EP2059540B1 - Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature - Google Patents

Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2059540B1
EP2059540B1 EP07796858A EP07796858A EP2059540B1 EP 2059540 B1 EP2059540 B1 EP 2059540B1 EP 07796858 A EP07796858 A EP 07796858A EP 07796858 A EP07796858 A EP 07796858A EP 2059540 B1 EP2059540 B1 EP 2059540B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
reactor
temperature
reaction
resin
polymer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07796858A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2059540A1 (en
Inventor
Richard B. Pannell
Robert O. Hagerty
Eric J. Markel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Univation Technologies LLC
Original Assignee
Univation Technologies LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univation Technologies LLC filed Critical Univation Technologies LLC
Publication of EP2059540A1 publication Critical patent/EP2059540A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2059540B1 publication Critical patent/EP2059540B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2/00—Processes of polymerisation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F10/00—Homopolymers and copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2/00—Processes of polymerisation
    • C08F2/02—Polymerisation in bulk
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F210/00—Copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • C08F210/16—Copolymers of ethene with alpha-alkenes, e.g. EP rubbers
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2400/00—Characteristics for processes of polymerization
    • C08F2400/02—Control or adjustment of polymerization parameters

Definitions

  • the invention pertains to methods for monitoring a polymerization reaction (e.g., an olefin polymerization reaction conducted in a gas phase reactor) and determining a melt initiation temperature (indicative of the temperature at which polymer resin in the reactor-is expected to begin to melt) from monitored reaction parameters in accordance with a predetermined model, and optionally also controlling the reaction in response to the melt initiation temperature.
  • a polymerization reaction e.g., an olefin polymerization reaction conducted in a gas phase reactor
  • determining a melt initiation temperature indicative of the temperature at which polymer resin in the reactor-is expected to begin to melt
  • on-line generation of data during a reaction is used herein to denote generation of the data sufficiently rapidly that the data is available essentially instantaneously for use during the reaction.
  • generation of data in on-line fashion is used synonymously with the expression on-line generation of data during a reaction.
  • Generation of data from a laboratory test (on at least one substance employed or generated in the reaction) is not considered “on-line generation” of data during the reaction, if the laboratory test consumes so much time that parameters of the reaction may change significantly during the test. It is contemplated that on-line generation of data can include the use of a previously generated database that may have been generated in any of a variety of ways including time-consuming laboratory tests.
  • diluent denotes condensable gas (or a mixture of condensable gases) present in a polymerization reactor with polymer resin being produced.
  • the diluent is condensable at the temperatures encountered in the process heat exchanger.
  • diluents include induced condensing agents (ICAs), comonomers, isomers of comonomers, and combinations thereof.
  • ICAs induced condensing agents
  • a conventional gas phase fluidized bed reactor during operation to produce polyolefins by polymerization, contains a fluidized dense-phase bed including a mixture of reaction gas, polymer (resin) particles, catalyst, and (optionally) catalyst modifiers.
  • a fluidized dense-phase bed including a mixture of reaction gas, polymer (resin) particles, catalyst, and (optionally) catalyst modifiers.
  • any of several process control variables can be controlled to cause the reaction product to have desired characteristics.
  • the amount of polymer produced in a fluidized bed polymerization process is directly related to the amount of heat that can be withdrawn from the fluidized bed reaction zone since the exothermic heat generated by the reaction is directly proportional to the rate of polymer production.
  • the rate of heat removal from the fluidized bed must equal the rate of heat generation, such that the bed temperature remains constant.
  • heat has been removed from the fluidized bed by cooling the gas recycle stream in a heat exchanger external to the reactor.
  • Cooling of the recycle stream to a temperature below the gas dew point temperature produces a two-phase gas/liquid mixture with solids contained in both of these phases.
  • the liquid phase of this two-phase gas/liquid mixture in "condensed mode" operation remains entrained or suspended in the gas phase of the mixture. Vaporization of the liquid occurs only when heat is added or pressure is reduced.
  • vaporization occurs when the two-phase mixture enters the fluidized bed, with the (warmer) resin providing the required heat of vaporization.
  • the vaporization thus provides an additional means of extracting heat of reaction from the fluidized bed.
  • the heat removal capacity is further enhanced in condensed mode operation by the lower gas temperatures of the gas stream entering the fluidized bed. Both of these factors increase the overall heat removal capability of the system and thereby enable higher space-time yields (higher reactor production rates per unit volume of the fluidized bed).
  • Jenkins, et al. illustrate the difficulty and complexity of such reactor control in general, and of trying to extend the stable operating zone to optimize the space time yield in a gas phase reactor, especially when operating in condensed mode.
  • discontinuity event is used to describe a disruption in the continuous operation of a polymerization reactor caused by sheeting, chunking or distributor plate fouling.
  • sheeting and/or chunking while used synonymously herein, may describe different manifestations of problems caused by excessive polymer stickiness in the fluid bed. In either manifestation (sheeting or chucking) the excessive polymer stickiness can lead directly to a reactor discontinuity event with the associated loss production.
  • PCT Application Publication Number WO 03/051929 describes the use of mathematical chaos theory to detect the onset and presence of sheeting in a fluid bed reactor.
  • Signals from a range of instruments including acoustic emission sensors, differential pressure sensors, static sensors, and wall temperature sensors are filtered by certain specified methods to construct a "time-series" of data, which is then processed by methods of non-linear dynamics herein referred to as chaos theory and compared to data from a control reactor running without sheeting.
  • the onset of sheeting is indicated by an increase in mean "cycle time” (relative to a baseline, control reactor), usually with a concurrent decrease in the "mean deviation" of the time-series.
  • the references also describe a method including the steps of determining the dry sticking temperature of a polymer to be produced; determining the melting point depression for the reaction as a result of laboratory measurements (i.e., by tests performed in a laboratory on a sample of the polymer to be produced, immersed in a liquid or liquid mixture) rather than reaction parameter measurements generated by monitoring the reaction; and then operating the gas phase reactor process with a bed temperature below a "critical temperature” defined as the dry sticking temperature minus the melting point depression.
  • the references teach that performing the reaction with the bed temperature below the critical temperature can eliminate stickiness in the resin due to high concentrations of condensables.
  • U.S. Patent Application 11/227,710 entitled “Method for Operating a Gas-Phase Reactor at or Near Maximum Production Rates While Controlling Polymer Stickiness," filed by Michael E. Muhle and Robert O. Hagerty on September 14, 2005, discloses monitoring (during operation of a polymerization reactor) of resin stickiness by generating a time series of readings of acoustic emissions of the contents of the reactor using acoustic emission sensors. Acoustic emission measurements are generated during steady state operation of a reactor (producing the relevant polymer). Additional acoustic emission measurements (generated during operation of the reactor) are then processed to determine whether they deviate from acoustic emissions indicative of steady state reactor operation.
  • Such deviation is treated as an indication of onset of excessive stickiness of polymer particles in the reactor.
  • Corrective action can be taken (e.g., ICA and/or monomer levels and/or reactor temperature can be adjusted) when the acoustic emission measurements are determined to deviate from those of a steady state reactor.
  • this application does not teach the generation of a reference temperature above which resin in a reactor is predicted to become sticky.
  • Steps (b) and (c) can be performed in any of a variety of ways, including by accessing one or more look-up tables prepared in accordance with the predetermined correlation or the model.
  • the dry MIT value may be determined in step (b) for the particular polymer in the reactor using a database of dry MIT values.
  • the database is populated with dry MIT values that have been previously determined for the full range of polymers expected to be produced in the reactor.
  • the polymer properties (density, MI, ) are provided as input to the database, and the dry MIT value is provided as the output.
  • the dry MIT values may be determined from DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) measurements as described below.
  • the three-step method described above also includes the step of:
  • the three-step method described above also includes the step of:
  • the temperature value determined in step (d) can also be used as a basis for maximizing reactor production rates.
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value ⁇ MIT which is at least substantially equal to Trx - MIT R , and the limiting (maximum) value of ⁇ MIT is in a range from 5°C. to 6°C
  • the reaction can be controlled using the current value of ⁇ MIT as feedback so as to proceed at a relatively high (but still safe) value of ⁇ MIT in the range from 2°C to 5°C. This can provide the maximum safe condensed mode cooling capacity and maximum production rates.
  • Preferred embodiments generate reduced melt initiation temperature values (and ⁇ MIT values) based on bed-averaged parameters of steady-state polymerization reactions and use them to characterize and control the steady-state reaction.
  • preferred embodiments generate reduced melt initiation temperature values (and ⁇ MIT values) based on instantaneous reaction parameters and use them to characterize and control the reactions during the transitions.
  • a steady-state reaction can be controlled to proceed with a ⁇ MIT value relatively close to a critical (or limiting) ⁇ MIT value.
  • the reaction should typically be controlled to proceed with a ⁇ MIT value (determined with instantaneous resin density and MI values in accordance with the invention) that is farther from the critical ⁇ MIT value.
  • the reaction should be controlled such that neither an " ⁇ MIT ave " temperature (indicative of the difference between current reactor temperature and a reference temperature above which resin having bed-averaged resin properties in the reactor is predicted to become sticky) nor an “ ⁇ MIT inst " temperature (indicative of the difference between current reactor temperature and a reference temperature above which the resin currently being produced in the reactor is predicted to become sticky) exceeds a predetermined limit or leaves a predetermined range.
  • the predetermined limit or range for ⁇ MIT ave may differ from that for ⁇ AMIT inst .
  • the reactor temperature or ICA concentration may be adjusted (typically lowered) to bring the ⁇ MIT value back into an acceptable range. Adjustments in the reactor temperature Trx are generally preferred because of the relatively quick response times involved. If, for example the calculated value of ⁇ MIT were too high by 1°C, a reduction in reaction temperature of 1°C would bring the ⁇ MIT back within range within a few minutes. Alternatively, an excessively high ⁇ MIT value may be corrected by lowering the concentration (or partial pressure) of ICA in the reactor.
  • the dry melt initiation temperature data are provided in the form of a predetermined database (a "Melt Reference Database") or look-up table, which can be accessed to determine a dry melt initiation temperature for polymer resin having measured density and/or melt index.
  • the database would preferably contain dry melt initiation temperature data for a dry version of each grade of polymer to be produced in the reactor.
  • the predetermined correlation employed in step (b) is developed from first melt DSC curves, measured in the laboratory with a group of samples representative of the different types or grades of polymer resin that may be produced in the reactor.
  • Suitable DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) data may be obtained by standard methods, well known to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, however, to use "first melt” data, that is data from previously unmelted granular polymer samples, since these samples are believed to be the most representative of the polymer as it exists in the reactor.
  • Measured values of dry melt initiation temperatures determined from first-melt DSC measurements are set forth below in Table 1 for a group of low density polyethylene samples.
  • MIT 763.4p - 1.7524•In(MI) - 606.09, where ⁇ represents the density of the polymer (in units of g/cc, ASTM), and MI represents the melt index, I 2 of the polymer (in units of dg/min, ASTM).
  • MI melt index
  • step (c) determines a reduced melt initiation temperature.
  • the reduced melt initiation temperature is determined as a function of reactor bed temperature and comonomer and diluent concentrations in the reactor.
  • the inventors found that the estimated degree of MIT depression typically varies with changes of condensable diluent gas partial pressures, and may be as high as 15-16 °C for typical metallocene resin products produced in condensed mode operation with high ICA concentrations.
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value ⁇ MIT and step (e) involves the step of controlling the reaction to maintain (or attempt to maintain) the current value of ⁇ MIT below a predetermined limiting temperature value (or range of values).
  • the limiting temperature value or range can be predetermined using historical reactor data that correlates reactor temperature with the formation of dome sheets, wall sheets, and rapid fouling of the distributor plate. Different predetermined limiting temperature values (or ranges) may be employed depending on the particular manner in which steps (b), (c), and (d) are performed. This does not pose a problem in performing embodiments of the inventive method as long as a consistent method of measurement and calculation is used throughout.
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value ⁇ MIT which is at least substantially equal to Trx - MIT R , and a running calculation of the current value of ⁇ MIT is provided by application software running on a process control computer while the reaction proceeds.
  • Current values of process data bed temperature, ICA, comonomer, and isomer partial pressures, resin density, and melt index
  • the application software determines a dry MIT value from a predetermined correlation between dry MIT value and resin density and melt index.
  • the application software Based on current values of ICA, comonomer, and isomer partial pressures, and resin density and melt index (and the dry MIT value), the application software also determines a reduced melt initiation temperature MIT R .
  • the resulting running calculation of ⁇ MIT provides the required running estimate of the degree of approach to conditions of limiting stickiness in the reactor. For some reactions, conditions of limiting stickiness occur when the current ⁇ MIT value exceeds a limiting value in the range from 5°C to 6 °C.
  • process conditions are adjusted as required to avoid operation with the ⁇ MIT value generated in step (d) greater than a limiting value (or outside a predetermined limiting value range).
  • a limiting value e.g., a value in the range from 5 °C to 6 °C in the case of some polyethylene polymerization reactions using metallocene catalyst A, to be described below
  • control actions can be taken to avoid excessive resin stickiness. These control actions may include a reduction in the reactor bed temperature, a decrease in the ICA partial pressure, a decrease in the comonomer partial pressure, an increase in resin density, or any combination of these four.
  • process conditions are adjusted to allow safe operation at high condensed mode production rates. If the current ⁇ MIT value generated in step (d) is significantly lower than the limiting value (or well within a limiting value range), changes can be made in reactor process conditions to increase the maximum heat transfer capability of the system. These actions may include an increase in the reactor bed temperature, or an increase in the ICA partial pressure.
  • the increased reactor temperature can provide a higher temperature differential (over the cooling water temperature) for additional reactor cooling.
  • the increased ICA partial pressure can provide a higher reactor gas dew point temperature, and correspondingly higher condensing levels in the reactor inlet gas stream.
  • the invention is a method to monitor reactor operation and to control reactor operation to avoid problems caused by excessive resin stickiness.
  • Current values of specific process variables e.g., reactor temperature, ICA, comonomer, and isomer partial pressures, and resin density and melt index
  • ⁇ MIT temperature value indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor.
  • the current value of ⁇ MIT is compared to a previously determined limiting value or range of values.
  • control actions may include a reduction in the reactor temperature (i.e., reactor bed temperature), a decrease in ICA partial pressure, a decrease in comonomer partial pressure, an increase in resin density or any combination of these four.
  • the invention is a method to monitor reactor operation (including by generating monitoring data on an on-line basis), and to control reactor operation (e.g., by generating reaction control data on an on-line basis) to avoid problems caused by excessive resin stickiness.
  • Current values of specific process variables e.g., reactor temperature, ICA, comonomer, and isomer partial pressures, and resin density and melt index
  • ⁇ MIT temperature value indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor.
  • the current value of ⁇ MIT is compared to a previously determined limiting value or range of values.
  • control actions may include a reduction in the reactor temperature (i.e., reactor bed temperature), a decrease in ICA partial pressure, a decrease in comonomer partial pressure, an increase in resin density or any combination of these four.
  • the invention is a method to monitor reactor operation (including by generating monitoring data on an on-line basis), and to control reactor operation (e.g., by generating reaction control data on an on-line basis) to allow safe operation at maximum reactor production rates, while still avoiding discontinuity problems caused by excessive resin stickiness.
  • current values of specific process variables e.g., temperature, ICA, comonomer, and isomer partial pressures, and resin density and melt index
  • ⁇ MIT temperature value indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor.
  • the current value of ⁇ MIT is compared to a previously determined limiting value or range of values.
  • changes can be made in reactor process conditions to increase the maximum heat transfer capability of the system. These actions may include an increase in the reactor bed temperature, or an increase in the ICA partial pressure. Increased reactor temperature can provide a higher temperature differential (over the cooling water temperature) for additional reactor cooling. Increased ICA partial pressure can provide a higher reactor gas dew point temperature, and correspondingly higher condensing levels in the reactor inlet gas stream.
  • the invention provides an improved method for controlling reactor conditions during grade transitions. This is particularly important during transitions to very low density polymer grades (VLDPE) from higher density grades because the resin melting and sticking temperatures for the VLDPE grades are so low.
  • VLDPE very low density polymer grades
  • reactor conditions must be adjusted to lower reaction temperature, lower ICA concentrations, lower production rates and lower resin densities. In commercial operations, these four variables must be changed quickly to minimize the production of off-specification material, while avoiding conditions which would result in the formation of excessively sticky polymer.
  • Embodiments of the present invention integrate the impact of each these variables on the polymer sticking temperature, making it possible to guide the trajectory of the reactor transition so as to avoid excessive resin stickiness, and the discontinuity problems (sheeting, plate fouling and/or chunking) that would result.
  • the bed averaged properties e.g., resin density and melt index
  • the instantaneous production the properties of the resin currently being produced. Therefore, it is possible to determine (i.e., in step (d) of the inventive method) two different temperature values indicative of resin stickiness: one calculated with bed-averaged resin properties, and one calculated with properties of the instantaneous production.
  • both temperature values must be less than a limiting value specific to the reaction or within a limiting value range specific to the reaction.
  • Figure 1 is a simplified cross-sectional view of a reaction system including a fluidized bed reactor (10), whose operation can be monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram of some elements of the Fig. 1 system and additional elements for implementing a process for calculating the control variables MIT R and ⁇ MIT. These parameters may be calculated using on-line data from the reaction system and used to provide a real-time estimate of the degree of resin stickiness in the fluidized bed.
  • Figure 3 is a first melt DSC curve generated from measured data for the polymer and catalyst listed in Row 6 of Table 1. A dry MIT value of 97.4 °C was determined from the initial inflection point of the DSC curve as shown in the figure.
  • Figure 4 is the DSC curve of Fig. 3 and another first melt DSC curve that shows the effect of dissolved hydrocarbons in displacing (or “depressing') the DSC curve of Figure 3 to lower values of temperature.
  • the dissolved hydrocarbons also produce a reduction of the MIT to a lower value, denoted as MIT R as shown.
  • the shift (or displacement) of MIT values (D) is computed using the Flory equation.
  • Figure 5 is a first melt DSC curve with indications that illustrate a calculation of the control variable ⁇ MIT as the difference between the reactor temperature (Trx) and the shifted value of the melt initiation temperature MIT R .
  • FIG. 1 A reactor system whose operation can be monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention will be described with reference to Figure 1 .
  • the Figure 1 system includes fluidized bed reactor 10.
  • Reactor 10 has a bottom end 11, a top expanded section 19, a cylindrical (straight) section 14 above bottom end 11, and a distributor plate 12 within section 14.
  • a fluidized bed 15 of granular polymer and catalyst particles is contained within the straight section 14.
  • the bed is fluidized by the steady flow of recycle gas through the distributor plate 12.
  • the flow rate of fluidizing gas is regulated to provide the fluidized bed with relatively good mixing, as illustrated in the figure.
  • the reactor system also has a catalyst feeder 9 for controlled addition of polymerization catalyst to the fluidized bed reaction zone.
  • the catalyst particles react with the ethylene and comonomer and optionally other reaction gas to produce granular polymer particles.
  • other polymer particles are continually withdrawn from the fluidized bed through a product discharge system (not shown). After passing through the product discharge system, the polymer granules are degassed (or "purged") with a flow of inert nitrogen to remove substantially all of the dissolved hydrocarbon materials.
  • the reactor system of Figure 1 also has a cooling control loop which includes a recycle gas line 31, a circulating gas cooler 30 and compressor 32, coupled with reactor 10 as shown.
  • a cooling control loop which includes a recycle gas line 31, a circulating gas cooler 30 and compressor 32, coupled with reactor 10 as shown.
  • the cooled circulating gas from cooler 30 flows through inlet 34 into reactor 10, then propagates upward through the bed and out from reactor 10 via outlet 33.
  • the expanded section 19 is also known as the "velocity reduction zone", and is designed to minimize the quantities of particle entrainment from the fluidized bed.
  • Each diameter of each horizontal cross-section of the expanded section 19 is greater than the diameter of straight section 14. The increased diameter causes a reduction in the speed of the fluidizing gas, which allows most of the entrained particles (catalyst and resin particles) to settle back into the fluidized bed, thereby minimizing the quantities of solid particles that are "carried over" from the fluidized bed (at a given value of fluidizing gas velocity) through the recycle gas line 31.
  • One or more temperature sensors 16 may be located in the fluidized bed, and used with a control system (not shown in Fig. 1 but which can include processor 50 of Fig. 2 ) and an external cooling loop to control the fluidized bed temperature Trx near the process set-point.
  • a control system not shown in Fig. 1 but which can include processor 50 of Fig. 2
  • an external cooling loop to control the fluidized bed temperature Trx near the process set-point.
  • Relatively warm reactor gases (whose temperature has increased during its flow through reactor 10) is withdrawn from outlet 33 and is pumped by compressor 32 to cooler 30, wherein the temperature of the gas (the cooling fluid) is reduced.
  • the relatively cool fluid from the cooler which may contain condensed liquid flows to the reactor inlet 34, to cool the fluidized bed.
  • Temperature sensors (not shown) near the inlet and outlet of cooler 30 may provide feedback to the control system to regulate the amount by which cooler 30 reduces the temperature of the fluid entering the reactor.
  • the Figure 1 system also includes "skin temperature” sensors 8, mounted in positions along straight section 14 of the reactor wall so as to protrude into the bed from the reactor wall by a small amount (e.g., one eighth to one quarter of an inch). Sensors 8 are configured and positioned to sense the temperature T w of the resin near the wall of reactor 10 during operation.
  • the one or more temperature sensors 16 in the fluidized bed can include at least one resistance temperature sensor positioned and configured to sense bed temperature during reactor operation at a location within reactor 10 away from the reactor wall.
  • the resistance temperature sensor can be mounted so as to protrude into the bed (e.g., 8 to 18 inches away from the reactor wall) more deeply than do sensors 8.
  • reaction parameters preferably include instantaneous and bed-averaged resin product properties (e.g., melt index and density of the polymer resin product being produced by the Figure 1 system during a polymerization reaction). Resin product properties are conventionally measured by periodically sampling the resin as it exits the reactor (e.g. once per hour), and performing the appropriate tests in a quality control laboratory.
  • resin product properties are conventionally measured by periodically sampling the resin as it exits the reactor (e.g. once per hour), and performing the appropriate tests in a quality control laboratory.
  • Other measured reaction parameters preferably include reactor gas composition, e.g., concentrations (and partial pressures) of all reactant gases and induced condensing agents (ICAs), as well as all inert gases (such as nitrogen, hydrocarbon inerts, ) that are present in relevant quantities.
  • the reactor gas composition may be measured with a gas chromatograph system 40.
  • a reaction e.g., a steady-state reaction and/or a reaction transition
  • a polymerization reactor is controlled by adjusting (or regulating) controlling process variables in response to at least one new control variable determined in accordance with the invention.
  • the one or more new control variables of the invention (which typically include MIT R and ⁇ MIT as defined herein) are determined based on the output of sensors (and optionally also other apparatus) that measure reaction parameters.
  • Processor 50 of Figure 2 is an example of a processor programmed to generate such new control variables in accordance with any embodiment of the invention in response to reaction parameters (e.g., parameters determined by the output of temperature sensor 16, resin properties measurements (density and MI), and the process gas chromatograph 40) measured during a reaction, and to control the reaction in response to these temperature values.
  • Processor 50 may be a separate, stand alone processor, or it may be integral with other process control computers that are conventionally used to monitor and control the reactor system.
  • Figure 3 shows a first melt DSC curve generated from measured data for the polymer listed in Row 6 of Table 1 (produced by polymerization using the catalyst listed in Row 6 of Table 1).
  • the melt initiation temperature MIT is taken as the point of rapid onset of melting. Quantitative values may be obtained graphically as the intersection of the two tangent lines as shown. For this particular polymer, the peak melting temperature was determined 116.1 °C, and the MIT was determined as 97.4 °C.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the effect of dissolved hydrocarbons in shifting (or "displacing” or “depressing") the polymer melt curve.
  • the effect of these dissolved components, principally dissolved comonomer and ICA, is assumed in the present work to displace the entire melt curve (shown in Fig. 3 and also shown as a dashed curve in Fig. 4 ) towards lower temperatures, resulting in the displaced curve indicated in Figure 4 .
  • the polymer peak melting temperature is displaced downwards, along with the MIT.
  • the amount of displacement is denoted as D (in units of temperature, °C), and is calculated using the Flory equation and appropriate data (or correlations) for the solubility of condensable hydrocarbons in the polymer.
  • the displaced value of MIT is denoted as MIT R .
  • Figure 5 illustrates a calculation of the control variable ⁇ MIT.
  • ⁇ MIT Trx.- MIT R , and represents the extent by which the reactor bed temperature exceeds (or "overlaps") the displaced value of the MIT.
  • the physical units of ⁇ MIT are temperature, in degrees C.
  • the ⁇ MIT incorporates all known process variables that affect resin stickiness (e.g., resin density and MI, reactor temperature Trx, and hydrocarbon concentrations and solubilities) into a single variable that can be monitored on-line (during a reaction) and used as the basis for control of the reactor to prevent problems associated with excessive stickiness, and/or to maximize reactor production rates.
  • Limiting values of ⁇ MIT correspond to limiting values of stickiness, and may be different for different catalyst systems. For polymers produced with Catalyst A (a metallocene catalyst described below) the limiting value of ⁇ MIT was determined to be in the range of 6 to 7°C.
  • Embodiments of the present invention determine an estimated degree of depression of a dry melt initiation temperature for a polymer resin due to presence of at least one diluent (e.g., ICA, comonomer, and at least one isomer of the comonomer) with the resin in a reactor during a polymerization reaction, from at least one parameter of the reaction and using a predetermined melt initiation temperature depression model based on the Flory equation.
  • the presence of condensable diluent e.g., comonomer and condensing agents, and isomers of comonomers
  • depresses the dry melt initiation temperature of polymer resin e.g., polyethylene
  • the magnitude of the depression of the dry melt initiation temperature may be sufficient to bring the reduced melt initiation temperature near the reaction temperature.
  • the model employed in the noted embodiments relates the dry melt initiation temperature of a dry version of the polymer resin (which itself is typically determined by a predetermined correlation with resin melt index and density) and the reduced melt initiation temperature of the polymer resin in the presence of significant amounts of the diluent components (typically soluble hydrocarbons) that are present with the resin while the resin is produced.
  • the reduced melt initiation temperature can be determined in accordance with the invention from the dry melt initiation temperature.
  • the model (sometimes referred to herein as a melt initiation temperature depression model or MIT depression model) can be readily programmed into a stand-alone computer or a conventional plant DCS system to provide a monitor of combinations of process conditions that lead to resin stickiness. This allows operations to adjust reactor conditions to avoid stickiness and reduce the likelihood of sheeting incidents.
  • inventions determine an estimated degree of depression of a dry melt initiation temperature for a polymer resin due to presence of at least one diluent (e.g., ICA, comonomer, and at least one isomer of the comonomer) with the resin in a reactor during a polymerization reaction, from at least one parameter of the reaction measured on an on-line basis and using a predetermined melt initiation temperature depression model based on the Flory equation.
  • diluent e.g., ICA, comonomer, and at least one isomer of the comonomer
  • condensable diluent e.g., comonomer and condensing agents, and isomers of comonomers
  • depresses the dry melt initiation temperature of polymer resin e.g., polyethylene
  • the magnitude of the depression of the dry melt initiation temperature may be sufficient to bring the reduced melt initiation temperature near the reaction temperature.
  • the model employed in the noted embodiments relates the dry melt initiation temperature of a dry version of the polymer resin (which itself is typically determined by a predetermined correlation with resin melt index and density) and the reduced melt initiation temperature of the polymer resin in the presence of significant amounts of the diluent components (typically soluble hydrocarbons) that are present with the resin while the resin is produced.
  • the reduced melt initiation temperature can be determined in accordance with the invention from the dry melt initiation temperature.
  • the model (sometimes referred to herein as a melt initiation temperature depression model or MIT depression model) can be readily programmed into a stand-alone computer or a conventional plant DCS system to provide an on-line monitor of combinations of process conditions that lead to resin stickiness. This allows operations to adjust reactor conditions to avoid stickiness and reduce the likelihood of sheeting incidents.
  • the noted embodiments include the steps of: determining a dry melt initiation temperature for polymer resin being produced, preferably by characterizing a DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) melting curve for a dry version of the resin being produced; and estimating the amount by which the dry melt initiation temperature is depressed due to the presence of the condensable diluent component(s) actually present with the resin being produced in the reactor.
  • a DSC melting curve an inflection point in the DSC melting curve is typically identified as the dry melt initiation temperature (MIT).
  • these embodiments determine a reduced melt initiation temperature (MIT R ) at which the resin in the reactor will begin to melt in the presence of the condensable diluent gases (e.g., soluble hydrocarbons) that are present with the resin during the reaction.
  • the reduced melt initiation temperature, MIT R is at least substantially equal to MIT - D, where MIT is the dry melt initiation temperature, and D is an estimated degree of MIT depression, caused by the soluble diluent gas components in the reactor.
  • the methodology for estimating the depression D of the dry melt initiation temperature may be based on the Flory equation and existing models for vapor solubility in the polymer resin.
  • the noted embodiments typically determine a single calculated parameter, ⁇ MIT, which is the difference between the reactor temperature, Trx, and MIT R , to quantify the degree to which the reactor temperature overlaps the (depressed) melting curve, and thus quantify the degree of resin stickiness.
  • DSC melting curve for dry version of polymer resin herein denotes an experimentally determined relationship between the rate at which heat is absorbed by a sample of the dry resin (e.g., in units of mcal/sec) versus temperature of the sample, as determined from DSC melting curve data resulting from differential scanning calorimetry measurements on the sample.
  • Two types of DSC melting curves are "first melt” and “second melt” curves.
  • a first melt curve is determined by measurements on a sample that has not previously been melted.
  • a second melt curve is determined by measurements on a sample that has previously been melted, in the sense that the sample is melted in a first scan through the DSC, then cooled back to ambient temperature, and then slowly reheated for the second DSC test.
  • DSC melting curves employed in preferred embodiments of the invention are first melt curves, since first melt data are believed to reflect the true melt curve of polymer resin as it exists in a polymerization reactor more accurately than second melt data.
  • Some embodiments of the inventive method that employ a melt initiation temperature depression model include the steps of:
  • dry melt initiation temperature value indicative of a temperature at which a dry version of the polymer resin is expected to begin to melt (e.g., a temperature at which the polymer resin in the reactor is expected to begin to melt in the absence of any significant amount of condensable diluent gas that is actually present in the reactor during the reaction).
  • dry MIT value is determined using a database including previously measured MIT values (determined from DSC measurements) as a function of resin properties (density, MI,);
  • a melt initiation temperature (MIT) depression model to determine a reduced melt initiation temperature at which the polymer resin is expected to begin to melt in the presence of the at least one condensable diluent gas in the reactor, said model identifying an estimated degree of depression of the dry MIT value due to presence of at least one diluent with the polymer resin (e.g., the presence of the condensable diluent gas actually present with the polymer resin in the reactor during the reaction).
  • the MIT depression model implements the Flory equation
  • step (c) determining a temperature value indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor, from the reduced melt initiation temperature determined in step (c) and a current value of the reactor temperature.
  • Steps (b) and (c) can be performed in any of a variety of ways, including by accessing one or more look-up tables prepared in accordance with the predetermined correlation or the model.
  • Additional embodiments of the inventive method that employ a melt initiation temperature depression model include the steps of:
  • dry melt initiation temperature value indicative of a temperature at which a dry version of the polymer resin is expected to begin to melt (e.g., a temperature at which the polymer resin in the reactor is expected to begin to melt in the absence of any significant amount of condensable diluent gas that is actually present in the reactor during the reaction).
  • dry MIT value is determined using a database including previously measured MIT values (determined from DSC measurements) as a function of resin properties (density, MI, );
  • a melt initiation temperature (MIT) depression model to determine in on-line fashion a reduced melt initiation temperature at which the polymer resin is expected to begin to melt in the presence of the at least one condensable diluent gas in the reactor, said model identifying an estimated degree of depression of the dry MIT value due to presence of at least one diluent with the polymer resin (e.g., the presence of the condensable diluent gas actually present with the polymer resin in the reactor during the reaction).
  • the MIT depression model implements the Flory equation
  • step (c) determining in on-line fashion a temperature value indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor, from the reduced melt initiation temperature determined in step (c) and a current value of the reactor temperature.
  • Steps (b) and (c) can be performed in any of a variety of ways, including by accessing one or more look-up tables prepared in accordance with the predetermined correlation or the model.
  • the reduced melt initiation temperature determined in step (c) is a temperature (MIT R ) above which resin in the reactor (in the presence of condensable diluent gas) is predicted to begin to melt.
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value, ⁇ MIT, which is at least substantially equal to Trx - MIT R , where Trx is the current reactor temperature, and MIT R is the reduced melt initiation temperature determined in step (c).
  • MIT R is at least substantially equal to MIT - D, where MIT ("melt initiation temperature”) is the dry MIT value determined in step (b), D is an estimated degree of MIT depression due to the presence of the at least one condensable diluent gas with the resin in the reactor.
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value otherwise indicative of the degree of resin stickiness in the fluid bed.
  • steps (a)-(d) are performed repeatedly (e.g., on an ongoing basis) during the reaction to generate a sequence of temperature values indicative of resin stickiness in the reactor (e.g., a sequence of values of ⁇ MIT or data indicative of a time-varying value of ⁇ MIT), and the method also includes the step of:
  • the reaction controlled in step (e) is a polyethylene polymerization reaction using a metallocene catalyst to be referred to as Catalyst A (described below)
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value ⁇ MIT which is at least substantially equal to Trx - MIT R .
  • a temperature value ⁇ MIT has been correlated with measured data characterizing the same type of polyethylene polymerization reaction (performed using Catalyst A) at a commercial gas phase reactor. The data characterized several wall and dome sheeting incidents that occurred during the reaction, as well as normal operation that occurred without sheeting.
  • step (e) preferably maintains (or attempts to maintain) the reaction parameters so that ⁇ MIT is in a predetermined limiting range from 5°C to 6°C (or less than a predetermined limiting value from 6°C to 7°C).
  • the temperature value generated in step (d) is a temperature value ⁇ MIT which is at least substantially equal to Trx - MIT R
  • step (e) maintains (or attempts to maintain) the reaction parameters so that ⁇ MIT is in a predetermined limiting range which is found (in commercial experience) to be appropriate for that catalyst.
  • the range of ⁇ MIT values required to avoid excessive resin stickiness may be different than 5°C to 6°C.
  • the limiting ⁇ MIT values (or range of values) for these catalysts are taken as those that are found to correlate with discontinuity events (sheeting, chunking and/or rapid fouling of the distributor plate) with the particular catalyst in a commercial reactor system.
  • step (c) We next describe an example of performance of step (c), assuming that a dry melt initiation temperature value has been determined in step (b).
  • the parameter ⁇ is defined by the above reference as: where:
  • Equation 3 is substituted into Equation 2 to calculate ⁇ for mixtures.
  • Tm 1 1 Tm 0 + 273.15 + R ⁇ ⁇ Hu ⁇ Vu Vs ⁇ ⁇ 1 - ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 - 273.15
  • T m 0 is the peak melt temperature determined from a first melt DSC curve for the polymer
  • T m 0 is the peak melt temperature expected for the polymer in the presence of the diluent. From thermodynamic considerations, the effect of the soluble diluents is to reduce (or "depress") the peak melting temperature, hence T m is always less than T m 0 in the presence of one or more soluble diluents, and the difference T m 0 - T m is always positive.
  • Equation 4 the volume fraction of each soluble component is also required.
  • melt DSC measurements were made for a series of polymers (produced with a variety of catalysts) before step (b) was performed.
  • Table 1 shows the melt index (MI) and density ( ⁇ ) of each polymer, the catalyst employed to produce the polymer (and included with the polymer sample measured), and the melt initiation temperature and peak melt temperature determined for the polymer.
  • the density of the polymers ranged from 0.909 to 0.966 g/cm 3 and their melt indices ranged from 0.81 to 19.0 g/10 min.
  • Catalyst C is a supported Ziegler-Natta catalyst prepared according to US Patent 4,302,566 .
  • This catalyst is prepared in three steps.
  • W.R. Grace & Co. 955 silica dehydrated at 600 °C is reacted with triethylaluminum (AlEt3) at 60 °C in isopentane, solvent is removed and the resulting product is dried.
  • AlEt3 triethylaluminum
  • a solution of MgC12 and TiCl3.1/3AlCl3 dissolved in THF is mixed at 60 °C with the product formed in the first step, solvent is removed and the resulting product is dried to reduce the THF concentration in the product to the range of 0.13 to 0.15.
  • the product formed in the second step is reacted with Et2AlCl and Al(n-hexyl)3 at 60 °C in isopentane, the solvent is removed and the product is dried.
  • the quantity of Et2AlCl used in the third step is such that the molar ratio of Et2AlCl/THF is 0.50.
  • the quantity of Al(n-hexyl)3 used in the third step is such that the molar ratio of Al(n-hexyl)3/THF is 0.30.
  • first melt DSC For each polymer evaluated, only the first melt DSC was used because this is believed to be more representative of the polymer as it exists in the reactor than the more conventional second melt DSC curves.
  • the second melt DSC curves may be significantly different than first melt DSC curves, typically showing lower peak melting temperatures and a sharper melt peak.
  • the DSC curves were generated with a temperature ramp rate of 10 °C/minute, and with a typical sample quantity of 4.5 mg.
  • Equation 15 is used to determine the dry melt initiation temperature (MIT) for polymers other than those specifically listed in Table 1.
  • MIT dry melt initiation temperature
  • no term is employed to account for the specific catalyst type used to produce the polymer. This is appropriate since all combinations of polymer and catalyst type for which DSC measurements were performed were found to fit the correlation of Equation 15.
  • polymers produced by other catalyst systems i.e. other than Catalysts A, B or C
  • Table 3 shows an exemplary calculation, performed using the coded melt initiation temperature depression model for a polymer of the type produced by Catalyst A, with a melt index (MI) of 1.0 dg/min (ASTM), and a density of 0.918 g/cc (ASTM), being produced in a fluid bed reactor.
  • MI melt index
  • ASTM density
  • 0.918 g/cc ASTM
  • the reactor system would be expected to operate at the conditions above without excessive resin stickiness in the fluidized bed and, consequently, without an increased tendency for discontinuity events such as sheeting, chunking or distributor plate fouling caused by excessive stickiness.
  • Embodiments of the inventive method which use the above-described MIT depression model allow linkage of resin properties and reactor operating conditions to predict operating conditions under which discontinuity events due to resin stickiness can be avoided during start-ups as well as steady-state operation. These embodiments also allow reactor production rates to be safely maximized while minimizing the potential for discontinuity events, and allow production rates to be maximized (i.e., to proceed with maximum combinations of reactor temperature and ICA) while avoiding the conditions in the reactor (or combinations of conditions) that would lead to excessive stickiness and discontinuity events.
  • isomeric compounds areomers of comonomers present in fluid bed polymerization reactors, in monitoring and optionally also controlling polymerization reactions occurring in the reactors (e.g., polyethylene polymerization reactions under metallocene catalyst polymerization conditions).
  • polymerization reactions occurring in the reactors e.g., polyethylene polymerization reactions under metallocene catalyst polymerization conditions.
  • Such isomeric compounds are relatively inert and accumulate significantly in commercial reactors fitted with recovery systems. (Isomers of the comonomer are rarely observed in any substantial amount in pilot plants which do not operate with recovery systems.) Because these isomers can be present in substantial amounts in commercial reaction systems, they can have a substantial impact of the melting point depression D and the reduced melt initiation temperature MIT R .
  • Preferred embodiments of the invention recognize and account for the impact of accumulated isomers on the melting point depression D, and the resulting values of MIT R and ⁇ MIT. Procedures to remedy the effects of accumulated isomers (such as controlled venting of the reactor as described below) are preferably also implemented.
  • the inventors have considered gas chromatograph composition data for isomers in at least one commercial, gas phase, polyethylene polymerization reactor operating with a catalyst substantially equivalent to Catalyst A.
  • the data was analyzed to characterize separately the 1-hexene comonomer and the C6 and C6+ isomers of the comonomer in samples of cycle gas from the reactor.
  • the data indicated that isomer concentrations as high as 2.5 mole percent (of the total reactor gas) were obtained in the reactor system, which was substantially higher than the approximately 1 to 1.5 mole percent concentration of 1-hexene alone.
  • the isomers themselves (excluding the comonomer) produced an increased depression of the MIT equal to 4 °C, which represents a very significant impact on commercial operations, including the tendency for sheeting.
  • the inventors expect that an isomer concentrations greater than 2.5 mole percent would have a correspondingly greater impact on estimated degree of MIT depression and thus on likelihood of sheeting, if isomer accumulation were allowed to continue until such concentrations were reached.
  • ⁇ MIT limits that apply for the particular melt initiation temperature that is employed
  • limiting values of ⁇ MIT are typically those values that correlate with an increased tendency for sheeting, chunking, and/or distributor plate fouling.
  • the melting curve depression D can be determined or estimated in any of a number of different ways; for example, in ways that do not make use of the Flory equation, or that use correlations for the solubility of diluent gas components in the resin other than those presented in the examples.
  • a method including reasonable, engineering estimates of the diluent gas solubilities and the resulting depression of the polymer melting curve may be employed.
  • a continuous gas phase fluidized bed reactor is monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention while it operates to perform polymerization as follows:
  • the fluidized bed is made up of polymer granules.
  • Gaseous feed streams of the primary monomer and hydrogen together with liquid or gaseous comonomer are mixed together in a mixing tee arrangement and introduced below the reactor bed into the recycle gas line.
  • the primary monomer is ethylene and the comonomer is 1-hexene.
  • the individual flow rates of ethylene, hydrogen and comonomer are controlled to maintain fixed gas composition targets.
  • the ethylene concentration is controlled to maintain a constant ethylene partial pressure.
  • the hydrogen is controlled to maintain a constant hydrogen to ethylene mole ratio.
  • the hexene is controlled to maintain a constant hexene to ethylene mole ratio (or alternatively, the flow rates of comonomer and ethylene are held at a fixed ratio).
  • concentration of all gases is measured by an on-line gas chromatograph to ensure relatively constant composition in the recycle gas stream.
  • a solid or liquid catalyst is injected directly into the fluidized bed using purified nitrogen as a carrier. The feed rate of catalyst is adjusted to maintain a constant production rate.
  • the reacting bed of growing polymer particles is maintained in a fluidized state by the continuous flow of make up feed and recycle gas through the reaction zone (i.e. the fluidized bed).
  • a polymerization reaction that is a continuous gas phase process (e.g., a fluid bed process) is monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention.
  • a fluidized bed reactor for performing such a process typically comprises a reaction zone and a so-called velocity reduction zone.
  • the reaction zone comprises a bed of growing polymer particles, formed polymer particles and a minor amount of catalyst particles fluidized by the continuous flow of the gaseous monomer and diluent to remove heat of polymerization through the reaction zone.
  • some of the recirculated gases may be cooled and compressed to form liquids that increase the heat removal capacity of the circulating gas stream when readmitted to the reaction zone. This method of operation is referred to as "condensed mode".
  • a suitable rate of gas flow may be readily determined by simple experiment. Make up of gaseous monomer to the circulating gas stream is at a rate equal to the rate at which particulate polymer product and monomer associated therewith is withdrawn from the reactor and the composition of the gas passing through the reactor is adjusted to maintain an essentially steady state gaseous composition within the reaction zone.
  • the gas leaving the reaction zone is passed to the velocity reduction zone where entrained particles are removed. Finer entrained particles and dust may be removed in a cyclone and/or fine filter.
  • the gas is compressed in a compressor and passed through a heat exchanger wherein the heat of polymerization is removed, and then returned to the reaction zone.
  • the liquid diluent employed in the polymerization medium is typically an alkane having from 3 to 7 carbon atoms, a branched alkane in one embodiment.
  • the medium employed should be liquid under the conditions of polymerization and relatively inert. When a propane medium is used the process must be operated above the reaction diluent critical temperature and pressure. In one embodiment, a hexane, isopentane or isobutane medium is employed.
  • a reaction monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with some embodiments of the invention can produce homopolymers of olefins (e.g., homopolymers of ethylene), and/or copolymers, terpolymers, of olefins, particularly ethylene, and at least one other olefin.
  • the olefins may contain from 2 to 16 carbon atoms in one embodiment; and in another embodiment, ethylene and a comonomer comprising from 3 to 12 carbon atoms in another embodiment; and ethylene and a comonomer comprising from 4 to 10 carbon atoms in yet another embodiment; and ethylene and a comonomer comprising from 4 to 8 carbon atoms in yet another embodiment.
  • a reaction monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention can produce polyethylenes.
  • Such polyethylenes can be homopolymers of ethylene and interpolymers of ethylene and at least one ⁇ -olefin wherein the ethylene content is at least about 50% by weight of the total monomers involved.
  • Exemplary olefins that may be utilized in embodiments of the invention are ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 4-methylpent-1-ene, 1-decene, 1-dodecene and 1-hexadecene.
  • the amount of ethylene present in the polymerization reactor may range to up to 1000 atmospheres pressure in one embodiment, and up to 500 atmospheres pressure in another embodiment, and up to 100 atmospheres pressure in yet another embodiment, and up to 50 atmospheres in yet another embodiment, and up to 10 atmospheres in yet another embodiment.
  • Hydrogen gas is often used in olefin polymerization to control the final properties of the polyolefin.
  • MI melt index
  • the MI can thus be influenced by the hydrogen concentration.
  • the amount of hydrogen in the polymerization can be expressed as a mole ratio relative to the total polymerizable monomer, for example, ethylene, or a blend of ethylene and hexene or propylene.
  • the amount of hydrogen used in some polymerization processes is an amount necessary to achieve the desired MI (or molecular weight) of the final polyolefin resin.
  • the mole ratio in the gas phase of hydrogen to total monomer (H 2 :monomer) is greater than 0.00001.
  • the mole ratio is greater than 0.0005 in another embodiment, greater than 0.001 in yet another embodiment, less than 10 in yet another embodiment, less than 5 in yet another embodiment, less than 3 in yet another embodiment, and less than 0.10 in yet another embodiment, wherein a desirable range may comprise any combination of any upper mole ratio limit with any lower mole ratio limit described herein.
  • a reactor monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention can implement a slurry or gas phase process in the presence of a bulky ligand metallocene-type catalyst system and in the absence of, or essentially free of, any scavengers, such as triethylaluminum, trimethylaluminum, tri-isobutylaluminum and tri-n-hexylaluminum and diethyl aluminum chloride, dibutyl zinc.
  • any scavengers such as triethylaluminum, trimethylaluminum, tri-isobutylaluminum and tri-n-hexylaluminum and diethyl aluminum chloride, dibutyl zinc.
  • essentially free it is meant that these compounds are not deliberately added to the reactor or any reactor components, and if present, are present to less than 1 ppm in the reactor.
  • supported catalyst(s) can be combined with activators and can be combined by tumbling and/or other suitable means, with up to 2.5 wt% (by weight of the catalyst composition) of an antistatic agent, such as an ethoxylated or methoxylated amine, an example of which is Kemamine AS-990 (ICI Specialties, Bloomington Delaware).
  • an antistatic agent such as an ethoxylated or methoxylated amine, an example of which is Kemamine AS-990 (ICI Specialties, Bloomington Delaware).
  • Other antistatic compositions include the Octastat family of compounds, more specifically Octastat 2000, 3000, and 5000.
  • Metal fatty acids and antistatic agents can be added as either solid slurries, solutions, or solids (preferably as a powder) as separate feeds into the reactor.
  • One advantage of this method of addition is that it permits on-line adjustment of the level of the additive.
  • Monomers that can be present in a reactor monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention include one or more of: C2 - C18 alpha olefins such as ethylene, propylene, and optionally at least one diene, for example, hexadiene, dicyclopentadiene, octadiene including methyloctadiene (e.g., 1-methyl-1,6-octadiene and 7-methyl-1,6-octadiene), norbornadiene, and ethylidene norbornene; and readily condensable monomers, for example, isoprene, styrene, butadiene, isobutylene, chloroprene, acrylonitrile, cyclic olefins such as norbornenes.
  • C2 - C18 alpha olefins such as ethylene, propylene, and optionally at least one diene
  • diene for example, he
  • Fluidized bed polymerization can be monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
  • the reaction can be any type of fluidized polymerization reaction and can be carried out in a single reactor or multiple reactors such as two or more reactors in series.
  • any of many different types of polymerization catalysts can be used in a polymerization process monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the present invention.
  • a single catalyst may be used, or a mixture of catalysts may be employed, if desired.
  • the catalyst can be soluble or insoluble, supported or unsupported. It may be a prepolymer, spray dried with or without a filler, a liquid, or a solution, slurry/suspension or dispersion.
  • These catalysts are used with cocatalysts and promoters well known in the art. Typically these are alkylaluminums, alkylaluminum halides, alkylaluminum hydrides, as well as aluminoxanes.
  • suitable catalysts include Ziegler-Natta catalysts, Chromium based catalysts, Vanadium based catalysts (e.g., vanadium oxychloride and vanadium acetylacetonate), Metallocene catalysts and other single-site or single-site-like catalysts, Cationic forms of metal halides (e.g., aluminum trihalides), anionic initiators (e.g., butyl lithiums), Cobalt catalysts and mixtures thereof, Nickel catalysts and mixtures thereof, rare earth metal catalysts (i.e., those containing a metal having an atomic number in the Periodic Table of 57 to 103), such as compounds of cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, gadolinium and neodymium.
  • a polymerization reaction monitored and optionally also controlled in accordance with the invention can employ other additives, such as (for example) inert particulate particles.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Polymerization Catalysts (AREA)
EP07796858A 2006-09-07 2007-07-13 Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature Active EP2059540B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US84271906P 2006-09-07 2006-09-07
PCT/US2007/016047 WO2008030294A1 (en) 2006-09-07 2007-07-13 Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2059540A1 EP2059540A1 (en) 2009-05-20
EP2059540B1 true EP2059540B1 (en) 2012-12-26

Family

ID=37964351

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07796858A Active EP2059540B1 (en) 2006-09-07 2007-07-13 Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature

Country Status (14)

Country Link
US (1) US7774178B2 (es)
EP (1) EP2059540B1 (es)
JP (1) JP2010502812A (es)
KR (1) KR20090063245A (es)
CN (1) CN101511882B (es)
AU (1) AU2007293486A1 (es)
BR (1) BRPI0716543B1 (es)
CA (1) CA2662793A1 (es)
CL (1) CL2007002566A1 (es)
ES (1) ES2405556T3 (es)
MX (1) MX2009002495A (es)
RU (1) RU2448981C2 (es)
TW (1) TW200829603A (es)
WO (1) WO2008030294A1 (es)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4069396A4 (en) * 2019-12-06 2023-12-20 Evolve Biologics Inc. MODIFIED COLUMN FOR EXPANDED BED ADSORPTION AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Families Citing this family (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7754830B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2010-07-13 Univation Technologies, Llc Polymerization reaction monitoring with determination of induced condensing agent concentration for preventing discontinuity events
US7683140B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2010-03-23 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization reaction monitoring
MX2009002494A (es) * 2006-09-07 2009-05-22 Univation Tech Llc Metodos para determinar el valor de temperatura indicativo de pegajosidad de resina a partir de datos generados por monitoreo de la reaccion de polimerizacion.
TW200902558A (en) * 2007-02-16 2009-01-16 Univation Tech Llc Method for on-line monitoring and control of polymerization processes and reactors to prevent discontinuity events
EP2055720A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-05-06 Total Petrochemicals Research Feluy Predictive model for density and melt index of polymer leaving loop reactor
EP2055721A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-05-06 Total Petrochemicals Research Feluy Method for optimising the transition from one polymer grade to another
US20100049561A1 (en) * 2008-08-22 2010-02-25 Alstom Technology Ltd. Fluidized bed combustion optimization tool and method thereof
US7910668B2 (en) * 2009-05-08 2011-03-22 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for on-line determination of degree or onset of resin stickiness using acoustic data
US8383739B2 (en) * 2009-05-08 2013-02-26 Univation Technologies, Llc Systems and methods for monitoring a polymerization reaction
RU2012128353A (ru) 2009-12-07 2014-01-20 Юнивейшн Текнолоджиз, Ллк Способы уменьшения статического заряда катализатора и способы применения такого катализатора для производства полиолефинов
ES2543635T3 (es) 2010-02-18 2015-08-20 Univation Technologies, Llc Métodos para operación de un reactor de polimerización
WO2012009215A1 (en) 2010-07-16 2012-01-19 Univation Technologies, Llc Systems and methods for measuring static charge on particulates
BR112013000679A2 (pt) 2010-07-16 2016-05-31 Univation Tech Llc sistemas e métodos para medir acúmulo de partícula em superfícies de reator
BR112014016325A8 (pt) * 2011-12-28 2017-07-04 Ineos Europe Ag processo de polimerização
CN103387624B (zh) * 2012-05-07 2015-06-17 中国石油化工股份有限公司 一种烯烃聚合物的制备方法
CN102671611B (zh) * 2012-05-31 2015-11-11 苏州市金翔钛设备有限公司 一种采用螺旋桨的反应釜
JP6235592B2 (ja) * 2012-09-07 2017-11-22 ユニベーション・テクノロジーズ・エルエルシー ポリオレフィン反応の制御
BR112015004883B1 (pt) * 2012-09-07 2021-11-09 Univation Technologies, Llc Método para determinação de temperatura de adesividade de resina
US9926390B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2018-03-27 Ineos Europe Ag Method for production of polymer
US9550847B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-01-24 Ineos Europe Ag Method for production of polymer
EP2874029A1 (de) * 2013-11-15 2015-05-20 Bayer Technology Services GmbH Verfahren zum Betreiben einer zur Durchführung von wenigstens einer chemischen Reaktion eingerichteten Anlage
SG11201703849QA (en) * 2014-11-25 2017-06-29 Univation Tech Llc Methods of changing polyolefin production rate with the composition of the induced condensing agents
US9579619B2 (en) * 2015-01-28 2017-02-28 Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp Temperature control for polymerizing particulate polyolefin
US11274170B2 (en) 2016-09-27 2022-03-15 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Polymerization process
CN116457086A (zh) 2020-11-17 2023-07-18 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 气相反应器启动方法
CN112973593B (zh) * 2021-02-04 2022-05-03 浙江大学 一种快速判断气相法聚烯烃生产装置开车状态的方法

Family Cites Families (103)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3056771A (en) * 1955-08-01 1962-10-02 Exxon Research Engineering Co Polymerization process
US3082198A (en) * 1958-08-25 1963-03-19 Goodrich Gulf Chem Inc Process for polymerizing ethylene in the process of aluminum alkyl, titanium tetrachloride, and carboxylic acid
US3470143A (en) * 1964-03-26 1969-09-30 Dart Ind Inc Highly fluorinated hydrocarbons used as diluents in the polymerization of ethylenically unsaturated monomers
JPS5038158B2 (es) * 1972-01-22 1975-12-08
GB1443074A (en) * 1974-01-14 1976-07-21 Ici Ltd Olefin polymerisation process
US4194073A (en) * 1978-01-04 1980-03-18 Phillips Petroleum Company Olefin polymerization
US4302566A (en) * 1978-03-31 1981-11-24 Union Carbide Corporation Preparation of ethylene copolymers in fluid bed reactor
US4232140A (en) * 1978-10-23 1980-11-04 Cities Service Company Process for polymerizing olefins
US4405495A (en) * 1980-06-30 1983-09-20 Union Carbide Corporation Catalyst impregnated on fine silica, process for preparing, and use for ethylene polymerization
US4792592A (en) * 1981-03-26 1988-12-20 Union Carbide Corporation Process for reducing sheeting during polymerization of alpha-olefins
US4588790A (en) * 1982-03-24 1986-05-13 Union Carbide Corporation Method for fluidized bed polymerization
DZ520A1 (fr) 1982-03-24 2004-09-13 Union Carbide Corp Procédé perfectionné pour accroitre le rendement espace temps d'une réaction de polymérisation exothermique en lit fluidisé.
US4543399A (en) * 1982-03-24 1985-09-24 Union Carbide Corporation Fluidized bed reaction systems
US5324800A (en) * 1983-06-06 1994-06-28 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Process and catalyst for polyolefin density and molecular weight control
US4593010A (en) * 1983-08-31 1986-06-03 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Polyethylene with broad molecular weight distribution
US4704491A (en) * 1985-03-26 1987-11-03 Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. Liquid ethylene-alpha-olefin random copolymer, process for production thereof, and use thereof
US5084534A (en) * 1987-06-04 1992-01-28 Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. High pressure, high temperature polymerization of ethylene
US4855370A (en) * 1986-10-01 1989-08-08 Union Carbide Corporation Method for reducing sheeting during polymerization of alpha-olefins
US5026795A (en) * 1987-02-24 1991-06-25 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for preventing fouling in a gas phase polymerization reactor
US4794096A (en) 1987-04-03 1988-12-27 Fina Technology, Inc. Hafnium metallocene catalyst for the polymerization of olefins
US4803251A (en) * 1987-11-04 1989-02-07 Union Carbide Corporation Method for reducing sheeting during polymerization of alpha-olefins
FR2646426B2 (fr) * 1988-09-13 1991-08-16 Bp Chemicals Sa Procede et appareillage de polymerisation d'alpha-olefine en phase gazeuse en presence d'un agent ralentisseur d'activite
DE3836059A1 (de) * 1988-10-22 1990-05-03 Hoechst Ag Verfahren zur herstellung eines ethylen-propylen-copolymers
EP0955322A3 (en) * 1988-12-26 1999-12-08 Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. Olefin copolymers and processes for preparing same
WO1990007526A1 (en) 1988-12-26 1990-07-12 Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. Olefin copolymer and production thereof
US5218071A (en) * 1988-12-26 1993-06-08 Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. Ethylene random copolymers
DE3927257A1 (de) 1989-08-18 1991-02-21 Hoechst Ag Verfahren zur herstellung eines polyolefins
US5037905A (en) * 1989-12-07 1991-08-06 Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Technology Corporation Process for reducing polymer build-up in heat exchangers during polymerization of alpha-olefins
GB9004014D0 (en) 1990-02-22 1990-04-18 Shell Int Research Co-oligomerization process
FR2660926B1 (fr) 1990-04-11 1992-07-31 Bp Chemicals Snc Prepolymere d'alpha-olefine contenant un metal de transition et procede de polymerisation d'alpha-olefine en phase gazeuse mettant en óoeuvre le prepolymere.
DE69107006T2 (de) 1990-10-17 1995-09-21 Idemitsu Kosan Co Verfahren zur Herstellung von Oligomeren auf Basis von Propylen.
US5258475A (en) * 1991-07-12 1993-11-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst systems for polymerization and copolymerization of olefins
US5281679A (en) * 1991-11-07 1994-01-25 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Catalyst and method of broadening polymer molecular weight distribution and increasing polymer tensile impact strength and products made thereof
EP0549252A1 (en) 1991-12-23 1993-06-30 BP Chemicals Limited Process for the gas-phase polymerisation of alpha-olefins in a fluidized-bed reactor
IT1262933B (it) * 1992-01-31 1996-07-22 Montecatini Tecnologie Srl Processo per la polimerizzazione in fase gas di alfa-olefine
TW254950B (es) * 1992-03-02 1995-08-21 Shell Internat Res Schappej Bv
US5436304A (en) * 1992-03-19 1995-07-25 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Process for polymerizing monomers in fluidized beds
US5352749A (en) * 1992-03-19 1994-10-04 Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. Process for polymerizing monomers in fluidized beds
DE69308209T2 (de) * 1992-05-29 1997-06-12 Amoco Corp Polymerisation von alpha-olefinen
US5710222A (en) 1992-06-22 1998-01-20 Fina Technology, Inc. Method for controlling the melting points and molecular weights of syndiotactic polyolefins using metallocene catalyst systems
US5194526A (en) * 1992-07-30 1993-03-16 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Process for producing sticky polymers
WO1994003509A1 (en) 1992-08-05 1994-02-17 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Gas phase polymerization of ethylene and c7 to c10 olefins
US5290745A (en) * 1992-08-10 1994-03-01 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Process for producing ethylene polymers having reduced hexane extractable content
ATE148905T1 (de) * 1992-09-16 1997-02-15 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc Weiche filme mit verbesserten physikalischen eigenschaften
ES2101217T3 (es) 1992-10-23 1997-07-01 Shell Int Research Composicion catalitica para oligomerizacion y co-oligomerizacion de alquenos.
US6313240B1 (en) 1993-02-22 2001-11-06 Tosoh Corporation Process for producing ethylene/α-olefin copolymer
CA2116259A1 (en) 1993-02-23 1994-08-24 Akira Sano Solid catalyst components for olefin polymerization and use thereof
US5376743A (en) * 1993-03-11 1994-12-27 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Process for the production of sticky polymers
US5462999A (en) * 1993-04-26 1995-10-31 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Process for polymerizing monomers in fluidized beds
CA2161419C (en) * 1993-04-26 1999-05-04 Marc Louis Dechellis Process for polymerizing monomers in fluidized beds
AU681678B2 (en) * 1993-06-24 1997-09-04 Dow Chemical Company, The Titanium(II) or zirconium(II) complexes and addition polymerization catalysts therefrom
US5342907A (en) * 1993-06-28 1994-08-30 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Ethylene/propylene copolymer rubbers
US5990251A (en) * 1993-07-13 1999-11-23 Bp Chemicals Limited Process for polymerising olefin with a Ziegler-Natta catalyst
US5391657A (en) * 1993-09-27 1995-02-21 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporaton Method for reducing sheeting and static charges during polymerization of ethylene polymers
AU677145B2 (en) * 1993-12-21 1997-04-10 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst composition
US5672669A (en) * 1993-12-23 1997-09-30 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Spray dried, filled metallocene catalyst composition for use in polyolefin manufacture
KR0162685B1 (ko) 1994-02-18 1999-01-15 고다 시게노리 에틸렌 중합체와 그 제조방법
DE4416894A1 (de) * 1994-05-13 1995-11-16 Witco Gmbh Verfahren zur Synthese von Mono- und Dimethylmetallocenen und deren Lösungen speziell für den Einsatz zur Polymerisation von Olefinen
US5541272A (en) * 1994-06-03 1996-07-30 Phillips Petroleum Company High activity ethylene selective metallocenes
US5453471B1 (en) * 1994-08-02 1999-02-09 Carbide Chemicals & Plastics T Gas phase polymerization process
US6384156B1 (en) * 1994-08-02 2002-05-07 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Gas phase polymerization process
FR2729393B1 (fr) 1995-01-18 1997-03-21 Bp Chemicals Snc Procede de polymerisation d'olefine
US5616661A (en) * 1995-03-31 1997-04-01 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Process for controlling particle growth during production of sticky polymers
US5677375A (en) 1995-07-21 1997-10-14 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Process for producing an in situ polyethylene blend
ATE153675T1 (de) * 1995-09-13 1997-06-15 Witco Gmbh Verfahren zur herstellung von metallocen- katalysatorsystemen auf inerten trägermaterialien unter verwendung von gasphasenreaktoren
US5969061A (en) 1995-10-16 1999-10-19 Eastman Chemical Company Suppression of fines in a fluid bed polyethylene process
US5767208A (en) * 1995-10-20 1998-06-16 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. High temperature olefin polymerization process
WO1997022639A1 (en) 1995-12-19 1997-06-26 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. High temperature solution polymerization process
JPH09176400A (ja) 1995-12-27 1997-07-08 Nippon Poriorefuin Kk 充填剤含有エチレン・α−オレフィン共重合体組成物およびその組成物を用いた成形品
JPH09183816A (ja) 1995-12-28 1997-07-15 Mitsui Petrochem Ind Ltd エチレン・α−オレフィン共重合体およびこの共重合体から得られるフィルム
US5665818A (en) 1996-03-05 1997-09-09 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation High activity staged reactor process
DE69708644T2 (de) 1996-07-16 2002-08-08 Exxonmobil Chem Patents Inc Olefinpolymerisationsverfahren mit alkylsubstituierten metallocenen
US6242545B1 (en) * 1997-12-08 2001-06-05 Univation Technologies Polymerization catalyst systems comprising substituted hafinocenes
US6534613B2 (en) * 1998-02-18 2003-03-18 Eastman Chemical Company Process for producing polyethylene
CA2237231C (en) * 1998-05-08 2006-08-08 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Heterogeneous metallocene catalyst
US6245868B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-06-12 Univation Technologies Catalyst delivery method, a catalyst feeder and their use in a polymerization process
CA2243775C (en) * 1998-07-21 2007-06-12 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Phosphinimine/heteroatom catalyst component
CA2243726C (en) * 1998-07-21 2006-12-12 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Cyclopentadienyl/phosphinimine catalyst with one and only one activatable ligand
CA2243783C (en) * 1998-07-21 2007-06-05 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Bis-phosphinimine catalyst
CA2254841C (en) * 1998-11-26 2007-02-06 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Nitrogen substituted phosphinimine ligand
CA2254601C (en) * 1998-11-27 2007-10-23 Nova Chemicals Ltd. Aluminum-phosphinimine complexes as catalysts for the (co)polymerization of ethylene
US6313236B1 (en) * 1999-03-30 2001-11-06 Eastman Chemical Company Process for producing polyolefins
US6417298B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-07-09 Eastman Chemical Company Process for producing ethylene/olefin interpolymers
CA2278042C (en) * 1999-07-19 2008-12-16 Nova Chemicals Corporation Mixed phosphinimine catalyst
CN1367797A (zh) * 1999-08-31 2002-09-04 伊斯曼化学公司 聚烯烃生产方法
WO2001030858A1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2001-05-03 University Of Maryland, College Park Stereospecific living polymerization of olefins by a novel ziegler-natta catalyst composition
US6482903B1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2002-11-19 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for preparing a supported catalyst system and its use in a polymerization process
US6281306B1 (en) * 1999-12-16 2001-08-28 Univation Technologies, Llc Method of polymerization
US6455638B2 (en) * 2000-05-11 2002-09-24 Dupont Dow Elastomers L.L.C. Ethylene/α-olefin polymer blends comprising components with differing ethylene contents
US6656866B2 (en) * 2000-12-04 2003-12-02 Univation Technologies, Llc Catalyst preparation method
US6605675B2 (en) * 2000-12-04 2003-08-12 Univation Technologies, Llc Polymerization process
US6759492B2 (en) * 2001-07-24 2004-07-06 Eastman Chemical Company Process for the polymerization of ethylene and interpolymers thereof
US7226789B2 (en) * 2001-12-17 2007-06-05 Unication Technolofies, Llc Method of applying non-linear dynamics to control a gas-phase polyethylene reactor operability
DE60137638D1 (de) 2001-12-19 2009-03-26 Borealis Tech Oy Herstellung von geträgerten Katalysatoren für die Olefinpolymerisation
US6846884B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2005-01-25 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation Control of resin properties
CN100415779C (zh) 2002-10-15 2008-09-03 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 通过喇曼光谱法在线测量和控制聚合物性能
CN1220660C (zh) * 2002-12-10 2005-09-28 扬子石油化工股份有限公司 乙烯装置中乙烯精馏塔的智能控制方法
BRPI0411257B1 (pt) * 2003-05-30 2019-12-31 Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Tech Corporation processo para controlar um processo exotérmico em fase gasosa contínuo em um reator
US7754830B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2010-07-13 Univation Technologies, Llc Polymerization reaction monitoring with determination of induced condensing agent concentration for preventing discontinuity events
US7683140B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2010-03-23 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization reaction monitoring
BRPI0510392A (pt) * 2004-05-20 2007-11-13 Univation Tech Llc processo de polimerização
WO2006009980A2 (en) 2004-06-21 2006-01-26 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Olefin polymerisation process
US7947797B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2011-05-24 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for operating a gas-phase reactor at or near maximum production rates while controlling polymer stickiness

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4069396A4 (en) * 2019-12-06 2023-12-20 Evolve Biologics Inc. MODIFIED COLUMN FOR EXPANDED BED ADSORPTION AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2448981C2 (ru) 2012-04-27
ES2405556T3 (es) 2013-05-31
US20080065360A1 (en) 2008-03-13
JP2010502812A (ja) 2010-01-28
BRPI0716543B1 (pt) 2018-08-07
BRPI0716543A2 (pt) 2013-03-19
RU2009112540A (ru) 2010-10-20
MX2009002495A (es) 2009-05-22
CL2007002566A1 (es) 2008-03-14
CA2662793A1 (en) 2008-03-13
CN101511882B (zh) 2011-09-21
CN101511882A (zh) 2009-08-19
WO2008030294A1 (en) 2008-03-13
TW200829603A (en) 2008-07-16
KR20090063245A (ko) 2009-06-17
US7774178B2 (en) 2010-08-10
AU2007293486A1 (en) 2008-03-13
EP2059540A1 (en) 2009-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2059540B1 (en) Methods for on-line determination of degree of resin stickiness using a model for depression of melt initiation temperature
EP2059537B1 (en) Methods for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization reaction monitoring
US8433443B2 (en) Method for on-line monitoring and control of polymerization processes and reactors to prevent discontinuity events
EP2875054B1 (en) Controlling a polyolefin reaction
US7683140B2 (en) Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization reaction monitoring
US20180326386A1 (en) Operating a polyolefin reactor
US7910668B2 (en) Method for on-line determination of degree or onset of resin stickiness using acoustic data
US7754830B2 (en) Polymerization reaction monitoring with determination of induced condensing agent concentration for preventing discontinuity events
US11618793B2 (en) Optimized inert gas partial pressure in a gas phase polymerization process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090204

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100128

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 590438

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007027661

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 590438

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130327

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2405556

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20130531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130426

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130326

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130426

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007027661

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130927

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20070713

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20160613

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20160720

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602007027661

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: KILBURN & STRODE LLP, NL

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230608

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230616

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230601

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230531

Year of fee payment: 17