and 230.
  • the serrated edges may however be examined in order to determine further adjustments of the jet timing of individual nozzles.
  • the mono-directional and the bi-directional errors may vary e.g. due to a variation in a nozzle - medium distance, i.e. a distance between a nozzle and the medium, resulting from a variation of a distance between the guiding means (20, Fig. 1A ) and the print surface (12, Fig. 1A ).
  • a bi-directional error may be determined over the width of the printer for a reference row of nozzles.
  • the mono-directional and bi-directional error for each of the rows of nozzles may be determined using a test pattern over a part of the width and extrapolating the results obtained from such a partial test pattern using the results of the full-width test pattern of the reference row of nozzles.
  • the printer is configured to operate in one of a number of possible modes, wherein a difference in a carriage speed of the carriage (16, Fig. 1A ) between print modes exists, it is noted that the calibrated jet timing of the nozzles needs to be adjusted to the carriage speed used in each print mode.
  • a difference in nozzle - medium distance between individual rows of nozzles may be at least partly compensated by considering errors due such a difference as a difference in ink drop ejection velocity. From a test pattern it is virtually impossible to retrieve which difference (nozzle - medium distance or ink drop ejection velocity) causes an error. However, in an embodiment, it is determined that a maximum error due to ejection velocity difference is substantially larger than a maximum error due to nozzle - medium distance difference. Now, by treating any error as an error due to velocity difference, a velocity difference between the individual rows of nozzles may be determined and may be used in estimating a correction factor for other print modes.
  • Y bidir represents the bi-directional error, if no jet timing compensation is applied
  • z represents the nozzle - medium distance
  • v carriage represents the carriage velocity
  • v drop represents the ink drop ejection velocity
  • z average represents an average nozzle - medium distance over the width of the printer
  • ⁇ z( y ) represents a local deviation from the average nozzle - medium distance at position y .
  • a single full-width test pattern may be employed for determining ⁇ z( y ) over the full width, i.e. for each possible value of y.
  • This ⁇ z( y ) is applicable to each row of nozzles and may be determined from a reference row of nozzles.
  • a correction factor for estimating a bi-directional error in another print mode employing another carriage velocity (v carriage ) may be easily determined by a skilled person.
  • differences between individual rows of nozzles may be compensated by considering the differences as resulting from a difference in ink drop ejection velocity (v drop ).
  • v drop ink drop ejection velocity

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Ink Jet (AREA)
  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Procédé d'étalonnage du tête d'impression à jet d'encre dans une imprimante à jet d'encre en utilisant un motif d'essai prédéterminé, la tête d'impression étant aménagée pour se déplacer dans une direction de balayage et comprenant une rangée de buses, la rangée de buses s'étendant sensiblement dans la direction d'avancement de support, la direction d'avancement de support étant sensiblement perpendiculaire à ladite direction de balayage, le motif d'essai ayant une taille de motif prédéterminée dans la direction d'avancement de support, le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à :
    (a) imprimer une première partie d'un motif d'essai prédéterminé sur un support d'impression en utilisant un premier sous-ensemble prédéterminé de buses, le premier sous-ensemble de buses étant compris dans une première partie de la rangée de buses, la première partie ayant une taille dans la direction d'avancement de support qui est sensiblement égale à la taille de motif prédéterminée ;
    (b) faire avancer le support d'impression dans la direction d'avancement de support par rapport à la tête d'impression sur une distance d'avancement de support prédéterminée ;
    (c) imprimer une seconde partie du motif d'essai prédéterminé sur le support d'impression en utilisant un second sous-ensemble prédéterminé de buses, le second sous-ensemble de buses étant compris dans une seconde partie de la rangée de buses, la seconde partie ayant une taille dans la direction d'avancement de support qui est sensiblement égale à la taille de motif prédéterminée, caractérisé en ce qui :
    la première partie et la seconde partie du motif d'essai comprennent chacun un certain nombre d'éléments d'essai, les éléments d'essai de la première partie et les éléments d'essai de la seconde partie étant aménagés en alternance sensiblement dans la direction de la rangée de buses et dans lequel les éléments d'essai de chaque partie du motif d'essai sont espacés l'un de l'autre dans la direction d'avancement de support.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la distance d'avancement de support prédéterminée correspond à la taille de motif prédéterminée.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les éléments d'essai sont des éléments en forme de barre s'étendant dans la direction de balayage.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la rangée de buses est subdivisée en un nombre prédéterminé de parties, le nombre de parties étant de trois ou plus, le procédé comprenant la répétition des étapes (b) et (c) pour chacune de la troisième et des autres parties.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'imprimante à jet d'encre comprend un dispositif d'imagerie pour imager le motif d'essai, le dispositif d'imagerie ayant un champ de vision prédéterminé, la taille du motif prédéterminé étant choisie pour être égale ou inférieure à la taille dudit champ de vision dans la direction d'avancement de support, le procédé comprenant par ailleurs l'imagerie du motif d'essai après impression du motif d'essai.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le procédé comprend l'ajustement de la synchronisation des jets de chaque buse de la rangée de buses sur la base du motif d'essai imprimé.
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le procédé comprend la détermination d'un profil de motif d'essai en prenant la moyenne du motif d'essai dans la direction d'avancement de support et par étalonnage de la tête d'impression sur la base des mesures effectuées à partir du profil de motif d'essai.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel chaque partie du motif d'essai est imprimée lors d'un premier mouvement de balayage de la tête d'impression dans un premier sens de balayage positif et lors d'un second mouvement de balayage dans un sens de balayage négatif, les sens de balayage positif et négatif étant opposés l'un à l'autre, le procédé comprenant l'impression d'éléments de référence dans le premier mouvement de balayage et l'impression d'éléments d'étalonnage dans le second mouvement de balayage.
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'imprimante à jet d'encre comprend au moins deux rangées de buses, le procédé comprenant l'impression d'éléments de référence en utilisant une première rangée de buses et l'impression d'éléments d'étalonnage en utilisant une seconde rangée de buses.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou la revendication 9, dans lequel le motif d'essai est imprimé lors d'un premier mouvement de balayage de la tête d'impression dans un sens de balayage positif et lors d'un second mouvement de balayage dans un sens de balayage négatif, les sens de balayage positif et négatif étant opposés l'un à l'autre, le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à :
    • déterminer une position moyenne des éléments de référence ;
    • déterminer une position moyenne des éléments d'étalonnage ; et
    • étalonner la tête d'impression à jet d'encre sur la base d'une distance comprise entre les positions moyennes respectives des éléments de référence et des éléments d'étalonnage.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le procédé comprend les étapes consistant à :
    - déterminer un profil de distance d'une première rangée de buses sur une pleine plage de balayage d'une première tête d'impression dans la direction de balayage, le profil de distance indiquant une distance entre les buses de ladite première rangée de buses en fonction d'une position de la tête d'impression dans la direction de balayage ;
    - effectuer les étapes (a) à (c) pour chaque rangée de buses de chaque tête d'impression sur une partie de la plage de balayage de chaque tête d'impression dans la direction de balayage ;
    - étalonner chaque rangée de buses de chaque tête d'impression sur la pleine plage de balayage en combinant le profil de distance de la première rangée de buses de la première tête d'impression et les motifs d'essai imprimés selon les étapes (a) à (c) en tenant compte d'une relation de position entre chaque rangée de buses et ladite première rangée de buses.
  12. Procédé la revendication 11, dans lequel la relation de position entre les rangées de buses est déterminée à partir des motifs d'essai imprimés selon les étapes (a) à (c).
  13. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'imprimante à jet d'encre est configurée pour opérer dans un premier mode d'impression et dans un second mode d'impression, un paramètre d'impression ayant une première valeur dans le premier mode d'impression et ayant une seconde valeur dans le second mode d'impression, le procédé comprenant la réalisation des étapes (a) à (c) dans le premier mode d'impression et l'étalonnage de la tête d'impression pour un fonctionnement dans le second mode d'impression sur la base des motifs d'essai imprimés dans le premier mode d'impression en tenant compte d'une différence entre la première valeur et la seconde valeur du paramètre d'impression.
  14. Appareil d'impression à jet d'encre comprenant au moins une tête d'impression à jet d'encre, la tête d'impression à jet d'encre étant aménagée pour se déplacer dans une direction de balayage et comprenant une rangée de buses, la rangée de buses s'étendant sensiblement dans une direction d'avancement de support, la direction d'avancement de support étant sensiblement perpendiculaire à la ladite direction de balayage, l'appareil d'impression étant configuré pour imprimer un motif d'essai prédéterminé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
EP08167028.3A 2007-11-22 2008-10-20 Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre Not-in-force EP2062734B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08167028.3A EP2062734B1 (fr) 2007-11-22 2008-10-20 Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07121313 2007-11-22
EP08167028.3A EP2062734B1 (fr) 2007-11-22 2008-10-20 Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2062734A1 EP2062734A1 (fr) 2009-05-27
EP2062734B1 true EP2062734B1 (fr) 2013-07-17

Family

ID=39301109

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08167028.3A Not-in-force EP2062734B1 (fr) 2007-11-22 2008-10-20 Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2062734B1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20170120582A1 (en) * 2015-11-04 2017-05-04 Seiko Epson Corporation Dot recording apparatus, inspection apparatus, and inspection method

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110141495A1 (en) * 2009-12-10 2011-06-16 Chung-Hui Kuo Automatic high-precision registration correction method via low resolution imaging
JP6232316B2 (ja) * 2014-03-04 2017-11-15 武藤工業株式会社 飽和インク量の測定方法
JP6113102B2 (ja) * 2014-03-28 2017-04-12 富士フイルム株式会社 位置ズレオーダの検出方法、画像の位置ズレの補正方法、スジムラ補正テーブルの作成方法、及びスジムラ補正方法
JP6228898B2 (ja) * 2014-06-27 2017-11-08 武藤工業株式会社 飽和インク量の測定方法及び判定方法
JP6558135B2 (ja) * 2015-08-06 2019-08-14 富士ゼロックス株式会社 画像形成装置及びプログラム
JP6651954B2 (ja) * 2016-03-31 2020-02-19 ブラザー工業株式会社 印刷装置
US10518530B2 (en) * 2016-07-18 2019-12-31 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Testing for wiping pre-treatment of print media
JP6828451B2 (ja) * 2017-01-18 2021-02-10 セイコーエプソン株式会社 液体吐出装置、及び調整パターンの形成方法
JP6903939B2 (ja) * 2017-02-21 2021-07-14 セイコーエプソン株式会社 テストパターンの作成方法、テストパターン、印刷装置、プログラム

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE60037118T2 (de) 1999-04-22 2008-08-28 Canon Finetech Inc., Mitsukaido Bilderzeugungsvorrichtung
US6769759B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2004-08-03 Seiko Epson Corporation Printing with selection of sub-scanning
JP2007038649A (ja) 2005-07-08 2007-02-15 Canon Inc インクジェット記録装置およびインクジェット記録方法
WO2007039444A1 (fr) 2005-09-20 2007-04-12 Agfa Graphics Nv Procede et appareil pour aligner automatiquement des reseaux d'elements d'impression

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20170120582A1 (en) * 2015-11-04 2017-05-04 Seiko Epson Corporation Dot recording apparatus, inspection apparatus, and inspection method
CN106965568A (zh) * 2015-11-04 2017-07-21 精工爱普生株式会社 点记录装置、检査装置及检査方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2062734A1 (fr) 2009-05-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2062734B1 (fr) Procédé pour l'étalonnage d'une tête d'impression à jet d'encre et appareil d'impression à jet d'encre
US6367903B1 (en) Alignment of ink dots in an inkjet printer
JP5063327B2 (ja) インクジェット記録装置および調整値取得方法
JP6878818B2 (ja) インクジェット装置及びインクジェット装置の濃度調整方法
US8636334B2 (en) Printing apparatus and adjustment pattern printing method
US9358790B2 (en) Printing apparatus and landing position determination method
JP2000052574A (ja) インクジェットのプリントヘッドを較正するための方法
JP2006272957A (ja) 記録装置およびその方法
EP1803577B1 (fr) Méthode pour aligner des gouttelettes expulsées d'une imprimante à jet d'encre
JP6021872B2 (ja) 記録装置および記録位置調整方法
US8534792B2 (en) Method for calibrating an array of imaging elements
US7044573B2 (en) Printhead alignment test pattern and method for determining printhead misalignment
US7407251B2 (en) Printing method, computer-readable medium, printing apparatus, printing system, and pattern for correction
CN108349273B (zh) 校准页宽阵列打印装置的介质推进系统
JP4647264B2 (ja) インク画像を受け取り材料に付着する方法およびプリンタ
JP2011115962A (ja) 流体噴射装置、及び、プログラム
US8708444B2 (en) Inkjet printer and ejection timing correction method
JP2012504060A (ja) マーク付け要素の位置合わせ
JP2019111693A (ja) 相対位置検出方法及びインクジェット記録装置
EP2610063B1 (fr) Appareil d'enregistrement d'images à jet d'encre
JP2008093851A (ja) 補正値の設定方法、補正値設定システム、及び、プログラム
JP2020037209A (ja) インクジェット記録装置、インクジェット記録方法、およびプログラム
JP6444129B2 (ja) 記録装置および記録方法
US20100302303A1 (en) Image recording apparatus, method of calculating record position shifts, and method of recording measured patterns
JP7244397B2 (ja) 印刷装置及び補正方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20091127

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20101006

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 621921

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008026022

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 621921

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131017

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131117

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131028

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131018

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008026022

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131020

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20081020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20181024

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20181019

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20181019

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20181022

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602008026022

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20191101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20191020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191020