EP1812917B1 - Vermeidung von geländekollisionen von flugzeugen sowie alarmverfahren und -vorrichtung - Google Patents

Vermeidung von geländekollisionen von flugzeugen sowie alarmverfahren und -vorrichtung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1812917B1
EP1812917B1 EP05817428A EP05817428A EP1812917B1 EP 1812917 B1 EP1812917 B1 EP 1812917B1 EP 05817428 A EP05817428 A EP 05817428A EP 05817428 A EP05817428 A EP 05817428A EP 1812917 B1 EP1812917 B1 EP 1812917B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aircraft
slope
terrain
avoidance
database
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP05817428A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1812917A1 (de
Inventor
Christophe Bouchet
Jean-Pierre Demortier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SAS
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations SAS filed Critical Airbus Operations SAS
Publication of EP1812917A1 publication Critical patent/EP1812917A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1812917B1 publication Critical patent/EP1812917B1/de
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/04Anti-collision systems
    • G08G5/045Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. determination of anti-collision manoeuvers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0086Surveillance aids for monitoring terrain

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and an alarm and terrain avoidance device for an aircraft, in particular a transport aircraft.
  • said second means determines the avoidance trajectory (which is taken into account by the third means to detect a risk of collision with the terrain), by using a slope having a fixed and invariable value, generally 6 ° for an airplane transport, and this regardless of the type of the aircraft and regardless of its actual performance.
  • a terrain avoidance device of the aforementioned type is known.
  • This known device provides for determining two trajectories which are then compared with the profile of the terrain overflown, one of said trajectories representing the predicted effective trajectory of the aircraft and the other trajectory may in particular correspond to a predicted climb trajectory.
  • This prior document provides for taking into account the maneuverability of the aircraft to predict these trajectories, without however indicating the manner in which these trajectories are actually calculated or predicted.
  • the present invention relates to a warning and terrain avoidance method for an aircraft, which overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks.
  • the avoidance trajectory is determined by taking into account the actual performance of the aircraft, thanks to the characteristics of said database. and measuring said effective values. Consequently, the detection of a risk of collision with the terrain takes into account the actual capabilities of the aircraft, which notably makes it possible to avoid false alarms and to obtain particularly reliable surveillance.
  • the document EP-0 750 238 mentioned above does not provide for determining and using a slope (for an avoidance trajectory) which depends on the actual values of particular flight parameters.
  • a predetermined fixed value is used to form said database, which makes it possible to reduce the size of the database.
  • the value of this flight parameter which has the most unfavorable effect on the slope of the aircraft, is used as a predetermined fixed value for a flight parameter.
  • the centering of the aircraft can be fixed on the front limit value which is the most penalizing.
  • a minimum stabilized speed is known which is known and the aircraft flies normally during a usual terrain avoidance procedure following a collision risk warning, it is that is, a fixed value corresponding to a speed protection value for flight controls of the aircraft.
  • a predetermined value corresponding to a better slope speed, and not to a minimum speed, as used in the invention, is advantageously used for the speed. previous example.
  • the slope of the aircraft is deduced, in the event of engine failure, from a minimum slope representative of a normal operation (without failure) of all the engines of the engine. the aircraft, to which a reduction is applied depending on said nominal failure.
  • said abatement is calculated by means of a polynomial function modeling said nominal slope (slope of the aircraft with all engines in operation).
  • said device of the aforementioned type is remarkable, according to the invention, in that it comprises, in addition, at least one performance database of the aircraft, relating to a maneuvering slope. flight avoidance by the aircraft, based on particular flight parameters, and a fifth means for determining during a flight of the aircraft the actual values of said particular parameters, and in that said second means is formed of in order to determine said avoidance trajectory, based on information received respectively from said database and said fifth means.
  • the design of said database therefore takes into account a predictive ability with respect to the climb performance of the aircraft to avoid terrain.
  • the speed of the avoidance phase being predetermined (at a minimum speed, as specified below) to then provide the associated slope, it is thus freed from the current speed of the aircraft (which is necessarily higher at said minimum speed), which makes it possible to stabilize the avoidance slope calculated by the device according to the invention and thus to avoid false alarms.
  • the device according to the invention comprises a plurality of such databases which relate respectively to different categories of aircraft, and a selection means for selecting, from among these databases, that which is relating to the aircraft on which said device is mounted, said second means using information from the database thus selected to determine said avoidance trajectory.
  • the figures 1 and 2 are the block diagrams of two different embodiments of a warning device and terrain avoidance according to the invention.
  • the device 1 according to the invention and schematically represented on the figures 1 and 2 is intended to detect any risk of collision of an aircraft, in particular a transport aircraft, with the surrounding terrain and to alert the crew of the aircraft when such a risk is detected, so that the latter can then implement a terrain avoidance maneuver.
  • said database Bi, B1, B2, Bn is formed on the ground during a preliminary stage, before a flight of the aircraft, in the manner specified below.
  • said slope is calculated in the usual way, as a function of said flight parameters, from standard documentation of aircraft performance (for example the flight manual), which is derived from failed models. by flight tests.
  • a predetermined fixed value is used to form said database Bi, B1, B2, Bn, which makes it possible to reduce the size of the database Bi, B1 , B2, Bn.
  • the value of this flight parameter is used as a predetermined fixed value for a flight parameter. has the most adverse effect on the slope of the aircraft.
  • the centering of the aircraft can be fixed on the front limit value which is the most penalizing, and air sampling configurations (anti-icing and air conditioning) can be set so as to remain conservative vis-à-vis the performance of the aircraft.
  • a fixed value corresponding to a speed protection value for flight controls of the aircraft is used for the speed, that is to say a minimum speed that the aircraft normally flies.
  • a speed V ⁇ max speed at maximum incidence
  • a speed VSW of type "Stall Warning” in English, that is to say stall warning.
  • the performance database Bi, B1, B2, Bn makes it possible to calculate in real time the capabilities of the aircraft to be avoided from above, any obstacle that presents itself in front of it and / or along the flight plan. monitoring.
  • the device 1 according to the invention determines the avoidance trajectory, taking into account the actual performance of the aircraft, thanks to the characteristics of said database Bi, B1, B2, Bn and the measurements of said actual values. . Therefore, the detection of a risk of collision with the terrain takes into account the actual capabilities of the aircraft, which allows in particular to avoid false alarms and to obtain particularly reliable surveillance.
  • Each of these categories of aircraft comprises either a single type of aircraft (a category then corresponds to a type), or a set of aircraft types presenting, for example, substantially equivalent performances and grouped under the same category (each category then comprises Several types).
  • the selection of the representative database of the aircraft is carried out by pin programming, ie "pin programming" (that is to say with terminals of a connector between the aircraft and the device 1, corresponding to logical levels 0 or 1 depending on the category of aircraft).
  • pin programming that is to say with terminals of a connector between the aircraft and the device 1, corresponding to logical levels 0 or 1 depending on the category of aircraft.
  • This programming can alternatively be carried out in a software way: the selection means 13 receives for example by a data link a numerical value which depends on the category of aircraft and it realizes the selection according to this numerical value received.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Verfahren zum Warnen vor und Vermeiden von Geländekollisionen für ein Flugzeug, wobei bei dem Verfahren im Verlauf eines Fluges des Flugzeugs:
    a) die Istwerte von besonderen Flugparametern bestimmt werden;
    b) aus diesen Istwerten der besonderen Flugparameter und aus Leistungen des Flugzeugs eine Ausweichflugbahn bestimmt wird;
    c) mithilfe der Ausweichflugbahn und des Profils zumindest des vor dem Flugzeug liegenden Geländes überprüft wird, ob für das Flugzeug die Gefahr einer Kollision mit dem Gelände besteht und
    d) im Falle der Gefahr einer Kollision ein entsprechendes Warnsignal abgegeben wird,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass:
    - in einem vorgelagerten Schritt mindestens eine Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) mit Leistungen des Flugzeugs gebildet wird, wobei sich die Leistungen auf eine Steigung eines von dem Flugzeug in Abhängigkeit von besonderen Flugparametern fliegbaren Ausweichmanövers beziehen und zur Bildung dieser Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) eine Vielzahl von Werten, die jeweils für unterschiedliche Werte bezüglich der Flugparameter repräsentativ sind, für die Steigung bestimmt wird;
    - für mindestens einen Flugparameter zur Bildung der Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) ein vorgegebener Festwert verwendet wird und
    - in Schritt b) die Ausweichflugbahn mithilfe der Datenbank (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) bestimmt wird.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Flugparameter wenigstens einige der folgenden Parameter des Flugzeugs umfassen:
    - seine Masse,
    - seine Geschwindigkeit,
    - seine Höhe,
    - die Umgebungstemperatur,
    - seine Zentrierung,
    - die Position seines Hauptlandefahrwerks,
    - die aerodynamische Konfiguration,
    - die Aktivierung einer Klimaanlage,
    - die Aktivierung einer Enteisungsanlage und
    - ein möglicher Ausfall eines Motors.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass als vorgegebener Festwert für einen Flugparameter der Wert dieses Flugparameters mit der ungünstigsten Auswirkung auf die Steigung des Flugzeugs verwendet wird.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für die Geschwindigkeit ein vorgegebener Wert verwendet wird, der einer stabilen Mindestgeschwindigkeit entspricht, mit der das Flugzeug normalerweise bei einem Verfahren zur Geländeausweichung fliegt.
  5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für die Geschwindigkeit ein vorgegebener Wert verwendet wird, der einer Geschwindigkeit mit bester Steigung entspricht.
  6. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass im Falle eines Ausfalls eines Motors, die Steigung des Flugzeugs von einer nominalen Steigung, die für einen Normalbetrieb aller Motoren des Flugzeugs repräsentativ ist und auf die ein von dem nominalen Ausfall abhängiger Abzug angewandt wird, abgeleitet wird.
  7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Abzug mittels einer polynomischen Funktion der nominalen Steigung berechnet wird.
  8. Einrichtung zum Warnen vor und Vermeiden von Geländekollisionen für ein Flugzeug, wobei die Einrichtung (1) umfasst:
    - ein erstes Mittel (2), das zumindest das Profil des vor dem Flugzeug liegenden Geländes kennt,
    - ein Mittel (9), um im Verlauf einess Fluges des Flugzeugs die Istwerte von besonderen Flugparametern zu bestimmen,
    - ein zweites Mittel (3), um aus diesen Istwerten der Flugparameter eine Ausweichflugbahn zu bestimmen,
    - ein mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Mittel (2, 3) verbundenes drittes Mittel (4) zum Überprüfen, ob für das Flugzeug die Gefahr einer Kollision mit dem Gelände besteht und
    - ein viertes Mittel (7), um ein Warnsignal auszugeben, falls von dem dritten Mittel (4) die Gefahr einer Kollision detektiert wird,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie außerdem mindestens eine Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) mit Leistungen des Flugzeugs umfasst, die auf eine Steigung eines von dem Flugzeug in Abhängigkeit von besonderen Flugparametern fliegbaren Ausweichmanövers bezogen sind, wobei die Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) eine Vielzahl von Werten für diese Steigung umfasst, die jeweils für unterschiedliche Werte bezüglich der Flugparameter repräsentativ sind, wobei für mindestens einen Flugparameter zur Bildung der Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) ein vorgegebener Festwert verwendet wird und dadurch, dass das zweite Mittel (3) derart ausgebildet ist, dass es die Ausweichflugbahn mithilfe der jeweils aus der Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) empfangenen Informationen bestimmt.
  9. Einrichtung nach Anspruch 8,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie eine Vielzahl von Datenbasen (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) umfasst, die sich jeweils auf unterschiedliche Flugzeugkategorien beziehen und ein Auswahlmittel (13), um unter diesen Datenbasen (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) diejenige auszuwählen, die sich auf das Flugzeug bezieht, in dem die Einrichtung (1) montiert ist, wobei das zweite Mittel (3) Informationen der auf diese Weise gewählten Datenbasis (Bi, B1, B2, Bn) verwendet, um die Ausweichflugbahn zu bestimmen.
  10. Flugzeug, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es eine Einrichtung (1) wie die unter einem der Ansprüche 8 und 9 spezifizierte aufweist.
EP05817428A 2004-11-15 2005-11-10 Vermeidung von geländekollisionen von flugzeugen sowie alarmverfahren und -vorrichtung Not-in-force EP1812917B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0412067A FR2878060B1 (fr) 2004-11-15 2004-11-15 Procede et dispositif d'alerte et d'evitement de terrain pour un aeronef
PCT/FR2005/002803 WO2006051220A1 (fr) 2004-11-15 2005-11-10 Procede et dispositif d’alerte et d’evitement de terrain pour un aeronef

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1812917A1 EP1812917A1 (de) 2007-08-01
EP1812917B1 true EP1812917B1 (de) 2008-09-17

Family

ID=34981909

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05817428A Not-in-force EP1812917B1 (de) 2004-11-15 2005-11-10 Vermeidung von geländekollisionen von flugzeugen sowie alarmverfahren und -vorrichtung

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US8010288B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1812917B1 (de)
JP (1) JP4940143B2 (de)
CN (1) CN100481154C (de)
AT (1) ATE408876T1 (de)
BR (1) BRPI0516330A (de)
CA (1) CA2582358A1 (de)
DE (1) DE602005009859D1 (de)
FR (1) FR2878060B1 (de)
RU (1) RU2375757C2 (de)
WO (1) WO2006051220A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10228692B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2019-03-12 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft flight envelope protection and recovery autopilot

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2897154B1 (fr) * 2006-02-08 2008-03-07 Airbus France Sas Dispositif pour construire et securiser une trajectoire de vol a basse altitude destinee a etre suivie par un aeronef.
US20110029162A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-02-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Systems and methods for selectively altering a ground proximity message
FR2913781B1 (fr) * 2007-03-13 2009-04-24 Thales Sa Procede de reduction des nuisances d'alerte anticollision avec des obstacles pour aeronef
US8570211B1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2013-10-29 Gregory Hubert Piesinger Aircraft bird strike avoidance method and apparatus
FR2949897B1 (fr) 2009-09-04 2012-08-03 Thales Sa Procede d'assistance au pilotage d'un aeronef et dispositif correspondant.
DE102009041599A1 (de) 2009-09-15 2011-04-14 Airbus Operations Gmbh Steuervorrichtung, Ein-/Ausgabevorrichtung, Verbindungsschaltevorrichtung und Verfahren für ein Flugzeug-Steuersystem
US8599045B2 (en) * 2009-09-28 2013-12-03 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for enhanced awareness of clearance from conflict for surface traffic operations
US8773299B1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2014-07-08 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for actively determining obstacles
US8116923B2 (en) * 2009-11-19 2012-02-14 Honeywell International Stabilized approach monitor
PL2388760T3 (pl) * 2010-05-21 2013-06-28 Agustawestland Spa Statek powietrzny zdolny do wykonywania lotu wiszącego, sposób wspomagania manewrowania statkiem powietrznym oraz interfejs
CN102163060B (zh) * 2010-11-26 2013-05-08 四川大学 一种直升机训练飞行防撞预警方法
US8638240B2 (en) * 2011-02-07 2014-01-28 Honeywell International Inc. Airport taxiway collision alerting system
FR2981778B1 (fr) * 2011-10-24 2013-12-13 Airbus Operations Sas Procede et dispositif d'atterrissage automatique d'un aeronef sur une piste a forte pente.
US8509968B1 (en) * 2012-03-20 2013-08-13 The Boeing Company System and method for real-time aircraft efficiency analysis and compilation
FR2996635B1 (fr) * 2012-10-08 2015-08-07 Airbus Operations Sas Procede et dispositif d'affichage de parametres de vol sur un aeronef.
CN103903481B (zh) * 2012-12-26 2018-01-16 上海航空电器有限公司 一种近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计方法
CN103991553B (zh) * 2013-02-19 2016-02-24 成都海存艾匹科技有限公司 飞机精准着陆辅助装置
US9406236B1 (en) 2013-06-06 2016-08-02 The Boeing Company Multi-user disparate system communications manager
FR3008530B1 (fr) * 2013-07-10 2015-07-17 Eurocopter France Procede et dispositif d'emission d'alertes pour l'evitement de terrain par un aeronef a voilure tournante
CN103744289B (zh) * 2013-12-27 2017-05-03 李竞捷 电传飞机双重输入选择性执行控制方法
US9633567B1 (en) * 2014-12-04 2017-04-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Ground collision avoidance system (iGCAS)
US9536435B1 (en) 2015-07-13 2017-01-03 Double Black Aviation Technology L.L.C. System and method for optimizing an aircraft trajectory
CN105955028B (zh) * 2016-06-02 2018-09-07 西北工业大学 一种航天器在轨规避制导控制一体化算法
FR3063551A1 (fr) * 2017-03-02 2018-09-07 Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) Dispositif et procede d'evitement de terrain pour un aeronef
JP2020520501A (ja) * 2017-05-08 2020-07-09 エイ・キューブド・バイ・エアバス・エル・エル・シー 航空機の外部物体を検知し回避するためのシステムおよび方法
CN109903591B (zh) * 2017-12-11 2023-01-06 上海航空电器有限公司 一种基于专家规则的航空器自动近地碰撞评估方法及系统
US11250713B2 (en) * 2019-03-27 2022-02-15 Honeywell International Inc. Unmanned aerial vehicle off-site landing system
CN112506176B (zh) * 2019-08-26 2024-05-28 上海汽车集团股份有限公司 路径规划方法及装置
KR102636551B1 (ko) * 2021-10-25 2024-02-14 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 무인기의 저고도 운용을 위한 자율 지형 충돌 회피 장치 및 방법

Family Cites Families (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE634635A (de) * 1962-07-09 1900-01-01
US3929921A (en) * 1965-09-29 1975-12-30 Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh Ring compounds
US3752967A (en) * 1971-12-20 1973-08-14 C Vietor Ascent and descent slope tracker system
JPS5198242A (en) * 1975-02-17 1976-08-30 Isopurentorimaano seizoho
JPS6059216B2 (ja) * 1977-08-03 1985-12-24 三菱油化株式会社 イソプレン環状三量体の製造法
US4675823A (en) * 1983-12-09 1987-06-23 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Ground proximity warning system geographic area determination
JPS6436400A (en) * 1987-07-31 1989-02-07 Japan Radio Co Ltd Front warning device
US4924401A (en) * 1987-10-30 1990-05-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Aircraft ground collision avoidance and autorecovery systems device
JP2919735B2 (ja) * 1993-12-28 1999-07-19 川崎重工業株式会社 航空機用地図表示装置
FR2717934B1 (fr) * 1994-03-22 1996-04-26 Sextant Avionique Dispositif d'évitement de collisions pour aéronef notamment avec le sol par contrôle de pente d'approche.
EP0750238B1 (de) * 1995-06-20 2000-03-01 Honeywell Inc. Integriertes System zur Grundkollisionsvermeidung
US6606034B1 (en) * 1995-07-31 2003-08-12 Honeywell International Inc. Terrain awareness system
US6092009A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-07-18 Alliedsignal Aircraft terrain information system
US6292721B1 (en) * 1995-07-31 2001-09-18 Allied Signal Inc. Premature descent into terrain visual awareness enhancement to EGPWS
US6138060A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-10-24 Alliedsignal Inc. Terrain awareness system
US5839080B1 (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-10-17 Allied Signal Inc Terrain awareness system
US6691004B2 (en) * 1995-07-31 2004-02-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft
DE19604931A1 (de) * 1996-02-10 1997-08-14 Nfs Navigations Und Flugfuehru Verfahren zur Korrektur des Flugablaufs eines Fluggerätes
FR2747492B1 (fr) * 1996-04-15 1998-06-05 Dassault Electronique Dispositif d'anti-collision terrain pour aeronef avec prediction de virage
JPH1079639A (ja) * 1996-07-10 1998-03-24 Murata Mfg Co Ltd 圧電共振子およびそれを用いた電子部品
GB2322611B (en) * 1997-02-26 2001-03-21 British Aerospace Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft
US6038498A (en) * 1997-10-15 2000-03-14 Dassault Aviation Apparatus and mehod for aircraft monitoring and control including electronic check-list management
US6057786A (en) * 1997-10-15 2000-05-02 Dassault Aviation Apparatus and method for aircraft display and control including head up display
FR2773609B1 (fr) 1998-01-12 2000-02-11 Dassault Electronique Procede et dispositif d'anti-collision terrain pour aeronef, a visualisation perfectionnee
US7587278B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2009-09-08 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system
US7702461B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2010-04-20 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection
US6983206B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2006-01-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection
US6828921B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2004-12-07 The Boeing Company Data link clearance monitoring and pilot alert sub-system (compass)
US7064680B2 (en) * 2002-12-20 2006-06-20 Aviation Communications & Surveillance Systems Llc Aircraft terrain warning systems and methods
US7633410B2 (en) * 2004-02-19 2009-12-15 Honeywell International Inc. Wireless assisted recovery systems and methods
FR2870514B1 (fr) * 2004-05-18 2006-07-28 Airbus France Sas Indicateur de pilotage determinant la pente maximale pour le pilotage d'un aeronef en suivi de terrain
FR2871879B1 (fr) * 2004-06-18 2006-09-01 Thales Sa Procede d'evaluation et de signalisation des marges laterales de manoeuvre de part et d'autre de la trajectoire du plan de vol d'un aeronef
FR2883403A1 (fr) * 2005-03-17 2006-09-22 Airbus France Sas Procede et systeme d'evitement de terrain pour un aeronef
FR2905756B1 (fr) * 2006-09-12 2009-11-27 Thales Sa Procede et dispositif pour aeronef,d'evitement des collisions avec le terrain
US7772994B2 (en) * 2007-01-11 2010-08-10 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft glide slope display system and method
FR2938683B1 (fr) * 2008-11-14 2012-06-15 Airbus France Procede et systeme d'evitement de terrain pour un aeronef

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10228692B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2019-03-12 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft flight envelope protection and recovery autopilot
US10930164B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2021-02-23 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft flight envelope protection and recovery autopilot
US11580865B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2023-02-14 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Aircraft flight envelope protection and recovery autopilot

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1812917A1 (de) 2007-08-01
JP2008519729A (ja) 2008-06-12
CN101057270A (zh) 2007-10-17
RU2007122395A (ru) 2008-12-20
JP4940143B2 (ja) 2012-05-30
US20090076728A1 (en) 2009-03-19
DE602005009859D1 (de) 2008-10-30
BRPI0516330A (pt) 2008-09-02
FR2878060B1 (fr) 2010-11-05
CN100481154C (zh) 2009-04-22
ATE408876T1 (de) 2008-10-15
CA2582358A1 (fr) 2006-05-18
WO2006051220A1 (fr) 2006-05-18
FR2878060A1 (fr) 2006-05-19
US8010288B2 (en) 2011-08-30
RU2375757C2 (ru) 2009-12-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1812917B1 (de) Vermeidung von geländekollisionen von flugzeugen sowie alarmverfahren und -vorrichtung
EP1907910B1 (de) Verfahren und einrichtung zum sichern eines automatischen fluges eines flugzeugs auf niedriger höhe
EP1907911B8 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erkennung der kollisionsgefahr eines flugzeuges mit umgebungsgelände
EP2629052B1 (de) Erkennung von Anomalien beim Sinkflug eines Luftfahrzeugs
EP1602994B1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sicherung eines Flugzeuges während eines Tieffluges
FR2916530A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour surveiller une indication de position d'un aeronef.
FR2908533A1 (fr) Methode et systeme de surveillance du suivi d'une trajectoire de reference par un aeronef
EP0717330A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung einer Information, Alarm oder Warnung für ein Flugzeug an der Bodennäherung
EP3045920B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der windgeschwindigkeit, die zur optimierung der masse beim abheben eines flugzeugs berücksichtigt werden muss
EP1893946A2 (de) Anzeigeverfahren und vorrichtung für ein einem flugplan folgenden flugzeug
FR2991485A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'estimation automatique d'une degradation en consommation et en trainee d'un aeronef.
EP1598271B1 (de) Steuerungsanzeige zum Anzeigen von Schubinformationen eines Luftfahrzeuges
FR3053025A1 (fr) Amelioration de la detection et de signalisation de l'approche du domaine de vortex par un giravion
FR2991486A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'assistance au suivi de mission d'un aeronef
FR2899350A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour determiner la turbulence de l'air susceptible d'etre rencontree par un aeronef
FR2901893A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance d'informations de commande d'un aeronef
EP1598720B1 (de) Steuerungsanzeige mit Ermittlung der maximalen Steigung zum Steuern eines Flugzeuges im Bodenfolgeflug
FR3109003A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de gestion de risques et d’alertes
EP1498737B1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung von Geschwindigkeitswerten in einem Flugzeug
EP2799890A1 (de) Verfahren und System zur Geschwindigkeitsbestimmung eines Luftfahrzeugs gegenüber der Luft
FR3016224B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de guidage d'un aeronef lors d'un vol a basse hauteur.
EP3933809A1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung von bypass-flugbahnen für ein flugzeug
FR3072816A1 (fr) Procede de determination de point(s) limite (s) de decision relative au declenchement d'une manoeuvre d'evitement par un aeronef, dispositif et programme d'ordinateur associes
EP1562023B1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung eines Temperaturwerts bei einer Zielhöhe eines Flugzeugs
EP3933810A1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung von bypass-flugbahnen für ein flugzeug

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070426

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070907

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081030

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081228

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090217

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090117

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE

Effective date: 20081130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090618

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090318

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091130

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081218

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20110721 AND 20110727

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CJ

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR

Effective date: 20110916

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: AIRBUS HOLDING, FR

Effective date: 20110913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

Effective date: 20120326

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FR

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS FRANCE, TOULOUSE, FR

Effective date: 20120326

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: ANWALTSKANZLEI MEISSNER & MEISSNER, DE

Effective date: 20120326

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20121120

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20131129

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20191121

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005009859

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210601

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20211122

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20211119

Year of fee payment: 17

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20221110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221130