EP1317838A1 - Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste - Google Patents

Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste

Info

Publication number
EP1317838A1
EP1317838A1 EP01967057A EP01967057A EP1317838A1 EP 1317838 A1 EP1317838 A1 EP 1317838A1 EP 01967057 A EP01967057 A EP 01967057A EP 01967057 A EP01967057 A EP 01967057A EP 1317838 A1 EP1317838 A1 EP 1317838A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
message
bluetooth
l2cap
test mode
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01967057A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Roland MÄSING
Stefan Nieder
Hasan Karacelik
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP1317838A1 publication Critical patent/EP1317838A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/06—Testing, supervising or monitoring using simulated traffic
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/50—Testing arrangements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W84/00—Network topologies
    • H04W84/18—Self-organising networks, e.g. ad-hoc networks or sensor networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/02—Terminal devices
    • H04W88/06—Terminal devices adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/18—Service support devices; Network management devices

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for checking the compliance of a Bluetooth device to be tested, in which the interface of the "Logic Link Control and Adaptation Protocol" (L2CAP) to higher layers of the Bluetooth protocol stack is tested by placing the L2CAP in a test mode brought so that certain messages for higher layers are redirected to a test device.
  • the invention further relates to an arrangement for checking the compliance of a Bluetooth device, with which the interface of the L2CAP to higher layers of the Bluetooth protocol stack is tested by placing the L2CAP in a test mode with a Bluetooth device to be tested and a test device, with certain messages being redirected to a test device in the test mode for higher layers.
  • Bluetooth compliance test a compliance test
  • the Bluetooth standard is defined in "BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.0 B”.
  • the Bluetooth compliance test is intended to ensure that the devices are able to communicate with other Bluetooth products without errors. Part of this test tests the error-free implementation of the "Logic Link Control and Adaption Protocol" (L2CAP).
  • L2CAP Logic Link Control and Adaption Protocol
  • the protocols involved in Bluetooth communication have a layer structure, so that a Bluetooth protocol stack is formed overall. In the compliance test for the L2CAP, the interface of the L2CAP to higher layers of the Bluetooth protocol stack is checked with a test device. In order to make this possible.
  • L2CAP are brought into a test mode, in this test mode messages which are in themselves for higher layers of the Bluetooth protocol Stack are determined, redirected so that they are transmitted to the test device instead of to the higher layers of the Bluetooth protocol stack. The test device is then able to verify the correct implementation of the L2CAP.
  • test mode can be implemented by appropriately configuring the hardware, for example using switches, jumpers, plugs or similar components. It is also conceivable to implement the test mode by means of an appropriate input via a user interface. These solutions are problematic. A hardware solution is expensive because in this case all devices must have the special hardware components. A solution to the input via the user interface first requires the existence of such an interface. Furthermore, it would be necessary to prevent unintentional entry into the test mode, which also entails an undesirable effort.
  • the invention is therefore based on the task of enabling the transition to a test mode for the L2CAP, the effort required for this to be minimized.
  • the invention builds on the generic method in that the L2CAP is brought into the test mode by a Bluetooth message. In this way, layers above the L2CAP including a user interface are unnecessary. borrowed. Additional hardware components are also unnecessary. Rather, on the basis of the invention, the message intended for the test device can be sent by any Bluetooth device which has the ability to generate such a message.
  • An "Asynchronous Connection-Less" message (ACL message) is preferably set up from a second Bluetooth device to the Bluetooth device to be tested, and the Bluetooth message is sent via the ACL connection.
  • An ACL message is preferably set up from a second Bluetooth device to the Bluetooth device to be tested, and the Bluetooth message is sent via the ACL connection.
  • Connection enables packet data exchange between two Bluetooth devices.
  • SCO connections synchronous connection-oriented connections
  • L2CAP specification is only defined for ACL connections and no support for SCO connections is planned, it is advisable to set up an ACL connection to transmit the test message.
  • the ACL connection is preferably cleared again after the message has been sent, and the L2CAP remains in the test mode.
  • the Bluetooth device to be tested can advantageously be tested in any way by the test device, regardless of the ACL connection between the Bluetooth devices.
  • test mode is ended by sending a further message.
  • the device to be tested can therefore be switched between the test mode and the normal operating mode without completely resetting its functions.
  • the further message is a Bluetooth message.
  • the test mode can therefore be switched off and the transition to the normal operating mode can be carried out, for example, by the same Bluetooth device that previously set the test mode.
  • the message is a special L2CAP message. Such a message with a special structure would therefore only be used to transfer the device to be tested into test mode, which prevents the Bluetooth device to be tested from accidentally entering test mode.
  • connection request packet (Connection Request
  • Connection request packets are sent out in order to create a channel between two Bluetooth devices.
  • a connection request packet is particularly suitable for integrating the message for setting up the test mode.
  • the message is implemented by a free "Protocol / Service Multiplexer” value (PSM value) of a connection request packet.
  • PSM value a free "Protocol / Service Multiplexer” value
  • the PSM data field is a component of the connection request package and is therefore suitable for accommodating the message which causes the transition to test mode.
  • the invention is based on the generic arrangement in that a second Bluetooth device is provided for transmitting a Bluetooth message and for transferring the L2CAP to the test mode.
  • a second Bluetooth device is provided for transmitting a Bluetooth message and for transferring the L2CAP to the test mode.
  • layers above the L2CAP including a user interface are not required. Additional hardware components are also unnecessary.
  • the message intended for the test device can be sent by any Bluetooth device which has the ability to generate such a message.
  • the message is a special L2CAP message. Such a message with a special The structure would therefore only be used to transfer the device to be tested into test mode, thereby preventing the Bluetooth device to be tested from accidentally entering test mode.
  • connection Request Packet a connection request packet of the L2CAP.
  • connection request packets are sent out to create a channel between two Bluetooth devices.
  • a connection request package is particularly suitable for integrating the message to set up the test mode.
  • the invention is based on the surprising finding that a test mode for an L2CAP compliance test can be provided without influencing the device hardware and without using the user interface parts.
  • a test mode for an L2CAP compliance test can be provided without influencing the device hardware and without using the user interface parts.
  • Figure 1 schematically shows a configuration for performing the method according to the invention.
  • the Bluetooth device 110 is a Bluetooth device under test ("Device Under Test" (DUT)).
  • the Bluetooth device 210 is any Bluetooth device that is able to communicate with the Bluetooth device 110 to be tested.
  • the structure of the Bluetooth protocol stack of the Bluetooth device 110 to be tested is shown below.
  • the Bluetooth protocol stack has a baseband 114 as the bottom layer.
  • the link control and adaptation protocol (L2CAP) 112 is arranged above the baseband.
  • L2CAP link control and adaptation protocol
  • LMP Link Manager Protocol
  • the “Link Manager Protocol” 116 is used for connection establishment and connection control.
  • the network layer 118 is located in the layer above the L2CAP 112 and the LMP 116.
  • Protocols of higher layers or applications 120 are in turn located above this network layer 118.
  • the Bluetooth device 210 is constructed in the same way, that is to say with the layer sequence baseband 214, L2CAP 212 and LMP 216, network layer 218, protocols of higher layers or applications 220.
  • the physical connection takes place in the communication between the Bluetooth devices 110, 210 Communication 12 between the baseband 114 of the Bluetooth device 110 and the baseband 214 of the Bluetooth device 210 takes place.
  • Bluetooth device 110 is now to be tested, a test device 10 is used for this purpose.
  • a Bluetooth message is transmitted from the Bluetooth device 210 or from any other Bluetooth device which has the corresponding capabilities to the Bluetooth device 110 to be tested.
  • This Bluetooth message places the Bluetooth device 110 or the L2CAP 112 in the test mode, so that the communication of the L2CAP 112 with higher layers is redirected to the test device 10.
  • the Bluetooth message from the Bluetooth device 210 is transmitted such that an ACL connection is established and that the Bluetooth message is sent via the ACL connection.
  • the ACL connection can be cleared down again, although the L2CAP 112 of the Bluetooth device 110 to be tested remains in the test mode and is therefore able to communicate with the test device 10.
  • the test mode is only switched back to a normal operating mode by the Bluetooth device 210 or any other Bluetooth device again sending a corresponding Bluetooth message.
  • the Bluetooth message can be such that a special L2CAP signal command is provided for this, although standardization would have to be carried out for this.
  • a way of transmitting the Bluetooth message without such standardization is possible by "hiding" the message in another standardized command.
  • This could be, for example, a connection request packet ("Connection Request Packet") from L2CAP, in which case the message is implemented by a free PSM value ("Protocol / Service Multiplexer").

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Management Of Digital Transmission (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Small-Scale Networks (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé pour contrôler la conformité d'un appareil Bluetooth devant être testé (110). Selon ce procédé, l'interface du protocole de commande et d'adaptation de liens logiques (logic link control and adaptation protocol : L2CAP) (112) est testée à des couches plus élevées de la pile de protocoles Bluetooth, par passage du L2CAP (112) en mode test, de façon que des messages définis pour des couches plus élevées sont déviés vers un appareil cible (10), le L2CAP (112) passant en mode test au moyen d'un message Bluetooth.
EP01967057A 2000-09-13 2001-08-31 Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste Withdrawn EP1317838A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10045243A DE10045243A1 (de) 2000-09-13 2000-09-13 Verfahren zum Überprüfen der Compliance eines zu testenden Bluetooth-Gerätes
DE10045243 2000-09-13
PCT/DE2001/003342 WO2002023858A1 (fr) 2000-09-13 2001-08-31 Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1317838A1 true EP1317838A1 (fr) 2003-06-11

Family

ID=7656035

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01967057A Withdrawn EP1317838A1 (fr) 2000-09-13 2001-08-31 Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20040042407A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1317838A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2004509525A (fr)
DE (1) DE10045243A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2002023858A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1213876B1 (fr) * 2000-12-06 2007-07-25 Tektronix Berlin GmbH & Co. KG Circuit pour tester un systéme de communication
EP1504572B1 (fr) * 2002-05-15 2006-07-05 Nokia Corporation Procede et appareil pour l'etablissement d'un canal l2cap dedie a la transmission de flux de donnees dans un reseau bluetooth
KR100559710B1 (ko) 2004-06-30 2006-03-10 주식회사 팬택 블루투스 테스트 시스템 및 방법
EP1851934B1 (fr) * 2005-02-08 2016-11-30 Nokia Solutions and Networks GmbH & Co. KG Procédé de détection d'erreur d'une interface d'information dans un dispositif de communication
US7899642B2 (en) * 2005-07-12 2011-03-01 Nokia Corporation Optimized RFID/NFC BER testing
FR3001909B1 (fr) 2013-02-11 2015-02-27 Mc Cain Foods Ltd Bloc de decoupe de produits alimentaires en fragments en "s"
US9883412B2 (en) * 2016-01-04 2018-01-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Verification of a wireless protocol implementation

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9021859D0 (en) * 1990-10-08 1990-11-21 D2B Systems Co Ltd Test apparatus and method
US5721728A (en) * 1995-12-21 1998-02-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Network node testing method and apparatus
US20020012329A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2002-01-31 Timothy Atkinson Communications apparatus interface and method for discovery of remote devices
US6813729B1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2004-11-02 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Programmable bi-directional MII testing methodology and device including same
US6937571B1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2005-08-30 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method of testing a network device through a medium independent interface (MII)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0223858A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040042407A1 (en) 2004-03-04
DE10045243A1 (de) 2002-03-28
JP2004509525A (ja) 2004-03-25
WO2002023858A1 (fr) 2002-03-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2006069735A1 (fr) Appareil test utilise dans un systeme test verifiant des processus de transmission dans un reseau de radiocommunications mobile
DE102005032692A1 (de) Anordnung und Verfahren zur Konfiguration von Schnittstellen einer drahtlosen Verbindung zur Datenübertragung sowie ein entsprechendes Computerprogramm und ein entsprechendes computerlesbares Speichermedium
WO2008053039A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour la manipulation de messages de communication
DE102014210238A1 (de) Fahrzeugdiagnosevorrichtung
EP1317838A1 (fr) Procede pour controler la conformite d'un appareil bluetooth devant etre teste
DE102006011945A1 (de) Mobiles Testsystem und Verfahren zum Schaffen eines Datenrelais zwischen einer Testanwendung und einer internen Diagnostik
WO2012110541A1 (fr) Procédé de transmission de données par le biais d'un bus de données série synchrone
DE3823925A1 (de) Anordnung zum pruefen peripherer anschlussbaugruppen eines kommunikationssystems
DE60036008T2 (de) Vorrichtung zum Übertragen und/oder Empfangen von Daten, und Verfahren zur Kontrolle dieser Vorrichtung
EP1972107A1 (fr) Appareil de protection ou de commande
DE10357269A1 (de) Steckmodulrahmen und Steckmodul dafür
EP1099952A1 (fr) Cellule de circuit avec fonction d'auto-test intégré et procédé pour essayer ledit circuit
EP3772199A1 (fr) Émulateur de réseau déterministe et procédé d'émulation d'un réseau
EP1213876B1 (fr) Circuit pour tester un systéme de communication
DE10137219C1 (de) Elektronisches Wählsystem und Verfahren zur Präqualifikation von Teilnehmeranschlussleitungen
DE10239846B4 (de) Fail-Silent-Steuergerät
WO2003047224A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour deboguer une carte de ligne xdsl
WO2016206980A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de simulation de conditions d'erreurs dans une ligne
WO2017016744A1 (fr) Circuit intégré destiné à fonctionner sur un bus et procédé de fonctionnement du circuit intégré
DE102008051631A1 (de) Übertragungssystem für Eisenbahnwagen und Eisenbahnwagen, der dieses verwendet
CH669700A5 (fr)
DE102004062034A1 (de) Repeaterknoten für ein Netzwerk
DE102021126404A1 (de) Redundantes audio-/videonetzwerk sowie netzwerk-switch und mediapaket-endpunkt zur erkennung von verkabelungsfehlern
WO2020233905A1 (fr) Dispositif de distribution et procédé
WO2020016693A1 (fr) Circuit de transmission de données avec mise en mémoire tampon

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030307

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MAESING, ROLAND

Inventor name: KARACELIK, HASAN

Inventor name: NIEDER, STEFAN

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20031211

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20050503