EP1964974A2 - Schutzvorrichtung gegen Einbruch - Google Patents
Schutzvorrichtung gegen Einbruch Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1964974A2 EP1964974A2 EP08290197A EP08290197A EP1964974A2 EP 1964974 A2 EP1964974 A2 EP 1964974A2 EP 08290197 A EP08290197 A EP 08290197A EP 08290197 A EP08290197 A EP 08290197A EP 1964974 A2 EP1964974 A2 EP 1964974A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- block
- gate
- movable
- impact
- fixed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F13/00—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions
- E01F13/12—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions for forcibly arresting or disabling vehicles, e.g. spiked mats
- E01F13/126—Pitfall barriers, causing the vehicle to face a step-like obstruction
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of protection devices, including entrances such as gates or passages with terminals, against burglary, including by ram vehicles.
- a problem in the field of protection of access to a place is that the protective devices are generally insufficiently resistant to allow to completely prevent a break and only allow to delay it. Indeed, it is known in the prior art protection devices, sometimes provided with a lock, such as gates, fixed or retractable terminals. These solutions have the disadvantages of not resisting burglary beyond a certain force, for example when using a vehicle, called a ram vehicle, to drive the protective device. It is known in the prior art, in particular by the applications EP 1279771 A2 and US 2005 / 135878A1 , barriers formed by blocks interconnected by a security consisting, respectively, in two complementary hooks each fixed on one of the blocks and nested one in the other and a hook of a block fitted in a housing of another block.
- protection devices comprising a concrete base in which is cast a metal frame prohibiting access to a place.
- This type of solution nevertheless has the same drawbacks of not resisting assaults by ram vehicles, especially when assaults are repeated.
- Another problem is the fact that the drivers of ram vehicles risk serious damage during their assaults.
- the known protection devices do not solve this problem while guaranteeing to prevent access to the protected place.
- the present invention aims to overcome some disadvantages of the prior art by providing an effective burglar protection device, even during repeated assaults by a ram vehicle.
- a burglar protection device in particular by a ram vehicle, the device being characterized in that it comprises at least one fixed block, anchored in the ground, and at least one movable block comprising a frame projecting from the ground and making it integral with a terminal or gate, the movable block being in contact with the fixed block by at least one contact surface arranged so that, during an impact on the terminal, the gate or the moving block, the latter absorbs the impact by retreating and rising relative to the fixed block, this movement of the mobile block creating a ditch in the ground and a wall formed, at least partially, by at least a part of the contact surface between the movable block and the fixed block.
- At least a portion of the contact surface is inclined.
- a solid plate connects two movable blocks so that, upon impact, it forms the wall and creates the ditch when moving the movable blocks relative to at least one fixed block on which they are arranged .
- the fixed block and the moving block are made of concrete.
- the frame of the movable block is metallic.
- the gate comprises two leaves connected by at least one security arranged to provide a mobility distinct from the 2 wings in normal situation and to lock together the two leaves during an impact on at least one of the leaves.
- the gate comprises at least one gate having at least one security arranged to offer, in a normal situation, a mobility of the gate with respect to the frame and to join the gate to the frame during an impact on the gate.
- the mobile block and the fixed block are electrically connected by at least one contact arranged to be interrupted during the movement of the movable block relative to the fixed block and trigger an alarm connected to the device.
- the present invention relates to a burglar protection device, in particular by a ram vehicle.
- This device comprises at least one block (2) fixed, anchored in the ground, and at least one block (1) mobile comprising a frame (10) projecting from the ground and to make it integral with a terminal or d 'an entrance.
- the device is particularly suitable for protection against attacking vehicles (known as a ram vehicle) but it can equip any type of access entrance to various places, even other than terminals or gates, as long as structure of the entrance is fixed on the frame (10) of the block (1) mobile.
- the device can equip entrance doors, garage doors (of various types), but also structures other than entrances, such as barriers surrounding a protected place or any structure to protect.
- the movable blocks (1) and fixed are made of solid materials, such as concrete or metal, for example, or may comprise a metal structure on which concrete is poured.
- various solid materials can be combined in one and / or the other block, such as for example with a mobile block (1) of metal resting on a block (2) fixed concrete or with mixed blocks having a combination of several materials, especially with at least one material facilitating the movement of the block (1) mobile.
- the frame (10) is also made of solid material (or combination of materials), such as for example concrete or metal, so as to facilitate its attachment to gates or terminals.
- the movable block (1) is formed integrally under a portal and the stationary block (2) is formed integrally under the movable block (1).
- the frame (10), at each end of the block (1) movable, is connected to a gate.
- the device comprises a solid plate (for example metal) interconnecting two blocks (1) movable resting on at least one block (2) fixed (for example, a fixed block in one piece extending under the two moving blocks or a fixed block under each moving block).
- the invention allows various embodiments, for example in which the mobile and fixed blocks and / or the plate are conveyed in different separate elements, which are assembled on site (for example when laying the gate) and possibly cast with concrete so as to stiffen them, the blocks can be cast on site, for example on a metal structure and / or in a mold.
- the present description refers to a block (1) mobile and a block (2) fixed but it will be understood that the details given here are most often transposable to the embodiments comprising several fixed and movable blocks.
- the movable block (1) is in contact with the block (2) fixed by at least one contact surface (12) arranged such that, during an impact on the terminal, the gate or the block (1) movable , the latter absorbs the impact by moving backwards and upwards relative to the fixed block (2), as can be seen by comparing the examples illustrated on the figures 1 and 3 (respectively corresponding to a device before and after the impact).
- This displacement of the block (1) movable in the direction of impact and height creates a ditch (20) in the ground and a wall (21) formed, at least partially, by at least a portion of the surface (12) contact between the block (1) movable and the block (2) fixed.
- the movable block (1) rises at least partially above the fixed block (2) and forms with it a wall (21).
- the two blocks (1) movable mount at least partially above the block (2) fixed and the plate forms a wall (21) with the block (2) fixed.
- the space cleared in the ground by the mobile block (s) and / or the plate forms a ditch (20) which forms with the wall (21) an obstacle difficult to cross. This mechanism makes it possible to prohibit the passage of ram vehicle because it is found in the impossibility of crossing the obstacle thus formed.
- the surface (12) between the movable contact block (1) can be formed of one or more surfaces.
- at least a portion of the contact surface (12) is inclined. This inclination allows the movable block to move in the direction of impact and climb over the block (2) fixed, at least partially.
- the fixed block (2) and / or the movable block (1) are equipped with guiding means facilitating movement of the block (1) movable relative to the block (2) fixed during the impact.
- These guide means may consist of any known means, for example adapted to the weight and dimensions of the two blocks to facilitate movement, such as rollers, rollers, guide rails or any other type of device allowing a recoil and a easier raising of the block (1) mobile, with less resistance.
- the guiding means can be arranged to provide a measured resistance to movement of the block (1) movable, for example adjusted according to the expected power of the impacts (to optimally dampen the impact and preserve the integrity of the driver while guaranteeing the prohibition of access).
- the moving block (1) and the fixed block (2) can have various forms, in particular different than those illustrated on the figures 1 and 3 .
- Fixed and mobile blocks (or masses) can have different forms as long as they are arranged to move as described above by absorbing the inertia of the movement of the aggressor vehicle.
- the fixed block (2) forms a slope on which the movable block (1) is arranged and that the surface (12) of contact between the two blocks comprises a curved portion.
- the invention may therefore provide various shapes of the blocks to facilitate the movement of the block (1) mobile.
- the mobile block (1) and the fixed block (2) may have 3 slopes (forming the contact surface (12) between the blocks) to allow the mobile block (1) to rise during an impact according to 3 different directions.
- the gate may comprise at least one stiffening element (such as braces or crosspieces for example) stiffening the gate so as to prevent it from dislocating, tearing or breaking during an impact. , especially by a ram vehicle.
- the gate may comprise at least one security (4) to prevent the opening of the gate during the impact and transmit the thrust on the (s) block (s) mobile (s).
- the portal may comprise a single leaf or several ventals of any type (for example sliding or pivoting) and the security (4) makes it possible to secure the gate so that the device according to the invention undergoes the thrust during the impact instead of the gate opens.
- the deformation of at least one blade engages the hooks of the security (4) which thus prevents opening.
- the force exerted on at least one of the two blades tends to open the gate by spreading the two blades of one another in an abnormal direction relative to the normal pivoting of the two pivoting blades (for example the two ventals deviate from each other substantially in translation because of the deformation of at least one of them, approximately in the vertical plane of the portal during an impact in the center of the portal).
- hook means here any structure substantially forming a hook shape, at least in section, and it must be obvious that the hook function can be provided by other structures.
- the safety device (4) comprises at least two abutment surfaces (one on each element to be locked) arranged to not cooperate together in a normal situation and to be put in contact during an abnormal displacement from less a vane, the contacting of these stop surface locking the security to prevent this abnormal opening.
- a leaf may comprise a rod whose one free end is wider than the rest of the rod and the other leaf may include a plate comprising a notch arranged to receive the stem when the vents are closed and whose dimensions are smaller than that of the free (and enlarged) end of the rod.
- the wide end of the rod and the plate in which the notch is formed form stop surfaces for locking the gate.
- the hook or the housing may be placed on the gate or on a frame of the gate (so as to lock the gate on the frame here). ) but the security will only be effective for a gate having an automatic opening mechanism with sufficient resistance to thrust to allow deformation of the leaf and locking of the security (4).
- the security can be achieved as described above, but rotated 90 ° relative to the plane of the portal, so that it leaves free the opening of the gate by sliding (translation) but prevents this opening if the gate is deformed by a shock and / or undergoes a force oriented in an abnormal direction, for example approximately perpendicular to the plane of the gate.
- a gate with a single gate one can therefore have, on one side of the gate, a connection (3) echoing the thrust on the block (1) mobile, and on the other side (where the gate can be opened), a security (4) locking the gate on the frame (10) of the movable block (and also transmitting the thrust on the block (1) mobile) during an attempt to abnormal opening.
- the two doors pivoting or sliding
- the two doors are connected by at least one security (4) arranged to offer a mobility distinct from the two doors in normal situation and to secure (ie, lock, return solidaires) together the two doors during an impact on at least one of the ventals or on the frame (10) or on the block (1) mobile.
- the security (4) secures the two doors of the gate (4), so as to keep the gate closed following the impact.
- a sliding gate it may comprise two posts connected to the (x) block (s) mobile (s) (for example masonry columns cast on the mobile block), for example placed behind the gate when it is in the closed position (for example with an additional link (3) or not).
- the gate directly transmits the energy of the aggressor vehicle movement to the block (1) mobile, which relying on the block (2) fixed, allows the retreat and elevation of the latter so as to create a gap (20) and a wall (21) behind it.
- the sliding doors of the gate are connected to the frame (10) of the block (1) movable by a link (3) transmitting the impact energy to the block (1) mobile, as in the case of a sliding gate (one or more leaves).
- the frame (10) may comprise, on each side of the gate, a link (3) forming a stop intended to be placed in contact with a portion of the blades of the gate. gate in the closed position, this stop being arranged to oppose the sliding ventals to the center, beyond the closed position.
- this link (3) can retain them and reflect the force of the impact on the block (1) mobile.
- the device can equip one or more terminal (s) fixed (s) or retractable (s).
- the frame (10) of the movable block (1) then comprises a link (3) of the block (1) movable to at least one terminal, the link (3) being arranged to absorb the energy of an impact on the terminal and transmit it to the mobile block (1).
- at least 2 terminals equipped with the device can be interconnected by a security or a link (not shown) arranged to secure the terminals, especially during the recoil and elevation of their block (s).
- the mobile block (1) and the fixed block (2) are electrically connected by at least one contact (5) arranged to be interrupted when the moving block (1) is moved relative to the block (2) sets and trigger an alarm (not shown) connected to the device.
- a power cable dry contact, for example
- an alarm not shown
- the contact is interrupted (disconnected or sectioned) and the alarm is triggered.
- the contact may be of any type, and may especially be formed simply by the contact between two conductive elements mounted on the blocks and connected to an alarm.
- the device can equip a gate and have a width of about 5 meters for a useful passage of about 4 meters, for a height of 2 meters and, after impact and movement of (or) mobile block (s), create a protection obstacle with a height of about 1.5 meters.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0701416A FR2913031A1 (fr) | 2007-02-28 | 2007-02-28 | Dispositif de protection aux vehicules "belier" |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1964974A2 true EP1964974A2 (de) | 2008-09-03 |
EP1964974A3 EP1964974A3 (de) | 2009-03-18 |
EP1964974B1 EP1964974B1 (de) | 2012-08-01 |
Family
ID=38544149
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP20080290197 Not-in-force EP1964974B1 (de) | 2007-02-28 | 2008-02-28 | Schutzvorrichtung gegen Einbruch |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1964974B1 (de) |
FR (1) | FR2913031A1 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2954786A1 (fr) * | 2009-12-29 | 2011-07-01 | Renaud Rigomer | Borne de type barriere |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1329411A (en) | 1969-07-14 | 1973-09-05 | Ellis T O | Fencing |
EP1279771A2 (de) | 2001-07-25 | 2003-01-29 | Hermann Spengler KG, Sand- und Betonwerk | Fahrbahnbegrenzungseinrichtung |
US20050135878A1 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2005-06-23 | C&M Mcnally Engnering Corp. | Temporary barrier |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2704880B1 (fr) * | 1993-05-07 | 1998-07-17 | Colas Sa | Dispositif de protection routière polyvalent. |
US7168881B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2007-01-30 | Walter H Hartlauer | Movable barrier for perimeter protection |
NL1028590C1 (nl) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-09-25 | Hubertus Johannes Ber Schoeren | Systeem voor verkeersregulatie. |
-
2007
- 2007-02-28 FR FR0701416A patent/FR2913031A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
-
2008
- 2008-02-28 EP EP20080290197 patent/EP1964974B1/de not_active Not-in-force
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1329411A (en) | 1969-07-14 | 1973-09-05 | Ellis T O | Fencing |
EP1279771A2 (de) | 2001-07-25 | 2003-01-29 | Hermann Spengler KG, Sand- und Betonwerk | Fahrbahnbegrenzungseinrichtung |
US20050135878A1 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2005-06-23 | C&M Mcnally Engnering Corp. | Temporary barrier |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2954786A1 (fr) * | 2009-12-29 | 2011-07-01 | Renaud Rigomer | Borne de type barriere |
WO2011080420A1 (fr) | 2009-12-29 | 2011-07-07 | Renaud Rigomer | Borne de type barriere |
US8851788B2 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2014-10-07 | Renaud Rigomer | Barrier type bollard |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1964974A3 (de) | 2009-03-18 |
FR2913031A1 (fr) | 2008-08-29 |
EP1964974B1 (de) | 2012-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1703022B1 (de) | Verbesserte Schranke | |
BE1025272B1 (fr) | Système d'ancrage pour un poteau de glissière de sécurité | |
WO2011154618A1 (fr) | Structure de bloc-porte | |
EP1945888B1 (de) | Absperrung | |
FR2672068A1 (fr) | Dispositif antivol a colonne blindee extractible notamment du type obstacle au passage de vehicule. | |
EP1964974B1 (de) | Schutzvorrichtung gegen Einbruch | |
CH640914A5 (fr) | Porte comportant un blindage. | |
EP0267343B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Schutz gegen mit Sprengstoff beladene oder überraschend eindringende Fahrzeuge | |
EP3208409B1 (de) | Einbruchsicherungssystem für garagentor | |
EP2303620A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum schutz eines öffnungsflügels eines fahrzeugs | |
EP2003274A1 (de) | Sicherungsvorrichtung für Sicherheitszugang zu einem Noteingang in eine öffentliche Infrastruktureinrichtung | |
EP0119238B1 (de) | Integrierte umfangsverriegelungsvorrichtung für verschlüsse | |
EP2305931A1 (de) | Zusatzverriegelung für den Zugang zu einem Sicherheitsbereich | |
EP1533423B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Aufnahme von Stossenergie an Schutzleitplanken von Fahrbahnen und Schutzleitplanke dafür | |
EP1767701A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Absorption eines Aufpralls gegen eine Schutzbarriere für Strassen und entsprechend ausgeführte Schutzbarriere | |
FR2996864A1 (fr) | Portique pour controler une voie de circulation | |
FR2972477A1 (fr) | Bloc-porte pour lieu d'enfermement, en particulier pour cellule de prison | |
FR2779174A1 (fr) | Dispositif de securite anti-effraction notamment pour portes | |
FR3060037A1 (fr) | Dispositif de signalisation routiere | |
BE1002751A6 (fr) | Portail suspendu de haute securite et a mouvements rapides, employe a titre d'issue interieure de sas d'acces pour vehicules. | |
WO2020104617A1 (fr) | Dispositif d'anti-franchissement | |
FR2799501A1 (fr) | Dispositif pour condamner l'acces inferieur d'une telle echelle a crinoline | |
FR3077323A1 (fr) | Dispositif d'obturation de l'acces a un lieu clos a ouverture mecanique automatisee | |
WO2001082256A1 (fr) | Dispositif de securisation d'acces perfectionne | |
FR3056233A1 (fr) | Obstacle de securite |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20090520 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: RIGOMER, RENAUD |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: RIGOMER, RENAUD |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 568794 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120815 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008017556 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120927 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: BOVARD AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 568794 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121201 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121203 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121112 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130503 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008017556 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130503 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130228 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20080228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20160831 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160824 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20160830 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20170728 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20170710 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602008017556 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 |