EP1748106B1 - Dispositif de sécurité - Google Patents

Dispositif de sécurité Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1748106B1
EP1748106B1 EP06101532A EP06101532A EP1748106B1 EP 1748106 B1 EP1748106 B1 EP 1748106B1 EP 06101532 A EP06101532 A EP 06101532A EP 06101532 A EP06101532 A EP 06101532A EP 1748106 B1 EP1748106 B1 EP 1748106B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gate
crash barrier
security facility
facility according
leaf
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP06101532A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1748106A1 (fr
Inventor
Jan Willem Moberg
Johannes Daniël Kleyweg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bavak Beveiligingsgroep BV
Original Assignee
Bavak Beveiligingsgroep BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bavak Beveiligingsgroep BV filed Critical Bavak Beveiligingsgroep BV
Publication of EP1748106A1 publication Critical patent/EP1748106A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1748106B1 publication Critical patent/EP1748106B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
    • E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
    • E01F13/00—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions
    • E01F13/04—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions movable to allow or prevent passage
    • E01F13/048—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions movable to allow or prevent passage with obstructing members moving in a translatory motion, e.g. vertical lift barriers, sliding gates

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a security facility for controlled vehicle access, comprising:
  • a gate provision is made in the broad sense for a railing or door with which an access passage for vehicles can be completely closed off, or conversely, can be opened if the vehicle is permitted to pass through the access passage.
  • Security facilities are found at many properties requiring guarding, such as bank buildings, embassies, airports, prisons, government buildings, etc. Such properties are often secured against attacks or forcible entry from outside. A large part of this security is aimed at being able to control the access of people and vehicles to such a property.
  • the property is often enclosed by a wall, fencing, etc.
  • a property can also be a building, such as a warehouse for goods, wherein the wall of the building forms the enclosure.
  • the enclosure is provided with a gate.
  • Such a gate has an outer side located on the outside of the enclosure and an inner side located on the inside of the enclosure.
  • an approach direction is understood to be the direction in which a vehicle approaches the property (from outside the enclosure), that is to say this approach direction can be represented by means of an arrow provided on the outside of the enclosure that is oriented towards the gate.
  • Speedgates are gates with grated railing sections or solid leaf doors.
  • the gate is built up of a number of railing leaves or solid door leaves that are pivotably joined to one another about vertical hinge axes in order to be able to move from an extended position in the extension of one another, in which the gate is closed, to a harmonica-like folded position, in which latter position the railing leaves or door leaves are situated on the opposing sides of the gate essentially parallel to the access direction.
  • Such gates can close and open rapidly, one can imagine, for example, in about 4 sec.
  • Such gates with which an access passage can essentially be closed off completely, have the disadvantage, in particular with access passages with a relatively large surface area, that they are relatively vulnerable to collisions from vehicles.
  • the gate can be made sturdy and robust, some limitations are associated with this, in particular in the sense of the bulk, the weight and the size of the construction. All this means that the moving parts of the gate still constitute a potentially weaker part of the gate that is sensitive to collisions.
  • barriers that more closely regulate traffic passing through the gate could be installed in front of or behind the gates. The traffic is then held at a distance by the barrier as long as the gate is closed. It's true that such a barrier is suitable for preserving a gate from unintentional collisions, but it is not suitable for preserving a gate from intentional ramming (such as in the case of terrorism, burglary or vandalism). After all a vehicle that is approaching at some speed will go straight through the barrier.
  • road blockers in the approach route to the gate.
  • the Applicant has been marketing such road blockers for some years.
  • Such road blockers are available in two versions. The first is the so-called spike barrier, where a row of spikes pointing in the opposite direction to the approach direction can be swung about a horizontal axis between a position that allows access with the spikes sunk in the road surface and a position pointing upwards from the road surface into the approach direction for holding back vehicles.
  • the other version is somewhat friendlier and consists of a construction that has a triangular cross-sectional shape viewed in the direction allowing access, which shape can be swung about a horizontal axis situated in the road surface between a position completely sunk into the road surface and a position projecting upwards from the road surface.
  • road blockers have to be provided at some distance in front of the gate, that they require the necessary installation depth and space in the ground, usually consisting of a road surface, and that the construction is relatively complex in the sense that in the event of a collision against such road blockers there is a relatively large amount of mechanical damage to the road blocker and it takes a relatively large amount of time to be able to restore the access through the gate.
  • a security facility is known from US 4,923,327 .
  • This security facility comprises a gate and a crash barrier.
  • the gate is a sliding gate.
  • the crash barrier comprises a turnstile and a crash bumper and is arranged behind the gate.
  • the aim of the present invention is to provide a security facility comprising a so-called gate which to a large degree is resistant to intentional ramming.
  • this aim is achieved by providing a security facility for controlled vehicle access, according to claim 1.
  • this crash barrier viewed in a direction perpendicular to the gate, can be made slim, that is to say taking up a small amount of space.
  • the beam as well as the columns can furthermore be made very robust with relatively small dimensions.
  • the crash barrier is capable of being installed very close to the gate. In this context, close is understood to mean in particular a distance of at most 1.5 metre from the gate.
  • the drive for the beam is capable of being implemented in a mechanically simple manner.
  • a threaded spindle provided in each column that extends through threaded passages provided in the ends of the beam. By turning the threaded spindle the beam will then be raised.
  • hydraulic rams where the beam can be moved over a certain vertical distance by powering a hydraulic cylinder/piston unit with a hydraulic fluid.
  • the great advantage of such hydraulic drive means is, moreover, that very large forces can be produced by these, which makes it possible to use a very robust beam.
  • such hydraulic drives in particular in the case of very robust constructions, are less susceptible to wear than mechanical drives.
  • each column is provided with an inclined prop, which is installed on the side of the respective column facing away from the approach side and which is anchored to the respective column at its upper end and is anchored in the ground at its opposing lower end.
  • the beam is at least partially sunk in the ground in the clear position.
  • the ideal height of the beam for the purpose of the barring position will be closer to the ground than to the top of the access passage of the gate.
  • the distance over which the beam has to be moved in order to move this back and forth between the clear position and the barring position is then the least.
  • the beam in the barring position is 40 to 120 cm above the ground, in particular 50 to 80 cm above the ground. At 50 to 80 cm it is possible to ensure that lorries as well as cars are reliably restrained. According to the invention the beam in the barring position will preferably be about 70 cm above the ground.
  • the crash barrier is provided behind the gate, viewed from the approach direction.
  • the crash barrier in particular the beam thereof, is situated at most 1.5 metre behind the gate, that is to say the plane that is closed off in the closed position of the gate. Preferably this distance will be at most 1 metre.
  • crash barrier relatively close behind the gate is that should the gate be rammed by a vehicle the gate itself functions as the first arresting net and then the crash beam fully restrains the vehicle.
  • providing the crash barrier close behind the gate has the additional advantage that the crash beam will also restrain the closing sections of the gate. The crash beam thus prevents full opening of the gate in the event this should be rammed. If the crash barrier is situated less than 1 metre behind the gate, the passage through the gate possibly arising from sections of the gate giving way will still be sufficiently small to make it extremely difficult for people to make a forced entry.
  • the gate is the so-called harmonica type with leaves hinged to one another about vertical hinge axes.
  • Such a type of gate has the great advantage that this can open and shut in a relatively short time.
  • a further important advantage of a gate of this type is that this requires relatively little installation space to the side of the gate. With a gate where a railing is slid away to the side, at least the same amount of space is required on both sides of the gate as the width of the access passage through the gate.
  • the disadvantage of a gate of the type with at least one swinging leaf is that the hinges constitute a weakening in the gate construction, from which, from the mechanical point of view, a greater vulnerability inherently results. In the event of a violent crash it is precisely to be expected that, as a result of these hinged joints, forced opening of the gate can occur. What is achieved by now providing the crash barrier close behind the gate is that this forced opening is limited by the beam of the crash barrier.
  • the distance from the crash barrier to the closed gate will be at most 75 % of the leaf width. It is in particular advantageous if this distance is at most 60 % or even at most 50 % of the leaf width. The distance can even be made less than 30%.
  • the security facility has control means that are equipped:
  • the invention provides that a further crash barrier is provided in front of the gate, viewed from the approach direction. This gives the advantage that during the opening of the gate, when this is more vulnerable to a collision than when this is completely closed, intentional ramming of the gate is prevented.
  • the security facility has control means equipped:
  • the gate and the crash barrier constitute an integrated entity.
  • this is understood to mean that the vertical columns of the crash barrier are built onto the frame of the gate.
  • FIG. 1 shows a crash barrier for a security facility which does not form part of the invention but is usefull for understanding.
  • the crash barrier 1 comprises a beam 2 provided between two vertically erected columns 3.
  • the columns 3 constitute vertical guides for moving the beam 2 up and down.
  • the columns 3 in this example extend through the guide passages 4 at the ends of the beam 2. Guiding can also be implemented in another way.
  • the columns, preferably both columns 3, are furthermore provided with drive means 5 to move the beam 2 in the vertical direction up and down.
  • the drive means 5 are indicated highly diagrammatically as comprising a ram 5, which is sunk into the ground 6.
  • the upper surface of the ground constitutes the pavement.
  • the drive means 5 thus comprise in this case a hydraulically operated cylinder 16 with a piston 7 therein that is connected to the beam 2 via a rod 8.
  • the beam 2 is capable of being moved up or, alternatively, down, as is known to a person skilled in the art.
  • Figure 1 shows the beam in the so-called barring position.
  • the beam 2 In the barring position the beam 2 is situated in this case at a height H of about 70 cm above the road surface.
  • the so-called approach direction is indicated diagrammatically by means of arrow A.
  • a vehicle to be restrained will be driven up from the approach direction A.
  • the columns 3 are each additionally braced against the ground by means of a prop 9.
  • Each prop 9 is anchored at its top end to the column 3 and at its bottom end to the road surface 6.
  • the props 9 in this example are at an angle of about 45°.
  • Figure 1 furthermore shows that a recess 10 has been made between the columns 3 in the road surface 6.
  • This recess 10 is intended to partially or completely accommodate the beam 2 in the clear position. If the beam 2 is completely accommodated in the recess 10 in the clear position, this will amount to the situation where the top surface of the beam 2 is precisely flush with the road surface 6. However, the top surface of the beam 2 can also protrude somewhat above the road surface 6. In that case it will be advantageous if upward sloping surfaces are provided on both opposing longitudinal sides of the beam 2 or on both opposing longitudinal sides of the recess 10, so that the beam 2 constitutes a hump than can be negotiated smoothly.
  • FIG 2 shows a security facility according to the invention where the gate and the crash barrier constitute an integrated entity.
  • the crash barrier is indicated in Figure 2 by 11.
  • This crash barrier 11 differs from the crash barrier 1 in Figure 1 essentially solely in that the columns 3 have been extended in the vertical direction up to the top of the gate 20. With the exception of the general indication for the crash barrier 11, the same reference numerals have otherwise been used for the crash barrier 11 as in Figure 1 .
  • the extension of the column 3 up to the top of the gate makes it possible to move the beam 2 in the upward direction to a clear position.
  • the beam 2 could be raised, as it were, above the gate 20 so that the vehicle is able to drive under it.
  • the gate 20 is essentially built up of a portal frame with two vertical uprights 21 that are joined to one another at the top by a beam construction 22. Between the vertical uprights 21, there is a two-part entrance gate with a left and right railing section.
  • the left and right railing sections each consist of two leaves 24 and 25 that are joined to one another by means of a vertical hinge 23.
  • the outer leaf 25 is attached to uprights 21 by means of a hinge 26 so as to be able to swing open through 90° according to arrow 30.
  • the inner leaf 24 can then swing about hinge 23 according to arrow 31 in each case.
  • the leaves 24 and 25 are then situated directly against one another and they extend parallel to arrow A.
  • the left and right gate sections can each comprise one leaf section, in which case the harmonica principle essentially does not apply, can comprise two leaf sections as shown, but can also comprise more leaf sections, such as three or four. It is also conceivable to work with only one harmonica-like gate section that can fold on itself instead of a left and right gate section such as shown in Figure 2 .
  • FIG 3 shows diagrammatically in perspective a security facility according to a further embodiment.
  • a crash barrier 1 according to Figure 1 is installed behind a gate 20, viewed in the approach direction, which is implemented in an essentially corresponding manner to the gate 20 described with reference to Figure 2 .
  • the crash barrier 1 and the gate 20 constitute two separate components. It can clearly be seen that the crash barrier 1, in accordance with Figure 2 , is installed at a distance D behind the gate 20, which approximately corresponds to 50 % of the width W of the respective leaf sections 24, 25.
  • each leaf section is greater than the distance D between a leaf section in the closed position and the beam 2.
  • the distance D here amounts to about 50 % of the width W.
  • Figure 4 shows a security facility which does not form part of the invention.
  • the variant according to Figure 4 differs from that according to Figure 3 essentially solely in that the crash barrier 1 is installed in front of the gates 20, viewed in the approach direction A. This is particularly so that the gate 20 can be protected from intentional ramming during opening and closing, in which intermediate position the gate 20 is relatively somewhat more vulnerable than in the completely closed position.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
  • Bidet-Like Cleaning Device And Other Flush Toilet Accessories (AREA)
  • Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
  • Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Installation de sécurité pour un accès contrôlé de véhicule, comportant :
    - une grille (20) qui peut se déplacer entre, d'une part, une position fermée dans laquelle un passage d'accès est fermé par la grille (20) et, d'autre part, une position ouverte dans laquelle le passage d'accès est ouvert pour permettre l'accès par un véhicule ; et
    - une barrière de collision (1, 11)
    caractérisée en ce que la barrière de collision (1, 11) comporte :
    - une poutre (2) qui s'étend en travers du passage sur toute la largeur du passage et qui peut monter et descendre dans la direction verticale entre une position de dégagement libérant le passage et une position de barrage située dans le passage ; et
    - deux colonnes verticales (3) entre lesquelles la poutre (2) s'étend et celles-ci sont pourvues de moyens d'entraînement (5) et de guides verticaux pour faire monter et descendre la poutre ;
    dans laquelle la grille (20) est du type pourvu d'au moins un battant (24, 25) articulé autour d'un axe vertical (23, 26) d'articulation ;
    dans laquelle le, au moins un, battant (24, 25), vu perpendiculairement à l'axe d'articulation (23, 26) a une largeur (W) de battant, dans laquelle le, au moins un, battant (24, 25) pivote vers la barrière de collision (1, 11) lors de l'ouverture de la grille (20), et dans laquelle la distance (D) entre la barrière (1, 11) de collision et le, au moins un, battant, lorsque la grille (20) est fermée, est inférieure à la largeur (W) du battant.
  2. Installation de sécurité selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle chaque colonne (3) est pourvue d'un étai incliné (9), lequel est installé sur le côté de la colonne respective (3) tournée à l'écart du côté d'approche et qui est ancré à la colonne respective (3) par son extrémité supérieure et est ancré dans le sol (6) par son extrémité inférieure opposée.
  3. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la poutre (2) est enfoncée au moins partiellement dans le sol (6) dans la position de dégagement.
  4. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la poutre (2), dans la position de barrage, est à 40 à 120 cm au-dessus du sol (6), en particulier à 50 à 80 cm au-dessus du sol (6).
  5. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la barrière de collision (1, 11) est située à 1 mètre au plus en arrière de la grille (20).
  6. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la grille (20) est du type harmonica ayant une multiplicité desdits battants (24, 25) qui sont reliés entre eux par des battants articulés autour d'axes verticaux (23, 26) d'articulation.
  7. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle ladite distance (D) de la barrière de collision (1, 11) à la grille fermée (20) est égale au plus à 75 % de la largeur (W) du battant.
  8. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle ladite distance (D) de la barrière de collision (1, 11) à la grille fermée (20) est égale au plus à 60 % de la largeur (W) du battant.
  9. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle ladite distance (D) de la barrière de collision (1, 11) à la grille fermée (20) est égale au plus à 50 % de la largeur (W) du battant.
  10. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, comportant en outre un moyen de commande équipé :
    - lors de l'ouverture de l'installation, pour d'abord amener la poutre (2) dans la position de dégagement et ensuite ouvrir la grille (20) ; et
    - lors de la fermeture de l'installation, pour d'abord fermer la grille (20) puis amener la poutre (2) dans la position de barrage.
  11. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la grille (20) et la barrière de collision (11) constituent une entité intégrée.
  12. Installation de sécurité selon l'une des revendications précédentes, comportant deux desdites barrières de collision (1, 11), une barrière de collision étant située sur le premier côté de la grille (20) et une autre barrière de collision étant située sur l'autre côté de la grille (20).
EP06101532A 2005-02-10 2006-02-10 Dispositif de sécurité Not-in-force EP1748106B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1028245A NL1028245C2 (nl) 2005-02-10 2005-02-10 Veiligheidsvoorziening voor het gecontroleerd doorlaten van voertuigen.

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1748106A1 EP1748106A1 (fr) 2007-01-31
EP1748106B1 true EP1748106B1 (fr) 2008-11-05

Family

ID=34974906

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06101532A Not-in-force EP1748106B1 (fr) 2005-02-10 2006-02-10 Dispositif de sécurité

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1748106B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE413492T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE602006003483D1 (fr)
NL (1) NL1028245C2 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU206425U1 (ru) * 2021-03-29 2021-09-13 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") Противотаранный комплекс "птк-1м"
RU212996U1 (ru) * 2022-01-25 2022-08-17 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") Подъемное противотаранное устройство

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9556673B2 (en) * 2013-08-06 2017-01-31 Diverse Holdings, Llc Safety gate apparatus and method
CN107938537A (zh) * 2017-11-30 2018-04-20 国家电网公司 一种非牛顿流体防撞梁
US11189138B2 (en) 2019-07-08 2021-11-30 Synergy Group LLC ATM security apparatus and method of use

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2483506B1 (fr) * 1980-05-28 1985-08-09 Milleret Joanny Portail a plusieurs vantaux rabattables
GB2192420B (en) * 1986-06-23 1989-09-13 Wong Kwan Yu A foldable blind and gate incorporating same.
US4923327A (en) 1987-12-04 1990-05-08 Flexible Barricades, Inc. Terrorist vehicle arresting system
US4822207A (en) * 1988-06-17 1989-04-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Anti-terrorist vehicle crash impact energy absorbing barrier
US5649396A (en) * 1995-04-11 1997-07-22 Carr; Michael J. Loading dock safety barrier
AU9475298A (en) * 1998-05-26 1999-12-13 Primex Technologies, Inc. Non-lethal, rapidly deployed, vehicle immobilizer system

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU206425U1 (ru) * 2021-03-29 2021-09-13 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") Противотаранный комплекс "птк-1м"
RU212996U1 (ru) * 2022-01-25 2022-08-17 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") Подъемное противотаранное устройство

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE413492T1 (de) 2008-11-15
NL1028245C2 (nl) 2006-08-11
DE602006003483D1 (de) 2008-12-18
EP1748106A1 (fr) 2007-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4574523A (en) Vehicle barricade or maximum security barrier
US5228237A (en) Vehicle barrier
US8985890B2 (en) Vertically actuated vehicle barrier system
US8740495B1 (en) Shallow flush-mounted vehicle control barrier
US4576509A (en) Security gate
US4554695A (en) Vehicular road block
US4624600A (en) Anti-terrorist vehicle impaler
US20180119373A1 (en) Finger wedge vehicle barrier
AU2010201467B2 (en) Improvements Relating to Multi-fold Panel Assemblies
EP1748106B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité
FI93378B (fi) Aukivedettävä sulku
US20080226391A1 (en) High Impact Gate
US20130287492A1 (en) Vertically actuated vehicle barrier system
NL1031381C2 (nl) Road Blocker/Wegversperring.
KR102180015B1 (ko) 개폐 장치 및 그것을 포함하는 접이식 자동 도어
US20050166476A1 (en) Apparatus for Tornado Shelter in Automobile Maintenance Pit
KR102224467B1 (ko) 방호형 볼라드 조립체
RU2320804C1 (ru) Противотаранное устройство (варианты)
EP1630343B1 (fr) Porte basculante pour garage collectif
NL1022853C2 (nl) Inrichting en werkwijze voor het blokkeren van een kozijnopening om een ramkraak tegen te gaan, alsmede een kozijnopening, voorzien van een dergelijke inrichting.
RU2781785C1 (ru) Барьерные ворота для дорожных ограждений
RU2537834C1 (ru) Ворота с повышенной противотаранной прочностью
CN112878238B (zh) 一种具有防逃票功能的轨道交通车站闸机
EP3867449B1 (fr) Barrière de sécurité résistant aux chocs à plusieurs parties
CN218509342U (zh) 一种方便开关的人防门

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070731

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070913

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602006003483

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081218

Kind code of ref document: P

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20081105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090205

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090205

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090406

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090206

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20110223

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20110303

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110315

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20110225

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110307

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20110225

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090506

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110224

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20110228

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081105

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BAVAK BEVEILIGINGSGROEP B.V.

Effective date: 20120228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20120901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20121031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006003483

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120901

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120210

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120210