EP1685668A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung der trägerfrequenzstabilität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetz - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung der trägerfrequenzstabilität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetzInfo
- Publication number
- EP1685668A1 EP1685668A1 EP04790677A EP04790677A EP1685668A1 EP 1685668 A1 EP1685668 A1 EP 1685668A1 EP 04790677 A EP04790677 A EP 04790677A EP 04790677 A EP04790677 A EP 04790677A EP 1685668 A1 EP1685668 A1 EP 1685668A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- transmitter
- carrier frequency
- phase shift
- impulse response
- frequency
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 claims description 79
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 61
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 101000879761 Homo sapiens Sarcospan Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 102100037329 Sarcospan Human genes 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 101100421334 Arabidopsis thaliana SFH2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100329630 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) CSR1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 abstract 5
- SUVMJBTUFCVSAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulforaphane Chemical compound CS(=O)CCCCN=C=S SUVMJBTUFCVSAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04H—BROADCAST COMMUNICATION
- H04H20/00—Arrangements for broadcast or for distribution combined with broadcast
- H04H20/65—Arrangements characterised by transmission systems for broadcast
- H04H20/67—Common-wave systems, i.e. using separate transmitters operating on substantially the same frequency
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for monitoring the stability of the carrier frequency of several transmitters in a single-frequency network.
- a method for monitoring the phase synchronism of the individual transmitters of a single-wave network is presented in DE 199 37 457 AI. Any phase asynchrony that occurs between two transmitters is recorded via a transit time difference measurement by determining the channel impulse responses of the two transmitters. If there is a large difference between the measured transit time difference of the two transmitters and a reference transit time difference for the synchronous operation of the two transmitters, the two transmitters emit asynchronously. This deviation in the transit time difference is determined by a receiving station in the transmission area of the single-frequency network by evaluating the channel impulse responses and transmitted to the two phase-asynchronous transmitters for subsequent synchronization.
- a method for monitoring identical carrier frequencies for two transmitters in one Commonwave network cannot be found in DE 199 37 457 AI.
- a control center transmits a frequency reference symbol to the individual transmitters of the single-frequency network in addition to the transmission data. This frequency reference symbol is evaluated by each transmitter in the single-wave network and used to synchronize the carrier frequency with the frequency reference.
- a disadvantage of this method is the fact that the evaluation of the synchronicity of the carrier frequency of. each transmitter is carried out individually. This transmitter-specific evaluation of the frequency synchronism of the carrier frequency can consequently involve a certain transmitter-specific measurement and evaluation error, which can lead to inconsistent monitoring of the carrier frequency of all transmitters involved in the single-frequency network.
- the monitoring of the carrier frequency at each individual transmitter requires synchronization of the individual transmitters by means of a time reference, which is received by the individual transmitter, for example via GPS.
- the frequency synchronization takes place in the circuit arrangement of DE 43 41 211 Cl before the modulation, so that a subsequent frequency shift of the carrier frequency by subsequent functional units of the transmitter is not excluded. All these weak points can lead to undesired reception of different carrier frequencies of the individual transmitters in a receiver positioned at any location in the transmission area of the single-frequency network.
- the invention is therefore based on the object of specifying a method and a device for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network in which the synchronism of the carrier frequencies of the individual transmitters is uniformly ensured a single measuring arrangement, which can be positioned anywhere in the transmission area of the single-frequency network, is monitored without synchronization of the measuring arrangement by means of a time reference.
- the object of the invention is achieved by a method for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network with the features of claim 1 and a device with the features of claim 12 or 13.
- Advantageous embodiments of the inventions are specified in the dependent claims.
- the monitoring of the carrier frequency stability of the transmitters belonging to a single-frequency network is carried out via a single receiving device, which is positioned at any location in the transmission area of the single-frequency network.
- the receiving device From the transmission function of the transmission channel, the receiving device preferably determines the course of the sum impulse response of all transmitters at two different times by means of the inverse complex Fourier transformation.
- the impulse responses belonging to the respective transmitter are masked out from the two sum impulse responses after their phase relationship has been set in relation to the phase position of the two impulse responses of a reference transmitter of the single-frequency network.
- phase profiles of the two impulse responses belonging to the respective transmitter are then determined, from which in turn the phase shift difference of the impulse response of the respective transmitter to the phase position of the impulse response of the reference transmitter between two observation times is derived for each transmitter.
- the carrier frequency shift of each transmitter relative to the carrier frequency of a reference transmitter of the single-frequency network can be calculated from the course of the phase shift difference.
- the sum impulse responses of all transmitters from the transmission function of the transmission channel are carried out repeatedly using the inverse complex Fourier transformation at several different times and, based on this, the carrier frequency shift of each transmitter to the carrier frequency of a reference transmitter of the single-frequency network is repeatedly calculated and fed to a subsequent averaging.
- phase shift difference of a transmitter falls between two times to a value less than - ⁇ or if the phase shift difference of a transmitter between two times increases to a value greater than + ⁇ , the value of the phase shift difference of the respective transmitter between two times in this time period becomes + 2 * ⁇ increased or reduced by 2 * ⁇ . In this way, the phase shift difference is limited to values between - ⁇ and + ⁇ .
- the impulse response of each transmitter of the single-frequency network is obtained by determining the coefficients of the transmission function of the transmission channel from the coefficients of the equalizer in the receiving device, which is matched to the transmission channel, and then calculating the inverse Fourier transform.
- the impulse response for each transmitter can alternatively be derived from the inverse Fourier transform of the transmission function of the transmission channel by evaluating the OFDM-modulated transmission signals belonging to the scattered pilot carriers.
- Fig. 1 is a functional representation of an inventive device for monitoring the Carrier frequency stability of transmitters in one. Single wave network
- FIG. 3 shows an example of a graphical representation for a change in the course of the transfer function of the transfer channel
- 4A is a flowchart to explain the first embodiment of the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network;
- 4B is a flow chart to explain the second embodiment of the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network;
- 5A shows an exemplary representation of the results of the first embodiment of the invention.
- 5B shows an exemplary representation of the results of the second embodiment of the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency — stability of transmitters in a single-wave network
- 6A shows an exemplary three-dimensional graphic representation of the amplitude and carrier frequency deviation
- FIG. 6B shows an exemplary two-dimensional graphical representation of the amplitude and carrier frequency deviation.
- the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network is described in its two embodiments below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 5.
- the transmitters S 0 , ..., S ⁇ Positioned in a single-wave network. , , 1, S n , for example according to FIG. 1, the transmitters S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , S 4 and S 5 , each radiate an identical phase and frequency-synchronous signal s (t) in the context of digital radio and TV broadcasting. out.
- a receiving device E which is positioned in the transmission area of the single-wave network, receives a reception signal e (t) as a superimposition of all reception signals e x (t) belonging to the individual transmitters S 0 , ..., S 17 ..., S n .
- transmitter S 0 is defined, for example, as the reference transmitter of the single-frequency network.
- the attenuation and phase distortions as well as the transit times that the transmit signals s (t) of the individual transmitters S 0 , ..., S 1 # ..., S n experience in the transmission channel to the receiving device E are in relation to the attenuation and Phase distortion and set at runtime of the reference transmitter S 0 .
- the signal e 0 (t) of the reference transmitter S 0 in equation (1) received in the receiving device E therefore corresponds to its transmission signal s (t).
- the transit time differences ⁇ . of the individual transmitters S ⁇ "to S" are based on the following effects:
- An additional phase shift A ⁇ between a transmitter S i and the reference transmitter S 0 can occur in the phase normalization of the received signal e (t) if, according to equation (4), there is a difference in the carrier frequency ⁇ . of the respective transmitter S L to the carrier frequency ⁇ 0 of the reference transmitter S 0 occurs:
- equation (1) for the time course of the received signal e (t) is converted to equation (5).
- e ( t ) s ( t ) + 2 v . * e / ⁇ , ( ' ) * J ( f _' r « (5)
- Equation (5) for the time profile of the received signal e (t) merges into equation (7) for the time range of the time slot ⁇ t B.
- ne (t) s (t) + ⁇ v, * e j ⁇ , * s (t- ⁇ ,) (7)
- ⁇ l
- the frequency spectrum E ( ⁇ ) of the received signal e (t) in equation (9) results from the Fourier transform of the received signal h SFW (t) according to equation (8) multiplied by the transfer function S ( ⁇ ) of the transmission channel of the single-frequency network :
- the bracketed term of the frequency spectrum E ( ⁇ ) of the E pfangs- signal e (t) in equation (9) corresponds to the transfer function H SFN ( ⁇ ) of the transmission channel of the single-frequency network. It consists of a sum of hands, the phase of which coincides with the ter change and have a constant phase shift ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ t for a specific time t.
- for a single-wave network with a reference transmitter S 0 and a second transmitter S x is shown above the frequency f in FIG. 3.
- has a periodic curve with a period of l / ⁇ x .
- is determined by the carrier frequency shift ⁇ x of the transmitter S x to the carrier frequency ü) 0 of the reference transmitter S 0 .
- the course of the impulse response h SFNi (t) of the transmitter S i also changes Carrier frequency ⁇ £ has shifted to the carrier frequency ⁇ o of the reference transmitter S 0 .
- the phase angle shift ⁇ ⁇ t) of the impulse response h SFNi (t) belonging to the transmitter Si from the time t B1 of the time slot ⁇ t B1 to the time t B2 of the time slot ⁇ t B2 is consequently proportional to the course of the carrier frequency shift ⁇ according to equation (11). (t) of the transmitter S at the carrier frequency ⁇ 0 of the reference transmitter S 0 .
- the first embodiment of the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network consequently results from the following method steps, as shown in FIG. 4A:
- step S1 the transfer function H SFN (f) of the transfer channel from the individual transmitters S 0 , ..., S. ; ..., S n of the single-wave network to the receiving device E is determined.
- the course of the transfer function H SPH (f) can be determined from the coefficients of the equalizer integrated in the receiving device E, which correspond to the coefficients of the transfer function H SPN (f) when the equalizer is adapted to the transmission channel.
- step S20 the curves of the associated complex sum impulse responses h SFN1 (t) and h SFN2 (t) at the two times t B1 of the time slot ⁇ t B1 and t B2 become from the transfer function H SFN (f) of the transmission channel by means of discrete inverse Fourier transformation of the time slot ⁇ t B2 is calculated.
- H SFN (f) the transfer function of the transmission channel by means of discrete inverse Fourier transformation of the time slot ⁇ t B2 is calculated.
- step S30 the two time-discrete courses of the complex sum impulse responses h SFN1 (t) and h SPN2 (t) are used to convert the complex impulse responses h SFNli (t) and to the transmitters Si involved in the single-frequency network filtered out at times t B1 and t B2 .
- the transmission function H SFN (f) of the transmission channel can be determined from the DVB-T symbols of the scattered carrier pilots.
- time-discrete courses of the impulse responses h SFNli (t) and h SFN2i (t) of the respective transmitter S. at times t B1 and t B2 are respectively complex sequences of numbers. From these complex courses of the impulse responses h SPNli (t) and h SFN2i (t), the associated time-discrete phase courses arg (h SFN1 . (T)) and arg (h SPN2 . (T)) of the respective transmitter S £ become in step S40 the times t B1 and t B2 determined. Alternatively, the impulse response cannot be assigned to the transmitters at this point in time, and for the time being only total impulse responses h SFN1 (t) and h SFN2 (t) can be calculated.
- phase shift difference ⁇ £ (t B2 -t E1 ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S j ⁇ to the reference transmitter S 0 between the times t B1 and t B2 can under certain circumstances take on values smaller than - ⁇ , which lie outside the permissible value range. Therefore, in step S60 in time periods in which the phase shift difference ⁇ ⁇ t ⁇ -t ⁇ ) the phase shift of the transmitter S L to Reference transmitter S 0 between the times t BX and t B2 assumes values smaller than - ⁇ , the phase shift difference ⁇ . (t B2 -t B1 ) of the phase shift according to equation (14) increased by the value 2 * ⁇ .
- phase shift difference ⁇ (t B2 -t B1 ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S £ to the reference transmitter S 0 between times t B1 and t B2 values greater than + ⁇ , which lie outside the permissible value range
- the phase shift difference ⁇ A (t B2 -t B1 ) the phase shift in method step S65 is reduced according to equation (15) by the value 2 * ⁇ .
- phase shift difference ⁇ i (t B2 -t B1 ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S carried out in the method steps S60 and S65 to the reference transmitter S 0 between the times t B1 and t B2 according to equations (13) and (14) ensure one unique phase value in the range from - ⁇ to + ⁇ .
- step S70 the course of the carrier frequency shift ⁇ is calculated according to equation (16). of the transmitter S £ to the carrier frequency ⁇ 0 of the reference transmitter S 0 between the times t B1 and t B2 resulting from equations (12) and (13) from the phase shift difference ⁇ i (t B2 -t B1 ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S. to the reference transmitter S 0 is calculated between times t B1 and t B2 .
- phase shift ⁇ Phasen £ (t) of the received signal e. (t) of the transmitter S due to a carrier frequency shift ⁇ otl of the transmitter S L to the reference transmitter S 0 can superimpose additional phase changes, for example due to phase noise, as shown in FIG. 5A, is a corresponding adjustment of the phase shift difference ⁇ . (t E2 -t B1 ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S to the reference transmitter S 0 between two observation times t E1 and t B2 of such phase disturbances.
- This cleanup takes place in the second embodiment of the method according to the invention for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of transmitters in a single-frequency network according to FIG. 4B.
- the phase shift difference ⁇ d in method step S50 In contrast to the first embodiment in FIG. 4A, in the second embodiment in FIG. 4B, the phase shift difference ⁇ d in method step S50. ( ⁇ t B ) of the phase shift of the transmitter S £ to the reference transmitter S 0 within a time interval ⁇ t B not only determined between the observation times t B1 and t B2 , but also at several other observation times t B and t B (d + 1) ⁇ die are separated from one another by a time interval ⁇ t B in accordance with equation (17).
- the time-discrete course of the complex sum impulse response h SPN .. (t) and h SFN (; i + 1) (t) is determined in each of the observation times t .. and t j + 1 in method step S20.
- step S30 the time-discrete courses of the complex sum impulse responses h SPN .. (t) and il sFn + D (t) become the time-discrete courses of the complex impulse responses h SFN; ii (t) and h SFN (; i + 1) i (t) of the respective transmitter S. at times t d and t. +1 hidden.
- phase profiles are arg (h SFN .. (t)) and. From the time-discrete courses of the complex impulse responses il SPNji (t) and h SPN (: i + (t) arg (h SFN ( . +1) i (t)) of transmitter S, determined at times t d and t d + 1 .
- phase shift difference ⁇ (t B (d + 1) -t Bd ) of the phase shift of the respective transmitter S, to the reference transmitter S 0 between the times t B (d + 1) and t Bd _ that of the difference in the phase shift ⁇ , (t B (d + 1) ) at time t B (d + 1) and the phase shift ⁇ . (t Bd ) at the time t Bd of the transmitter S. corresponds to the reference transmitter S 0 .
- the phase shift difference ⁇ , (t B (d + 1) -t B. ) The phase shift of the respective transmitter S, becomes the reference transmitter S 0 between the times t B ( . +1) and t B the carrier frequency shift ⁇ id of the transmitter S. based on the phase shift difference ⁇ . (t B (d + 1) -t Bd ) of the phase shift at the observation times t d and t. +1 calculated.
- the carrier frequency shift ⁇ id of the transmitter S. to the reference transmitter S 0 on the basis of the phase shift difference ⁇ . (t B (d + 1) -t B.) of the phase shift to the observation times t d and t d + 1 is at different observation times t d and t d + 1 j max total times repeatedly determined and calculated.
- the total j max calculated carrier frequency shifts ⁇ id of the transmitter S to the reference transmitter S 0 are then averaged in method step S80 in order to determine the influence of the above-mentioned phase interference, for example due to phase noise Carrier frequency shift ⁇ to eliminate or minimize.
- the averaging can also take the form of a pipeline structure in which the oldest value is rejected.
- a memory-saving variant is a recursive averaging.
- FIG. 5B An exemplary course of a carrier frequency shift .DELTA..omega., Of a transmitter S, which has been cleaned of phase interference to a reference transmitter S 0 is shown in FIG. 5B.
- FIG. 1 A device for monitoring the carrier frequency stability of several transmitters in a single-frequency network is shown in FIG. 1.
- the transmission signals from the transmitters S to S 5 are received by a receiving device E.
- the receiving device E is connected to an electronic data processing unit 1.
- the transmission function H SFN (f) of the transmission channel from the transmitters S to S 5 to the receiving device E is determined on the basis of the transmission signals of the transmitters S j ⁇ to S 5 received by the receiving device E.
- the coefficients of the equalizer integrated in the receiving device E are used, which correspond to the coefficients of the transfer function of the transmission channel in the case of an equalizer adjusted to the transmission channel.
- the transmission function H SFN (f) of the transmission channel from the transmitters S, to S 5 to the receiving device E can be determined from the scattered pilot carriers of a DVB-T signal in digital terrestrial TV broadcasting, bypassing the unit 11.
- the time-discrete courses of the complex sum impulse responses h SFNd (t) and h SFN (d + 1) (t) at the observation times t are converted from the transfer function H SFN (f) of the transfer channel Bd and t E (d + 1) calculated.
- the time-discrete profiles of the complex sum impulse responses h SPNj (t) and h SFN (d + 1) (t) are used to discrete time as the complex impulse responses and faded out for each transmitter S, the single-frequency network at times t Bd and t B (d + 1) .
- the discrete-time profiles of the complex impulse responses h SFNdi (t) and h SPH (d + 1) i (t) become the time-discrete phase profiles arg (h SFNd , (t)) and arg (h SPM ( . +1) , (t)) of the impulse responses h SFN ., (t) and h SFN ( . +1) , (t) at times t Bd and t B (d + 1) .
- arg (h SFN ., (T)) and arg (h SPN ( . +1) , ( t)) of the impulse responses h SFN ., (t) and t- sFNij + ui (t) at times t d and t j + 1 the phase shift difference ⁇ , (t B (d + 1) -t B ;.) of the phase shifts of a transmitter S, to a reference transmitter S 0 at the observation times t Bd and t B (d + 1) , which is the difference in the phase shift ⁇ , (t Bd ) and ⁇ , (t B (d + 1) ) of the transmitter S corresponds to the reference transmitter S 0 at the times t Bd and t B (d + 1) , and based on this the carrier frequency shift ⁇ ,. for each transmitter S, to a reference transmitter S
- the carrier frequency shifts ⁇ , of each transmitter S become a reference transmitter S 0 of the single-frequency network either in tabular form or represented graphically.
- the time t in the abscissa and the amplitude deviation ⁇ A, of the respective transmitter S, for the amplitude A 0 of the reference transmitter S 0 are plotted on the ordinate, while the carrier frequency deviation ⁇ , of the respective transmitter S, for Carrier frequency ⁇ o of the reference transmitter S 0 is characterized by a symbol corresponding to the carrier frequency deviation ⁇ of the point belonging to the respective transmitter S.
- the invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiments shown and described. In particular, all of the described features can be combined with one another as desired.
- the method described is also suitable not only for signals of the DAB or DVB-T standard, but also for all standards which enable SFN, in particular also for signals of the American ATSC standard.
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10354468A DE10354468A1 (de) | 2003-11-21 | 2003-11-21 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Trägerfrequenzstabilität von Sendern in einem Gleichwellennetz |
PCT/EP2004/011869 WO2005050882A1 (de) | 2003-11-21 | 2004-10-20 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung der trägerfrequenzstabilität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetz |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1685668A1 true EP1685668A1 (de) | 2006-08-02 |
EP1685668B1 EP1685668B1 (de) | 2011-12-14 |
Family
ID=34609205
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04790677A Active EP1685668B1 (de) | 2003-11-21 | 2004-10-20 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung der trägerfrequenzstabilität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetz |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7668245B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1685668B1 (de) |
JP (1) | JP4376268B2 (de) |
CN (1) | CN100596040C (de) |
AT (1) | ATE537622T1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE10354468A1 (de) |
DK (1) | DK1685668T3 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2376174T3 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2005050882A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10354468A1 (de) | 2003-11-21 | 2005-06-23 | Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Trägerfrequenzstabilität von Sendern in einem Gleichwellennetz |
US20070274496A1 (en) * | 2006-04-20 | 2007-11-29 | Ujjwal Singh | Method and system for multimodal communication using a phone number |
US7860995B1 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2010-12-28 | Saynow Corporation | Conditional audio content delivery method and system |
CN100468989C (zh) * | 2006-06-30 | 2009-03-11 | 北京泰美世纪科技有限公司 | 数字卫星广播系统的单频网适配方法 |
WO2016061793A1 (zh) * | 2014-10-23 | 2016-04-28 | 华为技术有限公司 | 控制相位同步的方法、装置和系统 |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4188582A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1980-02-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Simulcast transmission system having phase-locked remote transmitters |
US4959872A (en) * | 1988-06-23 | 1990-09-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Automatic frequency control apparatus for FM receivers |
US5031230A (en) * | 1988-10-24 | 1991-07-09 | Simulcomm Partnership | Frequency, phase and modulation control system which is especially useful in simulcast transmission systems |
US5689808A (en) * | 1991-10-10 | 1997-11-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Multiple channel automatic simulcast control system |
GB2271248B (en) * | 1992-10-05 | 1997-04-02 | Motorola Inc | Simulcast transmission system |
DE4341211C1 (de) * | 1993-12-03 | 1995-04-20 | Grundig Emv | Verfahren und Schaltungsanordnung zum Einfügen von Daten in ein Übertragungssignal |
CA2208697A1 (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 1996-07-04 | Ericsson, Incorporated | Simulcast resynchronisation improvement using global positioning system |
FI102578B (fi) * | 1996-11-27 | 1998-12-31 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Menetelmä taajuuseron mittaamiseksi ja vastaanotin |
ATE247348T1 (de) * | 1999-06-22 | 2003-08-15 | Swisscom Ag | Messverfahren für einfrequenznetze und dafür geeignete vorrichtungen |
DE19937457C2 (de) * | 1999-08-07 | 2003-10-09 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren zur Überwachung von Sendern in einem Gleichwellennetz und Anordnung hierfür |
US6956814B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2005-10-18 | Worldspace Corporation | Method and apparatus for mobile platform reception and synchronization in direct digital satellite broadcast system |
AUPR234700A0 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2001-01-25 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Error diffusion using next scanline error impulse response |
US6492945B2 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-12-10 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Instantaneous radiopositioning using signals of opportunity |
EP1335552B1 (de) * | 2002-02-07 | 2007-01-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Centre Europe B.V. | Kanal- und Verzögerungsschätzung in Mehrträgersystemen |
BR0318522A (pt) * | 2003-09-30 | 2006-09-12 | Telecom Italia Spa | método e sistema para estimar a função de transferência de um canal de transmissão, receptor para receber sinais digitais através de um canal de transmissão, e, produto de programa de computador carregável na memória de pelo menos um computador |
DE10354468A1 (de) | 2003-11-21 | 2005-06-23 | Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Trägerfrequenzstabilität von Sendern in einem Gleichwellennetz |
-
2003
- 2003-11-21 DE DE10354468A patent/DE10354468A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2004
- 2004-10-20 EP EP04790677A patent/EP1685668B1/de active Active
- 2004-10-20 DK DK04790677.1T patent/DK1685668T3/da active
- 2004-10-20 WO PCT/EP2004/011869 patent/WO2005050882A1/de active Application Filing
- 2004-10-20 CN CN200480025939A patent/CN100596040C/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-10-20 JP JP2006540209A patent/JP4376268B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-10-20 US US10/580,181 patent/US7668245B2/en active Active
- 2004-10-20 AT AT04790677T patent/ATE537622T1/de active
- 2004-10-20 ES ES04790677T patent/ES2376174T3/es active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005050882A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070104281A1 (en) | 2007-05-10 |
ES2376174T3 (es) | 2012-03-09 |
JP2007515870A (ja) | 2007-06-14 |
CN1849760A (zh) | 2006-10-18 |
DE10354468A1 (de) | 2005-06-23 |
JP4376268B2 (ja) | 2009-12-02 |
ATE537622T1 (de) | 2011-12-15 |
WO2005050882A1 (de) | 2005-06-02 |
US7668245B2 (en) | 2010-02-23 |
CN100596040C (zh) | 2010-03-24 |
EP1685668B1 (de) | 2011-12-14 |
DK1685668T3 (da) | 2012-04-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE69530245T2 (de) | Digitales OFDM-Rundfunksystem, sowie Übertragungs- und Empfangsvorrichtung für Digitalrundfunk | |
DE69924804T2 (de) | Ofdm (orthogonale frequenzmultiplexierung)-empfänger | |
DE69728383T2 (de) | Verfahren und Apparat für Zeitsynchronisierung in einem Empfänger für ein Mehrträgersignal | |
DE69933409T2 (de) | Verfahren un Anordnung zum Erreichen und Aufrechterhalten der Symbolsynchronisierung in einem OFDM-Übertragungssystem | |
DE69818875T2 (de) | Feine Einrastung des FFT-Fensters in Mehrträgerempfängern | |
DE4319769C1 (de) | Verfahren und Anordnung zur Einstellung der lokalen Oszillatoren eines Empfängers in einem Mehrkanalübertragungssystem | |
EP3211847B1 (de) | Verfahren zur frequenzkorrektur eines oszillators eines sensorknotens eines drahtlosen sensornetzwerkes | |
DE602005003273T2 (de) | Verfahren zum Schätzen des Frequenzversatzes in einem Kommunikationssystem über einen Rayleigh-Fading-Kanal | |
EP0454266B1 (de) | Empfänger mit einer Anordnung zur Frequenzablagenschätzung | |
EP0895387A1 (de) | Erkennung des Übertragungsmodus eines DVB-Signales | |
EP2140639B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ermittlung einer unverkürzten kanalimpulsantwort in einem ofdm-übertragungssystem | |
DE19925925B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Übertragung von Funksignalen und Empfänger zum Empfang von Funksignalen | |
EP1685668A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung der trägerfrequenzstabilität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetz | |
DE60219474T2 (de) | Frequenzkorrektion für ein mehrträgersystem | |
DE102014201755B4 (de) | Messsystem und Messverfahren mit breitbandigerSynchronisation und schmalbandiger Signalanalyse | |
DE112010005148B4 (de) | Digitalrundfunkempfänger und Verzögerungsprofil-Erzeugungsverfahren | |
EP1254546B1 (de) | Verfahren zum bestimmen der restträgerleistung bei einem nach dem dvb-t-standard im 8k-modus qam-modulierten multiträgersignal | |
WO2022248324A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur synchronisation | |
EP1643707B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Synchronisieren eines Abtasttaktes sowie Synchronisationseinheit für ein Mehrträgerempfangssystem | |
EP1665592B1 (de) | Verfahren zur überwachung der zeitsynchronität von sendern in einem gleichwellennetz | |
DE102004021860A1 (de) | Phasen- und Frequenznachführung eines OFDM-Empfängers mittels pilotgestützter Phasenwertschätzung | |
DE102004026072B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur bewegungskompensierten Rauschschätzung bei mobilen drahtlosen Übertragungssystemen | |
DE112015005243B4 (de) | Entzerrer, Entzerrungsverfahren und Empfänger | |
DE102018217701A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Taktgewinnung für PCMA-Signalanteile | |
DE102007005768A1 (de) | Phasenkorrektureinrichtung |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060209 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061122 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04H 20/67 20080101AFI20110113BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SPIERENBURG & PARTNER AG, PATENT- UND MARKENANWAEL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502004013157 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120209 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2376174 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20120309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20111214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120315 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120416 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20120917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502004013157 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120917 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ROHDE & SCHWARZ G.M.B.H. & CO. KG Effective date: 20121031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 537622 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121020 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041020 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20201020 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20201030 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20201022 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20220121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20211031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201021 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211020 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231025 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231023 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231018 Year of fee payment: 20 |